UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2014 |
|
|
|
¨ |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-3356220
ALBANY
MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified
in its charter)
DELAWARE |
|
14-1742717 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
26 Corporate Circle
Albany, New York 12212
(Address of principal executive offices)
(518) 512-2000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including
area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former
fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of
“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨ |
|
Accelerated filer x |
|
Non-accelerated filer ¨ |
|
Smaller reporting company ¨ |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s
classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class |
|
Outstanding at October
31, 2014 |
Common Stock, $.01 par value |
|
32,606,725 excluding treasury shares of 5,465,098 |
ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC.
INDEX
PART I — FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item 1. Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Albany Molecular Research, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations
(unaudited)
| |
Three Months Ended
September 30, | | |
Nine Months Ended
September 30, | |
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share data) | |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Contract revenue | |
$ | 57,481 | | |
$ | 53,029 | | |
$ | 169,993 | | |
$ | 150,286 | |
Recurring royalties | |
| 4,990 | | |
| 7,726 | | |
| 19,978 | | |
| 29,167 | |
Total revenue | |
| 62,471 | | |
| 60,755 | | |
| 189,971 | | |
| 179,453 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Cost of contract revenue | |
| 56,414 | | |
| 44,548 | | |
| 143,062 | | |
| 124,820 | |
Technology incentive award | |
| 260 | | |
| 571 | | |
| 1,277 | | |
| 2,254 | |
Research and development | |
| 568 | | |
| 94 | | |
| 775 | | |
| 370 | |
Selling, general and administrative | |
| 11,568 | | |
| 9,249 | | |
| 34,944 | | |
| 31,252 | |
Postretirement benefit plan settlement gain | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (1,285 | ) | |
| - | |
Restructuring charges | |
| 2,164 | | |
| 276 | | |
| 3,436 | | |
| 6,108 | |
Property and equipment impairment charges | |
| 1,232 | | |
| - | | |
| 4,950 | | |
| 1,440 | |
Total operating expenses | |
| 72,206 | | |
| 54,738 | | |
| 187,159 | | |
| 166,244 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
(Loss) income from operations | |
| (9,735 | ) | |
| 6,017 | | |
| 2,812 | | |
| 13,209 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Interest expense, net | |
| (2,575 | ) | |
| (138 | ) | |
| (8,256 | ) | |
| (411 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Other income (expense), net | |
| 235 | | |
| 155 | | |
| 3 | | |
| 1,038 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | |
| (12,075 | ) | |
| 6,034 | | |
| (5,441 | ) | |
| 13,836 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Income tax (benefit) expense | |
| (3,434 | ) | |
| 2,332 | | |
| (4,024 | ) | |
| 6,332 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net income (loss) | |
$ | (8,641 | ) | |
$ | 3,702 | | |
$ | (1,417 | ) | |
$ | 7,504 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Basic income (loss) per share | |
$ | (0.27 | ) | |
$ | 0.12 | | |
$ | (0.05 | ) | |
$ | 0.24 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Diluted income (loss) per share | |
$ | (0.27 | ) | |
$ | 0.12 | | |
$ | (0.05 | ) | |
$ | 0.24 | |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Albany Molecular Research, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive (Loss) Income
(unaudited)
| |
Three Months Ended | | |
Nine Months Ended | |
| |
September 30, | | |
September 30, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
Net (loss) income | |
$ | (8,641 | ) | |
$ | 3,702 | | |
$ | (1,417 | ) | |
$ | 7,504 | |
Foreign currency translation loss | |
| (1,475 | ) | |
| (247 | ) | |
| (467 | ) | |
| (2,912 | ) |
Net actuarial gain of pension and postretirement benefits | |
| 112 | | |
| 134 | | |
| 298 | | |
| 401 | |
Total comprehensive (loss) income | |
$ | (10,004 | ) | |
$ | 3,589 | | |
$ | (1,586 | ) | |
$ | 4,993 | |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Albany Molecular Research, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except for per share data) | |
September 30, 2014 | | |
December 31, 2013 | |
Assets | |
| | | |
| | |
Current assets: | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash and cash equivalents | |
$ | 18,416 | | |
$ | 175,928 | |
Restricted cash | |
| 5,483 | | |
| 714 | |
Accounts receivable, net | |
| 56,205 | | |
| 52,216 | |
Royalty income receivable | |
| 4,987 | | |
| 7,523 | |
Income taxes receivable | |
| 319 | | |
| - | |
Inventory | |
| 56,020 | | |
| 31,991 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | |
| 13,235 | | |
| 7,061 | |
Deferred income taxes | |
| 4,311 | | |
| 3,586 | |
Total current assets | |
| 158,976 | | |
| 279,019 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Property and equipment, net | |
| 165,926 | | |
| 127,775 | |
Notes hedges | |
| 102,946 | | |
| 22,654 | |
Goodwill | |
| 62,047 | | |
| - | |
Restricted cash | |
| - | | |
| 3,810 | |
Intangible assets and patents, net | |
| 35,455 | | |
| 3,042 | |
Deferred income taxes | |
| 2,377 | | |
| 2,047 | |
Other assets | |
| 5,309 | | |
| 6,921 | |
Total assets | |
$ | 533,036 | | |
$ | 445,268 | |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | |
| | | |
| | |
Current liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | |
$ | 41,081 | | |
$ | 30,174 | |
Deferred revenue and licensing fees | |
| 11,931 | | |
| 6,588 | |
Arbitration reserve | |
| 669 | | |
| 1,351 | |
Income taxes payable | |
| - | | |
| 8,901 | |
Accrued pension benefits | |
| 546 | | |
| 811 | |
Current installments of long-term debt | |
| 407 | | |
| 1,024 | |
Total current liabilities | |
| 54,634 | | |
| 48,849 | |
Long-term liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Long-term debt, excluding current installments | |
| 123,571 | | |
| 123,135 | |
Notes conversion derivative | |
| 102,946 | | |
| 22,654 | |
Deferred licensing fees | |
| 480 | | |
| 1,926 | |
Pension and postretirement benefits | |
| 4,318 | | |
| 6,059 | |
Deferred income taxes | |
| - | | |
| 631 | |
Other long-term liabilities | |
| 1,888 | | |
| 1,257 | |
Total liabilities | |
| 287,837 | | |
| 204,511 | |
Commitments and contingencies | |
| | | |
| | |
Stockholders’ equity: | |
| | | |
| | |
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 2,000 shares
authorized, none issued or outstanding | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000 shares authorized, 38,004
shares issued as of September 30, 2014 and 37,023 shares issued as of December 31, 2013 | |
| 380 | | |
| 370 | |
Additional paid-in capital | |
| 242,365 | | |
| 235,806 | |
Retained earnings | |
| 81,493 | | |
| 82,910 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net | |
| (11,446 | ) | |
| (11,277 | ) |
| |
| 312,792 | | |
| 307,809 | |
Less, treasury shares at cost, 5,463 shares as
of September 30, 2014 and 5,425 shares as of December 31, 2013 | |
| (67,593 | ) | |
| (67,052 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity | |
| 245,199 | | |
| 240,757 | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | |
$ | 533,036 | | |
$ | 445,268 | |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Albany Molecular Research, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows
(unaudited)
| |
Nine Months Ended September
30, | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
Operating activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Net (loss) income | |
$ | (1,417 | ) | |
$ | 7,504 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net
cash provided by operating activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Depreciation and intangible amortization | |
| 13,066 | | |
| 11,951 | |
Deferred financing amortization | |
| 1,276 | | |
| - | |
Accretion of discount on long-term debt | |
| 4,280 | | |
| - | |
Deferred income tax (expense) benefit | |
| (2,487 | ) | |
| 2,410 | |
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment | |
| 124 | | |
| 195 | |
Property and equipment impairment | |
| 4,950 | | |
| 1,440 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | |
| 2,975 | | |
| 1,808 | |
Gain on settlement of post-retirement liability | |
| (1,285 | ) | |
| - | |
Excess tax benefit of stock option exercises | |
| (1,456 | ) | |
| (692 | ) |
Provision for bad debt | |
| 64 | | |
| 137 | |
Changes in assets and liabilities that provide (use) cash, net of acquisitions: | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts receivable | |
| 3,054 | | |
| (1,332 | ) |
Royalty income receivable | |
| 2,536 | | |
| 402 | |
Inventory | |
| (14,107 | ) | |
| (6,244 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | |
| (3,043 | ) | |
| 643 | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | |
| 150 | | |
| 3,669 | |
Income taxes | |
| (7,179 | ) | |
| 1,292 | |
Deferred revenue and licensing fees | |
| 2,465 | | |
| 1,232 | |
Pension and postretirement benefits | |
| (261 | ) | |
| 135 | |
Other long-term liabilities | |
| 209 | | |
| (891 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | |
| 3,914 | | |
| 23,659 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Investing activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired | |
| (145,803 | ) | |
| - | |
Purchase of property, plant and equipment | |
| (12,013 | ) | |
| (7,654 | ) |
Payments for patent applications and other costs | |
| (292 | ) | |
| (316 | ) |
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment | |
| 80 | | |
| 169 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | |
| (158,028 | ) | |
| (7,801 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Financing activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Principal payments on long-term debt | |
| (5,027 | ) | |
| (595 | ) |
Deferred financing costs | |
| (232 | ) | |
| - | |
Change in restricted cash | |
| (959 | ) | |
| 524 | |
Proceeds from sale of common stock | |
| 2,135 | | |
| 1,505 | |
Purchases of treasury stock | |
| (541 | ) | |
| (157 | ) |
Excess tax benefit of stock option exercises | |
| 1,456 | | |
| 692 | |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | |
| (3,168 | ) | |
| 1,969 | |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | |
| (230 | ) | |
| (1,400 | ) |
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | |
| (157,512 | ) | |
| 16,427 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | |
| 175,928 | | |
| 23,293 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | |
$ | 18,416 | | |
$ | 39,720 | |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
(All amounts in thousands, except per share amounts, unless
otherwise noted)
Note 1 — Summary of Operations
and Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Business and Operations
Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the
“Company”) provides scientific services, technologies and products focused on improving the quality of life. With
locations in the U.S., Europe, and Asia, the Company provides customers with a range of services and cost models. The Company’s
core business consists of a fee-for-service contract services platform encompassing drug discovery, development and manufacturing.
The Company also owns a portfolio of proprietary technologies which have resulted from its internal programs, including drug discovery
and niche generic products and manufacturing process efficiencies, some of which are licensed to third parties, and some of which
benefit the Company’s operations.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. In accordance with Rule 10-01, the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles for complete consolidated financial statements. The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was
derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments) considered
necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim period have been included. Operating results for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31,
2014. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries as of September 30, 2014. All intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated during consolidation. Assets and liabilities of non-U.S. operations are translated
at period-end rates of exchange, and the statements of operations are translated at the average rates of exchange for the period.
Unrealized gains or losses resulting from translating non-U.S. currency financial statements are recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive loss in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. When necessary, prior years’ unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Use of Management Estimates
The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date
of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The most significant
estimates included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements include assumptions regarding the valuation of inventory,
intangible assets, and long-lived assets. Other significant estimates include assumptions utilized in determining actuarial obligations
in conjunction with the Company’s pension plan, the amount and realizabilty of deferred tax assets, assumptions utilized
in determining stock-based compensation, assumptions utilized in determining the value of both the notes hedges and the notes
conversion derivative and assumptions related to the collectability of receivables. Actual results can vary from these estimates.
Contract Revenue Recognition
The Company’s contract revenue consists
primarily of amounts earned under contracts with third-party customers and reimbursed expenses under such contracts. Reimbursed
expenses consist of chemicals and other project specific costs. The Company also seeks to include provisions in certain contracts
that contain a combination of up-front licensing fees, milestone and royalty payments should the Company’s proprietary technology
and expertise lead to the discovery of new products that become commercial. Generally, the Company’s contracts may be terminated
by the customer upon 30 days’ to two years’ prior notice, depending on the terms and/or size of the contract.
The Company analyzes its agreements to determine whether the elements can be separated and accounted for individually or as a
single unit of accounting in accordance with the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605-25, “Revenue
Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables,” and Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 104, “Revenue Recognition”.
Allocation of revenue to individual elements that qualify for separate accounting is based on the separate selling prices determined
for each component, and total contract consideration is then allocated pro rata across the components of the arrangement. If separate
selling prices are not available, the Company will use the best estimate of selling price, consistent with the overall pricing
strategy and after consideration of relevant market factors.
The Company generates
contract revenue under the following types of contracts:
Fixed-Fee. Under a fixed-fee
contract, the Company charges a fixed agreed upon amount for a deliverable. Fixed-fee contracts have fixed deliverables upon completion
of the project. Typically, the Company recognizes revenue for fixed-fee contracts after projects are completed, delivery is made
and title transfers to the customer, and collection is reasonably assured. In certain instances, the Company’s customers
request that the Company retain materials produced upon completion of the project due to the fact that the customer does not have
a qualified facility to store those materials or for other reasons. In these instances, the revenue recognition process is considered
complete when project documents have been delivered to the customer, as required under the arrangement, or other customer-specific
contractual conditions have been satisfied.
Full-time Equivalent (“FTE”).
An FTE agreement establishes the number of Company employees contracted for a project or a series of projects, the duration
of the contract period, the price per FTE, plus an allowance for chemicals and other project specific costs, which may or may
not be incorporated in the FTE rate. FTE contracts can run in one month increments, but typically have terms of six months or
longer. FTE contracts typically provide for annual adjustments in billing rates for the scientists assigned to the contract.
These contracts involve the Company’s
scientists providing services on a “best efforts” basis on a project that may involve a research component with a
timeframe or outcome that has some level of unpredictability. There are no fixed deliverables that must be met for payment as
part of these services. As such, the Company recognizes revenue under FTE contracts on a monthly basis as services are performed
according to the terms of the contract.
Time and Materials. Under
a time and materials contract, the Company charges customers an hourly rate plus reimbursement for chemicals and other project
specific costs. The Company recognizes revenue for time and material contracts based on the number of hours devoted to the project
multiplied by the customer’s billing rate plus other project specific costs incurred.
Recurring Royalties, Up-Front License
Fees and Milestone Revenue Recognition
Recurring Royalties Revenue.
Recurring royalties include royalties under a license agreement with Sanofi based on the worldwide net sales of fexofenadine
HCl, marketed as Allegra in the Americas and Telfast elsewhere, as well as on sales of Sanofi’s authorized or licensed generics
and sales by certain authorized sub-licensees. The Company records royalty revenue in the period in which the net sales of Allegra/Telfast
occur, because it can reasonably estimate such royalties. Royalty payments from Sanofi are due within 45 days after each
calendar quarter and are determined based on net sales of Allegra/Telfast and Teva Pharmaceuticals’ net sales of generic
D-12 in that quarter. The Company receives additional royalties in conjunction with a Development and Supply Agreement with Actavis,
Inc. (“Actavis”). These royalties, which the Company began receiving in the third quarter of 2012, are earned on Actavis’
net sales of a generic product. The Company records royalty revenue in the period in which the net sales of this product occur.
Royalty payments from Actavis are due within 60 days after each calendar quarter and are determined based on sales of the qualifying
product in that quarter.
Up-Front License Fees and Milestone
Revenue. The Company recognizes revenue from up-front non-refundable licensing fees on a straight-line basis over the
period of the underlying project. The Company will recognize revenue arising from a substantive milestone payment upon the successful
achievement of the event, and the resolution of any uncertainties or contingencies regarding potential collection of the related
payment, or if appropriate over the remaining term of the agreement.
The Company has discovered and conducted
the early development of several new drug candidates, with a view to out- licensing these candidates to partners for further development
in return for a potential combination of up-front license fees, milestone payments and recurring royalty payments if compounds
resulting from our intellectual property are successfully developed into new drugs and reach the market.
On October 20, 2005, the Company entered
into a License and Research Agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb (“BMS”) for a program of compounds that encompass
biogenic amine reuptake inhibitors in development for the treatment of depression and other central nervous system disorders.
As amended, the agreement is referred to herein as the “BMS Agreement”.
On December 20, 2010, the Company entered
into a Research Collaboration and License Agreement with Genentech, Inc. (“Genentech”) (the “Genentech Agreement”,
and collectively with the BMS Agreement, the “Agreements”) for a family of antibacterial compounds discovered from
the Company’s proprietary research of its natural products sample collection.
Under the terms of the Agreements, the
Company received upfront licensing fees and research funding to further develop the licensed compounds. In addition, the Company
is eligible to receive development and regulatory milestones for each licensed compound, as well as royalties on sales of commercialized
compounds if any.
Under the terms of the Agreements, the
Company may receive milestone payments for each compound advanced by BMS and Genentech upon achievement of certain clinical and
regulatory milestones as follows:
| · | Up
to $14,000 in clinical development milestones; and |
| · | Up
to $30,000 in regulatory milestones, due upon acceptance and/or approval of new drug
application filings with regulatory agencies in various jurisdictions. |
The Company has determined the milestones
contained in these Agreements to be substantive milestones in accordance with ASC 605-28-25. In evaluating the milestones included
in the Agreements, the Company considered the following:
| · | The
Company considered each individual milestone to be commensurate with the enhanced value
of the underlying licensed intellectual property as it is advanced from the development
stage to a commercialized product, and considered them to be reasonable when evaluated
in relation to the total agreement consideration, including other milestones. |
| · | The
milestones are deemed to relate solely to past performance, as each milestone is payable
to the Company only after the achievement of the related event defined in the agreement,
and is not refundable if additional future success events do not occur. |
For both the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2014 and 2013, no milestone revenue was recognized by the Company.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted
Cash
Cash equivalents consist
of money market accounts and overnight deposits. Some of our cash is deposited with financial institutions located throughout
the U.S. and at banks in foreign countries where we operate subsidiary offices and at times may exceed insured limits. For purposes
of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months
or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Upon entering into a new credit agreement
in April 2012, the Company was required to maintain a $5,000 restricted cash balance to partially collateralize the revolving
line of credit. In conjunction with an amendment to the credit agreement dated December 20, 2012, the restricted cash requirement
was directly reduced by the amount of principal payments made on the term loan which began in May 2013. In April 2014, the Company
utilized the balance of restricted cash to pay off the balance of the term loan, thereby eliminating the term loan liability.
In June 2014 the Company terminated the credit agreement while still maintaining the letters of credit, thus requiring the Company
to continue to maintain a restricted cash balance to collateralize these letters of credit. Restricted cash as of September 30,
2014 was $5,483.
Long-Lived Assets
The Company assesses the impairment of
a long-lived asset group whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying value may not be recoverable.
Factors the Company considers important that could trigger an impairment review include, among others, the following:
| · | a
significant change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset group is being
used; |
| · | a
significant change in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived
asset group; or |
| · | a
significant decrease in the market value of assets. |
If the Company determines
that the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable, based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators
of impairment, the Company compares the carrying value of the asset group to the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated
by the asset group. If the carrying value exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, an impairment charge is indicated. An impairment
charge is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds its fair value and will reduce only the
carrying amounts of the long-lived assets.
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
The
Company accounts for derivatives in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 815, Derivative and Hedging, which establishes accounting
and reporting standards requiring that derivative instruments be recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or a liability
measured at fair value. Additionally, changes in the derivative’s fair value shall be recognized currently in earnings unless
specific hedge accounting criteria are met.
Note 2 — Earnings Per Share
The shares used in the computation of
the Company’s basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows:
| |
Three Months Ended
September 30, | | |
Nine Months Ended
September 30, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic | |
| 31,631 | | |
| 31,041 | | |
| 31,468 | | |
| 30,854 | |
Dilutive effect of share-based compensation | |
| - | | |
| 975 | | |
| - | | |
| 873 | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted | |
| 31,631 | | |
| 32,016 | | |
| 31,468 | | |
| 31,727 | |
The Company has excluded certain outstanding
stock options, non-vested restricted stock and warrants from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2013 because of anti-dilutive effects. The Company has excluded all outstanding stock options and non-vested
restricted shares from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 because
the net loss causes these outstanding stock options and non-vested restricted shares to be anti-dilutive. The weighted average
number of anti-dilutive common equivalents outstanding (before the effects of the treasury stock method) was 3,453 and 189 for
the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and 2,930 and 502 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014
and 2013, respectively. These amounts are not included in the calculation of weighted average common shares outstanding.
Note 3 - Business Acquisitions
On July 1, 2014, the Company completed the purchase of Oso
Biopharmaceuticals Manufacturing, LLC (“OsoBio”), a contract manufacturer of highly complex injectable drug products
located in Albuquerque, NM. The preliminary estimated aggregate purchase price is $109,194.
A final valuation will be completed to
determine the fair value of the acquired property and equipment and any potential identifiable intangibles, which may result in
changes to their estimated fair values, as well as changes to the allocated goodwill fair value. The following table summarizes
the preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of the net assets acquired:
| |
July 1, 2014 | |
Assets Acquired | |
| | |
Cash | |
$ | 2,223 | |
Accounts receivable | |
| 6,270 | |
Inventory | |
| 6,459 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | |
| 1,992 | |
Property and equipment | |
| 35,476 | |
Goodwill | |
| 44,879 | |
Intangible assets | |
| 20,600 | |
Total assets acquired | |
$ | 117,899 | |
| |
| | |
Liabilities Assumed | |
| | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | |
$ | 7,129 | |
Deferred revenue | |
| 943 | |
Other long-term liabilities | |
| 633 | |
Total liabilities assumed | |
| 8,705 | |
Net assets acquired | |
$ | 109,194 | |
On April 4, 2014, the Company completed
the purchase of all of the outstanding shares of Cedarburg Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Cedarburg”), a contract developer
and manufacturer of technically complex active pharmaceutical ingredients (“API’s”) for both generic and branded
customers, located in Grafton, WI. The aggregate purchase price was $39,079.
The following table summarizes the final
allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of the net assets acquired:
| |
April 4, 2014 | |
Assets Acquired | |
| | |
Cash | |
$ | 247 | |
Accounts receivable | |
| 837 | |
Inventory | |
| 3,463 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | |
| 549 | |
Property and equipment | |
| 8,133 | |
Goodwill | |
| 17,168 | |
Intangible assets | |
| 12,500 | |
Total assets acquired | |
$ | 42,897 | |
| |
| | |
Liabilities Assumed | |
| | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | |
$ | 1,697 | |
Deferred revenue | |
| 489 | |
Capital lease obligations | |
| 566 | |
Restructuring liabilities | |
| 1,038 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | |
| 28 | |
Total liabilities assumed | |
| 3,818 | |
Net assets acquired | |
$ | 39,079 | |
Revenue and net loss from OsoBio for the
period July 1, 2014 to September 30, 2014 was $6,459 and $(2,670) respectively. Revenue and net income from Cedarburg for the
period April 4, 2014 to September 30, 2014 was $7,451 and $308 respectively.
The following table shows the unaudited
combined condensed pro forma statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively,
as if the OsoBio and Cedarburg acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2013. This pro forma information does not purport to represent
what the Company’s actual results would have been if the acquisitions had occurred as of the date indicated or what such
results would be for any future periods.
| |
Three Months Ended September 30, | | |
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
| |
(Unaudited) | | |
(Unaudited) | |
Total revenues | |
$ | 62,471 | | |
$ | 75,552 | | |
$ | 215,824 | | |
$ | 229,862 | |
Net (loss) income | |
| (8,333 | ) | |
| 2,246 | | |
| (3,115 | ) | |
| 5,712 | |
(Loss) Earnings per share: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Basic | |
$ | (0.26 | ) | |
$ | 0.07 | | |
$ | (0.10 | ) | |
$ | 0.19 | |
Diluted | |
$ | (0.26 | ) | |
$ | 0.07 | | |
$ | (0.10 | ) | |
$ | 0.18 | |
For the three and nine months ended September
30, 2014 pre-tax net income was adjusted by reducing expenses by $473 and $3,662, respectively, for acquisition related costs.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 pre-tax net income was adjusted by increasing expenses by $1,380 for acquisition
related costs.
For the nine months ended September 30,
2014 pre-tax net income was adjusted by increasing expenses by $1,231 for purchase accounting related depreciation and amortization.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 pre-tax net income was adjusted by increasing expenses by $753 and $2,260,
respectively, for purchase accounting related depreciation and amortization.
For the nine months ended September 30,
2014 pre-tax net income was adjusted by decreasing interest expense by $43, respectively, to reflect certain debt paid off at
the closing. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 pre-tax net income was adjusted by decreasing interest expense
by $24 and $75, respectively, to reflect certain debt paid off at the closing. For the three and nine months ended September 30,
2013 pre-tax net income was adjusted by decreasing interest expense by $5 and $16, respectively, to reflect interest expense associated
with OsoBio Holdings, LLC and subsidiaries that were not related to the OsoBio Manufacturing business acquired by the Company.
The Company funded the acquisition of
Cedarburg in April 2014 and the acquisition of OsoBio in July 2014 utilizing a portion of the proceeds from a private offering
of $150,000 aggregate principal amount of 2.25% Cash Convertible Senior Notes (the “Notes”) that was completed in
December 2013. The Company did not have sufficient cash on hand to complete these acquisitions as of January 1, 2013. For the
purposes of presenting the pro forma combined condensed statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2013, the Company has included the assumption of bridge financing as of January 1, 2013 to fund the acquisition of Cedarburg
and OsoBio as of that date. The pro forma combined condensed statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2013 reflects the recognition of interest expense on the assumed bridge financing for the period January 1, 2013 to December
4, 2013 using the rate of interest that the Company paid on its term loan facility, at which point it is further assumed that
a portion of the Notes financing would have been utilized to satisfy the bridge financing. For the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2013, pre-tax net income was adjusted by $2,519 and $7,556 of pro forma interest expense on the bridge financing.
Note 4 –Debt
The following table summarizes long-term
debt:
| |
September 30, | | |
December 31, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
Convertible senior notes, net of unamortized debt discount | |
$ | 121,212 | | |
$ | 116,931 | |
Term loan | |
| - | | |
| 4,524 | |
Industrial development authority bond | |
| 2,390 | | |
| 2,695 | |
Capital leases - equipment | |
| 371 | | |
| - | |
Miscellaneous loan | |
| 5 | | |
| 9 | |
| |
| 123,978 | | |
| 124,159 | |
Less current portion | |
| (407 | ) | |
| (1,024 | ) |
Total long-term debt | |
$ | 123,571 | | |
$ | 123,135 | |
The aggregate maturities of long-term debt,
exclusive of unamortized debt discount of $28,788 at September 30, 2014, are as follows:
2014 (remaining) | |
$ | 36 | |
2015 | |
| 447 | |
2016 | |
| 448 | |
2017 | |
| 397 | |
2018 | |
| 150,348 | |
Thereafter | |
| 1,090 | |
Total | |
$ | 152,766 | |
Convertible Senior Notes
On December 4, 2013, the Company completed
a private offering of $150,000 aggregate principal amount of 2.25% Cash Convertible Senior Notes (the “Notes”), dated
as of December 4, 2013 between the Company and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee. The Notes will mature
on November 15, 2018, unless earlier repurchased or converted into cash in accordance with their terms prior to such date and
interest will be paid in arrears semiannually on each May 15 and November 15 at an annual rate of 2.25% beginning on May 15, 2014.
The Notes were offered and sold only to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended (the "Securities Act").
The Notes are not convertible into the
Company's common stock or any other securities under any circumstances. Holders may convert their Notes solely into cash at their
option at any time prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding May 15, 2018 only under the following
circumstances: (1) during any calendar quarter commencing after the calendar quarter ending on December 31, 2013 (and only during
such calendar quarter), if the last reported sale price of the Company's common stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or
not consecutive) during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar
quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price on each applicable trading day; (2) during the five business
day period after any five consecutive trading day period in which the trading price per thousand dollars principal amount of Notes
for each trading day of the measurement period was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of the Company's
common stock and the conversion rate on each such trading day; or (3) upon the occurrence of specified corporate events. On or
after May 15, 2018 until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date, holders
may convert their Notes solely into cash at any time, regardless of the foregoing circumstances. Upon conversion, in lieu of receiving
shares of the Company's common stock, a holder will receive, per thousand dollars principal amount of Notes, an amount in cash
equal to the settlement amount, determined in the manner set forth in the indenture.
The initial conversion rate is 63.9844 shares
of the Company's common stock per thousand dollars principal amount of Notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately
$15.63 per share of common stock). The conversion rate is subject to adjustment in some events as described in the Indenture but
will not be adjusted for any accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, following certain corporate events that occur prior to
the maturity date, the Company has agreed to pay a cash make-whole premium by increasing the conversion rate for a holder who
elects to convert its Notes in connection with such a corporate event in certain circumstances as described in the indenture.
The Company may not redeem the Notes prior
to the maturity date, and no sinking fund is provided for the Notes.
The cash conversion feature of the Notes
(“Notes Conversion Derivative”) requires bifurcation from the Notes in accordance with ASC Topic 815, Derivatives
and Hedging, and is accounted for as a derivative liability. The fair value of the Notes Conversion Derivative at the time
of issuance of the Notes was $33,600 and was recorded as original debt discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component
of the Notes. This discount is amortized as interest expense using the effective interest method over the term of the Notes. For
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded $1,457 and $4,280, respectively of amortization of the
debt discount as interest expense based upon an effective rate of 7.69%.
The components of the Notes were as follows:
| |
September 30, 2014 | | |
December 31, 2013 | |
Principal amount | |
$ | 150,000 | | |
$ | 150,000 | |
Unamortized debt discount | |
| 28,788 | | |
| 33,069 | |
Net carrying amount of Notes | |
$ | 121,212 | | |
$ | 116,931 | |
In connection with the pricing of the
Notes, on November 19, 2013, the Company entered into cash convertible note hedge transactions (“Notes Hedges”) relating
to a notional number of shares of the Company's common stock underlying the Notes to be issued by the Company with two counterparties
(the "Option Counterparties"). The Notes Hedges, which are cash-settled, are intended to reduce the Company’s
exposure to potential cash payments that the Company would be required to make upon conversion of the Notes in excess of the principal
amount of converted notes if our common stock price exceeds the conversion price. The Notes Hedges are accounted for as a derivative
instrument in accordance with ASC Topic 815. The aggregate cost of the note hedge transaction was $33,600.
At the same time, the Company also entered
into separate warrant transactions with each of the Option Counterparties initially relating, in the aggregate, to 9,598 shares
of the Company's common stock underlying the note hedge transactions. The cash convertible note hedge transactions are intended
to offset cash payments due upon any conversion of the Notes. However, the warrant transactions could separately have a dilutive
effect to the extent that the market price per share of the Company's common stock (as measured under the terms of the warrant
transactions) exceeds the applicable strike price of the warrants. The initial strike price of the warrants is $18.9440 per
share, which is 60% above the last reported sale price of the Company's common stock of $11.84 on November 19, 2013 and proceeds
of $23,100 were received from the Option Counterparties from the sale of the warrants.
Aside from the initial payment of a $33,600
premium to the Option Counterparties, the Company is not required to make any cash payments to the Option Counterparties under
the Note Hedges and will be entitled to receive from the Option Counterparties an amount of cash, generally equal to the amount
by which the market price per share of common stock exceeds the strike price of the Note Hedges during the relevant valuation
period. The strike price under the Note Hedges is initially equal to the conversion price of the Notes. Additionally, if the market
price per share of the Company's common stock, as measured under the warrant transactions, exceeds the strike price of the warrants
during the measurement period at the maturity of the warrants, the Company will be obligated to issue to the Option Counterparties
a number of shares of the Company's common stock in an amount based on the excess of such market price per share of the Company's
common stock over the strike price of the warrants. The Company will not receive any proceeds if the warrants are exercised.
Neither the Notes Conversion Derivative
nor the Notes Hedges qualify for hedge accounting, thus any changes in the fair market value of the derivatives is recognized
immediately in the statement of operations. As of September 30, 2014, the changes in fair market value of the Notes Conversion
Derivative and the Notes Hedges were equal, therefore there was no change in fair market value that was recognized in the accompanying
condensed consolidated statement of operations.
The following table summarizes the fair
value and the presentation in the condensed consolidated balance sheet:
| |
Location on Balance Sheet | |
September 30, 2014 | | |
December 31, 2013 | |
Notes Hedges | |
Long-term assets | |
$ | 102,946 | | |
$ | 22,654 | |
Notes Conversion Derivative | |
Long-term liabilities | |
$ | (102,946 | ) | |
$ | (22,654 | ) |
Term Loan and Revolving Credit Facility
In April 2012, the Company entered into
a $20,000 credit facility consisting of a 4-year, $5,000 term loan and a $15,000 revolving line of credit. In April 2014, the
Company utilized the balance of restricted cash to pay off the balance of the term loan, thereby eliminating the term loan liability.
In June 2014 the Company terminated the credit agreement while still maintaining the letters of credit, thus requiring the Company
to continue to maintain restricted cash to collateralize these letters of credit.
The balance required to be maintained
as restricted cash must be at least 110% of the maximum potential amount of the outstanding letters of credit. As of September
30, 2014, the Company had $4,823 of outstanding letters of credit secured by restricted cash.
On October 24, 2014, the Company entered
into a $50,000 senior secured credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) consisting of a 3-year, $50,000 revolving
credit facility, which includes a $15,000 sublimit for the issuance of standby letters of credit and a $5,000 sublimit for swing
line loans. The Credit Agreement also includes an accordion feature that, subject to securing additional commitments from existing
lenders or new lending institutions, will allow the Company to increase the aggregate commitments under the Credit Agreement by
up to $10,000.
IDA Bonds
The Company maintains variable interest
rate industrial development authority (“IDA”) bonds due in increasing annual installments through 2021. Interest payments
are due monthly with a current interest rate of 0.15% at September 30, 2014. The amount outstanding as of September 30, 2014 was
$2,390.
Note 5 - Inventory
Inventory consisted of the following as of September 30, 2014
and December 31, 2013:
| |
September 30, 2014 | | |
December 31, 2013 | |
Raw materials | |
$ | 22,446 | | |
$ | 13,294 | |
Work in process | |
| 10,296 | | |
| 3,314 | |
Finished goods | |
| 23,278 | | |
| 15,383 | |
Total inventories, at cost | |
$ | 56,020 | | |
$ | 31,991 | |
Note 6 — Restructuring
and Impairment
In the third quarter of 2014, the
Company recorded restructuring charges related to optimizing the Singapore facility’s footprint. In April 2014, the
Company announced a restructuring plan transitioning Discovery and Development Services (“DDS”) activities at its
Syracuse, N.Y. site to other sites within AMRI and ceased operations in Syracuse at the end of June 2014. The actions taken
are consistent with the Company’s ongoing efforts to consolidate its facility resources to more effectively utilize its
discovery and development resource pool and to further reduce its facility cost structure.
Restructuring charges for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2014 of $2,164 and $3,436, respectively, consist primarily of lease termination charges associated
with optimizing the Singapore facility’s footprint and termination benefits and personnel realignment costs associated with
the closure of the Syracuse site.
The following table displays the restructuring activity and
liability balances for the nine month period ended and as of September 30, 2014:
| |
Balance at January 1, 2014 | | |
Charges/ (reversals) | | |
Amounts Paid | | |
Foreign Currency Translation & Other Adjustments (1) | | |
Balance at September 30, 2014 | |
Termination benefits and personnel realignment | |
$ | 323 | | |
$ | 1,676 | | |
$ | (1,422 | ) | |
$ | (3 | ) | |
$ | 574 | |
Lease termination and relocation charges | |
| 3,582 | | |
| 1,657 | | |
| (2,303 | ) | |
| 1,121 | | |
| 4,057 | |
Other | |
| 471 | | |
| 103 | | |
| (576 | ) | |
| 2 | | |
| - | |
Total | |
$ | 4,376 | | |
$ | 3,436 | | |
$ | (4,301 | ) | |
$ | 1,120 | | |
$ | 4,631 | |
| (1) | Included in lease termination
and relocation charges adjustments are restructuring accruals assumed in conjunction
with the Cedarburg acquisition in the second quarter of 2014. |
Termination benefits and personnel realignment
costs relate to severance packages, outplacement services, and career counseling for employees affected by the restructuring.
Lease termination charges relate to estimated costs associated with exiting a facility, net of estimated sublease income.
Restructuring charges are included under
the caption “Restructuring charges” in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 and the restructuring liabilities are included in “Accounts payable and accrued
expenses” and “other long-term liabilities” on the condensed consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2014
and December 31, 2013.
Anticipated cash outflow
related to the restructuring reserves as of September 30, 2014 for the remainder of 2014 is approximately $709.
In conjunction with
the Company’s actions to optimize its location footprint, the Company also recorded property and equipment impairment charges
of $4,950 and $1,440 in the first nine months of 2014 and 2013, respectively, in the DDS segment. These charges are included under
the caption “Property and equipment impairment charges” on the condensed consolidated statement of operations for
the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.
Note 7 — Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The carrying amounts of goodwill and intangible
assets as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are as follows:
| |
Amortization Period | | |
December 31, 2013 | | |
Acquisitions | | |
Additions | | |
Amortization | | |
September 30, 2014 | |
Patents and Licensing Rights | |
| 2-16 years | | |
$ | 2,804 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 292 | | |
$ | (212 | ) | |
$ | 2,884 | |
Trademarks | |
| 5 years | | |
| - | | |
| 1,600 | | |
| - | | |
| (100 | ) | |
| 1,500 | |
Customer Relationships | |
| 5-20 years | | |
| 238 | | |
| 31,500 | | |
| - | | |
| (667 | ) | |
| 31,071 | |
Goodwill | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 62,047 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 62,047 | |
Total | |
| | | |
$ | 3,042 | | |
$ | 95,147 | | |
$ | 292 | | |
$ | (979 | ) | |
$ | 97,502 | |
Amortization expense related to intangible
assets was $587 and $102 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $979 and $319 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The weighted average amortization period is 18.2 years.
The following chart represents estimated future annual amortization
expense related to intangible assets:
Year ending December 31, | |
| |
2014 (remaining) | |
$ | 584 | |
2015 | |
| 2,249 | |
2016 | |
| 2,175 | |
2017 | |
| 2,174 | |
2018 | |
| 2,170 | |
Thereafter | |
| 26,103 | |
Total | |
$ | 35,455 | |
Note 8 — Share-Based Compensation
During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2014, the Company recognized total share based compensation cost of $1,018 and $2,975, respectively, as compared
to total share based compensation cost for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 of $630 and $1,808, respectively.
The Company grants share-based compensation,
including restricted shares, under its 2008 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as well as its 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Restricted Stock
A summary of unvested restricted stock activity during the
nine months ended September 30, 2014 is presented below:
| |
Number of Shares | | |
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share | |
Outstanding, January 1, 2014 | |
| 509 | | |
$ | 6.28 | |
Granted | |
| 609 | | |
$ | 11.98 | |
Vested | |
| (199 | ) | |
$ | 5.56 | |
Forfeited | |
| (47 | ) | |
$ | 8.24 | |
Outstanding, September 30, 2014 | |
| 872 | | |
$ | 10.32 | |
As of September 30, 2014, there was $6,982
of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted shares. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 2.7 years. Of the 872 restricted shares outstanding, the Company currently expects 862 shares to vest.
Stock Options
The fair value of each stock option award
is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model based on the following assumptions:
| |
For the Nine Months Ended | |
| |
September 30, 2014 | | |
September 30, 2013 | |
Expected life in years | |
| 5 | | |
| 5 | |
Risk free interest rate | |
| 1.52 | % | |
| 0.82 | % |
Volatility | |
| 53 | % | |
| 56 | % |
Dividend yield | |
| - | | |
| - | |
A summary of stock option activity under
the Company’s Stock Option and Incentive Plans during the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 is presented below:
| |
Number of Shares | | |
Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share | | |
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) | | |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value | |
Outstanding, January 1, 2014 | |
| 2,046 | | |
$ | 5.62 | | |
| | | |
| | |
Granted | |
| 326 | | |
| 10.37 | | |
| | | |
| | |
Exercised | |
| (342 | ) | |
| 4.31 | | |
| | | |
| | |
Forfeited | |
| (96 | ) | |
| 6.47 | | |
| | | |
| | |
Expired | |
| (92 | ) | |
| 15.76 | | |
| | | |
| | |
Outstanding, September 30, 2014 | |
| 1,842 | | |
$ | 6.15 | | |
| 7.3 | | |
$ | 29,325 | |
Options exercisable, September 30, 2014 | |
| 884 | | |
$ | 5.82 | | |
| 6.3 | | |
$ | 15,220 | |
The weighted average fair value of stock
options granted for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $4.85 and $2.86, respectively. As of September 30, 2014,
there was $2,081 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options. That cost is expected to be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years. Of the 1,842 stock options outstanding, the Company currently expects 1,811 options
to vest.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
During the nine months ended September
30, 2014 and 2013, 74 and 163 shares, respectively, were issued under the Company’s 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”).
During the nine months ended September
30, 2014 and 2013, cash received from stock option exercises and employee stock purchases was $2,135 and $1,505, respectively.
The excess tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from share based compensation was $1,456 and $692 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Note 9 — Operating Segment Data
In the third quarter of 2014, the Company
completed the purchase of OsoBio, an aseptic fill and finish contract manufacturer of injectable sterile liquid, suspension and
lyophilized biologic and pharmaceutical products. With the addition of these capabilities, the Company’s aseptic finished
dose manufacturing business, which consists of OsoBio and AMRI Burlington, has become material to the financial and operational
results of the Company. As a result, the Company has realigned the internal operations management personnel, resources, and financial
planning and reporting of its operations, resulting in a change to its reportable segments based on the criteria set forth in
ASC 280, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”.
Prior to this acquisition, the Company
organized its operations into the DDS and LSM segments. The DDS segment remains unchanged and includes activities such as drug
lead discovery, optimization, drug development and small scale commercial manufacturing. The LSM segment has been separated into
the Large Scale API (“API”) and Drug Product segments. API includes pilot to commercial scale manufacturing of active
pharmaceutical ingredients and intermediates and high potency and controlled substance manufacturing. Drug Product includes pre-clinical
through commercial sale production of complex liquid-filled and lyophilized parenteral formulations and includes operations at
AMRI Burlington and OsoBio. Corporate activities include business development and administrative functions, as well as research
and development costs that have not been allocated to the operating segments. Prior period disclosures have been adjusted to reflect
the change in reportable segments.
The following table contains earnings data by operating segment,
reconciled to totals included in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements:
| |
Contract Revenue | | |
Milestone & Recurring
Royalty | | |
Income (Loss)
from
Operations | | |
Depreciation
and Intangible Amortization | |
For the three months ended September 30, 2014 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
DDS | |
$ | 17,982 | | |
$ | 2,603 | | |
$ | 2,078 | | |
$ | 1,525 | |
API | |
| 29,674 | | |
| 2,387 | | |
| 2,515 | | |
| 2,468 | |
Drug Product | |
| 9,825 | | |
| - | | |
| (2,760 | ) | |
| 1,048 | |
Corporate | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (11,568 | ) | |
| — | |
Total | |
$ | 57,481 | | |
$ | 4,990 | | |
$ | (9,735 | ) | |
$ | 5,041 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
For the three months ended September 30, 2013 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
DDS | |
$ | 19,402 | | |
$ | 5,709 | | |
$ | 7,322 | | |
$ | 1,775 | |
API | |
| 31,793 | | |
| 2,017 | | |
| 8,808 | | |
| 1,760 | |
Drug Product | |
| 1,834 | | |
| - | | |
| (864 | ) | |
| 283 | |
Corporate | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (9,249 | ) | |
| - | |
Total | |
$ | 53,029 | | |
$ | 7,726 | | |
$ | 6,017 | | |
$ | 3,818 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
Contract
Revenue | | |
Milestone &
Recurring
Royalty | | |
Income (Loss)
from
Operations | | |
Depreciation
and Intangible
Amortization | |
For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
DDS | |
$ | 56,995 | | |
$ | 12,817 | | |
$ | 13,093 | | |
$ | 5,210 | |
API | |
| 98,146 | | |
| 7,161 | | |
| 28,283 | | |
| 6,234 | |
Drug Product | |
| 14,852 | | |
| | | |
| (3,620 | ) | |
| 1,622 | |
Corporate | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (34,944 | ) | |
| - | |
Total | |
$ | 169,993 | | |
$ | 19,978 | | |
$ | 2,812 | | |
$ | 13,066 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
DDS | |
$ | 59,011 | | |
$ | 22,547 | | |
$ | 21,240 | | |
$ | 5,913 | |
API | |
| 87,573 | | |
| 6,620 | | |
| 26,912 | | |
| 4,908 | |
Drug Product | |
| 3,702 | | |
| - | | |
| (3,691 | ) | |
| 1,130 | |
Corporate | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (31,252 | ) | |
| - | |
Total | |
$ | 150,286 | | |
$ | 29,167 | | |
$ | 13,209 | | |
$ | 11,951 | |
The following table summarizes other information by segment
as of and for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014:
| |
DDS | | |
API | | |
Drug
Product | | |
Total | |
Total assets | |
$ | 133,709 | | |
$ | 266,461 | | |
$ | 132,866 | | |
$ | 533,036 | |
Goodwill included in total assets | |
| - | | |
| 17,168 | | |
| 44,879 | | |
| 62,047 | |
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates | |
| 956 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 956 | |
Capital expenditures | |
| 3,300 | | |
| 7,776 | | |
| 937 | | |
| 12,013 | |
The following table summarizes other information by segment
as of and for the nine month period ended September 30, 2013:
| |
DDS | | |
API | | |
Drug
Product | | |
Total | |
Total assets | |
$ | 90,050 | | |
$ | 173,170 | | |
$ | 14,186 | | |
$ | 277,406 | |
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates | |
| 956 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 956 | |
Capital expenditures | |
| 2,419 | | |
| 5,060 | | |
| 175 | | |
| 7,654 | |
Note 10 — Financial Information by Customer Concentration
and Geographic Area
Total contract revenue from DDS’s
three largest customers each represented approximately 11%, 8% and 7% for the three months ended September 30, 2014, and approximately
11%, 8% and 8%, of DDS’s total contract revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2013. Total contract revenue from
DDS’s three largest customers represented approximately 9%, 8% and 7%, individually, of DDS’s total contract revenue
for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, and approximately 9%, 8% and 8%, of DDS’s total contract revenue for the nine
months ended September 30, 2013.
Total contract revenue from API’s
largest customer, GE Healthcare (“GE”), represented 37% and 31% of API’s total contract revenue for the three
months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. GE accounted for approximately 27% and 28% of API’s total contract
revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. GE accounted for approximately 16% of the Company’s
total contract revenue for both the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. API’s second largest customer represented
14% of API’s total contract revenue for both the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 and 11% and 19% of API’s
total contract revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Additionally, this customer represented
7% and 11% of the Company’s total contract revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Total contract revenue from Drug Product’s
three largest customers each represented approximately 20%, 15% and 10% for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 30%,
18% and 15% for the three months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. Total contract revenue from Drug Product’s three
largest customers represented 13%, individually, of Drug Product’s total contract revenue for the nine months ended September
30, 2014, and 25%, 19% and 9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively.
The Company’s total contract revenue
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was recognized from customers in the following geographic regions:
| |
Three Months Ended
September 30, | | |
Nine Months Ended
September 30, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
United States | |
| 62 | % | |
| 60 | % | |
| 65 | % | |
| 66 | % |
Europe | |
| 27 | % | |
| 22 | % | |
| 22 | % | |
| 19 | % |
Asia | |
| 10 | % | |
| 13 | % | |
| 9 | % | |
| 11 | % |
Other | |
| 1 | % | |
| 5 | % | |
| 4 | % | |
| 4 | % |
Total | |
| 100 | % | |
| 100 | % | |
| 100 | % | |
| 100 | % |
Long-lived assets by
geographic region are as follows:
| |
September 30, | | |
December 31, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
United States | |
$ | 241,434 | | |
$ | 107,403 | |
Asia | |
| 15,802 | | |
| 17,449 | |
Europe | |
| 6,192 | | |
| 5,965 | |
Total long-lived assets | |
$ | 263,428 | | |
$ | 130,817 | |
Note 11 — Legal Proceedings
The Company, from time to time, may be
involved in various claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Except as noted below, the Company
is not currently a party to any such claims or proceedings which, if decided adversely to the Company, would either individually
or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations
or cash flows.
Allegra:
The Company has settled
all of the pending United States and foreign litigations surrounding the marketing of generic versions of Allegra and Allegra-D
products. All of the prior legal proceedings have been settled or resolved to the mutual satisfaction of the parties and the related
litigations have been dismissed by the mutual consent of the parties. The Company, along with Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc., the
U.S. pharmaceutical business of Sanofi, pursued those prior legal proceedings against several companies seeking to market or which
are currently marketing generic versions of Allegra and Allegra-D products. In accordance with the Company’s agreements
with Sanofi, Sanofi bears the external legal fees and expenses for these legal proceedings, but in general, the Company must consent
to any settlement or other arrangement with any third party. Under those same agreements, the Company received royalties from
Sanofi and certain approved sub-licensees on U.S. Patent No. 5,578,610 until it expired in November 2013, and will receive royalties
on U.S. Patent No. 5,750,703 until its expiration in 2015, unless those patents are earlier determined to be invalid. The Company
is also entitled to receive certain royalties from Sanofi and certain approved sub-licensees through mid-2015, unless the relevant
patent(s) are earlier determined to be invalid.
Note 12 – Fair Value
The Company determines
its fair value of financial instruments using the following methods and assumptions:
Cash and cash equivalents,
restricted cash, receivables, and accounts payable: The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets
approximate their fair value because of the short maturities of these instruments.
Convertible senior notes, derivatives
and hedging instruments: The fair values of the Company’s Notes, which differ from their carrying values, are influenced
by interest rates and the Company's stock price and stock price volatility and are determined by prices for the Notes observed
in market trading, which are level 2 inputs. The estimated fair value of the Notes at September 30, 2014 was $230,625. The Notes
Hedges and the Notes Conversion Derivative are measured at fair value using level 2 inputs. These instruments are not actively
traded and are valued using an option pricing model that uses observable market data for all inputs, such as implied volatility
of the Company's common stock, risk-free interest rate and other factors.
Long-term debt,
other than convertible senior notes: The carrying value of long-term debt approximated fair value at September 30, 2014
and December 31, 2013 due to the resetting dates of the variable interest rates.
The Company uses a framework for measuring
fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and making disclosures about fair value measurements. A three-tiered
fair value hierarchy has been established, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value.
These tiers include:
Level 1 – defined as quoted prices
in active markets for identical instruments;
Level 2 – defined as inputs
other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and
Level 3 – defined as
unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own
assumptions.
Note 13 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The activity related to accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) was as follows:
| |
Pension and postretirement benefit plans | | |
Foreign currency adjustments | | |
Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | |
Balance at December 31, 2013, net of tax | |
$ | (4,140 | ) | |
$ | (7,137 | ) | |
$ | (11,277 | ) |
Net current period change, net of tax | |
| 298 | | |
| (467 | ) | |
| (169 | ) |
Balance at September 30, 2014, net of tax | |
$ | (3,842 | ) | |
$ | (7,604 | ) | |
$ | (11,446 | ) |
The following table provides additional details of the amounts
recognized into net earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
| |
Three Months Ended September 30, | | |
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
Amortization of pension and other postretirement benefits (a) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Actuarial losses | |
$ | 148 | | |
$ | 206 | | |
$ | 460 | | |
$ | 617 | |
Total before tax effect | |
| 148 | | |
| 206 | | |
| 460 | | |
| 617 | |
Tax benefit on amounts reclassified into earnings | |
| (53 | ) | |
| (72 | ) | |
| (162 | ) | |
| (216 | ) |
| |
$ | 95 | | |
$ | 134 | | |
$ | 298 | | |
$ | 401 | |
(a) Amounts
represent amortization of net actuarial loss from shareholders’ equity into postretirement benefit plan cost. This amount
was primarily recognized as cost of contract revenue in the consolidated statement of operations.
Note 14 – Employee Benefit Plans
In the first quarter
of 2014, the union ratified an action to settle the medical component of the post-retirement benefit plan, significantly reducing
the level of benefits available to the participants. As a result, the Company recorded $1,285 of operating income in the first
quarter of 2014 due to the settlement of this obligation.
Note 15 - Revision of Prior Period Financial Statements
During the second quarter of fiscal year
2014, we identified an error in our accounting for income tax expense recorded in fiscal years 2006 to 2013. We assessed the materiality
of the error on prior periods’ financial statements and concluded that the error was not material to any of our prior period
annual or interim financial statements. We elected to revise previously issued consolidated financial statements the next time
they are filed. As each subsequent filing is made in the future, the previous period consolidated financial statements affected
by the error will be revised. We have revised the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2013 included herein
to reflect the correct balances by increasing income taxes payable and decreasing retained earnings each by $4,947. We have also
revised the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 by increasing
income tax expense by $228 and $684, respectively, resulting in a decrease in net income for the same periods by $228 and $684,
respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2013, income per basic share decreased by $0.01. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2013 income per basic and diluted share decreased by $0.03 and $0.02, respectively.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
The following discussion
of our results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements and the Notes thereto included within this report. This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking
statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements may be identified by forward-looking words such as “may,”
“could,” “should,” “would,” “will,” “intend,” “expect,”
“anticipate,” “believe,” and “continue” or similar words, and include, but are not limited
to, statements concerning the Company’s relationship with its largest customers, the Company’s collaboration with
Bristol-Myers Squibb (“BMS”) and Genentech, expected benefits from the acquisitions of Cedarburg Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. and Oso Biopharmaceuticals Manufacturing, LLC, the business interruption event at the OsoBio site during the third quarter
of 2014, future acquisitions or divestitures, earnings, contract revenues, costs and margins, patent protection, Allegra®
and Actavis royalty revenue, government regulation, retention and recruitment of employees, customer spending and business trends,
foreign operations, including increasing options and solutions for customers, business growth and the expansion of the Company’s
global market, clinical supply manufacturing, management’s strategic plans, drug discovery, product commercialization, license
arrangements, research and development projects and expenses, revenue and expense expectations for future periods, long-lived
asset impairment, pension costs, competition and tax rates. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only
predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual results may
differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause such differences
include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors”, of the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 17,
2014, as updated by Part II Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in subsequent Forms 10-Q. All forward-looking statements
are made as of the date of this report, and we do not undertake to update any such forward-looking statements in the future, except
as required by law. References to “AMRI”, the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our,”
refer to Albany Molecular Research, Inc. and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
Strategy and Overview
We are a global contract research and
manufacturing organization uniquely positioned in the marketplace to provide a competitive advantage to a diverse group of customers.
Our reputation of providing the highest quality service on a global basis with a variety of pricing options provides companies
with the security of sourcing discovery, development, small and large-scale manufacturing projects throughout our global network
of research and manufacturing facilities. We believe we have a unique portfolio of service offerings ranging from early stage
discovery through manufacturing and formulation across the U.S., Europe and Asia. We believe this product and geographic mix will
continue to allow us to increase multi-year strategic relationships and enhance our revenue growth with a variety of customers.
As part of our strategy to accomplish
these objectives, the recent appointment of some of our highly experienced, key personnel, underscores AMRI’s dedication
to client service, operational excellence, and growth. We have enhanced and unified our sales and marketing organization under
new global leadership to optimize selling opportunities and management of key accounts across our business segments. We believe
our strengthened organizational structure, combined with more focused sales and marketing efforts, should enable us to drive long
term growth across diversified segments and increased sustainable profitability.
Market trends continue to point to outsourcing
as an increasingly important part of business strategies for our customers across the discovery, development and API and formulation
manufacturing areas, including both generic and branded products. We believe our ability to offer a full service model, which
also allows customers to use a combination of our U.S., Europe and Asia based facilities, will result in an increase in demand
for our services globally. We also offer our customers the option of insourcing, a strategic relationship that embeds AMRI scientists
into the customer’s facility, allowing them to cost-effectively leverage their unused laboratory space.
We are also continuing to focus our efforts
on other important customer segments: small and large biotech companies, non-profit/government entities and related industries
such as the agricultural, nutraceutical and food industries. We believe maintaining a balance within our customer portfolio between
large pharmaceutical, non-profit/government, biotech and other companies will help support sustained sales and reduce risk.
In April 2014,
we announced the transitioning of our Discovery, Drug Development and Small Scale Manufacturing (“DDS”) activities
at our Syracuse, NY site to other sites within the Company and ceased operations in Syracuse at the end of June 2014. These actions
are consistent with our ongoing efforts to consolidate our facility resources to more effectively utilize its discovery and development
resource pool and to further reduce our facility cost structure. The cost base of our manufacturing and research facilities is
largely fixed in nature. However, we continue to seek opportunities to minimize these fixed costs, with a focus on gaining flexibility
and improving efficiency, cost structure and margin.
Although we suspended
substantial investments and halted proprietary compound R&D activities in 2011, we continue to believe there are additional
opportunities to partner our proprietary compounds or programs to create value. Our goal is to partner these programs in return
for a combination of up-front license fees, milestone payments and recurring royalty payments if compounds resulting from our
intellectual property are successfully developed into new drugs and reach the market. One compound was successfully partnered
in early 2013. We are continuing to focus on partnering other programs.
We may consider acquisitions
that enhance or complement our existing service offerings. In addition to growing the Company organically, any acquisitions would
generally be expected to contribute to AMRI’s growth by integrating with and expanding our current services, or adding services
within the drug discovery, development and manufacturing life cycle.
In April 2014,
we completed the acquisition of Cedarburg Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Cedarburg”), a contract developer and manufacturer
of technically complex API for both generic and branded customers. Customers
will benefit from access to a greater breadth of resources, including development of complex API, expanded scale-up capabilities
and large scale manufacturing in lower cost environments.
In July 2014,
we announced the completion of the acquisition of Oso Biopharmaceuticals Manufacturing, LLC (“OsoBio”), a contract
manufacturer of highly complex injectable drug products with expertise in large-scale commercial production. The addition of OsoBio
is complementary to our early stage drug product manufacturing capabilities. Customers will benefit from access to a single source
to address their sterile fill/finish needs from Phase 1 development to commercial supply.
The Cedarburg and OsoBio
transactions are consistent with our strategy to be the preeminent supplier of custom and complex drug development services and
product to both the branded and generic pharmaceutical industry.
With the addition of the OsoBio business
capabilities, the Company’s aseptic finished dose manufacturing business, which consists of OsoBio and AMRI Burlington,
has become material to the financial and operational results of the Company. As a result, the Company has realigned the internal
operations, management, personnel, resources, and financial planning and reporting of its operations, resulting in a change to
its reportable segments.
Prior to this acquisition, the Company
organized its operations into the DDS and LSM segments. The DDS segment remains unchanged and includes activities such as drug
lead discovery, optimization, drug development and small scale commercial manufacturing. The LSM segment has been separated into
the Large Scale API (“API”) and Drug Product segments. API includes pilot to commercial scale manufacturing of active
pharmaceutical ingredients and intermediates and high potency and controlled substance manufacturing. Drug Product includes pre-clinical
through commercial sale production of complex liquid-filled and lyophilized parenteral formulations and includes operations at
AMRI Burlington and OsoBio. Corporate activities include business development and administrative functions, as well as research
and development costs that have not been allocated to the operating segments. Prior period disclosures have been adjusted to reflect
the change in reportable segments.
Our backlog of open manufacturing orders
and accepted service contracts was $151.1 million at September 30, 2014 as compared to $127.6 million at September 30, 2013. Our
manufacturing and services contracts are completed over varying durations, from short to extended periods of time.
We believe our aggregate backlog as of
any date is not necessarily a meaningful indicator of our future results for a variety of reasons. First, contracts vary in duration,
and as such the timing and amount of revenues recognized from backlog can vary from period to period. Second, the Company’s
manufacturing and services contracts are of a nature that a customer may, at its option, cancel or delay the timing of delivery,
which would change our projections concerning the timing and extent to which revenue may be recognized. In addition, the value
of the Company’s services contracts that are conducted on a time and materials or full-time equivalent basis are based on
estimates, from which actual revenue generated could vary. Finally, there is no assurance that projects included in backlog will
not be terminated or delayed at any time by customers or regulatory authorities. We cannot provide any assurance that we will
be able to realize all or most of the net revenues included in backlog or estimate the portion to be filled in the current year.
Our total revenue for
the quarter ended September 30, 2014 was $62.5 million, which included $57.5 million from our contract service business and $5.0
million from royalties on sales of Allegra/Telfast and certain products sold by Actavis. Consolidated gross margin was 1.9% for
the quarter ended September 30, 2014 as compared to 16.0% for the quarter ended September 30, 2013.
During the nine months
ended September 30, 2014, cash provided by operations was $3.9 million compared to cash provided by operations of $23.7 million
for the same period of 2013. The change from the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily driven by a decrease in income
from operations, as well as changes in working capital items. During
the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we spent $12.0 million on capital expenditures, primarily related to growth and maintenance
of our existing facilities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we spent $38.8 million to acquire Cedarburg Pharmaceuticals
and $107.0 million to acquire OsoBio. As of September 30, 2014, we had $23.9 million in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted
cash and $124.0 million in bank and other related debt, of which the largest portion is a result of an offering of senior
convertible notes sold by us in the fourth quarter of 2013.
Results of Operations – Three
and Nine Months ended September 30, 2014 Compared to Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
Revenues
Total contract revenue
Contract revenue consists
primarily of fees earned under manufacturing or service contracts with third-party customers. Our contract revenues for each of
our DDS, API and Drug Product segments were as follows:
| |
Three Months Ended | | |
Nine Months Ended | |
| |
September 30, | | |
September 30, | |
(in thousands) | |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
DDS | |
$ | 17,982 | | |
$ | 19,402 | | |
$ | 56,995 | | |
$ | 59,011 | |
API | |
| 29,674 | | |
| 31,793 | | |
| 98,146 | | |
| 87,573 | |
Drug Product | |
| 9,825 | | |
| 1,834 | | |
| 14,852 | | |
| 3,702 | |
Total | |
$ | 57,481 | | |
$ | 53,029 | | |
$ | 169,993 | | |
$ | 150,286 | |
DDS contract revenues for the three months
ended September 30, 2014 decreased from the same period in 2013 primarily due to decreases in U.S. chemistry and U.S. development
and small-scale services. DDS contract revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 decreased from the same period in
2013 primarily due to decreases in U.S. chemistry and biology services offset by an increase in U.S. development and small-scale
services. We currently expect DDS contract revenue for full year 2014 to remain consistent with amounts recognized for the full
year of 2013 due to a decrease in demand for U.S. discovery services, offset by an increase in development services.
API revenue for the three months ended
September 30, 2014 decreased from the same period in 2013 primarily due to a decrease in commercial manufacturing services as
a result of timing of customer shipments, partially offset by incremental revenues from the Cedarburg acquisition in the second
quarter of 2014. API contract revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 increased from the same period in 2013 primarily
due to an increase in demand at our UK manufacturing facility as well as incremental revenues from the Cedarburg acquisition.
We currently expect growth in API contract revenue for full year 2014 due to on-going demand for our existing commercial manufacturing
services and clinical supply manufacturing services worldwide, as well as incremental revenues expected as a result of the acquisition
of Cedarburg Pharmaceuticals.
Drug Product revenue increased for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 from the same period in 2013 due to increased demand at our Burlington, MA manufacturing
facility, as well as incremental revenues from the acquisition of OsoBio in the third quarter of 2014. As a result, we expect
a significant increase in Drug Product contract revenue for full year 2014 as compared to full year 2013.
Recurring royalty revenue
Three Months Ended | | |
Nine Months Ended | |
September 30, | | |
September 30, | |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
(in thousands) | |
$ | 4,990 | | |
$ | 7,726 | | |
$ | 19,978 | | |
$ | 29,167 | |
The largest portion of our recurring royalties
relates to worldwide sales of Allegra/Telfast and Sanofi over-the-counter (“OTC”) product and authorized generics.
Additionally, beginning in the third quarter of 2012 we have earned recurring royalty revenue in conjunction with a Development
and Supply Agreement with Actavis at the Company’s Rensselaer, NY manufacturing facility.
Recurring royalties
decreased during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 from the same periods in 2013 primarily due to the incremental
effect of the introduction of generic fexofenadine in Japan in the later part of the first quarter of 2013. Additionally, there
was a decrease in Allegra royalties as a result of patent expirations that began in late 2013, as well as a less severe allergy
season in Japan in 2014.
We currently expect
full year 2014 recurring royalties to decrease from amounts recognized in 2013, as previously announced, primarily due to patent
expirations of Allegra that began in 2013 along with the introduction of generic fexofenadine in Japan during the first quarter
of 2013. These decreases will be partially offset by a slight increase in Actavis royalties.
The recurring royalties
we receive on the sales of Allegra/Telfast have historically provided a material portion of our revenues, earnings and operating
cash flows. We have been issued various United States and international patents covering fexofenadine HC1 and certain related
manufacturing processes. These U.S. patents began to expire in November 2013. The international patents began to expire in June
2014 and most of these patents are covered by our license agreements with Sanofi. We continue to develop our business in an effort
to supplement the revenues, earnings and operating cash flows that have historically been provided by Allegra/Telfast royalties.
Costs and Expenses
Cost of contract revenue
Cost of contract revenue consists of compensation and associated
fringe benefits for employees, chemicals, depreciation and other indirect project related costs. Cost of contract revenue for
our DDS, API and Drug Product segments were as follows:
| |
Three Months Ended | | |
Nine Months Ended | |
Segment | |
September 30, | | |
September 30, | |
(in thousands) | |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
DDS | |
$ | 14,829 | | |
$ | 16,858 | | |
$ | 46,905 | | |
$ | 50,581 | |
API | |
| 29,000 | | |
| 24,990 | | |
| 77,685 | | |
| 67,164 | |
Drug Product | |
| 12,585 | | |
| 2,700 | | |
| 18,472 | | |
| 7,075 | |
Total | |
$ | 56,414 | | |
$ | 44,548 | | |
$ | 143,062 | | |
$ | 124,820 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
DDS Gross Margin | |
| 17.5 | % | |
| 13.2 | % | |
| 17.7 | % | |
| 14.3 | % |
API Gross Margin | |
| 2.3 | % | |
| 21.4 | % | |
| 20.8 | % | |
| 23.3 | % |
Drug Product Gross Margin | |
| (28.1 | )% | |
| (47.2 | )% | |
| (24.4 | )% | |
| (91.1 | )% |
Total Gross Margin | |
| 1.9 | % | |
| 16.0 | % | |
| 15.8 | % | |
| 16.9 | % |
DDS contract revenue gross margin percentage
increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to contract revenue gross margin percentage for the
same periods in 2013. These increases are primarily due to on-going cost management. As a result, we currently expect DDS contract
margin percentage for full year 2014 to improve over amounts recognized in 2013.
API’s contract
revenue gross margin percentages decreased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the same periods
in 2013 due to lower capacity utilization as well as an increase in lower margin commercial sales.
We currently expect
API contract margins for full year 2014 to remain consistent with amounts recognized for the full year 2013 including the expected
accretive benefit of gross margin percentages from the Cedarburg Pharmaceuticals acquisition, offset by lower margin commercial
sales.
Drug Product contract
revenue gross margin percentages improved for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 from the same periods in 2013
primarily due to increases in Burlington revenues in relation to their fixed costs. Drug Product cost of contract revenue includes
$3.1 million business interruption charges at our OsoBio facility for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 which
led to a decrease in Drug Product contract gross margin.
We currently expect
Drug Product contract margins for full year 2014 to significantly improve from amounts recognized for the full year 2013 driven
by an increase in capacity utilization at our Burlington facility, as well as the expected accretive benefit of gross margin percentages
from the OsoBio acquisition, offset in part by business interruption charges at our OsoBio facility.
Technology incentive
award
We maintained a Technology
Development Incentive Plan, the purpose of which was to stimulate and encourage novel innovative technology developments by our
employees. This plan allowed eligible participants to share in a percentage of the net revenue earned by us relating to patented
technology with respect to which the eligible participant is named as an inventor or made a significant intellectual contribution.
To date, the royalties from Allegra are the main driver of the awards. The incentive awards were as follows:
Three Months Ended | | |
Nine Months Ended | |
September 30, | | |
September 30, | |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
(in thousands) | |
$ | 260 | | |
$ | 571 | | |
$ | 1,277 | | |
$ | 2,254 | |
We expect technology
incentive award expense to generally fluctuate directionally and proportionately with fluctuations in Allegra royalties in future
periods. Technology incentive award expense decreased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to the
same periods in the prior year due to the decrease in Allegra recurring royalty revenue as discussed above.
Research and development
Research and development (“R&D”)
expense consists of compensation and benefits for scientific personnel for work performed on various generic programs, costs of
chemicals, materials, outsourced activities and other out of pocket costs and overhead costs.
Research and development expenses were
as follows:
Three Months Ended | | |
Nine Months Ended | |
September 30, | | |
September 30, | |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
(in thousands) | |
$ | 568 | | |
$ | 94 | | |
$ | 775 | | |
$ | 370 | |
R&D expense for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 increased from the same periods in 2013 relating primarily to developing new
niche generic products and improving process efficiencies in our manufacturing plants. As a result, we currently expect full year
2014 R&D expense to increase from amounts recognized in 2013.
Selling, general and administrative
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”)
expenses consist of compensation and related fringe benefits for sales, marketing, operational and administrative employees, professional
service fees, marketing costs and costs related to facilities and information services. SG&A expenses were as follows:
Three Months Ended | | |
Nine Months Ended | |
September 30, | | |
September 30, | |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
(in thousands) | |
$ | 11,568 | | |
$ | 9,249 | | |
$ | 34,944 | | |
$ | 31,252 | |
SG&A increased for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to costs associated
with merger and acquisition activities, including the acquisitions of Cedarburg and OsoBio as well as incremental SG&A costs
from their associated businesses. SG&A for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 includes a one-time charge of $1.92 million
for the settlement of a U.S. litigation matter. As a result, we currently expect SG&A costs for the full year of 2014 to increase
from amounts recognized in 2013.
Postretirement benefit plan settlement
gain
Three Months Ended | | |
Nine Months Ended | |
September 30, | | |
September 30, | |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
(in thousands) | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | (1,285 | ) | |
$ | - | |
Three Months Ended | | |
Nine Months Ended | |
September 30, | | |
September 30, | |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
(in thousands) | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | (1,285 | ) | |
$ | - | |
In the first quarter
of 2014, we recognized a gain on settlement of post-retirement liability in the API segment.
Restructuring
Three Months Ended | | |
Nine Months Ended | |
September 30, | | |
September 30, | |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
(in thousands) | |
$ | 2,164 | | |
$ | 276 | | |
$ | 3,436 | | |
$ | 6,108 | |
In the third quarter
of 2014, the Company recorded restructuring charges related to optimizing the Singapore facility’s footprint. In April 2014,
the Company announced a restructuring plan transitioning DDS activities at its Syracuse, N.Y. site to other sites within AMRI
and ceased operations in Syracuse at the end of June 2014. These actions taken are consistent with AMRI’s ongoing efforts
to consolidate its facility resources to more effectively utilize its discovery and development resource pool and to further reduce
its facility cost structure.
Restructuring charges for the three months
ended September 30, 2014 consist primarily of lease termination charges associated with optimizing the Singapore facility’s
footprint. The nine months ended September 30, 2014 also include termination benefits and personnel realignment costs associated
with the closure of the Syracuse site.
During the first nine months of 2013,
we recorded $6.1 million of restructuring charges primarily related to the closure of our Bothell, WA and Budapest, Hungary facilities.
Property and Equipment
Impairment
Three Months Ended | | |
Nine Months Ended | |
September 30, | | |
September 30, | |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
(in thousands) | |
$ | 1,232 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 4,950 | | |
$ | 1,440 | |
In the third quarter
of 2014, we recorded property and equipment impairment charges of $1.2 million in our DDS segment associated with the Company’s
consolidation of facility resources at our Singapore site. In the second quarter of 2014, we recorded property and equipment impairment
charges of $3.7 million in our DDS segment associated with the Company’s decision to cease operations at our Syracuse, New
York facility.
In the first quarter
of 2013, we recorded property and equipment impairment charges of $0.5 million in our DDS segment associated with the Company’s
decision to cease operations at our Bothell, Washington facility. In the second quarter of 2013, as a result of resolving the
termination of the lease at our former Hungary facility, we recorded property and equipment impairment charges of $0.9 million
in our DDS segment related to certain moveable equipment located at the former Hungary facility.
Interest expense,
net
| |
Three Months Ended | | |
Nine Months Ended | |
| |
September 30, | | |
September 30, | |
(in thousands) | |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
Interest expense | |
$ | (2,575 | ) | |
$ | (141 | ) | |
$ | (8,259 | ) | |
$ | (419 | ) |
Interest income | |
| - | | |
| 3 | | |
| 3 | | |
| 8 | |
Interest expense, net | |
$ | (2,575 | ) | |
$ | (138 | ) | |
$ | (8,256 | ) | |
$ | (411 | ) |
Net interest expense
increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 from the same periods in 2013 primarily due to interest on our
convertible senior debt entered into in the fourth quarter of 2013. Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2014
also includes $0.4 million related to the write-off of deferred financing assets in conjunction with the termination of our term
loan and revolving credit facility.
Other income (expense),
net
Three Months Ended | | |
Nine Months Ended | |
September 30, | | |
September 30, | |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
(in thousands) | |
$ | 235 | | |
$ | 155 | | |
$ | 3 | | |
$ | 1,038 | |
Other income for the
three months ended September 30, 2014 was primarily related to the fluctuation in exchange rates associated with foreign currency
transactions. This income was offset by a write-off of a litigation settlement receivable balance for the nine months ended September
30, 2014.
Other income for the three months ended
September 30, 2013 was primarily related to the fluctuation in exchange rates associated with foreign currency transactions. Included
in other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was an insurance demutualization gain of $0.4 million.
Income tax (benefit) expense
Three Months Ended | | |
Nine Months Ended | |
September 30, | | |
September 30, | |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
(in thousands) | |
$ | (3,434 | ) | |
$ | 2,332 | | |
$ | (4,024 | ) | |
$ | 6,332 | |
The Company recognized a tax benefit for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2014 due primarily to the pre-tax loss. Additionally for the nine months ended September 30, 2014,
the Company recognized an additional tax benefit due to the reversal of a valuation allowance on a net operating loss deferred
tax asset for the Company’s U.K. operations of $2.8 million due to a change in estimate regarding the recoverability of
those assets resulting from improved profitability.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
We have historically funded our business
through operating cash flows and proceeds from borrowings. During the first nine months of 2014, we generated cash from operating
activities of $3.9 million compared to $23.7 million in the same period in 2013. This change was primarily driven by a decrease
in income from operations, as well as changes in working capital items.
During the first nine months of 2014,
cash used in investing activities was $158.0 million, resulting primarily from the use of $38.8 million in cash to acquire Cedarburg
Pharmaceuticals, $107.0 million in cash to acquire OsoBio and $12.0 million for the acquisition of property and equipment. Additionally,
during the first nine months of 2014, we used $3.2 million in cash in financing activities, relating primarily to payments made
on our credit facilities, offset by proceeds from the sale of common stock.
Working capital, defined as current assets
less current liabilities, was $104.3 million at September 30, 2014 as compared to $230.2 million as of December 31, 2013. This
decrease primarily relates to the use of cash to acquire Cedarburg and OsoBio during 2014.
In December 2013, we issued $150 million
of 2.25% Cash Convertible Senior Notes (the “Notes”), which generated net proceeds of $134.8 million, which includes
the associated warrants, convertible note hedges and bank fees. In connection with the offering of these notes, we entered into
convertible note hedging transactions with two counterparties. We also entered into warrant transactions in which we sold warrants
of our common stock to the counterparties. We paid the counterparties approximately $33.6 million for the convertible note hedge
and received approximately $23.1 million from the counterparties for the warrants. See Note 4 for additional information regarding
these transactions.
In April 2012, the Company entered into
a $20.0 million credit facility consisting of a 4-year, $5.0 million term loan and a $15.0 million revolving line of credit. Under
the terms of the April 2012 credit agreement, the Company was required to maintain a $5.0 million restricted cash balance to partially
collateralize the revolving line of credit. In conjunction with an amendment to the credit agreement dated December 20, 2012,
the restricted cash requirement was directly reduced by the amount of principal payments made on the term loan which began in
May 2013. In April 2014, the Company utilized the balance of restricted cash to pay off the balance of the term loan, thereby
eliminating both the term loan liability and releasing the restricted cash.
In June 2014, the Company terminated its
credit facility. In conjunction with the termination of the credit facility, the balance required to be maintained as restricted
cash must be at least 110% of the maximum potential amount of the outstanding letters of credit. As of September 30, 2014,
the Company had $4,823 of outstanding letters of credit secured by restricted cash.
On October 24, 2014, the Company entered
into a $50.0 million senior secured credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) consisting of a 3-year, $50.0 million
revolving credit facility, which includes a $15.0 million sublimit for the issuance of standby letters of credit and a $5.0 million
sublimit for swing line loans. The Credit Agreement also includes an accordion feature that, subject to securing additional commitments
from existing lenders or new lending institutions, will allow the Company to increase the aggregate commitments under the Credit
Agreement by up to $10.0 million. The Company expects to use the proceeds of any borrowings under the Credit Agreement for working
capital and other general corporate purposes of the Company and its subsidiaries, subject to the terms and conditions set forth
in the Credit Agreement.
The disclosure of payments we have committed
to make under our contractual obligations is set forth under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” under Item 7 of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. There have been no material changes to our contractual obligations
since December 31, 2013, other than the repayment of the principal outstanding under the aforementioned term loan in April 2014,
which was fully collateralized by the restricted cash. As of September 30, 2014, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined
in Item 303(a)(4) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation S-K.
We expect that additional
future capital expansion and acquisition activities, if any, could be funded with cash on hand, cash from operations, borrowings
under our credit facility and/or the issuance of equity or debt securities. There can be no assurance that attractive acquisition
opportunities will be available to us or will be available at prices and upon such other terms that are attractive to us. We regularly
evaluate potential acquisitions of other businesses, products and product lines and may hold discussions regarding such potential
acquisitions. In addition, in order to meet our long-term liquidity needs or consummate future acquisitions, we may incur additional
indebtedness or issue additional equity or debt securities, subject to market and other conditions. There can be no assurance
that such additional financing will be available on terms acceptable to us or at all. The failure to raise the funds necessary
to finance our future cash requirements or consummate future acquisitions could adversely affect our ability to pursue our strategy
and could negatively affect our operations in future periods.
Critical Accounting
Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis
of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires
us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to inventories,
long-lived assets, derivative instruments and hedging activities, pension and postretirement benefit plans, income taxes and contingencies,
among other effects. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities
that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
We refer to the policies and estimates
set forth in the section “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations —
Critical Accounting Estimates” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. There have
been no material changes or modifications to the policies since December 31, 2013.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
There have been no material changes with
respect to the information on Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk appearing in Part II, Item 7A
to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by rule 13a-15(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the Company’s last fiscal
quarter our management conducted an evaluation with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
regarding the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and
procedures, we recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable
assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and our management was required to apply its judgment in evaluating and
implementing possible controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
have concluded that, as of the end of the Company’s last fiscal quarter, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective
in that they provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under
the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s rules and forms, including ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. We intend to review and document our disclosure controls and procedures, including our internal controls and procedures
for financial reporting, on an ongoing basis, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness and
to ensure that our systems evolve with our business.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We acquired Cedarburg in the second quarter
of 2014 and OsoBio in the third quarter of 2014. The Cedarburg business is included in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements as of June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2014, and the OsoBio business is included in our unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements as of September 30, 2014. As these acquisitions occurred in the second and third quarters of 2014, the scope
of our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting does not include these businesses. The exclusion is in accordance
with the SEC’s general guidance that an assessment of a recently acquired business may be omitted from our scope in the
year of acquisition.
Other than the changes noted above, there
were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation
of such internal control that occurred during the Company’s last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Please refer to Part 1 – Note 11
to the condensed consolidated financial statements for details and history on outstanding litigation.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set
forth in this report, the risks and uncertainties that we believe are most important for you to consider are discussed in Part
II, "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, which could materially
affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the
only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial
also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. There are no material changes
to the Risk Factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, other than as previously
reported in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity
Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table represents share repurchases
during the three months ended September 30, 2014:
| |
(a) | | |
(b) | | |
(c) | |
(d) |
Period | |
Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) | | |
Average Price Paid Per Share | | |
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | |
Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program |
July 1, 2014 – July 31, 2014 | |
| - | | |
$ | - | | |
N/A | |
N/A |
August 1, 2014 – August 31, 2014 | |
| - | | |
$ | - | | |
N/A | |
N/A |
September 1, 2014 – September 30, 2014 | |
| 5,406 | | |
$ | 22.05 | | |
N/A | |
N/A |
Total | |
| 5,406 | | |
$ | 22.05 | | |
N/A | |
N/A |
(1) Consists of shares repurchased by the Company for
certain employee’s restricted stock that vested to satisfy minimum tax withholding obligations that arose on the vesting
of the restricted stock.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
|
|
|
101 |
|
XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language). The
following materials from Albany Molecular Research, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2014, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flows and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
* This
certification is not “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC. |
|
|
|
Date: November 10, 2014 |
By: |
/s/ Michael M. Nolan |
|
|
|
Michael M. Nolan |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, William S. Marth certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Albany
Molecular Research, Inc.; |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report; |
| 4. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
| (a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; |
| (b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
| (c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and |
| (d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
| 5. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| (a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and |
| (b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting. |
Date November 10, 2014 |
/s/ William S. Marth |
|
|
Name: William S. Marth |
|
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
Principal Executive Officer |
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Michael M. Nolan certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Albany
Molecular Research, Inc.; |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report; |
| 4. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
| (a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; |
| (b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
| (c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and |
| (d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
| 5. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| (a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and |
| (b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting. |
Date November 10, 2014 |
/s/ Michael M. Nolan |
|
|
Name: Michael M. Nolan |
|
Title: Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
Principal Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION
The undersigned officer
of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification
is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”)
promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act. In accordance
with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes
of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.
Date November 10, 2014 |
|
|
/s/ William S. Marth |
|
|
Name: William S. Marth |
|
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION
The undersigned officer of Albany Molecular
Research, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii)
of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of
the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates
it by reference.
Date: November 10, 2014 |
/s/ Michael M. Nolan |
|
|
Name: Michael M. Nolan |
|
Title: Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMRI)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2024 to May 2024
Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMRI)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2023 to May 2024