UNITED STATES
SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2012
Commission File Number 000-29621
XSUNX, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its
Charter)
Colorado
|
|
84-1384159
|
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
65 Enterprise, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip
Code)
(949) 330-8060
(Registrant’s Telephone Number)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b)
of the Act: Title of each class:
None
Name of Each Exchange on which Registered:
N/A
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g)
of the Act:
Title of each class:
Common Stock, no par
value per share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is
a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
o
NO
x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is
not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
o
NO
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted
and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months. Yes
S
NO
o
Check if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant
to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge,
in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.
(Check one)
|
|
|
|
£
Large accelerated filer
|
£
Accelerated filer
|
£
Non-accelerated filer
|
S
Smaller reporting company
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) (Check one): Yes
o
NO
x
As of March 31, 2012, the aggregate market
value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $7,843,978 million based
on the closing price as reported on the OTCBB.
As of January 11, 2013 there were 297,270,080 shares of
the registrant’s company stock outstanding.
XSUNX, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”) and the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) which are subject to risks, uncertainties
and assumptions that are difficult to predict. All statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, other than statements of historical
fact, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to safe harbor provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements include statements, among other things, concerning our
business strategy, including anticipated trends and developments in and management plans for, our business and the markets in which
we operate; future financial results, operating results, revenues, gross margin, operating expenses, products, projected costs
and capital expenditures; research and development programs; sales and marketing initiatives; and competition. In some cases, you
can identify these statements by forward-looking words, such as “estimate”, “expect”, “anticipate”,
“project”, “plan”, “intend”, “believe”, “forecast”, “foresee”,
“likely”, “may”, “should”, “goal”, “target”, “might”, “will”,
“could”, “predict” and “continue”, the negative or plural of these words and other comparable
terminology. The forward-looking statements are only predictions based on our current expectations and our projections about future
events. All forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are based upon information available to us as
of the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
We undertake no obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements for any reason. These forward-looking statements involve
known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance, or
achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these statements. These factors include the matters discussed
in the section entitled “Item 1A: Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Form 10-K. You should carefully consider the
risks and uncertainties described under this section.
For further information
about these and other risks, uncertainties and factors, please review the disclosure included in this report under Item 1A “Risk
Factors.”
PART I
Item 1. Business.
In this Report, we
use the terms “Company,” “XsunX,” “we,” “us,” and “our,” unless otherwise
indicated, or the context otherwise requires, to refer to XsunX, Inc.
Organization
XsunX, Inc. (“XsunX,”
the “Company” or the “issuer”) is a Colorado corporation formerly known as Sun River Mining Inc. “Sun
River”). The Company was originally incorporated in Colorado on February 25, 1997. Effective September 24, 2003, the Company
completed a plan of reorganization and name change to XsunX, Inc.
Business Overview
XsunX,
Inc. is developing and has begun to market a hybrid manufacturing solution to produce high performance Copper Indium Gallium (di)
Selenide (CIGS) thin film solar cells. Our patent pending processing technology, which we call CIGSolar®, focuses on the mass
production of individual thin-film CIGS solar cells that match silicon solar cell dimensions and can be offered as a non-toxic,
high-efficiency and lowest-cost alternative to the use of silicon solar cells. We intend to offer licenses for the use of the CIGSolar®
process technology thereby generating revenue streams through licensing fees and manufacturing royalties for the use of the technology.
Technology Overview
Our
efforts have been focused on the development and customization of a series of specialized processing tools that when combined provide
a turn-key high-throughput manufacturing system to produce CIGS solar cells.
Core
attributes to our process method are the use of small area thermal co-evaporation techniques coupled with state-of-the-art sputter
deposition technologies to improve manufacturing output, increase cell efficiency, production yields, and lower the costs for the
production of high efficiency CIGS cells.
There
are five (5) core process tools that when combined will produce 156 mm format (about 6” square) solar cells. We believe that
it will be the ability of our system to minimize processing defects while maintaining exceptional per hour production rates that
will provide superior commercial opportunities. CIGSolar® cells will be manufactured on stainless steel squares sized to match
silicon solar cells currently used in over 75% of all solar modules manufactured today.
This
innovative approach bridges the gap between inexpensive thin-film and costly high efficiency silicon wafer technologies to produce
a new breed of solar cell combining what we believe are the best attributes of each technology. The mass production of individual,
high performance CIGS solar cells – like solar building blocks – we believe will allow solar power to finally compete
effectively against other sources of electrical energy.
CIGS Thin Film Solar Devices
Copper
Indium Gallium (di) Selenide (CIGS) exceeds all other thin film solar cell performance to date delivering nearly 20% conversions
in laboratory environments. It is this high efficiency low cost potential for CIGS, and its wide array of potential uses and applications,
that we believe provides the basis to drive the cost of energy production for alternative sources to unprecedented new lows. For
this reason many major research institutes and agencies worldwide view CIGS as a significant solar technology and support continuous
development and research efforts related to CIGS thin films.
We
believe that through the successful combination of small area co-evaporation processing techniques with the high rate sputter processing
techniques, overall factory yields (total watts of production per day) can be increased thereby resulting in lower production costs
while still delivering the full energy and low cost potential that CIGS based devices can offer.
CIGS Experience
The technical experience
incorporated into our technology includes nearly 18 years of thin film and CIGS experience in successful technology development,
equipment design, and production of several million square feet CIGS products in a commercial production setting. Our technologists
have worked side by side with leading researchers at NREL and in fact, shares an R&D 100 award with NREL staff for efforts
related to CIGS technology development.
In June 2011 the National
Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) certified the peak efficiency conversion of 16.36% achieved by XsunX for Copper-Indium-Gallium-(di)selenide
(CIGS) photovoltaic devices. Overall efficiency of tested samples ranged from 15.3% to 16.36% producing an average efficiency of
15.91%. The samples provided to NREL was part of a 125 mm substrates which after deposition were sub-divided into quadrants to
produce NREL device test structures and analytical equipment test structures. The purpose was to provide a statistically significant
body of data in support of XsunX’s continuous process improvement efforts.
Sales and Marketing
We have developed
and have begun to implement a plan to offer CIGSolar® technology to existing manufacturers of solar products in the renewable
energy industry. Although XsunX focuses on the development of solar technology and products, we are not a systems or a machine
manufacturer. We have and intend to continue to develop relationships with equipment manufacturers that can build systems to our
specifications thereby allowing us to offer turn-key manufacturing solutions to enable our licensees to manufacturer CIGS cells
quickly and inexpensively.
We anticipate that
at the conclusion of the initial development of our CIGS technology, that we will generate revenue from an array of services and
license fees from manufacturers that utilize our technologies. These revenue fees may include inception license fees and royalty
streams based upon the efficiencies our unique CIGS technology, guidance for the conversion of new or existing facilities, production
line equipment and systems design and markups, training and implementation, as well as R&D support, and product reliability
expertise.
Intellectual Property
We plan to market license
opportunities for our technology and not directly manufacture the solar technologies and related products that may employ the use
of our thin film technologies. This business model requires that we develop and maintain intellectual property that includes both
patented and proprietary technologies. We have licensed certain patented and patent pending technologies, and we are developing
with the intent to file for patent protection certain other thin film manufacturing technologies. The following is an outline of
certain patents and technologies we are developing, have acquired, or licensed:
The Company is developing
a hybrid manufacturing solution to produce high performance Copper Indium Gallium (di) Selenide (CIGS) thin film solar cells.
Our system and processing technology, which we call CIGSolar®, focuses on the mass production of individual thin-film CIGS
solar cells that match silicon solar cell dimensions and can be offered as a non-toxic, high-efficiency and lowest-cost alternative
to the use of silicon solar cells. We have designed a proprietary system for a process known as co-evaporation used in the manufacture
of the solar absorbing material CIGS. Certain key features related to this system we believe may qualify for patent protection.
In November 2011 we filed provisional patent application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office identifying five (5)
initial claims that through continued system and process design revisions we subsequently modified and elected to forego the filing
of utility patent applications, and in July 2012 we filed three (3) additional claims related to our thermal effusion source design.
As we continue to refine our designs and process technologies we may elect to abandon, modify, or file additional applications
and we may seek to enforce our claims through filing of utility patents.
In September 2003, the Company was assigned
the rights to three patents as part of an Asset Purchase Agreement with Xoptix Inc., a California corporation. The patents acquired
were No. 6,180,871 for Transparent Solar Cell and Method of Fabrication (Device), granted on January 30, 2001; No. 6,320,117 for
Transparent Solar Cell and Method of Fabrication (Method of Fabrication), granted on November 20, 2001; and No. 6,509,204 for
Transparent Solar Cell and Method of Fabrication (formed with a Schottky barrier diode and method of its manufacture), granted
on January 21, 2003. We do not currently employ nor envision the use of the above named patents in the development or commercialization
of our
CIGSolar® technology. Because of technological and business developments within the solar industry, we believe
that these patents no longer provide business opportunities for the Company to pursue.
On July 10, 2012, the
United States Patent and Trademark Office issued a certificate of registration No. 4,172,218 granting the Company a trademark for
the use of “CIGSolar”.
As we continue to develop
these new technologies, we may actively seek patent protection for certain aspects related to methods and apparatus we develop.
We can give no assurance that any such patent(s) will be granted for any process and manufacturing technology that we may develop
individually or in conjunction with third parties.
We rely on trademark and
copyright law, trade secret protection and confidentiality or license agreements with our employees, customers, partners and others
to protect our proprietary rights.
We have not been subject to any intellectual property claims.
Company History
XsunX is a Colorado corporation
formerly known as Sun River Mining Inc. (“Sun River”). The Company was originally incorporated in Colorado on February
25, 1997. Effective September 24, 2003, the Company completed a Plan of Reorganization and Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Plan”).
Pursuant to the Plan,
the Company acquired the following three patents from Xoptix, Inc., a California corporation for Seventy Million (70,000,000) shares
of common stock (post reverse split one for twenty): No. 6,180,871 for Transparent Solar Cell and Method of Fabrication (Device),
granted on January 30, 2001; No. 6,320,117 for Transparent Solar Cell and Method of Fabrication (Method of Fabrication), granted
on November 20, 2001; and No. 6,509,204 for Transparent Solar Cell and Method of Fabrication (formed with a Schottky barrier diode
and method of its manufacture), granted on January 21, 2003.
Pursuant to the Plan,
the Company authorized the issuance of 110,530,000 (post reverse split) common shares. Prior to the Plan, the Company had no tangible
assets and insignificant liabilities. Subsequent to the Plan, the Company completed its name change from Sun River Mining, Inc.
to XsunX, Inc. The transaction was completed on September 30, 2003.
Government Contracts
There are no government contracts as of the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2012.
Competitive Conditions
Over developed production
capacities for silicon solar cells have created highly competitive conditions over the calendar years ending 2012 and 2011. These
competitive conditions have resulted in extensive price reductions exceeding in many instances over 70% for solar products incorporating
the use of silicon solar cell. These market sales price reductions have significantly affected operating margins at the manufacturer
level, and restructured the project planning process and selection of installed solar technologies at the project developer level.
Many manufacturers of thin film solar technologies that had previously enjoyed significant per watt price advantages have seen
this advantage erode and as a result there has been a significant reduction to the production of, and companies that, produce thin
film solar products in the 2012 calendar period.
Conversely, the demand
for, and installations of, solar systems has continued to increase with overall global installations of solar electricity projects
projected to exceed 32 giga watts in the calendar year ending 2012 – an increase of approximately 15% from 2011. However,
current production capacities for silicon based solar technologies exceed this demand and while market pricing has begun to see
some stabilization in the 2
nd
half of calendar 2012 it is anticipated that the current over supply will continue to
effect manufacturer operating margins and profitability, and the technology selection process for developers. As a result, the
demand for thin film solar technologies, which typically require more infrastructure and/or installed space necessary to produce
similar amounts of solar power compared to silicon technologies, may continue to experience loss of market share and demand for
the foreseeable future.
There continues to be
a number of thin film companies that produce thin film solar products such as First Solar and Nano Solar, and others
that are currently working to develop and commercialize new thin film manufacturing methods. Given the benefit of time, investment,
and advances in manufacturing technologies any of these competing technologies may be offered in formats delivering power similar
or greater to technologies that may be developed by us, and they may also achieve manufacturing costs per watt lower than cost
per watt to manufacture technologies developed by us. However, while these risks do exist the Company believes that the more prevalent
and greater risk posing both the Company, and the thin film market, will continue to be
further and prolonged market price reductions
from manufacturers of silicon solar technologies. Many of the companies within the silicon industry have greater resources to devote
to research, development, manufacturing and marketing than we do.
Other factors in accessing
the principal competitive factors in the market for solar electric power products, we use price per watt, stability and reliability,
conversion efficiency, diversity in use applications, and other performance metrics such as scalability of manufacturing processes
and the ability to adapt new technologies into cell designs and the manufacturing process without antiquation of existing infrastructure.
In addition, the current use of other clean renewable energy technologies such as wind, ocean thermal, ocean tidal, and geo-thermal
power sources and conventional fossil fuel based technologies for the production of electricity may increase and further reduce
the demand for solar technologies. If we do not compete successfully with respect to these or other factors, it could materially
and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Compliance with Environmental Laws and Regulations
The operations of the
Company are subject to local, state and federal laws and regulations governing environmental quality and pollution control. Compliance
with these regulations by the Company has required that we retain the use of consulting firms to assist in the engineering and
design of systems related to equipment operations, management of industrial gas storage and delivery systems, and occupancy fire
and safety construction standards to deal with emergency conditions. We do not anticipate that these costs will have a material
effect on the Company’s operations or competitive position, and the cost of such compliance has not been material. The Company
is unable to assess or predict at this time what effect additional regulations or legislation could have on its activities.
Employees and Consultants
As of the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2012, we had three employees. This represents a decrease of one employee over the same period ended 2011. To
compensate our need for scientific and technical productivity the Company also relies on qualified consultants to perform specific
functions that otherwise would require an employee. We consider relations with our employees and consultants to be good.
Available Information
Our website address is
www.xsunx.com. We make available on our website access to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current
reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports that we have filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
The information found on our website is not part of this or any other report we file with, or furnish to, the SEC.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
An investment in our common
stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors, as well as the other information
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in evaluating XsunX and our business. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial
condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Accordingly, the trading price of our common stock
could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment in our common stock. The risks and uncertainties described below
are not the only ones we face. Additional risks that we currently do not know about or that we currently believe to be immaterial
may also impair our business operations.
We Have Not Generated
Any Significant Revenues and Our Financial Statements Raise Substantial Doubt About Our Ability to Continue As A Going Concern.
We
are a development stage company and, to date, have not generated any significant revenues. The accompanying consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
which contemplate our continuation as a going concern. Net loss for the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $(1,555,194)
and $(1,117,654), respectively. Net cash used for operations was
$(379,240)
and
$(1,117,818)
for
the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
At September 30, 2012, we had a working capital deficit
of $(544,939).
From inception through September 30, 2012, we had an accumulated deficit of
$(36,592,653)
at September 30, 2012.
The items discussed above
raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We cannot assure you that we can achieve or sustain profitability
in the future. Our operations are subject to the risks and competition inherent in the establishment of a business enterprise.
There can be no assurance that future operations will be profitable. Revenues and profits, if any, will depend upon various factors,
including whether our product development can be completed, whether our products will achieve market acceptance and whether we
obtain additional financing. We may not achieve our business objectives and the failure to achieve such goals would have a materially
adverse impact on us.
We expect that we
will need to obtain additional financing to continue to operate our business, including capital expenditures to complete the development
of marketable thin film manufacturing technologies, and financing may be unavailable or available only on disadvantageous terms
which could cause the Company to curtail its business operations and delay the execution of its business plan.
We have in the past experienced
substantial losses and negative cash flow from operations and have required financing, including equity and debt financing, in
order to pursue the commercialization of products based on our technologies. We expect that we will continue to need significant
financing to operate our business. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that additional financing will be available or that the
terms of such additional financing, if available, will be acceptable to us. If additional financing is not available or not available
on terms acceptable to us, our ability to fund our operations, complete the development of marketable technologies, develop a sales
network, maintain our research and development efforts or otherwise respond to competitive pressures may be significantly impaired.
We could also be forced to curtail our business operations, reduce our investments, decrease or eliminate capital expenditures
and delay the execution of our business plan, including, without limitation, all aspects of our operations, which would have a
material adverse effect on our business.
We may be required
to raise additional financing by issuing new securities with terms or rights superior to those of our shares of common stock, which
could adversely affect the market price of our shares of common stock and our business.
We will require additional
financing to fund future operations, including expansion in current and new markets, development and acquisition, capital costs
and the costs of any necessary implementation of technological innovations or alternative technologies. We may not be able to obtain
financing on favorable terms, if at all. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, the percentage ownership of
our current stockholders will be reduced, and the holders of the new equity securities may have rights superior to those of the
holders of shares of common stock, which could adversely affect the market price and the voting power of shares of our common stock.
If we raise additional funds by issuing debt securities, the holders of these debt securities would similarly have some rights
senior to those of the holders of shares of common stock, and the terms of these debt securities could impose restrictions on operations
and create a significant interest expense for us which could have a materially adverse effect on our business.
If future products
based on technologies we are developing cannot be developed for manufacture and sold commercially or our products become obsolete
or noncompetitive, we may be unable to recover our investments or achieve profitability which will have a materially adverse effect
on our business.
There can be no assurance
that such research and development efforts will be successful or that we will be able to develop commercial applications for our
products and technologies. Further, the areas in which we are developing technologies and products are characterized by rapid and
significant technological change. Rapid technological development may result in our products becoming obsolete or noncompetitive.
If future products based on our technologies cannot be developed for manufacture and sold commercially or our products become obsolete
or noncompetitive, we may be unable to recover our investments or achieve profitability. In addition, the commercialization schedule
may be delayed if we experience delays in meeting development goals, if products based on our technologies exhibit technical defects,
or if we are unable to meet cost or performance goals. In this event, potential purchasers of products based on our technologies
may choose alternative technologies and any delays could allow potential competitors to gain market advantages.
There is no assurance
that the market will accept our products once development has been completed which could have an adverse effect on our business.
There can be no assurance
that products based on our technologies will be perceived as being superior to existing products or new products being developed
by competing companies or that such products will otherwise be accepted by consumers. The market prices for products based on our
technologies may exceed the prices of competitive products based on existing technologies or new products based on technologies
currently under development by competitors. There can be no assurance that the prices of products based on our technologies will
be perceived by consumers as cost-effective or that the prices of such products will be competitive with existing products or with
other new products or technologies. If consumers do not accept products based on our technologies, we may be unable to recover
our investments or achieve profitability.
Other companies,
many of which have greater resources than we have, may develop competing products or technologies which cause products based on
our technologies to become noncompetitive which could have an adverse effect on our business.
We will be competing with
firms, both domestic and foreign, that perform research and development, as well as firms that manufacture and sell solar products.
In addition, we expect additional potential competitors to enter the markets for solar products in the future. Some of these current
and potential competitors are among the largest industrial companies in the world with longer operating histories, greater name
recognition, access to larger customer bases, well-established business organizations and product lines and significantly greater
resources and research and development staff and facilities. There can be no assurance that one or more such companies will not
succeed in developing technologies or products that will become available for commercial sale prior to our products, that will
have performance superior to products based on our technologies or that would otherwise render our products noncompetitive. If
we fail to compete successfully, our business would suffer and we may lose or be unable to gain market share.
The loss of strategic
relationships used in the development of our thin film manufacturing technologies and products could impede our ability to complete
the development of our products and have a material adverse effect on our business.
We have established a
plan of operations under which a portion of our operations rely on strategic relationships with third parties, to provide systems
design, assembly and support. A loss of any of our third party relationships for any reason could cause us to experience difficulties
in implementing our business strategy. There can be no assurance that we could establish other relationships of adequate expertise
in a timely manner or at all.
We may suffer the loss of key personnel
or may be unable to attract and retain qualified personnel to maintain and expand our business which could have a material adverse
effect on our business.
Our success is highly
dependent on the continued services of a limited number of skilled managers, scientists, technicians, and access to qualified consultants.
The loss of any of these individuals or resources could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, our success will depend
upon, among other factors, the recruitment and retention of additional highly skilled and experienced management and technical
personnel. There can be no assurance that we will be able to retain existing employees or to attract and retain additional personnel
on acceptable terms given the competition for such personnel in industrial, academic and nonprofit research sectors.
We may not be successful in protecting
our intellectual property and proprietary rights and may be required to expend significant amounts of money and time in attempting
to protect these rights. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights, our competitive position
in the market could suffer.
Our intellectual property
consists of patent applications, trade secrets, and trade dress. Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain patents and
maintain adequate protection of our other intellectual property for our technologies and products in the U.S. and in other countries.
The laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the U.S., and many companies
have encountered significant problems in protecting their proprietary rights in these foreign countries. These problems may be
caused by, among other factors, a lack of rules and methods for defending intellectual property rights. Also, the costs associated
with the development of intellectual property rights can be significant and the Company may not be able to pursue rights initially
in every region that may pose competitive challenges to us.
Our future commercial
success requires us not to infringe on patents and proprietary rights of third parties, or breach any licenses or other agreements
that we have entered into with respect to our technologies, products and businesses. The enforceability of patent positions cannot
be predicted with certainty. We intend to apply for patents covering both our technologies and our products, if any, as we deem
appropriate. Patents, if issued, may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. There can be no assurance that no other relevant
patents have been issued that could block our ability to obtain patents or to operate as we would like. Others may develop similar
technologies or may duplicate technologies developed by us.
We are not currently a
party to any litigation with respect to any of our patent positions or trade secrets. However, if we become involved in litigation
or interference proceedings declared by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, or other intellectual property proceedings
outside of the U.S., we might have to spend significant amounts of money to defend our intellectual property rights. If any of
our competitors file patent applications or obtain patents that claim inventions or other rights also claimed by us, we may have
to participate in interference proceedings declared by the relevant patent regulatory agency to determine priority of invention
and our right to a patent of these inventions in the U.S. Even if the outcome is favorable, such proceedings might result in substantial
costs to us, including, significant legal fees and other expenses, diversion of management time and disruption of our business.
Even if successful on priority grounds, an interference proceeding may result in loss of claims based on patentability grounds
raised in the interference proceeding. Uncertainties resulting from initiation and continuation of any patent or related litigation
also might harm our ability to continue our research or to bring products to market.
An adverse ruling arising
out of any intellectual property dispute, including an adverse decision as to the priority of our inventions would undercut or
invalidate our intellectual property position. An adverse ruling also could subject us to significant liability for damages, prevent
us from using certain processes or products, or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements with third parties. Furthermore,
necessary licenses may not be available to us on satisfactory terms, or at all.
Confidentiality agreements with employees
and others may not adequately prevent disclosure of trade secrets and other proprietary information.
To protect our proprietary
technologies and processes, we rely on trade secret protection as well as on formal legal devices such as patents. Although we
have taken security measures to protect our trade secrets and other proprietary information, these measures may not provide adequate
protection for such information. Our policy is to execute confidentiality and proprietary information agreements with each of our
employees and consultants upon the commencement of an employment or consulting arrangement with us. These agreements generally
require that all confidential information developed by the individual or made known to the individual by us during the course of
the individual’s relationship with us be kept confidential and not be disclosed to third parties. These agreements also generally
provide that technology conceived by the individual in the course of rendering services to us shall be our exclusive property.
Even though these agreements are in place there can be no assurances that that trade secrets and proprietary information will not
be disclosed, that others will not independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or otherwise
gain access to our trade secrets, or that we can fully protect our trade secrets and proprietary information. Violations by others
of our confidentiality agreements and the loss of employees who have specialized knowledge and expertise could
harm our competitive position and cause our
sales and operating results to decline as a result of increased competition. Costly and time-consuming litigation might be necessary
to enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights, and failure to obtain or maintain trade secret protection might adversely
affect our ability to continue our research or bring products to market.
Downturns in general economic conditions
could adversely affect our profitability.
Downturns in general economic
conditions can cause fluctuations in demand for our products, product prices, volumes and margins. Future economic conditions may
not be favorable to our industry. A decline in the demand for our products or a shift to lower-margin products due to deteriorating
economic conditions could adversely affect sales of our intended products and our profitability and could also result in impairments
of certain of our assets.
Market demand and finished product pricing
conditions could adversely affect the demand for our technology, its competitive position, and collectively our ability to commercialize
our technology and any potential for future profitability.
We believe that a risk
posing both the Company, and the thin film solar product market, will continue to be further and prolonged market price reductions
from manufacturers of silicon solar technologies. While the primary cause for price reductions appears to be over supply which
has also caused significant loses for many manufacturers the trend of oversupply may continue for the foreseeable future. Many
of the companies within the silicon industry have greater resources to devote to research, development, manufacturing and marketing
than we do. These factors may cause a decline in interest in our technologies and pose significant threats to our ability to successfully
commercialize our technologies.
Standards for compliance
with section 404 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 are uncertain, and if we fail to comply in a timely manner, our business could
be harmed and our stock price could decline.
This annual report does
not include an attestation report of the company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial
reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules
of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management's report in this annual report.
The
standards that must be met for management to assess the internal control over financial reporting as effective are new and complex,
and require significant documentation, testing and possible remediation to meet the detailed standards and will impose significant
additional expenses on us. We may encounter problems or delays in completing activities necessary to make an assessment of our
internal control over financial reporting. If we cannot assess our internal control over financial reporting as effective, investor
confidence and share value may be negatively impacted.
Our common stock
is considered a “Penny Stock” and as a result, related broker-dealer requirements affect its trading and liquidity.
Our common stock is considered
to be a “penny stock” since it meets one or more of the definitions in Rules 15g-2 through 15g-6 promulgated under
Section 15(g) of the Exchange Act. These include but are not limited to the following: (i) the common stock trades at
a price less than $5.00 per share; (ii) the common stock is not traded on a “recognized” national exchange; (iii) the
common stock is not quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Market, or (iv) the common stock is issued by a company with average revenues
of less than $6.0 million for the past three (3) years. The principal result or effect of being designated a “penny
stock” is that securities broker-dealers cannot recommend our Common Stock to investors, thus hampering its liquidity.
Section 15(g) and
Rule 15g-2 require broker-dealers dealing in penny stocks to provide potential investors with documentation disclosing the
risks of penny stocks and to obtain a manually signed and dated written receipt of the documents before effecting any transaction
in a penny stock for the investor’s account. Potential investors in our Common Stock are urged to obtain and read such disclosure
carefully before purchasing any of our shares.
Moreover, Rule 15g-9
requires broker-dealers in penny stocks to approve the account of any investor for transactions in such stocks before selling any
penny stock to that investor. This procedure requires the broker-dealer to (i) obtain from the investor information concerning
his or her financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives; (ii) reasonably determine, based on that
information, that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for the investor and that the investor has sufficient knowledge and
experience as to be reasonably capable of evaluating the risks of penny stock transactions; (iii) provide the investor with
a written statement setting forth the basis on which the broker-dealer made the determination in (ii) above; and (iv) receive
a signed and dated copy of such statement from the investor, confirming that it accurately reflects the investor’s financial
situation, investment experience and investment objectives.
The trading market in our common stock
is limited and may cause volatility in the market price.
Our common stock is currently
traded on a limited basis on the OTCBB. The OTCBB is an inter-dealer, over-the-counter market that provides significantly less
liquidity than the NASDAQ Stock Market and the other national markets. Quotes for stocks included on the OTCBB are not listed in
the financial sections of newspapers as are those for the NASDAQ Stock Market. Therefore, prices for securities traded solely on
the OTCBB may be difficult to obtain.
The quotation of our common
stock on the OTCBB does not assure that a meaningful, consistent and liquid trading market currently exists, and in recent years
such market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have particularly affected the market prices of many smaller
companies like us. Thus, the market price for our common stock is subject to volatility and holders of common stock may be unable
to resell their shares at or near their original purchase price or at any price. In the absence of an active trading market:
|
•
|
investors may have difficulty buying and selling or obtaining market quotations;
|
|
•
|
market visibility for our common stock may be limited; and
|
|
•
|
a lack of visibility for our common stock may have a depressive effect on the market for our common stock.
|
Due to the low price of
the securities, many brokerage firms may not be willing to effect transactions in the securities. Even if a purchaser finds a broker
willing to effect a transaction in these securities, the combination of brokerage commissions, state transfer taxes, if any, and
any other selling costs may exceed the selling price. Further, many lending institutions will not permit the use of such securities
as collateral for any loans. Such restrictions could have a materially adverse effect on our business.
We may have difficulty raising necessary
capital to fund operations as a result of market price volatility for our shares of common stock.
The market price of our
common stock is likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in price in response to various factors, many of which
are beyond our control, including:
|
•
|
technological innovations or new products and services by us or our competitors;
|
|
•
|
additions or departures of key personnel;
|
|
•
|
sales of our common stock;
|
|
•
|
our ability to integrate operations, technology, products and services;
|
|
•
|
our ability to execute our business plan;
|
|
•
|
operating results below expectations;
|
|
•
|
loss of any strategic relationship;
|
|
•
|
economic and other external factors; and
|
|
•
|
period-to-period fluctuations in our financial results.
|
Because we have a limited
operating history with limited revenues to date, you may consider any one of these factors to be material. Our stock price may
fluctuate widely as a result of any of the above listed factors. In recent years, the securities markets in the United
States have experienced a high level of price and volume volatility, and the market price of securities of many companies have
experienced wide fluctuations that have not necessarily been related to the operations, performances, underlying asset values or
prospects of such companies. For these reasons, our shares of common stock can also be expected to be subject to volatility resulting
from purely market forces over which we will have no control. If our business development plans are successful, we will require
additional financing to continue to develop and exploit existing and new technologies and to expand into new markets. The exploitation
of our technologies may, therefore, be dependent upon our ability to obtain financing through debt, equity or other means.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
As of the date of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K, there are no unresolved staff comments regarding our previously filed periodic or current reports under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Item 2. Properties
California Corporate Office Lease
The Company leases limited
facilities in Aliso Viejo, CA. At the lease rate of approximately $200 per month, and has subleased
approximately 2,000 square feet of commercial
manufacturing space for the assembly and testing of its CIGSolar technologies in Irvine, CA at the lease rate of $3,000 per month
plus a one-time payment of 500,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock. We intend to operate in these facilities
for up to one year prior to locating, as and if necessary, to larger and permanent facilities.
The Company owns no real property.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary conduct
of our business, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of business.
However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to
time that may harm our business. We are currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have,
individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results. However,
in the period ended June 30, 2012 we did elect to settle the following claim;
On June 27, 2012, the
Company issued an aggregate of 27,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, no par value per share, to Ironridge Global
IV, Ltd., in settlement of approximate $494,561 in accounts payable of the Company. The transaction thereby substantially reduced
the Company’s liabilities, including its outstanding accounts payable balance associated with the assembly of the Company’s
CIGSolar™ thermal evaporation technology. The shares were issued pursuant to an Order for Approval of Stipulation for Settlement
of Claims between the Company and Ironridge, in settlement of the
bona fide
accounts payable of the Company, which had been
purchased by Ironridge from certain creditors of the Company, in an amount equal to the Accounts Payable, plus fees and costs.
Please see (On June 27, 2012, XsunX, Inc. - Ironridge Global IV, Ltd. under Section II, Item 5., Recent Sales
of Securities) below for a detailed description of the transaction.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Price Range of Common Stock
The Company’s common stock trades on
the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “XSNX”. The range of high, low and close quotations for the Company’s
common stock by fiscal quarter within the last two fiscal years, as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board, was as follows:
Year Ended September 30, 2012
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Close
|
|
First Quarter ended December 31, 2011
|
|
|
0.070
|
|
|
|
0.020
|
|
|
|
0.023
|
|
Second Quarter ended March 31, 2012
|
|
|
0.050
|
|
|
|
0.020
|
|
|
|
0.034
|
|
Third Quarter ended June 30, 2012
|
|
|
0.037
|
|
|
|
0.019
|
|
|
|
0.028
|
|
Fourth Quarter ended September 30, 2012
|
|
|
0.068
|
|
|
|
0.025
|
|
|
|
0.028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
Second Quarter ended March 31, 2011
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
Third Quarter ended June 30, 2011
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
Fourth Quarter ended September 30, 2011
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
The market price for our
common stock, like that of other technology companies, is highly volatile and is subject to fluctuations in response to variations
in our operating results, announcements related to technological innovation or business development, or other events and factors.
Our stock price may also be affected by broader market trends unrelated to our performance.
The above quotations reflect
inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down, or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
Number of Holders
As of September 30, 2012,
there were approximately 846 record holders of the Company’s common stock, not counting shares held in “street name”
in brokerage accounts, which is unknown. As of September 30, 2012, there were 281,233,150 shares of common stock outstanding on
record with the Company’s stock transfer agent, Island Stock Transfer. On September 30, 2012 the last reported sales price
of our common stock on the OTCBB was approximately $0.028 per share.
Transfer Agent
Our transfer agent
is Island Stock Transfer located at 15500 Roosevelt
Boulevard, Suite 301, Clearwater, Florida 33760, Office phone: 727-289-0010| Fax: 727-289-0069
Dividends
The Company has not declared or paid any cash
dividends on its common stock and does not anticipate paying dividends for the foreseeable future.
Stock Option Plan
On
January 5, 2007, the Board of Directors of XsunX resolved to establish the Company’s 2007 Stock Option Plan to enable the
Company to obtain and retain the services of the types of employees, consultants and directors who could contribute to the Company’s
long range success and to provide incentives which are linked directly to increases in share value which will inure to the benefit
of all stockholders of the Company.
Options granted under the Plan may be either Incentive Options or Nonqualified Options
and shall be administered by the Company's Board of Directors ("Board"). Each Option shall be exercisable to the nearest
whole share, in installments or otherwise, as the respective Option agreements may provide. Notwithstanding any other provision
of the Plan or of any Option agreement, each Option shall expire on the date specified in the Option agreement.
A
total of 20,000,000 shares of common stock are authorized under the plan.
Stock Compensation, Issuance of Stock Purchase Options
During the fiscal year ended September 30,
2012 one million five hundred thousand options were granted.
Table of Equity Compensation
The following table sets
forth summary information, as of September 30, 2012, concerning securities authorized for issuance under all equity compensation
plans and agreements for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, and 2011 is as follows:
Risk free interest rate
|
0.82%
|
Stock volatility factor
|
89.22%
|
Weighted average expected option life
|
5 years
|
Expected dividend yield
|
None
|
A summary of the Company’s
stock option activity and related information follows:
|
|
9/30/2012
|
|
9/30/2011
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Number
|
|
average
|
|
Number
|
|
average
|
|
|
of
|
|
exercise
|
|
of
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
Options
|
|
price
|
|
Options
|
|
price
|
Outstanding, beginning of the period
|
|
|
21,180,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.210
|
|
|
|
10,180,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
0.045
|
|
|
|
11,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(14,680,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.014
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Outstanding, end of the period
|
|
|
8,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.210
|
|
|
|
21,180,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the period
|
|
|
6,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.270
|
|
|
|
8,544,159
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
Weighted average fair value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
options granted during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
The weighted average remaining
contractual life of options outstanding issued under the plan as of September 30, 2012 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Stock
|
|
Remaining
|
Exercisable
|
|
Options
|
|
Options
|
|
Contractual
|
Prices
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Life (years)
|
$
|
0.360
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
0.06 years
|
$
|
0.360
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
0.06 years
|
$
|
0.360
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
0.12 years
|
$
|
0.360
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
0.16 years
|
$
|
0.160
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
1.50 years
|
$
|
0.100
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
3.05 years
|
$
|
0.045
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
4.28 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000,000
|
|
|
|
8,000,000
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
expense recognized during the period is based on the value of the portion of stock-based payment awards that is ultimately expected
to vest. Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the financial statements of operations during the year ended September
30, 2012, included compensation expense for the stock-based payment awards granted prior to, but not yet vested, as of September
30, 2012 based on the grant date fair value estimated, and compensation expense for the stock-based payment awards granted subsequent
to September 30, 2012, based on the grant date fair value estimated. We account for forfeitures as they occur. The stock-based
compensation expense recognized in the statement of operations during the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $129,834
and $186,016, respectively.
Warrants
A summary of the Company’s
warrants activity and related information follows:
|
|
9/30/2012
|
|
9/30/2011
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Number
|
|
average
|
|
Number
|
|
average
|
|
|
of
|
|
exercise
|
|
of
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
Options
|
|
price
|
|
Options
|
|
price
|
Outstanding, beginning of the period
|
|
|
8,583,332
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
4,195,332
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
6,363,637
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(11,363,637
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
(5,000,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
Expired
|
|
|
(250,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
(612,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.73
|
)
|
Outstanding, end of the period
|
|
|
3,333,332
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
8,583,332
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
Exercisable at the end of period
|
|
|
3,333,332
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
8,583,332
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
Weighted average fair value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
warrants granted during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
At September 30, 2012,
the weighted average remaining contractual life of warrants outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
Exercisable
|
|
Warrants
|
|
Warrants
|
|
Contractual
|
Prices
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Life (years)
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
1,666,666
|
|
|
|
1,666,666
|
|
|
0.08 years
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
1,666,666
|
|
|
|
1,666,666
|
|
|
0.08 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,333,332
|
|
|
|
3,333,332
|
|
|
|
Recent Sales of Securities (Registered and Unregistered)
The
authorized Common stock of the Company was established at 500,000,000 shares with no par value.
The Company is also
authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 per share. The rights, preferences and privileges
of the holders of the preferred stock will be determined by the Board of Directors prior to issuance of such shares.
The
following represents a detailed analysis of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 Common stock transactions.
On November 3, 2011, in
exchange for promissory note (the “Note”) of $456,920 plus accrued interest of $98,645 that had become due at September
1, 2011, the Company issued 7,000,000 restricted shares of common stock as payment for the reduction of $205,565 of principal and
accrued interest balance under the Note, and exchanged the Note for and issued a new unsecured promissory exchange note (the “Exchange
Note”) in the amount of $350,000.
In February 2012 the Company
accepted an offer for the sale of 1,666,667 units composed of one share of restricted common stock and a five year warrant exercisable
to purchase two shares of Common Stock at $0.015 per share for cash of $25,000. In March 2012 the Company accepted an offer for
the sale of 1,515,152 units composed of one share of restricted common stock and a five year warrant exercisable to purchase two
shares of Common Stock at $0.0165 per share for cash of $25,000. The above shares were issued in a transactions exempt from registration
pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
During the year ended
September 30, 2012, the Company entered into Securities Purchase Agreements (the "Purchase Agreements") each providing
for the sale by the Company of 8% unsecured Convertible Notes (“the Notes”) in the principal amounts of $53,000, $42,500,
$32,500, $37,500, $37,500, $32,500,$37,500, and $37,500 for an aggregate total of $310,500. During the year ended September 30,
2012 the holder convert an aggregate of $143,000 of principal and $5,120 in accrued interest retiring the first three notes and
portions of the fourth. Upon conversion, the Company issued an aggregate of 8,741,825 shares respectively of common voting stock
to the holder. The remaining Notes mature on December 19, 2012, January 20, 2013, March 6, 2013, April 3, 2013, and May 30, 2013.
The Company has the right to redeem a portion or all amounts outstanding under the any Note prior to one hundred and eighty one
days from issuance of the Note under a variable redemption rate premium. After one hundred and eighty days the holder may convert
into shares of common stock at a variable conversion price of 60% multiplied by the market price of the average lowest three (3)
trading prices for the common stock during the ten (10) trading days prior to the conversion date.
On June 27, 2012, XsunX,
Inc. (the “Company”) issued an aggregate of 27,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, no par value per
share (the “Initial Shares”), to Ironridge Global IV, Ltd. (“Ironridge”), in settlement of approximate
$494,561 in accounts payable of the Company (the “Accounts Payable”). The transaction thereby substantially reduced
the Company’s liabilities, including its outstanding accounts payable balance associated with the assembly of the Company’s
CIGSolar™ thermal evaporation technology.
The Initial Shares were
issued pursuant to an Order for Approval of Stipulation for Settlement of Claims (the “Order”) between the Company
and Ironridge, in settlement of the
bona fide
accounts payable of the Company, which had been purchased by Ironridge from
certain creditors of the Company, in an amount equal to the Accounts Payable, plus fees and costs. The Order was entered by the
Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Central District on June 26, 2012.
The Order also provides
for an adjustment in the total number of shares which may be issuable to Ironridge based on a calculation period for the transaction,
defined as that number of consecutive trading days following the date on which the Initial Shares were issued (the “Issuance
Date”) required for the aggregate trading volume of the Common Stock, as reported by Bloomberg LP, to exceed $2.5 million
(the “Calculation Period”). Pursuant to the Order, Ironridge will retain 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s Common
Stock, plus that number of shares (the “Final Amount”) with an aggregate value equal to (a) the sum of the Accounts
Payable plus 8% agent fee and reasonable attorney fees through the end of the Calculation Period, (b) divided by 80% of the following:
the volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of the Common Stock over the length of the Calculation Period, as reported
by Bloomberg, not to exceed the arithmetic average of the individual daily VWAPs of any five trading days during the Calculation
Period. The Order further provides that during the Calculation Period, or if at any time during such period a daily VWAP is below
80% of the closing price on the day before the issuance date, or if the Initial Shares are less than any reasonable Final Amount,
the Company will issue additional shares (each, an “Additional Issuance”), subject to a 9.99% beneficial ownership
limitation specified in the Order. The Company has reserved from its duly authorized capital stock twice the number of shares that
could be issued pursuant to the Order based on the most recent daily VWAP at the time of the Order and will, if necessary, increase
the number of shares reserved based on the lowest daily VWAP during the Calculation Period. At the end of the Calculation Period,
(a) if the sum of the Initial Shares and any
Additional Issuance is
less than the Final Amount, the Company shall issue additional shares to Ironridge, up to the Final Amount, and (b) if the sum
of the Initial Shares and any Additional Issuance is greater than the Final Amount, Ironridge shall promptly return any remaining
shares to the Company and its transfer agent for cancellation.
In connection with the
transaction, Ironridge represented that it does not hold any short position in the company’s stock, and warranted that it
would not to engage in or affect, directly or indirectly, any short sale of the common stock.
The issuance is exempt
from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) thereof, as an issuance
of securities in exchange for bona fide outstanding claims, where the terms and conditions of such issuance are approved by a court
after a hearing upon the fairness of such terms and conditions.
Pursuant to a Securities
Purchase Agreement entered into between the Company and Lincoln Park Capital Group, LLC (LPC) in March 2010 under which an S-1
Registration Statement was declared effective by the SEC on June 30, 2010, and a Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 registration was
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 4, 2011, over a 25 month period the Company had sold to
Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC approximately 12,410,184 shares for a total investment of $1,125,000. These shares were sold at
various pricing between $0.08 and $0.10 per share. An additional 1,423,608 shares were provided to LPC as a financing commitment
fee. The agreement with Lincoln Park expired in April 2012 and the registration statement is not available for use for sales to
Lincoln Park.
Issuance of Shares for Services
Between February and August
2012, the Company issued 1,450,078 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to two services providers for services
at fair value of $44,500. In May 2012 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock were issued to a scientific
consultant for $7,500 in services related to a special assembly project and twelve months of consulting services valued at $60,000.
In July 2012 as part of an amendment to facility lease terms that provided for the increase in usable space the Company issued
500,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock as partial payment for the ensuing 12-month lease commencing July
1, 2012 to the property owner. The above shares were issued in a transactions exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2)
of the Securities Act.
Use of Proceeds from the Sale of Securities
The proceeds from the
above sales of securities were and are being used primarily to fund efforts by the Company to develop marketable technologies for
the manufacture of thin film solar technologies, and in the day-to-day operations of the Company and to pay the accrued liabilities
associated with these operations.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
N/A
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of
Operations
Cautionary and Forward-Looking Statements
The following discussion
and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition to historical consolidated
financial information, the following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties
and assumptions as described under the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” that appears earlier
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated by these forward-looking
statements as a result of many factors, including those discussed under “Item 1A: Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly
revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date hereof. Readers should carefully
review the factors described in other documents the Company files from time to
time with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
including the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Annual Report on Form 10-K filed and any Current Reports on Form 8-K filed by
the Company.
Business Overview
XsunX,
Inc. is developing and has begun to market a hybrid manufacturing solution to produce high performance Copper Indium Gallium (di)
Selenide (CIGS) thin film solar cells. Our patent pending processing technology, which we call CIGSolar®, focuses on the mass
production of individual thin-film CIGS solar cells that match silicon solar cell dimensions and can be offered as a non-toxic,
high-efficiency and lowest-cost alternative to the use of silicon solar cells. We intend to offer licenses for the use of the CIGSolar®
process technology thereby generating revenue streams through licensing fees and manufacturing royalties for the use of the technology.
Our
efforts have been focused on the development and customization of a series of specialized processing tools that when combined provide
a turn-key high-throughput manufacturing system to produce CIGS solar cells.
Core
attributes to our process method are the use of small area thermal co-evaporation techniques coupled with state-of-the-art sputter
deposition technologies to improve manufacturing output, increase cell efficiency, production yields, and lower the costs for the
production of high efficiency CIGS cells.
There
are five (5) core process tools that when combined will produce 156mm format (about 6” square) solar cells. We believe that
it will be the ability of our system to minimize processing defects while maintaining exceptional per hour production rates that
will provide superior commercial opportunities. CIGSolar® cells will be manufactured on stainless steel squares sized to match
silicon solar cells currently used in more than 75% of all solar modules manufactured today.
This
innovative approach bridges the gap between inexpensive thin-film and costly high efficiency silicon wafer technologies to produce
a new breed of solar cell combining what we believe are the best attributes of each technology. The mass production of individual,
high performance CIGS solar cells – like solar building blocks – we believe will allow solar power to finally compete
effectively against other sources of electrical energy.
Plan of Operations
For
the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013, the Company has developed a plan of operations
focused on completing the assembly
of its multi-chamber CIGSolar® thermal co-evaporation system and the subsequent testing and calibration of the system necessary
to operate and allow the system to produce marketable samples of its manufacturing capabilities. The purpose of these efforts is
to provide hands-on access to interested customers of a production-sized multi-chamber CIGSolar® system. Working with third
party systems suppliers who will ultimately provide several of the support systems within our CIGSolar® system configuration
we plan to establish limited scale
pilot CIGS solar cell production capabilities to enhance marketing
and sales efforts, continued
CIGSolar®
process improvement, and to support general business
development efforts related to the commercialization of our CIGS solar cell manufacturing technology.
Our
Plan of Operations, based upon the aforementioned activities, excluding non-cash operating expenses, requires $360,000 for general
and administrative activities, $165,000 to support increased sales and marketing efforts, and $495,000 to expand the scope
and capabilities of our limited scale production system through the addition of process support tools, and to add additional
full time technical staff to provide continued process development and improvement under our technology license model, and
for support purposes of the systems that may be placed in the field as we work to commercialize our
CIGSolar®
manufacturing technology. However the cash flow requirements associated with the completion of these efforts, and
the transition to revenue recognition may continue to exceed cash generated from operations in the current and future
periods. If we are unable to complete a sale of our technology and transition to revenue recognition prior to completion of
this plan we will need to obtain additional financing from other sources or adjust the timing of our plans. However, we have
been able to raise capital in a series of equity and debt offerings in the past. While there can be no assurances that we
will be able to obtain additional financing, on terms acceptable to us and at the times required, or at all, we believe that
sufficient capital can be raised in the foreseeable future as necessary.
The Company may change
any or all of the budget categories in the execution of its business attempts. None of the items is to be considered fixed or unchangeable.
Management believes the
summary data and audit presented herein is a fair presentation of the Company’s results of operations for the periods presented.
Due to the Company’s change in primary business focus and new business opportunities these historical results may not necessarily
be indicative of results to be expected for any future period. As such, future results of the Company may differ significantly
from previous periods.
Results of Operations for the Fiscal Year Ended September
30, 2012 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2011.
Revenue and Cost of Sale
s:
The Company
generated no revenues in the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, and 2011. There were no associated costs of goods sold in any
of the fiscal periods represented above. The Company to date has had minimal revenue and cost of sales, and is still in the development
stage.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses:
Selling, General
and Administrative (SG&A) expenses decreased by $(300,913) during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 to $645,546 as
compared to $946,459 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. The decrease in SG&A expenses was related primarily to
a general reduction to salaries, staffing, and operating expenses under the Company’s re-focused plan of operations for
the development of a new CIGSolar® thin film solar manufacturing technology.
We anticipate
that expenditures associated with the commercial development and sales of our thin-film solar manufacturing technologies will
increase SG&A expenditures in the future. However, we plan to offer our technology as a licensable process to existing solar
product manufacturers which we anticipate will mitigate future expenditures that would normally be associated with our need to
establish direct large scale manufacturing capabilities and the associated facility infrastructure.
Research and Development:
Research and development
decreased by $(159,819) during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 to $122,673 as compared to $282,492 for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2011. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in research related employees used in the period on the
development of our new thin film solar manufacturing technology CIGSolar®. During the fiscal year while reducing direct research
development costs we focused resources on the assembly and customization of a specialized multi-chamber processing tool that incorporates
our patent pending processing technology to provide a turn-key high-throughput manufacturing system to produce the CIGS thin film
solar absorber. We anticipate that future R&D expense will again increase as we complete this process and work to further develop
and improve this processing technology.
Net Loss:
For the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2012, our net loss was $(1,555,194) as compared to a net loss of $(1,117,654) for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2011.The increase in net loss of $(437,540) primarily stems from a loss on settlement of debt in the current period. This debt
was primarily attributed to the costs associated with the assembly of our multi-chamber CIGSolar processing system. The Company
anticipates the trend of losses to continue in future periods until the Company can recognize sales of significance of which there
is no assurance.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We had a working
capital deficit at September 30, 2012 of $(544,939), as compared to a working capital deficit of $(654,041) as of September 30,
2011. The decrease of $(109,102) in working capital deficit was the result of an increase in prepaid expenses, with a decrease
in cash, accounts payable, and accrued expenses. There was no revenue producing activities for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2012.
Cash flow used
by operating activities was $(379,240) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, as compared to cash flow used by operating
activities of $(1,117,818) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. The decrease in cash flow used of $(738,578) by operating
activities was primarily due to a net change in non-cash expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses and prepaid expenses.
Cash flow used
by investing activities was $(3,309) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, as compared to cash flow provided in investing activities
of $158,972 during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. The net change in investing activities was primarily due to proceeds
received of $17,000 from the sale of certain assets, and a deposit refunded due to cancellation of a purchase order in the amount
of $230,000, offset by a payment made on a purchase order of $(81,975), and the purchase of fixed assets of $(6,053) in the prior
fiscal year.
Cash flow provided
by financing activities was $360,500 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, as compared to cash provided by financing activities
of $825,000 during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. The decrease in cash flow provided by financing activities was the
result of a reduction to cash provided through equity financing. Our capital needs have primarily been met from the proceeds of
private placements, and convertible notes as we are currently in the development stage and had no revenues.
The Company is
currently engaged in efforts to develop a thin film solar manufacturing technology that we believe provides an opportunity for
XsunX to establish a competitive advantage within the solar industry. However the cash flow requirements associated with the completion
of these development efforts, and the transition to revenue recognition will exceed cash generated from operations in the current
and future periods. We will need to seek to obtain additional financing from equity and/or debt placements. We have been able
to raise capital in a series of equity and debt offerings in the past. While there can be no assurances that we will be able to
obtain
such additional financing, on terms acceptable to us and at the times required, or at all, we believe that sufficient capital can
be raised in the foreseeable future as necessary.
For the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013
the Company has developed a plan of operations focused on the assembly of a multi-chamber CIGSolar® thermal co-evaporation
system to provide hands-on access to interested customers of a production-sized multi-chamber CIGSolar® system. Our plan requires
$360,000 for general and administrative activities, $165,000 to support increased sales and marketing efforts, and $495,000 to
expand the scope and capabilities of our limited scale production system through the addition of process support tools, and to
add additional full time technical staff to provide continued process development and improvement under our technology license
model, and for support purposes of the systems that may be placed in the field as we work to commercialize our CIGSolar® manufacturing
technology. To accomplish this plan we have engaged and plan to continue to engage consultants, equipment vendors, and component
manufacturers to assist in the supply of materials and assembly of our system. However the cash flow requirements associated with
the completion of these efforts, and the transition to revenue recognition may continue to exceed cash generated from operations
in the current and future periods. If we are unable to complete a sale of our technology and transition to revenue recognition
prior to completion of this plan we will need to obtain additional financing from other sources or adjust the timing of our plans.
However, we have been able to raise capital in a series of equity and debt offerings in the past. While there can be no assurances
that we will be able to obtain additional financing, on terms acceptable to us and at the times required, or at all, we believe
that sufficient capital can be raised in the foreseeable future as necessary.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any relationships
with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose
entities that would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance-sheet arrangements or for other contractually
narrow or limited purposes. As such, we are not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if
we had engaged in such relationships.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
Our products will be quoted
for sale and licensure in United States dollars and as our business development efforts progress we anticipate the sale and/or
licensure of our products to foreign entities. To the extent that we may be exposed to foreign currency risks related to the rise
and/or fall of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar we will report in United States dollars.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
All financial information
required by this Item is attached hereto at the end of this report beginning on page F-1 and is hereby incorporated by reference.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
Effective as of July 17,
2009, the board of directors of the Company approved the engagement of HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP (“HJ”)
as its principal independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Company’s financial statements. During the Company’s
two (2) most recent fiscal years, as well as the subsequent interim period through the Effective Date, there were no disagreements
between the Company and HJ on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope
or procedures, which disagreements if not resolved to their satisfaction would have caused them to make reference to the subject
matter of the disagreement in connection with HJ’s report. During the Company’s most recent two (2) fiscal years, as
well as the subsequent interim period through the Effective Date, HJ did not advise the Company of any of the matters identified
in Item 304(a)(v)(A) - (D) of Regulation S-K.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer
has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. The evaluation included certain control areas in which
we have made, and are continuing to make, changes to improve and enhance controls. A material weakness is a condition in which
the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that
misstatements caused by error or fraud in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited
may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions.
Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period,
our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, and we have discovered no material weakness.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible
for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control structure and procedures over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15d-15(f)) under the Exchange Act. The SEC rule making for the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Section 404 requires that a company's
internal controls over financial reporting be based upon a recognized internal control
framework. Our management conducted an assessment
of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012 based on the framework set forth
in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(“COSO”) that has been modified to more appropriately reflect the current limited operational scope of the Company
as a Development Stage company. The Company used the COSO guide - The Internal Control over Financial Reporting - Guidance for
Smaller Public Companies to implement the Company’s internal control framework. Additionally, the limited scope of operations
of the Company means that traditional separation of duties controls are not used by the Company as a result of the limited staffing
within the Company. The Company relies on alternative procedures to overcome this non-material control weakness.
During the
Company's fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, management continued to assess the Company's internal and controls procedure
documents basing any need for revision upon additional guidance for implementing the model framework created by COSO as is
appropriate to our operations and operations of smaller public entities. This framework is entitled Internal
Control-Integrated Framework. The COSO Framework, which is the common shortened title, was published in 1992 and has been
updated, and we believe will satisfy the SEC requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. As the Company
expands operations, additional staff will be added to implement separation of duties controls as well.
Based on that evaluation,
our Chief Executive Officer concluded that our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012 was effective. Internal
control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent
limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject
to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material
misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Except as noted above, there have not been
any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the
Exchange Act) during our fourth fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
Auditors Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
This annual report does
not include an attestation report of the company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial
reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the company to provide only management's report in this annual report.
Item 9B. Other Information
On November 7, 2012, XsunX,
Inc. (the "Company") consummated a Securities Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") providing for the
sale by the Company of 8% unsecured Convertible Note in the principal amount of $37,500 (the “Note”) which amount was
advanced immediately at the time of the sale. The Note matures on August 7, 2013 Note. The Company has the right to redeem a portion
or all amounts outstanding under the either Note prior to one hundred and eighty one days from issuance of the Note under a variable
redemption rate premium. After one hundred and eighty days the holder may convert into shares of common stock at a conversion price
of sixty percent of the average lowest three closing bid prices for the common stock, during the ten trading day period ending
on the latest complete trading day prior to the conversion date. The holder has certain rights of first refusal related to financings
of less than seventy five thousand dollars by the Company, and in the event of certain default conditions the Company may be subject
a default premium of fifty percent.
Subsequent to the end
of the year ended September 30, 2012, a holder of Securities Purchase Agreements (the "Purchase Agreements") each providing
for the sale by the Company of 8% unsecured Convertible Notes (“the Notes”) in the principal amounts of $37,500 of
which $22,500 remained, $37,500, and $32,500 converted the total remaining principal of $92,500 of principal and $4,800 in accrued
interest retiring the notes. Upon conversion, the Company issued an aggregate of 9,265,139 shares respectively of common voting
stock to the holder.
In exchange for a promissory note (the “Note”) of $350,000 plus accrued interest of $35,863 that
had become due at September 30, 2012, the Company issued a new unsecured promissory exchange note (the “Exchange Note”)
in the amount of $385,863 in November 2012. The Holder and the Company exchanged the Note solely for (i) a 12% promissory Exchange
Note, (ii) and 500,000 shares of common stock. Interest on the Exchange note accrued interest at the rate of 18% per annum commencing
on September 30, 2012 through October 31, 2012 and thereafter at the rate of 12%. The Exchange Note is convertible into securities
of the Company by the Holder at the lesser of $0.025 or 70% of the lowest volume weighted average (VWAP) occurring during the ten
consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date on which the Holder may elect to convert portions of the note. The Exchange
Note matures on September 30, 2013 and the Company can prepay any then remaining principal and accrued interest balance upon first
providing the holder with a ten day prepayment notice.
On November 7, 2012, the
Company issued a 10% unsecured convertible promissory note (the “Promissory Note”) for the principal sum of up to $78,000
plus accrued interest on any advanced principal funds. Upon issuance of the Promissory Note the lender immediately advance the
sum of $25,000 to the Company, and may elect to pay additional consideration to the Company in such amounts and at such times as
the Lender may choose in its sole discretion. The principal sum due the Lender shall be prorated based on the actual total consideration
paid to the Company by the Lender such that the Company will only be required to repay the amount funded by the lender, nor shall
any interest or other rights extend to any unfunded portion of the Promissory Note. The Promissory Note matures one year from its
issuance and may be converted by the Lender into shares of common stock of the Company at the lesser of $.0125 per share of at
a fifty percent of the lowest trade price in the twenty five trading days prior to the conversion of any outstanding funded principal
or accrued interest under the Promissory Note.
On December 13, 2012,
the Company issued a 10% unsecured convertible promissory note (the “Promissory Note”) for the principal sum of up
to $250,000 and accrued interest on any advanced principal funds. Upon issuance of the Promissory Note the lender immediately
advance the sum of $50,000 to the Company, and may elect to pay additional consideration to the Company in such amounts and at
such times as the Lender may choose in its sole discretion. The principal sum due the Lender shall be prorated based on the actual
total consideration paid to the Company by the Lender such that the Company will only be required to repay the amount funded by
the lender, nor shall any interest or other rights extend to any unfunded portion of the Promissory Note. If the Company repays
the Promissory Note on or before 90 days from the issuance date, the interest rate shall be zero percent (0%). If the Company
does not repay the Promissory Note on or before 90 days from the issuance date, a one-time Interest charge of 10% shall be applied
to the any then advanced principal sum. The Promissory Note matures one year from its issuance and may be converted by the Lender
into shares of common stock of the Company at the lesser of $.025 per share of at a sixty percent of the lowest trade price in
the twenty five trading days prior to the conversion of any outstanding funded principal or accrued interest under the Promissory
Note.
In accordance with the
Stipulation for Settlement of Claims (“Stipulation”), dated June 27, 2012, by and between Ironridge Global IV, Ltd
and the Company as documented in Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BC484549, pursuant to which the Company delivered 27,500,000
shares (“Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, no par value (“Common Stock”) to Ironridge. The
Stipulation provided for the subsequent issuance by the Company to Ironridge of additional Shares of Common Stock thereunder, the
(“Adjustment Shares”). In accordance with the stipulation on November 26, 2012 subject to a request by Ironridge the
Company issued 6,271,791 Adjustment Shares to Ironridge Global IV, Ltd.
Effective January 9, 2013,
as part of a continued effort that began in January 2012 to maximize the use of capital resources necessary to complete the assembly
and marketing of the Company’s CIGSolar technology through reductions to operating costs and functions that are redundant,
the Company elected to consolidate its executive management operations which has eliminated the need to have multiple officers
performing similar functions. In furtherance of these efforts the Company’s Board of Directors accepted the resignation of
Joseph Grimes as the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer, effective immediately, and approved by unanimous consent
the reorganization and appointment of executive management as follows;
In connection with the
resignation of Mr. Grimes, the Board appointed Mr. Tom Djokovich to the position of President. Mr. Djokovich will continue to also
serve as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO), a Director, and Secretary duties which he has performed since October
2003. Mr. Djokovich will focus on the strategic oversight of the day-to-day operations and securities compliance. Mr. Djokovich
did not enter into, or receive any grant or award under, any material plan, contract or arrangement in connection with his assumption
of duties as the Company’s President. Mr. Djokovich is 55 years old.
Mr. Grimes will continue
to serve as a member of the Board of Directors and will assume the position of Executive Sales Manager. As Executive Sales Manager,
Mr. Grimes will manage the marketing efforts associated with the Company’s commercialization efforts of its CIGSolar thin
film manufacturing technology, functions he began to manage in 2012. Mr. Grimes previously held the position of President and Chief
Operating Officer. Mr. Grimes did not enter into, or receive any grant or award under, any material plan, contract or arrangement
in connection with his assumption of duties as the Company’s executive sales manager. Mr. Grimes is 55 years old.
Issuance of Stock Purchase Options
In January 2012, the Board
of Directors authorized the grant of stock option agreements to the named individuals listed below as follows:
|
Date
Issued
|
|
Number
Issued
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
Expiration
Date
|
|
Consideration
|
Thomas Anderson
|
January 11, 2012
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
12-Jan-17
|
|
Future deliverables within the scope of the Directors influence
|
Oz Fundingsland
|
January 11, 2012
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
12-Jan-17
|
|
Future deliverables within the scope of the Directors influence
|
Dr. Michael Russak
|
January 11, 2012
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
12-Jan-17
|
|
Future deliverables within the scope of the Directors influence
|
The options issued to the named directors vested
upon issuance of the grant to each named individual.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
The following table lists the executive offices
and directors of the Company during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012:
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position Held
|
|
Tenure
|
Tom Djokovich
|
|
55
|
|
CEO, Director, Secretary, and acting Principal Accounting Officer
|
|
CEO and Director since October 2003, Secretary and PAO since September 2009
|
Joseph Grimes
|
|
55
|
|
President, COO, Director
|
|
President since March 2009, COO since April 2006, and as a director Since August 2008
|
Robert Wendt
|
|
50
|
|
CTO
|
|
Since March 2009
|
Thomas Anderson
|
|
47
|
|
Director
|
|
Since August 2001
|
Oz Fundingsland
|
|
69
|
|
Director
|
|
Since November 2007
|
Michael Russak
|
|
65
|
|
Director
|
|
Since November 2007
|
The above listed directors
will serve until the next annual meeting of the stockholders or until their death, resignation, retirement, removal, or disqualification,
and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. Vacancies in the existing Board of Directors are filled by majority
vote of the remaining Directors. There are no agreements or understandings for any officer or director to resign at the request
of another person and no officer or director is acting on behalf of or will act at the direction of any other person. There is
no family relationship between any of our directors.
The directors of the Company
will devote such time to the Company’s affairs on an “as needed” basis, but typically less than 20 hours per
month. As a result, the actual amount of time which they will devote to the Company’s affairs is unknown and is likely to
vary substantially from month to month.
Biographical Information
Mr. Tom Djokovich, age 55, Chief Executive Officer and a Director
as of October 2003, acting Principal Accounting Officer as of September 2009;
Mr. Djokovich was the
founder and served from 1995 to 2002 as the Chief Executive Officer of Accesspoint Corporation, a vertically integrated provider
of electronic transaction processing and e-business solutions for merchants. Under Mr. Djokovich’s guidance, Accesspoint
became a member of the Visa/MasterCard association, the national check processing association NACHA, and developed one of the payment
industry’s most diverse set of network based transaction processing, business management and CRM systems for both Internet
and conventional points of sale. Prior to Accesspoint, Mr. Djokovich founded TMD Construction and Development in 1979. TMD provided
management for multimillion-dollar projects incorporating at times hundreds of employees, subcontractors and international material
acquisitions for commercial, industrial and custom residential construction services as a licensed building and development firm
in California. In 1995 Mr. Djokovich developed an early Internet based business-to-business ordering system for the construction
industry.
Mr. Joseph Grimes, age 55, Chief Operating Officer as of April
2006, a Director as of August 2008, and President as of March 2009;
Mr. Grimes brings to XsunX
more than eight years direct experience in thin-film technology and manufacturing. He was most recently Vice President, Defense
Solutions, for Envisage Technology Company, where he directed and managed the defense group business development process, acquisition
strategies and vision for next generation applications from October 2005 to March 2006. Previously he was Co-Founder, President
and CEO of ISERA Group, where he established the company infrastructure and guided five development teams, finally selling the
company to Envisage from 1993 to 2005. His direct experience in thin-film technology came with Applied Magnetics Corporation from
1985 to 1993 as manager for thin-film prototype assembly. Mr. Grimes holds a Bachelor’s degree in business economics and
environmental studies, and a Master’s in computer modeling and operation research applications, both from the University
of California at Santa Barbara.
Mr. Robert Wendt, age 50, Chief Technology Officer as of March
2009;
(1)
Mr.
Wendt holds a B.S. and M.S. in Metallurgical Engineering and Material Science from the Colorado School of Mines. His responsibility
encompasses technical specification of the facilities, equipment, and manufacturing processes for XsunX. Prior to joining XsunX
in 2007, Mr. Wendt served at various times as Vice President of Sales, Product Development, and Engineering at Global Solar Energy
from May 1996 to 2005. At Global Solar, Mr. Wendt has led and directed several areas including copper indium gallium di-selenide
(CIGS) technology development, equipment design and integration, facilities design and construction, engineering, production, and
operations.
Prior to Global Solar, Mr. Wendt was at ITN with responsibility
for the development of thin-film deposition technologies, thin-film PV, and development of charge controller/battery systems for
portable solar cell powered systems. Prior to joining ITN, Mr. Wendt spent eight years with Lockheed Marietta Astronautics, Denver
Division. While in this position, Mr. Wendt was program manager/principal investigator on over 20 material-based programs. During
1994/1995, Mr. Wendt was the technical lead for thin-film PV research at the Denver Division.
|
(1)
|
On May 7, 2012, the Company and Mr. Wendt agreed to
terminate his position as CTO and alternately entered into a twelve-month technical consulting agreement with Mr. Wendt
under
which Mr. Wendt continues to assist the Company with its efforts to commercialize its CIGSolar® technology.
|
Independent Directors
Mr. Thomas Anderson, age 47, became a director of the Company
in August 2001;
Mr. Anderson presently
works as the Director of Southwest Business Operations for American Capital Energy, a commercial and utility scale solar integrator.
He has been with American Capital Energy since October, 2008. He recently served as Managing Director of the Environmental
Science and Engineering Directorate of Qinetiq North America in Los Alamos, New Mexico. He was with Qinetiq North America, formerly
Apogen Technologies, from January, 2005, through September, 2008. Mr. Anderson worked for 19 years in the environmental consulting
field, providing consulting services in the areas of environmental compliance, characterization and remediation services to Department
of Energy, Department of Defense, and industrial clients. He formerly worked as a Senior Environmental Scientist at Concurrent
Technologies Corp. from November 2000 to December 2004. He earned his B.S. in Geology from Denison University and his M.S. in Environmental
Science and Engineering from Colorado School of Mines.
Mr. Oz Fundingsland as Director, age 69, became a director
of the Company in November 2007;
On November 12, 2007,
the Company announced the appointment of Mr. Oz Fundingsland as Director, effective November 12, 2007. Mr. Fundingsland brings
over forty years of sales, marketing, executive business management, finance, and corporate governance experience to XsunX. His
professional and business experience principally originated with his tenure, commencing in 1964, at Applied Magnetics Corp., a
disk drive and data storage company. Prior to his retirement from Applied Magnetics in 1994, Mr. Fundingsland served as an Executive
Officer and Vice President of Sales and Marketing for 11 years directing sales growth from $50 million to over $550 million. Commencing
in 1993 through 2003 Mr. Fundingsland served as a member of the board of directors for the International Disk Drive Equipment Manufacturers
Association “IDEMA” where he retired emeritus, and continues to serve as an advisor to the board. For the last 13 years,
Mr. Fundingsland has provided consulting services assisting with sales, marketing, and management to a host of companies within
the disk drive, optical, software, and LED industries.
Dr. Michael A. Russak as Director, age 65, became a director
of the Company in November 2007;
On November 28, 2007,
the Company announced the appointment of Dr. Michael A. Russak as a Director, effective November 26, 2007. Dr. Russak is also a
member of the Company’s Scientific Advisory Board. Dr. Michael A. Russak currently holds the position of Executive Vice President
of Business Development with Intevac, Inc. in Santa Clara, CA. He has been working as a consultant in the hard disk
drive and photovoltaic industries since Jan 2007. He is also currently the Executive Director of IDEMA-U.S. (the hard disk drive
industry trade association) and a member of the Board of Directors and Scientific Advisory Board of XsunX, Inc. From 2001 to 2006
he was President and Chief Technical Officer of Komag, Inc., a manufacturer of hard magnetic recording disks for hard disk drive
applications. From 1993 to 2001 he was Chief Technical Officer of HMT Technology, Inc. also a manufacturer of magnetic recording
disks. From 1985 to 1993 he was a research staff member and program manager in the Research Division of the IBM Corporation. Dr.
Russak has over thirty five years of industrial experience progressing from a research scientist to senior executive officer of
two public companies. He has expertise in thin film materials and devices for magnetic recording, photovoltaic, solar thermal applications,
semiconductor devices as well as glass, glass-ceramic and ceramic materials. He also has over twelve years’ experience at
the executive management level of public companies with significant off shore development and manufacturing functions. He received
his B.S. in Ceramic Engineering in 1968 and Ph.D. in Materials Science in 1971, both from Rutgers University in New Brunswick,
NJ. During his career, he has been a contributing scientist and program manager at the Grumman Aerospace Corporation, a Research
Staff Member and technical manager in the areas of thin film materials and processes at the Research Division of the IBM Corporation
at the T.J. Watson Research Laboratories. In 1993, he joined HMT Technology, a manufacturer of thin film disks for magnetic storage,
as Vice President of Research and Development. His responsibilities included new product design and introduction. Dr. Russak became
Chief Technical Officer of HMT and held that position until 2000 when HMT merged with Komag Inc. Dr. Russak was appointed President
and Chief Technical Officer of the combined company. He continued to set technical, operational and business direction for Komag
until his retirement at the end of 2006. He has published over 90 technical papers, and holds 23 U.S. patents.
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
None of the members of
the Board of Directors or other executives has been involved in any bankruptcy proceedings, criminal proceedings, any proceeding
involving any possibility of enjoining or suspending members of our Board of Directors or other executives from engaging in any
business, securities or banking activities, and have not been found to have violated, nor been accused of having violated, any
federal or state securities or commodities laws.
Board Committees; Audit Committee
As of September 30, 2012,
the Company’s board was comprised of five directors, three of which are considered independent directors and the Company
did not have an audit committee. Further, none of the members of the board of directors is qualified as a financial expert. We
are a development stage company with limited resources and we are actively seeking a qualified financial expert for addition to
the board. The board of directors will appoint committees as necessary, including an audit committee as resources permit. In
the meantime, the Board serves as the Company’s audit committee utilizing business judgment rules and good faith efforts.
Section 16(A) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s officers and directors, and certain persons who own more than 10% of a registered
class of the Company’s equity securities (collectively, “Reporting Persons”), to file reports of ownership and
changes in ownership (“Section 16 Reports”) with the SEC. Reporting Persons are required by the SEC to furnish the
Company with copies of all Section 16 Reports they file.
Based on its review of the copies of such forms received
by it, or written representations from certain reporting persons, the Company believes that, during the fiscal year ended September
30, 2012, all filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors, and greater than ten-percent beneficial owners were complied
with the exception that one report, covering one transaction was not timely filed by the chief executive officer
with the SEC via year-end report on Form 5
.
Code of Ethics
The Company’s board of directors adopted
a Code of Ethics policy on January 7, 2008.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Overview
We are a development stage
Company and we rely on our board of directors to evaluate compensation and incentive offerings made by the Company as it applies
to our executive officers, and efforts to attract and maintain qualified staff. To date, our compensation policy has been conducted
on a case by case basis with input from our chief executive officer, and focused on the following four primary areas; (a) first
the Company’s commitment capabilities within the scope of objectives and capital capabilities, (b) salary compensatory with
peer group companies and peer position, (c) cash bonuses tied to sales and revenue attainment, and (d) long term equity compensation
tied to strategic objectives of establishing marketable solar technologies.
In
the year ended September 30, 2012 the Company’s named executive offices elected to accept reductions to compensation to allow
for the re-direction of available capital resources for use in the purchase and assembly of the Company’s
multi-chamber
CIGSolar® thermal co-evaporation system. As a result, initially salaries were reduced effective October 1, 2011 to $120,000
each annually. Then effective January 1, 2012 salaries were further reduced and/or eliminated to allow further re-direction of
available capital resources towards system assembly efforts. Since January 2012, wages have been paid as capital resources have
allowed, and as work efforts have been extended to complete the strategic objectives of the Company.
In this Compensation Discussion
and Analysis, the individuals in the Summary Compensation Table set forth below are referred to as the “named executive officers”.
Generally, the types of compensation and benefits provided to the named executive officers may be similar to what we intend to
provide to future executive officers.
Executive Compensation
The following table sets
forth information with respect to compensation earned by our chief executive officer, our chief operating officer, and our chief
technical officer (collectively, our “named executive officers”) for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, and
2011 respectively.
Summary Compensation Table
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
Contributed
Services
($)
|
|
Bonus
($)
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom
Djokovich, CEO(1)
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
82,215
|
|
|
|
37,035
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,303
|
|
|
|
126,553
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
165,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
|
|
169,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joe
Grimes, COO(2)
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
42,308
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
10,948
|
|
|
|
83,256
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
157,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
|
|
162,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert
Wendt, CTO(3)
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
36,838
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,591
|
|
|
|
69,429
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
165,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
|
|
169,800
|
|
|
(1)
|
$37,035 of Mr. Djokovich’s recorded compensation in the year ended September 30, 2012 was in the form
of wages that Mr. Djokovich forgave in lieu of the Company using the capital to purchase necessary supplies, and that the Company
recorded as contributed services in the period. In addition to Mr. Djokovich’s compensation
the Company also provides Mr. Djokovich with a $359 monthly health insurance allowance.
|
|
(2)
|
$30,000 of Mr. Grimes recorded compensation in the year ended September 30, 2012 was in the form of wages
that Mr. Grimes forgave in lieu of the Company using the capital to purchase necessary supplies, and that the Company recorded
as contributed services in the period. In addition to Mr. Grimes compensation the Company
also provides Mr. Grimes with a $913 monthly health insurance allowance.
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
$30,000 of Mr. Wendt’s recorded compensation in the year ended September 30, 2012 was in the form of
wages that Mr. Wendt forgave in lieu of the Company using the capital to purchase necessary supplies, and that the Company recorded
as contributed services in the period. In addition to Mr. Wendt’s base compensation the Company
also agreed to provide Mr. Wendt with a $324 monthly health insurance allowance. On May 7, 2012, the Company and Mr. Wendt
agreed to terminate his position as CTO and alternately entered into a twelve-month technical consulting agreement with Mr.
Wendt.
|
No other compensation
not described above was paid or distributed during the listed fiscal years to the executive officers of the Company.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
The following table sets
forth summary information regarding all grants of plan-based awards made to our named executive officers during the two years ended
September 30, 2012, and 2011 respectively.
Name
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
|
|
|
Exercise or
Base Price
of Option
Awards
($/Sh)
|
|
|
Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock and
Option Awards
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Djokovich, CEO
|
|
2012
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Grimes, COO
|
|
2012
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Wendt, CTO
(1)
|
|
2012
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
(1)
|
On May 7, 2012, the Company and Mr. Wendt agreed to terminate his position as CTO and alternately entered into a twelve-month technical consulting agreement with Mr. Wendt. As part of the agreements the total of Mr. Wendt’s above detailed plan and non-plan based awards were terminated.
|
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End Table
The following table sets forth the outstanding
equity awards with respect our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012
|
|
OPTION AWARDS
|
|
STOCK AWARDS
|
Name
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)
Unexercisable
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities Underlying Unexercisable Unearned Options (#)
|
|
Option Exercise Price
($)
|
|
Option
Expiration Date
|
|
Number
of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested (#)
|
|
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock that
Have Not
Vested ($)
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested (#)
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards
Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not
Vested (#)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Djokovich, CEO
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph Grimes, COO
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
10/23/2012
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
4/1/2014
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
10/18/2015
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Robert Wendt, CTO
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Option Exercises
None
Pension Benefits
None
Nonqualified Defined Contribution and Other Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation Plans
None
Employment Agreements and Arrangements
Tom M. Djokovich
Mr. Djokovich serves
as our chief executive officer, acting principal accounting officer, and a director. We do not have an employment agreement
with Mr. Djokovich. He currently works at the discretion of the board of directors as he has since October 2003. His annual
base compensation for the 2012 fiscal period was $85,215 in collected wages and benefits, and another $37,035 in wages that
were forgiven by Mr. Djokovich for use by the Company in the purchase of necessary supplies and recorded as contributed
capital in the period. Mr. Djokovich’s collected wages and contributed services totaled $122,250 in the year ended
September 30, 2012. Mr. Djokovich was also and he was provided with approximately $359 per month allowance for use in the
payment of medical benefits. His total compensation is based solely on the annual base cash salary and we do not have any
equity based, cash bonus, or special compensation agreements or understanding in place with Mr. Djokovich. Mr. Djokovich
is also subject to confidentiality and non-solicitation provisions which provide that Mr. Djokovich will not divulge
information or solicit employees for 24 months after termination of his employment.
Joseph Grimes
Mr. Grimes serves as
our chief operating officer, president, and a director. We do not have an employment agreement with Mr. Grimes and in the 2012
fiscal period he worked at the discretion of the board of directors. His annual base compensation for the 2012 fiscal period was
$42,308 in collected wages and benefits, and another $30,000 in wages that were forgiven by Mr. Grimes for use by the Company
in the purchase of necessary supplies and recorded as contributed capital in the period. Mr. Grimes collected wages and contributed
services totaled $72,308 in the year ended September 30, 2012. Mr. Grimes was also provided with approximately $913 per month
allowance for use in the payment of medical benefits. Mr. Grimes is also subject to confidentiality and non-solicitation
provisions which provide that Mr. Grimes will not divulge information or solicit employees for 24 months after termination
of his employment.
Robert Wendt
Mr. Wendt serves as our
chief technology officer. We do not have an employment agreement with Mr. Wendt and in the 2012 fiscal period he worked at the
discretion of the board of directors. His annual base salary compensation for the 2012 period was $36,838 in collected wages and benefits, and another $30,000 in wages that were forgiven by Mr. Wendt for
use by the Company in the purchase of necessary supplies and recorded as contributed capital in the period. Mr. Wendt’s collected
wages and contributed services totaled $66,838 in the year ended September 30, 2012. Mr. Wendt was also provided
with approximately $324 per month allowance for use in the payment of medical benefits. Mr. Wendt is also subject to confidentiality
and non-solicitation provisions which provide that Mr. Wendt will not divulge information or solicit employees for 24 months
after termination of his employment.
On May 7, 2012, the Company
and Mr. Wendt agreed to terminate his position as CTO and alternately entered into a twelve-month technical consulting agreement
with Mr. Wendt under which Mr. Wendt continues to assist the Company with its efforts to commercialize its CIGSolar® technology.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-In-Control
None
Long Term Incentive Plans — Awards in Last Fiscal
Year
None
Director Compensation
In
the fiscal
year
ended September 30, 2012, Directors received no cash compensation for their service
to the Company as directors. Each none affiliated Director did receive an option grant in the amount of 500,000 options
exercisable at $0.04 cents each into common shares of the Company’s stock. All Directors were reimbursed for any expenses
actually incurred in connection with attending meetings of the Board of Directors.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE OF DIRECTORS
Name
|
|
Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
|
|
All
Other
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
Tom Djokovich
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Joseph Grimes
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Thomas Anderson
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Oz Fundingsland
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Dr. Michael Russak
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012
adjustments or additions to new or existing employment agreements were reviewed and deliberated by the five members of the Company’s
Board of Directors.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The following table sets
forth, as of September 30, 2012, the number of shares of common stock owned of record and beneficially by executive officers, directors
and persons who hold 5.0% or more of the outstanding common stock of the Company. Also included are the shares held by all executive
officers and directors as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner listed below is c/o XsunX,
Inc., 65 Enterprise, Aliso Viejo, California 92656.
Shareholders/Beneficial Owners
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
Ownership
Percentage
(1)
|
Tom Djokovich
(2)
President & Director
|
|
|
14,993,000
|
|
5.3%
|
Thomas Anderson
Director
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
< 1%
|
Oz Fundingsland
Director
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
< 1%
|
Mike Russak
Director
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
< 1%
|
Joseph Grimes
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
1.0%
|
Robert Wendt
Chief Technical Officer
|
|
|
0
|
|
< 0%
|
All directors and executive officers as a group
of (6 persons) account for ownership of 21,993,000 shares representing 7.82% of the issued and outstanding common stock. Each principal
shareholder has sole investment power and sole voting power over the shares.
|
(1)
|
Applicable percentage ownership is based on 297,270,080 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of January 11, 2013. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of January 11, 2013 are deemed to be beneficially owned by the person holding such securities for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes 14,068,000 shares owned by the Djokovich Limited Partnership. Mr. Djokovich shares voting and dispositive power with respect to these shares with Mrs. Djokovich.
|
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and
Director Independence
No officer, director,
or related person of the Company has or proposes to have any direct or indirect material interest in any asset proposed to be acquired
by the Company through securities holdings, contracts, options or otherwise or any transaction in which the amount involved exceeds
the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the Company's total assets at year end
.
The Company has adopted
a policy under which any consulting or finder’s fee that may be paid to a third party for consulting services to assist management
in evaluating a prospective business opportunity can be paid in stock, stock purchase options or in cash. Any such issuance of
stock or stock purchase options would be made on an ad hoc basis. Accordingly, the Company is unable to predict whether or in what
amount such a stock issuance might be made.
The following directors are independent: Thomas
Anderson, Oz Fundingsland and. Dr. Michael Russak.
The following directors are not independent: Tom
Djokovich and Joseph Grimes.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
2012
For
the fiscal
year
ended September 30, 2012
HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP
incurred $35,400 in Audit Fees for the following professional services: review of the interim financial statements included in
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ended December 30, 2011, March 31, 2012, June 30, 2012 and for audit fees related
to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K. No Audit-Related, Tax or Other fees were billed by
HJ Associates &
Consultants, LLP
in the fiscal
year
ended September 30, 2012.
2011
For
the fiscal
year
ended September 30, 2011
HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP incurred
$28,600 in Audit Fees for the following professional services: review of the interim financial statements included in quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ended December 30, 2010, March 31, 2011, June 30, 2011 and for audit fees related to the
Company’s annual report on Form 10-K. No Audit-Related, Tax or Other fees were billed by HJ Associates & Consultants,
LLP
in the fiscal
year
ended September 30, 2011.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
Exhibits:
|
Exhibit
|
|
Description
|
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation(1)
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws(2)
|
|
10.1
|
|
XsunX Plan of Reorganization and Asset
Purchase Agreement, dated September 23, 2003.(3)
|
|
10.2
|
|
XsunX 2007 Stock Option Plan, dated
January 5, 2007.(4)
|
|
10.3
|
|
Form of Exchange Agreement and Exchange
Note used in connection with the exchange, partial repayment, and extension to a promissory note that had become due September
1, 2011. (5)
|
|
10.4
|
|
Form of Security Purchase and Warrant
Agreement used in connection with the sale of equity to an accredited investor of
a total of 3,181,819 units composed
of one share of restricted common stock and a five year warrant exercisable to purchase two shares of Common Stock, and the
same
Warrant Agreement used in connection with the cashless exercise by a holder of all
warrants. (5)
|
|
10.5
|
|
Form of Securities Purchase Agreement
and Convertible Promissory Note used in connection with the sale of nine convertible promissory notes in the aggregate amount
of $348,000. (5)
|
|
10.6
|
|
Form of Exchange Agreement and Exchange
Note used in connection with the exchange and 12 month extension to a promissory note that had become due September 30, 2012.
(13)
|
|
10.7
|
|
Form of Convertible Promissory Note
used in connection with the sale of a convertible promissory note in the amount of up to $78,000. (13)
|
|
10.8
|
|
Form of Convertible Promissory Note
used in connection with the sale of a convertible promissory note in the amount of up to $250,000. (13)
|
|
10.9
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Agreement and Registration
Rights Agreement dated as of March 30, 2011, by and between the Company and Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC.
(6)
|
|
10.10
|
|
Form S-1 and S-1/A related to the filing of a registration
statement by the Company
(7)(8)
|
|
10.11
|
|
Form
S-1/A related to the filing of a Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 registration statement
by the Company.
(9)
|
|
10.12
|
|
Form of Consulting Agreement used in
connection with the retention of a scientific advisor and the issuance of 2,000,000 shares of common stock. (10)
|
|
10.13
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement used by the Company
to grant 500,000 common stock purchase options to each of three unaffiliated members of the Board of Directors on January
11, 2012.
(11)
|
|
10.14
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement used
in connection with the issuance of Options to Joseph Grimes, October 2011(5)
|
|
10.15
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement used
in connection with the issuance of options to Robert Wendt, October 2011(5)
|
|
16.1
|
|
Auditor Letter(13)
|
|
31.1
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Certification(13)
|
|
32.1
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Certification (13)
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement
Form 10SB12G #000-29621 dated February 18, 2000 and by reference to exhibits included with the Company’s prior Report
on Form 8-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission dated October 29, 2003.
|
|
(2)
|
Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement
Form 10SB12G #000-29621 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission dated February 18, 2000.
|
|
(3)
|
Incorporated by reference to exhibits included with
the Company’s Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission dated October 29, 2003.
|
|
(4)
|
Incorporated by reference to exhibits included with
the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission dated January 5, 2007.
|
|
(5)
|
Incorporated by reference to exhibits included with
the Company’s Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission dated December 29, 2011.
|
|
(6)
|
Incorporated by reference to exhibits included with
the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission dated April 1, 2010.
|
|
(7)
|
Incorporated
by reference to exhibits included with the Company’s Report on Form S-1
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission dated April 30, 2011.
|
|
(8)
|
Incorporated by reference to exhibits included with
the Company’s Report on Form S-1/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission dated June 25, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
Incorporated
by reference to exhibits included with the Company’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 Report on
Form S-1/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission dated March 29, 2011.
|
(10)
|
Incorporated by reference to exhibits included
with the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission dated August 14, 2012.
|
(11)
|
Incorporated by reference to exhibits included
with the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission dated February 13, 2012.
|
(12)
|
Incorporated by reference
to exhibits included with the Company’s Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission dated
December 29, 2011.
|
(13)
|
Provided Herewith
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date:
January 11, 2013
|
XSUNX, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Tom Djokovich
|
|
Name:
|
Tom Djokovich
|
|
Title:
|
CEO and Principal Accounting Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities
and on the dates indicated.
/s/ Tom Djokovich
|
|
January 11, 2013
|
Tom Djokovich, President, Chief Executive Officer,
Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer, and
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph Grimes
|
|
January 11, 2013
|
Joseph Grimes, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Thomas Anderson
|
|
January 11, 2013
|
Thomas Anderson, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Oz Fundingsland
|
|
January 11, 2013
|
Oz Fundingsland, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael Russak
|
|
January 11, 2013
|
Michael Russak, Director
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
XsunX, Inc. (A Development Stage Company)
Alisa Viejo, California
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of XsunX, Inc. (a development stage company) as of September 30, 2012 and 2011
and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended and for the period from
February 25, 1997 (inception) to September 30, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
The financial
statements for the period from February 25, 1997 (inception) to September 30, 2008 were audited by other auditors and our opinion,
insofar as it relates to cumulative amounts included for such prior periods, is based solely on the reports of such other
auditors.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control
over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing
audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness
of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
XsunX, Inc. (a development stage company) as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for the years then ended and for the period from February 25, 1997 (inception) to September 30, 2012, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
The accompanying financial
statements
have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in
Note 1
to the financial statements, the Company does not generate significant revenue and has negative cash flows from operations which
raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are
also described in
Note 1
. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP
HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP
Salt Lake City, Utah
January 11, 2013
XSUNX, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Balance Sheets
|
|
September 30, 2012
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
44,527
|
|
|
$
|
66,576
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
162,186
|
|
|
|
9,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
206,713
|
|
|
|
75,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office & miscellaneous equipment
|
|
|
35,853
|
|
|
|
29,841
|
|
Machinery & equipment
|
|
|
232,084
|
|
|
|
177,699
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
17,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Property & Equipment
|
|
|
285,437
|
|
|
|
207,540
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(206,178
|
)
|
|
|
(164,472
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Property & Equipment
|
|
|
79,259
|
|
|
|
43,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing equipment in progress
|
|
|
309,082
|
|
|
|
81,975
|
|
Security deposit
|
|
|
5,700
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Assets
|
|
|
314,782
|
|
|
|
85,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
600,754
|
|
|
$
|
204,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
143,555
|
|
|
$
|
167,420
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
840
|
|
|
|
8,740
|
|
Credit card payable
|
|
|
2,623
|
|
|
|
1,099
|
|
Accrued interest on note payable
|
|
|
40,243
|
|
|
|
95,641
|
|
Derivative liability
|
|
|
150,926
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Convertible promissory notes, net of $104,035 in discounts
|
|
|
63,465
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Unsecured promissory note
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Note payable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
456,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
751,652
|
|
|
|
729,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
|
751,652
|
|
|
|
729,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000,000 authorized preferred shares
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Common stock, no par value;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000,000 authorized common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281,233,150 and 224,998,637 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
27,341,594
|
|
|
|
25,638,369
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
5,335,248
|
|
|
|
5,238,213
|
|
Paid in capital, common stock warrants
|
|
|
3,764,913
|
|
|
|
3,635,079
|
|
Deficit accumulated during the development stage
|
|
|
(36,592,653
|
)
|
|
|
(35,037,459
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
(150,898
|
)
|
|
|
(525,798
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
$
|
600,754
|
|
|
$
|
204,023
|
|
The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of
These Financial Statements
XSUNX, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
From Inception
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb ruary 25, 1997
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
through
|
|
|
September 30, 2012
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
September 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
14,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
645,546
|
|
|
|
946,459
|
|
|
|
18,522,346
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
122,673
|
|
|
|
282,492
|
|
|
|
3,286,627
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
41,706
|
|
|
|
38,472
|
|
|
|
729,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
809,925
|
|
|
|
1,267,423
|
|
|
|
22,538,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE OTHER INCOME/(EXPENSE)
|
|
|
(809,925
|
)
|
|
|
(1,267,423
|
)
|
|
|
(22,523,625
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME/(EXPENSES)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
445,537
|
|
Gain on sale of asset
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
16,423
|
|
Impairment of assets
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(7,285,120
|
)
|
Write down of inventory asset
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,177,000
|
)
|
Gain on legal settlement
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
179,580
|
|
|
|
1,279,580
|
|
Loan and commitment fees
|
|
|
(85,734
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(7,087,724
|
)
|
Forgiveness of debt
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
592,154
|
|
Loss on conversion of debt
|
|
|
(441,522
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(441,522
|
)
|
Gain on change in derivative
|
|
|
39,969
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
39,969
|
|
Other, non-operating
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(5,215
|
)
|
Penalties
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(596
|
)
|
|
|
(619
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(257,959
|
)
|
|
|
(46,215
|
)
|
|
|
(445,491
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL OTHER INCOME/(EXPENSES)
|
|
|
(745,269
|
)
|
|
|
149,769
|
|
|
|
(14,069,028
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS
|
|
$
|
(1,555,194
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,117,654
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36,592,653
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC AND DILUTED
|
|
|
247,855,835
|
|
|
|
218,617,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of
These Financial Statements
XSUNX, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Statements of Stockholders' Equity
From Inception February 25, 1997 to September
30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
Stock Options/
|
|
during the
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
Warrants
|
|
Development
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Capital
|
|
Paid-in-Capital
|
|
Stage
|
|
Total
|
Balance at September 30, 1996
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock for cash
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
15,880
|
|
|
|
217,700
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
217,700
|
|
Issuance of stock to Founders
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
14,110
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Issuance of stock for consolidation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
445,000
|
|
|
|
312,106
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
312,106
|
|
Net Loss for the year ended September 30, 1997
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(193,973
|
)
|
|
|
(193,973
|
)
|
Balance at September 30, 1997
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
474,990
|
|
|
|
529,806
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(193,973
|
)
|
|
|
335,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock for services
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
Issuance of stock for cash
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
50,200
|
|
|
|
204,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
204,000
|
|
Consolidation stock cancelled
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(60,000
|
)
|
|
|
(50,000
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(50,000
|
)
|
Net Loss for the year ended September 30, 1998
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(799,451
|
)
|
|
|
(799,451
|
)
|
Balance at September 30, 1998
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
466,690
|
|
|
|
713,806
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(993,424
|
)
|
|
|
(279,618
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock for cash
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
151,458
|
|
|
|
717,113
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
717,113
|
|
Issuance of stock for services
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
463,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
463,500
|
|
Net Loss for the year ended September 30, 1999
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,482,017
|
)
|
|
|
(1,482,017
|
)
|
Balance at September 30, 1999
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
753,148
|
|
|
|
1,894,419
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,475,441
|
)
|
|
|
(581,022
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock for cash
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
Net Loss for the year ended September 30, 2000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(118,369
|
)
|
|
|
(118,369
|
)
|
Balance at September 30, 2000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
768,148
|
|
|
|
1,921,419
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,593,810
|
)
|
|
|
(672,391
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
337,887
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
337,887
|
|
Net Loss for the year ended September 30, 2001
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(32,402
|
)
|
|
|
(32,402
|
)
|
Balance at September 30, 2001
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
768,148
|
|
|
|
2,259,306
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,626,212
|
)
|
|
|
(366,906
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss for the year ended September 30, 2002
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(47,297
|
)
|
|
|
(47,297
|
)
|
Balance at September 30, 2002
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
768,148
|
|
|
|
2,259,306
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,673,509
|
)
|
|
|
(414,203
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock for assets
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
70,000,000
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Issuance of stock for cash
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,000,000
|
|
|
|
225,450
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
225,450
|
|
Issuance of stock for debt
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
121,828
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
121,828
|
|
Issuance of stock for expenses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
89,939
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
89,939
|
|
Issuance of stock for services
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
31,300,000
|
|
|
|
125,200
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
125,200
|
|
Net Loss for the year ended September 30, 2003
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(145,868
|
)
|
|
|
(145,868
|
)
|
Balance at September 30, 2003
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
111,298,148
|
|
|
|
2,821,726
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,819,377
|
)
|
|
|
2,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock for cash
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,737,954
|
|
|
|
282,670
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
282,670
|
|
Warrant expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
825,000
|
|
|
|
375,000
|
|
|
|
1,200,000
|
|
Net Loss for the year ended September 30, 2004
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,509,068
|
)
|
|
|
(1,509,068
|
)
|
Balance at September 30, 2004
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
114,036,102
|
|
|
|
3,104,396
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
825,000
|
|
|
|
(3,953,445
|
)
|
|
|
(24,049
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock for cash
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,747,037
|
|
|
|
531,395
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
531,395
|
|
Issuance of stock for services
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,093,500
|
|
|
|
360,945
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
360,945
|
|
Warrant expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
Beneficial conversion
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
Shares held as collateral for debentures
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
26,798,418
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net Loss for the year ended September 30, 2005
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,980,838
|
)
|
|
|
(1,980,838
|
)
|
Balance at September 30, 2005
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
150,675,057
|
|
|
|
3,996,736
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
1,005,000
|
|
|
|
(5,934,283
|
)
|
|
|
(532,547
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock for services
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
72,366
|
|
|
|
31,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
31,500
|
|
Warrant expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
996,250
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
996,250
|
|
Beneficial conversion
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,685,573
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,685,573
|
|
Debenture conversion
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
21,657,895
|
|
|
|
5,850,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,850,000
|
|
Issuance of stock for interest expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
712,956
|
|
|
|
241,383
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
241,383
|
|
Issuance of stock for warrant conversion
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,850,000
|
|
|
|
3,171,250
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,171,250
|
|
Net Loss for the year ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(9,112,988
|
)
|
|
|
(9,112,988
|
)
|
Balance at September 30, 2006 (restated)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
183,968,274
|
|
|
|
13,290,869
|
|
|
|
6,085,573
|
|
|
|
2,001,250
|
|
|
|
(15,047,271
|
)
|
|
|
6,330,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of stock for services returned
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(150,000
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Release of security collateral
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(26,798,418
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Issuance of stock for warrants
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
Stock option and warrant expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
772,315
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
772,315
|
|
Net Loss for the year ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,968,846
|
)
|
|
|
(1,968,846
|
)
|
Balance at September 30, 2007 (restated)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
157,919,856
|
|
|
|
13,425,869
|
|
|
|
6,085,573
|
|
|
|
2,773,565
|
|
|
|
(17,016,117
|
)
|
|
|
5,268,890
|
|
The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part
of These Financial Statements
XSUNX, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Statements of Stockholders' Equity
From Inception February 25, 1997 to September
30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
Stock Options/
|
|
during the
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
Warrants
|
|
Development
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Capital
|
|
Paid-in-Capital
|
|
Stage
|
|
Total
|
Fusion Equity common stock purchase
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
15,347,581
|
|
|
|
5,200,000
|
|
|
|
(55,300
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,144,700
|
|
Commiment fees
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,190,000
|
|
|
|
(1,190,000
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Cumorah common stock purchase
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
8,650,000
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
Wharton settlement
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
875,000
|
|
|
|
297,500
|
|
|
|
(397,500
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(100,000
|
)
|
MVS warrant cancellation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
805,440
|
|
|
|
(805,440
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Stock options and warrant expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
673,287
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
673,287
|
|
Net Loss for the year ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(4,058,952
|
)
|
|
|
(4,058,952
|
)
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
186,292,437
|
|
|
|
22,613,369
|
|
|
|
5,248,213
|
|
|
|
2,641,412
|
|
|
|
(21,075,069
|
)
|
|
|
9,427,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares in October 2008 for cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000,000 common shares issued at $0.20 per share )
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares in November 2008 for cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000,000 common shares issued at $0.20 per share )
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares in November 2008 for services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,000 common shares issued at a fair value of $0.22 per share )
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares in August 2009 for cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,129,483 common shares issued at $0.062 per share )
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,129,483
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares in August 2009 for services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(900,000 common shares issued at a fair value of $0.12 per share )
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
108,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
108,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares in August 2009 for services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76,976 common shares issued at a fair value of $0.1364 per share )
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
76,976
|
|
|
|
10,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares in September 2009 for services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,714 common shares issued at a fair value of $0.14 per share )
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
35,714
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares in September 2009 for cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,000,000 common shares issued at $0.07 per share )
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
534,518
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
534,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss for the year ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,634,133
|
)
|
|
|
(10,634,133
|
)
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
196,484,610
|
|
|
|
23,767,869
|
|
|
|
5,248,213
|
|
|
|
3,175,930
|
|
|
|
(31,709,202
|
)
|
|
|
482,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares in October 2009 for cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,556,818 common shares issued at $0.088 per share )
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,556,818
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares in November 2009 for services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,789 common shares issued at a fair value of $0.1859 per share)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
53,789
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares in December 2009 for subscription receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000,000 common shares issued at $0.088 per share)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
88,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
88,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares in March 2010 for cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000,000 common shares issued at $0.075 per share )
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares in March 2010 for services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139,424 common shares issued at $0.16137 per share )
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
139,424
|
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares in March 2010 for cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,250,000 common shares issued at $0.10 per share )
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,250,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares in September 2010 for cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(279,661 common shares issued at $0.09167 per share )
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
279,661
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares in September 2010 for cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(291,035 common shares issued at $0.088 per share )
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
291,035
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
273,133
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
273,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issuance costs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(10,000
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(10,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss for the year ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,210,603
|
)
|
|
|
(2,210,603
|
)
|
Balance at Septemer 30, 2010
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
209,055,337
|
|
|
|
24,813,369
|
|
|
|
5,238,213
|
|
|
|
3,449,063
|
|
|
|
(33,919,805
|
)
|
|
|
(419,160
|
)
|
The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part
of These Financial Statements
XSUNX, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Statements of Stockholders' Equity
From Inception February 25, 1997 to September
30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
Stock Options/
|
|
during the
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
Warrants
|
|
Development
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Capital
|
|
Paid-in-Capital
|
|
Stage
|
|
Total
|
Issuance of common shares for cash
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13,263,096
|
|
|
|
825,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
825,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares for a cashless exercise of warrants
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,680,204
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation costs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
186,016
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
186,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the year ended September 30, 2011
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,117,654
|
)
|
|
|
(1,117,654
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2011
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
224,998,637
|
|
|
|
25,638,369
|
|
|
|
5,238,213
|
|
|
|
3,635,079
|
|
|
|
(35,037,459
|
)
|
|
|
(525,798
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock for cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(prices between $0.015 and $0.0165 per share)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,181,819
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for conversion of debt at fair value
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
|
|
420,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
420,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock for conversion of notes and interest
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
8,741,825
|
|
|
|
148,120
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
148,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write down of fair value of notes converted
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
119,605
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
119,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock for services at fair value
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,450,078
|
|
|
|
115,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
115,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issurance of common stock for accounts payable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
26,000,000
|
|
|
|
780,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
780,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock for commitment fees
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock for prepaid rent
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issurance of common stock through a cashless exercise
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,860,791
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation expense (unaudited)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
129,834
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
129,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributed capital
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
37,035
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
37,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributed services
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the year ended September 30, 2012
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,555,194
|
)
|
|
|
(1,555,194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2012
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
281,233,150
|
|
|
$
|
27,341,594
|
|
|
$
|
5,335,248
|
|
|
$
|
3,764,913
|
|
|
$
|
(36,592,653
|
)
|
|
$
|
(150,898
|
)
|
The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of
These Financial Statements
XSUNX, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
From Inception
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,1997
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
through
|
|
|
September 30, 2012
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
September 30, 2012
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(1,555,194
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,117,654
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36,592,653
|
)
|
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used in operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation & amortization
|
|
|
41,706
|
|
|
|
38,472
|
|
|
|
729,532
|
|
Common stock issued for services and other expenses
|
|
|
163,598
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,160,232
|
|
Common stock issued for prepaid rent
|
|
|
13,750
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13,750
|
|
Stock option and warrant expense
|
|
|
129,834
|
|
|
|
186,016
|
|
|
|
4,039,103
|
|
Beneficial conversion and commitment fees
|
|
|
85,734
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,771,307
|
|
Asset impairment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,285,120
|
|
Write down of inventory asset
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,177,000
|
|
(Gain)/loss conversion and settlement of debt
|
|
|
441,522
|
|
|
|
(179,580
|
)
|
|
|
(25,439
|
)
|
(Gain)/Loss on sale of asset
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(17,000
|
)
|
|
|
(16,423
|
)
|
Contributed capital and services
|
|
|
97,035
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
97,035
|
|
Settlement of lease
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
59,784
|
|
Change in derivative liability
|
|
|
(39,969
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(39,969
|
)
|
Amortization of debt discount recorded as interest expense
|
|
|
206,465
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
206,465
|
|
Common stock issued of interest payable
|
|
|
5,120
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,120
|
|
Change in Assets and Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) Decrease in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(2,130
|
)
|
|
|
4,857
|
|
|
|
11,334
|
|
Inventory held for sale
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,417,000
|
)
|
Other receivable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(2,500
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(5,700
|
)
|
Increase (Decrease) in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
(80,916
|
)
|
|
|
2,370,544
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
35,346
|
|
|
|
45,487
|
|
|
|
150,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(379,240
|
)
|
|
|
(1,117,818
|
)
|
|
|
(14,043,070
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase/Refund of manufacturing equipment and facilities in process
|
|
|
(3,309
|
)
|
|
|
148,025
|
|
|
|
(5,909,913
|
)
|
Payments on note receivable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,500,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
261,100
|
|
Receipts on note receivable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
Purchase of marketable prototype
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,780,396
|
)
|
Purchase of fixed assets
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(6,053
|
)
|
|
|
(597,972
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED/(USED) BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(3,309
|
)
|
|
|
158,972
|
|
|
|
(8,027,181
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from warrant conversion
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,306,250
|
|
Proceeds from debentures
|
|
|
310,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,160,500
|
|
Proceeds for issuance of common stock, net
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
825,000
|
|
|
|
12,648,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
360,500
|
|
|
|
825,000
|
|
|
|
22,114,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
|
|
|
(22,049
|
)
|
|
|
(133,846
|
)
|
|
|
44,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
|
|
66,576
|
|
|
|
200,422
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH, END OF PERIOD
|
|
$
|
44,527
|
|
|
$
|
66,576
|
|
|
$
|
44,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
603
|
|
|
$
|
440
|
|
|
$
|
120,734
|
|
Taxes paid
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON CASH TRANSACTIONS During the year ended September 30, 2012, in exchange for the note of $456,920 plus accrued interest of $98,645 that was due at September 1, 2011, the Company issued 7,000,000 restricted shares of common stock as payment for the reduction of $205,565 of principal balance and accrued interest under the note, and issued a new unsecured promissory exchange note in the amount of $350,000. Also, the Company issued 8,741,825 shares of common stock for the conversion of $148,120 promissory notes, which included interest of $5,120.. Additional the Company issued 5,860,791 shares of common stock for 8,863,637 stock purchase warrants through a cashless exercise; issued 27,500,000 shares for accounts payable in the amount of $509,179 plus $85,734 in commitment fees with a conversion loss of $230,087; issued 400,000 shares of common stock for accounts payable of $17,000 with a fair value of $14,000 and recognized a gain of $3,000; issued 500,000 shares of common stock for prepaid rent with a fair value of $25,000. During the year ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 1,363,636 shares of common stock in a cashless exercise of stock purchase warrants.
|
The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of
These Financial Statements
XSUNX, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements
September 30, 2012 and 2011
-
ORGANIZATION AND LINE OF BUSINESS
Organization
XsunX, Inc. (“XsunX,”
the “Company” or the “issuer”) is a Colorado corporation formerly known as Sun River Mining Inc. “Sun
River”). The Company was originally incorporated in Colorado on February 25, 1997. Effective September 24, 2003, the Company
completed a Plan of Reorganization and Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Plan”).
Line of Business
In the year
ended September 30, 2011, XsunX modified its previous plans to directly establish product manufacturing infrastructure. We have
re-focused operations on the development of a cross-industry thin film solar manufacturing concept that we believed provides an
opportunity for XsunX to establish a competitive advantage within the industry. We have been developing and we have begun to market
a hybrid manufacturing solution to produce high performance Copper Indium Gallium (di) Selenide (CIGS) thin film solar cells. Our
patent pending system and processing technology, which we call CIGSolar®, focuses on the mass production of individual thin-film
CIGS solar cells that match silicon solar cell dimensions and can be offered as a non-toxic, high-efficiency and lowest-cost alternative
to the use of silicon solar cells. We intend to offer licenses for the use of the CIGSolar® process technology thereby generating
revenue streams through licensing fees and manufacturing royalties for the use of the technology.
Going Concern
The accompanying financial statements
have been prepared on a going concern basis of accounting, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets and
liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The accompanying financial statements do not reflect any adjustments
that might result if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. The Company does not generate significant revenue, and
has negative cash flows from operations, which raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern and appropriateness of using the going concern basis is dependent
upon, among other things, additional cash infusion. The Company has obtained funds from its shareholders since its inception through
the year ended September 30, 2012. Management believes the existing shareholders and the prospective new investors will provide
the additional cash needed to meet the Company’s obligations as they become due, and will allow the development of its core
of business.
-
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
This summary of significant accounting policies of XsunX, Inc. is
presented to assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations
of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform
to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and have been consistently applied in the preparation
of the financial statements.
Development
Stage Activities and Operations
The Company has been in its initial
stages of formation and for the year ended September 30, 2012, had no revenues. A development stage activity as one in which all
efforts are devoted substantially to establishing a new business and even if planned principal operations have commenced, revenues
are insignificant.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the accompanying financial statements. Significant estimates made in preparing these financial statements include
the estimate of useful lives of property and equipment, the deferred tax valuation allowance, and the fair value of stock options.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the statements of cash flows, cash and
cash equivalents include cash in banks and money markets with an original maturity of three months or less.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated
at cost, and are depreciated using straight line over its estimated useful lives:
Leasehold improvements
|
|
Length of the lease
|
Computer software and equipment
|
|
3 Years
|
Furniture & fixtures
|
|
5 Years
|
Machinery & equipment
|
|
5 Years
|
The Company capitalizes property and
equipment over $500. Property and equipment under $500 are expensed in the year purchased. The depreciation expense for the years
ended September 30, 2012, and 2011, were $41,706 and $38,472, respectively.
XSUNX, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements
September 30, 2012 and 2011
-
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Fair Value
of Financial Instruments
Fair Value of Financial Instruments,
requires disclosure of the fair value information, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, where it is practicable to estimate
that value. As of September 30, 2012, the balances reported for cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses, derivative
liability, and notes payable approximate the fair value because of their short maturities.
We adopted ASC Topic 820 (originally
issued as SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements”) as of January 1, 2008 for financial instruments measured as fair value
on a recurring basis. ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, established a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
Fair value is defined as the price
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at
the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 established a three-tier fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring
fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
(level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). These tiers include:
|
·
|
Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical
instruments in active markets;
|
|
·
|
Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets
that are either directly or indirectly observable such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices
for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and
|
|
·
|
Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market
data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions, such as valuations derived from valuation techniques
in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.
|
We measure certain financial instruments
at fair value on a recurring basis. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows at September
30, 2012:
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
|
|
Total
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Liability
|
|
$
|
150,926
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
150,926
|
|
Convertible Debenture, net of discount
|
|
|
63,465
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
63,465
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
214,391
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
214,391
|
|
Loss per Share Calculations
Loss per Share is the calculation
of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to
common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares available. Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to
basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would
have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. The Company’s
diluted loss per share is the same as the basic loss per share for the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 as the inclusion
of any potential shares would have had an anti-dilutive effect due to the Company generating a loss.
|
|
For the year ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) to common shareholders (Numerator)
|
|
$
|
(1,555,194
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,117,654
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding (Denominator)
|
|
|
247,855,835
|
|
|
|
218,617,564
|
|
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue when
services are performed, and at the time of shipment of products, provided that evidence of an arrangement exists, title and risk
of loss have passed to the customer, fees are fixed or determinable, and collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured.
To date the Company has had minimal revenue and is still in the development stage.
Advertising
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Total advertising
costs were $7,565, and $6,622 for the years ended September 30, 2012 and
XSUNX, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements
September 30, 2012 and 2011
-
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Research and Development
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Total research and development costs were $122,673 and $282,492 for the years ended September 30, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation
Share-based Payment applies to transactions
in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services and also applies to liabilities an entity may incur for
goods or services that are to follow a fair value of those equity instruments. We are required to follow a fair value approach
using an option-pricing model, such as the Black Scholes option valuation model, at the date of a stock option grant. The deferred
compensation calculated under the fair value method would then be amortized over the respective vesting period of the stock option.
This has not had a material impact on our results of operations.
Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes are provided
using the liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and
tax credit carry-forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences
are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced
by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred
tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of the changes in tax laws and
rates of the date of enactment.
When tax returns are filed, it is
highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject
to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit
of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management
believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or
litigation
processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions.
Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is
more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits
associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized
tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheet along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing
authorities upon examination.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
Management reviewed accounting pronouncements
issued during the year ended September 30, 2012, and the following pronouncements were adopted during the period.
The Company adopted ASC 815 "Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities". This pronouncement addresses the accounting for derivative instruments
including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and hedging activities. Derivative instruments that meet
the definition of assets and liabilities should be reported in the financial statements at fair value, and any gain or loss should
be recognized in current earnings. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material effect on the financial statements
of the Company.
-
CAPITAL STOCK
At September 30, 2012, the Company’s authorized
stock consisted of 500,000,000 shares of common stock, with no par value. The Company is also authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares
of preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 per share. The rights, preferences and privileges of the holders of the preferred
stock will be determined by the Board of Directors prior to issuance of such shares.
During the year ended September 30,
2012, the Company issued 7,000,000 restricted shares of common stock as payment for the reduction of $205,565 of principal and
accrued interest balance under a note originally issued by the Company in August 2009. As of the date of the transaction the fair
value of the shares issued for the debt reduction was $420,000 resulting in a loss on conversion of $214,435. During the year ended
September 30, 2012, the Company also accepted offers for the sale of 1,666,667 units composed of one share of restricted common
stock and a five year warrant exercisable to purchase two shares of Common Stock at $0.015 per share for cash of $25,000; and 1,515,152
units composed of one share of restricted common stock and a five year warrant exercisable to purchase two shares of Common Stock
at $0.0165 per share for cash of $25,000; a holder of a warrant in the amount of 3,333,334 exercised all available warrants utilizing
a cashless exercise provision resulting in the net issuance of 1,720,430 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock;
a holder of a warrant in the amount of 3,030,303 exercised all available warrants utilizing a cashless exercise provision resulting
in the net issuance of 1,559,715 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock; 400,000 shares of the Company’s restricted
common stock were issued for accounts payable of $17,000 with a fair value of $14,000 and recognized a gain of $3,000; 1,050,078
shares of the Company’s restricted common stock were issued for services at fair value of $34,000; 2,000,000 shares of the
Company’s restricted common stock were issued to a scientific consultant for $7,500 in services related to a special assembly
project and 12 months of consulting services valued at $60,000; 500,000 shares of common stock were issued for 12 months of prepaid
rent with a fair value for $25,000; the holder of unsecured 8% convertible notes issued by the Company on various dates
XSUNX, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements
September 30, 2012 and 2011
-
CAPITAL STOCK (Continued)
during the year, converted
the total accrued principal and interest for the various notes in the amount of $148,120. Upon conversion the Company issued 8,741,825
shares of common voting stock to the holder. The above shares were issued in a transactions exempt from registration pursuant
to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. Also, during the period certain employees forgave their salary, which has been reflected
as contributed services in the financial statements. Additional, during the year ended September 30, 2012, the Company issued
an aggregate of 27,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, no par value per share, to Ironridge Global IV, Ltd., of
which 26,000,000 shares were for settlement of accounts payable of $549,913 with a fair value of $780,000, and the Company recognized
a loss of $230,087. Also, 1,500,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $45,000 were retained by Ironridge Global IV,
Ltd. The issuance is exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Section
3(a)(10) thereof, as an issuance of securities in exchange for bona fide outstanding claims, where the terms and conditions of
such issuance are approved by a court after a hearing upon the fairness of such terms and conditions.
During the year ended September 30,
2011, pursuant to an S-1 Registration Statement declared effective by the SEC on June 30, 2010,
and
a Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 registration declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 4, 2011
the
Company sold to Lincoln Park Capital Group, LLC (LPC) a total of approximately 7,013,096 shares for a total investment of $575,000.
These shares were sold at various pricing between $0.08 and $0.0888 per share, and included 159,720 of the remaining pool of 1,236,112
commitment shares were issued on a pro rata basis to LPC as LPC has purchased additional shares pursuant to the effective S-1 Registration
Statement. Also, during the year ended September 30, 2011, the Company also issued 5,000,000 units composed of one share of restricted
common stock and a five year warrant exercisable to purchase two shares of Common Stock at $0.04 per share for cash of $200,000;
1,250,000 shares of restricted common stock at a price of $0.04 per share for cash of $50,000; a holder of warrants exercised all
available 5,000,000 warrants utilizing a cashless exercise provision resulting in the net issuance of 2,680,204 shares of the Company’s
restricted common stock. The above shares were issued in a transactions exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act.
-
STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
The Company adopted a
Stock Option Plan for the purposes of granting stock options to its employees and others providing services to the Company, which
reserves and sets aside for the granting of Options for Twenty Million (20,000,000) shares of Common Stock. Options granted under
the Plan may be either Incentive Options or Nonqualified Options and shall be administered by the Company's Board of Directors
("Board"). Each Option shall be exercisable to the nearest whole share, in installments or otherwise, as the respective
Option agreements may provide. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan or of any Option agreement, each Option shall expire
on the date specified in the Option agreement. During the year ended September 30, 2012, the Company granted 1,500,000 incentive
stock options to board members for services and are fully vested. The stock options are exercisable for a period of five years
from the date of grant at an exercise price of $0.045 per share and expire on January 11, 2017.
Risk free interest rate
|
0.83%
|
Stock volatility factor
|
89.22%
|
Weighted average expected option life
|
5 years
|
Expected dividend yield
|
None
|
A summary of the Company’s stock
option activity and related information follows:
|
|
9/30/2012
|
|
9/30/2011
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Number
|
|
average
|
|
Number
|
|
average
|
|
|
of
|
|
exercise
|
|
of
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
Options
|
|
price
|
|
Options
|
|
price
|
Outstanding, beginning of the period
|
|
|
21,180,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.210
|
|
|
|
10,180,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
0.045
|
|
|
|
11,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(14,680,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.014
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Outstanding, end of the period
|
|
|
8,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.210
|
|
|
|
21,180,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the period
|
|
|
6,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.270
|
|
|
|
8,544,159
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
Weighted average fair value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
options granted during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
XSUNX, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements
September 30, 2012 and 2011
-
STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (Continued)
The weighted average remaining contractual life of options
outstanding issued under the plan as of September 30, 2012 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Stock
|
|
Remaining
|
Exercisable
|
|
Options
|
|
Options
|
|
Contractual
|
Prices
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Life (years)
|
$
|
0.360
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
0.06 years
|
$
|
0.360
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
0.06 years
|
$
|
0.360
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
0.12 years
|
$
|
0.360
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
0.16 years
|
$
|
0.160
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
1.50 years
|
$
|
0.100
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
3.05 years
|
$
|
0.045
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
4.28 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000,000
|
|
|
|
8,000,000
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense recognized
during the period is based on the value of the portion of stock-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest. Stock-based
compensation expense recognized in the financial statements of operations during the year ended September 30, 2012, included compensation
expense for the stock-based payment awards granted prior to, but not yet vested, as of September 30, 2012 based on the grant date
fair value estimated, and compensation expense for the stock-based payment awards granted subsequent to September 30, 2012, based
on the grant date fair value estimated. We account for forfeitures as they occur. The stock-based compensation expense recognized
in the statement of operations during the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $129,834 and $186,016, respectively.
Warrants
A summary of the Company’s warrants
activity and related information follows:
|
|
9/30/2012
|
|
9/30/2011
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Number
|
|
average
|
|
Number
|
|
average
|
|
|
of
|
|
exercise
|
|
of
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
Options
|
|
price
|
|
Options
|
|
price
|
Outstanding, beginning of the period
|
|
|
8,583,332
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
4,195,332
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
6,363,637
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(11,363,637
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
(5,000,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
Expired
|
|
|
(250,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
(612,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.73
|
)
|
Outstanding, end of the period
|
|
|
3,333,332
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
8,583,332
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
Exercisable at the end of period
|
|
|
3,333,332
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
8,583,332
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
Weighted average fair value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
warrants granted during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
At September 30, 2012, the weighted
average remaining contractual life of warrants outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
Exercisable
|
|
Warrants
|
|
Warrants
|
|
Contractual
|
Prices
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Life (years)
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
1,666,666
|
|
|
|
1,666,666
|
|
|
0.08 years
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
1,666,666
|
|
|
|
1,666,666
|
|
|
0.08 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,333,332
|
|
|
|
3,333,332
|
|
|
|
-
INCOME TAXES
The Company files income tax returns
in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction, and the state of California. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal,
state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2009.
Included in the balance at September
30, 2012, are no tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain, but for which there is uncertainty about
the timing of such deductibility. Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, other than interest and penalties, the disallowance
of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to
the taxing authority to an earlier period.
The Company's policy is to recognize
interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses. During the period
ended September 30, 2012, the Company did not recognize interest and penalties.
XSUNX, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements
September 30, 2012 and 2011
-
DEFERRED TAX BENEFIT
At September 30, 2012, the
Company had net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $20,003,900 that may be offset against future taxable income from
the year 2012 through 2030. No tax benefit has been reported in the September 30, 2012 financial statements since the potential
tax benefit is offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.
The income tax provision differs
from the amount of income tax determined by applying the U.S. federal and state income tax rate of 40% to pretax income from continuing
operations for the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 due to the following:
|
|
9/30/2012
|
|
9/30/2011
|
Book Income
|
|
$
|
(622,078
|
)
|
|
$
|
(447,062
|
)
|
Nondeductible Stock Compensation
|
|
|
51,934
|
|
|
|
74,406
|
|
Contributed capital
|
|
|
38,814
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Nondeductible other expenses
|
|
|
113,505
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Nondeductible Penalties
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
Loss on settlement of debt
|
|
|
176,609
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Meals & Entertainment
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(2,516
|
)
|
|
|
11,339
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(6,494
|
)
|
Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
243,491
|
|
|
|
367,043
|
|
Income Tax Expense
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Deferred taxes are provided on a liability
method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards
and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when,
in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
Net deferred
tax assets consist of the following components as of September 30, 2012 and 2011:
|
|
9/30/2012
|
|
9/30/2011
|
Deferred Tax Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOL Carryforward
|
|
$
|
7,996,118
|
|
|
$
|
7,755,958
|
|
Capital loss Carry-Forward
|
|
|
2,917,009
|
|
|
|
2,917,009
|
|
Contribution Carry-forward
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Section 179 Expense Carry-forward
|
|
|
73,406
|
|
|
|
73,406
|
|
R&D Carry-forward
|
|
|
44,217
|
|
|
|
37,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(17,796
|
)
|
|
|
(15,280
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
(11,012,994
|
)
|
|
|
(10,768,540
|
)
|
Net Deferred Tax Asset
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
-
PROMISSORY NOTE
During the year ended
September 30, 2009, the Company converted an accounts payable to a promissory note (the “Note”) in the amount of $456,920.
On November 3, 2011, in exchange for the Note of $456,920 plus accrued interest of $98,645 that had become due at September 1,
2011, the Company issued 7,000,000 restricted shares of common stock with a fair value of $420,000 as payment for the reduction
of $205,565 of principal balance and accrued interest under the Note, and incurred a loss on the conversion of the debt in the
amount of $214,435.
-
CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES
During the year ended September 30,
2012, the Company entered into eight Securities Purchase Agreements (the "Purchase Agreements") each providing for the
sale by the Company of 8% unsecured Convertible Notes (“the Notes”) in the principal amounts of $53,000, $42,500,
$32,500, $37,500, $37,500, $32,500, $37,500 and $37,500 for an aggregate total of $310,500. During the year ended September 30,
2012 the holder converted the $53,000 Note plus $2,120 in accrued interest, the $42,500 Note plus $1,700 in accrued interest,
the $32,500 Note plus $1,300 in accrued interest, and $15,000 of the $37,500 Note. Upon conversion the Company issued an aggregate
of 8,741,825 shares of common voting stock to the holder. The remaining Notes mature on December 19, 2012, January 30, 2013, March
6, 2013, April 3, 2013 and May 30, 2013. The Company has the right to redeem a portion or all amounts outstanding under the any
Note prior to one hundred and eighty one days from issuance of the Note under a variable redemption rate premium. After one hundred
and eighty days the holder may convert into shares of common stock at a variable conversion price of 60% multiplied by the market
price of the average lowest three (3) and five (5) trading prices for the common stock during the ten (10) trading days prior
to the conversion date.
XSUNX, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements
September 30, 2012 and 2011
-
CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES (Continued)
ASC Topic 815 provides
guidance applicable to convertible debt issued by the Company in instances where the number into which the debt can be converted
is not fixed. For example, when a convertible debt converts at a discount to market based on the stock price on the date of conversion,
ASC Topic 815 requires that the embedded conversion option of the convertible debt be bifurcated from the host contract and recorded
at their fair value. In accounting for derivatives under accounting standards, the Company recorded a liability of $150,926 representing
the estimated present value of the conversion feature considering the historic volatility of the Company’s stock, and a
discount of $310,500 representing the imputed interest associated with the embedded derivative. The discount is amortized over
the life of the convertible debts, which resulted in the recognition of $206,465
in interest expense for the year ended September
30, 2012, and the derivative liability is adjusted periodically according to stock price fluctuations. At the time of conversion,
any remaining derivative liability will be charged to additional paid-in capital. For purpose of determining the fair market value
of the derivative liability, the Company used Black Scholes option valuation model. The significant assumptions used in the Black
Scholes valuation of the derivative are as follows:
Stock price on the valuation dates
|
|
0.03 - 0.04
|
Conversion price for the debt
|
|
0.014 - 0.0192
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0.00%
|
Months to Maturity
|
|
2 to 9
|
Risk free rate
|
|
Between 0.09% and 0.018%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
Between 106.82% and 157.79%
|
The value of the derivative liability at September
30, 2012 was $150,926.
-
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company continues to lease a corporate office facility located
in Aliso Viejo and Irvine, CA. The lease is month to month at a monthly rate of $200 per month for the Aliso Viejo location and
$3,000 per month for the Irvine shop location.
-
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Management has evaluated subsequent events
as of the financial statement date according to the requirements of ASC TOPIC 855 and has reported the following:
Subsequent to the end
of the year ended September 30, 2012, a holder of Securities Purchase Agreements (the "Purchase Agreements") each providing
for the sale by the Company of 8% unsecured Convertible Notes (“the Notes”) in the principal amounts of $37,500 of
which $22,500 remained, $37,500, and $32,500 converted the total remaining principal of $92,500 of principal and $4,800 in accrued
interest retiring the notes. Upon conversion, the Company issued an aggregate of 9,265,139 shares respectively of common voting
stock to the holder.
In exchange for a promissory note (the “Note”) of $350,000 plus accrued interest of $35,863 that
had become due at September 30, 2012, the Company issued a new unsecured promissory exchange note (the “Exchange Note”)
in the amount of $385,863 in November 2012. The Holder and the Company exchanged the Note solely for (i) a 12% promissory Exchange
Note, (ii) and 500,000 shares of common stock. Interest on the Exchange note accrued interest at the rate of 18% per annum commencing
on September 30, 2012 through October 31, 2012 and thereafter at the rate of 12%. The Exchange Note is convertible into securities
of the Company by the Holder at the lesser of $0.025 or 70% of the lowest volume weighted average (VWAP) occurring during the ten
consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date on which the Holder may elect to convert portions of the note. The Exchange
Note matures on September 30, 2013 and the Company can prepay any then remaining principal and accrued interest balance upon first
providing the holder with a ten day prepayment notice.
On November 7, 2012, the Company consummated
a securities purchase agreement providing for the sales of an 8% convertible promissory note in the amount of $37,500, which, after
one hundred and eighty days, can be converted into shares of common stock at a conversion price of 60% of the average lowest five
(3) trading prices for the common stock, during the ten (10) trading day period ending on the latest complete trading day prior
to the conversion date. The note matures on August 7, 2013.
On November 7, 2012, the Company issued
a 10% unsecured convertible promissory note (the “Promissory Note”) for the principal sum of up to $78,000 plus accrued
interest on any advanced principal funds. Upon issuance of the Promissory Note the lender may immediately advance the sum of $25,000
to the Company, and may elect to pay additional consideration to the Company in such amounts and at such times as the Lender may
choose in its sole discretion. The Promissory Note matures one year from its issuance and may be converted by the Lender into shares
of common stock of the Company at the lesser of $.0125 per share at fifty percent of the lowest trade price in the twenty five
(25) trading days prior to the conversion of any outstanding funded principal or accrued interest under the Promissory Note.
In accordance with the Stipulation
for Settlement of Claims (“Stipulation”), dated June 27, 2012, by and between Ironridge Global IV, Ltd and the Company
as documented in Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BC484549, pursuant to which the Company delivered 27,500,000 shares
(“Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, no par value (“Common Stock”) to Ironridge. The Stipulation
provided for the subsequent issuance by the Company to Ironridge of additional Shares of Common Stock thereunder, the (“Adjustment
Shares”). In accordance with the stipulation on November 26, 2012 subject to a request by Ironridge the Company issued 6,271,791
Adjustment Shares to Ironridge Global IV, Ltd.
XSUNX, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements
September 30, 2012 and 2011
-
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (Continued)
On December 13, 2012, the Company issued a
10% unsecured convertible promissory note (the “Promissory Note”) for the principal sum of up to $250,000 and accrued
interest on any advanced principal funds. Upon issuance of the Promissory Note the lender immediately advance the sum of $50,000
to the Company, and may elect to pay additional consideration to the Company in such amounts and at such times as the Lender may
choose in its sole discretion. The principal sum due the Lender shall be prorated based on the actual total consideration paid
to the Company by the Lender such that the Company will only be required to repay the amount funded by the lender, nor shall any
interest or other rights extend to any unfunded portion of the Promissory Note. If the Company repays the Promissory Note on or
before 90 days from the issuance date, the interest rate shall be zero percent (0%). If the Company does not repay the Promissory
Note on or before 90 days from the issuance date, a one-time Interest charge of 10% shall be applied to the any then advanced
principal sum. The Promissory Note matures one year from its issuance and may be converted by the Lender into shares of common
stock of the Company at the lesser of $.025 per share of at a sixty percent of the lowest trade price in the twenty five trading
days prior to the conversion of any outstanding funded principal or accrued interest under the Promissory Note.
Effective January 9, 2013, as part
of a continued effort that began in January 2012 to maximize the use of capital resources necessary to complete the assembly and
marketing of the Company’s CIGSolar technology through reductions to operating costs and functions that are redundant, the
Company elected to consolidate its executive management operations which has eliminated the need to have multiple officers performing
similar functions. In furtherance of these efforts the Company’s Board of Directors accepted the resignation of Joseph Grimes
as the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer, effective immediately, and approved by unanimous consent the reorganization
and appointment of executive management as follows;
In connection with the resignation
of Mr. Grimes, the Board appointed Mr. Tom Djokovich to the position of President. Mr. Djokovich will continue to also serve as
the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO), a Director, and Secretary duties which he has performed since October 2003.
Mr. Djokovich will focus on the strategic oversight of the day-to-day operations and securities compliance. Mr. Djokovich did not
enter into, or receive any grant or award under, any material plan, contract or arrangement in connection with his assumption of
duties as the Company’s President. Mr. Djokovich is 55 years old.
Mr. Grimes will continue to serve
as a member of the Board of Directors and will assume the position of Executive Sales Manager. As Executive Sales Manager, Mr.
Grimes will manage the marketing efforts associated with the Company’s commercialization efforts of its CIGSolar thin film
manufacturing technology. Mr. Grimes previously held the position of President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Grimes did not
enter into, or receive any grant or award under, any material plan, contract or arrangement in connection with his assumption of
duties as the Company’s executive sales manager. Mr. Grimes is 55 years old.
NovAccess Global (QB) (USOTC:XSNX)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2024 to Jun 2024
NovAccess Global (QB) (USOTC:XSNX)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2023 to Jun 2024