UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended June 30,
2010
OR
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission
File No. 1-9328
ECOLAB INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its
charter)
Delaware
|
|
41-0231510
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.)
|
370 Wabasha Street N., St.
Paul, Minnesota
|
|
55102
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
1-800-232-6522
(Registrants telephone number, including area
code)
(Not Applicable)
(Former name, former
address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has
submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405
of Regulations S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post
such files).Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions
of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting
company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
x
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is
a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the
issuers classes of common stock, as of July 31, 2010.
233,303,576 shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per
share.
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements
ECOLAB INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
(millions, except per share)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,520.2
|
|
$
|
1,441.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales (including
special charges of $0.1 in 2009)
|
|
750.0
|
|
725.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
565.3
|
|
526.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special gains and charges
|
|
0.6
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
204.3
|
|
165.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
15.0
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
189.3
|
|
149.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
59.8
|
|
50.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income including
noncontrolling interest
|
|
129.5
|
|
99.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income
attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
0.2
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to
Ecolab
|
|
$
|
129.3
|
|
$
|
99.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings attributable to
Ecolab per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per
common share
|
|
$
|
0.1550
|
|
$
|
0.1400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common
shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
233.4
|
|
236.5
|
|
Diluted
|
|
237.4
|
|
239.5
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
the consolidated financial information.
2
ECOLAB INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
(millions, except per share)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,952.3
|
|
$
|
2,789.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales (including
special charges of $8.1 in 2009)
|
|
1,466.7
|
|
1,433.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
1,123.4
|
|
1,042.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special gains and charges
|
|
4.1
|
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
358.1
|
|
262.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
30.0
|
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
328.1
|
|
231.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
102.9
|
|
74.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income including
noncontrolling interest
|
|
225.2
|
|
157.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income
attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
0.4
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to
Ecolab
|
|
$
|
224.8
|
|
$
|
156.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings attributable to Ecolab
per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per
common share
|
|
$
|
0.3100
|
|
$
|
0.2800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common
shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
234.4
|
|
236.3
|
|
Diluted
|
|
238.1
|
|
239.1
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
the consolidated financial information.
3
ECOLAB INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
|
June 30
|
|
December 31
|
|
(millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
121.3
|
|
$
|
73.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
950.1
|
|
1,016.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
441.3
|
|
493.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
84.5
|
|
83.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
138.1
|
|
147.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
1,735.3
|
|
1,814.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment, net
|
|
1,124.0
|
|
1,176.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
1,272.1
|
|
1,414.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
277.8
|
|
312.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
254.6
|
|
303.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,663.8
|
|
$
|
5,020.9
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
the consolidated financial information.
(Continued)
4
ECOLAB INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (continued)
|
|
June 30
|
|
December 31
|
|
(millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
$
|
326.7
|
|
$
|
98.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
324.0
|
|
360.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
228.7
|
|
302.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
22.5
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
438.0
|
|
466.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
1,339.9
|
|
1,250.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
637.0
|
|
868.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement health care and
pension benefits
|
|
566.0
|
|
603.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
259.3
|
|
288.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
331.2
|
|
329.8
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
1,232.7
|
|
1,179.3
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
3,050.1
|
|
2,898.1
|
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss
|
|
(380.6
|
)
|
(232.9
|
)
|
Treasury stock
|
|
(2,375.1
|
)
|
(2,173.4
|
)
|
Total Ecolab shareholders equity
|
|
1,858.3
|
|
2,000.9
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
3.3
|
|
8.7
|
|
Total equity
|
|
1,861.6
|
|
2,009.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
4,663.8
|
|
$
|
5,020.9
|
|
(a)
|
Common stock, 400 million shares authorized, $1.00 par
value per share, 233.5 million shares outstanding at June 30, 2010,
236.6 million shares outstanding at December 31, 2009.
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
the consolidated financial information.
5
ECOLAB INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
(millions, except per share)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income including
noncontrolling interest
|
|
$
|
225.2
|
|
$
|
157.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income including noncontrolling interest to cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
178.0
|
|
165.0
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
3.8
|
|
Share-based compensation
expense
|
|
14.2
|
|
14.9
|
|
Excess tax benefits from
share-based payment arrangements
|
|
(6.9
|
)
|
(1.2
|
)
|
Pension and postretirement plan
contributions
|
|
(12.7
|
)
|
(63.2
|
)
|
Pension and postretirement plan
expense
|
|
44.7
|
|
41.1
|
|
Restructuring, net of cash
paid
|
|
|
|
33.9
|
|
Other, net
|
|
7.5
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets
and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
(26.8
|
)
|
53.6
|
|
Inventories
|
|
12.3
|
|
16.3
|
|
Other assets
|
|
(7.3
|
)
|
(8.3
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
(9.4
|
)
|
(32.5
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
(53.0
|
)
|
(86.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
365.0
|
|
299.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
the consolidated financial information.
(Continued)
6
ECOLAB
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
(millions, except per share)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
(125.4
|
)
|
$
|
(107.7
|
)
|
Capitalized software
expenditures
|
|
(21.1
|
)
|
(17.3
|
)
|
Property sold
|
|
1.4
|
|
1.0
|
|
Businesses acquired and
investments in affiliates, net of cash acquired
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
(5.2
|
)
|
Sale of business
|
|
10.0
|
|
0.3
|
|
Receipt from indemnification
escrow
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
Cash used for investing
activities
|
|
(134.9
|
)
|
(128.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net issuances (repayments)
of commercial paper and notes payable
|
|
73.2
|
|
(99.5
|
)
|
Long-term debt repayments
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
(3.5
|
)
|
Reacquired shares
|
|
(202.0
|
)
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Cash dividends on common
stock
|
|
(73.4
|
)
|
(66.4
|
)
|
Exercise of employee stock
options
|
|
34.8
|
|
12.1
|
|
Excess tax benefits from
share-based payment arrangements
|
|
6.9
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used for)
financing activities
|
|
(163.8
|
)
|
(156.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate
changes on cash
|
|
(18.6
|
)
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS
|
|
47.7
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of period
|
|
73.6
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents,
end of period
|
|
$
|
121.3
|
|
$
|
82.7
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
the consolidated financial information.
7
ECOLAB
INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
Consolidated
Financial Information
The unaudited consolidated financial information for the
second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, reflect, in
the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of
the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Ecolab Inc. (the
company) for the interim periods presented. The financial results for any
interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. The
consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2009 was derived from
the audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all
disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. The unaudited
consolidated financial information should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto incorporated in the companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
With respect to the unaudited financial information of
the company for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, included in this Form 10-Q, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP reported that
they have applied limited procedures in accordance with professional standards
for a review of such information. Therefore, their separate report dated August 5,
2010 appearing herein, states that they did not audit and they do not express
an opinion on that unaudited financial information. Accordingly, the degree of
reliance on their report on such information should be restricted in light of
the limited nature of the review procedures applied. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
is not subject to the liability provisions of Section 11 of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the Act), for their report on the unaudited
financial information because that report is not a report or a part of a
registration statement prepared or certified by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.
2.
Special
Gains and Charges
Special gains and charges reported on the
Consolidated Statement of Income include the following:
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
June 30
|
|
(millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special gains and charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
Venezuela currency
devaluation
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
Business structure and optimization
|
|
0.6
|
|
0.6
|
|
1.2
|
|
1.6
|
|
Business write-downs and
closure
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
Other items
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
1.3
|
|
Total
|
|
0.6
|
|
25.0
|
|
4.1
|
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total special gains and
charges
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
$
|
25.1
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
$
|
59.6
|
|
Beginning in 2010, Venezuela has been designated
hyper-inflationary and as such all foreign currency fluctuations are recorded
in income. On January 8, 2010 the Venezuelan government devalued its
currency (Bolivar Fuerte). As a result of the devaluation, the company recorded
a charge in the first quarter of 2010 as shown in the table above due to
remeasurement of the local balance sheet using the official rate of exchange
for the Bolivar Fuerte.
8
ECOLAB
INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
2.
Special
Gains and Charges (Continued)
As previously disclosed, in 2009, the company
completed restructuring and other cost-saving actions in order to streamline
operations and improve efficiency and effectiveness. The restructuring plan was
finalized and all actions, except for certain cash payments, were completed as
of December 31, 2009.
Changes to the restructuring liability accounts
during 2009 and 2010 include the following:
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
Costs
|
|
Disposals
|
|
Other
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded expense and accrual
|
|
$
|
55.2
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
$
|
56.7
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
(22.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(22.8
|
)
|
Non-cash charges
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
(0.9
|
)
|
(1.5
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring liability,
June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
33.6
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
33.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring liability December 31,
2009
|
|
$
|
18.6
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
$
|
20.0
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
(11.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
(12.6
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency
translation
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring liability, June 30,
2010
|
|
$
|
6.4
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
$
|
6.8
|
|
Restructuring charges have been included as a
component of both cost of sales and special gains and charges on the
Consolidated Statement of Income. Amounts included as a component of cost of
sales include asset write-downs and manufacturing related severance.
Restructuring liabilities have been classified as a component of other current
liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The majority of the remaining
accrued amount is expected to be paid in 2010.
Employee termination costs include personnel
reductions and related costs for severance, benefits and outplacement services.
Asset disposals include inventory and intangible asset write-downs related to
the discontinuance of product lines which are not consistent with the companys
long-term strategies. Other charges include one-time curtailment and settlement
charges related to the companys International pension plans and U.S.
postretirement health care benefits plan, and lease terminations.
For segment reporting purposes, special gains and
charges are included in the Corporate segment, which is consistent with the
companys internal management reporting.
9
ECOLAB
INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
3.
Selected
Balance Sheet Information
|
|
June 30
|
|
December 31
|
|
(millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
993.5
|
|
$
|
1,068.5
|
|
Allowance for doubtful
accounts
|
|
(43.4
|
)
|
(52.4
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
950.1
|
|
$
|
1,016.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
254.8
|
|
$
|
293.4
|
|
Raw materials and parts
|
|
208.8
|
|
222.9
|
|
Inventories at FIFO cost
|
|
463.6
|
|
516.3
|
|
Excess of FIFO cost over
LIFO cost
|
|
(22.3
|
)
|
(22.9
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
441.3
|
|
$
|
493.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
26.8
|
|
$
|
28.8
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
270.4
|
|
281.0
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
74.2
|
|
69.5
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
672.5
|
|
718.0
|
|
Merchandising equipment
|
|
1,380.7
|
|
1,424.2
|
|
Capitalized software
|
|
310.2
|
|
236.6
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
37.6
|
|
108.4
|
|
|
|
2,772.4
|
|
2,866.5
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
(1,648.4
|
)
|
(1,690.3
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,124.0
|
|
$
|
1,176.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets,
gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
254.2
|
|
$
|
296.0
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
112.0
|
|
115.7
|
|
Patents
|
|
76.7
|
|
74.8
|
|
Customer lists
|
|
5.6
|
|
5.6
|
|
Other intangibles
|
|
67.4
|
|
68.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
515.9
|
|
$
|
560.7
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
(141.8
|
)
|
$
|
(157.7
|
)
|
Trademarks
|
|
(40.5
|
)
|
(39.4
|
)
|
Patents
|
|
(25.3
|
)
|
(22.5
|
)
|
Customer lists
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
(5.5
|
)
|
Other intangibles
|
|
(25.0
|
)
|
(23.1
|
)
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
$
|
277.8
|
|
$
|
312.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
$
|
90.3
|
|
$
|
139.6
|
|
Pension
|
|
8.4
|
|
9.8
|
|
Other
|
|
155.9
|
|
154.5
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
254.6
|
|
$
|
303.9
|
|
10
ECOLAB
INC.
CONDENSED
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
3.
Selected
Balance Sheet Information (Continued)
|
|
June 30
|
|
December 31
|
|
(millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
$
|
121.4
|
|
$
|
74.4
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
48.0
|
|
16.2
|
|
Long-term debt, current
maturities
|
|
157.3
|
|
7.9
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
326.7
|
|
$
|
98.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounts and rebates
|
|
$
|
222.2
|
|
$
|
218.5
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
36.2
|
|
36.8
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
17.3
|
|
9.6
|
|
Taxes payable, other than
income
|
|
44.2
|
|
57.8
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
2.9
|
|
5.7
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
6.8
|
|
20.0
|
|
Other
|
|
108.4
|
|
118.5
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
438.0
|
|
$
|
466.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
$
|
70.5
|
|
$
|
86.7
|
|
Income taxes payable -
non-current
|
|
81.1
|
|
82.7
|
|
Other
|
|
107.7
|
|
119.2
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
259.3
|
|
$
|
288.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on financial
instruments, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(1.1
|
)
|
$
|
(3.7
|
)
|
Unrecognized pension and
postretirement benefit expense, net of tax
|
|
(402.1
|
)
|
(426.1
|
)
|
Cumulative translation, net
of tax
|
|
22.6
|
|
196.9
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(380.6
|
)
|
$
|
(232.9
|
)
|
4.
Interest
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
June 30
|
|
(millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
16.1
|
|
$
|
16.9
|
|
$
|
32.4
|
|
$
|
34.7
|
|
Interest income
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
(1.7
|
)
|
(2.4
|
)
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
$
|
15.0
|
|
$
|
15.2
|
|
$
|
30.0
|
|
$
|
31.0
|
|
11
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
5.
Financial
Instruments and Hedging Transactions
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The
companys financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable, commercial paper, notes payable, foreign currency
forward contracts and long-term debt. The carrying values of cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, commercial paper and notes
payable approximate fair value because of their short maturities. The carrying
values of foreign currency forward contracts is at fair value, which is
determined based on foreign currency exchange rates as of the balance sheet
date (level 2 - significant other observable inputs).
The
carrying amount and the estimated fair value of long-term debt, including
current maturities, held by the company were:
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
(millions)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Value
|
|
Amount
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (including
current maturities)
|
|
$
|
794.3
|
|
$
|
842.5
|
|
$
|
876.7
|
|
$
|
908.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of long-term debt is based on quoted
market prices for the same or similar debt instruments. The company has
concluded that it does not have any amounts of financial instruments measured
using the companys own assumptions of fair market value (level 3 -
unobservable inputs).
Derivative Instruments and Hedging
The company uses foreign currency forward contracts,
interest rate swaps and foreign currency debt to manage risks associated with
foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and net investments in foreign
operations. The company records all derivatives as assets and liabilities on
the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in fair value are recognized immediately
in earnings unless the derivative qualifies and is designated as a hedge. The
effective portion of changes in fair value of hedges are initially recognized
in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) on the Consolidated Balance
Sheet. Amounts recorded in AOCI are reclassified into earnings in the same
period or periods during which the hedged transactions affect earnings. The
company evaluates hedge effectiveness at inception and on an ongoing basis. If
a derivative is no longer expected to be effective, hedge accounting is
discontinued. Hedge ineffectiveness, if any, is recorded in earnings.
The company does not hold derivative financial
instruments of a speculative nature.
The company is exposed to
credit loss in the event of nonperformance of counterparties for foreign
currency forward exchange contracts and interest rate swap agreements. The
company monitors its exposure to credit risk by using credit approvals and
credit limits and by selecting major international banks and financial institutions
as counterparties. The company does not anticipate nonperformance by any of
these counterparties.
12
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
5.
Financial
Instruments and Hedging Transactions (Continued)
Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
The company utilizes foreign currency forward
contracts to hedge the effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on
forecasted foreign currency transactions, including: sales, inventory
purchases, and intercompany royalty and management fee payments. These forward
contracts are designated as cash flow hedges. The effective portions of the
changes in fair value of these contracts are recorded in AOCI until the hedged
items affect earnings, at which time the gain or loss is reclassified into the
same line item in the Consolidated Statement of Income as the underlying
exposure being hedged. All hedged transactions are forecasted to occur within
the next twelve months.
The company occasionally enters into interest rate
swap contracts to manage interest rate exposures. In 2006 the company entered
into and subsequently closed two forward starting swap contracts related to the
issuance of its senior euro notes. The settlement payment was recorded in AOCI
and is recognized in earnings as part of interest expense over the remaining
life of the notes as the forecasted interest transactions occur.
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
The company also uses foreign
currency forward contracts to offset its exposure to the change in value of
certain foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, primarily
receivables and payables. Although the
contracts are effective economic hedges, they are not designated as accounting
hedges. Therefore, changes in the value of these derivatives are recognized
immediately in earnings, thereby offsetting the current earnings effect of the
related foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the
companys outstanding derivatives:
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
December 31
|
|
June 30
|
|
December 31
|
|
(millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward
contracts
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward
contracts
|
|
2.5
|
|
2.3
|
|
1.4
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4.8
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
The
company had foreign currency forward exchange contracts with notional values
that totaled approximately $409 million at June 30, 2010, and $356 million
at December 31, 2009.
13
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
5.
Financial
Instruments and Hedging Transactions (Continued)
The impact on AOCI and earnings from derivative
contracts that qualified as cash flow hedges was as follows:
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
June 30
|
|
(millions)
|
|
Location
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss)
recognized into AOCI (effective portion)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward
contracts
|
|
AOCI (equity)
|
|
$
|
1.1
|
|
$
|
(9.0
|
)
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
$
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) reclassified
from AOCI into income (effective portion)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward
contracts
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
2.3
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
SG&A
|
|
0.2
|
|
1.3
|
|
0.5
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
3.6
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expense,net
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
(0.1
|
)
|
(0.2
|
)
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.9
|
)
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
$
|
(2.6
|
)
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
The impact on earnings from derivative contracts
that are
not
designated as hedging instruments was as follows:
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
June 30
|
|
(millions)
|
|
Location
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) recognized in
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward
contracts
|
|
SG&A
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
$
|
(1.4
|
)
|
$
|
(4.0
|
)
|
$
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expense, net
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
(1.6
|
)
|
(2.8
|
)
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
$
|
(3.0
|
)
|
$
|
(6.8
|
)
|
$
|
(4.9
|
)
|
The amounts recognized in earnings above offset
the earnings impact of the related foreign currency denominated assets and
liabilities.
14
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
5.
Financial
Instruments and Hedging Transactions (Continued)
Net Investment Hedge
The company designates its euro 300 million ($369
million as of June 30, 2010) senior notes and related accrued interest as
a hedge of existing foreign currency exposures related to net investments the
company has in certain Euro functional subsidiaries. Accordingly, the
transaction gains and losses on the euronotes which are designated and
effective as hedges of the companys net investments have been included as a
component of the cumulative translation adjustment account. Total transaction
gains and losses related to the euronotes charged to shareholders equity were
as follows:
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
June 30
|
|
(millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction gains (losses),
net of tax
|
|
$
|
24.7
|
|
$
|
(27.9
|
)
|
$
|
50.2
|
|
$
|
(27.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Comprehensive
Income
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
June 30
|
|
(millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income including
noncontrolling interest
|
|
$
|
129.5
|
|
$
|
99.5
|
|
$
|
225.2
|
|
$
|
157.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
(loss), net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
(84.0
|
)
|
143.3
|
|
(174.3
|
)
|
119.0
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
1.5
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
2.6
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
Pension and postretirement
benefits
|
|
9.6
|
|
0.1
|
|
24.0
|
|
2.9
|
|
Total
|
|
(72.9
|
)
|
135.6
|
|
(147.7
|
)
|
114.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income, including
noncontrolling interest
|
|
56.6
|
|
235.1
|
|
77.5
|
|
272.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Comprehensive income
(loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
0.3
|
|
0.7
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
attributable to
Ecolab
|
|
$
|
56.3
|
|
$
|
234.4
|
|
$
|
78.1
|
|
$
|
271.2
|
|
15
ECOLAB
INC.
CONDENSED
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
7.
Business
Acquisitions and Dispositions
There were no acquisitions during the first six
months of 2010. The company made an earnout payment in the second quarter
related to a previous acquisition. The company sold a small joint venture in
our international segment during the second quarter of 2010. The impact of this
divestiture was not material. There were no material business disposals during
the first six months of 2009.
In February 2009, the company acquired
assets of the Stackhouse business of CORPAK Medsystems, Inc. Stackhouse is a leading developer,
manufacturer and marketer of surgical helmets and smoke evacuators, primarily
for use during orthopedic surgeries. The
business, which has annual sales of approximately $4 million, became part of
the companys U.S. Cleaning & Sanitizing operations during the first
quarter of 2009.
Acquisitions in 2009 are not material to the
companys consolidated financial statements; therefore pro forma financial
information is not presented. The aggregate purchase price of acquisitions has
been reduced for any cash or cash equivalents acquired with the acquisitions.
Based upon purchase price allocations, the
components of the aggregate purchase prices of acquisitions and investments in
affiliates made were as follows:
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
June 30
|
|
(millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tangible assets acquired
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable intangible
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Patents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Other intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
0.7
|
|
0.5
|
|
0.7
|
|
0.8
|
|
Net cash paid for
acquisitions
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
16
ECOLAB
INC.
CONDENSED
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
7.
Business
Acquisitions and Dispositions (Continued)
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill
for each of the companys reportable segments during the first and second
quarter of 2010 were as follows:
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cleaning &
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
Sanitizing
|
|
Services
|
|
Total
|
|
Intl
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
446.8
|
|
$
|
50.5
|
|
$
|
497.3
|
|
$
|
920.8
|
|
$
|
1,418.1
|
|
Accumulated impairment
loss(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
(4.0
|
)
|
Goodwill, net
|
|
446.8
|
|
50.5
|
|
497.3
|
|
916.8
|
|
1,414.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71.8
|
)
|
(71.8
|
)
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
446.8
|
|
50.5
|
|
497.3
|
|
844.9
|
|
1,342.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisitions
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
0.7
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68.2
|
)
|
(68.2
|
)
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
446.6
|
|
50.5
|
|
497.1
|
|
775.0
|
|
1,272.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
446.6
|
|
50.5
|
|
497.1
|
|
779.0
|
|
1,276.1
|
|
Accumulated impairment
loss(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
(4.0
|
)
|
Goodwill, net
|
|
$
|
446.6
|
|
$
|
50.5
|
|
$
|
497.1
|
|
$
|
775.0
|
|
$
|
1,272.1
|
|
(1) Since adoption of FASB guidance for
goodwill and other intangibles on January 1, 2002.
17
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
8.
Earnings
Attributable to Ecolab Per Common Share
The computations of the basic and diluted
earnings attributable to Ecolab per share amounts were as follows:
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
June 30
|
|
(millions, except per share)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to
Ecolab
|
|
$
|
129.3
|
|
$
|
99.1
|
|
$
|
224.8
|
|
$
|
156.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common
shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
233.4
|
|
236.5
|
|
234.4
|
|
236.3
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options
and awards
|
|
4.0
|
|
3.0
|
|
3.7
|
|
2.8
|
|
Diluted
|
|
237.4
|
|
239.5
|
|
238.1
|
|
239.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings attributable to
Ecolab per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive stock options
and performance-based restricted stock units excluded from the computation of
diluted shares
|
|
4.9
|
|
9.3
|
|
7.3
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted stock
awards excluded from the computation of basic shares
|
|
0.1
|
|
0.1
|
|
0.1
|
|
0.1
|
|
9.
Pension
and Postretirement Plans
The company is not required to make any
contributions to its U.S. pension plan and postretirement health care benefits
plan for 2010.
Certain international pension benefit plans are
required to be funded in accordance with local government requirements. The
company contributed $13 million to its international pension benefit plans
during the first six months of 2010. The company currently estimates that it
will contribute approximately $12 million more to the international pension
benefit plans during the remainder of 2010.
18
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
9.
Pension
and Postretirement Plans (Continued)
The components of net periodic pension and
postretirement health care benefit costs for the second quarter ended June 30
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension
|
|
Pension
|
|
Health Care
|
|
(millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
12.7
|
|
$
|
11.8
|
|
$
|
4.3
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
Interest cost on benefit
obligation
|
|
15.6
|
|
14.8
|
|
6.0
|
|
6.5
|
|
2.2
|
|
2.4
|
|
Expected return on plan
assets
|
|
(22.5
|
)
|
(18.9
|
)
|
(3.9
|
)
|
(4.3
|
)
|
(0.4
|
)
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Recognition of net actuarial
loss
|
|
6.2
|
|
4.0
|
|
0.9
|
|
0.4
|
|
0.1
|
|
1.1
|
|
Amortization of prior service
cost (benefit)
|
|
0.1
|
|
0.1
|
|
0.1
|
|
0.1
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
(1.5
|
)
|
Curtailment and settlement
(gain) loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12.1
|
|
$
|
11.8
|
|
$
|
7.4
|
|
$
|
6.1
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
The components of net periodic pension and
postretirement health care benefit costs for the six months ended June 30
are as follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension
|
|
Pension
|
|
Health Care
|
|
(millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
25.4
|
|
$
|
23.6
|
|
$
|
9.2
|
|
$
|
7.3
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
Interest cost on benefit
obligation
|
|
31.2
|
|
29.6
|
|
12.9
|
|
12.4
|
|
4.4
|
|
4.8
|
|
Expected return on plan
assets
|
|
(45.0
|
)
|
(37.8
|
)
|
(8.3
|
)
|
(8.2
|
)
|
(0.8
|
)
|
(0.8
|
)
|
Recognition of net actuarial
loss
|
|
12.4
|
|
8.0
|
|
1.9
|
|
0.8
|
|
0.2
|
|
2.2
|
|
Amortization of prior service
cost (benefit)
|
|
0.2
|
|
0.2
|
|
0.2
|
|
0.2
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
(3.0
|
)
|
Curtailment and settlement
(gain) loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
24.2
|
|
$
|
23.6
|
|
$
|
15.9
|
|
$
|
12.4
|
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
$
|
5.1
|
|
19
ECOLAB
INC.
CONDENSED
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
10.
Operating
Segments
Financial information
for each of the companys reportable segments is as follows:
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
June 30
|
|
(millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cleaning &
Sanitizing
|
|
$
|
689.3
|
|
$
|
671.1
|
|
$
|
1,321.6
|
|
$
|
1,294.0
|
|
Other Services
|
|
114.9
|
|
115.3
|
|
219.6
|
|
222.4
|
|
Total
|
|
804.2
|
|
786.4
|
|
1,541.2
|
|
1,516.4
|
|
International
|
|
749.6
|
|
716.7
|
|
1,449.2
|
|
1,400.2
|
|
Subtotal at fixed currency
|
|
1,553.8
|
|
1,503.1
|
|
2,990.4
|
|
2,916.6
|
|
Effect of foreign currency
translation
|
|
(33.6
|
)
|
(61.6
|
)
|
(38.1
|
)
|
(126.9
|
)
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
1,520.2
|
|
$
|
1,441.5
|
|
$
|
2,952.3
|
|
$
|
2,789.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cleaning &
Sanitizing
|
|
$
|
138.6
|
|
$
|
126.3
|
|
$
|
252.0
|
|
$
|
228.9
|
|
Other Services
|
|
18.6
|
|
18.3
|
|
33.2
|
|
31.5
|
|
Total
|
|
157.2
|
|
144.6
|
|
285.2
|
|
260.4
|
|
International
|
|
55.1
|
|
57.8
|
|
92.3
|
|
83.2
|
|
Corporate
|
|
(6.9
|
)
|
(31.7
|
)
|
(18.8
|
)
|
(70.8
|
)
|
Subtotal at fixed currency
|
|
205.4
|
|
170.7
|
|
358.7
|
|
272.8
|
|
Effect of foreign currency
translation
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
(5.7
|
)
|
(0.6
|
)
|
(10.3
|
)
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
204.3
|
|
$
|
165.0
|
|
$
|
358.1
|
|
$
|
262.5
|
|
The International amounts included above are
based on translation into U.S. dollars at the fixed currency exchange rates
used by management for 2010.
Consistent with the companys internal management
reporting, the Corporate segment includes special gains and charges reported on
the Consolidated Statement of Income. The Corporate segment also includes
investments in the development of business systems and other corporate
investments the company is making as part of ongoing efforts to improve
efficiency and returns.
20
ECOLAB
INC.
CONDENSED
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
10.
Operating
Segments (Continued)
Total service revenue for the U.S. Other Services
and International segments, at public exchange rates are as follows:
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
June 30
|
|
(millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Other Services
|
|
$
|
97.8
|
|
$
|
98.0
|
|
$
|
185.6
|
|
$
|
187.6
|
|
International
|
|
44.9
|
|
41.0
|
|
89.3
|
|
79.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
The company tests goodwill for impairment on an annual
basis during the second quarter. If circumstances change significantly, the
company would also test a reporting unit for impairment during interim periods
between its annual tests. During the second quarter ended June 30, 2010,
the company completed its annual test for goodwill impairment using a risk
based approach. Using this approach, the company determined GCS Service
required testing due to soft sales and continued operating losses. The company uses both a discounted cash flow
analysis and market valuations, including similar company market multiples and
comparable transactions, to assess fair value. The estimated fair value of the
GCS business is based on a probability weighted-average of these various
measures. Based on this analysis, it was determined that the fair value of the
GCS Service reporting unit would have to decline by approximately 30% to
indicate the potential for an impairment of their goodwill. Therefore, the
company believes that the estimated fair value of the GCS Service reporting
unit substantially exceeds its carrying value and no adjustment to the $43
million carrying value of goodwill is necessary. The key assumptions utilized
in determining fair value are revenue growth rates, operating margins and
factors that impact the companys weighted-average cost of capital, including
interest rates. Of these factors, the fair value estimate is most sensitive to
changes in revenue growth rates which could be adversely impacted by continued
difficult economic conditions, uncertainty in the U.S. foodservice markets and
the timing of adding new customers.
The straight-line method of amortization reflects
an appropriate allocation of the cost of the intangible assets to earnings in
proportion to the amount of economic benefits obtained by the company in each
reporting period. Total amortization
expense related to other intangible assets during the second quarters ended June 30,
2010 and 2009 was $9.9 million and $11.5 million, respectively. Total
amortization expense related to other intangible assets during the first six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $20.2 million and $21.5 million,
respectively. As of June 30, 2010, future estimated amortization expense
related to amortizable other identifiable intangible assets will be:
(millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (Remainder: six-month
period)
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
2011
|
|
42
|
|
2012
|
|
41
|
|
2013
|
|
38
|
|
2014
|
|
28
|
|
12.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
There were no new accounting pronouncements that were issued
or became effective that have had or are expected to have a material impact on
the companys consolidated financial statements.
21
ECOLAB
INC.
CONDENSED
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
13.
Commitments
and Contingencies
The
company and certain subsidiaries are party to various lawsuits, claims and
environmental actions that have arisen in the ordinary course of business.
These include antitrust, patent infringement, product liability and wage hour
lawsuits, as well as possible obligations to investigate and mitigate the
effects on the environment of the disposal or release of certain chemical
substances at various sites, such as Superfund sites and other operating or
closed facilities. Because litigation is inherently uncertain, and unfavorable
rulings or developments could occur, there can be no certainty that the company
may not ultimately incur charges in excess of presently recorded liabilities. A
future adverse ruling, settlement or unfavorable development could result in
future charges that could have a material adverse effect on the companys
results of operations or cash flows in the period in which they are recorded.
The company currently believes that such future charge, if any, would not have
a material adverse effect on the companys consolidated financial position.
The
company records liabilities where a contingent loss is probable and can be
reasonably estimated. If the reasonable estimate of a probable loss is a range,
the company records the most probable estimate of the loss or the minimum
amount when no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other
amount. The company discloses a contingent liability even if the liability is
not probable or the amount is not estimable, or both, if there is a reasonable
possibility that a material loss may have been incurred.
As
previously disclosed, the company was a defendant in three wage hour lawsuits
in the Southern District of New York, one of which had been certified for
class-action status. The company agreed to the class certification of all three
suits for settlement purposes only and entered into a settlement agreement
which on May 11, 2010, received final approval by the court. On May 14,
2010, the company paid the full settlement amount, which had been fully accrued
and which is not material to the companys consolidated results of operations
or financial position, into a settlement fund in final settlement of these
suits.
22
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Directors
Ecolab Inc.
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet of Ecolab Inc. and its subsidiaries as of June 30, 2010 and the
related consolidated statements of income for each of the three and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and the consolidated statement of
cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. These
interim financial statements are the responsibility of Ecolabs management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of
interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical
procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted
in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion
regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not
express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material
modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated interim
financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
We previously audited, in accordance with the standards
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 2009, and the related consolidated
statements of income, of comprehensive income and changes in shareholders
equity, and of cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and
in our report dated February 26, 2010, we expressed an unqualified opinion
on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set
forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet information as of December 31,
2009, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated
balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
August 5, 2010
23
ECOLAB INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Item 2.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
.
The following discussion and analysis provides
information that we believe is useful in understanding our operating results,
cash flows and financial condition. The discussion should be read in
conjunction with both the unaudited consolidated financial information and
related notes included in this Form 10-Q, and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. This
discussion contains various Non-GAAP Financial Measures and also contains
various Forward-Looking Statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We refer readers to the statements
entitled Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Forward-Looking Statements located
at the end of Part I of this report.
Overview of the Second
Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 compared to the Second Quarter Ended June 30,
2009
We reported strong earnings growth for the second
quarter of 2010. Sales increased, led by strong growth from Asia Pacific and
Latin America. Cost savings actions and
lower delivered product costs helped income and margins improve during the
quarter.
Both 2010 and 2009 results of operations included
special gains and charges, as well as discrete tax items which impact the year
over year comparisons.
Sales Performance
·
Consolidated net sales increased 5% to $1.5 billion. Net sales were
favorably impacted by foreign currency exchange during the quarter. When
measured in fixed rates of currency exchange, sales grew 3%.
·
U.S. Cleaning & Sanitizing sales grew 3% to $689 million.
Results were led by 6% sales growth for Kay, 5% growth for Healthcare, 3%
growth for Food & Beverage and 2% growth for Institutional.
·
U.S. Other Services sales were comparable to the prior year at $115
million. A 1% increase in GCS sales was offset by a 1% sales decrease at Pest
Elimination.
·
International sales, when measured in fixed rates of currency exchange,
increased 5% to $750 million in the second quarter. Asia Pacific and Latin
America both reported 9% sales growth for the quarter, at fixed rates.
Europe/Middle East/Africa (EMEA) sales increased 4% and Canada sales were
comparable to the prior years second quarter, at fixed rates. When measured at
public currency rates, International sales increased 9%.
Financial Performance
·
Operating income increased 24% to $204 million. Excluding the impact of
special gains and charges from both years, adjusted operating income increased
8% compared to the second quarter of 2009.
·
Net income attributable to Ecolab increased 30% to $129 million. Excluding
the impact of special gains and charges, and discrete tax items, adjusted net
income attributable to Ecolab increased 10%.
·
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Ecolab increased 32% to $0.54
for the second quarter of 2010 compared to $0.41 in the second quarter of 2009.
Excluding the impact of special gains and charges, and discrete tax items,
adjusted diluted earnings per share attributable to Ecolab increased 12% to
$0.56 for the second quarter of 2010 compared to $0.50 in the second quarter of
2009.
24
Financial
Performance (Continued)
·
Our reported effective income tax rate was 31.6% for the second quarter
of 2010 compared to 33.6% for the second quarter of 2009. Excluding the tax
rate impact of special gains and charges, and discrete tax items, our adjusted
effective income tax rate was 30.4% and 31.3% for the second quarter of 2010
and 2009, respectively.
Reconciliations of reported and adjusted amounts are
provided on pages 27 - 28 of this report.
Results of Operations Second Quarter and Six Months
Ended June 30, 2010
Net Sales
Consolidated net sales for the second quarter
ended June 30, 2010 were $1.5 billion, an increase of 5% compared to last
year. For the first six months of 2010, net sales increased 6% to $3.0 billion.
When measured in fixed rates of currency exchange, sales increased 3% for both
the second quarter and first six months of 2010. The components of the sales
increase are shown below.
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
(percent)
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
Price changes
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Acquisitions &
divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales increase
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
Gross Profit Margin
The gross profit margin (gross margin)(defined
as the difference between net sales less cost of sales divided by net sales)
was 50.7% and 49.7% for the second quarters of 2010 and 2009, respectively. Our
gross margin for the first six months of 2010 and 2009 was 50.3% and 48.6%,
respectively. Our gross margin increase for the second quarter and first six
months of 2010 was driven by volume gains, pricing and favorable delivered
product costs. Cost of sales in 2009 included restructuring charges of $0.1
million and $8.1 million for the second quarter and first six months of 2009,
respectively, which reduced our gross margin last year.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a
percentage of consolidated net sales were 37.2% for the second quarter of 2010
compared to 36.5% in 2009. For the first six month periods, selling, general
and administrative expenses were 38.1% of sales in 2010 and 37.4% in 2009. The
increase in the ratio for the second quarter and first six months of 2010 was
due to continued investments in our business, people and systems as well as
other cost increases, which more than offset cost saving actions and leverage
from sales gains. We continue to make key business investments in our sales and
service force, information technology systems, R&D and in new markets and
businesses.
25
Special Gains and Charges
Special gains and charges reported on the Consolidated
Statement of Income included the following items:
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
June 30
|
|
(millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special gains and charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
Venezuela currency
devaluation
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
Business structure and
optimization
|
|
0.6
|
|
0.6
|
|
1.2
|
|
1.6
|
|
Business write-downs and
closure
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
Other items
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
1.3
|
|
Total
|
|
0.6
|
|
25.0
|
|
4.1
|
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total special gains and
charges
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
$
|
25.1
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
$
|
59.6
|
|
Beginning in 2010, Venezuela has been designated
hyper-inflationary and as such all foreign currency fluctuations are recorded
in income. On January 8, 2010 the Venezuelan government devalued its
currency (Bolivar Fuerte). We are remeasuring the financial statements of our
Venezuelan subsidiary using the official exchange rate of 4.30 Bolivars to U.S.
dollar. As a result of the devaluation, we recorded a charge of $4.2 million in
the first quarter of 2010 due to the remeasurement of the local balance sheet.
We are unable to predict the ongoing currency gains and losses for the
remeasurement of the balance sheet, but do not expect these gains and losses to
have a material impact on our future consolidated results of operations or
financial position.
In 2009 we undertook restructuring and other cost-saving
actions in order to streamline operations and improve efficiency and
effectiveness. We recorded restructuring expense of $24 million ($19 million
after tax) or $0.08 per diluted share and $57 million ($40 million after tax)
or $0.17 per diluted share during the second quarter and six months ended June 30,
2009, respectively. Restructuring expense on the Consolidated Statement of
Income has been included both as a component of cost of sales and as a
component of special gains and charges, as shown in the table above. Further
details related to these restructuring expenses are included in Note 2.
26
Operating Income
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
June 30
|
|
(millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
%
Change
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported GAAP operating
income
|
|
$
|
204.3
|
|
$
|
165.0
|
|
24%
|
|
$
|
358.1
|
|
$
|
262.5
|
|
36%
|
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special gains and charges
|
|
0.6
|
|
25.1
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
59.6
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP adjusted operating
income
|
|
$
|
204.9
|
|
$
|
190.1
|
|
8%
|
|
$
|
362.2
|
|
$
|
322.1
|
|
12%
|
|
Our reported operating income increase of 24% and
36% for the second quarter and first six months of 2010, respectively, was
impacted by the year over year comparison of special gains and charges. On an
adjusted basis, excluding special gains and charges, operating income increased
8% in the second quarter. Foreign currency exchange had a favorable impact on
the second quarter. Adjusted fixed currency operating income increased 5% in
the second quarter as volume gains, pricing, and favorable delivered product
costs more than offset continued investment in the business and other costs in
the quarter.
For the first six months of 2010, adjusted operating
income, excluding special gains and charges, increased 12%. Foreign currency
exchange had a favorable impact on year to date operating income. Adjusted
fixed currency operating income increased 9% for the first six months of 2010
as volume gains, pricing, favorable delivered product costs, and savings from
last years restructuring more than offset continued investment in the business
and other costs.
Interest Expense, Net
Net interest expense totaled $15.0 million in the
second quarter of 2010, compared with $15.2 million in the second quarter of
2009. Net interest expense for the first six months of 2010 and 2009 was $30.0
million and $31.0 million, respectively. The decline in our net interest
expense has been due to lower commercial paper borrowing rates combined with
lower borrowing amounts as well as lower interest expense related to hedging
activities, partially offset by lower interest income.
Provision for Income Taxes
The following table provides a summary of our
reported tax rate:
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
June 30
|
|
(percent)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported GAAP tax rate
|
|
31.6
|
%
|
33.6
|
%
|
31.4
|
%
|
32.1
|
%
|
Tax rate impact of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special gains and charges
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
(1.7
|
)
|
(0.5
|
)
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Discrete tax items
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
(0.6
|
)
|
(0.4
|
)
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Non-GAAP adjusted tax rate
|
|
30.4
|
%
|
31.3
|
%
|
30.5
|
%
|
31.3
|
%
|
27
Provision for Income Taxes
(Continued)
The
decrease in the 2010 adjusted effective tax rate compared to 2009 was due
primarily to increased benefits from the domestic manufacturing deduction in
the U.S. The reported tax rate for the second quarter and first six months of
2010 and 2009 included the tax impact of special gains and charges and discrete
tax items which increased our reported tax rate.
Discrete
tax expense for the second quarter and first six months of 2010 was $2.1
million and $1.3 million, respectively. The discrete tax items for the second
quarter of 2010 primarily include a $2 million charge for the impact of
international tax costs from optimizing our business structure. Discrete tax
items for the first quarter of 2010 included a $5 million charge due to the
passage of the U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Law which changes
the tax deductibility related to federal subsidies and resulted in a reduction
of the value of the companys deferred tax assets related to the subsidies. This
charge was offset by a $6 million tax benefit from the settlement of an
international tax audit.
Discrete tax expense for the second quarter and first six months of
2009 was $0.9 million and $0.7 million, respectively.
Net Income Attributable to Ecolab
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
June 30
|
|
(millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
%
Change
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported GAAP net income
|
|
$
|
129.3
|
|
$
|
99.1
|
|
30%
|
|
$
|
224.8
|
|
$
|
156.5
|
|
44%
|
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special gains and charges
|
|
0.6
|
|
19.8
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
42.1
|
|
|
|
Discrete tax expense
|
|
2.1
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP adjusted net income
|
|
$
|
132.0
|
|
$
|
119.8
|
|
10%
|
|
$
|
230.5
|
|
$
|
199.3
|
|
16%
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share Attributable to Ecolab
(EPS)
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
June 30
|
|
(dollars)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
%
Change
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported GAAP diluted EPS
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
32%
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
45%
|
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special gains and charges
|
|
0.00
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
Discrete tax expense
|
|
0.01
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP adjusted diluted
EPS
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
12%
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
17%
|
|
Note: Per share amounts do not
necessarily sum due to changes in shares outstanding and rounding.
Currency translation had a favorable impact of
approximately $2.9 million, net of tax, or $0.01 per share for the second
quarter of 2010 compared to 2009. Currency translation had a favorable impact
of approximately $5.9 million, net of tax, or $0.02 per share for the first six
months of 2010 compared to 2009.
28
Segment Results
Sales for each of our reportable segments are as
follows:
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
June 30
|
|
(millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
%
Change
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
%
Change
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cleaning &
Sanitizing
|
|
$
|
689.3
|
|
$
|
671.1
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,321.6
|
|
$
|
1,294.0
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
Other Services
|
|
114.9
|
|
115.3
|
|
0
|
|
|
219.6
|
|
222.4
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Total
|
|
804.2
|
|
786.4
|
|
2
|
|
|
1,541.2
|
|
1,516.4
|
|
2
|
|
|
International
|
|
749.6
|
|
716.7
|
|
5
|
|
|
1,449.2
|
|
1,400.2
|
|
3
|
|
|
Subtotal at fixed
currency
|
|
1,553.8
|
|
1,503.1
|
|
3
|
|
|
2,990.4
|
|
2,916.6
|
|
3
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency
translation
|
|
(33.6
|
)
|
(61.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(38.1
|
)
|
(126.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
1,520.2
|
|
$
|
1,441.5
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,952.3
|
|
$
|
2,789.7
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
U.S. Cleaning & Sanitizing sales
increased 3% in the second quarter and 2% for the first six months of 2010.
Sales for our large U.S. Cleaning & Sanitizing businesses were as
follows:
·
Institutional
Sales grew 2% for both the second quarter and first six months of
2010. New account gains, new products and the comparison to weaker distributor
shipments last year benefited second quarter sales. We experienced mixed market
trends in the second quarter as room demand at our lodging customers improved
while overall foot traffic declined at our foodservice customers.
·
Food &
Beverage
- Sales in the second quarter
of 2010 increased 3% while sales for the first six months of 2010 increased 2%.
Sales grew in the beverage and food markets as corporate account wins and
success with new products offset soft results in dairy, agri and meat &
poultry markets.
·
Kay
- Sales increased 6% and 9% for the second quarter and first six months
of 2010, respectively. Sales growth was led by food retail, which benefited
from new account growth and success with new products and programs. Sales at
Kay continue to benefit from good demand from existing and new quick service
restaurants.
·
Healthcare
Sales increased 5% for the second quarter and 2% for the first six
months of 2010. Sales growth in the second quarter was led by gains in sales of
infection barriers and central sterile partially offset by the continued
customer work down of H1N1-related product inventories from the prior years
spike in demand due to H1N1 virus fears.
29
Segment
Results (Continued)
U.S. Other Services sales in the second quarter
of 2010 were comparable to the prior year period. Sales declined 1% for the
first six months of 2010. Sales for our U.S. Other Services businesses were as
follows:
·
Pest Elimination
- Sales declined 1%
for both the second quarter and first six months of 2010 compared to the prior
year periods. Gains in the quick service restaurant and food &
beverage plant market were offset by slow conditions in other major markets.
New account gains are being offset by lower customer demand as our customers
continue to focus on reducing their spending due to the continued soft economy.
·
GCS Service
- Sales increased 1% in the
second quarter and declined 1% for the first six months of 2010. Service and
installed parts sales increased in the quarter, benefiting from new account
growth and pricing gains, which more than offset the impact of slow foodservice
business conditions. Sales of direct parts continued to be soft.
We evaluate the performance of our International
operations based on fixed rates of foreign currency exchange. Fixed currency
rate sales for our International operations increased 5% and 3% for the second
quarter and first six months of 2010, respectively. When measured at public
currency rates, International sales increased 9% for the second quarter of
2010 and 11% for the first six months of 2010. Fixed currency sales changes for
our International regions were as follows:
·
EMEA
- Sales increased 4% for the second quarter and 1% for the first six
months of 2010. Second quarter sales growth was led by strong sales growth in
the MEA region, and growth in Germany, Italy and the U.K., which more than
offset lower sales in France. From a divisional perspective, Europes
Institutional sales improved in the second quarter as foodservice and lodging
trends appear to have stabilized. Food & Beverage, Healthcare and Pest
Elimination sales also improved in the quarter while Textile Care sales were
comparable to the prior year period.
·
Asia
Pacific
- Sales increased 9% in the second quarter and
10% for the first six months of 2010 as the region shows good recovery from
last years low levels of business travel and tourism. Sales growth was driven
by growth in China, New Zealand and Australia.
From a divisional perspective, Institutional sales continued to be
strong as occupancy levels improve and economies recover. Food &
Beverage also continued to report strong sales growth, benefiting from
increased product penetration and account gains.
·
Latin
America
Sales increased 9% and 8% for the second
quarter and first six months of 2009. Sales were led by continued strong growth
in Brazil and Venezuela. Our Institutional, Food & Beverage and Pest
Elimination businesses all reported increased sales growth.
·
Canada
Sales for the second quarter were comparable to the prior year and
increased 3% for the first six months of 2010. Food & Beverage,
Textile Care and Vehicle Care reported strong sales growth in the second
quarter. Institutional and Healthcare sales were negatively affected by
customer reductions of H1N1-related product inventory.
30
Operating income for each of our reportable
segments is as follows:
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
June 30
|
|
(millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
%
Change
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cleaning &
Sanitizing
|
|
$
|
138.6
|
|
$
|
126.3
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
252.0
|
|
$
|
228.9
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
Other Services
|
|
18.6
|
|
18.3
|
|
2
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
31.5
|
|
5
|
|
|
Total
|
|
157.2
|
|
144.6
|
|
9
|
|
|
285.2
|
|
260.4
|
|
10
|
|
|
International
|
|
55.1
|
|
57.8
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
92.3
|
|
83.2
|
|
11
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
(6.9
|
)
|
(31.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(18.8
|
)
|
(70.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
Subtotal at fixed currency
|
|
205.4
|
|
170.7
|
|
20
|
|
|
358.7
|
|
272.8
|
|
31
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency
translation
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
(10.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
204.3
|
|
$
|
165.0
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
$
|
358.1
|
|
$
|
262.5
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
U.S. Cleaning & Sanitizing operating income
increased 10% for the second quarter and first six months of 2010. Volume gains
and favorable delivered product costs drove the increase in operating income
and we benefitted from favorable cost comparisons against prior year.
U.S. Other Services operating income increased 2%
and 5% for the second quarter and first six months of 2010, respectively.
Operating income growth was driven by pricing and cost savings actions which
more than offset higher service and other cost increases.
International segment operating income at fixed
currency rates decreased 5% for the second quarter of 2010. Volume growth,
pricing gains and favorable delivered product costs were more than offset by
additional business investments, including incremental amortization and normal
conversion costs for European systems and investments in personnel in Asia
Pacific and Latin America. International segment operating income at fixed
currency rates increased 11% for the first six months of 2010. Volume growth,
pricing gains, favorable delivered product costs and savings from last years
restructuring more than offset continued investments in the business and increased
costs. When measured at public currency rates, International operating
income increased 3% and 26% for the second quarter and first six months of
2010, respectively.
Consistent with our internal management
reporting, the Corporate segment includes special gains and charges reported on
the Consolidated Statement of Income. Items included in special gains and
charges are shown in the table on page 26. The Corporate segment also
includes investments in the development of business systems and other corporate
investments we are making as part of our ongoing efforts to improve efficiency
and returns.
31
Financial Position and Liquidity
Total assets were $4.7 billion as of June 30,
2010, compared to total assets of $5.0 billion at December 31, 2009. The
decrease was primarily due to the impact of foreign currency exchange rates
which decreased the value of international assets on our balance sheet when
translated into U.S. dollars.
Total debt was $964 million as of June 30,
2010 and $967 million as of December 31, 2009. The ratio of total debt to
capitalization (total equity plus total debt) increased to 34% at June 30,
2010 compared to 32% at December 31, 2009. While our total debt balance
remained similar to year end, the increase in the ratio was due to a decrease
in equity caused by share repurchases and the impact of balance sheet
translation, partially offset by an increase in retained earnings due to
current year earnings. We are in compliance with all of our debt covenants and
believe we have sufficient borrowing capacity to meet our foreseeable operating
needs.
Cash provided by operating activities totaled
$365 million for the first six months of 2010 compared to $299 million in 2009.
2010 operating cash flow benefited from improved earnings and lower pension
contributions offset partially by changes in working capital. Operating cash
flow in 2009 included a $50 million voluntary contribution to our U.S. pension
plan. We continue to generate strong cash flow from operations which has
allowed us to continue to fund our ongoing operations, investments in the
business, and return cash to shareholders through share repurchases and
dividend payments.
Cash used for investing activities was $135
million in 2010 compared to $129 million in 2009. Capital and software
investments increased compared to the prior year as we continue to invest in
merchandising equipment and systems. There has been limited acquisition
activity in 2010 and 2009.
Cash used for financing activities in 2010
included the repurchase of 4.5 million of our common shares for approximately
$200 million under our share repurchase program during the first six months of
2010. We did not repurchase shares under our share repurchase program during
the first six months of 2009.
The schedule of contractual obligations included
in the Financial Position and Liquidity section of our Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009 disclosed total notes payable and long-term
debt due within one year of $99 million. As of June 30, 2010, the total
notes payable and long-term debt due within one year has increased to $327
million. The increase from year end is primarily due to our $150 million 6.875%
notes, which are due in February 2011, being reclassified to current
portion of long-term debt and an increase in our outstanding U.S. commercial
paper. Our gross liability for uncertain tax positions was $108 million as of June 30,
2010 and $117 million as of December 31, 2009. We are not able to
reasonably estimate the amount by which the liability will increase or decrease
over time; however, at this time, we do not expect significant payments related
to these obligations within the next year. No other significant changes to our
contractual obligations occurred during the first six months of 2010.
We currently expect to fund all of the cash
requirements which are reasonably foreseeable for the next twelve months,
including scheduled debt repayments, new investments in the business, dividend
payments, possible business acquisitions and pension contributions with cash
from operating activities, cash reserves and short-term or long-term
borrowings. In the event of a significant acquisition or other significant
funding need, funding may occur through additional short and/or long-term
borrowing or through the issuance of the companys stock.
32
Financial
Position and Liquidity (Continued)
As of June 30, 2010, we had $121 million of
cash and cash equivalents on hand and expect our operating cash flow to remain
strong. Additionally, we have a $600 million multi-year credit facility
with a diverse portfolio of banks which expires in June 2012. The credit
facility supports our $600 million U.S. commercial paper program and our $200
million European commercial paper program. Combined borrowing under these two
commercial paper programs may not exceed $600 million. As of June 30,
2010, we had $121 million in outstanding U.S. commercial paper and no amounts
outstanding under our European commercial paper program. Both programs are
rated A-1 by Standard & Poors and P-1 by Moodys.
New Accounting Pronouncements
There were no new accounting pronouncements that
were issued or became effective that have had or are expected to have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation in Item 2, contains
financial measures that have not been calculated in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP). These Non-GAAP measures
include fixed currency sales and fixed currency operating income, adjusted
operating income, adjusted fixed currency operating income, adjusted effective
tax rate, adjusted net income attributable to Ecolab and adjusted diluted
earnings per share attributable to Ecolab. We provide these measures as
additional information regarding our operating results. We use these Non-GAAP
measures internally to evaluate our performance and in making financial and
operational decisions, including with respect to incentive compensation. We
believe that our presentation of these measures provides investors with greater
transparency with respect to our results of operations and that these measures
are useful for period-to-period comparison of results.
We
include in special gains and charges items that are unusual in nature,
significant in amount and important to an understanding of underlying business
performance. In order to better allow investors to compare underlying business
performance period-to-period, we provide adjusted operating income, adjusted
fixed currency operating income, adjusted net income attributable to Ecolab and
adjusted diluted earnings per share attributable to Ecolab, which exclude
special gains and charges and discrete tax items.
The
adjusted effective tax rate measure promotes period-to-period comparability of
the underlying effective tax rate because the amounts excluded do not
necessarily reflect costs associated with historical trends or expected future
costs.
We
evaluate the performance of our international operations based on fixed
currency rates of foreign exchange. Fixed currency sales, fixed currency operating
income and adjusted fixed currency operating measures eliminate the impact of
exchange rate fluctuations on our international sales, operating income and
adjusted operating income, respectively, and promote a better understanding of
our underlying sales and operating income trends. Fixed currency amounts are
based on translation into U.S. dollars at fixed foreign currency exchange rates
established by management at the beginning of 2010.
These
measures are not in accordance with, or an alternative to GAAP, and may be
different from Non-GAAP measures used by other companies. Investors should not
rely on any single financial measure when evaluating our business. We recommend
that investors view these measures in conjunction with the GAAP measures included
in this Financial Discussion and have provided reconciliations of reported GAAP
amounts to the Non-GAAP amounts.
33
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q,
including Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operation in Item 2, contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
statements include expectations concerning contributions to pension and
post-retirement health care benefit plans, amortization expense, the impact of
new accounting pronouncements, the impact of potential lawsuits or claims,
currency gains and losses, gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits or
uncertain tax positions, future restructuring cash payments, future cash flow
and sources of funding, nonperformance of financial counterparties, timing of
hedged transactions, borrowing capacity and short-term liquidity requirements.
Without limiting the foregoing, words or phrases such as will likely result, are
expected to, will continue, is anticipated, we believe, estimate, project
(including the negative or variations thereof) or similar terminology,
generally identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may
also represent challenging goals for us. These statements, which represent the
companys expectations or beliefs concerning various future events, are based
on current expectations that involve a number of risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those of such
forward-looking statements. We caution that undue reliance should not be placed
on such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Some of the factors which could cause results
to differ from those expressed in any forward-looking statement are set forth
under Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q. Except as required
under applicable law, we undertake no duty to update our Forward-Looking
Statements.
Item 3.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We primarily use foreign currency forward
contracts, foreign currency debt and interest rate swaps to manage risks
generally associated with interest rate and foreign exchange rate volatility
and net investments in our foreign operations. We do not hold derivative
financial instruments of a speculative nature. For a more detailed discussion
of derivative instruments, refer to Note 5, entitled Financial Instruments and
Hedging Transactions of the consolidated financial statements located under Part I, Item
1 of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, beginning on page 12.
Item 4.
Controls
and Procedures
As of June 30, 2010, we carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and
the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation
of our disclosure controls and procedures.
Based upon that evaluation, our Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
During the period April 1 through June 30,
2010, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
34
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
Note
13, entitled Commitments and Contingencies located under Part I, Item
1 of this Form 10-Q beginning on page 22 is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
In our report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 26, 2010, we identify under Item 1A important factors which
could affect our financial performance and could cause our actual results for
future periods to differ materially from our anticipated results or other
expectations, including those expressed in any forward-looking statements made
in this Form 10-Q. See the section
entitled Forward-Looking Statements located on page 34 of this Form 10-Q.
There
has been no material change in our risk factors subsequent to the filing of our
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. We may also refer to said disclosure to
identify factors that may cause results to differ from those expressed in other
forward-looking statements made in oral presentations, including telephone
conferences and/or webcasts open to the public.
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period
|
|
Total
number of
shares
purchased(1)
|
|
Average
price paid
per share
|
|
Number of
shares
purchased
as part of
publicly
announced
plans or
programs(2)
|
|
Maximum number
of shares that
may yet be
purchased
under the
plans or
programs(2)
|
|
April 1 - 30, 2010
|
|
891,959
|
|
$
|
45.0293
|
|
847,381
|
|
8,575,347
|
|
May 1 - 31, 2010
|
|
43,723
|
|
$
|
49.2308
|
|
0
|
|
8,575,347
|
|
June 1 - 30, 2010
|
|
321,696
|
|
$
|
46.6274
|
|
321,696
|
|
8,253,651
|
|
Total
|
|
1,257,378
|
|
$
|
45.5843
|
|
1,169,077
|
|
8,253,651
|
|
(1) Includes
88,301 shares reacquired from employees and/or directors as swaps for the cost
of stock options, or shares surrendered to satisfy minimum statutory tax
obligations under our stock incentive plans.
(2) As
announced on February 26, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized the
repurchase of up to 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock, including shares to be
repurchased under Rule 10b5-1. We intend to repurchase all shares under
this 2010 authorization, for which no expiration date has been established, in
open market or privately negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions.
35
Item 6.
Exhibits
(a) The following
documents are filed as exhibits to this report:
(4)
Form of
Common Stock Certificate effective August 4, 2010.
(15)
Letter
regarding unaudited interim financial information.
(31)
Rule 13a -
14(a) Certifications.
(32)
Section 1350
Certifications.
Pursuant to Rule 406T,
the following exhibit is furnished and should not be deemed filed under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
(101)
Interactive
Data File.
36
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
ECOLAB INC.
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
August 5, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/John J. Corkrean
|
|
|
John J. Corkrean
|
|
|
Vice President & Corporate Controller
|
|
|
(duly authorized Officer and
|
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
37
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
No.
|
|
Document
|
|
Method of Filing
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Form of
Common Stock Certificate effective August 4, 2010.
|
|
Filed herewith
Electronically
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15)
|
|
Letter regarding unaudited interim financial
information.
|
|
Filed herewith
electronically
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31)
|
|
Rule 13a - 14(a) Certifications.
|
|
Filed herewith electronically
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32)
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications.
|
|
Filed herewith electronically
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101)
|
|
Interactive Data File.
|
|
Filed herewith electronically
|
38
Ecolab (NYSE:ECL)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2024 to Nov 2024
Ecolab (NYSE:ECL)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Nov 2024