By Lara O'Reilly and Jack Nicas
Google's YouTube has made strides in bringing advertisers back
to the site after a backlash over ads appearing alongside offensive
videos. But many prominent holdouts remain, signaling that the
crisis isn't over yet.
Wal-Mart Stores Inc., AT&T Inc., J.P. Morgan Chase &
Co., Starbucks Corp., Procter & Gamble Co. and at least a dozen
other major brands or government agencies haven't returned to the
site, those institutions and people familiar with the situation
say. They pulled their spending after news organizations in March
revealed that their ads ran alongside extremist or racist
videos.
But some companies have resumed spending on YouTube ads --
including General Motors Co., Coca-Cola Co., and McDonald's Corp.'s
U.K. unit -- after the site improved its technology to screen
videos, committed to employing more human reviewers, and gave
marketers more control over where their ads appeared. YouTube also
issued refunds to some companies.
The mixed response from advertisers shows their "brand safety"
concerns are serious and could linger, but also aren't
insurmountable, so long as Google continues its efforts to ease
marketers' fears.
YouTube said in a statement: "Many advertisers never left and
many have decided to come back. While they know that no system can
be perfect, they appreciate the actions we've taken and know we are
taking this seriously and are committed to getting better and
better."
Google on Sunday also announced a series of changes to curb
extremist videos on its site, including adding more technology and
human reviewers to flag them and making less extreme ones harder to
find.
Many of the marketers still on the sidelines say they are
waiting for complete reassurance that poor ad placements won't
happen again.
A series of news stories about ads running alongside
controversial YouTube videos sparked advertisers to pull spending
in late March. In the 90 days from March 15 to June 13, digital-ad
research firm Pathmatics estimated spending on ads that ran before
YouTube videos or displayed on the YouTube site dropped by 50% to
$739 million, compared with a year earlier. Pathmatics didn't
capture data from YouTube's mobile app.
Other signs look more positive for YouTube. A poll of 316
marketers -- including 200 decision makers from the top 200
advertisers in the U.S. -- conducted in May by research consultancy
Advertiser Perceptions found that 38.5% of respondents were likely
to spend "a good deal more" with YouTube this year than last. Just
11.9% said they planned to spend less this year and 41.2% said
there would be no change. Among the remainder, some weren't YouTube
advertisers.
The data suggest that despite advertisers' concerns, YouTube's
scale and data make it irresistible for many marketers.
Google parent Alphabet Inc. posted a 22% increase in revenue to
$24.8 billion in the first quarter, mostly driven by its ad
business, but those figures largely preceded the backlash.
Investors are watching second-quarter results closely for any
impact.
Many marketers have ramped up oversight of where their ads
appear. Audits run by ad agencies have sometimes showed that even
YouTube channels the company brands as "Google Preferred" -- and
charges more for -- can include videos advertisers don't consider
premium, such as footage of people playing the popular children's
game Minecraft. Such videos aren't in bad taste, but their viewers
likely include many children, who aren't a priority for most
marketers.
YouTube said its Google Preferred channels include many
different categories of content, including material aimed at teens,
and that it works with marketers to put their ads on the right
videos.
Many advertisers are now moving from "blacklisting" videos they
wouldn't want to be associated with, to "whitelisting" the channels
they deem appropriate. Whitelisting can have the effect of
narrowing a company's ad buy.
Enterprise Holdings Inc., owner of Enterprise Rent-a-Car, for
example, is working with its media buying agency, Omnicom Media
Group, to test a program that scores hundreds of thousands of
popular videos each day, based on their suitability for ads.
Marketers have seized on the uproar to press for long-sought
changes. After the backlash, Google agreed to let independent
measurement firms monitor where marketers' ads appear.
"I think brands like giving Google a bloody nose as they have
been so reliant and plowed so much money" into the company, said
Ryan Kangisser, founder of ad consulting firm Stack I/O.
YouTube has refunded some advertisers for ads it served next to
objectionable content. The amounts returned have been small. In
March, Google's top executive in Europe, Matt Brittin, said the
matter affected "pennies not pounds" of individual marketers'
spending, because advertisers pay per view and few people actually
were shown ads next to objectionable videos.
London's transportation agency, Transport for London, said it
was satisfied with the refund it received for ads that ran next to
extremist videos, but it hasn't resumed spending on YouTube.
However, one media-agency executive said the refunds didn't
compensate advertisers for the damage to their brands, including
from the news stories showing their ads unwittingly funding hate
speech. "The level of money [Google wants] to give back as a sorry
is humiliating," the executive said.
Google has met with scores of advertisers and agencies since
March to help them ensure their ads only appear next to quality
content.
"They've worked harder than we've ever known Google to work to
communicate that to advertisers and agencies," said Jenny Biggam,
co-founder of U.K. independent media agency The7Stars.
Write to Lara O'Reilly at lara.o'reilly@wsj.com and Jack Nicas
at jack.nicas@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
June 20, 2017 05:44 ET (09:44 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2017 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Starbucks (NASDAQ:SBUX)
Historical Stock Chart
From Aug 2024 to Sep 2024
Starbucks (NASDAQ:SBUX)
Historical Stock Chart
From Sep 2023 to Sep 2024