100lbStriper
9 hours ago
Stokd $NLST 🔥🔥🔥BOOOOOM🔥🔥🔥
Micron's Motion for a New Trial in the $445 million #294 TX case on 912 & 417 patents --- DENIED!!! 🍻
I think that may be all of the post trial motions in this case...finally!
"MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Before the Court is the Rule 59 Motion for a New Trial (the “Motion”) filed by Defendants Micron Technology, Inc., Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., and Micron Technology Texas, LLC. (collectively, “Micron” or “Defendants”). (Dkt. No. 158.) In the Motion, Micron moves for a new trial pursuant to Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Id. at 1.) For the reasons discussed herein, the Court finds that the Motion should be DENIED."
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.196.1.pdf
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4646437/default.png
100lbStriper
10 hours ago
Stokd $NLST 🔥🔥BOOOOOM🔥🔥
Micron's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on DAMAGES in the $445 million #294 TX case on 912 & 417 patents --- DENIED!!! 🍻
Gilstrap:
"MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Before the Court is the Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Damages (the “Motion”) filed by Defendants Micron Technology, Inc., Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., and Micron Technology Texas, LLC. (collectively, “Micron” or “Defendants”). (Dkt. No. 156.) In the Motion, Micron moves for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) in its favor on damages pursuant to Rule 50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Id.) For the reasons discussed herein, the Court finds that the Motion should be DENIED."
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.195.1.pdf
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4646402/default.png
100lbStriper
10 hours ago
Stokd $NLST 🔥Boom🔥 Gilstrap strikes again, out of the blue!
Micron's post trial JMOL in the $445 million # 294 TX case — Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law for Non-Infringement Regarding the 912 & 417 patents (Netlist dropped 215) patents — is DENIED!!!
It had to get redacted and hence released a week after it was issued. Few more were filed that I'll get to now. Seems Gilstrap is getting done with this case!!! 🍻
"MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Before the Court is the Rule 50(b) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law for Non-Infringement Regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 7,619,912 and 11,093,417 (the “Motion”) filed by Defendants Micron (Dkt. No. 159.) In the Motion, Micron moves for judgment as a matter of law of non-infringement for U.S. Patent Nos. 7,619,912 and 11,093,417 pursuant to Rule 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Id. at 1.) For the reasons discussed herein, the Court finds that the Motion should be DENIED."
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.194.1.pdf
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4646345/default.png
100lbStriper
1 day ago
SK hynix Reportedly Slows 1c DRAM Investment, Shifts Focus to 1b DRAM for HBM3E/HBM4
https://www.trendforce.com/news/2025/06/17/news-sk-hynix-reportedly-slows-1c-dram-investment-shifts-focus-to-1b-dram-for-hbm3ehbm4/
As AI chip giants like NVIDIA and AMD race ahead with next-gen HBM adoption, SK hynix is reportedly taking a more cautious stance on the investment in 1c DRAM (6th-gen 10nm-class), according to South Korean media outlet the bell. The move reflects the company’s strategy to double down on the more lucrative and in-demand HBM market, the report suggests.
According to the bell, SK hynix is likely to ramp up 1c DRAM production only once it begins mass-producing HBM4E, which will use 1c as its core die. The upcoming HBM4, set to enter mass production in the second half of this year, will continue using the more mature 1b DRAM process, the report adds.
According to the bell, HBM is 3 to 5 times more profitable than standard DRAM. HBM3 8-Hi (24GB) chips are reportedly priced just over $200, while HBM3E 8-Hi (36GB) fetch nearly $400. The upcoming HBM4 12-Hi could top $600, the report notes.
Given the strong margins, the bell suggests that SK hynix is prioritizing the expansion of its 1b DRAM capacity, which powers both HBM3E and HBM4. Its new M15X fab, slated for completion in the second half of 2025, will house mass production lines for 1b DRAM, as per the bell.
As SK hynix aims to double down on 1b DRAM, the bell suggests that the company is slowing equipment orders for its 11nm-class 1c DRAM. As ZDNet indicates, related equipment installation in M15X is expected around October and November.
So far, SK hynix and Micron have reportedly rolled out their 12-layer HBM4 samples—SK hynix in March, Micron in June. Notably, unlike SK hynix and Micron, which will use 1b DRAM for HBM4, Samsung is betting on 1c DRAM instead, and plans to expand 1c DRAM production in both Hwaseong and Pyeongtaek, with investments starting by year-end, as per ZDNet.
100lbStriper
2 days ago
Netlist Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (8:20-cv-00993)
District Court, C.D. California https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17206527/netlist-inc-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
800
Jun 16, 2025
Main Document
Proof of Service (subsequent documents)
799
Jun 16, 2025
Main Document
Sealed Declaration in Support
798
Jun 16, 2025
Main Document
Leave to File Document Under Seal
797
Jun 16, 2025
Main Document
Leave to File Document
796
Jun 16, 2025
Main Document
Reply (Motion related)
100lbStriper
6 days ago
Stokd $NLST Remember, Samsung/Micron file frivolous cases and duplicative declaratory suits — Micron's bad faith & Samsung/Micron 087 declaratory cases — for purposes of forcing Netlist to expend more resources and finances, in order to stretch Netlist thin while all other parallel proceedings are ongoing, including appeals.
The amount of current litigation is staggering — as seen on my Litigation Chart for Dist Crt cases and CAFC Timeline Chart for appeals. And with Netlist's motions to stay 024 & 319 Samsung Decl Judg cases, they unravel that strategy.
Smart move by Netlist IMO, there is so much going on at once and many moving parts, all affecting each other to some degree in a way. We can't assume to make sense of every move at a deep level from what we see/think on the surface.
It's like watching others play chess and wondering what the motive/purpose for a certain move is, while knowing that we can't know till the end game plays out.
Netlist — you don't stay us, we stay you! 😂
100lbStriper
6 days ago
Stokd $NLST I like this for few reasons, including Netlist using Samsung's favorite strategy against them.
In 2 Samsung DE Declaratory Judgment Non-Infringement cases on 024 & 319 ptnts, filed a while ago and where Samsung already petitioned for IPRs which were instituted — those decisions are currently under PTAB Director Review — Netlist today filed for motions to Stay pending results of the IPRs. And uses the arguments Samsung makes when they file for stays pending IPRs. lol
Netlist has not filed infringement suits in TX on those patents unlike the recent 087 HBM patent, though Netlist did recently file counterclaims of infringement against Samsung in those DE cases.
The positives from this action are some we can speculate and I'm sure some only our legal team is aware of and strategizing. We don't know what we don't know.
Obviously, litigation burn stops, and if we get validity first, Samsung may settle before trial...by then some CAFC appeals will be done as well.
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4547090/default.png
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4547151/default.png
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4547155/default.png
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4547172/default.png
100lbStriper
6 days ago
Stokd $NLST Some info for inquiring minds on CAFC 'Guidance on Oral Argument Scheduling Conflicts'
"Following the end of briefing, the Clerk’s Office will request counsel submit a completed Form 32 providing up to ten (10) scheduling conflict dates for the next six (6) scheduled court sessions."
"The Clerk’s Office reviews identified conflicts to determine whether they are allowable for good cause, or unallowable for lack of good cause. The key requirements for “good cause” are (1) certainty, meaning the conflict is already scheduled rather than suspected or in planning stages, (2) specificity, meaning the Clerk’s Office will not accept generalized conflicts with no elaboration, and (3) strong basis, meaning that the conflict is one that provides a strong reason for being unable to attend oral argument and that the conflict cannot be easily resolved or rescheduled."
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4544023/default.png
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4544045/default.png
100lbStriper
6 days ago
Stokd $NLST It's like the CAFC just woke up!
Another one --- CAFC appeals of 918 & 054 patents has begun scheduling of Oral Arguments.
Seems to me that the CAFC is indeed setting up a situation where the #463 case and all its patents--060/160/918/054/339--will be heard together at the same Oral Argument...as we speculated based on research and available information.
This is the best scenario and what Netlist counsel preferred and sought in their filings.
NOTICE TO ADVISE OF SCHEDULING CONFLICTS OF ARGUING COUNSEL
"Within seven days of this notice, arguing counsel must file a completed Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts advising of any scheduling conflicts during the following upcoming court session months: 2025 – August, September, October, November, and December. 2026 – January."
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4536043/default.png
100lbStriper
6 days ago
Stokd $NLST And also the scheduling of Oral Arguments for the 339 patent CAFC appeal have begun --- NOTICE TO ADVISE OF SCHEDULING CONFLICTS OF ARGUING COUNSEL --- nice to see things progressing towards the final phase.
"Within seven days of this notice, arguing counsel must file a completed Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts advising of any scheduling conflicts during the following upcoming court session months: 2025 – August, September, October, November, and December. 2026 – January."
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4535512/default.png
100lbStriper
6 days ago
Stokd $NLST Alright, here we go...the CAFC has begun the scheduling of Oral Arguments in the Samsung # 463 case trial that Netlist won --- $303 million in damages for patents 060/160/054/918/339.
"Within seven days of this notice, arguing counsel must file a completed Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts advising of any scheduling conflicts during the following upcoming court session months: 2025 – August, September, October, November, and December. 2026 – January."
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4534611/default.png
fung_derf
6 days ago
THIS is hilarious!! I think of you when I think of The Three Amigos.....
"Wherever there is injustice, you will find us. Wherever there is suffering, we'll be there. Wherever scam stocks are found, you will find... jimmy joe!
I swear, you don't miss out on one bad stock. How is this possible?
Why are you not pissed about always losing your money?
I think we are also being illegally naked shorted.
Ya think choo choo~? I KNOW NetList is illegally naked shorted among other tricks MMs play.
Remember, the 3 amigos conspired to take NetList OUT, thus having access to all of NetList patents. This would also give them the ability to sue other Companies for patent infringement just as NetList is doing to them. Only they have much deeper pockets and political/lobby power.
NetList was on life support 2018-2019 after Scamscum breeched their contract with NetList. All planned IMO.
Where did Fact Master go~? Sent here to distribute FUD, get shareholders to sell.
Same games, different stock ticker.
NetList baby~!
News
Market Data
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
manfromjax
8 hours ago
Redoocs
22 hours ago
Jetmek_03052
2 days ago
gdog
3 days ago
