Netlist Inc (QB) (NLST) Quote

we need denny crane, 6,043 wins, zero loss's.......... start at 1:20...........

What his win loss record? lol

Stokd $NLST Reminder of (and TRUST) the new legal teams on our CAFC appeals, who are specialists in the field, one with interesting ties.

Lamken/MoloLamken on key patents & cases with won trial damages — 912 / 060 / 160 / 918 / 054 / 339 / 463 case

Milliken/SterneKessler — 523 / 506 / 314 / 215 / 417 / 608

Lamken Bio https://www.mololamken.com/professionals-jeffrey-lamken

“Jeff Lamken, a nationally recognized appellate practitioner, has argued 29 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court and briefed dozens more on a wide range of topics”

“He possesses particularly deep expertise in the specialized Federal Circuit.”

"Before founding MoloLamken, Mr. Lamken headed Baker Botts’ Supreme Court and Appellate Practice in Washington, D.C." — *FIRM REPRESENTS SAMSUNG* on all our PTAB IPRs & CAFC patent appeals…very intriguing.


Milliken (SterneKessler highly regarded) Bio https://www.sternekessler.com/professionals/william-h-milliken/

“Will is co-chair of the firm’s appellate practice..."

“Will is particularly well-known for his work in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit..”

https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/1946517/default.png

https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/1946525/default.png

lol!!! but, but....

No more tax breaks for you! ;0)

LETS DO IT!!!

NLST BABY!!! TO DA MOON!!! Money, it's a gas
Grab that cash with both hands and make a stash
New car, caviar, four star daydream
Think I'll buy me a football team

No smoke. Opinion only. 

Man, I want to know what you are smokin...
I want to have the same vision!🫨

My opinion. I see $5 print in 30 days or less. 
Happy trading. 

so scum wants a fare trial lol!!! one where they get a free license to steal. this is ludicrous...........

yes it is OTC

Case 8:20-cv-00993-MCS-ADS Document 656 Filed 02/10/25

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.656.0.pdf

DEFENDANT SAMSUNG’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO MODIFY JURY INSTRUCTIONS, VERDICT FORM, PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER, WITNESS LIST, AND EXHIBIT LIST; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF

Case 8:20-cv-00993-MCS-ADS Document 653 Filed 02/10/25

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.653.0.pdf

SAMSUNG’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL NETLIST INC.’S COMPLIANCE WITH TRIAL SUBPOENA OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE OR ARGUMENT CONCERNING THE SK HYNIX AGREEMENTS

Netlist IS on the OTC. That is far different from being "delisted". Being delisted means becoming non-tradeable.

Netlist is a LONG WAYS from that.

One these days the CAFC will rule on the first PTAB appeal, in a long line of such appeals. One of two things will occur. If they rule positively for NLST on that first PTAB ruling, the stock price will suddenly spike up at least $2-$5 dollars a share, in a single trading session. If the CAFC rules against NLST and concurs with the PTAB ruling, the stock will probably plummet to $.10/share (or less). Just because this might happen, no one should give up. There will be many other CAFC rulings, and the stock price will react in kind on each of them.

Right now, I count 13 patent appeals that we are awaiting CAFC judgement on. Some are still a year or more away. Some are imminent.

One thing we absolutely need to go our way is the BOC case in CA. It is imperative that Netlist establishes that the JDLA was terminated properly and that Samsung has NO CLAIM to ANY Netlist patent, after the JDLA was terminated. Once THAT is established, it's a matter of establishing that each patent is valid through the CAFC appeal process.

I remain positive on NLST and their chances of winning many of these battles.

I thought Netlist was already OTC

i think the win will comme in the next fey monates, but I see the only problem is delisting :(

i read an article about this not too long ago, and heard some rumors on other boards. truth told, even before this article i been thinking acts of conspiracy ever since the dollar amounts sunk in...........when it comes down to this much money anything is possible.

Interesting case similar to NLST.

Looks like the start of another great week in NLSTville.
I guess I still have my Dreams.
Sorry I cant copy a link on my phone, everyone will just have to find their best version of Dreams by Molly Hatchet.

At least the big board started green to compensate for Red, Red NLST.

where $ = When in the hell do we get paid!!! = ???? lol!!!

this will continue to get hammered until the boc trial is over, and even then ya gotta wonder........

(boc=no license, cafc=pay nlst) = X + $
where $ = When in the hell do we get paid!!!

OK, back to some real stocks......

Completely oversold imho. 
Best time to accumulate for me. 

Happy trading. 

yes sir, boc=no license, cafc=pay nlst.

Staying focused on the CAFC upcoming appeal and the BOC retrial. Those alone will tell a story for our future.

Stokd Cleaned up version with out all the borders...easier on the eyes. (in case you like this one better)
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/1871578/default.png

slashs dad sure could rock it....

New Litigation chart (02/08/2025) courtesy of Stokd

Stokd updated litigation chart, 2-8-25 $NLST As of Feb 6th all post trial motions and JMOLs in the Samsung #293 case (912 patent / $118 million trial win) have been fully briefed, the decision is now in Gilstrap’s hands. That makes both 912 patent cases with Samsung and Micron for which we’re awaiting post trial decisions before the next step of them being appealed to CAFC.

The motions are:
—Netlist’s Combined Rule 50(b) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, Rule 59 Motion for a New Trial on the Jury's Award of Damages in the Form of a Lump Sum to the Extent Samsung Claims it Constitutes a License For Future Use, and Contingent Rule 59(e) Motion to Amend Judgment

—Samsung’s 50(B) Motion for Judgment As A Matter Of Law

—Samsung’s Motion to Amend the Judgment and Stay Due to the C.D. Cal.'s New Trial Order

In addition to that, coming up we have:
—CAFC 523 oral argument March 4
—BOC retrial March 18
—awaiting CAFC scheduling of 314 & 506 oral argument
—filing of CAFC appeal on #293 & #294 cases after post trial motions are ruled.

https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/1870300/default.png

https://netlist.com/ looks like its been updated again.

Razorz $NLST May I begin by sincerely thanking Stok'd and the many others for keeping us up to speed with with the shennagins that are going on by the legal fraternity and others with hidden agendas. I know that the judges have to tread carefully so as to give no grounds for appeal and this fact only draws out the whole process. That said lets not lose sight of the reality at hand. Micron are as guilty as sin for they do NOT have a liciense. Guilty! Samsung likewise do Not have any rights to Netlists IP for they too are trading illegally. Lastly Google signed a NDA which makes their use illegal and liable and this was exposed by court inspectors.The only trial at the moment is the American justice system and if that is lost we are all at the mercy of a corrupt plutocratic system.So if you believe in the laws of the land, as intended, go all in. It may take a little time however the returns are manifold. Good tidings to all and may patience be in the hand you're holding!

PLUS INTEREST, i might add........

Bowlsketball $NLST I guess we will be seeing many 52 week HIGH'S ahead. BOC trial coming up next month. We should win again since same evidence will be used as the previous two trials (that we won). Also, as STOKD has pointed out the race to finality at the CAFC is upon us. If CAFC affirms the $303 million judgement against Samsung, we will get paid (Samsung will not have any recourse at that point).

if this keeps up we can get fitty cent as a spokesperson..........maybe he'd buy some shares instead of giving them to suji lol!!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/50_Cent

TOMKiLA $NLST Insider sources reveal further concerns, with reports that “Samsung Electronics has reduced its high bandwidth memory (HBM) production target by over 10%, cutting it from 200,000 units per month to 170,000 by the end of 2025.” This conservative adjustment comes in response to production delays and “sluggish demand,” suggesting a more cautious investment approach from the company. The longer-than-expected quality testing for HBM3E has led to a downward revision of Samsung’s 2025 capacity target from 135-140 billion GB to around 120 billion GB.

120b gb, remember netlist won 16$ per one HBM with 16gb

ITS AMAZING!

Stokd $NLST Samsung is well aware of the dangers/remands that lie ahead for them... this just strengthens my conviction even more.

"As the Court is aware, the timing of appeals from district court litigations and Patent Office proceedings concerning the same patent claims can be very important. See, e.g., Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter Int'l, Inc., 721 F.3d 1330, 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2013). Samsung’s proposed reciprocal treatment prevents any gamesmanship in the event there is a race to finality between rulings. This is not just a hypothetical concern, because the Patent Office addressed only one of several unpatentability grounds, leaving open the possibility of remand and a second appeal from the Patent Office.
In view of the circumstances and Netlist’s refusal of reciprocal treatment, Samsung requests that the Court either deny the requested extension or grant it subject to Samsung receiving an equal extension in any appeal of the district court litigation to ameliorate the potential prejudice."
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/1811753/default.png

Stokd $NLST Started searching for any Samsung opposition to extensions in CAFC appeals for mentions/references to “race” implications.

Found a Dec 12 filing by Samsung in Netlist's 912 CAFC appeal. Netlist motioned for an extension to file opening brief, and Samsung opposed revealing concerns regarding losing a possible race to finality — CAFC did grant it to Netlist.

This will allow both Samsung & Micron 912 patent District Crt cases to catch up — both currently awaiting post trial rulings before filing CAFC appeal — then to be designated companion status to moot any race unless the CAFC remands.

Look what they tried — “Samsung offered not to oppose the requested extension of Netlist’s Principal Brief deadline and asked only that Netlist agree not to oppose a similar length extension for Samsung’s Principal Brief deadline in any appeal of the district court litigation.” — “However, Netlist refused to agree to that reciprocal treatment.” — good!

Now READ pic — "not just a hypothetical concern"

https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/1811450/default.png

https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/1811461/default.png

Stokd $NLST That reply nailed it!
The last basis/argument of Netlist’s appeal — “IV. For the remaining limitations, the Board simply accepted Petitioner's arguments without discussion. The APA and precedent require the Board to explain why it accepts even undisputed arguments.” — is exactly asking for remand, it’s the only way to resolve that issue, if the CAFC does not outright reverse invalidity based on other basis/arguments behind the appeal.

And if there is no reversal of invalidity on the 060 & 160 patents, remand is the next best thing, thereby Netlist can win the race to finality on the district court trial verdict and collect damages even if later the patents are affirmed invalid. Though, with a remand we also have a chance of validity by PTAB followed by rounds at the CAFC…still a good chance of ultimately being affirmed valid.

You will pleased to know that the PTAB has a 6 month timeframe on remands, much faster than the initial IPR.

PTAB procedure- chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/sop_9_%20procedure_for_decisions_remanded_from_the_federal_circuit.pdf


https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/1810037/default.png

Stokd $NLST Some progress/movement in the consolidated 060 & 160 CAFC appeals.

Yesterday Netlist filed their Opening Brief in their CAFC appeals of PTAB’s invalidity of 060 & 160 HBM patents.

It’s from Pacer so I can’t link the full doc, but I’ll post pics of the 2 page Summary Of Argument and the Table Of Contents so you can see what is involved and for some insight into the substance and basis of the appeal.
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/1805587/default.png

https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/1805590/default.png

https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/1805596/default.png

https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/1805603/default.png

https://stocktwits.com/Stokd/message/603036917

Key Influencer in the High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) Market 2025: Rising Demand For High-Performance Computing (HPC) Fuels Growth In The High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) Market Driver
02-05-2025 03:04 PM CET | IT, New Media & Software
Press release from: The Business Research Company
High Bandwidth Memory HBM Market
High Bandwidth Memory HBM Market

What Is the Forecasted Market Size and Growth Rate for the High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) Market?
The high bandwidth memory (HBM) market will grow from $2.36 billion in 2024 to $3 billion in 2025, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 27.3%. Growth drivers include advancements in graphics processing units (GPUs), the emergence of big data and analytics, the expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), increasing complexity of workloads, and rising demand for high-performance computing (HPC).

The High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) market will see exponential growth, reaching $7.78 billion by 2029, growing at a CAGR of 26.8%. This is driven by 5G rollout, edge computing, IoT, AI advancements, and VR/AR applications. Key trends include integration in autonomous vehicles, gaming, data centers, and wearable tech.

What Factors Are Propelling the Expansion of the High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) Market?
The rising demand for high-performance computing (HPC) is expected to drive the growth of the high-bandwidth memory (HBM) market. HPC refers to advanced computing systems and technologies designed to tackle complex tasks at exceptional speeds and scales, surpassing traditional computing capabilities. HBM is utilized in HPC to facilitate faster and more efficient data access by vertically stacking memory dies on a single package, increasing bandwidth and reducing latency. For example, in January 2023, the U.S. Department of Energy announced a $1.8 million investment in six projects aimed at enhancing energy efficiency and productivity in manufacturing by leveraging HPC resources at U.S. National Laboratories. These initiatives focus on reducing carbon emissions in steelmaking, optimizing additive manufacturing, and improving battery manufacturing for electric vehicles. The growing demand for HPC is therefore contributing to the expansion of the high-bandwidth memory market.

Get Your Free Sample Now - Explore Exclusive Market Insights:
https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/sample.aspx?id=14114&type=smp

Which Businesses Are at the Forefront of High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) Market Development?
Major companies operating in the high bandwidth memory (HBM) market are Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd, Intel Corporation, International Business Machines (IBM) Corporation, Qualcomm Incorporated, SK Hynix Inc., Fujitsu Limited, Micron Technology Inc., Nvidia Corporation, Toshiba Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Western Digital Corporation, STMicroelectronics SA, Renesas Electronics Corporation, Powerchip Technology Corporation, Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Nanya Technology Corporation, Macronix International Co., Ltd., Silicon Motion Technology Corporation, Transcend Information Inc., Integrated Silicon Solution Inc. (ISSI), Adata Technology Co. Ltd., Netlist Inc., Open Silicon Inc., Micronet Ltd., Winbond Electronics Corporation

What Are the Latest Innovations in the High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) Market?
Companies in the high-bandwidth memory market are concentrating on developing innovative products, such as sustainable data center processors, to improve performance and energy efficiency. Sustainable data center processors aim to optimize energy efficiency and lessen environmental impact. For example, in January 2023, Intel Corporation, a US-based semiconductor company, launched the 4th Gen Xeon Scalable processors (Sapphire Rapids), Xeon CPU Max Series (Sapphire Rapids HBM), and the Data Center GPU Max Series (Ponte Vecchio). These products offer significant advancements in data center performance, efficiency, security, and capabilities in AI, cloud, network, edge, and supercomputing.

How Is the High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) Market Segmented?
The high bandwidth memory (HBM) market covered in this report is segmented -

1) By Memory Type: Hybrid Memory Cube (HMC), High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
2) By Type: HBWPIM, HBM3, HBM2E, HBM2
3) By Application: Servers, Networking, Consumer, Automotive, Other Applications

Subsegments:
1) By Hybrid Memory Cube (HMC): HMC 1.0, HMC 2.0, HMC 3.0
2) By High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM): HBM1, HBM2, HBM2E, HBM3

Pre-Book Your Report Now For A Swift Delivery:
https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/report/high-bandwidth-memory-hbm-global-market-report

Where Is the High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) Market Growth Most Prominent?
North America was the largest region in the high bandwidth memory (HBM) market in 2024. Asia-Pacific is expected to be the fastest-growing region in the forecast period. The regions covered in the high bandwidth memory (HBM) market report are Asia-Pacific, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, North America, South America, Middle East, Africa.

What Is Covered In The High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) Global Market Report?

- Market Size Analysis: Analyze the High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) Market size by key regions, countries, product types, and applications.
- Market Segmentation Analysis: Identify various subsegments within the High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) Market for effective categorization.
- Key Player Focus: Focus on key players to define their market value, share, and competitive landscape.
- Growth Trends Analysis: Examine individual growth trends and prospects in the Market.
- Market Contribution: Evaluate contributions of different segments to the overall High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) Market growth.
- Growth Drivers: Detail key factors influencing market growth, including opportunities and drivers.
- Industry Challenges: Analyze challenges and risks affecting the High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) Market.
- Competitive Developments: Analyze competitive developments, such as expansions, agreements, and new product launches in the market.

Unlock Exclusive Market Insights - Purchase Your Research Report Now!
https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/purchaseoptions.aspx?id=14114

Connect with us on:
LinkedIn: https://in.linkedin.com/company/the-business-research-company,
Twitter: https://twitter.com/tbrc_info,
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC24_fI0rV8cR5DxlCpgmyFQ.

Contact Us
Europe: +44 207 1930 708,
Asia: +91 88972 63534,
Americas: +1 315 623 0293 or
Email: mailto:info@tbrc.info

Learn More About The Business Research Company
With over 15,000+ reports from 27 industries covering 60+ geographies, The Business Research Company has built a reputation for offering comprehensive, data-rich research and insights. Our flagship product, the Global Market Model delivers comprehensive and updated forecasts to support informed decision-making.

This release was published on openPR.
Permanent link to this press release:

https://www.openpr.com/news/3851906/key-influencer-in-the-high-bandwidth-memory-hbm-market-2025
https://www.openpr.com/news/3851906/key-influencer-in-the-high-bandwidth-memory-hbm-market-2025

suji should just give us the money or pay the market pps, or go to sk and make a monster deal.

yup!!! 100%..

we win the first one, the rest follow. that first one is an important phycological booster more than you know!!!

viva la new sk deal!!! hope for the best...next march if i remember correctly?

just pay us and get this madness over!!!

Stokd $NLST Part-2
2 pics
1— is paragraph from article explaining/affirming why I claimed that a granted injunction can carry unforeseen circumstances unfavorable to Netlist in the race.

2— on relevance and that final judgment between district court and CAFC differ...race to finality refers to CAFC.

“Furthermore, as the Federal Circuit noted this year in Packet v. NetScout, even if a finding of infringement and no invalidity is affirmed, if any part of the decision is remanded to the lower court, then the decision is not final and can be affected by collateral estoppel of a co-pending decision.
This leaves certain judgments in the district courts at risk of being foreclosed by a later affirmed board decision finding unpatentability, or board decisions of unpatentability failing to take effect before a final damages judgment in a parallel district court case. Although parties cannot control whether a panel will remand, this should be part of the calculus when considering which issues to appeal.”

https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/1801952/default.png

https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/1801957/default.png

https://stocktwits.com/Stokd/message/603010451

Hard to say. Probably the funding but hard to say.

Stokd $NLST Part-1
A short article on the race to finality and how the law and its application evolved...doesn’t cover everything on the subject with all its nuances and factors, but a worthy read.

Keep in mind, usually the race has to do with getting to CAFC affirmation—called “final judgment” and not to be confused with a district court post trial final judgment—before a parallel proceeding concludes and prior to filing its appeal.

Contrary to our situation, where we have been able to eliminate any race up to this point because the parallel district court and PTAB proceedings were on somewhat of the same timeline towards CAFC and then designated companion appeals.

Our scenario of a race is about which gets to CAFC finality/affirmation first and whether there are any remands on the other/parallel proceeding.

chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.akingump.com/a/web/afgv4R3tPbRjXiXtMw85Kg/law360-racing-patents-to-the-fed-circ-collateral-estoppel-lessons.pdf

What will come first? the CAFC decisions or another $15 million registration to sell more shares???