SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

 

☒     QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2021.

 

OR

 

☐     TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OF 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

From the transition period ___________ to ____________.

 

Commission File Number 000-30371

 

DYNARESOURCE, INC.

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

   

Delaware

 

94-1589426

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)

 

222 W Las Colinas Blvd., Suite 1910 North Tower, Irving, Texas 75039

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(972) 868-9066

(Issuer's telephone number)

 

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes ☒    No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

 

Large Accelerated Filer

 ☐

Accelerated Filer

☐

Non-Accelerated Filer

 ☐

Smaller Reporting Company

 ☒

 

Indicate by a check mark whether the company is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes ☐    No ☒

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13 (a) of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐    No ☒

 

As of July 31, 2021, there were 17,722,825 shares of Common Stock of the issuer outstanding.

 
 

 

   

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 1.

Unaudited Financial Statements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 2.

Management's Discussion and Analysis and Plan of Operation

 

33

 

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

 

44

 

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 4.

Controls and Procedures

 

44

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART II.

OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 1.

Legal Proceedings

 

45

 

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 2.

Unregistered Sales of Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

49

 

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 3.

Default Upon Senior Securities

 

49

 

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

 

49

 

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 5.

Other Information

 

49

 

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 6.

Exhibits

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EXHIBIT 31.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EXHIBIT 31.2

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

 

 

  

 

2

 

   

DYNARESOURCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

JUNE 30, 2021 AND DECEMBER 31, 2020

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

 $ 9,364,960

 

 

 $ 1,504,016

 

Accounts Receivable

 

 

 3,828,995

 

 

 

 840,743

 

Inventories

 

 

 1,364,836

 

 

 

 603,967

 

Foreign Tax Receivable

 

 

 3,204,226

 

 

 

 2,179,914

 

Appeal Bond

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 1,111,111

 

Other Current Assets

 

 

 714,766

 

 

 

 578,661

 

Total Current Assets

 

 

 18,477,783

 

 

 

 6,818,412

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mining Equipment and Fixtures (Net of Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation of $114,801 and $113,176)

 

 

 4,353

 

 

 

 5,978

 

Operating Lease

 

 

 692,889

 

 

 

 735,220

 

Mining Concessions

 

 

 4,132,678

 

 

 

 4,132,678

 

Investment in Affiliate

 

 

 70,000

 

 

 

 70,000

 

Other Assets

 

 

 95,267

 

 

 

 95,380

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

 

 $ 23,472,970

 

 

 $ 11,857,668

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIBILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts Payable

 

 $ 1,363,617

 

 

 $ 2,274,011

 

Accrued Expenses

 

 

 4,404,998

 

 

 

 3,385,093

 

Customer Advances

 

 

 9,250,000

 

 

 

 2,500,000

 

Derivative Liabilities

 

 

 2,556,676

 

 

 

 2,371,560

 

Current Portion of Convertible Notes Payable – Series D

 

 

 3,539,409

 

 

 

 -

 

Current Portion of Convertible Notes Payable – Series I & II

 

 

 543,279

 

 

 

 -

 

Current Portion of Long-Term Debt

 

 

 2,009,461

 

 

 

 1,984,007

 

Current Portion of Operating Lease Payable

 

 

 92,386

 

 

 

 82,733

 

Total Current Liabilities

 

 

 23,759,826

 

 

 

 12,597,404

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Convertible Notes Payable – Series D, (Net of Unamortized Discount of $480,591 and $755,214), Less Current Portion

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 3,264,786

 

Convertible Notes Payable – Series I & II, Less Current Portion

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 543,279

 

Long Term Debt, Less Current Portion

 

 

 33,119

 

 

 

 97,428

 

Operating Lease Payable, Less Current Portion

 

 

 630,158

 

 

 

 685,951

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES

 

 

 24,423,103

 

 

 

 17,188,848

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred Stock, Series C, $0.0001 par value, 1,734,992 shares Authorized, issued and outstanding

 

 

 4,337,480

 

 

 

 4,337,480

 

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred Stock, Series A, $0.0001 par value, 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding

 

 

 1

 

 

 

 1

 

Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized 17,722,825 and 17,722,825 issued and outstanding

 

 

 177,228

 

 

 

 177,228

 

Preferred Rights

 

 

 40,000

 

 

 

 40,000

 

Additional Paid In Capital

 

 

 50,407,333

 

 

 

 50,407,333

 

Treasury Stock, 516,480 and 516,480 shares

 

 

 (1,474,486 )

 

 

 (1,474,486 )

Accumulated Other Comprehensive income

 

 

 66,685

 

 

 

 438,092

 

Accumulated Deficit

 

 

 (54,504,374 )

 

 

 (59,256,828 )

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

 

 

 (5,287,613 )

 

 

 (9,668,660 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

 

 $ 23,472,970

 

 

 $ 11,857,668

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

  

 
3

Table of Contents

   

DYNARESOURCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS) AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2021 AND 2020

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Three Months

June 30, 2021

 

 

Three Months

June 30, 2020

 

 

Six Months

June 30, 2021

 

 

Six Months

June 30, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REVENUES

 

 $ 10,526,313

 

 

 $ (3,409 )

 

 $ 15,439,025

 

 

 $ 414,635

 

COSTS AND EXPENSES OF MINING OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Production Costs Applicable to Sales

 

 

 778,885

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 1,160,151

 

 

 

 211,575

 

Mine Production Costs

 

 

 1,442,932

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 2,249,402

 

 

 

 533,901

 

Mine Exploration Costs

 

 

 1,273,241

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 2,285,989

 

 

 

 40,825

 

Mine Expansion Costs

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 639,656

 

 

   - _

 

 

 

 909,190

 

Camp, Warehouse and Facilities

 

 

 723,527

 

 

 

 421,282

 

 

 

 1,258,722

 

 

 

 873,324

 

Transportation

 

 

 355,134

 

 

 

 (446 )

 

 

 593,698

 

 

 

 75,734

 

Property Holding Costs

 

 

 36,903

 

 

 

 31,306

 

 

 

 79,650

 

 

 

 68,129

 

General and Administrative

 

 

 651,992

 

 

 

 1,097,315

 

 

 

 1,166,969

 

 

 

 1,517,571

 

Depreciation and Amortization

 

 

 813

 

 

 

 812

 

 

 

 1,625

 

 

 

 1,625

 

Total Operating Expenses

 

 

 5,263,427

 

 

 

 2,189,925

 

 

 

 8,796,206

 

 

 

 4,231,874

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)

 

 

 5,262,886

 

 

 

 (2,193,334 )

 

 

 6,642,819

 

 

 

 (3,817,239 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign Currency Gains (Losses)

 

 

 470,016

 

 

 

 (230,310 )

 

 

 136,281

 

 

 

 (339,685 )

Interest Expense

 

 

 (369,197 )

 

 

 (269,865 )

 

 

 (730,419 )

 

 

 (404,445 )

Derivatives Adj. Mark-to-Market Gain (Loss)

 

 

 210,151

 

 

 

 (750,524 )

 

 

 (185,116 )

 

 

 (689,275 )

Arbitration Award Expense

 

 

 (1,111,111 )

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 (1,111,111 )

 

 

 -

 

Other Income (Expense)

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 (4,427 )

 

  -_

 

 

 

 (4,427 )

Total Other Income (Expense)

 

 

 (800,141 )

 

 

 (1,255,126 )

 

 

 (1,890,365 )

 

 

 (1,437,832 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE TAXES

 

 

 4,462,745

 

 

 

 (3,448,460 )

 

 

 4,752,454

 

 

 

 (5,255,071 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME TAXES

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME (LOSS)

 

 $ 4,462,745

 

 

 $ (3,448,460 )

 

 $ 4,752,454

 

 

 $ (5,255,071 )

DEEMED DIVIDEND FOR SERIES C PREFERRED

 

 $ (43,375 )

 

 

 (43,330 )

 

 

 (86,750 )

 

 

 (86,660 )

LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS

 

 $ -

 

 

 $ -

 

 

 $ -

 

 

 $ 61,589

 

NET INCOME (LOSS)ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS

 

 $ 4,419,370

 

 

 $ (3,491,790 )

 

 $ 4,665,704

 

 

 $ (5,280,142 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE DATA  ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE EQUITY HOLDERS OF DYNARESOURCE, INC:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic Loss per Common Share

 

 $ 0.25

 

 

 $ (0.20 )

 

 $ 0.26

 

 

 $ (0.30 )

Diluted Loss per Common Share

 

 $ 0.24

 

 

 $ (0.19 )

 

 $ 0.25

 

 

 $ (0.30 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding, Basic

 

 

 17,722,825

 

 

 

 17,722,825

 

 

 

 17,722,825

 

 

 

 17,722,825

 

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding, Diluted

 

 

 18,945,827

 

 

 

 17,722,825

 

 

 

 18,945,827

 

 

 

 17,722,825

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Gains (Losses)

 

 

 (663,778 )

 

 

 10,683

 

 

 

 (371,407 )

 

 

 1,144,987

 

TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

 

 (663,778 )

 

 

 10,683

 

 

 

 (371,407 )

 

 

 1,144,987

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

 $ 3,798,967

 

 

 $ (3,437,777 )

 

 $ 4,381,047

 

 

 $ (4,110,084 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ATTRIBUTABLE TO:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EQUITY HOLDERS OF DYNARESOURCE, INC.

 

 $ 3,798,967

 

 

 $ (3,437,777 )

 

 $ 4,381,047

 

 

 $ (4,036,826 )

NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS

 

 $ -

 

 

 $ -

 

 

 $ -

 

 

 $ (73,258 )

TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

 $ 3,798,967

 

 

 $ (3,437,777 )

 

 $ 4,381,047

 

 

 $ (4,110,084 )

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

  

 
4

Table of Contents

   

DYNARESOURCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

FOR THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2021, AND 2020

  

 

 

Preferred A

 

 

 

Common

 

 

Preferred

 

 

Preferred

 

 

Paid In

 

 

Treasury

 

 

Treasury

 

 

Other Comp

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Non Controlling

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Rights

 

 

Amount

 

 

Capital

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Income

 

 

Deficit

 

 

Interests

 

 

Totals

 

Balance, March 31, 2020

 

 

 1,000

 

 

 $ 1

 

 

 

17,722,825

 

 

 $ 177,228

 

 

 

 1

 

 

 $ 40,000

 

 

 $ 51,056,738

 

 

 

 778,980

 

 

 $ (2,223,891 )

 

 $ 1,471,814

 

 

 $ (55,697,616 )

 

 $ 0

 

 

 $ (5,175,726 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Treasury Stock Issued for Services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 (363,917 )

 

 

 (162,500 )

 

 

 463,917

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 10,683

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 10,683

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 (3,448,460 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 (3,448,460 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, June 30, 2020

 

 

 1,000

 

 

 $ 1

 

 

 

 17,722,825

 

 

 $ 177,228

 

 

 

 1

 

 

 $ 40,000

 

 

 $ 50,692,821

 

 

 

 616,480

 

 

 $ (1,759,974 )

 

 $ 1,482,497

 

 

 $ (59,146,076 )

 

 $ 0

 

 

 $ (8,513,503 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, March 31, 2021

 

 

 1,000

 

 

 $ 1

 

 

 

 17,722,825

 

 

 $ 177,228

 

 

 

 1

 

 

 $ 40,000

 

 

 $ 50,407,333

 

 

 

 516,480

 

 

 $ (1,474,486 )

 

 $ 730,463

 

 

 $ (58,967,119 )

 

 $ 0

 

 

 $ (9,086,580 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 (663,778 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 (663,778 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 4,462,745

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 4,462,745

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, June 30, 2021

 

 

 1,000

 

 

 $ 1

 

 

 

 17,722,825

 

 

 $ 177,228

 

 

 

 1

 

 

 $ 40,000

 

 

 $ 50,407,333

 

 

 

 516,480

 

 

 $ (1,474,486 )

 

 $ 66,685

 

 

 $ (54,504,374 )

 

 $ 0

 

 

 $ (5,287,613 )

 

Balance, December 31, 2019

 

 

 1,000

 

 

 $               1 

 

 

 

 17,722,825

 

 

 $ 177,228

 

 

 

               1

 

 

 $ 40,000

 

 

 $ 56,622,159

 

 

 

 778,980

 

 

 $ (2,223,891 )

 

 $ 325,841

 

 

 $ (53,952,594 )

 

 $ (5,723,663 )

 

 $ (4,734,919 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Treasury Stock Issued for Services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 (363,917 )

 

 

 (162,500 )

 

 

 463,917

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 1,156,656

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 (11,669 )

 

 

 1,144,987

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 (5,193,482 )

 

 

 (61,589 )

 

 

 (5,255,071 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Elimination of Non-Controlling Interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 (5,565,421 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 5,796,921

 

 

 

 231,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, June 30, 2020

 

 

 1,000

 

 

 $ 1

 

 

 

 17,722,825

 

 

 $ 177,228

 

 

 

 1

 

 

 $ 40,000

 

 

 $ 50,692,821

 

 

 

 616,480

 

 

 $ (1,759,974 )

 

 $ 1,471,814

 

 

 $ (59,146,076 )

 

 $ 0

 

 

 $ (8,513,503 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2020

 

 

 1,000

 

 

 $ 1

 

 

 

 17,722,825

 

 

 $ 177,228

 

 

 

 1

 

 

 $ 40,000

 

 

 $ 50,407,333

 

 

 

 516,480

 

 

 $ (1,474,486 )

 

 $ 438,092

 

 

 $ (59,256,828 )

 

 $ 0

 

 

 $ (9,668,660 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 (371,407 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 (371,407 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 4,752,454

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 4,752,454

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, June 30, 2021

 

 

 1,000

 

 

 $ 1

 

 

 

 17,722,825

 

 

 $ 177,228

 

 

 

 1

 

 

 $ 40,000

 

 

 $ 50,407,333

 

 

 

 516,480

 

 

 $ (1,474,486 )

 

 $ 66,685

 

 

 $ (54,504,374 )

 

 $ 0

 

 

 $ (5,287,613 )

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

  

 
5

Table of Contents

  

DYNARESOURCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2021 AND 2020

(UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (Loss)

 

 $ 4,752,454

 

 

 $ (5,255,071 )

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in Derivatives

 

 

 185,116

 

 

 

 689,275

 

Depreciation

 

 

 1,625

 

 

 

 1,625

 

Amortization of Loan Discount

 

 

 274,623

 

 

 

 68,656

 

Stock issued for Services

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 100,000

 

Non-Dilution Stock Issuance

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 4,427

 

Change in Operating Assets and Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts Receivable

 

 

 (2,988,252 )

 

 

 718,487

 

Inventories

 

 

 (760,869 )

 

 

 523,089

 

Foreign Tax Receivable

 

 

 (1,024,312 )

 

 

 139,260

 

Appeal Bond

 

 

 1,111,111

 

 

 

 -

 

Operating Lease Assets

 

 

 42,331

 

 

 

 37,887

 

Other Assets

 

 

 (135,992 )

 

 

 (41,059 )

Accounts Payable

 

 

 (910,394 )

 

 

 (598,917 )

Accrued Expenses

 

 

 1,019,905

 

 

 

 220,056

 

Customer Advances

 

 

 6,750,000

 

 

 

 -

 

Lease Liabilities

 

 

 (46,140 )

 

 

 (37,659 )

CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 8,271,206

 

 

 

 (3,429,944 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advances from Stockholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 45,000

 

Proceeds from Borrowing

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 3,275,000

 

Payments of Convertible Notes

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 (112,500 )

Payments of Long-Term Debt

 

 

 (36,460 )

 

 

 (29,315 )

CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 (36,460 )

 

 

 3,178,185

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effects of Foreign Exchange

 

 

 (373,802 )

 

 

 728,966

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVILANTS

 

 

 7,860,944

 

 

 

 477,207

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD

 

 

 1,504,016

 

 

 

 354,572

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD

 

 $ 9,364,960

 

 

 $ 831,779

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Paid for Interest

 

 $ 243,979

 

 

 $ 47,875

 

Cash Paid for Income Taxes

 

 $ -

 

 

 $ -

 

NON-CASH TRANSACTION Accrued Interest Rolled into Notes Payable

 

 $ -

 

 

 $ 23,934

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

  

 
6

Table of Contents

   

DYNARESOURCE, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2021 AND 2020

 

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF ACTIVITIES AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Nature of Activities, History and Organization

 

DynaResource, Inc. (The “Company”, “DynaResource”, or “DynaUSA”) was organized September 28, 1937, as a California corporation under the name of West Coast Mines, Inc. In 1998, the Company re-domiciled to Delaware and changed its name to DynaResource, Inc. The Company is in the business of acquiring, investing in, and developing precious metal properties, and the production of precious metals.

 

In 2000, the Company formed a wholly owned subsidiary, DynaResource de México S.A. de C.V., chartered in México (“DynaMéxico”). This Company was formed to acquire, invest in and develop resource properties in México. DynaMéxico owns a portfolio of mining concessions that currently includes its interests in the San José de Gracía Project (“SJG”) in northern Sinaloa State, México. The SJG District covers 9,920 hectares (24,513 acres) on the west side of the Sierra Madre mountain range. The Company currently owns 100% of the outstanding capital of DynaMéxico. A 20% minority interest in Dyna México was held by Goldgroup Resources Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Goldgroup Mining Inc. Vancouver BC (“Goldgroup”) until February 24, 2020.

 

In 2005, the Company formed DynaResource Operaciones de San Jose De Gracía S.A. de C.V. (“DynaOperaciones”), and acquired control of Mineras de DynaResource, S.A. de C.V. (formerly Minera Finesterre S.A. de C.V., “DynaMineras”). The Company owns 100% of Dyna Mineras.

 

The Company elected to become a voluntary reporting issuer in Canada in order to avail itself of Canadian regulations regarding reporting for mining properties and, more specifically, National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”). This regulation sets forth standards for reporting resources in a mineral property and is a standard recognized in the mining industry.

 

Reclassifications and Adjustments

 

Certain financial statement reclassifications have been made to prior period balances to reflect the current period’s presentation format; such reclassifications had no impact on the Company’s consolidated statements of income or consolidated statements of cash flows and had no material impact on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

 

Significant Accounting Policies

 

The Company’s management selects accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and adopts methods for their application. The application of accounting principles requires the estimating, matching and timing of revenues and expenses. The accounting policies used conform to generally accepted accounting principles which have been consistently applied in the preparation of these financial statements.

 

The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. Management further acknowledges that it is solely responsible for adopting sound accounting practices, establishing and maintaining a system of internal accounting control and preventing and detecting fraud. The Company's system of internal accounting control is designed to assure, among other items that: 1) recorded transactions are valid; 2) valid transactions are recorded; and 3) transactions are recorded in the proper period in a timely manner to produce financial statements which present fairly the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the respective periods presented.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The Company prepares its financial statements on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The financial statements include the accounts of DynaResource, Inc., as well as DynaResource de México, S.A. de C.V. (100% ownership), DynaResource Operaciones S.A. de C.V. (100% ownership) and Mineras de DynaResource S.A. de C.V. (100% ownership). All significant inter-company transactions have been eliminated. All amounts are presented in U.S. Dollars unless otherwise stated.

  

 
7

Table of Contents

   

Non-Controlling Interest

 

The Company’s subsidiary, DynaResource de México S.A. de C.V, was 20% owned by Goldgroup Resources, Inc. until February 24, 2020 when the Company recovered the shares as partial satisfaction of a legal judgement. See Note 10 for further details.

 

The Company accounted for this outside interest as “non-controlling interest” through February 2020. A 20% share of operating income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) was allocated to the non-controlling interest through the date of the recovery of the shares.

 

Investments in Affiliates

 

The Company owns a 19.95% interest in DynaResource Nevada, Inc., a Nevada Corporation (“DynaNevada”), with one operating subsidiary in México, DynaNevada de México, S.A. de C.V. (“DynaNevada de México”), together “DynaNevada”. The Company accounts for this investment using the cost basis. The Company has significant influence over DynaNevada, but not control, due to the lack of a majority voting interest in the entity. DynaNevada has been dormant for several years. DynaUSA has no plan or intention of future funding with DynaNevada nor are any other transactions with DynaNevada contemplated at this time. The Company therefore accounts for this investment using the cost basis. The investment was $70,000 and $70,000 at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At times, cash balances may be in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance limits. As of June 30, 2021, the Company had $9,507,800 of deposits in U.S. Banks in excess of the FDIC limit.

 

Accounts Receivable and Allowances for Doubtful Accounts

 

The allowance for accounts receivable is recorded when receivables are considered to be doubtful of collection. As of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, no allowance has been made.

 

Foreign Tax Receivable

 

Foreign Tax Receivable is comprised of recoverable value-added taxes (“IVA”) charged by the Mexican government on goods and services rendered. Under certain circumstances, these taxes are recoverable by filing a tax return. Amounts paid for IVA are tracked and held as receivables until the funds are remitted. The total amounts of the IVA receivable as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 are $3,204,226 and $2,179,914, respectively.

 

Inventory

 

Inventories are carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value and consist of mined tonnage, and gravity and flotation concentrates, and gravity tailings or flotation feed material. The inventories are $1,364,836 and $603,967 as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.

 

Proven and Probable Reserves (No Known Reserves)

 

The definition of proven and probable reserves is set forth in SEC Industry Guide 7 (“Industry Guide 7”). Proven reserves for which (1) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes, grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling and (2) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geological character is so well defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of the reserves are well-established. Probable reserves are reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven (measured) reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling, and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven (measured) reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observations.

 

As June 30, 2021 of the Company's properties contain resources that satisfy the definition of proven and probable reserves. The Company classifies the development of its properties, including the San Jose de Gracía Property, as exploration stage projects since no proven or probable reserves have been established under Industry Guide 7.

 

 
8

Table of Contents

  

Property

 

Substantially all mine development costs, including design, engineering, mine construction, and installation of equipment are expensed as incurred as the Company has not established proven and probable reserves on any of its properties. Only certain types of mining equipment which has alternative uses or significant salvage value, may be capitalized without proven and probable reserves. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method. Office furniture and equipment are being depreciated on a straight-line method over estimated economic lives ranging from 3 to 5 years. Leasehold improvements, which relate to the Company's corporate office, are being amortized over the term of the lease of 10 years.

 

Design, Construction, and Development Costs: Mine development costs include engineering and metallurgical studies, drilling and other related costs to delineate an ore body, the removal of overburden to initially expose an ore body at open pit surface mines and the building of access ways, shafts, lateral access, drifts, ramps and other infrastructure at underground mines.

 

When proven and probable reserves as defined by Industry Guide 7 exist, development costs are capitalized, and the property is a commercially minable property. Mine development costs incurred either to develop new ore deposits, expand the capacity of operating mines, or to develop mine areas substantially in advance of current production would be capitalized. Costs of start-up activities and costs incurred to maintain current production or to maintain assets on a standby basis are charged to operations as incurred. Costs of abandoned projects are charged to operations upon abandonment. All capitalized costs would be amortized using the units of production method over the estimated life of the ore body based on recoverable ounces to be mined from proven and probable reserves.

 

Certain costs to design and construct mining and processing facilities may be incurred prior to establishing proven and probable reserves. As no proven and probable reserves have been established on any of the Company's properties, design, construction and development costs are not capitalized at any of the Company's properties, and accordingly, substantially all costs are expensed as incurred, resulting in the Company reporting larger losses than if such expenditures had been capitalized. Additionally, the Company does not have a corresponding depreciation or amortization of these costs going forward since these expenditures were expensed as incurred as opposed to being capitalized. As a result of these and other differences, the Company's financial statements may not be comparable to the financial statements of mining companies that have established reserves.

 

Mineral Properties Interests

 

Mineral property interests include acquired interests in development and exploration stage properties, which are considered tangible assets. The amount capitalized relating to a mineral property interest represents its fair value at the time of acquisition. When a property does not contain mineralized material that satisfies the definition of proven and probable reserves, such as with the San Jose de Gracía Property, capitalized costs and mineral property interests are amortized using the straight-line method once production begins. As of June 30, 2021, the mining interests have been in the pilot production stage and therefore, no amortization has been expensed. Mining properties consist of 33 mining concessions covering approximately 9,920 hectares at the San Jose de Gracía property (“SJG”), the basis of which are amortized on the unit of production method based on estimated recoverable resources. If it is determined that the deferred costs related to a property are not recoverable over its productive life, those costs will be written down to fair value as a charge to operations in the period in which the determination is made. The amounts at which mineral properties and the related costs are recorded do not necessarily reflect present or future values.

 

Impairment of Assets: The Company reviews and evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Mineral properties are monitored for impairment based on factors such as mineral prices, government regulation and taxation, the Company's continued right to explore the area, exploration reports, assays, technical reports, drill results and its continued plans to fund exploration programs on the property.

 

For operating mines, recoverability is measured by comparing the undiscounted future net cash flows to the net book value. When the net book value exceeds future net undiscounted cash flows, an impairment loss is measured and recorded based on the excess of the net book value over fair value. Fair value for operating mines is determined using a combined approach, which uses a discounted cash flow model for the existing operations and a market approach for the fair value assessment of exploration land claims. Future cash flows are estimated based on quantities of recoverable mineralized material, expected gold and silver prices (considering current and historical prices, trends and related factors), production levels, operating costs, capital requirements and reclamation costs, all based on life-of-mine plans. The term "recoverable mineralized material" refers to the estimated amount of gold or other commodities that will be obtained after considering losses during processing and treatment of mineralized material. In estimating future cash flows, assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of future cash flows from other asset groups. The Company's estimates of future cash flows are based on numerous assumptions and it is possible that actual future cash flows will be significantly different than the estimates, as actual future quantities of recoverable minerals, gold, silver and other commodity prices, production levels and costs and capital are each subject to significant risks and uncertainties.

  

 
9

Table of Contents

   

The recoverability of the book value of each property will be assessed annually for indicators of impairment such as adverse changes to any of the following:

 

●

estimated recoverable ounces of gold, silver or other precious minerals;

●

estimated future commodity prices;

●

estimated expected future operating costs, capital expenditures and reclamation expenditures.

 

A write-down to fair value will be recorded when the expected future cash flow is less than the net book value of the property or when events or changes in the property indicate that carrying amounts are not recoverable. This analysis will be completed as needed, and at least annually. As of the date of this filing, no events have occurred that would require write-down of any assets. As of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, no indications of impairment existed.

 

Asset Retirement Obligation

 

As the Company is not obligated to remediate the mining properties, no Asset Retirement Obligation (“ARO”) has been established. Changes in regulations or laws, any instances of non-compliance with laws or regulations that result in fines, or any unforeseen environmental contamination could result in a material impact to the amounts charged to operations for reclamation and remediation. Significant judgments and estimates are made when estimating the fair value of AROs. Expected cash flows relating to AROs could occur over long periods of time and the assessment of the extent of environmental remediation work is highly subjective. Considering all of these factors that go into the determination of an ARO, the fair value of the AROs can materially change over time.

 

Property Holding Costs

 

Holding costs to maintain a property on a care and maintenance basis are expensed in the period they are incurred. These costs include security and maintenance expenses, lease and claim fees and payments, and environmental monitoring and reporting costs.

 

Exploration Costs

 

Exploration costs are charged to operations and expenses as incurred. Exploration, development, direct field costs and administrative costs are expensed in the period incurred.

 

Transactions in and Translations of Foreign Currency

 

The functional currency for the subsidiaries of the Company is the Mexican Peso. As a result, the financial statements of the subsidiaries have been translated from Mexican Pesos into U.S. dollars using (i) yearend exchange rates for balance sheet accounts, and (ii) the weighted average exchange rate of the reporting period for all income statement accounts. Foreign currency translation gains and losses are reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss).

 

The financial statements of the subsidiaries should not be construed as representations that Mexican Pesos have been, could have been or may in the future be converted into U.S. dollars at such rates or any other rates.

 

Relevant exchange rates used in the preparation of the financial statements for the subsidiaries are as follows for the periods ended June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 (Mexican Pesos per one U.S. dollar):

 

 

 

June 30,

2021

 

 

Dec 31,

2020

 

Exchange Rate at Period End Pesos

 

 

 19.94

 

 

 

 19.91

 

 

Relevant exchange rates used in the preparation of the income statement portion of financial statements for the subsidiaries are as follows for the periods ended June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020 (Mexican Pesos per one U.S. dollar):

 

 

 

June 30,

2021

 

 

June 30,

2020

 

Weighted Average Exchange Rate for the Six Months Ended Pesos

 

 

 20.19

 

 

 

 21.65

 

  

 
10

Table of Contents

   

The Company recorded currency transaction gains (losses) of $136,281 and $(339,685) for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

 

Income Taxes

 

The Company accounts for income taxes under ASC 740 “Income Taxes” using the liability method, recognizing certain temporary differences between the financial reporting basis of liabilities and assets and the related income tax basis for such liabilities and assets. This method generates either a net deferred income tax liability or asset for the Company, as measured by the statutory tax rates in effect. The Company derives the deferred income tax charge or benefit by recording the change in either the net deferred income tax liability or asset balance for the year. The Company records a valuation allowance against any portion of those deferred income tax assets when it believes, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax asset will not be realized.

 

Income from the Company’s subsidiaries in México are taxed at applicable Mexican tax law.

 

Use of Estimates

 

In order to prepare financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, management must make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and determines whether contingent assets and liabilities, if any, are disclosed in the financial statements. The ultimate resolution of issues requiring these estimates and assumptions could differ significantly from resolution currently anticipated by management and on which the financial statements are based.

 

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

ASC 220 “Comprehensive Income” establishes standards for reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in a full set of general-purpose financial statements. The Company’s comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income (loss), consisting of unrealized net gains and losses on the translation of the assets and liabilities of its foreign operations.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

The Company follows ASC 606 “Revenue from contracts with customers”. The Company generates revenue by selling gold and silver produce from its mining operations. The Company recognizes revenue for gold and silver concentrate production, net of treatment and refining costs, when it satisfies the performance obligation of transferring control of the concentrate to the customer. This is generally when the material is delivered to the customer facility for treatment and processing as the customer has the ability to direct the use of and obtain substantially all the remaining benefits from the material and the customer has the risk of loss.

 

The amount of revenue recognized is initially recorded on a provisional basis based on the contract price and the estimated metal quantities based on assay data. The revenue is adjusted upon final settlement of the sale. The chief risk associated with the recognition of sales on a provisional basis is the fluctuations between the estimated quantities of precious metals base on the initial assay and the actual recovery from treatment and processing.

 

As of June 30, 2021 there are $9,250,000 in customer deposit liabilities for payments received in advance expected to be settled in 2021.

 

During the periods ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 there was $0 and $0 of revenue recognized during the period from customer deposit liabilities (deferred contract revenue) from prior periods, and $0 of customer deposits refunded to the customer on order cancellation.

 

As of and for the periods ended June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, there are no contract costs or commissions deferred.

 

We have elected to account for shipping and handling costs as fulfillment costs after the customer obtains control of the goods.

 

 
11

Table of Contents

   

Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company accounts for stock options at fair value as prescribed in ASC 718. The Company estimates the fair value of each stock option at the grant date by using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and provides for expense recognition over the service period, if any, of the stock option.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, receivables, payables and long-term debt. The carrying amount of cash, receivable and payables approximates fair value because of the short-term nature of these items. The carrying amount of long-term debt approximates fair value due to the relationship between the interest rate on long-term debt and the Company’s incremental risk adjusted borrowing rate.

 

Per Share Amounts

 

Earnings per share are calculated in accordance with ASC 260 “Earnings per Share”. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period is used to compute basic earnings (loss) per share. Diluted earnings per share are computed using the weighted average number of shares and potentially dilutive common shares outstanding. Potentially dilutive common shares are additional common shares assumed to be exercised. Potentially dilutive common shares consist of stock warrants, convertible preferred shares and convertible notes and are excluded from the diluted earnings per share computation in periods where the Company has incurred a net loss or where the average stock price was below the exercise price of the respective potentially dilutive common share, as their effect would be considered anti-dilutive.

 

The Company had 3,391,835 warrants outstanding at June 30, 2021 which upon exercise, would result in the issuance of 3,391,835 shares of common stock. Of these warrants 2,166,527 were exercisable at $2.05 per share and1,225,308 were exercisable at $.01 per share. The Company also had convertible debt instruments as of June 31, 2021 which, upon conversion at valuations from $2.00 to $2.50 per share, would result in the issuance of 2,227,312 shares of stock.

 

The Company had 3,391,835 warrants outstanding at December 31, 2020 which upon exercise, would result in the issuance of 3,391,835 shares of common stock. Of these warrants 2,166,527 were exercisable at $2.05 per share and 1,225,308 were exercisable at $.01 per share. The Company also had convertible debt instruments as of December 31, 2020 which, upon conversion at valuations from $2.00 to $2.50 per share, would result in the issuance of 2,227,312 shares of stock.

 

 

 

Three Month

Ended

June 30,

2021

 

 

Three Month

Ended

June 30,

2020

 

 

Six Month

Ended

June 30,

2021

 

 

Six Month

Ended

June 30,

2020

 

Net loss attributable to common shareholders

 

 $ 4,419,370

 

 

 $ (3,491,790 )

 

 $ 4,665,704

 

 

 $ (5,280,142 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, Basic

 

 

 17,722,825

 

 

 

 17,722,825

 

 

 

 17,722,825

 

 

 

 17,722,825

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding,

 

 

 18,945,827

 

 

 

 17,722,825

 

 

 

 18,945,827

 

 

 

 17,722,825

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share

 

 $ 0.25

 

 

 $ (0.20 )

 

 $ 0.26

 

 

 $ (0.30 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

 

 $ 0.24

 

 

 $ (0.19 )

 

 $ 0.25

 

 

 $ (0.30 )

 

At June 30, 2021 2,166,527 shares of potentially dilutive common stock related to outstanding stock warrants and 2,227,312 shares of potentially dilutive common stock related to convertible debt were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation because the exercise and conversion prices exceeded the average stock price and therefore their effect would be anti-dilutive.

 

At June 30, 2020 potentially dilutive common shares related to stock warrants and convertible debt were excluded from the diluted earning per share computation because the Company incurred a net loss and therefore their effect would be anti-dilutive.

   

Related Party Transactions

 

FASB ASC 850, "Related Party Disclosures" requires companies to include in their financial statements, disclosures of material related party transactions. The Company discloses all material related party transactions. A party is considered to be related to the Company if the party directly or indirectly or through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the Company. Related parties also include principal owners of the Company, its management, members of the immediate families of principal owners of the Company and its management and other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests. A party which can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or if it has an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests is also a related party.

  

 
12

Table of Contents

 

NOTE 2 – INVENTORIES

 

Inventories are carried at the lower of cost or fair value and consist of mined tonnage, gravity-flotation concentrates, and gravity tailings (or, flotation feed material). Inventory balances of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, were as follows:

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mined Tonnage

 

 $ 1,218,021

 

 

 $ 555,608

 

Gold-Silver Concentrates

 

 

 146,815

 

 

 

 48,359

 

Total Inventories

 

 $ 1,364,836

 

 

 $ 603,967

 

 

NOTE 3 – PROPERTY

 

Property consists of the following at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020:

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leasehold improvements

 

 $ 9,340

 

 

 $ 9,340

 

Office equipment

 

 

 31,012

 

 

 

 31,012

 

Office furniture and fixtures

 

 

 78,802

 

 

 

 78,802

 

Sub-total

 

 

 119,154

 

 

 

 119,154

 

Less: Accumulated depreciation

 

 

 (114,801 )

 

 

 (113,176 )

Total Property

 

 $ 4,353

 

 

 $ 5,978

 

 

Depreciation has been provided over each asset’s estimated useful life. Depreciation expense was $1,625 and $1,625 for the periods ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 respectively.

 

NOTE 4 – MINING CONCESSIONS

 

Mining properties consist of the San Jose de Gracía (“SJG”) concessions. Mining Concessions were $4,132,678 and $4,132,678 at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.  

 

Depletion expense was $0 and $0 for the periods ended June 20, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

 

NOTE 5 – INVESTMENT IN AFFILIATE/RECEIVABLES FROM AFFILIATE/OTHER ASSETS

 

The Company owns 19.95% DynaResource Nevada, Inc. (“DynaNevada”), a Nevada Corporation, which owns 100% of one operating subsidiary in México, DynaNevada de México, S.A. de C.V. (“DynaNevada de México”). DynaNevada is a related entity (affiliate), and through its subsidiary, DynaNevada de México has entered into an Option agreement with Grupo México (IMMSA) in México, for the exploration and development of approximately 3,000 hectares in the State of San Luis Potosi (“The Santa Gertrudis Property”). DynaNevada de México exercised the Option with IMMSA in March 2010, so that DynaNevada de México now owns 100% of the Santa Gertrudis Property. In June 2010, DynaNevada de México acquired an additional 6,000 hectares in the State of Sinaloa (the “San Juan Property”).

 

 
13

Table of Contents

   

On December 31, 2010, the Company received 3,223,040 shares, which represents approximately 19.95% of the outstanding shares of DynaNevada. At the time of the exchange, DynaNevada’s net book value was approximately $695,000, consisting of $30,000 of cash and the remainder being unproven mining properties. Subsequent to the exchange management determined the investment to be impaired due to a lack of development of the properties and incurred a charge to the income statement. Management estimated the value of the Company’s DynaNevada shares as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 to be $70,000 and $70,000, respectively.

 

At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company had a receivable from DynaNevada de México of $71,379 and $71,465, respectively for working capital advances. These amounts are included in Other Assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

 

NOTE 6 – CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES

 

Notes Payable – Series I

 

In April and May 2013, the Company entered into note agreements with shareholders in the principal amount of $1,495,000, of which $340,000 was then converted to preferred shares within the same year, netting to proceeds of $1,155,000 (the “Series I Notes”). The Series I Notes bear simple interest at twelve and a half percent (12.5%), accrued for twelve months, and with the accrued interest to be added to the principal, and then interest will be paid by the Company, quarterly in arrears. The holders of the Series I Notes (in aggregate) are also entitled to receive ten percent (10%) of the net profits received by the Company, on the first fifty thousand tons processed through the mill facilities at San Jose de Gracía. Such net profits (if any) are to be calculated after deducting “all expenses related to the production”, and after a prior deduction of thirty-three percent (33%) from the net profits, to be deposited into a sinking fund cash reserve. To date, the Company has not produced any net profits as calculated in accordance with the Series I Notes.

 

The Notes originally matured on December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2018, seven of the Series I Notes totaling $646,875 had subsequently been extended to December 30, 2019. On December 31, 2019, the Company entered into agreements to extend seven outstanding notes totaling $646,875 plus accrued interest totaling $34,277 for new total notes of $681,152 until December 31, 2020.

 

On March 31, 2020 the Company entered into agreements to extend the seven outstanding notes totaling $691,152 plus accrued interest totaling $21,286 for a new total of $702,438 until June 30, 2022. At December 31, 2020 one note for $246,533 was paid off leaving six Series I Notes remaining outstanding with a total balance of $455,905.

 

At June 30, 2021 six Series I Notes remained outstanding with a total balance of $455,905. The Company has the right to prepay the Series I Notes with a ten percent (10%) penalty.

 

The Series I Note holder retains the option, at any time prior to maturity or prepayment, to convert any unpaid principal and accrued interest into Common Stock at $2.50 per share. If the Series I Note is converted into Common Stock, at the time of conversion, the holder would also receive warrants, in the same number as the number of common shares received upon conversion, to purchase additional common shares of the Company for $7.50 per share, with such warrants expiring one year from their conversion date.

 

Notes Payable – Series II

 

In 2013 and 2014, the Company entered into additional note agreements of $199,808 and $250,000, respectively (the “Series II Notes”) with similar terms as the Series I Notes. The Series II Notes bear simple interest at twelve and a half percent (12.5%), accrued for twelve months, and with the accrued interest to be added to the principal, and then interest will be paid by the Company, quarterly in arrears. The holders of the Series II Notes (in aggregate) are also entitled to receive ten percent (10%) of the net profits received by the Company, on the second fifty thousand tons processed through the mill facilities at San Jose de Gracía. Such net profits (if any) are to be calculated after deducting “all expenses related to the production” and after a prior deduction of thirty-three percent (33%) from the net profits, to be deposited into a sinking fund cash reserve. To date, the Company has not produced any net profits as calculated in accordance with the Series II Notes.

 

The Notes originally matured on December 31, 2015. On December 31, 2019 the Company entered into agreements to extend the two notes totaling $78,750 plus accrued interest of $5,977 for total new notes of $84,757 to December 31, 2020. One note for $112,500 was not extended and was past due as of December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2019 three Series II notes remained outstanding for $197,226.

 

On March 31, 2020 the Company entered into agreements to extend the two notes totaling $84,726 plus accrued interest of $2,648 for total new notes of $87,374 to June 30, 2022. One note for $112,500 was not extended and was paid off in May 2020. At December 31, 2020 two Series II notes remained outstanding for $87,374.

 

 
14

Table of Contents

 

At June 30, 2021, two Series II notes remained outstanding for $87,374. The Company has the right to prepay the Series II Notes with a ten percent (10%) penalty.

 

The Note holder may, at any time prior to maturity or prepayment, convert any unpaid principal and accrued interest into common stock of the Company at $2.50 per share. At the time of conversion, the holder would receive a warrant to purchase additional common shares of the Company for $7.50 per share, such warrant expiring one year from their conversion date.

 

NOTE 7 – INCOME TAXES

 

The Company has adopted ASC 740-10, “Income Taxes”, which requires the use of the liability method in the computation of income tax expense and the current and deferred income taxes payable (deferred tax liability) or benefit (deferred tax asset). Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

 

The cumulative tax effect at the expected statutory tax rate of 21% of significant items comprising the Company’s net deferred tax amounts as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 are as follows:

 

Deferred Tax Asset Related to:

 

 

 

June 30,

2021

 

 

December 31,

2020

 

Prior Year

 

 $ 13,473,000

 

 

 $ 13,780,490

 

Tax (Expense) Benefit for Current Year

 

 

 (1,421,781 )

 

 

 953,120

 

Expiration of NOL Carryforward Period

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 (1,260,610 )

Total Deferred Tax Asset

 

 

 12,051,219

 

 

 

 13,473,000

 

Less Valuation Allowance

 

 

 (12,051,219 )

 

 

 (13,473,000 )

Net Deferred Tax Asset

 

 $ -

 

 

 $ -

 

 

For Financial Reporting Purposes Income (Loss) Before Taxes for the Six Months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 includes the Following Components:

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

United States

 

 $ (4,841,452 )

 

 $ (1,862,612 )

Foreign

 

 

 9,593,906

 

 

 

 (3,392,459 )

 

 

 $ 4,752,454

 

 

 $ (5,255,071 )

 

The Expense (Benefit) for Taxes for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 Consist of the Following:

 

Current

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 $ -

 

 

 $ -

 

State

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

Foreign

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 $ -

 

 

 $ -

 

Deferred and Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 $ (920,960 )

 

 $ (285,487 )

State

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

Foreign

 

 

 2,342,741

 

 

 

 (848,115 )

 

 

 

 1,421,781

 

 

 

 (1,133,602 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Tax Expense (Benefit)

 

 

 1,421,781

 

 

 

 (1,133,602 )

Change in Valuation Allowance

 

 

 (1,421,781 )

 

 

 1,133,602

 

Net Tax Expense (Benefit)

 

 $ -

 

 

 $ -

 

 

 
15

Table of Contents

 

The Company's Income Tax Expense (Benefit)for the six months ending June 30, 2021 and 2020 differs from the Statutory Rate of 21% due to the following:

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Tax Expense (Benefit) at Statutory Rate

 

 $ 998,015

 

 

 $ (1,103,565 )

Foreign Tax Rate Differential

 

 

 863,450

 

 

 

 (210,203 )

Permanent Differences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock Issued for Services

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 21,000

 

Change in Derivative Liability

 

 

 38,874

 

 

 

 144,748

 

Amortization of Loan Discount

 

 

 57,671

 

 

 

 14,418

 

Timing Differences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation & Capitalized Assets

 

 

 (15,283 )

 

 

 

 

Sales & Accounts Receivable

 

 

 (321,479 )

 

 

 

 

Inventory and COGS

 

 

 (198,667 )

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 (800 )

 

 

 

 

Change in Valuation Allowance

 

 

 (1,421,781 )

 

 

 1,133,602

 

Provision for Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

 

 $ -

 

 

 $ -

 

 

The net deferred tax asset and benefit for the current year is generated primarily from the cumulative net operating loss carry-forward which is approximately $49,800,000 at June 30, 2021 and will expire as follows:

 

United States Expiring 2029 through

 

 $ 18,500,000

 

United States indefinite limited to 80% of NOL

 

 

 11,300,000

 

Foreign expiring from 2021 to 2030

 

 

 20,000,000

 

Total

 

 $ 49,800,000

 

 

NOTE 8 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

Authorized Capital. The total number of shares of all classes of capital stock which the corporation shall have the authority to issue is 60,001,000 shares, consisting of (i) twenty million and one thousand (20,001,000) shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Preferred Stock”), of which one thousand (1,000) shares shall be designated as Series A Preferred Stock, 1,734,992 are designated as Series C Preferred Stock, and 3,000,000 shares are designated as Series D Preferred Stock and (ii) forty million (40,000,000) shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”). As of June 30, 2021, 15,265,008 of Preferred stock remain undesignated.

 

Series A Preferred Stock

 

The Company has designated 1,000 shares of its Preferred Stock as Series A, having a par value of $0.0001 per share. Holders of the Series A Preferred Stock have the right to elect a majority of the Board of Directors of the Company. The Company issued 1,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to its CEO. At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, there were 1,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding.

 

Series C Senior Convertible Preferred Shares

 

On June 30, 2015, the Company issued 1,600,000 Series C Senior Convertible Preferred Shares (the “Series C Preferred Shares”) at $2.50 per share for gross proceeds of $4,000,000, as well as issuing 133,221 additional Series C Preferred Shares due to anti-dilution provisions (with no cash remuneration). Legal fees of $45,000 were deducted from the proceeds of this transaction at closing. These Series C Preferred Shares were convertible to common shares at $2.50 per share, through June 30, 2020. The Series C Preferred Shares may receive a 4% per annum dividend, payable if available, and in arrears. A description of the transaction which included the issuance of the Series C Preferred Shares is included below. The Dividend is calculated at 4.0% of $4,337,480 payable annually on June 30. At June 30, 2021 dividends for the years 2017 to 2021 totaling $866,940 were in arrears.

 

Financing Agreement with Golden Post Rail, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company

 

 

1.

On May 6, 2015, the Company, Golden Post Rail, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Golden Post”), and Mr. Koy W. (“K.D.”) Diepholz, Chairman-CEO of the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”). Pursuant to the SPA, Golden Post acquired the following securities:

   

 
16

Table of Contents

 

 

a)

1,600,000 shares of Series C Senior Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series C Preferred”) at a purchase price of $2.50 per share ($4M USD), plus an additional 133,221 shares of Series C Preferred pursuant to anti-dilution provisions. The Series C Preferred is entitled to receive dividends at the per share rate of four percent (4%) per annum, ranks senior (in priority) to the Common Stock, the Series A Preferred Stock, and each other class or series of equity security of the Company. The Series C Preferred is convertible into Common Stock of the Company at the price of $2.41 per share and is entitled to anti-dilution protection for (i) subsequent equity issuances by the Company and (ii) changes in the Company’s ownership of DynaResource de México SA de CV (“DynaMéxico”). The Series C Preferred is also entitled to preemptive rights, and the holder has the right to designate one person to the Company’s Board of Directors as a Class III director.

 

 

 

 

b)

A Common Stock Purchase Warrant (the “Golden Post Warrant”) for the purchase of 2,166,527 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, at an exercise price of $2.50 per share, and expiring June 30, 2020. The anti-dilution protections contained in the terms of the Series C Preferred are essentially replicated in the Golden Post Warrant. The expiration of the Golden Post Warrant was extended on May 14, 2020, pursuant to an additional financing agreement with Golden Post.

   

 

2.

Pursuant to the SPA, the Company executed a Registration Rights Agreement pursuant to which Golden Post may require the Company to register the shares of Common Stock which may be issued upon the conversion of the Series C Preferred and the shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of the Warrant, including any additional shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to anti-dilution provisions.

   

Additional Financing Agreement with Golden Post Rail, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company, and with Shareholders of DynaResource, Inc.

 

On May 14, 2020, the Company closed an additional financing agreement with Golden Post, and with certain individual shareholders of DynaUSA (“DynaUSA Shareholders”), and related agreements. A summary of the transactions and related agreements are set forth below:

 

 

1.

Pursuant to the May 14, 2020 Note Purchase Agreement (the “NPA”) among the Company, Golden Post Rail, LLC (the “Lead Purchaser”), and the other parties listed on Exhibit A thereto (the “Remaining Purchasers”):

   

 

·

 Golden Post acquired the following securities:

   

 

(a)

A convertible promissory note (the “Golden Post Note”) payable to Golden Post in the principal amount of $2,500,000, bearing interest at 10%, and maturing two years from the date of execution. One half of the principal amount of the Golden Post Note, or $1,250,000, has been fully funded in accordance with an agreed-upon draw summary and budget. The balance of the principal amount will also be funded in accordance with agreed-upon draw summaries and the budget. The Golden Post Note is convertible, at the option of Golden Post, into shares of Series D Senior Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series D Preferred”) at a conversion price of $2.00 per share; and

 

(b)

A common stock purchase warrant (the “2020 Warrant”) for the purchase of 783,976 shares of the Company’s common stock, at an exercise price of $0.01 per share, and maturing on the 10-year anniversary of the date of issuance. The 2020 Warrant contains anti-dilution provisions; and

   

 

·

 The Remaining Purchasers acquired the following securities:

   

 

(a)

Convertible promissory notes (the “Remaining Notes”) in the aggregate principal amount of $1,400,000, bearing interest at 10%, and maturing two years from the date of issuance. The Remaining Notes have been fully funded. The Remaining Notes are convertible, at the option of each individual Remaining Purchaser, into shares of Series D Preferred at a conversion price of $2.00 per share; and

 

(b)

Common stock purchase warrants (the “Remaining Purchasers Warrants”) for the purchase of an aggregate of 439,026 shares of the Company’s common stock, at an exercise price of $0.01 per share, and maturing on the 10-year anniversary of the date of issuance. The Remaining Purchasers Warrants contain anti-dilution provisions.

   

 

2.

Also pursuant to the NPA, the Company and the Lead Purchaser have agreed to amend the common stock purchase warrant dated June 30, 2015 (the “2015 Warrant”), issued to the Lead Purchaser in connection with that certain Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of May 6, 2015. The 2015 Warrant contemplates the purchase, upon exercise, of 2,166,527 shares (subject to adjustment) of the Company’s common stock and matured June 30, 2020 (the “Termination Date”). The amendment to the 2015 Warrant provides that, following the expiration of the 2015 Warrant pursuant to its terms, the Company will issue to the Lead Purchaser a new warrant (the “New Warrant”), substantially in the same form of the 2015 Warrant, for the number of shares of the Company’s common stock that went unexercised on the Termination Date, if any. The New Warrant has a maturity date of June 30, 2022.

 

 
17

Table of Contents

   

 

3.

As part of the transaction contemplated by the NPA, the Company executed an Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement pursuant to which Golden Post may require the Company to register the shares of common stock which may be issued upon (i) the conversion of the Series C Senior Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred”), (ii) the conversion of the Series D Preferred, and (iii) the shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of the 2015 Warrant, the 2020 Warrant, and a compensatory warrant issued to the Lead Purchaser on May 13, 2020 (described below under the heading “Compensatory Issuances”), including any additional shares of common stock issuable pursuant to anti-dilution provisions of such securities.

 

 

4.

Pursuant to the transaction contemplated by the NPA, the Company agreed to call a special meeting of Company stockholders, to be held not later than July 14, 2020, to solicit stockholder approval of (a) an amendment of the Company’s certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 25,000,000 shares to 40,000,000 shares, and (b) an amendment of the Certificate of Designations of the Series C Preferred, in order to (a) extend the maturity date of the Series C Preferred by an additional two (2) years, (ii) add an equity cap in respect of the conversion of Series C Preferred into common stock of the Company, and (iii) add certain restrictions on the ability of the Company to issue Series C Preferred. The special meeting was properly called and held on July 13, 2020, whereby Company stockholders confirmed approval for each item referenced in item 4 above.

 

 

 

 

4.

Compensatory Issuances. On May 13, 2020, one business day prior to the NPA, the Company issued to the Lead Purchaser the following: (i) a common stock purchase warrant for 2,306 shares, at an exercise price of $0.01 per share, and maturing on the 7-year anniversary of the date of issuance (the “Compensatory Warrant”); and (ii) 1,771 shares of Series C Preferred Shares. These issuances were occasioned by the Company’s obligations under the Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of May 6, 2015.

 

 

 

 

6.

In order to accommodate the issuance of the additional 1,771 shares of Series C Preferred, on May 13, 2020 the Company filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware a Certificate of Increase of Series C Senior Convertible Preferred Stock, to increase the number of shares of preferred stock designated as Series C Preferred from 1,733,221 shares to 1,734,992 shares (“Certificate of Increase”).

 

(1)

Also, on May 13, 2020, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware a Certificate of Designations of the Powers, Preferences and Relative, Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights of Preferred Stock and Qualifications, Limitations and Restrictions thereof of Series D Senior Convertible Preferred Stock, contemplating the authorization of 3,000,000 shares of Series D Preferred (“Certificate of Designation”).

   

The sale of the Golden Post Note, the Remaining Notes, the 2020 Warrant, the Remaining Purchasers Warrants, the Compensatory Warrant, and the Series C Preferred was made pursuant to a privately negotiated transaction that did not involve a public offering of securities and, accordingly, the Company believes that the transaction was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) thereof. Each investor represented that it (A) is an “accredited investor” and (B) has such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that the investor is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of acquiring the securities acquired by such investor. All of the foregoing securities are deemed restricted securities for purposes of the Securities Act.

 

Due to underlying anti-dilutive provisions contained in the Series C Preferred Shares and the Golden Post Warrant, the Company incurred derivative liabilities. On May 14, 2020 in connection with the Series D Convertible Note financing, the expiration date for the Series C Preferred Shares and the Golden Post warrants were extended to June 30, 2022. In addition, a new derivative liability was incurred due to the issuance of warrants for kicker shares. At June 30, 2021 the total derivative liability was $2,556,676 which included $626,579 for the Series C Preferred Shares, and $830,432 in connection with the Golden Post Warrants and $1,099,665 in connection with the Series D Convertible Note Kicker Warrants. At December 31, 2020 the total derivative liability was $2,371,560 which included $601,313 for the Series C Preferred Shares, and $817,613 in connection with the Golden Post Warrants and $952,634 in connection with the Series D Convertible Note Kicker Warrants. The deemed dividend for the periods ending June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020 were $86,750 and $86,660. respectively. As the Company has not declared these dividends, it is required only as an item “below” the net income (loss) amount on the accompanying consolidated statements of income (loss).

 

Due to the nature of this transaction as mandatorily redeemable, the Series C preferred shares are classified as “temporary equity” on the balance sheet.

 

 

 

Preferred

Series C

 

 

 

 

 

Carrying Value, December 31, 2019

 

 $ 4,333,053

 

Issuances at Fair Value, Net of Issuance Costs

 

 

 -

 

Bifurcation of Derivative Liability

 

 

 -

 

Relative Fair Value of Warrants – Preferred Stock Discount

 

 

 4,427

 

Accretion of Preferred Stock to Redemption Value

 

 

 -

 

Carrying Value, December 31, 2020

 

 

 4,337,480

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuances at Fair Value, Net of Issuance Costs

 

 

 -

 

Bifurcation of Derivative Liability

 

 

 -

 

Relative Fair Value of Warrants – Preferred Stock Discount

 

 

 -

 

Accretion of Preferred Stock to Redemption Value

 

 

 -

 

Carrying Value, June 30, 2021

 

 $ 4,337,480

 

 

 
18

Table of Contents

 

Preferred Stock (Undesignated)

 

In addition to the 1,000 shares designated as Series A Preferred Stock and the 1,734,992 shares designated as Series C Preferred Shares and the 3,000,000 shares designated as Series D Preferred Stock, the Company is authorized to issue an additional 15,265,008 shares of Preferred Stock, having a par value of $0.0001 per share. The Board of Directors of the Company has authority to issue the Preferred Stock from time to time in one or more series, and with respect to each series of the Preferred Stock, to fix and state by the resolution the terms attached to the Preferred Stock. At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, there were no other shares of Preferred Stock outstanding.

 

Separate Series; Increase or Decrease in Authorized Shares. The shares of each series of Preferred Stock may vary from the shares of any other series thereof in any or all of the foregoing respects and in any other manner. The Board of Directors may increase the number of shares of Preferred Stock designated for any existing series by a resolution adding to such series authorized and unissued shares of Preferred Stock not designated for any other series. Unless otherwise provided in the Preferred Stock Designation, the Board of Directors may decrease the number of shares of Preferred Stock designated for any existing series by a resolution subtracting from such series authorized and unissued shares of Preferred Stock designated for such existing series, and the shares so subtracted shall become authorized, unissued and undesignated shares of Preferred Stock.

 

Common Stock

 

The Company is authorized to issue 40,000,000 common shares at a par value of $0.01 per share. These shares have full voting rights. At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, there were 17,722,825 and 17,722,825 shares outstanding, respectively. No dividends were paid for the periods ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

 

Preferred Rights

 

The Company issued “Preferred Rights” for the rights to percentages of revenues generated from the San Jose de Gracía Pilot Production Plant and received $784,500 for these rights. This has been reflected as “Preferred Rights” in stockholders’ equity. As of June 30, 2021, $744,500 had been repaid, leaving a current balance of $40,000 and $40,000 as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively

 

Stock Issuances

 

There were no issuances of common stock during the periods ending June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020.

 

Treasury Stock

 

During the year ending December 31, 2020, 262,500 treasury shares were transferred for services provided to the Company.

 

No treasury stock was issued during the period ended June 30, 2021

 

Outstanding treasury shares total 516,980 at both June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020.

 

Warrants

 

2021 activity

 

The Company had 3,391,835 warrants outstanding at June 30, 2021. There were no warrants issued or exercised in 2021 and no warrants expired in 2021.

 

2020 Activity

 

On May 13, 2020, the Company issued 2,306 warrants to purchase shares of common stock with an exercise price of $.01per share related to anti-dilution provisions of the Series C preferred stock. These warrants expire on May 13, 2027.

 

On May 14, 2020, the Company issued 1,223,002 warrants to purchase shares of common stock with an exercise price of $.01 per share as kicker shares as part of the Series D note agreements. These warrants expire on May 14, 2030.

 

On June 30, 2020, as part of the Series D note agreement the Company issued 2,166,527 warrants to purchase shares of common stock with an exercise price of $2.05 per share to replace the 2,166,527 warrants previously outstanding which expired on that date. These warrants expire on June 30, 2022.

 

At December 2020, the Company had a total of 3,391,835 warrants outstanding.

 

 
19

Table of Contents

 

The Company recorded no expense related to the issuance of these warrants since these warrants were issued in common stock for cash sales and note conversions.

 

 

 

Number

of Shares

 

 

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

 

 

Weighted

Average

Remaining Contractual

Life (Years)

 

 

Intrinsic

Value

 

Balance at December 31, 2019

 

 

 2,166,527

 

 

 $ 2.45

 

 

 

 0.51

 

 

 $ -

 

Granted

 

 

 3,391,815

 

 

 $ 1.31

 

 

 

 4.89

 

 

 $ -

 

Exercised

 

 

 -

 

 

 $ -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $ -

 

Forfeited

 

 

 2,166,527

 

 

 $ -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $ -

 

Balance at December 31, 2020

 

 

 3,391,815

 

 

 $ 1.31

 

 

 

 4.34

 

 

 $ -

 

Granted

 

 

 -

 

 

 $ -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $ -

 

Exercised

 

 

 -

 

 

 $ -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $ -

 

Forfeited

 

 

 -

 

 

 $ -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $ -

 

Balance at June 30, 2021

 

 

 3,391,815

 

 

 $ 1.31

 

 

 

 3.84

 

 

 $ -

 

Exercisable at June 30, 2021

 

 

 3,391,815

 

 

 $ 1.31

 

 

 

 3.84

 

 

 $ -

 

 

NOTE 9 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

Dynacap Group Ltd.

 

The Company paid $87,500 and $37,500 to Dynacap Group, Ltd. (“Dynacap”, an entity controlled by the CEO of the Company) for consulting and other fees during the periods ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

 

NOTE 10 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Concession Taxes

 

The Company is required to pay taxes in México in order to maintain mining concessions owned by DynaMéxico. Additionally, the Company is required to incur a minimum amount of expenditures each year for all concessions held. The minimum expenditures are calculated based upon the land area, as well as the age of the concessions. Amounts spent in excess of the minimum may be carried forward indefinitely over the life of the concessions and are adjusted annually for inflation. Based on Management’s recent business activities and current and forward plans and considering expenditures on mining concessions since 2002-2017 and continuing expenditures in current and forward activities, the Company does not anticipate that DynaMéxico will have any difficulties meeting the minimum annual expenditures for the concessions ($388 – $2,400 Mexican Pesos per hectare). DynaMéxico retains sufficient carry-forward amounts to cover over 10 years of the minimum expenditure (as calculated at the 2017 minimum, adjusted for annual inflation of 4%).

 

Leases

 

In addition to the surface rights held by DynaMéxico pursuant to the Mining Act of México and its Regulations (Ley Minera y su Reglamento), DynaMineras maintains access and surface rights to the SJG Project pursuant to the 20-year Land Lease Agreement. The 20 Year Land Lease Agreement with the Santa Maria Ejido Community surrounding San Jose de Gracía was dated January 6, 2014 and continues through 2033. It covers an area of 4,399 hectares surrounding the main mineral resource areas of SJG and provides for annual lease payments on January 1st each year by DynaMineras of $1,359,443 Pesos (approx. $72,000 USD), commencing in 2014. The Land Lease Agreement provides DynaMineras with surface access to the core resource areas of SJG (4,399 hectares), and allows for all permitted mining and exploration activities from the owners of the surface rights (Santa Maria Ejido community).

 

The Company leases office space for its corporate headquarters in Irving, Texas. In September 2017, the Company entered into a sixty-six-month extension of the lease through 2023. As part of the agreement the Company received six months free rent as a finish out allowance. The Company capitalized the leasehold improvement costs and amortized them over the rent abatement period as rent expense. The Company makes tiered lease payments on the 1st of each month.

 

Effective January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASC 842, which requires recognition of a right-of-use asset and lease liability for all leases at the commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. Additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures regarding the Company's leasing arrangements are also required. The Company adopted ASC 842 prospectively and elected the package of transition practical expedients that does not require reassessment of (1) whether any existing or expired contracts are or contain leases, (2) lease classification and (3) initial direct costs. In addition, the Company has elected other available practical expedients to not separate lease and non-lease components, which consist principally of common area maintenance charges, for all classes of underlying assets and to exclude leases with an initial term of 12 months or less.

 

 
20

Table of Contents

 

The Company determines if a contract is or contains a lease at inception. As of June 30, 2021, the Company has two operating leases - a six and one-half year lease for office space with a remaining term of eighteen months and a twenty-year ground lease in association with its México mining operations with a remaining term of thirteen years. Variable lease costs consist primarily of variable common area maintenance, storage parking and utilities. The Company’s leases do not have any residual value guarantees or restrictive covenants.

 

As the implicit rate is not readily determinable for most of the Company’s lease agreements, the Company uses an estimated incremental borrowing rate to determine the initial present value of lease payments. These discount rates for leases are calculated using the Company's interest rate of promissory notes.

 

The Company’s components of lease cost are as follows:

 

 

 

Period

Ended

June 30,

2021

 

Operating Lease – Office Lease

 

 $ 42,742

 

Operating Lease – Ground Lease

 

 

 44,337

 

Short Term Lease Costs

 

 

 6,279

 

Variable Lease Costs

 

 

 -

 

TOTAL

 

 $ 93,358

 

 

Weighted average remaining lease term and weighted average discount rate are as follows:

 

Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term (Years) – Operating Leases

 

 

 11.00

 

Weighted Average Discount Rate – Operating Leases

 

 

 12.50 %

 

Estimated future minimum lease obligations are as follow for the years ending June 30:

 

YEAR

 

 

 

2022

 

 $ 179,474

 

2023

 

 

 145,896

 

2024

 

 

 96,896

 

2025

 

 

 99,803

 

2026

 

 

 102,797

 

Thereafter

 

 

 684,885

 

Total

 

 $ 1,308,751

 

Less Imputed Interest

 

 

 (586,207 )

OPERATING LEASE PAYABLE

 

 $ 722,544

 

 

Other Contingencies

 

The Company's mining and exploration activities are subject to various laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations are continually changing and generally becoming more restrictive. The Company conducts its operations so as to protect public health and the environment, and believes its operations are materially in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The Company has made, and expects to make in the future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations.

 

Arbitration filed by Goldgroup / DynaMéxico Complaint against Goldgroup

 

On March 14, 2014, Goldgroup filed for arbitration in the United States with the American Arbitration Association ("AAA"), citing the Earn In Agreement dated September 1, 2006 as the basis for the arbitration filing. The Company filed an answer on April 10, 2014, disputing that any issues exist which provide for arbitration.

 

DynaResource de Mexico filed Civil Claims again Goldgroup Mining Inc., and Goldgroup Resources Inc. requesting Damages of $50M USD

 

On December 9, 2014, DynaMéxico filed an Ordinary commercial lawsuit (Civil Claims) against Goldgroup Mining Inc., its parent company Goldgroup Resources Inc., and the AAA, in the Thirty Sixth Civil Court in the Federal District of México, under file 1120 number / 2014 ("the DynaMéxico Trial"). The DynaMéxico Trial sought to terminate the U.S.-based arbitration proceedings, as DynaMéxico believes there is no legal basis for arbitration, and to nullify the arbitration proceedings since Goldgroup previously sought recourse in Mexican courts. In the DynaMéxico Trial, DynaMéxico also requests that substantial damages (in the amount of US $50 million) be awarded to DynaMéxico against Goldgroup for:

 

 
21

Table of Contents

 

 

a)

Wrongfully using and disseminating confidential information and data belonging to DynaMéxico;

 

b)

Asserting that Goldgroup owns any interest in the San Jose de Gracía Project in northern Sinaloa, México, rather than accurately disclosing that Goldgroup owns a common shares equity interest (shareholder’s interest) in DynaMéxico;

 

c)

Improperly disclosing the percentage of common shares equity interest (shareholder’s interest) owned by Goldgroup in DynaMéxico;

 

d)

Improperly disclosing or implying that Goldgroup is the operator of the San Jose de Gracía Project;

 

e)

Attempting to delay, stop, or otherwise impair the financing of, and further development of, the SJG Project;

 

f)

Making numerous threats against DynaMéxico management and officers;

 

g)

Failing to properly disclose that broad powers of attorney for acting on behalf of DynaMéxico are held by an individual not affiliated with Goldgroup.

 

On October 5, 2015, the Thirty Sixth Civil Court of the Superior Court of Justice of the Federal District of México (Tribunal Superior de Justicia del Distrito Federal), file number 1120/2014 declared, among other resolutions, that:

 

 

a)

The AAA must “cease and desist” from the arbitration proceeding;

 

b)

The AAA does not have jurisdiction to hear any conflict and/or interpretation arising from the Earn In/Option Agreement, dated September 1, 2006; and

 

c)

The AAA does not have jurisdiction to hear disputes arising between shareholders of DynaMexico, which disputes do not arise directly and immediately from the Earn In/Option Agreement, dated September 1, 2006.

   

$48M Damages Awarded to DynaMéxico

 

Also on October 5, 2015, DynaMéxico was awarded in excess of US $48 million in damages from Goldgroup Resources, Inc. by virtue of a Sentencia Definitiva (the “Definitive Sentence”) issued by the Thirty Sixth Civil Court of the Superior Court of Justice of the Federal District of México (Tribunal Superior de Justicia del Distrito Federal), File number 1120/2014. The Definitive Sentence included the considerations and resolutions by the Court, and additional Resolutions were also ordered in favor of DynaMéxico (together the damages award and the additional Resolutions are referred to as, the “Oct. 5, 2015 Resolution”).

 

A concise translation to English of the Oct. 5, 2015 Resolution (the resolution portion of the Definitive Sentence) is set forth below:

  

FIRST:

The action and litigation based on commercial law filed by DynaMéxico is valid and enforceable, and where Goldgroup and the American Arbitration Association were found to be in default, was proper.

SECOND:

Goldgroup is declared in breach of its corporate duties, for failure to refrain from claiming direct ownership of 50% of the San José de Gracía Mining Project.

THIRD:

Goldgroup is condemned and ordered to pay to DynaMéxico the amount of USD $20,000,000 (Twenty Million Dollars) in damages caused by Goldgroup to DynaMéxico, deriving from its breach of obligations in refraining from claiming direct ownership of 50% of the San Jose de Gracía Mining Project; which amount should be paid within five days upon execution of this order and resolution.

FOURTH:

Goldgroup is condemned and ordered to pay to DynaMéxico the amount of USD $28,280,808.34 (Twenty Eight Million Two Hundred and Eighty Thousand Eight Hundred and Eight and 34/100 Dollars), for breach of its corporate duty and covenants with regards to the San Jose de Gracía mining project, as a result of depriving profits from DynaMéxico which DynaMéxico could have earned for the sale of gold produced and extracted during the years 2013 and 2014; amounts that should be paid within five days upon execution of this order and resolution.

FIFTH:

Goldgroup is condemned and ordered to pay losses and damages to DynaMéxico, which Goldgroup continues to cause, until full payment of the above-mentioned amounts has been made, which damages, and losses shall be calculated by an expert opinion in a corresponding legal procedure related to this litigation.

SIXTH:

Pursuant to Article 1424 of the Commercial Code of México, the arbitration provision established under clause 8.16 of the Earn In/Option Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2006, is ineffective and impossible to execute.

SEVENTH:

This court declares that any controversy arising from the Ear In/Option Agreement must be brought and resolved under Mexican Law and by competent Mexican Courts with proper jurisdiction, in recognition of the waiver and exclusion of the arbitration clause (contained in the Earn In/Option Agreement) by both parties.

EIGHTH:

This Court declares that the American Arbitration Association must abstain from hearing arbitration procedure number 50 501 T 00226 14, or any other ongoing and/or future arbitration proceeding already filed or that may be filed by the co-defendant Goldgroup against DynaResource.

NINTH:

This Court declares that the American Arbitration Association does not have jurisdiction to hear any conflict and/or interpretation arising from the Earn In/Option Agreement, dated September 1, 2006.

TENTH:

This Court declares that the American Arbitration Association does not have jurisdiction to hear disputes arising between shareholders of DynaMéxico, which disputes do not arise directly and immediately from the Earn In/Option Agreement, dated September 1, 2006.

ELEVENTH:

This Court declares that the American Arbitration Association does not have jurisdiction to hear any matters where Koy Wilber Diepholz, who is the President of the Board of Directors of DynaMéxico and has been personally sued in relation to the arbitration clause established under clause 8.16 of the Earn In/Option Agreement, dated September 1, 2006, since he signed the mentioned instrument in representation of the Company and not in his personal capacity.

TWELFTH:

 The expenses and costs associated with these proceedings are hereby waived.

THIRTEENTH:

 

LET IT SO BE PUBLISHED. A Copy of this order and Sentence shall be found in the corresponding records.

 

 

 
22

Table of Contents

   

ORDERED, adjudged and decreed by the Thirty Sixth Civil Judge of the Superior Court of the Federal District, Mr. JULIO GABRIEL IGLESIAS GOMEZ.

 

The October 5, 2015 Resolution constitutes a public record which may be viewed through the Courts in México City.

 

México City Court Approves Lien on Shares of DynaMéxico owned by Minority Interest Holder

 

On October 5, 2016, the Thirty-Sixth Civil Court of the Superior Court of Justice of the Federal District of México (Tribunal Superior de Justicia del Distrito Federal) approved a Lien (referred to by the court as an “Embargo”), in favor of DynaMéxico, upon Stock Certificates in the name of Goldgroup Resources Inc. (“Goldgroup”). The Stock Certificates subject to the Lien (“Embargo”) constitute Shares of DynaMéxico (“the Goldgroup DynaMéxico Shares”).

 

The Goldgroup DynaMéxico Shares were seized as a partial recovery of assets by DynaMéxico after DynaMéxico was awarded more than $48M USD (Forty-Eight Million Dollars) in damages against Goldgroup (the “Damages against Goldgroup”) on October 05, 2015, as described in a Sentencia Definitiva (the “Definitive Sentence”) issued by the same court, the Thirty Sixth Civil Court of the Superior Court of Justice of the Federal District of México, File number 1120/2014. Excerpts from the Definitive Sentence appear below. In addition to the Damages against Goldgroup, the Definitive Sentence also included additional Resolutions ordered in favor of DynaMéxico (the Damages against Goldgroup and the additional Resolutions are together referred to as the “Oct. 5, 2015 Resolution”).

 

Denial of Amparo Appeal

 

On August 24, 2017 a Federal Amparo Judge (“Juzgado de Distrito”) in the State of Vera Cruz, México, dismissed Goldgroup Resources Inc’s Amparo Trial Challenge to the $48 M USD damages award previously granted in favor of DynaMéxico. Pursuant to the dismissal ruling, the $48M USD damages award, previously granted to DynaMéxico by the Thirty-Sixth Civil Court of the Superior Court of Justice of the Federal District of México on October 5, 2015, was effectively confirmed.

 

México Circuit Court of Appeals – Notice of Intent for Final Ruling in Favor of DynaResource de México

On May 27, 2019, The Eleventh Collegiate Court in Civil Matters of the First Circuit (“México Circuit Court”, and the Court of Final Appeal for Goldgroup Resources Inc.) issued a written notice confirming it was ruling against the Amparo Appeal filed by Goldgroup Resources Inc. and in Favor of DynaResource de México, S.A. de C.V. In an effort to stay the issuance of the Ruling by the México Circuit Court, Goldgroup Resources Inc. filed a request to The Supreme Court of México to review the Amparo Appeal decision.

 

Rejection of Goldgroup Resources Inc. request to the Supreme Court of México

On July 3, 2019 an Official Ruling from The Supreme Court of México was issued to Reject the Request of Goldgroup Resources Inc. (the “México Supreme Court Rejection to Goldgroup”). The Justices of the First Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of México issued a Rejection Notice to Goldgroup Resources Inc., “due to the lack of legitimacy presented by Goldgroup”; and in issuing the Rejection Notice to Goldgroup, the Supreme court thereby reverted the Amparo Appeal back to the México Circuit Court where the Official and Final Ruling from the México Circuit Court is expected to be issued.

 

Final Legal Ruling in México (DynaMéxico Final Legal Ruling)

 

On December 6, 2019 the 11th Federal Circuit Collegiate Court in México issued its Final Ruling (“the DynaMéxico Final Legal Ruling”).

 

The DynaMéxico Final Legal Ruling is Favorable to DynaMéxico, and denies the Amparo challenge of Goldgroup Resources Inc., the subsidiary of Goldgroup Mining Inc. (“GGA.TO”). The DynaMéxico Final Legal Ruling constitutes the Final Appeal of Goldgroup Resources Inc.; and is Not subject to further appeal or protest.

 

The DynaMéxico Final Legal Ruling is the result and culmination of 7 years of legal action performed by DynaMéxico and is the Final Ruling of the 11th Federal Circuit Collegiate Court. With this DynaMéxico Final Legal Ruling issued, all matters before the Court in México with respect to DynaMéxico and Goldgroup Resources Inc. are fully resolved and are no longer subject to appeal or reconsideration.

  

Legal Summary - Consequence of the México Final Legal Ruling:

 

 

1.

The $48,280,808.34 USD damages award (dated October 05, 2015) in favor of DynaMéxico and against Goldgroup Resources Inc. is now Final. Goldgroup Resources’ challenge(s) to that award have been fully denied and the damages award is Final.

 

2.

The Lien against the Shares of DynaMéxico owned by Goldgroup Resources Inc. (established October 5, 2016, the “Lien against Goldgroup Shares”) is now fully confirmed, Final, and enforceable.

 

3.

Ownership of the shares of DynaMéxico currently held by Goldgroup Resources (currently representing 20% of the outstanding shares of DynaMéxico) are subject to the Lien against Goldgroup Shares.

 

 
23

Table of Contents

 

DynaMéxico Recovery of 100% of Goldgroup Shares

On February 20, 2020, a México City court issued its Final Judgment, effectively foreclosing on all shares of DynaMéxico formerly held by Goldgroup Resources Inc. and awarding those shares to DynaMéxico (the “DynaMéxico Foreclosure Judgment”).

 

The DynaMéxico Foreclosure Judgment awarded to DynaMéxico 100% of the Shares of DynaMéxico previously owned by Goldgroup Resources Inc. (a Subsidiary Company in México owned 100% by Goldgroup Mining Inc., Vancouver, BC., “GGA.TO”). Prior to the DynaMéxico Foreclosure Judgment, Goldgroup Resources Inc. owned shares of DynaMéxico constituting 20% of the total outstanding shares of DynaMéxico (the “Goldgroup Shares of DynaMéxico”). The Goldgroup Shares of DynaMéxico were held under Lien by DynaMéxico since October 2016. DynaUSA previously owned 80% of the outstanding shares of DynaMéxico.

 

DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed an Original Petition for Recognition of the $48M USD Foreign Judgment in US. District Court, 134th Judicial District in Dallas County, Texas

 

 

·

 On December 5, 2020, DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed an Original Petition for Recognition of the $48M USD Foreign Judgment in US. District Court in Dallas County Texas.

 

·

 On February 4, 2021, DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed a First Amended Petition for Recognition of the $48M USD Foreign Judgment in US. District Court, 134th Judicial District, Dallas County, Texas.

 

·

 On May 12, 2021, The US District Court for Dallas County issued a ruling stating the Court was not obligated to recognize the $48M Judgment in the US.; but found the $48M Judgment to be final, conclusive and enforceable under Mexican Law.

   

DynaUSA and DynaMéxico Appeal of the US. District Court Ruling

 

On May 14, 2021, DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed a Notice of Appeal of the US District Court Ruling.

 

Arbitration Ruling

 

In direct contradiction to the October 5, 2015, Definitive Sentence issued by court in México, on August 25, 2016, the American Arbitration Association - International Centre for Dispute Resolution, Denver office (the “AAA”) issued an Arbitration Ruling (the “Arbitration Ruling”) in favor of Goldgroup Resources Inc. against DynaMéxico and DynaResource, Inc. The Arbitration Ruling was the result of a proceeding in which neither DynaMéxico nor DynaResource participated, since the Definitive Sentence issued by the court in México effectively prohibited their participation in the Arbitration proceeding and should have prohibited Goldgroup Resources Inc. participation.

 

The Arbitration Ruling provides the following: (i) the Earn In/Option Agreement is still in force, and consequently Goldgroup may appoint two directors to the DynaMéxico board, and may participate in the appointment of a fifth director; (ii) the DynaMéxico Management Committee is reinstated, and must approve all budgets and expenditures; (iii) amounts expended by DynaMéxico that were not approved by the Management Committee are subject to repayment by DynaResource; (iv) the issuance of additional shares by DynaMéxico (and consequent dilution of Goldgroup’s equity interest) was in violation of the Earn In/Option Agreement; and (v) DynaResource and DynaMéxico are responsible for Goldgroup’s costs and professional fees associated with the Arbitration Ruling.

 

Unlike most arbitration proceedings in the U.S., the Arbitration Ruling is not final. Since the Arbitration Ruling is subject to international rules, the ruling may be vacated by U.S. courts, or simply not recognized by U.S. courts, on several grounds. Accordingly, both DynaMéxico and DynaResource have timely requested relief from the United States Federal District Court in Colorado, via the filing of a Petition for Nonrecognition of Foreign Arbitral Award and/or Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award (the “Petition for Nonrecognition”), and a supporting brief. The Petition for Nonrecognition relies heavily upon the Mexican court’s Definitive Sentence, key excerpts of which appear immediately below.

 

The Mexican court has already ruled that “any controversy arising from the Earn In/Option Agreement must be brought and resolved under Mexican Law and by competent Mexican Courts with proper jurisdiction.” Consequently, the monetary awards against DynaResource – which are based upon a finding that the Earn In/Option Agreement is still in force – will not be enforceable if the Mexican court rules that the Earn In/Option Agreement is terminated. The Company believes that the potential for the assessment of a material monetary judgment against DynaResource is remote.

 

 

(a)

The Arbitration Ruling contains an acknowledgement by the AAA that the AAA was named as a defendant in the legal demand filed by DynaMéxico in the Thirty Sixth Civil Court of the Superior Court of Justice of the Federal District of México (the “DynaMéxico Legal Demand”). The Arbitration Ruling also contains a statement that the AAA was not properly served notice of the DynaMéxico Legal Demand;

 

(b)

DynaMéxico obeyed the October 5, 2015 Court Order and did not attend the Arbitration hearing;

 

(c)

DynaMéxico will pursue all legal remedies in order to obtain a full dismissal of the Arbitration Ruling;

 

(d)

The Arbitration Ruling contains an acknowledgement by the AAA that the AAA was named as a defendant in the legal demand filed by DynaMéxico in the Thirty Sixth Civil Court of the Superior Court of Justice of the Federal District of México (the “DynaMéxico Legal Demand”). The Arbitration Ruling also contains a statement that the AAA was not properly served notice of the DynaMéxico Legal Demand;

  

 
24

Table of Contents

   

DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed Motion to Vacate Arbitration Ruling

 

On November 17, 2016, DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed a Motion to Vacate the Arbitration Ruling in United States District Court, District of Colorado.

 

Recommendation to Vacate Arbitration Ruling issued by United States Magistrate Judge

 

On February 13, 2018 a Recommendation to Vacate the Arbitration Ruling was issued by a United States Magistrate Judge of the United States District Court, District of Colorado.

 

Arbitration Award against DynaResource, Inc. and DynaResource de México, S.A. de C.V.

 

On May 9, 2019, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado confirmed the August 2016 Arbitration award against DynaResource, Inc. and DynaResource de México, S.A. de C.V. The district court’s decision overruled the recommendation previously issued by the magistrate judge to sustain the DynaResource entities’ motion to vacate the arbitration award. Each of DynaResource, Inc. and DynaResource de México, S.A. de C.V. intends to exercise all its rights, as appropriate, including an appeal.

 

DynaResource Entities Filings in US District Court in Response to Arbitration Ruling

 

 

·

 DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed Motion to Alter Judgment

 

 

 

 

 

 On June 6, 2019, DynaUSA and DynaMéxico file a Motion to Alter Judgment.

 

 

 

 

·

 DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed Motion for Stay of Judgment Pending Appeal and to Waive Bond

 

 

 

 

 

 On June 7, 2019, DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed A Motion for Stay of Judgment Pending Appeal and to Waive Bond.

 

 

 

 

·

 DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed Motion for Leave to Supplement the Record

 

 

 

 

 

 On July 13, 2019, DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed A Motion for Leave to Supplement the Record with the following information:

 

 

 

 

·

 “Rejection of Goldgroup Resources Inc. request to the Supreme Court of México”

 

 

 

 

 

 On July 3, 2019, an Official Ruling from The Supreme Court of México was issued to Reject the Request of Goldgroup Resources Inc. (the “México Supreme Court Rejection to Goldgroup”). The Justices of the First Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of México issued a Rejection Notice to Goldgroup Resources Inc., “due to the lack of legitimacy presented by Goldgroup”; and in issuing the Rejection Notice to Goldgroup, the Supreme court thereby reverted the Amparo Appeal back to the México Circuit Court where the Official and Final Ruling from the México Circuit Court is expected to be issued.

 

 

 

 

·

 DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed Reply in Support of Motion to Alter Judgment.

 

 

 

 

 

 On July 23, 2019, DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed a Reply in Support of Motion to Alter Judgment. Goldgroup Resources was confirmed to be misleading the US District Court with inaccurate reports of the ruling of the México Supreme Court Rejection.

 

 

 

 

·

 Final Legal Ruling in México (DynaMéxico Final México Legal Ruling)

 

 

 

 

 

 On December 6, 2019, the 11th Federal Circuit Collegiate Court in México issued its Final Ruling (“the DynaMéxico Final México Legal Ruling”).

 

 

 

 

 

 The DynaMéxico Final México Legal Ruling is Favorable to DynaMéxico, and denies the Amparo challenge of Goldgroup Resources Inc., the subsidiary of Goldgroup Mining Inc. (“GGA.TO”). The DynaMéxico Final México Legal Ruling constitutes the Final Appeal of Goldgroup Resources Inc.; and is Not subject to further appeal or protest.

 

 

 

 

 

 The DynaMéxico Final Legal Ruling is the result and culmination of 7 years of legal action performed by DynaMéxico and is the Final Ruling of the 11th Federal Circuit Collegiate Court. With this DynaMéxico Final Legal Ruling issued, all matters before the Court in México with respect to DynaMéxico and Goldgroup Resources Inc. in México are fully resolved and are no longer subject to appeal or reconsideration.

 

 

 

 

·

 Legal Summary - Consequence of the México Final Legal Ruling:

   

 

o

The $48,280,808.34 USD damages award (dated October 05, 2015) in favor of DynaMéxico and against Goldgroup Resources Inc. is now Final. Goldgroup Resources’ challenge(s) to that award have been fully denied and the damages award is Final.

 

o

The Lien against the Shares of DynaMéxico owned by Goldgroup Resources Inc. (established October 5, 2016, the “Lien against Goldgroup Shares”) is now fully confirmed, Final, and enforceable.

 

o

Ownership of the shares of DynaMéxico currently held by Goldgroup Resources (currently representing 20% of the outstanding shares of DynaMéxico) are subject to the Lien against Goldgroup Shares.”

   

 
25

Table of Contents

 

 

·

 DynaMéxico Recovery of 100% of Goldgroup Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 On February 20, 2020, a México City court issued its Final Judgment, effectively foreclosing on all shares of DynaMéxico formerly held by Goldgroup Resources Inc. and awarding those shares to DynaMéxico (the “DynaMéxico Foreclosure Judgment”).

 

 

 

 

 

 The DynaMéxico Foreclosure Judgment awarded to DynaMéxico 100% of the Shares of DynaMéxico previously owned by Goldgroup Resources Inc. (a Subsidiary Company in México owned 100% by Goldgroup Mining Inc., Vancouver, BC., “GGA.TO”). Prior to the DynaMéxico Foreclosure Judgment, Goldgroup Resources Inc. owned shares of DynaMéxico constituting 20% of the total outstanding shares of DynaMéxico (the “Goldgroup Shares of DynaMéxico”). The Goldgroup Shares of DynaMéxico were held under Lien by DynaMéxico since October 2016. DynaUSA previously owned 80% of the outstanding shares of DynaMéxico.

 

 

 

Confirmation of Arbitration Award in U.S. District Court – District of Colorado

 

 

 

On March 25, 2020 The U.S. District Court, District of Colorado affirmed the August 24, 2016 Arbitration Award in favor of Goldgroup Resources Inc.

 

 

 

DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed Appeal of Arbitration Affirmation to U.S. District Court - 10th Circuit Court of Appeals

 

 

 

 

·

 On July 17, 2020, DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed an Appeal of the Affirmation of the Arbitration Award to the U.S. District Court – 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.

 

 

 

 

·

 On July 17, 2020, DynaUSA and DynaMéxico posted supersedeas bond with the U.S. District Court, District of Colorado, in the amount of $1.111M USD.; and DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed a motion for Stay of Judgment pending Appeal.

 

 

 

U.S. Court of Appeals - 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Denial of DynaUSA and DynaMéxico Appeal

 

 

 

On April 16, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit Court issued a Ruling which denied the DynaUSA and DynaMéxico Appeal of the August 24, 2016 Arbitration Award in favor of Goldgroup Resources, Inc. In denying the Appeal of DynaUSA and DynaMéxico, the Arbitration Award in favor of Goldgroup was affirmed.

 

 

 

 

·

 On July 17, 2020, DynaUSA and DynaMéxico posted supersedeas bond with the U.S. District Court, District of Colorado, in the Amount of $1.111M USD, in order to fully bond the Monetary portion of the Arbitration Award.

 

·

 On August 24, 2020, DynaMéxico conducted an Extraordinary Shareholder’s Meeting of DynaMéxico, wherein all Non-Monetary portions of the Arbitration Award were fully performed and executed.

 

 

 

Full Performance of Arbitration Award by DynaUSA and DynaMéxico / Closure of the Arbitration Case by US. District Court

 

 

 

 

·

 On August 24, 2020, DynaMéxico conducted an Extraordinary Shareholder’s Meeting of DynaMéxico, wherein all Non-Monetary portions of the Arbitration Award were fully performed and executed.

 

·

 On May 20, 2021, DynaUSA and DynaMéxico agreed to release the $1.111 M USD supersedeas bond and paid an addition amount of $4,054.59 in interest calculated to June 2, 2021; in full performance and satisfaction of the monetary portion of the Arbitration Award.

 

Goldgroup Resources Inc. Filed Motion for Contempt of Court Sanctions against DynaUSA and DynaMéxico

 

On June 11, 2021, Goldgroup Resources Inc. filed a Motion for Civil Contempt Sanctions against DynaUSA and DynaMéxico. The Motion for Contempt Sanctions is pending.

 

DynaUSA and DynaMéxico file Motion for Relief of Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)

 

On July 1, 2021, DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed a Motion for Relief of Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). The Motion for Relief of Judgment is pending.

 

 
26

Table of Contents

 

Complaint filed by Goldgroup against the May 17, 2013, Shareholders’ Meeting of DynaMéxico

 

On February 2nd, 2014, Goldgroup Resources Inc. filed a petition with the Judge of the Tenth District Mazatlán, according to record 08/2014, in the ordinary commercial action, against DynaResource Inc., and DynaResource de México, S.A. de CV. (“DynaMéxico”). In the Petition, Goldgroup complains against the results of the shareholders meeting of DynaMéxico of May 17, 2013, and petitions for the nullification of the meeting itself and for the nullification of the additional shares of the outstanding capital of DynaMéxico issued to DynaResource, Inc. in satisfaction of debts owed to DynaResource.

 

DynaResource and DynaMéxico filed a response on January 9, 2016. DynaMéxico will vigorously defend against all such complaints by Goldgroup, as there exists no legal basis for the complaint by Goldgroup against the May 17, 2013 shareholders meeting of DynaMéxico.

 

On October 31, 2018, the Judge of the Tenth District declared the Expiration of the Trial, due to inactivity of Goldgroup in the process, and the Judge decreed the Trial as a concluded and filed trial. As a result, the shareholders' meeting of May 17, 2013 remains valid.

 

On November 16, 2018, Goldgroup appealed the declaration of Expiration of the Trial.

 

On February 12, 2019, the Court of Appeals (Segundo Tribunal Unitario de Circuito in Mazatlán) confirmed the resolution issued October 31, 2018 by the Judge of Tenth District and declared and confirmed the Expiration of the Trial, due to the inactivity of Goldgroup to the process, and therefore the Court of Appeals decreed the matter as a concluded and filed trial. As a result, the shareholders' meeting of May 17, 2013 remains valid.

 

Goldgroup has filed a writ of amparo against the resolution of the Court of Appeals that confirmed the declaration of expiration of the trial. This Amparo Trial is pending resolution.

   

Litigation(s) in México – Company as Plaintiff

 

The Company, and DynaMéxico have filed several legal actions in México against Goldgroup Mining Inc. and Goldgroup Resources Inc., and certain individuals retained as agents of Goldgroup Mining Inc., or Goldgroup Resources. The Company and DynaMéxico are plaintiffs in the actions filed in México and the outcomes are pending.

 

The Company believes that no material adverse change will occur as a result of the actions taken, and the Company further believes that there is little to no potential for the assessment of a material monetary judgment against the Company for legal actions it has filed in México. For purposes of confidentiality, the Company does not provide more specific disclosure in this Form 10-Q.

 

Litigation

 

The Company believes that no material adverse change will occur as a result of the legal actions taken, and the Company further believes that there is little to no potential for the assessment of an adverse material monetary judgment against the Company for legal actions it has filed in México. Further, the Company believes there is no legal basis for which to conduct arbitration proceedings.

 

Coronavirus Pandemic

 

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of a novel coronavirus (COVID-19) as a pandemic, which continues to spread throughout the United States of America. Efforts implemented by local and national governments, as well as businesses, including temporary closures, are expected to have adverse impacts on local, national and the global economies. Although the disruption is currently expected to be temporary, there is uncertainty around the duration and the related economic impact. Therefore, while we expect this matter to have an impact our business, the impact to our results of operations and financial position cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.

 

 
27

Table of Contents

 

NOTE 11 – DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES

 

Preferred Series C Stock

 

As discussed in Note 8, the Company analyzed the embedded conversion features of the Series C Preferred Stock and determined that the stock qualified as a derivative liability and is required to be bifurcated and accounted for as such since the host and the embedded instrument are not clearly and closely related. The Company performed a valuation of the conversion feature. In performing the valuation, the Company applied the guidance in ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements”, to nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). To measure fair value, the Company incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability and utilizes market data to the maximum extent possible.

 

In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

 

The Company considered the inputs in this valuation to be level 3 in the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820 and used an equity simulation model to determine the value of conversion feature of the Series C Preferred Stock based on the assumptions below:

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Annual volatility rate

 

 

 167 %

 

 

 156 %

Risk free rate

 

 

 0.25 %

 

 

 0.13 %

Remaining Term

 

1.00 years

 

 

1.50 years

 

Fair Value of common stock

 

 $ 0.90

 

 

 $ 0.78

 

 

For the periods ended June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, an active market for the Company’s common stock did not exist. Accordingly, the fair value of the Company’s common stock was estimated using a valuation model with level 3 inputs.

 

The below table represents the change in the fair value of the derivative liability during the periods ended June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020.

 

Period Ended

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Fair value of derivative (stock), beginning of period

 

 $ 601,313

 

 

 $ 37,038

 

Change in fair value of derivative

 

 

 25,266

 

 

 

 276,547

 

Fair value of derivative on the date of issuance

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 287,728

 

Fair value of derivative (stock), end of period

 

 $ 626,579

 

 

 $ 601,313

 

 

Preferred Series C Warrants

 

As discussed in Note 8, the Company analyzed the embedded conversion features of the Series C Preferred Stock and determined that the Warrants qualified as a derivative liability and is required to be bifurcated and accounted for as such since the host and the embedded instrument are not clearly and closely related. The Company performed a valuation of the conversion feature. In performing the valuation, the Company applied the guidance in ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements”, to nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). To measure fair value, the Company incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability and utilizes market data to the maximum extent possible.

 

In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

 

The Company considered the inputs in this valuation to be level 3 in the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820 and used an equity simulation model to determine the value of conversion feature of the Warrants based on the assumptions below:

  

 
28

Table of Contents

  

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Annual volatility rate

 

 

 167 %

 

 

 156 %

Risk free rate

 

 

 0.25 %

 

 

 0.13 %

Remaining Term

 

1.00 years

 

 

1.5 years

 

Fair Value of common stock

 

 $ 0.90

 

 

 $ 0.78

 

 

For the periods ended June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, an active market for the Company’s common stock did not exist. Accordingly, the fair value of the Company’s common stock was estimated using a valuation model with level 3 inputs.

 

The below table represents the change in the fair value of the derivative liability during the periods ended June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020.

 

Period Ended

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Fair value of derivative (warrants), beginning of period

 

 $ 817,613

 

 

 $ 49,066

 

Change in fair value of derivative

 

 

 12,819

 

 

 

 367,781

 

Fair value of derivative on the date of issuance

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 400,766

 

Fair value of derivative(warrants), end of period

 

 $ 830,432

 

 

 $ 817,613

 

 

Series D Notes Kicker Warrants

 

As discussed in Note 8, the Company analyzed the conversion features of the Series D Notes and determined that the Warrants qualified as a derivative liability. The fair value was required to be allocated among the notes, conversion features, and the warrants, and then remeasured at each reporting date. The Company performed a valuation of the conversion feature. In performing the valuation, the Company applied the guidance in ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements”, to nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). To measure fair value, the Company incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability and utilizes market data to the maximum extent possible.

 

In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

 

The Company considered the inputs in this valuation to be level 3 in the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820 and used an equity simulation model to determine the value of conversion feature of the Series D Warrants based on the assumptions below:

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Annual volatility rate

 

 

 167 %

 

 

 156 %

Risk free rate

 

 

 0.25 %

 

 

 0.13 %

Remaining Term

 

8.88 years

 

 

10 years

 

Fair Value of common stock

 

 $ 0.90

 

 

 $ 0.78

 

 

For the periods ended June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, an active market for the Company’s common stock did not exist. Accordingly, the fair value of the Company’s common stock was estimated using a valuation model with level 3 inputs.

 

The below table represents the change in the fair value of the derivative liability during the periods ended June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020.

 

Period Ended

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Fair value of derivative (warrants), beginning of period

 

 $ 952,634

 

 

 $ -

 

Fair value of derivative on the date of issuance

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 409,998

 

Change in fair value of derivative

 

 

 147,032

 

 

 

 542,636

 

Fair value of derivative(warrants), end of period

 

 $ 1,099,665

 

 

 $ 952,634

 

 

 
29

Table of Contents

 

NOTE 12 – NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST

 

The Company’s Non-Controlling Interest recorded in the consolidated financial statements relates to an interest in DynaResource de México, S.A. de C.V. of 50% through May 13, 2013, and 20% until February 24, 2020 when the minority interest was eliminated. Changes in Non-Controlling Interest for the year ended December 31, 2020 was as follows:

 

 

 

2020

 

Beginning balance

 

 $ (5,723,663 )

Operating income (loss)

 

 

 (61,589 )

Share of Other Comprehensive Income (loss)

 

 

 (11,669 )

Elimination of Non-Controlling Interest

 

 

 5,796,921

 

Ending balance

 

 $ -

 

 

NOTE 13 – FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

The ASC guidance for fair value measurements and disclosure establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

 

 

Level 1 Inputs –

Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

 

Level 2 Inputs –

Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.

 

 Level 3 Inputs –

Instruments with primarily unobservable value drivers.

 

As of June 30, 2021, and December 31, 2020, the Company’s financial assets were measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs, with the exception of cash, which was valued using Level 1 inputs. A description of the valuation of the Level 3 inputs is discussed in Note 11.

  

 
30

Table of Contents

 

Fair Value Measurement at June 30, 2021 Using:

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

in Active

Markets For Identical

Assets

(Level 1)

 

 

Significant

Other

Observable

Inputs

(Level 2)

 

 

Significant

 Unobservable

 Inputs

(Level 3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative Liabilities

 

 $ 2,556,676

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 2,556,676

 

Totals

 

 $ 2,556,676

 

 

 $ -

 

 

 $ -

 

 

 $ 2,556,676

 

Fair Value Measurement at December 31, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative Liabilities

 

 $ 2,371,560

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 2,371,560

 

Totals

 

 $ 2,371,560

 

 

 $ -

 

 

 $ -

 

 

 $ 2,371,560

 

 

NOTE 14 – REVENUE CONCENTRATION

 

The Company had certain customers whose revenue individually represented 10% or more of the Company’s total revenue, or whose accounts receivable balances individually represented 10% or more of the Company’s total accounts receivable, as follows:

 

For each of the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, three and two customers accounted for 100% of revenue, respectively.

 

At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, three and four customer accounted for 100% of accounts receivable, respectively.

 

NOTE 15 – NOTES PAYABLE

 

In June 2017, the Company entered into financing agreements for unpaid mining concession taxes on the Francisco Arturo mining concession for the period July 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015 in the amount of $533,580. The Company paid an initial 20% payment in the amount of $106,716 and financed the balance over 36 months at 18% interest.

 

In February 2018, the Company entered into a financing agreement for unpaid mining concessions taxes on the Francisco Arturo mining concession for the year ended December 31, 2016 in the amount of $552,990. The Company paid an initial payment of $110,598 and financed the balance over 36 months at 18%.

 

In June 2018, the Company entered into financing agreements for the unpaid mining concession taxes on the Francisco Arturo mining concession for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the period ending June 30, 2018 in the amount of $1,739,392. The Company paid an initial 20% payment of $347,826 and financed the balance over 36 months at 21.84%

 

In February 2019, the Company entered into a financing agreement for unpaid mining concession taxes on the Francisco Arturo mining concession for the year ended December 31, 2018 in the amount of $335,350. The Company paid an initial 20% payment of $67,070 and financed the balance over 36 months at an interest rate of 21%.

 

In June 2018, the Company applied for a reduction of the Francisco Arturo mining concession, from 69,121 hectares to 3,280 hectares. On July 31, 2018, the application for reduction was approved and the Company paid an initial amount of 985,116 MNP (Pesos), for the second semester 2018 mining concessions taxes on the reduced Francisco Arturo mining concession. The Company continues to accrue an amount of $22,500 (USD) per semester on the reduced Francisco Arturo mining concession.

 

As of June 2019, the Company ceased making monthly payments on the above noted Francisco Arturo concession notes and has petitioned the Hacienda for a reduction in the liability equal to the reduction in the Francisco Arturo concession above. For financial reporting purposes the Company continues to carry all notes at unpaid principal amount and accrues interest on a monthly basis. At June 30, 2021 $879,240 of accrued interest on the notes was included in accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.

 

In October 2019, the Company entered into a financing agreement for unpaid mining concession taxes on the core mining concessions in the amount of $299,474. The Company paid an initial 20% payment of $59,895 and financed the balance over 36 months at an interest rate of 22%.

 

 
31

Table of Contents

 

The following is a summary of the transaction during the periods ended June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020:

 

 

 

 

 

Balance December 31, 2019

 

 

 2,272,431

 

Exchange Rate Adjustment

 

 

 (124,352 )

2020 Principal Payments

 

 

 (66,644 )

Balance December 31, 2020

 

 

 2,081,435

 

Exchange Rate Adjustment

 

 

 (2,395 )

2021 Principal Payments

 

 

 (36,460 )

Balance June 30, 2021

 

 $ 2,042,580

 

 

 

 

 

 

At June 30, 2021 future maturities of notes payable are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ending June 30:

 

 

 

 

2022

 

 $ 2,009,461

 

2023

 

 

 33,119

 

 

 

 $ 2,042,580

 

 

NOTE 16 – REVOLVING CREDIT LINE FACILITY

 

On February 4, 2021 Mineras de DynaResource SA de CV (“Seller”) entered into a Revolving Credit Line Facility and Commercial Offtake Agreement (the “RCL"), with a commercial buyer. Under the terms of the RCL:

 

 

·

 The Company will deliver 100% of its produced concentrates to the buyer and provider of the RCL, through December 31, 2022; unless extended by the Company;

 

·

 An initial RCL was established by buyer in the amount of $3.75M USD;

 

·

 At May 1, 2021, the RCL increased to an amount equal to 80% of prior 3 month’s revenue;

 

·

 Each successive month, the RCL shall be adjusted according to the company’s prior 3 month’s revenue;

 

·

 The RCL shall never be less than $3.75M USD;

 

·

 The RCL will be interest free for 45 days;

 

·

 The RCL is to be repaid through deliveries of Concentrates or Cash within 120 days;

 

Deposits under Revolving Credit Line Facility

 

Under the terms of the RCL, Mineras de DynaResource received the following advances from the buyer:

 

(1)

$2.5M advance on February 4, 2021. Settled on March 26, 2021.

(2)

$3.75M advance on March 30, 2021. Settled on May 12, 2021.

(3)

$3.75M advance on May 12, 2021. Settled on June 16, 2021.

(4)

$6.75M advance on June 18, 2021.

 

NOTE 17 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

The Company has evaluated events from June 30, 2021, through the date whereupon the financial statements were issued, and has determined the below described events subsequent to the end of the period.

 

Revolving credit line activity:

 

At August 1, 2021, the amount of the RCL was increased to $8.89M USD.

 

On August 4, 2021, Mineras de Dyna Resource S.A. de C.V. completed settlement of an advance in the amount of $6.75M USD from the Buyer of Concentrate products through a combination of product delivery and cash payment.

 

On August 9, 2021, Mineras de DynaResource S.A. de C.V. received an advance from the Buyer of Concentrate Products produced from San Jose de Gracía in the amount of $8.25M USD.

  

 
32

Table of Contents

 

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which we refer to in this annual report as the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which we refer to in this annual report as the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact but rather reflect our current expectations, estimates and predictions about future results and events. These statements may use words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “predict,” “project” and similar expressions as they relate to us or our management. When we make forward-looking statements, we are basing them on our management’s beliefs and assumptions, using information currently available to us. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including but not limited to, risks, uncertainties and assumptions discussed in this annual report. Factors that can cause or contribute to these differences include those described under the heading “Management Discussion and Analysis and Plan of Operation.”

 

If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may vary materially from what we projected. Any forward-looking statement you read in this annual report reflects our current views with respect to future events and is subject to these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, results of operations, growth strategy and liquidity. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or individuals acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this paragraph. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this annual report. The Company expressly disclaims any obligation to release publicly any updates or revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect any change in its views or expectations. The Company can give no assurances that such forward-looking statements will prove to be correct.

 

CAUTIONARY NOTE TO UNITED STATES INVESTORS—INFORMATION CONCERNING PREPARATION OF RESOURCE AND RESERVE ESTIMATES

 

The Company is an “OTC Reporting Issuer” as that term is defined in BC Multilateral Instrument 51-105, Issuers Quoted in the U.S. Over-the-Counter Markets, promulgated by the British Columbia Securities Commission.

 

In Canada, an issuer is required to provide technical information with respect to mineralization, including reserves and resources, if any, on its mineral exploration properties in accordance with Canadian requirements, which differ significantly from the requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) applicable to registration statements and reports filed by United States companies pursuant to the Securities Act or the Exchange Act. As such, certain disclosures of mineralization under Canadian standards may not be comparable to similar information made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the SEC and not subject to Canadian securities legislation.

 

While these terms are recognized and required by Canadian securities legislation (under National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”), entitled Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects), the SEC does not recognize these terms. Investors in the United States are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted to reserves. In addition, inferred mineral resources have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of a measured mineral resource, indicated mineral resource or inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian securities legislation, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, although they may form, in certain circumstances, the basis of a “preliminary economic assessment” as that term is defined in NI 43-101. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of any reported measured, indicated, or inferred mineral resource estimates referred to in the DynaMéxico NI 43-101 Technical Report and DynaMéxico 43-101 Mineral Resource Estimate (compiled for DynaResource de Mexico SA de CV) are economically or legally mineable.

  

 
33

Table of Contents

  

Under U.S. standards, as set forth in SEC Industry Guide 7, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless a determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. The SJG Property as described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is without known reserves. Mineral resources which are not classified as mineral reserves do not have “demonstrated economic viability.” The quantity of resources and the quality (grade) of resources reported as “Indicated” and “Inferred” mineral resources in the DynaMéxico 43-101 Mineral Resource Estimate compiled for DynaResource de Mexico SA de CV, under Canadian National Instrument 43-101 and filed by the Company with SEDAR, are not disclosed in this Form 10-Q. There has been insufficient exploration to define any mineral reserves on the SJG Property, and it is not certain if further exploration will result in the definition of mineral reserves.

 

The Company

 

The Company is a minerals investment, management, and exploration company, and currently conducting test mining and pilot milling operations through an operating subsidiary in México, with specific focus on precious and base metals in México. The Company was originally incorporated in the State of California on September 28, 1937, under the name West Coast Mines, Inc. In November 1998, the Company re-domiciled from California to Delaware and changed its name to DynaResource, Inc. (“DynaUSA”).

 

We currently own 80% of the outstanding shares of DynaMéxico, and DynaMéxico currently holds 20% of the outstanding shares of DynaMéxico. DynaMéxico owns 100% of the mining concessions, equipment, camp and related facilities which comprise the San Jose de Gracía Property (“SJG”), in northern Sinaloa State, México. We also own 100% of Mineras de DynaResource S.A. de C.V. (“DynaMineras”), the exclusive operator of the San José de Gracía Project, under contract with DynaMéxico. DynaMineras currently conducts test mining and pilot milling operations, and other exploration activities in México. The Company also has another wholly owned subsidiary, DynaResource Operaciones, S.A. de C.V. (“DynaOperaciones”). DynaOperaciones entered into a personnel management agreement with DynaMineras and, under the terms of that agreement, DynaOperaciones is the exclusive management company for registered employees.

 

Segment Information

 

Not required for small reporting Companies

 

Products

 

The end use product produced at our test mining and pilot milling operations at SJG is in the form of gold-silver concentrates. Gold-silver concentrates, or simply concentrate, is raw precious metals materials that has been crushed and ground finely to a sand-like product where gangue (waste) and non-precious metals are removed or reduced, thus concentrating the precious metals component. Concentrates processed and produced from San Jose de Gracía are shipped to third-party smelters, refineries or third parties for further processing or re-sale.

 

During the first six months of 2021, we reported the delivery and sale of 9,436 net Oz gold contained in concentrates. All gold-silver concentrate originated from the San Jose de Gracía Property in México.

 

Gold-silver concentrates are sold at a discount to the prevailing spot market price, based on the price per ounce of gold and silver quoted at the London PM fix, with the actual net precious metals prices received depending on the sales contract. Concentrates are priced by individual concentrate lots of 36 to 72 tons, or as a series of lots under contract, whereby the final selling price and gold-silver quantities are subject to final adjustments at the time of final purchase settlement.

 

Gold and Silver Pilot Processing Methods

 

Gold and silver are extracted from mined mineralized material, by crushing, grinding, milling, and further by simple gravity and flotation recoveries. The mineralized material is extracted by underground mining methods. The processing plant at the San José de Gracía mine is composed of conventional crushing and grinding circuits, and with gravity and flotation recovery methods. The gravity and flotation concentrates are dewatered and shipped to purchasers in semi-truck trailers.

 

Gold and Silver Reserves / No Known Reserves

 

The Company currently has no mineral “reserves” as defined by SEC Industry Guide 7 promulgated by the SEC.

 

General Government Regulations

 

 
34

Table of Contents

 

México

 

Mining in México is subject to numerous federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances governing mineral rights, operations and environmental protection.

 

Mineral Concession Rights. Exploration and exploitation of minerals in México may be carried out through Mexican companies incorporated under Mexican law by means of obtaining mining concessions. Mining concessions are granted by the Mexican government for a period of fifty years from the date of their recording in the Public Registry of Mining and are renewable for a further period of fifty years upon application within five years prior to the expiration of such concession in accordance with the Mining Law and its regulations. Mining concessions are subject to annual work requirements and payment of annual surface taxes which are assessed and levied on a semi-annual basis. Such concessions may be transferred or assigned by their holders, but such transfers or assignments must be registered with the Public Registry of Mining in order to be valid against third parties. The holder of a concession must pay semi-annual duties in January and July of each year on a per hectare basis and in accordance with the amounts provided by the Federal Fees Law. During the month of May of each year, the concessionaire must file with the General Bureau of Mines, the work assessment reports made on each concession or group of concessions for the preceding calendar year. The regulations of the Mining Law provide tables containing the minimum investment amounts that must be made on a concession. This amount is updated annually in accordance with the changes in the Consumer Price Index.

 

Surface Rights. In México, while mineral rights are administered by the federal government through federally issued mining concessions, Ejidos (communal owners of land recognized by the federal laws in México) control surface access rights to the land. An Ejido may sell or lease lands directly to a private entity. While the Company has agreements or is in the process of negotiating agreements with the Ejido that impact all of its projects in México, some of these agreements may be subject to renegotiations.

 

Mining Royalties. In October 2013, the Mexican lower house passed a bill levying a tax-deductible mining royalty of 7.5% on earnings before the deduction of interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, along with an additional 0.5% surcharge on precious metals revenue for mining companies. The effective date of the law was January 1, 2014. Although there are a few uncertainties surrounding the scope, calculation and enforcement of the royalty, based on the Company's current interpretation of the bill, the royalty or surcharge was not material for 2020.

 

Environmental Law. The Environmental Law in México, called the "General Law of Ecological Balance and Protection to the Environment" ("General Law"), provides for general environmental policies, with specific requirements for certain activities such as exploration set forth in regulations called "Mexican official norms". Responsibility for enforcement of the General Law, the regulations and the Mexican official norms is with the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources, which regulate all environmental matters with the assistance of Procuraduria Federal de Protección al Ambiente (known as "PROFEPA").

 

2020 Forestry Law. The 2020 Forestry Law provides for general policies for the use and protection of the surface, and for plants, soil and trees. The regulation of the Forestry Law is with the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources, with the assistance of PROFEPA.

 

Residues Law. The Residues Law, also known as Norm 141, provides for general policies for the deposit and storage of residue and waste. The regulation of the Residues Law is with the Ministry Of Environment and Natural Resources, with the assistance of PROFEPA.

The primary laws and regulations used by the State of Sinaloa, where our San Jose de Gracía property is located, in order to govern environmental protection for mining and exploration are: The General Law, the 2020 Forestry Law, Residues Law, as well as their specific regulations on air, water and residues, and the Mexican official norms (known as "NOM-120"). In order to comply with the environmental regulations, a concessionaire must obtain a series of permits during the exploitation and exploration stage. The time required to obtain the required permits is dependent on a few factors including the type of vegetation and trees impacted by proposed activities.

 

Mining Permits. The Secretariat of Environmental and Natural Resources, the Mexican Government environmental authority ("SEMARNAT"), is responsible for issuing environmental permits associated with mining. Three main permits required before construction can begin are: Environmental Impact Statement (known in México as Manifesto Impacto Ambiental) ("MIA"), Land Use Change (known in México as Estudio Justificativo Para Cambio Uso Sueldo) ("ETJ"), and Risk Analysis (known in México as Analisis de Riesgo) ("RA"). A construction permit is required from the local municipality and an archaeological release letter must be obtained from the National Institute of Anthropology and History (known as "INAH"). An explosives permit is required from the ministry of defense before construction can begin. The Environmental Impact Statement is required to be prepared by a third-party contractor and submitted to SEMARNAT and must include a detailed analysis of climate, air quality, water, soil, vegetation, wildlife, cultural resources and socio-economic impacts. The Risk Analysis study (which is included into the Environmental Impact Statement and submitted as one complete document) identifies potential environmental releases of hazardous substances and evaluates the risks in order to establish methods to prevent, respond to, and control environmental emergencies. The Land Use Change requires that an evaluation be made of the existing conditions of the land, including a plant and wildlife study, an evaluation of the current and proposed use of the land, impacts to naturally occurring resources, and an evaluation of reclamation/re-vegetation plans.

 

 
35

Table of Contents

 

Customers

 

The Company sells its concentrates to the buyer who offers the best terms based upon price, treatment costs, refining costs, and other terms of payment. During the six months ended June 30, 2021, the Company sold gold-silver concentrates to three purchasers.

 

Employees

 

As of June 30, 2021, we had 173 employees, including 168 employees based in México, and 5 in the United States. Consultants are retained from time to time. Employees based in México and the United States include laborers, engineers, geologists, information technologists, office administrators, managers and executives. None of our employees in México are covered by union contracts and the Company believes we have good relations with our employees.

 

The San Jose de Gracia Mineral Property

 

We classify our mineral property as an "Exploration Property". We do not suggest that we have proven or probable reserves at our property as defined by the SEC. Under U.S. standards, as set forth in SEC Industry Guide 7, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless a determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. The SJG Property as described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is without known reserves. Mineral resources which are not classified as mineral reserves do not have “demonstrated economic viability.” The quantity of resources and the quality (grade) of resources reported as “Indicated” and “Inferred” mineral resources in the mineral resource estimate compiled for DynaMéxico, under and filed by the Company on SEDAR, are not disclosed in this Form 10K. There has been insufficient exploration to define any mineral reserves on the SJG Property, and it is not certain if further exploration will result in the definition of mineral reserves.

 

San Jose de Gracia Mineral Property

 

San Jose de Gracía Property (“SJG”) is a high-grade mineralized system which reports historical production of 1,000,000 Oz. gold (“Au”), from a series of underground workings and is located in the state of Sinaloa, México. The Company is focused on the exploration and future exploitation of this vein-hosted, near surface, and over 400 meters down dip gold potential, that occurs within fault breccia veins; and has been traced on surface and underground over a 15 Sq. kilometer area.

 

DynaMéxico owns 100% of the mineral concessions at the SJG Property, and all mineral concessions are contiguous. The SJG Property is comprised of 33 concessions covering approximately 9,920 hectares (24,513 acres).

  

 
36

Table of Contents

 

Current Mining Concessions - San José de Gracía

Claim Name

Claim Number

Staking date

Expiry

Hectares

Taxes / ha (pesos)

AMPL. SAN NICOLAS

183815

22/11/1988

21/11/2038

17.4234

111.27

AMPL. SANTA ROSA

163592

30/10/1978

29/10/2028

25.0000

111.27

BUENA VISTA

211087

31/03/2000

30/03/2050

17.9829

63.22

EL CASTILLO

214519

02/10/2001

01/10/2051

100.0000

31.62

EL REAL

212571

07/11/2000

07/11/2052

2038.0000

31.62

EL REAL 2

216301

30/04/2002

29/04/2052

280.1555

31.62

FINISTERRE FRACC. A

219001

28/01/2003

27/01/2053

18.7856

31.62

FINISTERRE FRACC. B

219002

28/01/2003

27/01/2053

174.2004

31.62

GUADALUPE

189470

05/12/1990

04/12/2040

7.0000

111.27

LA GRACIA I

215958

02/04/2002

01/04/2052

300.0000

31.62

LA GRACIA II

215959

02/04/2002

01/04/2052

230.0000

31.62

LA LIBERTAD

172433

15/12/1983

14/12/2033

97.0000

111.27

LA NUEVA AURORA

215119

08/02/2002

07/02/2052

89.3021

31.62

LA NUEVA ESPERANZA

226289

06/12/2005

05/12/2055

40.0000

7.6

LA UNION

176214

26/08/1985

25/08/2035

4.1098

111.27

LOS TRES AMIGOS

172216

27/10/1983

26/10/2033

23.0000

111.27

MINA GRANDE

163578

10/10/1978

09/10/2028

6.6588

111.27

NUEVO ROSARIO

184999

13/12/1989

12/12/2039

32.8781

111.27

PIEDRAS DE LUMBRE 2

215556

05/03/2002

04/03/2052

34.8493

31.62

PIEDRAS DE LUMBRE 3

218992

28/01/2003

27/01/2053

4.3098

31.62

PIEDRAS DE LUMBRE No.4

212349

29/09/2000

28/09/2050

0.2034

63.22

PIEDRAS DE LUMBRE UNO

215555

05/03/2002

04/03/2052

40.2754

31.62

SAN ANDRES

212143

31/08/2000

30/08/2050

385.0990

63.22

SAN JOSÉ

208537

24/11/1998

23/11/2048

27.0000

111.27

SAN MIGUEL (1)

183504

26/10/1988

25/10/2038

7.0000

111.27

SAN NICOLAS

163913

14/12/1978

13/12/2028

55.5490

111.27

SAN SEBASTIAN

184473

08/11/1989

07/11/2039

40.0000

111.27

SANTA MARIA

218769

17/01/2003

16/01/2053

4.2030

31.62

SANTA ROSA

170557

13/05/1982

12/05/2032

31.4887

111.27

SANTO TOMAS

187348

13/08/1986

12/08/2036

312.0000

111.27

TRES AMIGOS 2

212142

31/08/2000

30/08/2050

54.4672

63.22

FINISTERRE 4

231166

18/01/2008

17/01/2058

2142.1302

5.08

FRANCISCO ARTURO

230494

06/09/2007

27/03/2057

3,279.56

 

TOTAL

 

 

 

9,920.00

 

 

 
37

Table of Contents

 

Surface Lease Rights

 

In addition to the surface rights held by DynaMéxico pursuant to the Mining Act of México and its Regulations (Ley Minera y su Reglamento), DynaMineras maintains access and surface rights to the SJG Project pursuant to the 20-year Land Lease Agreement (above). The 20 Year Land Lease Agreement with the Santa Maria Ejido Community surrounding San Jose de Gracía is dated January 6, 2014 and continues through 2033. It covers an area of 4,399 hectares surrounding the main mineral resource areas of SJG and provides for annual lease payments by DynaMineras of $1,359,443 Pesos (approx. $66,500 USD as of June 30, 2021), commencing in 2014.

 

The Land Lease Agreement provides DynaMineras with surface access to the core resource areas of SJG (4,399 hectares), and allows for all permitted mining, pilot production and exploration activities from the owners of the surface rights (Santa Maria Ejido community).

 

The Company expects DynaMineras will be successful in expanding the size and scope of the resources at SJG through continued drilling and development programs at San Pablo, Tres Amigos, La Ceceña, Palos Chinos, San Pablo East, La Purisima, and La Prieta. The Company expects extensions to mineralization in all directions and down dip from the main target areas.

 

Mineral Reserves / No Known Reserves

 

Under U.S. standards, as set forth in SEC Industry Guide 7, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless a determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. The SJG property is without known reserves. Mineral resources which are not classified as mineral reserves do not have “demonstrated economic viability.” The quantity of resources and the quality (grade) of resources reported as “Indicated” and “Inferred” mineral resources in the mineral resource estimate compiled for DynaMéxico is not disclosed in this Form 10-Q. There has been insufficient exploration to define any mineral reserves on the property, and it is not certain if further exploration will result in the definition of mineral reserves.

 

Technical Report and Resource Estimate According to Canadian National Instrument 43-101 (2012)

 

In 2012, DynaMéxico commissioned Servicios y Proyectos Mineros (“SPM”) for the production of Technical Report 43-101 (“43-101”) at San Jose de Gracía. Additionally, DynaMéxico commissioned Mr. Robert Sandefur, a senior reserve analyst for Chlumsky, Armbrust & Meyer LLC, Lakewood, CO (“CAM”) to produce a mineral resource estimate for the 4 main vein systems at the property.

 

Parameters Used to Estimate the Mineral Resource Estimate--The data base for the San Jose de Gracía Project consists of 372 drill holes of which 361 are diamond drill holes (“DDH”) and the remaining 11 were reverse circulation holes “(RC”), with a total drilling of 75,878 meters. The NI 43-101 Mineral Resource Estimate, prepared in 2012, concentrates on four main mineralized vein systems at SJG: Tres Amigos, San Pablo, La Union, and La Purisima. Of the 372 drill holes, 368 were drilled to test these four main vein systems and the remaining four holes tested the Argillic Zone. Technical personnel of Minop S.A. de C.V. (“Minop”), a subsidiary (or affiliate) of Goldgroup Mining Inc., built three dimensional solids to constrain estimation to the interpreted veins in each swarm. The 172 holes most recently drilled (2009-2011), were allocated as follows: Tres Amigos (64 holes), San Pablo (49 holes), La Union (24 holes), La Purisima (32 holes) and Argillic Zone (3 holes). The data base also includes rock and chip sampling, regional stream sediment sampling, and IP Surveys.

 

 
38

Table of Contents

 

Density--A total of 5,540 pieces of core were measured for specific gravity using the weight in air vs. weight in water method. This represents an additional 3,897 measurements taken in the 2009-11 drill seasons with density measurements taken from all mineral zones. Dried samples were coated with paraffin wax before being measured. The results tabulated have been sorted by lithology and mineralized veins. The average specific gravity of 5,051 wall rock samples was 2.59 while the average specific gravity for 489 samples of vein material is 2.68. CAM and Servicios y Proyectos Mineros have reviewed the procedures and results and opine that the results are suitable for use in mineral resource estimation.

 

Mineral Resource Estimate - Construction of Wireframes--Mineral Resources were estimated by Mr. Sandefur within wireframes constructed by technical personnel of Minop. Minop was contracted by Mineras de DynaResource S.A. de C.V. (“DynaMineras”).

 

Mineral Resource Estimate - Explanation of Resource Estimation--Resource estimation was done in MineSight and MicroModel computer systems with only those composites that were inside the wireframe used in the estimate. Estimation was done using kriging with the omni-directional variogram derived from all the data in each area for gold using the relative variogram derived from the log variogram. High grades were restricted by capping the assays at a breakpoint based on the cumulative frequency curves. Estimation was done using search radii of 100 x 100 x 50 m “blocks” oriented subparallel to the general strike and dip of the vein system in each area. A sector search, corresponding to the faces of the search box with a maximum of two points per sector was used in estimation. A density of 2.68 based on within ‘vein density’ samples was used in the resource estimate. Within each of the four areas there are approximately 20 to 40 veins in the vein swarm. Resources were estimated by kriging using data from all veins in the swarm. In general, gold accounts for at least 80% of the value of contained metal at the project, so the variograms for gold were used in estimation of the four other metals.

 

The veins at San Jose de Gracía have been historically mined for many years and historic mined volumes are not available. The one exception is the approximate 42,000 tonnes of ore processed by DynaMéxico during its pilot production activities in 2003-2006. The resource table is not adjusted for any historic mining. To validate that historic mining had not significantly reduced the resource, CAM reviewed the database for all assays greater than 1 gram per ton gold that were next to missing values at the bottom of drill holes. Only four assays satisfying this criterion were found, and on the basis of this review, Mr. Sandefur does not believe that significant mining has occurred within the volumes defined by the wireframes.

 

Servicios y Proyectos Mineros performed a database review and considers that a reasonable level of verification has been completed, and that no material issues have been left unidentified from the drilling programs undertaken.

 

Mineral Resource Estimate and 43-101 Technical Report - Data Verification--Mr. Ramon Luna Espinoza (“Mr. Luna”) initially visited the San Jose de Gracía Project in November 2010 and conducted site inspections at SJG in November 2011 and January 2012. Mr. Sandefur conducted a site inspection of the SJG Project in January 2012. While at the Property in November 2011, Mr. Luna inspected the areas of Tres Amigos, La Prieta, Gossan Cap, San Pablo, La Union, and La Purisima, and historic mining sites. In January 2012, Mr. Sandefur and Mr. Luna inspected the areas of Tres Amigos, San Pablo, La Union, and La Purisima. Pictures of the areas were taken. Many of the drill pads for the drilling programs of 2007 to 2011 were clearly located and identified. Mr. Luna also inspected at San José de Gracía, the core logging and storage facilities, the geology offices, the meteorological station, the plant nursery, and the mill. Mr. Sandefur also inspected the core logging and storage facilities.

 

The Company received from DynaMéxico on February 14, 2012, a National Instrument 43-101 Mineral Resource Estimate for San Jose de Gracía. The NI 43-101 Resource Estimate was prepared by Mr. Robert Sandefur, BS, MSc, P.E., a Qualified Person as defined under NI 43-101, and a senior reserve analyst for Chlumsky, Armbrust & Meyer LLC, Lakewood, CO (“CAM”). The Resource Estimate concentrates on four separate main vein systems at SJG: Tres Amigos, San Pablo, La Union, and La Purisima.

 

The mineral resource estimates prepared by Mr. Robert Sandefur for this Technical Report included Indicated Resources at Tres Amigos and San Pablo. Table summaries of Indicated and Inferred Resources are contained in the 2012 DynaMéxico-CAM Mineral Resource Estimate. The Resource Estimate has been filed, along with the Technical Report on SEDAR; but is not disclosed in this Form 10-K.

 

Water Concession

 

The Company has secured the Water Rights Concession for the area surrounding SJG. The Director of Water Administration of the National Water Commission of México (CONAGUA) formally certified in writing the rights of DynaResource de México, S.A. de C.V. to legally “use”, exploit and extract 1,000,000 cubic meters of water per year from the DynaMéxico extraction infrastructure located within the perimeter of the mining concessions comprising the San Jose de Gracía Mining Property in Sinaloa State, México. CONAGUA determined that the DynaMéxico water rights are not subject to any water rights concession or any other water extraction restriction. Water extracted by DynaMéxico will be subject to applicable levies imposed by the Mexican tax authorities in accordance with current Mexican tax laws.

 

 
39

Table of Contents

 

Company

 

The Company is a minerals investment, management, and exploration company, and currently conducting test mining and pilot milling operations through an operating subsidiary in México, with specific focus on precious and base metals in México. The Company was incorporated in the State of California on September 28, 1937, under the name West Coast Mines, Inc. In November 1998, the Company re-domiciled from California to Delaware and changed its name to DynaResource, Inc. (“DynaUSA”).

 

We currently conduct operations in México through our operating subsidiaries. We currently own 80% of the outstanding shares of DynaResource de México, S.A. de C.V. (“DynaMéxico”), and DynaMéxico currently holds 20% of its outstanding shares recovered from Goldgroup Resources Inc. DynaMéxico owns 100% of mining concessions, equipment, camp and related facilities which comprise the San Jose de Gracía Property, in northern Sinaloa State, México. We also own 100% of Mineras de DynaResource S.A. de C.V. (“DynaMineras”), the exclusive operator of the San José de Gracía Project, under contract with DynaMéxico. DynaOperaciones is the exclusive management company for registered employees.

 

Project Improvements, Expansion and Increased Output (2017 To 2021)

 

The Company continues its business plan of operations at San Jose de Gracía, which is to improve, increase and expand test mining and pilot milling operations and generally, to increase production of gold ounces. Since January 2015 startup of the test mining and milling activities, the Company has increased daily output from an initial 75 tons per 24-hour operating day, to a current 200 tons per 24-hour operating day, and during first quarter 2021 the Company expects to achieve production output of 300 tons per 24-hour operating day. (Note the Summary of Test Mining and Pilot Mill Operations for 2018 to 2021 below).

 

Since January 2017, the Company has expended over $13.8 million USD in non-operating costs, generally classified as project improvements and expansion costs which have been expensed in the company’s financial statements. These funds have been provided primarily from cash flows from operations. An itemized list of these non-operating costs is described below:

 

Mill Expansion:

 

 $ 1,927,000

 

Tailings Pond Expansion

 

 

 265,000

 

Machinery and Equipment

 

 

 968,000

 

Mining Camp Expansion

 

 

 146,000

 

Medical Facility

 

 

 126,000

 

Mine Development - San Pablo

 

 

 2,748,000

 

Mine Expansion - San Pablo East

 

 

 915,000

 

Mine Expansion – Tres Amigos

 

 

 1,599,000

 

SIG Mining Concessions

 

 

 1,392,000

 

Surface Rights and Permitting

 

 

 468,000

 

Debt Retirement

 

 

 484,000

 

Legal Fees

 

 

 2,635,000

 

Total

 

 $ 13,773,000

 

 

The Company is currently reporting all costs of mine operations, improvements, and expansion as expenses in accordance with United States General Accepted Accounting Principal (GAAP) requirements. The result of expensing all costs is that the Company has accumulated a net loss carry forward from México operations of $25 million USD which is available to offset future taxable earnings.

 

Summary of Test Mining and Pilot Mill Operations for 2016 to 2020:

 

Year

 

Total

Tonnes

Mined &

Processed

 

 

Reported

Mill Feed

Grade

(g/t Au)

 

 

Reported

 Recovery

%

 

 

Gross Gold Concentrates Produced

(Au oz.)

 

 

Net Gold Concentrates

Sold

(Au oz.)

 

2016

 

 

 33,172

 

 

 

 12.70

 

 

 

 79.70 %

 

 

 10,836

 

 

 

 8,668

 

2017

 

 

 35,170

 

 

 

 12.95

 

 

 

 85.00 %

 

 

 12,636

 

 

 

 10,740

 

2018

 

 

 52,038

 

 

 

 9.82

 

 

 

 86.11 %

 

 

 14,147

 

 

 

 13,418

 

2019

 

 

 66,031

 

 

 

 5.81

 

 

 

 86.86 %

 

 

 10,646

 

 

 

 9,713

 

2020

 

 

 44,218

 

 

 

 5.65

 

 

 

 87.31 %

 

 

 7,001

 

 

 

 5,828

 

Total

 

 

 230,629

 

 

 

 8.76

 

 

 

 88.40 %

 

 

 55,266

 

 

 

 48,367

 

 

Test pilot operations in 2020 yielded 44,218 tons mined and processed from underground mining activity and pilot mill operations; and the production of approximately 7,001 gross Oz Au (and net of dry weights, buyer’s price discount and refining and treatment costs, approximately 5,828 Oz. Au) contained in gold-silver concentrates, and the receipt of $9,048,831 in revenues from the sale of gold-silver concentrates.

 

 
40

Table of Contents

 

Summary of Test Mining and Pilot Mill Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020:

 

 

 

Total

Tonnes

Mined &

Processed

 

 

Reported

Mill Feed

Grade

(g/t Au)

 

 

Reported

Recovery

%

 

 

Gross Gold

Concentrates

Produced

(Au oz.)

 

 

Net Gold

Concentrates

Sold (Au oz.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2021

 

 

 41,376

 

 

 

 8.98

 

 

 

 86.74 %

 

 

 10,320

 

 

 

 9,436

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2020

 

 

 8,608

 

 

 

 3.33

 

 

 

 83.71 %

 

 

 772

 

 

 

 624

 

 

Test pilot operations in Q1 2021 yielded 17,342 tons mined and processed through mill operations; and the production of 3,571 gross Oz Au (and net weights, buyer’s price discount and refining and treatment costs, approximately 3,024 Oz. Au) contained in gold-silver concentrates, and the receipt of $4,912,712 in revenues from the sale of gold-silver concentrates.

 

Test pilot operations in Q2 2021 yielded 24,034 tons mined and processed through mill operations; and the production of 6,749 gross Oz Au (and net weights, buyer’s price discount and refining and treatment costs, approximately 6.256 Oz. Au) contained in gold-silver concentrates, and the receipt of $10,526,313 in revenues from the sale of gold-silver concentrates.

 

Additional Test Mining and Mill Operations Disclosure

 

DynaMineras expects to continue its test underground mining activity and pilot milling operations in 2021, and projects the output of 300 tons per 24-hour operating day from the mine and mill during the third quarter.

 

Results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020

 

REVENUE. Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were $10,526,313 and $(3,409), respectively. Year to date revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were $15,439,025 and $414,635, respectively. The increase is a result of the Company’s opening of the Tres Amigos mine and the expansion of mill capacity to 300 tones per day. As anticipated the opening of the Tres Amigos mine has resulted in an increase in yield from 3.33 to 8.98 au per ton. The increase mill capacity resulting of the processing of 24,034 tonnes of ore in Q2. During the prior year mining operations and milling were shutdown from March to July 2020 to open the Tres Amigos mine and expand the mill.

 

PRODUCTION COSTS RELATED TO SALES. Production costs related to sales for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were $778,885 and $0, respectively. Production costs related to sales for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were $1,160,151 and $211,575, respectively. These are expenses directly related to the milling, packaging and shipping of gold and other precious metals product. This represents a decrease in the cost per ton of milling ore. The decrease was due to Company’s ceasing mill operations from March to June 2020 to complete the financing and facility upgrade which allowed the Company to open the Tres Amigos mine and increase the output from the mill.

 

MINE PRODUCTION COSTS. Mine production costs for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were $1,442,932 and $0 respectively. Mine production costs for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were $2,249,402 and $533,901 respectively. These costs were directly related to the extraction of mine tonnage to be processed at the mill. The increase was a result of increased tonnage mined. The 2020 cost primarily represented the processing of inventory from the prior year.

 

MINE EXPLORATION COSTS. Mine exploration costs for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were $1,273,241 and $0, respectively. Mine exploration costs for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were $2,285,989 and $40,825, respectively. These were the costs of extracting waste material to reach the materials to be extracted for processing. The increase was a result of opening the Tres Amigos mine and the limited mining in the 2020 period. There were no exploration costs from February to June of the prior year.

 

MINE EXPANSION COSTS: Mine expansion costs for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were $0 and $639,656, respectively. Mine expansion costs for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were $0 and $909,190, respectively. These were the costs associated with the expansion of the mining facilities and the cost associated with preparing the Tres Amigos for production in the 2020 period. There have been no mine expansion activities in 2021.

 

TRANSPORTATION. Transportation costs for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were $355,134 and $(446), respectively. Transportation costs for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were $593,698 and $75,734, respectively. These were the costs of transporting the product to the customer for treatment and sale. The increase is consistent with the overall increase in production and revenue.

 

 
41

Table of Contents

 

CAMP, WAREHOUSE AND SUPPORT FACILITIES. Camp, warehouse and support facility cost for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were $723,527 and $421,282, respectively. Camp, warehouse and support facility cost for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were $1,258,722 and $873,324, respectively. These were the support costs of the mining facilities including housing, food, security and warehouse operations. The increase was a result of the increased activity at the camp during the six months ended June 30, 2021 compared to the shutdown of mining activity in the six months ended June 30, 2020.

 

PROPERTY HOLDING COSTS. Property holding costs for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were $36,903 and $31,305, respectively. Property holding costs for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were $79,650 and $68,129, respectively. These costs were concessions taxes, leases on land and other direct costs of maintaining the property.

 

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were $651,992 and $1,097,315 respectively. General and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were $1,166,969 and $1,517,571 respectively. These were the costs of operating the Company not directly associated with the mine operations including management, accounting, and legal expenses. The decrease was largely a result of legal fees associated with the Company’s successful recovery of the non-controlling stock and legal cost of the Company’s new financing incurred in the second quarter of 2020.

 

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE). Other income for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 was $(1,890,365) and $(1,437,832) respectively. Included in this category in 2021 was interest expense of $(730,419), change in derivative of $(185,116) and currency transaction gain of $136,281 and arbitration award expense of $1,111,111. Included in this category in 2020 was interest expense of $(404,445), change in derivative of $(689,275), currency transaction loss of $(339,665) and other expenses of $(4,427). The 2020 derivative liability increase is the result of the extension of stock warrants and the issuance of new convertible debt and stock warrants as part of the financing closed in the second quarter of 2020. The 2020 increase was limited to changes in stock prices and remaining life of the underlying securities. Likewise, the increase in interest expense is reflective of the Company’s increase in debt. See the legal summary for a more detail discussion of the arbitration award.

 

NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST. The non-controlling interest portion of the net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 was $0 and $61,589, respectively. This represented the non-controlling interest share of Dyna México’s loss. The 2020 allocation included only the non-controlling interest’s share of the net loss for January and February as the non-controlling interest was eliminated at the end of February 2020.

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS). Comprehensive income (loss) includes the Company’s net income (loss) plus the unrealized currency translation gain (loss) for the period. The Company’s other comprehensive loss for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 consisted of unrealized currency gains (losses) of $(371,407) and $1,144,987, respectively. The change is due to the variances in the peso exchange rates throughout the two periods.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

As of June 30, 2021, the Company had working capital of $(5,282,043), comprised of current assets of $18,477,783 and current liabilities of $23,759,826. This represented an increase of $496,949 from the working capital maintained by the Company of $(5,778,992) as of December 31, 2020. The primary reason for the increase was the increase in accounts receivable and inventory.

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operations for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 was $8,271,206 and $(3,429,944), respectively. The increase is primarily the result of the Company’s operating profit and increase in customer advances as a result of the Company’s increased production in its mining and pilot milling operations during the six months in 2021.

 

Net cash provided by (used) in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 was $0 and $0, respectively. Expenditures necessary for the expansion of mining operations totaled $111,702 and $21,219 in the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, would normally have been included in this category were expenses due to the company’s lack of proven and probable reserves.

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 was $(36,460) and $3,178,185, respectively. In the 2020 period, the Company received $3,275,000 loan proceeds and $45,000 of advances from stockholders. The Company used $(36,460) and $(141,815) for repayments of long-term debt and convertible notes in the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

 

 
42

Table of Contents

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

As of June 30, 2021, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, which have or are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

 

Plan of Operation

 

The Plan of operation for the next twelve months includes DynaMineras continuing the improvement and expansion of the test mining and pilot milling operations at SJG. The Company commenced its testing activities in fall 2015 at the rate of approximately 100 tons per 24-hour operating day from the mine and approximately the same output from the processing plant. Over the past five years, the Company has gradually increased its output to approximately 200 tons per 24-hour operating day from the mines and processing plant. In 2021, the Company completed its phases of expansion to reach the output of approximately 300 tons per 24-hour operating day from the mine and the processing plant.

 

The Company funds its general and administrative expenses in the US, from the Company’s operating subsidiaries, DynaMineras and DynaOperaciones. These amounts are eliminated in consolidation. The Company believes that cash on hand, and including cash flow generated from its current operations, is adequate to fund its ongoing general and administrative expenses through the subsequent twelve months.

 

Capital Expenditures

 

The Company’s primary activities relate to the test mining and pilot milling operations of the SJG property through its 100% owned operating subsidiary, DynaMineras. DynaMineras is conducting activities at SJG under the terms of the Exploitation Amendment Agreement (the “EAA”, or “operating agreement”) with DynaMéxico.

 

No Known Reserves

 

The SJG property is without known reserves. Under U.S. standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless a determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made.

 

Exploitation Amendment Agreement (“EAA”)

 

On May 15, 2013, DynaMineras entered into an Exploitation Amendment Agreement (“EAA”) with DynaMéxico. The EAA grants to DynaMineras the right to finance, explore, develop and exploit the SJG Property, in exchange for: (A) Reimbursement of all costs associated with financing, maintenance, exploration, development and exploitation of the SJG Property, which costs are to be charged and billed by DynaMineras to DynaMéxico; and, (B) After Item (A) above, the receipt by DynaMineras of 75% of gross receipts received by DynaMéxico from the sale of all minerals produced from SJG, to the point that DynaMineras has received 200% of its advanced funds; and, (C) after items (A) and (B) above; the receipt by DynaMineras of 50% of all gross receipts received by DynaMéxico from the sale of all minerals produced from SJG, and throughout the term of the EAA; and, (D) in addition to Items (A), (B), and (C) above, DynaMineras shall receive a 2.5% NSR (“Net Smelter Royalty”) on all minerals sold from SJG over the term of the EAA. The total Advances made by DynaMineras to DynaMéxico as of December 31, 2014 is $4,025,000. The EAA is the third and latest Amendment to the original Contract Mining Services and Mineral Production Agreement (the “Operating Agreement”), which was previously entered into by DynaMineras with DynaMéxico in April 2005, wherein DynaMineras was named the Exclusive Operating Entity at SJG. The Operating Agreement was previously amended in September 2006 (the “First Amendment”) and amended again at July 15, 2011 (the “Second Amendment”). The Term of the Second Amendment is 20 years, and the EAA (Third Amendment) provides for the continuation of the 20 Year Term from the date of the Second Amendment (July 15, 2011).

 

Exclusive Operating Entity at San Jose de Gracía

 

Under agreement with DynaMéxico, Mineras de DynaResource S.A. de C.V. (“DynaMineras”) has been named the exclusive operating entity at the San Jose de Gracía Project. DynaResource owns 100% of DynaMineras.

 

DynaMéxico General Powers of Attorney

 

The Chairman-CEO of DynaUSA also serves as the President of DynaMéxico and as the President of DynaMineras. The President of DynaMéxico holds broad powers of attorney granted by the shareholders of DynaMéxico which gives the current President significant and broad authority within DynaMéxico.

 

 
43

Table of Contents

 

Note Receivable and Investments in Affiliate

 

DynaResource Nevada, Inc., a Nevada Corporation (“DynaNevada”), with one operating subsidiary in México, DynaNevada de México, S.A. de C.V. (“DynaNevada de México”) have common officers, directors and shareholders. The total amount loaned by the Company to DynaNevada at December 31, 2010 was $805,760. The terms of the Note Receivable provided for a “Convertible Loan,” repayable at 5% interest over a 3-year period, and convertible at the Company’s option into Common Stock of DynaNevada at $0.25 / Share. On December 31, 2010, the Company converted its receivable from DynaNevada into 3,223,040 Shares of DynaNevada; and as a result, the Company owns 19.92% of the outstanding shares of DynaNevada. DynaNevada is therefore a related entity, and through its subsidiary in México (DynaNevada de México), (“DynaNevada de México”), has entered into an Option agreement with Grupo México (“IMMSA”) in México, for the exploration and development of approximately 3,000 hectares in the State of San Luis Potosi (“the Santa Gertrudis Property”). The Company had a receivable from DynaResource Nevada, Inc. of $70,294 and $71,465 at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 respectively. The Company has an investment balance in DynaResource Nevada, Inc. of $70,000 and $70,000 as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.

   

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

We carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of June 30, 2021. This evaluation was accomplished under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer / principal executive officer and our financial consultant who concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective to ensure that all material information required to be filed in the annual report on Form 10-K has been made known to them. The evaluation did not include a 404A assessment. For purposes of this section, the term disclosure controls and procedures mean controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act (15 U.S.C. 78a et seg.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure, controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act") is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

 

The Company has not made any changes in its internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
44

Table of Contents

 

PART II

 

ITEM 1 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

Arbitration filed by Goldgroup / DynaMéxico Complaint against Goldgroup

 

On March 14, 2014, Goldgroup filed for arbitration in the United States with the American Arbitration Association ("AAA"), citing the Earn In Agreement dated September 1, 2006 as the basis for the arbitration filing. The Company filed an answer on April 10, 2014, disputing that any issues exist which provide for arbitration.

 

DynaResource de Mexico filed Civil Claims again Goldgroup Mining Inc., and Goldgroup Resources Inc. requesting Damages of $50M USD

 

On December 9, 2014, DynaMéxico filed an Ordinary commercial lawsuit (Civil Claims) against Goldgroup Mining Inc., its parent company Goldgroup Resources Inc., and the AAA, in the Thirty Sixth Civil Court in the Federal District of México, under file 1120 number / 2014 ("the DynaMéxico Trial"). The DynaMéxico Trial sought to terminate the U.S.-based arbitration proceedings, as DynaMéxico believes there is no legal basis for arbitration, and to nullify the arbitration proceedings since Goldgroup previously sought recourse in Mexican courts. In the DynaMéxico Trial, DynaMéxico also requests that substantial damages (in the amount of US $50 million) be awarded to DynaMéxico against Goldgroup for:

 

 

h)

Wrongfully using and disseminating confidential information and data belonging to DynaMéxico;

 

I)

Asserting that Goldgroup owns any interest in the San Jose de Gracía Project in northern Sinaloa, México, rather than accurately disclosing that Goldgroup owns a common shares equity interest (shareholder’s interest) in DynaMéxico;

 

j)

Improperly disclosing the percentage of common shares equity interest (shareholder’s interest) owned by Goldgroup in DynaMéxico;

 

k)

Improperly disclosing or implying that Goldgroup is the operator of the San Jose de Gracía Project;

 

l)

Attempting to delay, stop, or otherwise impair the financing of, and further development of, the SJG Project;

 

m)

Making numerous threats against DynaMéxico management and officers;

 

n)

Failing to properly disclose that broad powers of attorney for acting on behalf of DynaMéxico are held by an individual not affiliated with Goldgroup.

 

On October 5, 2015, the Thirty Sixth Civil Court of the Superior Court of Justice of the Federal District of México (Tribunal Superior de Justicia del Distrito Federal), file number 1120/2014 declared, among other resolutions, that:

 

 

a)

The AAA must “cease and desist” from the arbitration proceeding;

 

b)

The AAA does not have jurisdiction to hear any conflict and/or interpretation arising from the Earn In/Option Agreement, dated September 1, 2006; and

 

c)

The AAA does not have jurisdiction to hear disputes arising between shareholders of DynaMexico, which disputes do not arise directly and immediately from the Earn In/Option Agreement, dated September 1, 2006.

 

$48M Damages Awarded to DynaMéxico

 

Also on October 5, 2015, DynaMéxico was awarded in excess of US $48 million in damages from Goldgroup Resources, Inc. by virtue of a Sentencia Definitiva (the “Definitive Sentence”) issued by the Thirty Sixth Civil Court of the Superior Court of Justice of the Federal District of México (Tribunal Superior de Justicia del Distrito Federal), File number 1120/2014. The Definitive Sentence included the considerations and resolutions by the Court, and additional Resolutions were also ordered in favor of DynaMéxico (together the damages award and the additional Resolutions are referred to as, the “Oct. 5, 2015 Resolution”).

 

A concise translation to English of the Oct. 5, 2015 Resolution (the resolution portion of the Definitive Sentence) is set forth below:

 

FIRST:

The action and litigation based on commercial law filed by DynaMéxico is valid and enforceable, and where Goldgroup and the American Arbitration Association were found to be in default, was proper.

SECOND:

Goldgroup is declared in breach of its corporate duties, for failure to refrain from claiming direct ownership of 50% of the San José de Gracía Mining Project.

THIRD:

Goldgroup is condemned and ordered to pay to DynaMéxico the amount of USD $20,000,000 (Twenty Million Dollars) in damages caused by Goldgroup to DynaMéxico, deriving from its breach of obligations in refraining from claiming direct ownership of 50% of the San Jose de Gracía Mining Project; which amount should be paid within five days upon execution of this order and resolution.

FOURTH:

Goldgroup is condemned and ordered to pay to DynaMéxico the amount of USD $28,280,808.34 (Twenty Eight Million Two Hundred and Eighty Thousand Eight Hundred and Eight and 34/100 Dollars), for breach of its corporate duty and covenants with regards to the San Jose de Gracía mining project, as a result of depriving profits from DynaMéxico which DynaMéxico could have earned for the sale of gold produced and extracted during the years 2013 and 2014; amounts that should be paid within five days upon execution of this order and resolution.

 

 
45

Table of Contents

   

FIFTH:

Goldgroup is condemned and ordered to pay losses and damages to DynaMéxico, which Goldgroup continues to cause, until full payment of the above-mentioned amounts has been made, which damages, and losses shall be calculated by an expert opinion in a corresponding legal procedure related to this litigation.

SIXTH:

Pursuant to Article 1424 of the Commercial Code of México, the arbitration provision established under clause 8.16 of the Earn In/Option Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2006, is ineffective and impossible to execute.

SEVENTH:

This court declares that any controversy arising from the Ear In/Option Agreement must be brought and resolved under Mexican Law and by competent Mexican Courts with proper jurisdiction, in recognition of the waiver and exclusion of the arbitration clause (contained in the Earn In/Option Agreement) by both parties.

EIGHT:

This Court declares that the American Arbitration Association must abstain from hearing arbitration procedure number 50 501 T 00226 14, or any other ongoing and/or future arbitration proceeding already filed or that may be filed by the co-defendant Goldgroup against DynaResource.

NINTH:

This Court declares that the American Arbitration Association does not have jurisdiction to hear any conflict and/or interpretation arising from the Earn In/Option Agreement, dated September 1, 2006.

TENTH:

This Court declares that the American Arbitration Association does not have jurisdiction to hear disputes arising between shareholders of DynaMéxico, which disputes do not arise directly and immediately from the Earn In/Option Agreement, dated September 1, 2006.

ELEVENTH:

This Court declares that the American Arbitration Association does not have jurisdiction to hear any matters where Koy Wilber Diepholz, who is the President of the Board of Directors of DynaMéxico and has been personally sued in relation to the arbitration clause established under clause 8.16 of the Earn In/Option Agreement, dated September 1, 2006, since he signed the mentioned instrument in representation of the Company and not in his personal capacity.

TWELFTH:

 

The expenses and costs associated with these proceedings are hereby waived.

THIRTEENTH:

 

LET IT SO BE PUBLISHED. A Copy of this order and Sentence shall be found in the corresponding records.

 

 

ORDERED, adjudged and decreed by the Thirty Sixth Civil Judge of the Superior Court of the Federal District, Mr. JULIO GABRIEL IGLESIAS GOMEZ.

 

The October 5, 2015 Resolution constitutes a public record which may be viewed through the Courts in México City.

 

México City Court Approves Lien on Shares of DynaMéxico owned by Minority Interest Holder

 

On October 5, 2016, the Thirty-Sixth Civil Court of the Superior Court of Justice of the Federal District of México (Tribunal Superior de Justicia del Distrito Federal) approved a Lien (referred to by the court as an “Embargo”), in favor of DynaMéxico, upon Stock Certificates in the name of Goldgroup Resources Inc. (“Goldgroup”). The Stock Certificates subject to the Lien (“Embargo”) constitute Shares of DynaMéxico (“the Goldgroup DynaMéxico Shares”).

 

The Goldgroup DynaMéxico Shares were seized as a partial recovery of assets by DynaMéxico after DynaMéxico was awarded more than $48M USD (Forty-Eight Million Dollars) in damages against Goldgroup (the “Damages against Goldgroup”) on October 05, 2015, as described in a Sentencia Definitiva (the “Definitive Sentence”) issued by the same court, the Thirty Sixth Civil Court of the Superior Court of Justice of the Federal District of México, File number 1120/2014. Excerpts from the Definitive Sentence appear below. In addition to the Damages against Goldgroup, the Definitive Sentence also included additional Resolutions ordered in favor of DynaMéxico (the Damages against Goldgroup and the additional Resolutions are together referred to as the “Oct. 5, 2015 Resolution”).

 

Denial of Amparo Appeal

 

On August 24, 2017 a Federal Amparo Judge (“Juzgado de Distrito”) in the State of Vera Cruz, México, dismissed Goldgroup Resources Inc’s Amparo Trial Challenge to the $48 M USD damages award previously granted in favor of DynaMéxico. Pursuant to the dismissal ruling, the $48M USD damages award, previously granted to DynaMéxico by the Thirty-Sixth Civil Court of the Superior Court of Justice of the Federal District of México on October 5, 2015, was effectively confirmed.

 

México Circuit Court of Appeals – Notice of Intent for Final Ruling in Favor of DynaResource de México

On May 27, 2019, The Eleventh Collegiate Court in Civil Matters of the First Circuit (“México Circuit Court”, and the Court of Final Appeal for Goldgroup Resources Inc.) issued a written notice confirming it was ruling against the Amparo Appeal filed by Goldgroup Resources Inc. and in Favor of DynaResource de México, S.A. de C.V. In an effort to stay the issuance of the Ruling by the México Circuit Court, Goldgroup Resources Inc. filed a request to The Supreme Court of México to review the Amparo Appeal decision.

 

Rejection of Goldgroup Resources Inc. request to the Supreme Court of México

On July 3, 2019 an Official Ruling from The Supreme Court of México was issued to Reject the Request of Goldgroup Resources Inc. (the “México Supreme Court Rejection to Goldgroup”). The Justices of the First Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of México issued a Rejection Notice to Goldgroup Resources Inc., “due to the lack of legitimacy presented by Goldgroup”; and in issuing the Rejection Notice to Goldgroup, the Supreme court thereby reverted the Amparo Appeal back to the México Circuit Court where the Official and Final Ruling from the México Circuit Court is expected to be issued.

 

 
46

Table of Contents

 

Final Legal Ruling in México (DynaMéxico Final Legal Ruling)

On December 6, 2019 the 11th Federal Circuit Collegiate Court in México issued its Final Ruling (“the DynaMéxico Final Legal Ruling”).

 

The DynaMéxico Final Legal Ruling is Favorable to DynaMéxico, and denies the Amparo challenge of Goldgroup Resources Inc., the subsidiary of Goldgroup Mining Inc. (“GGA.TO”). The DynaMéxico Final Legal Ruling constitutes the Final Appeal of Goldgroup Resources Inc.; and is Not subject to further appeal or protest.

 

The DynaMéxico Final Legal Ruling is the result and culmination of 7 years of legal action performed by DynaMéxico and is the Final Ruling of the 11th Federal Circuit Collegiate Court. With this DynaMéxico Final Legal Ruling issued, all matters before the Court in México with respect to DynaMéxico and Goldgroup Resources Inc. are fully resolved and are no longer subject to appeal or reconsideration.

 

Legal Summary - Consequence of the México Final Legal Ruling:

 

 

4.

The $48,280,808.34 USD damages award (dated October 05, 2015) in favor of DynaMéxico and against Goldgroup Resources Inc. is now Final. Goldgroup Resources’ challenge(s) to that award have been fully denied and the damages award is Final.

 

 

 

 

5.

The Lien against the Shares of DynaMéxico owned by Goldgroup Resources Inc. (established October 5, 2016, the “Lien against Goldgroup Shares”) is now fully confirmed, Final, and enforceable.

 

 

 

 

6.

Ownership of the shares of DynaMéxico currently held by Goldgroup Resources (currently representing 20% of the outstanding shares of DynaMéxico) are subject to the Lien against Goldgroup Shares.

 

DynaMéxico Recovery of 100% of Goldgroup Shares

On February 20, 2020, a México City court issued its Final Judgment, effectively foreclosing on all shares of DynaMéxico formerly held by Goldgroup Resources Inc. and awarding those shares to DynaMéxico (the “DynaMéxico Foreclosure Judgment”).

 

The DynaMéxico Foreclosure Judgment awarded to DynaMéxico 100% of the Shares of DynaMéxico previously owned by Goldgroup Resources Inc. (a Subsidiary Company in México owned 100% by Goldgroup Mining Inc., Vancouver, BC., “GGA.TO”). Prior to the DynaMéxico Foreclosure Judgment, Goldgroup Resources Inc. owned shares of DynaMéxico constituting 20% of the total outstanding shares of DynaMéxico (the “Goldgroup Shares of DynaMéxico”). The Goldgroup Shares of DynaMéxico were held under Lien by DynaMéxico since October 2016. DynaUSA previously owned 80% of the outstanding shares of DynaMéxico.

 

DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed an Original Petition for Recognition of the $48M USD Foreign Judgment in US. District Court, 134th Judicial District in Dallas County, Texas

 

 

·

 On December 5, 2020, DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed an Original Petition for Recognition of the $48M USD Foreign Judgment in US. District Court in Dallas County Texas.

 

·

 On February 4, 2021, DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed a First Amended Petition for Recognition of the $48M USD Foreign Judgment in US. District Court, 134th Judicial District, Dallas County, Texas.

 

·

 On May 12, 2021, The US District Court for Dallas County issued a ruling stating the Court was not obligated to recognize the $48M Judgment in the US.; but found the $48M Judgment to be final, conclusive and enforceable under Mexican Law.

 

DynaUSA and DynaMéxico Appeal of the US. District Court Ruling

 

On May 14, 2021, DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed a Notice of Appeal of the US District Court Ruling.

 

Arbitration Ruling

 

In direct contradiction to the October 5, 2015, Definitive Sentence issued by court in México, on August 25, 2016, the American Arbitration Association - International Centre for Dispute Resolution, Denver office (the “AAA”) issued an Arbitration Ruling (the “Arbitration Ruling”) in favor of Goldgroup Resources Inc. against DynaMéxico and DynaResource, Inc. The Arbitration Ruling was the result of a proceeding in which neither DynaMéxico nor DynaResource participated, since the Definitive Sentence issued by the court in México effectively prohibited their participation in the Arbitration proceeding and should have prohibited Goldgroup Resources Inc. participation.

 

The Arbitration Ruling provides the following: (i) the Earn In/Option Agreement is still in force, and consequently Goldgroup may appoint two directors to the DynaMéxico board, and may participate in the appointment of a fifth director; (ii) the DynaMéxico Management Committee is reinstated, and must approve all budgets and expenditures; (iii) amounts expended by DynaMéxico that were not approved by the Management Committee are subject to repayment by DynaResource; (iv) the issuance of additional shares by DynaMéxico (and consequent dilution of Goldgroup’s equity interest) was in violation of the Earn In/Option Agreement; and (v) DynaResource and DynaMéxico are responsible for Goldgroup’s costs and professional fees associated with the Arbitration Ruling.

 

 
47

Table of Contents

 

Unlike most arbitration proceedings in the U.S., the Arbitration Ruling is not final. Since the Arbitration Ruling is subject to international rules, the ruling may be vacated by U.S. courts, or simply not recognized by U.S. courts, on several grounds. Accordingly, both DynaMéxico and DynaResource have timely requested relief from the United States Federal District Court in Colorado, via the filing of a Petition for Nonrecognition of Foreign Arbitral Award and/or Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award (the “Petition for Nonrecognition”), and a supporting brief. The Petition for Nonrecognition relies heavily upon the Mexican court’s Definitive Sentence, key excerpts of which appear immediately below.

 

The Mexican court has already ruled that “any controversy arising from the Earn In/Option Agreement must be brought and resolved under Mexican Law and by competent Mexican Courts with proper jurisdiction.” Consequently, the monetary awards against DynaResource – which are based upon a finding that the Earn In/Option Agreement is still in force – will not be enforceable if the Mexican court rules that the Earn In/Option Agreement is terminated. The Company believes that the potential for the assessment of a material monetary judgment against DynaResource is remote.

 

 

(a)

The Arbitration Ruling contains an acknowledgement by the AAA that the AAA was named as a defendant in the legal demand filed by DynaMéxico in the Thirty Sixth Civil Court of the Superior Court of Justice of the Federal District of México (the “DynaMéxico Legal Demand”). The Arbitration Ruling also contains a statement that the AAA was not properly served notice of the DynaMéxico Legal Demand;

 

(b)

DynaMéxico obeyed the October 5, 2015 Court Order and did not attend the Arbitration hearing;

 

(c)

DynaMéxico will pursue all legal remedies in order to obtain a full dismissal of the Arbitration Ruling;

 

(d)

The Arbitration Ruling contains an acknowledgement by the AAA that the AAA was named as a defendant in the legal demand filed by DynaMéxico in the Thirty Sixth Civil Court of the Superior Court of Justice of the Federal District of México (the “DynaMéxico Legal Demand”). The Arbitration Ruling also contains a statement that the AAA was not properly served notice of the DynaMéxico Legal Demand;

 

DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed Motion to Vacate Arbitration Ruling

 

On November 17, 2016, DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed a Motion to Vacate the Arbitration Ruling in United States District Court, District of Colorado.

 

Recommendation to Vacate Arbitration Ruling issued by United States Magistrate Judge

 

On February 13, 2018 a Recommendation to Vacate the Arbitration Ruling was issued by a United States Magistrate Judge of the United States District Court, District of Colorado.

 

Arbitration Award against DynaResource, Inc. and DynaResource de México, S.A. de C.V.

 

On May 9, 2019, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado confirmed the August 2016 Arbitration award against DynaResource, Inc. and DynaResource de México, S.A. de C.V. The district court’s decision overruled the recommendation previously issued by the magistrate judge to sustain the DynaResource entities’ motion to vacate the arbitration award. Each of DynaResource, Inc. and DynaResource de México, S.A. de C.V. intends to exercise all its rights, as appropriate, including an appeal.

  

DynaResource Entities Filings in US District Court in Response to Arbitration Ruling

 

 

 

 

·

 DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed Motion to Alter Judgment

 

 

 

 

 

 On June 6, 2019, DynaUSA and DynaMéxico file a Motion to Alter Judgment.

 

 

 

 

·

 DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed Motion for Stay of Judgment Pending Appeal and to Waive Bond

 

 

 

 

 

 On June 7, 2019, DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed A Motion for Stay of Judgment Pending Appeal and to Waive Bond.

 

 

 

 

·

 DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed Motion for Leave to Supplement the Record

 

 

 

 

 

 On July 13, 2019, DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed A Motion for Leave to Supplement the Record with the following information:

 

 

 

 

·

 “Rejection of Goldgroup Resources Inc. request to the Supreme Court of México”

 

 

 

 

 

 On July 3, 2019, an Official Ruling from The Supreme Court of México was issued to Reject the Request of Goldgroup Resources Inc. (the “México Supreme Court Rejection to Goldgroup”). The Justices of the First Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of México issued a Rejection Notice to Goldgroup Resources Inc., “due to the lack of legitimacy presented by Goldgroup”; and in issuing the Rejection Notice to Goldgroup, the Supreme court thereby reverted the Amparo Appeal back to the México Circuit Court where the Official and Final Ruling from the México Circuit Court is expected to be issued.

 

 

 

 

·

 DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed Reply in Support of Motion to Alter Judgment.

 

 

 

 

 

 On July 23, 2019, DynaUSA and DynaMéxico filed a Reply in Support of Motion to Alter Judgment. Goldgroup Resources was confirmed to be misleading the US District Court with inaccurate reports of the ruling of the México Supreme Court Rejection.

 

 

 

 

·

 Final Legal Ruling in México (DynaMéxico Final México Legal Ruling)

 

 

 

 

 

 On December 6, 2019, the 11th Federal Circuit Collegiate Court in México issued its Final Ruling (“the DynaMéxico Final México Legal Ruling”).

 

 
48

Table of Contents

 

 

 

The DynaMéxico Final México Legal Ruling is Favorable to DynaMéxico, and denies the Amparo challenge of Goldgroup Resources Inc., the subsidiary of Goldgroup Mining Inc. (“GGA.TO”). The DynaMéxico Final México Legal Ruling constitutes the Final Appeal of Goldgroup Resources Inc.; and is Not subject to further appeal or protest.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The DynaMéxico Final Legal Ruling is the result and culmination of 7 years of legal action performed by DynaMéxico and is the Final Ruling of the 11th Federal Circuit Collegiate Court. With this DynaMéxico Final Legal Ruling issued, all matters before the Court in México with respect to DynaMéxico and Goldgroup Resources Inc. in México are fully resolved and are no longer subject to appeal or reconsideration.

 

 

 

 

 

·

 Legal Summary - Consequence of the México Final Legal Ruling:

 

 

 

 

 

 

o

 The $48,280,808.34 USD damages award (dated October 05, 2015) in favor of DynaMéxico and against Goldgroup Resources Inc. is now Final. Goldgroup Resources’ challenge(s) to that award have been fully denied and the damages award is Final.

 

 

o

 The Lien against the Shares of DynaMéxico owned by Goldgroup Resources Inc. (established October 5, 2016, the “Lien against Goldgroup Shares”) is now fully confirmed, Final, and enforceable.

 

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

None.

 

ITEM 3. Default Upon Senior Securities

 

None.

 

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

 

As the Company has no mines located in the United States or any of its territories, the disclosure required by this Item is not applicable.

 

ITEM 5. Other Information

 

None.

 

 
49

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 6. Exhibits

 

Exhibit Number; Name of Exhibit

 

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as enacted by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as enacted by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

32.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 
50

Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

DynaResource, Inc.
     
By: /s/ K.W. (“K.D.”) Diepholz

 

K.W. (“KD”) Diepholz, Chairman / CEO

  
   
Date: August 11, 2021   

  

 
51

 

Dynaresource (QB) (USOTC:DYNR)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2022 to May 2022 Click Here for more Dynaresource (QB) Charts.
Dynaresource (QB) (USOTC:DYNR)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2021 to May 2022 Click Here for more Dynaresource (QB) Charts.