UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14A INFORMATION
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange
Act of 1934 (Amendment No. __)
|
|
Filed
by the Registrant |
|
Filed
by a Party other than the Registrant |
Check
the appropriate box: |
|
Preliminary
Proxy Statement |
|
CONFIDENTIAL,
FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14A-6(E)(2)) |
|
Definitive
Proxy Statement |
|
Definitive
Additional Materials |
|
Soliciting
Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
(Name
of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name
of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the registrant)
Payment
of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
|
No
fee required. |
|
Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. |
|
(1)
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
(2)
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
(3)
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount
on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
(4)
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
(5)
Total fee paid: |
|
Fee
paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
Check
box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting
fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date
of its filing. |
|
(1)
Amount previously paid: |
|
(2)
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
(3)
Filing Party: |
|
(4)
Date Filed: |
2020
Annual General Meeting
of Shareholders
Proxy Statement
DEAR
FELLOW SHAREHOLDERS
JACQUES
AIGRAIN
Chairman
of the Board of Directors
BHAVESH
(BOB) PATEL
Chief
Executive Officer
April
[__], 2020
$9.58
2019
EARNINGS PER
SHARE
(DILUTED)
$3.4B
2019
NET INCOME
$5.7B
2019
EBITDA
On
behalf of our Board, we thank you for your investment in our Company and welcome your vote at our 2020 annual meeting.
LEADING.
ADVANTAGED. DISCIPLINED.
LyondellBasell
is committed to maintaining its leading
global portfolio of proven,
flexible, and focused businesses, advantaged
position as the industry’s
best operator, and disciplined
capital allocation that supports
value-driven growth. In 2019, we exhibited strong cash generation and extended our record of industry-leading safety performance
and cost management. We also advanced our organic growth projects while realizing synergies from the acquisition and integration
of A. Schulman’s businesses. In the face of industry headwinds, LyondellBasell’s resilient asset portfolio and commitment
to operational excellence have delivered earnings stability for our investors. We are continuing to execute our strategy as we navigate the global challenges presented by the coronavirus pandemic, maintaining business continuity while prioritizing the health and safety of our employees and the larger community.
COMMITTED
TO SUSTAINABILITY
2019
saw LyondellBasell and its fellow founding members launch the Alliance to End Plastic Waste and achieve significant milestones
for our innovative mechanical and molecular recycling initiatives. We also announced the first simultaneous production of bio-based
polypropylene and low-density polyethylene, two of the most common types of plastics, at commercial-scale and published our second
annual sustainability report. We are continually evaluating opportunities to use our advantaged technologies and know-how to build
a more sustainable future for our industry.
BUILDING
A STRONGER TEAM
Our
Board is committed to having one of the best leadership teams in the industry. In 2019, we welcomed four new senior executives
to the Company, including Michael McMurray, EVP and CFO; Ken Lane, EVP, Global Olefins & Polyolefins; Torkel Rhenman, EVP,
Global Intermediates & Derivatives; and Anup Sharma, SVP, Global Business Services – a new function with responsibility
for accelerating the Company’s digital initiatives.
We
thank you for your continued support of LyondellBasell Industries and encourage you to cast your vote as soon as possible to ensure
your shares are represented at the meeting.
Very
truly yours,
JACQUES
AIGRAIN
Chair
of the Board |
BHAVESH
(BOB) PATEL
CEO
|
|
|
NOTICE
OF AND AGENDA FOR 2020
ANNUAL
GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
MEETING
INFORMATION
FRIDAY,
MAY 29, 2020
1:00 p.m. Local Time
LyondellBasell Industries
Delftseplein 27E
3013 AA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
ITEMS
OF BUSINESS
1. |
Elect
our Board of Directors; |
2. |
Discharge
our directors from liability in connection with the exercise of their duties during 2019; |
3. |
Adopt
our 2019 Dutch statutory annual accounts; |
4. |
Appoint
the external auditor for our 2020 Dutch statutory annual accounts; |
5. |
Ratify
the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm; |
6. |
Provide
an advisory vote on our executive compensation (say-on-pay); |
7. |
Approve
the interim dividends declared and paid out of our 2019 Dutch statutory annual accounts; |
8. |
Authorize
the repurchase of up to 10% of our issued share capital; and |
9. |
Approve
the cancellation of all or a portion of the shares held in our treasury account. |
We
will also discuss our corporate governance, dividend policy, and executive compensation program.
By
order of the Board,
CHARITY
R. KOHL
Corporate
Secretary
April
[__], 2020
HOW
TO VOTE |
Your
vote is important. You are eligible to vote if you are a shareholder of record at the close of business on May 1, 2020. |
|
|
|
|
|
ONLINE |
BY
PHONE |
BY
MAIL |
IN
PERSON |
Visit
the website on your proxy card |
Call
the telephone number on your proxy card |
Sign,
date and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope |
Attend
the annual meeting in person See pages 63-64 |
|
If
you are a registered shareholder, you may vote online at www.proxyvote.com, by telephone, or by mailing a proxy card. If you
hold your shares through a bank, broker, or other institution, you may vote your shares through the method specified on the
voting instruction form provided to you. |
|
Due
to concerns resulting from the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak and related restrictions on travel and public gatherings, in
person attendance at the 2020 annual general meeting of shareholders may not be possible or advisable. We are therefore providing
virtual access to shareholders through a live webcast. Shareholders will be able to ask questions during and in advance of
the meeting but will be required to vote their shares by proxy in advance. We are continuing to monitor COVID-19 developments
closely and considering options to protect the health and safety of all meeting participants. If we determine to make alternative
arrangements for the meeting, we will announce that decision by press release as soon as practicable.
If
you would like to attend the meeting via webcast or in person (if possible), notice must be given to the Company no later
than May 22, 2020. Additional information regarding in person attendance or access to the live webcast will be provided at
that time. See pages 63-64 for additional information.
|
|
Important
Notice Regarding Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2020 Annual General Meeting |
|
This
proxy statement and our 2019 annual report to shareholders are available on our website at www.LyondellBasell.com by clicking
“Investors,” then “Company Reports.” This proxy statement is first being mailed to shareholders on
or about April [__], 2020. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM 1 |
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
|
|
The Board recommends that you vote FOR the
election of each of the nominees to our Board of Directors. |
The Board of Directors of LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (“LyondellBasell” or
the “Company”) recommends that each of the eleven director nominees introduced below be re-elected to our Board, in
each case for a term ending at our 2021 annual general meeting. All nominees are current directors who were elected by shareholders
at the 2019 annual general meeting of shareholders.
OUR
BOARD
Our
Nominating and Governance Committee focuses on Board succession planning and refreshment and is responsible for recruiting and
recommending nominees to the full Board for election. From time to time, the Nominating and Governance Committee also uses outside
consultants to assist in identifying potential director candidates. Our goal is to have a Board that provides effective oversight
of the Company through the appropriate balance of experience, expertise, skills, specialized knowledge, and other qualifications
and attributes. Director candidates also must be willing and able to devote the time and attention necessary to engage in relevant,
informed discussion and decision-making. Our Board considers diversity a priority and seeks representation across a range of attributes,
including race and gender. The Nominating and Governance Committee, as well as its outside consultants, include women and minority
candidates in each pool from which a director candidate is selected.
These
recruitment efforts are evidenced by our current Board composition and the qualities and qualifications of each of our nominees.
DIRECTOR EXPERIENCE
AND EXPERTISE
|
|
Aigrain |
Benet |
Bindra |
Buchanan |
Cooper |
Dicciani |
Farley |
Goren |
Hanley |
Manifold |
Patel |
|
INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE
Experience with and understanding of the chemicals and refining industries |
|
|
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
|
● |
|
HSE EXPERIENCE
Experience with social responsibility issues related to health, safety, and the environment |
|
|
● |
|
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
STRATEGIC PLANNING
Knowledge of corporate strategy and strategic planning |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS
Experience with mergers, acquisitions, and other strategic transactions |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
CORPORATE FINANCE
Financial expertise and experience with corporate finance |
● |
● |
|
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT / CEO EXPERIENCE
Executive management experience with large or international organizations |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Knowledge of corporate governance issues applicable to companies listed on the NYSE |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTOR
Service on the boards of other public companies |
● |
|
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 7
DIRECTORS’
INDEPENDENCE, TENURE, AND DIVERSITY
Our director nominees
provide the Board with a broad range of perspectives due to their diverse gender, age, ethnicity, nationality, and tenure profiles,
as well as the qualifications and skills identified above. Each of the ten non-executive directors nominated to our Board is independent.
DIRECTOR
NOMINATIONS
Although
our Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for recommending director candidates to the Board, under the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), candidates may also be proposed by other directors, management, and
our shareholders.
Any shareholder
who wishes to recommend a director candidate should submit a written recommendation to our Corporate Secretary at LyondellBasell
Industries, 4th Floor, One Vine Street, London W1J 0AH, United Kingdom. The recommendation must include the name of
the nominated individual, relevant biographical information, and the individual’s consent to nomination. For our 2021 annual
general meeting of shareholders, recommendations must be received by December [__], 2020 to be considered.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 8
2020 NOMINEES TO THE BOARD
On the recommendation
of the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Board has nominated eleven continuing directors for election to the Board. These
eleven individuals have a high caliber and diverse array of expertise, experience, and leadership skills.
Rudy van der Meer will
not stand for re-election to the Board as he has reached our mandatory retirement age. Our Nominating and Governance Committee,
together with its consultants, is evaluating potential director candidates to fill the vacancy created by Mr. van der Meer’s
departure. If a leading candidate is identified prior to the Company’s 2021 annual general meeting of shareholders, the Board
intends to appoint a director to serve as a temporary replacement for the partial-year term ending at that general meeting.
We introduce our eleven
nominees below.
JACQUES AIGRAIN |
Age 65
French-Swiss
Non-Executive Director
since 2011;
Chair since 2018
INDEPENDENT |
BIOGRAPHY
Mr. Aigrain is our Chair
of the Board and a Senior Advisor and former Partner of Warburg Pincus, a global private equity firm. Prior to joining Warburg
Pincus in 2013, Mr. Aigrain served as Chief Executive Officer of Swiss Re, a publicly traded insurance company, and was Co-Global
Head of M&A and Head of Financial Institutions at J.P. Morgan. He also has many years of experience as a director of public
and multinational organizations including The London Stock Exchange Group plc and WPP plc, a multinational advertising and public
relations company. Mr. Aigrain’s more than 30 years of financial services and management experience provide him with expertise
in all areas of strategy, mergers and acquisitions, finance, and capital markets. Additionally, he brings substantial knowledge
of board- and governance-related matters. |
EDUCATION
●
Université Paris Dauphine, M.A., Economics
●
Sorbonne University, Ph.D., Economics |
|
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS
●
Corporate Finance
●
Mergers & Acquisitions
●
International Operations
●
Corporate Governance |
●
Strategic Planning
●
Capital Markets
●
CEO Experience
●
Public Company Director Experience |
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS
●
The London Stock Exchange Group plc (since 2013)
●
WPP plc (since 2013) |
FORMER PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS
●
Lufthansa German Airlines (2007-2015) |
|
|
|
LINCOLN BENET |
Age 56
American-British
Non-Executive
Director
since 2015
INDEPENDENT |
BIOGRAPHY
Mr. Benet has served as
Chief Executive Officer of Access Industries, a privately held industrial group with world-wide holdings, since 2006. Prior to
joining Access, he spent 17 years at Morgan Stanley, including as Managing Director. Mr. Benet also has experience serving on the
boards of several privately-held companies, including those in the investment, music and publishing, oil and gas pipes and tubing,
cement, sports media, and petrochemicals industries. As a result of this background, he brings to our board a working knowledge
of global markets, mergers and acquisitions, executive management, strategic planning, and corporate strategy, as well as experience
with international finance, including corporate finance matters such as treasury, insurance, and tax. |
EDUCATION
●
Yale University, B.A., Economics
●
Harvard Business School, M.B.A. |
|
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS
●
Strategic Planning
●
Mergers & Acquisitions
●
International Operations
●
Corporate Governance |
●
Corporate Finance
●
Capital Markets
●
CEO Experience |
|
|
|
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 9
JAGJEET (JEET) BINDRA |
Age 72
American
Non-Executive
Director
since 2011
INDEPENDENT |
BIOGRAPHY
Mr. Bindra is a retired
executive of Chevron, a multinational energy corporation, where he spent 32 years in senior leadership positions and retired as
President of the company’s worldwide manufacturing operations. Mr. Bindra holds a degree in chemical engineering and started
his career at Chevron as a research engineer before progressing to increasingly senior positions, including the roles of Manager
of Strategic Planning and Group Manager of Projects & Engineering Technology. His education and background provide him with
extensive knowledge of global manufacturing, capital project management, engineering technology, strategic business planning, and
health, safety, and environmental and operations matters. Mr. Bindra has served as a director of multiple private and publicly
traded companies, including Edison International and its subsidiary, Southern California Edison, WorleyParsons, and Transocean
Ltd., and he has broad knowledge of board and governance matters. Mr. Bindra currently serves as a member of the board of HPCL-Mittal
Energy Limited (India). |
EDUCATION
●
Indian Institute of Technology, Bachelor of Technology, Chemical Engineering
●
University of Washington, M.S., Chemical Engineering
●
Saint Mary’s College of California, M.B.A. |
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS
●
Industry Experience
●
Capital Project Execution
●
Executive Management
●
Corporate Governance
●
Mergers & Acquisitions |
●
HSE Experience
●
Strategic Planning
●
International Operations
●
Public Company Director Experience |
FORMER PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS
●
Edison International / Southern California Edison Co. (2010-2017)
●
WorleyParsons (2015-2017) |
|
|
|
ROBIN BUCHANAN |
Age 68
British
Non-Executive
Director
since 2011
INDEPENDENT |
BIOGRAPHY
Mr. Buchanan is a director
of Cicap Ltd, a global private equity firm, a former director of Schroders plc, a global asset management firm, and the former
Chairman of PageGroup plc, a global specialist recruitment company. He was previously Dean and President of London Business School
and UK Senior Partner and member of the worldwide board of directors of Bain & Company Inc., a global business consulting firm,
where he continues to serve in an advisory role. He also serves as an advisor to Access Industries and Non-Executive Chairman of
its Advisory Board, which advises on portfolio strategy. Mr. Buchanan’s experience as a board member of publicly traded,
private, and charitable companies, Dean of a leading Business School, and long tenure with Bain provide him with deep experience
in strategy, leadership, board effectiveness, business development, and acquisitions across most industry sectors, including considerable
involvement with chemicals and energy in Europe. He also brings a wealth of experience in board and governance matters, particularly
as related to multi-national companies. Mr. Buchanan is a Chartered Accountant and a published author on strategy, acquisitions,
leadership, board effectiveness, corporate governance, and compensation. |
EDUCATION
●
Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales, F.C.A.
●
Harvard Business School, M.B.A. |
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS
●
Strategy Development
●
Industry Experience
●
Mergers & Acquisitions
●
Corporate Finance
●
Corporate Accounting
●
International Operations |
●
Leadership Development
●
Executive Management
●
Risk Management
●
Corporate Governance
●
Public Company Director Experience |
FORMER PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS
●
Schroders plc (2010-2019)
●
PageGroup plc (Chairman) (2011-2015) |
|
|
|
|
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 10
STEPHEN COOPER |
Age 73
American
Non-Executive Director
since 2010
INDEPENDENT |
BIOGRAPHY
Mr. Cooper has served
as Chief Executive Officer and Director of Warner Music Group Corp., a recorded music and music publishing business, since 2011.
He has also been a Managing Partner of Cooper Investment Partners, a private equity firm specializing in underperforming companies,
since 2008. In the course of a long career as a financial advisor and corporate turnaround specialist, Mr. Cooper has served as
the top executive of a number of publicly traded companies, including as Chief Executive Officer of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.,
a media company focused on film and television, and Hawaiian Telecom, the dominant telecom services provider in Hawaii. Mr. Cooper
has expansive knowledge and experience relating to all matters of executive management, finance, and strategy, and due to his role
as a sitting CEO he has deep insight into day-to-day business, management, and strategy issues. |
EDUCATION
●
Occidental College, M.A.
●
University of Pennsylvania Wharton School of Business, M.B.A. |
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS
●
Strategic Planning
●
Capital Markets
●
Corporate Finance
●
International Operations
●
Corporate Governance |
●
Mergers & Acquisitions
●
Industry Experience
●
CEO Experience
●
HSE Experience
●
Public Company Director Experience |
|
|
|
NANCE DICCIANI |
Age 72
American
Non-Executive
Director
since 2013
INDEPENDENT |
BIOGRAPHY
Ms. Dicciani is a retired
senior executive and chemical engineer. She spent her early career in research and development at Air Products and Chemicals, and
then joined Rohm and Haas, a specialty chemicals manufacturer, as business director for the Petroleum Chemicals Division. After
10 years with Rohm and Haas in which she rose to the level of Senior Vice President, Ms. Dicciani became President and Chief Executive
Officer of Honeywell Specialty Materials, also a chemicals manufacturer. Ms. Dicciani served on the Executive Committees of the
American Chemistry Council and the Society of Chemical Industry and was appointed by George W. Bush to the President’s Council
of Advisors on Science and Technology. Her background provides her with specific industry knowledge and an understanding of manufacturing,
health, safety, and environmental matters; insight into the competitive landscape relevant to our industry; and a wealth of experience
in all areas of executive management. Ms. Dicciani also has extensive experience in board and governance matters and has served
as a director of several public companies, including Halliburton, an oilfield services company, and Linde, an industrial gases
company. |
EDUCATION
●
Villanova University, B.S., Chemical Engineering
●
University of Virginia, M.S., Chemical Engineering
●
University of Pennsylvania, Ph.D., Chemical Engineering
●
University of Pennsylvania Wharton School, M.B.A. |
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS
●
Industry Experience
●
HSE Experience
●
Capital Project Execution
●
Mergers & Acquisitions
●
Capital Markets
●
Public Company Director Experience |
●
International Operations
●
CEO Experience
●
Strategic Planning
●
Corporate Finance
●
Corporate Governance |
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS
●
Halliburton (since 2009)
●
AgroFresh Solutions, Inc. (since 2015)
●
Linde plc (since 2018) |
FORMER PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS
●
Praxair (2008-2018) |
|
|
|
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 11
CLAIRE FARLEY |
Age 61
American
Non-Executive
Director
since 2014
INDEPENDENT |
BIOGRAPHY
Ms. Farley is an advisor
to KKR Energy Group and a retired executive in the oil and gas exploration and production industry. Ms. Farley has served in several
roles with KKR Energy Group since 2011, including as Vice Chair from 2016 to 2017 and as a member of KKR Management LLC, the general
partner of a global investment firm, from 2013 to 2015. Prior to joining KKR, Ms. Farley served as Chief Executive Officer of Randall
& Dewey, an oil and gas asset transaction advisory firm. She became Co-President and then Senior Advisor at Jeffries &
Company after Randall & Dewey became its oil and gas investment banking group, and then co-founded RPM Energy, a privately-owned
oil and natural gas exploration and development company. Ms. Farley brings to the Board experience in business development, mergers,
acquisitions, and divestitures, as well as knowledge of the chemical industry’s feedstocks and their markets. She also has
experience in all matters of executive management and a deep understanding of public company and governance matters due to her
current and prior service on the boards of companies including Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Encana Corporation, and TechnipFMC. |
EDUCATION
●
Emory University, B.S., Exploration Geology |
|
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS
●
CEO Experience
●
Strategic Planning
●
Public Company Director Experience
●
Capital Markets |
|
●
Corporate Governance
●
HSE Experience
●
Mergers & Acquisitions
●
International Operations |
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS
●
TechnipFMC (since 2017) |
FORMER PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS
●
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation (2017-2019)
●
FMC Technologies, Inc. (2009-2017) |
|
|
|
ISABELLA (BELLA) GOREN |
Age 59
American
Non-Executive
Director
since 2014
INDEPENDENT |
BIOGRAPHY
Ms. Goren has served in
a wide range of executive roles in capital intensive and highly competitive global businesses, most recently as Chief Financial
Officer of American Airlines, Inc. and its parent company, AMR Corporation, from 2010 to 2013.* Her 27-year career at American
and AMR spanned leadership roles in Revenue Management, Investor Relations, Operations, and Customer Service, including being the
head of American’s Asia Pacific Division and Customer Relationship Marketing. Ms. Goren was also President of AMR Services,
an AMR Corporation subsidiary company with operations at 60 locations worldwide. Her experience and areas of expertise include
strategic planning, management of complex international operations, business development, global asset management, and corporate
finance. Ms. Goren is also a chemical engineer and began her career at DuPont. As a director of major multinational companies,
including MassMutual Financial Group and Gap Inc., she brings public company director experience and extensive knowledge of corporate
governance matters. |
|
EDUCATION
●
The University of Texas at Austin, B.S., Chemical Engineering
●
Southern Methodist University, M.B.A. |
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS
●
Executive Management
●
Corporate Finance
●
Global Asset Management
●
Mergers & Acquisitions
●
Corporate Governance |
|
●
International Operations
●
Strategic Planning
●
Capital Markets
●
HSE Experience
●
Public Company Director Experience |
OTHER CURRENT CORPORATE DIRECTORSHIPS
●
MassMutual Financial Group (since 2014)
●
Gap Inc. (since 2011) |
|
|
|
|
| * | AMR Corporation and American
Airlines, Inc. successfully completed a reorganization under Chapter 11 in 2013, for
which a voluntary petition was filed in 2011. |
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 12
MICHAEL HANLEY |
Age 54
Canadian
Non-Executive
Director
since 2018
INDEPENDENT |
BIOGRAPHY
Mr. Hanley has 25 years
of experience in senior management and finance roles, including as Chief Financial Officer of Alcan, a Canadian mining company
and aluminum manufacturer, President and CEO of Alcan’s Global Bauxite and Alumina business group, and Senior Vice President,
Operations & Strategy of the National Bank of Canada. He brings strong financial and operational experience, deep knowledge
of capital-intensive and process industries, experience with U.S. and international accounting standards, and a broad understanding
of international markets. Mr. Hanley also has significant experience on public company boards and in the role of audit committee
chair, and an appreciation for corporate governance matters and the board’s role in financial oversight. He is currently
a member of the board of the Quebec chapter of the non-profit Canadian Institute of Corporate Directors, and is a member of the
Quebec Order of Chartered Professional Accountants. |
EDUCATION
●
Hautes Etudes Commerciales, B.Commerce |
|
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS
●
Corporate Finance
●
Strategic Planning
●
International Operations
●
Public Company Director Experience |
●
Corporate Accounting
●
Capital Markets
●
Executive Management
●
Corporate Governance |
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS
●
BRP, Inc. (since 2012)
●
Shawcor Ltd. (since 2015) |
FORMER PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS
●
Industrial Alliance Insurance & Financial Services (2015-2019)
●
Groupe Jean Coutu (PJC), Inc. (2016-2018)
●
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (2012-2015) |
|
|
|
ALBERT MANIFOLD |
Age 57
Irish
Non-Executive
Director
since 2019
INDEPENDENT |
BIOGRAPHY
Mr. Manifold has been
the Group Chief Executive and a director of CRH plc, an international group of diversified building materials businesses supplying
the construction industry, since 2014. Mr. Manifold joined CRH in 1998 and advanced to increasingly senior roles, including Finance
Director of the Europe Materials Division, Group Development Director, Managing Director of Europe Materials, and Chief Operating
Officer (2009 to 2014). Prior to joining CRH, Mr. Manifold was Chief Operating Officer of Allen McGuire & Partners, a private
equity group. As a sitting CEO with a background in other senior management roles, Mr. Manifold has acquired extensive leadership
experience in competitive industries. In addition, he has significant knowledge of corporate finance, capital markets, strategic
planning, and international operations. Mr. Manifold is also a Fellow of the Institute of Certified Public Accountants in Ireland. |
EDUCATION
●
Institute of Certified Public Accountants in Ireland
●
Dublin City University, M.B.S., Strategic International Marketing
●
Dublin City University, M.B.A. |
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS
●
Corporate Finance
●
International Operations
●
Corporate Accounting
●
Mergers & Acquisitions |
|
●
CEO Experience
●
Capital Markets
●
Strategic Planning
●
Capital Project Execution |
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS
●
CRH plc (since 2009) |
|
|
|
|
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 13
BHAVESH (BOB) PATEL |
Age 53
American
Executive Director since 2018 |
BIOGRAPHY
Mr. Patel has served as
our Chief Executive Officer since January 2015. From the time he joined the Company in 2010 until his appointment as CEO, he held
the roles of Senior Vice President, Olefins and Polyolefins–Americas and Executive Vice President, Olefins and Polyolefins–Europe,
Asia, International & Technology, with additional responsibility for all manufacturing operations outside of the Americas and
the Company’s Polypropylene Compounding business. Taken together with his previous tenure with Chevron Corp. and Chevron
Phillips Chemical Company, Mr. Patel has more than 30 years’ experience in the chemicals, plastics, and refining industries,
including extensive leadership experience on a global basis. This background gives him a detailed understanding of the Company’s
industries and operations. Mr. Patel serves as a director of Union Pacific Corporation. |
EDUCATION
●
The Ohio State University, B.S., Chemical Engineering
●
Temple University, M.B.A. |
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS
●
Industry Experience
●
HSE Experience
●
CEO Experience
●
Corporate Finance
●
Corporate Governance
●
Public Company Director Experience |
●
Strategic Planning
●
Capital Project Execution
●
International Operations
●
International Business
●
Mergers & Acquisitions |
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS
●
Union Pacific Corporation (since 2017) |
|
|
|
|
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 14
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
LyondellBasell recognizes the importance of good corporate
governance as a driver of long-term stakeholder value. Our Board has adopted, and regularly reviews and strives to improve upon,
LyondellBasell’s robust corporate governance policies, practices, and procedures with consideration given to regulatory developments
and evolving U.S. and Dutch governance best practices. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Rules for the Board of Directors
are available on our website at www.LyondellBasell.com by clicking “Investors,” then “Corporate Governance.”
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Our Board annually reviews the independence of its
members. In February 2020, the Board affirmatively determined that all of our non-executive directors and director nominees are
independent under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”).
The Board has adopted categorical standards of independence
that meet, and in some instances exceed, the requirements of the NYSE. In order to qualify as independent under our categorical
standards, a director must be determined to have no material relationship with LyondellBasell other than as a director. The categorical
standards include strict guidelines for non-executive directors and their immediate families regarding employment or affiliation
with LyondellBasell and its independent registered public accounting firm. Our categorical independence standards are included
in our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
The Board has determined that there are no relationships
or transactions that prohibit any of our non-executive directors or nominees from being deemed independent under the categorical
standards and that each of our non-executive directors and nominees is independent. In addition to the relationships and transactions
that would bar an independence finding under the categorical standards, the Board considered all other known relationships and
transactions in making its determination, including those set forth below under “–Other Governance Matters–Related
Party Transactions.” In determining that no known transactions or relationships affect the independence of any of the non-executive
directors, the Board considered that all of the identified transactions are ordinary course and none of the dollar amounts involved
were material to the Company or the relevant counterparty.
BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE
Our Board is led by its independent Chair,
Jacques Aigrain. The Chair’s responsibilities include leading Board meetings and executive sessions, approving Board
meeting agendas and schedules, facilitating information flow and communication among directors, and serving as a liaison
between the Board and management, and supporting the Company’s strategic growth initiatives. The Board regularly reviews LyondellBasell’s leadership structure and the
responsibilities of its Chair, and may from time to time delegate additional duties to the role.
Under Dutch law, only a non-executive director may
serve as Chair of our Board. Our Board believes that the separation of the positions of Chair and Chief Executive Officer that
results from this governance structure promotes strong Board governance, independence, and oversight. The separation of the two
roles additionally allows Mr. Aigrain to focus on managing Board matters while our CEO, Mr. Patel, focuses on managing our business.
EXECUTIVE SESSIONS
Executive sessions of our Board take place at every regular Board meeting. During
executive sessions, directors have an opportunity to review and discuss matters such as the performance of the Chief Executive
Officer and other members of management and the criteria against which performance is evaluated, including the impact of performance
on compensation matters. Mr. Aigrain leads these executive sessions. If he is unavailable, the non-executive director with the
longest tenure will preside. If two or more individuals have equal tenure, the eldest of them will chair.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 15
BOARD EVALUATIONS
Our Board and its committees evaluate their own effectiveness
by participating in a robust self-assessment process overseen by the Nominating and Governance Committee. Each year, directors
respond to survey questions soliciting information to be used to improve the effectiveness of the Board and its committees. Survey
results are supplemented by one-on-one interviews conducted by Board leadership, and the Nominating and Governance Committee periodically
engages outside consultants to facilitate and refresh the evaluation process. An outside consultant was last engaged for the 2017
assessment cycle, and in 2018 the Board took steps to implement the feedback received and adjust the general process and areas
of focus for the assessment accordingly.
For 2019, the Board conducted its evaluation process as described below.
Development
and Approval of Evaluation Process and Topics |
|
In
September 2019, the Nominating and Governance Committee discussed and approved the overall process for the 2019 evaluation
cycle, including one-on-one interviews with the Chair in addition to survey responses. The Chair of the Nominating and
Governance Committee worked with the Corporate Secretary to develop lists of potential topics and questions for distribution
to the Board and each of its committees, which were approved by the Nominating and Governance Committee in November.
For
2019, the Committee also approved an individual evaluation process for the Chair, to be facilitated by the Chair of the
Nominating and Governance Committee through additional survey questions specific to his role.
Key
areas covered in the Board and committee surveys include membership; responsibilities; functionality; meetings; strategy;
senior management (including succession planning); focus on performance; ensuring financial robustness; building corporate
reputation; and matching risk with return. Committee members are also asked to consider whether each committee is functioning
in compliance with its charter and keeping the Board adequately informed and reviews its member skill sets and leadership.
Survey questions for the individual Chair assessment focused on effective management of meetings and facilitation of constructive
relationships and communication among Board members and with management. |
Distribution
of Surveys and Interview Process |
|
In
late 2019 and early 2020, Board members provided responses to the surveys anonymously, and also participated in one-on-one
interviews with, and received individual feedback from, the Chair of the Board.
In
parallel, senior executives provided their views of Board effectiveness and interactions with management through confidential
survey responses provided to the Corporate Secretary. |
Reporting
and Board Review of Results |
|
The
Corporate Secretary compiled feedback from the self-evaluation process, including feedback from management, which was discussed
during the February 2020 Board and committee meetings in executive sessions. Consideration was given to what actions, if any,
could enhance and further improve the functioning of the Board and its committees, as well as steps that can be taken to address
specific requests or perceived areas for improvement. |
DIRECTOR ONBOARDING, TRAINING, AND SITE VISITS
Our Board is committed to understanding its governance
responsibilities, evolving best practices, and all aspects of our Company and business. The Company provides an extensive
orientation program that enables each new director joining the Board to become familiar with LyondellBasell and to meet with
key members of the Company’s management and functional leaders. Mr. Hanley and Mr. Manifold, who joined our Board in
2018 and 2019, respectively, completed our onboarding program and met with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, Chief Legal Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, and additional members of the leadership team to discuss
our corporate structure, business strategy, operations, and segments, as well as tax, accounting, compliance, investor
relations, human resources, and health and safety matters, among other topics.
All of our directors are encouraged to participate in industry and governance
organizations and seek out training opportunities that will provide them with continuing education on key topics. Our directors
also have regular opportunities to visit the Company’s manufacturing and technology centers and meet with site management.
In addition, the Board is invited to tour the Company’s plants or facilities each year. In September 2019, members of the
Board visited the Company’s Cincinnati Technology Center.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 16
SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
We recognize the value of regular and consistent
communication with our shareholders and welcome investor input on environmental, social, governance, executive compensation,
and other matters. We regularly review general governance trends and emerging best practices and invite feedback from our
shareholders and other stakeholders, which is brought to our Board and instrumental in its decision-making process. In 2018
and 2019, we discussed the Company’s environmental, social, and governance profile with investors and engaged their
questions or concerns on these and other topics. Our independent Board Chair and the Chairs of our Nominating and Governance and Compensation Committees, as appropriate, make themselves available for these discussions. We are committed to remaining proactive in our engagement efforts and shareholder outreach.
COMMUNICATION WITH THE BOARD
Shareholders and other interested parties may communicate
with the Board or any individual director. Communications should be addressed to our Corporate Secretary at corporatesecretary@lyb.com
or LyondellBasell Industries, 4th Floor, One Vine Street, London W1J 0AH, United Kingdom.
Communications are distributed to the Board or to one
or more individual directors, as appropriate, depending on the facts and circumstances outlined in the communication. Communications
such as business solicitations or advertisements; junk mail and mass mailings; new product suggestions; product complaints; product
inquiries; and resumes and other forms of job inquiries will not be relayed to the Board. In addition, material that is unduly
hostile, threatening, illegal, or similarly unsuitable will be excluded. Any communication that is filtered out is made available
to any director upon request.
CEO AND MANAGEMENT SUCCESSION PLANNING
One of the primary responsibilities of the Board is to ensure
that we have a high-performing management team in place. On an annual basis, the Board conducts a detailed review of development
and succession planning activities to maximize the pool of internal candidates who can assume executive officer positions without
undue interruption. The Board reviews CEO and executive succession planning and ensures that executive officer reviews and evaluations
are conducted at least annually, by either the Compensation Committee or the Board as a whole. The Board also reviews in-depth
assessments of the Company’s bench strength, retention, progression, and succession readiness for all other senior level
managers.
Monitoring the Company’s leadership development,
talent management, and succession planning is also a key responsibility of our Compensation Committee, which devotes significant
time to discussion and oversight of the Company’s human resources strategy.
In 2019, the Company welcomed four new external hires to our leadership
team, each with significant experience in his role: Michael McMurray, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Torkel
Rhenman, Executive Vice President, Intermediates & Derivatives; Ken Lane, Executive Vice President, Global Olefins & Polyolefins;
and Anup Sharma, Senior Vice President, Global Business Services. In addition, the Company executed on its existing leadership
development and succession plans and promoted internal candidates to leadership team positions, including Dale Friedrichs, Senior
Vice President, Human Resources; Kim Foley, Vice President, Health, Safety and Environment; and Jim Seward, Senior Vice President,
Research & Development, Technology and Sustainability.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 17
BOARD OVERSIGHT OF RISK
While the Company’s CEO is responsible for assessing and managing the Company’s
day-to-day risks and related control systems, the Board has broad oversight of the Company’s risk profile and risk management.
In this oversight role, the Board is responsible for satisfying itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented
by management are functioning and that necessary steps are taken to foster a culture of risk-adjusted decision-making throughout
the organization. The Company believes that this division of responsibilities achieves sound risk management and that the Board’s
involvement ensures effective oversight.
The Company has an enterprise
risk management function, with a group of employees dedicated to enterprise-wide risk management activities. The CEO and Chief
Financial Officer are responsible for overseeing these risk management programs, including assessing risk tolerances, evaluating
whether such tolerances are aligned with the Company’s strategic goals, and defining our overall risk profile. The CEO has
delegated to an internal Risk Management Committee the authority to review and approve transactions that are in furtherance of
the Company’s approved strategies.
In addition to the CEO,
the standing members of the Risk Management Committee include the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Legal Officer. Through
a variety of policies and procedures, senior management and their leadership teams identify, monitor, mitigate, and report on
risks and develop risk management plans aligned with the Company’s enterprise risk management framework.
The results of the risk management processes
and updates on material risks are reported to the Board and its committees on a regular basis. The Audit Committee is responsible
for ensuring that an effective risk assessment process is in place, and reports are made to the Audit Committee in accordance
with NYSE requirements.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 18
BOARD AND COMMITTEE INFORMATION
The Board currently has six standing committees, each consisting
entirely of independent directors: (1) Audit Committee, (2) Compensation Committee, (3) Nominating and Governance Committee, (4)
HSE&O Committee, (5) Finance Committee, and (6) Executive Committee. Our Compensation Committee, Nominating and Governance
Committee, and HSE&O Committee meet in connection with each regularly scheduled Board meeting (other than the Board’s
strategy session held in July) and hold additional meetings as needed, while other committees meet independently as the matters
under their respective responsibilities require. Committees regularly receive reports from LyondellBasell management, report on
committee actions to the Board, and may retain outside advisors.
In 2019, eight of our directors attended 100%, and
each of our remaining directors attended more than 85%, of the meetings of the Board and of each committee of which they were members.
Although the Company does not maintain a policy regarding directors’ attendance at its annual general meetings of shareholders,
both our Chair and CEO attend the Company’s annual general meeting each year and will attend the 2020 Annual Meeting either in person (if COVID-19 travel restrictions and health and safety protocols permit) or by participating in the live webcast.
In 2019, the Board held four regularly scheduled meetings, three special meetings,
and two information sessions. The table below provides membership and meeting information for each of the Board’s committees
as of the date of this proxy statement.
Name |
Audit |
Compensation |
Nominating & Governance |
HSE&O |
Finance |
Executive |
Jacques Aigrain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lincoln Benet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jagjeet Bindra |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robin Buchanan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Cooper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nance Dicciani |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claire Farley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Goren |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Hanley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Albert Manifold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bob Patel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rudy
van der Meer(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019 MEETINGS |
5 |
6(2) |
3(2) |
3(2) |
7 |
2(3) |
Chair
Member
| (1) | Mr.
van der Meer is not standing for re-election to the Board at the Annual Meeting as he
has reached the mandatory retirement age. |
| (2) | The
Board, Compensation Committee, HSE&O Committee, and Nominating and Governance Committee
each also met in person in September 2019 for an information session and held informal
calls and sessions throughout the year. |
| (3) | Members
of the Executive Committee also held informal calls throughout the year and between meetings
to discuss coordination among the Board and its committees. |
Each of our committees
has a written charter, approved by the Board. The charters can be found on our website at www.LyondellBasell.com by clicking
on “Investors,” then “Corporate Governance,” then “Board of Directors.” Each committee annually
reviews and recommends any changes to its charter and conducts an evaluation of committee performance with respect to delegated
duties and responsibilities.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 19
AUDIT COMMITTEE
CHAIR:
MICHAEL HANLEY*
MEMBERS:
JEET BINDRA
BELLA GOREN*
ALBERT MANIFOLD*
* AUDIT COMMITTEE
FINANCIAL EXPERTS
INDEPENDENCE:
ALL MEMBERS |
The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing all matters relating to our financial statements and reporting, our internal audit function and independent auditors, and our compliance function. Listed below are the general responsibilities of the Audit Committee. |
|
Independent Auditor – Engage external auditor, review performance, and approve compensation; review independence and establish policies relating to the hiring of auditor employees; and pre-approve audit and non-audit services; |
|
Internal Audit – Review plans, staffing, and activities of the internal audit function and its effectiveness; |
|
Financial Statements – Review financial statements and earnings releases; discuss and review accounting policies and practices and external auditor reviews; and discuss and review the effectiveness of internal controls; and |
|
Compliance – Review plans, staffing, and activities of the compliance function and its effectiveness; establish and review procedures for complaints, including anonymous complaints regarding accounting, controls, and auditing; and review the Company’s Code of Conduct and system for monitoring compliance therewith. |
|
|
|
Our Board has determined that all Audit Committee members
are independent under the NYSE listing standards, our categorical independence standards, and the heightened independence requirements
applicable to audit committee members under SEC rules. Our Board has also determined that all Audit Committee members are financially
literate in accordance with the NYSE listing standards and that Mr. Hanley, Ms. Goren, and Mr. Manifold qualify as audit committee
financial experts under SEC rules.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
CHAIR:
NANCE DICCIANI
MEMBERS:
ROBIN BUCHANAN
CLAIRE FARLEY
BELLA GOREN
INDEPENDENCE:
ALL MEMBERS |
The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing
our executive compensation and talent management programs and developing the Company’s compensation philosophy.
In fulfilling its responsibility for the oversight
of compensation matters, the Compensation Committee may delegate authority for day-to-day administration and interpretation of
the Company’s compensation plans to Company employees, including responsibility for the selection of participants, determination
of award levels within plan parameters, and approval of award documents. The Compensation Committee may not, however, delegate
authority for matters affecting the compensation and benefits of the Company’s executive officers. The Compensation Committee’s
responsibilities include the following: |
|
Executive Compensation – Approve the compensation and benefits of executive officers; review executive compensation practices to ensure consistency with corporate objectives; review and approve CEO goals and objectives and evaluate CEO performance; and make recommendations to the Board regarding CEO and executive officer compensation; |
|
Company Compensation Benefits – Review the Company’s compensation philosophy, programs, and practices; review and approve pension and benefit arrangements as well as funding of pension and benefit plans; and make recommendations to the Board on these subjects; and |
|
Talent Management – Review the Company’s organizational leadership structure and oversee leadership development, talent management and succession and continuity planning for the CEO and other executive officers. |
|
|
|
Our Board has determined that all Compensation Committee members are independent
under the NYSE listing standards, our categorical independence standards, and other independence requirements applicable to compensation
committee members under NYSE rules.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation –
No member of the Compensation Committee serves or has served as an officer or employee of the Company or any of our subsidiaries
and, during 2019, no executive officer served on the compensation committee or board of any entity that employed any member of
our Compensation Committee or Board.
For additional information on the Compensation Committee, including information
regarding compensation consultants engaged during 2019, see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on
page 33.
NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
CHAIR:
CLAIRE FARLEY
MEMBERS:
JACQUES AIGRAIN
LINCOLN BENET
ROBIN BUCHANAN
RUDY VAN DER MEER
INDEPENDENCE:
ALL MEMBERS |
The Nominating and Governance Committee is primarily
responsible for identifying nominees for election to the Board and overseeing matters regarding corporate governance.
To fulfill those duties, the Nominating and Governance
Committee has the responsibilities summarized below: |
|
Administrative – Coordinate evaluations by committees and the full Board; |
|
Directors and Director Nominees – Identify and recommend candidates for membership on the Board and recommend committee memberships; |
|
Director Compensation – Evaluate and recommend director compensation; and |
|
|
Corporate Governance – Review the Company’s governance profile and make necessary recommendations; review and propose modifications to the Company’s governance documents and policies; and review and comment on shareholder proposals. |
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 20
HEALTH, SAFETY, ENVIRONMENTAL AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
CHAIR:
JEET BINDRA
MEMBERS:
STEVE COOPER
MICHAEL HANLEY
RUDY VAN DER MEER
INDEPENDENCE:
ALL MEMBERS |
The HSE&O Committee assists the Board in its oversight
responsibilities by assessing the effectiveness of health, safety, and environmental programs and initiatives that support Company
policies. The HSE&O Committee also reviews the Company’s material technologies and the risks relating to its technology
portfolio, the physical security of the Company’s assets, and the Company’s performance in executing large capital
projects and turnarounds.
The specific responsibilities of the HSE&O Committee
are summarized below: |
|
Administrative – Review the status of the Company’s health, safety, and environmental policies and performance, including processes to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations; |
|
HSE Performance and Sustainability – Review and monitor the Company’s health, safety, and environmental performance results; provide oversight of the Company’s programs, initiatives, and activities in the areas of technology and sustainability; review with management environment, health, safety, product stewardship, and other sustainability issues that can have a material impact on the Company; and review the status of related policies, programs, and practices; |
|
Audit – Review and approve the scope of the Company’s health, safety, and environmental audit program; regularly monitor audit program results; and review and approve the annual budget for the health, safety, and environmental audit program; and |
|
|
Operational Performance – Assess the Company’s operational performance; review the scope of the Company’s operational excellence audit program and monitor program results; and review and monitor the Company’s progress on and results for capital projects and turnarounds. |
FINANCE COMMITTEE
CHAIR:
LINCOLN BENET
MEMBERS:
JACQUES AIGRAIN
NANCE DICCIANI
ALBERT MANIFOLD
INDEPENDENCE:
ALL MEMBERS |
The Finance Committee is responsible for monitoring
and assessing such matters as the Company’s capital structure and allocation, debt portfolio, and tax and derivative strategies.
In fulfilling its duties, the Finance Committee has
the responsibilities summarized below: |
|
Strategy – Review analyses and provide guidance and advice regarding acquisitions and divestments and discuss and review the Company’s tax strategies, planning, and related structures; |
|
Capital – Review the Company’s capital structure and capital allocation, including organic and inorganic investments; review and discuss the Company’s dividend policy; and review and discuss share repurchase activities and plans; and |
|
Securities and Financing – Review and discuss the Company’s debt portfolio, credit facilities, compliance with financial covenants, commodity, interest rate, and currency derivative strategies, and proposed securities offerings. |
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
CHAIR:
JACQUES AIGRAIN
MEMBERS:
LINCOLN BENET
JEET BINDRA
NANCE DICCIANI
CLAIRE FARLEY
MICHAEL HANLEY
INDEPENDENCE:
ALL MEMBERS |
The Executive Committee consists of the chairs of each of the other Board committees. The role of the Executive Committee is to facilitate and improve communication and coordination among members of the Board and its committees. It does so by, among other things, collaborating on agenda setting and discussing ad-hoc issues. |
|
|
|
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 21
OTHER GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Retirement Policy and Term Limits
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Rules for the
Board of Directors provide that directors will not be re-nominated for election to the Board after they reach the age of 75. While
the Board does not believe there is a specific age after which directors should no longer serve on boards, it does believe mandatory
retirement ages are useful for promoting board refreshment. In 2019, Albert Manifold joined our Board, replacing a retiring director.
The Board has not adopted term limits for its membership.
The Nominating and Governance Committee and the full Board regularly discuss board succession and refreshment and strive to maintain
a balance of directors with varying lengths of service and ages. While the Board recognizes that term limits could assist in this
regard, they may have the unintended consequence of causing the Board and the Company to lose the contribution of directors who
over time have developed enhanced knowledge and valuable insight into the Company and its operations. The Board believes that the
mandatory retirement age and an annual evaluation process for deciding whether to re-nominate individuals for election are currently
more effective means of ensuring board refreshment and renewal, while also allowing for continuity of service.
Code of Conduct
The Company has a Code of Conduct for all employees
and directors and a Financial Code of Ethics specifically for our CEO, CFO, Chief Accounting Officer and persons performing similar
functions. Copies of these codes can be found on our website at www.LyondellBasell.com by clicking on “Investors,”
then “Corporate Governance.” Any waivers of the codes must be approved, in advance, by our Board, and any amendments
to or waivers from the codes that apply to our executive officers and directors will be posted on the “Corporate Governance”
section of our website.
Share Ownership Guidelines
Members of our Board are subject to Share Ownership
Guidelines. Under the Share Ownership Guidelines, non-executive directors are prohibited from selling any shares of the Company
until they own shares that are valued at no less than six times their annual cash retainer for Board service, or $690,000 for all
directors other than our Chair, whose ownership requirement is $1,950,000. Once a director has reached his or her required ownership
level, he or she may not sell shares that would bring ownership below the threshold level.
Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging Shares
Pursuant to our Policy Prohibiting Insider Trading,
members of the Board, executive officers and certain other designated employees are prohibited from purchasing, selling, or writing
options on the Company’s shares, engaging in short sales, participating in other derivative or short-term purchase or sale
transactions, or otherwise engaging in transactions that would enable them to hedge against any decrease in our share price. Such
individuals are also prohibited from pledging Company shares as collateral for personal loans or other obligations, including holding
shares in a brokerage margin account. These restrictions extend to covered individuals’ immediate family members and certain
related entities and are intended to keep the interests of our directors, executives and employees aligned with the long-term interests
of the Company and our shareholders.
Dutch Corporate Governance Code
As a Dutch incorporated entity, we are subject to the Dutch Corporate Governance
Code. The Code, most recently amended in 2016 and a copy of which can be found at www.commissiecorporategovernance.nl, is
a statement of principles and best practices for Dutch companies with an emphasis on integrity, transparency, and accountability
as the primary means of achieving good governance. The Code’s compliance principle is “comply-or-explain,” which
permits a Dutch company to apply the best practices outlined in the Code or explain why the company has chosen to apply different
practices.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 22
The principles and practices prescribed by the Code
are largely consistent with NYSE and SEC requirements and best practices for U.S. companies. In our Dutch Annual Report, which
accompanies our 2019 Dutch Annual Accounts and can be found on our website at www. LyondellBasell.com by clicking “Investors,”
then “Company Reports,” we disclose those instances where we have chosen to apply practices that differ from the Code.
In general, these instances arise from our decision to apply practices that are more common or appropriate for NYSE traded companies
than those called for by the Code. For example, although the Board’s categorical standards for director independence incorporate
the standards of both the Code and the NYSE, our Board has chosen to apply the standards of the NYSE where the two conflict, including
with respect to the independence classification of directors nominated by Access Industries, a greater than 10% shareholder. Our
Board believes that application of the NYSE independence standards is more appropriate for LyondellBasell, which is listed only
on the NYSE and not on any exchange in the Netherlands. Our Board further believes that the service of Access nominees on the Company’s
key independent committees provides those committees with shareholder perspective and the significant skills, experience, and qualifications
of these directors, to the benefit of the Board, the Company, and our stakeholders more generally.
Related Party Transactions
We have adopted a written Related Party Transaction Approval
Policy, which requires the disinterested members of the Audit Committee to review and approve certain transactions that we may
enter into with related parties, including members of the Board, executive officers, and certain shareholders. The policy applies
to any transaction:
|
in the ordinary course of business with an aggregate value of $25 million or more; |
|
not in the ordinary course of business, regardless of value; or |
|
with a value of $120,000 or more and in which an executive officer or non-executive director has a direct or indirect material interest. |
The disinterested members of the Audit Committee determine
the fairness of any related party transaction to the Company by considering whether the terms of the transaction are no less favorable
than those which could be obtained from non-related parties. The following is a description of related party transactions in existence
since the beginning of fiscal year 2019.
ACCESS INDUSTRIES
In 2010, we entered into certain agreements with affiliates
of Access Industries, including a registration rights agreement, which obligates us to register and bear the costs for the resale
of equity securities owned by Access Industries or its affiliates, and a nomination agreement. Pursuant to the nomination agreement,
Access Industries has the right to nominate individuals for appointment to the Board if certain ownership thresholds are met. Access
Industries currently owns more than 18% of our outstanding shares and has nominated Messrs. Benet, Buchanan, and Cooper pursuant
to the agreement. The Company entered into these agreements with Access Industries before it became publicly traded and the Related
Party Transaction Approval Policy was adopted. Amendments to the nomination agreement are approved by disinterested directors.
ANADARKO PETROLEUM
On an ongoing basis and in the ordinary course of business,
the Company makes spot purchases of natural gas and natural gas liquids, which are raw materials used to manufacture the Company’s
products, from Anadarko Petroleum Corporation. Claire Farley, a director, was a member of Anadarko’s board of directors until
its acquisition by Occidental Petroleum in August 2019. In July 2014, the Audit Committee approved the Company making spot purchases
from Anadarko as it deems appropriate, noting that those transactions were on terms no less favorable than those which could be
obtained from non-related parties. The Company purchased approximately $92 million of natural gas and natural gas liquids from
a subsidiary of Anadarko Petroleum in 2019.
CALPINE CORPORATION
Calpine Corporation, the owner and operator of power plants across the United
States and Canada, supplies power and steam to the Company’s Houston refinery and is owned by a group of investors including
Access Industries. The Audit Committee has reviewed and approved, most recently in October 2018, the Company’s contracts
with Calpine, which were determined to be on terms fair to the Company and more advantageous than those offered by other parties.
In 2019, the Company purchased approximately $70 million of power, steam, and water from Calpine and sold approximately $15 million
of excess gas and raw water to Calpine.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 23
PLASTO-CARGAL GROUP
From time to time, the Company’s Advanced Polymer
Solutions segment sells certain additives to Plasto-Cargal Group, a manufacturer of plastic container and film products, in which
Access Industries holds an indirect minority investment. Sales are conducted in the ordinary course and no approval is required
under the Company’s Related Party Transaction Approval Policy; however, the Audit Committee has reviewed and approved the
continuation of such transactions, which totaled approximately $0.5 million for 2019.
OTHER TRANSACTIONS
Although not related party transactions under SEC rules,
the Board was also made aware of, and considered the fairness of, certain transactions and relationships between the Company and
our directors as described below. These transactions were also considered in evaluating the independence of the non-executive members
of our Board and the outside commitments of our executive director, Mr. Patel.
|
Access: Mr. Benet is CEO of Access Industries; Mr. Buchanan is an adviser to Access Industries and Non-Executive Chairman of its Advisory Board, which advises on portfolio strategy; and Mr. Cooper is CEO of Warner Music, a subsidiary of Access Industries. |
|
Bindra: The Company licenses certain technology and engineering services to, and makes small spot purchases of raw materials from, HPCL-Mittal Energy Limited, where Mr. Bindra is a director. |
|
Buchanan: The Company has engaged Bain & Company, where Mr. Buchanan was previously a partner and continues in a limited and unrelated advisory role, for certain strategic planning and transaction advisory services. |
|
Dicciani: In February 2019, the Company purchased certain La Porte, Texas assets from Linde plc, where Ms. Dicciani is a director. The Company also purchases industrial gases from, and sells crude hydrogen to, Linde, and Linde provides technical services to certain Company sites in Europe which license its technology. The Company sells temporary chemical diverters for well completion to Halliburton, where Ms. Dicciani is a director. |
|
Farley: The Company purchases measurement products and receives site engineering services from TechnipFMC, where Ms. Farley is a director. In 2019, the Company engaged TechnipFMC for a furnace construction project that was subsequently postponed. |
|
Hanley: The Company sells polypropylene, flame spray products, and coating systems to Shawcor Ltd., where Mr. Hanley is a director. |
|
Goren: The Company purchases employee medical insurance from MassMutual Asia, an affiliate of MassMutual Financial Group, where Ms. Goren is a director. |
|
Patel: The Company receives transportation services from Union Pacific Corporation, where Mr. Patel is a director. |
Indemnification
We indemnify members of our Board to the fullest extent permitted by law
so they will be free from undue concern about personal liability in connection with their service to the Company. Our Articles
of Association establish this indemnification right, and we have also entered into agreements with each of our non-executive directors
and our CEO contractually obligating us to indemnify them.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 24
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Our non-executive directors receive cash compensation and equity compensation, in the form of restricted stock units (“RSUs”), for their service on the Board and its committees. Members of the Board have the option to elect to receive all or a portion of the cash component of their compensation in Company shares. Our Nominating and Governance Committee reviews director compensation, in consultation with Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (“Pearl Meyer”), the Board’s independent compensation consultant, on an annual basis and recommends any changes in compensation determined advisable.
In connection with this annual review, the director compensation program is benchmarked against director pay within the Company’s compensation peer group and at other large U.S. public companies. The Nominating and Governance Committee gives consideration to the qualifications and caliber of the Company’s directors and significant commitment required for service on our Board, including the additional time and effort required by overseas travel for a majority of our Board meetings.
Following its annual review, in November 2019, the Nominating and Governance Committee recommended no changes to director compensation and approved the continuation of the existing director compensation policy, as further described below. No changes have been made to the director compensation policy since 2015, apart from an increase in the annual retainer for the Board Chair in connection with the election of Mr. Aigrain to the role in 2018 and the significant expansion of Chair duties (including in support of the Company’s strategic growth initiatives) and time commitment and travel required for the role.
Compensation
|
|
|
Board Retainer
|
Cash
|
$115,000 ($325,000 for Chair)
|
|
RSUs
|
Valued at $170,000 ($325,000 for Chair)
|
Committee Retainers
|
Members
|
$10,000 ($15,000 for Audit Committee)
|
(excluding Executive Committee)
|
Chairs
|
$20,000 ($27,500 for Audit and Compensation Committee Chairs)
|
In addition to the retainers shown above, we provide members of the Board with a cash payment of $5,000 for each intercontinental trip taken in performing board service.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION IN 2019
|
Fees Earned
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
or Paid in Cash
|
Stock Awards
|
Compensation
|
Total
|
Name
|
($)(4)
|
($)(5)
|
($)(6)
|
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jacques Aigrain
|
340,890
|
325,045
|
20,000
|
685,935
|
Lincoln Benet
|
145,000
|
170,070
|
10,000
|
325,070
|
Jagjeet Bindra
|
150,000
|
170,070
|
11,974
|
332,043
|
Robin Buchanan
|
–
|
314,549
|
–
|
314,549
|
Stephen Cooper
|
–
|
319,262
|
1,974
|
321,236
|
Nance Dicciani
|
–
|
352,365
|
1,974
|
354,338
|
Claire Farley
|
–
|
340,553
|
1,974
|
342,526
|
Isabella Goren
|
140,000
|
170,070
|
21,974
|
332,043
|
Michael Hanley
|
105,400
|
215,423
|
18,750
|
339,573
|
Albert
Manifold(1)
|
82,466
|
170,033
|
5,000
|
257,498
|
Bruce
Smith(2)
|
–
|
58,569
|
1,974
|
60,542
|
Rudy
van der Meer(3)
|
135,000
|
170,070
|
14,131
|
319,201
|
(1)
|
Mr. Manifold was elected to the Board on May 31, 2019.
|
(2)
|
Mr. Smith retired from the Board on May 31, 2019.
|
(3)
|
Mr. van der Meer is not standing for re-election to the Board at the Annual Meeting as he has reached the mandatory retirement age.
|
(4)
|
Includes retainers for services earned or paid through December 31, 2019. Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Cooper, Ms. Dicciani, Ms. Farley, Mr. Hanley, and Mr. Smith each elected to receive all or a portion of the cash component of their 2019 compensation in the form of shares of our common stock.
|
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 25
(5) | Represents
annual grants of RSUs for all directors (other than Mr. Smith) and shares of stock issued
in lieu of cash compensation for Mr. Buchanan, |
Mr.
Cooper, Ms. Dicciani, Ms. Farley, Mr. Hanley, and Mr. Smith.
The
annual grants of RSUs are made in conjunction with the Board’s regularly scheduled meeting in May of each year or at the
time of a new director’s election to the Board. The terms of the RSUs provide for vesting one year from the date of grant
and for cash dividend equivalent payments when dividends are paid on the Company’s shares. In 2019, the annual grant for
each continuing director, other than Mr. Aigrain and Mr. Manifold, was 2,197 units. Mr. Aigrain received 4,199 units and Mr. Manifold
received 2,290 units based on the Company’s stock price as of the date of his election. These awards are the only stock
awards outstanding at 2019 fiscal year-end for the non-executive directors. In accordance with FASB Topic ASC 718, Compensation
– Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), the grant date fair value of the awards is the number of units granted times
the fair market value of our shares on that date. See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2019 for a description accounting for equity-based compensation.
The
shares received in lieu of cash compensation are issued at the same time quarterly cash payments for retainers and travel fees
are otherwise made. The number of shares issued is based on the average of the closing price of the Company’s shares over
the quarter in which the compensation was earned. The shares issued in lieu of cash compensation in 2019 were as follows: Mr.
Buchanan – 1,632 shares, Mr. Cooper – 1,686 shares, Ms. Dicciani
–
2,063 shares, Ms. Farley – 1,927 shares, Mr. Hanley – 513 shares (25% share election), and Mr. Smith – 690 shares.
(6) | Includes
$5,000 for each intercontinental trip taken for work performed for the Company, other
than for Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Cooper, Ms. Dicciani, Ms. Farley, and Mr. Smith, each of whom
received shares as compensation for their travel fees, and for Mr. Hanley, who received
$3,750 for each intercontinental trip and shares as compensation for the remaining portion
of his travel fees. Also includes benefits in kind related to tax preparation and advice
related to the directors’ UK and Dutch tax returns and payments. The Company provides
these services, through a third party, to members of our Board because of our unique
incorporation and tax domicile situation. |
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 26
SECURITIES
OWNERSHIP
SIGNIFICANT
SHAREHOLDERS
The
table below shows information for shareholders known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of our shares.
|
Shares
Beneficially Owned |
Name
and Address |
Number |
Percentage(1) |
Certain
affiliates of Access Industries, LLC(2)
730
Fifth Ave., 20th Floor, New York, NY 10019 |
77,457,868 |
[ ]% |
Capital
World Investors(3)
333
South Hope Street, Los Angeles, CA 90071 |
22,076,572 |
[ ]% |
BlackRock,
Inc.(4)
55
East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055 |
21,478,057 |
[ ]% |
The
Vanguard Group(5)
100
Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355 |
20,554,616 |
[ ]% |
| (1) | All
percentages are based on [___] shares outstanding as of April [___], 2020. |
| (2) | Information
is based on a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on November 8, 2019. Access Industries
is a privately-held U.S. industrial group which controls directly or indirectly AI International
Chemicals S.à r.l. and certain other entities that are recordholders of our outstanding
shares (collectively, the “Access Recordholders”). Len Blavatnik controls
Access Industries and may be deemed to beneficially own the shares held by one or more
of the Access Recordholders. Access Industries and each of its affiliated entities and
the officers, partners, members, and managers thereof (including, without limitation,
Mr. Blavatnik), other than the applicable Access Recordholder, disclaim beneficial ownership
of any shares owned by the Access Recordholders. |
| (3) | Information
is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2020 by Capital World
Investors reporting beneficial ownership of the Company’s stock as of December
31, 2019. The shareholder reports sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect
to 22,076,572 shares. |
| (4) | Information
is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 5, 2020 by BlackRock, Inc.
reporting beneficial ownership of the Company’s stock as of December 31, 2019,
on behalf of its direct and indirect subsidiaries including BlackRock Life Limited, BlackRock
International Limited, BlackRock Advisors, LLC, BlackRock (Netherlands) B.V., BlackRock
Institutional Trust Company, National Association, BlackRock Asset Management Ireland
Limited, BlackRock Financial Management, Inc., iShares (DE) I Investmentaktiengesellschaft
mit Teilgesellsc, BlackRock Japan Co., Ltd., BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG, BlackRock
Investment Management, LLC, FutureAdvisor, Inc., BlackRock Investment Management (UK)
Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Deutschland
AG, BlackRock (Luxembourg) S.A., BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited,
BlackRock Advisors (UK) Limited, BlackRock Fund Advisors, BlackRock Asset Management
North Asia Limited, BlackRock (Singapore) Limited, and BlackRock Fund Managers Ltd. The
shareholder reports sole voting power with respect to 18,758,698 shares and sole dispositive
power with respect to 21,478,057 shares. |
| (5) | Information
is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 12, 2020 by The Vanguard
Group reporting beneficial ownership of the Company’s stock as of December 31,
2019, on behalf of its direct and indirect subsidiaries including Vanguard Fiduciary
Trust Company and Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd. The shareholder reports sole voting
power with respect to 388,904 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 20,118,533
shares. |
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 27
BENEFICIAL
OWNERSHIP
Information
relating to the beneficial ownership of our shares by each director, director nominee, and executive officer named in the Summary
Compensation Table is included below, as is information with respect to all of these individuals and all other executive officers
of the Company, as a group. Shares are considered to be beneficially owned by a person if he or she, directly or indirectly, has
sole or shared voting or investment power with respect to such shares. In addition, a person is deemed to beneficially own shares
if that person has the right to acquire such shares within 60 days of March 15, 2020. The individuals set forth in the table below,
individually and in the aggregate, beneficially own less than 1% of our outstanding shares as of March 15, 2020.
|
Number of |
Stock
Options
Exercisable Within
60
days |
Name |
Shares |
RSus(1) |
Jacques
Aigrain |
9,483 |
– |
– |
Lincoln
Benet |
3,766 |
– |
– |
Jagjeet
Bindra(2) |
17,532 |
– |
– |
Robin
Buchanan |
42,444 |
– |
– |
Stephen
Cooper |
27,639 |
– |
– |
Nance
Dicciani |
17,974 |
– |
– |
Claire
Farley |
11,401 |
– |
– |
Isabella
Goren |
8,474 |
– |
– |
Michael
Hanley |
1,369 |
– |
– |
Albert
Manifold |
– |
– |
– |
Bob
patel(3) |
270,826 |
– |
686,003 |
Rudy
van der Meer |
15,671 |
– |
– |
Michael
McMurray |
– |
– |
– |
Thomas
Aebischer |
32,520 |
– |
125,011 |
Dan
Coombs |
21,396 |
– |
69,476 |
Ken
Lane |
3,793 |
– |
– |
Torkel
Rhenman |
8,000 |
– |
– |
ALL
DIRECTORS, NOMINEES, AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS A GROUP (23 PERSONS) |
559,510 |
– |
996,688 |
| (1) | Represents
RSUs (each equivalent to a share of LyondellBasell stock) that will vest within 60 days. |
| (2) | Includes
9,200 shares owned by the Bindra Family Revocable Trust. Mr. Bindra disclaims beneficial
ownership of such shares except to the extent of any pecuniary interest therein. |
| (3) | Includes
202,721 shares held in family trusts. Mr. Patel disclaims beneficial ownership of such
shares except to the extent of any pecuniary interest therein. |
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 28
ITEM 2 |
DISCHARGE OF DIRECTORS FROM LIABILITY |
| The
Board recommends that you vote FOR
the
discharge of our directors from liability for the performance of their duties in 2019. |
Under
Dutch law, shareholders may discharge the Company’s Board of Directors from liability in connection with the exercise of
duties during the most recently completed fiscal year. The discharge does not affect any potential liability under the laws of
The Netherlands relating to liability upon bankruptcy and does not extend to matters that have not been disclosed to shareholders.
It is proposed that shareholders resolve to discharge the Company’s executive and non-executive directors in office in 2019
from liability in connection with the exercise of their respective duties during the year.
ITEM 3 | ADOPTION OF DUTCH STATUTORY ANNUAL ACCOUNTS |
| The
Board recommends that you vote FOR
the
adoption of our 2019 Dutch statutory annual accounts. |
At
the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to adopt our Dutch statutory annual accounts for the year ended December 31, 2019, as required
under Dutch law and our Articles of Association. Our Dutch statutory annual accounts are prepared in accordance with international
financial reporting standards (“IFRS”) and Dutch law. A copy of the 2019 Dutch statutory annual accounts can be accessed
through our website at www.LyondellBasell.com by clicking “Investors,” then “Company Reports,”
and may be obtained free of charge by request to our Corporate Secretary at corporatesecretary@lyb.com or LyondellBasell
Industries, 4th Floor, One Vine Street, London W1J 0AH, United Kingdom, Attention: Corporate Secretary.
ITEM 4 | APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS
ACCOUNTANTS N.V. AS THE AUDITOR OF OUR DUTCH STATUTORY ANNUAL ACCOUNTS |
| The
Board recommends that you vote FOR
the
appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants N.V. (“PwC N.V.”) as the
auditor of our 2020 Dutch statutory annual accounts. |
The
Board has selected PwC N.V. to serve as the auditor of our Dutch statutory annual accounts to be prepared in accordance with IFRS
for the year ending December 31, 2020, and, in accordance with our Articles of Association, we are requesting that shareholders
appoint PwC N.V. as auditor of such annual accounts. PwC N.V. has acted as the auditor of our Dutch statutory annual accounts
since 2010. Representatives of PwC N.V. will be present at the Annual Meeting either in person or by joining the webcast and may be questioned by shareholders in relation
to PwC N.V.’s report on the fairness of the financial statements.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 29
ITEM 5 | RATIFICATION
OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
| The
Board recommends that you vote FOR
the
ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as our independent registered
public accounting firm for 2020. |
The
Board has selected PwC to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2020. PwC
has acted as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2010. The Audit Committee, which annually recommends selection
of the Company’s independent accountants, reviews PwC’s performance and independence on an ongoing basis and believes
the continued retention of PwC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2020 is in the best interest
of the Company and its stakeholders.
Although
shareholder ratification of the selection of PwC is not required, our Board is submitting the selection to shareholders for ratification
because we value our shareholders’ views on the Company’s auditors. If our shareholders fail to ratify the selection
of PwC, it will be considered as notice to the Board and Audit Committee to consider the selection of a different firm. Even if
the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may recommend that the Board select a different independent
registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interest
of the Company and its stakeholders.
Representatives
of PwC are not expected to attend the Annual Meeting; however, representatives of PwC N.V., the auditor of the Company’s
Dutch statutory annual accounts, will be present at the Annual Meeting either in person or by joining the webcast and will have the opportunity to respond to appropriate
shareholder questions and make a statement if they desire to do so.
PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES FEE INFORMATION
Fees
for professional services provided by PwC in each of the last two fiscal years, in each of the following categories, were as follows:
(in
millions) |
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
Audit
Fees |
$ |
10.4 |
$ |
9.3 |
Audit-Related
Fees |
|
0.4 |
|
0.6 |
Tax
Fees |
|
0.8 |
|
1.2 |
All
Other Fees |
|
– |
|
– |
TOTAL |
$ |
11.6 |
$ |
11.1 |
Audit
fees consist of the aggregate fees and expenses billed or expected to be billed for professional services rendered by PwC for
the audit of our consolidated financial statements, the review of financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form
10-Q, and services that are normally provided by an independent auditor in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or
engagements, including comfort letters, statutory audits, attest services, and consents.
Audit-related
fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services by PwC that are reasonably related to the performance
of its audit or review of the Company’s financial statements and are not reported as audit fees herein. This category includes
fees related to audits of benefit plans; agreed-upon or expanded audit procedures relating to accounting records required to respond
to or comply with financial, accounting, or regulatory reporting requirements; and consultations as to the accounting or disclosure
treatment of transactions or events and/or the actual or potential impact of final or proposed rules, standards, or interpretations
by regulatory or standard-setting bodies.
Tax
fees consist of international tax compliance and corporate tax consulting.
The
Audit Committee has adopted procedures for the approval of PwC’s services and related fees. Each year, the Audit Committee
discusses the scope of the audit plan with PwC and all audit and audit-related services, tax services, and other services for
the upcoming fiscal year are provided to the Audit Committee for pre-approval. The services, which may be provided in the upcoming
twelve-month period, are grouped into significant categories substantially in the format shown above.
The
Audit Committee is updated on the status of all PwC services and related fees on a periodic basis or more frequently as matters
warrant. In 2019 and 2018, the Audit Committee pre-approved all audit, audit-related, tax and other services performed by PwC.
As
set forth in the Audit Committee Report below, the Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services
by PwC is compatible with maintaining auditor independence and has determined in the affirmative with respect to the services provided
in 2019.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 30
AUDIT
COMMITTEE REPORT
The
role of the Audit Committee is, among other things, to oversee the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the
Board, to recommend to the Board whether the Company’s financial statements should be included in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Annual Report”), and to select the Company’s
independent auditor for ratification by shareholders. Company management is responsible for the Company’s financial statements
as well as for its financial reporting process, accounting principles, and internal controls. The Company’s independent
auditor is responsible for performing an audit of the Company’s financial statements and expressing an opinion as to the
conformity of such financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The
Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December
31, 2019 with management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), the Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. In addition, the Audit Committee has taken the following steps in
making its recommendation that the Company’s financial statements be included in the Annual Report:
| | First,
the Audit Committee discussed with PwC those matters required to be discussed by Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) Auditing Standard 1301 Communications
with Audit Committees, including information regarding the scope and results of the audit.
These communications and discussions are intended to assist the Audit Committee in overseeing
the financial reporting and disclosure process. |
| | Second,
the Audit Committee discussed with PwC its independence and received from PwC the written
disclosures and the letter concerning PwC’s communications with the Audit Committee
concerning independence as required under applicable independence standards for auditors
of public companies. This discussion and disclosure helped the Audit Committee in evaluating
such independence. The Audit Committee also considered whether, and concluded that, PwC’s
provision of other non-audit services to the Company is compatible with the auditor’s
independence. |
| | Third,
the Audit Committee met periodically with members of management, the head of the Company’s
internal audit department, and PwC to review and discuss internal control over financial
reporting. Further, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed management’s report
on internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, as well as PwC’s
report regarding the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. |
| | Finally,
the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with the Company’s management and PwC
the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December
31, 2019, including the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles
applied, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of the disclosure. |
The
Audit Committee also discussed with the head of the Company’s internal audit department and PwC the overall scope and plans
of their respective audits. The Audit Committee meets periodically with both the head of the internal audit department and PwC,
with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations and their respective evaluations of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting.
The
members of the Audit Committee are not engaged in the accounting or auditing profession and, consequently, are not experts in
matters involving auditing or accounting. In the performance of their oversight function, the members of the Audit Committee necessarily
relied upon the information, opinions, reports, and statements presented to them by Company management and by PwC as the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm.
Based
on the reviews and discussions explained above (and without other independent verification), the Audit Committee recommended to
the Board of Directors (and the Board of Directors approved) that the Company’s financial statements be included in the
Annual Report. The Audit Committee has also approved the selection of PwC as the Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm for fiscal year 2020.
The Audit Committee
Michael Hanley, Chair
Jagjeet Bindra
Bella Goren
Albert Manifold
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 31
ITEM 6 | ADVISORY
VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (SAY-ON-PAY) |
|
The
Board recommends that you vote FOR the approval,
on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. |
We
believe that LyondellBasell’s executive compensation program supports our executive compensation philosophy and goals,
drives performance, encourages an appropriate sensitivity to risk, and increases shareholder value. Our philosophy, which is set
by the Compensation Committee, is intended to align each executive’s compensation with the Company’s short-term
and long-term performance and to provide the compensation and incentives needed to attract, motivate, and retain high-caliber
executives who are crucial to our long-term success.
A
significant portion of the total compensation opportunity for each of our executives is directly tied to the Company’s
progress against our strategic and operating goals.
We
implement our philosophy and achieve our program goals by following certain key principles, including:
| | positioning
total direct compensation and each individual element of executive compensation near
the median of our peer group companies, with consideration given to the relative complexity
of comparable executive roles; |
| | aligning
short-term incentive awards with annual operating, financial, and strategic objectives,
while taking into account the realities of a cyclical
industry and rewarding differential performance rather than favorable or unfavorable
market circumstances; and |
| | rewarding
absolute and relative performance over time through long-term equity incentive awards. |
RESULTS
OF LAST YEAR’S SAY-ON-PAY VOTE
Our
executive compensation program received substantial shareholder support and was approved, on an advisory basis, by more than 94%
of votes cast at the 2019 annual general meeting of shareholders. Our Compensation Committee and Board believe this level of approval
of our executive compensation program demonstrates our shareholders’ strong support of our compensation philosophy and
goals and the decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2018 and early 2019. They also believe the consistently high level
of shareholder support for our executive compensation is a result of our Compensation Committee’s commitment to compensating
our executives in a manner that ensures a strong link between pay and performance and is reflective of our philosophy and goals,
market best practices, and strong shareholder engagement.
PAY
FOR PERFORMANCE IN 2019
The
Compensation Committee believes that the compensation of our Named Executive Officers for 2019 is reasonable and appropriate,
is supported by the Company’s performance, and works to ensure management’s interests align with increasing shareholder
value. The Board requests that you consider the structure of our executive compensation program in connection with our 2019 performance,
which is more fully discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) section of this proxy statement
that follows. The CD&A explains how we implement our compensation philosophy and goals and how we apply these principles to
our compensation program.
2020
ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
In
accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are requesting that shareholders vote on an advisory basis
to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers in 2019, as described in this proxy statement. Shareholders have the
opportunity to share their opinion regarding our executive compensation program by voting for or against the following resolution:
“RESOLVED,
that the Company’s shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers as disclosed
in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, including the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and other related tables and disclosure.”
Although
the advisory vote is non-binding, the Board values our shareholders’ opinions. The Compensation Committee will review the
results of the vote and consider shareholders’ input when considering future decisions regarding our executive compensation
programs. If you have concerns relating to our executive compensation programs, we encourage you to contact us. A vote against
this proposal will not provide the Compensation Committee with information about shareholders’ specific concerns.
The
Company provides for annual say-on-pay votes, and accordingly the next say-on-pay vote will occur at our 2021 annual general meeting
of shareholders.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 32
COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
This
section explains the decisions made concerning the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”)
for fiscal year 2019. It also describes the Company’s compensation philosophy, our executive compensation program, the
process our Compensation Committee followed, and the factors the Committee considered in determining the amount of compensation
awarded. The NEOs for 2019 and their current positions are provided below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOB
PATEL
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |
|
MICHAEL
MCMURRAY
EVP
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER |
|
DAN
COOMBS
EVP – GLOBAL MANUFACTURING, PROJECTS, AND REFINING |
|
KEN
LANE
EVP – GLOBAL OLEFINS & POLYOLEFINS |
|
TORKEL
RHENMAN
EVP
– GLOBAL INTERMEDIATES & DERIVATIVES |
In addition, Mr.
Aebischer, our former EVP and Chief Financial Officer, retired from his position effective December 31, 2019 and is included as
an NEO.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 33
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
2019 Performance
Highlights
In
2019, the Company and our industry faced significant headwinds and challenging market conditions. While our Technology business
delivered its most profitable year in company history, margins within the Intermediates & Derivatives, Advanced Polymer Solutions,
and both Olefins & Polyolefins segments were all impacted by slow industrial demand. While year-over-year 2019 performance
exceeded many of our peers, overall financial performance fell short of our EBITDA expectations.
Notwithstanding
these challenges, LyondellBasell generated $5 billion of cash from operating activities, executed on its capital allocation strategy,
and delivered significant value to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases, including the completion of a successful
equity tender offer in July 2019. In the second quarter of 2019, the Company increased the quarterly dividend by 5%, the eleventh
such increase since the dividend program began in 2011. The Company also repurchased 42.7 million shares in 2019, resulting in
combined dividends and share repurchases of $5.2 billion for the year.
LyondellBasell
made significant advances in its commitment to sustainability in 2019. Specifically, we maintained top decile safety performance,
co-founded the Alliance to End Plastic Waste, invested in joint ventures and partnerships that are developing sustainable circular
products, and committed to achieving a 15% reduction in CO2 emissions per ton of product by 2030. The Company announced its entry
into memoranda of understanding with Liaoning Bora Enterprise Group (for which definitive agreements were signed in 2020) and
Sinopec to form two new joint ventures in China to support the rapidly growing Chinese market, and advanced our organic growth
projects by completing construction of a new Hyperzone polyethylene plant in December 2019 and making significant progress
on construction of the world’s largest PO/TBA plant.
The
Company is committed to a strong pay-for-performance culture and, primarily as a result of EBITDA results, paid out annual bonuses
for 2019 at only 69% of target. The Company’s performance share units (“PSUs”) for the three-year performance
period ended December 31, 2019 also paid out below target at 50% since total shareholder return, while remaining positive, fell
below the median when measured against the Company’s peers over the period. The performance metrics under the Company’s
annual bonus program and PSUs are described below under “2019 Executive Compensation Decisions in Detail.”
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 34
Key Compensation Practices
Our executive compensation practices support our pay for performance
philosophy, align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders, and reflect best governance without encouraging
unnecessary risk-taking.
|
|
What We Do |
|
Pay for performance. We tie a significant amount of compensation to our financial, business, and strategic goals. |
|
Emphasize long-term performance. We balance long-term and short-term incentives and use long-term equity incentive awards, including PSUs, RSUs, and stock options, to reward sustained long-term performance. |
|
Double-trigger vesting. We provide for “double-trigger” vesting in connection with any change-in-control event. |
|
Clawbacks. We have adopted strong clawbacks so we can recover performance-based compensation in certain circumstances. |
|
Share ownership guidelines. We restrict our executives’ and directors’ ability to sell shares unless they first meet robust share ownership guidelines. |
|
Independent compensation consultant. We engage an independent consultant to advise on executive compensation matters, and our independent Compensation Committee meets regularly with the consultant in executive session. |
|
Annual say-on-pay. We hold an annual say-on-pay advisory vote. |
|
|
What
We Don’t Do |
|
Excise tax gross-ups. We do not provide
for excise tax gross-ups in connection with change-in-control events or terminations. |
|
Hedging
or pledging. We do not allow our officers and directors to hedge or pledge our stock. |
|
Guaranteed bonuses.
We do not pay guaranteed or multi-year bonuses. |
|
Automatic compensation
increases. We do not automatically increase executive base salaries each year or make lock-step changes in compensation
based on peer group compensation levels or metrics. |
|
Reprice or exchange underwater options. We
do not permit option repricing or the buyout of underwater options without shareholder approval. |
Say-on-Pay and Shareholder
Outreach
Our executive compensation program has received
substantial and consistent shareholder support over the past several years. At the 2019 annual general meeting of shareholders,
more than 94% of votes were cast in favor of our executive compensation program. Our Compensation Committee and Board believe that
this consistent high level of support from our shareholders is a result of our commitment to ensuring that our executives are compensated
in a manner that provides a strong link between pay and performance.
The Compensation Committee and Board value
our shareholders’ insights and are committed to ongoing, regular dialogue with shareholders regarding executive compensation,
among other matters. We consider shareholder feedback, evolving business needs, and our desire to maintain a strong link between
executive pay and performance when evaluating our compensation program. To enhance transparency, we have provided additional disclosure
in this proxy statement regarding how we measure attainment of Company performance metrics under our compensation programs. In
particular, we explain the market adjustments that are a part of our annual bonus program (referred to as our short-term incentive,
or STI, program).
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 35
CEO Performance and Compensation
Decisions
In recognition of the central role our CEO, Mr. Patel, plays
in shaping and executing on the Company’s strategy, the CEO’s overall performance is measured by considering the performance
of the Company, as a whole, with respect to its financial, operational, and strategic goals. To assess Mr. Patel’s overall
performance, the Compensation Committee considered the Company’s 2019 performance in the following areas:
|
|
|
Significant progress in talent management and strengthening the leadership team, including the hiring or promotion of seven new individuals to the executive leadership team and the establishment of development academies and training programs to support employees with senior management and leadership team potential; |
|
Successful execution on the Company’s inorganic growth strategy, including significant progress on integration of A. Schulman businesses and the announcement of two new joint ventures in China, as well as disciplined evaluation of, and decisions not to proceed with, other acquisition opportunities; |
|
Advancement of the Company’s sustainability
initiatives and commitments; |
|
Progress on capital allocation and toward the Company’s optimal balance sheet, while returning significant capital to shareholders through increasing dividends and share repurchases, including completion of the July 2019 tender offer; |
|
Continued cost discipline across the Company; and |
|
Challenges in global projects performance, including construction cost and schedule overruns, despite meaningful improvement in turnaround performance. |
In consideration of the Company’s achievements and financial
results in 2019, including EBITDA that fell below the Company’s adjusted budget for the year, Mr. Patel was paid an annual
bonus of $1,600,000 under the Company’s STI program. This payout reflects Company performance at 69% of target (as described
in detail on pages 41-42) as well as a discretionary downward adjustment to Mr. Patel’s STI award largely due to the challenges
with global projects performance. Mr. Patel received long-term incentive awards consisting of PSUs, RSUs, and stock options with
an aggregate grant date value of $12,312,500.
Additional Compensation Committee
Actions in 2019
Our Compensation Committee determines the compensation of our
NEOs and is responsible for the design of our executive compensation programs. Annually, the Compensation Committee’s independent
compensation consultant provides a review of executive compensation trends and best practices, as well as regulatory updates that
may impact our executive compensation programs. This information is used to form decisions on executive compensation. In 2019,
the Compensation Committee approved the following changes to our compensation programs.
REDUCED STI AWARD OPPORTUNITY
Based on a survey of the Company’s peers and input from
management, the Compensation Committee modified the Company’s 2019 STI program to reduce the maximum possible payout from
300% to 200% and to remove the individual modifier for all employees. The Committee believes that the new payout formula, under
which bonuses will be determined 75% based on Company performance and 25% based on individual performance, anchored to Company
results, is more in line with the practices of our compensation peers and will provide the appropriate balance of incentives for
employees, including the Company’s executives. See “2019 Executive Compensation Decisions in Detail—2019 Annual
Bonus Payments” for more information.
EXPANDED CLAWBACK
The Compensation Committee approved an expanded clawback policy
for the STI program, which provides the Compensation Committee discretion to recover STI compensation from any executive who engages
in or benefits from misconduct, regardless of whether such misconduct affected the calculation of incentive compensation. See “Additional
Information Concerning Executive Compensation—Clawbacks.”
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 36
WHAT GUIDES
OUR PROGRAM
Executive Compensation
Philosophy
|
|
Our executive compensation program is designed to: |
|
Take into account the realities of a cyclical, commodity industry and reward differential performance |
|
Align the interests of management with those of our shareholders |
|
Encourage both short-term and long-term results |
|
Attract, retain, and incentivize the highest caliber team possible |
|
Enable us to pay high achievers above-market median compensation based on individual performance, potential, and impact to the Company’s results |
|
Recognize and maintain the Company’s market-leading position in HSE performance, costs, and business performance |
Components of Executive Compensation
Our compensation program is structured to incorporate the following
compensation components:
|
|
|
|
Component |
Objective |
Key Features |
Performance-Based |
Base
Salaries |
Provide a regular fixed income in recognition of job responsibilities |
Determined when executives are hired or promoted into their position and reviewed annually |
Individual performance is a key driver of any annual base salary adjustment. Increases are not guaranteed and must be approved by the Compensation Committee |
Short-Term
Incentives |
Incentivize executives by aligning their compensation with key annual objectives and the results that are achieved |
Target value of annual bonus is determined as a percentage of base salary. Executives earn from 0 to 200% of target based on Company results and individual performance |
Payout is determined by the Compensation Committee based on corporate performance and achievement of individual goals |
Long-Term
Incentives |
Encourage executives to increase shareholder value over the long term and support talent retention |
Target value of LTI awards at grant is determined as either a percentage of base salary or, for the CEO, as a set target value
PSUs – three-year performance period, vest from 0 to 200% of target
RSUs – generally cliff vest after three years
Options – vest ratably over three years; expire ten years from grant; exercise price is fair market value at date of grant |
Value of all LTI awards varies in relationship to changes in share price
PSUs pay out based on Company performance, as determined by the Compensation Committee. For PSUs granted since 2017 (including those vested on December 31, 2019), performance is based solely on TSR relative to peers |
|
|
|
|
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 37
Compensation Mix
Our executive compensation program emphasizes
incentive-based and variable pay aligned with performance and shareholder value creation. The mix of compensation components for
our NEOs is heavily weighted toward performance-based and variable compensation. Our CEO’s compensation package emphasizes
performance-based and variable compensation even more than those of the other NEOs to reflect the fact that the CEO’s actions
have the greatest influence on the Company’s overall performance. For 2019, the Total Target Direct Compensation (“TTDC”)
of our NEOs was as follows:
The Decision-Making Process
The Compensation Committee oversees our executive
compensation program, working closely with its independent consultant to ensure the effectiveness of the program throughout the
year. Details of the Compensation Committee’s authority and responsibilities are specified in its charter, which can be found
on our website at www.LyondellBasell.com by clicking on “Investors,” then “Corporate Governance,”
then “Board of Directors.”
THE ROLE OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Compensation Committee, comprising solely
independent directors, is responsible for determining the compensation of our executives (including the NEOs) and designing our
executive compensation program. With input from the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, the Committee annually
conducts a comprehensive analysis and assessment of our executive compensation program, including an evaluation of each component
of target compensation for our executive officers, and approves TTDC for the coming year. The Committee also approves performance
metrics and target performance levels for the Company’s STI program and performance-based equity grants, after receiving
input from management and from the HSE&O Committee regarding the design and payout for annual HSE performance metrics. Members
of the Board review and provide input on the Compensation Committee’s decisions relating to the compensation of our executive
officers.
THE ROLE OF THE CEO
Each year, Mr. Patel presents the Compensation Committee with
recommendations regarding the compensation of each of the other executive officers (including the other NEOs). These recommendations
are based on his assessment of each executive’s performance, the performance of the executive’s business unit or function,
benchmark information, and retention risk. Mr. Patel also provides input on the overall executive compensation program design.
The Committee reviews Mr. Patel’s recommendations and makes adjustments as it deems appropriate. Mr. Patel does not have
any role in the Committee’s determination of his own compensation.
THE ROLE OF THE INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION CONSULTANT
The Compensation Committee has retained Pearl Meyer as its independent
compensation consultant to provide advice regarding executive compensation matters. As required by SEC rules, the Committee engaged
Pearl Meyer after assessing the firm’s independence and determining that the engagement of Pearl Meyer did not raise any
conflict of interest or other concerns.
The services provided by Pearl Meyer generally include advising
on the design of our executive compensation program and evolving industry practices, providing market data and analysis regarding
the competitiveness of our executive compensation program, and evaluating proposed compensation decisions and program updates.
Additionally, Pearl Meyer attends regularly-scheduled meetings of the Compensation Committee and telephone conferences with members
of the Committee or its Chair throughout the year to assist with the review and discussion of executive compensation matters.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 38
Competitive Positioning and
Our Peer Group
Annually, the Compensation Committee reviews
the TTDC for each of our executive officers, which includes base salaries, target bonuses, and the grant date value of long-term
incentive awards. The Committee strives to set our NEOs’ TTDC and each individual component of executive compensation near
the median compensation levels of our peer group companies. A large portion of the TTDC opportunity for our NEOs is directly tied
to the achievement of financial and operational metrics that measure our performance in both absolute terms and relative to peers.
The Committee reviews publicly available
financial and compensation information reported by our peer group companies (described below) and general survey data. The survey
data used to inform the Committee’s 2019 compensation decisions was collected from the 2018 Willis Towers Watson Executive
Compensation Database. This survey data reflects a combination of general industry and chemical industry compensation for executives
with responsibilities similar to those of our executives.
The Committee reviews the peer group and
survey data to determine the median compensation for each executive’s position and then sets each executive’s base
salary and compensation targets for the current year. This generally involves establishing an annual bonus target and the value
of LTI awards as a percentage of base salary, other than for our CEO, whose LTI target value for 2019 equity grants was a fixed
amount. Median compensation is used as a reference point for pay recommendations. Actual pay and targets vary from median based
on the executive’s industry experience; experience and performance in his or her role and at the Company; value of the role
to the Company; internal pay parity among our executives; and any other factors the Committee deems relevant.
The compensation peer group is also used
more generally when the Committee reviews our compensation program design, including the types of compensation awarded and the
terms and conditions of compensation components.
OUR 2019 PEER GROUP
The Compensation Committee conducts an annual
review of the Company’s executive compensation peer group to determine if any changes are necessary. In choosing our peers,
the Committee considers companies that operate in similar industries with comparable cost structures, have similar business models
and global reach, and have comparable revenues and market capitalization to the Company’s.
2019
COMPENSATION PEER GROUP COMPANIES
3M
Andeavor
Caterpillar |
Cummins
Deere & Co.
DowDuPont
Honeywell |
International Paper
Johnson Controls
Marathon Petroleum
Monsanto |
Phillips 66
PPG Industries
Valero |
For 2019, the only adjustments made to our
peer group reflect acquisition activity by our peers during the prior year. Excluding Andeavor and Monsanto which were acquired
during 2019, the peer group reported 2019 revenue that ranged from approximately $14 billion to $124 billion, with a median revenue
of approximately $38 billion. In comparison, the Company’s 2019 revenue was approximately $35 billion.
2019 EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION DECISIONS IN DETAIL
The compensation of our executive officers,
including our NEOs, is reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee at the time of each executive’s hiring or promotion
and annually during a regularly scheduled meeting held in February of each year. Decisions are made based on the Company’s
and each executive’s performance in the prior year, other than with respect to PSU payouts, for which decisions are based
on Company performance over a three-year period.
February 2019 compensation decisions include
the approval of 2019 base salaries; target values, criteria and metrics for the 2019 annual bonuses to be paid in 2020; and 2019
grants of annual long-term incentive awards, including PSUs, RSUs and stock options, as described on pages 44-45. In February 2020,
the Committee approved payout of 2019 annual bonuses and the percentage earned for the PSUs granted in 2017 with a performance
period that ended December 31, 2019.
2019 Base Salaries
The table below shows the base salaries for our NEOs in 2018 and
2019. Salaries for Mr. McMurray, Mr. Lane, and Mr. Rhenman, who joined the Company in 2019, were negotiated as part of each executive’s
employment offer and overall compensation package based on the role the executive was assuming, the length and quality of the executive’s
experience before joining the Company, market competition for talent, and other factors.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 39
Salary changes for continuing executives
are generally approved at the Compensation Committee’s February meeting and effective on April 1, with the exception of
Mr. Patel, whose salary change, if any, is effective from January 1 in accordance with his employment agreement. The Committee
reviews market data and considers internal pay parity when making its decisions. The Committee also considers each executive’s
performance during the prior year, any changes in responsibilities, and the executive’s time in his or her role. The 2019
salary increase for Mr. Aebischer, effective April 1, 2019, was intended to bring his base salary more in line with the salaries
of similarly positioned executives in the Company’s peer group and closer to the median of market generally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
2018
Base Salary |
|
2019
Base Salary |
|
Increase |
|
Bob Patel |
|
$ |
1,575,000 |
|
$ |
1,575,000 |
|
|
0.0% |
|
Michael McMurray |
|
|
N/A |
|
$ |
800,000 |
|
|
N/A |
|
Thomas Aebischer |
|
$ |
769,153 |
|
$ |
796,073 |
|
|
3.5% |
|
Dan Coombs |
|
$ |
686,400 |
|
$ |
686,400 |
|
|
0.0% |
|
Ken Lane |
|
|
N/A |
|
$ |
750,000 |
|
|
N/A |
|
Torkel Rhenman |
|
|
N/A |
|
$ |
750,000 |
|
|
N/A |
|
2019
Annual Bonus Payments
The Company’s annual bonus program
rewards participants for achieving the Company’s annual objectives. Under this short-term incentive, or STI, program, the
Compensation Committee establishes metrics and target performance levels and sets a target bonus, determined as a percentage of
base salary, for each executive. In 2019, our NEOs’ target bonuses were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
2019 Target Bonus
(% of salary) |
|
Bob Patel |
|
|
160% |
|
Michael McMurray(1) |
|
|
N/A |
|
Thomas Aebischer |
|
|
90% |
|
Dan Coombs |
|
|
90% |
|
Ken Lane |
|
|
85% |
|
Torkel
Rhenman(2) |
|
|
90% |
|
(1) |
Mr. McMurray did not receive a 2019 STI award as he joined the Company
in November 2019. His target bonus for 2020 will be 90% of base salary. |
(2) |
Mr. Rhenman received a pro-rated 2019 STI award as a result of his partial
year of service with the Company beginning in July 2019. |
The amount of target bonus earned depends on the Compensation
Committee’s determination of Company and individual performance under each of the STI program metrics. STI awards for 2019
were calculated as follows:
ANNUAL
BONUS CALCULATION
(1) |
Mr. Patel’s STI payout is based entirely on Company performance. There is no individual performance component. |
(2) |
Overall payout under the STI program will not exceed 200% of an individual’s target bonus. |
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 40
COMPANY PERFORMANCE –
PAYOUT AT 69% OF TARGET
Payout for the Company performance component of the STI award
is based on achievement of target performance levels for three metrics: business results, HSE performance, and costs, weighted
as described below.
|
|
(1) |
Payout for the TRIR component of HSE performance
was reduced to 70% due to the occurrence of two fatalities at legacy A. Schulman sites. |
BUSINESS RESULTS (60%)
WHY
EBITDA? |
We believe that EBITDA is the financial measure that best enables shareholders to gauge our profitability and assess our business results. We determine performance under this metric by comparing EBITDA to our annual EBITDA budget, after making certain non-discretionary adjustments at the end of the year to account for market tailwinds and headwinds. Our aim is to ensure that our compensation rewards differential rather than circumstantial performance. These adjustments are reviewed in detail with, and approved by, the Compensation Committee to ensure they are rigorous and support the alignment of pay and performance. |
The Compensation Committee considers the Company’s
EBITDA relative to the adjusted EBITDA budget. Payout at 27% of target was based on 2019 EBITDA that fell below the Company’s
adjusted EBITDA budget for the year by 7.3%.
EBITDA Budget Adjustments. Each year
at its regularly scheduled November meeting, the Board reviews and approves the Company’s annual EBITDA budget for the coming
year. After completion of the year, and in order to ensure that our executives are compensated on the basis of differential rather
than circumstantial performance, the Company’s EBITDA budget may be adjusted in three primary ways. These adjustments can
increase the EBITDA budget in an upcycle or lower the budget in a downturn, and are used as a tool to ensure the Committee pays
for actual performance, not performance due to the volatility and cyclicality of the chemicals industry, which is heavily influenced
by energy prices.
Specifically, these adjustments account for
(i) differences between actual market margins or spreads and budget assumptions, (ii) movements in foreign-exchange rates, the
mark-to-market of certain assets (e.g., precious metals), and the same fixed cost exclusions taken into account when measuring
the Company’s cost performance, and (iii) the budget impact of significant unanticipated events. All adjustments are reviewed
and approved by the Compensation Committee and are subject to certain thresholds before an adjustment will be considered.
Adjustments for actual market margins or
spreads are calculated using independent third-party sources whenever available, including IHS Markit (IHS) and Phillip Townsend
Associates (PTAI). No market adjustments are made for businesses that do not have market references, including our Advanced Polymer
Solutions (APS) and Technology segments, and in 2019 slow industrial demand and headwinds in the automotive market caused non-adjusted
businesses such as APS to significantly underperform EBITDA budget assumptions. Similarly, while unfavorable margins customarily
have a negative impact on realized sales volumes, no adjustments are made to the EBITDA budget to account for those impacts.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 41
The table below summarizes the approved
adjustments, both positive and negative, to the Company’s 2019 EBITDA budget by segment, which collectively reduced the
EBITDA budget by 15.4% (net). To avoid disclosing competitively-sensitive information, we do not provide specific details on market impacts.
|
|
Segment(s) |
Description of EBITDA Budget Adjustments |
Olefins & Polyolefins – Americas |
Ethylene cash margin (IHS), polyethylene spread (PTAI), and polypropylene spread (PTAI) |
Olefins & Polyolefins – Europe, Asia, International |
Ethylene cash margin (IHS), polyethylene spread (PTAI), and polypropylene spread (PTAI) |
Intermediates & Derivatives |
U.S. methanol variable margin (IHS), styrene raw
material margin (IHS), and EU MTBE raw material margin (IHS) |
Refining |
Maya 2-1-1 crack spread, net of RINs and co-product spread |
All |
Foreign-exchange rate impacts, mark-to-market adjustments, and fixed cost exclusions |
Olefins & Polyolefins – Americas; Intermediates & Derivatives |
Impact of unanticipated Venezuelan sanctions |
|
|
NET EBITDA BUDGET IMPACT |
15.4% |
We
define EBITDA as Income from continuing operations before interest expense (net), provision for (benefit from) income taxes and
depreciation and amortization. For a reconciliation of EBITDA to net income for the year ended December 31, 2019, please refer
to Appendix A. At the Compensation Committee’s discretion, the Company’s annual EBITDA results may be adjusted for
the impact of certain extraordinary events during the year. For 2019, approved EBITDA adjustments included the impacts of the
Intercontinental Terminals Company fire event in March 2019 and French transport strikes in December 2019, as well as lower of
cost or market adjustments.
HSE PERFORMANCE (20%)
WHY
HSE PERFORMANCE? |
Operating in a safe, reliable manner protects our employees, our assets, and the communities in which we operate. We believe our focus on HSE performance is the right thing to do, and it helps contain costs of operations and avoid operational upsets and reputational harm. |
The
Compensation Committee primarily considers the Company’s performance in personal safety (70%) and process safety (30%) and
has discretion to adjust the resulting payout to account for environmental incidents and extraordinary trends and circumstances.
Personal safety is measured by the Company’s total recordable incident rate (“TRIR”), calculated as the number
of injuries per 200,000 hours worked. Process safety is measured by the Company’s process safety incident rate (“PSIR”),
which represents the number of Tier 1 incidents, as measured by the American Chemistry Council, per 200,000 hours worked. Due
to the occurrence of two fatalities at legacy A. Schulman sites during 2019, payout for the personal safety component of HSE performance
was capped at 80% and reduced by the Compensation Committee to 70% as recommended by management. This TRIR impact resulted in
overall payout at 88% of target despite PSIR that matched the Company’s record performance in 2018 and a sharp reduction
in environmental incidents. Absent fatalities, payout for the HSE performance component would have been 165%.
COSTS (20%)
WHY
COSTS? |
We believe maintaining controllable costs is vital to our success. We operate in an industry where a substantial portion of operating costs are market-driven and, in response, we drive a culture of cost discipline and strive to keep our fixed costs among the lowest in the industry. |
The Compensation Committee considers the Company’s adjusted
fixed costs as compared to our annual cost budget, adjusted downward by 1.5% for the impact of foreign exchange rates. 2019 adjustments
to fixed costs (cumulative impact of approximately 0.7%), all of which were approved by the Compensation Committee and subject
to de minimis thresholds, accounted for the positive and negative impacts of new lease accounting standards, true-up of current
and prior year bonus payments, unbudgeted expenditures on strategic transaction activity, cost savings resulting from delayed corporate
initiatives and capital projects, and unanticipated environmental reserve increases. Payout at 177% of target recognized that the
Company’s strong commitment to cost discipline in 2019 resulted in adjusted fixed costs that were 2.3% below budget.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 42
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE
Reduction of Maximum STI and Removal of Individual Modifier. For 2018 and prior years, payout under the Company’s
STI program was determined based on Company results multiplied by an individual performance modifier that ranged from
0 to 1.5. In 2019, the Compensation Committee determined to reduce the maximum payout under the STI program from 300% to 200%
of the executive’s target bonus, in line with market practices. The Committee also removed the individual modifier for
all employees, including our executives, and moved to a model under which bonuses will be determined 75% based on Company
performance and 25% based on individual performance, anchored to Company results. |
The
payouts awarded for the individual performance component of the NEOs’ STI award reflect their individual contributions to
achieving successful Company performance, whether they met or exceeded expectations for their respective roles, and any other
significant factors during the year, such as special projects, challenges, or other performance issues. Individual performance
ratings range from 0 to 200%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name(1) |
Individual
Target
Bonus |
Company Performance Component |
|
Individual Performance
Component |
STI Payout (as a % of salary) |
|
STI Payout |
Bob Patel(2) |
160% |
x |
69% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
= |
N/A |
|
$ |
1,600,000 |
Thomas Aebischer |
90% |
x |
[ (69% |
x |
75%) |
+ |
(69% |
x |
100% |
x |
25%) ] |
= |
62% |
|
$ |
490,239 |
Dan Coombs |
90% |
x |
[ (69% |
x |
75%) |
+ |
(69% |
x |
90% |
x |
25%) ] |
= |
61% |
|
$ |
415,598 |
Ken Lane |
85% |
x |
[ (69% |
x |
75%) |
+ |
(69% |
x |
120% |
x |
25%) ] |
= |
60% |
|
$ |
461,869 |
Torkel
Rhenman(3) |
90% |
x |
[ (69% |
x |
75%) |
+ |
(69% |
x |
130% |
x |
25%) ] |
= |
70% |
|
$ |
232,875 |
(1) |
Mr. McMurray did not receive a 2019 STI award as he joined the Company
in November 2019. |
(2) |
Mr. Patel’s 2019 STI award was adjusted lower at the discretion of
the Compensation Committee. See additional information below. |
(3) |
Mr. Rhenman received a pro-rated 2019 STI award as a result of his partial
year of service with the Company beginning in July 2019. |
The Compensation Committee has determined
that Mr. Patel’s payout under the STI program should be directly tied to, and determined by reference to, Company performance,
which is described on page 36. There is no individual performance component to his annual STI award, however, for 2019 the Committee
exercised its discretion to reduce his payout from 69% of target, or $1,738,000, to $1,600,000 due to certain challenges in global
projects performance. The Committee’s evaluation of each other NEO’s individual performance is described below.
Mr. Aebischer’s individual performance
rating of 100% was agreed in connection with his retirement.
Mr. Coombs’s individual performance
rating of 90% is a result of continued challenges in global projects performance, including cost and schedule overruns, balanced
by his leadership in achieving significantly improved turnaround performance for the Company and the successful start of commissioning
of the Hyperzone plant in 2019.
Mr. Lane’s individual performance rating
of 120% is based on his leadership of the global organization established to support the Company’s Olefins & Polyolefins
– Americas and Olefins & Polyolefins – Europe, Asia, International segments during the second half of 2019, as
well as the advancement of the Company’s planned joint venture with Liaoning Bora Enterprise Group through execution of a
memorandum of understanding and progress negotiating definitive agreements.
Mr. Rhenman’s individual performance
rating of 130% reflects his rapid and deep integration into his role leading the Company’s Intermediates & Derivatives
segment, strong leadership of the business and delivery of differential results throughout a challenging fourth quarter, and progress
toward formation of a joint venture with China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec), including the entry into a memorandum
of understanding in December 2019.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 43
2019 Long-Term Incentives
2019 GRANTS OF AWARDS
The long-term incentive awards granted to
the NEOs in 2019 included PSUs (50%), RSUs (25%), and stock options (25%). The allocation among these types of awards was determined
by the Compensation Committee to be the most appropriate split between equity that is performance-based (PSUs) and time-based (RSUs
and stock options).
|
Performance-based awards that pay out at 0 to 200% of target based on the Company’s total shareholder return (“TSR”) over a three-year period. PSUs only reward our executives if our shareholder return over the performance period compares favorably to that of our peers. |
|
Time-based awards that cliff vest after three years. RSUs provide retention value and encourage executives to consider the Company’s long-term success, strengthening the alignment between their interests and those of our shareholders. |
|
Time-based awards that are intended to direct executives’ focus toward increasing the market value of our shares. Options vest ratably over three years, expire ten years from the date of grant, and only provide value to the executive if there is an appreciation of our stock price over time. |
The value of long-term incentive awards
granted to the NEOs is determined as a percentage of base salary, except the award for our CEO, Mr. Patel, which was a fixed amount
in 2019. The Compensation Committee reviews the target awards annually and recommends changes based on the executive’s time
and experience in the position, changes in job responsibilities, and market data. At the February 2019 Compensation Committee
meeting, it was determined that Mr. Patel would receive a modest increase in LTI target value. The LTI target values for Messrs.
McMurray, Lane, and Rhenman were negotiated as part of each executive’s employment offer and determined based on each executive’s
role and experience, internal parity, and the competitive marketplace.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
2018 Target
(% of base salary) |
|
Total Value of
2018 LTI Awards |
|
2019 Target
(% of base salary) |
|
Total Value of 2019
LTI Awards |
|
Bob Patel(1) |
|
|
750 |
% |
|
11,812,500 |
|
|
N/A |
|
$ |
12,312,500 |
|
Michael McMurray(2) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
— |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
— |
|
Thomas Aebischer |
|
|
310 |
% |
|
2,384,000 |
|
|
310 |
% |
$ |
2,468,000 |
|
Dan Coombs(3) |
|
|
310 |
% |
|
2,128,000 |
|
|
248 |
% |
$ |
1,702,500 |
|
Ken Lane(4) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
— |
|
|
240 |
% |
$ |
838,500 |
|
Torkel Rhenman(4) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
— |
|
|
260 |
% |
$ |
935,000 |
|
(1) |
For 2019, Mr. Patel’s LTI target value was established
as an absolute value of $12,312,500 rather than as a percentage of base salary. |
(2) |
Mr. McMurray did not receive an annual LTI grant for 2019 and will receive
his first annual grant in 2020 with a target of 310% of base salary. Mr. McMurray did receive a one-time sign-on RSU and stock
option grant at the time of his employment, as described below. |
(3) |
Mr. Coombs’s 2019 LTI target value was adjusted to 80% of 2018 LTI
target value as a result of his individual performance rating for 2018. |
(4) |
Mr. Lane and Mr. Rhenman each received a pro-rata award under the 2019
LTI program as a result of their partial year of service with the Company beginning July 15 and July 10, respectively. Each
executive also received a one-time sign-on RSU grant as described below. |
For a description of the vesting and forfeiture of LTI awards
upon termination, please see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” at pages 56-58.
2019 GRANTS OF PSUs WITH A PERFORMANCE PERIOD
ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2021 (50%)
One-half of the value of our NEOs’
annual equity award in 2019 was granted in the form of PSUs. (Mr. McMurray did not receive an annual grant of PSUs in 2019.) The
number of units awarded was determined by dividing that dollar amount by the fair market value of our stock on the grant date.
PSUs accrue dividend equivalents during the performance period, which will be converted to additional units using the closing stock
price as of the end of the performance period on December 31, 2021. Each unit deemed earned on the basis of Company performance
will pay out in one share of the Company’s common stock after the performance period concludes.
The number of 2019 PSUs earned will depend
on the Company’s total shareholder return (“TSR”) over the performance period as compared to selected industry
peers. We believe use of relative TSR as the metric for performance provides transparency for shareholders and our executives,
rewards our executives if we out-perform our peers, and promotes executive accountability to and alignment with our shareholders.
The Compensation Committee compares TSR for the entire three-year performance period, using a 20-day closing average stock price
at the beginning and the end of the period and assuming all dividends are reinvested. As shown below, payout will range from 0
to 200%. There is no payout for negative TSR in the bottom half of the peer group or positive TSR in the bottom quartile of the
peer group.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 44
PAYOUT BY COMPANY TSR RANK
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
Positive TSR |
200% |
200% |
178% |
156% |
133% |
111% |
89% |
67% |
44% |
22% |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
Negative TSR |
100% |
100% |
83% |
67% |
50% |
33% |
17% |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
The companies
that are used as comparators in determining our relative
TSR performance (shown below) are the other thirteen companies in the S&P
500 Chemical Index at the
time the PSUs were
granted in February
20l9. The Compensation
Committee has provided for adjustments
to the peer group in the event of bankruptcies, acquisitions,
or going-private transactions involving any of the peers
during the performance period.
2019 PSUs - TSR PEER GROUP COMPANIES
Air Products & Chemicals
Albemarle Corporation
Celanese |
CF Industries Holdings
DowDuPont
Eastman Chemical
Ecolab |
FMC Corporation
International Flavors & Fragrances
Linde |
Mosaic
PPG Industries
Sherwin-Williams |
2019
GRANTS OF RSUs (25%)
In 20l9,
each of our NEOs (other than Mr. McMurray)
received a number of RSUs calculated by dividing 25% of the dollar amount of his LTI
target by the fair
market value of the Company’s shares on the date
of grant .The 20l9 RSU grants vest in
full three years after
the date of grant. Upon vesting, holders of RSUs receive
one share of the Company’s common stock for
each RSU. RSU holders also receive cash dividend equivalents on their
units throughout the vesting
period.
2019
GRANTS OF STOCK OPTIONS (25%)
The number of options
granted to each NEO is determined by dividing 25% of the
value of his annual LTI target by the Black-Scholes value
of options for the Company as of the grant date. The options
granted to the NEOs in 20l9 vest in three equal installments
beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, and expire ten years after the grant date. The exercise price of the options
is the fair market value of the Company’s
shares on the grant date.
EARNED
PERCENTAGE FOR 2017 PSUs WITH A PERFORMANCE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019
Each of
our NEOs employed by the Company
in 20l7 (Messrs. Patel, Aebischer, and Coombs) received a PSU award with a performance period
that ended December 3l, 20l9. Payout of these PSUs is determined, as for the 20l9 PSUs, based on the Company’s relative TSR
over the performance period. Specifically, the
Compensation Committee compared our three-year TSR against
that of our peers using a 20-day closing
average stock price at the beginning and
the end of the performance
period and adjusting for dividends. At its meeting in
February 2020, the Compensation Committee determined that
50% of target had been earned under the 20l7
PSUs, reflecting the fact that
the Company’s TSR,
while positive, fell
in the bottom half of our peers.
PAYOUT BY COMPANY TSR
RANK
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
Positive TSR |
200% |
200% |
175% |
150% |
125% |
100% |
75% |
50% |
25% |
-- |
-- |
-- |
Negative TSR |
100% |
100% |
80% |
60% |
40% |
20% |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
The companies
used as comparators in determining the
Company’s relative TSR performance
are shown below and represent the eleven companies that were included with LyondellBasell in
the S&P 500 Chemicals Index at
the time the PSUs were granted in February 20l7, adjusted
to reflect the merger of Dow Chemical and E.I. du Pont
de Nemuors into the combined company DowDuPont and the
subsequent acquisitions of Praxair and Monsanto.
2017 PSUs - TSR PEER GROUP COMPANIES
Air Products & Chemicals
Albemarle Corporation
CF Industries
DowDuPont |
Eastman Chemical
Ecolab
FMC Corporation |
International Flavors & Fragrances
Mosaic
PPG Industries
Sherwin-Williams |
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 45
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION CONCERNING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Share Ownership and
Holding Requirements
The Company’s Share Ownership Guidelines
require executives to achieve
an ownership of Company shares that is valued at a percentage
of their respective base salaries. Executives
are expected to meet or
exceed the guidelines
within fIve years of
their hiring or promotion into their role. They may
not sell shares
unless and until
these ownership levels have
been met and then only
shares in excess of
the required
levels may be sold.
Under the guidelines, shares beneficially
owned and RSUs count towards meeting the ownership thresholds.
We determine
compliance with our Share Ownership Guidelines annually
in January. The
number of shares held by each of our NEOs as a multiple
of base salary as of January 15, 2020 is set forth
below. Messrs. McMurray, Coombs, Lane,
and Rhenman are still
within the five-year transition period for attaining
their required ownership. Mr.
Aebischer is no longer
subject to the Share
Ownership Guidelines
following his
retirement on December 31, 2019.
Name |
Required Ownership as a Multiple of Base Salary |
Shares held as a Multiple of Base Salary |
Complies or Within 5-Year Transition Period |
Bob patel |
6x |
17.3x |
|
Michael McMurray |
4x |
2.5x |
|
Dan Coombs |
4x |
3.7x |
|
Ken Lane |
3x |
2.6x |
|
Torkel Rhenman |
3x |
2.0x |
|
Clawbacks
Under the
Company’s clawback policy,
the Compensation Committee can elect to
recover annual bonus
or equity compensation
from any executive determined to have engaged in misconduct
that increased the value of the
compensation he or she received. In 2019,
the Compensation Committee enhanced this policy
to provide that annual
bonus compensation may be recovered if
an executive engages in misconduct,
including
any act or failure to act causing a violation of law,
Company policies, or
GAAP, whether or not such misconduct affected the
calculation of such bonus compensation.
Hedging and Pledging
Policies
All of our executive
officers, including our NEOs, are subject to
our Policy Prohibiting
Insider Trading. Under this
policy, executives may not purchase, sell or
write options on LyondellBasell shares, engage in
short sales, or participate in any
other derivative or
short-term purchase or sale transactions
that would enable them to hedge
the economic risk of their
share ownership. Additionally, our executives are prohibited
from pledging LyondellBasell
shares as collateral for personal loans or
other obligations, including holding
shares in a brokerage margin account. These
restrictions extend to executives’
immediate family members and certain
related entities and are intended to keep our executives’
interests aligned with the
long-term interests of the
Company and our shareholders.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 46
NEO Appointments and
Departures
In 2019,
the Company’s new leadership
team members include three
of our NEOs: Michael McMurray, Executive
Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer; Ken Lane, Executive Vice
President, Global Olefins and Polyolefins; and Torkel Rhenman,
Executive Vice President, Global Intermediates
and Derivatives. Pursuant to the terms of their respective offer letters,
each newly hired NEO received
a one-time cash payment, which must be repaid, in
whole or in part, if
the executive’s employment is terminated by the Company
for cause or if he terminates his employment voluntarily within the
first two years of
his employment. Each executive also received a sign-on equity
grant which vests in equal installments
over a three-year period beginning
on the first anniversary of the
date of grant .The Company
also paid or reimbursed reasonable expenses incurred as a result of each executive’s relocation to Houston,
Texas.
Name |
Start Date |
Sign-on
Cash Award(1) |
Sign-on
Equity Grant(2) |
Relocation Expenses |
Michael McMurray |
November 5 |
$ 750,000 |
$ 3,750,000 |
$ 206,101 |
Ken Lane |
July 15 |
$ 750,000 |
$ 1,450,000 |
$ 210,429 |
Torkel Rhenman |
July 10 |
$ 350,000 |
$ 650,000 |
$ 206,101 |
| (1) | Mr. McMurray’s cash payment must be repaid in full if there is a qualifying
termination prior to the first anniversary of his date of employment, and 50% of the total payment must be repaid if there is a
qualifying termination between the first and second anniversaries of his date of employment. Mr. Lane and Mr. Rhenman must repay
their respective cash payments if there is a qualifying termination prior to the second anniversary of the executive’s date
of employment. |
| (2) | Mr. McMurray’s equity grant was awarded 60% in RSUs and 40% in stock options. The equity
grants to Mr. Lane and Mr. Rhenman were awarded in RSUs. |
Mr.
Aebischer, our former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
officer, retired from the Company on
December 31, 2019. Pursuant to an employment transition agreement, Mr. Aebischer
received a transition payment of $250,000 at the time of his retirement and is entitled
to an additional $250,000 which has been and will continue to be paid in twelve equal monthly installments following his
retirement so long as he complies with customary
confidentiality, cooperation, non-competition, non-solicitation and
non-disparagement obligations. Upon
his retirement, Mr. Aebischer’s unvested equity awards vested pro rata on the terms described
under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or
Change in Control-Retirement” at page
57.
Perquisites and
Other Benefits
Our NEOs
receive the same benefits generally provided to all of our employees, which include vacation
allowances, Company matching under our 401(k) plan, Company
contributions to our defined benefit pension plan, and health and welfare benefits. The perquisites received by our executives
that are not offered to all employees include:
| | Annual executive physical |
| | Financial,tax,
and estate planning -The Company
will reimburse up to $15,000 of expenses. |
| | Matching under the
U.S. Deferral Plan- The
Company makes contributions to
the U.S. Deferral
Plan for amounts that exceed the
IRS base salary limits
on matching under our 401(k)
plan and contributions to our defined benefit pension plan. The
value of the contributions is
11% for
all base salary compensation in
excess of the IRS
limits. |
From time
to time, the Company provides other benefits to our executives
that are intended for business purposes, including
tax equalization payments, limited
personal use of Company aircraft or payment for spouse
travel, relocation benefits, and the payment of business club memberships or dues.
Tax equalization
payments are designed to make executives whole if they incur
income tax in jurisdictions other than
their country and/or state of residence. For example,
executives may travel to other jurisdictions on
Company business and may be taxed based on days
worked in those jurisdictions. If, and
only to the extent, those additional taxes cannot be
offset against the executive’s regular income tax liability (such
as in the form of credits), the Company will
reimburse an amount sufficient to make the executive’s tax liability equal
to the full income
tax for his jurisdiction of residence only.
The primary
use of Company aircraft
is for business purposes and must be authorized by our
CEO. From time to time and with CEO approval, spouses,
family members or personal guests may accompany our executive officers on Company aircraft.
The Company may also pay or reimburse the cost of occasional
spouse travel related to business trips. When approved
travel of a family
member or guest is imputed
as income to the executive
officer, we reimburse the additional income tax incurred.
Taxes
Section 162(m)
of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code
limits the deductibility of compensation paid to certain
executives, including our CEO, CFO, and our three
other most highly compensated officers, to $1 million annually. Prior to adoption of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “TCJA”), the
deduction limit did not apply to certain
performance-based compensation. We historically took Section 162(m) and the deductibility of
compensation, among other factors, into consideration
in structuring our annual bonuses and long-term incentive
awards (other than our RSUs) so that
they would qualify as
performance-based compensation and these amounts would be fully deductible for income tax purposes. Given the changes made by
the TCJA, annual bonuses and long-term incentive awards
granted by the Company are no longer exempt from the
$1 million deduction limit.
The Compensation
Committee will continue to consider tax implications (including the
lack of deductibility under section 162(m)) among other relevant factors in designing and
implementing our executive compensation programs. We will continue
to monitor taxation, applicable incentives, standard practice in our industry, and
other factors and adjust our executive compensation programs as needed.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 47
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation
Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis with management and, based on such review and discussions,
recommended to the Board
of Directors that the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included
in this
proxy statement.
The Compensation Committee
Nance Dicciani, Chair
Robin Buchanan
Claire Farley
Bella Goren
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 48
COMPENSATION
TABLES
Summary Compensation Table
The following
table sets forth information
with respect to the compensation
of our NEOs for the
years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Name and Principal Position |
Year |
Salary(5)
($) |
Bonus(6)
($) |
Stock
Awards(7)
($) |
Option
Awards(8)
($) |
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(9)
($) |
Change in
Pension
Value(10)
($) |
All Other
Compensation(11)
($) |
Total
($) |
Bob
Patel
Chief Executive
Officer |
2019 |
1,575,000 |
— |
9,234,533 |
3,078,125 |
1,600,000 |
20,332 |
435,323 |
15,943,313 |
2018 |
1,573,558 |
— |
8,859,526 |
2,953,136 |
4,536,001 |
13,212 |
271,364 |
18,206,797 |
2017 |
1,497,596 |
— |
8,437,663 |
2,812,521 |
4,435,200 |
20,731 |
385,660 |
17,589,372 |
Michael
McMurray(1)
Executive Vice
President and Chief
Financial Officer |
2019 |
104,615 |
750,000 |
2,250,026 |
1,500,003 |
— |
4,751 |
211,639 |
4,821,034 |
Thomas
Aebischer(2)
Former Executive
Vice President
and Chief Financial
Officer |
2019 |
788,825 |
— |
1,850,978 |
616,962 |
490,239 |
14,922 |
286,890 |
4,048,816 |
2018 |
763,122 |
— |
1,788,421 |
596,112 |
1,360,787 |
13,208 |
93,416 |
4,615,066 |
2017 |
726,023 |
— |
1,736,269 |
578,737 |
880,768 |
12,736 |
77,566 |
4,012,099 |
Dan
Coombs
Executive
Vice President Global
Manufacturing,
Projects, and
Refining |
2019 |
686,400 |
— |
1,276,790 |
425,569 |
415,598 |
16,395 |
80,877 |
2,901,629 |
2018 |
679,292 |
— |
1,763,003 |
531,973 |
881,138 |
14,596 |
79,057 |
3,949,060 |
2017 |
643,846 |
— |
1,485,079 |
495,011 |
941,097 |
14,601 |
70,905 |
3,650,539 |
Ken
Lane(3)
Executive Vice
President Global
Olefins & Polyolefins |
2019 |
331,731 |
750,000 |
2,078,897 |
209,595 |
461,869 |
12,405 |
238,826 |
4,083,323 |
Torkel
Rhenman(4)
Executive
Vice President
Intermediates and
Derivatives |
2019 |
340,385 |
350,000 |
1,351,322 |
233,745 |
240,053 |
13,010 |
236,838 |
2,765,353 |
| (1) | Mr. McMurray joined the
Company on November 5, 2019. |
| (2) | Mr. Aebischer retired effective
December 31, 2019. |
| (3) | Mr. Lane joined the Company
on July 15, 2019. |
| (4) | Mr. Rhenman joined the
Company on July 10, 2019. |
| (5) | Mr. Patel’s employment
agreement provides that he receives an annual base salary of no less than $1,500,000. |
| (6) | Represents cash sign-on
bonuses paid in connection with the appointments of Mr. McMurray, Mr. Lane, and Mr. Rhenman. |
| (7) | Stock
awards granted to NEOs in 2019 include RSUs and PSUs. The RSUs are granted under the LyondellBasell Industries Long Term Incentive
Plan (the “LTIP”) and entitle the recipient to an equal number of shares of the Company’s stock when the RSUs
vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant. RSUs receive cash dividend equivalents at the same time dividends are paid
on the Company’s stock. Amounts included in the table are the aggregate grant date fair values of the awards calculated in
accordance with ASC 718. The PSUs are also granted under the LTIP. The PSUs entitle the recipient to a number of shares of the
Company’s common stock equal to the number of units, multiplied by an earned percentage that can range from 0 to 200% of
the targeted number of units based on Company performance. The PSUs accrue dividend equivalents during the performance period in
the form of additional units. See Note 17 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the “2019 Annual Report”) for a discussion of the calculation of the fair
value of the awards. |
Annual grants of
RSUs and PSUs are made at the first regularly scheduled Compensation Committee meeting of the calendar year. Pursuant to his employment
agreement, Mr. Patel is eligible to receive annual equity awards, including RSUs, PSUs and stock options as discussed under footnote
8 below, with an aggregate value of no less than 750% of his base salary. In July 2019, at the time of their respective hirings,
Mr. Lane and Mr. Rhenman each received a pro-rata annual grant of RSUs, PSUs, and stock options, as well as a one-time sign-on
award of RSUs. Mr. McMurray did not receive an annual equity grant for 2019, but did receive a one-time sign-on grant of RSUs and
stock options. The following is the aggregate grant date fair value of the PSUs granted in 2019 if we assumed the maximum amounts
(200% of target) will be earned: Bob Patel - $12,312,651; Thomas Aebischer - $2,467,911; Dan Coombs - $1,702,386; Ken Lane - $838,361;
Torkel Rhenman - $935,061.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 49
| (8) | Stock options are also
granted under the
LTIP and annual awards
are made at the first regularly
scheduled Compensation Committee meeting of
the calendar year. Mr. Lane and Mr. Rhenman received
their pro-rata stock option grants in July
2019. Mr. McMurray did not receive an annual stock
option grant for 2019 but did receive a one-time
sign-on grant in November 2019.
The stock options vest
ratably over a three-year
period beginning with the first anniversary
of the date of grant
and expire after ten
years. The amounts shown
are the fair values
of the stock options on the
date of grant, in accordance
with ASC 718. The fair
values of stock options
were calculated using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. We use the
Black-Scholes formula to calculate
an assumed value of the options
for compensation expense
purposes; because the formula uses
assumptions,the fair values
calculated are not
necessarily indicative
of the actual values
of the stock options. |
The
assumptions used for the annual grants to Messrs.
Patel, Aebischer, and Coombs were: a dividend yield of 4%; a risk-free interest rate of
2.551%; an expected life of
6 years; and stock price volatility of 27.45%. The assumptions used
for the November grant to Mr. McMurray were: a dividend yield
of 5%; a risk-free
interest rate of 1.709%; an expected life of
6 years; and stock price volatility of
28.11%. The assumptions used for
the July grants to Mr.
Lane and Mr. Rhenman
were: a dividend yield
of 4%; a risk-free
interest rate of 1.901%; an expected
life of 6 years; and stock
price volatility of 27.22%. See Note
17 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial
Statements in the 2019 Annual Report for a
discussion of the calculation of the fair value of the awards.
| (9) | Amounts of Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Compensation in
2019 are the annual
bonuses paid out in March 2020 for performance during 2019.
Mr. Patel’s employment agreement provides that
he will be
eligible for an
annual bonus with a target
amount of no less than
160% of his base salary. Mr. McMurray
did not receive an
annual bonus for 2019 as he joined
the Company in November. However,
he received a sign-on cash payment in
the amount of $750,000,
paid in January 2020,
as reflected
under the “Bonus”
column of the Summary Compensation Table.
Mr. Lane was paid his
annual bonus based
on annual salary, without
pro-ration. Mr. Rhenman was
paid a pro-rated annual bonus based on his partial year of service. |
| (10) | Amounts include increases
during 2019 in the
actuarial present values of benefits under the LyondellBasell
Retirement Plan. The increases
are calculated based on the difference
between the total benefit actuarially reduced
from age 65 to current
age and the present value of the benefits under the
plan. See the “Pension
Benefits” table on page
55 for more information. |
| (11) | Amounts included in “All
Other Compensation”
for 2019 in the
table above include the following
(amounts in
dollars): |
| | |
Name |
Matching
401(k)
and Pension
Contributions(a)
($) |
Matching
Deferral Plan
Contributions(b)
($) |
Tax
Reimbursements(c)
($) |
Personal
Use
of Aircraft(d)
($) |
Relocation
Expenses(e)
($) |
Other(f)
($) |
Total
($) |
Bob
Patel(g) |
16,800 |
142,450 |
224,113 |
29,310 |
— |
22,650 |
435,323 |
Michael McMurray |
5,538 |
— |
— |
— |
206,101 |
— |
211,639 |
Thomas Aebischer |
16,800 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
270,090 |
286,890 |
Dan Coombs |
16,800 |
44,704 |
— |
1,822 |
— |
17,552 |
80,877 |
Ken Lane |
16,800 |
5,690 |
— |
— |
210,429 |
5,907 |
238,826 |
Torkel Rhenman |
16,800 |
6,642 |
— |
— |
206,101 |
7,295 |
236,838 |
| (a) | Includes Company matching
contributions to each NEO’s 401(k) and the Company’s pension plan contributions. |
| (b) | Includes
Company contributions under the Company’s U.S. Senior Management Deferral Plan. See the “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
in 2019” table on page 55 for more information. |
| (c) | Includes
Company reimbursement, and a gross-up on that reimbursement, of state taxes owed for work performed in those states on behalf of
the Company. |
| (d) | Represents
the approximate incremental cost to the Company for the personal use of Company aircraft by the NEO’s spouse or personal
guest in 2019 or the payment or reimbursement of commercial spouse travel related to business trips, as well as reimbursement of
additional income tax incurred by the NEO when the cost of such travel is imputed as income. Approximate incremental cost for travel
on Company aircraft has been determined based on the total trip charge for each flight segment divided by the total number of passengers
traveling on that segment. |
| (e) | Represents
Company-paid or reimbursed relocation expenses, including gross-ups on those amounts of $81,101, $82,804 and $81,101 for Messrs.
McMurray, Lane, and Rhenman, respectively. |
| (f) | Includes
executive physicals; payment of professional fees for tax filings; payment of business club memberships and dues; and financial
planning allowances, none of which individually exceeded the greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total amount of other compensation
for the executive in 2019. For Mr. Aebischer, also includes the $250,000 transition payment earned in connection with his retirement. |
| (g) | Under
his employment agreement, Mr. Patel is eligible to participate in the benefit programs generally available to senior executives
of the Company. |
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 50
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
|
Estimated
Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2) |
|
Estimated
Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(3) |
All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units(4) |
All
Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options(5) |
Exercise or
Base Price
of Option
Awards
($) |
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards
($) |
Name |
Grant
Date(1) |
Target
($) |
Max. ($) |
|
Target
(#) |
Max. (#) |
Bob Patel |
02/21/2019 |
2,520,000 |
5,040,000 |
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
02/21/2019 |
— |
— |
|
69,563 |
139,126 |
— |
— |
— |
6,156,326 |
|
02/21/2019 |
— |
— |
|
— |
— |
34,782 |
— |
— |
3,078,207 |
|
02/21/2019 |
— |
— |
|
— |
— |
– |
190,596 |
88.50 |
3,078,125 |
Michael McMurray |
11/05/2019 |
— |
— |
|
— |
— |
23,108 |
— |
— |
2,250,026 |
11/05/2019 |
— |
— |
|
— |
— |
— |
103,306 |
97.37 |
1,500,003 |
Thomas Aebischer |
02/21/2019 |
716,466 |
1,432,932 |
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
02/21/2019 |
— |
— |
|
13,943 |
27,886 |
— |
— |
— |
1,233,956 |
|
02/21/2019 |
— |
— |
|
— |
— |
6,972 |
— |
— |
617,022 |
|
02/21/2019 |
— |
— |
|
— |
— |
— |
38,202 |
88.50 |
616,962 |
Dan Coombs |
02/21/2019 |
617,760 |
1,235,520 |
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
02/21/2019 |
— |
— |
|
9,618 |
19,236 |
— |
— |
— |
851,193 |
|
02/21/2019 |
— |
— |
|
— |
— |
4,809 |
— |
— |
425,597 |
|
02/21/2019 |
— |
— |
|
— |
— |
— |
26,351 |
88.50 |
425,569 |
Ken Lane |
07/15/2019 |
637,500 |
1,275,000 |
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
07/15/2019 |
— |
— |
|
4,881 |
9,762 |
– |
— |
— |
419,180 |
|
07/15/2019 |
— |
— |
|
— |
— |
19,326 |
— |
— |
1,659,717 |
|
07/15/2019 |
— |
— |
|
— |
— |
— |
14,346 |
85.88 |
209,595 |
Torkel Rhenman |
07/15/2019 |
323,630 |
647,260 |
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
– |
07/15/2019 |
— |
— |
|
5,444 |
10,888 |
— |
— |
— |
467,531 |
|
07/15/2019 |
— |
— |
|
— |
— |
10,291 |
— |
— |
883,791 |
|
07/15/2019 |
— |
— |
|
— |
— |
— |
15,999 |
85.88 |
233,745 |
| (1) | The
grant date of February 21, 2019 is the date of the first regularly-scheduled Board meeting
that follows the first regularly-scheduled Compensation Committee meeting of the calendar
year when annual grants are made. Mr. McMurray received his 2019 sign-on grants of RSUs
and options on November 5, 2019 when he joined the Company. Mr. Lane and Mr. Rhenman
received their 2019 annual and sign-on grants of RSUs, PSUs and options on July 15, 2019
when they joined the Company. |
| (2) | The awards shown
are the estimated possible payouts of the NEOs’ annual bonus payments for performance in 2019. Actual bonus (STI) payments
for 2019 are shown in the Summary Compensation Table under the column “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.” The
NEOs’ target bonuses are a percentage of base salary. The maximum shown in the table is the maximum amount that can be earned
under the terms of the STI plan, which is 200% of target. Each performance measure is assessed and weighted, and payments can range
from 0 – 200% of target. |
| (3) | Represents PSUs.
These awards, granted in 2019, are earned over a three-year performance period ending December 31, 2021, with payouts, if any,
in the first quarter of 2022. The performance criterion for the PSUs is assessed, and payments can range from 0 – 200% of
the target award, to be settled in shares. These awards accrue dividend equivalents during the performance period in the form of
additional units. |
| (4) | Represents RSUs.
The regular RSU grants made on February 21, 2019 and the pro-rata annual RSU grants to Mr. Lane (2,441 RSUs) and Mr. Rhenman (2,722
RSUs) on July 15, 2019 will vest three years from the respective grant dates. Mr. McMurray’s one-time sign-on RSU grant made
on November 5, 2019 (23,108 RSUs) and the one-time sign-on RSU grants made to Mr. Lane (16,885 RSUs) and Mr. Rhenman (7,569 RSUs)
on July 15, 2019 will each vest in equal increments over a three-year period beginning on the first anniversary of their respective
grant dates. RSUs receive cash dividend equivalents. |
| (5) | Represents annual
stock option grants and Mr. McMurray’s one-time sign-on stock option grant in November 2019. The exercise price of all options
is equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. All stock options included in the table vest in equal increments over a
three-year period beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant and expire ten years after the date of grant. |
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 51
Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31,
2019
|
Option Awards |
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
Name |
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable |
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable(1) |
Option
Exercise
Price
($) |
Option
Expiration
Date |
|
Number
of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested(2) |
Market Value
Of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested(3)
($) |
Number
of
Unearned
Shares, Units,
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested(4) |
Market
or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units,
or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested(3)
($) |
Bob Patel |
2,418 |
— |
85.80 |
02/20/2024 |
|
115,834 |
10,943,996 |
123,705 |
11,687,448 |
|
170,294 |
56,764 |
76.15 |
01/12/2025 |
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
70,211 |
— |
89.94 |
02/17/2025 |
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
101,108 |
— |
77.93 |
02/16/2026 |
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
87,048 |
43,524 |
92.69 |
02/16/2027 |
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
45,552 |
91,104 |
109.09 |
02/21/2028 |
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
— |
190,596 |
88.50 |
02/21/2029 |
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
Michael McMurray |
— |
103,306 |
97.37 |
11/05/2029 |
|
23,108 |
2,183,244 |
— |
— |
Thomas Aebischer |
26,042 |
— |
86.90 |
12/31/2024 |
|
— |
— |
11,934 |
1,127,524 |
27,066 |
— |
77.93 |
12/31/2024 |
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
26,620 |
— |
92.69 |
12/31/2024 |
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
23,882 |
— |
109.09 |
12/31/2024 |
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
21,401 |
— |
88.50 |
12/31/2024 |
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
Dan Coombs |
4,871 |
— |
101.10 |
05/29/2025 |
|
16,558 |
1,564,400 |
19,371 |
1,830,172 |
|
16,427 |
— |
77.93 |
02/16/2026 |
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
15,321 |
7,660 |
92.69 |
02/16/2027 |
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
8,207 |
16,410 |
109.09 |
02/21/2028 |
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
— |
26,351 |
88.50 |
02/21/2029 |
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
Ken Lane |
— |
14,346 |
85.88 |
07/15/2029 |
|
19,326 |
1,825,920 |
4,881 |
461,157 |
Torkel Rhenman |
— |
15,999 |
85.88 |
07/15/2029 |
|
10,291 |
972,294 |
5,444 |
574,349 |
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 52
| (1) | The vesting schedules of the unexercisable stock
options are shown below: |
Name |
Total Unvested
Stock Options |
Exercise Price
($) |
2020 Vesting Details |
2021 Vesting Details |
2022 Vesting Details |
Bob Patel |
56,764 |
76.15 |
56,764 vested on
January 12, 2020 |
|
|
|
43,524 |
92.69 |
43,524 vested on
February 16, 2020 |
|
|
|
91,104 |
109.09 |
45,552 vested on
February 21, 2020 |
45,552 vesting on
February 21, 2021 |
|
|
190,596 |
88.50 |
63,532 vested on
February 21, 2020 |
63,532 vesting on
February 21, 2021 |
63,532 vesting on
February 21, 2022 |
Michael McMurray |
103,306 |
97.37 |
34,436 vesting on
November 5, 2020 |
34,435 vesting on
November 5, 2021 |
34,435 vesting on
November 5, 2022 |
Dan Coombs |
7,660 |
92.69 |
7,660 vested on
February 16, 2020 |
|
|
|
16,410 |
109.09 |
8,205 vested on
February 21, 2020 |
8,205 vesting on
February 21, 2021 |
|
|
26,351 |
88.50 |
8,785 vested on
February 21, 2020 |
8,783 vesting on
February 21, 2021 |
8,783 vesting on
February 21, 2022 |
Ken Lane |
14,346 |
85.88 |
4,782 vesting on
July 15, 2020 |
4,782 vesting on
July 15, 2021 |
4,782 vesting on
July 15, 2022 |
Torkel Rhenman |
15,999 |
85.88 |
5,333 vesting on
July 15, 2020 |
5,333 vesting on
July 15, 2021 |
5,333 vesting on
July 15, 2022 |
| (2) | Includes RSUs for each of the
NEOs, the vesting schedules for which are shown
below: |
Name |
Total
Unvested RSUs |
Vesting
Schedule |
Bob Patel |
115,834 |
23,637 vested on 1/12/2020 |
|
|
30,344 vested on 2/16/2020 |
|
|
27,071 vesting on 2/21/2021 |
|
|
34,782 vesting on 2/21/2022 |
Michael McMurray |
23,108 |
7,704 vesting on 11/5/2020 |
|
|
7,702 vesting on 11/5/2021 |
|
|
7,702 vesting on 11/5/2022 |
Dan Coombs |
16,558 |
5,341 vested on 2/16/2020 |
|
|
6,408 vesting on 2/21/2021 |
|
|
4,809 vesting on 2/21/2022 |
Ken Lane |
19,326 |
5,629 vesting on 7/15/2020 |
|
|
5,628 vesting on 7/15/2021 |
|
|
8,069 vesting on 7/15/2022 |
Torkel Rhenman |
10,291 |
2,523 vesting on 7/15/2020 |
|
|
2,523 vesting on 7/15/2021 |
|
|
5,245 vesting on 7/15/2022 |
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 53
(3) | Dollar
values are based on the closing price of $94.48 of the Company’s shares on the
NYSE on December 31, 2019. |
(4) | Includes
PSUs granted in 2018 and 2019 with three-year performance periods ending December 31,
2020 and December 31, 2021, respectively. We have included the targeted number of PSUs,
although payouts on PSUs are made after the Company’s financial results for the
performance period are reported and the Compensation Committee determines achievement
of performance goals and corresponding vesting, typically in mid to late February of
the following year. The PSUs for the 2017-2019 performance period are not included in
the table as they are considered earned as of December 31, 2019 for proxy disclosure
purposes; those PSUs are included in the “Option Exercises and Stock Vested”
table below. The PSUs in the table above include the following: |
|
|
|
PSUs with Three-Year Performance |
|
Period
Ending December 31, |
Name |
2020 |
2021 |
Bob Patel |
54,142 |
69,563 |
Michael McMurray |
– |
– |
Thomas Aebischer |
7,286 |
4,648 |
Dan Coombs |
9,753 |
9,618 |
Ken Lane |
– |
4,881 |
Torkel
Rhenman |
– |
5,444 |
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested(1)
|
Stock
Awards(2) |
|
|
Value
Realized |
|
Number of Shares |
on
Vesting |
Name |
Acquired
on Vesting |
($) |
Bob Patel |
83,806 |
7,111,951 |
Michael McMurray |
– |
– |
Thomas Aebischer |
17,448 |
1,473,745 |
Dan Coombs |
10,238 |
863,101 |
Ken Lane |
– |
– |
Torkel
Rhenman |
– |
– |
(1) | There
were no exercises of option awards in 2019 and, therefore, the Company has omitted the
columns that would otherwise represent the number of shares acquired and value received
on exercises from the table above. |
(2) | Includes
RSUs that vested in 2019 and PSUs granted in 2017 with a performance period ended December
31, 2019, as well as RSUs and PSUs that vested pro-rata upon Mr. Aebischer’s retirement
on December 31, 2019. The Compensation Committee determined the achievement of performance
goals and corresponding vesting of the PSUs in February 2020. The number of shares acquired
on vesting for both RSUs and PSUs is the gross number of shares for all NEOs, although
we withhold shares in payment of minimum statutory withholding taxes when the awards
vest. The value realized for RSUs is the number of gross shares vested multiplied by
the market price on the date the restrictions lapsed. The value realized for PSUs is
the number of gross shares vested multiplied by the market price on the date the Compensation
Committee determined the earned percentage of shares. The table below shows the gross
number of shares that vested under both RSUs and PSUs for each of the NEOs in 2019. |
|
|
PSUs
Earned for Performance Period |
Name |
RSUs Vested in 2019 |
Ending December 31,
2019 |
Bob Patel |
49,704 |
34,102 |
Michael McMurray |
– |
– |
Thomas Aebischer |
10,430 |
7,018 |
Dan Coombs |
4,235 |
6,002 |
Ken Lane |
– |
– |
Torkel
Rhenman |
– |
– |
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 54
Pension
Benefits
Name
|
Plan
Name
|
Number
of Years
Credited
Service(1)
|
Present
Value of Accumulated
Benefit(2) ($)
|
Payments
During Last Fiscal
Year ($)
|
Bob
Patel
|
LyondellBasell
Retirement Plan
|
10
|
132,473
|
—
|
Michael
McMurray
|
LyondellBasell
Retirement Plan
|
0
|
4,751
|
—
|
Mhomas
Aebischer
|
LyondellBasell
Retirement Plan
|
3
|
40,866
|
—
|
Dan
Coombs
|
LyondellBasell
Retirement Plan
|
5
|
66,605
|
—
|
Ken
Lane
|
LyondellBasell
Retirement Plan
|
0
|
12,405
|
—
|
Torkel
Rhenman
|
LyondellBasell
Retirement Plan
|
0
|
13,010
|
—
|
| (1) | Mr.
Aebischer joined the Company in January 2016 but did not accrue benefits under the U.S.
LyondellBasell Retirement Plan while located outside of the United States. Mr. Aebischer
was credited with vesting service under the plan for the full period of his employment
with the Company. |
| (2) | The
amounts shown in the table are the actuarial present value of each participant’s
accumulated benefits as of December 31, 2019, calculated on the same basis as used in
Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2019 Annual Report, with the
exception that each participant was assumed to continue to be actively employed by us
until age 65 (earliest unreduced retirement age) and immediately commence his benefit
at that time. |
The
LyondellBasell Retirement Plan is a U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan that provides pension benefits under a cash balance
formula that defines participants’ accrued benefits in terms of a notional cash account balance. Eligible employees become
participants immediately upon employment and are fully vested upon the earliest of (i) three years of service, (ii) death, or
(iii) reaching age 65. The notional account balance for each participant comprises a pay credit of 5% and interest credits, each
of which are accumulated at the end of each quarter. Pay credits are based on quarterly base pay, as limited by the Internal Revenue
Code, and interest credits are based on the 5th, 4th,
and 3rd monthly- determined 30-year treasury rates before the start of that quarter.
Benefits under the plan are payable upon separation from the Company.
Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation in 2019
Name
|
Executive
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year(1) ($)
|
Registrant
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year(1)(2) ($)
|
Aggregate
Earnings
in Last Fiscal
Year(3) ($)
|
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions(4) ($)
|
Aggregate
Balance
at Last Fiscal
Year End(5) ($)
|
Bob
patel
|
—
|
142,450
|
124,282
|
—
|
892,479
|
Michael
McMurray
|
—
|
–
|
–
|
—
|
–
|
Thomas
Aebischer
|
—
|
–
|
14,422
|
—
|
108,653
|
Dan
Coombs
|
—
|
44,704
|
19,712
|
—
|
189,647
|
Ken
Lane
|
—
|
5,690
|
–
|
—
|
5,690
|
Torkel
Rhenman
|
—
|
6,642
|
–
|
—
|
6,642
|
| (1) | The
Company maintains a U.S. Senior Management Deferral Plan that allows executives to defer
up to 50% of their base salary and up to 100% of their annual bonus and equity grants
(“eligible pay”) for payment at a future date. Funds deferred under this
plan are allocated into notional accounts that mirror selected investment funds in our
401(k) plans, though the deferred funds are not actually invested and the Company may
use separate assets to fund the benefit. |
| (2) | Company
contributions to the executives’ Deferral Plan accounts are included in “All
Other Compensation,” but not “Salary,” in the Summary Compensation
Table. The Deferral Plan provides for Company contributions for that portion of pay that
cannot be taken into account for matching contributions or accruals under the Company’s
401(k) plan and defined benefit pension plan due to IRS limits. The eligibility for Company
contributions begins in the Deferral Plan once the employee’s salary has reached
the IRS limits for those plans; actual contributions by the Company are made as of February
15 of the next calendar year. The Company’s contribution occurs regardless of
whether the employee has contributed any amounts under the Deferral Plan or 401(k) plan.
Eligible employees must be employed as of February 15 in order to receive the Company
contribution. |
| (3) | Earnings
on these accounts are not included in any other amounts in the tables included in this
proxy statement, as the amounts of the NEOs’ earnings represent the general market
gains on investments and are not amounts or rates set by the Company for the benefit
of the NEOs. |
| (4) | Accounts
are distributed as either a lump sum payment or in annual installments upon the later
of (i) the date on which the employee reaches at least 55 years of age and has ten years
of service or (ii) termination of employment. Special circumstances may allow for a modified
distribution in the event of the employee’s death, an unforeseen emergency, or
upon a change-in-control of the Company. In the event of death, distribution will be
made to the designated beneficiary in the form previously elected by the executive. In
the event of an unforeseen emergency, the plan administrator may allow an early payment
in the amount required to satisfy the emergency. All participants are immediately 100%
vested in all of their contributions, Company contributions, and gains and/or losses
related to their notional investment choices. |
| (5) | The
balance as of the last year includes the Company contributions made in respect of the
NEOs’ 2019 earnings, although amounts were not credited to the accounts for continuing
NEOs until February 2020. |
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 55
POTENTIAL
PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
Mr.
Patel is party to an employment agreement and our other NEOs participate in our Executive Severance Program. Mr.
Patel’s employment agreement and the Executive Severance Program provide for severance payments
in the event of termination of employment, provided the executive executes a release in favor of the Company. Under the terms
of the Company’s STI program, NEOs will receive pro-rata annual bonus payments in the event of termination of employment
due to death or disability or termination without Cause (as defined below), payable following certification of payout under the
STI program the following year. Additionally, under the terms of our LTIP and equity award
agreements, our NEOs will receive accelerated or pro-rated vesting of their equity awards upon termination in certain circumstances.
In
the event of a change-in-control of the Company, the vesting of equity awards will be accelerated or pro-rated, but only if the
individual’s employment is terminated within one year of the change in control. The Company believes that this “double
trigger” is appropriate because it ensures our executives do not have conflicts in the event of a change in control and
also avoids windfalls for any employees whose employment with the Company or its successors continues following such an event.
The treatment of the equity awards for the NEOs is the same as for all other employees who receive equity awards.
A
summary of the treatment of equity awards in different scenarios under the terms of our LTIP and the award agreements is
provided below. “Cause” and “Good Reason” are defined in the Company’s Executive Severance
Plan as follows:
“Cause”
means (i) the executive’s continued failure (except where due to physical or mental incapacity) to substantially perform
his or her duties; (ii) the executive’s intentional misconduct or gross neglect in the performance of his or her duties;
(iii) the executive’s conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, a felony; (iv) the commission by the executive
of an act of fraud or embezzlement against the Company or any affiliate; (v) the executive’s breach of fiduciary duty,
(vi) an executive’s violation of the Company’s Code of Conduct or (vii) the executive’s willful breach of
any material provision of any employment or other written agreement between the executive and the Company or an affiliate (as
determined in good faith by the Compensation Committee) which is not remedied within 15 days after written notice is received
from the Company or affiliate specifying the breach. Any determination of whether Cause exists shall be made by the Compensation
Committee in its sole discretion.
“Good
Reason” means the occurrence, without the Participant’s express written consent, of (i) a material diminution in
the executive’s duties, responsibilities or authority; (ii) any material diminution of the executive’s Base Salary;
or (iii) the involuntary relocation of the executive’s principal place of employment by more than 50 miles from the executive’s
principal place of employment immediately prior to the relocation. Any assertion by an executive of a termination of employment
for “Good Reason” will not be effective unless certain conditions regarding notice and cure are satisfied.
Termination
of Employment for Cause by the Company or without Good Reason by the Executive |
All
unvested
awards are forfeited. In the event
of termination for Cause by the Company, unexercised stock options are also forfeited.
In the event of resignation without Good Reason by the executive, previously vested options
may be exercised for 90 days after termination of employment.
If
termination occurs prior to the
second anniversary of their employment with the Company, Mr. Lane and Mr. Rhenman are required to repay the one-time cash payments
received at the time of their hiring. If termination occurs prior to the first anniversary or between the first and second anniversaries
of the date of his employment with the Company, Mr. McMurray is required to pay all or 50%, respectively, of the one-time cash
payment received at the time of his hiring.
|
Termination
of Employment without Cause by the Company |
Stock
options, RSUs, and PSUs vest pro-rata
Stock
options:
Stock options provide for vesting in equal installments on the first three anniversaries of the grant date. In the event of termination
without Cause, pro-ration is determined for each unvested installment separately based on the number of months worked from the
date of grant until termination divided by the number of months from the date of grant until the original vesting date for that
installment. The options may be exercised for 90 days after termination of employment.
RSUs and
PSUs:
Pro-ration is determined based on the number of months worked from the date of grant (for RSUs) or beginning of the relevant performance
period (for PSUs) until termination divided by the number of months in the vesting or performance period, respectively. The number
of units earned under the PSUs is based on performance over the applicable three-year performance period as determined by the
Compensation Committee in the first quarter after the end of the performance period and can range from 0 to 200% of target.
|
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 56
Termination
of Employment with Good Reason by the Executive
|
For all NEOs other than Mr. Patel, all
unvested awards are forfeited and previously vested options may be exercised for 90 days after termination of employment.
Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Patel’s awards vest pro-rata, based on the same calculations as in the case of
a termination without Cause.
|
Termination
of Employment without Cause by the Company or with Good Reason by the Executive within 12 Months of a Change in Control
|
Stock
options and RSUs: All stock options and RSUs are immediately vested. Stock options
remain exercisable for 90 days.
PSUs: PSUs vest
pro-rata based on the number of months worked from the beginning of the performance period until termination divided by the number
of months in the performance period. The number of units earned under the PSUs is based on the Compensation Committee’s
determination of performance results as of the last quarter prior to the change in control.
|
Retirement
|
All awards vest pro-rata, based on the same calculations as in the case of a termination without Cause. Stock options remain exercisable
for five years or their original term, whichever is shorter.
For awards granted in February 2020, executives who retire after age 60 with at least 10 years of service are eligible for continued
vesting of their full awards on the original vesting schedule, subject to compliance with customary restrictive covenants.
|
Death
or Disability
|
Stock
Options and RSUs: Stock options and RSUs vest immediately. The stock options remain exercisable for one year.
PSUs:
PSUs vest pro-rata, based on the same calculations as in the case of a termination without Cause.
|
In
accordance with SEC disclosure requirements, the tables below show, in dollars, the amounts our NEOs could receive in different
circumstances if the termination events occurred as of December 31, 2019. We excluded any amounts for benefits or payments that
are available to all salaried employees of the Company. The amounts shown are not the amounts the NEO would actually receive in
a termination event, but are calculated as described below.
death
or disaBility
|
Accelerated
Option
Awardss
|
Accelerated
RSUs(2)
|
Pro-rated
PSUs(3)
|
Cash
Severance Payment(4)
|
Total(5)
|
Bob
Patel
|
2,258,156
|
10,943,996
|
5,601,058
|
—
|
18,803,210
|
Michael
McMurray
|
–
|
2,183,244
|
–
|
—
|
2,183,244
|
Thomas
Aebischer
|
244,479
|
1,764,981
|
1,127,524
|
—
|
3,136,844
|
Dan
Coombs
|
171,290
|
1,564,400
|
917,212
|
—
|
2,652,902
|
Ken
Lane
|
123,376
|
1,825,921
|
153,719
|
—
|
2,103,016
|
Torkel
Rhenman
|
137,591
|
972,294
|
171,481
|
—
|
1,281,366
|
termiNatioN
By Neo for good reasoN
|
Pro-rated Option
Awards
|
Pro-rated
RSUs
|
Pro-rated
PSUs
|
Cash
Severance Payment(4)
|
Total(5)
|
Bob
Patel
|
1,754,713
|
7,658,832
|
5,601,058
|
6,142,501
|
21,157,104
|
Michael
McMurray
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
1,520,000
|
1,520,000
|
Thomas
Aebischer
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
1,512,539
|
1,512,539
|
Ddan
Coombs
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
1,304,160
|
1,304,160
|
Ken
Lane
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
1,387,500
|
1,387,500
|
Torkel
Rhenman
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
1,425,000
|
1,425,000
|
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 57
retiremeNt
or termiNatioN Without Cause
|
Pro-rated
Option Awards(1)
|
Pro-rated
RSUs(2)
|
Pro-rated
PSUs(3)
|
Cash
Severance Payment(4)
|
Total(5)
|
Bob
Patel
|
1,754,713
|
7,658,832
|
5,601,058
|
6,142,501
|
21,157,104
|
Michael
McMurray
|
–
|
222,406
|
–
|
1,520,000
|
1,742,406
|
Thomas
Aebischer(6)
|
143,565
|
1,104,849
|
1,127,524
|
1,512,539
|
3,888,477
|
Dan
Coombs
|
101,615
|
1,016,417
|
917,212
|
1,304,160
|
3,339,404
|
Ken
Lane
|
37,702
|
525,970
|
153,719
|
1,387,500
|
2,104,891
|
Torkel
Rhenman
|
42,054
|
261,521
|
171,481
|
1,425,000
|
1,900,056
|
termiNatioN
Without Cause or By Neo for good reasoN WithiN 12 moNths of a ChaNge iN CoNtrol
|
Accelerated
Option Awards(1)
|
Accelerated
RSUs(2)
|
Pro-rated
PSUs(3)
|
Cash
Severance Payment(4)
|
Total(5)
|
Bob
Patel
|
2,258,156
|
10,943,996
|
5,601,058
|
10,237,501
|
29,040,711
|
Michael
McMurray
|
–
|
2,183,244
|
–
|
1,520,000
|
3,703,244
|
Thomas
Aebischer
|
244,479
|
1,764,981
|
1,127,524
|
1,512,539
|
4,649,523
|
Dan
Coombs
|
171,290
|
1,564,400
|
917,212
|
1,304,160
|
3,957,062
|
Ken
Lane
|
123,376
|
1,825,921
|
153,719
|
1,387,500
|
3,490,516
|
Torkel
Rhenman
|
137,591
|
972,294
|
171,481
|
1,425,000
|
2,706,366
|
| (1) | The
values for stock options included are calculated based on the number of options that
would vest, multiplied by the difference between $94.48, the market value of our common
stock as of December 31, 2019 (determined as the closing price of our common stock on
the last preceding trading day), and the exercise price of the stock option. Amounts
actually received by the NEO would depend on the fair market value of our shares when
the options are exercised. |
| (2) | The
values of the RSUs are based on the number of RSUs that would vest multiplied by the
fair market value of our stock on December 31, 2019, which may be different than the
fair market value of our stock upon a termination event. |
| (3) | PSUs
granted in 2018 and 2019 accumulate dividend equivalents that are converted to additional
units at the end of the performance period, subject to the same terms and conditions
as the original award. The values of the PSUs are based on the number of units that would
vest multiplied by the market value of our stock on December 31, 2019. The values above
assume that the payout is at target, or 100%. The actual payout would be determined by
the Compensation Committee after the performance period or, in the case of termination
without Cause or by the NEO for Good Reason within twelve months of a change in control,
as of the end of the last quarter prior to the change in control. Also, although the
values are calculated as of December 31, the shares would not be issued until the first
quarter after the end of the original performance period of the awards. |
| (4) | No
amounts are included for 2019 bonus payments under the STI program because the NEOs would
be entitled to the same payment with or without a termination event. |
| (5) | In
addition (and not shown above), Mr. Patel would receive twelve months of continued coverage
under the Company’s health plans for himself and his dependents, which is valued
at approximately $22,000. Each of the other NEOs would receive a lump sum payment of
approximately $33,000 for the cost of eighteen months of continuation coverage premiums
for medical coverage for himself and his dependents in any termination event other than
death and disability. All NEOs other than Mr. Patel would also receive Company-provided
outplacement services, with a value of up to $20,000. |
| (6) | Mr.
Aebischer retired from the Company on December 31, 2019. Pursuant to an employment transition
agreement, Mr. Aebischer waived his rights to severance under the Executive Severance
Plan and received a transition payment of $500,000, $250,000 of which was paid upon his
retirement and the remaining $250,000 of which has been and will continue to be paid
in equal monthly installments over the one-year period following his retirement, subject
to continued compliance with customary post-employment covenants. Mr. Aebischer’s
unvested equity awards vested pro rata on the terms described above. |
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 58
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN
INFORMATION
The following table provides information as of December 31,
2019 about the number of shares to be issued upon vesting or exercise of equity awards and the number of shares remaining available
for issuance under our equity compensation plans.
|
Number
of Securities to be |
|
Number
of Securities |
|
Issued Upon Exercise
of |
Weighted-Average
Exercise |
Remaining Available
for |
|
Outstanding Options, |
Price of Outstanding
Options, |
Future Issuance Under
Equity |
Plan
Category |
Warrants,
and Rights(2)(3) |
Warrants,
and Rights(4) |
Compensation
Plans(5) |
Equity compensation plans approved by |
3,878,541 |
$ 90.10 |
4,964,787 |
security holders(1) |
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved |
— |
— |
— |
by
security holders |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
3,878,541 |
$ 90.10 |
4,964,787 |
| (1) | Includes
the LTIP and the LyondellBasell Global Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated
(the “ESPP”). |
| (2) | Includes
1,781,466 shares that may be issued pursuant to outstanding stock options, 612,578 shares
that may be issued pursuant to outstanding RSUs, and 742,249 shares that may be issued
pursuant to outstanding PSUs. The Compensation Committee determines the actual number
of shares the recipient receives at the end of a three-year performance period which
may range from 0 to 200% of the target number of shares. Because up to 200% of the target
number of shares may ultimately be issued, we have included an aggregate of 1,484,498
shares, the maximum possible payout under the PSUs, as the number that may be issued. |
| (3) | Excludes
purchase rights that accrue under the ESPP. Purchase rights under the ESPP are considered
equity compensation for accounting purposes. However, the number of shares to be purchased
is indeterminable until the time shares are actually issued, as automatic employee contributions
may be terminated before the end of an offering period and, due to the pricing feature,
the purchase price and corresponding number of shares to be purchased is unknown. |
| (4) | Includes
only the weighted-average exercise price of the outstanding stock options. Does not include
RSUs or PSUs, as those awards have no exercise price associated with them. Also excludes
purchase rights under the ESPP for the reasons described in note (3) above. |
| (5) | The
shares remaining available as of December 31, 2019 include 4,064,350 shares under the
LTIP and 900,437 shares under the ESPP. |
CEO
PAY RATIO
Pursuant
to Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are required to provide the following information with respect to fiscal 2019:
| | The
annual total compensation of the global median employee of our company (other than Mr.
Patel, our CEO), was $86,466; |
| | The
annual total compensation of Mr. Patel, our Chief Executive Officer, was $15,943,313;
and |
| | Based
on this information, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive
Officer to the annual total compensation of the global median employee is 184 to 1. |
For
2019, we identified a new global median employee due to a substantial increase in our employee population as a result of our acquisition
of A. Schulman, Inc. in August 2018. As disclosed in our 2019 proxy statement, A. Schulman employees were excluded from the determination
of the median employee for 2018 as permitted by SEC rules. The global median employee for fiscal year 2019 was identified by examining
the 2019 total compensation for all regular full - and part-time employees who were actively employed by the Company on December
31, 2019 and students and interns who were hired for partial periods during 2019. For these employees, we calculated annual compensation
using methodology and guidelines consistent with the approach used to determine our median employee for 2017 and 2018:
| | To
find the annual total compensation of all of our employees (other than our CEO), we considered
all gross and net components of compensation (including short- and long-term incentives)
received by each employee and documented in the year-end payroll records for 2019. |
| | Compensation
for full- and part-time employees hired during 2019 and still active as of December 31,
2019 was annualized. Compensation for all students and interns hired for partial periods
during 2019 was not annualized. |
| | Annual
compensation for expatriate employees and employees involved in permanent cross-border
transfers during 2019 was calculated using all relevant country payroll records. |
After
identifying the global median employee, we calculated 2019 total compensation for the selected employee using the same methodology
used for our NEOs as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 59
ITEM 7 | RATIFICATION AND APPROVAL OF DIVIDENDS |
|
The Board recommends that you vote FOR the proposal to ratify and approve the
payment of dividends in respect of the 2019 Dutch statutory annual accounts. |
DISCUSSION
OF DIVIDEND POLICY
Pursuant
to the Dutch Corporate Governance Code, we provide shareholders with an opportunity to discuss our dividend policy and any major
changes in that policy each year at our annual general meeting.
Our
dividend policy continues to be to pay a consistent quarterly dividend, with the goal of increasing the dividend over time. Through
March 31, 2020, we have paid an aggregate of approximately $15.4 billion in dividends since we began our dividend program in 2011,
increasing the dividend payments from $0.10 per share in the second quarter of 2011 to $1.05 per share in 2019. The Company’s
strong balance sheet and results of operations support the continuation of this dividend program.
Pursuant
to our Articles of Association, the Board has determined the amount, if any, out of our annual profits to be allocated to reserves
prior to the payment of dividends. The portion of our annual profits that remains after the reservation is available for dividend
payments as approved by shareholders. The determination to pay any dividends will be made after a review of the Company’s
expected earnings, the economic environment, financial position, and prospects of the Company, and any other considerations deemed
relevant by the Board.
The
Company paid an aggregate of $4.20 per share from its 2019 Dutch statutory annual accounts, for a total of approximately $1.4
billion. This includes interim dividends of $1.05 per share paid in each of the second, third and fourth quarters of 2019 and
the first quarter of 2020.
ITEM 8 | AUTHORIZATION TO CONDUCT SHARE REPURCHASES |
|
The Board recommends that you vote FOR the proposal to grant authority to the
Board to repurchase up to 10% of our issued share capital until November 29, 2021. |
Under
Dutch law and our Articles of Association, shareholder approval is necessary to authorize our Board to repurchase shares. At the
extraordinary general meeting of shareholders held on September 12, 2019, shareholders authorized the Board to repurchase up to
10% of our outstanding shares. As of April [__], 2020, we have repurchased an aggregate of approximately [___] shares pursuant
to this authorization.
Adoption
of the current proposal will give us the flexibility to continue to repurchase shares if we believe it is an appropriate use of
our excess cash. The number of shares repurchased, if any, and the timing and manner of any repurchases will be determined after
taking into consideration prevailing market conditions, our available resources, and other factors that cannot now be predicted.
In
order to provide us with sufficient flexibility, we propose that shareholders grant authority to the Board to repurchase up to
10% of our issued share capital as of the date of the Annual Meeting (or, based on the number of shares currently issued, approximately
34.0 million shares) on the open market, through privately negotiated repurchases, in self-tender offers, or through accelerated
repurchase arrangements, at prices ranging from the nominal value of our shares up to 110% of the market price for our shares;
provided that (i) for open market or privately negotiated repurchases, the market price shall be the price for our shares on the
NYSE at the time of the transaction; (ii) for self-tender offers, the market price shall be the volume weighted average price
(“VWAP”) for our shares on the NYSE during a period, determined by the Board, of no less than one and no greater than
five consecutive trading days immediately prior to the expiration of the tender offer; and (iii) for accelerated repurchase arrangements,
the market price shall be the VWAP for our shares on the NYSE over the term of the arrangement. The VWAP for any number of trading
days shall be calculated as the arithmetic average of the daily VWAP on those trading days.
If
approved, the authority will extend for 18 months from the date of the Annual Meeting, or until November 29, 2021, and will replace
the current repurchase authorization of the Board which was granted by shareholders at the extraordinary general meeting on September
12, 2019. Any shares repurchased under this authority may be cancelled pursuant to the authorization to cancel shares requested
under Item 9 below.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 60
ITEM 9 |
CANCELLATION OF SHARES |
|
The Board recommends that you vote FOR the proposal to cancel all or a portion of
the shares in our treasury account. |
Under
Dutch law and our Articles of Association, shareholder approval is necessary to cancel ordinary shares that are held in treasury
by us, or that may in the future be held in treasury by us as a result of share repurchases. Also under Dutch law, the number
of shares held by us, or our subsidiaries, may not exceed 50% of our issued share capital at any time.
As
of April [__], 2020, we held approximately [__] million shares in our treasury account, primarily as the result of share repurchases.
Treasury shares, if not cancelled, may be used for general corporate purposes, including for issuance under our equity compensation
plans.
We
are requesting that shareholders approve the cancellation of all or any portion of shares held in our treasury account or that
may be repurchased pursuant to the authority requested under Item 8, above.
If
this Item 9 is adopted, the cancellation of treasury shares may be executed in one or more tranches. The number of treasury shares
that will be cancelled, if any, will be determined by the Board. If the Board determines it is appropriate to cancel our shares,
we will follow the procedure set forth under Dutch law to cancel treasury shares from time to time. In accordance with Dutch statutory
provisions, the cancellation of treasury shares will not be effective until two months after the resolution to cancel treasury
shares has been filed with the Dutch Trade Register and announced in a Dutch national daily newspaper. Once the procedure is complete,
the relevant treasury shares will be cancelled.
If
this Item 9 is not approved, we will not cancel any treasury shares unless the general meeting of shareholders approves such cancellation
at a later date.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 61
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
Who
is soliciting my vote?
Our
Board is soliciting your vote on matters submitted for approval at the Company’s 2020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.
Why
are these matters being submitted for voting?
In
accordance with Dutch law and the rules and regulations of the NYSE and the SEC, we are required to submit certain items for the
approval of our shareholders. Several matters that are within the authority of a company’s board of directors under most
U.S. state corporate laws require shareholder approval under Dutch law. Additionally, in accordance with Dutch corporate governance
guidelines, we provide for the discussion at our Annual Meeting of certain topics that are not subject to a shareholder vote,
including our governance practices and our dividend policy.
The
discharge from liability of our directors, the adoption of our 2019 Dutch statutory annual accounts, the appointment of the auditor
for our 2020 Dutch statutory annual accounts, the approval of dividends, the authorization to repurchase shares, and the cancellation
of shares held in our treasury account are all items that we are required to submit to shareholders due to our incorporation in
the Netherlands.
How
does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote my shares?
The
Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each of the items presented in this
proxy statement.
Unless
you give other instructions on your proxy card, the persons named as proxy holders on the proxy card will vote in favor of each
of the items in accordance with the recommendation of the Board of Directors.
Who
is entitled to vote?
You
may vote your LyondellBasell shares at the Annual Meeting if you are the record owner of such shares as of the close of business
on May 1, 2020 (the “Record Date”). You are entitled to one vote for each share of LyondellBasell common stock that
you own. As of April [__], 2020, there were [_________] shares of LyondellBasell common stock outstanding and entitled to vote
at the Annual Meeting.
How
many votes must be present to hold the meeting?
Your shares are counted as present at the Annual Meeting if you held such shares as of the Record Date and (i) properly return a proxy by Internet, telephone, or mail or (ii) if
in person attendance at the Annual Meeting is possible, properly notify us of your
intention to attend the Annual Meeting, attend the meeting, and vote in person. There are no quorum requirements under Dutch law and, as a result, we may hold
our meeting regardless of the number of shares that are present in person or by proxy.
How
many votes are needed to approve each of the proposals?
The
number of votes required to approve the matters presented in this proxy statement varies by proposal:
| | Pursuant
to the Dutch Civil Code and our Articles of Association, the nomination of a candidate to our Board (Item 1) is binding on shareholders
unless 2/3 of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting, representing at least 50% of the Company’s issued share capital (which
for this purpose includes only our outstanding shares), vote against the nominee. This means that a nominee will be elected unless
the votes against him or her constitute 2/3 of the votes cast and represent at least 50% of our issued share capital. |
| | Under
Dutch law, the cancellation of shares held in our treasury account (Item 9) requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the
votes cast at the Annual Meeting. If, however, less than 50% of the Company’s issued share capital (which for this purpose
includes only our outstanding shares) is represented at the Annual Meeting, the proposal will require the affirmative vote of
at least 2/3 of the votes cast. |
| | Each
other proposal set forth in this proxy statement requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by shareholders
in order to be approved. |
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 62
How
do I vote?
You
can vote by proxy without attending the meeting or, if possible given COVID-19 developments and restrictions on travel and public gatherings, in person at the meeting. To vote by proxy, you must vote over the Internet,
by telephone, or by mail. Instructions for each method of voting are included on the proxy card.
If
you hold your LyondellBasell shares in a brokerage account (that is, you hold your shares in “street name”), your
ability to vote by telephone or over the Internet depends on your broker’s voting process. Please follow the directions
on your proxy card or voter instruction form.
Given current travel and meeting restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, including the prohibition on all public gatherings in the Netherlands through June 1, 2020, it may not be possible or advisable for shareholders to attend the Annual Meeting in person. The Company will provide virtual access to shareholders through a live webcast. Shareholders will be able to ask questions during and in advance of the meeting but will be required to vote their shares by proxy in advance. Please see “Who can attend the Annual Meeting?” below for additional information regarding participation in the Annual Meeting.
Even
if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares by proxy in advance. If you plan to vote in person
at the Annual Meeting and you hold your LyondellBasell shares in street name, you must obtain a proxy from your broker and bring
that proxy to the meeting.
Can
I change my vote?
Yes.
You can change or revoke your vote at any time before the polls close at the Annual Meeting. You can do this by:
| | Entering
a new vote by telephone or over the Internet prior to 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 27, 2020; |
| | Signing
another proxy card with a later date and returning it to us by a method that allows us to receive the proxy prior to the Annual
Meeting; |
| | Sending
us a written document revoking your earlier proxy; or |
| | If possible, attending
the Annual Meeting and voting your shares in person (attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy previously
given by you). It will not be possible to vote through the live webcast, and shareholders intending to attend the Annual Meeting remotely will be required to vote and change or revoke that vote by proxy in advance. |
Who
counts the votes?
We
have hired Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. to count the votes represented by proxies at the Annual Meeting.
Will
my shares be voted if I do not provide my proxy and do not attend the Annual Meeting?
If
you do not provide a proxy or vote your shares in person, the shares held in your name will not be voted. Please note that it will not be possible to vote through the live webcast, and all shareholders intending to attend the Annual Meeting remotely must vote by proxy in advance.
If
you hold your shares in street name, your broker may be able to vote your shares for certain “routine” matters even
if you do not provide the broker with voting instructions. We believe that, pursuant to NYSE rules, Item 3, Item 4, Item 5, Item
7, Item 8, and Item 9 are considered routine matters. Therefore, without instructions from you, your broker may not vote your
shares with respect to any other proposals, i.e. Item 1, Item 2, and Item 6. It is therefore important that you act to ensure
your shares are voted.
What
is a broker non-vote?
If
a broker does not have discretion to vote shares held in street name on a particular proposal and does not receive instructions
from the beneficial owner on how to vote those shares, the broker may return the proxy card without voting on that proposal. This
is known as a broker non-vote. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the vote for any matter properly introduced at the meeting.
What
if I return my proxy but don’t vote for some of the matters listed on my proxy card?
If
you return a signed proxy card without indicating your vote on all matters listed, your shares will be voted FOR each of the matters
for which you did not vote.
How
are votes counted?
For
all proposals other than the election of nominees to our Board of Directors, you may vote FOR,
AGAINST, or ABSTAIN. For the proposal for
the election of nominees (Item 1), you may vote FOR, AGAINST,
or WITHHOLD with respect to each nominee. A vote to abstain or withhold does not count
as a vote cast, and therefore will not have any effect on the outcome of any matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 63
Could
other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?
No.
Any matters to be decided at the Annual Meeting must be included in the agenda for the meeting as described in this proxy statement.
Who
can attend the Annual Meeting?
The Annual Meeting is open to all LyondellBasell shareholders who hold shares as of the close of business on May 1, 2020, the Record Date.
If
you would like to attend the Annual Meeting in person (if possible) or via webcast, you must inform us in writing of your intention
to do so prior to May 22, 2019, one week prior to the date of the meeting. The notice may be emailed to corporatesecretary@lyb.com.
Additional information regarding the availability of and procedures for in person attendance at the Annual Meeting, if possible,
or webcast details and access information will be provided to shareholders who provide timely notice of intent to attend and proper
evidence of their ownership of LyondellBasell shares as of the Record Date. Admittance of shareholders to the Annual Meeting,
whether in person or through the live webcast, will be governed by Dutch law.
We are continuing to monitor COVID-19 developments closely and considering options to protect the health and safety of all meeting participants. If we determine to make alternative arrangements for the meeting, we will announce that decision by press release as soon as practicable.
Why are you providing remote access to the Annual Meeting?
Due to the significant health and safety concerns resulting from the emerging coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak and related restrictions on travel and in person meetings, including the current prohibition on all public gatherings in the Netherlands through June 1, 2020, we recognize that it may not be possible or advisable for shareholders to attend the Annual Meeting. The remote access we are providing through our live webcast is intended to preserve shareholder access to and facilitate participation in the Annual Meeting in the current environment, and all shareholders in attendance will have the opportunity to ask questions during and in advance of the meeting.
The health and safety of our shareholders is of primary importance to us, and shareholders wishing to attend this year’s Annual Meeting are strongly encouraged to participate using the remote access provided.
What
is the cost of this proxy solicitation?
The
Company will pay the cost of soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting. Our directors, officers, and employees may solicit proxies
by mail, by email, by telephone, or in person for no additional compensation. In addition, we have retained Georgeson LLC to assist
in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $12,500, plus reimbursement of reasonable expenses.
Why
did my household receive a single set of proxy materials?
SEC
rules permit us to deliver a single copy of our annual report and proxy statement to any household at which two or more shareholders
reside, if we believe the shareholders are members of the same family.
If
you prefer to receive your own copy of the proxy statement now or in future years, please request a duplicate set by phone at
(800) 579-1639, through the Internet at www.proxyvote.com, or by email to sendmaterial@proxyvote.com. If you hold
your shares in street name and you received more than one set of proxy materials at your address, you may need to contact your
broker or nominee directly if you wish to discontinue duplicate mailings to your household.
Why
did I receive a “notice of internet availability of proxy materials” but no proxy materials?
We
distribute our proxy materials to certain shareholders via the Internet using the “Notice and Access” approach permitted
by rules of the SEC. This approach conserves natural resources and reduces our distribution costs, while providing our shareholders
with a timely and convenient method of accessing the materials and voting. On or before April [__], 2020, we mailed a “Notice
of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials” to participating shareholders, containing instructions on how to access the
proxy materials on the Internet.
Can
I submit a proposal for the 2021 shareholder meeting?
Our
Articles of Association provide that a shareholder representing at least one percent of our issued share capital can submit an
agenda item for consideration at the Company’s general meeting of shareholders. Any such request must be received at least
60 days prior to the date of the annual meeting.
Under
SEC rules, if a shareholder wishes to include a proposal in our proxy materials for presentation at our 2021 annual general meeting,
the proposal must be received at our offices at LyondellBasell Industries, 4th Floor, One Vine Street, London W1J 0AH, United
Kingdom, Attention: Corporate Secretary or sent to corporatesecretary@lyb.com, by December [__], 2020. All proposals must
comply with Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT 64
APPENDIX
A: | RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE |
A
reconciliation of EBITDA to net income for the year ended December 31, 2019 is shown in the following table:
|
Year
ended |
(amounts
in millions) |
December
31, 2019 |
Net
income(1)(2) |
$ 3,397 |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
7 |
Income
from continuing operations(1)(2) |
3,404 |
Provision
for income taxes(2) |
648 |
Depreciation and amortization |
1,312 |
Interest expense, net |
328 |
EBITDA(3) |
$ 5,692 |
| (1) | Includes
after-tax charges for transaction and integration costs associated with the acquisition
of A. Schulman of $12 million, $15 million, $33 million and $29 million in the first,
second, third and fourth quarters, respectively. |
| (2) | Includes
a non-cash benefit of $85 million related to previously unrecognized tax benefits and
the release of associated accrued interest. |
| (3) | Includes
pre-tax charges for transaction and integration costs associated with the acquisition
of A. Schulman of $16 million, $19 million, $43 million and $38 million, respectively. |
LYONDELLBASELL
2020 PROXY STATEMENT A-1
This regulatory filing also includes additional resources:
llyb003_pre14a.pdf
LyondellBasell Industrie... (NYSE:LYB)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
LyondellBasell Industrie... (NYSE:LYB)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024