As previously announced on December 24, 2020, PRGX Global,
Inc., a Georgia corporation (the “Company”), entered into an
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with
Pluto Acquisitionco Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”),
and Pluto Merger Sub Inc., a Georgia corporation and wholly owned
subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which
Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company (the
“Merger”), with the Company surviving as the surviving
corporation (the “Surviving Corporation”) and a wholly owned
subsidiary of Parent. Parent is an affiliate of Ardian North
America Fund II, L.P. (“Ardian”).
In connection with the Merger, the Company filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) a definitive
proxy statement, dated January 29, 2021 (the “Proxy
Statement”), which the Company commenced mailing to
shareholders on or about January 29, 2021. Set forth below are
supplemental disclosures relating to the Merger.
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
Following the filing of the Proxy Statement, as of the date of this
Current Report on Form 8-K,
nine complaints have been filed on behalf of nine purported
shareholders of the Company against the Company and the members of
its Board of Directors. Of those nine complaints, four were filed
in the United States District Court for the Southern District of
New York, one of which also names Parent, Merger Sub and Ardian as
defendants, two were filed in the United States District Court for
the District of Delaware, both of which also name Parent and Merger
Sub as defendants, and three were filed in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta
Division. Those complaints are captioned as follows:
Kross v. PRGX Global, Inc., et al.,
No. 1:21-cv-01024-KPF
(S.D.N.Y.); Stein v. PRGX Global, Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-01057-KPF
(S.D.N.Y.); Freeman v. PRGX Global Inc., et al.,
No. 1:21-cv-01429
(S.D.N.Y.); Schulz v. PRGX Global, Inc., et al.,
No. 1:21-cv-01447
(S.D.N.Y.); Ciccotelli v. PRGX Global, Inc., et al.,
No. 1:21-cv-00156-UNA
(D. Del.); Waterman v. PRGX Global, Inc., et al.,
No. 1:21-cv-00178-UNA
(D. Del.); Plumley v. PRGX Global, Inc., et al.,
No. 1:21-cv-00571-MHC
(N.D. Ga.); Sabatini v. PRGX Global, Inc., et al.,
No. 1:21-cv-00586-MHC
(N.D. Ga.); and Finger v. PRGX Global, Inc., et al.,
No. 1:21-cv-00703-MHC (N.D.
Ga.) (collectively, the “Shareholder Actions”). The
Shareholder Actions generally allege that the Proxy Statement omits
certain material information in violation of Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder, and
further that the members of the Company’s Board of Directors are
liable for those omissions under Section 20(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. One of the Shareholder Actions
also alleges a state law breach of fiduciary duty claim against the
members of the Company’s Board of Directors with respect to the
same disclosures. The relief sought in the Shareholder Actions
includes, among other things, to enjoin the shareholder vote
scheduled for March 2, 2021 at which the Company’s
shareholders will vote on a proposal to adopt the Merger
Agreement.
While the Company believes that the disclosures set forth in the
Proxy Statement comply fully with applicable law, and vigorously
denies any wrongdoing or liability with respect to the allegations
and claims asserted, or which could have been asserted, in the
Shareholder Actions, to resolve the purported shareholders’ claims
and moot the disclosure claims, to avoid nuisance, potential
expense, and delay, and to provide additional information to the
Company’s shareholders, the Company has determined to voluntarily
supplement the Proxy Statement with the below disclosures (the
“Supplemental Disclosures”). The Supplemental Disclosures
contained below should be read in conjunction with the Proxy
Statement, which is available on the Internet site maintained by
the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. The Company and the other named
defendants deny that they have violated any laws or breached any
duties to the Company’s shareholders. The Company is providing the
Supplemental Disclosures solely to eliminate the burden and expense
of litigation and to avoid any possible disruption to the Merger
that could result from further litigation. Nothing in the
Supplemental Disclosures should be deemed to be an admission of the
legal necessity or materiality of any Supplemental Disclosure under
applicable laws. To the extent that the information set forth below
differs from or updates information contained in the Proxy
Statement, the information set forth herein supersedes or
supplements the information in the Proxy Statement. References to
sections herein are references to the corresponding sections of the
Proxy Statement; all page references are to pages in the Proxy
Statement; and any capitalized terms that are used herein have the
same meanings ascribed to them in the Proxy Statement.
If you have not already voted your shares in connection with the
proposals to be decided at the Company’s virtual special meeting,
you are urged to do so promptly. This Form 8-K does not affect the validity of any
proxy card or voting instructions that the Company’s shareholders
may have previously received or delivered. No action is required by
any Company shareholder who has previously delivered a proxy card
or voting instructions and who does not wish to revoke or change
that proxy card or voting instructions.