NY1972
2 years ago
recent technical advances using culture conditions with IL-7/IL-15 and
the addition of IL-21 may enhance the enrichment for TSCM cells
in the final CART product (74β76), which can be further increased
with the addition of drugs blocking T-cell differentiation, such as
glycogen synthase-3 inhibitors (77). Nevertheless, robust clinical grade protocols for generating TSCM-enriched CART products
have not been developed so far. Recently, a few CART19 clinical
trials for DLBCL have been conducted in which CART products
were manufactured from CD62L+ isolated T cells to generate
cellular products enriched for TCM cells (21, 78); however, due to
prolonged culture conditions, enrichment for TSCM and TCM
subsets in the infused product could not be demonstrated
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2022.904497/full
NY1972
2 years ago
Thanks for the link.
Most commonly reported grade 3/4 AEs were neutrophil count decrease (6/9, 67%), anemia (5/9, 56%), thrombocytopenia (2/9,22%), platelet count decrease (2/9, 22%) and no infection was reported. Complete response rate(CRR) was 78%
Compared to T-Charge
http://www.koreabiomed.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=12767
jondoeuk
2 years ago
That depends. Typically, the more the cells expand during manufacturing, the more they differentiate. In the case of ALLO, it seems most are effector memory (manufacturing time is ~19 days and there are a number of steps involved). LYEL refer to this as the expansion/quality paradox. With Epi-R, they have shown they can expand TCR-T cells up to 18 billion by day ten. In addition, these cells are over 94% viable and maintain their ''stem-like'' qualities.