Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
following is a description of the more significant policies used in the presentation of the accompanying consolidated financial
statements of Sunnyside Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary, (collectively, the “Company”).
Principles
of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements are comprised of the accounts of Sunnyside Bancorp. Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Sunnyside
Federal Savings and Loan Association of Irvington (“Sunnyside Federal” or the “Association”). All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Business
Sunnyside
Federal is a community-oriented savings institution whose primary business is accepting deposits from customers within its market
area (Westchester County, New York) and investing those funds in mortgage loans secured by one-to-four family residences and in
mortgage-backed and other securities. To a lesser extent, funds are invested in multi-family and commercial mortgage loans, commercial
loans, and consumer loans. Customer deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
As a federally-chartered savings association, Sunnyside Federal’s primary regulator is the Office of the Controller of the
Currency (the “OCC”).
Basis
of Financial Statement Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with instructions for
Form 10-Q, and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”)
for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for
complete financial statements. However, such information presented reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring
adjustments), which are, in the opinion of the Company’s management, necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim
period.
The
results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected
for the year ended December 31, 2017, or any other future interim period. The unaudited consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December
31, 2016 included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
For
purposes of reporting cash flows, the Company considers all cash and amounts due from depository institutions and interest-bearing
deposits in other depository institutions with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Investment
and Mortgage-Backed Securities
Securities
that the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity securities and reported
at amortized cost. Securities classified as available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized holding
gains or losses reported in a separate component of retained earnings. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company
had no securities classified as held for trading.
The
Company conducts a periodic review and evaluation of the securities portfolio to determine if a decline in the fair value of any
security below its cost basis is other-than-temporary. The evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment considers the duration
and severity of the impairment, the Company’s intent and ability to hold the securities and assessments of the reason for
the decline in value and the likelihood of a near-term recovery. If such a decline is deemed other-than-temporary, the security
is written down to a new cost basis and the resulting loss is charged to income as a component of non-interest expense.
1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(Cont’d)
Investment
and Mortgage-Backed Securities (cont’d)
Premiums
and discounts on securities are amortized by use of the level-yield method, over the life of the individual securities. Gain or
loss on sales of securities is based upon the specific identification method.
Loans
Receivable
Loans
receivable are stated at unpaid principal balances less the allowance for loan losses and net deferred loan fees.
Recognition
of interest on the accrual method is generally discontinued when interest or principal payments are ninety days or more in arrears,
or when other factors indicate that the collection of such amounts is doubtful. At that time, a loan is placed on a nonaccrual
status, and all previously accrued and uncollected interest is reversed against interest income in the current period. Interest
on such loans, if appropriate, is recognized as income when payments are received. A loan is returned to an accrual status when
factors indicating doubtful collectibility no longer exist.
Allowance
for Loan Losses
An
allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level, to the best of management’s knowledge, to cover all known and inherent
losses in the portfolio that are both probable and reasonable to estimate. Management of the Company, in determining the provision
for loan losses considers the risks inherent in its loan portfolio and changes in the nature and volume of its loan activities,
along with the general economic and real estate market conditions. The Company utilizes a two tier approach: (1) identification
of problem loans and establishment of specific loss allowances on such loans; and (2) establishment of general valuation allowances
on the remainder of its loan portfolio. The Company maintains a loan review system which allows for a periodic review of its loan
portfolio and the early identification of potential problem loans. Such system takes into consideration, among other things, delinquency
status, size of loans, type of collateral and financial condition of the borrowers. Specific loan losses are established for identified
loans based on a review of such information and appraisals of the underlying collateral. General loan losses are based upon a
combination of factors including, but not limited to, actual loan loss experience, composition of the loan portfolio, current
economic conditions, and management’s judgment. Although management believes that adequate specific and general loan loss
allowances are established, actual losses are dependent upon future events and, as such, further additions to the level of specific
and general loan loss allowances may be necessary.
A
loan evaluated for impairment is deemed to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the
Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. An insignificant payment
delay, which is defined as up to ninety days by the Company, will not cause a loan to be classified as impaired. A loan is not
impaired during a period of delay in payment if the Company expects to collect all amounts due, including interest accrued at
the contractual interest rate for the period of delay. The amount of loan impairment is measured based on the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the loan’s
observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. All loans identified as impaired
are evaluated independently. The Company does not aggregate such loans for evaluation purposes. Payments received on impaired
loans are applied first to accrued interest receivable and then to principal.
Federal
Home Loan Bank of New York stock
As
a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLB”), the Company is required to acquire and hold shares of
FHLB Class B stock. The holding requirement varies based on the Company’s activities, primarily its outstanding borrowings,
with the FHLB. The investment in FHLB stock is carried at cost. The Company conducts a periodic review and evaluation of its FHLB
stock to determine if any impairment exists.
Premises
and Equipment
Premises
and equipment are comprised of land, building, and furniture, fixtures, and equipment, at cost, less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation charges are computed on the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
Building
and improvements
|
5
to 40 years
|
Furniture,
fixtures and equipment
|
2
to 10 years
|
1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(Cont’d)
Bank-Owned
Life Insurance
Bank-owned
life insurance (“BOLI”) is accounted for in accordance with FASB guidance. The cash surrender value of BOLI is recorded
on the statement of financial condition as an asset and the change in the cash surrender value is recorded as non-interest income.
The amount by which any death benefits received exceeds a policy’s cash surrender value is recorded in non-interest income
at the time of receipt. A liability is also recorded on the statement of financial condition for postretirement death benefits
provided by the split-dollar endorsement policy. A corresponding expense is recorded in non-interest expense for the accrual of
benefits over the period during which employees provide services to earn the benefits.
Income
Taxes
Federal
and state income taxes have been provided on the basis of reported income. The amounts reflected on the tax return differ from
these provisions due principally to temporary differences in the reporting of certain items for financial reporting and income
tax reporting purposes. The tax effect of these temporary differences is accounted as deferred taxes applicable to future periods.
Deferred income tax expense or benefit is determined by recognizing deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated future
tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities
and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to
taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred
tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period that includes the enactment date.
The realization of deferred tax assets is assessed and a valuation allowance provided, when necessary, for that portion of the
asset which is not likely to be realized.
Employee
Benefits
Defined
Benefit Plans:
The
accounting guidance related to retirement benefits requires an employer to: (a) recognize in its statement of financial position
an asset for a plan’s overfunded status or a liability for a plan’s underfunded status; (b) measure a plan’s
assets and its obligations that determine its funded status as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year; and (c) recognize,
in comprehensive income, changes in the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan in the year in which the changes
occur. The accounting guidance requires that plan assets and benefit obligations be measured as of the date of the employer’s
fiscal year-end statement of financial condition.
401(K)
Plan:
The
Company has a 401(k) plan covering substantially all employees. The Company matches 50% of the first 6% contributed by participants
and recognizes expense as its contributions are made.
Employee
Stock Ownership Plan:
The
employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) is accounted for in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718-40, “Employers’
Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans.” The funds borrowed by the ESOP from the Company to purchase the Company’s
common stock are being repaid from the Association’s contributions over a period of up to 25 years. The Company’s
common stock not yet allocated to participants is recorded as a reduction of stockholders’ equity at cost. Compensation
expense for the ESOP is based on the market price of the Company’s stock and is recognized as shares are committed to be
released to participants.
Equity
Incentive Plan:
On
July 17, 2014, the Board of Directors adopted the Sunnyside Bancorp, Inc. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Stock Incentive
Plan”) which was approved by shareholders at the Company’s 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on September 16,
2014. Stock options and restricted stock may be granted to directors, officers and other employees of the Company. The maximum
number of shares which may be issued upon exercise of the options under the plan cannot exceed 79,350 shares. The maximum number
of shares of stock that may be issued as restricted stock awards cannot exceed 23,805.
1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(Cont’d)
Employee
Benefits
(Cont’d)
Equity
Incentive Plan (Cont’d):
The
Stock Incentive Plan will remain in effect as long as any awards under it are outstanding; however, no awards may be granted under
the Stock Incentive Plan on or after the 10-year anniversary of the effective date of the Stock Incentive Plan or July 17, 2024.
Under
FASB ASC Topic 718, the Company will recognize compensation expense in its income statement over the requisite service period
or performance period based on the grant date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation (such as restricted
stock).
On
June 16, 2015, the Company granted 10,500 shares of restricted stock to certain executive officers, with a grant date fair value
of $10.50 per share. Twenty percent of the shares awarded vest annually. Management recognizes expense for the fair value of those
awards on a straight line basis over the requisite service period. The Company recognized approximately $5,500 in expense for
the three month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 and $11,000 in expense for the six month periods ended June 30, 2017 and
2016 in regard to those restricted stock awards. Expected future expense relating to the non-vested restricted shares at June
30, 2017 is $66,000 over a weighted average period of 3 years. There were no stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2017.
Comprehensive
Income
Accounting
principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes
in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, and the actuarial gains and losses
of the pension plan, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net
income, are components of comprehensive income.
Concentration
of Credit Risk and Interest-Rate Risk
Financial
instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents, investment
and mortgage-backed securities and loans. Cash and cash equivalents include amounts placed with highly rated financial institutions.
Investment securities include securities backed by the U.S. Government and other highly rated instruments. The Company’s
lending activity is primarily concentrated in loans collateralized by real estate in the State of New York. As a result, credit
risk is broadly dependent on the real estate market and general economic conditions in the State.
The
Company is principally engaged in the business of attracting deposits from the general public and using these deposits, together
with borrowings and other funds, to make loans secured by real estate in the State of New York. The potential for interest-rate
risk exists as a result of the shorter duration of the Company’s interest-sensitive liabilities compared to the generally
longer duration of interest-sensitive assets. In a rising rate environment, liabilities will reprice faster than assets, thereby
reducing net interest income. For this reason, management regularly monitors the maturity structure of the Company’s assets
and liabilities in order to measure its level of interest-rate risk and to plan for future volatility.
Advertising
Costs
It
is the Company’s policy to expense advertising costs in the period in which they are incurred.
Earnings
Per Share
Basic
earnings per share is computed by dividing net income for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding adjusted for unearned shares of the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”). Diluted earnings per share
is computed by adjusting the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding to include the effect of outstanding
stock options and compensation grants, if dilutive, using the treasury stock method.
1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(Cont’d)
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial
Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as
a Going Concern.” This update is intended to provide guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether
there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures.
Management is required under the new guidance to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate,
that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the
financial statements are issued when preparing financial statements for each interim and annual reporting period. If conditions
or events are identified, the ASU specifies the process that must be followed by management and also clarifies the timing and
content of going concern footnote disclosures in order to reduce diversity in practice. The amendments in this ASU are effective
for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of this guidance
on January 1, 2017 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
In
January, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): “Recognition and Measurement
of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” requires all equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes
in the fair value recognized through net income (other than those accounted for under equity method of accounting or those that
result in consolidation of the investee). The amendments in this Update also require an entity to present separately in other
comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific
credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial
instruments. In addition, this ASU eliminates the requirement to disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at
amortized cost for entities that are not public business entities and the requirement to disclose the method(s) and significant
assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost
on the balance sheet for public business entities. ASU 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017
for public entities. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2018 is not expected to have a material effect on the operating
results or financial position of the Company.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”. Under the new guidance, lessees will be required
to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: (i) a lease liability,
which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and (ii) a right-of-use
asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease
term. Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. Public business entities should apply the amendments in
ASU 2016-02 for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application
is permitted for all public business entities upon issuance. Lessees (for capital and operating leases) and lessors (for sales-type,
direct financing, and operating leases) must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered
into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The adoption of this guidance
on January 1, 2019 is not expected to have a material effect on the operating results or financial position of the Company.
In
March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based
Payment Accounting. The objectives of the ASU are to simplify accounting for the tax consequences of a stock payment and amend
the manner in which excess tax benefits and a business’s payments to satisfy the tax obligation for recipients of the shares
should be classified. The amendments: (i) allow companies to estimate the number of stock awards they expect to vest, and (ii)
revise the withholding requirements for classifying stock awards as equity. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2017 did
not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
In
June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), which requires the measurement
of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date be based on historical experience, current condition,
and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information
to better inform their credit loss estimates. This guidance also amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale
debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. For the Company, this guidance is effective for fiscal
years and interim periods beginning after
1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(Cont’d)
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
(Cont’d)
December
31, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance to determine the impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In
August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), which provides guidance on eight specific cash
flow issues in order to reduce diversity in the manner in which certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified
in the statements of cash flows. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2018. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2019 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s
financial condition or results of operations.
In
March 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-07, “Compensation Retirement Benefits (Topic 715)” which provides more prescriptive
guidance around the presentation of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit cost in the income statement. The amendment
requires that the service cost component be disaggregated from other components of net periodic benefit cost in the income statement.
The amendments in this ASU are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The
adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2018 is not expected to have a material effect on the operating results or financial position
of the Company.
In
March 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-08, “Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities (Subtopic 310-20)”.
The update shortens the amortization period for premiums on purchased callable debt securities to the earliest call date. The
amendment will apply only to callable debt securities with explicit, non-contingent call features that are callable at fixed prices
and on preset dates, apply to all premiums on callable debt securities, regardless of how they were generated, and require companies
to reset the effective yield using the payment terms of the debt security if the call option is not exercised on the earliest
call date. The ASU does not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount. The discount continues to be amortized
to maturity and does not apply when the investor has already incorporated prepayments into the calculation of its effective yield
under other GAAP. The amendments in the ASU are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2018, including interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.
If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the
fiscal year that includes that interim period. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2019 is not expected to have a material
effect on the operating results or financial position of the Company.
In May, 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-09,
“Stock Compensation, Scope of Modification Accounting.” This ASU clarifies when it is appropriate to apply modification
accounting guidance when there is a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. Specifically, the standard
provides that an entity should account for the effects of a modification unless the fair value of the modified award is the same
as the original award immediately before modification, if the vesting conditions of the modified award are the same as the vesting
conditions of the original award immediately before modification, and the classification of the modified award is the same as
the classification of the original award immediately before modification. ASU 2017-09 is effective for annual periods, and interim
periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2018 is not
expected to have a material effect on the operating results or financial position of the Company.
Subsequent
Events
The
Company has evaluated all events subsequent to the balance sheet date of June 30, 2017 through the date of this report, and has
determined that there are no subsequent events that require disclosure under FASB guidance.
2.
MUTUAL TO STOCK CONVERSION AND LIQUIDATION ACCOUNT
On
July 15, 2013, the Association completed its mutual-to-stock conversion, and the Company consummated its initial stock offering.
The Company sold 793,500 shares of its common stock, including 55,545 shares purchased by the Association’s ESOP, at a price
of $10.00 per share, in a subscription offering, for gross offering proceeds of $7,935,000. The cost of conversion and the stock
offering were deferred and deducted from the proceeds of the offering. Conversion costs incurred totaled $845,000 resulting in
net proceeds of $6.5 million after also deducting the shares acquired by the ESOP.
In
accordance with applicable federal conversion regulations, at the time of the completion of our mutual-to-stock conversion, the
Company established a liquidation account in the Association in an amount equal to the Association’s total retained earnings
as of the latest balance sheet date in the final prospectus used in the Conversion. Each eligible account holder or supplemental
account holder is entitled to a proportionate share of this liquidation account in the event of a complete liquidation of the
Association, and only in such event. This share will be reduced if the eligible account holder’s or supplemental account
holder’s deposit balance falls below the amounts on the date of record as of any December 31 and will cease to exist if
the account is closed. The liquidation account will never be increased despite any increase after conversion in the related deposit
balance.
The
Company may not declare, pay a dividend on, or repurchase any of its capital stock, if the effect thereof would cause retained
earnings to be reduced below the liquidation account amount or regulatory capital requirements.
3.
SECURITIES
|
|
June
30, 2017
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State,
county, and municipal obligations
|
|
$
|
549,623
|
|
|
$
|
7,501
|
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
|
$
|
556,731
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
|
|
110,133
|
|
|
|
3,970
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
114,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
659,756
|
|
|
$
|
11,471
|
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
|
$
|
670,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government
and agency obligations
|
|
$
|
4,998,174
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
7,954
|
|
|
$
|
4,990,220
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
|
|
27,445,970
|
|
|
|
5,740
|
|
|
|
363,150
|
|
|
|
27,088,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,444,144
|
|
|
$
|
5,740
|
|
|
$
|
371,104
|
|
|
$
|
32,078,780
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
government and agency obligations
|
|
$
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,698
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,011,698
|
|
State, county, and
municipal obligations
|
|
|
550,234
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,225
|
|
|
|
542,009
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
|
|
1,404,315
|
|
|
|
52,999
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,457,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,954,549
|
|
|
$
|
64,697
|
|
|
$
|
8,225
|
|
|
$
|
4,011,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government
and agency obligations
|
|
$
|
3,198,932
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
6,818
|
|
|
$
|
3,192,114
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
|
|
26,905,021
|
|
|
|
5,575
|
|
|
|
771,432
|
|
|
|
26,139,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,103,953
|
|
|
$
|
5,575
|
|
|
$
|
778,250
|
|
|
$
|
29,331,278
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities consist of securities guaranteed by Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Small Business Administration with
amortized costs of $350,000, $15.2 million, $9.1 million, and $2.9 million, respectively, at June 30, 2017 ($1.7 million, $16.8
million, $6.7 million, and $3.1 million, respectively, at December 31, 2016).
Proceeds
from the sales and calls of securities held to maturity amounted to $1,091,000 and $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2017
and 2016, respectively. Net gains of $34,400 and $0 were recognized on the sales during the three months ended June 30, 2017 and
June 30, 2016, respectively.. The sale of the securities occurred after the Association had already collected a substantial portion
(at least 85%) of the principal outstanding due to prepayments on the debt securities.
Proceeds
from the sales and calls of securities available for sale amounted to $0 and $3,990,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2017
and 2016, respectively. Net gains of $0 and $20,600 were recognized on those sales during the three months ended June 30, 2017
and June 30, 2016, respectively.
Proceeds
from the sales and calls of securities held to maturity amounted to $3,091,000 and $222,000 for the six months ended June 30,
2017 and 2016, respectively. Net gains of $34,400 and $4,500 were recognized on the sales during the six months ended June 30,
2017 and June 30, 2016, respectively. The sale of the securities occurred after the Association had already collected a substantial
portion (at least 85%) of the principal outstanding due to prepayments on the debt securities.
3.
SECURITIES
(Cont’d)
Proceeds
from the sales and calls of securities available for sale amounted to $0 and $15,704,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017
and 2016, respectively. Net gains of $0 and $105,000 were recognized on those sales and calls for the six months ended, June 30,
2017 and 2016, respectively.
The
following is a summary of the amortized cost and fair value of securities at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, by remaining
period to contractual maturity. Actual maturities may differ from these amounts because certain debt security issuers have the
right to call or redeem their obligations prior to contractual maturity. In addition, mortgage backed securities that amortize
monthly are listed in the period the security is legally set to pay off in full.
|
|
June
30, 2017
|
|
|
|
Held
to Maturity
|
|
|
Available
for Sale
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,999,819
|
|
|
$
|
1,999,784
|
|
After one to five years
|
|
|
203,383
|
|
|
|
202,990
|
|
|
|
2,998,355
|
|
|
|
2,990,437
|
|
After five to ten years
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,855,256
|
|
|
|
2,824,596
|
|
After ten years
|
|
|
456,373
|
|
|
|
467,844
|
|
|
|
24,590,714
|
|
|
|
24,263,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
659,756
|
|
|
$
|
670,834
|
|
|
$
|
32,444,144
|
|
|
$
|
32,078,780
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
|
Held
to Maturity
|
|
|
Available
for Sale
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,199,549
|
|
|
$
|
2,199,424
|
|
After one to five years
|
|
|
204,107
|
|
|
|
201,678
|
|
|
|
999,383
|
|
|
|
992,690
|
|
After five to ten years
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,905,702
|
|
|
|
2,836,866
|
|
After ten years
|
|
|
3,750,442
|
|
|
|
3,809,343
|
|
|
|
23,999,319
|
|
|
|
23,302,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,954,549
|
|
|
$
|
4,011,021
|
|
|
$
|
30,103,953
|
|
|
$
|
29,331,278
|
|
3.
SECURITIES
(Cont’d)
The
following tables summarize the fair values and unrealized losses of securities with an unrealized loss at June 30, 2017 and December
31, 2016, segregated between securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than one year, or one year or longer,
at the respective dates.
|
|
June
30, 2017
|
|
|
|
Under
One Year
|
|
|
One
Year or More
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
Securities held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State,
county, and municipal obligations
|
|
$
|
202,990
|
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government
and agency obligations
|
|
|
4,990,220
|
|
|
|
7,954
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
|
|
22,207,487
|
|
|
|
283,560
|
|
|
|
2,165,134
|
|
|
|
79,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,197,707
|
|
|
|
291,514
|
|
|
|
2,165,134
|
|
|
|
79,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,400,697
|
|
|
$
|
291,907
|
|
|
$
|
2,165,134
|
|
|
$
|
79,590
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
|
Under
One Year
|
|
|
One
Year or More
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
Securities held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State,
county, and municipal obligations
|
|
$
|
542,009
|
|
|
$
|
8,225
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government
and agency obligations
|
|
|
3,192,114
|
|
|
|
6,818
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
|
|
22,915,969
|
|
|
|
669,270
|
|
|
|
2,354,733
|
|
|
|
102,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,108,083
|
|
|
|
676,088
|
|
|
|
2,354,733
|
|
|
|
102,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,650,092
|
|
|
$
|
684,313
|
|
|
$
|
2,354,733
|
|
|
$
|
102,162
|
|
The
unrealized losses are primarily due to changes in market interest rates subsequent to purchase. A total of 37 and 34 securities
were in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The Company generally purchases securities
issued by Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSE). Accordingly, it is expected that the GSE securities would not be settled at
a price less than the Company’s amortized cost basis. The Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily
impaired at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 since the decline in market value is attributable to changes in interest rates
and not credit quality and the Company has the intent and ability to hold these investments until there is a full recovery of
the unrealized loss, which may be at maturity.
4.
LOANS RECEIVABLE, NET
|
|
June
30, 2017
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
Mortgage
loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
1-4 family
|
|
$
|
22,493,079
|
|
|
$
|
24,808,914
|
|
Commercial
and multi-family
|
|
|
14,941,622
|
|
|
|
15,790,917
|
|
Home
equity lines of credit
|
|
|
506,639
|
|
|
|
524,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,941,340
|
|
|
|
41,124,245
|
|
Other
loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured
by savings accounts
|
|
|
9,281
|
|
|
|
11,390
|
|
Student
|
|
|
8,159,812
|
|
|
|
5,743,338
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
1,240,886
|
|
|
|
1,493,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,409,979
|
|
|
|
7,248,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
loans
|
|
|
47,351,319
|
|
|
|
48,372,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
loan fees (costs) and (premiums), net
|
|
|
(246,125
|
)
|
|
|
(139,659
|
)
|
Allowance
for loan losses
|
|
|
472,459
|
|
|
|
466,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,334
|
|
|
|
327,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
47,124,985
|
|
|
$
|
48,045,062
|
|
In
the ordinary course of business, the Company makes loans to its directors, executive officers, and their associates (related parties)
on the same terms as those prevailing at the time of origination for comparable loans with other borrowers. The unpaid principal
balances of related party loans were approximately $156,000 and $160,000 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
Activity
in the allowance for loan losses is summarized as follows:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
469,578
|
|
|
$
|
463,243
|
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
|
|
2,881
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at end of period
|
|
$
|
472,459
|
|
|
$
|
463,243
|
|
4.
LOANS RECEIVABLE, NET
(Cont’d)
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
466,893
|
|
|
$
|
463,243
|
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
|
|
5,566
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at end of period
|
|
$
|
472,459
|
|
|
$
|
463,243
|
|
The
allowance for loan losses consists of specific, general and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that
are classified as impaired. For loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows
(or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. There are
no specific allowances as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The general component covers pools of loans by loan class not
considered impaired, as well as smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as one-to-four family real estate, home equity lines of
credit and other consumer loans. These pools of loans are evaluated for loss exposure based upon historical loss rates for each
of these categories of loans, adjusted for qualitative factors. These qualitative risk factors include:
1.
|
Lending
policies and procedures, including underwriting standards and collection, charge-off, and recovery practices.
|
|
|
2.
|
National,
regional, and local economic and business conditions including the value of underlying collateral for collateral dependent
loans.
|
|
|
3.
|
Nature
and volume of the portfolio and terms of loans.
|
|
|
4.
|
Experience,
ability, and depth of lending management and staff and the quality of the Company’s loan review system.
|
|
|
5.
|
Volume
and severity of past due, classified and nonaccrual loans.
|
|
|
6.
|
Existence
and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes in the level of such concentrations.
|
|
|
7.
|
Effect
of external factors, such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements.
|
Each
factor is assigned a value to reflect improving, stable or declining conditions based on management’s best judgment using
relevant information available at the time of the evaluation. Adjustments to the factors are supported through documentation of
changes in conditions in a narrative accompanying the allowance for loan loss calculation.
An
unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The
unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies
for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.
The
allowance calculation methodology includes further segregation of loan classes into risk rating categories. The borrower’s
overall financial condition, repayment sources, guarantors and value of collateral, if appropriate, are evaluated when credit
deficiencies arise, such as delinquent loan payments. Credit quality risk ratings include regulatory classifications of pass,
special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss.
Loan
classifications are defined as follows:
|
●
|
Pass
— These loans are well protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor (or guarantors, if any)
or by the fair value, less cost to acquire and sell, of any underlying collateral in a timely manner.
|
4.
LOANS RECEIVABLE, NET
(Cont’d)
|
●
|
Special
Mention — These loans have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected,
these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of repayment prospects.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Substandard
— These loans are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the collateral
pledged, if any. Assets so classified must have a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of
the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are
not corrected.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Doubtful
— These loans have all the weaknesses inherent in a loan classified substandard with the added characteristic that the
weaknesses make the full recovery of our principal balance highly questionable and improbable on the basis of currently known
facts, conditions, and values. The likelihood of a loss on an asset or portion of an asset classified as doubtful is high.
Its classification as Loss is not appropriate, however, because pending events are expected to materially affect the amount
of loss.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Loss
— These loans are considered uncollectible and of such little value that a charge-off is warranted. This classification
does not necessarily mean that an asset has no recovery or salvage value; but rather, there is much doubt about whether, how
much, or when the recovery will occur.
|
One
of the primary methods the Company uses as an indicator of the credit quality of their portfolio is the regulatory classification
system. The following table reflects the credit quality indicators by portfolio segment and class, at the dates indicated:
|
|
June
30, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
1-4 Family
|
|
|
|
Commercial
Real Estat and
Multi-Family
|
|
|
|
Home Equity
|
|
|
|
Student
|
|
|
|
Commercial
and
Other
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
21,938
|
|
|
$
|
14,942
|
|
|
$
|
489
|
|
|
$
|
8,160
|
|
|
$
|
1,249
|
|
|
$
|
46,778
|
|
Special
Mention
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
22,493
|
|
|
$
|
14,942
|
|
|
$
|
507
|
|
|
$
|
8,160
|
|
|
$
|
1,249
|
|
|
$
|
47,351
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
1-4 Family
|
|
|
|
Commercial
Real Estate and Multi-Family
|
|
|
|
Home Equity
|
|
|
|
Student
|
|
|
|
Commercial
and
Other
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
24,249
|
|
|
$
|
15,791
|
|
|
$
|
503
|
|
|
$
|
5,743
|
|
|
$
|
1,505
|
|
|
$
|
47,791
|
|
Special
Mention
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
24,809
|
|
|
$
|
15,791
|
|
|
$
|
524
|
|
|
$
|
5,743
|
|
|
$
|
1,505
|
|
|
$
|
48,372
|
|
4.
LOANS RECEIVABLE, NET
(Cont’d)
The
following table provides information about loan delinquencies at the dates indicated:
|
|
June
30, 2017
|
|
|
|
30-59
Days
Past Due
|
|
|
60-89
Days
Past Due
|
|
|
90
Days
or More
Past Due
|
|
|
Total
Past Due
|
|
|
Current
Loans
|
|
|
Total
Loans
|
|
|
90
Days
or More
Past Due
and
Accruing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
1-4 family
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
336
|
|
|
$
|
336
|
|
|
$
|
22,157
|
|
|
$
|
22,493
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Commercial
real estate and multi-family
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
14,942
|
|
|
|
14,942
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Home
equity lines of credit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Student
loans
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
8,124
|
|
|
|
8,160
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Other
loans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,249
|
|
|
|
1,249
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
366
|
|
|
$
|
372
|
|
|
$
|
46,979
|
|
|
$
|
47,351
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
|
30-59
Days
Past Due
|
|
|
60-89
Days
Past Due
|
|
|
90
Days
or More
Past Due
|
|
|
Total
Past Due
|
|
|
Current
Loans
|
|
|
Total
Loans
|
|
|
90
Days
or More
Past Due
and
Accruing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
1-4 family
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
272
|
|
|
$
|
337
|
|
|
$
|
609
|
|
|
$
|
24,200
|
|
|
$
|
24,809
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Commercial
real estate and multi-family
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15,791
|
|
|
|
15,791
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Home
equity lines of credit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Student
loans
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
5,728
|
|
|
|
5,743
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other
loans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,505
|
|
|
|
1,505
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
282
|
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
$
|
645
|
|
|
$
|
47,727
|
|
|
$
|
48,372
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
There
were no troubled debt restructured loans at June 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016.
The
following is a summary of loans, by loan type, on which the accrual of income has been discontinued and loans that are contractually
past due 90 days or more but have not been classified as non-accrual at the dates indicated:
|
|
June
30, 2017
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
1-4 family
|
|
$
|
555
|
|
|
$
|
609
|
|
Commercial
real estate and multi-family
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Home
equity lines of credit
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Student
loans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other
loans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
non-accrual loans
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing
loans delinquent 90 days or more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student
loans
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
non-performing loans
|
|
$
|
603
|
|
|
$
|
630
|
|
4.
LOANS RECEIVABLE, NET
(Cont’d)
The
total amount of interest income on non-accrual loans that would have been recognized if interest on all such loans had been recorded
based upon original contract terms amounted to approximately $7,900 and $13,400 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016,
respectively. The total amount of interest income recognized on non-accrual loans amounted to approximately $2,000 and $29,200
during the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
For
the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, such interest income that would have been recognized on non-accrual loans totaled
approximately $15,900 and $25,300, respectively. The total amount of interest income recognized on non-accrual loans amounted
to approximately $7,700 and $29,200 during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The
following tables present the activity in the allowance for loan losses by loan type for the periods indicated:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June
30, 2017
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
1-4 Family
|
|
|
Commercial
and
Multi-Family
|
|
|
Home Equity
|
|
|
Student
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
470
|
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
Balance
|
|
$
|
285
|
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
472
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June
30, 2016
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
1-4 Family
|
|
|
Commercial
and
Multi-Family
|
|
|
Home Equity
|
|
|
Student
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
463
|
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
Balance
|
|
$
|
299
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
463
|
|
4.
LOANS RECEIVABLE, NET
(Cont’d)
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June
30, 2017
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential 1-4 Family
|
|
|
Commercial
and Multi-Family
|
|
|
Home Equity
|
|
|
Student
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
467
|
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Ending
Balance
|
|
$
|
285
|
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
472
|
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June
30, 2016
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
1-4
Family
|
|
|
Commercial
and
Multi-Family
|
|
|
Home Equity
|
|
|
Student
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
463
|
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
Balance
|
|
$
|
299
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
463
|
|
5.
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
The
components of accumulated other comprehensive loss included in equity are as follows:
|
|
June
30, 2017
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
net loss on pension plan
|
|
$
|
(1,543,410
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,569,348
|
)
|
Unrealized
loss on securities available for sale
|
|
|
(365,364
|
)
|
|
|
(772,676
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss before taxes
|
|
|
(1,908,774
|
)
|
|
|
(2,342,024
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
effect
|
|
|
652,885
|
|
|
|
796,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(1,255,889
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,545,736
|
)
|
6.
REGULATORY CAPITAL
The
Association is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet
minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possible additional discretionary, actions by regulators, that
if undertaken could have a direct material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines
and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Association must meet specific capital guidelines that involve
quantitative measures of the Association’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items, as calculated under
regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators
about components, risk weightings and other factors.
6.
REGULATORY CAPITAL
(Cont’d)
Quantitative
measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Association to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of
common equity Tier 1 capital, total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and
Tier
1 capital to average assets, as defined in the regulations. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Association exceeded
all capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject (see tables below).
On
January 1, 2015, the final rules implementing the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision capital guidelines for banking organizations
(Basel III) regulatory capital framework and related Dodd-Frank Act changes became effective for the Association. These rules
supersede the federal banking agencies' general risk-based capital rules (Basel I). Full compliance with all of the final rule's
requirements is phased in over a multi-year transition period ending on January 1, 2019. Basel III revised minimum capital requirements
and adjusted prompt corrective action thresholds. Under the final rules, minimum requirements increased for both the quantity
and quality of capital held by the Association. The rules included a new common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
ratio of 4.5 percent, raised the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 4.0 percent to 6.0 percent, required
a minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8.0 percent, and required a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0 percent.
A new capital conservation buffer, comprised of common equity Tier 1 capital, was also established above the regulatory minimum
capital requirements. This conservation buffer will is being phased in beginning January 1, 2016 at 0.625 percent of risk-weighted
assets and increase each subsequent year by an additional 0.625 percent until reaching its final level of 2.5 percent of risk-weighted
assets on January 1, 2019. The final rule also revised the definition and calculation of Tier 1 capital, total capital and risk-weighted
assets.
The
following table presents the Association’s actual capital positions and ratios at the dates indicated:
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Minimum Capital
Requirements
|
|
|
To
be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt
Corrective
Action Provisions
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
30, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Risked-based Capital
|
|
$
|
12,244
|
|
|
|
25.47
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,446
|
|
|
|
9.250
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,807
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Common
Equity Tier 1 Capital
|
|
|
11,772
|
|
|
|
24.49
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,764
|
|
|
|
5.750
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,124
|
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
Tier
1 Risk-based Capital
|
|
|
11,772
|
|
|
|
24.49
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,485
|
|
|
|
7.250
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,845
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
Tier
1 Leverage Capital
|
|
|
11,772
|
|
|
|
13.37
|
%
|
|
|
3,521
|
|
|
|
4.000
|
%
|
|
|
4,402
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Risked-based Capital
|
|
$
|
12,146
|
|
|
|
26.87
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,899
|
|
|
|
8.625
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,521
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Common
Equity Tier 1 Capital
|
|
|
11,679
|
|
|
|
25.84
|
%
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
|
|
5.125
|
%
|
|
|
2,938
|
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
Tier
1 Risk-based Capital
|
|
|
11,679
|
|
|
|
25.84
|
%
|
|
|
2,995
|
|
|
|
6.625
|
%
|
|
|
3,616
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
Tier
1 Leverage Capital
|
|
|
11,679
|
|
|
|
12.84
|
%
|
|
|
3,637
|
|
|
|
4.000
|
%
|
|
|
4,547
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
7.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DISCLOSURES
A.
Fair Value Measurements
The
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC Topic
820 applies only to fair value measurements already required or permitted by other accounting standards and does not impose requirements
for additional fair value measures. ASC Topic 820 was issued to increase consistency and comparability in reporting fair values.
The
Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and to determine fair value disclosures.
The Company did not have any liabilities that were measured at fair value at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. Securities available-for-sale
are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the Company may be required to record at fair
value other assets or liabilities on a non-recurring basis,
7.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DISCLOSURES
(Cont’d)
such
as foreclosed real estate owned and certain impaired loans. These non-recurring fair value adjustments generally involve the write-down
of individual assets due to impairment losses.
In
accordance with ASC Topic 820, the Company groups its assets at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the
assets are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:
●
|
Level
1 — Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
|
|
|
●
|
Level
2 — Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or
similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions
are observable in the market.
|
|
|
●
|
Level
3 — Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market.
These unobservable assumptions reflect the Company’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use
in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include the use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models
and similar techniques. The results cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate
settlement of the asset or liability.
|
The
Company bases its fair values on the price that would be received to sell an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable
inputs when measuring fair value.
Assets
that are measured on a recurring basis are limited to the available-for-sale securities portfolio. The available-for-sale portfolio
is carried at estimated fair value with any unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, reported as accumulated other comprehensive
income or loss in stockholders’ equity. Substantially all of the available-for-sale portfolio consists of investment securities
issued by government-sponsored enterprises. The fair values for substantially all of these securities are obtained from an independent
securities broker. Based on the nature of the securities, the securities broker provides the Company with prices which are categorized
as Level 2 since quoted prices in active markets for identical assets are generally not available for the majority of securities
in the portfolio.
The
following table provides the level of valuation assumptions used to determine the carrying value of assets measured at fair value
on a recurring basis at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Quoted
Prices in Active
Markets for Identical
|
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
Description
|
|
Value
|
|
|
(Level
1)
|
|
|
(Level
2)
|
|
|
(Level
3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
30, 2017:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
available for sale
|
|
$
|
32,078,780
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
32,078,780
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
available for sale
|
|
$
|
29,331,278
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
29,331,278
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
There
were no assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
B.
Fair Value Disclosures
The
following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair values of financial instruments as disclosed herein.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
For
cash and due from banks and federal funds sold, the carrying amount approximates the fair value (Level 1).
7.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DISCLOSURES
(Cont’d)
B.
Fair Value Disclosures (Cont’d)
Securities
The
fair value of securities is estimated based on bid quotations received from securities dealers, if available (Level 1). If a quoted
market price was not available, fair value was estimated using quoted market prices of similar instruments, adjusted for differences
between the quoted instruments and the instruments being valued (Level 2).
FHLB
Stock
The
fair value for FHLB stock is its carrying value, since this is the amount for which it could be redeemed. There is no active market
for this stock, and the Company is required to maintain a minimum balance based upon the unpaid principal of home mortgage loans
(Level 2).
Loans
Receivable
Fair
values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as residential
mortgage, commercial, and consumer. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and
by performing and nonperforming categories (Level 3).
Deposits
The
fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest-bearing demand deposits, savings, and NOW and money market
accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand (Level 1). The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted
value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits with similar remaining
maturities (Level 2).
Short-Term
Borrowings
The
carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, and other short-term borrowings maturing within 90 days approximate their fair values.
Fair values of other short-term borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the Company’s current
incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements (Level 1).
Long-Term
Borrowings
The
fair value of long-term borrowings is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on the current incremental borrowing
rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements (Level 2).
Off-Balance-Sheet
Instruments
In
the ordinary course of business the Company has entered into off-balance-sheet financial instruments consisting of commitments
to extend credit. Such financial instruments are recorded in the financial statements when they are funded. Their fair value would
approximate fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements.
The
carrying values and estimated fair values of financial instruments are as follows (in thousands):
7.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DISCLOSURES
(Cont’d)
B.
Fair Value Disclosures (Cont’d)
|
|
June
30, 2017
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
2,319
|
|
|
$
|
2,319
|
|
|
$
|
2,923
|
|
|
$
|
2,923
|
|
Securities
held to maturity
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
3,955
|
|
|
|
4,011
|
|
Securities
available for sale
|
|
|
32,079
|
|
|
|
32,079
|
|
|
|
29,331
|
|
|
|
29,331
|
|
Loans
receivable
|
|
|
47,125
|
|
|
|
47,448
|
|
|
|
48,045
|
|
|
|
48,488
|
|
FHLB
and other stock, at cost
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
Accrued
interest receivable
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
73,088
|
|
|
|
73,129
|
|
|
|
74,288
|
|
|
|
74,308
|
|
FHLB
Advances
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,001
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,001
|
|
The
fair value estimates are made at a discrete point in time based on relevant market information and information about the financial
instruments. Fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions,
risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve
uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions
could significantly affect the estimates. Further, the foregoing estimates may not reflect the actual amount that could be realized
if all or substantially all of the financial instruments were offered for sale.
In
addition, the fair value estimates were based on existing on-and-off balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to
value the anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Other
significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial assets and liabilities include premises and equipment and
advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized
gains and losses have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in any of the estimates.
Finally,
reasonable comparability between financial institutions may not be likely due to the wide range of permitted valuation techniques
and numerous estimates which must be made given the absence of active secondary markets for many of the financial instruments.
The lack of uniform valuation methodologies introduces a greater degree of subjectivity to these estimated fair values.