Table of Contents

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

 

x       QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

 

or

 

o          TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from         to

 

Commission file number: 001-33437

 


 

KKR FINANCIAL HOLDINGS LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

 

11-3801844
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

 

555 California Street, 50 th  Floor
San Francisco, CA

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

94104
(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (415) 315-3620

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  x  Yes   o  No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  x   No  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer  x

 

Accelerated filer  o

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer  o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Smaller reporting company  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  o  Yes   x  No

 

The number of shares of the registrant’s common shares outstanding as of August 2, 2012 was 178,393,521.

 

 

 




Table of Contents

 

PART I.    FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

 

KKR Financial Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands, except share information)

 

 

 

 

 

June 30,
2012

 

December 31,
2011

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

473,789

 

$

392,154

 

Restricted cash and cash equivalents

 

414,814

 

399,620

 

Securities

 

813,777

 

922,603

 

Corporate loans, net (includes $183,934 and $317,332 loans held for sale as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively)

 

5,945,230

 

6,443,399

 

Equity investments, at estimated fair value ($16,418 and $12,222 pledged as collateral as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively)

 

157,677

 

189,845

 

Derivative assets

 

32,319

 

28,463

 

Interest and principal receivable

 

38,223

 

62,124

 

Other assets

 

483,808

 

209,020

 

Total assets

 

$

8,359,637

 

$

8,647,228

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

Collateralized loan obligation secured debt

 

$

5,063,406

 

$

5,540,037

 

Collateralized loan obligation junior secured notes to affiliates

 

322,348

 

365,848

 

Credit facilities

 

100,000

 

38,300

 

Convertible senior notes

 

277,408

 

299,830

 

Senior notes

 

362,132

 

250,676

 

Junior subordinated notes

 

283,517

 

283,517

 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities

 

44,097

 

24,680

 

Accrued interest payable

 

25,043

 

25,536

 

Accrued interest payable to affiliates

 

6,921

 

6,561

 

Related party payable

 

7,967

 

11,078

 

Derivative liabilities

 

120,072

 

125,333

 

Total liabilities

 

6,612,911

 

6,971,396

 

Shareholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred shares, no par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized and none issued and outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011

 

 

 

Common shares, no par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, and 178,393,521 and 178,145,482 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively

 

 

 

Paid-in-capital

 

2,760,628

 

2,759,478

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(46,633

)

(35,619

)

Accumulated deficit

 

(967,269

)

(1,048,027

)

Total shareholders’ equity

 

1,746,726

 

1,675,832

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

8,359,637

 

$

8,647,228

 

 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3



Table of Contents

 

KKR Financial Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands, except per share information)

 

 

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

Net investment income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loan interest income

 

$

107,602

 

$

102,656

 

$

211,696

 

$

212,301

 

Securities interest income

 

20,813

 

22,073

 

43,389

 

44,629

 

Other investment income

 

12,135

 

11,114

 

23,399

 

14,243

 

Total investment income

 

140,550

 

135,843

 

278,484

 

271,173

 

Interest expense

 

42,655

 

32,978

 

83,370

 

65,099

 

Interest expense to affiliates

 

12,318

 

14,142

 

25,177

 

26,238

 

Provision for loan losses

 

 

 

46,498

 

11,661

 

Net investment income

 

85,577

 

88,723

 

123,439

 

168,175

 

Other income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net realized and unrealized gain on investments

 

18,382

 

58,541

 

81,970

 

97,725

 

Net realized and unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives and foreign exchange

 

(3,630

)

1,241

 

5,519

 

7,308

 

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on residential mortgage-backed securities, at estimated fair value

 

3,016

 

609

 

6,063

 

(129

)

Net loss on restructuring and extinguishment of debt

 

 

 

(445

)

 

Other income

 

1,701

 

2,187

 

5,293

 

4,110

 

Total other income

 

19,469

 

62,578

 

98,400

 

109,014

 

Non-investment expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related party management compensation

 

12,804

 

24,315

 

30,917

 

45,516

 

General, administrative and directors expenses

 

19,526

 

10,367

 

32,330

 

18,538

 

Professional services

 

1,308

 

1,691

 

3,204

 

3,123

 

Total non-investment expenses

 

33,638

 

36,373

 

66,451

 

67,177

 

Income before income tax expense (benefit)

 

71,408

 

114,928

 

155,388

 

210,012

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

203

 

7,424

 

(3,865

)

8,741

 

Net income

 

$

71,205

 

$

107,504

 

$

159,253

 

$

201,271

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.40

 

$

0.60

 

$

0.89

 

$

1.13

 

Diluted

 

$

0.39

 

$

0.59

 

$

0.87

 

$

1.10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

177,809

 

177,674

 

177,792

 

177,376

 

Diluted

 

181,642

 

182,393

 

181,944

 

181,844

 

 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4



Table of Contents

 

KKR Financial Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

Net income

 

$

71,205

 

$

107,504

 

$

159,253

 

$

201,271

 

Other comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized (losses) gains arising during period

 

(54,547

)

(9,151

)

(59,161

)

11,089

 

Reclassification adjustments for gains (losses) realized in net income

 

27,073

 

(28,761

)

49,334

 

(36,097

)

Unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale

 

(27,474

)

(37,912

)

(9,827

)

(25,008

)

Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges

 

(15,779

)

(10,019

)

(1,187

)

(1,827

)

Total other comprehensive loss

 

(43,253

)

(47,931

)

(11,014

)

(26,835

)

Comprehensive income

 

$

27,952

 

$

59,573

 

$

148,239

 

$

174,436

 

 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5



Table of Contents

 

KKR Financial Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

(Unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

Common
Shares

 

Paid-In
Capital

 

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss

 

Accumulated
Deficit

 

Total
Shareholders’
Equity

 

Balance at January 1, 2012

 

178,145

 

$

2,759,478

 

$

(35,619

)

$

(1,048,027

)

$

1,675,832

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

159,253

 

159,253

 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

(11,014

)

 

 

(11,014

)

Cash distributions on common shares

 

 

 

 

(78,495

)

(78,495

)

Grant of restricted common shares

 

259

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repurchase and cancellation of common shares

 

(10

)

(96

)

 

 

(96

)

Share-based compensation expense related to restricted common shares

 

 

1,246

 

 

 

1,246

 

Balance at June 30, 2012

 

178,394

 

$

2,760,628

 

$

(46,633

)

$

(967,269

)

$

1,746,726

 

 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

6



Table of Contents

 

KKR Financial Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

For the six months
ended June 30, 2012

 

For the six months
ended June 30, 2011

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

159,253

 

$

201,271

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Net realized and unrealized gain on derivatives and foreign exchange

 

(5,519

)

(7,308

)

Net loss on restructuring and extinguishment of debt

 

445

 

 

Write-off of debt issuance costs

 

1,220

 

860

 

Lower of cost or estimated fair value adjustment on corporate loans held for sale

 

6,064

 

12,356

 

Provision for loan losses

 

46,498

 

11,661

 

Impairment charges

 

4,426

 

1,128

 

Share-based compensation

 

1,246

 

2,343

 

Net realized and unrealized (gain) loss on residential mortgage-backed securities, at estimated fair value

 

(6,063

)

129

 

Net realized and unrealized gain on investments

 

(89,442

)

(111,209

)

Depreciation and net amortization

 

(36,945

)

(49,067

)

Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest receivable

 

5,696

 

(982

)

Other assets

 

(6,065

)

14,857

 

Related party payable

 

(3,111

)

6,893

 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities

 

(1,071

)

10,332

 

Accrued interest payable

 

(493

)

427

 

Accrued interest payable to affiliates

 

360

 

1,089

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

76,499

 

94,780

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Principal payments from corporate loans

 

1,080,341

 

1,123,526

 

Principal payments from securities available-for-sale and other securities, at estimated fair value

 

20,616

 

85,959

 

Principal payments from residential mortgage-backed securities, at estimated fair value

 

3,277

 

3,591

 

Proceeds from sale of corporate loans

 

221,606

 

312,881

 

Proceeds from sale of securities available-for-sale and other securities, at estimated fair value

 

192,657

 

93,501

 

Proceeds from sale of equity investments

 

15,290

 

12,512

 

Proceeds from securities sold, not yet purchased

 

 

41,287

 

Purchases of corporate loans

 

(762,791

)

(1,510,024

)

Purchases of securities available-for-sale and other securities, at estimated fair value

 

(63,318

)

(120,036

)

Purchases of equity and other investments

 

(233,686

)

(131,004

)

Cover securities sold, not yet purchased

 

 

(39,320

)

Net proceeds, purchases, and settlements of derivatives

 

(2,674

)

(532

)

Net change in restricted cash and cash equivalents

 

(15,194

)

(23,578

)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

456,124

 

(151,237

)

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of collateralized loan obligation secured debt

 

55,711

 

283,797

 

Retirement of collateralized loan obligation secured debt

 

(577,039

)

(221,655

)

Retirement of collateralized loan obligation junior secured notes to affiliates

 

 

(276

)

Proceeds from credit facilities

 

61,700

 

19,900

 

Repayment of convertible senior notes

 

(23,495

)

 

Proceeds from senior notes

 

111,418

 

 

Distributions on common shares

 

(78,495

)

(55,219

)

Issuance of common shares

 

 

1,297

 

Repurchase and cancellation of common shares

 

(96

)

(1,297

)

Other capitalized costs

 

(692

)

(2,190

)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

(450,988

)

24,357

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

81,635

 

(32,100

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

392,154

 

313,829

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

473,789

 

$

281,729

 

Supplemental cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest

 

$

91,920

 

$

73,565

 

Net cash paid for income taxes

 

$

62

 

$

725

 

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of restricted common shares

 

$

2,446

 

$

2,355

 

Loans transferred from held for investment to held for sale

 

$

63,014

 

$

688,636

 

Loans transferred from held for sale to held for investment

 

$

65,879

 

$

288,891

 

 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

7



Table of Contents

 

KKR Financial Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Note 1. Organization

 

KKR Financial Holdings LLC together with its subsidiaries (the “Company”) is a specialty finance company with expertise in a range of asset classes. The Company’s core business strategy is to leverage the proprietary resources of its manager with the objective of generating both current income and capital appreciation by deploying capital to its strategies, which include bank loans and high yield securities, natural resources, special situations, mezzanine, commercial real estate and private equity. The Company’s holdings across these strategies primarily consist of below investment grade syndicated corporate loans, also known as leveraged loans, high yield debt securities, private equity, interests in joint ventures and partnerships, and working and royalty interests in oil and gas properties. The corporate loans that the Company holds are purchased via assignment or participation in the primary or secondary market.

 

The majority of the Company’s holdings consist of corporate loans and high yield debt securities held in collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”) transactions that are structured as on-balance sheet securitizations and are used as long term financing for the Company’s investments in corporate debt. The senior secured debt issued by the CLO transactions is generally owned by unaffiliated third party investors and the Company owns the majority of the mezzanine and subordinated notes in the CLO transactions. The Company executes its core business strategy through its majority-owned subsidiaries, including CLOs.

 

KKR Financial Advisors LLC (the “Manager”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of KKR Asset Management LLC, manages the Company pursuant to a management agreement (the “Management Agreement”). KKR Asset Management LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. (“KKR”).

 

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and entities established to complete secured financing transactions that are considered to be variable interest entities and for which the Company is the primary beneficiary.

 

These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. The Company’s results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year or any other interim period. In the opinion of management, all normal recurring adjustments have been included for a fair statement of this interim financial information.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from management’s estimates.

 

Consolidation

 

KKR Financial CLO 2005-1, Ltd. (“CLO 2005-1”), KKR Financial CLO 2005-2, Ltd. (“CLO 2005-2”), KKR Financial CLO 2006-1, Ltd. (“CLO 2006-1”), KKR Financial CLO 2007-1, Ltd. (“CLO 2007-1”), KKR Financial CLO 2007-A, Ltd. (“CLO 2007-A”) and KKR Financial CLO 2011-1, Ltd. (“CLO 2011-1”) are entities established to complete secured financing transactions. These entities are variable interest entities (“VIEs”) which the Company consolidates as the Company has determined it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact these entities’ economic performance and the Company has both the obligation to absorb losses of these entities and the right to receive benefits from these entities that could potentially be significant to these entities. In CLO transactions, subordinated notes have the first risk of loss and conversely, the residual value upside of the transactions. These CLOs are considered non-recourse leverage to the Company.

 

The Company finances the majority of its corporate debt investments through its CLOs. As of June 30, 2012, the Company’s six CLOs held $6.8 billion par amount, or $6.4 billion estimated fair value, of corporate debt investments. As of December 31, 2011, the Company’s six CLOs held $7.4 billion par amount, or $6.8 billion estimated fair value, of corporate debt investments. The assets in each CLO can be used only to settle the debt of the related CLO. As of June 30, 2012, the aggregate CLO debt totaled $5.1 billion of secured debt outstanding held by unaffiliated third parties and $322.3 million of junior secured notes outstanding held by an affiliate of the Manager. As of December 31, 2011, the aggregate CLO debt totaled $5.5 billion of secured debt outstanding held by unaffiliated third parties and $365.8 million of junior secured notes outstanding held by an affiliate of the Manager.

 

8



Table of Contents

 

The Company continues to consolidate all non-VIEs in which it holds a greater than 50 percent voting interest.

 

In addition, the Company has non-controlling interests in joint ventures and partnerships that do not qualify as VIEs and do not meet the control requirements for consolidation as defined by GAAP.

 

All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or market and the instruments’ complexity for disclosure purposes. Assets and liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their value. Hierarchical levels, as defined under GAAP, are directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuations of these assets and liabilities, and are as follows:

 

Level 1:  Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.

 

The types of assets generally included in this category are equity securities listed in active markets.

 

Level 2:  Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability.

 

The types of assets and liabilities generally included in this category are certain corporate debt securities, certain corporate loans held for sale, certain equity investments at estimated fair value and certain financial instruments classified as derivatives.

 

Level 3:  Inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and consideration of factors specific to the asset.

 

The types of assets and liabilities generally included in this category are certain corporate debt securities, certain corporate loans held for sale, certain equity investments at estimated fair value, residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”), certain interests in joint ventures and partnerships and certain financial instruments classified as derivatives.

 

A significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability is an indication that transactions or quoted prices may not be representative of fair value because in such market conditions there may be increased instances of transactions that are not orderly. In those circumstances, further analysis of transactions or quoted prices is needed, and a significant adjustment to the transactions or quoted prices may be necessary to estimate fair value.

 

The availability of observable inputs can vary depending on the financial asset or liability and is affected by a wide variety of factors, including, for example, the type of product, whether the product is new, whether the product is traded on an active exchange or in the secondary market, and the current market condition. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The variability of the observable inputs affected by the factors described above may cause transfers between Levels 1, 2, and/or 3, which the Company recognizes at the end of the reporting period.

 

Many financial assets and liabilities have bid and ask prices that can be observed in the marketplace. Bid prices reflect the highest price that the Company and others are willing to pay for an asset. Ask prices represent the lowest price that the Company and others are willing to accept for an asset. For financial assets and liabilities whose inputs are based on bid-ask prices, the Company does not require that fair value always be a predetermined point in the bid-ask range. The Company’s policy is to allow for mid-market pricing and adjusting to the point within the bid-ask range that meets the Company’s best estimate of fair value.

 

9



Table of Contents

 

Depending on the relative liquidity in the markets for certain assets, the Company may transfer assets to Level 3 if it determines that observable quoted prices, obtained directly or indirectly, are not available. The valuation techniques used for the assets and liabilities that are valued using Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are described below.

 

Corporate Debt Securities:   Corporate debt securities are initially valued at transaction price and are subsequently valued using market data for similar instruments (e.g., recent transactions or broker quotes), comparisons to benchmark derivative indices or valuation models. Valuation models are based on discounted cash flow techniques, for which the key inputs are the amount and timing of expected future cash flows, market yields for such instruments and recovery assumptions. Inputs are determined based on relative value analyses, which incorporate similar instruments from similar issuers.

 

Equity Investments, at Estimated Fair Value:   Equity investments, at estimated fair value, are initially valued at transaction price and are subsequently valued using observable market prices, if available, or internally developed models in the absence of readily observable market prices. Valuation models are generally based on a market and income (discounted cash flow) approaches, in which various internal and external factors are considered. Factors include the price at which the investment was acquired, the nature of the investment, current market conditions, recent public market and private transactions for comparable securities, and financing transactions subsequent to the acquisition of the investment. The fair value recorded for a particular investment will generally be within the range suggested by the two approaches.

 

Interests in Joint Ventures and Partnerships:   Interests in joint ventures and partnerships include investments related to the oil and gas and commercial real estate sectors. Interests in joint ventures and partnerships are initially valued at transaction price and are subsequently valued using observable market prices, if available, or internally developed models in the absence of readily observable market prices. Valuation models are generally based on a market and income (discounted cash flow) approaches, in which various internal and external factors are considered. Factors include the price at which the investment was acquired, the nature of the investment, current market conditions, recent public market and private transactions for comparables, and financing transactions subsequent to the acquisition of the investment. The fair value recorded for a particular investment will generally be within the range suggested by the two approaches.

 

Over-the-counter (“OTC”) Derivative Contracts:   OTC derivative contracts include forward, swap and option contracts related to interest rates, foreign currencies, credit standing of reference entities, and equity prices. The fair value of OTC derivative products can be modeled using a series of techniques, including closed-form analytic formulae, such as the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, and simulation models or a combination thereof. Many pricing models employ methodologies that have pricing inputs observed from actively quoted markets, as is the case for generic interest rate swap and option contracts.

 

Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities, at Estimated Fair Value:   Residential mortgage-backed securities are initially valued at transaction price and are subsequently valued using industry recognized models (including Intex and Bloomberg) and data for similar instruments (e.g., nationally recognized pricing services or broker quotes). The most significant inputs to the valuation of these instruments are default and loss expectations and market credit spreads.

 

Valuation Process

 

The valuation process involved in Level 3 measurements for assets and liabilities is completed on a quarterly basis and is designed to subject the valuation of Level 3 investments to an appropriate level of consistency, oversight and review. The Company has a valuation committee, whose members consist of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and certain other employees of the Manager. The Company’s valuation committee is responsible for coordinating and implementing the Company’s quarterly valuation process. For assets classified as Level 3, the investment professionals are responsible for documenting preliminary valuations based on their evaluation of financial and operating data, company specific developments, market valuations of comparable companies and model projections discussed above, among other factors. The Company engages an independent valuation firm to opine on its valuations for certain holdings over a specific dollar threshold. All valuations are approved by the Company’s valuation committee.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash held in banks and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Interest income earned on cash and cash equivalents is recorded in other investment income.

 

10



Table of Contents

 

Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Restricted cash and cash equivalents represent amounts that are held by third parties under certain of the Company’s financing and derivative transactions. Interest income earned on restricted cash and cash equivalents is recorded in other investment income.

 

On the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows, net additions or reductions to restricted cash and cash equivalents are classified as an investing activity as restricted cash and cash equivalents reflect the receipts from collections or sales of investments, as well as payments made to acquire investments held by third parties.

 

Securities

 

Securities Available-for-Sale

 

The Company classifies its investments in securities as available-for-sale as the Company may sell them prior to maturity and does not hold them principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term. These investments are carried at estimated fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income. Estimated fair values are based on quoted market prices, when available, on estimates provided by independent pricing sources or dealers who make markets in such securities, or internal valuation models when external sources of fair value are not available. Upon the sale of a security, the realized net gain or loss is computed on a weighted average cost basis. Purchases and sales of securities are recorded on the trade date.

 

The Company monitors its available-for-sale securities portfolio for impairments. A loss is recognized when it is determined that a decline in the estimated fair value of a security below its amortized cost is other-than-temporary. The Company considers many factors in determining whether the impairment of a security is deemed to be other-than-temporary, including, but not limited to, the length of time the security has had a decline in estimated fair value below its amortized cost and the severity of the decline, the amount of the unrealized loss, recent events specific to the issuer or industry, external credit ratings and recent changes in such ratings. In addition, for debt securities, the Company considers its intent to sell the debt security, the Company’s estimation of whether or not it expects to recover the debt security’s entire amortized cost if it intends to hold the debt security, and whether it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. For equity securities, the Company also considers its intent and ability to hold the equity security for a period of time sufficient for a recovery in value.

 

The amount of the loss that is recognized when it is determined that a decline in the estimated fair value of a security below its amortized cost is other-than-temporary is dependent on certain factors. If the security is an equity security or if the security is a debt security that the Company intends to sell or estimates that it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell before recovery of its amortized cost, then the impairment amount recognized in earnings is the entire difference between the estimated fair value of the security and its amortized cost. For debt securities that the Company does not intend to sell or estimates that it is not more likely than not to be required to sell before recovery, the impairment is separated into the estimated amount relating to credit loss and the estimated amount relating to all other factors. Only the estimated credit loss amount is recognized in earnings, with the remainder of the loss amount recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income.

 

Unamortized premiums and unaccreted discounts on securities available-for-sale are recognized in interest income over the contractual life, adjusted for actual prepayments, of the securities using the effective interest method.

 

Other Securities, at Estimated Fair Value

 

The Company has elected the fair value option of accounting for certain securities for the purpose of enhancing the transparency of its financial condition as fair value is consistent with how the Company manages the risks of these securities. Other securities, at estimated fair value are included within securities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets with unrealized gains and losses reported in income.

 

Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities, at Estimated Fair Value

 

The Company has elected the fair value option of accounting for its residential mortgage investments for the purpose of enhancing the transparency of its financial condition as fair value is consistent with how the Company manages the risks of its residential mortgage investments. RMBS, at estimated fair value are included within securities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets with unrealized gains and losses reported in income.

 

Equity Investments, at Estimated Fair Value

 

The Company has elected the fair value option of accounting for certain marketable equity securities and private equity investments. The Company elects the fair value option of accounting for private equity investments received through restructuring

 

11



Table of Contents

 

debt transactions or issued by an entity in which the Company may have significant influence. The Company elected the fair value option for certain equity investments for the purpose of enhancing the transparency of its financial condition as fair value is consistent with how the Company manages the risks of these equity investments. Equity investments, at fair value, are managed based on overall value and potential returns. These equity investments carried at estimated fair value are presented separately on the condensed consolidated balance sheets with unrealized gains and losses reported in net realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

 

Interests in Joint Ventures and Partnerships

 

The Company has elected the fair value option of accounting for certain non-controlling interests in joint ventures and partnerships, for the purpose of enhancing the transparency of its financial condition as fair value is consistent with how the Company manages the risks of these interests. These interests in joint ventures and partnerships are presented within other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets with unrealized gains and losses reported in net realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

 

Securities Sold, Not Yet Purchased

 

Securities sold, not yet purchased consist of equity and debt securities that the Company has sold short. In order to facilitate a short sale, the Company borrows the securities from another party and delivers the securities to the buyer. The Company will be required to “cover” its short sale in the future through the purchase of the security in the market at the prevailing market price and deliver it to the counterparty from which it borrowed. The Company is exposed to a loss to the extent that the security price increases during the time from when the Company borrowed the security to when the Company purchases it in the market to cover the short sale. Securities sold, not yet purchased are presented within accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets with gains and losses reported in net realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments on the condensed consolidated statement of operations.

 

Corporate Loans, Net

 

Corporate Loans

 

Corporate loans are generally held for investment and the Company initially records loans at their purchase prices. The Company subsequently accounts for loans based on their outstanding principal plus or minus unaccreted purchase discounts and unamortized purchase premiums. Corporate loans that the Company transfers to held for sale are transferred at the lower of cost or estimated fair value.

 

Interest income on loans includes interest at stated coupon rates adjusted for accretion of purchase discounts and the amortization of purchase premiums. Unamortized premiums and unaccreted discounts are recognized in interest income over the contractual life, adjusted for actual prepayments, of the loans using the effective interest method.

 

A loan is typically placed on non-accrual status at such time as: (i) management believes that scheduled debt service payments may not be paid when contractually due; (ii) the loan becomes 90 days delinquent; (iii) management determines the borrower is incapable of, or has ceased efforts toward, curing the cause of the impairment; or (iv) the net realizable value of the underlying collateral securing the loan decreases below the Company’s carrying value of such loan. As such, loans placed on non-accrual status may or may not be contractually past due at the time of such determination. While on non-accrual status, previously recognized accrued interest is reversed if it is determined that such amounts are not collectible and interest income is recognized using the cost-recovery method, cash-basis method or some combination of the two methods. A loan is placed back on accrual status when the ultimate collectability of the principal and interest is not in doubt.

 

The Company may modify corporate loans in transactions where the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and a concession is granted to the borrower as part of the modification. These concessions may include a reduction in interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, an exchange of assets or a combination thereof. Such modifications typically qualify as troubled debt restructurings. The Company may also identify receivables that are newly considered impaired and discloses the total amount of receivables and the allowance for credit losses as of the end of the period of adoption related to those receivables that are newly considered impaired.

 

In addition, the Company may also modify corporate loans which usually involve changes in existing interest rates combined with changes of existing maturities to prevailing market rates/maturities for similar instruments at the time of modification. Such modifications typically do not meet the definition of a troubled debt restructuring since the respective borrowers are neither experiencing financial difficulty nor are seeking a concession as part of the modification.

 

12



Table of Contents

 

The corporate loans the Company invests in are generally deemed in default upon the non-payment of a single interest payment or as a result of the violation of a covenant in the respective loan agreement. The Company charges-off a portion or all of its amortized cost basis in a corporate loan when it determines that it is uncollectible due to either: i) the estimation based on a recovery value analysis of a defaulted loan that less than the amortized cost amount will be recovered through the agreed upon restructuring of the loan or as a result of a bankruptcy process of the issuer of the loan; or ii) the determination by the Company to transfer a loan to held for sale with the loan having an estimated market value below the amortized cost basis of the loan.

 

Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality are recorded at initial cost and interest income is recognized as the difference between the Company’s estimate of all cash flows that it will receive from the loan in excess of its initial investment on a level-yield basis over the life of the loan (accretable yield) using the effective interest method.

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

The Company’s corporate loan portfolio is comprised of a single portfolio segment which includes one class of financing receivables, that is, high yield loans that are purchased via assignment or participation in either the primary or secondary market and are held primarily for investment. High yield loans are generally characterized as having below investment grade ratings or being unrated.

 

The Company’s allowance for loan losses represents its estimate of probable credit losses inherent in its corporate loan portfolio held for investment as of the balance sheet date. Estimating the Company’s allowance for loan losses involves a high degree of management judgment and is based upon a comprehensive review of the Company’s loan portfolio that is performed on a quarterly basis. The Company’s allowance for loan losses consists of two components, an allocated component and an unallocated component. The allocated component of the allowance for loan losses pertains to specific loans that the Company has determined are impaired. The Company determines a loan is impaired when management estimates that it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. On a quarterly basis the Company performs a comprehensive review of its entire loan portfolio and identifies certain loans that it has determined are impaired. Once a loan is identified as being impaired, the Company places the loan on non-accrual status, unless the loan is already on non-accrual status, and records a reserve that reflects management’s best estimate of the loss that the Company expects to recognize from the loan. The expected loss is estimated as being the difference between the Company’s current cost basis of the loan, including accrued interest receivable, and the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, except as a practical expedient, the loan’s observable estimated fair value may be used. The Company also estimates the probable credit losses inherent in its unfunded loan commitments as of the balance sheet date. Any credit loss reserve for unfunded loan commitments is recorded in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.

 

The unallocated component of the Company’s allowance for loan losses represents its estimate of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date where the specific loan that the loan loss relates to is indeterminable. The Company estimates the unallocated component of the allowance for loan losses through a comprehensive review of its loan portfolio and identifies certain loans that demonstrate possible indicators of impairment, including internally assigned credit quality indicators. This assessment excludes all loans that are determined to be impaired and as a result, an allocated reserve has been recorded as described in the preceding paragraph. Such indicators include, but are not limited to, the current and/or forecasted financial performance and liquidity profile of the issuer, specific industry or economic conditions that may impact the issuer, and the observable trading price of the loan if available. All loans are first categorized based on their assigned risk grade and further stratified based on the seniority of the loan in the issuer’s capital structure. The seniority classifications assigned to loans are senior secured, second lien and subordinate. Senior secured consists of loans that are the most senior debt in an issuer’s capital structure and therefore have a lower estimated loss severity than other debt that is subordinate to the senior secured loan. Senior secured loans often have a first lien on some or all of the issuer’s assets. Second lien consists of loans that are secured by a second lien interest on some or all of the issuer’s assets; however, the loan is subordinate to the first lien debt in the issuer’s capital structure. Subordinate consists of loans that are generally unsecured and subordinate to other debt in the issuer’s capital structure.

 

There are three internally assigned risk grades that are applied to loans that have not been identified as being impaired: high, moderate and low. High risk means that there is evidence of possible loss due to the financial or operating performance and liquidity of the issuer, industry or economic concerns specific to the issuer, or other factors that indicate that the breach of a covenant contained in the related loan agreement is possible. Moderate risk means that while there is not observable evidence of loss, there are issuer and/or industry specific trends that indicate a loss may have occurred. Low risk means that while there is no identified evidence of loss, there is the risk of loss inherent in the loan that has not been identified. All loans held for investment, with the exception of loans that have been identified as impaired, are assigned a risk grade of high, moderate or low.

 

The Company applies a range of default and loss severity estimates in order to estimate a range of loss outcomes upon which to base its estimate of probable losses that results in the determination of the unallocated component of the Company’s allowance for loan losses.

 

13



Table of Contents

 

Corporate Loans Held for Sale

 

From time to time the Company makes the determination to transfer certain of its corporate loans from held for investment to held for sale. The decision to transfer a loan to held for sale is generally as a result of the Company determining that the respective loan’s credit quality in relation to the loan’s expected risk-adjusted return no longer meets the Company’s investment objective and/or the Company deciding to reduce or eliminate its exposure to a particular loan for risk management purposes. Corporate loans held for sale are stated at lower of cost or estimated fair value and are assessed on an individual basis. Prior to transferring a loan to held for sale, any difference between the carrying amount of the loan and its outstanding principal balance is recognized as an adjustment to the yield by the interest method. The loan is transferred from held for investment to held for sale at the lower of its cost or estimated fair value and is carried at the lower of its cost or estimated fair value thereafter. Subsequent to transfer and while the loan is held for sale, recognition as an adjustment to yield by the interest method is discontinued for any difference between the carrying amount of the loan and its outstanding principal balance.

 

From time to time the Company also makes the determination to transfer certain of its corporate loans from held for sale back to held for investment. The decision to transfer a loan back to held for investment is generally as a result of the circumstances that led to the initial transfer to held for sale no longer being present. Such circumstances may include deteriorated market conditions often resulting in price depreciation or assets becoming illiquid, changes in restrictions on sales and certain loans amending their terms to extend the maturity, whereby the Company determined that selling the asset no longer met its investment objective and strategy. The loan is transferred from held for sale back to held for investment at the lower of its cost or estimated fair value, whereby a new cost basis is established based on this amount.

 

Interest income on corporate loans classified as held for sale is recognized through accrual of the stated coupon rate for the loans, unless the loans are placed on non-accrual status, at which point previously recognized accrued interest is reversed if it is determined that such amounts are not collectible and interest income is recognized using either the cost-recovery method or on a cash-basis.

 

Corporate Loans, at Estimated Fair Value

 

The Company has elected the fair value option of accounting for certain corporate loans for the purpose of enhancing the transparency of its financial condition as fair value is consistent with how the Company manages the risks of these corporate loans. Corporate loans carried at estimated fair value are included within corporate loans, net on the condensed consolidated balance sheets with unrealized gains and losses reported in income.

 

Long-Lived Assets

 

The Company evaluates its proved oil and natural gas properties and related equipment and facilities for impairment on a field-by-field basis, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such properties may not be recoverable. The determination of recoverability is made based upon estimated undiscounted future net cash flows. The amount of impairment loss, if any, is determined by comparing the fair value, as determined by a discounted cash flow analysis, with the carrying value of the related asset. The factors used to determine fair value include, but are not limited to, estimates of proved reserves, future commodity pricing, future production estimates, anticipated capital expenditures, future operating costs and a discount rate commensurate with the risk on the properties and cost of capital. Unproved oil and natural gas properties are assessed periodically on a property-by-property basis, and any impairment in value is recognized when incurred. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded $2.9 million and $3.0 million, respectively, of impairments which are included in general, administrative and directors expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. No impairments were recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.

 

Borrowings

 

The Company finances the majority of its investments through the use of secured borrowings in the form of securitization transactions structured as non-recourse secured financings and other secured and unsecured borrowings. In addition, the Company finances certain of its oil and gas asset acquisitions through borrowings. The Company recognizes interest expense on all borrowings on an accrual basis.

 

Trust Preferred Securities

 

Trusts formed by the Company for the sole purpose of issuing trust preferred securities are not consolidated by the Company as the Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of such trusts. The Company’s investment in the common securities of such trusts is included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

 

14



Table of Contents

 

Derivative Financial Instruments

 

The Company recognizes all derivatives on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at estimated fair value. On the date the Company enters into a derivative contract, the Company designates and documents each derivative contract as one of the following at the time the contract is executed: (i) a hedge of a recognized asset or liability (“fair value” hedge); (ii) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (“cash flow” hedge); (iii) a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation; or (iv) a derivative instrument not designated as a hedging instrument (“free-standing derivative”). For a fair value hedge, the Company records changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative instrument and, to the extent that it is effective, changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability in the current period earnings in the same financial statement category as the hedged item. For a cash flow hedge, the Company records changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative to the extent that it is effective in other comprehensive (loss) income and subsequently reclassifies these changes in estimated fair value to net income in the same period(s) that the hedged transaction affects earnings. The effective portion of the cash flow hedges is recorded in the same financial statement category as the hedged item. For free-standing derivatives, the Company reports changes in the fair values in other income (loss).

 

The Company formally documents at inception its hedge relationships, including identification of the hedging instruments and the hedged items, its risk management objectives, strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction and the Company’s evaluation of effectiveness of its hedged transactions. Periodically, the Company also formally assesses whether the derivative it designated in each hedging relationship is expected to be and has been highly effective in offsetting changes in estimated fair values or cash flows of the hedged item using either the dollar offset or the regression analysis method. If the Company determines that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge, it discontinues hedge accounting.

 

Foreign Currency

 

The Company makes investments in non-United States dollar denominated securities and loans. As a result, the Company is subject to the risk of fluctuation in the exchange rate between the United States dollar and the foreign currency in which it makes an investment. In order to reduce the currency risk, the Company may hedge the applicable foreign currency. All investments denominated in a foreign currency are converted to the United States dollar using prevailing exchange rates on the balance sheet date. Income, expenses, gains and losses on investments denominated in a foreign currency are converted to the United States dollar using the prevailing exchange rates on the dates when they are recorded. Foreign exchange gains and losses are recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

 

Manager Compensation

 

The Management Agreement provides for the payment of a base management fee to the Manager, as well as an incentive fee if the Company’s financial performance exceeds certain benchmarks. Additionally, the Management Agreement provides for the Manager to be reimbursed for certain expenses incurred on the Company’s behalf. See Note 11 to these condensed consolidated financial statements for additional discussion on the payment of the base management fee and incentive fee. The base management fee and the incentive fee are accrued and expensed during the period for which they are earned by the Manager.

 

Share-Based Compensation

 

The Company accounts for share-based compensation issued to its directors and to its Manager using the fair value based methodology in accordance with relevant accounting guidance. Compensation cost related to restricted common shares issued to the Company’s directors is measured at its estimated fair value at the grant date, and is amortized and expensed over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. Compensation cost related to restricted common shares and common share options issued to the Manager is initially measured at estimated fair value at the grant date, and is remeasured on subsequent dates to the extent the awards are unvested. The Company has elected to use the graded vesting attribution method to amortize compensation expense for the restricted common shares and common share options granted to the Manager.

 

Income Taxes

 

The Company intends to continue to operate so as to qualify, for United States federal income tax purposes, as a partnership and not as an association or publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation. Therefore, the Company generally is not subject to United States federal income tax at the entity level, but is subject to limited state and foreign taxes. Holders of the Company’s shares will be required to take into account their allocable share of each item of the Company’s income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit for the taxable year of the Company ending within or with their taxable year.

 

During 2012, the Company owned equity interests in entities that each elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (a “REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). A REIT generally is not subject to United States federal income tax to the extent that it currently distributes its income and satisfies certain asset, income and ownership tests, and recordkeeping requirements, but it may be subject to some amount of federal, state, local and foreign taxes based on its taxable income.

 

15



Table of Contents

 

The Company has wholly-owned domestic and foreign subsidiaries that are taxable as corporations for United States federal income tax purposes and thus are not consolidated with the Company for United States federal income tax purposes. For financial reporting purposes, current and deferred taxes are provided for on the portion of earnings recognized by the Company with respect to its interest in the domestic taxable corporate subsidiaries, because each is taxed as a regular corporation under the Code. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed based on temporary differences between the GAAP condensed consolidated financial statements and the United States federal income tax basis of assets and liabilities as of each condensed consolidated balance sheet date. The foreign corporate subsidiaries were formed to make certain foreign and domestic investments from time to time. The foreign corporate subsidiaries are organized as exempted companies incorporated with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands, and are anticipated to be exempt from United States federal and state income tax at the corporate entity level because they restrict their activities in the United States to trading in stock and securities for their own account. However, the Company will be required to

include their current taxable income in the Company’s calculation of its taxable income allocable to shareholders.

 

The Company must recognize the tax impact from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax impact recognized in the financial statements from such a position is measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution. Penalties and interest related to uncertain tax positions are recorded as tax expense. Significant judgment is required in the identification of uncertain tax positions and in the estimation of penalties and interest on uncertain tax positions. If it is determined that recognition for an uncertain tax provision is necessary, the Company would record a liability for an unrecognized tax expense from an uncertain tax position taken or expected to be taken.

 

Earnings Per Share

 

The Company presents both basic and diluted earnings per common share (“EPS”) in its condensed consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto. Basic earnings per common share (“Basic EPS”) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income or loss by the weighted average number of common shares, including vested restricted common shares, outstanding for the period. The Company calculates EPS using the more dilutive of the two-class method or the if-converted method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines EPS for common shares and participating securities. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of EPS using the two-class method. Accordingly, all earnings (distributed and undistributed) are allocated to common shares and participating securities based on their respective rights to receive dividends. Diluted earnings (loss) per share (“Diluted EPS”) reflects the potential dilution of common share options and unvested restricted common shares using the treasury method, as well as the potential dilution of convertible senior notes using the number of shares it would take to satisfy the excess conversion obligation (average Company share price for the period in excess of the conversion price related to the Company’s convertible senior notes), if they are not anti-dilutive.

 

Note 3. Earnings per Share

 

The following table presents a reconciliation of basic and diluted net income per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (amounts in thousands, except per share information), as well as the distributions declared per common share during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

 

 

 

Three months ended
June 30

 

Six months ended
June 30

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Net income

 

$

71,205

 

$

107,504

 

$

159,253

 

$

201,271

 

Less: Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities

 

234

 

274

 

531

 

903

 

Net income applicable to common shareholders

 

$

70,971

 

$

107,230

 

$

158,722

 

$

200,368

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

 

177,809

 

177,674

 

177,792

 

177,376

 

Net income per share

 

$

0.40

 

$

0.60

 

$

0.89

 

$

1.13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

 

177,809

 

177,674

 

177,792

 

177,376

 

Dilutive effect of convertible senior notes

 

3,833

 

4,719

 

4,152

 

4,468

 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding(1)

 

181,642

 

182,393

 

181,944

 

181,844

 

Net income per share

 

$

0.39

 

$

0.59

 

$

0.87

 

$

1.10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions declared per common share

 

$

0.18

 

$

0.16

 

$

0.44

 

$

0.31

 

 


(1)                                   Potential anti-dilutive common shares excluded from diluted earnings per share related to common share options were 1,932,279 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

 

16



Table of Contents

 

Note 4. Securities

 

The Company accounts for securities based on the following categories: (i) securities available-for-sale, which are carried at estimated fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income; (ii) other securities, at estimated fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of operations; and (iii) residential mortgage-backed securities, at estimated fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s securities as of June 30, 2012, which are carried at estimated fair value (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

June 30, 2012

 

 

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

 

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 

Estimated
Fair
Value

 

Securities available-for-sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate debt securities

 

$

623,104

 

$

62,891

 

$

(10,470

)

$

675,525

 

Common and preferred stock

 

5,136

 

 

 

5,136

 

Total securities available-for-sale

 

628,240

 

62,891

 

(10,470

)

680,661

 

Other securities, at estimated fair value(1)

 

39,364

 

6,275

 

(458

)

45,181

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities, at estimated fair value(1)

 

192,511

 

7,979

 

(112,555

)

87,935

 

Total securities

 

$

860,115

 

$

77,145

 

$

(123,483

)

$

813,777

 

 


(1)                                   Unrealized gains and losses are recorded in earnings.

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s securities as of December 31, 2011, which are carried at estimated fair value (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

 

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 

Estimated
Fair
Value

 

Securities available-for-sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate debt securities

 

$

741,438

 

$

75,442

 

$

(13,637

)

$

803,243

 

Common and preferred stock

 

12,766

 

444

 

 

13,210

 

Total securities available-for-sale

 

754,204

 

75,886

 

(13,637

)

816,453

 

Other securities, at estimated fair value(1)

 

16,467

 

3,225

 

(21

)

19,671

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities, at estimated fair value(1)

 

209,502

 

4,132

 

(127,155

)

86,479

 

Total securities

 

$

980,173

 

$

83,243

 

$

(140,813

)

$

922,603

 

 


(1)                                   Unrealized gains and losses are recorded in earnings.

 

The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company’s available-for-sale securities, aggregated by length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

Less Than 12 months

 

12 Months or More

 

Total

 

 

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Unrealized
Losses

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Unrealized
Losses

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Unrealized
Losses

 

June 30, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate debt securities

 

$

119,022

 

$

(8,584

)

$

11,789

 

$

(1,886

)

$

130,811

 

$

(10,470

)

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate debt securities

 

$

252,467

 

$

(10,562

)

$

32,876

 

$

(3,075

)

$

285,343

 

$

(13,637

)

 

17



Table of Contents

 

The unrealized losses in the table above are considered to be temporary impairments due to market factors and are not reflective of credit deterioration. The Company considers many factors when evaluating whether an impairment is other-than-temporary. For corporate debt securities included in the table above, the Company does not intend to sell them and does not believe that it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell any of its corporate debt securities prior to recovery. In addition, based on the analyses performed by the Company on each of its corporate debt securities, the Company believes that it is able to recover the entire amortized cost amount of the corporate debt securities included in the table above.

 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recognized losses totaling $0.1 million and $0.8 million, respectively, for corporate debt securities that it determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired based on the criteria above. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company had no other-than-temporary impairment losses for corporate debt securities. The Company intends to sell these securities and as a result, the entire amount is recorded through earnings in net realized and unrealized gain on investments in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

 

For common and preferred stock, the Company considers many factors when evaluating whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, including its intent and ability to hold the common and preferred stock for a period of time sufficient for recovery to cost. If the Company believes it will not recover the cost basis based on its intent or ability, an other-than-temporary loss will be recorded through earnings in net realized and unrealized gain on investments in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

 

During both the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recognized $0.2 million of losses for common and preferred stock that it determined to be other-than-temporary impaired. During both the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized no losses for common and preferred stock that it determined to be other-than-temporary impaired.

 

As of both June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had no corporate debt securities in default.

 

Corporate debt securities sold at a loss typically include those that the Company determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired or had a deterioration in credit quality. The following table shows the net realized gains on the sales of securities available-for-sale (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

Gross realized gains

 

$

27,386

 

$

29,533

 

$

34,967

 

$

36,941

 

Gross realized losses

 

(12

)

(405

)

(12

)

(477

)

Net realized gains(1)

 

$

27,374

 

$

29,128

 

$

34,955

 

$

36,464

 

 


(1)                                   Excludes net realized gains from paydowns and restructurings totaling zero and $16.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. Excludes net realized gains from paydowns and restructurings totaling $0.4 million for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. Also, excludes an impairment charge of $0.3 million and $1.0 million for investments which were determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

 

The Company’s securities available-for-sale portfolio has certain credit risk concentrated in a limited number of issuers. As of June 30, 2012, approximately 47% of the estimated fair value of the Company’s securities available-for-sale portfolio was concentrated in ten issuers, with the two largest concentrations of securities available-for-sale in securities issued by SandRidge Energy, Inc. and First Data Corporation,  which combined represented $89.2 million, or approximately 13% of the estimated fair value of the Company’s securities available-for-sale. As of December 31, 2011, approximately 46% of the estimated fair value of the Company’s securities available-for-sale portfolio was concentrated in ten issuers, with the two largest concentrations of securities available-for-sale in securities issued by First Data Corporation and SandRidge Energy, Inc., which combined represented $138.3 million, or approximately 17% of the estimated fair value of the Company’s securities available-for-sale.

 

18



Table of Contents

 

Note 6 to these condensed consolidated financial statements describes the Company’s borrowings under which the Company has pledged securities for borrowings. The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of securities available-for-sale pledged as collateral as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

As of
June 30, 2012

 

As of
December 31, 2011

 

Pledged as collateral for collateralized loan obligation secured debt and junior secured notes to affiliates

 

$

598,257

 

$

710,734

 

Total

 

$

598,257

 

$

710,734

 

 

As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, no other securities, at estimated fair value or RMBS were pledged as collateral for the Company’s borrowings.

 

Note 5. Corporate Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

 

The Company accounts for loans based on the following categories (i) corporate loans held for investment, which are measured based on their outstanding principal plus or minus unaccreted purchase discounts and unamortized purchase premiums, net of an allowance for loan losses; (ii) corporate loans held for sale, which are measured at lower of cost or estimated fair value; and (iii) corporate loans, at estimated fair value, which are measured at fair value.

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s corporate loans as of June 30, 2012 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

June 30, 2012

 

 

 

Corporate
Loans

 

Corporate Loans
Held for Sale

 

Corporate Loans, at
Estimated Fair Value

 

Total
Corporate Loans

 

Principal(1)

 

$

6,121,450

 

$

331,256

 

$

37,225

 

$

6,489,931

 

Net unamortized discount

 

(149,139

)

(91,408

)

(13,880

)

(254,427

)

Total amortized cost

 

5,972,311

 

239,848

 

23,345

 

6,235,504

 

Lower of cost or fair value adjustment

 

 

(55,914

)

 

(55,914

)

Allowance for loan losses

 

(235,807

)

 

 

(235,807

)

Unrealized gains

 

 

 

1,447

 

1,447

 

Net carrying value

 

$

5,736,504

 

$

183,934

 

$

24,792

 

$

5,945,230

 

 


(1)                                   Principal amount is net of cumulative charge-offs and other adjustments totaling $67.3 million as of June 30, 2012.

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s corporate loans as of December 31, 2011 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

Corporate
Loans

 

Corporate Loans
Held for Sale

 

Corporate Loans, at
Estimated Fair Value

 

Total
Corporate Loans

 

Principal(1)

 

$

6,501,679

 

$

470,562

 

$

3,655

 

$

6,975,896

 

Net unamortized discount

 

(187,381

)

(102,324

)

(562

)

(290,267

)

Total amortized cost

 

6,314,298

 

368,238

 

3,093

 

6,685,629

 

Lower of cost or fair value adjustment

 

 

(50,906

)

 

(50,906

)

Allowance for loan losses

 

(191,407

)

 

 

(191,407

)

Unrealized gains

 

 

 

83

 

83

 

Net carrying value

 

$

6,122,891

 

$

317,332

 

$

3,176

 

$

6,443,399

 

 


(1)                                   Principal amount is net of cumulative charge-offs and other adjustments totaling $79.8 million as of December 31, 2011.

 

Allowance For Loan Losses

 

As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had an allowance for loan losses of $235.8 million and $191.4 million, respectively. As described in Note 2 to these condensed consolidated financial statements, the allowance for loan losses represents the Company’s estimate of probable credit losses inherent in its loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. The Company’s allowance for loan losses consists of two components, an allocated component and an unallocated component. The allocated component of the allowance for loan losses consists of individual loans that are impaired. The unallocated component of the allowance for loan losses represents the Company’s estimate of losses inherent, but not identified, in its portfolio as of the balance sheet date.

 

19



Table of Contents

 

The following table summarizes the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the Company’s corporate loan portfolio during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

Allowance for loan losses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance

 

$

235,807

 

$

198,582

 

$

191,407

 

$

209,030

 

Provision for loan losses

 

 

 

46,498

 

11,661

 

Charge-offs

 

 

(9,708

)

(2,098

)

(31,817

)

Ending balance

 

$

235,807

 

$

188,874

 

$

235,807

 

$

188,874

 

 

The following table summarizes the ending balances of the allowance and corporate loans portfolio by basis of impairment method as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

June 30, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

Allowance for loan losses:

 

 

 

 

 

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

235,807

 

$

191,407

 

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment

 

 

 

Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality

 

 

 

 

 

$

235,807

 

$

191,407

 

Corporate loans (recorded investment)(1):

 

 

 

 

 

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

5,991,020

 

$

6,334,232

 

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment

 

 

 

Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality

 

 

 

 

 

$

5,991,020

 

$

6,334,232

 

 


(1)           Recorded investment is defined as amortized cost plus accrued interest.

 

As of June 30, 2012, the allocated component of the allowance for loan losses totaled $37.2 million and relates to investments in certain loans issued by five issuers with an aggregate par amount of $82.1 million and an aggregate recorded investment of $67.5 million. As of December 31, 2011, the allocated component of the allowance for loan losses totaled $33.8 million and relates to investments in certain loans issued by five issuers with an aggregate par amount of $83.5 million and an aggregate recorded investment of $68.7 million.

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s recorded investment and unpaid principal balance in impaired loans, as well as the related allowance for credit losses as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

June 30, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

Recorded
Investment

 

Unpaid
Principal
Balance

 

Related
Allowance

 

Recorded
Investment

 

Unpaid
Principal
Balance

 

Related
Allowance

 

With no related allowance recorded

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

With an allowance recorded

 

67,516

 

82,076

 

37,166

 

68,692

 

83,452

 

33,836

 

Total

 

$

67,516

 

$

82,076

 

$

37,166

 

$

68,692

 

$

83,452

 

$

33,836

 

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s average recorded investment in impaired loans and interest income recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

For the three months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the three months ended
June 30, 2011

 

For the six months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the six months ended
June 30, 2011

 

 

 

Average
Recorded
Investment

 

Interest
Income
Recognized

 

Average
Recorded
Investment

 

Interest
Income
Recognized

 

Average
Recorded
Investment

 

Interest
Income
Recognized

 

Average
Recorded
Investment

 

Interest
Income
Recognized

 

With no related allowance recorded

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

5,406

 

$

 

With an allowance recorded

 

68,272

 

978

 

56,494

 

676

 

68,412

 

1,781

 

82,185

 

1,039

 

Total

 

$

68,272

 

$

978

 

$

56,494

 

$

676

 

$

68,412

 

$

1,781

 

$

87,591

 

$

1,039

 

 

As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the allocated component of the allowance for loan losses included all impaired loans. While all of the Company’s impaired loans are on non-accrual status, the Company’s non-accrual loans also include those held for sale that are measured at the lower of cost or fair value and are not reflected in the table above.

 

20



Table of Contents

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s recorded investment in non-accrual loans as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

June 30,
2012

 

December 31,
2011

 

Impaired loans held for investment

 

$

67,516

 

$

68,692

 

Loans held for sale

 

97,779

 

99,999

 

Total non-accrual loans

 

$

165,295

 

$

168,691

 

 

The amount of interest income recognized using the cash-basis method during the time within the period that the loans were impaired was $2.3 million, which included $1.0 million for impaired loans that were held for investment and $1.3 million for non-accrual loans held for sale, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and $6.7 million, which included $1.8 million for impaired loans that were held for investment and $4.9 million for non-accrual loans held for sale, for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The amount of interest income recognized using the cash-basis method during the time within the period that the loans were non-accrual was $1.7 million, which included $0.6 million for impaired loans that were held for investment and $1.1 million for non-accrual loans held for sale, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and $5.7 million, which included $1.0 million for impaired loans that were held for investment and $4.7 million for non-accrual loans held for sale, for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

 

The Company did not have any corporate loans past due at June 30, 2012 and 2011.

 

The unallocated component of the allowance for loan losses totaled $198.6 million and $157.6 million as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. As described in Note 2 to these condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company estimates the unallocated components of the allowance for loan losses through a comprehensive review of its loan portfolio and identifies certain loans that demonstrate possible indicators of impairments, including credit quality indicators. The following table summarizes how the Company determines internally assigned grades related to credit quality based on a combination of concern as to probability of default and the seniority of the loan in the issuer’s capital structure as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (amounts in thousands):

 

Internally Assigned Grade

 

Capital Hierarchy

 

Recorded Investment
June 30, 2012 (1)

 

Recorded Investment
December 31, 2011 (1)

 

High

 

Senior Secured Loan

 

$

820,236

 

$

926,258

 

 

 

Second Lien Loan

 

294,296

 

310,971

 

 

 

Subordinated

 

9,945

 

14,392

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,124,477

 

$

1,251,621

 

Moderate

 

Senior Secured Loan

 

$

585,529

 

$

645,939

 

 

 

Second Lien Loan

 

 

 

 

 

Subordinated

 

 

6,951

 

 

 

 

 

$

585,529

 

$

652,890

 

Low

 

Senior Secured Loan

 

$

4,031,707

 

$

4,184,094

 

 

 

Second Lien Loan

 

126,086

 

65,695

 

 

 

Subordinated

 

55,705

 

111,240

 

 

 

 

 

$

4,213,498

 

$

4,361,029

 

 

 

Total Unallocated

 

$

5,923,504

 

$

6,265,540

 

 

 

Total Allocated

 

67,516

 

68,692

 

 

 

Total Loans Held for Investment

 

$

5,991,020

 

$

6,334,232

 

 


(1)   Recorded investment is defined as amortized cost plus accrued interest.

 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded charge-offs totaling zero and $2.1 million, respectively, comprised primarily of loans transferred to loans held for sale. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded charge-offs totaling $9.7 million and $31.8 million, respectively, comprised primarily of loans transferred to loans held for sale.

 

Loans Held For Sale and the Lower of Cost or Fair Value Adjustment

 

As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had $183.9 million and $317.3 million of loans held for sale, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company transferred $16.9 million and $63.0 million amortized cost amount, respectively, of loans from held for investment to held for sale. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company transferred $105.8 million and $688.6 million amortized cost amount, respectively, of loans from held for investment to held for sale. The transfers of certain loans to held for sale were due to the Company’s determination that credit quality of a loan in relation to its expected risk-adjusted return no longer met the Company’s investment objective and the determination by

 

21



Table of Contents

 

the Company to reduce or eliminate the exposure for certain loans as part of its portfolio risk management practices. Also, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company transferred $58.4 million and $65.9 million amortized cost amount, respectively, from loans held for sale back to loans held for investment at the lower of cost or estimated fair value. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company transferred $191.0 million and $288.9 million amortized cost amount, respectively, from loans held for sale back to loans held for investment. These transfers back to held for investment occurred as the circumstances that led to the initial transfer to held for sale were no longer present. Such circumstances may include deteriorated market conditions often resulting in price depreciation or assets becoming illiquid, changes in restrictions on sales and certain loans amending their terms to extend the maturity, whereby the Company determined that selling the asset no longer met its investment objective and strategy.

 

The Company recorded a $16.5 million and $6.1 million net charge to earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, for the lower of cost or estimated fair value adjustment for certain loans held for sale, which had a carrying value of $183.9 million as of June 30, 2012. The Company recorded a $13.9 million and $12.4 million net charge to earnings during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, for the lower of cost or estimated fair value adjustment for certain loans held for sale, which had a carrying value of $539.3 million as of June 30, 2011.

 

Defaulted Loans

 

As of June 30, 2012, the Company held corporate loans that were in default with a total amortized cost of $26.8 million from one issuer. These loans in default were included in the loans for which the allocated component of the Company’s allowance for loan losses was related to, or for which the Company determined were loans held for sale as of June 30, 2012. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had no corporate loans in default.

 

Troubled Debt Restructurings

 

The Company did not modify any loans that qualified as troubled debt restructurings during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

 

The Company modified $619.3 million and $1.1 billion amortized cost of corporate loans during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, that did not qualify as troubled debt restructurings. The Company modified $661.0 million and $1.2 billion amortized cost of corporate loans during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. These modifications involved changes in existing rates and maturities to prevailing market rates/maturities for similar instruments and did not qualify as troubled debt restructurings as the respective borrowers were neither experiencing financial difficulty nor were seeking (nor granted) a concession as part of the modification. In addition, these modifications of non-troubled debt holdings were accomplished with modified loans that were not substantially different from the loans prior to modification.

 

Concentration Risk

 

The Company’s corporate loan portfolio has certain credit risk concentrated in a limited number of issuers. As of June 30, 2012, approximately 47% of the total amortized cost basis of the Company’s corporate loan portfolio was concentrated in twenty issuers, with the three largest concentrations of corporate loans in loans issued by U.S. Foodservice, Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC and Modular Space Corporation, which combined represented $994.1 million or approximately 16% of the aggregated amortized cost basis of the Company’s corporate loans. As of December 31, 2011, approximately 47% of the total amortized cost basis of the Company’s corporate loan portfolio was concentrated in twenty issuers, with the three largest concentrations of corporate loans in loans issued by U.S. Foodservice, Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC and Modular Space Corporation, which combined represented $992.5 million, or approximately 15% of the aggregated amortized cost basis of the Company’s corporate loans.

 

Note 6 to these condensed consolidated financial statements describes the Company’s borrowings under which the Company has pledged loans for borrowings. The following table summarizes the amortized cost of corporate loans and corporate loans held for sale pledged as collateral as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

As of
June 30, 2012

 

As of
December 31, 2011

 

Pledged as collateral for collateralized loan obligation secured debt and junior secured notes to affiliates

 

$

6,018,976

 

$

6,448,404

 

Total

 

$

6,018,976

 

$

6,448,404

 

 

As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, no corporate loans carried at estimated fair value were pledged as collateral for the Company’s borrowings.

 

22



Table of Contents

 

Note 6. Borrowings

 

Certain information with respect to the Company’s borrowings as of June 30, 2012 is summarized in the following table (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

Outstanding
Borrowings

 

Weighted
Average
Borrowing
Rate

 

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Maturity
(in days)

 

Fair Value of
Collateral(1)

 

CLO 2005-1 senior secured notes

 

$

522,269

 

0.82

%

1,761

 

$

605,394

 

CLO 2005-2 senior secured notes

 

557,718

 

0.81

 

1,975

 

687,327

 

CLO 2006-1 senior secured notes

 

683,266

 

0.83

 

2,247

 

907,497

 

CLO 2007-1 senior secured notes

 

2,075,040

 

1.02

 

3,241

 

2,376,092

 

CLO 2007-1 junior secured notes(2) 

 

132,550

 

 

3,241

 

151,781

 

CLO 2007-A senior secured notes

 

701,148

 

1.57

 

1,933

 

797,653

 

CLO 2007-A junior secured notes(3) 

 

10,112

 

 

1,933

 

11,504

 

CLO 2011-1 senior debt

 

381,303

 

1.82

 

2,237

 

483,999

 

Total collateralized loan obligation secured debt

 

5,063,406

 

 

 

 

 

6,021,247

 

CLO 2007-1 junior secured notes to affiliates(4) 

 

274,906

 

 

3,241

 

314,790

 

CLO 2007-A junior secured notes to affiliates(5) 

 

47,442

 

 

1,933

 

53,972

 

Total collateralized loan obligation junior secured notes to affiliates

 

322,348

 

 

 

 

 

368,762

 

Senior secured credit facility

 

 

3.71

 

672

 

 

Asset-based borrowing facility(6) 

 

100,000

 

2.73

 

1,223

 

236,193

 

Total credit facilities

 

100,000

 

 

 

 

 

236,193

 

7.0% Convertible senior notes

 

112,036

 

7.00

 

15

 

 

7.5% Convertible senior notes

 

165,372

 

7.50

 

1,660

 

 

8.375% Senior notes

 

250,705

 

8.38

 

10,730

 

 

7.500% Senior notes

 

111,427

 

7.50

 

10,855

 

 

Junior subordinated notes

 

283,517

 

5.50

 

8,896

 

 

Total borrowings

 

$

6,408,811

 

 

 

 

 

$

6,626,202

 

 


(1)                                   Collateral for borrowings consists of corporate loans, securities available-for-sale and equity investments, at estimated fair value.

 

(2)                                   CLO 2007-1 junior secured notes consist of $126.7 million of mezzanine notes with a weighted average borrowing rate of 3.1% and $5.8 million of subordinated notes that do not have a contractual coupon rate, but instead receive a pro rata amount of the net distributions from CLO 2007-1.

 

(3)                                  CLO 2007-A junior secured notes consist of $5.5 million of mezzanine notes with a weighted average borrowing rate of 7.2% and $4.6 million of subordinated notes that do not have a contractual coupon rate, but instead receive a pro rata amount of the net distributions from CLO 2007-A.

 

(4)                                   CLO 2007-1 junior secured notes to affiliates consist of $144.6 million of mezzanine notes with a weighted average borrowing rate of 5.8% and $130.3 million of subordinated notes that do not have a contractual coupon rate, but instead receive a pro rata amount of the net distributions from CLO 2007-1.

 

(5)                                   CLO 2007-A junior secured notes to affiliates consist of $36.9 million of mezzanine notes with a weighted average borrowing rate of 7.7% and $10.5 million of subordinated notes that do not have a contractual coupon rate, but instead receive a pro rata amount of the net distributions from CLO 2007-A.

 

(6)                                   Collateral for borrowings consists of the carrying value of certain oil and gas assets, which are included in other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

 

23



Table of Contents

 

Certain information with respect to the Company’s borrowings as of December 31, 2011 is summarized in the following table (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

Outstanding
Borrowings

 

Weighted
Average
Borrowing
Rate

 

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Maturity
(in days)

 

Fair Value of
Collateral(1)

 

CLO 2005-1 senior secured notes

 

$

715,354

 

0.75

%

1,943

 

$

798,876

 

CLO 2005-2 senior secured notes

 

745,226

 

0.83

 

2,157

 

870,712

 

CLO 2006-1 senior secured notes

 

683,265

 

0.87

 

2,429

 

884,873

 

CLO 2007-1 senior secured notes

 

2,075,040

 

1.01

 

3,423

 

2,343,420

 

CLO 2007-1 junior secured notes(2) 

 

61,491

 

 

3,423

 

69,444

 

CLO 2007-A senior secured notes

 

812,318

 

1.36

 

2,115

 

900,660

 

CLO 2007-A junior secured notes(3) 

 

10,821

 

 

2,115

 

11,997

 

CLO 2011-1 senior debt

 

436,522

 

1.77

 

2,419

 

557,389

 

Total collateralized loan obligation secured debt

 

5,540,037

 

 

 

 

 

6,437,371

 

CLO 2007-1 junior secured notes to affiliates(4) 

 

300,396

 

 

3,423

 

337,407

 

CLO 2007-A junior secured notes to affiliates(5) 

 

65,452

 

 

2,115

 

72,570

 

Total collateralized loan obligation junior secured notes to affiliates

 

365,848

 

 

 

 

 

409,977

 

Senior secured credit facility

 

 

3.83

 

854

 

 

Asset-based borrowing facility(6) 

 

38,300

 

2.53

 

1,405

 

86,874

 

Total credit facilities

 

38,300

 

 

 

 

 

86,874

 

7.0% Convertible senior notes

 

135,086

 

7.00

 

197

 

 

7.5% Convertible senior notes

 

164,744

 

7.50

 

1,842

 

 

8.375% Senior notes

 

250,676

 

8.38

 

10,912

 

 

Junior subordinated notes

 

283,517

 

5.48

 

9,078

 

 

Total borrowings

 

$

6,778,208

 

 

 

 

 

$

6,934,222

 

 


(1)                                   Collateral for borrowings consists of corporate loans, securities available-for-sale and equity investments, at estimated fair value.

 

(2)                                   CLO 2007-1 junior secured notes consist of $55.7 million of mezzanine notes with a weighted average borrowing rate of 3.7% and $5.8 million of subordinated notes that do not have a contractual coupon rate, but instead receive a pro rata amount of the net distributions from CLO 2007-1.

 

(3)                                   CLO 2007-A junior secured notes consist of $6.2 million of mezzanine notes with a weighted average borrowing rate of 7.1% and $4.6 million of subordinated notes that do not have a contractual coupon rate, but instead receive a pro rata amount of the net distributions from CLO 2007-A.

 

(4)                                   CLO 2007-1 junior secured notes to affiliates consist of $170.1 million of mezzanine notes with a weighted average borrowing rate of 5.3% and $130.3 million of subordinated notes that do not have a contractual coupon rate, but instead receive a pro rata amount of the net distributions from CLO 2007-1.

 

(5)                                   CLO 2007-A junior secured notes to affiliates consist of $55.0 million of mezzanine notes with a weighted average borrowing rate of 6.6% and $10.5 million of subordinated notes that do not have a contractual coupon rate, but instead receive a pro rata amount of the net distributions from CLO 2007-A.

 

(6)                                   Collateral for borrowings consists of the carrying value of certain oil and gas assets, which are included in other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

 

CLO Debt

 

The indentures governing the Company’s CLO transactions stipulate the reinvestment period during which the collateral manager, which is an affiliate of the Company’s Manager, can generally sell or buy assets at its discretion and can reinvest principal proceeds into new assets. CLO 2007-A ended its reinvestment period during the fourth quarter of 2010 and both CLO 2005-1 and CLO 2005-2 ended their reinvestment periods in the second quarter of 2011. As a result, principal proceeds from the assets held in each of these transactions are generally used to amortize the outstanding balance of senior notes outstanding. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, $433.0 million and $521.8 million, respectively, of original CLO 2007-A, CLO 2005-1 and CLO 2005-2 senior notes were repaid. CLO 2006-1 and CLO 2007-1 will end their respective reinvestment periods during August 2012 and May 2014, respectively. CLO 2011-1 does not have a reinvestment period and all principal proceeds from holdings in CLO 2011-1 will be used to amortize the transaction. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, $50.1 million and $55.2 million, respectively, of original CLO 2011-1 senior notes were repaid. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, $111.2 million and $221.6 million, respectively, of original CLO 2007-A senior notes were repaid.

 

24



Table of Contents

 

On March 31, 2011, the Company closed CLO 2011-1, a $400.0 million secured financing transaction secured by the assets held in CLO 2011-1. At closing, the Company entered into a senior loan agreement (the “CLO 2011-1 Agreement”) through which CLO 2011-1 was able to borrow up to $300.0 million through a non-recourse loan secured by the assets held in CLO 2011-1. On July 6, 2011, the Company amended the CLO 2011-1 Agreement to upsize the transaction to $600.0 million, whereby CLO 2011-1 is able to borrow up to an additional $150.0 million, or total of $450.0 million. Under the amended CLO 2011-1 Agreement, the CLO 2011-1 senior loan matures on August 15, 2018 and borrowings under the CLO 2011-1 Agreement bear interest at a rate of the three-month London interbank offered rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.35%. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had $381.3 million and $436.5 million, respectively, of borrowings outstanding under the CLO 2011-1 Agreement.

 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company issued $17.5 million par amount and $59.5 million par amount, respectively, of CLO 2007-1 class D notes for proceeds of $13.2 million and $45.1 million, respectively. In addition, during the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company issued $11.3 million par amount of CLO 2007-A class C notes for proceeds of $10.6 million.

 

Credit Facilities

 

Senior Secured Credit Facility

 

The Company has available a $250.0 million asset-based revolving credit facility (the “2014 Facility”), maturing on May 3, 2014, that is subject to, among other things, the terms of a borrowing base derived from the value of eligible specified financial assets. The 2014 Facility bears interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.25% per annum and contains customary covenants applicable to the Company, including a restriction from making annual distributions to holders of common shares in excess of 65% of the Company’s estimated annual taxable income calculated in accordance with the 2014 Facility credit agreement.

 

As of June 30, 2012, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under the 2014 Facility.

 

Asset-Based Borrowing Facility

 

On June 15, 2012, the Company entered into an amendment to its credit agreement to further increase its five-year non-recourse, asset-based revolving credit facility (the “2015 Natural Resources Facility”), maturing on November 5, 2015, from $137.2 million to $151.4 million, that is subject to, among other things, the terms of a borrowing base derived from the value of eligible specified oil and gas assets. The borrowing base is subject to certain caps and concentration limits customary for financings of this type. The Company has the right to prepay loans under the 2015 Natural Resources Facility in whole or in part at any time. Loans under the 2015 Natural Resources Facility bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus a tiered applicable margin ranging from 1.75% to 2.75% per annum. The 2015 Natural Resources Facility contains customary covenants applicable to the Company.

 

As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had $100.0 million and $38.3 million, respectively, of borrowings outstanding under the 2015 Natural Resources Facility. In addition, under the 2015 Natural Resources Facility, the Company had a letter of credit outstanding totaling $1.0 million.

 

As of June 30, 2012, the Company believes it was in compliance with the covenant requirements for both credit facilities.

 

Convertible Debt

 

In 2010, the Company issued $172.5 million of 7.5% convertible senior notes due January 15, 2017 (“7.5% Notes”), resulting in net proceeds of $167.3 million. Holders of the 7.5% Notes may convert their notes at the applicable conversion rate at any time prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the stated maturity date subject to the Company’s right to terminate the conversion rights of the notes. The Company may satisfy its obligation with respect to the 7.5% Notes tendered for conversion by delivering to the holder either cash, common shares, no par value, issued by the Company or a combination thereof. As of June 30, 2012, the conversion rate for each $1,000 principal amount of 7.5% Notes was 137.1469 common shares.

 

In accordance with accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion, the Company separately accounted for the liability and equity components to reflect the nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. The Company determined that the equity component of the 7.5% Notes totaled $10.0 million and is included in paid-in-capital on the Company’s

 

25



Table of Contents

 

condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2012. The remaining liability component of $165.4 million, included within convertible senior notes on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2012, is comprised of the principal $172.5 million less the unamortized debt discount of $7.1 million. The total debt discount amortization recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively. The debt discount will continue to be amortized at the effective interest rate of 8.6%. The total debt discount amortization recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the total interest expense recognized on the 7.5% Notes was $3.3 million and $6.5 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the total interest expense recognized on the 7.5% Notes was $3.3 million and $6.5 million, respectively.

 

During the first quarter of 2012, the Company repurchased $23.1 million par amount of its 7.0% convertible senior notes due July 15, 2012 (the “7.0% Notes”). These transactions resulted in the Company recording a loss of $0.4 million and a $0.2 million write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs. During 2011, the Company repurchased $45.5 million par amount of its 7.0% Notes, which resulted in the Company recording a loss of $1.7 million and a write-off of $0.1 million of unamortized debt issuance costs.  On July 13, 2012, the Company repaid in full its $112.0 million of outstanding 7.0% Notes, which matured on July 15, 2012.

 

Senior Notes

 

On March 20, 2012, the Company issued $115.0 million par amount of 7.500% senior notes due March 20, 2042 (“7.500% Senior Notes”), resulting in net proceeds of $111.4 million. Interest on the 7.500% Senior Notes is payable quarterly in arrears on June 20, September 20, December 20 and March 20 of each year.

 

On November 15, 2011, the Company issued $258.8 million par amount of 8.375% senior notes due November 15, 2041 (“8.375% Senior Notes”), resulting in net proceeds of $250.7 million. Interest on the 8.375% Senior Notes is paid quarterly in arrears on February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15 of each year.

 

Note 7. Derivative Financial Instruments

 

The Company enters into derivative transactions in order to hedge certain risks related to changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. Additionally, the Company enters into derivative transactions in the course of its portfolio management activities. The counterparties to the Company’s derivative agreements are major financial institutions with which the Company and its affiliates may also have other financial relationships. In the event of nonperformance by the counterparties, the Company is potentially exposed to losses. The counterparties to the Company’s derivative agreements have investment grade ratings and, as a result, the Company does not anticipate that any of the counterparties will fail to fulfill their obligations.

 

The table below summarizes the aggregate notional amount and estimated net fair value of the derivative instruments as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

As of
June 30, 2012

 

As of
December 31, 2011

 

 

 

Notional

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Notional

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Cash Flow Hedges:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

$

508,333

 

$

(101,900

)

$

508,333

 

$

(100,718

)

Free-Standing Derivatives:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity swaps

 

 

10,155

 

 

7,371

 

Credit default swaps—protection sold

 

3,000

 

20

 

33,500

 

(7,177

)

Credit default swaps—protection purchased

 

(86,737

)

2,878

 

 

 

Total rate of return swaps

 

 

 

 

152

 

Foreign exchange forward contracts

 

(256,974

)

(9,994

)

(234,524

)

(12,224

)

Foreign exchange options

 

130,207

 

8,254

 

130,207

 

13,394

 

Common stock warrants

 

 

2,834

 

 

2,332

 

Total

 

$

297,829

 

$

(87,753

)

$

437,516

 

$

(96,870

)

 

26



Table of Contents

 

Cash Flow Hedges

 

The Company uses interest rate derivatives consisting of swaps to hedge a portion of the interest rate risk associated with its borrowings under CLO senior secured notes as well as certain of its floating rate junior subordinated notes. The Company designates these financial instruments as cash flow hedges. Changes in value of the interest rate swap are recorded through other comprehensive loss, with gains or losses representing hedge ineffectiveness, if any, recognized in earnings during the reporting period.

 

In September 2011, the Company entered into a $25.0 million notional pay-fixed, receive-variable interest rate swap. The swap has been designated as a cash flow hedge, the objective of which is to eliminate the variability of cash flows in the interest payments of the Company’s floating rate junior subordinated notes due to fluctuations in the indexed rate. The hedged transaction period is through July 2037, which is the stated maturity of the floating rate debt. As of June 30, 2012, the total interest rate swaps used to hedge a portion of the interest rate risk associated with the Company’s floating rate junior subordinated notes was $125.0 million.

 

The following table shows the net losses recognized in other comprehensive loss related to derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

For the
three months

ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the
three months

ended
June 30, 2011

 

For the
six months

ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the six
months
ended
June 30, 2011

 

Losses recognized in other comprehensive loss on cash flow hedges

 

$

(15,779

)

$

(10,019

)

$

(1,187

)

$

(1,827

)

 

For all hedges where hedge accounting is being applied, effectiveness testing and other procedures to ensure the ongoing validity of the hedges are performed at least quarterly. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company did not recognize any ineffectiveness in income on the condensed consolidated statements of operations from its cash flow hedges.

 

Free-Standing Derivatives

 

Free-standing derivatives are derivatives that the Company has entered into in conjunction with its investment and risk management activities, but for which the Company has not designated the derivative contract as a hedging instrument for accounting purposes. Such derivative contracts may include credit default swaps (“CDS”), foreign exchange contracts and options, interest rate swaps and commodity derivatives. Free-standing derivatives also include investment financing arrangements (total rate of return swaps) whereby the Company receives the sum of all interest, fees and any positive change in fair value amounts from a reference asset with a specified notional amount and pays interest on such notional amount plus any negative change in fair value amounts from such reference asset.

 

Gains and losses on free-standing derivatives are reported in the condensed consolidated statements of operations in net realized and unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives and foreign exchange. Unrealized (losses) gains represent the change in fair value of the derivative instruments and are noncash items.

 

Credit Default Swaps

 

A CDS is a contract in which the contract buyer pays, in the case of a short position, or receives, in the case of long position, a periodic premium until the contract expires or a credit event occurs. In return for this premium, the contract seller receives a payment from or makes a payment to the buyer if there is a credit default or other specified credit event with respect to the issuer (also known as the referenced entity) of the underlying credit instrument referenced in the CDS. Typical credit events include bankruptcy, dissolution or insolvency of the referenced entity, failure to pay and restructuring of the obligations of the referenced entity.

 

As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had sold protection with a notional amount of $3.0 million and $33.5 million, respectively. In addition, as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had purchased protection with a notional amount of $86.7 million and zero, respectively. The Company sells or purchases protection to replicate fixed income securities and to complement the spot market when cash securities of the referenced entity of a particular maturity are not available or when the derivative alternative is less expensive compared to other purchasing alternatives. In addition, the Company may purchase protection to hedge economic exposure to declines in value of certain credit positions. The Company purchases its protection from banks and broker dealers, other financial institutions and other counterparties.

 

Commodity Derivatives

 

In an effort to minimize the effects of the volatility of oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids prices, the Company will from time to time enter into derivative instruments such as swap contracts to hedge its forecasted commodities sales. The Company does not designate these contracts as cash flow hedges and as such, the changes in fair value of these instruments are recorded in current period earnings.

 

27



Table of Contents

 

The Company entered into commodity derivative contracts, consisting of oil, natural gas and certain natural gas liquid products receive fixed, pay-floating swaps for certain years through 2016. Realized gains (losses) represent amounts related to the settlement of derivative instruments, and for commodity derivatives, are aligned with the underlying production. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company had $1.8 million and $2.7 million, respectively, of commodity derivatives settlements, which are settled monthly. For both the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company had $0.1 million of oil and natural gas derivatives settlements.

 

Note 8. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

 

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

As of
June 30, 2012

 

As of
December 31, 2011

 

Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities

 

$

52,421

 

$

62,248

 

Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges

 

(99,054

)

(97,867

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

$

(46,633

)

$

(35,619

)

 

Note 9. Commitments & Contingencies

 

Commitments

 

As part of its strategy of investing in corporate loans, the Company commits to purchase interests in primary market loan syndications, which obligate the Company to acquire a predetermined interest in such loans at a specified price on a to-be-determined settlement date. Consistent with standard industry practices, once the Company has been informed of the amount of its syndication allocation in a particular loan by the syndication agent, the Company bears the risks and benefits of changes in the fair value of the syndicated loan from that date forward. In addition, the Company also commits to purchase corporate loans in the secondary market that similar to the above, the Company bears the risks and benefits of changes in the fair value from the trade date forward. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had committed to purchase corporate loans with aggregate commitments totaling $127.3 million and $97.2 million, respectively. In addition, the Company participates in certain contingent financing arrangements, whereby the Company is committed to provide funding of up to a specific predetermined amount at the discretion of the borrower or has entered into an agreement to acquire interests in certain assets. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had unfunded financing commitments for corporate loans totaling $7.1 million and $8.1 million, respectively. In addition, as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had unfunded financing commitments for other assets, including equity investments, at estimated fair value and interests in joint ventures and partnerships, totaling approximately $106.8 million and $40.9 million, respectively.

 

Note 10. Common Shares, Restricted Shares and Share Options

 

On May 4, 2007, the Company adopted an amended and restated share incentive plan (the “2007 Share Incentive Plan”) that provides for the grant of qualified incentive common share options that meet the requirements of Section 422 of the Code, non-qualified common share options, share appreciation rights, restricted common shares and other share-based awards. The Compensation Committee of the board of directors administers the plan. Share options and other share-based awards may be granted to the Manager, directors, officers and any key employees of the Manager and to any other individual or entity performing services for the Company.

 

The exercise price for any share option granted under the 2007 Share Incentive Plan may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common shares at the time the common share option is granted. Each option to acquire a common share must terminate no more than ten years from the date it is granted. As of June 30, 2012, the 2007 Share Incentive Plan authorizes a total of 8,714,625 shares that may be used to satisfy awards under the 2007 Share Incentive Plan. On January 17, 2012, the Compensation Committee of the board of directors granted the Manager 258,303 restricted common shares subject to graded vesting over three years with the final vesting date of March 1, 2015.

 

The following table summarizes restricted common share transactions:

 

 

 

Manager

 

Directors

 

Total

 

Unvested shares as of January 1, 2012

 

240,845

 

145,676

 

386,521

 

Issued

 

258,303

 

 

258,303

 

Vested

 

(60,211

)

 

(60,211

)

Forfeited

 

 

 

 

Unvested shares as of June 30, 2012

 

438,937

 

145,676

 

584,613

 

 

28



Table of Contents

 

The Company is required to value any unvested restricted common shares granted to the Manager at the current market price. The Company valued the unvested restricted common shares granted to the Manager at $8.52 and $9.81 per share at June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. There were $3.0 million and $2.4 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested restricted common shares granted as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These costs are expected to be recognized through 2015. The following table summarizes common share option transactions:

 

 

 

Number of
Options

 

Weighted Average
Exercise Price

 

Outstanding as of January 1, 2012

 

1,932,279

 

$

20.00

 

Granted

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

 

Outstanding as of June 30, 2012

 

1,932,279

 

$

20.00

 

 

As of June 30, 2012 and 2011, 1,932,279 common share options were exercisable. As of June 30, 2012, the common share options were fully vested and expire in August 2014.

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the components of share-based compensation expense are as follows (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

Restricted shares granted to Manager

 

$

416

 

$

307

 

$

799

 

$

1,941

 

Restricted shares granted to certain directors

 

216

 

203

 

447

 

402

 

Total share-based compensation expense

 

$

632

 

$

510

 

$

1,246

 

$

2,343

 

 

Note 11. Management Agreement and Related Party Transactions

 

The Manager manages the Company’s day-to-day operations, subject to the direction and oversight of the Company’s board of directors. The Management Agreement expires on December 31 of each year, but is automatically renewed for a one-year term each December 31 unless terminated upon the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the Company’s independent directors, or by a vote of the holders of a majority of the Company’s outstanding common shares, based upon (1) unsatisfactory performance by the Manager

that is materially detrimental to the Company or (2) a determination that the management fee payable by the Manager is not fair, subject to the Manager’s right to prevent such a termination under this clause (2) by accepting a mutually acceptable reduction of management fees. The Manager must be provided 180 days prior notice of any such termination and will be paid a termination fee equal to four times the sum of the average annual base management fee and the average annual incentive fee for the two 12-month periods immediately preceding the date of termination, calculated as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter prior to the date of termination.

 

The Management Agreement contains certain provisions requiring the Company to indemnify the Manager with respect to all losses or damages arising from acts not constituting bad faith, willful misconduct, or gross negligence. The Company has evaluated the impact of these guarantees on its condensed consolidated financial statements and determined that they are not material.

 

Base Management Fees and Manager Share-Based Compensation

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company incurred $7.2 million and $14.2 million, respectively, in base management fees. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had $2.4 million base management fee payable to the Manager. In addition, the Company recognized share-based compensation expense related to restricted common shares granted to the Manager of $0.4 million and $0.8 million, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively (see Note 10). For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company incurred $6.6 million and $12.8 million, respectively, in base management fees. In addition, the Company recognized share-based compensation expense related to restricted common shares granted to the Manager of $0.3 million and $1.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively (see Note 10).

 

Base management fees incurred and share-based compensation expense relating to common share options and restricted common shares granted to the Manager are included in related party management compensation in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

 

29



Table of Contents

 

The Manager is waiving base management fees related to the $230.4 million common share offering and $270.0 million common share rights offering that occurred during the third quarter of 2007 until such time as the Company’s common share closing price on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) is $20.00 or more for five consecutive trading days. Accordingly, the Manager permanently waived approximately $2.2 million of base management fees during each of the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and $4.4 million during each of the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

 

Incentive Fees

 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Manager earned $4.1 million and $13.7 million, respectively, of incentive fees. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had $4.1 million incentive fee payable to the Manager. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Manager earned $16.1 million and $28.2 million, respectively, of incentive fees. Incentive fees are included in related party management compensation on the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of operations.

 

CLO Management Fees

 

An affiliate of the Manager entered into separate management agreements with the respective investment vehicles for CLO 2005-1, CLO 2005-2, CLO 2006-1, CLO 2007-1, CLO 2007-A and CLO 2011-1 and is entitled to receive fees for the services performed as collateral manager for all of these CLOs, except for CLO 2011-1. The collateral manager has the option to waive the fees it earns for providing management services for the CLO.

 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the collateral manager waived all management fees for all CLOs, except for CLO 2005-1, and waived aggregate CLO management fees of $8.1 million and $16.4 million, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the collateral manager waived management fees for all CLOs, except for CLO 2005-1, totaling $8.4 million and $17.2 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded an expense for CLO management fees totaling $1.1 million and $2.2 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded an expense for CLO management fees totaling $1.3 million and $2.6 million, respectively.

 

Reimbursable General and Administrative Expenses

 

Certain general and administrative expenses are incurred by the Company’s Manager on its behalf that are reimbursable to the Manager pursuant to the Management Agreement. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company incurred reimbursable general and administrative expenses to its Manager of $1.9 million and $3.9 million, respectively, as compared to $1.6 million and $3.3 million during the three and six months ended June 30 2011, respectively. Expenses incurred by the Manager and reimbursed by the Company are reflected in general, administrative and directors expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

 

Affiliated Investments

 

The Company has invested in corporate loans, debt securities, and other investments of entities that are affiliates of KKR. As of June 30, 2012, the aggregate par amount of these affiliated investments totaled $2.2 billion, or approximately 29% of the total investment portfolio, and consisted of 29 issuers. The total $2.2 billion in affiliated investments was comprised of $2.1 billion of corporate loans, $94.6 million of corporate debt securities and $67.1 million of equity investments, at estimated fair value. As of December 31, 2011, the aggregate par amount of these affiliated investments totaled $2.4 billion, or approximately 29% of the total investment portfolio, and consisted of 28 issuers. The total $2.4 billion in affiliated investments was comprised of $2.2 billion of corporate loans, $168.1 million of corporate debt securities and $62.0 million of equity investments, at estimated fair value.

 

In addition, the Company has invested in certain joint ventures and partnerships alongside KKR and its affiliates. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the aggregate cost amount of these interests in joint ventures and partnerships, which are included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets, totaled $99.4 million and zero, respectively.

 

30



Table of Contents

 

Note 12. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The fair value of certain instruments including securities available-for-sale, corporate loans, derivatives, and loan commitments is based on quoted market prices or estimates provided by independent pricing sources. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, interest receivable, interest payable and other liabilities approximates cost due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

 

The table below discloses the carrying value and the estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments, as well as the respective hierarchy classifications, as of June 30, 2012 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

As of June 30, 2012

 

Fair Value Hierarchy

 

 

 

Carrying
Amount

 

Estimated Fair
Value

 

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)

 

Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

 

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

 

Financial Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash, restricted cash, and cash equivalents

 

$

 888,603

 

$

 888,603

 

$

 888,603

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Securities available-for-sale

 

680,661

 

680,661

 

5,136

 

607,424

 

68,101

 

Other securities, at estimated fair value

 

45,181

 

45,181

 

 

42,077

 

3,104

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

87,935

 

87,935

 

 

 

87,935

 

Corporate loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $235,807 as of June 30, 2012

 

5,736,504

 

5,739,968

 

 

5,156,320

 

583,648

 

Corporate loans held for sale

 

183,934

 

234,177

 

 

202,389

 

31,788

 

Corporate loans, at estimated fair value

 

24,792

 

24,792

 

 

11,961

 

12,831

 

Equity investments, at estimated fair value

 

157,677

 

157,677

 

2,903

 

32,038

 

122,736

 

Derivative assets

 

32,319

 

32,319

 

970

 

20,783

 

10,566

 

Private equity investments, at cost (1)

 

405

 

465

 

 

 

465

 

Interests in joint ventures and partnerships (1)

 

98,101

 

98,101

 

 

 

98,101

 

Other assets

 

184

 

184

 

 

184

 

 

Financial Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Collateralized loan obligation secured debt

 

$

5,063,406

 

$

4,765,571

 

$

 

$

 

$

4,765,571

 

Collateralized loan obligation junior secured notes to affiliates

 

322,348

 

260,696

 

 

 

260,696

 

Credit facilities

 

100,000

 

100,000

 

 

 

100,000

 

Convertible senior notes

 

277,408

 

347,485

 

 

347,485

 

 

Senior notes

 

362,132

 

399,154

 

399,154

 

 

 

Junior subordinated notes

 

283,517

 

255,520

 

 

 

255,520

 

Securities sold, not yet purchased

 

9,416

 

9,416

 

1,247

 

8,169

 

 

Derivative liabilities

 

120,072

 

120,072

 

 

119,624

 

448

 

 


(1)           Included within other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

 

The table below discloses the carrying value and the estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments as of December 31, 2011 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2011

 

 

 

Carrying
Amount

 

Estimated Fair
Value

 

Financial Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash, restricted cash, and cash equivalents

 

$

791,774

 

$

791,774

 

Securities available-for-sale

 

816,453

 

816,453

 

Other securities, at estimated fair value

 

19,671

 

19,671

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

86,479

 

86,479

 

Corporate loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $191,407 as of December 31, 2011

 

6,122,891

 

5,999,771

 

Corporate loans held for sale

 

317,332

 

359,463

 

Corporate loans, at estimated fair value

 

3,176

 

3,176

 

Equity investments, at estimated fair value

 

189,845

 

189,845

 

Interest and principal receivable

 

62,124

 

62,124

 

Derivative assets

 

28,463

 

28,463

 

Private equity investments, at cost (1) 

 

780

 

780

 

Financial Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Collateralized loan obligation secured debt

 

$

5,540,037

 

$

5,200,534

 

Collateralized loan obligation junior secured notes to affiliates

 

365,848

 

283,914

 

Credit facilities

 

38,300

 

38,300

 

Convertible senior notes

 

299,830

 

368,502

 

Senior notes

 

250,676

 

261,834

 

Junior subordinated notes

 

283,517

 

262,962

 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities

 

23,424

 

23,424

 

Accrued interest payable

 

25,536

 

25,536

 

Accrued interest payable to affiliates

 

6,561

 

6,561

 

Related party payable

 

11,078

 

11,078

 

Securities sold, not yet purchased

 

1,256

 

1,256

 

Derivative liabilities

 

125,333

 

125,333

 

 


(1)           Included within other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

 

31



Table of Contents

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2012, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)

 

Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

 

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

 

Balance as of
June 30,

2012

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities available-for-sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate debt securities

 

$

 

$

607,424

 

$

68,101

 

$

675,525

 

Common and preferred stock

 

5,136

 

 

 

5,136

 

Total securities available-for-sale

 

5,136

 

607,424

 

68,101

 

680,661

 

Other securities, at estimated fair value

 

 

42,077

 

3,104

 

45,181

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

87,935

 

87,935

 

Total securities

 

5,136

 

649,501

 

159,140

 

813,777

 

Corporate loans, at estimated fair value

 

 

11,961

 

12,831

 

24,792

 

Equity investments, at estimated fair value

 

2,903

 

32,038

 

122,736

 

157,677

 

Foreign exchange options

 

 

 

8,702

 

8,702

 

Commodity swaps

 

 

11,723

 

 

11,723

 

Common stock warrants

 

970

 

 

1,864

 

2,834

 

Foreign exchange forward contracts

 

 

4,544

 

 

4,544

 

Credit default swaps—protection purchased

 

 

4,496

 

 

4,496

 

Credit default swaps—protection sold

 

 

20

 

 

20

 

Interests in joint ventures and partnerships

 

 

 

98,101

 

98,101

 

Other assets

 

 

184

 

 

184

 

Total

 

$

9,009

 

$

714,467

 

$

403,374

 

$

1,126,850

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities sold, not yet purchased

 

$

(1,247

)

$

(8,169

)

$

 

$

(9,416

)

Cash flow interest rate swaps

 

 

(101,900

)

 

(101,900

)

Foreign exchange forward contracts

 

 

(14,538

)

 

(14,538

)

Credit default swaps—protection purchased

 

 

(1,618

)

 

(1,618

)

Commodity swaps

 

 

(1,568

)

 

(1,568

)

Foreign exchange options

 

 

 

(448

)

(448

)

 

 

$

(1,247

)

$

(127,793

)

$

(448

)

$

(129,488

)

 

32



Table of Contents

 

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of June 30, 2012, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value (amounts in thousands). There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:

 

 

 

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical Assets

 

Significant Other
Observable
Inputs

 

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

 

Balance as of

 

 

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

June 30, 2012

 

Corporate loans held for sale(1) 

 

$

 

$

71,615

 

$

11,582

 

$

83,197

 

Private equity investments(2)

 

 

 

75

 

75

 

Total

 

$

 

$

71,615

 

$

11,657

 

$

83,272

 

 


(1)           As of June 30, 2012, total loans held for sale had a carrying value of $183.9 million of which $83.2 million was carried at estimated fair value and the remaining $100.7 million carried at amortized cost. Of the $83.2 million carried at estimated fair value, $71.6 million was classified as Level 2 given that the assets were valued using quoted prices and other observable inputs in an active market. The remaining $11.6 million was classified as Level 3 given that the Company applied unobservable inputs based on the best available information to determine the estimated fair value.

 

(2)           Represents private equity investments accounted for under the cost method that were classified as Level 3 when the assets were impaired and measured at estimated fair value using unobservable inputs.

 

The Company evaluates its proved oil and natural gas properties and related equipment and facilities for impairment on a field-by-field basis, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such properties may not be recoverable. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded impairment charges totaling $3.0 million to write down certain of its oil and natural gas properties with a carrying amount of $6.5 million to an estimated fair value of $3.5 million.

 

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities (including derivatives that are presented net) measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2011, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)

 

Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

 

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

 

Balance as of
December 31,
2011

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities available-for-sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate debt securities

 

$

 

$

736,010

 

$

67,233

 

$

803,243

 

Common and preferred stock

 

11,902

 

1,308

 

 

13,210

 

Total securities available-for-sale

 

11,902

 

737,318

 

67,233

 

816,453

 

Other securities, at estimated fair value

 

 

16,893

 

2,778

 

19,671

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

86,479

 

86,479

 

Total securities

 

11,902

 

754,211

 

156,490

 

922,603

 

Corporate loans, at estimated fair value

 

 

3,176

 

 

3,176

 

Equity investments, at estimated fair value

 

10,498

 

28,385

 

150,962

 

189,845

 

Total rate of return swaps

 

 

 

152

 

152

 

Foreign exchange options, net

 

 

 

13,394

 

13,394

 

Commodity swaps, net

 

 

7,371

 

 

7,371

 

Common stock warrants

 

1,066

 

 

1,266

 

2,332

 

Other assets

 

 

 

567

 

567

 

Total

 

$

23,466

 

$

793,143

 

$

322,831

 

$

1,139,440

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities sold, not yet purchased

 

$

(1,256

)

$

 

$

 

$

(1,256

)

Cash flow interest rate swaps

 

 

(100,718

)

 

(100,718

)

Foreign exchange forward contracts, net

 

 

(12,224

)

 

(12,224

)

Credit default swaps—protection sold, net

 

 

(7,177

)

 

(7,177

)

 

 

$

(1,256

)

$

(120,119

)

$

 

$

(121,375

)

 

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2011, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value (amounts in thousands). There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:

 

 

 

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)

 

Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

 

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

 

Balance as of
December 31,
2011

 

Loans held for sale(1)

 

$

 

$

159,120

 

$

6,698

 

$

165,818

 

Private equity investments(2)

 

 

 

780

 

780

 

Total

 

$

 

$

159,120

 

$

7,478

 

$

166,598

 

 


(1)                                   As of December 31, 2011, total loans held for sale had a carrying value of $317.3 million of which $165.8 million was carried at estimated fair value and the remaining $151.5 million carried at amortized cost. Of the $165.8 million carried at estimated fair value, $159.1 million was classified as Level 2 given that the assets were valued using quoted prices and other observable inputs in an active market. The remaining $6.7 million was classified as Level 3 given that the Company applied unobservable inputs based on the best available information to determine the estimated fair value.

 

(2)                                   Represents private equity investments accounted for under the cost method that were classified as Level 3 when the assets were impaired and measured at estimated fair value using unobservable inputs.

 

33



Table of Contents

 

The following table presents additional information about assets, including derivatives that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

Securities
Available-
For-Sale:
Corporate
Debt
Securities

 

Other
Securities,
at Estimated
Fair Value

 

Residential
Mortgage-
Backed
Securities

 

Corporate
Loans, at
Estimated
Fair Value

 

Equity
Investments,
at Estimated
Fair Value

 

Total
Rate of
Return
Swaps

 

Common
Stock
Warrants

 

Foreign
Exchange
Options,
Net

 

Interests in
Joint Ventures and
Partnerships

 

Other
Assets

 

Beginning balance as of April 1, 2012

 

$

71,506

 

$

2,721

 

$

87,363

 

$

9,929

 

$

159,501

 

$

293

 

$

1,551

 

$

12,154

 

$

 

$

676

 

Total gains or losses (for the period):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Included in earnings(1)

 

(97

)

383

 

2,298

 

(561

)

1,830

 

 

313

 

(3,900

)

(2,482

)

233

 

Included in other comprehensive loss

 

1,917

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transfers into Level 3(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

34,230

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3(2)

 

 

 

 

 

(34,230

)

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases

 

 

 

 

3,229

 

 

 

 

 

66,541

 

 

Sales

 

(4,660

)

 

 

 

(4,365

)

 

 

 

 

(706

)

Settlements

 

(565

)

 

(1,726

)

234

 

 

(293

)

 

 

(188

)

(203

)

Ending balance as of June 30, 2012

 

$

68,101

 

$

3,104

 

$

87,935

 

$

12,831

 

$

122,736

 

$

 

$

1,864

 

$

8,254

 

$

98,101

 

$

 

Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings for assets held at the end of the reporting period(1)

 

$

(99

)

$

383

 

$

10,649

 

$

(561

)

$

1,785

 

$

 

$

313

 

$

(3,900

)

(2,482

)

$

 

 


(1)                                      Amounts are included in net realized and unrealized gain on investments, net realized and unrealized gain on derivatives and foreign exchange or net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on residential mortgage-backed securities, at estimated fair value in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

 

(2)                                      There were no transfers between Level 1 or 2. The transfers into and out of Level 3 represented the reclassification of certain assets from equity investments, at estimated fair value to interests in joint ventures and partnerships. The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers into and out of Level 3 at the end of the reporting period.

 

The following table presents additional information about assets, including derivatives that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

Securities
Available-
For-Sale:
Corporate
Debt
Securities

 

Other
Securities,
at Estimated
Fair Value

 

Residential
Mortgage-
Backed
Securities

 

Corporate
Loans, at
Estimated
Fair Value

 

Equity
Investments,
at Estimated
Fair Value

 

Total
Rate of
Return
Swaps

 

Common
Stock
Warrants

 

Foreign
Exchange
Options,
Net

 

Interests in Joint
Ventures and Partnerships

 

Other
Assets

 

Beginning balance as of January 1, 2012

 

$

67,233

 

$

2,778

 

$

86,479

 

$

 

$

150,962

 

$

152

 

$

1,266

 

$

13,394

 

$

 

$

567

 

Total gains or losses (for the period):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Included in earnings(1)

 

453

 

326

 

4,734

 

753

 

4,218

 

141

 

598

 

(5,140

)

(2,482

)

342

 

Included in other comprehensive loss

 

5,968

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transfers into Level 3(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

34,230

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3(2)

 

 

 

 

 

(34,230

)

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases

 

 

 

 

11,844

 

6,151

 

 

 

 

66,541

 

 

Sales

 

(4,660

)

 

 

 

(4,365

)

 

 

 

 

( 706

)

Settlements

 

(893

)

 

(3,278

)

234

 

 

(293

)

 

 

(188

)

(203

)

Ending balance as of June 30, 2012

 

$

68,101

 

$

3,104

 

$

87,935

 

$

12,831

 

$

122,736

 

$

 

$

1,864

 

$

8,254

 

$

98,101

 

$

 

Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings for assets held at the end of the reporting period(1)

 

$

324

 

$

326

 

$

18,447

 

$

753

 

$

1,215

 

$

 

$

598

 

$

(5,140

)

$

(2,482

)

$

 

 


(1)                                      Amounts are included in net realized and unrealized gain on investments, net realized and unrealized gain on derivatives and foreign exchange or net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on residential mortgage-backed securities, at estimated fair value in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

 

(2)                                      There were no transfers between Level 1 or 2. The transfers into and out of Level 3 represented the reclassification of certain assets from equity investments, at estimated fair value to interests in joint ventures and partnerships. The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers into and out of Level 3 at the end of the reporting period.

 

34



Table of Contents

 

The following table presents additional information about valuation techniques and inputs used for assets and liabilities, including derivatives, that are measured at fair value and categorized within Level 3 as of June 30, 2012 (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

Balance as of
June 30,
2012

 

Valuation Techniques (1)

 

Unobservable
Inputs (2)

 

Range (Weighted
Average) (3)

 

Impact to
Valuation
from an
Increase in
Input (4)

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities available-for-sale: Corporate debt securities

 

$

68,101

 

Yield Analysis

 

Yield

Discount margin

Net leverage

Illiquidity discount

EBITDA multiple

 

11%-31% (15%)

1050bps-2950bps (1400bps)

3x-7x (5x)

2%-3% (3%)

6x-9x (7x)

 

Decrease Decrease Decrease Decrease Increase

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Broker quotes

 

Offered quotes

 

67-103 (86)

 

Increase

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other securities, at estimated fair value

 

$

3,104

 

Yield Analysis

 

Yield

 

11% (11%)

 

Decrease

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

$

87,935

 

Discounted cash flows

 

Probability of default

Loss severity

Constant prepayment rate

 

0%-31% (6%)

21%-73% (31%)

0%-35% (13%)

 

Decrease Decrease
(5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate loans, at estimated fair value

 

$

12,831

 

Yield Analysis

 

Yield

Discount margin

Illiquidity discount

Net leverage

EBITDA multiple

 

60% (60%)

4600bps-5900bps (4900bps)

20% (20%)

8x-10x (9x)

8x-11x (10x)

 

Decrease Decrease Decrease Decrease Increase

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Broker quotes

 

Offered quotes

 

47 (47)

 

Increase

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity investments, at estimated fair value

 

$

122,736

 

Market comparables

 

LTM EBITDA multiple

Forward EBITDA multiple

Control premium

 

6x-11x (10x)

5x-11x (8x)

13% (13%)

 

Increase Increase Increase

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discounted cash flows

 

Weighted average cost of capital

LTM EBITDA exit multiple

 

7%-15% (12%)

6x-11x (8x)

 

Decrease Increase

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Broker quotes

 

Offered quotes

 

21 (21)

 

Increase

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock warrants

 

$

1,864

 

Market comparables

 

LTM EBITDA multiple

Forward EBITDA multiple

Illiquidity discount

 

6x (6x)

6x (6x)

15% (15%)

 

Increase Increase
Decrease

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discounted cash flows

 

Weighted average cost of capital
LTM EBITDA exit multiple

 

11% (11%)

6x (6x)

 

Decrease Increase

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange options

 

$

8,702

 

Option pricing model

 

Forward and spot rates

 

0-2 (1)

 

(6)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interests in joint ventures and partnerships

 

$

98,101

 

Discounted cash flows

 

Illiquidity discount

Weighted average cost of capital

 

10%-15% (10%)

13%-30% (14%)

 

Decrease Decrease

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange options

 

$

(448

)

Option pricing model

 

Forward and spot rates

 

0.02 (0.02)

 

(6)

 


(1)  For the assets that have more than one valuation technique, the Company may rely on the techniques individually or in aggregate based on a weight ascribed to each one ranging from 0-100%. Broker quotes obtained for valuation purposes are reviewed by the Company through other valuation techniques. Equity investments, at estimated fair value are assigned a minimum 5% illiquidity discount, with the exception of certain investments related to natural resources.

(2)  The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s assets and liabilities may include the last twelve months (“LTM”) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) multiple, weighted average cost of capital, discount margin, probability of default, loss severity and constant prepayment rate. In determining certain of these inputs, management evaluates a variety of factors including economic, industry and market trends and developments; market valuations of comparable companies; and company specific developments including potential exit strategies and realization opportunities. Significant increases or decreases in any of these inputs in isolation could result in significantly lower or higher fair value measurement.

(3) Weighted average amounts are based on the estimated fair values.

(4) Unless otherwise noted, this column represents the directional change in the fair value of the Level 3 investments that would result from an increase to the corresponding unobservable input. A decrease to the unobservable input would have the opposite effect. Significant changes in these inputs in isolation could result in significantly higher or lower fair value measurements.

(5) The impact of changes in prepayment speeds may have differing impacts depending on the seniority of the instrument. Generally, an increase in the constant prepayment speed will positively impact the overall valuation of traditional mortgage assets. In contrast, an increase in the constant prepayment rate will negatively impact the overall valuation of interest-only strips.

(6) The directional change from an increase in forward and spot rates varies and is dependent on the specific option.

 

35



Table of Contents

 

The following table presents additional information about assets, including derivatives that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis for which the Company has utilized level 3 inputs to determine fair value, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

Securities
Available-
For-Sale

 

Residential
Mortgage-
Backed
Securities

 

Equity
Investments,
at Estimated
Fair Value

 

Total Rate of
Return
Swaps

 

Common
Stock
Warrants

 

Foreign
Exchange
Options,
Net

 

Other
Assets

 

Beginning balance as of April 1, 2011

 

$

106,432

 

$

90,369

 

$

136,541

 

$

135

 

$

4,171

 

$

16,473

 

$

750

 

Total gains or losses (realized and unrealized):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Included in earnings(1)

 

16

 

(141

)

18,426

 

28

 

228

 

2,479

 

4

 

Included in other comprehensive income

 

(511

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases

 

4,326

 

 

2,668

 

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

 

 

(286

)

 

 

 

 

Settlements

 

(17,188

)

(1,690

)

(665

)

 

 

 

365

 

Ending balance as of June 30, 2011

 

$

93,075

 

$

88,538

 

$

156,684

 

$

163

 

$

4,399

 

$

18,952

 

$

1,119

 

The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date(1)

 

$

 

$

7,805

 

$

18,426

 

$

 

$

228

 

$

2,479

 

$

4

 

 


(1)                                   Amounts are included in net realized and unrealized gain on investments, net realized and unrealized gain on derivatives and foreign exchange or net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on residential mortgage-backed securities, at estimated fair value in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

 

There were no transfers in to or out of Level 3

 

36



Table of Contents

 

The following table presents additional information about assets, including derivatives that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

Securities
Available-
For-Sale

 

Residential
Mortgage-
Backed
Securities

 

Equity
Investments,
at Estimated
Fair Value

 

Total Rate of
Return
Swaps

 

Common
Stock
Warrants

 

Foreign
Exchange
Options,
Net

 

Other
Assets

 

Beginning balance as of January 1, 2011

 

$

83,097

 

$

93,929

 

$

84,932

 

$

104

 

$

3,453

 

$

14,791

 

$

 

Total gains or losses (realized and unrealized):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Included in earnings(1) 

 

255

 

(1,801

)

42,888

 

59

 

946

 

4,161

 

4

 

Included in other comprehensive income

 

2,939

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transfers in to Level 3(2) 

 

12,986

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases

 

6,142

 

 

20,092

 

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

(1,665

)

 

(286

)

 

 

 

 

Settlements

 

(10,679

)

(3,590

)

9,058

 

 

 

 

1,115

 

Ending balance as of June 30, 2011

 

$

93,075

 

$

88,538

 

$

156,684

 

$

163

 

$

4,399

 

$

18,952

 

$

1,119

 

The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date(1) 

 

$

 

$

11,683

 

$

42,888

 

$

 

$

946

 

$

4,161

 

$

4

 

 


(1)                                   Amounts are included in net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives and foreign exchange or net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on residential mortgage-backed securities, residential mortgage loans, and residential mortgage-backed securities issued, carried at estimated fair value in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

 

(2)                                   Certain securities available-for-sale and equity investments, at estimated fair value, were transferred in to Level 3 reflecting reduced transparency of prices for these financial instruments as a result of less trading activity. There were no significant transfers out of Level 3 into Level 1 or 2.

 

Note 13. Segment Reporting

 

Operating segments are defined as components of a company in which separate financial information is available and reviewed by the chief operating decision maker or group in determining how to allocate resources and assessing performance. The Company operates its business through multiple reportable business segments, which it has determined to be credit (“Credit”) and all other segments (“Other”). The Company’s segments are differentiated primarily by their investment focuses. The Credit segment includes primarily below investment grade corporate debt comprised of senior secured and unsecured loans, mezzanine loans, high yield bonds, and distressed and stressed debt securities. The Other segments include all other portfolio holdings, including oil and natural gas working interests and overriding royalty interests, and commercial real estate investments.

 

Prior to 2011, the Company operated under a single business segment of Credit. However, during 2011, the Company began purchasing additional working interests and overriding royalty interests in oil and natural gas properties. As of December 31, 2011, the Company determined that it met certain segment reporting requirements and accordingly, began disclosing information by segment based on its acquisition of additional natural resources assets, combined with its belief that other areas of investment focus including natural resources, while currently not significant, may become a significant part of its business. The segments currently reported are consistent with the way decisions regarding the allocation of resources are made, as well as how operating results are reviewed by the Company.

 

The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based on several components including total investment income, net investment income, other income (loss) and net income (loss). Net investment income is the difference between income earned on assets (or total investment income) and the cost of liabilities to fund those assets, as well as the related provision for loan losses, if applicable. Net income (loss) includes (i) net investment income, (ii) other income (loss), which is comprised primarily of unrealized and realized gains and losses on investments and derivatives, and (iii) non-investment expenses. Certain corporate assets and expenses that are not directly related to the individual segments, including base management fees and professional services are allocated to

 

37



Table of Contents

 

individual segments based on the carrying value of the assets within those segments. Certain other corporate assets and expenses, including prepaid insurance, incentive fees, insurance expenses, directors’ expenses and share-based compensation expense are not allocated to individual segments in the Company’s assessment of segment performance. Collectively, these items are included as reconciling items between reported segment amounts and consolidated totals.

 

The following table shows data of reportable segments reconciled to amounts reflected in the condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (amounts in thousands):

 

For the three months

 

Credit

 

Other

 

Reconciling Items

 

Total Consolidated

 

ended June 30,

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Total investment income

 

$

128,828

 

$

129,254

 

$

11,722

 

$

6,589

 

$

 

$

 

$

140,550

 

$

135,843

 

Net investment income

 

$

74,555

 

$

82,374

 

$

11,022

 

$

6,349

 

$

 

$

 

$

85,577

 

$

88,723

 

Other income

 

$

17,606

 

$

62,171

 

$

1,863

 

$

407

 

$

 

$

 

$

19,469

 

$

62,578

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

80,080

 

$

125,289

 

$

(3,718

)

$

(231

)

$

(5,157

)

$

(17,554

)

$

71,205

 

$

107,504

 

 

For the six months

 

Credit

 

Other

 

Reconciling Items

 

Total Consolidated

 

ended June 30,

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Total investment income

 

$

255,709

 

$

261,678

 

$

22,775

 

$

9,495

 

$

 

$

 

$

278,484

 

$

271,173

 

Net investment income

 

$

101,835

 

$

159,081

 

$

21,604

 

$

9,094

 

$

 

$

 

$

123,439

 

$

168,175

 

Other income

 

$

91,803

 

$

108,891

 

$

6,597

 

$

123

 

$

 

$

 

$

98,400

 

$

109,014

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

172,838

 

$

237,571

 

$

2,779

 

$

(373

)

$

(16,364

)

$

(35,927

)

$

159,253

 

$

201,271

 

 

The following table shows total assets of reportable segments reconciled to amounts reflected in the condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

Credit

 

Other

 

Reconciling Items

 

Total Consolidated

 

For the periods ended

 

June 30,
2012

 

December 31,
2011

 

June 30,
2012

 

December 31,
2011

 

June 30,
2012

 

December 31,
2011

 

June 30,
2012

 

December 31,
2011

 

Total assets

 

$

7,972,672

 

$

8,487,702

 

$

386,859

 

$

158,639

 

$

106

 

$

887

 

$

8,359,637

 

$

8,647,228

 

 

Note 14. Subsequent Events

 

On July 26, 2012, the Company’s board of directors declared a cash distribution for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 on the Company’s common shares of $0.21 per share. The distribution is payable on August 23, 2012 to common shareholders of record as of the close of business on August 9, 2012.

 

38



Table of Contents

 

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Except where otherwise expressly stated or the context suggests otherwise, the terms “we,” “us” and “our” refer to KKR Financial Holdings LLC and its subsidiaries. The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Certain information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitutes “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that are based on our current expectations, estimates and projections. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “aim,” “expect,” “strive,” “plan,” “estimate,” and “project,” and similar words identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are not guarantees of future performance, events or results and involve potential risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, actual results and the timing of certain events could differ materially from those addressed in forward-looking statements due to a number of factors including, but not limited to, changes in interest rates and market values, financing and capital availability, changes in prepayment rates, general economic and political conditions and events, changes in market conditions, particularly in the global fixed income, credit and equity markets, the impact of current, pending and future legislation, regulation and legal actions, and other factors not presently identified. Other factors that may impact our actual results are discussed under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on February 28, 2012. We do not undertake, and specifically disclaim, any obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions that may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements, except for as required by federal securities laws.

 

Executive Overview

 

We are a specialty finance company with expertise in a range of asset classes. Our core business strategy is to leverage the proprietary resources of our manager with the objective of generating both current income and capital appreciation by deploying capital to our strategies, which include bank loans and high yield securities, natural resources, special situations, mezzanine, commercial real estate and private equity. Our holdings across these strategies primarily consist of below investment grade syndicated corporate loans, also known as leveraged loans, high yield debt securities, private equity, interests in joint ventures and partnerships, and working and royalty interests in oil and gas properties. The corporate loans that we hold are purchased via assignment or participation in the primary or secondary market.

 

The majority of our holdings consist of corporate loans and high yield debt securities held in collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”) transactions that are structured as on-balance sheet securitizations and are used as long term financing for our investments in corporate debt. The senior secured debt issued by the CLO transactions is primarily owned by unaffiliated third party investors and we own the majority of the subordinated notes in the CLO transactions. Our CLO transactions consist of six CLO transactions, KKR Financial CLO 2005-1, Ltd. (“CLO 2005-1”), KKR Financial CLO 2005-2, Ltd. (“CLO 2005-2”), KKR Financial CLO 2006-1, Ltd. (“CLO 2006-1”), KKR Financial CLO 2007-1, Ltd. (“CLO 2007-1”), KKR Financial CLO 2007-A, Ltd. (“CLO 2007-A”), and KKR Financial CLO 2011-1, Ltd. (“CLO 2011-1”) (collectively the “Cash Flow CLOs”). We execute our core business strategy through our majority-owned subsidiaries, including CLOs.

 

We are a Delaware limited liability company and were organized on January 17, 2007. We are the successor to KKR Financial Corp., a Maryland corporation. Our common shares are publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “KFN”. We intend to continue to operate so as to qualify, for United States federal income tax purposes, as a partnership and not as an association or publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation.

 

We are managed by KKR Financial Advisors LLC (our “Manager”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of KKR Asset Management LLC (“KAM”), pursuant to a management agreement (the “Management Agreement”). KAM is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. (“KKR”).

 

Business Environment

 

During the second quarter of 2012, the high yield debt markets continued to experience overall price appreciation as evidenced through the leveraged loan and high yield bond indices, albeit at a slower pace compared to the first quarter of 2012. Specifically, the S&P/LSTA Loan Index returned 0.7% for the second quarter of 2012 (as compared to 0.2% for the second quarter of 2011 and 3.8% for the first quarter of 2012) and 4.5% for the first half of 2012 (as compared to 2.6% for the first half of 2011) while the Merrill Lynch High Yield Master II index returned 1.8% for the second quarter of 2012 (as compared to 1.0% for the second quarter of 2011 and 5.1% for the first quarter of 2012) and 7.1% for the first half of 2012 (as compared to 4.9% for the first half of 2011).

 

39



Table of Contents

 

Interest rates in the U.S. remained low during the second quarter of 2012 with the three-month London interbank offered rate (“LIBOR”) rate at 0.46% as of June 30, 2012 compared to 0.25% as of June 30, 2011 and 0.47% as of March 31, 2012. As a result of the low interest rates, we saw a continual flow of assets offering a LIBOR floor.

 

In addition to our corporate debt portfolio, which is impacted by the factors above, we hold oil and natural gas properties, which are impacted by the relevant commodity prices. The Henry Hub Spot natural gas prices decreased to $2.81 million metric British thermal units (“mmBtu”) as of June 30, 2012 from $4.39 mmBtu as of June 30, 2011 and increased from $2.02 mmBtu as of March 31, 2012. Revenue earned on our oil and natural gas properties are dependent on volume as well as price. As such, commodity price volatility will impact our net income through other investment income and net realized and unrealized gains and losses on our commodity swaps.

 

Summary of Results

 

Our net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 totaled $71.2 million (or $0.39 per diluted common share), and $159.3 million (or $0.87 per diluted common share), respectively, as compared to net income of $107.5 million (or $0.59 per diluted common share), and $201.3 million (or $1.10 per diluted common share), respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2012 consisted of net investment income of $85.6 million, other income totaling $19.5 million and non-investment expenses of $33.6 million. Comparatively, net income for the three months ended June 30, 2011 consisted of net investment income of $88.7 million, other income totaling $62.6 million and non-investment expenses of $36.4 million. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 consisted of net investment income before a provision for loan losses of $169.9 million, a provision for loan losses of $46.5 million, other income totaling $98.4 million and non-investment expenses of $66.5 million. Comparatively, net income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 consisted of net investment income before a provision for loan losses of $179.8 million, a provision for loan losses of $11.7 million, other income totaling $109.0 million and non-investment expenses of $67.2 million.

 

Net investment income is comprised of total investment income, net of interest expense and provision for loan losses. Total investment income consists primarily of interest income and discount accretion from our investment portfolio, as well as other investment income from our working and royalty interests in oil and gas properties. Net investment income decreased $3.1 million from the three months ended June 30, 2011 to 2012 primarily due to $7.6 million of interest expense recorded in 2012 related to our senior note offerings from November 2011 and March 2012. Net investment income before a provision for loan losses decreased $9.9 million from the six months ended June 30, 2011 to 2012 primarily due to $13.3 million of interest expense on our senior notes offerings and $6.6 million of additional interest expense on our collateralized loan obligation secured debt, partially offset by $13.3 million of additional revenue earned from our interest ownership in oil and gas properties.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded a provision for loan losses of $46.5 million as compared to $11.7 million for the same period in 2011. Reflecting the $46.5 million provision we recorded, our allowance for loan losses totaled $235.8 million as of June 30, 2012. Of this amount, $37.2 million reflected our allocated reserve and $198.6 million reflected our unallocated reserve.

 

Other income decreased $43.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 to 2012, and $10.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 to 2012, primarily as a result of larger realized gains on sales and paydowns of certain individual investments during 2011.

 

The components of net income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 are detailed further below under “Results of Operations.”

 

Book value per share increased $ 0.38 from $9.41 as of December 31, 2011, and decreased $0.02 from $9.81 as of March 31, 2012 to $ 9.79 as of June 30, 2012. The decrease in book value per share from March 31, 2012 to June 30, 2012 was attributable to (i) an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss, a component of shareholders’ equity, of $0.24 per share partially as a result of declines in value of certain interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and (ii) the distribution to shareholders for the first quarter 2012 of $0.18 per common share, partially offset by (iii) earnings for the second quarter of $0.40 per basic common share.

 

Cash Distributions to Shareholders

 

On July 26, 2012, our board of directors declared a cash distribution for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 on our common shares of $0.21 per share. The distribution is payable on August 23, 2012 to common shareholders of record as of the close of business on August 9, 2012.

 

40



Table of Contents

 

The amount and timing of our distributions to our common shareholders, including quarterly distributions or any special distributions, is determined by our board of directors and is based upon a review of various factors including current market conditions, existing restrictions under borrowing agreements, the amount of ordinary taxable income or loss earned by us, gains or losses recognized by us on the disposition of assets and our liquidity needs. For this purpose, we will generally determine gains or losses based upon the price we paid for those assets. We note, however, because of the tax rules applicable to partnerships, the gains or losses recognized by a shareholder on the sale of assets held by us may be higher or lower depending upon the purchase price the shareholder paid for our shares. Shareholders may have taxable income or tax liability attributable to our shares for a taxable year that is greater than our cash distributions for such taxable year. See “Non-Cash ‘Phantom’ Taxable Income” for further discussion about taxable income allocable to holders of our common shares and “Sources of Funds—Credit Facilities” for further discussion about the restrictions on the amount of cash distributions we can pay.

 

Consolidation

 

CLO 2005-1, CLO 2005-2, CLO 2006-1, CLO 2007-1, CLO 2007-A and CLO 2011-1 are all variable interest entity (“VIEs”) that we consolidate as we have determined we have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact these entities’ economic performance and we have both the obligation to absorb losses of these entities and the right to receive benefits from these entities that could potentially be significant to these entities.

 

As our condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are presented to reflect the consolidation of the Cash Flow CLOs we hold investments in, the information contained in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations reflects the Cash Flow CLOs on a consolidated basis, which is consistent with the disclosures in our condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

Non-Cash “Phantom” Taxable Income

 

We intend to continue to operate so as to qualify, for United States federal income tax purposes, as a partnership and not as an association or a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation. Holders of our shares are subject to United States federal income taxation and generally other taxes, such as state, local and foreign income taxes, on their allocable share of our taxable income, regardless of whether or when they receive cash distributions. In addition, certain of our investments, including investments in foreign corporate subsidiaries, CLO issuers (which are treated as partnerships or disregarded entities for United States federal income tax purposes) and debt securities, may produce taxable income without corresponding distributions of cash to us or produce taxable income prior to or following the receipt of cash relating to such income. In addition, we have recognized and may recognize in the future cancellation of indebtedness income upon the retirement of our debt at a discount. Consequently, in some taxable years, holders of our shares may recognize taxable income in excess of our cash distributions. Furthermore, even if we did not pay cash distributions with respect to a taxable year, holders of our shares may still have a tax liability attributable to their allocation of our taxable income from us during such year.

 

Investment Portfolio Overview

 

Our core business strategy is to leverage the proprietary resources of our Manager with the objective of generating both current income and capital appreciation by deploying capital to different strategies that reflect the opportunity set that our Manager specializes in. These strategies and a summary of each are as follows:

 

·                   Bank loans and high yield: We deploy capital to this strategy primarily through our CLO subsidiaries. This strategy primarily consists of senior secured corporate loans and debt securities, but also includes second lien, unsecured and subordinated corporate loans and debt securities.

 

·                   Natural resources: Our natural resources strategy primarily consists of deploying capital to oil and gas opportunities by acquiring working interests in conventional producing properties, acquiring royalty interests in both producing properties and unconventional resource developments (i.e. emerging shale plays) and deploying capital to private equity, joint venture and partnership opportunities focused on the oil and gas sector.

 

·                   Special situations: Special situations opportunities may take the form of debt and/or equity and generally consist of deploying capital to deeply discounted secondary market opportunities, debtor-in-possession and exit facilities, rescue financing transactions and other distressed opportunities.

 

·                   Mezzanine: Mezzanine opportunities generally represent the private debt instruments located in the middle of a company’s capital structure, senior to common or preferred equity but subordinate to senior secured debt. Generally, mezzanine securities take the form of privately negotiated subordinated debt, and, to a lesser extent, senior notes or preferred stock, with some form of equity participation either through common or preferred stock, options or warrants.

 

41



Table of Contents

 

·                   Commercial real estate:  Our commercial real estate strategy consists of deploying capital to domestic and foreign opportunities through debt or equity interests, as well as participation in joint ventures and partnerships in commercial real estate properties and fixed income instruments.

 

·                   Private equity: Our private equity strategy consists of deploying capital to private equity opportunities primarily on a side-by-side basis with KKR’s private equity funds.

 

Refer to “Investment Portfolio” below for a reconciliation of these six core strategies to the line items on our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

 

The majority of our investments are held through CLO transactions that are managed by an affiliate of our Manager and for which we own the majority, and in some cases all, of the residual economic interests in the transaction through the subordinated notes in the transaction. As of June 30, 2012, our Cash Flow CLOs, which were structured as financing vehicles engaged in holding primarily corporate debt investments, held $6.8 billion par amount or $6.4 billion estimated fair value of corporate debt investments. Our corporate debt investments held through our Cash Flow CLOs consist of the following as of June 30, 2012:

 

·                   Corporate loans: Corporate loans consist of bank loans that are held through our CLOs with an aggregate par value of $6.2 billion and estimated fair value of $5.8 billion. Corporate loans held through our CLO transactions have a weighted average coupon of 5.0%, of which 99.9% of the corporate loans are floating rate with a weighted average coupon spread to LIBOR of 4.2%. The remaining 0.1% are fixed rate with a weighted average coupon of 11.5%.

 

·                   Corporate debt securities: Corporate debt securities consist of high yield bonds held through our CLOs with an aggregate par amount of $596.8 million and estimated fair value of $598.3 million. Corporate debt securities held through our CLO transactions have a weighted average coupon of 8.8%, of which 82.1% of the corporate debt securities are fixed rate with a weighted average coupon of 9.8%. The remaining 17.9% are floating rate with a weighted average coupon spread to LIBOR of 3.6%.

 

Weighted average coupon and coupon spreads are calculated based on par values. Fixed and floating percentages are also calculated based on par values.

 

In addition to the corporate debt portfolio, we hold two pay-fixed, receive-variable interest rate swaps through certain of our CLOs. These interest rate derivatives consist of swaps to hedge a portion of the interest rate risk associated with our borrowings under the CLO senior secured notes. As of June 30, 2012, the contractual notional balance of our amortizing interest rate swaps was $383.3 million.

 

These Cash Flow CLOs had aggregate secured debt outstanding totaling $5.1 billion held by unaffiliated third parties and aggregate junior secured notes outstanding totaling $322.3 million held by an affiliate of our Manager. In CLO transactions, subordinated notes effectively represent the equity in such transactions as they have the first risk of loss and conversely, the residual value upside of the transactions. As we hold the majority or all of the subordinated notes in each of the Cash Flow CLOs, we consolidate all of the Cash Flow CLOs and reflect all income and losses related to the assets in these Cash Flow CLOs on our condensed consolidated statement of operations even though a minority interest in two of our CLO transactions is not held by us.

 

The indentures governing the CLO transactions stipulate the reinvestment period during which the collateral manager, an affiliate of our Manager, can generally sell or buy assets at its discretion and can reinvest principal proceeds into new assets. CLO 2007-A ended its reinvestment period during the fourth quarter of 2010 and both CLO 2005-1 and CLO 2005-2 ended their reinvestment periods in the second quarter of 2011. As a result, principal proceeds from the assets held in each of these three transactions are generally used to amortize the outstanding balance of senior notes outstanding. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, $433.0 million and $521.8 million, respectively, of original CLO 2007-A, CLO 2005-1 and CLO 2005-2 senior notes were repaid. CLO 2006-1 and CLO 2007-1 will end their respective reinvestment periods during August 2012 and May 2014, respectively. CLO 2011-1 does not have a reinvestment period and all principal proceeds from holdings in CLO 2011-1 will be used to amortize the transaction. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, $50.1 million and $55.2 million, respectively, of original CLO 2011-1 senior notes were repaid. Accordingly, absent any new CLO transactions that we may enter into, our total investments held through CLOs will continue to decline as investments are paid down or paid off once the reinvestment period ends. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the indentures governing our CLO transactions, we have the ability to call in a CLO transaction by redeeming the notes and reinvesting the proceeds into a new CLO.

 

On an unconsolidated basis, which reflects our interests in our CLO subsidiaries as notes versus actual corporate loans and high yield securities on a consolidated basis, our investment portfolio primarily consists of the following holdings as of June 30, 2012:

 

·                   CLO note holdings:  We hold $1.1 billion par amount of mezzanine and subordinated notes in our six Cash Flow CLO transactions. As our Cash Flow CLOs are consolidated under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), these holdings are not reflected on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as the assets

 

42



Table of Contents

 

and liabilities of our CLO subsidiaries are consolidated and our ownership interests in the Cash Flow CLOs are eliminated for consolidation.

 

·                   Corporate loans:  Our corporate loans consist of bank loans that are held outside of our CLO transactions. These corporate loans have an aggregate par value of $212.3 million and estimated fair value of $130.0 million. These loans have a weighted average coupon of 6.3% and a weighted average coupon spread to LIBOR of 5.4%. In addition, we hold equity from one issuer with an estimated fair value of $26.3 million, which was restructured from a debt instrument to equity.

 

·                   Corporate debt securities:  Our corporate debt securities consist of high yield bonds. These corporate debt securities have an aggregate par value of $28.8 million and estimated fair value of $25.9 million. These debt securities have a weighted average coupon of 13.4%.

 

·                   Natural resources:  Our natural resources holdings consist of (i) private equity and joint venture transactions focused on the oil and gas sector with an aggregate cost basis of $93.5 million and an estimated fair value of $98.8 million, (ii) oil and gas working interests in proved developed and proved undeveloped properties with a carrying amount of $236.2 million, partially financed with $100.0 million borrowed under a non-recourse, asset-based credit facility, and (iii) overriding royalty interests with a carrying amount of $49.6 million.

 

·                   Special situations:  Our special situations holdings consist of (i) $197.0 million par amount of debt investments with an $128.6 million amortized cost and estimated fair value of $143.8 million, (ii) $27.2 million amortized cost of equity, including warrants, with an estimated fair value of $30.0 million, and (iii) $15.3 million amortized cost of other investments with an estimated fair value of $16.0 million. The $197.0 million par amount of debt has a weighted average coupon of 7.7%.

 

·                   Mezzanine:  Our mezzanine holdings consist of (i) $47.8 million par amount of debt with an estimated fair value of $46.4 million and (ii) $4.5 million amortized cost of equity with an estimated fair value of $4.7 million. The $47.8 million par amount of mezzanine debt has a weighted average coupon of 13.7%.

 

·                   Commercial real estate:  Our commercial real estate holding with a carrying value of $36.8 million was acquired during the second quarter of 2012.

 

·                   Private equity:  Our private equity holdings, excluding those related to the oil and gas sector, have an aggregate cost basis of $50.6 million with an estimated fair value of $51.1 million.

 

·                   Residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”):  Our RMBS have an aggregate par amount of $169.5 million with an estimated fair value of $87.9 million.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Our condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared by management in conformity with GAAP. Our significant accounting policies are fundamental to understanding our financial condition and results of operations because some of these policies require that we make significant estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of our assets or liabilities and financial results. We believe that certain of our policies are critical because they require us to make difficult, subjective, and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. We have reviewed these critical accounting policies with our board of directors and our audit committee.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or market and the instruments’ complexity for disclosure purposes. Assets and liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their value. Hierarchical levels, as defined under GAAP, are directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuations of these assets and liabilities, and are as follows:

 

43



Table of Contents

 

Level 1:  Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.

 

The types of assets generally included in this category are equity securities listed in active markets.

 

Level 2:  Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability.

 

The types of assets and liabilities generally included in this category are certain corporate debt securities, certain corporate loans held for sale, certain equity investments at estimated fair value and certain financial instruments classified as derivatives.

 

Level 3:  Inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and consideration of factors specific to the asset.

 

The types of assets and liabilities generally included in this category are certain corporate debt securities, certain corporate loans held for sale, certain equity investments at estimated fair value, RMBS, certain interests in joint ventures and partnerships and certain financial instruments classified as derivatives.

 

A significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability is an indication that transactions or quoted prices may not be representative of fair value because in such market conditions there may be increased instances of transactions that are not orderly. In those circumstances, further analysis of transactions or quoted prices is needed, and a significant adjustment to the transactions or quoted prices may be necessary to estimate fair value.

 

The availability of observable inputs can vary depending on the financial asset or liability and is affected by a wide variety of factors, including, for example, the type of product, whether the product is new, whether the product is traded on an active exchange or in the secondary market, and the current market condition. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by us in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The variability of the observable inputs affected by the factors described above may cause transfers between Levels 1, 2, and/or 3, which we recognize at the end of the reporting period.

 

Many financial assets and liabilities have bid and ask prices that can be observed in the marketplace. Bid prices reflect the highest price that we and others are willing to pay for an asset. Ask prices represent the lowest price that we and others are willing to accept for an asset. For financial assets and liabilities whose inputs are based on bid-ask prices, we do not require that fair value always be a predetermined point in the bid-ask range. Our policy is to allow for mid-market pricing and adjusting to the point within the bid-ask range that meets our best estimate of fair value.

 

Depending on the relative liquidity in the markets for certain assets, we may transfer assets to Level 3 if we determine that observable quoted prices, obtained directly or indirectly, are not available. The valuation techniques used for the assets and liabilities that are valued using Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are described below.

 

Corporate Debt Securities:   Corporate debt securities are initially valued at transaction price and are subsequently valued using market data for similar instruments (e.g., recent transactions or broker quotes), comparisons to benchmark derivative indices or valuation models. Valuation models are based on discounted cash flow techniques, for which the key inputs are the amount and timing of expected future cash flows, market yields for such instruments and recovery assumptions. Inputs are determined based on relative value analyses, which incorporate similar instruments from similar issuers.

 

Equity Investments, at Estimated Fair Value:   Equity investments, at estimated fair value, are initially valued at transaction price and are subsequently valued using observable market prices, if available, or internally developed models in the absence of readily observable market prices. Valuation models are generally based on a market and income (discounted cash flow) approaches, in which various internal and external factors are considered. Factors include the price at which the investment was acquired, the nature of the investment, current market conditions, recent public market and private transactions for comparable securities, and financing transactions subsequent to the acquisition of the investment. The fair value recorded for a particular investment will generally be within the range suggested by the two approaches.

 

Interests in Joint Ventures and Partnerships:   Interests in joint ventures and partnerships include investments related to the oil and gas and commercial real estate sectors. Interests in joint ventures and partnerships are initially valued at transaction price and are subsequently valued using observable market prices, if available, or internally developed models in the absence of readily

 

44



Table of Contents

 

observable market prices. Valuation models are generally based on a market and income (discounted cash flow) approaches, in which various internal and external factors are considered. Factors include the price at which the investment was acquired, the nature of the investment, current market conditions, recent public market and private transactions for comparables, and financing transactions subsequent to the acquisition of the investment. The fair value recorded for a particular investment will generally be within the range suggested by the two approaches.

 

Over-the-counter (“OTC”) Derivative Contracts:   OTC derivative contracts include forward, swap and option contracts related to interest rates, foreign currencies, credit standing of reference entities, and equity prices. The fair value of OTC derivative products can be modeled using a series of techniques, including closed-form analytic formulae, such as the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, and simulation models or a combination thereof. Many pricing models employ methodologies that have pricing inputs observed from actively quoted markets, as is the case for generic interest rate swap and option contracts.

 

Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities at Estimated Fair Value:   Residential mortgage-backed securities are initially valued at transaction price and are subsequently valued using industry recognized models (including Intex and Bloomberg) and data for similar instruments (e.g., nationally recognized pricing services or broker quotes). The most significant inputs to the valuation of these instruments are default and loss expectations and market credit spreads.

 

Share-Based Compensation

 

We account for share-based compensation issued to members of our board of directors and our Manager using the fair value based methodology in accordance with GAAP. We do not have any employees, although we believe that members of our board of directors are deemed to be employees for purposes of interpreting and applying accounting principles relating to share-based compensation. We record as compensation costs the restricted common shares that we issued to members of our board of directors at estimated fair value as of the grant date and we amortize the cost into expense over the three-year vesting period using the straight-line method. We record compensation costs for restricted common shares and common share options that we issued to our Manager at estimated fair value as of the grant date and we remeasure the amount on subsequent reporting dates to the extent the awards have not vested. Unvested restricted common shares are valued using observable secondary market prices. Unvested common share options are valued using the Black-Scholes model and assumptions based on observable market data for comparable companies. We amortize compensation expense related to the restricted common shares and common share options that we granted to our Manager using the graded vesting attribution method.

 

Because we remeasure the amount of compensation costs associated with the unvested restricted common shares and unvested common share options that we issued to our Manager as of each reporting period, our share-based compensation expense reported in our condensed consolidated financial statements will change based on the estimated fair value of our common shares and this may result in earnings volatility. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, share-based compensation totaled $0.6 million and $1.2 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2012, a $1 increase in the price of our common shares would have increased our future share-based compensation expense by approximately $0.4 million and this future share-based compensation expense would be recognized over the remaining vesting periods of our outstanding restricted common shares. As of June 30, 2012, the common share options were fully vested and expire in August 2014. As of June 30, 2012, future unamortized share-based compensation totaled $3.0 million, of which $1.1 million, $1.3 million and $0.6 million will be recognized in 2012, 2013 and beyond, respectively.

 

Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

 

We recognize all derivatives on our condensed consolidated balance sheets at estimated fair value. On the date we enter into a derivative contract, we designate and document each derivative contract as one of the following at the time the contract is executed: (i) a hedge of a recognized asset or liability (“fair value” hedge); (ii) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (“cash flow” hedge); (iii) a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation; or (iv) a derivative instrument not designated as a hedging instrument (“free-standing derivative”). For a fair value hedge, we record changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative instrument and, to the extent that it is effective, changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability in the current period earnings in the same financial statement category as the hedged item. For a cash flow hedge, we record changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative to the extent that it is effective in other comprehensive (loss) income and subsequently reclassify these changes in estimated fair value to net income in the same period(s) that the hedged transaction affects earnings. The effective portion of the cash flow hedges is recorded in the same financial statement category as the hedged item. For free-standing derivatives, we report changes in the fair values in other income (loss).

 

We formally document at inception our hedge relationships, including identification of the hedging instruments and the hedged items, our risk management objectives, strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction and our evaluation of effectiveness of our hedged transactions. Periodically, we also formally assess whether the derivative designated in each hedging relationship is expected to be and has been highly effective in offsetting changes in estimated fair values or cash flows of the hedged item using either the dollar offset or the regression analysis method. If we determine that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge, we discontinue hedge accounting.

 

45



Table of Contents

 

We are not required to account for our derivative contracts using hedge accounting as described above. If we decide not to designate the derivative contracts as hedges or if we fail to fulfill the criteria necessary to qualify for hedge accounting, then the changes in the estimated fair values of our derivative contracts would affect periodic earnings immediately potentially resulting in the increased volatility of our earnings. The qualification requirements for hedge accounting are complex and as a result, we must evaluate, designate, and thoroughly document each hedge transaction at inception and perform ineffectiveness analysis and prepare related documentation at inception and on a recurring basis thereafter. As of June 30, 2012, the estimated fair value of our net derivative liabilities totaled $87.8 million.

 

Impairments

 

Securities Available-For-Sale

 

We monitor our available-for-sale securities portfolio for impairments. A loss is recognized when it is determined that a decline in the estimated fair value of a security below its amortized cost is other-than-temporary. We consider many factors in determining whether the impairment of a security is deemed to be other-than-temporary, including, but not limited to, the length of

time the security has had a decline in estimated fair value below its amortized cost and the severity of the decline, the amount of the unrealized loss, recent events specific to the issuer or industry, external credit ratings and recent changes in such ratings. In addition, for debt securities we consider our intent to sell the debt security, our estimation of whether or not we expect to recover the debt security’s entire amortized cost if we intend to hold the debt security, and whether it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. For equity securities, we also consider our intent and ability to hold the equity security for a period of time sufficient for a recovery in value.

 

The amount of the loss that is recognized when it is determined that a decline in the estimated fair value of a security below its amortized cost is other-than-temporary is dependent on certain factors. If the security is an equity security or if the security is a debt security that we intend to sell or estimate that it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell before recovery of its amortized cost, then the impairment amount recognized in earnings is the entire difference between the estimated fair value of the security and its amortized cost. For debt securities that we do not intend to sell or estimate that we are not more likely than not to be required to sell before recovery, the impairment is separated into the estimated amount relating to credit loss and the estimated amount relating to all other factors. Only the estimated credit loss amount is recognized in earnings, with the remainder of the loss amount recognized in other comprehensive income (loss).

 

This process involves a considerable amount of judgment by our management. As of June 30, 2012, we had aggregate unrealized losses on our securities classified as available-for-sale of approximately $10.5 million, which if not recovered may result in the recognition of future losses. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded charges for impairments of securities that we determined to be other-than-temporary totaling $0.3 million and $1.0 million, respectively.

 

Long Lived Assets

 

We evaluate our proved oil and natural gas properties and related equipment and facilities for impairment on a field-by-field basis, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such properties may not be recoverable. The determination of recoverability is made based upon estimated undiscounted future net cash flows. The amount of impairment loss, if any, is determined by comparing the fair value, as determined by a discounted cash flow analysis, with the carrying value of the related asset. The factors used to determine fair value include, but are not limited to, estimates of proved reserves, future commodity pricing, future production estimates, anticipated capital expenditures, future operating costs and a discount rate commensurate with the risk on the properties and cost of capital. Unproved oil and natural gas properties are assessed periodically on a property-by-property basis, and any impairment in value is recognized when incurred.

 

Based on certain events and circumstances that indicated a need for impairment, which may include a projection of future oil and natural gas reserves that will be produced from a field, the timing of this future production, future costs to produce the oil and natural gas and future inflation levels, we determined that an impairment was necessary in 2012. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded $2.9 million and $3.0 million, respectively, of impairments which are included in general, administrative and directors expenses on our condensed consolidated statements of operations. These impairments were recognized on certain fields in Texas related to working interests acquired during the fourth quarter of 2010. No impairments were recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.

 

46



Table of Contents

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

Our corporate loan portfolio is comprised of a single portfolio segment which includes one class of financing receivables, that is, high yield loans that are purchased via assignment or participation in either the primary or secondary market and are held primarily for investment. High yield loans are generally characterized as having below investment grade ratings or being unrated and generally consist of leveraged loans.

 

Our allowance for loan losses represents our estimate of probable credit losses inherent in our corporate loan portfolio held for investment as of the balance sheet date. Estimating our allowance for loan losses involves a high degree of management judgment and is based upon a comprehensive review of our loan portfolio that is performed on a quarterly basis. Our allowance for loan losses consists of two components, an allocated component and an unallocated component. The allocated component of our allowance for loan losses pertains to specific loans that we have determined are impaired. We determine a loan is impaired when we estimate that it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. On a quarterly basis we perform a comprehensive review of our entire loan portfolio and identify certain loans that we have determined are impaired. Once a loan is identified as being impaired we place the loan on non-accrual status, unless the loan is already on non-accrual status, and record a reserve that reflects our best estimate of the loss that we expect to recognize from the loan. The expected loss is estimated as being the difference between our current cost basis of the loan, including accrued interest receivable, and the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, except as a practical expedient, the loan’s observable estimated fair value may be used. We also estimate the probable credit losses inherent in our unfunded loan commitments as of the balance sheet date. Any credit loss reserve for unfunded loan commitments is recorded in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities on our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

 

The unallocated component of our allowance for loan losses represents our estimate of probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date where the specific loan that the loan loss relates to is indeterminable. We estimate the unallocated component of our allowance for loan losses through a comprehensive review of our loan portfolio and identify certain loans that demonstrate possible indicators of impairment, including internally assigned credit quality indicators. This assessment excludes all loans that are determined to be impaired and as a result, an allocated reserve has been recorded as described in the preceding paragraph. Such indicators include, but are not limited to, the current and/or forecasted financial performance and liquidity profile of the issuer, specific industry or economic conditions that may impact the issuer, and the observable trading price of the loan if available. All loans are first categorized based on their assigned risk grade and further stratified based on the seniority of the loan in the issuer’s capital structure. The seniority classifications assigned to loans are senior secured, second lien and subordinate. Senior secured consists of loans that are the most senior debt in an issuer’s capital structure and therefore have a lower estimated loss severity than other debt that is subordinate to the senior secured loan. Senior secured loans often have a first lien on some or all of the issuer’s assets. Second lien consists of loans that are secured by a second lien interest on some or all of the issuer’s assets; however, the loan is subordinate to the first lien debt in the issuer’s capital structure. Subordinate consists of loans that are generally unsecured and subordinate to other debt in the issuer’s capital structure.

 

There are three internally assigned risk grades that are applied to loans that have not been identified as being impaired: high, moderate and low. High risk means that there is evidence of possible loss due to the financial or operating performance and liquidity of the issuer, industry or economic concerns specific to the issuer, or other factors that indicate that the breach of a covenant contained in the related loan agreement is possible. Moderate risk means that while there is not observable evidence of loss, there are issuer and/or industry specific trends that indicate a loss may have occurred. Low risk means that while there is no identified evidence of loss, there is the risk of loss inherent in the loan that has not been identified. All loans held for investment, with the exception of loans that have been identified as impaired, are assigned a risk grade of high, moderate or low.

 

We apply a range of default and loss severity estimates in order to estimate a range of loss outcomes upon which to base our estimate of probable losses that results in the determination of the unallocated component of our allowance for loan losses. As of June 30, 2012, the range of outcomes used to estimate concern as to the probability of default was between 1% and 20% and the range of loss severity assumptions was between 5% and 85%. The estimates and assumptions we use to estimate our allowance for loan losses are based on our estimated range of outcomes that are determined from industry information providing both historical and forecasted empirical performance of the type of corporate loans that we invest in, as well as from our own estimates based on the nature of our corporate loan portfolio. These estimates and assumptions are susceptible to change due to our corporate loan portfolio’s performance as well as industry and general economic conditions. Changes in the assumptions and estimates used to estimate our allowance for loan losses could have a significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations. The default and loss severity estimates used in determining our allowance for loan losses are assessed on a quarterly and annual basis. As of June 30, 2012, management believes that these estimates are appropriate and consistent with historical and forecasted estimates evidenced and used in both industry and our corporate loan portfolio.

 

As of June 30, 2012, our allowance for loan losses totaled $235.8 million.

 

47



Table of Contents

 

Results of Operations

 

Summary

 

The following discussion presents an analysis of our results of operations on a comparative basis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. Our results of operations may be significantly affected by market fluctuations and current economic events, particularly in the fixed income and equity markets. A summary of key financial results are as follows (amounts in thousands, except per share information):

 

 

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

Net investment income

 

$

85,577

 

$

88,723

 

$

123,439

 

$

168,175

 

Total other income

 

19,469

 

62,578

 

98,400

 

109,014

 

Total non-investment expenses

 

33,638

 

36,373

 

66,451

 

67,177

 

Income before income tax expense

 

71,408

 

114,928

 

155,388

 

210,012

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

203

 

7,424

 

(3,865

)

8,741

 

Net income

 

$

71,205

 

$

107,504

 

$

159,253

 

$

201,271

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share—diluted

 

$

0.39

 

$

0.59

 

$

0.87

 

$

1.10

 

 

Net Investment Income

 

The following table presents the components of our net investment income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

 

Comparative Net Investment Income Components

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

Investment Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate loans and securities interest income

 

$

97,416

 

$

92,509

 

$

199,542

 

$

189,635

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities interest income

 

3,108

 

3,927

 

6,070

 

7,959

 

Other investment income

 

11,768

 

6,628

 

22,868

 

9,574

 

Dividend income

 

367

 

4,486

 

531

 

4,669

 

Net discount accretion

 

27,891

 

28,293

 

49,473

 

59,336

 

Total investment income

 

140,550

 

135,843

 

278,484

 

271,173

 

Interest Expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Collateralized loan obligation secured debt

 

18,489

 

15,465

 

36,752

 

30,202

 

Credit facilities

 

1,264

 

742

 

2,296

 

1,452

 

Convertible senior notes

 

5,712

 

7,002

 

11,825

 

13,992

 

Junior subordinated notes

 

3,943

 

3,872

 

7,892

 

7,740

 

Senior notes

 

7,598

 

 

13,295

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

5,595

 

5,681

 

11,180

 

11,342

 

Other interest expense

 

54

 

216

 

130

 

371

 

Total interest expense

 

42,655

 

32,978

 

83,370

 

65,099

 

Interest expense to affiliates

 

12,318

 

14,142

 

25,177

 

26,238

 

Provision for loan losses

 

 

 

46,498

 

11,661

 

Net investment income

 

$

85,577

 

$

88,723

 

$

123,439

 

$

168,175

 

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011

 

As presented in the table above, net investment income decreased $3.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. Net investment income is comprised of total investment income, net of interest expense and provision for loan losses.

 

48



Table of Contents

 

Total investment income, consisting primarily of interest income, other investment income and discount accretion from our investment portfolio, totaled $140.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and $135.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $4.7 million. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in other investment income of $5.1 million and corporate loans and securities interest income of $4.9 million, partially offset by a reduction in dividend income of $4.1 million.

 

Other investment income increased $5.1 million from $6.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 to $11.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 primarily as the result of an increase in revenue earned on our working and royalty interests in oil and gas properties of $5.1 million. We began acquiring working and royalty interests in oil and gas properties during the fourth quarter of 2010. Specifically, we acquired working interests by funding, and partially financing through our asset-based borrowing facility, approximately: (i) $35.2 million, partially financed with $18.4 million, during the fourth quarter of 2010; (ii) $56.7 million, partially financed with $19.9 million, during the second quarter of 2011; (iii) $69.8 million, partially financed with $28.5 million, during the first quarter of 2012; and (iv) $84.3 million, partially financed with $30.2 million, during the second quarter of 2012. In addition, we acquired royalty interests by investing approximately $55.0 million during the first quarter of 2011. These amounts for working and royalty interests acquisitions included the purchase price of the asset, as well as costs related to the acquisitions. We expect that as we continue to grow our natural resources holdings, the related net revenue will steadily increase as production increases through the acquisition of additional oil and gas properties and drilling of existing undeveloped property. These revenues are included within the other segments (‘‘Other’’) for segment reporting purposes.

 

Corporate loans and securities interest income increased $4.9 million, from $92.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 to $97.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. As the majority of our corporate debt portfolio is floating rate indexed to three-month LIBOR, increases in these LIBOR rates will positively impact interest income. The $4.9 million increase in interest income was due to an increase of 0.70% in the weighted average coupon earned on our corporate debt portfolio, driven primarily by two factors: (i) an increase in interest rate spreads of 0.50% as a result of a higher yielding portfolio driven by LIBOR floors and attractive yield spreads seen in the current market as compared to 2011, as well as advantageous loan amendments which increased the rates of certain corporate loan positions; and (ii) an increase in average three-month LIBOR, which almost doubled from 0.25% to 0.46% over the comparative periods. As of June 30, 2012, approximately 42.4% of our floating rate corporate debt portfolio had LIBOR floors with a weighted average floor of 1.4%, compared to approximately 28.4% of our floating rate corporate debt portfolio with a weighted average floor of 1.5% as of June 30, 2011.

 

These positive drivers were offset by reductions in the corporate debt portfolio.  The weighted average par balances for our corporate loan portfolio was $6.5 billion and $7.0 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  This reduction of $454.6 million in the weighted average par balance of our corporate loan portfolio from the three months ended June 30, 2011 to June 30, 2012 was the result of fewer purchases subsequent to June 30, 2011 within certain of our CLOs that ended their reinvestment period. CLO 2007-A ended its reinvestment period during the fourth quarter of 2010 and both CLO 2005-1 and CLO 2005-2 ended their reinvestment periods during the second quarter of 2011. Refer to “Investment Portfolio Overview” above for further discussion on the principal proceeds from the assets held in each of these CLO transactions used to amortize the outstanding balance of the CLO senior notes outstanding.

 

Offsetting these increases in total investment income was a $4.1 million decrease in dividend income earned, from $4.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 to $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, primarily as the result of a non-recurring dividend received from one investment in the prior period. In addition, accretion income decreased $0.4 million from the three months ended June 30, 2011 to 2012 as a net result of (i) a $2.9 million decline in recurring accretion income due to a smaller par balance and the continued paydown of legacy assets, which were previously purchased at larger discounts, partially offset by (ii) a $2.5 million increase in accelerated discount accretion as a result of additional paydowns.

 

Total interest expense increased $9.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from the same period in 2011 primarily due to $7.6 million of interest expense on our senior notes for the three months ended June 30, 2012. Our 8.375% and 7.500% 30-year senior notes were issued in November 2011 and March 2012, respectively, and therefore we recorded no interest expense on senior notes for the three months ended June 30, 2011.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011

 

As presented in the table above, net investment income decreased $44.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 primarily due to higher interest expense and the provision for loan losses, partially offset by the increase in total investment income.

 

Total investment income, consisting primarily of interest income, other investment income and discount accretion from our investment portfolio, totaled $278.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and $271.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $7.3 million. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in other investment income primarily from revenue earned on our working and royalty interests in oil and gas properties of $13.3 million during the first half of 2012. Refer to the above three months comparison for additional discussion surrounding our natural resources acquisitions.

 

49



Table of Contents

 

Furthermore, the increase in total investment income was attributable to $9.9 million of additional corporate loans and securities interest income earned primarily from a higher yielding corporate debt portfolio. At June 30, 2012, the three-month LIBOR rate was 0.46%, with an average rate of 0.49% for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 0.25% at June 30, 2011, with an average rate of 0.29% for the six months ended June 30, 2011. In addition, the percentage of our floating rate corporate debt portfolio with LIBOR floors increased to 42.4% as of June 30, 2012 from 28.4% as of June 30, 2011. The incremental income earned from the increases in rates offset the impact of the decline in average balance of our corporate debt portfolio, primarily in the weighted average par balance of our corporate loan portfolio, which fell $207.6 million from $7.0 billion to $6.8 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2011 to June 30, 2012, respectively, largely as a result of the paydowns of assets held in CLOs, as described above.

 

Counterbalancing the increase in corporate loans and securities interest income was a decrease in net discount accretion of $9.9 million primarily due to additional paydowns during the six months ended June 30, 2011. These paydowns resulted in $5.2 million of higher accelerated discount accretion compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012.

 

Interest expense on our collateralized loan obligation secured debt increased as a result of the increase in LIBOR rates as described above combined with the fact that we closed CLO 2011-1 on March 31, 2011, partially offset by the amortization of outstanding senior notes for those CLOs that ended their reinvestment periods. As of June 30, 2011, we had $283.8 million of borrowings outstanding under CLO 2011-1. As CLO 2011-1 was subsequently upsized to $450.0 million on July 6, 2011, borrowings outstanding under the CLO 2011-1 agreement totaled $439.4 million as of September 30, 2011 and $381.3 million as of June 30, 2012.

 

The provision for loan losses totaled $46.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $11.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in provision for loan losses was largely as a result of an increase in the unallocated component of our allowance for loan losses based on a review of our unimpaired, held for investment loan portfolio, with particular sensitivity to the loans that we have designated as high risk within our internally assigned risk grades.

 

Other Income

 

The following table presents the components of other income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

 

Comparative Other Income Components

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

Net realized and unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives and foreign exchange:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity swaps

 

$

1,746

 

$

407

 

$

6,480

 

$

123

 

Credit default swaps

 

233

 

(446

)

2,284

 

(329

)

Total rate of return swaps

 

 

28

 

141

 

59

 

Common stock warrants

 

(233

)

296

 

503

 

1,014

 

Foreign exchange(1)

 

(5,376

)

1,050

 

(3,889

)

6,535

 

Options

 

 

(94

)

 

(94

)

Total realized and unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives and foreign exchange

 

(3,630

)

1,241

 

5,519

 

7,308

 

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on residential mortgage-backed securities, at estimated fair value

 

3,016

 

609

 

6,063

 

(129

)

Net realized and unrealized gain on investments(2)

 

19,059

 

58,470

 

83,369

 

98,484

 

Net realized and unrealized (loss) gain on securities sold, not yet purchased

 

(2

)

224

 

9

 

369

 

Impairment of securities available-for-sale and private equity at cost

 

(675

)

(153

)

(1,408

)

(1,128

)

Net loss on restructuring and extinguishment of debt

 

 

 

(445

)

 

Other income

 

1,701

 

2,187

 

5,293

 

4,110

 

Total other income

 

$

19,469

 

$

62,578

 

$

98,400

 

$

109,014

 

 


(1)                                   Includes foreign exchange contracts and foreign exchange remeasurement gain or loss.

 

(2)                                   Includes lower of cost or estimated fair value adjustment to corporate loans held for sale and unrealized gain (loss) on investments held at estimated fair value.

 

50



Table of Contents

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011

 

Total other income totaled $19.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to $62.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. This decrease of $43.1 million was driven primarily by lower net realized and unrealized gains on investments of $39.4 million. While both periods included significant realized gains from sales and paydowns of investments, the gains recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2011 exceeded those recorded during the same period in 2012. Specifically, during the second quarter of 2012, we had realizations totaling $20.8 million from the partial sale of one of our largest debt security holdings and $6.0 million from the paydown of a corporate loan investment. Comparatively, during the second quarter of 2011, we recognized a $28.8 million gain on a partial sale of one of our largest debt security holdings, $16.6 million gain on a partial sale of one of our largest corporate loan holdings and $10.9 million gain from the sale of one equity investment, at estimated fair value.

 

Additionally, the decline in net realized and unrealized gains on investments was impacted by a $2.5 million increase in the lower of cost or estimated fair value adjustment charge on our corporate loans held for sale portfolio, from a $13.9 million loss for the three months ended June 30, 2011 to a $16.5 million loss for the three months ended June 30, 2012, despite a much larger corporate loans held for sale portfolio at June 30, 2011 of $539.3 million compared to $183.9 million at June 30, 2012.

 

The decline in total other income was also attributable to a $6.4 million unfavorable variance in foreign exchange contracts and remeasurement, primarily in Euro-denominated investments.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011

 

Total other income totaled $98.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to $109.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. This decrease of $10.6 million from the six months ended June 30, 2011 to 2012 was primarily attributable to a $15.1 million decline in net realized and unrealized gain on investments, comprised primarily of a $39.4 million decrease in net realized and unrealized gain on equity investments, at estimated fair value, partially offset by a $17.1 million increase in net realized and unrealized gains on our corporate debt securities portfolio. Specifically, during the six months ended June 30, 2011, we recognized $45.4 million in gains, as described above, on partial sales from two of our largest corporate debt holdings. In comparison, during the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recognized a $20.8 million gain on a partial sale of another one of our largest debt security holdings and a $6.0 million gain from the paydown of a single corporate loan.

 

The comparative decrease in gains from sales and paydowns of investments was partially offset by a $6.3 million reduction in the lower of cost or estimated fair value charge on our corporate loans held for sale portfolio, from a loss of $12.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 to a loss of $6.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, as a result of less significant price declines in our corporate loans held for sale portfolio.

 

The decline in total other income was also attributable to a $1.8 million decrease in net realized and unrealized gains on derivatives and foreign exchange. This decline was largely attributable to: (i) a $10.4 million unfavorable variance in foreign exchange contracts and remeasurement, primarily in Euro-denominated investments, partially offset by (ii) a $6.4 million increase in net realized and unrealized gain on commodity swaps, primarily the result of declining oil and natural gas prices and (iii) a $2.6 million increase in net realized and unrealized gain on credit default swaps. As of June 30, 2012, we had purchased protection under credit default swaps with a notional amount of $86.7 million, as compared to zero as of June 30, 2011. We purchased protection to hedge economic exposure to declines in value of certain credit positions, the majority of which related to our foreign denominated special situations investments.

 

Partially offsetting the above contributors to the decline in other income was a $6.2 million increase in realized and unrealized gains on residential mortgage-backed securities, at estimated fair value from the six months ended June 30, 2011 to 2012. These gains were partially due to price appreciation on the securities from the six months ended June 30, 2011 to 2012.

 

51



Table of Contents

 

Non-Investment Expenses

 

The following table presents the components of non-investment expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

Comparative Non-Investment Expense Components

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

Related party management compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Base management fees

 

$

7,162

 

$

6,565

 

$

14,164

 

$

12,780

 

Incentive fees

 

4,058

 

16,146

 

13,728

 

28,159

 

Share-based compensation

 

416

 

307

 

799

 

1,941

 

CLO management fees

 

1,168

 

1,297

 

2,226

 

2,636

 

Related party management compensation

 

12,804

 

24,315

 

30,917

 

45,516

 

Professional services

 

1,308

 

1,691

 

3,204

 

3,123

 

Insurance

 

436

 

708

 

872

 

1,295

 

Directors’ expenses

 

249

 

396

 

967

 

931

 

Other general and administrative

 

18,841

 

9,263

 

30,491

 

16,312

 

Total non-investment expenses

 

$

33,638

 

$

36,373

 

$

66,451

 

$

67,177

 

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011

 

As presented in the table above, our non-investment expenses decreased $2.7 million from the three months ended June 30, 2011 to the same period in 2012. The significant components of non-investment expense are described below.

 

Related party management compensation consists of base management fees payable to our Manager pursuant to the Management Agreement, incentive fees, collateral management fees, and share-based compensation related to restricted common shares and common share options granted to our Manager.

 

The base management fee payable was calculated in accordance with the Management Agreement and is based on an annual rate of 1.75% times our “equity” as defined in the Management Agreement. Base management fees increased by $0.6 million from the three months ended June 30, 2011 to the three months ended June 30, 2012 primarily due to an increase in “equity” resulting from net income earned throughout 2011 and into 2012.

 

Our Manager is also entitled to a quarterly incentive fee provided that our quarterly “net income,” as defined in the Management Agreement, before the incentive fee exceeds a defined return hurdle. Incentive fees of $4.1 million were earned by the Manager during the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to $16.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011.

 

An affiliate of our Manager entered into separate management agreements with the respective investment vehicles CLO 2005-1, CLO 2005-2, CLO 2006-1, CLO 2007-1, CLO 2007-A and CLO 2011-1 and is entitled to receive fees for the services performed as collateral manager for all of these CLOs, except for CLO 2011-1. The collateral manager has the option to waive the fees it earns for providing management services for the CLOs and has done so in prior periods.

 

During the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the collateral manager waived the management fees for all CLOs, except for CLO 2005-1, and waived aggregate CLO management fees of $8.1 million and $8.4 million, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we recorded an expense for CLO management fees totaling $1.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively.

 

Professional services expenses consist of legal, accounting and other professional services. Directors’ expenses represent share-based compensation, as well as expenses and reimbursements due to the board of directors for their services.

 

Other general and administrative expenses increased $9.6 million from the three months ended June 30, 2011 to the same period in 2012, the majority of which was related to our working and royalty interests. As a result of our increased working and royalty interests acquisitions beginning from the fourth quarter of 2010, $9.0 million of additional expenses were incurred during the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011. Our working and royalty interests holdings increased from $142.5 million carrying value as of June 30, 2011 to $285.8 million carrying value as of June 30, 2012. Accordingly, the associated costs of managing and operating the oil and natural gas properties, including the production and taxes on royalty interests, increased $3.8 million. Similarly, the depreciation, depletion and amortization for these natural resources investments increased $2.5 million from the three months ended June 30, 2011 to 2012. Lastly, of the $9.0 million increase, $2.9 million was attributable to an impairment charge recorded in the second quarter of 2012 on our oil and natural gas properties acquired during the fourth quarter of 2010. We evaluate our proved oil and natural gas properties and related equipment and facilities for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such properties may not be recoverable. The amount of impairment loss, if any, is determined by comparing the fair value, as determined by a discounted cash flow analysis, with the carrying value of the related asset. Downward revisions in estimates of reserve quantities or expectations of

 

52



Table of Contents

 

falling commodity prices or rising operating costs could result in a reduction in undiscounted cash flows. All of these expenses, which relate to our working and royalty interests, are included within the Other segments for segment reporting purposes. We expect that as we continue to increase our holdings in natural resources assets, our total expenses will increase accordingly.

 

In addition, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, other general and administrative expenses included expenses incurred by our Manager on our behalf that were reimbursable to our Manager pursuant to the Management Agreement. For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred reimbursable general and administrative expenses to our Manager of $1.9 million and $1.6 million, respectively.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011

 

As presented in the table above, our non-investment expenses decreased $0.7 million from the six months ended June 30, 2011 to the same period in 2012. The significant components of non-investment expense are described below.

 

Base management fees increased by $1.4 million from the six months ended June 30, 2011 to the six months ended June 30, 2012 primarily due to an increase in “equity” resulting from net income earned throughout 2011 and into 2012. In addition, incentive fees of $13.7 million were earned by the Manager during the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to $28.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the collateral manager waived the management fees for all CLOs, except for CLO 2005-1, and waived aggregate CLO management fees of $16.4 million and $17.2 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we recorded an expense for CLO management fees totaling $2.2 million and $2.6 million, respectively.

 

Other general and administrative expenses increased $14.2 million from the six months ended June 30, 2011 to the same period in 2012. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase of $15.2 million of expenses related to the acquisition, management and operation of our working and overriding royalty interests, including impairment and recurring charges for depreciation, depletion and amortization for our natural resources investments, as described above. Specifically, the associated costs of managing and operating the oil and natural gas properties, including the production and taxes on royalty interests, increased $4.9 million, while the depreciation, depletion and amortization for these natural resources investments increased $6.1 million from the six months ended June 30, 2011 to 2012. In addition, of the $15.2 million increase, $3.0 million was attributable to an impairment charge recorded in the second quarter of 2012 on oil and natural gas properties acquired during the fourth quarter of 2010. These expenses, which relate to our working and royalty interests, are included within the Other segments for segment reporting purposes. We expect that as we continue to increase our holdings in natural resources assets, our total expenses will increase accordingly, especially as certain acquisition and transaction costs are nonrecurring and expensed upfront at the time of purchase.

 

In addition, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, other general and administrative expenses included expenses incurred by our Manager on our behalf that were reimbursable to our Manager pursuant to the Management Agreement. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred reimbursable general and administrative expenses to our Manager of $3.9 million and $3.3 million, respectively.

 

Income Tax Provision

 

We intend to continue to operate so as to qualify, for United States federal income tax purposes, as a partnership and not as an association or publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation. Therefore, we generally are not subject to United States federal income tax at the entity level, but are subject to limited state and foreign income taxes. Holders of our shares are required to take into account their allocable share of each item of our income, gain, loss, deduction and credit for our taxable year ending within or with their taxable year.

 

During 2012, we owned equity interests in entities that each elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (a “REIT”) under the Code. A REIT is not subject to United States federal income tax to the extent that it currently distributes its income and satisfies certain asset, income and ownership tests, and recordkeeping requirements, but it may be subject to some amount of federal, state, local and foreign taxes based on its taxable income.

 

We have wholly-owned domestic and foreign subsidiaries that are taxable as corporations for United States federal income tax purposes and thus are not consolidated by us for United States federal income tax purposes. For financial reporting purposes, current and deferred taxes are provided for on the portion of earnings recognized by us with respect to our interest in the domestic taxable corporate subsidiaries, because each is taxed as a regular corporation under the Code. Deferred income tax assets and

 

53



Table of Contents

 

liabilities are computed based on temporary differences between the GAAP condensed consolidated financial statements and the United States federal income tax basis of assets and liabilities as of each condensed consolidated balance sheet date. The foreign corporate subsidiaries were formed to make certain foreign and domestic investments from time to time. The foreign corporate subsidiaries are organized as exempted companies incorporated with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands, and are anticipated to be exempt from United States federal and state income tax at the corporate entity level because they restrict their activities in the United States to trading in stock and securities for their own account. They generally will not be subject to corporate income tax in our financial statements on their earnings, and no provisions for income taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 were recorded; however, we will be required to include their current taxable income in our calculation of our taxable income allocable to shareholders.

 

We recorded $0.2 million and $(3.9) million of federal and state tax expense (benefit) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. We recorded $7.4 million and $8.7 million of federal and state tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. The most significant component of our tax expense (benefit) relates to our domestic taxable corporate subsidiaries.

 

Segment Reporting

 

We operate our business through multiple reportable business segments, which we have determined to be credit (‘‘Credit’’) and Other segments. Our segments are differentiated primarily by our investment focuses. The Credit segment includes primarily below investment grade corporate debt. The Other segments include all other portfolio holdings, including oil and natural gas working interests and overriding royalty interests, and commercial real estate investments.

 

Prior to 2011, we operated under a single business segment of Credit. However, during 2011, we began purchasing additional working interests and overriding royalty interests in oil and natural gas properties. As of December 31, 2011, we determined that we met certain segment reporting requirements and accordingly, we began disclosing information by segment based on our acquisition of additional natural resources assets, combined with our belief that other areas of investment focus including natural resources, while currently not significant, may become a significant part of our business. The segments currently reported are consistent with the way decisions regarding the allocation of resources are made, as well as how we review our operating results.

 

We evaluate the performance of our segments based on several components including total investment income, net investment income, other income (loss) and net income (loss). Certain corporate assets and expenses that are not directly related to the individual segments, including base management fees and professional services are allocated to individual segments based on the carrying value of the assets within those segments. Certain other corporate assets and expenses, including prepaid insurance, incentive fees, insurance expenses, directors’ expenses and share-based compensation expense are not allocated to individual segments in our assessment of segment performance. Collectively, these items are included as reconciling items between reported segment amounts and consolidated totals.

 

The following table shows data of reportable segments reconciled to amounts reflected in the condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (amounts in thousands):

 

For the three months

 

Credit

 

Other

 

Reconciling Items

 

Total Consolidated

 

ended June 30,

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Total investment income

 

$

128,828

 

$

129,254

 

$

11,722

 

$

6,589

 

$

 

$

 

$

140,550

 

$

135,843

 

Net investment income

 

$

74,555

 

$

82,374

 

$

11,022

 

$

6,349

 

$

 

$

 

$

85,577

 

$

88,723

 

Other income

 

$

17,606

 

$

62,171

 

$

1,863

 

$

407

 

$

 

$

 

$

19,469

 

$

62,578

 

Net income

 

$

80,080

 

$

125,289

 

$

(3,718

)

$

(231

)

$

(5,157

)

$

(17,554

)

$

71,205

 

$

107,504

 

 

For the six months

 

Credit

 

Other

 

Reconciling Items

 

Total Consolidated

 

ended June 30,

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Total investment income

 

$

255,709

 

$

261,678

 

$

22,775

 

$

9,495

 

$

 

$

 

$

278,484

 

$

271,173

 

Net investment income

 

$

101,835

 

$

159,081

 

$

21,604

 

$

9,094

 

$

 

$

 

$

123,439

 

$

168,175

 

Other income

 

$

91,803

 

$

108,891

 

$

6,597

 

$

123

 

$

 

$

 

$

98,400

 

$

109,014

 

Net income

 

$

172,838

 

$

237,571

 

$

2,779

 

$

(373

)

$

(16,364

)

$

(35,927

)

$

159,253

 

$

201,271

 

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011

 

Consolidated net income decreased $36.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to a $43.1 million decline in consolidated total other income. The decline in consolidated total other income was primarily driven by the Credit segment, which had a $44.6 million reduction in other income due to comparatively larger realized gains from sales of assets in 2011. During the second quarter of 2011 alone, we recognized $45.4 million of realized gains from partial sales of two of our largest corporate debt holdings. The decline in other income was partially offset by a $4.7

 

54



Table of Contents

 

million increase in consolidated total investment income. The increase in consolidated total investment income was primarily driven by Other segments, which increased $5.1 million from the prior period as a result of revenue earned on our working and overriding royalty interests as of June 30, 2011, as well as incremental revenue earned on the interests acquired subsequently. As of June 30, 2012, the carrying value of our working and royalty interests totaled $285.8 million as compared to $142.5 million as of June 30, 2011.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011

 

Consolidated net income decreased $42.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to a (i) $44.7 million decline in consolidated net investment income and (ii) $10.6 million decline in consolidated other income, partially offset by (iii) a favorable $12.6 million net change in consolidated income tax, which is included in consolidated net income. The $44.7 million decline in consolidated net investment income was primarily driven by a $46.5 million provision for loan losses recorded within the Credit segment during the first half of 2012, partially offset by a $12.5 million increase in net investment income in Other segments. This $12.5 million increase in Other segments was due to revenue earned on our working and overriding royalty interests as of June 30, 2011, as well as incremental revenue earned on the interests acquired subsequently. We expect that as we continue to grow our natural resources holdings, the related net revenue will steadily increase as production increases through the acquisition of additional oil and gas assets and drilling of existing undeveloped property.

 

The $10.6 million decline in consolidated other income was attributable to a $17.1 million decline in other income under the Credit segment, partially offset by a $6.5 million increase in other income under Other segments. The $17.1 million reduction in the Credit segment was due to comparatively larger realized gains from sales of certain corporate debt holdings during the first half of 2011 compared to the same period in 2012. The $6.5 million increase in Other segments was due to realized and unrealized gains on commodity derivatives, such as our swap contracts to partially hedge our forecasted oil, natural gas and natural gas liquid sales.

 

Consolidated income tax benefit totaled $3.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to income tax expense of $8.7 million for the same period in 2011. The favorable $12.6 million variance was primarily due to the change in estimated fair value of a certain private equity investment held in a domestic taxable corporate subsidiary as of June 30, 2012 compared to June 30, 2011.

 

Investment Portfolio

 

Our investment portfolio primarily consists of corporate debt holdings, comprised of corporate loans and corporate debt securities. The details of our corporate debt portfolio are discussed below under “Corporate Debt Portfolio”. Also included in our investment portfolio are our other holdings, including oil and gas working and royalty interests, equity investments, and interests in joint ventures and partnerships, which are all discussed below under “Other Holdings”.

 

The following table summarizes the carrying value of our investment portfolio by strategy as of June 30, 2012 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

Bank Loans
& High Yield

 

Natural
Resources

 

Special
Situations

 

Mezzanine

 

Commercial
Real Estate

 

Private
Equity

 

Total

 

Corporate loans(1)

 

$

6,088,833

 

$

 

$

47,774

 

$

44,430

 

$

 

$

 

$

6,181,037

 

Securities(2)

 

624,166

 

 

98,343

 

3,333

 

 

 

725,842

 

Equity investments, at estimated fair value(3)

 

32,037

 

37,466

 

32,844

 

4,271

 

 

51,059

 

157,677

 

Other assets(4)

 

 

347,141

 

15,330

 

330

 

36,758

 

75

 

399,634

 

Total

 

$

6,745,036

 

$

384,607

 

$

194,291

 

$

52,364

 

$

36,758

 

$

51,134

 

$

7,464,190

 

 


(1)           Includes loans held for sale and loans at estimated fair value. Amounts presented are gross of allowance for loan losses totaling $235.8 million as of June 30, 2012.

 

(2)           Excludes our investments in residential mortgage-backed securities with an estimated fair value of $87.9 million and securities sold, not yet purchased with an estimated fair value of $9.4 million.

 

(3)           Includes certain marketable equity securities and private equity investments, including bank loans and high yield debt securities which were restructured from debt instruments to equity, for which we elected the fair value option of accounting.

 

(4)           Includes interests in joint ventures and partnerships.

 

The table above reconciles our assets as presented on our condensed consolidated balance sheets to our six core strategies, which differs from our reportable segments. For segment reporting purposes, the majority of our corporate debt portfolio and equity investments, at estimated fair value are included within our Credit segment. Our Other segments includes our oil and natural gas properties and commercial real estate investment (both of which are included in other assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheets) and excludes the private equity and interests in joint ventures and partnerships focused on the oil and gas sector (included in equity investments, at estimated fair value and other assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheets).

 

55



Table of Contents

 

Corporate Debt Portfolio

 

Our corporate debt investment portfolio primarily consists of investments in corporate loans and debt securities. Our corporate loans primarily consist of senior secured, second lien and subordinated loans. The corporate loans we invest in are generally below investment grade and are floating rate indexed to either one-month or three-month LIBOR. Our investments in corporate debt securities primarily consist of fixed rate investments in below investment grade corporate bonds that are senior secured, senior unsecured and subordinated. We evaluate and monitor the asset quality of our investment portfolio by performing detailed credit reviews and by monitoring key credit statistics and trends. The key credit statistics and trends we monitor to evaluate the quality of our investments include credit ratings of both our investments and the issuer, financial performance of the issuer including earnings trends, free cash flows of the issuer, debt service coverage ratios of the issuer, financial leverage of the issuer, and industry trends that have or may impact the issuer’s current or future financial performance and debt service ability.

 

We do not require specific collateral or security to support our corporate loans and debt securities; however, these loans and debt securities are either secured through a first or second lien on the assets of the issuer or are unsecured. We do not have access to any collateral of the issuer of the corporate loans and debt securities, rather the seniority in the capital structure of the loans and debt securities determines the seniority of our investment with respect to prioritization of claims in the event that the issuer defaults on the outstanding debt obligation.

 

Corporate Loans

 

Our corporate loan portfolio had an aggregate par value of $6.6 billion and $7.1 billion as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Our corporate loan portfolio consists of debt obligations of corporations, partnerships and other entities in the form of senior secured loans, second lien loans and subordinated loans.

 

The following table summarizes our corporate loans portfolio stratified by type as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Loans that are not deemed to be held for sale are carried at amortized cost, net of allowance for loan losses, on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Loans that are classified as held for sale are carried at the lower of net amortized cost or estimated fair value on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. We also have certain loans that we elected to carry at estimated fair value.

 

Corporate Loans

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

June 30, 2012(1)

 

December 31, 2011(1)

 

 

 

Par

 

Carrying
Value

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Par

 

Carrying
Value

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Senior secured

 

$

5,850,755

 

$

5,648,507

 

$

5,648,507

 

$

5,449,816

 

$

6,329,636

 

$

6,085,696

 

$

6,085,696

 

$

5,826,951

 

Second lien

 

501,808

 

468,945

 

468,945

 

399,738

 

474,903

 

434,705

 

434,705

 

351,484

 

Subordinated

 

204,703

 

118,052

 

118,052

 

149,383

 

251,124

 

165,228

 

165,228

 

183,975

 

Subtotal

 

6,557,266

 

6,235,504

 

6,235,504

 

5,998,937

 

7,055,663

 

6,685,629

 

6,685,629

 

6,362,410

 

Lower of cost or fair value adjustment

 

 

(55,914

)

 

 

 

(50,906

)

 

 

Allowance for loan losses

 

 

(235,807

)

 

 

 

(191,407

)

 

 

Unrealized gains

 

 

1,447

 

 

 

 

83

 

 

 

Total

 

$

6,557,266

 

$

5,945,230

 

$

6,235,504

 

$

5,998,937

 

$

7,055,663

 

$

6,443,399

 

$

6,685,629

 

$

6,362,410

 

 


(1)                                   Includes loans held for sale and loans carried at estimated fair value.

 

As of June 30, 2012, $6.5 billion par amount, or 99.7%, of our corporate loan portfolio was floating rate and $18.4 million par amount, or 0.3%, was fixed rate. In addition, as of June 30, 2012, $273.4 million par amount, or 4.2%, of our corporate loan portfolio was denominated in foreign currencies, of which 66.8% was denominated in Euros. As of December 31, 2011, $7.0 billion par amount, or 99.9%, of our corporate loan portfolio was floating rate and $9.4 million par amount, or 0.1%, was fixed rate. In addition, as of December 31, 2011, $278.5 million par amount, or 3.9%, of our corporate loan portfolio was denominated in foreign currencies, of which 76.7% was denominated in Euros.

 

All of our floating rate corporate loans have index reset frequencies of less than twelve months with the majority resetting at least quarterly. The weighted average coupon on our floating rate corporate loans was 5.1% as of June 30, 2012 and 4.6% as of December 31, 2011, and the weighted average coupon spread to LIBOR of our floating rate corporate loan portfolio was 4.3% as of June 30, 2012 and 3.9% as of December 31, 2011. The weighted average years to maturity of our floating rate corporate loans was 4.4 years and 4.1 years as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

 

56



Table of Contents

 

As of June 30, 2012, our fixed rate corporate loans had a weighted average coupon of 13.1% and a weighted average years to maturity of 1.7 years, as compared to 11.7% and 3.7 years, respectively, as of December 31, 2011.

 

Non-accrual Loans

 

We hold certain corporate loans designated as being non-accrual, impaired and/or in default. Non-accrual loans consist of both corporate loans held for investment and corporate loans held for sale. Loans are placed on non-accrual when there is uncertainty regarding whether future income amounts on the loan will be earned and collected. While on non-accrual status, interest income is recognized using the cost-recovery method, cash-basis method or some combination of the two methods. A loan is placed back on accrual status when the ultimate collectability of the principal and interest is not in doubt. When placed on non-accrual status, previously recognized accrued interest is reversed and charged against current income.

 

The following table summarizes our recorded investment in non-accrual loans as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

June 30, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

Non-accrual loans (recorded investment):

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired loans held for investment

 

$

67,516

 

$

68,692

 

Loans held for sale

 

97,779

 

99,999

 

Total non-accrual loans

 

$

165,295

 

$

168,691

 

 

The $3.4 million decrease in non-accrual loans from $168.7 million as of December 31, 2011 to $165.3 million as of June 30, 2012 was primarily due to foreign exchange remeasurement and paydowns. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we recognized $2.3 million and $6.7 million, respectively, of interest income from cash receipts for loans on non-accrual status.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we recognized $1.7 million and $5.7 million, respectively, of interest income from cash receipts for loans on non-accrual status.

 

Impaired Loans

 

Impaired loans consist of loans held for investment where we have determined that it is more likely than not that we will not recover our outstanding investment in the loan under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans may or may not be in default at the time a loan is designated as being impaired and all impaired loans are placed on non-accrual status. Impaired loans on a recorded investment basis decreased from $68.7 million as of December 31, 2011 to $67.5 million as of June 30, 2012 due to $1.2 million of foreign exchange remeasurement and paydowns.

 

Defaulted Loans

 

Defaulted loans consist of corporate loans that have defaulted under the contractual terms of their loan agreements.  The balance of defaulted loans may be comprised of loans held for investment and loans held for sale. Loans that are held for sale are carried at the lower of amortized cost or estimated market value and, accordingly, no allowance for loan losses is maintained for such loans. In contrast, loans that are specifically identified as being impaired have a specific allocated reserve that represents the excess of the loan’s amortized cost amount over its estimated fair value.  Since defaulted loans may primarily consist of loans classified as held for sale and impaired loans consist of only loans held for investment, fluctuations in the balances of defaulted loans will not necessarily correspond to fluctuations in impaired loans. As of June 30, 2012, we held corporate loans that were in default with a total amortized cost of $26.8 million from one issuer. These loans in default were included in the loans for which the allocated component of our allowance for loan losses was related to, or for which we determined were loans held for sale as of June 30, 2012. As of December 31, 2011, we had no corporate loans in default.

 

Troubled Debt Restructurings

 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, there were no loan modifications that qualified as troubled debt restructurings.

 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we modified $619.3 million and $1.1 billion, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we modified $661.0 million and $1.2 billion, respectively, amortized cost of corporate loans, respectively, that did not qualify as troubled debt restructurings. These modifications involved changes in existing rates and maturities to prevailing market rates/maturities for similar instruments and did not qualify as troubled debt restructurings as the respective borrowers were neither experiencing financial difficulty nor were seeking (nor granted) a concession as part of the modification. In addition, these modifications of non-troubled debt holdings were accomplished with modified loans that were not substantially different from the loans prior to modification.

 

57



Table of Contents

 

Allowance For Loan Losses

 

The following table summarizes the changes in our allowance for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

$

235,807

 

$

198,582

 

$

191,407

 

$

209,030

 

Provision for loan losses

 

 

 

46,498

 

11,661

 

Charge-offs

 

 

(9,708

)

(2,098

)

(31,817

)

Balance at end of year

 

$

235,807

 

$

188,874

 

$

235,807

 

$

188,874

 

 

As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had an allowance for loan loss of $235.8 million and $191.4 million, respectively. As described under “Critical Accounting Policies”, our allowance for loan losses represents our estimate of probable credit losses inherent in our corporate loan portfolio held for investment as of the balance sheet date. Estimating our allowance for loan losses involves a high degree of management judgment and is based upon a comprehensive review of our loan portfolio that is performed on a quarterly basis. Our allowance for loan losses consists of two components, an allocated component and an unallocated component. The allocated component of our allowance for loan losses pertains to specific loans that we have determined are impaired. We determine a loan is impaired when we estimate that it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. On a quarterly basis we perform a comprehensive review of our entire loan portfolio and identify certain loans that we have determined are impaired. Once a loan is identified as being impaired we place the loan on non-accrual status, unless the loan is already on non-accrual status, and record a reserve that reflects our best estimate of the loss that we expect to recognize from the loan. The expected loss is estimated as being the difference between our current cost basis of the loan, including accrued interest receivable, and the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, except as a practical expedient, the loan’s observable estimated fair value may be used.

 

The unallocated component of our allowance for loan losses represents our estimate of probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date where the specific loan that the loan loss relates to is indeterminable. We estimate the unallocated component of our allowance for loan losses through a comprehensive quarterly review of our loan portfolio and identify certain loans that demonstrate possible indicators of impairment, including internally assigned credit quality indicators. This assessment excludes all loans that are determined to be impaired and as a result, an allocated reserve has been recorded as described in the preceding paragraph. Such indicators include, but are not limited to, the current and/or forecasted financial performance and liquidity profile of the issuer, specific industry or economic conditions that may impact the issuer, and the observable trading price of the loan if available. All loans are first categorized based on their assigned risk grade and further stratified based on the seniority of the loan in the issuer’s capital structure. The seniority classifications assigned to loans are senior secured, second lien and subordinate. Senior secured consists of loans that are the most senior debt in an issuer’s capital structure and therefore have a lower estimated loss severity than other debt that is subordinate to the senior secured loan. Senior secured loans often have a first lien on some or all of the issuer’s assets. Second lien consists of loans that are secured by a second lien interest on some or all of the issuer’s assets; however, the loan is subordinate to the first lien debt in the issuer’s capital structure. Subordinate consists of loans that are generally unsecured and subordinate to other debt in the issuer’s capital structure.

 

There are three internally assigned risk grades that are applied to loans that have not been identified as being impaired: high, moderate and low. High risk means that there is evidence of possible loss due to the financial or operating performance and liquidity of the issuer, industry or economic concerns specific to the issuer, or other factors that indicate that the breach of a covenant contained in the related loan agreement is possible. Moderate risk means that while there is not observable evidence of loss, there are issuer and/or industry specific trends that indicate a loss may have occurred. Low risk means that while there is no identified evidence of loss, there is the risk of loss inherent in the loan that has not been identified. All loans held for investment, with the exception of loans that have been identified as impaired, are assigned a risk grade of high, moderate or low.

 

We apply a range of default and loss severity estimates in order to estimate a range of loss outcomes upon which to base our estimate of probable losses that results in the determination of the unallocated component of our allowance for loan losses.

 

As of June 30, 2012, the allocated component of our allowance for loan losses totaled $37.2 million and relates to investments in certain loans issued by five issuers with an aggregate par amount of $82.1 million and an aggregate recorded investment of $67.5 million. As of December 31, 2011, the allocated component of our allowance for loan losses totaled $33.8 million and relates to investments in certain loans issued by five issuers with an aggregate par amount of $83.5 million and an aggregate recorded investment of $68.7 million.

 

58



Table of Contents

 

The unallocated component of our allowance for loan losses totaled $198.6 million and $157.6 million as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. As discussed above, we estimate the unallocated reserve by first categorizing our corporate loans held for investment portfolio based on their assigned risk grade and then based on the seniority of the loan in the issuer’s capital structure. Of the three internally assigned risk grades, as of June 30, 2012, we had loans issued from eleven issuers with an aggregate par value of $1.2 billion and amortized cost amount of $1.1 billion that we classified as high risk. Approximately 85% of the amortized cost balance of loans classified as high risk consisted of the following holdings: i) $311.8 million amortized cost amount of loans issued by Modular Space Corporation; ii) $309.8 million amortized cost amount of loans issued by Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC; iii) $205.6 million amortized cost amount of loans issued by First Data Corporation; iv) $69.3 million amortized cost amount of loans issued by Realogy Corporation; and, v) $60.9 million amortized cost amount of loans issued by Caesars Entertainment Operating Company.

 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded charge-offs totaling zero and $2.1 million, respectively, comprised primarily of loans transferred to loans held for sale. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded charge-offs totaling $9.7 million and $31.8 million, respectively, comprised primarily of loans transferred to loans held for sale.

 

Loans Held For Sale and the Lower of Cost or Fair Value Adjustment

 

The following table summarizes the changes in our loans held for sale balance for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the three
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2012

 

For the six
months ended
June 30, 2011

 

Loans Held for Sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance

 

$

297,708

 

$

869,808

 

$

317,332

 

$

463,628

 

Transfers in

 

16,937

 

105,758

 

63,014

 

688,636

 

Transfers out

 

(58,375

)

(191,036

)

(65,879

)

(288,891

)

Sales, paydowns, restructurings and other

 

(55,871

)

(231,336

)

(124,469

)

(311,746

)

Lower of cost or estimated fair value adjustment(1) 

 

(16,465

)

(13,924

)

(6,064

)

(12,357

)

Net carrying value

 

$

183,934

 

$

539,270

 

$

183,934

 

$

539,270

 

 


(1)                                   Represents the recorded net adjustment to earnings for the respective period.

 

As of June 30, 2012, we had $183.9 million of loans held for sale, a decrease of $133.4 million from December 31, 2011 primarily due to the sale and paydown of certain loans, as well as the net transfer of loans from held for sale to held for investment as described below.

 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we transferred $16.9 million and $63.0 million, respectively, of loans from held for investment to held for sale. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we transferred $105.8 million and $688.6 million amortized cost amount, respectively, of loans from held for investment to held for sale. The transfers of certain loans to held for sale were due to our determination that credit quality of a loan in relation to its expected risk-adjusted return no longer met our investment objective and our determination to reduce or eliminate the exposure for certain loans as part of our portfolio risk management practices. Also, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we transferred $58.4 million and $65.9 million amortized cost amount, respectively, from loans held for sale back to loans held for investment at the lower of cost or estimated fair value. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we transferred $191.0 million and $288.9 million amortized cost amount, respectively, from loans held for sale back to loans held for investment. These transfers back to held for investment occurred as circumstances that led to the initial transfer to held for sale were no longer present. Such circumstances may include deteriorated market conditions often resulting in price depreciation or assets becoming illiquid, changes in restrictions on sales and certain loans amending their terms to extend the maturity, whereby we determined that selling the asset no longer met our investment objective and strategy.

 

We recorded a $16.5 million and $6.1 million net charge to earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, for the lower of cost or estimated fair value adjustment for certain loans held for sale, which had a carrying value of $183.9 million as of June 30, 2012. We recorded a $13.9 million and $12.4 million net charge to earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, for the lower of cost or estimated fair value adjustment for certain loans held for sale, which had a carrying value of $539.3 million as of June 30, 2011.

 

59



Table of Contents

 

Concentration Risk

 

Our corporate loan portfolio has certain credit risk concentrated in a limited number of issuers. As of June 30, 2012, approximately 47% of the total amortized cost basis of our corporate loan portfolio was concentrated in twenty issuers, with the three largest concentrations of corporate loans in loans issued by U.S. Foodservice, Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC, and Modular Space Corporation, which combined represented $994.1 million, or approximately 16% of the aggregated amortized cost basis of the our corporate loans. As of December 31, 2011, approximately 47% of the total amortized cost basis of our corporate loan portfolio was concentrated in twenty issuers, with the three largest concentrations of corporate loans in loans issued by U.S. Foodservice, Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC and Modular Space Corporation, which combined represented $992.5 million, or approximately 15% of the aggregated amortized cost basis of our corporate loans.

 

Corporate Debt Securities

 

Our corporate debt securities portfolio had an aggregate par value of $743.7 million and $869.7 million as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Our corporate debt securities portfolio consists of debt obligations of corporations, partnerships and other entities in the form of senior secured, senior unsecured and subordinated bonds. Our corporate debt securities are included in securities on our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

 

The following table summarizes our corporate debt securities portfolio stratified by type as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

Corporate Debt Securities

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

June 30, 2012(1)

 

December 31, 2011(1)

 

 

 

Par

 

Carrying
Value

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Par

 

Carrying
Value

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Senior secured

 

$

312,544

 

$

302,127

 

$

293,097

 

$

302,127

 

$

312,876

 

$

298,467

 

$

294,472

 

$

298,467

 

Senior unsecured

 

369,203

 

361,552

 

328,589

 

361,552

 

465,948

 

448,407

 

395,932

 

448,407

 

Subordinated

 

61,960

 

57,027

 

40,782

 

57,027

 

90,881

 

76,040

 

67,501

 

76,040

 

Total

 

$

743,707

 

$

720,706

 

$

662,468

 

$

720,706

 

$

869,705

 

$

822,914

 

$

757,905

 

$

822,914

 

 


(1)                                   In addition to certain corporate debt securities available-for-sale, these amounts include other corporate debt securities carried at estimated fair value, which have unrealized gains and losses recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

 

As of June 30, 2012, $594.0 million par amount, or 79.9%, of our corporate debt securities portfolio was fixed rate and $149.7 million par amount, or 20.1%, was floating rate. In addition, as of June 30, 2012, $47.9 million par amount, or 6.4%, of our corporate debt securities portfolio, was denominated in foreign currencies, of which 77.0% was denominated in Euros. As of December 31, 2011, $660.5 million, or 75.9%, of our corporate debt securities portfolio was fixed rate and $209.2 million, or 24.1%, was floating rate. In addition, as of December 31, 2011, $72.4 million par amount, or 8.3%, of our corporate debt securities portfolio, was denominated in foreign currencies, of which 67.5% was denominated in Euros.

 

As of June 30, 2012, our fixed rate corporate debt securities had a weighted average coupon of 9.5% and a weighted average years to maturity of 5.2 years, as compared to 9.6% and 6.0 years, respectively, as of December 31, 2011. All of our floating rate corporate debt securities have index reset frequencies of less than twelve months. The weighted average coupon on our floating rate corporate debt securities was 6.7% as of June 30, 2012 and 6.0% as of December 31, 2011, and the weighted average coupon spread to LIBOR of our floating rate corporate debt securities was 5.9% as of June 30, 2012 and 5.3% as of December 31, 2011. The weighted average years to maturity of our floating rate corporate debt securities was 2.5 years and 2.8 years as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded $0.1 million and $0.8 million, respectively, of impairment losses for corporate debt securities that we determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired. These securities were determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired either due to our determination that recovery in value was no longer likely or because we decided to sell the respective security in response to specific credit concerns regarding the issuer. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded no impairment losses for corporate debt securities that we determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired.

 

As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had no corporate debt securities in default.

 

60



Table of Contents

 

Concentration Risk

 

Our corporate debt securities portfolio has certain credit risk concentrated in a limited number of issuers. As of June 30, 2012, approximately 44% of the estimated fair value of our corporate debt securities portfolio was concentrated in ten issuers, with the two largest concentrations of debt securities in securities issued by SandRidge Energy, Inc. and First Data Corporation, which

combined represented $89.2 million, or approximately 12% of the estimated fair value of our corporate debt securities. As of December 31, 2011, approximately 46% of the estimated fair value of our corporate debt securities portfolio was concentrated in ten issuers, with the two largest concentrations of debt securities in securities issued by First Data Corporations and SandRidge Energy, Inc., which combined represented $138.3 million, or approximately 17% of the estimated fair value of our corporate debt securities.

 

Other Holdings

 

Our other holdings primarily consist of working and royalty interests, marketable and private equity investments, as well as interests in joint ventures and partnerships.

 

Natural Resources Holdings

 

Our natural resources holdings include working interests in producing oil and natural gas fields located in Texas, Mississippi and Louisiana. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the working interests had a carrying value of $236.2 million and $86.9 million, respectively. These interests are in both proved developed and proved undeveloped properties, with the majority of our exposure to natural gas, followed by natural gas liquids and then oil. The acquisition of these working interests was partially financed with $100.0 million of borrowings through a five-year $151.4 million non-recourse, asset-based credit facility maturing November 5, 2015.

 

In addition to natural resources working interests, we own overriding royalty interests in acreage located in south Texas. The overriding royalty interests include producing oil and natural gas properties, but most of the acreage is still under development. The overriding royalty interest properties are operated by unaffiliated third parties and as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, had a carrying value of $49.6 million and $51.7 million, respectively.

 

Our natural resources properties are located in the United States, primarily in Texas. Working interests reserves as of June 30, 2012 totaled 176,543 millions of cubic feet equivalent (“mmcfe”), of which approximately 67% was proved developed producing, 23% was proved undeveloped and 10% was proved developed non-producing. At June 30, 2012, our working and royalty interests had 1,376 and 140 gross producing wells, respectively. Working interests reserves as of December 31, 2011 totaled 73,095 mmcfe, of which approximately 59% was proved developed producing, 27% was proved undeveloped and 14% was proved developed non-producing. At December 31, 2011, our working and royalty interests had 259 and 94 gross producing wells, respectively. Working interest reserves represent estimates prepared based on estimates of underground accumulations of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil that cannot be measured in an exact manner.

 

Equity Holdings

 

As of June 30, 2012, our equity investments consisted of (i) marketable equity securities (included in securities on our condensed consolidated balance sheet) with an aggregate cost amount and estimated fair value of $5.1 million, (ii) private equity investments carried at cost (included in other assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheet) with an aggregate cost amount of $0.4 million and an estimated fair value of $0.5 million, and (iii) equity investments carried at estimated fair value, with an aggregate cost amount of $145.1 million and an estimated fair value of $157.7 million. Equity investments carried at estimated fair value primarily consist of private equity investments. In comparison, as of December 31, 2011, our equity investments consisted of (i) marketable equity securities (included in securities on our condensed consolidated balance sheet) with an aggregate cost amount of $12.8 million and estimated fair value of $13.2 million, (ii) private equity investments carried at cost (included in other assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheet) with both an aggregate cost amount and estimated fair value of $0.8 million, and (iii) equity investments, carried at estimated fair value, with an aggregate cost amount of $180.9 million and estimated fair value of $189.8 million.

 

Interests in Joint Ventures and Partnerships Holdings

 

As of June 30, 2012, our interests in joint ventures and partnerships had an aggregate cost amount of $99.4 million and estimated fair value of $98.1 million.

 

61



Table of Contents

 

Portfolio Purchases

 

We made investment portfolio purchases of $529.0 million and $1.1 billion during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to $884.9 million and $1.9 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, primarily comprised of the following purchases by strategy. All amounts presented are on a trade date cost basis.

 

Portfolio Purchases

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2012

 

Bank Loans &
High Yield

 

Natural
Resources

 

Special
Situations

 

Commercial
Real Estate

 

Mezzanine

 

Private
Equity

 

Total

 

Corporate loans

 

$

314,603

 

$

 

$

10,273

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

324,876

 

Securities

 

35,277

 

 

22,222

 

 

 

 

57,499

 

Equity investments, at estimated fair value

 

 

 

1,744

 

 

 

 

1,744

 

Other assets(1) 

 

 

107,285

 

832

 

36,758

 

 

 

144,875

 

Total

 

$

349,880

 

$

107,285

 

$

35,071

 

$

36,758

 

$

 

$

 

$

528,994

 

% of total

 

66.1

%

20.3

%

6.7

%

6.9

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

100.0

%

 


(1)           Includes other investments, at estimated fair value, interests in joint ventures and partnerships, as well as working and overriding royalty interests in oil and natural gas properties.

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2011

 

Bank Loans &
High Yield

 

Natural
Resources

 

Special
Situations

 

Commercial
Real Estate

 

Mezzanine

 

Private
Equity

 

Total

 

Corporate loans

 

$

733,760

 

$

 

$

557

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

734,317

 

Securities

 

85,895

 

 

3,963

 

 

 

 

89,858

 

Equity investments, at estimated fair value

 

 

 

3,586

 

 

 

2,668

 

6,254

 

Other assets(1) 

 

 

54,100

 

365

 

 

 

 

54,465

 

Total

 

$

819,655

 

$

54,100

 

$

8,471

 

$

 

$

 

$

2,668

 

$

884,894

 

% of total

 

92.6

%

6.1

%

1.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.3

%

100.0

%

 


(1)           Includes other investments, at estimated fair value, interests in joint ventures and partnerships, as well as working and overriding royalty interests in oil and natural gas properties.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2012

 

Bank Loans &
High Yield

 

Natural
Resources

 

Special
Situations

 

Commercial
Real Estate

 

Mezzanine

 

Private
Equity

 

Total

 

Corporate loans

 

$

769,329

 

$

 

$

25,081

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

794,410

 

Securities

 

37,821

 

 

33,988

 

 

 

 

71,809

 

Equity investments, at estimated fair value

 

1,882

 

 

1,972

 

 

 

5,000

 

8,854

 

Other assets(1) 

 

 

185,067

 

6,739

 

36,758

 

 

 

228,564

 

Total

 

$

809,032

 

$

185,067

 

$

67,780

 

$

36,758

 

$

 

$

5,000

 

$

1,103,637

 

% of total

 

73.3

%

16.8

%

6.1

%

3.3

%

0.0

%

0.5

%

100.0

%

 


(1)           Includes other investments, at estimated fair value, interests in joint ventures and partnerships, as well as working and overriding royalty interests in oil and natural gas properties.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2011

 

Bank Loans &
High Yield

 

Natural
Resources

 

Special
Situations

 

Commercial
Real Estate

 

Mezzanine

 

Private
Equity

 

Total

 

Corporate loans

 

$

1,569,351

 

$

 

$

26,528

 

$

 

$

9,847

 

$

 

$

1,605,726

 

Securities

 

129,166

 

 

10,605

 

 

 

 

139,771

 

Equity investments, at estimated fair value

 

 

 

7,678

 

 

631

 

15,416

 

23,725

 

Other assets(1) 

 

 

109,102

 

3,492

 

 

 

 

112,594

 

Total

 

$

1,698,517

 

$

109,102

 

$

48,303

 

$

 

$

10,478

 

$

15,416

 

$

1,881,816

 

% of total

 

90.3

%

5.8

%

2.5

%

0.0

%

0.6

%

0.8

%

100.0

%

 


(1)           Includes other investments, at estimated fair value, interests in joint ventures and partnerships, as well as working and overriding royalty interests in oil and natural gas properties.

 

62



Table of Contents

 

Shareholders’ Equity

 

Our shareholders’ equity at both June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 totaled $1.7 billion. Included in our shareholders’ equity as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is accumulated other comprehensive loss totaling $ 46.6 million and $35.6 million, respectively.

 

Our average shareholders’ equity and return on average shareholders’ equity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was $1.7 billion and 16.4% and $1.7 billion and 18.4%, respectively. Our average shareholders’ equity and return on average shareholders’ equity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was $1.8 billion and 24.4% and $1.7 billion and 23.4%, respectively. Return on average shareholders’ equity is defined as net income divided by weighted average shareholders’ equity.

 

Our book value per share as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was $ 9.79 and $9.41, respectively, and was computed based on 178,393,521 and 178,145,482 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

 

On February 2, 2012, our board of directors declared a cash distribution for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 of $0.18 per share to common shareholders of record on February 16, 2012. The distribution was paid on March 1, 2012. In addition, on February 2, 2012, our board of directors declared a special cash distribution for the year ended December 31, 2011 of $0.08 per share to common shareholders of record on March 15, 2012. The distribution was paid on March 29, 2012.

 

On April 24, 2012, our board of directors declared a cash distribution for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 of $0.18 per share to shareholders of record on May 8, 2012. The distribution was paid on May 22, 2012.

 

On July 26, 2012, our board of directors declared a cash distribution for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 of $0.21 per share to shareholders of record on August 9, 2012. The distribution is payable on August 23, 2012.

 

On March 1, 2012, we repurchased and cancelled 10,264 of our common shares in connection with the satisfaction of tax withholding obligations related to common shares previously awarded to certain of our officers and vesting on that date.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

We actively manage our liquidity position with the objective of preserving our ability to fund our operations and fulfill our commitments on a timely and cost-effective basis. Although we believe our current sources of liquidity are adequate to preserve our ability to fund our operations and fulfill our commitments, we will continue to evaluate opportunities to issue incremental capital. This may include taking advantage of market opportunities to issue equity or refinance or replace indebtedness, including the issuance of new debt securities and retiring debt pursuant to privately negotiated transactions, open market purchases or otherwise.

 

As of June 30, 2012, we had a $112.0 million principal amount outstanding on our 7.0% convertible senior notes (the “7.0% Notes”), which we repaid in full on July 13, 2012. As of June 30, 2012, we had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents totaling $473.8 million, of which we subsequently used $112.0 million to redeem the principal amount outstanding of our 7.0% Notes.

 

The majority of our investments are held in Cash Flow CLOs. Accordingly, the majority of our cash flows have historically been received from our investments in the mezzanine and subordinated notes of our Cash Flow CLOs. However, during the period in which a Cash Flow CLO is not in compliance with an over-collateralization (“OC Test”) as outlined in its respective indenture, the cash flows we would generally expect to receive from our Cash Flow CLO holdings are paid to the senior note holders of the Cash Flow CLOs. As of June 30, 2012, all our Cash Flow CLOs were in compliance with certain compliance tests (specifically, their respective OC Tests) and made cash distributions to mezzanine and/or subordinate note holders, including us.

 

On March 31, 2011, we closed CLO 2011-1, a $400.0 million secured financing transaction secured by the assets held in CLO 2011-1. At closing, we entered into a senior loan agreement (the “CLO 2011-1 Agreement”) through which CLO 2011-1 was able to borrow up to $300.0 million through a non-recourse loan secured by the assets held in CLO 2011-1. On July 6, 2011, we amended the CLO 2011-1 Agreement to upsize the transaction to $600.0 million, whereby CLO 2011-1 was able to borrow up to an additional $150.0 million, or total of $450.0 million. Under the amended CLO 2011-1 Agreement, the CLO 2011-1 senior loan matures on August 15, 2018 and borrowings under the CLO 2011-1 Agreement bear interest at a rate of the three-month LIBOR plus 1.35%. In addition, concurrent with the amendment to increase the size of CLO 2011-1, the transaction was amended to reduce the par value ratio test (“PVR Test”) from 133.33% to 120.0%. Under CLO 2011-1, if the PVR Test is below 120.0%, up to 50% of all interest collections that otherwise are payable to us are used to amortize the senior loan amount outstanding by the lower of the amount required to bring the PVR Test into compliance and the outstanding loan amount. Similarly, if the PVR Test is below 120.0%, the principal collections that otherwise would be payable to us are used to amortize the senior loan amount outstanding by the lower of the amount required to bring the PVR Test into compliance and the outstanding loan amount. Once the total portfolio held by CLO 2011-1 is reduced below 35% of the total committed transaction size, all principal proceeds received by CLO 2011-1 are used to amortize the senior loan. As of June 30, 2012, we had $381.3 million of borrowings outstanding under the CLO 2011-1 Agreement.

 

63



Table of Contents

 

Sources of Funds

 

Senior Notes Offerings

 

On March 20, 2012, we issued $115.0 million par amount of 7.500% senior notes (“7.500% Senior Notes”) due March 20, 2042, resulting in net proceeds of $111.4 million. Interest on the 7.500% Senior Notes is payable quarterly in arrears on June 20, September 20, December 20 and March 20 of each year.

 

On November 15, 2011, we issued $258.8 million par amount of 8.375% senior notes (“8.375% Senior Notes”) due November 15, 2041, resulting in net proceeds of $250.7 million. Interest on the 8.375% Senior Notes is paid quarterly in arrears on February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15 of each year.

 

Cash Flow CLO Transactions

 

As of June 30, 2012, we had six Cash Flow CLO transactions outstanding. An affiliate of our Manager owns an interest in the junior secured notes of both CLO 2007-1 and CLO 2007-A. The aggregate carrying amount of the junior secured notes in CLO 2007-1 and CLO 2007-A held by the affiliate of our Manager was $322.3 million as of June 30, 2012 and is reflected as collateralized loan obligation junior secured notes to affiliates on our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

 

In accordance with GAAP, we consolidate each of our CLO subsidiaries as we have the power to direct the activities of these VIEs, as well as the obligation to absorb losses of the VIEs and the right to receive benefits of the VIEs that could potentially be significant to the VIEs. We utilize CLOs to fund our investments in corporate loans and corporate debt securities.

 

The indentures governing our Cash Flow CLOs include numerous compliance tests, the majority of which relate to the CLO’s portfolio.

 

For CLO 2011-1, which we closed on March 31, 2011, we receive all remaining interest collections on a quarterly basis after administrative expenses and interest expense on the senior loan are paid, unless the PVR Test is below 120.0%, in which case up to 50% of all interest collections that otherwise would be payable to us are used to amortize the senior loan amount outstanding by the lower of the amount required to bring the PVR Test into compliance and the outstanding loan amount. Similarly, 25% of all principal collections received by CLO 2011-1 are distributed to us unless the PVR Test is below 120.0%, in which case the principal collections that otherwise would be payable to us are used to amortize the senior loan amount outstanding by the lower of the amount required to bring the PVR Test into compliance and the outstanding loan amount. Once the total portfolio held by CLO 2011-1 is reduced below 35% of the total committed transaction size, all principal proceeds received by CLO 2011-1 are used to amortize the senior loan. For purposes of the calculation, collateral value is the par value of the assets unless an asset is in default or is a CCC-rated asset in excess of the CCC-rated asset limit percentage specified for CLO 2011-1, in which case the collateral value of such asset is the market value of such asset.

 

The following table summarizes the PVR Test for CLO 2011-1. This information is based on the June 2012 monthly report which is prepared by the independent third party trustee for CLO 2011-1:

 

(dollar amounts in thousands)

 

CLO 2011-1

 

Portfolio total

 

$

495,352

 

Par value test minimum

 

120.0

%

Par value test ratio

 

133.3

%

Cushion / (Excess)

 

$

50,840

 

Par value portfolio collateral value

 

$

508,404

 

Outstanding loan balance

 

$

381,303

 

 

In the case of our other Cash Flow CLOs, which vary from CLO 2011-1’s compliance tests, in the event that a portfolio profile test is not met, the indenture places restrictions on the ability of the CLO’s manager to reinvest available principal proceeds generated by the collateral in the CLOs until the specific test has been cured. In addition to the portfolio profile tests, the indentures for these CLOs include OC Tests which set the ratio of the collateral value of the assets in the CLO to the tranches of debt for which the test is being measured, as well as interest coverage tests. For purposes of the calculation, collateral value is the par value of the assets unless an asset is in default, is a discounted obligation, or is a CCC-rated asset in excess of the percentage of CCC-rated asset limit specified for each CLO.

 

If an asset is in default, the indenture for each CLO transaction defines the value used to determine the collateral value, which is the lower of market value of the asset or the recovery value proscribed for the asset based on its type and rating by Standard & Poor’s or Moody’s.

 

A discount obligation is an asset with a purchase price of less than a particular percentage of par. The discount obligation amounts are specified in each CLO and are generally set at a purchase price of less than 80% of par for corporate loans and 75% of par for corporate debt securities.

 

64



Table of Contents

 

The indenture for each CLO specifies a CCC-threshold for the percentage of total assets in the CLO that can be rated CCC. All assets in excess of the CCC threshold specified for the respective CLO are also included in the OC Tests at market value and not par.

 

Defaults of assets in CLOs, ratings downgrade of assets in CLOs to CCC, price declines of CCC assets in excess of the proscribed CCC threshold amount, and price declines in assets classified as discount obligations may reduce the over-collateralization ratio such that a CLO is not in compliance. If a CLO is not in compliance with an OC Test, cash flows normally payable to the holders of junior classes of notes will be used by the CLO to amortize the most senior class of notes until such point as the OC Test is brought back into compliance. While being out of compliance with an OC Test would not impact our investment portfolio or results of operations, it would impact our unrestricted cash flows available for operations, new investments and cash distributions. As of June 30, 2012, all of our CLOs were in compliance with their respective OC Tests. The following table summarizes several of the key tests and metrics for each of our CLOs. This information is based on the June 2012 monthly reports, which are prepared by the independent third party trustee for each CLO:

 

·                   Investments: The par value of the investments in each CLO plus principal cash in the CLO.

 

·                   Senior interest coverage (“IC”) ratio minimum: Minimum required ratio of interest income earned on investments to interest expense on the senior debt issued by the CLO per the respective CLO’s indenture.

 

·                   Actual senior IC ratio: The ratio is interest income earned on the investments divided by interest expense on the senior debt issued by the CLO.

 

·                   CCC amount: The par amount of assets rated CCC or below (excluding defaults, if any).

 

·                   CCC threshold percentage: Maximum amount of assets in portfolio that are rated CCC without being subject to being valued at fair value for purposes of the OC Tests.

 

·                   Senior OC Test minimum: Minimum senior over-collateralization requirement per the respective CLO’s indenture.

 

·                   Actual senior OC Test: Actual senior over-collateralization amount as of the June 2012 report date.

 

·                   Actual cushion / (excess): Dollar amount that over-collateralization test is being passed, cushion, or failed (excess).

 

·                   Subordinated OC Test minimum: Minimum subordinated over-collateralization requirement per the respective CLO’s indenture.

 

·                   Actual subordinated OC Test: Actual subordinated over-collateralization amount as of the June 2012 report date.

 

·                   Subordinate cushion / (excess): Dollar amount that the OC Test is being passed, cushion, or failed (excess).

 

(dollar amounts in thousands)

 

CLO 2005-1

 

CLO 2005-2

 

CLO 2006-1

 

CLO 2007-1

 

CLO 2007-A

 

Investments

 

$

731,557

 

$

749,818

 

$

1,041,623

 

$

3,349,025

 

$

1,014,135

 

Senior IC ratio minimum

 

115.0

%

125.0

%

115.0

%

115.0

%

120.0

%

Actual senior IC ratio

 

584.7

%

888.0

%

569.5

%

778.5

%

601.8

%

CCC amount

 

$

83,304

 

$

102,870

 

$

193,176

 

$

537,961

 

$

165,575

 

CCC percentage of portfolio

 

11.4

%

13.7

%

18.5

%

16.1

%

16.3

%

CCC threshold percentage

 

5.0

%

7.5

%

7.5

%

7.5

%

7.5

%

Senior OC Test minimum

 

119.4

%

123.0

%

143.1

%

159.1

%

119.7

%

Actual senior OC Test

 

150.4

%

145.9

%

160.6

%

180.9

%

156.5

%

Cushion / (Excess)

 

$

143,039

 

$

114,276

 

$

106,765

 

$

387,709

 

$

223,580

 

Subordinated OC Test minimum

 

106.2

%

106.9

%

114.0

%

120.1

%

109.9

%

Actual subordinated OC Test

 

117.1

%

122.8

%

137.1

%

126.0

%

122.0

%

Cushion / (Excess)

 

$

64,789

 

$

93,992

 

$

164,786

 

$

150,993

 

$

94,029

 

 

During the three and six months quarter ended June 30, 2012, we issued $17.5 million par amount and $59.5 million par amount, respectively, of CLO 2007-1 class D notes for proceeds of $13.2 million and $45.1 million, respectively. In addition, during the three months ended June 30, 2012, we issued $11.3 million par amount of CLO 2007-A class C notes for proceeds of $10.6 million.

 

65



Table of Contents

 

Credit Facilities

 

Senior Secured Credit Facility

 

We have available a $250.0 million asset-based revolving credit facility (the “2014 Facility”), maturing on May 3, 2014, that is subject to, among other things, the terms of a borrowing base derived from the value of eligible specified financial assets. The 2014 Facility bears interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.25% per annum and contains negative covenants that restrict our ability, among other things, to pay distributions or make certain other restricted payments, including a restriction from making distributions to holders of common shares in excess of 65% of our estimated annual taxable income calculated in accordance with the 2014 Facility credit agreement. In addition, no distributions shall be paid if a deficiency in the required collateral per the agreement exists or would exist as a result of such distributions. We may obtain additional commitments under the 2014 Facility so long as the aggregate amount of commitments at any time does not exceed $600.0 million.

 

As of June 30, 2012, we had no borrowings outstanding under the 2014 Facility.

 

Asset-Based Borrowing Facility

 

On June 15, 2012, we entered into an amendment to our credit agreement to further increase our five-year non-recourse, asset-based revolving credit facility (the “2015 Natural Resources Facility”), maturing on November 5, 2015, from $137.2 million to $151.4 million, that is subject to, among other things, the terms of a borrowing base derived from the value of eligible specified oil and gas assets. The borrowing base is subject to certain caps and concentration limits customary for financings of this type. We have the right to prepay loans under the 2015 Natural Resources Facility in whole or in part at any time. Loans under the 2015 Natural Resources Facility bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus a tiered applicable margin ranging from 1.75% to 2.75% per annum. The 2015 Natural Resources Facility contains customary covenants applicable to us.

 

As of June 30, 2012, we had $100.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the 2015 Natural Resources Facility. In addition, under the 2015 Natural Resources Facility, we had a letter of credit outstanding totaling $1.0 million.

 

As of June 30, 2012, we believe we were in compliance with the covenant requirements for both credit facilities above.

 

Convertible Debt

 

In 2010, we issued $172.5 million of 7.5% convertible senior notes due January 15, 2017 (the “7.5% Notes”). The 7.5% Notes will mature on January 15, 2017 unless previously redeemed, repurchased or converted in accordance with their terms prior to such date. Holders of the 7.5% Notes may convert their notes at the applicable conversion rate at any time prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the stated maturity date subject to our right to terminate the conversion rights of the notes. We may satisfy our obligation with respect to the 7.5% Notes tendered for conversion by delivering to the holder either cash, common shares, no par value, issued by us or a combination thereof.

 

During the first quarter of 2012, we repurchased $23.1 million par amount of our 7.0% Notes. These transactions resulted in us recording a loss of $0.4 million and a $0.2 million write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs. During 2011, we repurchased $45.5 million par amount of our 7.0% Notes, which resulted in us recording a loss of $1.7 million and a write-off of $0.1 million of unamortized debt issuance costs.  On July 13, 2012, we repaid in full our $112.0 million of outstanding 7.0% Notes, which matured on July 15, 2012.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Commitments

 

As of June 30, 2012, we had committed to purchase corporate loans with aggregate commitments totaling $127.3 million. In addition, we participate in certain financing arrangements, whereby we are committed to provide funding of up to a specific predetermined amount at the discretion of the borrower or have entered into an agreement to acquire interests in certain assets. As of June 30, 2012, we had unfunded financing commitments totaling $7.1 million for corporate loans and approximately $106.8 million for other assets, including equity investments, at estimated fair value and interests in joint ventures and partnerships.

 

Partnership Tax Matters

 

Non-Cash “Phantom” Taxable Income

 

We intend to continue to operate so that we qualify, for United States federal income tax purposes, as a partnership and not as an association or a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation. Holders of our shares are subject to United States federal income taxation and generally other taxes, such as state, local and foreign income taxes, on their allocable share of our taxable

 

66



Table of Contents

 

income, regardless of whether or when they receive cash distributions. In addition, certain of our investments, including investments in foreign corporate subsidiaries, CLO issuers (which are treated as partnerships or disregarded entities for United States federal income tax purposes) and debt securities, may produce taxable income without corresponding distributions of cash to us or may produce taxable income prior to or following the receipt of cash relating to such income. In addition, we have recognized and may recognize in the future cancellation of indebtedness income upon the retirement of our debt at a discount. Consequently, in some taxable years, holders of our shares may recognize taxable income in excess of our cash distributions. Furthermore, even if we did not pay cash distributions with respect to a taxable year, holders of our shares may still have a tax liability attributable to their allocation of taxable income from us during such year.

 

Qualifying Income Exception

 

We intend to continue to operate so as to qualify, for United States federal income tax purposes, as a partnership and not as an association or a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation. In general, if a partnership is “publicly traded” (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”)), it will be treated as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes. A publicly traded partnership will be taxed as a partnership, however, and not as a corporation, for United States federal income tax purposes so long as it is not required to register under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act”) and at least 90% of its gross income for each taxable year constitutes “qualifying income” within the meaning of Section 7704(d) of the Code. We refer to this exception as the “qualifying income exception.” Qualifying income generally includes rents, dividends, interest (to the extent such interest is neither derived from the “conduct of a financial or insurance business” nor based, directly or indirectly, upon “income or profits” of any person), income and gains derived from certain activities related to minerals and natural resources, and capital gains from the sale or other disposition of stocks, bonds and real property. Qualifying income also includes other income derived from the business of investing in, among other things, stocks and securities.

 

If we fail to satisfy the “qualifying income exception” described above, items of income, gain, loss, deduction and credit would not pass through to holders of our shares and such holders would be treated for United States federal (and certain state and local) income tax purposes as shareholders in a corporation. In such case, we would be required to pay income tax at regular corporate rates on all of our income. In addition, we would likely be liable for state and local income and/or franchise taxes on all of our income. Distributions to holders of our shares would constitute ordinary dividend income taxable to such holders to the extent of our earnings and profits, and these distributions would not be deductible by us. If we were taxable as a corporation, it could result in a material reduction in cash flow and after-tax return for holders of our shares and thus could result in a substantial reduction in the value of our shares and any other securities we may issue.

 

Tax Consequences of Investments in Natural Resources

 

As referenced above, we have made and may make certain investments in natural resources. It is likely that the income from such investments will be treated as effectively connected with the conduct of a United States trade or business with respect to holders of our shares that are not “United States persons” within the meaning of Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code. Furthermore, any notional principal contracts that we enter into, if any, in connection with investments in natural resources likely would generate income that would be treated as effectively connected income with the conduct of a United States trade or business. To the extent our income is treated as effectively connected income, a holder who is a non-United States person generally would be required to (i) file a United States federal income tax return for such year reporting its allocable share, if any, of our income or loss effectively connected with such trade or business and (ii) pay United States federal income tax at regular United States tax rates on any such income. Moreover, if such a holder is a corporation, it might be subject to a United States branch profits tax on its allocable share of our effectively connected income. In addition, distributions to such a holder would be subject to withholding at the highest applicable tax rate to the extent of the holder’s allocable share of our effectively connected income. Any amount so withheld would be creditable against such holder’s United States federal income tax liability, and such holder could claim a refund to the extent that the amount withheld exceeded such holder’s United States federal income tax liability for the taxable year. Finally, if we are engaged in a United States trade or business, a portion of any gain recognized by an investor who is a non-United States person on the sale or exchange of its shares may be treated for United States federal income tax purposes as effectively connected income, and hence such holder may be subject to United States federal income tax on the sale or exchange.

 

In addition, for all of our holders, investments in natural resources would likely constitute doing business in the jurisdictions in which such assets are located. As a result, holders of our shares will likely be required to file foreign, state and local income tax returns and pay foreign, state and local income taxes in some or all of these various jurisdictions. Further, holders may be subject to penalties if they fail to comply with those requirements.

 

67



Table of Contents

 

Our Investment Company Act Status

 

Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act defines an investment company as any issuer that is, holds itself out as being, or proposes to be, primarily engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities and Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment Company Act defines an investment company as any issuer that is engaged or proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and owns or proposes to acquire “investment securities” (within the meaning of the Investment Company Act) having a value exceeding 40% of the value of the issuer’s total assets (exclusive of United States government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis (the “40% test”). Excluded from the term “investment securities” are, among others, securities issued by majority-owned subsidiaries unless the subsidiary is an investment company or relies on the exceptions from the definition of an investment company provided by Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act (a “fund”).

 

We are organized as a holding company. We conduct our operations primarily through our majority-owned subsidiaries. Each of our subsidiaries is either outside of the definition of an investment company in Sections 3(a)(1)(A) and 3(a)(1)(C), described above, or excepted from the definition of an investment company under the Investment Company Act. We believe that we are not, and that we do not propose to be, primarily engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities and we do not believe that we have held ourselves out as such. We intend to continue to conduct our operations so that we are not required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.

 

We monitor our holdings regularly to confirm our continued compliance with the 40% test. In calculating our position under the 40% test, we are responsible for determining whether any of our subsidiaries is majority-owned. We treat as majority-owned subsidiaries for purposes of the 40% test entities, including those that issue CLOs, in which we own at least 50% of the outstanding voting securities or that are otherwise structured consistent with applicable SEC staff guidance. Some of our subsidiaries may rely solely on the exceptions from the definition of “investment company” found in Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act. In order for us to satisfy the 40% test, our ownership interests in those subsidiaries or any of our subsidiaries that are not majority-owned for purposes of the Investment Company Act, together with any other “investment securities” that we may own, may not have a combined value in excess of 40% of the value of our total assets on an unconsolidated basis and exclusive of United States government securities and cash items. However, many of our majority-owned subsidiaries either fall outside of the general definitions of an investment company or rely on exceptions provided by provisions of, and rules and regulations promulgated under, the Investment Company Act (other than Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act) and, therefore, the securities of those subsidiaries that we own and hold are not investment securities for purposes of the Investment Company Act. In order to conform to these exceptions, these subsidiaries are limited with respect to the assets in which each of them can invest and/or the types of securities each of them may issue. We must, therefore, monitor each subsidiary’s compliance with its applicable exception and our freedom of action relating to such a subsidiary, and that of the subsidiary itself, may be limited as a result. For example, our subsidiaries that issue CLOs generally rely on the exception provided by Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act, while our subsidiaries that are taxed as REITs for United States federal income tax purposes, generally rely on the exception provided by Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act. Each of these exceptions requires, among other things that the subsidiary (i) not issue redeemable securities and (ii) engage in the business of holding certain types of assets, consistent with the terms of the exception. Similarly, any subsidiaries engaged in the ownership of oil and gas assets may, depending on the nature of the assets, be outside the definition of an investment company or rely on exceptions provided by Section 3(c)(5)(C) or Section 3(c)(9) of the Investment Company Act. While Section 3(c)(9) of the Investment Company Act does not limit the nature of the securities issued, it does impose business engagement requirements that limit the types of assets that may be held.

 

We do not treat our interests in majority-owned subsidiaries that are outside of the general definition of an investment company or that rely on Section 3(c)(5)(C) or Section 3(c)(9) of, or Rule 3a-7 under, the Investment Company Act as investment securities when calculating our 40% test.

 

We sometimes refer to our subsidiaries that rely on Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act as “CLO subsidiaries.” Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act is available to certain structured financing vehicles that are engaged in the business of holding financial assets that, by their terms, convert into cash within a finite time period and that issue fixed income securities entitling holders to receive payments that depend primarily on the cash flows from these assets, provided that, among other things, the structured finance vehicle does not engage in certain portfolio management practices resembling those employed by management investment companies (e.g., mutual funds). Accordingly, each of these CLO subsidiaries is subject to an indenture (or similar transaction documents) that contains specific guidelines and restrictions limiting the discretion of the CLO subsidiary and its collateral manager. In particular, these guidelines and restrictions prohibit the CLO subsidiary from acquiring and disposing of assets primarily for the purpose of recognizing gains or decreasing losses resulting from market value changes. Thus, a CLO subsidiary cannot acquire or dispose of assets primarily to enhance returns to the owner of the equity in the CLO subsidiary; however, subject to this limitation, sales and purchases of assets may be made so long as doing so does not violate guidelines contained in the CLO subsidiary’s relevant transaction documents. A CLO subsidiary generally can, for example, sell an asset if the collateral manager believes that its credit quality has declined since its acquisition or that the credit profile of the obligor will deteriorate and the proceeds of permitted

 

68



Table of Contents

 

dispositions may be reinvested in additional collateral, subject to fulfilling the requirements set forth in Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act and the CLO subsidiary’s relevant transaction documents. As a result of these restrictions, our CLO subsidiaries may suffer losses on their assets and we may suffer losses on our investments in those CLO subsidiaries.

 

We sometimes refer to our subsidiaries that rely on Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act, as our “REIT subsidiaries.” Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act is available to companies that are primarily engaged in the business of purchasing or otherwise acquiring mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate. While the SEC has not promulgated rules to address precisely what is required for a company to be considered to be “primarily engaged in the business of purchasing or otherwise acquiring mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate,” the SEC’s Division of Investment Management, or the “Division,” has taken the position, through a series of no-action and interpretive letters, that a company may rely on Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act if, among other things, at least 55% of the company’s assets consist of mortgage loans, other assets that are considered the functional equivalent of mortgage loans and certain other interests in real property (collectively, “qualifying real estate assets”), and at least 25% of the company’s assets consist of real estate-related assets (reduced by the excess of the company’s qualifying real estate assets over the required 55%), leaving no more than 20% of the company’s assets to be invested in miscellaneous assets. The Division has also provided guidance as to the types of assets that can be considered qualifying real estate assets. Because the Division’s interpretive letters are not binding except as they relate to the companies to whom they are addressed, if the Division were to change its position as to, among other things, what assets might constitute qualifying real estate assets our REIT subsidiaries might be required to change its investment strategy to comply with the changed position. We cannot predict whether such a change would be adverse.

 

Based on current guidance, our REIT subsidiaries classify investments in mortgage loans as qualifying real estate assets, as long as the loans are “fully secured” by an interest in real estate on which we retain the unilateral right to foreclose. That is, if the loan-to-value ratio of the loan is equal to or less than 100%, then the mortgage loan is considered to be a qualifying real estate asset. Mortgage loans with loan-to-value ratios in excess of 100% are considered to be only real estate-related assets. Our REIT subsidiaries consider agency whole pool certificates to be qualifying real estate assets. Examples of agencies that issue whole pool certificates are the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Government National Mortgage Association. An agency whole pool certificate is a certificate issued or guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United States government or by a federally chartered entity, which represents the entire beneficial interest in the underlying pool of mortgage loans. By contrast, an agency certificate that represents less than the entire beneficial interest in the underlying mortgage loans is not considered to be a qualifying real estate asset, but is considered by our REIT subsidiaries to be a real estate-related asset.

 

Most non-agency mortgage-backed securities do not constitute qualifying real estate assets because they represent less than the entire beneficial interest in the related pool of mortgage loans; however, based on Division guidance, where our REIT subsidiaries’ investment in non-agency mortgage-backed securities is the “functional equivalent” of owning the underlying mortgage loans, our REIT subsidiaries may treat those securities as qualifying real estate assets. Moreover, investments in mortgage-backed securities that do not constitute qualifying real estate assets are classified by our REIT subsidiaries as real estate-related assets. Therefore, based upon the specific terms and circumstances related to each non-agency mortgage-backed security that our REIT subsidiaries own, our REIT subsidiaries will make a determination of whether that security should be classified as a qualifying real estate asset or as a real estate-related asset; and there may be instances where a security is recharacterized from being a qualifying real estate asset to a real estate-related asset, or conversely, from being a real estate-related asset to being a qualifying real estate asset based upon the acquisition or disposition or redemption of related classes of securities from the same securitization trust. If our REIT subsidiaries acquire securities that, collectively, receive all of the principal and interest paid on the related pool of underlying mortgage loans (less fees, such as servicing and trustee fees, and expenses of the securitization), and that subsidiary has unilateral foreclosure rights with respect to those mortgage loans, then our REIT subsidiaries will consider those securities, collectively, to be qualifying real estate assets. If another entity acquires any of the securities that are expected to receive cash flow from the underlying mortgage loans, then our REIT subsidiaries will consider whether it has appropriate foreclosure rights with respect to the underlying loans and whether its investment is a first loss position in deciding whether these securities should be classified as qualifying real estate assets. If our REIT subsidiaries own more than one subordinate class, then, to determine the classification of subordinate classes other than the first loss class, our REIT subsidiaries will consider whether such classes are contiguous with the first loss class (with no other classes absorbing losses after the first loss class and before any other subordinate classes that our REIT subsidiaries own), whether our REIT subsidiaries own the entire amount of each such class and whether our REIT subsidiaries would continue to have appropriate foreclosure rights in connection with each such class if the more subordinate classes were no longer outstanding. If the answers to any of these questions is no, then our REIT subsidiaries would expect not to classify that particular class, or classes senior to that class, as qualifying real estate assets.

 

We have made or may make oil and gas and other mineral investments that are held through one or more subsidiaries and would refer to those subsidiaries as our “Oil and Gas Subsidiaries”. Depending upon the nature of the oil and gas assets held by an Oil and Gas Subsidiary, such Oil and Gas Subsidiary may rely on Section 3(c)(5)(C) or Section 3(c)(9) of the Investment Company Act or may fall outside of the general definition of an investment company. An Oil and Gas Subsidiary that does not engage primarily, propose to engage primarily or hold itself out as engaging primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities will be outside of the general definition of an investment company provided that it passes the 40% test. This may be the case where an

 

69



Table of Contents

 

Oil and Gas Subsidiary holds a sufficient amount of oil and gas assets constituting real estate interests together with other assets that are not investment securities such as equipment. Oil and Gas Subsidiaries that hold oil and gas assets that constitute real property interests, but are unable to pass the 40% test, may rely on Section 3(c)(5)(C), subject to the requirements and restrictions described above. Alternately, an Oil and Gas Subsidiary may rely on Section 3(c)(9) of the Investment Company Act if substantially all of its business consists of owning or holding oil, gas or other mineral royalties or leases, certain fractional interests, or certificates of interest or participations in or investment contracts relating to such royalties, leases or fractional interests. These various restrictions imposed on our Oil and Gas Subsidiaries by the Investment Company Act may have the effect of limiting our freedom of action with respect to oil and gas assets (or other assets) that may be held or acquired by such subsidiary or the manner in which we may deal in such assets.

 

As noted above, if the combined values of the securities issued to us by our subsidiaries that must rely on Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act, together with any other investment securities we may own, exceed 40% of the value of our total assets (exclusive of United States government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis, we may be deemed to be an investment company. If we fail to maintain an exception, exemption or other exclusion from the Investment Company Act, we could, among other things, be required either (i) to change substantially the manner in which we conduct our operations to avoid being subject to the Investment Company Act or (ii) to register as an investment company. Either of these would likely have a material adverse effect on us, the type of investments we make, our ability to service our indebtedness and to make distributions on our shares, and on the market price of our shares and any other securities we may issue. If we were required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we would become subject to substantial regulation with respect to our capital structure (including our ability to use leverage), management, operations, transactions with certain affiliated persons (within the meaning of the Investment Company Act), portfolio composition (including restrictions with respect to diversification and industry concentration) and other matters. Additionally, our Manager would have the right to terminate our Management Agreement. Moreover, if we were required to register as an investment company, we would no longer be eligible to be treated as a partnership for United States federal income tax purposes. Instead, we would be classified as a corporation for tax purposes and would be able to avoid corporate taxation only to the extent that we were able to elect and qualify as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under applicable tax rules. Because our eligibility for RIC status would depend on our assets and sources of income at the time that we were required to register as an investment company, there can be no assurance that we would be able to qualify as a RIC. If we were to lose partnership status and fail to qualify as a RIC, we would be taxed as a regular corporation. See “Partnership Tax Matters—Qualifying Income Exception”.

 

We have not requested approval or guidance from the SEC or its staff with respect to our Investment Company Act determinations, including, in particular: our treatment of any subsidiary as majority-owned; the compliance of any subsidiary with Section 3(c)(5)(C) or Section 3(c)(9) of, or Rule 3a-7 under, the Investment Company Act, including any subsidiary’s determinations with respect to the consistency of its assets or operations with the requirements thereof; or whether our interests in one or more subsidiaries constitute investment securities for purposes of the 40% test. If the SEC were to disagree with our treatment of one or more subsidiaries as being excepted from the Investment Company Act pursuant to Rule 3a-7, Section 3(c)(5)(C), Section 3(c)(9) or any other exception, with our determination that one or more of our other holdings do not constitute investment securities for purposes of the 40% test, or with our determinations as to the nature of the business in which we engage or the manner in which we hold ourselves out, we and/or one or more of our subsidiaries would need to adjust our operating strategies or assets in order for us to continue to pass the 40% test or register as an investment company, either of which could have a material adverse effect on us. Moreover, we may be required to adjust our operating strategy and holdings, or to effect sales of our assets in a manner that, or at a time or price at which, we would not otherwise choose, if there are changes in the laws or rules governing our Investment Company Act status or that of our subsidiaries, or if the SEC or its staff provides more specific or different guidance regarding the application of relevant provisions of, and rules under, the Investment Company Act. The SEC published on August 31, 2011 an advance notice of proposed rulemaking to potentially amend the conditions for reliance on Rule 3a-7 and the treatment of asset-backed issuers that rely on Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act (the “3a-7 Release”). The SEC, in the 3a-7 Release, requested public comment on the nature and operation of issuers that rely on Rule 3a-7 and indicated various steps it may consider taking in connection with Rule 3a-7, although it did not formally propose any changes to the rule. Among the issues for which the SEC has requested comment in the 3a-7 Release is whether Rule 3a-7 should be modified so that parent companies of subsidiaries that rely on Rule 3a-7 should treat their interests in such subsidiaries as investment securities for purposes of the 40% test. The SEC also published on August 31, 2011 a concept release seeking information about the nature of entities that invest in mortgages and mortgage-related pools and public comment on how the SEC staff’s interpretive positions in connection with Section 3(c)(5)(C) affect these entities, although it did not propose any new interpretive positions or changes to existing interpretive positions in connection with Section 3(c)(5)(C). Any guidance or action from the SEC or its staff, including changes that the SEC may ultimately propose and adopt to the way Rule 3a-7 applies to entities or new or modified interpretive positions related to Section 3(c)(5)(C), could further inhibit our ability, or the ability of a subsidiary, to pursue our current or future operating strategies, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

 

If the SEC or a court of competent jurisdiction were to find that we were required, but failed, to register as an investment company in violation of the Investment Company Act, we would have to cease business activities, we would breach representations and warranties and/or be in default as to certain of our contracts and obligations, civil or criminal actions could be brought against us, our contracts would be unenforceable unless a court were to require enforcement and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of us and liquidate our business, any or all of which would have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

70



Table of Contents

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

Foreign Currency Risks

 

From time to time, we may make investments that are denominated in a foreign currency through which we may be subject to foreign currency exchange risk. As of June 30, 2012, $321.3 million par amount, or 4.4%, of our corporate debt portfolio was denominated in foreign currencies, of which 68.3% was denominated in Euros. In addition, as of June 30, 2012, $114.1 million par amount, or 37.4%, of other assets, which includes our equity investments at estimated fair value and interests in joint ventures and partnerships, was denominated in foreign currencies, of which 50.1% was denominated in Euros and 27.7% was denominated in Canadian dollars.

 

Based on these investments, we are exposed to movements in foreign currency exchange rates which may impact earnings if the United States dollar significantly strengthens or weakens against foreign currencies. Accordingly, we may use derivative instruments from time to time, including foreign exchange options and forward contracts, to manage the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

 

Credit Spread Exposure

 

Our investments are subject to spread risk. Our investments in floating rate loans and securities are valued based on a market credit spread over LIBOR and for which the value is affected by changes in the market credit spreads over LIBOR. Our investments in fixed rate loans and securities are valued based on a market credit spread over the rate payable on fixed rate United States Treasuries of like maturity. Increased credit spreads, or credit spread widening, will have an adverse impact on the value of our investments while decreased credit spreads, or credit spread tightening, will have a positive impact on the value of our investments. However, tightening credit spreads will increase the likelihood that certain holdings will be refinanced at lower rates that would negatively impact our earnings.

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

Interest rate risk is defined as the sensitivity of our current and future earnings to interest rate volatility, variability of spread relationships, the difference in repricing intervals between our assets and liabilities and the effect that interest rates may have on our cash flows and the prepayment rates experienced on our investments that have embedded borrower optionality. The objective of interest rate risk management is to achieve earnings, preserve capital and achieve liquidity by minimizing the negative impacts of changing interest rates, asset and liability mix, and prepayment activity.

 

We are exposed to basis risk between our investments and our borrowings. Interest rates on our floating rate investments and our variable rate borrowings do not reset on the same day or with the same frequency and, as a result, we are exposed to basis risk with respect to index reset frequency. Our floating rate investments may reprice on indices that are different than the indices that are used to price our variable rate borrowings and, as a result, we are exposed to basis risk with respect to repricing index. The basis risks noted above, in addition to other forms of basis risk that exist between our investments and borrowings, could have a material adverse impact on our future net interest margins.

 

Interest rate risk impacts our interest income, interest expense, prepayments, as well as the fair value of our investments, interest rate derivatives and liabilities. We generally fund our variable rate investments with variable rate borrowings with similar interest rate reset frequencies. As of June 30, 2012, approximately 42.4% of our corporate debt portfolio had LIBOR floors with a weighted average floor of 1.4%. Based on our variable rate investments and variable rate borrowings as of June 30, 2012, we estimated that net interest income would be negatively impacted by approximately $8.9 million annually in the event interest rates were to increase by 1% and would be positively impacted by approximately $27.4 million annually in the event rates were to increase by 3%.

 

We manage our interest rate risk using various techniques ranging from the purchase of floating rate investments to the use of interest rate derivatives. The use of interest rate derivatives is a component of our interest risk management strategy. The contractual notional balance of our interest rate swaps was $508.3 million as of June 30, 2012.

 

Derivative Risk

 

Derivative transactions including engaging in swaps and foreign currency transactions are subject to certain risks. There is no guarantee that a company can eliminate its exposure under an outstanding swap agreement by entering into an offsetting swap agreement with the same or another party. Also, there is a possibility of default of the other party to the transaction or illiquidity of the derivative instrument. Furthermore, the ability to successfully use derivative transactions depends on the ability to predict market movements which cannot be guaranteed. As such, participation in derivative instruments may result in greater losses as we would

 

71



Table of Contents

 

have to sell or purchase an investment at inopportune times for prices other than current market prices or may force us to hold an asset we might otherwise have sold. In addition, as certain derivative instruments are unregulated, they are difficult to value and are therefore susceptible to liquidity and credit risks.

 

Collateral posting requirements are individually negotiated between counterparties and there is no regulatory requirement concerning the amount of collateral that a counterparty must post to secure its obligations under certain derivative instruments. Because they are unregulated, there is no requirement that parties to a contract be informed in advance when a credit default swap is sold. As a result, investors may have difficulty identifying the party responsible for payment of their claims. If a counterparty’s credit becomes significantly impaired, multiple requests for collateral posting in a short period of time could increase the risk that we may not receive adequate collateral. Amounts paid by us as premiums and cash or other assets held in margin accounts with respect to derivative instruments are not available for investment purposes.

 

The following table summarizes the estimated net fair value of our derivative instruments held at June 30, 2012 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

As of
June 30, 2012

 

 

 

Notional

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Cash Flow Hedges:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

$

508,333

 

$

(101,900

)

Free-Standing Derivatives:

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity swaps

 

 

10,155

 

Credit default swaps—protection sold

 

3,000

 

20

 

Credit default swaps—protection purchased

 

(86,737

)

2,878

 

Foreign exchange forward contracts

 

(256,974

)

(9,994

)

Foreign exchange options

 

130,207

 

8,254

 

Common stock warrants

 

 

2,834

 

Total

 

$

297,829

 

$

(87,753

)

 

For our derivatives, our credit exposure is directly with our counterparties and continues until the maturity or termination of such contracts. The following table sets forth the fair values of our primary derivative investments by remaining contractual maturity as of June 30, 2012 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

Less than
1 year

 

1 - 3 years

 

3 - 5 years

 

More than
5 years

 

Total

 

Cash Flow Hedges:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flow interest rate swaps

 

$

(2,847

)

$

 

$

 

$

(99,053

)

$

(101,900

)

Free-Standing Derivatives:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity swaps

 

3,894

 

4,810

 

1,451

 

 

10,155

 

Credit default swaps—protection sold

 

20

 

 

 

 

20

 

Credit default swaps—protection purchased

 

(82

)

 

2,960

 

 

2,878

 

Foreign exchange forward contracts

 

2,222

 

(12,178

)

(38

)

 

(9,994

)

Foreign exchange options

 

 

8,254

 

 

 

8,254

 

Total

 

$

3,207

 

$

886

 

$

4,373

 

$

(99,053

)

$

(90,587

)

 

Commodity Price Risk

 

Certain of our natural resources holdings, including our working interests in producing oil and natural gas fields are subject to fluctuations in the prices of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil, which may cause our revenues and cash flows to be volatile. As of June 30, 2012, natural gas comprised approximately 69% of our total working interests reserves, while natural gas liquids and oil comprised approximately 29% and 2%, respectively. In order to help mitigate the potential exposure and effects of changing commodity prices on our revenues and cash flows from operations, we have entered into, and expect to continue to use, commodity swaps for our working interests. Our policy has been to hedge a majority portion of the total estimated oil, natural gas and natural gas liquid production on our working interests for a specified amount of time. We currently use commodity derivative contracts, consisting of oil, natural gas and certain natural gas liquid products receive-fixed, pay-floating swaps for certain years through 2016. Our unhedged production may expose us to commodity price declines or alternatively, provide the potential upside from commodity price increases. Our price hedging strategy and future hedging transactions, including the prices at which we hedge our production, are dependent upon several factors, including expected production and commodities prices at the time we enter into these transactions.

 

72



Table of Contents

 

We do not designate any of our commodity derivatives as cash flow hedges. As such, the changes in fair value of these instruments are recorded in current period earnings. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we had $1.8 million and $2.7 million, respectively, of commodity derivatives settlements, which are settled monthly. The estimated fair value of our commodity swaps as of June 30, 2012 totaled $10.2 million. As a significant portion of our commodity derivatives hedge the majority of our estimated natural gas production through 2015, a 40% decrease in the future prices of natural gas as compared to the future prices at June 30, 2012 would result in an estimated unhedged production value decrease of less than $3.5 million for any year through 2015.

 

Counterparty Risk

 

We have credit risks that are generally related to the counterparties with which we do business. If a counterparty becomes bankrupt, or otherwise fails to perform its obligations under a derivative contract due to financial difficulties, we may experience significant delays in obtaining any recovery under the derivative contract in a bankruptcy or other reorganization proceeding. These risks of non-performance may differ from risks associated with exchange-traded transactions which are typically backed by guarantees and have daily mark-to-market and settlement positions. Transactions entered into directly between parties do not benefit from such protections and thus, are subject to counterparty default. It may be the case where any cash or collateral we pledged to the counterparty may be unrecoverable and we may be forced to unwind our derivative agreements at a loss. We may obtain only a limited recovery or may obtain no recovery in such circumstances, thereby reducing liquidity and earnings.

 

Management Estimates

 

The preparation of our financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant estimates, assumptions and judgments are applied in situations including the determination of our allowance for loan losses and the valuation of certain investments. We revise our estimates when appropriate. However, actual results could materially differ from management’s estimates.

 

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

See discussion of quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk in “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

 

The Company’s management evaluated, with the participation of the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officer, the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of June 30, 2012. Based on their evaluation, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2012 were designed and were functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.

 

There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the three months ending June 30, 2012, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

73



Table of Contents

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

 

None.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

For a discussion of our potential risks and uncertainties, see the information under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, filed with the SEC on February 28, 2012, which is accessible on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at www.sec.gov.

 

Item 2 . Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

On April 15, 2012, our non-employee directors deferred $0.1 million of cash compensation in exchange for 5,423 phantom shares pursuant to the KKR Financial Holdings LLC Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation and Share Award Plan. On May 22, 2012, our non-employee directors deferred $0.1 million of cash distribution in exchange for 4,260 phantom shares pursuant to the KKR Financial Holdings LLC Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation and Share Award Plan. Each phantom share is the economic equivalent of one of our common shares. The phantom shares become payable, in cash or common shares, at our election, upon the earlier of (i) the first day of January following the applicable non-employee director’s termination of service as a director or (ii) an election date pre-selected by the applicable non-employee director, and in any event in cash or common shares, at the election of the applicable non-employee director, upon the occurrence of a change in control of us. The grants made to our non-employee directors were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4 (2) thereof.

 

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

None.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

 

None.

 

Item 5. Other Information

 

None.

 

Item 6. Exhibits

 

Exhibit
Number

 

Description

 

 

 

31.1

 

Chief Executive Officer Certification

31.2

 

Chief Financial Officer Certification

32

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

 

74



Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, KKR Financial Holdings LLC has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

KKR Financial Holdings LLC

 

 

 

Signature

 

Title

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ WILLIAM C. SONNEBORN

 

Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

William C. Sonneborn

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ MICHAEL R. MCFERRAN

 

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Michael R. McFerran

 

 

 

 

 

Date: August 8, 2012

 

 

 

75


Kkr Financial (NYSE:KFN)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024 Click Here for more Kkr Financial Charts.
Kkr Financial (NYSE:KFN)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024 Click Here for more Kkr Financial Charts.