MYC BlackRock MuniYield California Fund Inc

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number 811-06499

Name of Fund: BlackRock MuniYield California Fund, Inc. (MYC)

Fund Address: 100 Bellevue Parkway, Wilmington, DE 19809

Name and address of agent for service: John M. Perlowski, Chief Executive Officer, BlackRock MuniYield California Fund, Inc., 55 East 52 ^nd Street, New York, NY 10055

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 882-0052, Option 4

Date of fiscal year end: 07/31/2014

Date of reporting period: 01/31/2014

Item 1 – Report to Stockholders

JANUARY 31, 2014

SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (UNAUDITED)

BlackRock Muni New York Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc. (MNE)

BlackRock MuniYield Arizona Fund, Inc. (MZA)

BlackRock MuniYield California Fund, Inc. (MYC)

BlackRock MuniYield Investment Fund (MYF)

BlackRock MuniYield New Jersey Fund, Inc. (MYJ)

Not FDIC Insured • May Lose Value • No Bank Guarantee

Table of Contents

					Page
Dear Shareholder					3
Semi-Annual Report:
Municipal Market Overview					4
The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging					5
Derivative Financial Instruments					5
Fund Summaries					6
Financial Statements:
Schedules of Investments					16
Statements of Assets and Liabilities					35
Statements of Operations					36
Statements of Changes in Net Assets					37
Statements of Cash Flows					40
Financial Highlights					41
Notes to Financial Statements					46
Officers and Directors					54
Additional Information					55

2

SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

JANUARY 31, 2014

Dear Shareholder

One year ago, US financial markets were improving despite a sluggish global economy, as loose monetary policy beckoned investors to take on more risk in their portfolios. Slow but positive growth in the US was sufficient to support corporate earnings, while uncomfortably high unemployment reinforced expectations that the Federal Reserve would continue its aggressive monetary stimulus programs. International markets were not as fruitful in the earlier part of the year given uneven growth rates and more direct exposure to macro risks such as the resurgence of political instability in Italy, the banking crisis in Cyprus and a generally poor outlook for European economies. Additionally, emerging markets significantly lagged the rest of the world due to slowing growth and structural imbalances.

Global financial markets were rattled in May when Fed Chairman Bernanke mentioned the possibility of reducing (or “tapering”) the central bank’s asset purchase programs—comments that were widely misinterpreted as signaling an end to the Fed’s zero-interest-rate policy. US Treasury yields rose sharply, triggering a steep sell-off across fixed income markets. (Bond prices move in the opposite direction of yields.) Equity prices also suffered as investors feared the implications of a potential end of a program that had greatly supported the markets. Markets rebounded in late June, however, when the Fed’s tone turned more dovish, and improving economic indicators and better corporate earnings helped extend gains through most of the summer.

The fall was a surprisingly positive period for most asset classes after the Fed defied market expectations with its decision to delay tapering. Higher volatility returned in late September when the US Treasury Department warned that the national debt would soon breach its statutory maximum. The ensuing political brinksmanship led to a partial government shutdown, roiling global financial markets through the first half of October, but equities and other so-called “risk assets” resumed their rally when politicians engineered a compromise to reopen the government and extend the debt ceiling, at least temporarily.

The remainder of 2013 was generally positive for stock markets in the developed world, although investors continued to grapple with uncertainty about when and how much the Fed would scale back on stimulus. When the long-awaited taper announcement ultimately came in mid-December, the Fed reduced the amount of its monthly asset purchases but at the same time extended its time horizon for maintaining low short-term interest rates. Markets reacted positively, as this move signaled the Fed’s perception of real improvement in the economy and investors were finally relieved from the tenacious anxiety that had gripped them for quite some time.

Investors’ risk appetite diminished in the new year. Heightened volatility in emerging markets and mixed US economic data caused global equities to weaken in January while bond markets found renewed strength. While tighter global liquidity was an ongoing headwind for developing countries, financial troubles in Argentina and Turkey launched a sharp sell-off in a number of emerging market currencies. Unexpectedly poor economic data out of China added to the turmoil. In the US, most indicators continued to signal a strengthening economy; however, stagnant wage growth raised concerns about the sustainability of the overall positive momentum. US stocks underperformed other developed equity markets as a number of disappointing corporate earnings reports prompted investors to take advantage of lower valuations abroad.

While accommodative monetary policy was the main driver behind positive market performance over the period, it was also the primary cause of volatility and uncertainty. Developed market stocks were the strongest performers for the six- and 12-month periods ended January 31. In contrast, emerging markets were weighed down by uneven growth, high debt levels and severe currency weakness. Rising interest rates pressured US Treasury bonds and other high-quality fixed income sectors, including tax-exempt municipals and investment grade corporate bonds. High yield bonds, to the contrary, benefited from income-oriented investors’ search for yield in the low-rate environment. Short-term interest rates remained near zero, keeping yields on money market securities near historical lows.

At BlackRock, we believe investors need to think globally and extend their scope across a broader array of asset classes and be prepared to move freely as market conditions change over time. We encourage you to talk with your financial advisor and visit www.blackrock.com for further insight about investing in today’s world.

Sincerely,

  

Rob Kapito
President, BlackRock Advisors, LLC

“ While accommodative monetary policy was the main driver behind positive market performance over the period, it was also the primary cause of volatility and uncertainty . ”

Rob Kapito

President, BlackRock Advisors, LLC

---

Total Returns as of January 31, 2014

	6-month				12-month
US large cap equities (S&P 500 ® Index)		6.85	%			21.52	%
US small cap equities (Russell 2000 ® Index)		8.88				27.03
International equities (MSCI Europe, Australasia, Far East Index)		7.51				11.93
Emerging market equities (MSCI Emerging Markets Index)		(0.33	)			(10.17	)
3-month Treasury bill (BofA Merrill Lynch 3-Month US Treasury Bill Index)		0.03				0.08
US Treasury securities (BofA Merrill Lynch 10-Year US Treasury Index)		0.77				(2.97	)
US investment grade bonds (Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index)		1.78				0.12
Tax-exempt municipal bonds (S&P Municipal Bond Index)		3.13				(1.10	)
US high yield bonds (Barclays US Corporate High Yield 2% Issuer Capped Index)		4.70				6.76

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only. You cannot invest directly in an index.

---

THIS PAGE NOT PART OF YOUR FUND REPORT

3

Municipal Market Overview

For the Reporting Period Ended January 31, 2014

Municipal Market Conditions

In the earlier months of 2013, municipal bond supply was met with robust demand as investors were starved for yield in the low-rate, low-return environment and seeking tax-exempt investments in light of higher US tax rates that became effective at the turn of the year. Investors moved into municipal bond mutual funds, favoring long-duration and high-yield funds as they tend to provide higher levels of income.

However, market conditions turned less favorable in May when the US Federal Reserve initially mentioned the eventual reduction of its bond-buying stimulus program (which ultimately took effect in January 2014). Further signals from the Fed alluding to a retrenchment of asset purchases led to rising interest rates and waning municipal bond performance in June. (Bond prices fall as rates rise.) Municipal bond mutual funds saw strong outflows in the last six months of 2013, before investors again sought the relative safety of the asset class in the New Year. For the 12-month period ended January 31, 2014, net outflows were approximately $62.8 billion (based on data from the Investment Company Institute).

High levels of interest rate volatility resulted in a sharp curtailment of tax-exempt issuance in May through the end of the period. However, from a historical perspective, total new issuance for the 12 months ended January 31, 2014 remained relatively strong at $322 billion (but meaningfully lower than the $389 billion issued in the prior 12-month period). A significant portion of new supply during this period was attributable to refinancing activity (roughly 40%) as issuers took advantage of lower interest rates to reduce their borrowing costs. Total new supply was also supported by recent activity in the taxable market, where taxable municipal issuance was up approximately 15% year-over-year.

S&P Municipal Bond Index

Total Returns as of January 31, 2014

6 months:       3.13%

12 months:      (1.10)%

A Closer Look at Yields

 

From January 31, 2013 to January 31, 2014, muni yields increased by 99 basis points (“bps”) from 2.86% to 3.85% on AAA-rated 30-year municipal bonds, while increasing 71 bps from 1.82% to 2.53% on 10-year bonds and rising another 31 bps from 0.79% to 1.10% on 5-year issues (as measured by Thomson Municipal Market Data). Overall, the municipal yield curve remained relatively steep over the 12-month period as the spread between 2- and 30-year maturities widened by 103 bps and the spread between 2- and 10-year maturities widened by 75 bps.

During the same time period, US Treasury rates rose by 43 bps on 30-year and 66 bps on 10-year bonds, while moving up 61 bps in 5-years. Accordingly, tax-exempt municipal bonds underperformed Treasuries on the long end of the yield curve as investors sought to reduce interest rate risk later in the period. On the short end of the curve, the outperformance of municipal bonds versus Treasuries was driven largely by a supply/demand imbalance within the municipal market and a rotation from long-duration assets (which are more sensitive to interest rate movements) into short- and intermediate-duration investments (which are less sensitive to interest rate movements). Additionally, municipal bonds benefited from the increased appeal of tax-exempt investing in the new higher tax rate environment. The asset class is known for its lower relative volatility and preservation of principal with an emphasis on income as tax rates rise. The municipal market continues to be an attractive avenue for investors seeking yield in today’s environment, particularly as the recent correction has restored value in the market and placed yields at levels not obtainable since early 2011. However, opportunities have not been as broad-based as in 2011 and 2012, warranting a more tactical approach going forward.

Financial Conditions of Municipal Issuers Continue to Improve

Following an extended period of nation-wide austerity and de-leveraging as states sought to balance their budgets, 14 consecutive quarters of positive revenue growth coupled with the elimination of more than 750,000 jobs in recent years have put state and local governments in a better financial position. Many local municipalities, however, continue to face increased health care and pension costs passed down from the state level. BlackRock maintains the view that municipal bond defaults will be minimal and remain in the periphery, and that the overall market is fundamentally sound. We continue to recognize that careful credit research, appropriate structure and security selection remain imperative amid uncertainty in this tepid economic environment.

The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only. You cannot invest directly in an index.

4

SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

JANUARY 31, 2014

The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging

The Funds may utilize leverage to seek to enhance the yield and net asset value (”NAV”) of their common shares (“Common Shares”). However, these objectives cannot be achieved in all interest rate environments.

To obtain leverage, the Funds issue Variable Rate Demand Preferred Shares (“VRDP Shares”) (VRDP Shares are referred to as “Preferred Shares”). Preferred Shares pay dividends at prevailing short-term interest rates, and the Funds invest the proceeds in long-term municipal bonds. In general, the concept of leveraging is based on the premise that the financing cost of assets to be obtained from leverage, which will be based on short-term interest rates, will normally be lower than the income earned by each Fund on its longer-term portfolio investments. To the extent that the total assets of each Fund (including the assets obtained from leverage) are invested in higher-yielding portfolio investments, each Fund’s shareholders will benefit from the incremental net income.

The interest earned on securities purchased with the proceeds from leverage is paid to shareholders in the form of dividends, and the value of these portfolio holdings is reflected in the per share NAV. However, in order to benefit shareholders, the yield curve must be positively sloped; that is, short-term interest rates must be lower than long-term interest rates. If the yield curve becomes negatively sloped, meaning short-term interest rates exceed long-term interest rates, income to shareholders will be lower than if the Funds had not used leverage.

To illustrate these concepts, assume a Fund’s Common Shares capitalization is $100 million and it issues Preferred Shares for an additional $50 million, creating a total value of $150 million available for investment in long-term municipal bonds. If prevailing short-term interest rates are 3% and long-term interest rates are 6%, the yield curve has a strongly positive slope. In this case, the Fund pays dividends on the $50 million of Preferred Shares based on the lower short-term interest rates. At the same time, the securities purchased by the Fund with assets received from Preferred Shares issuance earn income based on long-term interest rates. In this case, the dividends paid to holders of Preferred Shares (“Preferred Shareholders”) are significantly lower than the income earned on the Fund’s long-term investments, and therefore the holders of Common Shares (“Common Shareholders”) are the beneficiaries of the incremental net income.

If short-term interest rates rise, narrowing the differential between short-term and long-term interest rates, the incremental net income pickup will be reduced or eliminated completely. Furthermore, if prevailing short-term interest rates rise above long-term interest rates, the yield curve has a negative slope. In this case, the Fund pays higher short-term interest rates whereas the Fund’s total portfolio earns income based on lower long-term interest rates.

Furthermore, the value of the Funds’ portfolio investments generally varies inversely with the direction of long-term interest rates, although other factors can influence the value of portfolio investments. In contrast, the redemption value of the Funds’ Preferred Shares does not fluctuate in relation to interest rates. As a result, changes in interest rates can influence the Funds’ NAVs positively or negatively in addition to the impact on Fund performance from leverage from Preferred Shares discussed above.

The Funds may also leverage their assets through the use of tender option bond trusts (“TOBs”), as described in Note 3 of the Notes to Financial Statements. TOB investments generally will provide the Funds with economic benefits in periods of declining short-term interest rates, but expose the Funds to risks during periods of rising short-term interest rates similar to those associated with Preferred Shares issued by the Funds, as described above. Additionally, fluctuations in the market value of municipal bonds deposited into the TOB trust may adversely affect each Fund’s NAV per share.

The use of leverage may enhance opportunities for increased income to the Funds and Common Shareholders, but as described above, it also creates risks as short- or long-term interest rates fluctuate. Leverage also will generally cause greater changes in the Funds’ NAVs, market prices and dividend rates than comparable portfolios without leverage. If the income derived from securities purchased with assets received from leverage exceeds the cost of leverage, the Funds’ net income will be greater than if leverage had not been used. Conversely, if the income from the securities purchased is not sufficient to cover the cost of leverage, each Fund’s net income will be less than if leverage had not been used, and therefore the amount available for distribution to Common Shareholders will be reduced. Each Fund may be required to sell portfolio securities at inopportune times or at distressed values in order to comply with regulatory requirements applicable to the use of leverage or as required by the terms of leverage instruments, which may cause a Fund to incur losses. The use of leverage may limit each Fund’s ability to invest in certain types of securities or use certain types of hedging strategies, such as in the case of certain restrictions imposed by rating agencies that rate the Preferred Shares issued by the Funds. Each Fund will incur expenses in connection with the use of leverage, all of which are borne by Common Shareholders and may reduce income to the Common Shares.

Under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), the Funds are permitted to issue senior securities in the form of equity securities (e.g. Preferred Shares) up to 50% of their total managed assets (each Fund’s total assets less its total accrued liabilities). In addition, each Fund with VRDP Shares limits its economic leverage to 45% of its total managed assets. As of January 31, 2014, the Funds had economic leverage from Preferred Shares and/or TOBs as a percentage of their total managed assets as follows:

	Percent of Economic Leverage
MNE	37	%
MZA	39	%
MYC	38	%
MYF	40	%
MYJ	39	%

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Funds may invest in various derivative financial instruments, including financial futures contracts, as specified in Note 4 of the Notes to Financial Statements, which may constitute forms of economic leverage. Such derivative financial instruments are used to obtain exposure to a security, index and/or market without owning or taking physical custody of securities or to hedge market and/or interest rate risks. Derivative financial instruments involve risks, including the imperfect correlation between the value of a derivative financial instrument and the underlying asset, possible default of the counterparty to the transaction or illiquidity of the derivative financial instrument. The Funds’ ability to use a derivative financial instrument successfully depends on the investment advisor’s ability to predict pertinent market movements accurately, which cannot be assured. The use of derivative financial instruments may result in losses greater than if they had not been used, may require a Fund to sell or purchase portfolio investments at inopportune times or for distressed values, may limit the amount of appreciation a Fund can realize on an investment, may result in lower dividends paid to shareholders and/or may cause a Fund to hold an investment that it might otherwise sell. The Funds’ investments in these instruments are discussed in detail in the Notes to Financial Statements.

SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

JANUARY 31, 2014

5

Fund Summary  as of January 31, 2014	BlackRock Muni New York Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc.

Fund Overview

BlackRock Muni New York Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc.’s (MNE) (the “Fund”) investment objective is to provide shareholders with high current income exempt from federal income tax and New York State and New York City personal income taxes. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its assets in municipal obligations exempt from federal income tax (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax) and New York State and New York City personal income taxes. Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests at least 75% of its assets in municipal obligations that are investment grade quality at the time of investment. Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests at least 80% of its assets in municipal obligations with a duration of three to ten years. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.

No assurance can be given that the Fund’s investment objective will be achieved.

Performance

•

For the six-month period ended January 31, 2014, the Fund returned 4.82% based on market price and 4.13% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper Intermediate Municipal Debt Funds category posted an average return of 5.89% based on market price and 4.25% based on NAV. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Fund’s discount to NAV, which narrowed during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. The following discussion relates to performance based on NAV.

•

Tax-exempt rates declined over the course of the period, with longer-duration bonds (those with higher sensitivity to interest rate movements) and bonds with maturities beyond 15 years tending to provide the largest returns. (Bond prices rise when rates fall.) In this environment, the Fund’s holdings in health care, education and transportation were positive contributors to performance as these were the best performing sectors. Exposure to lower-coupon bonds also benefited returns as they had strong price performance due to their relatively long durations for their respective maturities. The Fund’s significant exposure to high-quality issues had a positive impact on results as the market’s strongest performance during the period was concentrated in high-quality issues. Additionally, the Fund benefited from income generated from coupon payments on its municipal bond holdings. The use of leverage allowed the Fund to enhance its income.

•

The Fund’s exposure to Puerto Rico government-related credits, although limited, was a detractor from results as credit spreads on these bonds widened materially during the period due to investors’ lack of confidence and a weak local economy. The Fund’s positions in Puerto Rico government-related securities were eliminated by the end of the period.

The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.

Fund Information

Symbol on New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”)				MNE
Initial Offering Date				August 1, 2003
Yield on Closing Market Price as of January 31, 2014 ($13.31) 1				5.50%
Tax Equivalent Yield 2				11.15%
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share 3				$0.061
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share 3				$0.732
Economic Leverage as of January 31, 2014 4				37%

1

Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

2

Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal federal and state tax rate of 50.67%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based on income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent yields.

3

The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change.

4

Represents VRDP Shares and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VRDP Shares and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 5.

6

SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

JANUARY 31, 2014

	BlackRock Muni New York Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc.

Market Price and Net Asset Value Per Share Summary

				1/31/14				7/31/13				Change				High				Low
Market Price				$	13.31			$	13.06				1.91	%		$	13.80			$	12.49
Net Asset Value				$	14.72			$	14.54				1.24	%		$	14.79			$	13.95

Market Price and Net Asset Value History For the Past Five Years

 

    

Overview of the Fund’s Long-Term Investments

Sector Allocation				1/31/14				7/31/13
County/City/Special District/School District					22	%			17	%
Transportation					18				20
Education					13				12
Utilities					12				12
Health					12				13
State					10				13
Corporate					7				7
Housing					6				6

Credit Quality Allocation 1				1/31/14				7/31/13
AAA/Aaa					7	%			6	%
AA/Aa					48				47
A					30				32
BBB/Baa					8				8
BB/Ba					4				3
Not Rated 2					3				4

1

Using the higher of Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) or Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) ratings.

2

The investment advisor has deemed certain of these non-rated securities to be of investment grade quality. As of January 31, 2014 and July 31, 2013, the market value of these securities was $1,317,449 and $530,726, each representing 1%, respectively, of the Fund’s long-term investments.

Call/Maturity Schedule 3
Calendar Year Ended December 31,
2014					4	%
2015					8
2016					11
2017					5
2018					10

3

Scheduled maturity dates and/or bonds that are subject to potential calls by issuers over the next five years.

SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

JANUARY 31, 2014

7

Fund Summary  as of January 31, 2014	BlackRock MuniYield Arizona Fund, Inc.

Fund Overview

BlackRock MuniYield Arizona Fund, Inc.’s (MZA) (the “Fund”) investment objective is to provide shareholders with as high a level of current income exempt from federal and Arizona income taxes as is consistent with its investment policies and prudent investment management. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its assets in municipal obligations exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax) and Arizona income taxes. Under normal market conditions, the Fund expects to invest at least 75% of its assets in municipal obligations that are investment grade quality at the time of investment. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.

No assurance can be given that the Fund’s investment objective will be achieved.

Performance

•

For the six-month period ended January 31, 2014, the Fund returned 5.53% based on market price and 6.02% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds category posted an average return of 3.25% based on market price and 4.82% based on NAV. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Fund’s discount to NAV, which widened during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. The following discussion relates to performance based on NAV.

•

Contributing positively to performance was the Fund’s income accrual generated from coupon payments on its portfolio of Arizona state tax-exempt municipal bonds. The Fund’s duration exposure (sensitivity to interest rate movements) had a positive impact on returns as municipal interest rates declined during the period. (Bond prices rise when rates fall.) Exposure to longer-dated bonds added to returns as the municipal yield curve flattened (i.e., longer-term rates fell more than shorter-term rates).

•

The Fund’s exposure to Puerto Rico government-related credits, although limited, was a detractor from results as credit spreads on these bonds widened materially during the period due to investors’ lack of confidence and a weak local economy. The Fund’s positions in Puerto Rico government-related securities were eliminated by the end of the period.

The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.

Fund Information

Symbol on NYSE MKT				MZA
Initial Offering Date				October 29, 1993
Yield on Closing Market Price as of January 31, 2014 ($13.63) 1				6.12%
Tax Equivalent Yield 2				11.33%
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share 3				$0.0695
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share 3				$0.8340
Economic Leverage as of January 31, 2014 4				39%

1

Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

2

Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal federal and state tax rate of 45.97%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based on income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent yields.

3

The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change.

4

Represents VRDP Shares and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VRDP Shares and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 5.

8

SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

JANUARY 31, 2014

	BlackRock MuniYield Arizona Fund, Inc.

Market Price and Net Asset Value Per Share Summary

				1/31/14				7/31/13				Change				High				Low
Market Price				$	13.63			$	13.33				2.25	%		$	13.89			$	12.66
Net Asset Value				$	13.94			$	13.57				2.73	%		$	13.95			$	12.92

Market Price and Net Asset Value History For the Past Five Years

 

    

Overview of the Fund’s Long-Term Investments

Sector Allocation				1/31/14				7/31/13
County/City/Special District/School District					26	%			29	%
Utilities					20				20
State					14				17
Education					13				12
Health					13				11
Corporate					10				8
Transportation					3				2
Housing					1				1

Credit Quality Allocation 1				1/31/14				7/31/13
AAA/Aaa					12	%			13	%
AA/Aa					45				41
A					32				34
BBB/Baa					7				8
B					1				1
Not Rated 2					3				3

1

Using the higher of S&P’s or Moody’s ratings.

2

The investment advisor has deemed certain of these non-rated securities to be of investment grade quality. As of January 31, 2014 and July 31, 2013, the market value of these securities was $1,095,590 and $1,120,000, each representing 1%, respectively, of the Fund’s long-term investments.

Call/Maturity Schedule 3
Calendar Year Ended December 31,
2014					6	%
2015					7
2016					5
2017					2
2018					29

3

Scheduled maturity dates and/or bonds that are subject to potential calls by issuers over the next five years.

SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

JANUARY 31, 2014

9

Fund Summary  as of January 31, 2014	BlackRock MuniYield California Fund, Inc.

Fund Overview

BlackRock MuniYield California Fund, Inc.’s (MYC) (the “Fund”) investment objective is to provide shareholders with as high a level of current income exempt from federal and California income taxes as is consistent with its investment policies and prudent investment management. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its assets in municipal obligations exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax) and California income taxes. Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests primarily in long-term municipal obligations that are investment grade quality at the time of investment. The Fund may invest up to 20% of its total assets in securities rated below investment grade or deemed equivalent at the time of purchase. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.

No assurance can be given that the Fund’s investment objective will be achieved.

Performance

•

For the six-month period ended January 31, 2014, the Fund returned 7.65% based on market price and 8.12% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper California Municipal Debt Funds category posted an average return of 8.06% based on market price and 6.82% based on NAV. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Fund’s discount to NAV, which widened during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. The following discussion relates to performance based on NAV.

•

The Fund’s exposure to bonds with longer maturities, which tend to have higher durations (greater sensitivity to interest rate movements), contributed positively to performance as tax-exempt rates declined during the period. (Bond prices rise when rates fall.) Security selection had a positive impact on returns as the Fund’s holdings of high-quality school district issues performed well due to continued improvement in the State of California’s finances. Holdings of securities in the education and utilities sectors also added to results. Leverage on the Fund’s assets achieved through the use of tender option bonds amplified the positive effect of falling rates on performance.

•

While the Fund’s cash reserves were generally maintained at a minimal level, to the extent reserves were held, the cash holdings added little in the form of additional yield and provided no price appreciation in a generally positive period for the municipal market.

The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.

Fund Information

Symbol on NYSE				MYC
Initial Offering Date				February 28, 1992
Yield on Closing Market Price as of January 31, 2014 ($14.51) 1				6.53%
Tax Equivalent Yield 2				13.31%
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share 3				$0.079
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share 3				$0.948
Economic Leverage as of January 31, 2014 4				38%

1

Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

2

Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal federal and state tax rate of 50.93%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based on income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent yields.

3

The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change.

4

Represents VRDP Shares and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VRDP Shares and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 5.

10

SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

JANUARY 31, 2014

	BlackRock MuniYield California Fund, Inc.

Market Price and Net Asset Value Per Share Summary

				1/31/14				7/31/13				Change				High				Low
Market Price				$	14.51			$	13.94				4.09	%		$	15.18			$	13.16
Net Asset Value				$	15.64			$	14.96				4.55	%		$	15.66			$	14.31

Market Price and Net Asset Value History For the Past Five Years

 

    

Overview of the Fund’s Long-Term Investments

Sector Allocation				1/31/14				7/31/13
County/City/Special District/School District					40	%			41	%
Utilities					20				22
Education					12				10
Health					11				11
Transportation					7				6
State					7				8
Corporate					1				1
Housing					1				1
Tobacco					1				—

Credit Quality Allocation 1				1/31/14				7/31/13
AAA/Aaa					5	%			10	%
AA/Aa					72				67
A					20				22
BBB/Baa					1				1
BB					2				—

1

Using the higher of S&P’s or Moody’s ratings.

Call/Maturity Schedule 2
Calendar Year Ended December 31,
2014					2	%
2015					2
2016					11
2017					8
2018					17

2

Scheduled maturity dates and/or bonds that are subject to potential calls by issuers over the next five years.

SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

JANUARY 31, 2014

11

Fund Summary  as of January 31, 2014	BlackRock MuniYield Investment Fund

Fund Overview

BlackRock MuniYield Investment Fund’s (MYF) (the “Fund”) investment objective is to provide shareholders with as high a level of current income exempt from federal income taxes as is consistent with its investment policies and prudent investment management. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its assets in municipal obligations exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax). Under normal market conditions, the Fund primarily invests in municipal bonds that are investment grade quality at the time of investment. The Fund may invest up to 20% of its total assets in securities rated below investment grade or deemed equivalent at the time of purchase. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.

No assurance can be given that the Fund’s investment objective will be achieved.

Performance

•

For the six-month period ended January 31, 2014, the Fund returned 8.22% based on market price and 6.61% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper General & Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category posted an average return of 7.76% based on market price and 5.69% based on NAV. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Fund’s discount to NAV, which narrowed during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. The following discussion relates to performance based on NAV.

•

The Fund benefited from its holdings in the State of California. The continued improvement in the State’s economy was the catalyst for the price appreciation in these bonds. Additionally, as the municipal yield curve flattened during the period (i.e., rates on longer-dated bonds fell more than rates on shorter-dated securities), the Fund’s longer-dated holdings in health care, education and transportation experienced the strongest price appreciation. (Bond prices rise when rates fall.)

•

The Fund’s exposure to Puerto Rico government-related credits, although limited, was a detractor from results as credit spreads on these bonds widened materially during the period due to investors’ lack of confidence and a weak local economy. The Fund’s positions in Puerto Rico government-related securities were eliminated by the end of the period.

The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.

Fund Information

Symbol on NYSE				MYF
Initial Offering Date				February 28, 1992
Yield on Closing Market Price as of January 31, 2014 ($14.16) 1				6.69%
Tax Equivalent Yield 2				11.82%
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share 3				$0.079
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share 3				$0.948
Economic Leverage as of January 31, 2014 4				40%

1

Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

2

Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal federal tax rate of 43.4%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based on income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent yields.

3

The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change.

4

Represents VRDP Shares and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VRDP Shares and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 5.

12

SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

JANUARY 31, 2014

	BlackRock MuniYield Investment Fund

Market Price and Net Asset Value Per Share Summary

				1/31/14				7/31/13				Change				High				Low
Market Price				$	14.16			$	13.55				4.50	%		$	14.31			$	12.51
Net Asset Value				$	14.68			$	14.26				2.95	%		$	14.70			$	13.61

Market Price and Net Asset Value History For the Past Five Years

 

    

Overview of the Fund’s Long-Term Investments

Sector Allocation				1/31/14				7/31/13
Transportation					23	%			21	%
County/City/Special District/School District					21				21
Utilities					17				20
Health					15				14
Education					9				9
State					6				7
Corporate					4				4
Housing					3				3
Tobacco					2				1

Credit Quality Allocation 1				1/31/14				7/31/13
AAA/Aaa					7	%			9	%
AA/Aa					61				60
A					25				25
BBB/Baa					4				5
BB/Ba					1				—
Not Rated					2				1

1

Using the higher of S&P’s or Moody’s ratings.

Call/Maturity Schedule 2
Calendar Year Ended December 31,
2014					2	%
2015					—
2016					1
2017					1
2018					15

2

Scheduled maturity dates and/or bonds that are subject to potential calls by issuers over the next five years.

SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

JANUARY 31, 2014

13

Fund Summary  as of January 31, 2014	BlackRock MuniYield New Jersey Fund, Inc.

Fund Overview

BlackRock MuniYield New Jersey Fund, Inc.’s (MYJ) (the “Fund”) investment objective is to provide shareholders with as high a level of current income exempt from federal income taxes and New Jersey personal income tax as is consistent with its investment policies and prudent investment management. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its assets in municipal obligations exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may subject to the federal alternative minimum tax) and New Jersey personal income taxes. Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests primarily in long-term municipal obligations that are investment grade quality at the time of investment. The Fund may invest up to 20% of its total assets in securities rated below investment grade or deemed equivalent at the time of purchase. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.

No assurance can be given that the Fund’s investment objective will be achieved.

Performance

•

For the six-month period ended January 31, 2014, the Fund returned 6.50% based on market price and 6.34% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper New Jersey Municipal Debt Funds category posted an average return of 4.50% based on market price and 6.00% based on NAV. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Fund’s discount to NAV, which narrowed during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. The following discussion relates to performance based on NAV.

•

As the municipal yield curve flattened during the period (i.e., rates on longer-dated bonds fell more than rates on shorter-dated securities), the Fund’s longer-dated holdings in health care, education and transportation experienced the strongest price appreciation. (Bond prices rise when rates fall.)

•

The Fund’s exposure to Puerto Rico government-related credits, although limited, was a detractor from results as credit spreads on these bonds widened materially during the period due to investors’ lack of confidence and a weak local economy. The Fund’s positions in Puerto Rico government-related securities were eliminated by the end of the period.

The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.

Fund Information

Symbol on NYSE				MYJ
Initial Offering Date				May 1, 1992
Yield on Closing Market Price as of January 31, 2014 ($14.13) 1				6.28%
Tax Equivalent Yield 2				12.19%
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share 3				$0.074
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share 3				$0.888
Economic Leverage as of January 31, 2014 4				39%

1

Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

2

Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal federal and state tax rate of 48.48%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based on income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent yields.

3

The monthly distribution per common share, declared on March 3, 2014, was increased to $0.075 per share. The yield on closing market price, current monthly distribution per common share and current annualized distribution per common share do not reflect the new distribution rate. The new distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change in the future.

4

Represents VRDP Shares and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VRDP Shares and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 5.

14

SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

JANUARY 31, 2014

	BlackRock MuniYield New Jersey Fund, Inc.

Market Price and Net Asset Value Per Share Summary

				1/31/14				7/31/13				Change				High				Low
Market Price				$	14.13			$	13.74				2.84	%		$	14.19			$	12.67
Net Asset Value				$	15.32			$	14.92				2.68	%		$	15.36			$	14.25

Market Price and Net Asset Value History For the Past Five Years

 

    

Overview of the Fund’s Long-Term Investments

Sector Allocation				1/31/14				7/31/13
Transportation					31	%			26	%
State					24				27
Education					14				14
County/City/Special District/School District					12				14
Health					9				9
Corporate					6				4
Housing					3				5
Utilities					1				1

Credit Quality Allocation 1				1/31/14				7/31/13
AAA/Aaa					4	%			4	%
AA/Aa					36				36
A					49				52
BBB/Baa					9				7
Not Rated 2					2				1

1

Using the higher of S&P’s or Moody’s ratings.

2

The investment advisor has deemed certain of these non-rated securities to be of investment grade quality. As of January 31, 2014 and July 31, 2013, the market value of these securities was $7,338,825, representing 2%, and $3,519,770, representing 1%, respectively, of the Fund’s long-term investments.

Call/Maturity Schedule 3
Calendar Year Ended December 31,
2014					5	%
2015					5
2016					1
2017					7
2018					11

3

Scheduled maturity dates and/or bonds that are subject to potential calls by issuers over the next five years.

SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

JANUARY 31, 2014

15

Schedule of Investments  January 31, 2014 (Unaudited)	BlackRock Muni New York Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc. (MNE) (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets)

Municipal Bonds				Par (000)				Value
New York — 132.9%
Corporate — 13.1%
City of New York New York Industrial Development Agency, RB, British Airways PLC Project, AMT, 7.63%, 12/01/32				$	1,000			$	1,004,830
City of New York New York Industrial Development Agency, Refunding RB, Terminal One Group Association Project, AMT (a):
5.50%, 1/01/18					1,000				1,083,010
5.50%, 1/01/21					250				268,377
5.50%, 1/01/24					1,000				1,070,560
County of Essex New York Industrial Development Agency, Refunding RB, International Paper Co. Project, Series A, AMT, 5.20%, 12/01/23					1,000				1,016,170
County of Jefferson New York Industrial Development Agency, Refunding RB, Solid Waste Disposal, International Paper Co. Project, Series A, AMT, 5.20%, 12/01/20					500				500,135
New York State Energy Research & Development Authority, Refunding RB (NPFGC):
Brooklyn Union Gas/Keyspan, Series A, AMT, 4.70%, 2/01/24					500				521,410
Rochester Gas & Electric Corp., Series C, 5.00%, 8/01/32 (a)					1,000				1,089,380
Niagara Area Development Corp., Refunding RB, Solid Waste Disposal Facility, Covanta Energy Project, Series B, 4.00%, 11/01/24					500				467,885
Utility Debt Securitization Authority, Refunding RB, New York Restructuring, Series E, 5.00%, 12/15/32					1,000				1,115,410
									8,137,167
County/City/Special District/School District — 23.0%
Amherst Development Corp., Refunding RB, University at Buffalo Foundation Faculty-Student Housing Corp., Series A (AGM), 4.00%, 10/01/24					1,000				1,029,310
City of New York New York, GO, Refunding:
Fiscal 2013, Series J, 5.00%, 8/01/23					2,000				2,329,140
Series E, 5.00%, 8/01/27					600				675,096
Series E, 5.00%, 8/01/30					500				545,375
Series H, 5.00%, 8/01/25					1,000				1,135,130
City of New York New York, GO:
Sub-Series A-1, 5.00%, 8/01/33					700				753,158
Sub-Series F-1, 5.00%, 3/01/29					250				274,668
Sub-Series G-1, 5.00%, 4/01/29					750				817,590
Sub-Series I-1, 5.13%, 4/01/25					750				852,832
City of New York New York Convention Center Development Corp., RB, Hotel Unit Fee Secured (AMBAC), 5.00%, 11/15/35					120				121,342
City of New York New York Industrial Development Agency, RB, PILOT, Queens Baseball Stadium (AMBAC), 5.00%, 1/01/31					1,500				1,400,790

Municipal Bonds				Par (000)				Value
New York (continued)
County/City/Special District/School District (concluded)
City of New York New York Industrial Development Agency, Refunding ARB, Transportation Infrastructure Properties LLC, Series A, AMT, 5.00%, 7/01/22				$	500			$	519,465
County of Monroe New York Industrial Development Corp., Refunding RB, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/30					1,000				1,097,540
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., RB, Senior, Fiscal 2012, Series A, 5.75%, 2/15/47					1,000				1,080,590
New York Liberty Development Corp., Refunding RB, Liberty, 4 World Trade Center Project, 5.00%, 11/15/31					1,000				1,064,920
United Nations Development Corp., Refunding RB, Series A, 4.25%, 7/01/24					500				521,105
									14,218,051
Education — 20.6%
Build NYC Resource Corp., RB, Series A:
Bronx Charter School For Excellence Project, 3.88%, 4/15/23					505				421,963
South Bronx Charter School For International Cultures and The Arts Project, 5.00%, 4/01/33					750				714,398
County of Buffalo & Erie New York Industrial Land Development Corp., Refunding RB, Buffalo State College Foundation Housing, 6.00%, 10/01/31					1,000				1,128,800
County of Madison New York Capital Resource Corp., Refunding RB, Colgate University Project, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/33					650				712,862
County of Nassau New York Industrial Development Agency, Refunding RB, New York Institute of Technology Project, Series A, 5.00%, 3/01/21					1,000				1,101,430
County of Schenectady New York Capital Resource Corp., Refunding RB, Union College, 5.00%, 7/01/32					940				1,010,754
County of Schenectady New York Industrial Development Agency, Refunding RB, Union College Project, 5.00%, 7/01/26					1,000				1,081,630
County of Suffolk New York Industrial Development Agency, Refunding RB, New York Institute of Technology Project, 5.25%, 3/01/21					600				613,272
New York State Dormitory Authority, RB:
Convent of the Sacred Heart (AGM), 4.00%, 11/01/18					880				978,023
Convent of the Sacred Heart (AGM), 5.00%, 11/01/21					120				134,887
Fordham University, Series A, 5.25%, 7/01/25					500				561,400
Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 5.50%, 7/01/25					1,000				1,096,080
Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Series A (NPFGC), 5.15%, 7/01/24					250				274,960
New York State Dormitory Authority, Refunding RB:
Pace University, Series A, 5.00%, 5/01/24					850				860,616
Teachers College, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/31					375				402,949
The Culinary Institute of America, 5.00%, 7/01/28					500				522,325

Portfolio Abbreviations

To simplify the listings of portfolio holdings in the Schedules of Investments, the names and descriptions of many of the securities have been abbreviated according to the following list:

AGC

Assured Guaranty Corp.

HFA

Housing Finance Agency

AGM

Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.

HRB

Housing Revenue Bonds

AMBAC

American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp.

IDA

Industrial Development Authority DB

AMT

Alternative Minimum Tax (subject to)

IDB

Industrial Development Board

ARB

Airport Revenue Bonds

IDRB

Industrial Development Revenue Bonds

BARB

Building Aid Revenue Bonds

ISD

Independent School District

BHAC

Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.

LRB

Lease Revenue Bonds

CAB

Capital Appreciation Bonds

M/F

Multi-Family

CIFG

CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty

NPFGC

National Public Finance Guarantee Corp.

COP

Certificates of Participation

PILOT

Payment in Lieu of Taxes

EDA

Economic Development Authority

RB

Revenue Bonds

ERB

Education Revenue Bonds

S/F

Single-Family

GARB

General Airport Revenue Bonds

SONYMA

State of New York Mortgage Agency

GO

General Obligation Bonds

Syncora

Syncora Guarantee

See Notes to Financial Statements.

16

SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

JANUARY 31, 2014

Schedule of Investments (continued)	BlackRock Muni New York Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc. (MNE) (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets)

Municipal Bonds				Par (000)				Value
New York (continued)
Education (concluded)
State of New York Dormitory Authority, Refunding RB, State University Dormitory Facilities, Series A, 5.25%, 7/01/30				$	1,050			$	1,168,660
									12,785,009
Health — 18.3%
City of New York New York Industrial Development Agency, RB, PSCH, Inc. Project, 6.20%, 7/01/20					1,415				1,386,035
County of Dutchess New York Industrial Development Agency, RB, Vassar Brothers Medical Center (AGC), 5.00%, 4/01/21					215				246,287
County of Dutchess New York Local Development Corp., Refunding RB, Health Quest System, Inc., Series A (AGM), 5.25%, 7/01/25					1,000				1,099,770
County of Erie New York Industrial Development Agency, RB, Episcopal Church Home, Series A, 5.88%, 2/01/18					325				325,543
County of Genesee New York Industrial Development Agency, Refunding RB, United Memorial Medical Center Project, 4.75%, 12/01/14					150				150,216
County of Suffolk New York Industrial Development Agency, Refunding RB, Jefferson’s Ferry Project, 4.63%, 11/01/16					800				862,208
County of Westchester New York Healthcare Corp., Refunding RB, Senior Lien:
Remarketing, Series A, 5.00%, 11/01/24					910				984,556
Remarketing, Series A, 5.00%, 11/01/30					250				259,743
Series B, 6.00%, 11/01/30					240				265,294
County of Westchester New York Industrial Development Agency, RB, Special Needs Facilities Pooled Program, Series D-1, 6.80%, 7/01/19					515				515,973
County of Westchester New York Local Development Corp., Refunding RB, Kendal On Hudson Project:
3.00%, 1/01/18					500				514,925
4.00%, 1/01/23					480				476,981
New York State Dormitory Authority, RB:
New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc., Series A, 5.30%, 7/01/23					450				491,031
New York University Hospitals Center, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/22					1,000				1,109,160
New York University Hospitals Center, Series B, 5.25%, 7/01/24					380				403,370
New York State Dormitory Authority, Refunding RB:
Mount Sinai Hospital, Series A, 4.25%, 7/01/23					250				261,567
North Shore-Long Island Jewish, Series E, 5.00%, 5/01/22					650				709,501
State of New York Dormitory Authority, Refunding RB, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Obligated Group, Series A, 5.00%, 5/01/32					500				520,620
Yonkers New York Industrial Development Agency, RB, Sacred Heart Association Project, Series A, AMT (SONYMA), 4.80%, 10/01/26					750				764,490
									11,347,270
Housing — 7.4%
City of New York New York Housing Development Corp., RB, M/F Housing:
Series B1, 5.25%, 7/01/30					500				549,860
Series H-2-A, Remarketing, AMT, 5.00%, 11/01/30					780				788,276
New York State Mortgage Agency, Refunding RB, Homeowner Mortgage, 130th Series, AMT, 4.75%, 10/01/30					2,500				2,504,350
State of New York Mortgage Agency, Refunding RB, AMT:
133rd Series, 4.95%, 10/01/21					230				233,921
143rd Series, 4.85%, 10/01/27					500				505,815
									4,582,222

Municipal Bonds				Par (000)				Value
New York (concluded)
State — 14.4%
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Refunding RB, Series B, 5.25%, 11/15/25				$	750			$	865,132
New York City Transitional Finance Authority, BARB, Fiscal 2009, Series S-3, 5.00%, 1/15/23					575				648,307
New York State Dormitory Authority, RB:
Education, Series F, 5.00%, 3/15/30					1,290				1,333,615
Haverstraw King’s Daughters Public Library, 5.00%, 7/01/26					1,015				1,117,515
Municipal Health Facilities Lease, Sub-Series 2-4, 5.00%, 1/15/27					600				655,110
Unrefunded Balance, Series D, 5.00%, 3/15/31					500				533,615
New York State Dormitory Authority, Refunding RB, Department of Health, Series A (CIFG), 5.00%, 7/01/25					1,500				1,579,710
New York State Thruway Authority, Refunding RB, Series A-1, 5.00%, 4/01/22					1,000				1,145,840
New York State Urban Development Corp., RB, Personal Income Tax, Series A-1, 5.00%, 3/15/32					400				436,372
State of New York Thruway Authority, RB, Transportation, Series A, 5.00%, 3/15/32					250				272,733
State of New York Urban Development Corp., RB, Personal Income Tax, Series A, 3.50%, 3/15/28					305				302,639
									8,890,588
Transportation — 23.9%
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, RB:
Series A, 5.00%, 11/15/27					1,000				1,085,460
Series A (NPFGC), 5.00%, 11/15/16 (b)					990				1,114,621
Series A (NPFGC), 5.00%, 11/15/24					1,010				1,118,636
Series B (NPFGC), 5.25%, 11/15/19					860				1,019,031
Series H, 5.00%, 11/15/30					500				534,800
Sub-Series B-1, 5.00%, 11/15/24					460				525,306
Sub-Series B-4, 5.00%, 11/15/24					300				342,591
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Refunding RB, Series F, 5.00%, 11/15/30					500				534,800
Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, ARB, JFK International Air Terminal LLC Project, 5.00%, 12/01/20					1,000				1,093,600
Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, Refunding ARB, Consolidated, 152nd Series, AMT, 5.00%, 11/01/23					500				543,135
Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, Refunding RB, AMT:
178th Series, 5.00%, 12/01/32					1,000				1,059,710
Consolidated, 138th Series, 4.75%, 12/01/30					205				208,169
Consolidated, 152nd Series, 5.00%, 11/01/24					1,000				1,084,040
State of New York Thruway Authority, Refunding RB, General, Series I, 5.00%, 1/01/37					1,000				1,049,250
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, Refunding RB, Series A:
5.00%, 11/15/22					525				624,897
5.00%, 11/15/24					2,000				2,289,840
5.00%, 1/01/27					500				555,835
									14,783,721
Utilities — 12.2%
City of New York New York Municipal Water Finance Authority, Refunding RB, Water & Sewer System, 2nd General Resolution:
Series DD, 5.00%, 6/15/32					500				528,895
Series EE, 5.00%, 6/15/34					3,000				3,240,330
Long Island Power Authority, Refunding RB:
Electric System, Series A, 5.50%, 4/01/24					500				555,715
General, Series D (NPFGC), 5.00%, 9/01/25					2,000				2,167,280
New York State Environmental Facilities Corp., Refunding RB, NYC Municipal Water Finance Authority Project, 2nd Resolution, Series B, 5.00%, 6/15/31					1,000				1,094,650
									7,586,870
Total Municipal Bonds in New York									82,330,898

See Notes to Financial Statements.

SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

JANUARY 31, 2014

17

Schedule of Investments (continued)	BlackRock Muni New York Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc. (MNE) (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets)

Municipal Bonds				Par (000)				Value
Puerto Rico — 2.5%
Housing — 2.5%
Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority, Refunding RB, Subordinate, Capital Fund Modernization, 5.13%, 12/01/27				$	1,570			$	1,571,554
Total Municipal Bonds — 135.4%									83,902,452
Municipal Bonds Transferred to Tender Option Bond Trusts (c)
New York — 21.1%
County/City/Special District/School District — 10.8%
City of New York New York, GO, Refunding, Series E, 5.25%, 8/01/22					2,000				2,367,000
City of New York New York, GO:
Sub-Series B-1, 5.25%, 9/01/22					750				858,098
Sub-Series I-1, 5.50%, 4/01/21					1,499				1,759,993
New York State Urban Development Corp., Refunding RB, Service Contracts, Series B, 5.00%, 1/01/21					1,499				1,697,588
									6,682,679
Transportation — 5.0%
Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, ARB, Consolidated, 169th Series, AMT, 5.00%, 10/15/26					750				817,388
Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, RB, Consolidated, 169th Series, AMT, 5.00%, 10/15/21					2,000				2,325,120
									3,142,508

Municipal Bonds Transferred to Tender Option Bond Trusts (c)				Par (000)				Value
New York (concluded)
Utilities — 5.3%
City of New York New York Municipal Water Finance Authority, Refunding RB, Water & Sewer System:
2nd General Resolution, Fiscal 2011, Series HH, 5.00%, 6/15/32				$	1,560			$	1,689,745
Series A, 4.75%, 6/15/30					1,500				1,589,580
									3,279,325
Total Municipal Bonds Transferred to Tender Option Bond Trusts — 21.1%									13,104,512
Total Long-Term Investments (Cost — $93,739,308) — 156.5%									97,006,964
Short-Term Securities					Shares
BIF New York Municipal Money Fund, 0.00% (d)(e)					342,677				342,677
Total Short-Term Securities (Cost — $342,677) — 0.6%									342,677
Total Investments (Cost — $94,081,985) — 157.1%									97,349,641
Other Assets Less Liabilities — 1.3%									755,707
Liability for TOB Trust Certificates, Including Interest Expense and Fees Payable — (10.6%)									(6,538,577	)
VRDP Shares, at Liquidation Value — (47.8%)									(29,600,000	)
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0%								$	61,966,771

Notes to Schedule of Investments

(a)				Variable rate security. Rate shown is as of report date.
(b)				US government securities, held in escrow, are used to pay interest on this security, as well as to retire the bond in full at the date indicated, typically at a premium to par.
(c)				Represent bonds transferred to a TOB. In exchange for which the Fund acquired residual interest certificates. These bonds serve as collateral in a financing transaction. See Note 3 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details of municipal bonds transferred to TOBs.
(d)				Investments in issuers considered to be an affiliate of the Fund during the six months ended January 31, 2014, for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the 1940 Act, were as follows:

 

Affiliate		Shares Held at July 31, 2013		Net Activity		Shares Held at January 31, 2014		Income
BIF New York Municipal Money Fund		802,542		(459,865)		342,677		—

(e)				Represents the current yield as of report date.
•				Financial futures contracts outstanding as of January 31, 2014 were as follows:

 

Contracts Sold				Issue				Exchange				Expiration				Notional Value				Unrealized Depreciation
(52)				10-Year US Treasury Note				Chicago Board of Trade				March 2014				$	6,539,000			$	(105,551	)

•

For Fund compliance purposes, the Fund’s sector classifications refer to any one or more of the sector sub-classifications used by one or more widely recognized market indexes or rating group indexes, and/or as defined by the investment advisor. These definitions may not apply for purposes of this report, which may combine such sector sub-classifications for reporting ease.

See Notes to Financial Statements.

18

SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

JANUARY 31, 2014

Schedule of Investments (concluded)	BlackRock Muni New York Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc. (MNE)

•

Fair Value Measurements – Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of investments and derivative financial instruments. These inputs to valuation techniques are categorized into a disclosure hierarchy consisting of three broad levels for financial statement purposes as follows:

•				Level 1 – unadjusted price quotations in active markets/exchanges for identical assets or liabilities that the Fund has the ability to access
•				Level 2 – other observable inputs (including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are active, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities (such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates) or other market-corroborated inputs)
•				Level 3 – unobservable inputs based on the best information available in the circumstances, to the extent observable inputs are not available (including the Fund’s own assumptions used in determining the fair value of investments and derivative financial instruments)

				The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3. The inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the fair value hierarchy classification is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
				Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy. In accordance with the Fund’s policy, transfers between different levels of the fair value disclosure hierarchy are deemed to have occurred as of the beginning of the reporting period. The categorization of a value determined for investments and derivative financial instruments is based on the pricing transparency of the investment and derivative financial instrument and is not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in those securities. For information about the Fund’s policy regarding valuation of investments and derivative financial instruments, please refer to Note 2 of the Notes to Financial Statements.
				The following tables summarize the Fund’s investments and derivative financial instruments categorized in the disclosure hierarchy as of January 31, 2014:

 

				Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				Total
Assets:
Investments:
Long-Term Investments 1					—			$	97,006,964				—			$	97,006,964
Short-Term Securities				$	342,677				—				—				342,677
Total				$	342,677			$	97,006,964				—			$	97,349,641

1

See above Schedule of Investments for values in each sector.

 

				Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				Total
Derivative Financial Instruments 2
Liabilities:
Interest rate contracts				$	(105,551	)			—				—			$	(105,551	)

2

Derivative financial instruments are financial futures contracts, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation/depreciation on the instrument.

The carrying amount for certain of the Fund’s assets and/or liabilities approximates fair value for financial statement purposes. As of January 31, 2014, such assets and/or liabilities are categorized within the disclosure hierarchy as follows:

 

				Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				Total
Assets:
Cash pledged for financial futures contracts				$	87,000				—				—			$	87,000
Liabilities:
TOB trust certificates					—			$	(6,537,751	)			—				(6,537,751	)
VRDP Shares					—				(29,600,000	)			—				(29,600,000	)
Total				$	87,000			$	(36,137,751	)			—			$	(36,050,751	)

There were no transfers between levels during the six months ended January 31, 2014.

See Notes to Financial Statements.

SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

JANUARY 31, 2014

19

Schedule of Investments  January 31, 2014 (Unaudited)	BlackRock MuniYield Arizona Fund, Inc. (MZA) (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets)