ITEM 1: CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AWARE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS
(in thousands, except
share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
June
30,
2018
|
|
|
December
31,
2017
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
49,121
|
|
|
$
|
51,608
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
3,517
|
|
|
|
2,389
|
|
Unbilled receivables
|
|
|
1,542
|
|
|
|
1,429
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
54,404
|
|
|
|
55,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
4,226
|
|
|
|
4,304
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
5,223
|
|
|
|
5,071
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
63,853
|
|
|
$
|
65,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
164
|
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,366
|
|
|
|
1,401
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
3,876
|
|
|
|
4,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred revenue
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingent liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 1,000,000 shares
authorized, none outstanding
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 70,000,000 shares authorized; issued and
outstanding 21,520,117 as of June 30, 2018 and 21,493,440 as of December 31, 2017
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
96,282
|
|
|
|
96,246
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(36,610
|
)
|
|
|
(35,927
|
)
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
59,887
|
|
|
|
60,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’
equity
|
|
$
|
63,853
|
|
|
$
|
65,035
|
|
The accompanying notes
are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
AWARE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands, except
per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
$
|
1,659
|
|
|
$
|
1,014
|
|
|
$
|
3,133
|
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
|
Software maintenance
|
|
|
1,402
|
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
2,696
|
|
|
|
2,534
|
|
Services
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
Royalties
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
3,760
|
|
|
|
2,542
|
|
|
|
6,671
|
|
|
|
6,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of software licenses
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
1,887
|
|
|
|
1,876
|
|
|
|
3,762
|
|
|
|
3,733
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
1,937
|
|
|
|
1,910
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
816
|
|
|
|
1,656
|
|
|
|
1,605
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
4,141
|
|
|
|
3,791
|
|
|
|
7,775
|
|
|
|
7,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patent related income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(381
|
)
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
(1,104
|
)
|
|
|
286
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
(741
|
)
|
|
|
494
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income
taxes
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
79
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(188
|
)
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
(683
|
)
|
|
$
|
415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share – basic
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
Net income (loss) per share – diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares – basic
|
|
|
21,534
|
|
|
|
21,774
|
|
|
|
21,540
|
|
|
|
22,013
|
|
Weighted-average shares - diluted
|
|
|
21,534
|
|
|
|
21,919
|
|
|
|
21,540
|
|
|
|
22,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(188
|
)
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
(683
|
)
|
|
$
|
415
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) (net of tax):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on
available for sale securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(188
|
)
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
(683
|
)
|
|
$
|
434
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of the consolidated financial statements.
AWARE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(683
|
)
|
|
$
|
415
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
Deferred tax benefit on other comprehensive income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Amortization of discount on investments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Gain on sale of investments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(1,128
|
)
|
|
|
(289
|
)
|
Unbilled receivables
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
377
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
|
|
(642
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
|
|
|
(2,182
|
)
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Sales of investments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Payments made for taxes of employees who surrendered
shares related to unrestricted stock
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
(3,646
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
(3,722
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(2,487
|
)
|
|
|
(2,488
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning
of period
|
|
|
51,608
|
|
|
|
51,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end
of period
|
|
$
|
49,121
|
|
|
$
|
49,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
The accompanying notes
are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
AWARE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
|
A)
|
Nature of Business.
We
are a leading provider of software and services to the biometrics industry. Our software
products are used in government and commercial biometrics systems, which are capable
of determining or verifying an individual’s identity. We also offer engineering
services related to software customization, integration, and installation, as well as
complete systems development. We sell our biometrics software products and services globally
through systems integrators, OEMs, and directly to end user customers. We also derive
a portion of our revenue from the sale of imaging software.
|
|
B)
|
Basis of Presentation.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with the instructions for Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all information and
notes necessary for a complete presentation of our financial position, results of operations
and cash flows, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. We filed
audited financial statements which included all information and notes necessary for such
presentation for the three years ended December 31, 2017 in conjunction with our 2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K. This Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with that Form
10-K.
|
The accompanying unaudited consolidated
balance sheets, statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), and statements of cash flows reflect all adjustments
(consisting only of normal recurring items) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of financial
position at June 30, 2018, and of operations and cash flows for the interim periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.
The results of operations for the
interim period ended June 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year.
|
C)
|
Revenue Recognition.
Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”),
Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), using the full
retrospective transition method. Adoption of the standard using the full retrospective
method required us to restate certain previously reported results.
|
In accordance with ASC 606, revenue
is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods and services. The amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration
to which we expect to be entitled to receive in exchange for these goods and services. In addition, ASC 606 requires disclosures
of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.
The core principle of the standard
is that we should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects
the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, we
should apply the following five step model:
|
1.
|
Identify the contract with the customer;
|
|
2.
|
Identify the performance obligations in the contract;
|
|
3.
|
Determine the transaction price;
|
|
4.
|
Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations
in the contract; and
|
|
5.
|
Recognize revenue when (or as) each performance obligation
is satisfied.
|
1) Identify the contract with the customer
A contract with a customer exists
when (i) we enter into an enforceable contract with a customer that defines each party’s rights regarding the goods or services
to be transferred and identifies the related payment terms, (ii) the contract has commercial substance, and (iii) we determine
that collection of substantially all consideration for goods and services that are transferred is probable based on the customer’s
intent and ability to pay the promised consideration. We apply judgment in determining the customer’s intent and ability
to pay, which is based on a variety of factors including the customer’s historical payment experience, or in the case of
a new customer, published credit and financial information pertaining to the customer.
We evaluate contract modifications
for the impact on revenue recognition if they have been approved by both parties such that the enforceable rights and obligations
under the contract have changed. Contract modifications are either accounted for using a cumulative effect adjustment or prospectively
over the remaining term of the arrangement. The determination of which method is more appropriate depends on the nature of the
modification, which we evaluate on a case-by-case basis.
We combine two or more contracts
entered into at or near the same time with the same customer and account for them as a single contract if (i) the contracts are
negotiated as a package with a common commercial objective, (ii) the amount of consideration to be paid in one contract depends
on the price or performance of the other contract, or (iii) some or all of the goods or services in one contract would be combined
with some or all of the goods and services in the other contract into a single performance obligation. If two or more contracts
are combined, the consideration to be paid is aggregated and allocated to the individual performance obligations without regard
to the consideration specified in the individual contracts.
2) Identify the performance obligations in the
contract
Performance obligations promised
in a contract are identified based on the goods and services that will be transferred to the customer that are both capable of
being distinct, whereby the customer can benefit from the good or service either on its own or together with other available resources,
and are distinct in the context of the contract, whereby the transfer of the good or service is separately identifiable from other
promises in the contract. To the extent a contract includes multiple promised goods and services, we apply judgment to determine
whether promised goods and services are capable of being distinct and distinct in the context of the contract. If these criteria
are not met, the promised goods and services are accounted for as a combined performance obligation. To identify performance obligations,
we consider all of the goods or services promised in a contract regardless of whether they are explicitly stated or are implied
by customary business practices.
3) Determine the transaction price
The transaction price is determined
based on the consideration we expect to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods and services to the customer.
Determining the transaction price requires significant judgment. To the extent the transaction price includes variable consideration,
we estimate the amount of variable consideration that should be included in the transaction price utilizing either the expected
value method or the most likely amount method depending on the nature of the variable consideration. Variable consideration is
included in the transaction price if, in our judgment, it is probable that a significant future reversal of cumulative revenue
recognized under the contract will not occur. Any estimates, including the effect of the constraint on variable consideration,
are evaluated at each reporting period. The amount of consideration is not adjusted for a significant financing component if the
time between payment and the transfer of the related good or service is expected to be one year or less under the practical expedient
in ASC 606-10-32-18. Our revenue arrangements are typically accounted for under such expedient, as payment is typically due within
30 to 60 days. As of June 30, 2018, none of our contracts contained a significant financing component.
4) Allocate the transaction price to performance
obligations in the contract
If the contract contains a single
performance obligation, the entire transaction price is allocated to the single performance obligation. Contracts that contain
multiple performance obligations require an allocation of the transaction price to each performance obligation based on a relative
standalone selling price (“SSP”) basis unless the transaction price is variable and meets the criteria to be allocated
entirely to a performance obligation or to a distinct service that forms part of a single performance obligation. The consideration
to be received is allocated among the separate performance obligations based on relative SSPs. The SSP is the price at which we
would sell a promised good or service separately to a customer. The best estimate of SSP is the observable price of a good or
service when we sell that good or service separately. A contractually stated price or a list price for a good or service may be
the SSP of that good or service. We use a range of amounts to estimate SSP when we sell each of the goods and services separately
and need to determine whether there is a discount that needs to be allocated based on the relative SSP of the various goods and
services. In instances where SSP is not directly observable, such as when we do not sell the product or service separately, we
typically determine the SSP using an adjusted market assessment approach using information that may include market conditions
and other observable inputs. We typically have more than one SSP for individual goods and services due to the stratification of
those goods and services by customers and circumstances. In these instances, we may use information such as the nature of the
customer and distribution channel in determining the SSP.
5) Recognize revenue when or as we satisfy a performance
obligation
We satisfy performance obligations
either over time or at a point in time as discussed in further detail below. Revenue is recognized over time if 1) the customer
simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by our performance, 2) our performance creates or enhances an asset
that the customer controls as the asset is created or enhanced, or 3) our performance does not create an asset with an alternative
use to us and we have an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date. If we do not satisfy a performance obligation
over time, the related performance obligation is satisfied at a point in time by transferring the control of a promised good or
service to a customer.
We categorize revenue as software
licenses, software maintenance, services, or royalties. In addition to the general revenue recognition policies described above,
specific revenue recognition policies apply to each category of revenue.
Software licenses
Software licenses consist of revenue
from the sale of software licenses for biometrics and imaging applications. Our software licenses are functional intellectual
property and typically provide customers with the right to use our software in perpetuity as it exists when made available to
the customer. We recognize revenue from software licenses at a point in time upon delivery, provided all other revenue recognition
criteria are met.
Software maintenance
Software maintenance consists of
revenue from the sale of software maintenance contracts for biometrics and imaging software. Software maintenance contracts entitle
customers to receive software support and software updates, if and when they become available, during the term of the maintenance
contract. Software support and software updates are considered distinct services. However, these distinct services are considered
a single performance obligation consisting of a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and have the same
pattern of transfer to the customer. We recognize software maintenance revenue over time on a straight-line basis over the contract
period.
Services
Service revenue consists of fees
from biometrics customers for software engineering services we provide to them. We recognize services revenue over time as the
services are delivered using an input method (i.e., labor hours incurred as a percentage of total labor hours budgeted), provided
all other revenue recognition criteria are met.
Royalties
Royalties consist primarily of
royalty payments we receive under DSL silicon contracts with two customers that incorporate our silicon intellectual property
(“IP”) in their DSL chipsets. We sold the assets of our DSL IP business in 2009, but we continued to receive royalty
payments from these customers. Royalties are reported in continuing operations in accordance with ASC 205, Reporting Discontinued
Operations, because we have continuing ongoing cash flows from this business.
We recognize revenue from sales-based
royalties at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the
royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied).
Refer to Note G – Business
Segments for further information on the disaggregation of revenue, including revenue by geography and category.
Arrangements with multiple
performance obligations
In addition to selling software
licenses, software maintenance and software services on a standalone basis, a significant portion of our contracts include multiple
performance obligations. The various combinations of multiple performance obligations and our revenue recognition for each are
described as follows:
|
•
|
Software
licenses and software maintenance. When software licenses and software maintenance contracts
are sold together, the software licenses and software maintenance are generally considered
distinct performance obligations. The transaction price is allocated to the software
licenses and the software maintenance based on relative SSP. Revenue allocated to the
software licenses is recognized at a point in time upon delivery, provided all other
revenue recognition criteria are met. Revenue allocated to the software maintenance is
recognized over time on a straight-line basis over the contract period.
|
|
•
|
Software
licenses and services. When software licenses and significant customization engineering
services are sold together, they are accounted for as a combined performance obligation,
as the software licenses are generally highly dependent on, and interrelated with, the
associated services and therefore are not distinct performance obligations. Revenue for
the combined performance obligation is recognized over time as the services are delivered
using an input method (i.e., labor hours incurred as a percentage of total labor hours
budgeted). When software licenses and standard implementation or consulting-type services
are sold together, they are generally considered distinct performance obligations as
the software licenses are not dependent on or interrelated with the associated services.
The transaction price in these arrangements is allocated to the software licenses and
services based on relative SSP. Revenue allocated to the software licenses is recognized
at a point in time upon delivery, provided all other revenue recognition criteria are
met. Revenue allocated to the services is recognized over time using an input method
(i.e., labor hours incurred as a percentage of total labor hours budgeted). In arrangements
with both software licenses and services, the software license portion of the arrangement
is classified as software license revenue and the services portion is classified as services
revenue in our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
|
|
•
|
Software
licenses, software maintenance and services. When we sell software licenses, software
maintenance and software services together, we account for the individual performance
obligations separately if they are distinct. The transaction price is allocated to the
separate performance obligations based on relative SSP. Revenue allocated to the software
licenses is recognized at a point in time upon delivery. Revenue allocated to the services
is recognized over time using an input method (i.e., labor hours incurred as a percentage
of total labor hours budgeted). Revenue for the software maintenance is recognized over
time on a straight-line basis over the contract period. However, if the software services
are significant customization engineering services, they are accounted for with the software
licenses as a combined performance obligation, as stated above. Revenue for the combined
performance obligation is recognized over time using an input method (i.e., labor hours
incurred as a percentage of total labor hours budgeted).
|
We do not offer rights of return
for our products and services in the normal course of business.
Customer Acceptance
Our contracts with customers generally
do not include customer acceptance clauses.
Contract Balances
When the timing of our delivery
of goods or services is different from the timing of payments made by customers, we recognize either a contract asset (performance
precedes contractual due date) or a contract liability (customer payment precedes performance). Customers that prepay are represented
by the deferred revenue below until the performance obligation is satisfied. Contract assets represent arrangements in which the
good or service has been delivered but payment is not yet due. Our contract assets consist of unbilled receivables. Our contract
liabilities consisted of deferred (unearned) revenue, which is generally related to software maintenance contracts. We classify
deferred revenue as current or noncurrent based on the timing of when we expect to recognize revenue.
The following table presents changes
in our contract assets and liabilities during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2018 (in thousands):
|
|
Balance at
Beginning
of
Period
|
|
|
Revenue
Recognized
In Advance of
Billings
|
|
|
Billings
|
|
|
Balance at End of
Period
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unbilled receivables
|
|
$
|
2,043
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
(243
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unbilled receivables
|
|
$
|
1,233
|
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
$
|
(233
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,542
|
|
|
|
Balance at
Beginning
of
Period
|
|
|
Billings
|
|
|
Revenue
Recognized
|
|
|
Balance at End of
Period
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
$
|
2,421
|
|
|
$
|
1,152
|
|
|
$
|
(1,282
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
$
|
2,396
|
|
|
$
|
1,427
|
|
|
$
|
(1,402
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
Balance at
Beginning
of
Period
|
|
|
Revenue
Recognized
In Advance of
Billings
|
|
|
Billings
|
|
|
Balance at End of
Period
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unbilled receivables
|
|
$
|
2,259
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
(502
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unbilled receivables
|
|
$
|
1,429
|
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
|
$
|
(462
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,542
|
|
|
|
Balance at
Beginning
of
Period
|
|
|
Billings
|
|
|
Revenue
Recognized
|
|
|
Balance at End of
Period
|
|
Six months ended June, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
$
|
2,933
|
|
|
$
|
1,903
|
|
|
$
|
(2,545
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
$
|
2,932
|
|
|
$
|
2,185
|
|
|
$
|
(2,696
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,421
|
|
Remaining Performance Obligations
Remaining performance obligations
represent the transaction price from contracts for which work has not been performed or goods and services have not been delivered.
We expect to recognize revenue on approximately 73% of the remaining performance obligations over the next 12 months, with the
remainder recognized thereafter. As of June 30, 2018, the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to remaining performance
obligations for services and software maintenance contracts with a duration greater than one year was $0.3 million and $1.7 million,
respectively. This does not include revenue related to performance obligations that are part of a contract whose original expected
duration is one year or less.
Contract Costs
We recognize an other asset for
the incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer if we expect the benefit of those costs to be longer than one year.
We have determined that certain sales commissions meet the requirements to be capitalized, and we amortize these costs on a consistent
basis with the pattern of transfer of the goods and services in the contract. Total capitalized costs to obtain a contract were
immaterial during the periods presented and are included in other current and long-term assets on our consolidated balance sheets.
We apply a practical expedient
to expense costs as incurred for costs to obtain a contract when the amortization period is one year or less. These costs include
sales commissions on software maintenance contracts with a contract period of one year or less as sales commissions paid on contract
renewals are commensurate with those paid on the initial contract.
|
D)
|
Fair Value Measurements.
The
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Codification defines fair value,
and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques
used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to the unadjusted
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements)
and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels
of the fair value hierarchy under the FASB Codification are: i) Level 1 – valuations
that are based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date;
ii) Level 2 – valuations that are based on quoted prices in markets that are not
active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly;
and iii) Level 3 – valuations that require inputs that are both significant to
the fair value measurement and unobservable.
|
Cash and cash equivalents, which
primarily include money market mutual funds, were $49.1 million and $51.6 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.
We classified our cash equivalents of $48.7 million and $50.0 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 within Level 1
of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices.
As of June 30, 2018, our assets
that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and whose carrying values approximate their respective fair values include
the following (in thousands):
|
|
Fair Value Measurement
at June 30, 2018 Using:
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical
Assets
|
|
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Money market funds
(included in cash and cash equivalents)
|
|
$
|
48,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
48,712
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
As of December 31, 2017, our assets
that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and whose carrying values approximate their respective fair values include
the following (in thousands):
|
|
Fair Value Measurement
at December 31, 2017 Using:
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical
Assets
|
|
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Money market funds (included in cash and cash equivalents)
|
|
$
|
49,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
49,986
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
E)
|
Computation of Earnings per Share.
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income or loss by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by
dividing net income or loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
plus additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential
common shares had been issued. For the purposes of this calculation, stock options are
considered common stock equivalents in periods in which they have a dilutive effect.
Stock options that are anti-dilutive are excluded from the calculation. Potential common
stock equivalents of 144,727 and 85,657 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018,
respectively, were not included in the per share calculation for diluted earnings per
share, because we had a net loss and the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
|
Net income (loss) per share is calculated as follows
(in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
Three Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(188
|
)
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
(683
|
)
|
|
$
|
415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
21,534
|
|
|
|
21,774
|
|
|
|
21,540
|
|
|
|
22,013
|
|
Additional dilutive common stock
equivalents
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
21,534
|
|
|
|
21,919
|
|
|
|
21,540
|
|
|
|
22,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share – basic
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
Net income (loss) per share - diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
F)
|
Stock-Based
Compensation.
The following table presents stock-based employee compensation
expenses included in our unaudited consolidated statements of comprehensive income (in
thousands):
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
$
|
196
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
$
|
267
|
|
Stock Option Grants
. We
may grant stock options under our 2001 Nonqualified Stock Plan although we have not granted any stock options since the first
quarter of 2012. When we grant stock options, we estimate their fair value using the Black-Scholes valuation model. This valuation
model takes into account the exercise price of the award, as well as a variety of significant assumptions. The assumptions used
to estimate the fair value of stock options include the expected term, the expected volatility of our stock over the expected
term, the risk-free interest rate over the expected term, and our expected annual dividend yield. We believe that the valuation
technique and the approach utilized to develop the underlying assumptions are appropriate in calculating the fair values of our
stock options. Estimates of fair value are not intended to predict actual future events or the value ultimately realized by persons
who receive equity awards.
Unrestricted Stock Grants
.
We also grant unrestricted shares of stock under our 2001 Nonqualified Stock Plan. Stock-based compensation expense for stock
grants is determined based on the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant, provided the number of shares in the grant
is fixed on the grant date.
We granted shares of unrestricted
stock in 2018 and 2017 that affected financial results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. These
grants are described below.
2018 Grant.
On March 20, 2018,
we granted 138,000 shares of unrestricted stock to directors, officers and employees. The shares will be issued in two equal installments
shortly after June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2018, provided each grantee is serving as a director, officer or employee on those
dates. The total stock-based compensation expense related to this grant is $580,000, of which $184,000 and $208,000 was charged
to expense in the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and we anticipate the remaining $372,000 will be charged to expense
ratably over the remaining two quarters of 2018.
2017 Grant
. In February 2017,
we granted 134,000 shares of unrestricted stock to directors, officers and employees. The shares were issued in two equal installments
shortly after June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2017. We expensed the entire $663,000 stock-based compensation expense related to
this grant in 2017. We issued shares of common stock related to this grant as follows: i) 54,014 net shares of common stock were
issued in early July 2017 after employees surrendered 12,986 shares for which we paid $67,000 of withholding taxes on their behalf;
and ii) 53,378 net shares of common stock were issued in early January 2018 after employees surrendered 13,622 shares for which
we paid $64,000 of withholding taxes on their behalf.
|
G)
|
Business Segments
. We
organize ourselves into a single segment that reports to the chief operating decision
maker.
|
We conduct our operations in the
United States and sell our products and services to domestic and international customers. Revenues were generated from the following
geographic regions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
1,522
|
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
$
|
3,591
|
|
|
$
|
5,120
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
1,374
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Rest of World
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
1,572
|
|
|
|
1,388
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,760
|
|
|
$
|
2,542
|
|
|
$
|
6,671
|
|
|
$
|
6,698
|
|
Revenue by product group for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biometrics
|
|
$
|
3,403
|
|
|
$
|
2,288
|
|
|
$
|
5,888
|
|
|
$
|
6,091
|
|
Imaging
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
783
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
DSL royalties
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,760
|
|
|
$
|
2,542
|
|
|
$
|
6,671
|
|
|
$
|
6,698
|
|
Revenue by timing of transfer of
goods or services for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goods or services transferred at a point in time
|
|
$
|
1,064
|
|
|
$
|
1,054
|
|
|
$
|
2,538
|
|
|
$
|
3,583
|
|
Goods or services transferred over time
|
|
|
2,696
|
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
|
|
4,133
|
|
|
|
3,115
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,760
|
|
|
$
|
2,542
|
|
|
$
|
6,671
|
|
|
$
|
6,698
|
|
|
H)
|
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements.
|
FASB ASU No. 2014-09.
In
May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The ASU is
the result of a joint project by the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) to clarify the
principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards
(“IFRS”) that would: remove inconsistencies and weaknesses, provide a more robust framework for addressing revenue
issues, improve comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, jurisdictions, industries, and capital markets,
improve disclosure requirements and resulting financial statements, and simplify the presentation of financial statements. The
core principle of the new guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services
to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods
or services. We adopted the standard on January 1, 2018 utilizing the full retrospective method.
We implemented new internal controls
for the implementation and modified and augmented our existing internal controls to enable the preparation of financial information
on adoption. The most significant impacts of adopting the new standard related to the following:
|
i)
|
2015 imaging software license
contract.
We consummated a $4.625 million license contract in October 2015 that included
a $4.5 million license fee plus a $125,000 software maintenance fee. We delivered the
licensed software and the customer paid us in the fourth quarter of 2015. Under legacy
GAAP, we were unable to establish vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”)
for the maintenance element and, as a result we recognized the total fee ratably over
the twelve-month period that ran from October 2015 to October 2016. Under the new standard,
license revenue of $4.5 million from that contract is recognized in 2015 when control
over the software was transferred to the customer and software maintenance revenue of
$125,000 is recognized ratably over the twelve-month period that ran from October 2015
to October 2016. This change resulted in a decrease in revenue of $3.6 million for fiscal
year 2016. This change had no impact to our reported results for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2017.
|
|
ii)
|
DSL royalty contracts.
Under our legacy revenue recognition policy, we recognized DSL royalty revenue in the
period in which we received royalty reports, which was typically in the quarter immediately
following the quarter in which sales of royalty-bearing products occurred. Under the
new standard, we recognize DSL royalty revenue in the quarter in which sales of royalty-bearing
products occur. Therefore, we make estimates of royalties earned in the current period
and record royalty revenue based on those estimates. This change resulted in a decrease
in revenue of $17,000 and $39,000 for fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively. This
change resulted in a decrease in revenue of $2,000 for the three months ended June 30,
2017, and an increase in revenue of $7,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
|
|
iii)
|
Minimum license/royalty payment
contract.
One of our revenue contracts required the customer to make a fixed payment
for professional services as well as minimum license/royalty payments for software to
be distributed to end-users. Under legacy GAAP, we recognized the professional services
fee over the period that the services were performed and revenue for the minimum license/royalty
payments when those minimum payments became due. Under the new standard we recognized
the estimated amount of total consideration, including the professional services fee
and our estimate of variable consideration related to the minimum license/royalty payments,
in the contract that we expect to be entitled to and recognized revenue in the period(s)
that the related licenses and services were transferred to the customer. This change
resulted in a decrease in revenue of $800,000 for fiscal year 2017, $200,000 of which
related to the three months ended June 30, 2017 and $400,000 of which related to the
six months ended June 30, 2017, an increase in revenue of $860,000 for fiscal year 2016,
an increase in unbilled receivables of $1.4 million in fiscal year 2017, an increase
in unbilled receivables of $2.2 million in fiscal year 2016 and an increase in stockholders’
equity of $2.2 million in fiscal year 2016.
|
|
iv)
|
Sales commissions and other
third-party acquisition costs.
Under legacy GAAP, sales commissions and other third-party
acquisition costs resulting directly from securing contracts with customers were expensed
as incurred. ASC 340 requires these costs to be recognized as an asset when incurred
and expensed over a period consistent with the period of transfer to the customer of
goods or services to which the asset relates. We adopted the practical expedient that
if the amortization period of the asset that we otherwise would have recognized is one
year or less, we expense the sales commissions and other third-party acquisition costs
resulting directly from securing contracts with customers when incurred. The adoption
of the new standard resulted in a decrease in expense of approximately $114,000 for fiscal
year 2017, $29,000 of which related to the three months ended June 30, 2017 and $56,000
of which related to the six months ended June 20, 2017, and $294,000 for fiscal year
2016 and a decrease in stockholders’ equity of $0.3 million in fiscal year 2016.
For fiscal year 2017, the decrease in expense primarily relates to lower sales commissions
due to lower revenue on our minimum license/royalty payment contract as noted above.
For fiscal year 2016, the decrease primarily relates to lower sales commissions due to
lower revenue from our 2015 imaging software license contract and lower revenue on our
minimum license/royalty payment contract as noted above.
|
Revenue recognition related to
our other arrangements for software licenses, software maintenance, services, and hardware remained substantially unchanged.
As a practical expedient, for contracts
that were modified before the earliest reporting period of application of the standard, we have not retrospectively restated the
contracts for those contract modifications. Instead we have reflected the aggregate effect of all modifications that occurred
before the earliest reporting period of application when (i) identifying the satisfied and unsatisfied performance obligations,
(ii) determining the transaction price, and (iii) allocating the transaction price to the satisfied and unsatisfied performance
obligations.
We have not restated contracts
that began and were completed within the same annual reporting periods. For completed contracts that have variable consideration,
we have used the transaction price at the date the contract was completed rather than estimating variable consideration amounts
in comparative reporting periods.
For fiscal years 2017 and 2016,
adoption of the standard resulted in an aggregate decrease in revenue of $0.8 million and $2.8 million, respectively, a decrease
in costs and expenses of $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, a decrease in the provision for income taxes of $0.4 million
and $1.0 million, respectively, and an increase in stockholders’ equity of $0.9 million and $1.2 million respectively, primarily
due to the changes noted above. In addition, adoption of the standard resulted in an increase in accounts receivable of $1.4 million
and $2.2 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, driven by unbilled receivables from recognition of revenue from
the estimate of variable consideration related to the minimum license/royalty payments in one of our contracts; a decrease in
deferred tax assets of $0.3 million and $0.8 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, driven primarily by a difference
in timing of revenue recognition and expenses for book and tax purposes; and an increase in accrued expenses of $0.2 million and
$0.3 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, driven by sales commissions related to recognition of revenue from
the estimate of variable consideration related to the minimum license/royalty payments in one of our contracts.
For the three and six months ended
June 30, 2017, adoption of the standard resulted in an aggregate decrease in revenue of $202,000 and $393,000, respectively, a
decrease in costs and expenses of $29,000 and $56,000, respectively, and a decrease in the provision for income taxes of $59,000
and $119,000, respectively, primarily due to the same reasons noted above.
See Impacts of Topic 606 Adoption
to Reported Results below for the impact of the adoption of the new standard on our consolidated financial statements.
Impacts of Topic 606 Adoption to Reported Results
Adoption of the new revenue standard impacted our reported
results as follows:
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported
|
|
|
New Revenue
Standard
Adjustment
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,745
|
|
|
$
|
(203
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,542
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
3,820
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
3,791
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
74
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
114
|
|
Net income per share - basic and diluted
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June
30, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported
|
|
|
New Revenue
Standard
Adjustment
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
7,092
|
|
|
$
|
(394
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,698
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
7,871
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
7,815
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
79
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
415
|
|
Net income per share - basic and diluted
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported
|
|
|
New Revenue
Standard
Adjustment
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
3,321
|
|
|
$
|
1,841
|
|
|
$
|
5,162
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
5,843
|
|
|
|
(634
|
)
|
|
|
5,209
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
Stockholders' equity
|
|
|
59,796
|
|
|
|
944
|
|
|
|
60,740
|
|
Adoption of the new revenue standard
had no impact on total cash provided from or used in operating, financing, or investing in our consolidated statements of cash
flows.
|
I)
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Not Yet Adopted.
|
FASB ASU No.
2016-13.
In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses
(Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” This new standard replaces the incurred loss impairment
methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range
of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. For trade and other receivables, loans, and other financial
instruments, entities will be required to use a forward-looking expected loss model rather than the incurred loss model for recognizing
credit losses which reflects losses that are probable. Credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities will also
be recorded through an allowance for credit losses rather than as a reduction in the amortized cost basis of the securities. This
standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 with early adoption permitted in fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the effect this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements
and related disclosures.
With the exception of the standard
discussed above, there have been no other recently issued accounting pronouncements that are of significance or potential significance
to us that we have not adopted as of June 30, 2018.
|
J)
|
Income
Taxes
.
Income tax expense was $8,000
for the three months ended June 30, 2018. Income tax benefit was $58,000 the six months
ended June 30, 2018. Income tax expense and benefit in the three and six month periods
ended June 30, 2018, respectively, was based on the U.S. statutory rate of 21%, increased
by state income taxes, and reduced by permanent adjustments and research tax credits.
Income tax expense was $74,000 and $79,000 for the three and six months ended June 30,
2017, respectively. Income tax expense in the three and six month periods ended June
30, 2017 was based on the U.S. statutory rate of 34%, increased by state income taxes,
and reduced by permanent adjustments and research tax credits.
|
As
of June 30, 2018, we had a total of $5.2 million of deferred tax assets for which we had recorded no valuation allowance. We have
assessed the need for a valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets. Based on our assessment of future sources of income,
including reversing deferred tax liabilities, and future earnings, we have determined that it is more likely than not that the
deferred tax assets will be realized, and therefore there is no valuation allowance required for the deferred tax assets. We will
continue to assess the level of valuation allowance in future periods. Should evidence regarding the realizability of tax assets
change at a future point in time, the valuation allowance will be adjusted accordingly.
In the second quarter of 2017,
the Internal Revenue Service commenced an examination of our tax return for the year ended December 31, 2015. In February 2018,
the IRS notified us that it had completed its examination and that it had no changes to our reported tax.
|
K)
|
Share Repurchase
Program.
On April 24, 2018, we announced that our Board of Directors had approved
a program authorizing the Company to purchase up to $10 million of our common stock.
The shares may be purchased from time to time in the open market or through privately
negotiated transactions at management’s discretion, depending upon market conditions
and other factors. The authorization to repurchase our stock expires on December 31,
2019. We repurchased 33,771 shares of common stock under this program for a total cost
of $137,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2018.
|
|
L)
|
Income from
patent arrangement.
We entered into an arrangement with an unaffiliated third
party in 2010 under which we assigned certain patents in return for royalties on proceeds
from patent monetization efforts by the third party. The third party has engaged in various
patent monetization activities, including enforcement, litigation and licensing. In the
three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the third party reported and we recorded $1.3
million and $1.4 million, respectively, of income from this arrangement. In the three
and six months ended June 30, 2018, there was no income was from this arrangement.
|
ITEM 2:
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the
“Safe Harbor” Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
Some of the information in this Form 10-Q
contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. You can identify these statements by forward-looking
words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,”
“continue” and similar words. You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they: (1) discuss
our future expectations; (2) contain projections of our future operating results or financial condition; or (3) state other “forward-looking”
information. However, we may not be able to predict future events accurately. The risk factors listed in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, as well as any cautionary language in this Form 10-Q, provide examples of risks,
uncertainties and events that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking
statements. You should be aware that the occurrence of any of the events described in these risk factors and elsewhere in this
Form 10-Q could materially and adversely affect our business.
Summary of Operations
We are primarily engaged in the development
and sale of biometrics products and services. Our software products are used in government and commercial biometrics systems to
identify or authenticate people. Principal government applications of biometrics systems include border control, visitor screening,
law enforcement, national defense, intelligence, secure credentialing, access control, and background checks. Principal commercial
applications include: i) user authentication for login and access to mobile devices, computers, networks, and software programs;
ii) user authentication for financial transactions and purchases (online and in-person); iii) physical access control to buildings,
and iv) screening and background checks of prospective employees and customers. We sell our software and services globally through
systems integrators and OEMs, and directly to end user customers. We also derive a portion of our revenue from the sale of imaging
software licenses to OEMs and systems integrators that incorporate our software into medical imaging products and medical systems.
Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted ASC
606 using the full retrospective transition method. Adoption of the standard using the full retrospective method required us to
restate certain previously reported results. Refer to Note H – Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements for further information
on the impacts of adopting ASC 606.
Summary of Financial Results
We use revenue and operating income to summarize
financial results as we believe these measurements are the most meaningful way to understand our operating performance.
Revenue and operating loss for the three months
ended June 30, 2018 were $3.8 million and $0.4 million, respectively. These results compared to revenue of $2.5 million and operating
income of $0.1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2017. Higher revenue in the current year three month period was primarily
due to higher biometrics license, maintenance and services sales. Operating loss in the current year three month period as compared
to the prior year operating income was primarily due to: i) no income from a patent arrangement, and ii) higher total engineering
costs.
Revenue and operating loss for the six months
ended June 30, 2018 were $6.7 million and $1.1 million, respectively. These results compared to revenue of $6.7 million and operating
income of $0.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2017. Operating loss in the current year three month period as compared
to the prior year operating income was primarily due to: i) no income from a patent arrangement, and ii) higher total engineering
costs, that was partially offset by lower cost of software licenses.
These and all other financial results are
discussed in more detail in the results of operations section that follows.
Results of Operations
Software licenses.
Software
licenses consist of revenue from the sale of biometrics and imaging software products. Sales of software products depend on our
ability to win proposals to supply software for biometrics systems projects either directly to end user customers or indirectly
through channel partners.
Software license revenue increased 64% from
$1.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2017 to $1.7 million in the same three month period in 2018. As a percentage of
total revenue, software license revenue increased from 40% in the second quarter of 2017 to 44% in the current year quarter. The
$0.7 million increase in software license revenue was primarily due to a $0.5 million increase in biometrics software license
sales, and a $0.1 million increase in imaging software license sales. The reasons for the changes in imaging and biometrics software
licenses were:
|
i)
|
Biometrics software
licenses – Biometrics software license sales were $1.3 million in the second quarter
of 2018 versus $0.8 million in the same quarter last year. The dollar increase was primarily
due to a software license agreement we entered into with a systems integrator in the
second quarter of 2018 for a large project. We recognized $0.6 million of software license
revenue from this agreement in the second quarter of 2018. The project also involves
us providing engineering services. We expect our development effort on this project to
continue for approximately the next three to four quarters.
|
|
ii)
|
Imaging software
licenses – Imaging software license sales were $0.3 million in the second quarter
of 2018 versus $0.2 million in the same quarter last year. The dollar increase was due
to slightly higher license sales in the second quarter of 2018 versus the same month
period in 2017.
|
Software license revenue decreased 10% from
$3.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2017 to $3.1 million in the same six month period in 2018. As a percentage of total
revenue, software license revenue decreased from 52% in the first six months of 2017 to 47% in the current year quarter. The $0.4
million decrease in software license revenue was primarily due to a $0.6 million decrease in biometrics software license sales,
which was partially offset by a $0.2 million increase in imaging software license sales. The reasons for the changes in imaging
and biometrics software licenses were:
|
i)
|
Biometrics software
licenses – Biometrics software license sales were $2.4 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2018 versus $3.0 million in the corresponding period a year ago. The decrease
was primarily due to a $1.1 million decrease in software license sales to our direct
government customers, of which the majority was a $0.9 million software license sale
to the U.S. Marines (“USMC”) in the first six months of 2017 whereas the
was no such sale in the corresponding period of 2018. This was partially offset by higher
license revenue due to the software license agreement we entered into with a systems
integrator in the second quarter of 2018 for a large project. We recognized $0.6 million
of software license revenue from this agreement in the first six months of 2018.
|
We are unable to predict whether
the USMC will purchase this software again in the future.
|
ii)
|
Imaging software
licenses – Imaging software license sales were $0.7 million in the six months ended
June 30, 2018 versus $0.5 million in the corresponding period a year ago. The dollar
increase was due to slightly higher license sales in the first six months of 2018 versus
the corresponding period in 2017.
|
As described in the strategy section of our
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, our market strategy is to continue to focus on our legacy government biometrics
markets and expand into new commercial biometrics markets. We are unable to predict future revenue from commercial markets as
these are emerging markets.
Software maintenance
. Software
maintenance consists of revenue from the sale of software maintenance contracts. Software maintenance contracts entitle customers
to receive software support and software updates, if and when they become available, during the term of the contract.
Software maintenance revenue increased 9%
from $1.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2017 to $1.4 million in the same three month period in 2018. As a percentage
of total revenue, software maintenance revenue decreased from 50% in the second quarter of 2017 to 37% in the current year quarter.
Software maintenance revenue increased 6%
from $2.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2017 to $2.7 million in the same six month period in 2018. As a percentage
of total revenue, software maintenance revenue increased from 38% in the first six months of 2017 to 40% in the corresponding
period of 2018.
For the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2018, the dollar increase in software maintenance revenue was primarily due to higher retention of maintenance renewals
in current periods.
Services
.
Services consist
of fees we charge to perform software development, integration, installation, and customization services. Similar to software
license revenue, services revenue depends on our ability to win biometrics systems projects either directly with end user customers
or in conjunction with channel partners. Services revenue will fluctuate when we commence new projects and/or when we complete
projects that were started in previous periods.
Services increased 239% from $0.2 million
in the three months ended June 30, 2017 to $0.7 million in the same three month period in 2018. As a percentage of total revenue,
services increased from 8% in the second quarter of 2017 to 19% in the current year quarter.
For the three month period ended June 30,
2018, the dollar increase in services revenue was primarily due to higher services revenue related to the software license agreement
we entered into with a systems integrator in the second quarter of 2018 for a large project.
Services increased 45% from $0.6 million in
the six months ended June 30, 2017 to $0.8 million in the same six month period in 2018. As a percentage of total revenue, services
increased from 9% in the first six months of 2017 to 13% in the corresponding period of 2018.
For the six month periods ended June 30, 2018,
the dollar increase in services revenue was primarily due to higher services revenue related to the software license agreement
we entered into with a systems integrator in the second quarter of 2018 for a large project which was partially offset by lower
service revenue from our other service customers.
We expect our development effort on this large
project to continue for approximately the next three to four quarters.
Services backlog was $1.5 million as of June
30, 2018.
Royalties.
Royalties consist
primarily of royalty payments we receive under DSL silicon contracts with two customers that incorporate our silicon intellectual
property (“IP”) in their DSL chipsets. We sold our DSL IP business in 2009, but we continued to receive royalty payments
from these customers. Royalties are reported in continuing operations in accordance with ASC 205-20, Reporting Discontinued Operations,
because we have continuing ongoing cash flows from this business.
Royalties decreased 100% from $41,000 in the
three months ended June 30, 2017 to zero in the same three month period in 2018. Royalties decreased 100% from $84,000 in the
six months ended June 30, 2017 to zero in the same six month period in 2018.
We do not consider DSL royalties to be a key
element of our strategy and we believe that it is unlikely we will receive DSL royalties in future periods.
Cost of software licenses.
Cost
of software licenses consists primarily of the cost of third party software included in certain software products delivered to
the USMC.
Cost of software licenses were zero in the
three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2018.
Cost of software licenses decreased 100% from
$0.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2017 to zero in the same six month period in 2018. Cost of software licenses as
a percentage of software license sales was 7% in the first six months of 2017. The dollar decrease in cost of software licenses
was primarily due to the delivery of software to the USMC that included third party software in the first six months of 2017,
whereas we had no such order in the corresponding period of 2018.
Cost of Services.
Cost of services
consists of engineering costs to perform customer services projects. Such costs primarily include: i) engineering salaries, stock-based
compensation, fringe benefits, and facilities; and ii) engineering consultants and contractors.
Cost of services increased 254% from $104,000
in the three months ended June 30, 2017 to $370,000 in the same three month period in 2018. Cost of services as a percentage of
services increased from 51% in the second quarter of 2017 to 53% in the current year quarter, which means that gross margins decreased
from 49% to 47%.
Cost of services increased 31% from $320,000
in the six months ended June 30, 2017 to $420,000 in the same six month period in 2018. Cost of services as a percentage of services
decreased from 55% in the first six months of 2017 to 50% in the corresponding period of 2018, which means that gross margins
increased from 45% to 50%.
For both the three and six month periods,
the dollar increase in cost of services was primarily due to a large project with a systems integrator that we signed in the second
quarter of 2018. We anticipate further cost of services from this project over the next three to four quarters.
Research and development expense.
Research
and development expense consists of costs for: i) engineering personnel, including salaries, stock-based compensation, fringe
benefits, and facilities; ii) engineering consultants and contractors, and iii) other engineering expenses such as supplies, equipment
depreciation, dues and memberships and travel. Engineering costs incurred to develop our technology and products are classified
as research and development expense. As described in the cost of services section, engineering costs incurred to provide engineering
services for customer projects are classified as cost of services, and are not included in research and development expense.
The classification of total engineering costs
to research and development expense and cost of services was (in thousands):
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expense
|
|
$
|
1,887
|
|
|
$
|
1,876
|
|
|
$
|
3,762
|
|
|
$
|
3,733
|
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
Total engineering costs
|
|
$
|
2,257
|
|
|
$
|
1,980
|
|
|
$
|
4,182
|
|
|
$
|
4,053
|
|
Research and development expense was essentially
unchanged at $1.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. As a percentage of total revenue, research and development
expense decreased from 74% in the second quarter of 2017 to 50% in the corresponding period of 2018.
Research and development expense was essentially
unchanged at $3.76 million in the six months ended June 30, 2017 to $3.73 million in the same six month period in 2018. As a percentage
of total revenue, research and development expense was 56% for both six month periods.
As the table immediately above indicates,
total engineering costs in the second quarter of 2018 increased by $277,000 compared to the same period last year. The spending
increase was primarily due to higher spending on third-party development costs, higher employee costs and recruiting fees. Total
engineering costs increased by $129,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period last year. The spending
increase was primarily due to higher employee costs and recruiting fees that were partially offset by lower spending on third-party
development costs.
We anticipate that we will continue to focus
our future research and development activities on enhancing our existing products and developing new products.
Selling and marketing expense.
Selling and marketing expense primarily consists of costs for: i) sales and marketing personnel, including salaries, sales commissions,
stock-based compensation, fringe benefits, travel, and facilities; and ii) advertising and promotion expenses.
Sales and marketing expense increased 2% from
$995,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2017 to $1,013,000 in the same three month period of 2018. As a percentage of total
revenue, sales and marketing expense decreased from 39% in the second quarter of 2017 to 27% in the corresponding period in 2018.
The dollar increase in sales and marketing expense was primarily due to higher sales commissions and bonuses, which was partially
offset by lower spending on sales agents and recruiting costs.
Sales and marketing expense increased 1% from
$1.91 million in the six months ended June 30, 2017 to $1.94 million in the same six month period of 2018. As a percentage of
total revenue, sales and marketing expense was 29% for both six month periods. The dollar increase in sales and marketing expense
was primarily due to higher employee costs, higher advertising and tradeshow costs, and higher sales commissions, which was partially
offset by lower spending on sales agents and recruiting costs.
General and administrative expense.
General and administrative expense consists primarily of costs for: i) officers, directors and administrative personnel,
including salaries, bonuses, director compensation, stock-based compensation, fringe benefits, and facilities; ii) professional
fees, including legal and audit fees; iii) public company expenses; and iv) other administrative expenses, such as insurance costs
and bad debt provisions.
General and administrative expense increased
7% from $816,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2017 to $871,000 in the same three month period in 2018. As a percentage of
total revenue, general and administrative expense decreased from 32% in the first six months of 2017 to 23% in the corresponding
period in 2018. The increase in general and administrative expense was primarily due to higher professional fees.
General and administrative expense increased
3% from $1.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2017 to $1.7 million in the same six month period in 2018. As a percentage
of total revenue, general and administrative expense increased from 24% in the first six months of 2017 to 25% in the corresponding
period in 2018. The increase in general and administrative expense was primarily due to higher professional fees, which was partially
offset by lower stock-based compensation costs.
Patent related income.
We entered
into an arrangement with an unaffiliated third party in 2010 under which we assigned certain patents in return for royalties on
proceeds from patent monetization efforts by the third party. The third party has engaged in various patent monetization activities,
including enforcement, litigation and licensing. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the third party reported and
we recorded $1.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively, of income from this arrangement. There was no such income in the three
and six month periods ended June 30, 2018. We continue to have a contractual relationship with this third party. However, we are
unable to predict how much more income we might receive from this arrangement, if any, because we do not know whether any patent
monetization efforts by the third party will be successful.
Interest income.
Interest income
increased 127% from $89,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2017 to $201,000 in the same three month period in 2018. Interest
income increased 111% from $172,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2017 to $363,000 in the same six month period in 2018. For
the three and six month periods, the dollar increase in interest income was primarily due to higher interest rates within our
money market accounts.
Income taxes.
Income
tax expense was $8,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2018. Income tax benefit was $58,000 the six months ended June 30,
2018. Income tax expense and benefit in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018, respectively, was based on the U.S.
statutory rate of 21%, increased by state income taxes, and reduced by permanent adjustments and research tax credits. Income
tax expense was $74,000 and $79,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively. Income tax expense in the
three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 was based on the U.S. statutory rate of 34%, increased by state income taxes,
and reduced by permanent adjustments and research tax credits.
As
of June 30, 2018, we had a total of $5.2 million of deferred tax assets for which we had recorded no valuation allowance. We have
assessed the need for a valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets. Based on our assessment of future sources of income, including
reversing deferred tax liabilities, and future earnings, we have determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred
tax assets will be realized, and therefore there is no valuation allowance required for the deferred tax assets. We will continue
to assess the level of valuation allowance in future periods. Should evidence regarding the realizability of tax assets change
at a future point in time, the valuation allowance will be adjusted accordingly.
In
the second quarter of 2017, the Internal Revenue Service commenced an examination of our tax return for the year ended December
31, 2015. In February 2018, the IRS notified us that it had completed its examination and that it had no changes to our reported
tax.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2018, we had cash and cash equivalents
of $49.1 million, which represented a decrease of $2.5 million from December 31, 2017. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents
was primarily due to the following factors:
Cash used in operations was $2.2 million in
the first six months of 2018. Cash used from operations was primarily the result of $0.7 million of net loss and $1.9 million
of changes in assets and liabilities. Cash from these sources was partially offset by the add back of $0.4 million of non-cash
items primarily for depreciation, amortization, and stock-based compensation.
Cash used in investing activities was $134,000
in the first six months of 2018. This cash usage consisted of purchases of property and equipment.
Cash used in financing activities was $171,000
in the first six months of 2018. Financing activity cash usage was primarily the result of $137,000 used to buy back stock under
our stock repurchase program and $61,000 used to pay income taxes for employees who surrendered shares in connection with stock
grants. Cash used for these purposes was partially offset by $27,000 of proceeds from our employee stock purchase.
While we cannot assure you that we will not
require additional financing, or that such financing will be available to us, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents will
be sufficient to fund our operations for at least the next twelve months.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
See Note H to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1.
ITEM 3: