Tenor Of For-Profit School Discussion Gets Toned Down
April 30 2010 - 4:08PM
Dow Jones News
This week's sell-off in for-profit school stocks, prompted by a
report of a U.S. Department of Education official's speech, may
have been overblown, some analysts say now that they have read a
full transcript of the comments.
The sector's shares fell sharply Thursday after trade Web site
Inside Higher Ed reported that Robert Shireman, deputy
undersecretary for education, spoke harshly of market-funded
colleges at a meeting of state school administrators and
accreditors Wednesday. The article, citing sources at the meeting,
said Shireman compared the schools to Wall Street firms whose
actions helped cause the recent financial crisis. Inside Higher Ed,
which didn't have a reporter at the meeting, attempted to confirm
the comments with Education Department officials, who declined
comment for the article.
Shireman did make that comparison, according to a transcript of
his speech, which analysts believe was relatively even-handed and
wide-ranging. He also said regulators could do a better job.
Shireman devoted much of his speech, delivered at the National
Association of State Administrators and Supervisors of Private
Schools meeting, to proposed changes in rules governing all of
higher education.
The Inside Higher Ed article sparked a nearly universal sell-off
in higher-education shares, but some recovered ground Friday.
Career Education Corp. (CECO), which fell more than 12% Thursday,
was recently trading up 1.1% to $29.59. ITT Educational Services
Inc. (ESI), which lost 6.6% the previous day, was off a fraction in
recent trading at $102.78. Apollo Group Inc. (APOL), which fell
6.1% Thursday, was up 0.4% at $57.98.
Analysts who have read both Inside Higher Ed's report and a
transcript of Shireman's speech say the comments were mostly in
line with his earlier stance, which has generally accepted the role
of for-profit schools in the Obama administration's plan to
increase access to higher education.
Doug Lederman, editor of Inside Higher Ed and author of the
article, said the story "made pretty clear that it was based on
accounts from people in the room. There was no question that they
interpreted his comments in a certain way." Lederman has heard a
recording of the full speech since publishing the article.
"Shireman was laying out a case for greater government
regulation given increased investments in Pell Grants," Wedbush
Securities analyst Ariel Sokol said in an email message after
reviewing the meeting transcript. "He seemed amenable to forming
bridges with the sector."
Shireman commended the schools for "making sure that there was
capacity to be able to serve additional students" during the
recession, according to a transcript provided by Career Education
Review. Shireman cited year-over-year percentage increases in Pell
grant funds for 11 publicly traded school companies, including
Corinthian Colleges Inc. (COCO), DeVry Inc. (DV), and American
Public Education Inc. (APEI).
Most for-profit schools derive the majority of their revenue
from federal student aid.
A Department of Education spokesman reiterated Shireman's
comments, saying in an emailed statement: "For-profit colleges play
a critically important role in helping to ensure so many Americans
have access to education and training that can improve their job
prospects and lives."
To be sure, Shireman did liken the relationship between schools
and accrediting groups to that between banks and ratings agencies,
which have an "inherent conflict of interest," as the agencies are
paid by the companies they are supposed to regulate.
"Are there regulators in the room who feel like you do have the
analytical firepower you need to assess what is going on with the
entities you regulate in higher education," Shireman asked. "I
don't think we feel we have the firepower we need."
Lederman said the speech was "a much stronger indictment of the
system of higher education accreditation than of the sector."
Trace Urdan of Signal Hill Capital Group wrote in a note to
clients, regarding the full transcript, that Shireman's "tone in
general is much less severe" toward schools specifically. "He
presents as a reasonable person struggling with accountability gaps
that he perceives exist in the system."
According to the transcript, Shireman devoted a portion of his
speech to detailing the process by which the Department of
Education formulates new rules governing higher education, known as
negotiated rulemaking. He stressed that there were productive
discussions on many fronts, though he said college representatives
weren't particularly constructive when it came to a measure to
quantify how well the schools prepare students for "gainful
employment" in a recognized occupation.
Concerns over that proposal have upended the for-profit school
industry over the past few months, with a trade group estimating
the government's early version would displace hundreds of thousands
of students as their programs lose access to federal funds. During
a question-and-answer session, Shireman said there is no final
proposal yet, and he is open to suggestions to ensure the rule is
fair.
-By Melissa Korn, Dow Jones Newswires; 212-416-2271;
melissa.korn@dowjones.com
Apollo Education Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:APOL)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024
Apollo Education Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:APOL)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024