Pentagon Demurs on Explanation of Satellite Debacle
January 11 2018 - 6:18PM
Dow Jones News
By Nancy A. Youssef and Andy Pasztor
The Pentagon refused to say anything at a briefing Thursday
about why a classified U.S. government satellite launched by a
contractor failed to reach a stable orbit and instead plummeted
back into the atmosphere in what is presumed to be a total loss
over the weekend.
"I would have to refer you to SpaceX, who conducted the launch,"
Defense Department spokeswoman Dana White said repeatedly during a
briefing with reporters at the Pentagon.
It was the first public statement by the Pentagon since Sunday's
botched mission and represented an unusual stance, given that
officials in the past typically have confirmed successful
deployments of even secret national-security satellites.
Code-named Zuma, the satellite was launched from Florida on
board a Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Falcon 9 rocket, but
didn't separate as planned from the upper part of the boosters,
according to industry officials. Instead, it is believed to have
plummeted back into the atmosphere and ended up in the Indian
Ocean.
Earlier this week, Elon Musk's SpaceX said it was not
responsible for the loss of the satellite because its rocket
performed exactly as planned. And Northrop Grumman Corp., which
built the satellite and chose SpaceX for the mission, said its
normal procedures barred commenting on classified projects.
In the wake of the event, industry and government officials
focused on operation of certain hardware, called an adapter, which
attached the payload to the rocket and was supposed to release it.
The mechanism, according to some of these officials, was supplied
by Northrop Grumman instead of SpaceX.
Launch contracts for classified payloads, they noted, frequently
are structured so that the classified customer, rather than the
rocket provider, calls the shots about separation decisions.
The satellite's high price tag has sparked interest in its fate.
But Ms. White did not provide any information, citing the
classified nature of the launch.
Asked whether the Pentagon owed the public an explanation for
what appeared to be a costly failure, Ms. White told reporters she
would "come back to you on that."
On Capitol Hill, lawmakers and staffers in both the House and
Senate have been briefed about the satellite. In briefings
following the botched mission, lawmakers have been told the
spacecraft took eight years and about $3.5 billion to develop and
build, according to industry officials familiar with the
details.
Despite the lack of government comment, officials from SpaceX
and Northrop Grumman have a cache of video images and other
information about the sequence of events during Sunday's launch.
The data is believed to indicate precisely what went wrong,
industry officials said, but it isn't clear why mission managers
monitoring real-time video feeds weren't able to intervene.
For rapidly growing SpaceX, the failed mission came as the firm
seeks to establish itself as a reliable, low-cost launch provider
for the Pentagon. But the company has said it isn't making any
design or operational changes to its fleet of Falcon 9 rockets.
Write to Nancy A. Youssef at Nancy.Youssef@wsj.com and Andy
Pasztor at andy.pasztor@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
January 11, 2018 18:03 ET (23:03 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2018 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Northrop Grumman (NYSE:NOC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Aug 2024 to Sep 2024
Northrop Grumman (NYSE:NOC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Sep 2023 to Sep 2024