Washington, D. C. 20549
☑ Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
☐ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
☑
No
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
☑
No
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" , "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, (Check one):
If an emerging growth company, indicate by checkmark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
☐
As of November 3, 2017, the Registrant had 22,802,060 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.
Cadiz Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (Unaudited)
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,456
|
|
|
|
1,977
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
2,525
|
|
|
|
2,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(2,414
|
)
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(3,577
|
)
|
|
|
(3,244
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(5,991
|
)
|
|
|
(5,174
|
)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss and comprehensive loss applicable to common stock
|
|
$
|
(5,992
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,175
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
22,857
|
|
|
|
18,809
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Cadiz Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (Unaudited)
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
327
|
|
|
$
|
303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
8,747
|
|
|
|
6,973
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
8,959
|
|
|
|
7,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(8,632
|
)
|
|
|
(6,889
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(14,653
|
)
|
|
|
(10,473
|
)
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt and debt refinancing
|
|
|
(3,501
|
)
|
|
|
(2,250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(26,786
|
)
|
|
|
(19,612
|
)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss and comprehensive loss applicable to common stock
|
|
$
|
(26,789
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,615
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per common share
|
|
$
|
(1.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
22,471
|
|
|
|
18,319
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Cadiz Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
16,055
|
|
|
$
|
12,172
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
3,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
16,636
|
|
|
|
15,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, equipment and water programs, net
|
|
|
44,724
|
|
|
|
44,182
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,813
|
|
|
|
3,813
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,716
|
|
|
|
3,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
68,889
|
|
|
$
|
67,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
418
|
|
|
$
|
439
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
3,953
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
1,378
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
Warrant liabilities
|
|
|
6,642
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
9,035
|
|
|
|
4,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net
|
|
|
120,929
|
|
|
|
102,374
|
|
Long-term lease obligations, net
|
|
|
13,023
|
|
|
|
12,287
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
1,443
|
|
|
|
1,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
145,180
|
|
|
|
121,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' deficit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock - $.01 par value; 70,000,000 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
authorized at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares issued and outstanding - 22,530,376 at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2017 and 21,768,864 at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
360,144
|
|
|
|
355,336
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(436,660
|
)
|
|
|
(409,871
|
)
|
Total stockholders' deficit
|
|
|
(76,291
|
)
|
|
|
(54,317
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit
|
|
$
|
68,889
|
|
|
$
|
67,099
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Cadiz Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to
|
|
$
|
(26,789
|
)
|
|
|
(19,615
|
)
|
net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs
|
|
|
2,829
|
|
|
|
3,277
|
|
Interest expense added to loan principal
|
|
|
6,884
|
|
|
|
6,399
|
|
Interest expense added to lease liability
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
Loss on debt conversion
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
3,501
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
Compensation charge for stock and share option awards
|
|
|
2,027
|
|
|
|
974
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
121
|
|
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
2,866
|
|
|
|
(3,146
|
)
|
(Increase) in other assets
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
350
|
|
(Decrease) increase in accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(3,493
|
)
|
|
|
2,432
|
|
Increase in warrant liabilities
|
|
|
3,747
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(7,726
|
)
|
|
|
(6,410
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(671
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(671
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up-front payment related to lease liability
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,509
|
|
Net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
57,190
|
|
|
|
7,600
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
Principal payments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(44,910
|
)
|
|
|
(11,399
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
12,280
|
|
|
|
7,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
3,883
|
|
|
|
1,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
12,172
|
|
|
|
2,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
16,055
|
|
|
$
|
3,893
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Cadiz Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Deficit (Unaudited)
(
$ in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Stockholders'
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
21,768,864
|
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
|
$
|
355,336
|
|
|
$
|
(409,871
|
)
|
|
$
|
(54,317
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares to lenders
|
|
|
29,706
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares pursuant to bond conversion
|
|
|
326,163
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2,253
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
405,643
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss and comprehensive loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(26,789
|
)
|
|
|
(26,789
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2017
|
|
|
22,530,376
|
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
|
$
|
360,144
|
|
|
$
|
(436,660
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76,291
|
)
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Cadiz Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared by Cadiz Inc., also referred to as "Cadiz" or "the Company", without audit and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
The foregoing Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which management considers necessary for a fair statement of the Company's financial position, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the periods presented and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences may be material to the financial statements. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.
Liquidity
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company have been prepared using accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which assumes realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company incurred losses of $26.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to $19.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The Company had working capital of $7.6 million at September 30, 2017, and used cash in its operations of $7.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.
Cash requirements during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily reflect certain administrative costs related to the Company's water project development efforts. Currently, the Company's sole focus is the development of its land and water assets.
The Company's New Senior Secured Debt and its convertible notes contain representations, warranties and covenants that are typical for agreements of this type, including restrictions that would limit the Company's ability to incur additional indebtedness, incur liens, pay dividends or make restricted payments, dispose of assets, make investments and merge or consolidate with another person. However, while there are affirmative covenants, there are no financial maintenance covenants and no restrictions on the Company's ability to issue additional common stock to fund future working capital needs. The debt covenants associated with the New Senior Secured Debt were negotiated by the parties with a view towards the Company's operating and financial condition as it existed at the time the agreements were executed. At September 30, 2017, the Company was in compliance with its debt covenants.
The Company's cash resources provide the Company with sufficient funds to meet its working capital needs for a period beyond one year from this quarterly report issuance date. The Company may meet working capital requirements beyond this period through a variety of means, including construction financing, equity or debt placements, through the sale or other disposition of assets or reductions in operating costs. Equity placements may be made using our existing shelf registration. Equity placements, if made, would be undertaken only to the extent necessary, so as to minimize the dilutive effect of any such placements upon the Company's existing stockholders.
Limitations on the Company's liquidity and ability to raise capital may adversely affect it. Sufficient liquidity is critical to meet the Company's resource development activities. Although the Company currently expects its sources of capital to be sufficient to meet its near-term liquidity needs, there can be no assurance that its liquidity requirements will continue to be satisfied. If the Company cannot raise needed funds, it might be forced to make substantial reductions in its operating expenses, which could adversely affect its ability to implement its current business plan and ultimately its viability as a company.
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Under the terms of the Prior Senior Secured Debt, the Company was required to pay 50% of all quarterly interest payments in cash or stock on the Prior Senior Secured Debt, rather than in accretion to principal. Under the terms of the New Senior Secured Debt, the Company is required to pay 25% of all future quarterly interest payments in cash. No other payments are due on the corporate secured debt or convertible notes prior to their maturities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, approximately $433 thousand in interest payments on the corporate secured debt was paid in stock. As a result, 29,706 shares of common stock were issued to the lenders.
In connection with the New Senior Secured Debt, the Company issued a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 357,500 shares of its common stock ("2017 Warrant"). The Company recorded a debt discount at the time of the closing of the New Senior Secured Debt in the amount of $2.9 million which was the fair value of the 2017 Warrant issued. The fair value of the 2017 Warrant will be re-measured each reporting period, and the change in warrant value will be recorded as an adjustment to the derivative liability.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, approximately $2.25 million in convertible notes were converted by certain of the Company's lenders. As a result, 326,163 shares of common stock were issued to the lenders.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Guidance Not Yet Adopted
In May 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standards update on revenue recognition including enhanced disclosures. Under the new standard, revenue is recognized when (or as) a good or service is transferred to the customer and the customer obtains control of the good or service. On July 9, 2015, the FASB approved a one-year deferral, updating the effective date to January 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating this new guidance, and expects this new standard will not have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standards update related to lease accounting including enhanced disclosures. Under the new standard, a lease is defined as a contract, or part of a contract, that conveys the right to control the use of identified assets for a period of time in exchange for consideration. Lessees will classify leases with a term of more than one year as either operating or finance leases and will need to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability. The liability will be equal to the present value of lease payments. The asset will be based on the liability, subject to adjustment, such as for initial direct costs. Operating leases will result in straight-line expense while finance leases will result in a front-loaded expense pattern. This guidance is effective January 1, 2019, but early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this new guidance and cannot determine the impact of this standard at this time.
In August 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standards update which eliminates the diversity in practice related to the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows, by adding or clarifying guidance on eight specific cash flow issues. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years, but early adoption is permitted. While the Company continues to asses all potential impacts of this standard, the Company does not currently expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on
the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standards update which clarifies the definition of a business and provides guidance on evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. This guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those periods, with early adoption permitted. While the Company continues to asses all potential impacts of this standard, the Company does not currently expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on
the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.
In May 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standards update which clarifies which changes to terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting, in accordance with Topic 218. An entity should account for the effect of a modification unless all of the following are met:
|
1.
|
The fair value of the modified award is the same as the fair value of the original award immediately before the original award is modified. If the modification does not affect any of the inputs of the valuation technique that the entity uses to value the award, the entity is not required to estimate the value immediately before and after the modification.
|
|
2.
|
The vesting conditions of the modified award are the same as the vesting conditions of the original award immediately before the original award is modified.
|
|
3.
|
The classification of the modified award as an equity instrument or a liability instrument is the same as the classification of the original award immediately before the original award is modified.
|
This guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those periods with early adoption permitted. While the Company continues to asses all potential impacts of this standard, the Company does not currently expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.
In July 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standards update to provide new guidance for the
classification analysis of certain equity-linked financial instruments, or embedded features, with down round features, as well as clarify existing disclosure requirements for equity-classified instruments. When determining whether certain financial instruments should be classified as liabilities or equity instruments, a down round feature no longer precludes equity classification when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to an entity's own stock. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this new guidance and cannot determine the impact of this standard at this time.
Accounting Guidance Adopted
In March 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standards update to simplify the accounting for share-based payments. Under this new guidance, the tax effects related to share based payments are recorded through the income statement. Previously, tax benefits in excess of compensation cost ("windfalls") are recorded in equity, and tax deficiencies ("shortfalls") are recorded in equity to the extent of previous windfalls, and then to the income statement. This guidance is effective January 1, 2017, and early adoption was permitted. The new standard also revised reporting on the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2017, and the new standard did not have a material impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standards update which eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Entities should perform their goodwill impairment tests by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value. The amendments in this update are effective prospectively during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this guidance on September 30, 2017, and the new standard did not have a material impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 2 – LONG-TERM DEBT
The carrying value of the Company's debt approximates fair value. The fair value of the Company's debt (Level 2) is determined based on an estimation of discounted future cash flows of the debt at rates currently quoted or offered to the Company by its lenders for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities.
On May 25, 2017 ("Closing Date"), the Company entered into a new $60 million credit agreement ("Credit Agreement") with funds affiliated with Apollo Global Management, LLC ("Apollo") that replaced and refinanced the Company's then existing $45 million senior secured mortgage debt ("Prior Senior Secured Debt") and provided $15 million of new senior debt to fund immediate construction related expenditures ("New Senior Secured Debt"). The New Senior Secured Debt will mature on the earliest of (a) the four year anniversary of the Closing Date, and (b) the "Springing Maturity Date", which is defined as the date which is 91 days prior to the maturity date of the 7.00% Convertible Senior Notes of Cadiz due 2020 (the "New Convertible Notes") that were issued in December 2015 and April 2016 pursuant to the New Convertible Notes Indenture as defined in the Credit Agreement, if on the 91
st
day preceding the maturity date of the New Convertible Notes, the 5-Day VWAP, as defined in the Credit Agreement, is less than 120% of the then applicable Conversion Rate, as defined in the New Convertible Notes Indenture, and at least $10,000,000 in original principal amount of the New Convertible Notes is outstanding ((a) or (b), as applicable, the "Maturity Date").
The proceeds from the Credit Agreement were used to repay the Prior Senior Secured Debt resulting in a loss on extinguishment of $3.5 million which consisted of the write-off of unamortized debt discount, unamortized debt issuance costs and fees paid to the former lenders. In addition, the Company incurred $1.5 million in legal and finders' fees which was recorded as additional debt discount and is being amortized through December 2019, which is the Springing Maturity Date as discussed above. In connection with the repayment, the Company entered into a Payoff Agreement on May 24, 2017, which was implemented in October 2017 (see Note 7 – Subsequent Events). The outstanding warrants registered in the name of the prior lenders ("2016 Warrants") are accounted for as a derivative liability with unrealized gains or losses reflected in interest expense.
Interest on the New Senior Secured Debt is due quarterly on each March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 (each an "Interest Date") beginning on June 30, 2017. Interest on the New Senior Secured Debt will (i) accrete to the outstanding principal amount at a rate per annum equal to 6% (the "PIK Rate") compounded quarterly on each Interest Date and (ii) accrue on the outstanding principal amount at a rate per annum equal to 2% (the "Cash Rate"). The Company, in its discretion, may make any quarterly interest payment in cash on the applicable Interest Date at the PIK Rate, in lieu of accretion of such interest to the principal amount at the PIK Rate.
The Accreted Loan Value plus the Applicable Prepayment Premium will be due and payable on the Maturity Date. "Accreted Loan Value" means, as of the date of determination, the outstanding principal amount of the applicable Loan, plus all accreted interest as of the calendar day immediately prior to such date of determination. "Applicable Prepayment Premium" means with respect to any repayment of the New Senior Secured Debt (a) the Accreted Loan Value of the New Senior Secured Debt being prepaid or repaid, as applicable, multiplied by (b) 3.00%.
The Company may prepay the New Senior Secured Debt, in whole or in part, for an amount equal to the Accreted Loan Value plus the Applicable Prepayment Premium; provided that if the Springing Maturity Date has not occurred, the Company may not prepay the New Senior Secured Debt, without the prior written consent of the holders of more than 50% of the aggregate unpaid principal amount of the New Senior Secured Debt, during the period commencing on the date that is 91 days prior to the maturity date of the New Convertible Notes and ending on the maturity date of the New Convertible Notes.
The Company paid Apollo an upfront fee of 2.00% of the aggregate principal amount of the New Senior Secured Debt funded on the Closing Date. This amount was recorded as additional debt discount and is being amortized over the remaining term of the loan.
In conjunction with the closing of the New Senior Secured Debt, the Company issued to Apollo a warrant to purchase an aggregate 357,500 shares of its common stock ("2017 Warrant"). The Company recorded a debt discount at the time of the closing of the New Senior Secured Debt in the amount of $2.9 million which is the fair value of the 2017 Warrant issued. The debt discount is being amortized through December 2019, which is the Springing Maturity Date as discussed above. The fair value of the 2017 Warrant will be re-measured each reporting period, and the change in warrant value will be recorded as an adjustment to the derivative liability. The warrant has a five-year term and an exercise price of $14.94 per share, subject to adjustment.
The Company recorded unrealized gains in the amount of $421 thousand for warrant liabilities accounted for as derivatives in interest expense in the three-month period ended September 30, 2017. Total unrealized losses of $3.6 million for warrant liabilities accounted for as derivatives have been recorded in interest expense in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2017.
The Company's New Senior Secured Debt and its convertible notes contain representations, warranties and covenants that are typical for agreements of this type, including restrictions that would limit the Company's ability to incur additional indebtedness, incur liens, pay dividends or make restricted payments, dispose of assets, make investments and merge or consolidate with another person. However, while there are affirmative covenants, there are no financial maintenance covenants and no restrictions on the Company's ability to issue additional common stock to fund future working capital needs. The debt covenants associated with the New Senior Secured Debt were negotiated by the parties with a view towards the Company's operating and financial condition as it existed at the time the agreements were executed. At September 30, 2017, the Company was in compliance with its debt covenants.
NOTE 3 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS AND WARRANTS
The Company has issued options and has granted stock awards pursuant to its 2009 Equity Incentive Plan and 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, as described below.
2009 Equity Incentive Plan
The 2009 Equity Incentive Plan was approved by stockholders at the 2009 Annual Meeting. The plan provides for the grant and issuance of up to 850,000 shares and options to the Company's employees and consultants. The plan became effective when the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-8 on December 18, 2009. All options issued under the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan have a ten-year term with vesting periods ranging from issuance date to 24 months.
2014 Equity Incentive Plan
The 2014 Equity Incentive Plan was approved by stockholders at the June 10, 2014 Annual Meeting. The plan provides for the grant and issuance of up to 675,000 shares and options to the Company's employees, directors and consultants. Upon approval of the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, all shares of common stock that remained available for award under the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan were cancelled. Following registration of the 2014 Plan on Form S-8, the Company entered into revised employment agreements with certain senior management that provide for the issuance of up to 162,500 Restricted Stock Units ("RSU's") during the period July 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016 and the issuance of up to 200,000 RSU's in connection with obtaining construction financing for the Water Project ("Milestone RSUs"). The Milestone RSUs vested in June 2017, and the Company recorded stock compensation expense of $1.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, to reflect the issuance of these shares. The Company recorded no stock compensation expense during the three months ended September 30, 2017 related to the issuance of these shares.
Under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, each outside director receives $30,000 of cash compensation and receives a deferred stock award consisting of shares of the Company's common stock with a value equal to $20,000 on June 30 of each year. The award accrues on a quarterly basis, with $7,500 of cash compensation and $5,000 of stock earned for each fiscal quarter in which a director serves. The deferred stock award vests automatically on January 31 in the year following the award date.
All options that have been issued under the above plans have been issued to officers, employees and consultants of the Company. In total, options to purchase 507,500 shares were unexercised and outstanding on September 30, 2017, under the two equity incentive plans.
The Company recognized no stock option related compensation costs in each of the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. Additionally, no options were exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.
Stock Awards to Directors, Officers, and Consultants
The Company has granted stock awards pursuant to its 2009 Equity Incentive Plan and 2014 Equity Incentive Plan.
Of the total 850,000 shares reserved under the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, 297,265 shares were issued as share grants and 507,500 were issued as options. Upon approval of the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan in June 2014, 45,235 shares remaining available for award under the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan were cancelled.
Of the total 675,000 shares reserved under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, 600,158 shares have been awarded to the Company directors, consultants and employees as of September 30, 2017. Of the 600,158 shares awarded, 8,694 shares were awarded to the Company's directors for services performed during the plan year ended June 30, 2017. These shares will vest and be issued on January 31, 2018.
The Company recognized stock-based compensation costs of $107,000 and $215,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively; and $2,027,000 and $974,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
NOTE 4 – INCOME TAXES
As of September 30, 2017, the Company had net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards of approximately $279 million for federal income tax purposes and $168 million for California state income tax purposes. Such carryforwards expire in varying amounts through the year 2037. Use of the carryforward amounts is subject to an annual limitation as a result of ownership changes.
As of September 30, 2017, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits totaling approximately $2.8 million. None of these, if recognized, would affect the Company's effective tax rate because the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against these assets.
The Company's tax years 2014 through 2016 remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service, and tax years 2013 through 2016 remain subject to examination by California tax jurisdictions. In addition, the Company's loss carryforward amounts are generally subject to examination and adjustment for a period of three years for federal tax purposes and four years for California purposes, beginning when such carryovers are utilized to reduce taxes in a future tax year.
Because it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize its net deferred tax assets, it has recorded a full valuation allowance against these assets. Accordingly, no deferred tax asset has been reflected in the accompanying balance sheets.
NOTE 5 – NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average common shares outstanding. Options, deferred stock units, warrants and the zero coupon term loan convertible into or exercisable for certain shares of the Company's common stock were not considered in the computation of net loss per share because their inclusion would have been antidilutive. Had these instruments been included, the fully diluted weighted average shares outstanding would have increased by approximately 11,193,000 and 11,923,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively; and 10,888,000 and 10,737,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
NOTE 6 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following table presents information about warrant liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2017, and indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques we utilized to determine such fair value. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. We consider a security that trades at least weekly to have an active market. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize data points that are observable, such as quoted prices, interest rates and yield curves. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs are unobservable data points for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.
|
Investments at Fair Value as of September 30, 2017
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,537
|
)
|
|
|
(2,105
|
)
|
|
|
(6,642
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total warrant liabilities
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(4,537
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,105
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,642
|
)
|
The following table presents a reconciliation of Level 3 activity for the three month period ended September 30, 2017:
|
|
Level 3 Liabilities
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Warrant Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 1, 2017
|
|
$
|
2,240
|
|
Unrealized Gains
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
Balance at September 30, 2017
|
|
$
|
2,105
|
|
The following table presents a reconciliation of Level 3 activity for the nine month period ended September 30, 2017:
|
|
Level 3 Liabilities
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Warrant Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2017
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
New warrants issued
|
|
|
2,895
|
|
Unrealized Gains, net
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
Transfers to level 2
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
Balance at September 30, 2017
|
|
$
|
2,105
|
|
The 2017 Warrants are Level 3 and are valued using a lattice model that uses unobservable inputs such as volatility and future probability of issuing new shares. The 2016 Warrants were transferred to Level 2 during 2017, after they became exercisable, and are valued using the Company's stock price which is an observable input.
NOTE 7 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On October 2, 2017, the Company agreed to issue an aggregate of 264,096 shares (the "Shares") of the Company's common stock with an aggregate value of $3.3 million in connection with a Payoff Agreement the Company entered into with prior lenders on May 24, 2017. Effective upon the delivery of the Shares, the 2016 Warrants, pursuant to which the prior lenders had a right to purchase up to 357,500 shares of the Company's common stock, may not be exercised and have been deemed cancelled. The derivative liability of $4.5 million recorded by the Company as of September 30, 2017 related to the 2016 Warrants will be eliminated during the fourth quarter of 2017, resulting in a $1.2 million gain. In connection with the issuance of the Shares, the Company increased the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the 2017 Warrant, from 357,500 to 362,500 shares. The 2017 Warrant has a term of five years from its issue date of May 25, 2017, and an exercise price of $14.94 per share, subject to adjustment.
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
In connection with the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the following discussion contains trend analysis and other forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as "intends", "anticipates", "believes", "estimates", "projects", "forecasts", "expects", "plans" and "proposes". Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, there are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements. These include, among others, our ability to maximize value from our land and water resources; and our ability to obtain new financings as needed to meet our ongoing working capital needs. See additional discussion under the heading "Risk Factors" in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Overview
We are a land and water resource development company with 45,000 acres of land in three areas of eastern San Bernardino County, California. Virtually all of this land is underlain by high-quality, naturally recharging groundwater resources, and is situated in proximity to the Colorado River and the Colorado River Aqueduct ("CRA"), California's primary mode of water transportation for imports from the Colorado River into the State. Our properties are suitable for various uses, including large-scale agricultural development, groundwater storage and water supply projects. Our main objective is to realize the highest and best use of these land and water resources in an environmentally responsible way.
We believe that the long-term highest and best use of our land and water assets will be realized through the development of a combination of water supply and storage projects at our properties. Therefore, the Company has been primarily focused on the development of the Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery and Storage Project ("Water Project" or "Project"), which will capture and conserve millions of acre-feet
1
of native groundwater currently being lost to evaporation from the aquifer system beneath our 34,000-acre property in the Cadiz and Fenner valleys of eastern San Bernardino County (the "Cadiz/Fenner Property"), and deliver it to water providers throughout Southern California (see "Water Resource Development")
.
A second phase of the Water Project would offer storage of up to one million acre-feet of imported water in the aquifer system. We believe that the ultimate implementation of this Water Project will provide a significant source of future cash flow.
The primary factor driving the value of such projects is ongoing pressure on California's traditional water supplies and the resulting demand for new, reliable supply solutions that can meet both immediate and long-term water needs. Available supply is constrained by environmental and regulatory restrictions on each of the State's three main water sources: the CRA, the State Water Project, which provides water supplies from Northern California to the central and southern parts of the state, and the Los Angeles Aqueduct, which delivers water from the eastern Sierra Nevada mountains to Los Angeles. Southern California's water providers rely on imports from these systems for a majority of their water supplies, but deliveries from all three into the region have been below capacity over the last several years, even in wet years.
1
One acre-foot is equal to approximately 326,000 gallons or the volume of water that will cover an area of one acre to a depth of one-foot. An acre-foot is generally considered to be enough water to meet the annual water needs of one average California household.
Availability of supplies in California also differs greatly from year to year due to natural hydrological variability. Over the last several years, California has struggled through an historic drought featuring record-low winter precipitation and reservoir storage levels. However, as a result of a series of strong storms through the 2016-2017 winter, California received record amounts of rain and snow, ending the State's multi-year drought. The rapid swing from drought to an extremely wet year challenged California's traditional infrastructure system, and deliveries into Southern California from the State Water Project, CRA, and Los Angeles Aqueduct, although larger than in the last several drought years, have remained below capacity.
Southern California water providers are presently making investments in infrastructure and supply to meet long-term demand given the variety of challenges and limitations faced by the State's traditional infrastructure. The Cadiz Water Project is a local supply option in Southern California that could help address the region's water supply challenges by providing new reliable supply and local groundwater storage opportunities (see "Water Resource Development" below) in both dry and wet years. Following a multi-year California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") review and permitting process, the Water Project received permits that
allow the capture and conservation of 2.5 million acre-feet of groundwater over 50 years in accordance with the terms of a groundwater management plan approved by San Bernardino County, the public agency responsible for groundwater use at the project area.
Our current working capital requirements relate largely to the final development activities associated with the Water Project and those activities consistent with the Water Project related to further development of our land and agricultural assets. While we continue to believe that the ultimate implementation of the Water Project will provide the primary source of our future cash flow, we also believe there is significant additional value in our underlying agricultural assets. Demand for agricultural land with water rights is at an all-time high; therefore, in addition to our Water Project proposal, we are engaged in agricultural joint ventures at the Cadiz/Fenner Property that put some of the groundwater currently being lost to evaporation from the underlying aquifer system to immediate beneficial use. We have farmed portions of the Cadiz/Fenner Property since the late 1980s relying on groundwater from the aquifer system for irrigation and have found the site is well suited for various permanent and seasonal crops. Presently, the property has 2,100 acres leased for cultivation of a variety of crops, including citrus, dried-on-the-vine raisins and seasonal vegetables.
We also continue to explore additional uses of our land and water resource assets, including renewable energy development, the marketing of our approved desert tortoise land conservation bank, which is located on our properties outside the Water Project area, and other long-term legacy uses of our properties, such as habitat conservation and cultural development.
W
ater Resource Development
The Water Project is designed to capture and conserve billions of gallons of renewable native groundwater currently being lost annually to evaporation from the aquifer system underlying our Cadiz/Fenner Property, and provide a new reliable water supply for approximately 400,000 people in Southern California. The total quantity of groundwater to be recovered and conveyed to Water Project participants will not exceed a long-term annual average of 50,000 acre-feet per year for 50 years. The Water Project also offers participants the ability to carry-over their annual supply and store it in the groundwater basin from year to year. A second phase of the Water Project, Phase II, will offer up to one million acre-feet of storage capacity that can be used to hold imported water supplies at the project area.
Water Project facilities required for Phase I primarily include, among other things:
·
|
High-yield wells designed to efficiently recover available native groundwater from beneath the Water Project area;
|
·
|
A water conveyance pipeline to deliver water from the well-field to the CRA for further delivery to Project participants; and
|
·
|
An energy source to provide power to the well-field, pipeline and pumping facilities.
|
If an imported water storage component of the Project is ultimately implemented in Phase II, the following additional facilities would be required, among other things:
·
|
Facilities to pump water through the conveyance pipeline from the CRA to the Water Project well-field and/or through the Company's pipeline from Cadiz to Barstow, CA; and
|
·
|
Spreading basins, which are shallow settling ponds that will be configured to efficiently percolate water from the ground surface down to the water table using subsurface storage capacity for the storage of water.
|
Phase I
Phase I has been fully reviewed and permitted in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In May 2016, all permits and approvals were sustained in the California Court of Appeal and are no longer subject to further litigation. As a result, the Project presently is permitted to provide an average of 50,000 acre-feet of water for 50 years to meet municipal and industrial (M&I) water needs in Southern California.
In October 2017, the US Bureau of Land Management provided a letter finding that the Project's proposed use of a portion of the Arizona & California Railroad Company ("ARZC") right-of-way from Cadiz to Freda, California to construct and operate the Water Project's water conveyance pipeline and related railroad improvements from Cadiz to the CRA is within the scope of the original right of way grant and not subject to additional permitting or review. The buried pipeline would be constructed parallel to the railroad tracks and be used to convey water between our Cadiz Valley property and the CRA.
Construction of Phase I of Water Project facilities is expected to cost approximately $250 million and will require capital financing that we expect will be secured by definitive Purchase and Sale Agreements with Project participants and the new facility assets. On May 25, 2017, the Company closed a strategic transaction with funds affiliated with Apollo Global Management, LLC ("Apollo"), a leading global alternative investment manager with approximately $197 billion of assets under management, to initiate financial arrangements for the construction of Phase I. In furtherance of the strategic transaction, funds managed by affiliates of Apollo and the Company executed a conditional commitment of up to $240 million for Phase I construction finance expenditures. The conditional commitment is intended to provide the additional resources necessary to complete the construction of Phase I of the Water Project. However, Cadiz is not obligated to accept such financing from Apollo, and Apollo's commitment is conditional (see "Liquidity and Capital Resources", below). We expect to finalize construction financing after the final terms of contracts and conveyance are negotiated, as described below.
In addition to finalizing construction financing terms as described above, prior to construction, the Water Project must (1) finalize contracts with Project participating agencies, (2) secure transportation arrangements to deliver water into each participant's service area, and (3) complete final design and engineering. Below is a discussion of present activities to advance these objectives.
(1) Contracts with Public Water Agencies or Private Water
Utilities
The Company has executed Letters of Intent ("LOIs"), option agreements and purchase agreements, or contracts (collectively, "Agreements") with public water agencies and private water utilities in California during the Project's development. These participating agencies serve more than one million customers in cities throughout California's San Bernardino, Riverside, Los Angeles, Orange, Imperial and Ventura Counties.
Santa Margarita Water District ("SMWD") was the first participant to convert its option agreement and adopt resolutions approving a Water Purchase and Sale Agreement for 5,000 acre-feet of water. The structure of the SMWD purchase agreement calls for an annually adjusted water supply payment, plus a pro rata portion of the capital recovery charge and operating and maintenance costs. The capital recovery charge is calculated by amortizing the total capital investment by the Company over a 30-year term.
Agreements entered into prior to the beginning of the CEQA review process provide the right to acquire an annual supply of 5,000 acre-feet of water at a $775 per acre-foot (2010 dollars, subject to adjustment), which is competitive with the incremental cost of new water. In addition, these agencies received options to acquire storage rights in the Water Project to allow for the management of their Water Project supplies in complement with their own water resources. Up to 150,000 acre-feet of carry-over storage is available for reservation by the agencies prior to construction commencement. Participants that elect to achieve year-to-year flexibility in their use of Project water by utilizing carry-over storage will reserve storage capacity for $1,500 per acre-foot prior to construction.
LOIs that have been entered into since completion of the CEQA review process reserve supplies from the Water Project at $960 per acre-foot (2014 dollars, subject to adjustment). These LOIs also include the option to reserve carry-over storage capacity for $1,500 per acre-foot prior to construction.
Presently, total reservations of supplies from the Water Project via these Agreements are in excess of Water Project capacity. Prior to construction of the Water Project, we expect to convert existing option agreements and LOIs to purchase agreements. We are working collaboratively with the participating water agencies to account for any oversubscription in the final definitive Purchase and Sale Agreements we enter into with these agencies and allow for inclusive participation across Southern California.
(2) Conveyance Arrangements
Prior to construction of the Water Project, and in coordination with final participation contracts described in (1) above, an agreement and terms for moving water supplies in the CRA must be negotiated with Metropolitan Water District of Southern California ("Metropolitan"), which owns and controls the CRA.
Water supplies conserved by the Project would enter the CRA at the termination of the project's conveyance pipeline near Rice, CA. The CEQA process considered a variety of options to enter the CRA and assumed final entry into the CRA would be determined by MWD in consultation with the Project's participating agencies.
Once arrangements are reached, the Metropolitan Board would take action as a responsible agency under CEQA regarding the terms and conditions of the Water Project's use of the CRA to transport water to its participating agencies.
There is no application yet before Metropolitan related to entry and transportation of Project supplies, but we expect such a formal application will be filed in 2018 as the Project's contractual arrangements with participants are finalized.
Any agreement as to the terms and conditions of the Water Project's use of the CRA will be negotiated between and entered into by Metropolitan and the Project participating agencies, not the Company.
Discussions with Metropolitan regarding conveyance of Project water in the CRA have been led by SMWD, the Water Project's CEQA lead agency.
Water Project supplies entering the CRA will comply with Metropolitan's published engineering, design and water quality standards and will be subject to all applicable fees and charges routinely established by Metropolitan for the conveyance of water within its service territory.
We believe there are multiple benefits that can be secured by MWD upon making space reasonably available for the Cadiz Water supplies and having the flexibility of relying on the Cadiz project in both wet and dry years.
(3) Final Design and Permitting
As a component of completing contract terms with participating agencies and related wheeling arrangements with Metropolitan, we must also finalize design of Project facilities and acquire relevant construction permits with state and local agencies. Together with SMWD we have engaged engineering and environmental consultants to complete design plans for the 43-mile pipeline, Project wellfield, any necessary water treatment facilities, and facilities required to connect to the Metropolitan system at and near the CRA. This work is ongoing and expected to proceed in coordination with the negotiation of contracts and wheeling arrangements.
Once facility design and layout near completion, we will need to obtain additional permits and approvals from state or local entities prior to construction. This may include but is not limited to confirmation of existing access rights, easements and right-of-ways, for areas that may be crossed by Project facilities in the Project area subject to final pipeline configuration.
Phase II