Item 1A. Ri
sk
Factors
See “Item 1A – Risk Factors”
as disclosed in Form 10-K as filed with the Commission on April 2, 2018.
Additional risk factors:
We
are a development-stage company and will need to make additions to senior management in order to successfully execute our business
plan.
We
will need to identify and recruit additional prospective executives and other employees with experience in the digital therapeutic
and neurocognitive disorder industries, specifically candidates who have managed and completed FDA-required regulatory affairs
and clinical studies concerning new products. Edward Cox, our Chief Executive Officer, is one of our founders and has agreed to
serve in that capacity in the interim. Although his primary background involves biosciences, healthcare, life sciences, and technology,
he has experience in development-stage companies and venture-level investments and early stage capital formation for emerging growth
companies. Our inability to recruit and retain executives with proven experience in these fields could delay or negatively affect
our ability to execute on our business plan, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results
of operation.
Our business is subject to government
regulation, which may have a negative impact on our ability to develop and implement our business strategy and bring new products
to market, and our ability to continue operations.
The digital health sector is relatively
new and untested, and impacts of regulations and general market conditions could have a negative impact on our business. The digital
health sector may be impacted by economic volatility, consumer spending patterns and market share gains of competitors’ branded
products. Overall the digital health market is largely new and untested; the uptake of products may not meet uptake projections
as there is little to no prior data. In addition, the United States healthcare industry is highly regulated and subject to frequent
and substantial changes. Digital health is an evolving industry within the United States healthcare industry, and is particularly
susceptible to these changes. The impacts of these regulations and the general market conditions could have a negative impact on
our business and operations.
Research, development, and commercialization
of medical devices are inherently risky. The cost and time needed to obtain regulatory clearance or approval are uncertain. We
cannot give any assurance that we will receive or maintain regulatory clearance or approval of DTHR-ALZ or potentially other products.
DTHR-ALZ is a medical device that will
be subject to FDA regulation. Therefore, FDA clearance or approval will be required before marketing DTHR-ALZ. As a company, we
have no experience in obtaining regulatory clearance or approval of a medical device. Likewise, we have no experience in the commercialization
or marketing of a medical device. Although DTHR-ALZ has been granted Breakthrough Device designation, such a designation does not
guarantee that a device will be approved by the FDA. In addition, Breakthrough Device designation does not guarantee faster development,
regulatory review or approval. The FDA has acknowledged that review times may take longer for some Breakthrough Devices than for
other devices because of the novel scientific issues Breakthrough Devices may raise. The FDA may also withdraw Breakthrough Device
designation after it is granted if the device is no longer eligible or if the request for Breakthrough Designation contained untrue
statements of material fact or omitted material information. To receive FDA clearance or approval, we must provide reasonable assurance
of the safety and effectiveness of DTHR-ALZ. To provide such assurance, we may be required to conduct clinical studies or other
analyses. The cost and length of time needed to complete such studies or analyses are uncertain. As a company, we have no experience
in conducting the types of clinical studies or analyses required to receive FDA clearance or approval of a medical device. If we
are unable to successfully complete required clinical studies or other analyses, we will not receive FDA clearance or approval.
Following FDA clearance or approval, if received, we will be subject to ongoing regulatory requirements around the continued development,
commercialization, and marketing of DTHR-ALZ. If we do not comply with such requirements, FDA may withdraw its clearance or approval
and may direct us to remove DTHR-ALZ from the market.
Our management plans to seek Medicare,
Medicaid and/or private payor reimbursement for this and potential other products, but there is no guarantee that we will be successful
in these efforts. If FDA disagrees with our analysis that ReminX is a general wellness device exempt from FDA regulations and
decides to exercise regulatory authority over ReminX, if we are unable to obtain FDA clearance or approval for our DTHR-ALZ product
and potential other products, or if we are unsuccessful in obtaining Medicare, Medicaid or private payor reimbursement for DTHR-ALZ
and potential other products, our ability to develop and implement our business strategy could be delayed, limited, or unsuccessful.
Even if we are successful in obtaining Medicare, Medicaid, or private payor reimbursement for this and potentially other products,
such products may become subject to unfavorable pricing regulations, third party reimbursement practices, or healthcare reform
initiatives, which would harm our business.
If our efforts to sell to
Direct-Response Consumer Health (DRCH) companies and other sales channels are not successful, our revenues may be materially
affected.
We intend to
generate substantially all of our revenues initially through sales of the ReminX Product to the Direct-Response Consumer Health
(DRCH) channel. We also plan to initiate sales through a number of channels. We must develop these sales channels, which we seek
to do in part by investing in our product platform and new services and technologies. If our efforts to grow these sales channels
are not successful, our revenues would be adversely affected. We intend to rely on our marketing and advertising efforts to attract
new clients and subscribers. If we are unable to effectively attract new clients and subscribers, our business, financial condition
and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.
If we fail to comply with healthcare
laws, we could face substantial penalties and our business, operations, and financial conditions could be adversely affected.
Our future arrangements with payors and
customers may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations that may constrain the
business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we market, sell and distribute any products. Federal and state
healthcare laws and regulations pertaining to fraud and abuse and patients’ rights will be applicable to our business. Restrictions
under applicable federal, state and foreign healthcare laws and regulations may affect our ability to operate and expose us to
areas of risk, including:
|
•
|
federal civil and criminal false claims laws and civil monetary penalty laws, including the False
Claims Act, which impose criminal and civil penalties, including through civil “qui tam” or “whistleblower”
actions, against individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment or approval
from Medicare, Medicaid, or other third party payors that are false or fraudulent or knowingly making a false statement to improperly
avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government. A person or entity does not need to have actual
knowledge of these statutes or specific intent to violate them in order to have committed a violation;
|
|
•
|
the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, which created
federal criminal statutes that prohibit knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare
benefit program or obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, any of the money or property
owned by, or under the custody or control of, any healthcare benefit program, regardless of the payor (e.g., public or private)
and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up by any trick or device a material fact or making any materially
false statements in connection with the delivery of, or payment for, healthcare benefits, items or services relating to healthcare
matters;
|
|
•
|
HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of
2009, or HITECH, and their respective implementing regulations, which impose requirements on certain covered healthcare providers,
health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses as well as their respective business associates that perform services for them that
involve the use, or disclosure of, individually identifiable health information, relating to the privacy, security and transmission
of individually identifiable health information without appropriate authorization;
|
|
•
|
the federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act, created under the ACA, and its implementing regulations,
which require manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologicals and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare,
Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program to report annually to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
under the Open Payments Program, information related to payments or other transfers of value made to physicians and teaching hospitals,
as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members, as well as other state and
foreign laws regulating marketing activities;
|
|
•
|
federal consumer protection and unfair competition laws, which broadly regulate marketplace activities
and activities that potentially harm consumers; and
|
|
•
|
analogous state and foreign laws and regulations.
|
Because of the breadth of these laws and
the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and safe harbors available, it is possible that some of our business activities could,
despite our efforts to comply, be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws. Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements
will comply with applicable healthcare laws may involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental and enforcement authorities
will conclude that our business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law interpreting
applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are
not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business, including
the imposition of civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, disgorgement, monetary fines, possible exclusion from
participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits
and future earnings, and curtailment of our operations, any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business
and our results of operations. In addition, the approval and commercialization of any of our product candidates outside the United
States will also likely subject us to foreign equivalents of the healthcare laws mentioned above, among other foreign laws.
Digital Therapeutics, and particularly
Digital Therapeutics based on Reminiscence Therapy, is relatively new and unproven in the healthcare market, and our products may
experience slow or limited growth, which would adversely affect our ability to fully realize the potential of our products.
Our
products combine elements of Reminiscence Therapy and Digital Therapeutics
to improve the lives of seniors and individuals
suffering from social isolation and dementia, as well as those who care for them
. This approach
is relatively new, and evaluating the size and scope of the market is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. We believe
that our future success will depend in large part on the growth of this market.
Our management anticipates that DTHR-ALZ
will be the first non-pharmacological prescription treatment for the symptoms of agitation and depression associated with major
neurocognitive disorder of the Alzheimer’s type, and it is expected be used primarily in the senior living, skilled nursing,
and/or home care/home health sectors. These markets and market participants
may not recognize
the need for, or benefits of, our products. Even if this market does grow, our ability to expand our business and extend our market
position depends upon a number of factors, including the cost, performance and perceived value of our products and the applications
we develop for them. The perceived value of our products and the applications we develop for them may be a function of estimated
cost savings by healthcare providers using our products, which may be difficult to accurately predict. Market opportunity and cost
saving estimates are subject to significant uncertainty and are based on assumptions and estimates, including our internal analysis
and industry experience. Assessing the market for our solutions in each of the markets we are planning to compete in is particularly
difficult due to a number of factors, including limited available information and rapid evolution of the market. The market for
our products may fail to grow significantly or be unable to meet the level of growth we expect. As a result of these and other
factors, we may experience lower-than-expected demand for our products and services due to lack of channel partner, hospital and/or
physician acceptance, technological challenges, competing products and services, decreases in spending by current and prospective
customers, weakening economic conditions and other causes. If our market does not experience significant growth, or if demand for
our products does not increase in line with our projections, then our business, results of operations and financial condition will
be adversely affected.
To the extent our business model
depends on government payors, and those payors fail to provide coverage or adequate reimbursement for the services in which our
products are used, our revenue and prospects for profitability would be harmed.
Our
current go-to-market strategy for our ReminX product does not contemplate or rely upon governmental or third party payor reimbursement.
As noted,
DTHR-ALZ is a development-stage medical device that has been granted Breakthrough Device designation by the FDA
for the mitigation of the symptoms of agitation and depression associated with major neurocognitive disorder of the Alzheimer's
type. Our management plans to seek Medicare, Medicaid and/or private payor reimbursement for this and potentially other products,
but there is no guarantee that we will be successful in these efforts.
To the extent that
we adopt a market strategy which is in whole or in part reliant on third party reimbursement, commercial sales of our DTHR-ALZ
product will depend in part on the availability of reimbursement from such third-party payors, including government health administrative
authorities, managed care providers, private health insurers and other organizations. Each third-party payor may have its own policy
regarding what products it will cover, the conditions under which it will cover such products, and how much it will pay for such
products. Third-party payors are increasingly examining the medical necessity and cost effectiveness of medical products and services
in addition to safety and efficacy and, accordingly, significant uncertainty exists as to the reimbursement status of newly approved
devices.
Risks Related to Regulatory Matters
Breakthrough
Device designation by the FDA does not guarantee clearance or approval and may not actually lead to a faster development or regulatory
review or approval process.
DTHR-ALZ was granted
Breakthrough Device designation by the FDA on August 20, 2018, for the mitigation of the symptoms of agitation and depression associated
with major neurocognitive disorder of the Alzheimer's type. Under the Breakthrough Devices program, a provision of the 21st Century
Cures Act, the FDA works with medical device developers to expedite development assessment and review in order to give patients
more timely access to diagnostic and therapeutic medical devices. According to the FDA, a “Breakthrough Device” is
a medical device that may be more effective at treating or diagnosing a life-threatening or irreversibly debilitating disease or
condition compared to the current standard of care and represents a breakthrough technology (1) for which no approved or cleared
alternatives exist, (2) offers significant advantages over existing approved or cleared alternatives, or (3) the availability of
the device is in the best interests of patients.
There
is no assurance we will receive similar designations for any of our future products. Further, even though we have received Breakthrough
Device designation for DTHR-ALZ, we may not experience a faster development process, review or clearance/approval compared to conventional
FDA procedures, or may not receive clearance or approval at all. The FDA may withdraw Breakthrough Device designation for DTHR-ALZ
or any other device designated as a Breakthrough Device if it believes that such designation is no longer supported by data from
our clinical development program.
As we develop our DTHR-ALZ product
and other potential products that are regulated by the FDA, we will be subject to costly and complex laws and governmental regulations
and any adverse regulatory action may materially adversely affect our financial condition and business operations.
As
noted,
DTHR-ALZ is a development-stage medical device that has been granted Breakthrough Device designation by the FDA for
the mitigation of the symptoms of agitation and depression associated with major neurocognitive disorder of the Alzheimer's type.
As we develop
DTHR-ALZ and other potential products that are regulated by the FDA, we will
be subject to regulation by numerous government agencies, including the FDA and comparable agencies outside the United States.
To varying degrees, each of these agencies requires us to comply with laws and regulations governing the development, testing,
manufacturing, labeling, marketing, and distribution of our products.
We
cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain or maintain marketing clearance or approval for our medical device products or
enhancements or modifications to existing products. We have no FDA cleared or approved products, and we may not receive further
clearances or approvals on a timely basis, if at all. The failure to maintain or obtain approval or clearance for new products
or functions could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial conditions and cash flows.
Even if we are able to obtain such approval or clearance, it may:
|
•
|
take a significant amount of time;
|
|
•
|
require the expenditure of substantial resources;
|
|
•
|
involve stringent clinical and pre-clinical testing, as well
as increased post-market compliance requirements and surveillance;
|
|
•
|
involve modifications, repairs, or replacements of our products;
and
|
|
•
|
result in limitations on the proposed uses and marketing
of our products.
|
Further,
if the FDA or other applicable regulatory authorities approve or clear a similar product that competes with our product or products,
it could decrease our expected sales. Both before and after a product is commercially released, we have ongoing responsibilities
under FDA regulations. Many of our facilities and procedures and those of our suppliers are also subject to periodic inspections
by the FDA to determine compliance with the FDA’s requirements, including primarily the quality system regulations and medical
device reporting regulations. The results of these inspections can include inspectional observations on FDA’s Form-483, warning
letters, or other forms of enforcement. If the FDA were to conclude that we are not in compliance with applicable laws or regulations,
or that any of our products are ineffective or pose an unreasonable health risk, the FDA could prohibit us from marketing such
products, detain or seize adulterated or misbranded products, order a recall, repair, replacement, or refund of such devices, refuse
to grant pending pre-market clearance or approval applications or require certificates of non-U.S. governments for exports, or
require us to notify health professionals and others that the devices present unreasonable risks of substantial harm to the public
health. The FDA may also assess civil or criminal penalties against us, our officers or employees and impose restrictions on a
company-wide basis, or enjoin or restrain certain conduct resulting in violations of applicable law. The FDA may also recommend
prosecution to the U.S. Department of Justice. Any adverse regulatory action, depending on its magnitude, may restrict us from
effectively marketing and selling our products and limit our ability to obtain future pre-market clearances or approvals, and could
result in a substantial modification to our business practices and operations.
Our
ability to generate product revenue from DTHR-ALZ is dependent on the success of our development of DTHR-ALZ, for human therapeutic
use, specifically
for the mitigation of the symptoms of agitation and depression associated with major neurocognitive disorder
of the Alzheimer's type
. We are in the early stage of developing DTHR-ALZ. FDA clearance
may require significant additional development efforts, preclinical testing and studies, as well as applicable regulatory guidance
for preclinical and clinical studies from the FDA and other regulatory authorities before we can seek regulatory clearance and
begin commercial sales of any potential products. The design and execution of clinical studies to support FDA clearance of DTHR-ALZ
is subject to substantial risk and uncertainty. Clinical development is a lengthy and expensive process with an uncertain outcome,
and results of earlier studies and trials may not be predictive of future trial results. Clinical failure can occur at any stage
of clinical development. We likely will rely on third parties to conduct our clinical studies. If these third parties do not successfully
carry out their contractual duties or meet expected deadlines, or if they terminate their agreement with us, we may not be able
to obtain regulatory clearance for or commercialize our products.
The
regulatory clearance processes of the FDA are lengthy, time consuming and inherently unpredictable, and if we are ultimately unable
to obtain regulatory clearance for our products, our business will be substantially harmed.
In
addition, the marketing license for any product is limited by the FDA to those specific indications and conditions for which clinical
safety and efficacy have been demonstrated. The FDA has taken the position that device manufacturers are prohibited from promoting
their products other than for the uses and indications set forth in the approved product labeling. The U.S. government has initiated
a number of enforcement actions against manufacturers that promote products for “off-label” uses, including actions
alleging that federal health care program reimbursement of products promoted for “off-label” uses (or services in which
such products are utilized) constitute false and fraudulent claims to the government. The failure to comply with “off-label”
promotion restrictions can result in significant civil or criminal exposure, administrative obligations and costs, or other potential
penalties from, or agreements with, the federal government.
FDA may disagree with our assessment
that ReminX is a general wellness device, or may decide in the future to exercise regulatory authority over some or all general
wellness devices.
We have assessed the regulatory status
of ReminX under the law and FDA regulations and guidance documents. We have concluded that for certain of its intended uses, broadly
summarized as alleviating social isolation in people who may or may not have a particular disease state, ReminX is a consumer health
product that does not make medical claims. Under the 21
st
Century Cures Act of 2016, “a software function that
is intended … for maintaining or encouraging a healthy lifestyle and is unrelated to the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, prevention,
or treatment of a disease or condition” is not a device under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and thus is not subject
to FDA regulation. For its other intended uses, to help people live well with Alzheimer’s and other forms of dementia, we
have concluded that ReminX is a device under Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act but meets the definition of a “general
wellness” device under an FDA guidance document published in 2016. In that guidance, FDA states that it will not exercise
regulatory authority over general wellness devices, and therefore such devices are not required to comply with otherwise applicable
FDA requirements for premarket review and approval or clearance and post-market regulatory requirements for devices, including,
but not limited to: registration and listing and premarket notification requirements, labeling requirements, good manufacturing
practice requirements, and Medical Device Reporting.
There is no guarantee that the
FDA will agree with our assessment that ReminX is not a device for some of its intended uses and a general wellness device
for other intended uses. In the event that the FDA were to disagree with our assessment we may be subject to FDA enforcement
actions, including but not limited to seizure and recall of our products, injunctions and civil and criminal penalties. We
may also be forced to alter some of the claims that we make for ReminX.
There is also no guarantee that the
FDA will continue to decline to exercise its regulatory authority over general wellness devices. If FDA alters its approach
to these products, we may have to alter the intended uses of ReminX and/or seek regulatory clearance or approval for some of
its intended uses.
We make our FDA regulated products
under extensive FDA and foreign regulatory quality and manufacturing requirements and may face future regulatory difficulties under
these requirements.
The
FDA and other regulatory authorities require that our FDA-regulated devices be manufactured in compliance with Quality System Regulations,
or QSR, and similar standards in foreign markets where we intend to sell our products. Any failure by us or our third-party manufacturers
to comply with QSR or failure to scale up manufacturing processes as needed, including any failure to deliver sufficient quantities
of products in a timely manner, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and
cash flows. In addition, such failure could be the basis for action by the FDA to withdraw clearance for products previously granted
to us and for other regulatory action. Compliance with quality standards is further complicated by the fact that the FDA’s
guidance and expectations for software quality systems is evolving. Thus, changes to current product quality and manufacturing
standards, guidance and regulations may impact the timeline and resources required to develop and make our products.
Our industry is experiencing greater
scrutiny and regulation by governmental authorities, which may lead to greater regulation in the future.
Our
medical devices and technologies and our business activities are subject to a complex regime of regulations and enforcement environment,
including regulations promulgated by the FDA, the U.S. Department of Justice, the Office of Inspector General of the Department
of Health and Human Services, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and numerous other federal, state, and non-U.S. governmental
authorities. In addition, certain state governments and the federal government have enacted legislation aimed at increasing transparency
of our interactions with health care providers. As a result, if our devices and solutions (or the procedures in which they are
used) are reimbursed by Federal Healthcare programs such as Medicare or Medicaid, we are required by law to disclose payments and
other transfers of value to health care providers licensed by certain states and to all U.S. physicians and U.S. teaching hospitals
at the federal level. Any failure to comply with these legal and regulatory requirements could impact our business. In addition,
we will continue to devote substantial additional time and financial resources to further develop and implement policies, systems,
and processes to comply with enhanced legal and regulatory requirements, which may also impact our business. We anticipate that
governmental authorities will continue to scrutinize our industry closely, and that additional regulation may increase compliance
and legal costs, exposure to litigation, and other adverse effects to our operations.
If we fail to comply with applicable
health information privacy and security laws and other state and federal privacy and security laws, we may be subject to significant
liabilities, reputational harm and other negative consequences, including decreasing the willingness of current and potential customers
to work with us.
DTHR-ALZ
may be subject to data privacy and security regulation by both the federal government and the states in which we conduct our business.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, established uniform federal standards for “covered
entities,” which include certain healthcare providers, healthcare clearinghouses, and health plans, governing the conduct
of specified electronic healthcare transactions and protecting the security and privacy of protected health information, or PHI.
The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or HITECH Act, which became effective on February 17,
2010, makes HIPAA’s security standards directly applicable to “business associates,” which are independent contractors
or agents of covered entities that create, receive, maintain, or transmit PHI in connection with providing a service for or on
behalf of a covered entity. The HITECH Act also increased the civil and criminal penalties that may be imposed against covered
entities, business associates and certain other persons, and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civil actions for
damages or injunctions in federal courts to enforce HIPAA’s requirements and seek attorney’s fees and costs associated
with pursuing federal civil actions.
A
portion of the data that we obtain and handle for or on behalf of certain of our clients may be considered PHI, subject to HIPAA.
If so, we would also be required to maintain similar business associate agreements with our subcontractors that have access to
PHI of our customers in rendering services to us or on our behalf. Under HIPAA and our contractual agreements with our HIPAA-covered
entity health plan customers, we would be considered a “business associate” to those customers, and would be required
to maintain the privacy and security of PHI in accordance with HIPAA and the terms of our business associate agreements with our
clients, including by implementing HIPAA-required administrative, technical and physical safeguards. We would incur significant
costs to establish and maintain these safeguards and, if additional safeguards are required to comply with HIPAA regulations or
our clients’ requirements, our costs could increase further, which would negatively affect our operating results. Furthermore,
we cannot guarantee that such safeguards have been and will continue to be adequate. If we fail to maintain adequate safeguards,
or we or our agents or subcontractors use or disclose PHI in a manner prohibited or not permitted by HIPAA, our subcontractor business
associate agreements, or our business associate agreements with our customers, or if the privacy or security of PHI that we obtain
and handle is otherwise compromised, we could be subject to significant liabilities and consequences, including, without limitation:
|
•
|
breach of our contractual obligations to clients, which may cause our clients to terminate their
relationship with us and may result in potentially significant financial obligations to our clients;
|
|
•
|
investigation by the federal and state regulatory authorities empowered to enforce HIPAA and other
data privacy and security laws, which include the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services the Federal Trade Commission and
state attorneys general, and the possible imposition of civil and criminal penalties;
|
|
•
|
private litigation by individuals adversely affected by any misuse of their personal health information
for which we are responsible and/or breach notification related costs; and
|
|
•
|
negative publicity, which may decrease the willingness of potential future customers to work with
us and negatively affect our sales and operating results.
|
Further, we publish
statements to end users of our services that describe how we handle and protect personal information. If federal or state regulatory
authorities or private litigants consider any portion of these statements to be untrue, we may be subject to claims of deceptive
practices, which could lead to significant liabilities and consequences, including, without limitation, damage to our reputation
and costs of responding to investigations, defending against litigation, settling claims and complying with regulatory or court
orders.
Recent legal developments
in Europe have created compliance uncertainty regarding certain transfers of personal data from Europe to the United States. For
example, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which came into application in the European Union (EU) on May 25, 2018,
applies to all of our activities conducted from an establishment in the EU or related to products and services that we offer to
EU users. The GDPR created a range of new compliance obligations which may cause us to change our business practices, and significantly
increased financial penalties for noncompliance (including possible fines of up to 4% of global annual turnover for the preceding
financial year or €20 million (whichever is higher) for the most serious infringements).
Federal
or state governmental authorities may impose additional data security standards or additional privacy or other restrictions on
the collection, use, maintenance, transmission and other disclosures of health information. Legislation has been proposed at various
times at both the federal and the state level that would limit, forbid or regulate the use or transmission of medical information
outside of the United States. Such legislation, if adopted, may render our use of off-shore partners for work related to such data
impracticable or substantially more expensive. Alternative processing of such information within the United States may involve
substantial delay in implementation and increased cost.
If we fail to comply with federal
and state healthcare laws and regulations, including those governing submission of false or fraudulent claims to government healthcare
programs and financial relationships among healthcare providers, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties or loss of eligibility
to participate in government healthcare programs.
We
may be subject to certain federal and state laws and regulations designed to protect patients, governmental healthcare programs,
and private health plans from fraudulent and abusive activities. These laws include anti-kickback restrictions and laws prohibiting
the submission of false or fraudulent claims. These laws are complex and their application to our specific products, services and
relationships may not be clear and may be applied to our business in ways that we do not anticipate. Federal and state regulatory
and law enforcement authorities have recently increased enforcement activities with respect to Medicare and Medicaid fraud and
abuse regulations and other reimbursement laws and rules. From time to time in the future, we may receive inquiries or subpoenas
to produce documents in connection with such activities. We could be required to expend significant time and resources to comply
with these requests, and the attention of our management team could be diverted to these efforts. If we are found to be in violation
of any federal or state fraud and abuse laws, we could be subject to civil and criminal penalties, and we could be excluded from
participating in federal and state healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. The occurrence of any of these events could
significantly harm our business and financial condition.
Provisions
in Title XI of the Social Security Act, commonly referred to as the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, prohibit the knowing and
willful offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, in return for or to
induce either the referral of an individual or arranging for the referral of an individual for items or services for which payment
may be made in whole or in part by a federal health care program, or the purchasing, leasing, ordering, or arranging for or recommending
the purchasing, leasing, or ordering of items, services, goods, or facilities for which payment may be made, in whole or in part,
by a federal healthcare program, including but not limited to Medicare or Medicaid. The definition of “remuneration”
has been broadly interpreted to include anything of value such as gifts, discounts, rebates, waiver of payments or providing anything
at less than its fair market value. Many states have adopted similar prohibitions against kickbacks and other practices that are
intended to induce referrals which are applicable to all patients regardless of whether the patient is covered under a governmental
health program or private health plan. We attempt to scrutinize our business relationships and activities to comply with the federal
Anti-Kickback Statute and similar laws and we generally attempt to structure our sales and group purchasing arrangements in a manner
that is consistent with the requirements of applicable safe harbors to these laws. We cannot assure you, however, that our arrangements
will be protected by such safe harbors or that such increased enforcement activities will not directly or indirectly have an adverse
effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Any determination by a state or federal agency that any of
our activities or those of our vendors or customers violate any of these laws could subject us to civil or criminal penalties,
monetary fines, disgorgement, individual imprisonment, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings
and curtailment of our operations, could require us to change or terminate some portions of operations or business, could disqualify
us from providing services to healthcare providers doing business with government programs and, thus, could have an adverse effect
on our business.
Our
business may also be subject to numerous federal and state laws regarding submission of false or fraudulent claims, including without
limitation the civil False Claims Act, which forbids knowingly presenting or “causing to be presented” false or fraudulent
claims for payment to a federal health care program. Analogous state laws and regulations may apply to our arrangements and our
customers’ claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by non-governmental third-party payors. Additionally,
HIPAA also imposes criminal and civil liability for, among other things, executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program
or making false statements relating to healthcare matters.
These
laws and regulations may change rapidly, and it is frequently unclear how they apply to our business. Errors created by our products
that relate to entry, formatting, preparation or transmission of claim or cost report information may be determined or alleged
to be in violation of these laws and regulations. Any failure of our products or services to comply with these laws and regulations
could result in substantial civil or criminal liability, monetary fines, disgorgement, individual imprisonment, contractual damages,
reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings and curtailment of our operations, could adversely affect demand for
our one or more of our offerings, could invalidate all or portions of some of our customer contracts, could require us to change
or terminate some portions of our business, could require us to refund certain amounts collected, could cause us to be disqualified
from serving clients doing business with government payors and could have an adverse effect on our business.
Our
activities are also subject to state and federal self-referral laws, including the federal Physician Self-referral Law, commonly
known as the Stark Law, which prohibits physicians from referring patients to an entity for Medicare-covered “designated
health services” if the physician, or a member of the physician’s immediate family, has a financial relationship with
the entity, unless a statutory or regulatory exception applies. Many states have similar laws that may apply regardless of payor.
In addition, our activities may also implicate state laboratory licensure laws, as well as the corporate practice of medicine prohibition
in certain states that maintain such laws or regulations. Our failure to abide by these state and federal laws could expose us
to criminal, civil and administrative sanctions, reputational harm, and could harm our results of operations and financial conditions.
We
may encounter substantial delays in completing our clinical studies which in turn will require additional costs, or we may fail
to demonstrate adequate safety and efficacy to the satisfaction of applicable regulatory authorities.
It
is impossible to predict if or when DTHR-ALZ will be deemed to be effective
for the mitigation of the symptoms of agitation
and depression associated with major neurocognitive disorder of the Alzheimer's type .
Before
obtaining marketing clearance or approval from regulatory authorities for the sale and marketing of DTHR-ALZ or future FDA regulated
products, we may be required to conduct clinical studies to demonstrate their safety and efficacy. Clinical testing is expensive,
time-consuming and uncertain as to outcome. We cannot guarantee that any clinical studies will be conducted as planned or completed
on schedule, if at all. A failure of one or more clinical studies can occur at any stage of testing. Events that may prevent successful
or timely completion of clinical development include:
|
•
|
delays in reaching, or failing to reach, a consensus with
regulatory agencies on study design;
|
|
•
|
delays in reaching, or failing to reach, agreement on acceptable
terms with a sufficient number of prospective contract research organizations (“CROs”) or clinical study sites, the
terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and trial sites;
|
|
•
|
delays in obtaining required Institutional Review Board (“IRB”)
or Ethics Committee (“EC”) approval at each clinical study site;
|
|
•
|
delays in recruiting a sufficient number of suitable patients
to participate in our clinical studies;
|
|
•
|
imposition of a clinical hold by regulatory agencies, after
an inspection of our clinical study operations or study sites;
|
|
•
|
failure by our CROs, other third parties or us to adhere
to clinical study, regulatory or legal requirements;
|
|
•
|
failure to perform in accordance with the FDA’s good
clinical practices (“GCP”) or applicable regulatory guidelines in other countries;
|
|
•
|
delays in the testing, validation, manufacturing and delivery
of sufficient quantities of our product candidates to the clinical sites;
|
|
•
|
delays in having patients complete participation in a study
or return for post-treatment follow-up;
|
|
•
|
clinical study sites or patients dropping out of a study;
|
|
•
|
delay or failure to address any patient safety concerns that
arise during the course of a trial;
|
|
•
|
unanticipated costs or increases in costs of clinical studies
of our product candidates;
|
|
•
|
occurrence of serious adverse events associated with the
product candidate that are viewed to outweigh its potential benefits; or
|
|
•
|
changes in regulatory requirements and guidance that require
amending or submitting new clinical protocols.
|
We
could also encounter delays if a clinical
study
is
suspended or terminated by us, by the IRBs or ECs of the institutions or partners with which such trials are being conducted, by
an independent Safety Review Board (“SRB”) for such
study
or
by the FDA or other regulatory authorities. Such authorities may suspend or terminate a clinical
study
due to a number of factors, including failure to conduct the clinical
study
in accordance with regulatory requirements or our clinical protocols, inspection of
the clinical
study
operations or trial site by
the FDA or other regulatory authorities resulting in the imposition of a clinical hold, unforeseen safety issues or adverse side
effects, failure to demonstrate a benefit from using a device, changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions or
lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical
study
.
Any
inability to successfully complete preclinical and clinical development could result in additional costs to us or impair our ability
to generate revenues from product sales, regulatory and commercialization milestones and royalties. In addition, if we make manufacturing
or software changes to our product candidates, we may need to conduct additional studies to prove the efficacy of DTHR-ALZ or our
future FDA regulated products.
Clinical
study delays could also shorten any periods during which we are able to commercialize DTHR-ALZ or allow our competitors to bring
a competing product to market before we do, which could impair our ability to successfully commercialize DTHR-ALZ. In addition,
any delays in completing our clinical studies will increase our costs, slow down the development and approval or clearance process
for DTHR-ALZ and jeopardize our ability to commence product sales and generate revenues. Any of these occurrences may significantly
harm our business, financial condition and prospects. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement
or completion of clinical studies may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval or clearance of DTHR-ALZ or our
future FDA regulated products.
The
outcome of preclinical studies and early clinical studies may not be predictive of the success of later clinical studies, and interim
results of a clinical study do not necessarily predict final results. Further, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible
to various interpretations and analyses, and many companies that have believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily
in preclinical studies and clinical studies have nonetheless failed to obtain marketing approval or clearance. If the results of
our clinical studies are inconclusive or if there are concerns or adverse events associated with DTHR-ALZ or our future FDA regulated
products, we may:
|
•
|
be delayed in obtaining marketing approval for DTHR-ALZ and
other products, if approved at all;
|
|
•
|
obtain approval for indications or patient populations that
are not as broad as intended or desired;
|
|
•
|
obtain approval with labeling that includes significant use
or distribution restrictions or safety warnings;
|
|
•
|
be required to change the way the product is used;
|
|
•
|
be required to perform additional clinical studies to support
approval or be subject to additional post-marketing testing requirements;
|
|
•
|
have regulatory authorities withdraw their approval of a
product or impose restrictions on its distribution in the form of a modified risk evaluation and mitigation strategy;
|
|
•
|
experience damage to our reputation.
|
Additionally,
use of DTHR-ALZ could potentially cause other adverse events that have not yet been predicted. As described above, any of these
events could prevent us from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of DTHR-ALZ and impair our ability to commercialize DTHR-ALZ
and other products.
Conducting successful clinical studies
may require the enrollment of large numbers of patients, and suitable patients may be difficult to identify and recruit.
Patient enrollment in clinical
studies
and completion of patient participation and follow-up depends on many factors, including the size of the patient population;
the nature of the trial protocol; the attractiveness of, or the discomforts and risks associated with, the treatments received
by enrolled subjects; the availability of appropriate clinical
study
investigators; support
staff; and proximity of patients to clinical sites and ability to comply with the eligibility and exclusion criteria for participation
in the clinical study and patient compliance. For example, patients may be discouraged from enrolling in our clinical
studies
if the trial protocol requires them to undergo extensive post-treatment procedures or follow-up to assess the effectiveness
of our products or if they determine that the uses and results of DTHR-ALZ under the trial protocols are not attractive. Patients
may also not participate in our clinical
studies
if they choose to participate in
contemporaneous clinical
studies
of competitive products.
If the
third parties on which we rely to conduct our clinical
studies
and to assist us with preclinical development do not perform as contractually required or expected,
we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our products.
We do not
have the ability to independently conduct our pre-clinical and clinical
studies
for
our products and we must rely on third parties, such as contract research organizations, pharmaceutical companies, medical institutions,
clinical investigators and contract laboratories to conduct such studies. If these third parties do not successfully carry out
their contractual duties or regulatory obligations, meet expected deadlines or need to be replaced, or if the quality or accuracy
of the data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our clinical protocols or regulatory requirements or for
other reasons, our pre-clinical development activities or clinical
studies
may
be extended, delayed, suspended or terminated, and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval or clearance for, or successfully
commercialize, our products on a timely basis, if at all. Furthermore, our third-party clinical study investigators may be delayed
in conducting our clinical
studies
for reasons
outside of their control. The occurrence of any of the foregoing may adversely affect our business, operating results and prospects.
The
future results of our current or future clinical
studies
may
not support our product candidate claims or may result in the discovery of unexpected adverse side effects.
Even if our clinical
studies
are completed as planned, we cannot be certain that their results will support the claims for which DTHR-ALZ has received
Breakthrough Device Designation, or that the FDA or foreign authorities will agree with our conclusions regarding them. Success
in preclinical studies and early clinical
studies
does not ensure that later clinical
studies
will be successful, and we cannot be sure that the later trials will replicate
the results of prior trials and preclinical studies. The clinical study process may fail to demonstrate that DTHR-ALZ is safe
and effective for the proposed indicated uses. If the FDA concludes that the clinical studies for DTHR-ALZ, or any other
product for which we might seek clearance in the future, has failed to demonstrate safety and effectiveness, we would not receive FDA clearance
to market that product in the United States for the indications sought.
In addition, such an outcome
could cause us to abandon DTHR-ALZ and might delay development of others. Any delay or termination of our clinical studies
will delay the filing of any product submissions with the
FDA
and, ultimately, our ability to commercialize DTHR-ALZ and our future products and generate revenues.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equi
ty
Securities and Use of Proceeds
Pre-Launch Offering
The Company commenced a private placement
offering of shares of its common stock (the “Pre-launch Offering”) in the fourth quarter of 2017. As of December 31,
2017, the Company had sold a total of 59,770 shares of the Company's Common Stock for net proceeds of $777,000 in the Pre-launch
Offering.
As of August 14, 2018, the Company closed
the private placement offering, selling a total of 196,264 shares of the Company’s common stock and had raised an aggregate
of $2,551,350.
The Offering was made to accredited investors
only. No warrants or other securities were offered in the offering.
The above issuances were completed in reliance
on exemptions from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”). These transactions
qualified for exemption from registration because (i) the Company did not engage in any general solicitation or advertising to
market the securities; (ii) each purchaser was provided the opportunity to ask questions and receive answers from the Company regarding
the Company and the issuance; (iii) the securities were issued to persons with knowledge and experience in financial and business
matters so that he or she is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of an investment in the Company; and (iv) the recipients
received “restricted securities” that include a restrictive legend on the certificate, which restricts the shares from
being transferred except pursuant to a registration statement that is effective with the SEC or pursuant to an exemption from registration.
Options Granted to Employees and Consultants
On June 28, 2018, the Company’s Board
of Directors approved the grant of an aggregate of 30,000 options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, consisting
of grants of 1,250 options to 24 employees and consultants to the Company who had been instrumental in helping the Company get
to the point of the initial launch. The options granted had an exercise price of $8.40 per share, which was the market price of
the common stock on the date of grant, and vest one-third on each of the first, second, and third anniversaries of the date of
grant, and expire on the eighth anniversary of the date of grant.
On June 29, 2018, the Company’s Board
of Directors approved the grant of an aggregate of 12,500 options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, consisting
of grants of 6,250 options to the two board members of the Company. The options granted had an exercise price of $8.40 per share,
and vest one-third on each of the first, second, and third anniversaries of the date of grant, and expire on the eighth anniversary
of the date of grant.
The option grants were completed in reliance
on exemptions from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) and Rule 701 and other rules. The grants of options qualified for
exemption from registration because the Company is not subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and the other requirements of Rule 701 were met.
RSJ and Wade Capital Bridge Transaction
On September 14, 2018, the Company entered
into a Promissory Note Purchase Agreement (collectively, the “Wade Note Purchase Agreements”) with Wade Capital Corporation
(“Wade”), pursuant to which the Company issued a 10% Original Issue Discount Promissory Note with a face amount of
$275,000, with a purchase price of $250,000 (the “Wade Note”).
On September 17, 2018, the Company entered
into another Promissory Note Purchase Agreement (the “RSJ Note Purchase Agreement,” and with the Wade Note Purchase
Agreement, the “Bridge Note Purchase Agreements”) with RSJ INVESTMENTS SICAV A.S. pursuant to which the Company issued
a 10% Original Issue Discount Promissory Note (the “RSJ Note,” and with the Wade Note, the “Bridge Notes”)
with a face amount of $550,000, with a purchase price of $500,000, $100,000 of which was paid through the exchange of an existing
promissory note, and the other $400,000 of which was paid in cash.
In addition, the Company issued warrants
(the “Bridge Warrants”) to acquire an aggregate of 75,000 shares (the “Warrant Shares”) of the Company’s
Common Stock pursuant to the terms of the Note Purchase Agreement, covering 25,000 shares of Common Stock to Wade and 50,000 shares
of Common stock to RSJ. As an added inducement to the Purchasers to enter into its respective Bridge Note Purchase Agreement, the
Company also issued an aggregate of 37,500 shares of our restricted common stock, consisting of 12,500 shares to Wade and 25,000
shares to RSJ (collectively, the “Commitment Shares,” and collectively with the Warrants and the Bridge Notes, the
“Bridge Securities”).
Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreements,
each of the Purchasers agreed that the face amounts of the Bridge Notes would convert automatically into or be exchanged for securities
to be issued in certain potential future financings, as specified in the Bridge Notes and the Bridge Purchase Agreements. The Company
agreed that until the Bridge Notes are so converted, with limited exceptions, the Company would not incur any debt that is senior
to or pari passu with the Bridge Notes without the approval of the Purchasers.
The proceeds from the sale of the Bridge
Securities are intended to be used for general corporate proceeds.
The sale of the Bridge Securities is exempt
from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), pursuant to Section 4(a)(2)
of the Act (in that the Bridge Notes, the Commitment Shares, the Bridge Warrants, and the Bridge Warrant Shares were sold by us
in a transaction not involving any public offering) and pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The Bridge
Notes, the Commitment Shares, the Bridge Warrants, and the Bridge Warrant Shares are restricted securities that have not been registered
under the Act, and will not be registered under the Act, and may not be offered or sold absent registration or applicable exemption
from the registration requirements.
Ionic Bridge Transaction
On September 21, 2018, the Company
entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Ionic Purchase Agreement”) with Ionic Ventures, LLC
(“Ionic”) for the issuance and sale of (i) an Original Issue Discount Senior Convertible Promissory Note (the
“Ionic Note”) in the aggregate principal amount of $1,100,000 with a six-month term, that is convertible into
shares (the “Ionic Conversion Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the
“Common Stock”) under certain conditions set forth in the Ionic Note, and (ii) 100,000 warrants (the “Ionic
Warrants”) to acquire shares (the “Ionic Warrant Shares”) of our Common Stock pursuant to the terms of the
Ionic Purchase Agreement. As an added inducement to Ionic to enter into the Ionic Purchase Agreement, the Company also issued
50,000 shares of our restricted common stock (the “Ionic Commitment Shares,” and collectively with the Ionic Note
and the Ionic Warrants, the “Ionic Securities”). The purchase price for the Ionic Securities was $1,000,000.
Pursuant to the Ionic Purchase Agreement,
as long as the Ionic Note is outstanding (including any extension or modification thereto), if the Company effects a future financing
that is permitted under the Ionic Purchase Agreement, Ionic may elect, in its sole discretion, to exchange up to $550,000 of the
Note then held by Ionic for any securities issued in such permitted future financing, all on terms as specified in the Ionic Purchase
Agreement. In addition, at any time prior to the listing of the Common Stock on a national securities exchange, Ionic benefits
from a “most favored nation” provision requiring the Company to amend the terms of the Ionic Securities to reflect
any more favorable terms in any subsequent sales of securities of like tenor, structure or kind as the Ionic Securities.
The Company incurred certain fees in connection
with the Ionic Purchase Agreement, all of which were paid on or about September 21, 2018: (i) the Company reimbursed Ionic for
their legal fees; and (ii) the Company paid an advisory fee to Alliance Global Partners (“AGP”), which served as the
placement agent in connection with the sale of the Ionic Securities.
The Ionic Purchase Agreement contains certain
customary representations, warranties, and covenants by, among, and for the benefit of the parties, which were made solely for
the benefit of the parties thereto and are intended as a way of allocating the risk among such parties. Accordingly, stockholders
should not rely on such representations, warranties and covenants as characterizations of the actual state of facts or condition
of the Company.
The Company intends to use the proceeds
from the sale of the Ionic Securities for general corporate purposes.
The sale of the Ionic Securities is exempt
from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), pursuant to Section 4(a)(2)
of the Act (in that the Ionic Securities were sold by us in a transaction not involving any public offering) and pursuant to Rule
506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The Ionic Securities are restricted securities that have not been registered under
the Act, and will not be registered under the Act, and may not be offered or sold absent registration or applicable exemption from
the registration requirements.
Option Grants to New Director
On October 29, 2018, the Company’s
Board of Directors approved the grant of 20,000 options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. The options granted
had an exercise price of $4.10 per share, and vest one-third on each of the first, second, and third anniversaries of the date
of grant, and expire on the eighth anniversary of the date of grant.
The option grants were completed in reliance
on exemptions from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) and Rule 701 and other rules. The grants of options qualified for exemption
from registration because we were not subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange
Act”) as of the dates of grant, and the other requirements of Rule 701 were met.
Promissory Notes; Extensions; Repayments
On July 2, 2018, we issued a
short-term note to an unrelated party for $100,000 due 60 days from the date of issuance, which was subsequently extended
through October 31, 2018. This holder of this note participated in the Bridge Financing and exchanged the face value of the
note for the same amount in the Bridge Financing.
On June 28, 2018, we received $50,000 for
a short-term promissory note to an unrelated party due 60 days from the date of issuance. The note bore interest at a rate of 12%
per annum. The face value of this note was exchanged into a subsequent financing round.
On May 11, 2018, we issued a short-term
promissory note to an unrelated party for $50,000 due 30 days from the date of issuance, which was subsequently extended through
October 31, 2018. The note bore an interest rate of 14.4% per annum, and we had the right to pre-pay with no penalty or premium.
Our obligation to repay the note was secured by the grant of a security interest in all of our assets except for our intellectual
property assets. This note was repaid in full on October 2, 2018.
On July 2, 2018, we issued a short-term
promissory note to an unrelated party for $50,000 due 60 days from the date of issuance, which was subsequently extended through
October 31, 2018. The note bore interest at a rate of 12% per annum, and we had the right to pre-pay with no penalty or premium.
Our obligation to repay the note was secured by the grant of a security interest in all of the assets of the Company except for
our intellectual property assets. This note was repaid in full on October 2, 2018.
The above issuances were completed in reliance
on exemptions from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. These transactions qualified for exemption from registration
because (i) we did not engage in any general solicitation or advertising to market the securities; (ii) each purchaser was provided
the opportunity to ask questions and receive answers from us regarding our business and the issuance; (iii) the securities were
issued to persons with knowledge and experience in financial and business matters so that he or she is capable of evaluating the
merits and risks of an investment in us; and (iv) the recipients received “restricted securities” that include a restrictive
legend on the note, which restricts the note from being transferred except pursuant to a registration statement that is effective
with the SEC or pursuant to an exemption from registration.