The GP Board (acting upon the recommendation of the Conflicts
Committee) has unanimously (a) determined that the Merger
Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the
Merger, are not adverse to the interest of Rattler, including the
holders of Public Common Units, (b) authorized and approved
the execution, delivery and performance of the Merger Agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger,
(c) directed that the Merger Agreement be submitted to a vote
of the Limited Partners and (d) authorized the Limited
Partners to act by written consent pursuant to the terms of the
Partnership Agreement.
Contemporaneously with the execution of the Merger Agreement,
E&P, in its capacity as the record and beneficial holder of
107,815,152 issued and outstanding Class B units in Rattler,
constituting a “Unit Majority” (as defined in the Partnership
Agreement), delivered its written consent approving the Merger
Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the
Merger (the “Written Consent”). As a result, no other vote or
consent of the Limited Partners is required to approve the Merger
and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger
Agreement.
The Merger Agreement contains customary representations and
warranties from the parties, and each party has agreed to customary
covenants, including, among others, covenants relating to
(a) the conduct of business during the interim period between
the execution of the Merger Agreement and the Effective Time and
(b) the obligation to use reasonable best efforts to cause the
Merger to be consummated.
The completion of the Merger is subject to certain customary
closing conditions, including, among others, (a) the Written
Consent not having been amended, modified, withdrawn, terminated or
revoked, (b) there being no law, injunction or judgment
prohibiting consummation of the transactions contemplated under the
Merger Agreement, (c) the effectiveness of a registration
statement on Form S-4
relating to the shares of Common Stock to be issued as Merger
Consideration, (d) authorization for listing on Nasdaq of the
shares of Common Stock to be issued as Merger Consideration,
(e) subject to specified materiality standards, the accuracy
of certain representations and warranties of each party and
(f) compliance by each party in all material respects with its
covenants.
The Merger Agreement provides for certain termination rights for
both Rattler and Diamondback, including in the event that
(a) the parties agree by mutual written consent to terminate
the Merger Agreement, (b) the Merger is not consummated by
December 31, 2022, (c) a law or injunction prohibiting the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger
Agreement is in effect and has become final and non-appealable or
(d) the other party is in material breach of the Merger
Agreement and has not cured the breach within the time period
specified in the Merger Agreement. The Merger Agreement provides
that upon termination of the Merger Agreement due to a material
breach by a party, the breaching party will be obligated to
reimburse the other party for its expenses in an amount not to
exceed $3.5 million.
The foregoing description of the Merger Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby does not purport to be complete
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of
the Merger Agreement, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 2.1 to
this Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated into this Item
1.01 by reference.
The Merger Agreement has been included to provide investors with
information regarding its terms. It is not intended to provide any
other factual information about Rattler, Diamondback or their
respective subsidiaries and affiliates. The representations,
warranties and covenants contained in the Merger Agreement were
made only for purposes of the Merger Agreement as of the specific
dates therein, were solely for the benefit of the parties to the
Merger Agreement, may be subject to limitations agreed upon by the
contracting parties, including being qualified by confidential
disclosures made for the purposes of allocating contractual risk
between the parties to the Merger Agreement instead of establishing
these matters as facts, and may be subject to standards of
materiality applicable to the contracting parties that differ from
those applicable to investors. Investors should not rely on the
representations, warranties and covenants or any descriptions
thereof as characterizations of the actual state of facts or
condition of the parties thereto or any of their respective
subsidiaries or affiliates. Moreover, information concerning the
subject matter of representations and warranties may change after
the date of the Merger Agreement, which subsequent information may
or may not be fully reflected in Rattler’s or Diamondback’s public
disclosures.