Proxy Statement (definitive) (def 14a)

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant ☑Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐	Preliminary Proxy Statement

☐	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☑	Definitive Proxy Statement

☐	Definitive Additional Materials

☐	Soliciting Material Pursuant to ss.240.14a-11(c) or ss.240.14a-12

GSE SYSTEMS, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

☑	No fee required.

☐	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

_________________________________________________________________________________

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

_________________________________________________________________________________

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

_________________________________________________________________________________

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

_________________________________________________________________________________

(5)

Total fee paid:

_________________________________________________________________________________

☐	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

☐	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

_________________________________________________________________________________

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

_________________________________________________________________________________

(3)

Filing Party:

_________________________________________________________________________________

(4)

Date Filed:

_________________________________________________________________________________

GSE SYSTEMS, INC.

6940 Columbia Gateway Drive, Suite 470

Columbia, MD 21046

(410) 970-7800

Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of GSE Systems, Inc. on Tuesday, June 15, 2021. The Annual Meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. local time and is currently scheduled to take place at 6724 Alexander Bell Drive, Hub Spot Conference Center, Suite 105, Columbia, Maryland 21046. Appropriate pandemic safety protocols will be observed, and all attendees will be expected to wear a mask covering their nose and mouth.

The business to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting is described in the Proxy Statement. We urge you to read the Proxy Statement carefully. In addition to the formal items of business, I will be available at the meeting to answer your questions.

We look forward to seeing you at the meeting.

Very truly yours,

J. Barnie Beasley

Chairman of the Board

GSE SYSTEMS, INC.

6940 Columbia Gateway Drive, Suite 470

Columbia, MD 21046

NOTICE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Tuesday, June 15, 2021

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of GSE Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) will be held on Tuesday, June 15, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. local time, at 6724 Alexander Bell Drive, Hub Spot Conference Center, Suite 105, Columbia, Maryland 21046, and thereafter as it may from time to time be adjourned, for the purposes stated below:

To elect one Class II director to serve until the 2024 Annual Meeting and until his or her successor is elected and qualified;

To approve a non-binding resolution regarding the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;

To ratify the appointment by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021; and

To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or at any adjournments or postponements thereof.

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on April 16, 2021, as the record date for the Annual Meeting. Owners of the Company’s common stock at the close of business on that day are entitled to receive this notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or at any adjournments or postponements thereof. Information regarding each of the matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting is contained in the attached Proxy Statement and this Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. We urge you to read the Proxy Statement carefully.

If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please mark the appropriate box on the proxy card to help us plan for the Annual Meeting. Appropriate pandemic safety protocols will be observed, and all attendees will be expected to wear a mask covering their nose and mouth.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Daniel W. Pugh

General Counsel and Secretary

Columbia, Maryland

April 30, 2021

GSE SYSTEMS, INC.

6940 Columbia Gateway Drive, Suite 470

Columbia, MD 21046

(410) 970-7800

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To be Held on Tuesday, June 15, 2021

GENERAL ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

This proxy statement contains information related to the annual meeting (the “Annual Meeting”) of stockholders of GSE Systems, Inc. (the “Company” or “GSE Systems”) to be held on Tuesday, June 15, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. local time at 6724 Alexander Bell Drive, Hub Spot Conference Center, Suite 105, Columbia, Maryland 21046. Proxies are hereby being solicited by the board of directors (“Board of Directors”). The notice of the Annual Meeting will be mailed to stockholders on or about April 30, 2021, which will be the date electronic materials are first made available to the stockholders.

Electronic Document Delivery

Why didn’t I receive paper copies of the proxy materials in the mail?

As permitted by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we are now primarily furnishing proxy materials and annual reports to our stockholders on the Internet, rather than mailing paper copies of the Proxy Statement and the Annual Report to each stockholder. If you received only an Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) by mail, you will not receive a paper copy of these proxy materials unless you request one. Instead, the Notice will instruct you on how you may vote your shares. The Notice will also instruct you as to how you may access your proxy card to vote over the Internet. If you received a Notice by mail or electronic mail and would like to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, free of charge, please follow the instructions included in the Notice.

Annual Meeting Business

What proposals will be addressed at the Annual Meeting?

Stockholders will be asked to vote on the following proposals at the Annual Meeting:

Election of one Class II director to serve until the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor is elected and qualified;

A non-binding resolution to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;

A resolution ratifying the appointment by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021; and

Any other matters properly brought before the meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.

Our Board unanimously recommends that the stockholders vote FOR the nominee for Class II director in Proposal 1, Suresh Sundaram, Ph.D., and FOR proposals 2 and 3.

What vote is required to approve each proposal?

Conduct of business at the Annual Meeting requires the presence of a quorum of stockholders. A quorum is achieved if stockholders holding at least a majority of our outstanding common stock as of the close of business on April 16, 2021 (the “Record Date”) are present at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as present for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present for the conduct of business.

Proposal 1: Election of Director. To be elected to the Board of Directors, a nominee for director must receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the sum of (a) the total votes cast for and (b) the total votes affirmatively withheld as to such nominee. There is one Class II director to be elected at the Annual Meeting and one individual has been properly nominated. Abstentions and broker non-votes have no impact on the outcome of the election of directors as long as a quorum is present. The nominee for Class II director is Suresh Sundaram, Ph.D.

Proposal 2: A Non-binding Resolution to Approve the Company’s Named Executive Officer Compensation. The approval of Proposal 2 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not votes cast and, therefore, will not affect the outcome of the voting for this proposal as long as a quorum is present. This proposal is non-binding on the Board of Directors. Although non-binding, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee will carefully review and consider the voting results.

Proposal 3: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The approval of Proposal 3 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal. Abstentions will have no effect on the results of this vote. Brokerage firms have authority to vote customers’ unvoted shares held by the firms in street names on this proposal. If a broker does not exercise this authority, such broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the voting for this proposal.

The Company will continue its long-standing practice of holding the votes of all stockholders in confidence from directors, officers and employees except: (a) as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements and to assert and defend claims for or against the Company; (b) in case of a contested proxy solicitation; or (c) if a stockholder makes a written comment on the proxy card or otherwise communicates his/her vote to management.

Voting and Proxies

Who may vote at the Annual Meeting?

All stockholders of record of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), on the Record Date will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on the Record Date, the Company had 20,637,447 shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote.

How many votes do I have?

You are entitled to cast one vote for each share of Common Stock owned by you on the Record Date on all matters properly brought before the Annual Meeting.

How do I vote?

If you are a holder of record (that is, if your shares are registered in your name with Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, our transfer agent (the “Transfer Agent”)), there are four ways to vote:

Telephone Voting: You may vote by telephone by calling the toll-free telephone number indicated on the proxy card. Please follow the voice prompts that allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.

Internet Voting: You may vote electronically over the Internet by following the instructions on the proxy card. Please follow the website prompts that allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.

Return Your Proxy Card By Mail: You may vote by completing, signing and returning the proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided with this proxy statement. The proxy holders will vote your shares according to your directions. If you sign and return your proxy card without specifying choices, your shares will be voted by the persons named in the proxy in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors as set forth in this proxy statement.

Vote at the Meeting: You may cast your vote in person at the Annual Meeting. Written ballots will be passed out to anyone who wants to vote in person at the meeting.

Telephone and Internet voting for stockholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. local time on June 14, 2021. Telephone and Internet voting is convenient, provides postage and mailing cost savings and is recorded immediately, minimizing the risk that postal delays may cause votes to arrive late and, therefore, not be counted.

Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you are encouraged to vote your shares by proxy. You may still vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting even if you have previously voted by proxy. If you are present at the Annual Meeting and desire to vote in person, your vote by proxy will not be counted.

How do I vote if I hold my shares in “street name?”

If you hold shares in “street name,” you should follow the voting directions provided by your broker or nominee. You may complete and mail a voting instruction card to your broker or nominee or, in most cases, submit voting instructions by telephone or the Internet to your broker or nominee. If you provide specific voting instructions by mail, telephone or the Internet, your broker or nominee will vote your shares as you have directed.

Will my shares be voted if I do not provide my proxy?

If you are the stockholder of record and you do not vote or provide a proxy, your shares will not be voted.

If your shares are held in street name, your broker can only cast a vote on your behalf on “routine” matters under applicable New York Stock Exchange rules governing brokers. Your broker may not vote your shares on non-routine matters unless they have received voting instructions from you. The election of Directors and the non-binding resolution to approve the Company’s executive compensation are not considered to be “routine” matters, and therefore your broker may not vote your shares with respect to these proposals without receiving your voting instructions.

Can I change my mind after I vote?

Yes. If you are a stockholder of record, you may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by:

•	submitting a new proxy by telephone or via the Internet after the date of the earlier voted proxy and prior to the deadline for submitting a vote by telephone or Internet;

•	signing another proxy card with a later date and returning it to us prior to the Annual Meeting; or

•	attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person after giving notice to the Secretary of the Annual Meeting.

If you hold your shares in street name, you may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker, bank or other nominee. You may also vote in person at the Annual Meeting if you obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee.

Other Meeting Information

Could the Annual Meeting be postponed?

If a quorum is not present or represented at the Annual Meeting, the chair of the meeting or the stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting have the power to postpone the meeting. The presence, in person or by proxy, of at least a majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the Record Date will constitute a quorum and is required to transact business at the Annual Meeting.

Who bears the cost of soliciting proxies?

The Company will bear the cost of preparing, assembling and mailing the full set of proxy materials and of reimbursing brokers, nominees, fiduciaries and other custodians for out-of-pocket and clerical expenses of transmitting the proxy materials to the beneficial owners of our shares. In addition to use of the mail, proxies may be solicited by directors, officers and other employees of the Company, without additional compensation, in person or by telephone. The Company does not plan to employ a professional solicitation firm with respect to items to be presented at the Annual Meeting.

How can I obtain additional information about the Company?

The Company will, upon written request of any stockholder, furnish without charge a copy of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 (the “2020 Form 10-K”), as filed with the SEC, including financial statements and financial statement schedules required to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 13a-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), but without exhibits. A list describing the exhibits not contained in the 2020 Form 10-K will be furnished with the 2020 Form 10-K. Please address all written requests to GSE Systems, Inc., 6940 Columbia Gateway Drive, Suite 470, Columbia, Maryland 21046, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Exhibits to the 2020 Form 10-K will be provided upon written request and payment of an appropriate processing fee which is limited to the Company’s reasonable expenses incurred in furnishing the requested exhibits. In addition, the 2020 Form 10-K can be found on the Company’s website by navigating to the SEC filings page at www.gses.com/about/investors/financials/, and you may also view proxy materials or request paper copies online at www.proxyvote.com using the information and instructions provided on the proxy card.

Do any of the officers or directors have a material interest in the matters to be acted upon?

To the best of our knowledge, no directors, officers, or any of their associates have a material interest, direct or indirect, in any matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting, other than with respect to the non-binding executive compensation proposal.

What COVID-19 measures will be implemented at the annual meeting?

We anticipate following state and local regulations and guidance from the Centers from Disease Control (CDC) at the annual meeting. We will follow regulations and ordinances promulgated by the State of Maryland and Howard County, Maryland, respectively. As informed by recent updated guidance from the CDC, appropriate pandemic safety protocols will be observed and all attendees will be expected to wear a mask covering their nose and mouth while in attendance at the meeting. Some Company officers, directors, or representatives may attend the meeting via telephone or video conference in order to reduce the number of physical attendees.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS, DIRECTORS, AND MANAGEMENT

Voting Securities and Principal Holders Thereof

The following table sets forth certain information known to the Company regarding the beneficial ownership of the Common Stock as of the Record Date by (1) all beneficial owners of 5% or more of the Common Stock; (2) each director and nominee for election as director; (3) each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table appearing elsewhere in this Proxy Statement (the “Named Executive Officers”); and (4) all executive officers, directors and nominees of the Company as a group. The number of shares beneficially owned by each person is determined under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. SEC rules deem a person to be the beneficial owner of any securities which that person has the right to acquire within 60 days of the Record Date. The Common Stock is the only class of voting securities of the Company. Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the tables below, the Company believes that the beneficial owners of the Common Stock have sole investment and voting power with respect to such shares, subject to community property laws where applicable. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each of the stockholders listed below is c/o GSE Systems, Inc., 6940 Columbia Gateway Drive, Suite 470, Columbia, Maryland 21046.

Name of Beneficial Owner	GSE Common Stock Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (A)(1)		Percent of Class (B)(1)
Beneficial Owners:

NGP Energy Technology Partners II, L.P. 1700 K St. NW, Suite 750 Washington, DC 20006	2,616,525	(2)	12.7%


Polar Asset Management Partners Inc. 401 Bay Street, Suite 1900 P.O. Box 19 Toronto, Ontario, M5H 2Y4, Canada	1,239,300	(3)	6.0%


Needham Asset Management, LLC, Needham Investment Management L.L.C., Needham Aggressive Growth Fund, and George A. Needham 250 Park Avenue, 10th Floor New York, NY 10177-1099	1,081,654	(4)	5.2%

(table continued) Name of Beneficial Owner	GSE Common Stock Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (A)(1)		Percent of Class (B)(1)

Board and Management
J. Barnie Beasley	58,543	(5)	*
William S. Corey, Jr.	50,316	(6)	*
Kathryn O’Connor Gardner	48,906	(7)	*
Suresh Sundaram, Ph.D.	127,277	(8)	*
Kyle J. Loudermilk	586,041	(9)	2.3%
Christopher D. Sorrells	311,701	(10)	1.5%
Bahram Meyssami, Ph.D.	158,271	(11)	*
Emmett A. Pepe	142,920	(12)	*

Directors and Executive Officers as a group (9 persons)	1,555,931	(13)	7.5%

*	Less than one percent.

(A)	This table is based on information supplied by officers, directors, and principal stockholders of the Company and on any Schedules 13D or 13G filed with the SEC.

(B)	Applicable percentages are based on 20,637,447 shares outstanding on April 16, 2021, adjusted where applicable for each owner as required by rules promulgated by the SEC.

(1)	Includes all time-restricted stock units vesting within 60 days of the Record Date.

(2)

Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2020, by NGP Energy Technology Partners II, L.P., on its own behalf and on behalf of NGP ETP II, L.L.C., Energy Technology Partners, L.L.C., and Philip J. Deutch. Each of the Reporting Persons other than NGP Energy Technology Partners II, L.P., disclaim beneficial ownership over the securities reported except to the extent of the Reporting Persons’ pecuniary interest therein.

(3)

Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 2021, by Polar Asset Management Partners Inc. Polar Asset Management Partners Inc. serves as investment advisor to Polar Multi-Strategy Master Fund, Polar Micro-Cap Fund, and Polar Micro-Cap Fund II L.P., with respect to the shares of Common Stock directly held by these entities.

(4)

Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021, by Needham Asset Management, LLC, Needham Investment Management L.L.C., Needham Aggressive Growth Fund, as series of The Needham Funds Inc., and George A. Needham. Needham Investment Management L.L.C., is the relevant entity for which each of Needham Asset Management, LLC and George A. Needham may be considered a control person. Each of Needham Asset Management, LLC, Needham Investment Management L.L.C., and George A. Needham share voting and dispositive power with respect to 1,081,654 shares of Common Stock, while Needham Aggressive Growth Fund shares voting and dispositive power with respect to 1,057,625 shares of Common Stock.

(5)	Includes 33,227 shares of Common Stock owned directly by Mr. Beasley and 25,316 shares of Common Stock issuaable upon vesting of time-restricted stock units held by Mr. Beasley.

(6)	Includes 25,000 shares of Common Stock owned directly by Mr. Corey and 25,316 shares of Common Stock issuaable upon vesting of time-restricted stock units held by Mr. Corey.

(7)	Includes 23,590 shares of Common Stock owned directly by Ms. Gardner and 25,316 shares of Common Stock issuaable upon vesting of time-restricted stock units held by Ms. Gardner.

(8)	Includes 101,961 shares of Common Stock owned directly by Dr. Sundaram and 25,316 shares of Common Stock issuaable upon vesting of time-restricted stock units held by Dr. Sundaram.

(9)	Includes 586,041 shares of Common Stock owned directly by Mr. Loudermilk.

(10)	Includes 311,701 shares of Common Stock owned directly by Mr. Sorrells.

(11)	Includes 158,271 shares of Common Stock owned directly by Dr. Meyssami.

(12)	Includes 142,920 shares of Common Stock owned directly by Mr. Pepe.

(13)	Includes 1,454,667 shares of Common Stock owned directly by the directors and executive officers and 101,264 shares of Common Stock issuable upon vesting of time-restricted stock units held by the independent directors.

INFORMATION ABOUT DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Independent Directors

Name		Age	Title(s)
J. Barnie Beasley	(1)	69	Director, Chairman of the Board of Directors
William S. Corey, Jr.	(1)	61	Director, Chair of the Audit Committee
Kathryn O’Connor Gardner	(1)	45	Director, Chair of the Nominating & Governance Committee
Suresh Sundaram	(1), (2)	55	Director, Chair of the Compensation Committee

(1) Member of Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating & Governance Committee

(2) Candidate for re-election to the Board of Directors as an Independent Director

Directors who are also Executive Officers

Name		Age	Titles
Kyle J. Loudermilk		53	Chief Executive Officer, President, Director

Executive Officers

Name	Age	Title(s)
Bahram Meyssami, Ph.D.	59	Chief Technology Officer
Emmett A. Pepe	56	Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
Daniel W. Pugh	54	Chief Legal and Risk Officer, Secretary

Background of Directors and Executive Officers and Qualifications of Directors

Biographical information with respect to the directors and executive officers of GSE Systems is set forth below. There are no familial relationships between any directors or executive officers.

Independent Directors

J. Barnie Beasley – Mr. Beasley has served as an independent director of GSE Systems since June 2018 and as Chairman of the Board of Directors since August 2020. As disclosed on GSE’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 26, 2021, he has notified the Company that he does not intend to stand for re-election when his term ends at the Annual Meeting on June 15, 2021. He currently serves on the Boards of Directors of American Electric Power (Nasdaq:AEP), one of the largest electric utilities in the United States, delivering electricity to nearly 5.4 million customers in 11 states, and of KCI Technologies, Inc., a privately held engineering services company. His AEP director responsibilities include a five-year membership on the Audit Committee and membership on the Policy Committee, Human Resources and Compensation Committee, and the Nuclear Oversight Committee, of which he is Chairman. On the KCI Technologies board Mr. Beasley serves as Chairman of the Compensation Committee and as a member of the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee. He also served from 2014 to 2019 as an independent consultant to Energy Solutions, an international nuclear services company. In this consulting role he served as Chairman of the Nuclear Safety Review Board for the nuclear power stations being decommissioned by Energy Solutions.

Mr. Beasley retired in 2008 as Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Nuclear Operating Company, the subsidiary of the Southern Company that operates and maintains Southern Company’s nuclear power plants. Mr. Beasley’s career with Southern Nuclear Operating Company began in 1997, where he served as Vice President and later as Executive Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer before becoming Chairman, President, and CEO. Prior to Southern Nuclear, Mr. Beasley spent 27 years in various roles with Georgia Power Company including Plant General Manager of the Vogtle Nuclear Generating Station.

Mr. Beasley served for five years on the Board of Directors of Energy Solutions (NYSE:ES), a public international nuclear services company with operations throughout the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and other countries. As a director on the Energy Solutions board, he served on the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee, and was involved in the company’s successful sale in 2013 to a private equity group. He also served for three years as an independent nuclear safety and operations expert advising the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Board of Directors. Mr. Beasley’s prior board service also includes the National Nuclear Accrediting Board, the Board of Directors and Executive Committee of the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), the Board of Directors of the Foundation for Nuclear Studies, and the Board of Directors of the Southeastern Electric Exchange.

Mr. Beasley graduated from the University of Georgia with a B.S. degree in Engineering. He has held a Senior Reactor Operator’s license from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and he currently holds a Professional Engineering License in the State of Georgia. He served for ten years as a member of the College of Engineering Advisory Board at the University of Georgia for which he also served as its inaugural Chairman. He is a member of both the Georgia Society and the National Society of Professional Engineers.

Mr. Beasley’s extensive experience working in the nuclear power industry enables him to make valuable contributions of business and strategic insight to GSE’s executive leadership team and the Company’s Board of Directors. Mr. Beasley’s broad career experience in corporate, governance, and financial roles enables him to provide leadership expertise as Chairman of the Board, in the area of corporate governance as a member of the Company’s Nominating and Governance Committee, as a financial expert on the Company’s Audit Committee, and as a member of the Compensation Committee of the Board.

William S. Corey, Jr. – Mr. Corey has served as an independent director of GSE Systems since August 2020 and is Chair of the Company’s Audit Committee. He brings more than 37 years of experience in public accounting including extensive experience in auditing SEC registrants, financial reporting, complex accounting, and internal controls evaluation. From 2002 until June 2020, Mr. Corey was an Audit, Senior Relationship and National Pursuit Team Partner for PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), where he led the audit practice and served as office managing partner for PwC’s Baltimore office for more than 11 years. Prior to his work with PwC, Mr. Corey served as an audit partner at Arthur Andersen LLP from 1995 to 2002, and in other roles in its Audit Practice from 1982 to 1995. Mr. Corey graduated with honors from James Madison University with a B.B.A. in accounting and finance and a minor in economics in 1982.

Mr. Corey is a member of the board of directors of Stewart Information Services, Inc. (NYSE:STC), where he serves on the audit committee, and he recently joined the board of directors of Fundbox, Ltd., a small business finance company. He also currently serves on the LP Advisory Committee for Squadra Ventures, and on the board of advisors of Greenspring Global Partners X, L.P., both venture capital funds located in the Baltimore, Maryland area. Finally, he also serves on the Board of Directors of the Port Discovery Children’s Museum in Baltimore and as a member of the Board of Advisors of the James Madison University College of Business.

Mr. Corey’s extensive career has included auditing public and large private companies and advising boards of directors and audit committees on financial reporting, internal controls, internal and external investigations, disaster recovery, regulatory reviews, and cyber-attacks. His financial expertise, global perspective, and proven ability to work collaboratively with management and fellow board members bring depth and strength to the Board.

Kathryn O’Connor Gardner – Ms. Gardner is an experienced distressed debt investor. In 2020, she helped launch Livello Capital, a fund focusing on deep value, event-driven situations. Prior to this, Ms. Gardner was a Senior Vice President and Corporate Credit Research Analyst within AllianceBernstein’s high-yield research group, focusing on the energy sector. In this role, she oversaw all energy-related investments for traditional high yield portfolios with roughly $35 billion in assets under management. She was also an Investment Committee Member for the Energy Opportunity Funds at AllianceBernstein. Prior to joining AllianceBernstein in 2016, Ms. Gardner was a Managing Director on the sell-side at Deutsche Bank where she covered industries including energy, automotive, and aerospace & defense. Ms. Gardner’s Wall Street experience spans more than 20 years, and she also has experience serving as an advisor for startups on strategy, financial analysis and capital market transactions.

Ms. Gardner is a Founding Board Member of the Haas Center for Gender, Equity & Leadership, which seeks to build the economic case for supporting workplace diversity, and is a member of the Haas Dean’s Advisory Board, which brings together the school’s next generation of leaders. Finally, she sits on the board of the CSNK2A1 Foundation, which is focused on finding a cure for an ultra-rare genetic disorder called Okur-Chung Neurodevelopmental Syndrome. Ms. Gardner holds a BS in economics and a BA in business administration (Walter A. Haas School of Business) from the University of California, Berkeley. Her valuable experience in the finance industry enables her to provide broad financial and investor expertise as a member of the Board, as Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee, and as a member of the Compensation Committee and the Audit Committee where she also serves as a financial expert.

Suresh Sundaram, Ph.D. – Dr. Sundaram has served as a director of the Company since September 2016. Dr. Sundaram has more than 28 years of experience in product development, sales, and marketing, focused on high-tech. He is currently the General Manager of Trimble Real Estate and Workplace Solutions, a division of Trimble, Inc. Prior to Trimble, Dr. Sundaram was Chief Product and Marketing Officer at CiBO Technologies, a Cambridge, MA based startup bringing simulation and data science technology to the agriculture industry. Prior to CiBO, he was the Senior Vice President – Products and Marketing at Exa Corporation, and before that, held a variety of leadership roles during a twenty-year career at Aspen Technology, a publicly-traded process software company, where his last role was Senior Vice President of Products and Market Strategy. Dr. Sundaram earned his Master of Science and Ph.D. degrees in Chemical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Bombay.

Dr. Sundaram brings a wide range of applicable experience and knowledge to his role as a member of the Board, particularly with respect to providing strategic guidance on product development and marketing, business turnaround, scaling companies, mergers and acquisitions, and as a member of the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Governance Committees of the Board. He also contributes his expertise in executive and board compensation and leadership as Chair of the Company’s Compensation Committee.

Directors who are also Executive Officers

Kyle J. Loudermilk – Mr. Loudermilk joined the Company in August 2015 as the CEO and President and also serves as a member of the Board of Directors. He is a technology executive whose 25-year career has focused on growing technology companies through organic growth, geographic expansion and acquisitions, creating significant stockholder value along the way.

Mr. Loudermilk was the VP of Operations – Technology from 2013 to 2015 and VP of Corporate Development from 2005 to 2009 at MicroStrategy, a company focused on business intelligence, big data, and mobile identity solutions. From 2009 to 2012 he was the VP of Product Management at Datatel, now known as Ellucian, a firm focused on higher education solutions, growing the company significantly through new product introduction during his tenure. Mr. Loudermilk held management roles including VP of the Design and Simulation Business Unit and VP of R&D/Operations at Aspen Technology. He began his career as a Process Engineer for Mobil Oil Corporation. He earned his B.S. and M.S. from Columbia University in chemical engineering, and is an alumnus of Harvard Business School having completed The General Manager Program.

Mr. Loudermilk’s extensive experience in leading and providing strategic guidance to technology driven organizations enables him to contribute valuable perspective and first-hand knowledge as a Board member.

Executive Officers

Bahram Meyssami, Ph.D. – Dr. Meyssami joined the Company as its Chief Technology Officer in December 2015. He has 30 years of experience in complex enterprise-level software development and delivery for engineering, education, and analytics. From February 2012 until he joined the Company, Dr. Meyssami was the Senior Director of Data Analysis in the Office of Analytics at the University of Maryland University College. He served as Director of Software Development, Technology at Ellucian, Inc. (formerly Datatel, Inc.) from March 2010 to January 2012. Before that he was Vice President, Technology for Three Stage Media, Inc. (formerly BDMetrics) from July 2005 to February 2010. Dr. Meyssami has held multiple technology leadership roles in several organizations developing state-of-the-art software technology and growing effective technology teams focused on delivery of customer-aligned value. He holds a B.S., a M.S., and a Ph.D. in chemical engineering from the University of Maryland College Park.

Emmett A. Pepe – Mr. Pepe has served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since July 2016. From 2012 to 2016, Mr. Pepe had served as Senior Vice President – Finance and worldwide Controller of MicroStrategy, Inc., a publicly-traded enterprise-analytics, mobile, and security software company, overseeing that company’s financial activities including accounting, financial reporting, tax, and treasury. From 2007 to 2012, Mr. Pepe served as Vice President – Accounting and Corporate Controller at BroadSoft, Inc., a software and services company that enables telecommunications service providers to deliver hosted, cloud-based unified communications to their enterprise customers. While at BroadSoft, Mr. Pepe was responsible for overall global accounting, SEC reporting, tax, treasury, human resources, and facilities, and was part of the executive management team that took BroadSoft public in 2010. Mr. Pepe also has held a number of senior financial leadership positions with various other companies including Software AG, webMethods, Inc., British Telecom Inc., Concert Communications Company, and MCI Communications Corporation. Mr. Pepe has a B.S. degree in Accounting from Penn State University and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Daniel W. Pugh – Mr. Pugh joined the Company in February 2016 and serves as its Chief Legal and Risk Officer and Corporate Secretary. He is a business attorney with more than 26 years of experience working with technology-enabled software and service companies. Mr. Pugh’s core areas of expertise include operations, transactions, risk management, technology development and commercialization, intellectual property protection, and corporate practices improvement. From October 2010 through January 2016, Mr. Pugh served as General Counsel of ANCILE Solutions, Inc., a leading workforce performance improvement enterprise software company, where he was responsible for all legal and corporate matters and operational risk management. Prior to that he served as General Counsel of Synthetic Genomics, Inc., a biotechnology and biofuels research and development company, and as Counsel to other public and private businesses. His degrees include a S.B. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, a J.D. from the University of Maryland Carey School of Law, where he served as Executive Editor of the Maryland Law Review, and a M.B.A. from the University of Maryland Smith School of Business. Mr. Pugh also is a Certified Financial Risk Manager (FRM).

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Board of Directors

The Board oversees the business affairs of the Company, while Management carries out the daily processes, controls and execution of the Company’s long-term strategy. Among the Board’s most significant responsibilities are the oversight of the Company’s long-term strategy, the selection and support of the CEO of the Company, and the annual election of the Company’s executive officers. The Board has the responsibility for establishing broad corporate policies and for the overall performance of the Company. The Board recognizes the importance of ensuring that the Company’s overall business strategy is designed to create long-term value for Company stockholders. As a result, the Board maintains an active oversight role in formulating, planning and implementing the Company’s long-term strategy and has sought to align compensation incentives with that vision. Members of the Board are kept informed of the Company’s business and progress in relation to this long-term strategy by regular communications with the CEO, various reports and documents sent to them, and by way of operating and financial reports made at Board and Committee meetings. The Board regularly considers the progress of and challenges to the Company’s strategy and related risks throughout the year. At each regularly-scheduled Board meeting, the Chairman leads an executive session with the non-employee members of the Board to discuss executive officer performance, the Company’s long-term plans, and strategic and other significant business developments since the last meeting.

In terms of the structure of the Board, the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that the Board is divided into three classes, as nearly equal in number as possible, that serve staggered three-year terms. The stockholders elect at least one class of directors annually. Stockholders will elect one Class II director at the 2021 Annual Meeting, and Dr. Suresh Sundaram has been properly nominated for election to a three-year term at the Annual Meeting. The other incumbent Class II director, J. Barnie Beasley, has notified the Company that he does not intend to stand for re-election when his term ends at the Annual Meeting on June 14, 2021. The Company’s Class III directors (Kathryn O’Connor Gardner and Kyle J. Loudermilk) will serve until the 2022 annual meeting and their successors are duly elected and qualified, and the current Class I director (William S. Corey, Jr.) will serve until the 2023 annual meeting and his successor is duly elected and qualified. The Board believes that the Company continues to be best served by a staggered or classified board as it promotes continuity as the Company pursues its business strategy. Nevertheless, the Board is aware of the concerns related to a staggered Board and, in recent years, has promoted Board refreshment and revitalization.

Independence

The Board has adopted specific director independence criteria, consistent with the NASDAQ listing standards, to assist it in making determinations regarding the independence of its members. The Board considers the independence of its members at least annually. No directors will be deemed to be independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that the director in question has no material relationship with the Company, directly or as an officer, stockholder, member or partner of an organization that has a material relationship with the Company. The Board has determined that no director other than Mr. Loudermilk has a direct or indirect material relationship with the Company, nor does any other director have a direct or indirect material interest in any transaction involving the Company. Every current director other than Mr. Loudermilk satisfies the Company’s independence criteria. The Board has further determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee (Messrs. Corey, Beasley, and Sundaram, and Ms. Gardner) meet the applicable heightened standards for audit committee independence.

Board Leadership Structure

Mr. Beasley currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors. Mr. Loudermilk currently serves as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company. The Company believes it is the Chairman’s responsibility to lead the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer’s responsibility to lead the day-to-day operations of the Company. As directors continue to have more oversight responsibility than ever before, the Company believes it is beneficial to have a Chairman whose focus and responsibility is to lead the Board, which allows the Chief Executive Officer to focus on running the Company. This separation of responsibilities ensures that there is no duplication of effort between the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer. The Company believes this separation of leadership provides strong leadership for its Board, while also positioning its Chief Executive Officer as the leader of the Company in the eyes of customers, employees, and stockholders.

Board’s Role in Oversight

While the Board oversees risk management, Company management is charged with managing risk. The Board and the Audit Committee monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls at least annually. Management communicates with the Board, committees, and individual directors on the significant risks identified and how they are being managed. Directors are free to, and indeed often do, communicate directly with senior management. The Board implements its risk oversight function both as a whole and through Committees. The Audit Committee oversees risks related to the Company’s financial statements, the financial reporting process, and accounting matters. The Audit Committee oversees the audit function and the Company’s ethics programs. The Audit Committee members meet separately with representatives of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Compensation Committee evaluates the risks and rewards associated with the Company’s compensation philosophy and programs. The Nominating and Governance Committee selects and recommends to the full Board nominees for election as directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee also bears responsibility for overseeing corporate governance matters.

Board of Director Attendance

The Board held nine meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. During the 2020 fiscal year, no director attended less than seventy-five percent (75%) of the aggregate of (1) the total number of meetings of the Board (held during the period for which he or she was a director) and (2) the total number of meetings held by all committee(s) of the Board on which he or she served (during the periods that he or she served on those committees). The Company encourages, but does not require, all of its directors to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and all directors attended the Annual Meeting in 2020.

Committees of the Board of Directors

The Board has three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Governance Committee. As a Nasdaq Capital Market listed company, we are subject to the NASDAQ listing standards. The Company is required under the NASDAQ listing standards to have a majority of independent directors and all of the members of the Audit Committee are required to comply with additional, heightened independence standards applicable to a director’s service on such committee.

Audit Committee – The Audit Committee consists of Ms. Gardner, Dr. Sundaram, Mr. Beasley, and Mr. Corey (Chair), each of whom meets the general as well as the heightened independence standards set by applicable SEC rules and the NASDAQ listing standards. In addition, the Board has determined that Mr. Corey, Ms. Gardner, and Mr. Beasley are “audit committee financial experts” as defined by applicable SEC and NASDAQ rules. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. Management is responsible for the Company’s internal controls and preparing the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and issuing a report thereon and the Committee is responsible for overseeing the conduct of these activities. The Audit Committee appoints and engages the independent registered public accounting firm, reviews with the independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement, approves professional services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, reviews the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm and reviews the adequacy of the Company’s internal accounting controls. The Audit Committee met fourteen times during fiscal year 2020. See “Audit Committee Report” below. The Audit Committee Charter is available on our website at https://www.gses.com/about/investors/corporate-governance/.

Compensation Committee – The Compensation Committee consists of Dr. Sundaram (Chair), Mr. Beasley, Mr. Corey, and Ms. Gardner. Dr. Sundaram, Mr. Beasley, Mr. Corey, and Ms. Gardner are all “independent” directors as that term is defined by applicable NASDAQ listing standards. The Compensation Committee is responsible for recommending to the full Board the compensation for the Company’s executive officers, including the granting of awards under the Company’s 1995 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Long-Term Incentive Plan”). The Compensation Committee met eight times during fiscal year 2020, and members of the Compensation Committee provided further advice and recommendations to the Board as a whole on Compensation Committee matters at Board meetings. The Compensation Committee operates pursuant to a written Charter which is available on our website at https://www.gses.com/about/investors/corporate-governance/.

Nominating and Governance Committee – The Nominating and Governance Committee consists of Mr. Corey, Ms. Gardner (Chair), Dr. Sundaram, and Mr. Beasley. All four members are “independent” directors as that term is defined by applicable NASDAQ listing standards. The Nominating and Governance Committee selects and recommends to the full Board nominees for election as directors and oversees the Company’s corporate governance generally. The Nominating and Governance Committee met five times during fiscal year 2020, and members of the Nominating and Governance Committee provided further advice and recommendations to the Board as a whole on Committee matters at Board meetings. The Nominating and Governance Committee operates pursuant to a written Charter which is available on our website at https://www.gses.com/about/investors/corporate-governance/.

Enhancements to Corporate Governance

Led by the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Board of Directors is committed to best practices in corporate governance. The Board believes that good governance enhances stockholder value and goes beyond simply complying with the basic requirements of state law and NASDAQ and SEC rules and regulations. Good governance means taking thoughtful approach to promote integrity, accountability, transparency, and the highest ethical standards. The Board and its Nominating and Governance Committee are committed to having an engaged and independent Board that upholds the strictest ethical standards. During 2020, the Board continued its efforts to analyze existing practices, evaluate best practices, and make improvements through adoption of revised policies and practices to ensure effective governance. The Board anticipates that these efforts will continue to include the following:

Development and Maintenance of a Board Skills Matrix – When evaluating each director nominee and the potential needs and composition of the Board as a whole, the Nominating and Governance Committee looks for individuals with the potential to make significant contributions that will enhance the Board’s ability to continue to serve the long-term interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Board also self-assesses its own strengths and weaknesses to identify skills that individuals may add to the Board. To that end, the Nominating and Governance Committee has undertaken an effort to identify critical attributes, experiences, qualifications, and skills required of members of the Board to deliver long-term value to the stockholders of the Company. From that list, the Board develops a matrix to ensure each of the identified critical attributes, experiences, qualifications, and skills are adequately represented among the Company’s directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board will regularly review this skills matrix to confirm that it appropriately supports the Company’s long-term strategy.

Board Tenure and Diversity – As a key component of ensuring that the Board reflects an appropriate mix of attributes, experiences, qualifications, and skills, the Nominating and Governance Committee regularly reviews director diversity, tenure, and succession. In recent years, the Board has experienced significant refreshment as a result of this process, adding new directors each of the past four years. The Committee believes that in future years the Company will benefit from the deep Company knowledge and continuity of longer-tenured directors complemented by the fresh perspectives of newer directors. In future years, relying in part on its developing skills matrix, the Company intends to pursue diversity in all forms to enhance the long-term value of the Company for its stockholders.

Self-Evaluation – Beginning in 2019, the Nominating and Governance Committee led an enhanced annual performance evaluation of the Board. Board members completed questionnaires that collected information about the overall effectiveness of the Board and each Board committee together with specific commentary on strengths and weaknesses of these groups. The evaluations were compiled and analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively, and then discussed in detail within each Board committee and among the full Board. Next, each director was asked to complete a questionnaire assessing the effectiveness of the individual Board members; following compilation and analysis, the Board chairman discussed these results individually with each director as a tool for self-analysis and improvement. A similar process was conducted during 2020. The positive outcomes of the 2019 and 2020 self-evaluation processes have confirmed the Board’s view that self-evaluation of Board and committee performance is an integral part of its commitment to continuous improvement. The Nominating and Governance Committee plans to conduct a similar self-evaluation process for the current Board service year.

Whistleblower Policies and Ombudsman – The Board’s enhanced internal reporting and whistleblower mechanisms continued to operate during 2020 and continues to operate during 2021, providing alternative outlets for complaints within the Company. The Board has taken these steps to ensure that employee concerns and complaints reach the Board, and the Board receives reports from the Company Ethics and Compliance Officer on a quarterly basis.

Communications with the Board of Directors

The Board desires to foster open communications with its stockholders regarding issues of a legitimate business purpose affecting the Company. Under the Board’s supervision, the Company makes a concerted effort to engage with stockholders to ensure that the Board considers their views and address their interests. In addition to meeting with stockholders to discuss performance, strategy, and operations, the Company also engages with its stockholders to solicit their views on matters of corporate governance and other topics. In addition to communicating with stockholders during our proxy season, Mr. Loudermilk, Mr. Pepe, and Mr. Beasley engage with many of our major stockholders to promote a constructive dialogue.

To this end, the Board has adopted policies and procedures to facilitate written communications by stockholders to the Board. Persons wishing to write to our Board, a specific director, a committee of the Board, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, or the non-management directors as a group, should send correspondence to the Corporate Secretary at 6940 Columbia Gateway Drive, Suite 470, Columbia, Maryland 21046.

The Corporate Secretary will forward to the directors all communications that, in his judgment, are appropriate for consideration by the directors. Examples of communications that would not be appropriate for consideration by the directors include commercial solicitations and matters not relevant to the stockholders, to the functioning of the Board, or to the affairs of the Company. Any correspondence received that is addressed generically to the Board will be forwarded to the Chairman of the Board, with a copy to the Chair of the Audit Committee.

Stockholder Proposals

To be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials for next year’s annual meeting in accordance with Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, a stockholder proposal must be submitted in writing by December 31, 2021, to the Company’s principal executives offices c/o Corporate Secretary at 6940 Columbia Gateway Drive, Suite 470, Columbia, Maryland 21046, and must otherwise comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act.

In addition, the Company’s Third Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”) establish an advance notice procedure for stockholders who wish to present certain matters before an annual meeting of stockholders without including those matters in the Company’s proxy statement. Such proposals, including the information required by the Bylaws, must be received at the Company’s principal executive offices c/o Corporate Secretary, 6940 Columbia Gateway Drive, Suite 470, Columbia, Maryland 21046, no earlier than February 12, 2022, and no later than March 14, 2022. If the date of the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders is moved more than 30 days before or 60 days after the anniversary of the 2021 Annual Meeting, stockholders must give notice on or before the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which the Company’s notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or other public disclosure of the annual meeting date is first made. A stockholder’s notice to the Company must set forth, as to each matter the stockholder proposes to bring before an annual meeting, the information required by the Bylaws, which have been publicly filed with the SEC.

If a stockholder fails to give notice of a stockholder proposal as required by the Bylaws or other applicable requirements (including those attendant to the Exchange Act), then the proposal will not be included in the proxy statement for our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders and the proposal will not be presented to the stockholders for a vote at the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders.

Copies of the Company’s Bylaws are available to stockholders without charge upon request to the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s address set forth above.

Stockholder Nominations of Directors

The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider nominees for director who are submitted by stockholders. All nominations must be made in accordance with the Bylaws. Written notice of all stockholder director nominees proposed for election at the 2022 Annual Meeting must be received at the Company’s principal executive offices c/o Corporate Secretary, 6940 Columbia Gateway Drive, Suite 470, Columbia, Maryland 21046, no earlier than February 12, 2022, and no later than March 14, 2022. If the date of the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders is moved more than 30 days before or 60 days after the anniversary of the 2021 Annual Meeting, stockholders must give notice of all stockholder director nominees on or before the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which the Company’s notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or other public disclosure of the annual meeting date is first made. A stockholder’s nomination of a director must set forth the information required by the Bylaws, which have been publicly filed with the SEC, including:

•	the name and address of the nominating stockholder as they appear on the Company’s books and of the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination is being made,

•

the class and number of shares of the Company that are owned by the nominating stockholder (beneficially and of record) and owned by the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination is being made, as of the date of the nominating stockholder’s notice, and a representation that the nominating stockholder will notify the Company in writing of the class and number of such shares owned of record and beneficially as of the record date for the meeting promptly following the later of the record date or the date notice of the record date is first publicly disclosed,

•

a description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding with respect to such nomination between or among the nominating stockholder and any of its affiliates or associates, and any others (including their names) acting in concert with any of the foregoing, and a representation that the nominating stockholder will notify the Company in writing of any such agreement, arrangement or understanding in effect as of the record date for the meeting promptly following the later of the record date or the date notice of the record date is first publicly disclosed,

•

a description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding (including any derivative or short positions, profit interests, options, hedging transactions, and borrowed or loaned shares) that has been entered into as of the date of the nominating stockholder’s notice by, or on behalf of, the nominating stockholder or any of its affiliates or associates, the effect or intent of which is to mitigate loss to, manage risk or benefit of share price changes for, or increase or decrease the voting power of the nominating stockholder or any of its affiliates or associates with respect to shares of stock of the Company, and a representation that the nominating stockholder will notify the Company in writing of any such agreement, arrangement or understanding in effect as of the record date for the meeting promptly following the later of the record date or the date notice of the record date is first publicly disclosed,

•	a representation that the nominating stockholder is a holder of record of shares of the Company entitled to vote at the meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice, and

•

a representation whether the nominating stockholder intends to deliver a proxy statement and/or form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of the Company’s outstanding capital stock required to approve the nomination and/or otherwise to solicit proxies from stockholders in support of the nomination.

The Company may require any proposed nominee to furnish such other information as it may reasonably require to determine the eligibility of such proposed nominee to serve as an independent director of the Company or that could be material to a reasonable stockholder’s understanding of the independence, or lack thereof, of such nominee. The foregoing is qualified in its entirety by reference to Section 2.7 of the Bylaws, which have been publicly filed with the SEC.

The Nominating and Governance Committee will apply the same criteria when considering stockholder nominees as it does to Company nominated candidates.

Each director nominee will be evaluated considering the relevance to the Company of the director nominee’s skills and experience, which must be complimentary to the skills and experience of the other members of the Board and those critical attributes, experiences, qualifications, and skills identified on the Company’s skills matrix. Although the Nominating and Governance Committee does not have a formal policy regarding diversity, in considering director candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers such factors as it deems appropriate to assist in developing a board and committees that are diverse in nature and comprised of members who have various types of experience (industry, professional, public service). Each director nominee is evaluated in the context of the Board’s qualifications, as a whole, with the objective of establishing a Board that can best perpetuate the Company’s success and represent stockholder interests through the exercise of sound business judgment.

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

It is the Company’s policy that any transactions with related parties are to be reviewed and approved by the Company’s Audit Committee, with the exception of officer compensation, which is approved by the Compensation Committee.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics for the directors, Principal Executive Officers, and Senior Financial Officers of the Company and its subsidiaries, and a Conduct of Business Policy for directors, officers, and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. It is the Company’s intention to disclose any amendments to or waivers of such Code of Ethics or Conduct of Business Policy on the Company’s website at https://www.gses.com/about/investors/ corporate-governance/. The Company’s Code of Ethics and Conduct of Business Policy is available on the Company’s website at https://www.gses.com/about/investors/corporate-governance/.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires any person who was one of our executive officers, directors or who owned more than ten percent (10%) of any publicly traded class of our equity securities at any time during the fiscal year (the “Reporting Persons”), to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of equity securities of the Company with the SEC. These Reporting Persons are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) filings.

Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and Forms 4 and amendments thereto furnished to the Company during the most recent fiscal year, and Forms 5 and amendments thereto with respect to its most recent fiscal year, or written representations from certain Reporting Persons that such filings were not required, the Company believes that all forms except for two were filed in a timely manner in 2020. Two Form 4s were filed late by two days in July, one for Emmett Pepe and one for Ravi Khanna.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee has:

•

reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020, with management and with Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2020, who represented to the Audit Committee that the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, were prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles;

•	discussed with Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP the matters required under applicable professional auditing standards and regulations by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) Statement on Auditing Standards No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees;

•

received the written disclosures and the letter from Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, including Ethics and Independence Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, and has discussed with Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP its independence from the Company and its management;

•	discussed with Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP the overall scope and plans of their audit, and met with Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting; and

•	recommended, based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, for filing with the SEC.

By the members of the Audit Committee:

William S. Corey, Jr., Chair

J. Barnie Beasley

Kathryn O’Connor Gardner

Suresh Sundaram

AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL OF AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES

The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services provided to the Company by its independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services, and other services. The Audit Committee has adopted policies and procedures for the pre-approval of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. Management must provide a detailed description of each proposed service and the projected fees and costs (or a range of such fees and costs) for the service. The policies and procedures require management to provide quarterly updates to the Audit Committee regarding services rendered to date and services yet to be performed.

As permitted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to its Chair for audit and permitted non-audit services. Any service pre-approved by the Audit Committee or its Chair must be reported to the Audit Committee at the next scheduled quarterly meeting. In addition, the pre-approval procedures require that all proposed engagements of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for services of any kind be directed to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer before they are submitted for approval prior to the commencement of any service.

The following table presents fees for professional audit services and other related services rendered by the Company’s prior independent registered public accounting firm BDO USA, LLP (“BDO”), for the year ended December 31, 2019, and by the Company’s current independent registered public accounting firm Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP (“DHG”) for the year ended December 31, 2020 (together with consent fees paid to BDO for 2020). The Audit Committee approved 100% of the services described in the following table.

	2020		2019

Audit fees (1) DHG BDO	$	526,987 185,000	$	-- 914,349

Audit-related fees DHG BDO (2)		-- --		-- 49,091

Tax fees DHG BDO		-- --		-- --

All other fees DHG BDO		-- --		-- --

Total Fees	$	711,897	$	963,440

(1)

Audit fees consisted of fees for the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, including quarterly review services in accordance with SAS No. 100 and statutory audit services for subsidiaries of the Company, and consent fees paid to BDO for 2020 as the Company’s prior auditor.

(2)

Audit-related fees for 2019 consisted of fees for the audit of the financial statements of the Company’s 401(k) Savings Plan, in the amount of $22,471, and fees for the audit of the financial statements of the Company’s recently acquired subsidiary, in the amount of $26,620.

There were no other fees paid to DHG or BDO, except as outlined in the above table.

AUDIT COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT OF NEW INDEPENDENT AUDIT FIRM

The Audit Committee notified BDO that the Company was dismissing BDO as its independent registered public accounting firm and engaging DHG as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020, effective on and as of July 23, 2020. The decision to dismiss BDO and to engage DHG was approved by the Audit Committee.

The reports of BDO on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except that BDO’s audit report dated June 11, 2020, contained an emphasis of matter paragraph concerning matters that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, and the subsequent interim periods through the date of dismissal, there were no disagreements with BDO on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of BDO, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its reports on the financial statements for those periods.

For the years ended December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, and through the subsequent interim periods, there was one “reportable event” as that term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K. As disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the “2019 10-K”), management concluded that the Company did not maintain effective control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, as a result of the material weaknesses described in Item 9A of the 2019 10-K, which disclosure is incorporated herein by reference. The Audit Committee has discussed the material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting with BDO and has authorized BDO to respond fully to any inquiries from DHG concerning such material weaknesses.

The Company provided BDO with a copy of this disclosure and requested that BDO furnish the Company with a letter addressed to the US Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether it agrees with the statements contained herein. A copy of BDO’s letter was filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, and through the subsequent interim periods, neither the Company, nor anyone acting on its behalf, consulted with DHG with respect to (1) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that would have been rendered on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and neither a written report nor oral advice was provided that DHG concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue; or (2) any matters that was either the subject of a disagreement (as that term is used in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions to Item 304 of Regulation S-K) or a reportable event (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In 2020, the Compensation Committee once again engaged the services of a compensation consultant, Aon Consulting, Inc. (“Aon”), to evaluate the compensation practice of the Company with respect to its Named Executive Officers, benchmark that compensation against similar companies, and offer recommendations as to how the Compensation Committee could align incentive compensation with the Company’s long-term strategy. Aon regularly partners with compensation committees and management teams to help guide their approach to setting executive pay. Aon maintains policies and procedures to avoid conflicts of interest, performs no other work for the Company, and does not trade in the Company’s common stock. There are no business or personal relationships among Aon and the Named Executive Officers or members of the Compensation Committee. As a result of the compensation review process, the Board adopted certain benchmarks with regard to Company performance in 2020 and beyond that the Board believes will best align Executive Compensation with the investment thesis and long-term plan that the Company has articulated to its stockholders.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth all plan and non-plan compensation awarded to, earned by or paid for all services rendered in all capacities to the Company and its subsidiaries by the Named Executive Officers for each of the last two completed fiscal years. The Named Executive Officers listed in the following table include our principal executive officer (“PEO”) and our two most highly compensated officers other than the PEO.

		Annual Compensation
Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary	Bonus	Stock Awards(1)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(2)	All Other Compensation	Total
Kyle J. Loudermilk	2020	$425,000	$100,000	$294,319	$-	$14,767	$ 834,086
Chief Executive Officer	2019	$425,000	$-	$691,074	$-	$17,161	$1,133,235
Christopher D. Sorrells	2020	$320,833(3)	$-	$-	$35,000	$-	$ 355,833
former Chief Operating Officer	2019	$350,000(3)	$-	$414,645	$-	$ 8,664	$ 773,309
Emmett A. Pepe	2020	$300,000	$70,000	$117,728	$-	$10,154	$ 497,882
Chief Financial Officer	2019	$300,000	$-	$276,429	$-	$10,874	$ 587,303
Bahram Meyssami, Ph.D.	2020	$255,000	$-	$53,609	$-	$11,151	$ 319,760
Chief Technology Officer	2019	$255,000	$-	$98,702	$-	$10,977	$ 364,679

(1)

The amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of RSU awards, as computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, assuming no forfeitures, for awards granted pursuant to the Long-Term Incentive Plan. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in footnote 17 to the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 13, 2021.

(2)

Reflects amounts earned under an executive bonus plan approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. For 2020, each of Mr. Loudermilk and Mr. Pepe were eligible to receive a cash bonus with a potential value up to 100% of the their salary in the event of over-achievement of financial targets, while Dr. Meyssami was eligible to receive a cash bonus with a potential value up to 80% of his salary in the event of over-achievement of these financial targets. The Company failed to achieve the minimum financial performance targets set forth in the 2020 executive bonus plan, and therefore the Board of Directors determined that no executive bonuses were payable with respect to 2020. Mr. Sorrells received a portion of his 2019 bonus plan eligibility amount during 2020 pursuant to a Separation Agreement, as described more fully below.

(3)	A portion of this amount (for 2019), and all of this amount (for 2020) was salary continuation pay pursuant to a Separation Agreement, described more fully below.

Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2020

The following tables set forth certain information with respect to unexercised options and unvested restricted share unit (“RSU”) awards held by the Named Executive Officers at the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

	Option Awards				Stock Awards
	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options at 12/31/2020				Equity Incentive Plan Awards
Name	Exercisable	Un-exercisable	Option Exercise Price ($/share)	Option Expiration Date	Number of RSUs that have not vested		Market value of RSUs that have not vested (1)
Kyle J. Loudermilk	-	-	$ -		863,962	(2)	$1,140,430

Christopher D. Sorrells	-	-	$ -		-		$-

Emmett A. Pepe	-	-	$ -		269,585	(3)	$355,852

Bahram Meyssami	-	-	$ -		171,270	(4)	$226,076

(1)	Market value is based on the closing market price of the Common Stock on the last trading day of the year, December 31, 2020, of $1.32.

(2)

These stock awards vest as follows: (a) 200,000 performance-restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) vest when the volume-weighted average price (“VWAP”) of the Common Stock over a 30-day period exceeds $4.25 per share; (b) 250,000 PRSUs vest when the VWAP of the Common Stock over a 30-day period exceeds $6.00 per share, with 70,000 of these PRSUs to be settled in Common Stock and the remaining 180,000 to be settled in cash upon vesting; (c) up to 74,405 PRSUs vest based on the Company’s total revenue earned during fiscal year 2021, with 44,643 vesting upon achievement of the minimum target of $200 million in total revenue for 2021, up to another 14,881 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of total revenue between $200 million and $250 million for 2021, and up to another 14,881 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of total revenue between $250 million and $300 million for 2021 (pro-rated in each of the last two cases for 2021 revenue amounts between $200 million and $250 million and between $250 million and $300 million, respectively; (d) up to 74,405 PRSUs vest based on the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA during fiscal year 2021, with 44,643 vesting upon achievement of the minimum target of $20 million in Adjusted EBITDA for 2021, up to another 14,881 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of Adjusted EBITDA between $20 million and $25 million for 2021, and up to another 14,881 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of Adjusted EBITDA between $25 million and $30 million for 2021 (pro-rated in each of the last two cases for 2021 Adjusted EBITDA amounts between $20 million and $25 million and between $25 million and $30 million, respectively; (e) up to 132,576 PRSUs vest based on the Company’s total revenue earned during fiscal year 2022, with 79,546 vesting upon achievement of the minimum target of $94.7 million in total revenue for 2022, up to another 26,515 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of total revenue between $94.7 million and $96.54 million for 2022, and up to another 26,515 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of total revenue between $96.54 million and $100 million for 2022 (pro-rated in each of the last two cases for 2022 revenue amounts between $94.7 million and $96.54 million and between $96.54 million and $100 million, respectively; and (f) up to 132,576 PRSUs vest based on the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA during fiscal year 2022, with 79,546 vesting upon achievement of the minimum target of $6.5 million in Adjusted EBITDA for 2022, up to another 26,515 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of Adjusted EBITDA between $6.5 million and $7.5 million for 2022, and up to another 26,515 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of Adjusted EBITDA between $7.5 million and $8.5 million for 2022 (pro-rated in each of the last two cases for 2022 Adjusted EBITDA amounts between $6.5 million and $7.5 million and between $7.5 million and $8.5 million, respectively.

(3)

These stock awards vest as follows: (a) 48,000 PRSUs vest when the VWAP of the Common Stock over a 30-day period exceeds $4.25 per share; (b) 56,000 PRSUs vest when the VWAP of the Common Stock over a 30-day period exceeds $6.00 per share; (c) up to 29,762 PRSUs vest based on the Company’s total revenue earned during fiscal year 2021, with 17,858 vesting upon achievement of the minimum target of $200 million in total revenue for 2021, up to another 5,952 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of total revenue between $200 million and $250 million for 2021, and up to another 5,952 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of total revenue between $250 million and $300 million for 2021 (pro-rated in each of the last two cases for 2021 revenue amounts between $200 million and $250 million and between $250 million and $300 million, respectively; (d) up to 29,762 PRSUs vest based on the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA during fiscal year 2021, with 17,858 vesting upon achievement of the minimum target of $20 million in Adjusted EBITDA for 2021, up to another 5,952 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of Adjusted EBITDA between $20 million and $25 million for 2021, and up to another 5,952 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of Adjusted EBITDA between $25 million and $30 million for 2021 (pro-rated in each of the last two cases for 2021 Adjusted EBITDA amounts between $20 million and $25 million and between $25 million and $30 million, respectively; (e) up to 53,031 PRSUs vest based on the Company’s total revenue earned during fiscal year 2022, with 31,819 vesting upon achievement of the minimum target of $94.7 million in total revenue for 2022, up to another 10,606 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of total revenue between $94.7 million and $96.54 million for 2022, and up to another 10,606 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of total revenue between $96.54 million and $100 million for 2022 (pro-rated in each of the last two cases for 2022 revenue amounts between $94.7 million and $96.54 million and between $96.54 million and $100 million, respectively; and (f) up to 53,030 PRSUs vest based on the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA during fiscal year 2022, with 31,819 vesting upon achievement of the minimum target of $6.5 million in Adjusted EBITDA for 2022, up to another 10,606 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of Adjusted EBITDA between $6.5 million and $7.5 million for 2022, and up to another 10,605 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of Adjusted EBITDA between $7.5 million and $8.5 million for 2022 (pro-rated in each of the last two cases for 2022 Adjusted EBITDA amounts between $6.5 million and $7.5 million and between $7.5 million and $8.5 million, respectively.

(4)

These stock awards vest as follows: (a) 48,000 PRSUs vest when the VWAP of the Common Stock over a 30-day period exceeds $4.25 per share; (b) 56,000 PRSUs vest when the VWAP of the Common Stock over a 30-day period exceeds $6.00 per share; (c) up to 9,487 PRSUs vest based on the Company’s total revenue earned during fiscal year 2021, with 5,692 vesting upon achievement of the minimum target of $200 million in total revenue for 2021, up to another 1,897 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of total revenue between $200 million and $250 million for 2021, and up to another 1,898 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of total revenue between $250 million and $300 million for 2021 (pro-rated in each of the last two cases for 2021 revenue amounts between $200 million and $250 million and between $250 million and $300 million, respectively; (d) up to 9,487 PRSUs vest based on the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA during fiscal year 2021, with 5,692 vesting upon achievement of the minimum target of $20 million in Adjusted EBITDA for 2021, up to another 1,897 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of Adjusted EBITDA between $20 million and $25 million for 2021, and up to another 1,898 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of Adjusted EBITDA between $25 million and $30 million for 2021 (pro-rated in each of the last two cases for 2021 Adjusted EBITDA amounts between $20 million and $25 million and between $25 million and $30 million, respectively; (e) up to 24,148 PRSUs vest based on the Company’s total revenue earned during fiscal year 2022, with 14,489 vesting upon achievement of the minimum target of $94.7 million in total revenue for 2022, up to another 4,830 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of total revenue between $94.7 million and $96.54 million for 2022, and up to another 4,829 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of total revenue between $96.54 million and $100 million for 2022 (pro-rated in each of the last two cases for 2022 revenue amounts between $94.7 million and $96.54 million and between $96.54 million and $100 million, respectively; and (f) up to 24,148 PRSUs vest based on the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA during fiscal year 2022, with 14,489 vesting upon achievement of the minimum target of $6.5 million in Adjusted EBITDA for 2022, up to another 4,830 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of Adjusted EBITDA between $6.5 million and $7.5 million for 2022, and up to another 4,829 PRSUs vesting upon achievement of Adjusted EBITDA between $7.5 million and $8.5 million for 2022 (pro-rated in each of the last two cases for 2022 Adjusted EBITDA amounts between $6.5 million and $7.5 million and between $7.5 million and $8.5 million, respectively.

Employment Agreements – All of the Named Executive Officers have entered into employment agreements. The terms of all of such agreements are summarized below.

Loudermilk Employment Agreement – Mr. Loudermilk entered into an employment agreement with the Company, dated July 1, 2015, as amended July 1, 2016, June 12, 2017 and January 11, 2019 (the “Loudermilk Employment Agreement”), which provides that he will serve as the Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company for a term ended on December 31, 2018. The term was extended, and will automatically extend, for additional one-year periods unless either Mr. Loudermilk or the Company decides not to extend the term. Under the Loudermilk Employment Agreement, Mr. Loudermilk is entitled to a base salary of at least $350,000, which may be increased (but not decreased) by the Compensation Committee. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Loudermilk’s base salary to $425,000, and this base salary did not change in 2020. In addition, Mr. Loudermilk is entitled to a bonus of a certain percentage of his base salary, subject to achievement of annual performance goals. In 2020, Mr. Loudermilk was eligible to earn a bonus of up to $425,000; based on the Company’s financial performance, however, no bonus was paid to Mr. Loudermilk for 2020. Mr. Loudermilk is entitled to participate in all employee benefits available to senior executives or employees of the Company.

Benefits include a 401(k) savings plan, which is a tax-qualified retirement savings plan pursuant to which all U.S. employees, including the Named Executive Officers, are able to contribute up to the limit prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code (a) on a before-tax basis for traditional 401(k) participants, and (b) on a post-tax basis for Roth 401(k) participants. The Company matches 50% of contributions up to 6% of eligible compensation to all 401(k) plan participants other than certain field professionals working for Hyperspring, LLC, and Absolute Consulting, Inc., subject to IRS compensation limits.

The Loudermilk Employment Agreement will terminate prior to the end of its term if certain events occur. If the Loudermilk Employment Agreement terminates due to Mr. Loudermilk’s death, disability, or for “Cause”, the Company will pay him through the date of termination. Termination for “Cause” includes: willful and continued failure by Mr. Loudermilk to perform his duties (other than as a result of disability) after 30 days’ notice and opportunity to cure; his willful engaging in misconduct that materially adversely affects the Company’s business or prospects; his felony conviction or plea of no contest to a crime of moral turpitude; abuse of alcohol or drugs affecting his performance; or material breach of a material term of the Loudermilk Employment Agreement.

If the Company terminates the Loudermilk Employment Agreement for any reason other than death, disability, or Cause, or if Mr. Loudermilk terminates the Loudermilk Employment Agreement for “Good Reason”, the Company will pay Mr. Loudermilk 12 months’ salary, payable as and when salaries are generally paid to executive officers, and he will continue to be eligible to participate in all medical, dental, life insurance, and 401(k) plan benefits for that 12-month period. He will also receive a prorated bonus to the extent he otherwise would have earned one had he remained employed through the end of the year of termination, payable within the first quarter of the following year. Mr. Loudermilk’s unvested restricted stock units are forfeited upon termination of his employment, except that a certain percentage of the PRSUs previously granted to him may vest if his employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by him for Good Reason. Mr. Loudermilk may terminate the Loudermilk Employment Agreement for “Good Reason” if: his duties, responsibilities or authority are materially reduced without his consent; his base salary and bonus opportunity are reduced; his benefits are discontinued or materially reduced, in the aggregate; his primary office is moved more than fifty (50) miles from his current office; or the Company materially breaches the Loudermilk Employment Agreement.

The Loudermilk Employment Agreement provides Mr. Loudermilk with benefits in the event of a Change of Control that are different from those described above. Those benefits are triggered if he terminates his employment for Good Reason (defined above) or the Company terminates his employment for any reason other than Cause (defined above), in each case within one year following the effective date of a Change of Control (defined below). Those benefits are payable in lieu of any other termination benefits and consist of the following: Mr. Loudermilk will receive his base salary and benefits for a period of 12 months from the date of termination of his employment, payable as and when salaries are generally paid to executive officers of the Company, and he will also receive, on the date of termination, a lump sum equal to the greater of (i) the actual amount of bonus earned as of the date of termination or (ii) the target amount of bonus for the period during which his employment terminates. In addition, upon a Change of Control, a certain percentage of Mr. Loudermilk’s PRSUs may vest based on the date of the Change of Control and the volume-weighted average Price (“VWAP”) of the Common Stock at that time.

A “Change of Control” occurs if either of the following events occur: (1) Any person not in control of the Company as of the date of the Loudermilk Employment Agreement (other than an employee benefit plan of the Company, or a company owned directly or indirectly by the stockholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of voting securities of the Company) becomes the beneficial owner of a majority of the combined voting power of the Company; or (2) the stockholders of the Company approve: (x) a plan of complete liquidation of the Company; (y) an agreement for the sale or disposition of all or substantially all the Company’s assets; or (z) a merger, consolidation, or reorganization of the Company with or involving any other corporation, other than a merger, consolidation, or reorganization that would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) at least a majority of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company (or such surviving entity) outstanding immediately after such merger, consolidation, or reorganization.

Mr. Loudermilk agreed during the term of the Loudermilk Employment Agreement, and for a one-year period following termination of the Loudermilk Employment Agreement, not to compete with Company or solicit employees or customers of the Company.

In 2019, the Company entered into a Retention Agreement with Mr. Loudermilk (the “Retention Agreement”). The Retention Agreement provided for payment of a cash bonus on July 1, 2020, so long as he remained employed by the Company and had not given notice of resignation or retirement as of that date. The bonus would also have been paid upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, as defined above (the earlier of such an occurrence or the July 1, 2020, date being the “Retention Date”). Under the Retention Agreement, on the Retention Date, Mr. Loudermilk was entitled to a bonus in the amount of $100,000, in addition to any amounts provided under his Employment Agreement. Because Mr. Loudermilk remained employed on July 1, 2020, and no Change of Control had occurred, he was paid the full retention bonus amount.

Sorrells Employment Agreement – Mr. Sorrells entered into an employment agreement with the Company, dated August 15, 2016, as amended June 12, 2017, and January 11, 2019 (the “Sorrells Employment Agreement”), which provided that he will serve as the Chief Operating Officer of the Company for a term that ended on December 31, 2018. The term was extended through December 31, 2019. Under the Sorrells Employment Agreement, Mr. Sorrells was entitled to a base salary of at least $290,000, which may be increased (but not decreased) by the Compensation Committee. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Sorrells’s base salary to $350,000. In addition, Mr. Sorrells was entitled to a bonus of a certain percentage of his base salary, subject to achievement of annual performance goals. In 2019, Mr. Sorrells was eligible to earn a bonus of up to $350,000; due to Mr. Sorrells’s resignation on September 30, 2019, and entry into a Separation Agreement as described below (the “Separation Agreement”), Mr. Sorrells was paid an agreed bonus amount of $35,000 during 2020 with respect to 2019. Mr. Sorrells was entitled to participate in all employee benefits available to senior executives or employees of the Company, and pursuant to the Separation Agreement these benefits continued until September 30, 2020.

The Sorrells Employment Agreement would have terminated prior to the end of its term if certain events had occurred. If the Sorrells Employment Agreement had terminated due to Mr. Sorrells’s death, disability, or for Cause (as defined above for Mr. Loudermilk), the Company would have paid him through the date of termination. None of these events occurred prior to Mr. Sorrells’s resignation.

If the Company terminated the Sorrells Employment Agreement for any reason other than death, disability, or Cause, or if Mr. Sorrells terminated the Sorrells Employment Agreement for Good Reason (as defined above for Mr. Loudermilk), the Company would pay Mr. Sorrells twelve months’ salary, payable as and when salaries are generally paid to executive officers, and he would continue to be eligible to participate in all medical, dental, life insurance, and 401(k) plan benefits for that 12-month period. He would also receive a prorated bonus to the extent he otherwise would have earned one had he remained employed through the end of the year of termination, payable within the first quarter of the following year. As described below, the Separation Agreement contains provisions effectuating these terms. Pursuant to the relevant grant agreements, Mr. Sorrells’s unvested restricted stock units would be forfeited upon termination of his employment, except that a certain percentage of PRSUs may vest if his employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by him for Good Reason. Notwithstanding these provisions, the Company and Mr. Sorrells agreed to certain accelerated vesting terms for his unvested RSUs as described below.

The Sorrells Employment Agreement provided Mr. Sorrells with benefits in the event of a Change in Control that were different from those described above. Those benefits would have been triggered if he terminated his employment for Good Reason (defined above) or the Company terminated his employment for any reason other than Cause (defined above), in each case within one year following the effective date of a Change of Control. Those benefits would be payable in lieu of any other termination benefits and consist of the following: Mr. Sorrells would receive his base salary and benefits for a period of 12 months from the date of termination of his employment, payable as and when salaries are generally paid to executive officers of the Company, and he would also receive, on the date of termination, a lump sum equal to the greater of (i) the actual amount of bonus earned as of the date of termination or (ii) the target amount of bonus for the period during which his employment terminates. In addition, upon a Change of Control, a certain percentage of Mr. Sorrells’s PRSUs may vest based on the date of the Change of Control and the VWAP of the Common Stock at that time. As described below, the Separation Agreement includes terms replacing these provisions.

Mr. Sorrells agreed during the term of the Sorrells Employment Agreement, and for a one-year period following termination of the Sorrells Employment Agreement, not to compete with Company or solicit employees or customers of the Company.

The Separation Agreement provided that Mr. Sorrells’s employment would end as of September 30, 2019. In exchange for Mr. Sorrells’s resignation from the Company’s Board of Directors and various mutual releases and covenants, the Company and Mr. Sorrells agreed that the Company would continue to pay him his base salary for a period of fourteen months on the Company’s ‘regular payroll dates, and that the Company would fund the cost of Mr. Sorrells’s COBRA benefits for a period of twelve months if he elected to receive them. The Company also agreed to pay Mr. Sorrells 10% of his 2019 bonus eligibility in March 2020. All other benefits and compensation were terminated. Finally, the Company also agreed (a) to amend Mr. Sorrells’ time-restricted share unit grant agreements to accelerate the vesting of his then-unvested TRSUs to September 30, 2019; (b) to amend Mr. Sorrells’s performance-vesting restricted share unit grant agreements to extend the performance period during which such PRSUs may vest if the performance criteria are satisfied until September 30, 2020.

Pepe Employment Agreement – Mr. Pepe entered into an employment agreement with the Company, dated July 1, 2016, as amended June 12, 2017, and January 11, 2019 (the “Pepe Employment Agreement”), which provides that he will serve as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company for a term that ended on December 31, 2018. The term was extended, and will automatically extend, for additional one-year periods unless either Mr. Pepe or the Company decides not to extend the term. Under the Pepe Employment Agreement, Mr. Pepe is entitled to a base salary of at least $250,000, which may be increased (but not decreased) by the Board of Directors. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Pepe’s base salary to $300,000, and this base salary did not change in 2020. In addition, Mr. Pepe is entitled to a bonus of a certain percentage of his base salary, subject to achievement of annual performance goals. In 2020, Mr. Pepe was eligible to earn a bonus of up to $300,000; based on the Company’s financial performance, however, no bonus was paid to Mr. Pepe for 2020. Mr. Pepe is entitled to participate in all employee benefits available to senior executives or employees of the Company.

The Pepe Employment Agreement will terminate prior to the end of its term if certain events occur. If the Pepe Employment Agreement terminates due to Mr. Pepe’s death, disability, or for Cause (as defined above for Mr. Loudermilk), the Company will pay him through the date of termination.

If the Company terminates the Pepe Employment Agreement for any reason other than death, disability, or Cause, or if Mr. Pepe terminates the Pepe Employment Agreement for Good Reason (as defined above for Mr. Loudermilk), the Company will pay Mr. Pepe twelve months’ salary, payable as and when salaries are generally paid to executive officers, and he will continue to be eligible to participate in all medical, dental, life insurance, and 401(k) plan benefits for that 12-month period. He will also receive a prorated bonus to the extent he otherwise would have earned one had he remained employed through the end of the year of termination, payable within the first quarter of the following year. Mr. Pepe’s unvested restricted stock units are forfeited upon his termination of employment, except that a certain percentage of PRSUs may vest if his employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by him for Good Reason.

The Pepe Employment Agreement provides Mr. Pepe with benefits in the event of a Change in Control that are different from those described above. Those benefits are triggered if he terminates his employment for Good Reason (defined above) or the Company terminates his employment for any reason other than Cause (defined above), in each case within one year following the effective date of a Change of Control. Those benefits are payable in lieu of any other termination benefits and consist of the following: Mr. Pepe will receive his base salary and benefits for a period of 12 months from the date of termination of his employment, payable as and when salaries are generally paid to executive officers of the Company, and he will also receive, on the date of termination, a lump sum equal to greater of (i) the actual amount of bonus earned as of the date of termination or (ii) the target amount of bonus for the period during which his employment terminates. In addition, upon a Change of Control, a certain percentage of Mr. Pepe’s PRSUs may vest based on the date of the Change of Control and the VWAP of the Common Stock at that time.

Mr. Pepe agreed during the term of the Pepe Employment Agreement, and for a one-year period following termination of the Pepe Employment Agreement, not to compete with Company or solicit employees or customers of the Company.

In 2019, the Company entered into a Retention Agreement with Mr. Pepe (the “Retention Agreement”). The Retention Agreement provided for payment of a cash bonus on July 1, 2020, so long as he remained employed by the Company and had not given notice of resignation or retirement as of that date. The bonus would also have been paid upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, as defined above (the earlier of such an occurrence or the July 1, 2020, date being the “Retention Date”). Under the Retention Agreement, on the Retention Date, Mr. Pepe was entitled to a bonus in the amount of $70,000, in addition to any amounts provided under his Employment Agreement. Because Mr. Pepe remained employed on July 1, 2020, and no Change of Control had occurred, he was paid the full retention bonus amount.

Meyssami Employment Agreement – Dr. Meyssami originally entered into an employment agreement with the Company, dated December 1, 2015. This employment agreement was then amended and restated as of January 1, 2019 (the “Meyssami Employment Agreement”). The Meyssami Employment Agreement provides that he will serve as the Chief Technology Officer of the Company for a term ending on December 31, 2019. The term will automatically extend for an additional one year period on each December 31, starting December 31, 2019, unless either Dr. Meyssami or the Company decides not to extend the term. Under the Meyssami Employment Agreement, Dr. Meyssami is entitled to a base salary of $255,000, which will be reviewed annually by the Board of Directors. In addition, Dr. Meyssami is eligible for a bonus of up to 80% of his base salary, subject to the achievement of certain performance goals. In 2020, Dr. Meyssami was eligible to earn a bonus of up to $204,000; based on the Company’s financial performance, however, no bonus was paid to Dr. Meyssami for 2020. Dr. Meyssami is entitled to participate in all employee benefits available to senior executives or employees of the Company, as described above with respect to Mr. Loudermilk. Each fiscal year Dr. Meyssami will have the potential to earn 25% of his Base Salary in RSUs and will also be eligible to receive additional grants of performance vesting RSUs that, if granted, will vest based upon metrics determined by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board of Directors.

The Meyssami Employment Agreement will terminate prior to the end of its term if certain events occur. If the Meyssami Employment Agreement terminates due to Dr. Meyssami’s death, disability or for “Cause” (as defined above for Mr. Loudermilk), the Company will pay him through the date of termination.

If the Company terminates the Meyssami Employment Agreement for any reason other than death, disability or Cause, or if Dr. Meyssami terminates the Meyssami Employment Agreement for “Good Reason” (as defined above for Mr. Loudermilk), the Company will pay Dr. Meyssami 12 months’ salary, payable as and when salaries are generally paid to executive officers, and he will continue to be eligible to participate in all medical, dental, life insurance and 401(k) plan benefits for six months. He will also receive a prorated bonus to the extent he otherwise would have earned one had he remained employed through the end of the year of termination, payable within the first quarter of the following year. Dr. Meyssami’s unvested restricted stock units are forfeited upon his termination of employment, except that a certain percentage of PRSUs may vest if his employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by him for Good Reason.

The Meyssami Employment Agreement provides Dr. Meyssami with benefits in the event of a Change in Control that are different from those described above. Those benefits are triggered if he terminates his employment for Good Reason (defined above) within one year following the effective date of a Change of Control. Those benefits are payable in lieu of any other termination benefits and consist of the following: Dr. Meyssami will receive his base salary and benefits for a period of 12 months from the date of termination of his employment, payable as and when salaries are generally paid to executive officers of the Company, and he will also receive, on the date of termination, a lump sum equal to the greater of (i) the actual amount of bonus earned as of the date of termination or (ii) the target amount of bonus for the period during which his employment terminates. In addition, upon a Change of Control, a certain percentage of Dr. Meyssami’s PRSUs may vest based on the date of the Change of Control and the VWAP of the Common Stock at that time.

Dr. Meyssami agreed during the term of the Meyssami Employment Agreement, and for a one year period following termination of the Meyssami Employment Agreement, not to compete with Company or solicit employees or customers of the Company.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

As more fully described below, during 2020 the Company (a) paid cash compensation and (b) granted time-vesting restricted stock units (TRSUs) to directors who were classified as “independent directors” based upon the SEC and NASDAQ criteria for director independence. The Board establishes its compensation plan for non-employee directors based upon input from the Board’s independent compensation consultant, and adjusts this plan periodically to ensure that the plan is reasonably well aligned with the Company’s peers. Each Board compensation plan generally covers the time period beginning July 1 and ending June 30 of the following year.

1. Board Compensation During the First and Second Quarters of 2020: For the Board service year beginning July 1, 2019, and ending June 30, 2020, the objective of the Board compensation plan was to provide compensation to independent directors with approximate total value ranging between $90,000 and $100,000, as follows:

(a)

TRSUs Granted: the Board granted to each independent director a number of TRSUs from the Long-Term Incentive Plan determined by dividing $60,000 by the closing price per share of the Common Stock on the last trading day prior to the grant, vesting at the earlier of 12 months after the date of grant or the Company’s subsequent annual meeting. For the 2019-2020 Board service year, each independent director received 25,316 TRSUs.

(b)

Cash Compensation: each non-employee director was paid a base quarterly amount of cash compensation equal to $7,500 ($30,000 annualized), plus (i) additional quarterly cash compensation of $625 ($2,500 annualized) for each Board committee on which the independent director serves, plus (ii) additional quarterly cash compensation of $2,500 ($10,000 annualized) for the Chairman of the Board of Directors, plus (iii) additional quarterly cash compensation of $1,250 ($5,000 annualized) for the Chairs of each of the Compensation Committee, Audit Committee, and Nominating and Governance Committee.

2. Board Compensation during the Third and Fourth Quarters of 2020: For the Board service year beginning July 1, 2020, and ending June 30, 2021, the objective of the Board compensation plan again was to provide compensation to independent directors with approximate total value ranging between $90,000 and $100,000, with certain adjustments deemed necessary to improve the overall fairness of the plan, as follows:

(a)

TRSUs Granted: in recognition of the fact that a decline in the Company’s stock price during 2020 would have resulted in the grant of relatively larger number of TRSUs to independent directors, the Board determined that it would be preferable to avoid excess stockholder dilution by granting fewer TRSUs. Consequently, the Board approved the grant of the same number of TRSUs (25,316) to each independent director as were granted in 2019. This decision resulted in a smaller portion of total independent director compensation being allocated to equity compensation (approximately $24,810 as compared with the approximately $60,000 in value previously granted).

(b)

Cash Compensation: to calculate the base cash compensation amount for independent directors, the value of the equity grant ($24,810) was deducted from $90,000. This base cash compensation was to be paid to non-employee director in quarterly amounts of $16,298 ($65,190 annualized), plus (i) additional quarterly cash compensation of $625 ($2,500 annualized) for each Board committee on which the independent director serves, plus (ii) additional quarterly cash compensation of $5,000 ($20,000 annualized) for the Chairman of the Board of Directors, plus (iii) additional quarterly cash compensation of $2,500 ($10,000 annualized) for the Chair of the Audit Committee, plus (iv) additional quarterly cash compensation of $1,250 ($5,000 annualized) for the Chairs of each of the Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee.

The table below summarizes the compensation paid by the Company to independent directors during 2020:

	Fees Earned		Stock
	or Paid in Cash		Awards(1)		Total
J. Barnie Beasley		$67,595		$24,810		$92,405	(2)
William S. Corey, Jr.		$41,345		$24,810		$66,155	(3)
John D. Fuller		$35,625		$14,244		$49,869	(4)
Kathryn O’Connor Gardner		$57,595		$24,810		$82,405	(5)
James H. Stanker		$31,875		$14,244		$46,119	(6)
Suresh Sundaram, Ph.D.		$60,095		$24,810		$84,905	(7)

(1)

The amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of TRSUs, as computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, assuming no forfeitures, for awards granted pursuant to the Long-Term Incentive Plan. Assumptions used in the calculation of the stock award values are included in footnote 17 to the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 13, 2021.

(2)

Mr. Beasley was awarded 25,316 TRSUs in August 2020 having an aggregate grant date fair value of $24,810. In addition, 25,316 TRSUs that were granted to Mr. Beasley in 2019 vested during 2020, resulting in the issuance to Mr. Beasley of 25,316 shares of Common Stock valued at the date of vesting at $1.01 per share (these shares are not included in the “Stock Awards” column for Mr. Beasley because the underlying TRSUs were granted during 2019). At fiscal year-end, Mr. Beasley had no stock options and 25,316 TRSUs outstanding.

(3)	Mr. Corey’s service as an independent member of the Board commenced in the third quarter of 2020. Mr. Corey was awarded 25,316 TRSUs in August 2020 having an aggregate grant date fair value of $24,810. At fiscal year-end, Mr. Corey had no stock options and 25,316 TRSUs outstanding.

(4)

Mr. Fuller’s service as an independent member of the Board ended in the third quarter of 2020. Mr. Fuller was awarded 15,306 immediately-vested TRSUs in August 2020 having an aggregate grant date fair value of $14,244. In addition, 25,316 TRSUs that were granted to Mr. Fuller in 2019 vested during 2020, resulting in the issuance to Mr. Fuller of 25,316 shares of Common Stock valued at the date of vesting at $1.01 per share (these shares are not included in the “Stock Awards” column for Mr. Fuller because the underlying TRSUs were granted during 2019). At fiscal year-end, Mr. Fuller had no stock options and no TRSUs outstanding.

(5)

Ms. Gardner was awarded 25,316 TRSUs in August 2020 having an aggregate grant date fair value of $24,810. In addition, 23,590 TRSUs that were granted to Ms. Gardner in 2019 vested during 2020, resulting in the issuance to Ms. Gardner of 23,590 shares of Common Stock valued at the date of vesting at $1.01 per share (these shares are not included in the “Stock Awards” column for Ms. Gardner because the underlying TRSUs were granted during 2019). At fiscal year-end, Ms. Gardner had no stock options and 25,316 TRSUs outstanding.

(6)

Mr. Stanker’s service as an independent member of the Board ended in the third quarter of 2020. Mr. Stanker was awarded 15,306 immediately-vested TRSUs in August 2020 having an aggregate grant date fair value of $14,244. In addition, 25,316 TRSUs that were granted to Mr. Stanker in 2019 vested during 2020, resulting in the issuance to Mr. Stanker of 25,316 shares of Common Stock valued at the date of vesting at $1.01 per share (these shares are not included in the “Stock Awards” column for Mr. Stanker because the underlying TRSUs were granted during 2019). At fiscal year-end, Mr. Stanker had no stock options and no TRSUs outstanding.

(7)

Dr. Sundaram was awarded 25,316 TRSUs in August 2020 having an aggregate grant date fair value of $24,810. In addition, 25,316 TRSUs that were granted to Dr. Sundaram in 2019 vested during 2020, resulting in the issuance to Dr. Sundaram of 25,316 shares of Common Stock valued at the date of vesting at $1.01 per share (these shares are not included in the “Stock Awards” column for Dr. Sundaram because the underlying TRSUs were granted during 2019). At fiscal year-end, Dr. Sundaram had no stock options and 25,316 TRSUs outstanding.

Through its Compensation Committee, the Board intends to continue assessing the manner in which it compensates its non-employee directors and to consider and implement further modifications to its compensation policies as necessary to continue to attract high-quality individuals to serve on the Board and to align its compensation of non-employee directors with best practices observed by similar companies.

PROPOSALS RECOMMENDED FOR CONSIDERATION BY STOCKHOLDERS

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

The Board has nominated Dr. Sundaram for re-election to the Board of Directors as a Class II director to serve until the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders and until his successor is elected and qualified. Currently there are five directors serving on the Board. The Board is divided into three classes that serve staggered three-year terms and are as nearly equal in number as possible. Each class generally serves for a period of three years, although a director may be elected for a shorter term in order to keep the number of directors in each class approximately equal. To be elected to the Board of Directors, a nominee for director must receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the sum of (a) the total votes cast for and (b) the total votes affirmatively withheld as to such nominee. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted for purposes of Proposal I.

The terms of the Company’s Class II directors – Mr. J. Barnie Beasley and Dr. Suresh Sundaram – will expire at the 2020 Annual Meeting. Mr. Beasley has announced his retirement from the Board and, therefore, informed the Board that he would not stand for reelection. Dr. Sundaram has been properly nominated for re-election at the Annual Meeting. If elected, Dr. Sundaram will hold office until the 2024 Annual Meeting and until his successor is duly elected and qualified. Biographical information, including professional background and business-related experience, for the nominee and each of the incumbent directors is contained in the section captioned “Information About Directors and Executive Officers.”

The proxies solicited hereby, unless directed to the contrary, will be voted FOR election of the nominee. The nominee has consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and to serve if elected. The Board has no reason to believe that the nominee will not be a candidate or will be unable to serve, but if either occurs proxies may be voted for such substituted nominee or nominees as the Board, in its discretion, may designate.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR

THE RE-ELECTION OF SURESH SUNDARAM, PH.D.

Proposal 2: Non-Binding Resolution to Approve Executive Compensation

In accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we are providing stockholders the chance to approve, in a non-binding vote, the Company’s executive compensation as reported in this Proxy Statement. We are providing stockholders with this opportunity on an annual basis pursuant to the recommendation of stockholders at the 2017 Annual Meeting that the Company hold a “say on pay” vote every year.

Our executive compensation programs are designed to support the Company’s long-term success. The Compensation Committee has structured our executive compensation program to achieve the following key objectives:

•	to attract, retain, and reward talented and productive executive officers and other employees who can contribute (both short and long-term) to the success of the Company;

•	provide incentives for executive officers for superior performance; and

•	to align compensation and interests of the executive officers with those of the Company and reward executive officers according to their contribution to the Company’s success.

We urge stockholders to read the “Executive Compensation” disclosure set forth in this Proxy Statement, which describes in more detail how our executive compensation policies and procedures operate and are designed to achieve our compensation philosophy and objectives, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and related compensation tables and narrative below which provide detailed information on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors believe that the policies and procedures articulated in that disclosure are effective in achieving our goals and that the compensation of our Named Executive Officers reported in this Proxy Statement has supported and contributed to the Company’s success.

We are asking stockholders to approve the following non-binding resolution at the Annual Meeting:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of GSE Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table and the related compensation tables and narrative in the Proxy Statement relating to the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

This advisory resolution, commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” resolution, is non-binding on the Board of Directors. Although non-binding, the Board and the Compensation Committee will carefully review and consider the voting results when evaluating our executive compensation program.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR

THE ADVISORY RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS SET FORTH IN THE SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE AND THE RELATED COMPENSATION TABLES AND NARRATIVE IN THE PROXY STATEMENT, AND IT IS INTENDED THAT PROXIES NOT MARKED TO THE CONTRARY WILL BE SO VOTED.

Proposal 3: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee of the Board has appointed the firm of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP (“DHG”) as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for fiscal year 2021. Representatives of DHG are expected to attend the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement at the meeting if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. For a description of the Audit Committee’s pre-approval policies and procedures pursuant to 17 CFR 210.2-01(c)(7)(i), see the section captioned “Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services.”

Ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of the shares of common stock voting in person or by proxy at the annual meeting. The stockholders’ ratification of the appointment of DHG will not impact the Audit Committee’s responsibility pursuant to its charter to appoint, replace, and discharge the independent registered public accounting firm. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment of DHG, the Audit Committee may reconsider the appointment.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DIXON HUGHES GOODMAN LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021

Other Business

As of the date of this proxy statement, the Company does not know of any matters that will be presented for action at the annual meeting other than those expressly set forth herein. If other matters properly come before the meeting, proxies submitted on the enclosed form will be voted by the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy in accordance with their best judgment. In addition, if (i) the person named as the nominee to serve as a director is unable to serve or for good cause will not serve and the Board of Directors designates a substitute nominee or (ii) any stockholder proposal, which is not in this proxy statement or on the proxy card or voting instructions form pursuant to Rule 14a-8 or 14a-9 of the Exchange Act, is presented for action at the meeting, or (iii) if any matters concerning the conduct of the meeting are presented for action, then stockholders present at the meeting may vote on such items. If you are represented by proxy, your proxy will vote your shares using his discretion.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Daniel W. Pugh

General Counsel and Secretary

Columbia, Maryland