UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-06416
DTF Tax-Free Income Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
200 South Wacker
Drive, Suite 500, Chicago, Illinois 60606
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
|
|
|
Alan M. Meder
|
|
Lawrence R. Hamilton
|
DTF Tax-Free Income Inc.
|
|
Mayer Brown LLP
|
200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 500
|
|
71 South Wacker Drive
|
Chicago, Illinois 60606
|
|
Chicago, Illinois 60606
|
(Name and address of agents for service)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: 1-800-338-8214
Date of fiscal year end:
October 31
Date of reporting period: October 31, 2011
ITEM 1.
|
REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS.
|
Board of Directors
David J. Vitale,
Chairman
Nancy Lampton,
Vice Chairperson
Stewart E. Conner
Robert J. Genetski
Philip R. McLoughlin
Geraldine M. McNamara
Eileen A. Moran
Nathan I. Partain, CFA
Christian H. Poindexter
Carl F. Pollard
Officers
Nathan I. Partain, CFA,
President & Chief Executive Officer
T. Brooks Beittel, CFA,
Secretary
Timothy M. Heaney, CFA,
Chief Investment Officer
Lisa H. Leonard,
Vice President
Alan M. Meder, CFA, CPA,
Treasurer & Assistant Secretary
Joyce B. Riegel,
Chief Compliance Officer
Investment Adviser
Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co.
200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 500
Chicago, IL 60606
Call toll-free (800) 243-4361 ext. 4941
(860) 263-4941
www.dpimc.com
Administrator
J.J.B. Hilliard, W.L. Lyons, LLC
500 West Jefferson Street
Louisville, KY 40202
Call toll-free (888) 878-7845
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company
One Heritage Drive
North Quincy, MA 02171
Transfer Agent
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
6201 15th Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11219
Call toll-free (800) 937-5449
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Ernst & Young LLP
155 North Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
Legal Counsel
Mayer Brown LLP
71 South Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
This report is for stockholder information. This is not a prospectus intended for use in the purchase or sale of Fund shares.
DTF Tax-Free
Income Inc.
Annual Report
October 31, 2011
LETTER TO
SHAREHOLDERS
December 15, 2011
Dear
Fellow Shareholders:
The Current Municipal Market Environment and Your Fund:
After a very challenging start to 2011, the municipal bond market rebounded in the second and third quarters as media predictions of a
significant increase in municipal bond defaults did not materialize and municipal interest rates declined to historically low levels. Through the first ten months of this year, the municipal bond market produced solid returns, with municipal
interest rates on bonds with maturities beyond ten years declining by 80 to almost 100 basis points. Because the market value of bonds tends to increase when interest rates fall, this decline in municipal interest rates was a major factor in the DTF
Funds net asset value (NAV) return of 11% for the ten months ended October 31, 2011. While impressive, the decline in municipal bond yields is still well below the level experienced in the U.S. Treasury (UST) bond market. Through the
first three quarters of 2011, 10- to 30-year UST yields have declined by almost 120 basis points. As a result, municipal bond yields as a percentage of UST yields have increased in 2011 and are now well above average levels across the entire yield
curve. This attractive relative value is beginning to draw the attention of even nontraditional buyers to the municipal bond market.
As 2011 comes to a close, uncertainty surrounding the U.S. and global economy and the European sovereign debt problems will be the main focus of all fixed income investors. While these macro concerns will
clearly remain front and center for municipal bond investors, additional concerns surrounding municipal credit, new issue volume and the supply and demand for municipal bonds will also be important determinants of performance as we move into 2012.
Credit:
The underlying credit fundamentals in the municipal market improved slowly during the first ten months of 2011.
States are reporting year-over-year improvements in revenue as tax collections have increased and economic activity, albeit lower than we would prefer, has been positive. While states have experienced improved financial metrics, local government
issuers have begun to feel the impact of reduced state support and uncertain revenue prospects. Local issuers, who generally rely more heavily on property taxes, are being forced to navigate in an environment where assessed valuations and financial
support from the states are declining. These issuers will be challenged to reduce expenses and preserve revenue until the housing market begins to show signs of sustained improvement. While this challenge will be difficult for local municipal
issuers and will remain an area of focus for municipal investors over the next several quarters, we believe it will be manageable and will not result in large-scale defaults or multiple-notch downgrades.
New Issue Volume:
As we move through the balance of 2011 and into 2012, the level of new issuance will be very important to bond
valuations. After a very slow start to the year, the new issue market has experienced a revival. Through the first ten months of 2011, new issue volume is on pace to approach $300 billion, or approximately 75% of the annual issuance levels
experienced over the past few years. Issuers appear to be taking advantage of historically low municipal interest rates, while investor demand for municipal bonds has improved. However, with municipalities still hesitant to take on the additional
cost of debt while their fiscal situations are challenging, we do not expect to see issuance levels return to the robust levels of 2007-2010 in the near term.
Demand:
After starting the year 2011 with five consecutive months of outflows from open-end municipal bond mutual funds, the direction of flows has reversed. Combined, September and October have
seen approximately $4 billion of inflows. These strong inflows are helping to support bond valuations. This is especially helpful in the current environment as UST yields and equity markets continue to be extremely volatile. In addition to the
demand from the markets traditional investors, several nontraditional types of investors (hedge funds, pension funds and taxable bond funds) have recently become buyers of
1
municipal bonds as the relationship between municipal yields and UST yields has reached its widest level since the 2008/2009 credit crisis. While the overall yields available on municipal bonds
are low by historical standards, when compared to UST bond yields, the municipal market still provides solid value and relative opportunity for investors, as evidenced by this nontraditional demand.
In managing the DTF Fund, we continue to emphasize an investment strategy of owning higher quality bonds, given the significant budgetary
challenges facing most municipalities across the country. The Fund is well diversified across multiple sectors, with water and sewer, pre-refunded bonds and electric utility issues representing the Funds largest exposures. We continue to be
attracted to revenue-backed bonds because they generally provide a sound legal framework for investors. The theme of high quality is evident in the fact that almost two-thirds of the portfolios holdings are rated AA or higher. Additionally,
the Fund is well diversified geographically with exposure to 29 states along with Puerto Rico and Washington D.C. We continue to be fully invested along the entire yield curve in order to insulate the portfolio from potential changes in interest
rates and the shape of the yield curve that may occur from future Federal Reserve actions and changing investor sentiment.
Outlook:
As the
municipal bond market moves into 2012, investors will be closely watching the U.S. economy and the developments in Europe. In addition to these macro themes, we expect increased attention by the mainstream media on the fiscal challenges facing
municipalities, higher levels of interest rate volatility and the tax-exempt status of municipal bonds. As the increasing U.S. deficit continues be a hotly debated topic in Washington D.C. and on Main Street, the federal government is looking for
ways to increase revenue and cut expenses. Recently, President Obama introduced a jobs proposal that included a provision to reduce the tax exemption for high-income individuals holding existing and future tax-exempt securities. While we assign a
low probability to the prospect of this provision being passed in the near future, the greater concern is the apparent interest in Washington on overhauling the tax-exempt bond market as a solution to deficit reduction. While we expect these and
other challenges to persist for the foreseeable future, we believe our conservative style of management will help navigate through these uncertain times. We still believe that tax-exempt municipal bonds will continue to be an important asset class
for clients with a goal of wealth protection and the desire to receive predicable levels of tax-exempt income.
Fund Performance:
The following table compares the DTF
Funds total return, on an NAV and share price basis, to its Lipper peer group and the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index for one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUALIZED TOTAL
RETURN
|
|
|
|
(10/31/11)
1
|
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
Three Years
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
Ten Years
|
|
DTF Fund (NAV)
2
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
DTF Fund (Share Price)
3
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
Lipper Peer Group Average Return (NAV)
4
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
Lipper Peer Group Average Return (Share Price)
4
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index
5
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
1 Past performance is not indicative of future results. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance
in historical periods.
2 Source: Administrator of the Fund. Total return of the Fund represents the change in net asset value from the
beginning of the period through the period ending date of 10/31/2011 and assumes the reinvestment of dividends and distributions.
3
Source: Administrator of the Fund. Shares of the Fund are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) using the symbol DTF. Total return of the Fund represents the change in the DTF share price from the beginning of the period through the period
ending date of 10/31/2011 and assumes the reinvestment of dividends and distributions in the Funds dividend reinvestment plan.
4.
Source: Lipper Inc. General Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) peer group average return.
5. Source: Barclays Capital.
As of October 31, 2011, the Fund was paying an 81-cent
annualized dividend and had a closing share price of $15.54. This monthly dividend translates into a taxable equivalent current yield of 8.02% as of October 31, 2011 for an individual in the 35% federal tax bracket.
2
On December 12, 2011, the Board of Directors increased the common dividend for the
second time in the past year. The monthly dividend was increased from $0.0675 to $0.07 per common share beginning January 2012. One principal reason why the Fund was able to increase its dividends has been the low cost of leverage over the
past two years. During this period, common shareholders have benefited from a very steep municipal yield curve that has allowed the Fund to pay a very low dividend rate on its preferred stock while re-investing the proceeds into much higher
yielding bonds. However, that relationship between cost of leverage and investment returns could change in the future. If leverage costs were to move higher, future dividend increases would be more difficult to implement and the dividend rate
could even decrease.
Additionally, the Funds common shareholders will receive a long term capital gains distribution of
$0.048298 and special distribution of $0.011818 per share payable December 23, 2011. This special distribution, taxed as ordinary income, is the result of market discount being recognized on bonds redeemed by several bond issuers during
the year. Market discount arises when a bond is purchased in the secondary market at a price below par. Please consult your financial advisor for the tax treatment of this distribution.
We continue to appreciate your interest in the DTF Tax-Free Income Fund and look forward to being of continued service in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy M. Heaney, CFA
|
|
Nathan I. Partain, CFA
|
Chief Investment Officer
|
|
Director, President & Chief Executive Officer
|
3
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
Schedule of Investments
October 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
Amount
(000)
|
|
|
Description (a)
|
|
Value
(Note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS142.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona3.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona St. Trans Brd. Hwy. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/1/30, Ser. B
|
|
$
|
2,146,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salt River Proj. Agric. Impvt. & Pwr.
Dist. Elec. Sys. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 1/1/38, Ser. A
|
|
|
2,097,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,243,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California19.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bay Area Toll Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.125%, 4/1/39, Ser. F-1
|
|
|
2,086,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
California St. Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
5.50%, 3/1/26
|
|
|
547,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
California St. Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
6.00%, 4/1/38
|
|
|
1,106,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
California St. Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
5.50%, 3/1/40
|
|
|
523,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Statewide Communities
Dev. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.75%, 7/1/47, FGIC
|
|
|
2,046,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresno Swr. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,545
|
|
|
6.25%, 9/1/14, Ser. A-1, AMBAC
|
|
|
1,658,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
5.75%, 6/1/47, Ser. A-1
|
|
|
2,159,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imperial Irrigation District Elec. Sys. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
5.00%, 11/1/36, Ser. B
|
|
|
516,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles Wastewtr. Sys. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/1/26, Ser. A, NRE
|
|
|
2,102,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
Riverside Cnty. Sngl. Fam. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
7.80%, 5/1/21, Ser. A,
Escrowed to maturity(b)
|
|
|
3,467,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Bernardino Cnty. Res. Mtge. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,840
|
|
|
9.60%, 9/1/15,
Escrowed to maturity(b)
|
|
|
10,383,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saratoga Unified Sch. Dist. Gen. Oblig.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
Zero Coupon, 9/1/20, Ser. A, FGIC / NRE
|
|
|
715,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,314,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connecticut3.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connecticut St. Hlth. & Edl. Facs. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/1/25, Ser. C, RAD
|
|
|
932,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connecticut St. Hlth. & Edl. Facs. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/1/41, Ser. A
|
|
$
|
989,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connecticut St. Hlth. & Edl. Facs. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/1/32, Ser. A
|
|
|
502,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mashantucket Western Pequot Tribe Spl. Rev., 144A,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
5.75%, 9/1/18, Ser. B(c)(d)
|
|
|
927,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Central Connecticut Reg. Wtr. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 8/1/41, Ser. 26
|
|
|
1,058,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,409,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia2.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia Inc. Tax Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 12/1/31, Ser. A
|
|
|
1,082,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia Wtr. & Swr. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
5.00%, 10/1/33, FGIC / NRE
|
|
|
1,575,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan Washington D.C. Airport Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 10/1/18, Ser. A, AGM / AMBAC
|
|
|
1,113,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,771,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida9.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broward Cnty. Port Fac. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
6.00%, 9/1/23, Ser. A
|
|
|
1,705,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
Escambia Cnty. Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
6.00%, 8/15/36
|
|
|
989,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida Mun. Ln. Council Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,210
|
|
|
5.375%, 8/1/20, Ser. B, NRE
|
|
|
2,290,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida St. Bd. of Ed. Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/1/21, Ser. A
|
|
|
2,138,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highlands Cnty. Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
5.125%, 11/15/32, Ser. G, Prerefunded 11/15/16 @ $100(b)
|
|
|
82,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highlands Cnty. Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
|
5.125%, 11/15/32, Ser. G
|
|
|
1,949,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orlando and Orange Cnty. Expwy. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/1/35, Ser. B,
BHAC / AMBAC
|
|
|
2,018,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seminole Cnty. Sales Tax Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.25%, 10/1/31, Ser. B, NRE
|
|
|
2,204,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,379,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
Amount
(000)
|
|
|
Description (a)
|
|
Value
(Note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia11.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta Wtr. & Wastewtr. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,385
|
|
|
5.00%, 11/1/29, Ser. A, FGIC / NRE
|
|
$
|
2,386,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta Wtr. & Wastewtr. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
5.00%, 11/1/38, Ser. A, FGIC / NRE
|
|
|
715,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fulton Cnty. Sch. Dist. Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.375%, 1/1/16
|
|
|
2,329,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia Mun. Elec. Auth. Pwr. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
6.40%, 1/1/13, Ser. Y,
Escrowed to maturity(b)
|
|
|
103,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia Mun. Elec. Auth. Pwr. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,655
|
|
|
6.40%, 1/1/13, Ser. Y, AMBAC
|
|
|
1,705,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia Mun. Elec. Auth. Pwr. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
6.50%, 1/1/20, Ser. X, AMBAC
|
|
|
6,465,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metro. Atlanta Rapid Tran. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/1/39, Ser. 3
|
|
|
2,085,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,790,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idaho0.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idaho Hsg. Agcy.
Sngl. Fam. Mtge. Sr. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6.65%, 7/1/14, Ser. B
|
|
|
5,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idaho Hsg. Agcy.
Sngl. Fam. Mtge. Sr. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
6.60%, 7/1/27, Ser. B
|
|
|
78,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois6.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago Bd. of Ed. Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.50%, 12/1/30, Ser. A, AMBAC
|
|
|
1,071,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago Multi-Family Hsg. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
4.90%, 3/20/44, FHA
|
|
|
464,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago Park Dist. Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 1/1/27, Ser. A, AMBAC
|
|
|
1,030,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois Fin. Auth. Ed. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.375%, 9/1/32, Ser. C,
Prerefunded 9/1/17 @ $100(b)
|
|
|
1,213,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois Fin. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
6.00%, 8/15/38, Ser. A
|
|
|
1,010,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois St. Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.50%, 1/1/29
|
|
|
2,159,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois St. Toll Hwy. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
5.50%, 1/1/33, Ser. B
|
|
|
1,582,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement
Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
6.00%, 6/1/28
|
|
|
1,039,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,572,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana7.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana Fin. Auth. Hospital Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.875%, 5/1/29, Ser. A
|
|
|
1,021,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana Mun. Pwr. Agcy.
Pwr. Supply Sys. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
6.00%, 1/1/13, Ser. B, NRE
|
|
|
5,300,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indianapolis Local Pub. Impvt.
Bond Bank Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,100
|
|
|
5.25%, 7/1/33, Ser. A,
Prerefunded 7/1/12 @ 100(b)
|
|
$
|
2,169,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indianapolis Local Pub. Impvt.
Bond Bank Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 2/1/38, Ser. A
|
|
|
2,108,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,600,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kentucky1.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisville & Jefferson Cnty. Met. Swr.
Dist. Swr. & Drain Sys. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
5.00%, 5/15/30, Ser. A, FGIC / NRE
|
|
|
1,502,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana1.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana St. Gasoline & Fuels Tax Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 5/1/41, Ser. A
|
|
|
1,029,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Tran. Auth. Louisiana Sales Tax Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
5.00%, 12/1/30, AGM
|
|
|
1,172,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,201,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland1.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland St. Trans. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/1/37, AGM
|
|
|
2,121,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts6.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts Bay Trans. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
5.50%, 7/1/29, Ser. B, NRE
|
|
|
3,682,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts St. College Bldg.
Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 5/1/40, Ser. B
|
|
|
2,091,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts St. Dev. Fin. Agcy.
Solid Waste Disp. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
5.00%, 2/1/36
|
|
|
1,491,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts St. Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.50%, 8/1/30, Ser. A, AMBAC
|
|
|
1,223,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,488,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan1.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Detroit Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
5.25%, 11/1/35
|
|
|
516,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
Detroit Wtr. Supply Sys. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/1/30, Ser. A, FGIC / NRE
|
|
|
2,000,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,516,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska4.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Omaha Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.25%, 4/1/27
|
|
|
2,479,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
Omaha Pub. Pwr. Dist. Elec. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
6.15%, 2/1/12, Ser. B,
Escrowed to maturity(b)
|
|
|
673,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
Omaha Pub. Pwr. Dist. Elec. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
6.20%, 2/1/17, Ser. B,
Escrowed to maturity(b)
|
|
|
2,888,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,041,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
Amount
(000)
|
|
|
Description (a)
|
|
Value
(Note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada4.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clark Cnty. Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,165
|
|
|
5.00%, 11/1/22, AMBAC
|
|
$
|
2,362,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas Valley Wtr. Dist. Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/1/25, Ser. B, NRE
|
|
|
1,470,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada St. Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 12/1/24, Ser. F, AGM
|
|
|
2,143,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,975,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey4.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey Econ. Dev. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
4.95%, 3/1/47
|
|
|
989,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey St. Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.25%, 7/1/17, Ser. H
|
|
|
2,362,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey St. Tpk. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 1/1/36, Ser. H
|
|
|
1,040,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey Trans. Trust Fund
Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.25%, 12/15/22, Ser. A
|
|
|
2,283,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,675,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York6.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Albany Industrial Dev. Agy. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 4/1/32, Ser. A
|
|
|
844,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Island Pwr. Auth. Elec. Sys. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
5.00%, 12/1/35, Ser. B
|
|
|
815,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metro. Trans. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.25%, 11/15/31, Ser. A, FGIC / NRE
|
|
|
1,016,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York City Mun. Wtr. Fin.
Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.375%, 6/15/43, Ser. EE
|
|
|
1,099,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York City Mun. Wtr. Fin.
Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.50%, 6/15/43, Ser. EE
|
|
|
1,112,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York St. Dorm. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
7.25%, 10/1/28, Ser. C
|
|
|
1,787,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York St. Dorm. Auth.
St. Personal Inc. Tax Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 3/15/30, Ser. F
|
|
|
2,091,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,768,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio5.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deerfield Twp. Tax Increment Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
5.00%, 12/1/25
|
|
|
768,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hamilton Elec. Sys. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
4.60%, 10/15/20, Ser. A, AGM
|
|
|
1,072,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio St. Air Quality Dev. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
5.70%, 2/1/14, Ser. A
|
|
|
809,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio St. Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
5.00%, 9/1/30, Ser. A
|
|
|
543,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio St. Tpk. Comm. Tpk. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
5.00%, 2/15/31, Ser. A
|
|
|
1,112,696
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
Amount
(000)
|
|
|
Description (a)
|
|
Value
(Note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio St. Wtr. Dev. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,445
|
|
|
5.50%, 6/1/20, Ser. B, AGM
|
|
$
|
2,999,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,306,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania5.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware Cnty. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/1/21, Ser. A,
Prerefunded 6/1/15 @ $100(b)
|
|
|
2,275,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
East Stroudsburg Area Sch. Dist. Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
7.75%, 9/1/27, Ser. A, FGIC / NRE
|
|
|
1,210,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania Econ. Dev. Fin.
Auth. Res. Recov. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
4.625%, 12/1/18, Ser. F, AMBAC
|
|
|
962,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania St. Higher Ed. Facs.
Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/15/28, Ser. AL
|
|
|
2,188,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania St. Tpk. Comm. Oil Franchise Tax Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
5.00%, 12/1/23, Ser. A-2, AGT
|
|
|
1,136,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,773,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico0.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Elec. Pwr. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/1/25, Ser. PP, FGIC / NRE
|
|
|
1,011,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rhode Island1.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rhode Island Hlth. & Edl. Bldg. Corp. Higher Ed. Facs. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 9/1/37
|
|
|
2,093,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina1.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spartanburg Waterworks Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
5.25%, 6/1/28,
Prerefunded 6/1/14 @ $100(b)
|
|
|
1,671,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee1.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee Energy Acquisition
Corp. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
5.25%, 9/1/20, Ser. A
|
|
|
1,509,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee Energy Acquisition
Corp. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.25%, 9/1/21, Ser. A
|
|
|
1,003,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,513,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas14.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alliance Airport Auth. Inc. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
4.85%, 4/1/21
|
|
|
1,040,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bexar Met. Wtr. Dist. Waterworks
Sys. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
5.00%, 5/1/25, NRE
|
|
|
2,501,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dallas Area Rapid Transit Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.25%, 12/1/48
|
|
|
1,057,690
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
Amount
(000)
|
|
|
Description (a)
|
|
Value
(Note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dallas Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
4.50%, 2/15/23,
Prerefunded 2/15/12 @ $100(b)
|
|
$
|
2,024,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
El Paso Wtr. & Swr. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,555
|
|
|
5.50%, 3/1/12, Ser. A, AGM
|
|
|
1,582,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
Everman Indep. Sch. Dist. Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 2/15/36, PSF
|
|
|
1,060,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston Hotel Occupancy Tax &
Spl Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.25%, 9/1/29, Ser. A
|
|
|
1,021,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Klein Indep. Sch. Dist. Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 8/1/38, Ser. A, PSF
|
|
|
1,061,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower Colorado River Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 5/15/31, AGM
|
|
|
2,001,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
McLennan Cnty. Pub. Fac. Corp.
Proj. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,970
|
|
|
6.625%, 6/1/35
|
|
|
2,121,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Texas Twy. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
5.75%, 1/1/40, Ser. A, BHAC
|
|
|
1,285,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pharr-San Juan-Alamo Indep. Sch. Dist. Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,975
|
|
|
5.50%, 2/1/33, PSF
|
|
|
2,131,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spring Branch Indep. Sch. Dist.
Gen. Oblig.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.25%, 2/1/38, PSF
|
|
|
1,109,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,998,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utah1.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utah Trans. Auth. Sales Tax Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/15/32, Ser. A, AGM
|
|
|
1,063,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utah Trans. Auth. Sales Tax Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/15/36, Ser. A, AGM
|
|
|
1,055,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,118,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia4.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia College Bldg. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5.00%, 2/1/23, Ser. E-1
|
|
|
2,412,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia St. Hsg. Dev. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
4.55%, 1/1/24
|
|
|
1,496,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia St. Pub. Bldg. Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,050
|
|
|
5.00%, 8/1/29, Ser. B
|
|
|
2,251,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,159,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington2.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Northwest Wind Proj. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
4.75%, 7/1/21, NRE
|
|
|
520,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
King Cnty. Swr. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
5.00%, 1/1/31, FGIC / NRE
|
|
|
2,519,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,040,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
West Virginia1.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monongalia Cnty. Bldg. Comm. Hospital Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/1/30, Ser. A
|
|
|
1,424,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin3.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin St. Gen. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
6.00%, 5/1/33, Ser. A
|
|
$
|
2,263,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin St. Hlth. & Edl. Facs.
Auth. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
6.50%, 4/15/33
|
|
|
2,040,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,304,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wyoming3.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wyoming St. Farm Loan Brd. Cap. Facs. Rev.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
5.75%, 10/1/20
|
|
|
4,554,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term investments
(cost $187,062,161)
|
|
|
197,429,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENT2.1%
|
|
|
2,872
|
|
|
State Street Institutional Tax-Free Money Market Fund (cost $2,871,599)
|
|
$
|
2,871,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments145%
(cost $189,933,760)
|
|
|
200,301,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets in excess of
liabilities2.0%
|
|
|
2,803,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidation Value of Remarketed Preferred Stock(47.0%)
|
|
|
(65,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common
Stock100.0%
|
|
$
|
138,104,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
The following abbreviations are used in portfolio descriptions to indicate an obligation of credit support, in whole or in part:
|
AMBACAmbac Assurance Corporation.
AGMAssured Guaranty Municipal Corporation.
AGTAssured Guaranty Corp.
BHACBerkshire Hathaway Assurance Corporation.
FGICFinancial Guaranty Insurance Company.
FHAFederal Housing
Authority.
NRENational Public Finance Guarantee Corporation.
PSFTexas Permanent School Fund.
RADRadian Asset Assurance Inc.
(b)
|
Prerefunded and escrowed to maturity issues are secured by escrowed cash, government obligations, or other securities.
|
(c)
|
Security is not registered under the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be resold in transactions in accordance with Rule 144A to qualified institutional
buyers. At October 31, 2011, such securities amounted to a value of $927,325 or 0.67% of net assets applicable to common stock.
|
(d)
|
Non-income producing security.
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
7
The percentage shown for each investment category is the total value of that category as a
percentage of the net assets applicable to common stock of the Fund.
The Funds investments are carried at fair value which is defined as the price that the Fund would receive upon selling an investment in a timely transaction to an independent buyer in the principal
or most advantageous market of the investment. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs established to classify fair value measurements for disclosure purposes is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
Level 1quoted prices in active
markets for identical securities.
Level 2other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices
for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.).
Level 3significant
unobservable inputs (including the Funds own assumptions in determining fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in these
securities. The following is a summary of the inputs used to value each of the Funds investments at October 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Money Market Fund
|
|
$
|
2,871,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
197,429,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,871,599
|
|
|
$
|
197,429,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no Level 3 priced
securities held and there were no significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the year ended October 31, 2011.
Summary of Ratings as a Percentage of Long-Term Investments
At October 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Rating *
|
|
%
|
|
AAA
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
AA
|
|
|
56.8
|
|
A
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
BB
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
B
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
NR
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Individual ratings are grouped based on the lower rating of Standard & Poors Financial Services LLC (S&P) or Moodys Investors Service,
Inc. (Moodys) and are expressed using the S&P ratings scale. If a particular security is rated by either S&P or Moodys, but not both, then the single
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
|
rating is used. If a particular security is not rated by either S&P or Moodys, then a rating from Fitch Ratings Ltd. is used, if available.
|
Summary of State Diversification as
a Percentage of Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders
At October 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
State
|
|
%
|
|
California
|
|
|
19.8
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
Georgia
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
Indiana
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
Illinois
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
New York
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Nebraska
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Nevada
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Wyoming
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Wisconsin
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Arizona
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
District of Columbia
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Washington
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Short-Term Investment
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Maryland
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Rhode Island
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Kentucky
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
West Virginia
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Idaho
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145.0
|
|
Other assets in excess of liabilities
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Liquidation value of remarketed preferred stock
|
|
|
(47.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
October 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments, at value (cost $189,933,760)
|
|
$
|
200,301,190
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable
|
|
|
2,994,639
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
1,132
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
12,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
203,309,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fee (Note 3)
|
|
|
86,328
|
|
|
|
Administrative fee (Note 3)
|
|
|
16,443
|
|
|
|
Preferred shareholder dividends
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
101,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
204,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remarketed preferred stock ($.01 par value; 1,300 shares issued and outstanding, liquidation preference $50,000 per share) (Note
6)
|
|
$
|
65,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stock
|
|
$
|
138,104,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock ($.01 par value; 599,998,700 shares authorized, 8,507,456 issued and outstanding)
|
|
$
|
85,075
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
120,440,442
|
|
|
|
Undistributed net investment income
|
|
|
6,795,280
|
|
|
|
Accumulated net realized gain on investments
|
|
|
416,741
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation on investments
|
|
|
10,367,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stock
|
|
$
|
138,104,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per share of common stock
|
|
$
|
16.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
Statement of Operations
For the Year
Ended October 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
9,534,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees (Note 3)
|
|
|
994,111
|
|
|
|
Administrative fees (Note 3)
|
|
|
187,351
|
|
|
|
Directors fees
|
|
|
97,873
|
|
|
|
Remarketing agent fees
|
|
|
99,306
|
|
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
87,328
|
|
|
|
Custodian fees
|
|
|
62,659
|
|
|
|
Reports to shareholders
|
|
|
29,020
|
|
|
|
Transfer agent fees
|
|
|
29,307
|
|
|
|
Registration fees
|
|
|
19,781
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
39,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
1,646,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
7,887,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain on investments
|
|
|
416,741
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments
|
|
|
(2,523,297
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized loss
|
|
|
(2,106,556
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and Distributions on Remarketed Preferred Stock from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
(96,913
|
)
|
|
|
Net realized gains
|
|
|
(18,967
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividends and distributions on remarketed preferred stock
|
|
|
(115,880
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Net Assets Applicable to Common Stock Resulting from Operations
|
|
$
|
5,665,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements.
9
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
Statements of Changes
in Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year
Ended
October 31, 2011
|
|
|
For the Year
Ended
October 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
7,887,496
|
|
|
$
|
8,110,815
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain
|
|
|
416,741
|
|
|
|
1,059,984
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation
|
|
|
(2,523,297
|
)
|
|
|
3,627,702
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and distributions on remarketed preferred stock from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
(96,913
|
)
|
|
|
(138,990
|
)
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains
|
|
|
(18,967
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets applicable to common stock resulting from operations
|
|
|
5,665,060
|
|
|
|
12,659,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and
Distributions on Common Stock
from
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
(6,766,634
|
)
|
|
|
(6,515,631
|
)
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains
|
|
|
(893,139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividends and distributions on common stock
|
|
|
(7,659,773
|
)
|
|
|
(6,515,631
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase (decrease) in net assets
|
|
|
(1,994,713
|
)
|
|
|
6,143,880
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
|
140,099,681
|
|
|
|
133,955,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
$
|
138,104,968
|
|
|
$
|
140,099,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed net investment income at end of year
|
|
$
|
6,795,280
|
|
|
$
|
5,771,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements.
10
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
Financial Highlights
The table below provides information about income and
capital changes for a share of common stock outstanding throughout the years indicated (excluding supplemental data provided below):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended October 31,
|
|
PER SHARE DATA
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
16.47
|
|
|
$
|
15.75
|
|
|
$
|
13.96
|
|
|
$
|
15.88
|
|
|
$
|
16.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
(1)
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
|
|
0.97
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
(2.05
|
)
|
|
|
(0.49
|
)
|
Dividends and distributions on remarketed preferred stock from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) from investment operations
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
2.43
|
|
|
|
(1.32
|
)
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and distributions on common stock from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
(0.90
|
)
|
|
|
(0.76
|
)
|
|
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|
|
(0.60
|
)
|
|
|
(0.66
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividends and distributions on common stock
|
|
|
(0.90
|
)
|
|
|
(0.76
|
)
|
|
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|
|
(0.60
|
)
|
|
|
(0.66
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, end of year
|
|
$
|
16.23
|
|
|
$
|
16.47
|
|
|
$
|
15.75
|
|
|
$
|
13.96
|
|
|
$
|
15.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share market value, end of year
|
|
$
|
15.54
|
|
|
$
|
16.06
|
|
|
$
|
14.10
|
|
|
$
|
11.25
|
|
|
$
|
13.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INVESTMENT RETURN ON COMMON STOCK
(2)
|
|
|
2.73
|
%
|
|
|
18.57
|
%
|
|
|
31.62
|
%
|
|
|
(15.78
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.69
|
)
|
RATIOS TO AVERAGE NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK:
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
1.23
|
%
|
|
|
1.25
|
%
|
|
|
1.32
|
%
|
|
|
1.35
|
%
|
|
|
1.42
|
%
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
|
|
5.91
|
%
|
|
|
6.52
|
%
|
|
|
6.28
|
%
|
|
|
5.95
|
%
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio turnover rate
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Net assets applicable to common stock, end of year (000s omitted)
|
|
$
|
138,105
|
|
|
$
|
140,100
|
|
|
$
|
133,956
|
|
|
$
|
118,757
|
|
|
$
|
135,098
|
|
Asset coverage per share of preferred stock, end of year
|
|
$
|
156,235
|
|
|
$
|
157,769
|
|
|
$
|
153,043
|
|
|
$
|
141,352
|
|
|
$
|
153,921
|
|
Preferred stock outstanding (000s omitted)
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
(1)
|
Based on average number of shares of common stock outstanding.
|
(2)
|
Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of common stock at market value on the opening of the first day and a sale at market value on
the closing of the last day of each year reported. Dividends and distributions are assumed, for purposes of this calculation, to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Funds dividend reinvestment plan. Brokerage commissions are not
reflected.
|
(3)
|
Ratios calculated on the basis of income and expenses applicable to both the common and preferred stock relative to the average net assets applicable
to common stock. Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend and distributions on remarketed preferred stock.
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
Notes to Financial Statements
October 31, 2011
Note 1. Organization
DTF Tax-Free Income Inc. (the Fund) was organized in Maryland on September 24, 1991 as a diversified, closed-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act
of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). The Funds investment objective is current income exempt from regular federal income tax consistent with preservation of capital.
Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements.
A.
Securities Valuation:
The Fund
values its fixed income securities by using valuation data provided by an independent pricing service, market quotations, prices provided by market makers or estimates of market values obtained from yield data relating to instruments or securities
with similar characteristics in accordance with procedures established by the Board of Directors of the Fund. The relative liquidity of some securities in the Funds portfolio may adversely affect the ability of the Fund to accurately value
such securities. Any securities for which it is determined that market prices are unavailable or inappropriate are valued at fair value using a procedure determined in good faith by the Board of Directors and are generally classified as Level 2 or
3.
Investments in mutual funds are valued at
their net asset value as of the close of the New York Stock Exchange on the date of valuation and are classified as Level 1. Short-term investments having a maturity of 60 days or less at the time of purchase are valued on an amortized cost
basis, which approximates market value and are classified as Level 2.
B.
Securities Transactions and Investment Income:
Securities transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains and losses on sales of securities are determined on the identified
cost basis. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. The Fund amortizes premiums and accretes discounts on securities using the effective interest method.
C.
Federal Income Taxes:
It is the Funds
intention to comply with requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially all of its net taxable income and net capital gains to its shareholders. Therefore, no
provision for federal income tax or excise tax is required. Management of the Fund has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions that would require recognition in the financial statements. Since tax authorities can examine
previously filed tax returns, the Funds tax returns for each of the four years in the period ended October 31, 2011 are subject to such review.
D.
Dividends and Distributions:
The Fund will declare and pay dividends on its common stock monthly from net investment
income. Net long-term capital gains, if any, in excess of loss carryforwards are expected to be distributed annually. Dividends and distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividends on the Funds preferred stock are accrued and paid
on a weekly basis and are determined as described in Note 6.
The amount and timing of distributions are generally determined in accordance with federal tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
E.
Reclassification of Capital Accounts:
U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles require that certain components of net assets be adjusted to reflect permanent differences between financial and tax reporting. Accordingly, during the year ended October 31, 2011, there were no
reclassifications between components of net assets caused by permanent differences.
F.
Use of Estimates:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Note 3. Agreements and Management Arrangements
|
A. Adviser:
The Fund has an Advisory Agreement with Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co. (the
Adviser), a subsidiary of Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (Virtus). The investment advisory fee is payable monthly at an annual rate of 0.50% of the Funds average weekly managed assets, which is defined as the average
weekly value of the total assets of the Fund minus the sum of all accrued liabilities of the Fund (other than the aggregate amount of any outstanding borrowings or other indebtedness constituting financial leverage).
|
12
B. Administrator:
The Fund has an Administration Agreement with J.J.B. Hilliard,
W.L. Lyons, LLC (Hilliard). The administration fee is payable monthly at an annual rate of 0.14% of the Funds average weekly net assets, which is defined as the average weekly value of the total assets of the Fund minus the
sum of all accrued liabilities of the Fund (including aggregate amount of any outstanding borrowings or other indebtedness constituting financial leverage).
C. Directors:
The Fund pays each director not affiliated with the Adviser an annual fee plus a fee for certain meetings of the
board or committees of the board attended. Total fees paid to directors for the year ended October 31, 2011 were $97,873.
D. Affiliated Shareholders:
At October 31, 2011, Virtus Partners Inc. held 24,270 shares of the Fund. This represents 0.29% of
the Funds outstanding shares on this date. These shares may be sold at any time.
Note 4. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of
investment securities (excluding short-term investments) for the year ended October 31, 2011 aggregated $11,688,488 and $13,225,000, respectively.
Note 5. Distributions and Tax Information
The federal income tax basis of the Funds investments and the aggregate gross unrealized appreciation (depreciation) at October 31, 2011 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
Tax
Cost
|
|
|
Unrealized
Appreciation
|
|
|
Unrealized
Depreciation
|
|
|
Net
Unrealized
Appreciation
|
|
$
|
189,684,975
|
|
|
$
|
12,492,345
|
|
|
$
|
1,876,130
|
|
|
$
|
10,616,215
|
|
The tax character of
distributions paid during the fiscal years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/31/2011
|
|
|
10/31/2010
|
|
Distributions paid from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt income
|
|
$
|
6,838,551
|
|
|
$
|
6,263,825
|
|
Ordinary income
|
|
|
24,996
|
|
|
|
390,796
|
|
Long-term capital gains
|
|
|
912,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions
|
|
$
|
7,775,653
|
|
|
$
|
6,654,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At October 31, 2011,
the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed net tax-exempt income
|
|
$
|
6,446,446
|
|
Undistributed net ordinary income
|
|
|
100,049
|
|
Undistributed net long-term capital gains
|
|
|
416,741
|
|
Unrealized net appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
10,616,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,579,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The difference between
book-basis and tax-basis unrealized gains (losses) is attributable primarily to the difference between book and tax amortization methods for premiums and discounts on fixed income securities.
Note 6. Remarketed Preferred Stock
The Funds Charter authorizes the issuance of Remarketed Preferred Stock (RP). Accordingly, the Fund issued 1,300 shares
of RP on February 4, 1992. The RP has a liquidation value of $50,000 per share plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends.
Dividends on shares of RP are cumulative from their date of original issue and payable on each dividend payment date. Since February 2008,
the short-term auction and remarketed preferred stock market has been ineffective at matching buyers with sellers. This has impacted the Funds RP shares. The RP shares dividend rate was reset to the maximum applicable rate. These maximum
dividend rates ranged from 0.055% to 0.423% during the year ended October 31, 2011. A failed remarketing is not an event of default for the Fund, but it is a liquidity event for the holders of its RP shares. Recent auction and RP market
liquidity problems have triggered numerous failed auctions and remarketings for many closed-end funds. A failed remarketing occurs when there are more sellers of RP shares than buyers. It is impossible to predict how long this imbalance will last. A
successful remarketing of the Funds RP shares may not occur for a long period of time, if ever. Even if the RP market becomes more liquid, the holders of the Funds RP shares may not have the amount of liquidity they desire or the ability
to sell the RP shares at par.
Under the 1940
Act, the Fund may not declare dividends or make other distributions on shares of common stock or purchase any such shares if, at the time of the declaration, distribution or purchase, asset coverage with respect to the outstanding preferred stock
would be less than 200%.
13
The RP is redeemable at the option of the Fund, in whole or in part, on any dividend payment
date at $50,000 per share plus any accumulated or unpaid dividends, whether or not declared. The RP is also subject to a mandatory redemption at $50,000 per share plus any accumulated or unpaid dividends, whether or not declared, if certain
requirements relating to the composition of the assets and liabilities of the Fund as set forth in the Funds Charter are not satisfied.
The holders of RP have voting rights equal to the holders of common stock (one vote per share) and generally vote together with holders of
common stock as a single class. However, holders of RP are also entitled, voting as a separate class, to elect two of the Funds directors. In addition, the 1940 Act requires that along with approval by shareholders that might otherwise be
required, the approval of the holders of a majority of any outstanding shares of preferred stock, voting separately as a class, would be required to (a) adopt any plan of reorganization that would adversely affect the preferred stock, and
(b) take certain actions requiring a vote of security holders, including, among other things, changes in the Funds subclassification as a closed-end investment company or changes in its fundamental investment restrictions.
Note 7. Indemnifications
Under the Funds organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the
performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications to other parties. The Funds maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as
this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, the Fund has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these arrangements and expects the risk of loss to be remote.
Note 8. Recent Accounting Pronouncement
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04, Amendments
to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). ASU No. 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair
value between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU No. 2011-04 will require reporting entities to disclose quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements and the valuation processes used by the reporting entity
categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. In addition, ASU No. 2011-04 will require reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The new
and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of ASU No. 2011-04 and its impact on the financial statements has not been
determined.
Note 9. Subsequent Events
Subsequent to October 31, 2011, dividends paid on preferred stock totaled $7,917 through December 9, 2011. On November 3,
2011, the Fund announced a dividend of $0.0675 per share of common stock payable on December 30, 2011 to common shareholders of record on December 15, 2011. On December 9, 2011, the Fund announced a long term capital gains distribution of $0.048298
and a special taxable distribution of $0.011818 per share of common stock, payable on December 23, 2011 to shareholders of record on December 19, 2011. On December 12, 2011, the Board of Directors approved a dividend of $0.07 per share of common
stock payable on January 31, 2012 and February 29, 2012 to common shareholders of record on January 17, 2012, and February 15, 2012. Management has evaluated the impact all subsequent events on the Fund through the date the financial statements were
issued and has determined that, other than those described above, there were no subsequent events requiring recognition or disclosure in these financial statements.
14
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Shareholders and Board of Directors of
DTF Tax-Free Income Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and
liabilities of DTF Tax-Free Income Inc. (the Fund), including the schedule of investments, as of October 31, 2011, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of
the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Funds internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of
internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Funds internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2011, by correspondence with the custodian. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of DTF Tax-Free Income Inc. at October 31, 2011, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each
of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Chicago, Illinois
December 15, 2011
15
IMPORTANT TAX
INFORMATION (Unaudited)
Taxable distributions of ordinary income of $520 were paid to preferred shareholders, and $24,476 were paid to common shareholders during the taxable year ended October 31, 2011. The Fund designated
and paid long-term capital gains dividends of $18,967 to preferred shareholders and $893,139 to common shareholders during the taxable year ended October 31, 2011. All of the other net investment income distributions paid by the Fund qualify and are
designated as tax-exempt interest dividends for Federal income tax purposes.
REPORT ON ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS (Unaudited)
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Fund was held on May 3, 2011. The following is a description of each matter voted upon at the meeting and the number of votes cast on each matter:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Voted
For
|
|
|
Shares
Withheld
|
|
1. To elect three directors to serve until the Annual Meeting in the year indicated below or until their successors are duly
elected and qualified:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geraldine M. McNamara (2014)
|
|
|
4,853,692
|
|
|
|
123,664
|
|
Christian H. Poindexter (2014)
|
|
|
4,848,287
|
|
|
|
129,069
|
|
Carl F. Pollard (2014)*
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
*Elected
|
by the holders of the Funds preferred stock voting as a separate class.
|
Directors whose term of office continued beyond this meeting are as follows:
Stewart E. Conner, Robert J. Genetski, Nancy Lampton, Philip R. McLoughlin, Eileen A. Moran, Nathan I. Partain, and David J. Vitale.
16
DIVIDEND
REINVESTMENT AND CASH PURCHASE PLAN (Unaudited)
Pursuant to the Funds Dividend Reinvestment Plan (the Plan), common shareholders may elect to have all distributions of
dividends and capital gains automatically reinvested by American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (the Plan Agent) in shares of common stock of the Fund (Fund Shares) pursuant to the Plan; provided that such election
is subject to the power of the Board of Directors to declare capital gains distributions in the form of stock (if such a declaration is made by the Board of Directors, all shareholders who do not elect to receive cash will receive the distribution
in the form of stock whether or not they elect to participate in the Plan). Common shareholders who do not participate in the Plan will receive all distributions in cash (except as described above) paid by check in United States dollars mailed
directly to the shareholder of record (or if the shares are held in street or other nominee name, then to the nominee) by the Custodian, as dividend disbursing agent. Common shareholders who wish to participate in the Plan should contact the Fund at
6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, 11219 or call toll free (800) 937-5449.
The Plan Agent serves as agent for the common shareholders in administering the Plan. After the Fund declares a dividend or determines to make a capital gain distribution, if (1) the market price is
lower than net asset value, the participants in the Plan will receive the equivalent in Fund Shares valued at the market price determined as of the time of purchase (generally, the payment date of the dividend or distribution); or if (2) the
market price of Fund Shares on the payment date of the dividend or distribution is equal to or exceeds their net asset value, participants will be issued Fund Shares at the higher of net asset value or 95% of the market price. This discount reflects
savings in underwriting and other costs that the Fund otherwise will be required to incur to raise additional capital. If net asset value exceeds the market price of Fund Shares on the payment date or the Fund declares a dividend or other
distribution payable only in cash (i.e., if the board of directors precludes reinvestment in Fund Shares for that purpose), the Plan Agent will, as agent for the participants, receive the cash payment and use it to buy Fund Shares in the open
market, on the New York Stock Exchange, other national securities exchanges on which the Funds common stock is listed or elsewhere, for the participants accounts. If, before the Plan Agent has completed its purchases, the market price
exceeds the net asset value of a Fund Share, the average per share purchase price paid by the Plan Agent may exceed the net asset value of Fund Shares, resulting in the acquisition of fewer shares than if the dividend or distribution had been paid
in shares issued by the Fund. The Fund will not issue shares under the Plan below net asset value.
Participants in the Plan may withdraw from the Plan upon written notice to the Plan Agent and will receive certificates for whole Fund Shares and a cash payment will be made for any fraction of a Fund
Share.
There is no charge to participants for
reinvesting dividends or capital gain distributions, except for certain brokerage commissions, as described below. The Plan Agents fees for the handling of the reinvestment of dividends and distributions will be paid by the Fund. There will be
no brokerage commissions charged with respect to shares issued directly by the Fund. However, each participant will pay a pro rata share of brokerage commissions incurred with respect to the Plan Agents open market purchases in connection with
the reinvestment of dividends and distributions. The automatic reinvestment of dividends and distributions will not relieve participants of any federal income tax that may be payable on such dividends or distributions.
Experience under the Plan may indicate that changes are
desirable. Accordingly, the Fund reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan as applied to any dividend or distribution paid subsequent to written notice of the change sent to all shareholders of the Fund at least 90 days before the record
date for the dividend or distribution. The Plan also may be amended or terminated by the Plan Agent upon at least 90 days written notice to all common shareholders of the Fund. All correspondence concerning the Plan should be directed to the Fund at
the address on the front of this report.
The
Plan permits Plan participants to periodically purchase additional shares of common stock through the Plan by delivering to the Plan Agent a check for at least $100, but not more than $5,000, in any month. The Plan Agent will use the funds to
purchase shares in the open market or in private transactions as described above with respect to reinvestment of dividends and distributions. Purchases made pursuant to this feature of the Plan will be made commencing at the time of the first
dividend or distribution payment following the second business day after receipt of the funds for additional purchases, and may be aggregated with purchases of shares for reinvestment of the dividends and distributions.
17
Shares will be allocated to the accounts of participants purchasing additional shares at the average price per share, plus a service charge imposed by the Plan Agent and brokerage commissions (or
equivalent purchase costs) paid by the Plan Agent for all shares purchased by it, including for reinvestment of dividends and distributions. Checks drawn on a foreign bank are subject to collection and collection fees, and will be invested at the
time of the next distribution after funds are collected by the Plan Agent.
The Plan Agent will make every effort to invest funds promptly, and in no event more than 30 days after the Plan Agent receives a dividend or distribution, except where postponement is deemed necessary to
comply with applicable provisions of the federal securities laws.
Funds sent to the Plan Agent for voluntary additional share investment may be recalled by the participant by written notice received by the Plan Agent not later than two business days before the next
distribution payment date. If for any reason a regular monthly distribution is not paid by the Fund, funds for voluntary additional share investment will be returned to the participant, unless the participant specifically directs that they continue
to be held by the Plan Agent for subsequent investment.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Unaudited)
Since November 1, 2010: (i) there have been no
material changes in the Funds investment objectives or policies that have not been approved by the shareholders; (ii) there have been no changes in the Funds charter or by-laws that would delay or prevent a change in control of the
Fund which have not been approved by the shareholders; (iii) there have been no material changes in the principal risk factors associated with an investment in the Fund; and (iv) there have been no changes in the persons who are primarily
responsible for the day-to-day management of the Funds portfolio.
Additional information, if any, relating to the Funds directors and officers, in addition to such information as is found elsewhere in the Annual Report, may be requested by contacting the Fund at
the address provided in this report.
Notice is
hereby given in accordance with Section 23(c) of the 1940 Act that the Fund may from time to time purchase its shares of common stock in the open market.
INFORMATION ABOUT PROXY VOTING BY THE FUND (Unaudited)
Although the Fund does not typically hold voting securities,
the Funds Board of Directors has adopted proxy voting policies and procedures whereby Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co., the Funds investment adviser (the Adviser), would review any proxy solicitation materials
on a case-by-case basis and would vote any such securities in accordance with the Advisers good faith belief as to the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders. These proxy voting policies and procedures may be changed at any time by
the Funds Board of Directors. A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, by calling the Administrator toll-free
at (888) 878-7845 or is available on the Funds website www.dtffund.com or on the SECs website www.sec.gov.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE FUNDS PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS (Unaudited)
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third fiscal quarters
of each fiscal year (quarters ended January 31 and July 31) on Form N-Q. The Funds Form N-Q is available on the SECs web site at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SECs Public Reference Room in Washington
D.C. Information on the operation of the SECs Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) 732-0330. In addition, the Funds Form N-Q is available without charge, upon request, by calling the Administrator toll-free at
(888) 878-7845 or is available on the Funds website at www.dtffund.com.
18
DIRECTORS OF THE
FUND (Unaudited)
Set forth below are the names and certain biographical information about the directors of the Fund. Directors are divided into three classes and are elected to serve staggered three-year terms. All of the
directors are elected by the holders of the Funds common stock, except for Mr. Pollard and Ms. Lampton, who are elected by the holders of the Funds preferred stock. All of the current directors of the Fund, with the exception of Mr.
Partain, are classified as independent directors because none of them are interested persons of the Fund, as defined in the 1940 Act. Mr. Partain is an interested person of the Fund by reason of his position as President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Fund and President, Chief Investment Officer and employee of the Adviser. The term Fund Complex refers to the Fund and all the other investment companies advised by affiliates of Virtus.
The address for all directors is c/o Duff & Phelps
Investment Management Co., 200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 500, Chicago, Illinois 60606. All of the Funds directors currently serve on the Board of Directors of three other registered closed-end investment companies that are advised by Duff
& Phelps Investment Management Co.: DNP Select Income Fund Inc. (DNP), Duff & Phelps Global Utility Income Fund Inc. (DPG) and Duff & Phelps Utility and Corporate Bond Trust Inc. (DUC).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Age
|
|
Positions
Held
with Fund
|
|
Term of
Office and
Length of
Time Served
|
|
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 Years
|
|
Number of
Portfolios in
Fund Complex
Overseen by
Director
|
|
|
Other
Directorships Held
by the Director
During Past 5 Years
|
Stewart E. Conner
Age:
70
|
|
Director
|
|
Term expires 2012; Director since 2009
|
|
Attorney, Wyatt Tarrant & Combs LLP since 1966 (Chairman, Executive Committee 2000-2004, Managing Partner 1988-2000)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Genetski
Age:
68
|
|
Director
|
|
Term expires 2013; Director since 2009
|
|
President, Robert Genetski & Associates, Inc. (economic and financial consulting firm) since 1991; Senior Managing Director, Chicago Capital Inc. (financial services firm)
1995-2001; former Senior Vice President and Chief Economist, Harris Trust & Savings Bank, author of several books; regular contributor to the Nikkei Financial Daily
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Director, Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. 2005-2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nancy Lampton
Age: 69
|
|
Director and Vice Chairperson of the Board
|
|
Term expires 2012; Director since 2005
|
|
Vice Chairperson of the Board of the Fund and DUC since May 2007, DNP since February 2006 and DPG since May 2011; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Hardscuffle Inc. (insurance
holding company) since January 2000; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, American Life and Accident Insurance Company of Kentucky since 1971
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Director, Constellation Energy Group, Inc. (public utility holding company); Advisory Board Member, CanAlaska Uranium
Ltd.
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Age
|
|
Positions
Held
with Fund
|
|
Term of
Office and
Length of
Time Served
|
|
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 Years
|
|
Number of
Portfolios in
Fund Complex
Overseen by
Director
|
|
|
Other
Directorships Held
by the Director
During Past 5 Years
|
Philip R. McLoughlin
Age:
65
|
|
Director
|
|
Term expires 2013; Director since 1996
|
|
Partner, CrossPond Partners, LLC (investment management consultant) since 2006; Managing Director, SeaCap Partners LLC (strategic advisory firm) 2009-2010; Private investor
2004-2006; Consultant to Phoenix Investment Partners, Ltd. (PXP) 2002-2004; Chief Executive Officer of PXP, 1995-2002 (Chairman 1997-2002, Director 1995-2002); Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer, The Phoenix Companies,
Inc. 2000-2002
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, The World Trust Fund (closed-end fund); Director, Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd. (insurance holding company, formerly known as PXRE Group Ltd.)
1999-2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geraldine M. McNamara
Age: 60
|
|
Director
|
|
Term expires 2014; Director since 2003
|
|
Private investor since July 2006; Managing Director, U.S. Trust Company of New York 1982-July 2006
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eileen A. Moran
Age:
57
|
|
Director
|
|
Term expires 2012; Director since 1996
|
|
Private investor since April 2011; President and Chief Executive Officer, PSEG Resources L.L.C. (investment company) 1990-April 2011
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christian H. Poindexter
Age
73
|
|
Director
|
|
Term expires 2014; Director since 2008
|
|
Retired Executive, Constellation Energy Group, Inc. (public utility holding company) since March 2003 (Executive Committee Chairman, July 2002-March 2003; Chairman of the Board,
April 1999-July 2002; Chief Executive Officer, April 1999-October 2001; President, April 1999-October 2000); Chairman, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, January 1993-July 2002 (Chief Executive Officer, January 1993-July 2000; President, March
1998-October 2000; Director, 1988-2003)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Director, The Baltimore Life Insurance Company (1998-November 2011)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carl F. Pollard
Age: 73
|
|
Director
|
|
Term expires 2014; Director since 2006
|
|
Owner, Hermitage Farm LLC (thoroughbred breeding) since January 1995; Chairman, Columbia Healthcare Corporation 1993-1994; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Galen Health Care,
Inc. March-August 1993; President and Chief Operating Officer, Humana Inc. 1991-1993 (previously Senior Executive Vice President, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Director, Churchill Downs Incorporated 2001-June 2011 (Director 1985-June 2011)
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Age
|
|
Positions
Held
with Fund
|
|
Term of
Office and
Length of
Time Served
|
|
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 Years
|
|
Number of
Portfolios in
Fund Complex
Overseen by
Director
|
|
|
Other
Directorships Held
by the Director
During Past 5 Years
|
David J. Vitale
Age:
65
|
|
Director and Chairman of the Board
|
|
Term expires 2012;
Director since 2005
|
|
Chairman of the Board of the Fund, DNP and DUC since May 2009 and DPG since May 2011; Executive Chairman, Urban Partnership Bank since August 2010; Private investor January
2009-August 2010; Senior Advisor to the CEO, Chicago Public Schools April 2007-December 2008; Chief Administrative Officer, Chicago Public Schools April 2007-December 2008; (Chief Administrative Officer, Chicago Public Schools April 2003-April
2007); President and Chief Executive Officer, Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc. March 2001-November 2002; Private investor 1999-2001; Vice Chairman and Director, Bank One Corporation, 1998-1999; Vice Chairman and Director, First Chicago
NBD Corporation, and President, The First National Bank of Chicago, 1995-1998; Vice Chairman, First Chicago Corporation and The First National Bank of Chicago, 1993-1998 (Director, 1992-1998; Executive Vice President, 1986-1993)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Director, UAL Corporation (airline holding company), Urban Partnership Bank, Alion Science and Technology Corporation, ISO New England Inc. (independent system operator of New
Englands electricity supply), Ariel Capital Management, LLC and Wheels, Inc. (automobile fleet management)
|
|
|
|
|
Interested Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nathan I. Partain, CFA
Age: 55
|
|
Director
|
|
Term expires 2013; Director since 2007
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Fund and DUC since 2004; President and Chief Investment Officer of the Adviser since April 2005 (Executive Vice President 1997-2005);
President and Chief Executive Officer of DNP since February 2001 (Chief Investment Officer since April 1998; Executive Vice President, April 1998-February 2001; Senior Vice President, January 1997-April 1998); Director of Utility Research, Duff
& Phelps Investment Research Co. 1989-1996 (Director of Equity Research, 1993-1996 and Director of Fixed Income Research, 1993)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Director, Otter Tail Corporation (manages diversified operations in the electric, plastics, manufacturing, health services and other business operations
sectors)
|
21
OFFICERS OF THE
FUND (Unaudited)
The officers serve until their respective successors are chosen and qualified. The Funds officers receive no compensation from the Fund, but are also officers of the Adviser or Virtus and receive
compensation in such capacities. Information pertaining to Nathan I. Partain, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Fund, is provided above under the caption Interested Director. Information pertaining to the other
officers of the Fund is set forth below. The address for all officers noted below is c/o Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co., 200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 500, Chicago, Illinois 60606.
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Age
|
|
Position(s) Held with Fund and Length of
Time
Served
|
|
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5
Years
|
|
|
|
T. Brooks Beittel, CFA
Age:
61
|
|
Secretary since 2005
|
|
Executive Vice President and Assistant Chief Investment Officer of the Adviser since 2008 (Senior Vice President 1993-2008; Vice President 1987-1993)
|
|
|
|
Timothy M. Heaney, CFA
Age:
46
|
|
Chief Investment Officer since 2004; Vice President since 1997 (Portfolio Manager 1997-2004)
|
|
Senior Vice President of the Adviser since 2004 (Vice President 1997-2004); Senior Portfolio Manager, Fixed Income, Newfleet Asset Management, LLC since 2011; Senior Managing
Director, Fixed Income, Virtus Investment Advisors, Inc. (f/k/a Phoenix Investment Counsel, Inc.) 2006-2011, (Managing Director, Fixed Income 1997-2006; Director, Fixed Income Research 1996-1997; Investment Analyst, 1992-1996)
|
|
|
|
Lisa H. Leonard
Age:
48
|
|
Vice President since 2006
|
|
Vice President of the Adviser since 2006 (Assistant Vice President 1998-2006); Portfolio Manager, Fixed Income, Newfleet Asset Management, LLC since 2011; Managing Director, Fixed
Income, Virtus Investment Advisors, Inc. (f/k/a Phoenix Investment Counsel, Inc.) 2006-2011, (Director, Fixed Income 1998-2006, Director, Investment Operations 1994-1998, Fixed Income Trader 1987-1994)
|
|
|
|
Alan M. Meder, CFA, CPA
Age:
52
|
|
Treasurer since 2000; Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Assistant Secretary since 2002
|
|
Senior Vice President of the Adviser since 1994; Chief Risk Officer since 2001; Member of Board of Governors of CFA Institute since 2008 (currently serves as Vice Chairman of the
Board); Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council Member since 2011
|
|
|
|
Joyce B. Riegel
Age:
57
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer since 2003
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Adviser since 2004 (Vice President and Compliance Officer 2002-2004); Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer, Stein
Roe Investment Counsel LLC 2001-2002
|
22
As of the end
of the period covered by this report, the registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer (the Code of Ethics). The registrants principal
financial officer also performs the functions of principal accounting officer.
The text of the Code of Ethics is posted on
the registrants web site at http://www.DTFfund.com. In the event that the registrant makes any amendment to or grants any waiver from the provisions of the Code of Ethics, the registrant intends to disclose such amendment or waiver on its web
site within five business days.
ITEM 3.
|
AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.
|
The registrants board of directors has determined that two members of its audit committee, Philip R. McLoughlin and Carl F. Pollard,
are audit committee financial experts and that each of them is independent for purposes of this Item.
ITEM 4.
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
|
The following table sets forth the aggregate audit and non-audit fees billed to the registrant for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the registrants principal
accountant (the Independent Auditor).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended
October 31, 2011
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended
October 31, 2010
|
|
Audit Fees (1)
|
|
$
|
49,000
|
|
|
$
|
48,000
|
|
Audit-Related Fees (2)(6)
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
Tax Fees (3)(6)
|
|
|
5,700
|
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
All Other Fees (4)(6)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Aggregate Non-Audit Fees (5)(6)
|
|
|
9,300
|
|
|
|
8,900
|
|
(1)
|
Audit Fees are fees billed for professional services rendered by the Independent Auditor for the audit of the registrants annual financial statements and for
services that are normally provided by the Independent Auditor in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
|
(2)
|
Audit-Related Fees are fees billed for assurance and related services by the Independent Auditor that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the
registrants financial statements and are not reported under the caption Audit Fees. In both years shown in the table, such services consisted of the performance of periodic agreed-upon procedures relating to the registrants
preferred stock.
|
(3)
|
Tax Fees are fees billed for professional services rendered by the Independent Auditor for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. In both years shown in the
table, such services consisted of preparation of the registrants annual federal and state income tax returns and excise tax returns.
|
(4)
|
All Other Fees are fees billed for products and services provided by the Independent Auditor, other than the services reported under the captions Audit
Fees, Audit-Related Fees and Tax Fees.
|
(5)
|
Aggregate Non-Audit Fees are non-audit fees billed by the Independent Auditor for services rendered to the registrant, the registrants investment adviser (the
Adviser) and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant (collectively, the Covered Entities). During both years shown in the table, no
portion of such fees related to services rendered by the Independent Auditor to the Adviser or any other Covered Entity.
|
(6)
|
No portion of these fees was approved by the registrants audit committee after the beginning of the engagement pursuant to the waiver of the pre-approval
requirement for certain
de minimis
non-audit services described in Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and applicable regulations.
|
The audit committee of the board of directors of the registrant (the Audit Committee), jointly with the audit committee of
the board of directors of DNP Select Income Fund Inc. (DNP) and Duff & Phelps Utility and Corporate Bond Trust Inc. (DUC), has adopted a Joint Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy to govern the provision by the
Independent Auditor of the following services: (i) all engagements for audit and non-audit services to be provided by the Independent Auditor to the registrant and (ii) all engagements for non-audit services to be provided by the
Independent Auditor to the Adviser or any other Covered Entity, if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the registrant. With respect to non-audit services rendered by the Independent Auditor to the Adviser or
any other Covered Entity that were not required to be pre-approved by the Audit Committee because they do not relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the registrant, the Audit Committee has nonetheless considered whether the
provision of such services is compatible with maintaining the independence of the Independent Auditor.
Set forth below is a
copy of the Joint Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy (omitting data in the appendices relating to DNP and DUC).
DNP SELECT
INCOME FUND INC.
DUFF & PHELPS UTILITY AND CORPORATE BOND TRUST INC.
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES PRE-APPROVAL POLICY
(adopted February 22, 2011 and amended August 11, 2011)
I.
|
Statement of Principles
|
Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act), the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of each of DNP Select Income
Fund Inc., Duff & Phelps Utility and Corporate Bond Trust Inc. and DTF Tax-Free Income Inc. (each a Fund and, collectively, the Funds)
(
1
)
is responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of the independent auditor. As part of this
responsibility, the Audit Committee is required to pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditor in order to assure that they do not impair the auditors independence from the Fund. To implement these
provisions of the Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) has issued rules specifying the types of services that an independent auditor may not provide to its audit client, as well as the Audit Committees
administration of the engagement of the independent auditor. Accordingly, the Audit Committee has adopted this Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy (this Policy), which sets forth the procedures and the conditions pursuant to
which services proposed to be performed by the independent auditor may be pre-approved.
(1)
|
This Joint Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy has been adopted by the Audit Committee of each Fund. Solely for the sake of clarity and simplicity,
this Joint Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy has been drafted as if there is a single Fund, a single Audit Committee and a single Board. The terms Audit Committee and Board mean the Audit Committee and Board of each Fund,
respectively, unless the context otherwise requires. The Audit Committee and the Board of each Fund, however, shall act separately and in the best interests of its respective Fund.
|
The SECs rules establish two different approaches to pre-approving services, which the SEC considers
to be equally valid. Proposed services either: may be pre-approved without consideration of specific case-by-case services by the Audit Committee (general pre-approval); or require the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee
(specific pre-approval). The Audit Committee believes that the combination of these two approaches in this Policy will result in an effective and efficient procedure to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditor. As set
forth in this Policy, unless a type of service has received general pre-approval, it will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee if it is to be provided by the independent auditor. Any proposed services exceeding pre-approved cost
levels or budgeted amounts will also require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.
For both types of pre-approval, the Audit
Committee will consider whether such services are consistent with the SECs rules on auditor independence. The Audit Committee will also consider whether the independent auditor is best positioned to provide the most effective and efficient
service, for reasons such as its familiarity with the Funds business, people, culture, accounting systems, risk profile and other factors, and whether the service might enhance the Funds ability to manage or control risk or improve audit
quality. All such factors will be considered as a whole, and no one factor should necessarily be determinative.
Under the SECs rules,
the Audit Committee must pre-approve non-audit services provided not only to the Fund but also to the Funds investment adviser and other affiliated entities that provide ongoing services to the Fund if the independent accountants
services to those affiliated entities have a direct impact on the Funds operations or financial reporting.
The Audit Committee is also
mindful of the relationship between fees for audit and non-audit services in deciding whether to pre-approve any such services and may determine, for each fiscal year, the appropriate ratio between the total amount of fees for audit, audit-related
and tax services (including any audit-related or tax service fees for affiliates that are subject to pre-approval) and the total amount of fees for certain permissible non-audit services classified as all other services (including any
such services for affiliates that are subject to pre-approval).
The appendices to this Policy describe the audit, audit-related, tax and
all other services that have the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The term of any general pre-approval is 12 months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee considers a different period and states otherwise.
The Audit Committee will annually review and pre-approve the services that may be provided by the independent auditor without obtaining specific pre-approval from the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will add to or subtract from the list of
general pre-approved services from time to time, based on subsequent determinations.
The purpose of this Policy is to set forth the
procedures by which the Audit Committee intends to fulfill its responsibilities. It does not delegate the Audit Committees responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditor to management.
The independent auditor has reviewed this Policy and believes that implementation of this Policy will not adversely affect the auditors
independence.
As provided in the Act and the
SECs rules, the Audit Committee may delegate either type of pre-approval authority to one or more of its members who are independent directors. Any member to whom such authority is delegated must report, for informational purposes only, any
pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. In accordance with the foregoing provisions, the Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval to its chairman, since under the Audit Committees charter each member of
the Audit Committee, including the chairman, is required to be an independent director.
The annual audit services
engagement terms and fees will be subject to the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee. Audit services include the annual financial statement audit and other procedures required to be performed by the independent auditor to be able to form an
opinion on the Funds financial statements. These other procedures include information systems and procedural reviews and testing performed in order to understand and place reliance on the systems of internal control, and consultations relating
to the audit. The Audit Committee will monitor the audit services engagement as necessary, but no less than on a semiannual basis, and will also approve, if necessary, any changes in terms, conditions and fees resulting from changes in audit scope,
Fund structure or other items.
In addition to the annual audit services engagement approved by the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee may
grant general pre-approval to other audit services, which are those services that only the independent auditor reasonably can provide. Other audit services may include statutory audits and services associated with SEC registration statements (on
Forms N-1A, N-2, N-3, N-4, etc.), periodic reports and other documents filed with the SEC or other documents issued in connection with securities offerings.
The Audit Committee has pre-approved the audit services in Appendix A. All other audit services not listed in Appendix A must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
IV.
|
Audit-Related Services
|
Audit-related services
are assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Funds financial statements or that are traditionally performed by the independent auditor. Because the Audit Committee believes
that the provision of audit-related services does not impair the independence of the auditor and is consistent with the SECs rules on auditor independence, the Audit Committee may grant general pre-approval to audit-related services.
Audit-related services include, among others, accounting consultations related to accounting, financial reporting or disclosure matters not classified as audit services; assistance with understanding and implementing new accounting and
financial reporting guidance from rulemaking authorities; agreed-upon or expanded audit procedures related to accounting and/or billing records required to respond to or comply with financial, accounting or regulatory reporting matters; and
assistance with internal control reporting requirements under form N-SAR.
The Audit Committee has pre-approved the audit-related services in
Appendix B. All other audit-related services not listed in Appendix B must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee believes that
the independent auditor can provide tax services to the Fund such as tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice without impairing the auditors independence, and the SEC has stated that the independent auditor may provide such services. Hence,
the Audit Committee believes it may grant general pre-approval to those tax services that have historically been provided by the auditor, that the Audit Committee has reviewed and believes would not impair the independence of the auditor, and that
are consistent with the SECs rules on auditor independence. The Audit Committee will not permit the retention of the independent auditor in connection with a transaction initially recommended by the independent auditor, the sole business
purpose of which may be tax avoidance and the tax treatment of which may not be supported in the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations. The Audit Committee will consult with the Funds Administrator or outside counsel to determine that
the tax planning and reporting positions are consistent with this Policy.
Pursuant to the preceding paragraph, the Audit Committee has
pre-approved the tax services in Appendix C. All tax services involving large and complex transactions not listed in Appendix C must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee, including: tax services proposed to be provided by the
independent auditor to any executive officer or director of the Fund, in his or her individual capacity, where such services are paid for by the Fund.
The Audit Committee
believes, based on the SECs rules prohibiting the independent auditor from providing specific non-audit services, that other types of non-audit services are permitted. Accordingly, the Audit Committee believes it may grant general pre-approval
to those permissible non-audit services classified as all other services that it believes are routine and recurring services, would not impair the independence of the auditor and are consistent with the SECs rules on auditor independence.
The Audit Committee has pre-approved the all other services in Appendix D. Permissible all other services not listed
in Appendix D must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
A list of the SECs prohibited non-audit services is attached to
this Policy as Appendix E. The SECs rules and relevant guidance should be consulted to determine the precise definitions of these services and the applicability of exceptions to certain of the prohibitions.
VII.
|
Pre-Approval Fee Levels or Budgeted Amounts
|
Pre-approval fee levels or budgeted amounts for all services to be provided by the independent auditor will be established annually by the Audit
Committee. (Note that separate amounts may be specified for services to the Fund and for services to other affiliated entities that are subject to pre-approval.) Any proposed services exceeding these levels or amounts will require specific
pre-approval by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is mindful of the overall relationship of fees for audit and non-audit services in determining whether to pre-approve any such services. For each fiscal year, the Audit Committee may determine
the appropriate ratio between the total amount of fees for audit, audit-related and tax services for the Fund (including any audit-related or tax services fees for affiliates that are subject to pre-approval), and the total amount of fees for
services classified as all other services (including any such services for affiliates that are subject to pre-approval).
All requests or applications for
services to be provided by the independent auditor that do not require specific approval by the Audit Committee will be submitted to the Funds Administrator and must include a detailed description of the services to be rendered. The
Administrator will determine whether such services are included within the list of services that have received the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will be informed on a timely basis of any such services rendered by
the independent auditor.
Requests or applications to provide services that require specific approval by the Audit Committee will be submitted
to the Audit Committee by both the independent auditor and the Funds Administrator, and must include a joint statement as to whether, in their view, the request or application is consistent with the SECs rules on auditor independence.
The Audit Committee has designated the Funds Administrator to monitor the performance of all services provided by the independent
auditor and to determine whether such services are in compliance with this Policy. The Administrator will report to the Audit Committee on a periodic basis on the results of its monitoring. Both the Administrator and any member of management will
immediately report to the Chairman of the Audit Committee any breach of this Policy that comes to their attention.
IX.
|
Additional Requirements
|
The Audit Committee has
determined to take additional measures on an annual basis to meet its responsibility to oversee the work of the independent auditor and to assure the auditors independence from the Fund, such as reviewing a formal written statement from the
independent auditor delineating all relationships between the independent auditor and the Fund, consistent with applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountants communications with
the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussing with the independent auditor its methods and procedures for ensuring independence.
Appendix A
Pre-Approved Audit Services for Fiscal Year Ending in 2011
Dated: February 22, 2011
and amended August 11, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
DTF
|
|
|
Affiliates
(2)
|
|
1. Services required under generally accepted auditing standards to perform the audit of the annual financial statements of
the Fund, including performance of tax qualification tests relating to the Funds regulated investment company status and issuance of an internal control letter for the Funds Form N-SAR
|
|
$
|
49,000
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
2. Reading of the Funds semi-annual financial statements
|
|
|
|
(3
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
3. Services associated with SEC registration statements, periodic reports and other documents filed with the SEC or other
documents issued in connection with securities offerings (e.g., comfort letters, consents), and assistance in responding to SEC comment letters
|
|
|
|
(3
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
4. Consultations by the Funds management as to the accounting or disclosure treatment of transactions or events
and/or the actual or potential impact of final or proposed rules, standards or interpretations by the SEC, FASB, or other regulatory or standard setting bodies (Note: Under SEC rules, some consultations may be audit-related services
rather than audit services)
|
|
|
|
(3
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
(1)
|
In addition to the fees shown in the table, the Audit Committee has pre-approved the reimbursement of the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by
the independent accountant in providing the pre-approved services.
|
(2)
|
These affiliates include the Funds investment adviser (excluding sub-advisers) and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control
with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the Fund. The Funds Audit Committee must pre-approve non-audit services provided not only to the Fund but also to the adviser and such other affiliated entities, where such entities provide
ongoing services to the Fund
and
the independent accountants services to such entities have a direct impact on the Funds operations or financial reporting.
|
(3)
|
Fees for services designated with a
(3)
shall either be included in the fee approved for item 1 of this Appendix A or may be separately
charged, provided that the aggregate separate charges for all services designated with a
(3)
in Appendices A and B may not exceed 10% of the fee approved for item 1 of this Appendix A.
|
Appendix B
Pre-Approved Audit-Related Services for Fiscal Year Ending in 2011
Dated:
February 22, 2011 and amended August 11, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
DTF
|
|
|
Affiliates
(2)
|
|
1. Issuance of annual agreed-upon procedures letters relating to the preferred stock or commercial paper, if any, issued by
the Fund
|
|
$
|
3,600
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
2. Agreed-upon or expanded audit procedures related to accounting records required to respond to or comply with financial,
accounting or regulatory reporting matters
|
|
|
|
(3
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
3. Consultations by the Funds management as to the accounting or disclosure treatment of transactions or events
and/or the actual or potential impact of final or proposed rules, standards or interpretations by the SEC, FASB, or other regulatory or standard-setting bodies (Note: Under SEC rules, some consultations may be audit services rather than
audit-related services)
|
|
|
|
(3
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
4. General assistance with implementation of the requirements of SEC rules or listing standards promulgated pursuant to the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
|
|
(3
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
(1)
|
In addition to the fees shown in the table, the Audit Committee has pre-approved the reimbursement of the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by
the independent accountant in providing the pre-approved services.
|
(2)
|
These affiliates include the Funds investment adviser (excluding sub-advisers) and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control
with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the Fund. The Funds Audit Committee must pre-approve non-audit services provided not only to the Fund but also to the adviser and such other affiliated entities, where such entities provide
ongoing services to the Fund
and
the independent accountants services to such entities have a direct impact on the Funds operations or financial reporting.
|
(3)
|
Fees for services designated with a
(3)
shall either be included in the fee approved for item 1 of Appendix A or may be separately
charged, provided that the aggregate separate charges for all services designated with a
(3)
in Appendices A and B may not exceed 10% of the fee approved for item 1 of Appendix A.
|
Appendix C
Pre-Approved Tax Services for Fiscal Year Ending in 2011
Dated: February 22, 2011 and
amended August 11, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
DTF
|
|
|
Affiliates
(2)
|
|
1. Preparation of federal and state tax returns, including excise tax returns, and review of required distributions to
avoid excise tax
|
|
$
|
5,700
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
2. Consultations with the Funds management as to the tax treatment of transactions or events
|
|
|
|
(3
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
3. Tax advice and assistance regarding statutory, regulatory or administrative developments
|
|
|
|
(3
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
(1)
|
In addition to the fees shown in the table, the Audit Committee has pre-approved the reimbursement of the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by
the independent accountant in providing the pre-approved services.
|
(2)
|
These affiliates include the Funds investment adviser (excluding sub-advisers) and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control
with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the Fund. The Funds Audit Committee must pre-approve non-audit services provided not only to the Fund but also to the adviser and such other affiliated entities, where such entities provide
ongoing services to the Fund
and
the independent accountants services to such entities have a direct impact on the Funds operations or financial reporting.
|
(3)
|
Fees for services designated with a (3) shall either be included in the fee approved for item 1 of this Appendix C or may be separately
charged, provided that the aggregate separate charges for all services designated with a (3) in this Appendix C may not exceed 10% of the fee approved for item 1 of this Appendix C.
|
Appendix D
Pre-Approved All Other Services for Fiscal Year Ending in 2011
Dated:
February 22, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
DTF
|
|
Affiliates
(2)
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
In addition to the fees shown in the table, the Audit Committee has pre-approved the reimbursement of the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by
the independent accountant in providing the pre-approved services.
|
(2)
|
These affiliates include the Funds investment adviser (excluding sub-advisers) and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control
with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the Fund. The Funds Audit Committee must pre-approve non-audit services provided not only to the Fund but also to the adviser and such other affiliated entities, where such entities provide
ongoing services to the Fund
and
the independent accountants services to such entities have a direct impact on the Funds operations or financial reporting.
|
Appendix E
Prohibited Non-Audit Services
|
|
|
Bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements of the audit client
|
|
|
|
Financial information systems design and implementation
|
|
|
|
Appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions or contribution-in-kind reports
|
|
|
|
Internal audit outsourcing services
|
|
|
|
Broker-dealer, investment adviser or investment banking services
|
|
|
|
Expert services unrelated to the audit
|
ITEM 5.
|
AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.
|
The registrant has a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The members of the Audit Committee are Robert J. Genetski,
Philip R. McLoughlin and Carl F. Pollard.
A schedule of
investments is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of this report.
ITEM 7.
|
DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
|
Although the registrant does not typically hold voting securities, the registrants board of directors has adopted the following
statement of policy with respect to proxy voting.
DNP SELECT INCOME FUND INC.
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
DUFF & PHELPS UTILITY AND CORPORATE BOND TRUST INC.
DUFF &
PHELPS GLOBAL UTILITY INCOME FUND INC.
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Last Revised June 14, 2011
I.
|
Definitions
.
As used in these Policies and Procedures, the following terms shall have the meanings ascribed below:
|
|
A.
|
Adviser refers to Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co.
|
|
B.
|
Advisers Act refers to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended.
|
|
C.
|
corporate governance matters refers to changes involving the corporate ownership or structure of an issuer whose voting securities are within a portfolio
holding, including changes in the state of incorporation, changes in capital structure, including increases and decreases of capital and preferred stock issuance, mergers and other corporate restructurings, and anti-takeover provisions such as
staggered boards, poison pills, and supermajority voting provisions.
|
|
D.
|
Delegate refers to the Adviser, any proxy committee to which the Adviser delegates its responsibilities hereunder and any qualified, independent
organization engaged by the Adviser to vote proxies on behalf of the Fund.
|
|
E.
|
executive compensation matters refers to stock option plans and other executive compensation issues.
|
|
F.
|
Fund refers to DTF Tax-Free Income Inc.
|
|
G.
|
Investment Company Act refers to the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.
|
|
H.
|
portfolio holding refers to any company or entity whose voting securities are held within the investment portfolio of the Fund as of the date a proxy is
solicited.
|
|
I.
|
proxy contests refer to any meeting of shareholders of an issuer for which there are at least two sets of proxy statements and proxy cards, one solicited by
management and the others by a dissident or group of dissidents.
|
|
J.
|
social issues refers to social, political and environmental issues.
|
|
K.
|
takeover refers to hostile or friendly efforts to effect radical change in the voting control of the board of directors of a
company.
|
II.
|
General policy
.
It is the intention of the Fund to exercise voting stock ownership rights in portfolio holdings in a manner that is reasonably
anticipated to further the best economic interests of shareholders of the Fund. Accordingly, the Fund or its Delegate(s) shall endeavor to analyze and vote all proxies that are considered likely to have financial implications, and, where
appropriate, to participate in corporate governance, shareholder proposals, management communications and legal proceedings. The Fund and its Delegate(s) must also identify potential or actual conflicts of interests in voting proxies and address any
such conflict of interest in accordance with these Policies and Procedures.
|
III.
|
Factors to consider when voting
.
|
|
A.
|
The Delegate may abstain from voting when it concludes that the effect on shareholders economic interests or the value of the portfolio holding is indeterminable
or insignificant.
|
|
B.
|
In analyzing
anti-takeover measures
, the Delegate shall vote on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration such factors as overall long-term financial
performance of the target company relative to its industry competition. Key measures which shall be considered include, without limitation, five-year annual compound growth rates for sales, operating income, net income, and total shareholder returns
(share price appreciation plus dividends). Other financial indicators that will be considered include margin analysis, cash flow, and debt levels.
|
|
C.
|
In analyzing
proxy contests for control
, the Delegate shall vote on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration such factors as long-term financial
performance of the target company relative to its industry; managements track record; background to the proxy contest; qualifications of director nominees (both slates); evaluation of what each side is offering shareholders as well as the
likelihood that the proposed objectives and goals can be met; and stock ownership positions.
|
|
D.
|
In analyzing
contested elections for director
, the Delegate shall vote on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration such factors as the qualifications of
all director nominees. The Delegate shall also consider the independence and attendance record of board and key committee members. A review of the corporate governance profile shall be completed highlighting entrenchment devices that may reduce
accountability.
|
|
E.
|
In analyzing
corporate governance matters
, the Delegate shall vote on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration such factors as tax and economic benefits
associated with amending an issuers state of incorporation, dilution or improved accountability associated with changes in capital structure, management proposals to require a supermajority shareholder vote to amend charters and bylaws and
bundled or conditioned proxy proposals.
|
|
F.
|
In analyzing
executive compensation matters
, the Delegate shall vote on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration a companys overall pay program and
demonstrated pay-for-performance philosophy, and generally disfavoring such problematic pay practices as (i) repricing or replacing of underwater stock options, (ii) excessive perquisites or tax gross-ups and (iii) change-in-control payments that
are excessive or are payable based on a single trigger (
i.e.,
without involuntary job loss or substantial diminution of duties). With respect to the advisory vote on the frequency of say on pay votes, the Delegate
shall vote in favor of an annual frequency for such votes.
|
|
G.
|
The Delegate shall generally vote against shareholder proposals on
social issues,
except where the Delegate determines that a different position would be in the
clear economic interests of the Fund and its shareholders.
|
IV.
|
Responsibilities of Delegates
.
|
|
A.
|
In the absence of a specific direction to the contrary from the Board of Directors of the Fund, the Adviser will be responsible for voting proxies for all portfolio
holdings in accordance with these Policies and Procedures, or for delegating such responsibility as described below.
|
|
B.
|
The Adviser may delegate its responsibilities hereunder to a proxy committee established from time to time by the Adviser and may engage one or more qualified,
independent organizations to vote proxies on behalf of the Fund. The Adviser shall be responsible for the ensuring that any such Delegate is informed of and complies with these Policies and Procedures.
|
|
C.
|
In voting proxies on behalf of the Fund, each Delegate shall have a duty of care to safeguard the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders and to act in
accordance with these Policies and Procedures.
|
|
D.
|
No Delegate shall accept direction or inappropriate influence from any other client or third party, or from any director, officer or employee of any affiliated company,
and shall not cast any vote inconsistent with these Policies and Procedures without obtaining the prior approval of the Board of Directors of the Fund or its duly authorized representative.
|
V.
|
Conflicts of interest
.
|
|
A.
|
The Fund and its Delegate(s) seek to avoid actual or perceived conflicts of interest in the voting of proxies for portfolio holdings between the interests of Fund
shareholders, on the one hand, and those of the Adviser or any affiliated person of the Fund or the Adviser, on the other hand. The Board of Directors may take into account a wide array of factors in determining whether such a conflict exists,
whether such conflict is material in nature, and how to properly address or resolve the same.
|
|
B.
|
While each conflict situation varies based on the particular facts presented and the requirements of governing law, the Board of Directors or its duly authorized
representative may take the following actions, among others, or otherwise give weight to the following factors, in addressing material conflicts of interest in voting (or directing Delegates to vote) proxies pertaining to portfolio holdings:
(i) vote pursuant to the recommendation of the proposing Delegate; (ii) abstain from voting; or (iii) rely on the recommendations of an established, independent third party with qualifications to vote proxies, such as Institutional
Shareholder Services.
|
|
C.
|
The Adviser shall notify the Board of Directors of the Fund promptly after becoming aware that any actual or potential conflict of interest exists and shall seek the
Board of Directors recommendations for protecting the best interests of Funds shareholders. The Adviser shall not waive any conflict of interest or vote any conflicted proxies without the prior written approval of the Board of Directors
or its duly authorized representative.
|
|
A.
|
A copy of the current Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures and the voting records for the Fund, reconciling proxies with portfolio holdings and recording proxy voting
guideline compliance and justification, shall be kept in an easily accessible place and available for inspection either physically or through electronic posting on an approved website.
|
|
B.
|
In the event that a determination, authorization or waiver under these Policies and Procedures is requested at a time other than a regularly scheduled meeting of the
Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Audit Committee shall be the duly authorized representative of the Board of Directors with the authority and responsibility to interpret and apply these Policies and Procedures and shall provide a report of
his or her determinations at the next following meeting of the Board of Directors.
|
|
C.
|
The Adviser shall present a report of any material deviations from these Policies and Procedures at every regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors and
shall provide such other reports as the Board of Directors may request from time to time. The Adviser shall provide to the Fund or any shareholder a record of its effectuation of proxy voting pursuant to these Policies and Procedures at such times
and in such format or medium as the Fund shall reasonably request. The Adviser shall be solely responsible for complying with its disclosure and reporting requirements under applicable laws and regulations, including, without limitation, Rule
206(4)-6 under the Advisers Act. The Adviser shall gather, collate and present information relating to its proxy voting activities and those of each Delegate in such format and medium as the Fund shall determine from time to time in order for the
Fund to discharge its disclosure and reporting obligations pursuant to Rule 30b1-4 under the Investment Company Act.
|
|
D.
|
The Adviser shall pay all costs associated with proxy voting for portfolio holdings pursuant to these Policies and Procedures and assisting the Fund in providing public
notice of the manner in which such proxies were voted, except that the Fund shall pay the costs associated with any filings required under the Investment Company Act.
|
|
E.
|
In performing its duties hereunder, any Delegate may engage the services of a research and/or voting adviser, the cost of which shall be borne by such Delegate.
|
|
F.
|
These Policies and Procedures shall be presented to the Board of Directors annually for their amendment and/or approval.
|
ITEM 8.
|
PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
|
In this Item 8, the term Fund refers to the registrant, DTF Tax-Free Income Inc.
The Funds Portfolio Managers
A team of investment professionals employed by Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co., the Funds investment adviser, is responsible for the day-to-day management of the Funds
portfolio. The members of that investment team and their respective roles, as of January 5, 2012, are as follows:
Timothy M. Heaney has
been Chief Investment Officer of the Fund since 2004 and Vice President since 1997 (Portfolio Manager 1997-2004). He has been a Senior Vice President of the Adviser since 2004 (Vice President 1997-2004). He has been a Senior Portfolio Manager in the
Fixed Income unit of Newfleet Asset Management, LLC since 2011 and was Senior Managing Director in the Fixed Income unit of the Advisers affiliate, Virtus Investment Advisers, Inc. (f/k/a Phoenix Investment Counsel, Inc.) (VIA)
2006-2011 (Managing Director 1997-2006, Director, Fixed Income Research 1996-1997, Investment Analyst 1992-1996). Mr. Heaney is the head of the municipal bond product area for the Adviser and Newfleet Asset Management, LLC.
Lisa H. Leonard has been Vice President of the Fund and the Adviser since 2006. She has also been a Portfolio Manager in the Fixed Income unit of
Newfleet Asset Management, LLC since 2011 and was Portfolio Manager in the Fixed Income unit of VIA 1998-2011 (Director, Investment Operations 1994-1998, Fixed Income Trader 1987-1993). Ms. Leonard assists Mr. Heaney in the management of
the Funds portfolio in her capacity as a portfolio manager in the municipal bond product area for the Adviser and Newfleet Asset Management, LLC.
Other Accounts Managed by the Funds Portfolio Managers
The following table provides
information as of October 31, 2011 regarding the other accounts besides the Fund that are managed by the portfolio managers of the Fund. As noted in the table, portfolio managers of the Fund may also manage or be members of management teams for
other mutual funds within the same fund complex or other similar accounts. For purposes of this disclosure, the term fund complex includes the Fund and all other investment companies advised by affiliates of Virtus Investment Partners,
Inc. (Virtus), the Advisers parent company. As of October 31, 2011, the Funds portfolio managers did not manage any accounts with respect to which the advisory fee is based on the performance of the account, nor do they
manage any hedge funds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered Investment
Companies
(1)
|
|
|
Other Pooled
Investment Vehicles
(2)
|
|
|
Other Accounts (3)
|
|
Name of Portfolio Manager
|
|
Number of
Accounts
|
|
Total Assets
(in
millions)
|
|
|
Number of
Accounts
|
|
Total Assets
(in
millions)
|
|
|
Number of
Accounts
|
|
Total Assets
(in
millions)
|
|
Timothy M. Heaney
|
|
1
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
47
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
Lisa H. Leonard
|
|
1
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
47
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
(1)
|
Registered Investment Companies include all open and closed-end mutual funds. For Registered Investment Companies, assets represent net assets of all open-end
investment companies and gross assets of all closed- end investment companies.
|
(2)
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles include, but are not limited to, securities of issuers exempt from registration under Section 3(c) of the Investment Company Act
of 1940, such as private placements and hedge funds.
|
(3)
|
Other Accounts include, but are not limited to, individual managed accounts, separate accounts, institutional accounts, pension funds and collateralized bond
obligations.
|
There may be certain inherent conflicts of interest that arise in connection with the portfolio
managers management of the Funds investments and the investments of any other accounts they manage. Such conflicts could include aggregation of orders for all accounts managed by a particular portfolio manager, the allocation of
purchases across all such accounts, the allocation of IPOs and any soft dollar arrangements that the Adviser may have in place that could benefit the Fund and/or such other accounts. The Adviser has adopted policies and procedures designed to
address any such conflicts of interest to ensure that all management time, resources and investment opportunities are allocated equitably. There have been no material compliance issues with respect to any of these policies and procedures during the
Funds most recent fiscal year.
Compensation of the Funds Portfolio Managers
The following is a description of the compensation structure, as of October 31, 2011, of the Funds Portfolio Managers. The Portfolio Managers
receive a base salary, an incentive bonus opportunity, and a benefits package, as detailed below. Highly-compensated individuals participate in a long-term incentive compensation program, including potential awards of Virtus restricted stock units
(RSUs) with multi-year vesting and options, subject to Virtus board approval, and may also take advantage of opportunities to defer their compensation and potentially defer their current tax liability.
Base Salary.
Each Portfolio Manager is paid a fixed base salary, which is determined by Virtus and the Adviser and is designed to be competitive
in light of the individuals experience and responsibilities. Virtus management utilizes results of an investment industry compensation survey conducted by an independent third party in evaluating competitive market compensation for its
investment management professionals.
Incentive Bonus.
Annual incentive payments are based on targeted compensation levels, adjusted
based on profitability, investment performance factors and a subjective assessment of each individuals contribution to the team effort. The short-term incentive payment is generally paid in cash, but a portion may be made in Virtus RSUs.
Individual payments are assessed using comparisons of actual investment performance with specific peer group or index measures. (Current benchmarks and/or peer groups are indicated in the table below.) The performance component is further adjusted
to reward investment personnel for managing within the stated framework and for not taking unnecessary risks. The intent is to discourage Portfolio Managers from taking on unnecessary risk to chase performance or assets for personal gain and to
ensure that managers remain focused on managing and acquiring securities that correspond to the Funds mandate and risk profile. It also avoids the temptation for Portfolio Managers to take on more risk and unnecessary exposure to chase
performance for personal gain.
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index
Lipper Peer Group Leveraged Municipal Average Return (NAV)
Lipper Peer Group Leverage Municipal Average Return (Share Price)
Incentive bonus compensation of the Funds Portfolio Managers is currently comprised of two main components:
First, 70% of the incentive bonus is based on: (i) the pre-tax performance of the Fund, as measured over one-, three-, and five-year periods against
specified benchmarks and/or peer groups; (ii) the success of the individual manager in achieving assigned goals; and (iii) a subjective assessment of the managers contribution to the efforts of the Advisers team. The total
return component of the performance portion of Portfolio Managers incentive bonus compensation is compared to the benchmarks and/or peer groups listed above. Portfolio Managers who manage more than one product may have other components in
their formulaic calculation that are appropriate to the other products, weighted according to the proportion of the managers time that is allocated to each specific product.
Second, 30% of the target incentive is based on financial measures of Virtus. These financial measures include; adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, gross inflows, and
product investment performance. A portion of the total incentive bonus can be paid in Virtus RSUs that vest over three years.
It is
intentional that the performance portion of Portfolio Managers incentive bonus compensation is not based on the value of assets held in the Funds portfolio (except to the extent that the level of assets in the Funds portfolio
affects the advisory fee received by the Adviser and, thus indirectly, the profitability of Virtus).
Other Benefits.
Portfolio
Managers are eligible to participate in a 401(k) plan, health insurance, and other benefits offered generally to the firms employees that could include granting of RSUs and options in Virtus stock.
Equity Ownership of Portfolio Managers
The following table sets forth the dollar range of equity securities in the Fund beneficially owned, as of October 31, 2011, by each of the portfolio
managers identified above.
|
|
|
Name of Portfolio Manager
|
|
Dollar Range of
Equity
Securities in the Fund
|
Timothy M. Heaney
|
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
Lisa H. Leonard
|
|
None
|
ITEM 9.
|
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.
|
During the period covered by this report, no purchases were made by or on behalf of the registrant or any affiliated purchaser
(as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act) of shares or other units of any class of the registrants equity securities that is registered by the registrant pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act.
ITEM 10.
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
|
No changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrants board of directors have been implemented after the registrant last provided disclosure in response to the
requirements of Item 22(b)(15) of Schedule 14A (
i.e.,
in the registrants Proxy Statement dated March 31, 2011) or this Item.
ITEM 11.
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
|
(a)
The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the registrants disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940
Act)) are effective, based on an evaluation of those controls and procedures made as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report as required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act and Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act.
(b) There has been no change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d)
under the 1940 Act) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
(a) Exhibit 99.CERT
|
|
Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
(b) Exhibit 99.906CERT
|
|
Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
|
|
|
By (Signature and Title)
|
|
/s/ A
LAN
M.
M
EDER
|
|
|
Alan M. Meder
Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
Date: January 5, 2012
|
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of
1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
By (Signature and Title)
|
|
/s/ N
ATHAN
I.
P
ARTAIN
|
|
|
Nathan I. Partain
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
Date: January 5, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By (Signature and Title)
|
|
/s/ A
LAN
M.
M
EDER
|
|
|
Alan M. Meder
Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
Date: January 5, 2012
|
|
|
DTF Tax free Income 2028... (NYSE:DTF)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2024 to Nov 2024
DTF Tax free Income 2028... (NYSE:DTF)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Nov 2024