- Current report filing (8-K)
February 02 2010 - 8:32AM
Edgar (US Regulatory)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D. C. 20549
FORM
8-K
CURRENT
REPORT
Pursuant
to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date
of Report (Date of earliest event reported) February 2,
2010
CENTRAL
VERMONT PUBLIC SERVICE CORPORATION
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its
charter)
|
Vermont
(State
or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation)
|
1-8222
(Commission
File
Number)
|
03-0111290
(IRS
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
77
Grove Street, Rutland,
Vermont 05701
(Address
of principal executive
offices) (Zip
Code)
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code
(800)
649-2877
N/A
(Former
name or former address, if changed since last
report)
|
Check
the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to
simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any
of the following provisions:
¨
Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
230.425)
¨
Soliciting
material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14a-12)
¨
Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
¨
Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))
|
Item
7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure.
|
This
presentation will be made to the Wall Street Utility Group in New York,
New York on February 2, 2010.
|
Wall
Street Utility Group
New
York, NY February 2, 2010
Presented
by Robert Young and Pamela Keefe
Safe
Harbor Statement
Statements
contained in this presentation that are not historical fact are
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor
provisions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Whenever used in this presentation, the words “estimate,”
“expect,” “believe,” or similar expressions are intended to identify such
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve
estimates, assumptions, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in the
forward-looking statements. Actual results will depend upon,
among other things, the actions of regulators, performance of the Vermont
Yankee nuclear power plant, effects of and changes in weather and economic
conditions, volatility in wholesale power markets, our ability to maintain
our current credit ratings, performance of our unregulated business, and
other considerations such as the operations of ISO-New England, changes in
the cost or availability of capital, authoritative accounting guidance,
and the effect of the volatility in the equity markets on pension benefit
and other costs. We cannot predict the outcome of any of these
matters; accordingly, there can be no assurance that such indicated
results will be realized. We undertake no obligation to
publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
Investor
Contact Information
Pamela
J. Keefe
Sr.
Vice President, CFO & Treasurer
(802)
747-5435
e-mail:
pkeefe@cvps.com
|
CVPS
Profile
·
Vermont’s
largest integrated electric utility
·
CVPS
serves approximately 159,000 customers in a territory covering half of the
area of Vermont
·
Rural
service territory of 18 customers per mile of
line
|
Credit
Ratings
|
Moody’s
|
Corporate
Credit Rating
|
Baa3
/ Stable
|
First
Mortgage Bonds
|
Baa1
|
Preferred
Stock
|
Ba2
|
COMMON
STOCK PROFILE (NYSE: CV)
Quarter
Ended December 31, 2009
|
Market
Capitalization
Book
Value
Market-to-Book
52-week
Range
Debt%
- Equity %
Average
Daily Volume
Shares
Outstanding
Annualized
Dividend Yield
|
$243.5M
$19.77
1.05
$15.78-$26.32
46%
- 54%
41,558
11,706,895
4.60%
(1/27/10)
|
Today’s
Discussion Topics
Ø
|
Attributes
and recent accomplishments
|
Ø
|
Key
measures of success
|
Ø
|
Future
energy planning considerations
|
-
|
Financial
position and performance
|
-
|
Infrastructure
investments & Velco
|
-
|
2010
earnings guidance and drivers
|
Attributes
& Recent Accomplishments
-
|
Lowest rates
among major utilities in New
England
|
-
|
Ranked second
in East Region Midsize segment for customer satisfaction in 2009 J.D.
Power survey
|
-
|
Customer
transactional satisfaction consistently rated
over
90%
|
-
|
Met
or exceeded Vermont’s 17 service quality and reliability standards
for fifth straight
year
|
-
|
Among
lowest carbon-emitting power mixes in the
U.S.
|
-
|
Granted
5.58% rate increase effective
1/1/10
|
-
|
Achieved
investment grade rating from Moody’s
(Baa3)
|
-
|
Awarded
$31M by DOE
for
CVPS SmartPowerTM program
|
-
|
CVPS
Cow PowerTM: DOE 2009 Utility Green Power Program of the
Year
|
-
|
2007
and 2008 EEI Emergency Recovery
Awards
|
Superior
customer service – 2009 JD Power East Region customer survey
Overall
Satisfaction
|
|
|
Southern
Maryland Electric Cooperative
|
|
|
|
Central
Vermont Public Service
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public
Service Electric and Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public
Service of New Hampshire
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western
Massachusetts Electric
|
|
New
York State Electric & Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Con
Edison Company of New York
|
|
Jersey
Central Power & Light
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connecticut
Light & Power
|
|
Central
Hudson Gas & Electric
|
|
|
|
Long
Island Power Authority
|
|
*
Small Sample
|
|
Superior
customer service – quarterly customer transaction satisfaction
survey
|
Customer
Transaction Satisfaction – 9 Qtrs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
Standard:
|
80%
|
Key
Measures of Success
Ø
|
Keep
customer rates competitive while maintaining superior
reliability
|
-
|
Meet
service quality standards
|
Ø
|
Achieve
positive regulatory outcomes
|
-
|
Modify
and extend Alternative Regulation
Plan
|
-
|
Maintain
positive, productive relationship with
regulators
|
Ø
|
Secure
stable, long-term, clean, competitively priced energy
supplies
|
-
|
Achieve
regulatory approval of long-term renewable PPA and its cost recovery in
rates
|
-
|
Be
prepared in 2012 for the outcome of Entergy-Vermont Yankee
relicensing
|
-
|
Additional
RFPs and negotiate new contract with VY and
Hydro-Quebec
|
-
|
Meet
Vermont’s renewable requirements
|
Ø
|
Increase
rate base on which shareholders earn a
return
|
-
|
Update
Asset Management Plan
|
-
|
Complete
capital projects per Asset Management Plan, including CVPS
SmartPowerTM
|
-
|
Continue
investments in Velco
|
Ø
|
Maintain
or improve investment grade corporate credit
rating
|
-
|
Currently
Baa3 from Moody’s
|
Regulatory
Update
Ø
|
Working
with consumer advocate and other VT stakeholders to plan for smart grid
technologies (part of VT’s ‘e-State’
initiative)
|
-
|
July
1, 2009: VT PSB proposal for decision on state-wide MOU would allow
pre-approval of smart grid
investments
|
-
|
August
2009: Submitted detailed application for federal stimulus along
with the other VT utilities ($133M statewide project cost; requested 50%
from DOE)
|
-
|
October
2009: DOE awarded the full requested amount to the VT utilities
- $69M ($31M for CV’s part of the
project)
|
-
|
Detailed
plan for PSB approval of scope, schedule and cost recovery for CV
SmartPower plan
|
-
|
Close
to an MOU with DPS
|
-
|
Negotiating
an MDMS contract with Siemens
|
-
|
Negotiating
DOE contract terms
|
Ø
|
Settled
staffing docket
|
-
|
No
decision that CV is overstaffed
|
-
|
CV
agreed to reduce headcount by 17 fte’s over 5 years (in addition to
planned reductions under CV SmartPower
project)
|
Ø
|
Granted
5.58% rate increase effective
1/1/10
|
Ø
|
CV
will petition to amend and extend its Alt Reg Plan past
2011
|
Ø
|
Integrated
Resource Plan (IRP)
|
-
|
Detailed
portfolio evaluation scoring method
developed
|
-
|
Used
to evaluate proposals received in recent market-wide solicitation;
incorporates input from consumer
advocate
|
-
|
2009
VT law establishes standard contract rates for up to 50 MW of new
renewable energy projects with a capacity of < 2.2
MW
|
-
|
Standard
rates range from $0.125 to $0.30 per kWh depending on energy
source
|
-
|
Initial
offering by PSB was fully
subscribed
|
Emerging
VT regulatory issues
-
|
Current
Governor (Douglas-R) will not seek a fifth
term
|
-
|
1
Republican and 5 Democratic
candidates
|
-
|
New
governor will choose a new Public Service
Commissioner
|
-
|
New
governor may choose a new Chair of the Public Service
Board
|
Ø
|
Vermont
customers will see rates increase over
time
|
-
|
New
long-term power contracts will reflect costs evident in the
market
|
·
|
Higher
cost than existing 180 MW VY contract (currently at $0.43 per
kWh)
|
-
|
Transmission
component of rates is increasing due to expansion in New
England
|
-
|
Feed
in Tariff and other ‘green’ mandates and preferences will add
costs
|
-
|
Growing
rate base from infrastructure build
out
|
2008
U.S. ENERGY SOURCES*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Source: Energy
Information Administration, Annual Energy Review 2008, rounded to tenths
of a percent.
|
Future
Energy Planning Considerations
Ø
|
Regulatory
and public input incorporated in new power supply evaluation methods
during the Integrated Resource Planning
process
|
Ø
|
Evaluation
scoring of new power sources
|
-
|
Initial
screen: consistency with CVPS’ investment grade credit
status
|
·
|
Impact
of new sources on the power supply portfolio’s expected cost and cost
variability 60%
weight
|
·
|
Renewable/
sustainable
resource
40%
weight
|
·
|
Environmental
impacts
40% weight
|
·
|
Energy,
technology and source
diversity 40%
weight
|
·
|
Reliability
characteristics
40%
weight
|
New
Power Portfolio Options
-
|
CVPS’s
180 MW power purchase from the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Plant comes to term
in March 2012
|
·
|
CVPS’s
strategy is to further diversify its supplies through competitive
procurement and legacy supplier
negotiations
|
-
|
Competitive
Procurement
|
·
|
“Joint
RFP” (with GMP and Vermont Electric Coop) for 100
MW
|
§
|
41
Proposals evaluated in the Spring of
‘09
|
§
|
3
contracts executed, possibly a
fourth
|
§
|
Development
risk associated with 2 sources
|
§
|
All
indicators point to ample future power supply available in
NE
|
·
|
“Contingent
RFP” (with GMP) for 150 MW
|
§
|
Contingent
on the relicensing status of Vermont
Yankee
|
§
|
Resolution
expected later in 2010 when Vermont Yankee’s relicensing status is better
understood
|
·
|
CV
will issue additional RFPs as
needed
|
Long-Term
Contract Negotiations Continuing
Hydro-Quebec
Ø
|
For
25 years VT has purchased system power from HQ under long-term
contract
|
-
|
CVPS
is an owner of key transmission interconnections (QE/
NE)
|
-
|
This
transfer capacity is equivalent to about ½ of our expected power
needs
|
Ø
|
CV’s
existing 142 MW PPA continues until November
2015
|
Ø
|
Productive
contract negotiations are continuing with Hydro-Quebec. We
remain optimistic, expecting a new agreement in
2010
|
Ø
|
HQ
is building 4,000 MW of new capacity for export
growth
|
-
|
Energy
exports are a significant part of the Province of Quebec’s economic
development strategy
|
Ø
|
HQ
has reached agreement to purchase New Brunswick
Power
|
-
|
New
Brunswick represents another market and potential NE
route-to-market
|
Ø
|
HQ
continues planning new NU/ NStar interface -- another potetial NE
route-to-market
|
-
|
Vermont
utilities may participate in PPA on this
interface
|
Long-Term
Contract Negotiations Continuing
Vermont
Yankee (Entergy)
Ø
|
CVPS’s
existing purchased power contract with VY ends in March
2012
|
-
|
CVPS
has no power purchase with VY after that
date
|
Ø
|
Vermont
Yankee’s future is very uncertain
|
-
|
VY
must obtain permissions from Vermont
for:
|
·
|
Relicensed
operations through 2032
|
·
|
Spinning-off
VY as a component of Entergy’s new company
(Enexus)
|
-
|
Tritium
issue surfaced Jan. 2010
|
Ø
|
The
pre-existing 10 year “revenue sharing agreement,” under which Entergy
would split revenue above $61/ mWh with the plant’s former owners, will
provide no payment if VY is not
relicensed
|
-
|
The
RSA has potential value as insurance against high future power market
prices
|
Ø
|
CV
remains open to a potential future purchase from VY –
however:
|
-
|
we
are acting to cover our open 2012 load
responsibility
|
-
|
VY’s
issues must be resolved to Vermont’s
satisfaction
|
Financial
Update
Financial
Overview
Ø
|
2009
earnings outlook $1.50 - $1.65 per share, increased from original range of
$1.40 - $1.60 per share
|
-
|
Loss
of load due to economic conditions, particularly among commercial &
industrial customers
|
-
|
EPS
dilution from November 2008 equity issue (1.19M
shares)
|
-
|
Pension
and medical costs decreased vs
budget
|
-
|
Positive
performance in variable life insurance policies within our Rabbi Trust
(making up for poor performance in ’08) – below the
line
|
·
|
Derivative,
positive effect on effective tax
rate
|
-
|
Storm
activity well below normal (5 yr average is in
rates)
|
Ø
|
2009
earnings will be released on March 15,
2010
|
Q3
2009 Financial Results
All
numbers in 000s except per share
|
|
|
|
|
Q3
2009
|
|
|
|
Q3
2008
|
|
|
YTD
2009
|
|
|
YTD
2008
|
|
Operating
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
68,067
|
|
|
$
|
70,362
|
|
|
$
|
205,532
|
|
|
$
|
211,341
|
|
|
|
|
10,188
|
|
|
|
10,751
|
|
|
|
41,252
|
|
|
|
40,430
|
|
|
|
|
3,536
|
|
|
|
2,654
|
|
|
|
8,361
|
|
|
|
7,707
|
|
|
|
$
|
81,791
|
|
|
$
|
83,767
|
|
|
$
|
255,145
|
|
|
$
|
259,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,676
|
|
|
$
|
40,131
|
|
|
$
|
117,891
|
|
|
$
|
124,319
|
|
|
|
|
37,994
|
|
|
|
33,201
|
|
|
|
116,111
|
|
|
|
111,344
|
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
3,120
|
|
|
|
4,541
|
|
|
|
5,825
|
|
|
|
$
|
76,575
|
|
|
$
|
76,452
|
|
|
$
|
238,543
|
|
|
$
|
241,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
in Earnings of Affiliates
|
|
$
|
4,320
|
|
|
$
|
4,043
|
|
|
$
|
13,196
|
|
|
$
|
12,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,200
|
|
|
$
|
6,481
|
|
|
$
|
18,569
|
|
|
$
|
16,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
per share of common stock – diluted
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
1.57
|
|
|
$
|
1.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
impact of 2008 equity issue
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity
& Financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows
|
|
YTD
9/09
|
|
|
YTD
9/08
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
6,722
|
|
|
$
|
3,803
|
|
Cash
provided by operating activities
|
|
|
33,326
|
|
|
|
32,793
|
|
Cash
used for investing activities
|
|
|
(21,970
|
)
|
|
|
(26,027
|
)
|
Cash
used for financing activities
|
|
|
(7,802
|
)
|
|
|
159
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
10,276
|
|
|
$
|
10,728
|
|
Ø
|
$20.8M
Velco investment in December 2009
|
Ø
|
$5.5M
of debt matured in December 2009
|
Ø
|
Obtained
364-day, $15M revolver in December 2009 (in addition to 3-year $40M
existing revolver)
|
Ø
|
Prospectus
Supplement filed Jan. 2010 for ‘continuous equity
offering’
|
-
|
Expect
to issue ~ $25M in 2010
|
Rate
Base Growth
CVPS
RATE BASE – ACTUAL AND PROJECTED
|
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
Dollars
in millions
|
$236
|
$236
|
$302
|
$344
|
$381
|
$423
|
$480
|
$512
|
$530
|
$537
|
Ø
|
Projected
CAGR of 7.11% from 2009 – 2014 (8.95% gross of stimulus
funding)
|
HISTORIC
& PROJECTED CAPITAL SPENDING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
spending has not been inflated to 2009 dollars. Projected spending
includes inflationary assumptions. SmartPower spending is net
of $28M stimulus funding applied to
capital.
|
Velco
Investment Background
Ø
|
Vermont’s
transmission operator
|
Ø
|
Approx
$450M of construction planned or
underway
|
Ø
|
Owned
by 20 Vermont utilities, including investor-owned, municipals and
cooperatives
|
Ø
|
CVPS
owns 39%; equity investments generally based on VTA load share of
43%
|
Ø
|
Independent
management and board of
directors
|
VELCO
INVESTMENTS 2004 – 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
Earnings Guidance and Drivers
-
|
$1.55
- $1.70 per diluted share
|
-
|
5.58%
rate increase effective 1/1/10
|
-
|
Alt
Reg mechanisms (base rate filing, PCAM,
ESAM)
|
-
|
ESAM
provides ‘floor’ for earnings in the regulated
business
|
-
|
Regulatory
support for recovery of SmartPower
costs
|
-
|
Possible
further reductions in load (vs our forecast in base rate
filing)
|
-
|
Unforeseen
operating expenses
|
Projected
Sources and Uses of Cash 2010 – 2014
($
in MMs)
OCF
|
$195
|
Stimulus
Grant
|
$31
|
New
Debt
|
$70
|
New
Equity
|
$25
|
Debt
Retirement
|
($20)
|
Dividend
|
($48)
|
Internal
Capex
|
($198)
|
Velco
Inv.
|
($55)
|
Ø
|
4.60%
annualized dividend yield (as of Jan. 27,
2010)
|
Ø
|
Long-term
strategy is for dividend yield to remain in line with peer
utilities
|
Ø
|
Over
short term, significant amount of available capital is being deployed in
infrastructure improvements
|
Future
earnings drivers under Alt Reg plan
Ø
|
Annual
ROE
adjustment mechanism
|
-
|
2010
allowed ROE is 9.59%
|
-
|
Future
years adjust at ½ the change in the average yield on 10 Yr Treasuries
measured over last 20 trading days prior to Oct.
15
|
Ø
|
Quarterly
Power
Cost Adjustment Mechanism
(“PCAM”)
|
-
|
100%
of fixed and 90% of variable power & transmission costs (the latter
beyond a $315k deadband)
|
-
|
Any
variances not recovered via the PCAM become part of the
ESAM
|
Ø
|
Annual
Earnings
Sharing Adjustment (“ESAM”)
|
-
|
Regulated
earnings will fall between -100 bp and +75 bp of allowed
ROE
|
-
|
Growth
in rate base, upon which we earn a return, is projected at 7.11% CAGR from
2009 - 2014
|
Ø
|
Provide
superior customer service and
reliability
|
Ø
|
Sustained
financial strength to maintain our credit rating at investment grade and
to fuel capital investments in our core business and
VELCO
|
Ø
|
Partner
with the State and other utilities to create an affordable, reliable and
environmentally responsible electric future for
Vermont
|
These
strategies create shareholder value over the long term
Appendix
– Key Data Elements
Ø
|
Market
Cap at 12/31/09: $243.5M
|
Ø
|
2010
Effective Tax Rate: 34.5%
|
Ø
|
2010
Capex (ex. Transco): $39.6M
|
Ø
|
2010
Transco
investment: ~$43M
|
Ø
|
~5
bp of ROE = $0.01 eps
|
Ø
|
Corp.
Credit Rating (Moody’s): Baa3/
stable
|
Ø
|
2009
Peak load: 418 MW (Dec.
29)
|
Ø
|
2009
Avg 12 month system capability: 463.1
MW
|
Vermont
Regulators and Leadership
Key
Regulators
Ø
|
Vermont
Public Service Board
|
-
|
Adjudicating
body that issues rulings in utility
matters
|
-
|
Three-member
board, appointed by Governor
|
-
|
Six-year,
staggered terms
|
Ø
|
Vermont
Dept. of Public Service
|
-
|
Commissioner
appointed by Governor
|
Ø
|
Governor
James Douglas ( R )
|
-
|
First
elected in 2002, re-elected in 2008 to serve fourth, 2-year
term
|
-
|
Challenged
by $150M budget shortfall expected in FY’11 and by a General Assembly
controlled by Democrats
|
-
|
Will
not seek re-election in 2010
|
Appendix
– Key Data Elements
Ø
|
2009
Average Number of Customers:
|
-
|
3%
Other Operating Revenue
|
Appendix
– Owned Generation Overview
|
Net
Effective Capability /
Entitlement
(MW)
|
Generated
and
Purchased
mWh
|
Wholly-Owned
Plants
|
|
|
Hydro
|
41.2
|
235,464
|
Diesel
and Gas Turbine
|
27.3
|
615
|
|
|
|
Jointly-Owned
Plants
(1)
|
|
|
Millstone
#3 (nuclear)
|
20.0
|
174,540
|
Wyman
#4 (oil)
|
10.7
|
905
|
McNeil
(various)
|
10.7
|
52,903
|
|
|
|
Note:
(1) includes
retired nuclear units
|
SIGNATURE
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
hereunto duly authorized.
|
CENTRAL
VERMONT PUBLIC SERVICE CORPORATION
|
|
|
By
|
/s/
Pamela J.
Keefe
Pamela
J. Keefe
Senior
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and
Treasurer
|
February
2, 2010
Central Vermont Public Service (NYSE:CV)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024
Central Vermont Public Service (NYSE:CV)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024