RISK FACTORS
Risks Relating to Our Financial Position and Capital Needs
We have incurred substantial losses since our inception
and anticipate that we will continue to incur substantial and increasing losses for the foreseeable future.
We are a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company
focused on development of novel cancer immunotherapies for a broad range of cancer indications. Investment in
biopharmaceutical product development is highly speculative because it entails substantial upfront capital expenditures and
significant risk that a product candidate will fail to prove effective, gain regulatory approval or become commercially
viable. We do not have any products approved by regulatory authorities and have not generated any revenues from collaboration
and licensing agreements or product sales to date, and have incurred significant research, development and other expenses
related to our ongoing operations and expect to continue to incur such expenses. As a result, we have not been profitable and
have incurred significant operating losses in every reporting period since our inception. For the three months ended March
31, 2019 and the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, we reported a net loss of $4.5 million, $27.7 million and $23.8
million respectively. As of March 31, 2019 and
December 31, 2018, we had an accumulated deficit of $86.4 million and $81.9 million respectively.
We do
not expect to generate revenues for many years, if at all. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses
for the foreseeable future. We anticipate these losses to increase as we continue to research, develop and seek regulatory approvals
for our product candidates and any additional product candidates we may acquire, and potentially begin to commercialize product
candidates that may achieve regulatory approval. We may also encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays
and other unknown factors that may adversely affect our business. The size of our future net losses will depend, in part, on the
rate of future growth of our expenses and our ability to generate revenues. Our expenses will further increase as we:
|
•
|
conduct additional clinical trials of our lead product, GPS, including the Phase 3 clinical trials evaluating GPS for AML and other cancers;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
continue to develop immunotherapy programs for NPS;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
pursue research and development of our other product candidates, including GALE-301 (a vaccine against the E39 peptide derived from the folate binding protein, or FBP) and GALE-302 (a vaccine against the J65 peptide derived from FBP);
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
in-license or acquire the rights to, and pursue development of, other products, product candidates or technologies;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
hire additional clinical, manufacturing, quality control, quality assurance and scientific personnel;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
seek marketing approval for any product candidates that successfully complete clinical trials;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
develop our outsourced manufacturing and commercial activities and establish sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, if we receive, or expect to receive, marketing approval for any product candidates;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
maintain, expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
add operational, financial and management information systems and personnel.
|
We need significant additional financing to fund our operations
and complete the development and, if approved, the commercialization of our product candidates. If we are unable to raise capital
when needed, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs or commercialization efforts.
We expect our existing cash as of March 31, 2019 and the
proceeds received in May 2019 upon the exercise of common stock warrants, together with the proceeds (after deducting
commissions and offering expenses) of $1,000,000 that have been received as of May 20, 2019 in connection with the exercise
of certain warrants to purchase shares of common stock, as well as the gross proceeds of up to an additional $0.7 million
that we may receive on or before May 31, 2019 in connection with the exercise of certain additional warrants that remain
outstanding, will enable us to fund our operating expenses through the first half of 2020. In the event that not all of
the warrants subject to the warrant exercise agreement are exercised, we will need to raise additional capital earlier
than anticipated to fund our operations. Our existing cash will not be sufficient to complete development and obtain
regulatory approval for any of our lead product candidates, and we will need to raise significant additional capital to help
us do so. In addition, our operating plan may change as a result of many factors currently unknown to us, and we may need
additional funds sooner than planned.
We expect to expend substantial resources for the foreseeable
future to continue the clinical development and manufacturing of our product candidates and the advancement and expansion of our
preclinical research pipeline, in particular the Phase 1/2 basket study of GPS in combination with pembrolizumab and our planned
Phase 3 study of GPS in AML. These expenditures will include costs associated with research and development, potentially acquiring
new product candidates or technologies, conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials and potentially obtaining regulatory
approvals and manufacturing products, as well as marketing and selling products approved for sale, if any.
Our future
capital requirements depend on many factors, including:
|
•
|
the scope, progress, results and costs of our ongoing and planned development programs for our product candidates, as well as any additional clinical trials we undertake to obtain data sufficient to seek marketing approval for our product candidates in any indication;
|
|
•
|
the timing of, and the costs involved in, obtaining regulatory approvals for our product candidates if our clinical trials are successful;
|
|
•
|
the cost of commercialization activities for our product candidates, if any of these product candidates are approved for sale, including marketing, sales and distribution costs;
|
|
•
|
the cost of manufacturing our product candidates for clinical trials in preparation for regulatory approval, including the cost and timing of process development, manufacturing scale-up and validation activities;
|
|
•
|
our ability to establish and maintain strategic licensing or other arrangements and the financial terms of such agreements;
|
|
•
|
the costs to in-license future product candidates or technologies;
|
|
•
|
the costs involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining, expanding, defending and enforcing patent claims, including litigation costs and the outcome of such litigation;
|
|
•
|
the costs in defending and resolving future derivative and securities class action litigation;
|
|
•
|
our operating expenses; and
|
|
•
|
the emergence of competing technologies or other adverse market developments.
|
Additional funds may not be available when we need them on terms
that are acceptable to us, or at all. We have no committed source of additional capital. If adequate funds are not available to
us on a timely basis, we may not be able to continue as a going concern or we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate
preclinical studies, clinical trials or other development activities for one or more of our product candidates or target indications,
or delay, limit, reduce or terminate our establishment of sales and marketing capabilities or other activities that may be necessary
to commercialize our product candidates.
We have announced that we are considering strategic alternatives
in order to maximize shareholder value, including financings, strategic alliances, acquisitions, or the possible sale of the Company.
We may not be able to identify or consummate any suitable strategic alternatives.
We have announced that we are considering all strategic alternatives
that may be available to us, to maximize shareholder value, including financings, strategic alliances, acquisitions, or the possible
sale of the Company. We currently have no agreements or commitments to engage in any specific strategic transactions, and our exploration
of various strategic alternatives may not result in any specific action or transaction. To the extent that this engagement results
in a transaction, our business objectives may change depending upon the nature of the transaction. There can be no assurance that
we will enter into any transaction as a result of the engagement.
Furthermore, if we determine to engage in a strategic transaction,
we cannot predict the impact that such strategic transaction might have on our operations or stock price. We also cannot predict
the impact on our stock price if we fail to enter into a transaction.
Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our existing
stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our product candidates on unfavorable terms to us.
We may seek additional capital through a variety of means, including
through private and public equity offerings and debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances and marketing, distribution
or licensing arrangements. To the extent that we raise additional capital (including this offering) through the sale of equity
or convertible debt securities, or through the issuance of shares under management or other types of contracts, or upon the exercise
or conversion of outstanding derivative securities, the ownership interests of our stockholders will be diluted, and the terms
of such financings may include liquidation or other preferences, anti-dilution rights, conversion and exercise price adjustments
and other provisions that adversely affect the rights of our stockholders, including rights, preferences and privileges that are
senior to those of our holders of common stock in the event of a liquidation. For example, in March and May 2018, we issued convertible
preferred stock which contained rights, preferences and privileges which were senior to those of holder of our common stock. Such
preferred stock is no longer outstanding. In such event, there is a possibility that once all senior claims are settled, there
may be no assets remaining to pay out to the holders of our common stock. Debt financing, if available, could include covenants
limiting or restricting our ability to take certain actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures, entering
into licensing arrangements, or declaring dividends and may require us to grant security interests in our assets, including our
intellectual property, and for our subsidiaries to guarantee our obligations. If we raise additional funds through collaborations,
strategic alliances, or marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable
rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, products or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable
to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings when needed, we may be required to grant rights
to develop and market products or product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.
There is substantial doubt about our ability to continue
as a going concern.
As of March 31, 2019, we had a cash and cash
equivalents balance of approximately $2.6 million. In addition, we had outstanding accounts payable and accrued expenses of
$5.4 million. We expect our existing cash as of March 31, 2019 and the proceeds received in May 2019 upon the exercise of
common stock warrants, together with the proceeds (after deducting commissions and offering expenses) of $1,000,000 that have
been received as of May 21, 2019 in connection with the exercise of certain warrants to purchase shares of common stock, as
well as the gross proceeds of up to an additional $0.7 million that we may receive on or before May 31, 2019 in connection
with the exercise of certain additional warrants that remain outstanding, will enable us to fund our operating expenses and
capital expenditure requirements through the first half of 2020. In the event that we are unable to obtain additional financing,
we may be unable to continue as a going concern. There is no guarantee that we will be able to secure additional financing,
including in connection with this offering. Changes in our operating plans, our existing and anticipated working capital
needs, defense costs related to our ongoing legal proceedings and any additional legal proceedings we might become subject to
in the future, the acceleration or modification of our development activities, any near-term or future expansion plans,
increased expenses, potential acquisitions or other events may further affect our ability to continue as a going concern. See
Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in the 2018 Form 10-K for additional information on our
assessment as of December 31, 2018. Similarly, the report of our independent registered public accounting firm on our
consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018 includes an explanatory paragraph indicating
that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. If we cannot continue as a viable entity,
our securityholders may lose some or all of their investment in us.
We currently have no source of revenues. We may never
generate revenues or achieve profitability.
Currently,
we do not generate any revenues from product sales or otherwise. Even if we are able to successfully achieve regulatory approval
for our product candidates, we do not know when we will generate revenues or become profitable, if at all. Our ability to generate
revenues from product sales and achieve profitability will depend on our ability to successfully commercialize products, including
our current product candidates, and other product candidates that we may develop, in-license or acquire in the future. Our ability
to generate revenues and achieve profitability also depends on a number of additional factors, including our ability to:
|
•
|
successfully complete development activities, including the necessary clinical trials;
|
|
•
|
complete and submit either BLAs or NDAs to the FDA and obtain U.S. regulatory approval for indications for which there is a commercial market;
|
|
•
|
complete and submit applications to foreign regulatory authorities in Europe, Asia and other jurisdictions;
|
|
•
|
obtain regulatory approval in territories with viable market sizes;
|
|
•
|
obtain coverage and adequate reimbursement from third parties, including government and private payors;
|
|
•
|
set commercially viable prices for our products, if any;
|
|
•
|
establish and maintain supply and manufacturing relationships with reliable third parties and/or build our own manufacturing facility and ensure adequate, legally globally compliant manufacturing of bulk drug substances and drug products to maintain that supply;
|
|
•
|
develop distribution processes for our product candidates;
|
|
•
|
develop commercial quantities of our product candidates, once approved, at acceptable cost levels; obtain additional funding, if required to develop and commercialize our product candidates;
|
|
•
|
develop a commercial organization capable of sales, marketing and distribution for any products we intend to sell ourselves, in the markets in which we choose to commercialize on our own;
|
|
•
|
achieve market acceptance of our products;
|
|
•
|
attract, hire and retain qualified personnel; and
|
|
•
|
protect our
rights in our intellectual property portfolio.
|
Our revenues for any product candidate for which regulatory
approval is obtained will be dependent, in part, upon the size of the markets in the territories for which it gains regulatory
approval, the accepted price for the product, the ability to get reimbursement at any price, and whether we own the commercial
rights for that territory. If the number of our addressable disease patients is not as significant as our estimates, the indication
approved by regulatory authorities is narrower than we expect, or the reasonably accepted population for treatment is narrowed
by competition, physician choice or treatment guidelines, we may not generate significant revenues from sales of such products,
even if approved. In addition, we anticipate incurring significant costs associated with commercializing any approved product candidate.
As a result, even if we generate revenues, we may not become profitable and may need to obtain additional funding to continue operations.
If we fail to become profitable or are unable to sustain profitability on a continuing basis, then we may be unable to continue
our operations at planned levels and may be forced to reduce our operations.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act could adversely affect our business
and financial condition.
H.R. 1, “An Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant
to title II and V of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018”, informally entitled the Tax Cuts and
Jobs Act, enacted on December 22, 2017, among other things, contains significant changes to corporate taxation, including reduction
of the corporate tax rate from a top marginal rate of 35% to a single rate of 21%, limitation of the tax deduction for interest
expense to 30% of adjusted taxable income (except for certain small businesses), limitation of the deduction for net operating
losses carried forward from taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 to 80% of current year taxable income and elimination
of net operating loss carrybacks, one time taxation of offshore earnings at reduced rates regardless of whether they are repatriated,
elimination of U.S. tax on foreign earnings (subject to certain important exceptions), providing immediate deductions for certain
new investments instead of deductions for depreciation expense over time, and modifying or repealing many business deductions and
credits (including reduction of tax credits under the Orphan Drug Act). Notwithstanding the reduction in the corporate income tax
rate, the overall impact of the Tax Act is uncertain and our business and financial condition could be adversely affected. In addition,
it is uncertain if and to what extent various states will conform to the Tax Act.
Our ability to use net operating losses to offset future
taxable income may be subject to limitations.
As of December 31, 2018, we had federal and state net operating
loss carryforwards of approximately $19.7 million and $3.7 million, respectively. Our NOLs generated in tax years ending on or
prior to December 31, 2017 are only permitted to be carried forward for 20 years under applicable U.S. tax laws, and will begin
to expire, if not utilized, beginning in 2027. These NOL carryforwards could expire unused and be unavailable to offset future
income tax liabilities. Under the Tax Act, federal NOLs incurred in tax years ending after December 31, 2017 may be carried forward
indefinitely, but the deductibility of such federal NOLs is limited. It is uncertain if and to what extent various states will
conform to the Tax Act,or whether any further regulatory changes may be adopted in the future that could minimize its applicability.
In addition, under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and certain corresponding provisions of state
law, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” which is generally defined as a greater than 50% change, by
value, in the ownership of its equity over a three-year period, the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change NOL carryforwards
and other pre-change tax attributes to offset its post-change income may be limited. The Merger constituted an ownership change
and as such, our ability to use our NOL carryforwards is materially limited, which may harm our future operating results by effectively
increasing our future tax obligations.
Risks Related to the Development and Regulatory Approval
of Our Product Candidates
Clinical-stage biopharmaceutical companies with product
candidates in clinical development face a wide range of challenging activities which may entail substantial risk.
We are currently a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company
with product candidates in clinical development. The success of our product candidates will depend on several factors, including
the following:
|
•
|
designing, conducting and successfully completing preclinical development activities, including preclinical efficacy and IND-enabling studies, for our product candidates or product candidates we are interested in in-licensing or acquiring, including product candidates;
|
|
•
|
designing, conducting and completing clinical trials for our product candidates with positive results;
|
|
•
|
receipt of regulatory approvals from applicable authorities;
|
|
•
|
obtaining and maintaining patent and trade secret protection and regulatory exclusivity for our product candidates;
|
|
•
|
making arrangements with third-party manufacturers, receiving regulatory approval of our manufacturing processes and our third-party manufacturers’ facilities from applicable regulatory authorities and ensuring adequate supply of drug product;
|
|
•
|
manufacturing our product candidates at an acceptable cost;
|
|
•
|
effectively launching commercial sales of our product candidates, if approved, whether alone or in collaboration with others;
|
|
•
|
achieving acceptance of our product candidates, if approved, by patients, the medical community and third-party payors;
|
|
•
|
effectively competing with other therapies;
|
|
•
|
if our products candidates are approved, obtaining and maintaining coverage and adequate reimbursement by third-party payors, including government payors, for our product candidates;
|
|
•
|
complying with all applicable regulatory requirements, including FDA current Good Clinical Practices, or GCP, current Good Manufacturing Practices, or cGMP, and standards, rules and regulations governing promotional and other marketing activities;
|
|
•
|
maintaining a continued acceptable safety profile of the products during development and following approval; and
|
|
•
|
maintaining and growing an organization of scientists and business people who can develop and commercialize our products and technology.
|
If we do not achieve one or more of these factors in a timely
manner or at all, we could experience significant delays or an inability to successfully develop and commercialize our product
candidates, which could materially harm our business.
Our lead product candidate, GPS, represents a new therapeutic
approach that presents significant challenges.
Our future success is substantially dependent on the successful
development of WT1 peptide immunotherapies in general and GPS in particular. Because this program represents a new approach to
cancer immunotherapy for the treatment of cancer and other diseases, developing and commercializing GPS subjects us to a number
of challenges, including:
|
•
|
obtaining regulatory approval from the FDA and other regulatory authorities, which have very limited experience with the development and commercialization of WT1 cancer immunotherapies;
|
|
•
|
obtaining the components required for the administration of GPS (i.e., GPS, granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor, or GM-CSF, and Montanide) from three separate sources, the subsequent separate storage requirements for each of these components and the delivery of these components to the administration location;
|
|
•
|
utilizing GPS in combination with other therapies, which may increase the risk of adverse side effects;
|
|
•
|
sourcing clinical and, if approved, commercial supplies for the materials used to manufacture and process GPS;
|
|
•
|
developing a manufacturing process used in connection with GPS that will yield a satisfactory product that is safe, effective, scalable and profitable;
|
|
•
|
establishing sales and marketing capabilities after obtaining any regulatory approval to gain market acceptance; and
|
|
•
|
obtaining coverage and adequate reimbursement from third-party payors and government authorities.
|
Moreover, public perception of safety issues, including adoption
of new therapeutics or novel approaches to treatment, may adversely influence the willingness of subjects to participate in clinical
trials, or if approved, of physicians to subscribe to the novel treatment mechanics. Physicians, hospitals and third-party payors
often are slow to adopt new products, technologies and treatment practices that require additional educational upfront costs and
training. Physicians may not be willing to undergo training to adopt this novel therapy, may decide the therapy is too complex
to adopt without appropriate training and may choose not to administer the therapy. Based on these and other factors, hospitals
and payors may decide that the benefits of this new therapy do not or will not outweigh our costs.
We may find it difficult to enroll patients in our clinical
trials given the limited number of patients who have the diseases for which our product candidates are being studied which could
delay or prevent the start of clinical trials for our product candidates.
Identifying and qualifying patients to participate in clinical
trials of our current and future product candidates is essential to our success. The timing of our clinical trials depends in part
on the rate at which we can recruit patients to participate in clinical trials of our product candidates, and we may experience
delays in our clinical trials if we encounter difficulties in enrollment. If we experience delays in our clinical trials, the timeline
for obtaining regulatory approval of our product candidates will most likely be delayed.
Many factors
may affect our ability to identify, enroll and maintain qualified patients, including the following:
|
•
|
eligibility criteria of our ongoing and planned clinical trials with specific characteristics appropriate for inclusion in our clinical trials;
|
|
•
|
design of the clinical trial;
|
|
•
|
size and nature of the patient population;
|
|
•
|
patients’ perceptions as to risks and benefits of the product candidate under studyand the participation in a clinical trial generally in relation to other available therapies, including any new drugs that may be approved for the indications we are investigating;
|
|
•
|
the availability and efficacy of competing therapies and clinical trials;
|
|
•
|
pendency of other trials underway in the same patient population;
|
|
•
|
willingness of physicians to participate in our planned clinical trials;
|
|
•
|
severity of the disease under investigation;
|
|
•
|
proximity of patients to clinical sites;
|
|
•
|
patients who do not complete the trials for personal reasons; and
|
|
•
|
issues with contract research organizations, or CROs, and/or with other vendors that handle our clinical trials.
|
For example, in our planned AML, Phase 3 clinical trial for
GPS, only patients who meet specific inclusion criteria will enter the study. Primary entry restrictions include being greater
than or equal to 60 years of age, having received upfront treatment with chemotherapy agents only, having achieved complete remission
or CRem, as well as demonstrating adequate hematologic recovery. The estimated prevalence of AML is 12,000 to 20,000 cases in the
United States (across all ages) and only a subset of this group satisfies the enrollment criteria for our AML Phase 3 clinical
trial.
We may not be able to initiate or continue to support clinical
trials of our product candidates for one or more indications, or any future product candidates if we are unable to locate and enroll
a sufficient number of eligible participants in these trials as required by the FDA or other regulatory authorities. Even if we
are able to enroll a sufficient number of patients in our clinical trials, if the pace of enrollment is slower than we expect,
the development costs for our product candidates may increase and the completion of our trials may be delayed or our trials could
become too expensive to complete.
If we experience delays in the completion of, or termination
of, any clinical trials of our current or future product candidates, the commercial prospects of our product candidates could be
harmed, and our ability to generate product revenue from any of these product candidates could be delayed or prevented. In addition,
any delays in completing our clinical trials would likely increase our overall costs, impair product candidate development and
jeopardize our ability to obtain regulatory approval relative to our current plans. Any of these occurrences may harm our business,
financial condition, and prospects significantly.
The results of preclinical studies or earlier clinical
trials are not necessarily predictive of future results. Our existing product candidates in clinical trials, and any other product
candidates that may advance into clinical trials, may not have favorable results in later clinical trials or receive regulatory
approval.
Success in preclinical studies and early clinical trials does
not ensure that later clinical trials will generate adequate data to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of an investigational
drug. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, including those with greater resources and experience
than us, have suffered significant setbacks in clinical trials, even after seeing promising results in earlier preclinical studies
or clinical trials. Any of our product candidates that are in, or may advance to, clinical trials may not succeed in clinical trials
despite promising preclinical data. For example, with respect to GPS, a broadly similar anti-cancer peptide immunotherapeutic against
melanoma-specific antigen being developed by GlaxoSmithKline for advanced unresectable melanoma initially produced positive efficacy
data in a Phase 2 clinical study, but subsequently failed to prove more beneficial than placebo in a controlled, blinded and randomized
Phase 3, registration-enabling clinical trial in the same indication in patients after tumor resection.
Despite the results reported in earlier preclinical studies
or clinical trials for our product candidates, we do not know whether the clinical trials we may conduct will demonstrate adequate
efficacy and safety to result in regulatory approval to market GPS or any of our product candidates for a particular indication,
either as a monotherapy or in combination, in any particular jurisdiction. Efficacy data from prospectively designed trials may
differ significantly from those obtained from retrospective subgroup analyses. If later-stage clinical trials do not produce favorable
results, our ability to achieve regulatory approval for GPS may be adversely impacted. Even if we believe that we have adequate
data to support an application for regulatory approval to market any of our current or future product candidates, the FDA or other
regulatory authorities may not agree and may require that we conduct additional clinical trials.
Clinical drug development involves a lengthy and expensive
process with an uncertain outcome.
Clinical testing is expensive and can take many years to complete,
with the outcome inherently uncertain. Failure can occur at any time during the clinical trial process. Before obtaining approval
from regulatory authorities for the sale of any product candidate, we must conduct extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the
safety and efficacy of our product candidates in humans. Prior to initiating clinical trials, a sponsor must complete extensive
preclinical testing of a product candidate, including, in most cases, preclinical efficacy experiments as well IND-enabling toxicology
studies. These experiments and studies may be time-consuming and expensive to complete. The necessary preclinical testing may not
be completed successfully for a preclinical product candidate and a potentially promising product candidate may therefore never
be tested in humans. Once it commences, clinical testing is expensive, difficult to design and implement, can take many years to
complete and is uncertain as to outcome. A failure of one or more clinical trials can occur at any stage of testing. The outcome
of preclinical testing and early clinical trials may not be predictive of the success of later clinical trials, and interim results
of a clinical trial do not necessarily predict final results. Moreover, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to
varying interpretations and analyses, and many companies that have believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in
preclinical studies and clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain marketing approval of their products. We may experience
numerous unforeseen events during drug development that could delay or prevent our ability to receive marketing approval or commercialize
our product candidates. In particular, clinical trials of our product candidates may produce inconclusive or negative results.
We have limited data regarding the safety, tolerability and efficacy of GPS administered as monotherapy or in combination with
PD-1 inhibitors. For a further discussion of the safety risks in our trials, see the risk factor herein entitled "Our current
and future product candidates, the methods used to deliver them or their dosage levels may cause undesirable side effects or have
other properties that could delay or prevent their regulatory approval, limit the commercial profile of an approved label or result
in significant negative consequences following any regulatory approval." Clinical trials also require the review and oversight
of an institutional review board, or IRB. An inability or delay in obtaining IRB approval could prevent or delay the initiation
and completion of clinical trials, and the FDA may decide not to consider any data or information derived from a clinical investigation
not subject to initial and continuing IRB review and approval.
We may
experience delays in our ongoing or future clinical trials, and we do not know whether planned clinical trials will begin or enroll
subjects on time, will need to be redesigned or will be completed on schedule, if at all. There can be no assurance that the FDA
will not put clinical trials of any of our product candidates on clinical hold in the future. Clinical trials may be delayed, suspended
or prematurely terminated for a variety of reasons, such as:
|
•
|
delay or failure in reaching
agreement with the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority on a clinical trial design that we are able to execute;
|
|
•
|
delay or failure in obtaining
authorization to commence a trial or inability to comply with conditions imposed by a regulatory authority regarding the scope
or design of a trial;
|
|
•
|
delay or failure in reaching
agreement on acceptable terms with prospective contract research organizations, or CROs, and clinical trial sites, the terms of
which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and trial sites;
|
|
•
|
delay or failure in obtaining
IRB approval or the approval of other reviewing entities, including comparable foreign regulatory authorities, to conduct a clinical
trial at each site;
|
|
•
|
withdrawal of clinical
trial sites from our clinical trials or the ineligibility of a site to participate in our clinical trials;
|
|
•
|
delay or failure in recruiting
and enrolling suitable subjects to participate in a trial;
|
|
•
|
delay or failure in subjects
completing a trial or returning for post-treatment follow-up;
|
|
•
|
clinical sites and investigators
deviating from trial protocol, failing to conduct the trial in accordance with regulatory requirements, or dropping out of a trial;
|
|
•
|
inability to identify and
maintain a sufficient number of trial sites, many of which may already be engaged in other clinical trial programs, including
some that may be for the same indication;
|
|
•
|
failure of our third-party
clinical trial managers, CROs, clinical trial sites, contracted laboratories or other third-party vendors to satisfy their contractual
duties, meet expected deadlines or return trustworthy data;
|
|
•
|
delay or failure in adding
new trial sites;
|
|
•
|
interim results or data
that are ambiguous or negative or are inconsistent with earlier results or data;
|
|
•
|
alteration of trial design
necessitated by re-evaluation of design assumptions based upon observed data;
|
|
•
|
feedback from the FDA,
the IRB, DSMB or a comparable foreign regulatory authority, or results from earlier stage or concurrent preclinical studies and
clinical trials, that might require modification to the protocol for a trial;
|
|
•
|
a decision by the FDA,
the IRB, a comparable foreign regulatory authority, or us, or a recommendation by a DSMB or comparable foreign regulatory authority,
to suspend or terminate clinical trials at any time for safety issues or for any other reason;
|
|
•
|
unacceptable risk-benefit
profile, unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects;
|
|
•
|
failure to demonstrate
a benefit from using a product candidate;
|
|
•
|
difficulties in manufacturing
or obtaining from third parties sufficient quantities of a product candidate to start or to use in clinical trials;
|
|
•
|
lack of adequate funding
to continue a trial, including the incurrence of unforeseen costs due to enrollment delays, requirements to conduct additional
studies or increased expenses associated with the services of our CROs and other third parties; or
|
|
•
|
changes in governmental
regulations or administrative actions or lack of adequate funding to continue a clinical trial.
|
If we experience delays in the completion or termination of
any clinical trial of our product candidates, the approval and commercial prospects of such product candidates will be harmed,
delaying our ability to generate product revenues from such product candidate and our costs will most likely increase. The required
regulatory approvals may also be delayed, thereby jeopardizing our ability to commence product sales and generate revenues and
the period of commercial exclusivity for our products may be decreased. Regulatory approval of our product candidates may be denied
for the same reasons that caused the delay.
Risks associated with operating in foreign countries could
materially adversely affect our product development.
We may conduct future studies in countries outside of the United
States Consequently, we may be subject to risks related to operating in foreign countries. Risks associated with conducting operations
in foreign countries include:
differing regulatory requirements for drug approvals and regulation
of approved drugs in foreign countries;
more stringent
privacy requirements for data to be supplied to our operations in the United States,
e.g.
, General Data Protection Regulation
in the European Union;
|
•
|
unexpected changes in tariffs, trade barriers and regulatory requirements; economic weakness, including inflation, or political instability in particular foreign economies and markets; compliance with tax, employment, immigration and labor laws for employees living or traveling abroad; foreign taxes, including withholding of payroll taxes;
|
|
•
|
differing payor reimbursement regimes, governmental payors or patient self-pay systems and price controls;
|
|
•
|
foreign currency fluctuations, which could result in increased operating expenses or reduced revenues, and other obligations incident to doing business or operating in another country;
|
|
•
|
workforce uncertainty in countries where labor unrest is more common than in the United States;
|
|
•
|
production shortages resulting from any events affecting raw material supply or manufacturing capabilities abroad; and
|
|
•
|
business interruptions resulting from geopolitical actions, including war and terrorism.
|
Our current and future product candidates, the methods
used to deliver them or their dosage levels may cause undesirable side effects or have other properties that could delay or prevent
their regulatory approval, limit the commercial profile of an approved label or result in significant negative consequences following
any regulatory approval.
Undesirable side effects caused by our current or future product
candidates, their delivery methods or dosage levels could cause us or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt clinical
trials and could result in a more restrictive label or the delay or denial of regulatory approval or termination of clinical trials
by the FDA or other comparable foreign regulatory authority; an independent DSMB that is governing our clinical trials; or an IRB,
that approves and, monitors biomedical research to protect the rights and welfare of human subjects. For example, although no high-grade
delayed type hypersensitivity in the skin or systemic anaphylaxis events have been noted after GPS administration in patients treated
in our clinical studies to date, it is theoretically possible that such toxicities, or other type of adverse events, may occur
in future clinical studies. As a result of safety or toxicity issues that we may experience in our clinical trials, or negative
or inconclusive results from the clinical trials of others for drug candidates similar to our own, we may not receive approval
to market any product candidates, which could prevent us from ever generating revenues or achieving profitability. Results of our
trials could reveal an unacceptably high severity and incidence of side effects. In such an event, our trials could be suspended
or terminated, and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities could order us to cease further development of or deny
approval of our product candidates for any or all targeted indications. The drug-related side effects could also affect patient
recruitment or the ability of enrolled subjects to complete the trial or result in potential product liability claims. Any of these
occurrences may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and future
prospects.
Additionally,
if any of our product candidates receives regulatory approval, and we or others later identify undesirable side effects caused
by such product, a number of potentially significant negative consequences could result, including that:
|
•
|
we may be forced to suspend marketing of such product;
|
|
•
|
regulatory authorities may withdraw their approvals of such product;
|
|
•
|
regulatory authorities may require additional warnings on the label that could diminish the usage or otherwise limit the commercial success of such products;
|
|
•
|
we may be required to conduct post-marketing studies;
|
|
•
|
we may be required to change the way the product is administered;
|
|
•
|
we could be sued and held liable for harm caused to subjects or patients; and
|
|
•
|
our reputation may suffer.
|
Any of these events could prevent us from achieving or maintaining
market acceptance of the particular product candidate, if approved.
Our product development program may not uncover all possible
adverse events that patients who take our product candidates may experience. The number of subjects exposed to product candidates
and the average exposure time in the clinical development program may be inadequate to detect rare adverse events, or chance findings,
that may only be detected once the product is administered to more patients and for greater periods of time.
Clinical trials by their nature utilize a sample of the potential
patient population. However, with a limited number of subjects and limited duration of exposure, we cannot be fully assured that
rare and severe side effects of our product candidates will be uncovered. Such rare and severe side effects may only be uncovered
with a significantly larger number of patients exposed to our product candidates. If such safety problems occur or are identified
after our product candidates reaches the market, the FDA may require that we amend the labeling of the product or recall the product,
or may even withdraw approval for the product.
Our future success is dependent on the regulatory approval
of our product candidates.
Our business is dependent on our ability to obtain regulatory
approval for our product candidates in a timely manner. We cannot commercialize product candidates in the United States without
first obtaining regulatory approval for the product from the FDA; similarly, we cannot commercialize product candidates outside
of the United States without obtaining regulatory approval from comparable foreign regulatory authorities. Before obtaining regulatory
approvals for the commercial sale of any product candidate for a target indication, we must demonstrate with substantial evidence
gathered in preclinical studies and clinical trials, generally including two well-controlled Phase 3 trials, that the product candidate
is safe and effective for use for that target indication and that the manufacturing facilities, processes and controls are adequate
with respect to such product candidate.
The time required to obtain approval by the FDA and comparable
foreign regulatory authorities is unpredictable but typically takes many years following the commencement of preclinical studies
and clinical trials and depends upon numerous factors, including the substantial discretion of the regulatory authorities. In addition,
approval policies, regulations, or the type and amount of clinical data necessary to gain approval may change during the course
of a product candidate’s clinical development and may vary among jurisdictions.
Even if a product candidate were to successfully obtain approval
from the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities, any approval might contain significant limitations related to use restrictions
for specified age groups, warnings, precautions or contraindications, or may be subject to burdensome post-approval study or risk
management requirements. Also, any regulatory approval of our current or future product candidates, once obtained, may be withdrawn.
Our current and future product candidates could fail to
receive regulatory approval from the FDA.
We have
not obtained regulatory approval for any product candidate and it is possible that our existing product candidates or any future
product candidates will not obtain regulatory approval, for many reasons, including:
|
•
|
disagreement with the regulatory authorities regarding the scope, design or implementation of our clinical trials;
|
|
•
|
failure to demonstrate that a product candidate is safe and effective for our proposed indication;
|
|
•
|
failure of clinical trials to meet the level of statistical significance required for approval;
|
|
•
|
failure to demonstrate that a product candidate’s clinical and other benefits outweigh its safety risks;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
disagreement with our interpretation of data from preclinical studies or clinical trials;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the insufficiency of data collected from clinical trials of our product candidates to support the submission and filing of a BLA, NDA or other submission or to obtain regulatory approval;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the insufficiency of a single Phase 3 clinical trial of GPS in AML for regulatory approval in that indication;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
failure to obtain approval of our manufacturing processes or facilities of third-party manufacturers with whom we contract for clinical and commercial supplies or our own manufacturing facility; or
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
changes in the approval policies or regulations that render our preclinical and clinical data insufficient for approval.
|
The FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority may require
more information, including additional preclinical or clinical data to support approval or additional studies, which may delay
or prevent approval and our commercialization plans, or we may decide to abandon the development program. If we were to obtain
approval, regulatory authorities may approve any of our product candidates for fewer or more limited indications than we request
(including failing to approve the most commercially promising indications), may grant approval contingent on the performance of
costly post-marketing clinical trials, or may approve a product candidate with a label that does not include the labeling claims
necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of that product candidate.
If we are unable to obtain regulatory approval for one of our
product candidates in one or more jurisdictions, or any approval contains significant limitations, we may not be able to obtain
sufficient funding to continue the development of that product or generate revenues attributable to that product candidate.
We currently have Orphan Drug designation for certain
product candidates, and may seek Orphan Drug Product designation for additional product candidates or indications, which might
not be received or provide the intended benefit thereof.
Regulatory authorities in some jurisdictions, including the
United States and Europe, may designate drugs for relatively small patient populations as Orphan Drugs. Under the Orphan Drug Act,
the FDA may designate a product as an Orphan Drug if it is a drug intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally
defined as a patient population of fewer than 200,000 individuals annually in the United States We have received Orphan Drug Product
designations from the FDA for GPS in AML, MPM and MM as well as Orphan Medicinal Product designations from the EMA for GPS in AML,
MPM and MM. We also have received Orphan Drug Product designation for GALE-301 and GALE-302 from the FDA. Although we have received
Orphan Drug Product designation for GPS, GALE-301 and GALE-302, there is no guarantee that these products will be successfully
approved by the FDA, that they will be commercially successful in the marketplace, or that another product will not be approved
for the same indication ahead of our product candidate.
Even if we obtain Orphan Drug exclusivity for a product, that
exclusivity may not effectively protect the product from competition because different drugs can be approved for the same condition.
Even after an Orphan Drug is approved, the FDA can subsequently approve the same drug for the same condition if the FDA concludes
that the later drug is clinically superior in that it is shown to be safer, more effective or makes a major contribution to patient
care. In addition, Orphan Drug exclusivity may be lost if the FDA or EMA determines that the request for designation was materially
defective or if the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient quantity of the drug to meet the needs of patients with the rare
disease or condition.
We currently have Fast Track designation for certain product
candidates and may seek Fast Track designation for additional product candidates or indications, which might not be received or
provide the intended benefits thereof.
If a product candidate is intended for the treatment of a serious
condition and nonclinical or clinical data demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical need for this condition, a product
sponsor may apply to the FDA for Fast Track designation, which may or may not be granted by the FDA. The FDA has given us Fast
Track designation for GPS in AML and MPM and for NPS for the adjuvant treatment of patients with early state breast cancer with
low to intermediate HER2 expression following standard of care upfront therapy (surgery plus chemotherapy +/- radiotherapy).
However, Fast Track designation does not ensure that we will
receive marketing approval or that approval will be granted within any particular timeframe. We may not experience a faster development
or regulatory review or approval process with Fast Track designation compared to conventional FDA procedures. In addition, the
FDA may withdraw Fast Track designation if it believes that the designation is no longer supported by data from our clinical development
program. Fast Track designation alone does not guarantee qualification for the FDA’s priority review procedures.
Failure to obtain regulatory approval in international
jurisdictions would prevent our product candidates from being marketed abroad.
In addition to regulations in the United States, to market and
sell our product candidates in the European Union, United Kingdom, many Asian countries and other jurisdictions, we must obtain
separate regulatory approvals and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements. Approval by the FDA does not ensure
approval by regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions, and approval by one regulatory authority outside the United
States does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions or by the FDA. The regulatory approval
process outside the United States generally includes all of the risks associated with obtaining FDA approval as well as risks attributable
to the satisfaction of local regulations in foreign jurisdictions. The approval procedure varies among countries and can involve
additional testing. The time required to obtain approval may differ substantially from that required to obtain FDA approval. We
may not be able to obtain approvals from regulatory authorities outside the United States on a timely basis, if at all. Clinical
trials accepted in one country may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other countries. In addition, many countries outside
the United States require that a product be approved for reimbursement before it can be approved for sale in that country. A product
candidate that has been approved for sale in a particular country may not receive reimbursement approval in that country.
We may not be able to file for regulatory approvals and may
not receive necessary approvals to commercialize our products in any market. If we are unable to obtain approval of any of our
current or future product candidates by regulatory authorities in the European Union, United Kingdom, Asia or elsewhere, the commercial
prospects of that product candidate may be significantly diminished, our business prospects could decline and this could materially
adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Even if our current and future product candidates receive
regulatory approval, they may still face future development and regulatory difficulties.
Even if we obtain regulatory approval for a product candidate,
that approval would be subject to ongoing requirements by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities governing the manufacture,
quality control, further development, labeling, packaging, storage, distribution, adverse event reporting, safety surveillance,
import, export, advertising, promotion, recordkeeping and reporting of safety and other post-marketing information. These requirements
include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, registration, as well as continued compliance by
us and/or our contract manufacturing organizations, or CMOs, and CROs for any post-approval clinical trials that we may conduct.
The safety profile of any product will continue to be closely monitored by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities
after approval. If the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities become aware of new safety information after approval of
any of our product candidates, they may require labeling changes or establishment of a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy,
impose significant restrictions on a product’s indicated uses or marketing or impose ongoing requirements for potentially
costly post-approval studies or post-market surveillance.
In addition, manufacturers of drug products and their facilities
are subject to continual review and periodic inspections by the FDA and other regulatory authorities for compliance with Good Manufacturing
Practices, or cGMP, Good Clinical Practices, or GCP, and other regulations. If we or a regulatory agency discover previously unknown
problems with a product, such as adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or problems with the facility where the
product is manufactured, a regulatory agency may impose restrictions on that product, the manufacturing facility or us, including
requiring recall or withdrawal of the product from the market or suspension of manufacturing. If we, our product candidates or
the manufacturing facilities for our product candidates fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, a regulatory agency
may:
|
•
|
issue warning letters or untitled letters;
|
|
•
|
mandate modifications to promotional materials or
require us to provide corrective information to healthcare practitioners;
|
|
•
|
require us to enter into a consent decree, which can
include imposition of various fines, reimbursements for inspection costs, required due dates for specific actions and penalties
for noncompliance;
|
|
•
|
seek an injunction or impose civil or criminal penalties
or monetary fines;
|
|
•
|
suspend or withdraw regulatory approval;
|
|
•
|
suspend any ongoing clinical trials;
|
|
•
|
refuse to approve pending applications or supplements
to applications filed by us;
|
|
•
|
suspend or impose restrictions on operations, including
costly new manufacturing requirements; or
|
|
•
|
seize or detain products, refuse to permit the import
or export of products, or require us to initiate a product recall.
|
The occurrence of any event or penalty described above may inhibit
our ability to successfully commercialize our products and generate revenues.
Advertising and promotion of any product candidate that obtains
approval in the United States will be heavily scrutinized by the FDA, the DOJ, the Office of Inspector General of HHS, state attorneys
general, members of Congress and the public. A company can make only those claims relating to safety and efficacy, purity and potency
that are approved by the FDA and in accordance with the provisiosn of the approved label. Additionally, advertising and promotion
of any product candidate that obtains approval outside of the United States will be heavily scrutinized by comparable foreign regulatory
authorities. Violations, including actual or alleged promotion of our products for unapproved or off-label uses, are subject to
enforcement letters, inquiries and investigations, and civil and criminal sanctions by the FDA, as well as prosecution under the
federal False Claims Act. Any actual or alleged failure to comply with labeling and promotion requirements may have a negative
impact on our business.
Even if we obtain regulatory approval for a product, we
will remain subject to ongoing regulatory requirements.
Even if our product candidates are approved, we will be subject
to ongoing regulatory requirements with respect to manufacturing, labeling, packaging, storage, advertising, promotion, sampling,
record-keeping, conduct of post-marketing clinical trials and submission of safety, efficacy and other post-approval information,
including both federal and state requirements in the United States and requirements of comparable foreign regulatory authorities.
Manufacturers and manufacturers’ facilities are required
to continuously comply with FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authority requirements, including ensuring quality control and
manufacturing procedures conform to cGMP, regulations and corresponding foreign regulatory manufacturing requirements. Accordingly,
we and our contract manufacturers will be subject to continual review and inspections to assess compliance with cGMP and adherence
to commitments made in any NDA submission to the FDA or any other type of domestic or foreign marketing authorization application.
Any regulatory approvals we receive for any of our product candidates
may be subject to limitations on the approved indicated uses for which the product candidate may be marketed or to the conditions
of approval, or contain requirements for potentially costly post-marketing testing, including Phase 4 clinical trials, and surveillance
to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product candidate. We will be required to report adverse reactions and production problems,
if any, to the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities. Any new legislation addressing drug safety issues could result
in delays in product development or commercialization, or increased costs to assure compliance. If our original marketing approval
for a product candidate was obtained through an accelerated approval pathway, we could be required to conduct a successful post-marketing
clinical trial to confirm the clinical benefit for our products. An unsuccessful post-marketing clinical trial or failure to complete
such a trial could result in the withdrawal of marketing approval.
If a regulatory agency discovers previously unknown problems
with a product, such as adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or problems with the facility where the product
is manufactured, or it disagrees with the promotion, marketing or labeling of a product, the regulatory agency may impose restrictions
on that product or us, including requiring withdrawal of the product from the market. If we fail to comply with applicable regulatory
requirements, a regulatory agency or enforcement authority may, among other things:
|
•
|
issue warning letters;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
impose civil or criminal penalties;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
suspend or withdraw regulatory approval;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
suspend any of our ongoing clinical trials;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
refuse to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications submitted by us;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
impose restrictions on our operations, including closing our contract manufacturers’ facilities; or
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
require a product recall.
|
Any government investigation of alleged violations of law would
require us to expend significant time and resources in response and could generate adverse publicity. Any failure to comply with
ongoing regulatory requirements may significantly and adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize our products and
the value of our business and our operating results would be adversely affected.
Risks Related to Our Manufacturing
We have limited to no manufacturing, sales, marketing
or distribution capability and must rely upon third parties for such.
We currently have agreements with various third-party manufacturing
facilities for production of our product candidates for research and development and testing purposes. We depend on these manufacturers
to meet our deadlines, quality standards and specifications. Our reliance on third parties for the manufacture of our active pharmaceutical
ingredient and drug product and, in the future, any approved products, creates a dependency that could severely disrupt our research
and development, our clinical testing, and ultimately our sales and marketing efforts if the source of such supply proves to be
unreliable or unavailable. If the contracted manufacturing source is unreliable or unavailable, we may not be able to manufacture
clinical drug supplies of our product candidates, and our preclinical and clinical testing programs may not be able to move forward
and our entire business plan could fail.
Both the active pharmaceutical ingredient and drug product for
our product candidates are currently single sourced. We believe these single sources are currently capable of supplying all anticipated
needs of our proposed clinical studies, as well as initial commercial introduction. If we are able to commercialize our products
in the future, there is no assurance that our manufacturers will be able to meet commercialized scale production requirements in
a timely manner or in accordance with applicable standards or cGMP. Once the nature and scope of additional indications and their
commensurate drug product demands are established, we will seek secondary suppliers of both the active pharmaceutical ingredient
and drug product for our product candidates, but we cannot assure that such secondary suppliers will be found on terms acceptable
to us, or at all.
We are subject to a multitude of manufacturing risks,
any of which could substantially increase our costs and limit supply of our product candidates.
We and our CMOs will need to conduct significant development
work for each product candidate for each target indication for studies, trials and commercial launch readiness. For example, the
processes by which GPS is manufactured were initially developed by MSK for clinical purposes. Concurrent with the license of GPS,
we acquired certain supplies intended for clinical use from MSK. These MSK clinical supplies may not be adequate for future clinical
studies. We intend to improve the existing processes for GPS in connection with more advanced clinical trials or commercializationefforts
we may undertake in the future. Developing commercially viable manufacturing processes is a difficult, expensive and uncertain
task, and there are risks associated with scaling to the level required for advanced clinical trials or commercialization, including
cost overruns, potential problems with process scale-up, process reproducibility, stability issues, consistency and timely availability
of reagents or raw materials. The manufacturing facilities in which our product candidates will be made could be adversely affected
by earthquakes and other natural disasters, equipment failures, labor shortages, power failures, and numerous other factors.
Additionally,
the process of manufacturing our product candidates is complex, highly regulated and subject to several risks, including but not
limited to:
|
•
|
product loss due to contamination, equipment failure or improper installation or operation of equipment, or vendor or operator error;
|
|
•
|
reduced production yields, product defects, and other supply disruptions due to deviations, even minor, from normal manufacturing and distribution processes;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
unexpected product defects;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
microbial, viral, or other contaminations in our product candidates or in the manufacturing facilities in which our product candidates are made, which may result in the closure of such manufacturing facilities for an extended period of time to allow for the investigation and remediation of the contamination;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
adverse impact on the active ingredient of GPS as a result of potential contamination from the presence of heavy metals which can lead to higher than acceptable rates of impurities resulting in the active ingredient being unacceptable for use; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
adverse impact on the manufacturing of GPS as a result of potential contamination from excess water and oxygen which can lead to higher than acceptable levels of impurities resulting in the drug product being unacceptable for use.
|
Any adverse developments affecting manufacturing operations
for our product candidates may result in shipment delays, inventory shortages, lot failures, withdrawals or recalls or other interruptions
in the supply of our drug substance and drug product, which could delay the development of our product candidates. We may also
have to write off inventory, incur other charges and expenses for supply of drug product that fails to meet specifications, undertake
costly remediation efforts, or seek more costly manufacturing alternatives. Inability to meet the demand for our product candidates
could damage our reputation and the reputation of our products among physicians, healthcare payors, patients or the medical community,
and cancer treatment centers, which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our results of operations.
In the clinical trials using GPS and NPS, GM-CSF is also
administered and its availability is dependent upon a third-party manufacturer, which may or may not reliably provide GM-CSF, thus
jeopardizing the completion of the trials.
Some of our product candidates are administered in combination
with GM-CSF, which is available in both liquid and lyophilized forms exclusively from one manufacturer. We will continue to be
dependent on that manufacturer for our supply of GM-CSF in connection with the ongoing GPS and NPS trials and the potential commercial
manufacture of these programs. We have not entered into a dedicated supply agreement with the manufacturer for GM-CSF, and instead
rely on purchase orders to meet our supply needs. Any temporary interruptions or discontinuation of the availability of GM-CSF,
or any determination by us to change the GM-CSF used with GPS or NPS, could have a material adverse effect on our clinical trials
and any commercialization of the assets.
If any of our CMOs’ clinical manufacturing facilities
are damaged or destroyed or production at such facilities is otherwise interrupted, our business and prospects would be negatively
affected.
If our CMOs’ manufacturing facilities or the equipment
in them is damaged or destroyed, we may not be able to quickly or inexpensively replace our manufacturing capacity or replace it
at all. In the event of a temporary or protracted loss of this facility or equipment, we might not be able to transfer manufacturing
to another CMO. Even if we could transfer manufacturing to another CMO, the shift would likely be expensive and time-consuming,
particularly because the new facility would need to comply with the necessary regulatory requirements and we would need FDA approval
before selling any products manufactured at that facility. Such an event could delay our clinical trials or reduce our product
sales.
Although we currently maintain insurance coverage against damage
to our property and to cover business interruption and research and development restoration expenses, our insurance coverage may
not reimburse us, or may not be sufficient to reimburse us, for any expenses or losses we may suffer. We may be unable to meet
our requirements for our product candidates if there were a catastrophic event or failure of our current manufacturing facility
or processes.
Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties and Our
License Agreements
We rely on third parties to conduct our preclinical studies
and clinical trials. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or meet expected deadlines,
or if we lose any of our CROs or other key third-party vendors, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize
our current or future product candidates on a timely basis, if at all.
Our internal capacity for clinical trial execution and management
is limited and therefore we rely heavily on third parties. We have relied upon and plan to continue to rely upon third-party CROs,
vendors and contractors to monitor and manage data for our ongoing preclinical and clinical programs. For example, our collaborating
investigators at MSK, along with their clinical and clinical operations teams, manage the conduct of the ongoing clinical trials
for GPS as well as perform the analysis, publication and presentation of data and results related to this program. We also rely
on collaborating investigators, along with their clinical and clinical operations teams, at MSK for the collection and transfer
of various types of follow-up data regarding studies previously conducted by MSK.
We plan to rely on CROs and other third-party vendors for all
currently contemplated clinical studies, with services to be rendered by such CROs ranging from, in the case of assorted Phase
2 trials, specific and need-tailored (
e.g.
, data management and biostatistics) only to, in the case of our immune combination
(PD1 blocker) Phase 2 trials and our planned Phase 3 trial for GPS in AML, all-encompassing. We rely on these parties for the execution
of our preclinical studies and clinical trials, including the proper and timely conduct of our clinical trials, and we control
only some aspects of their activities. Outsourcing these functions involves risk that third parties may not perform to our standards,
may not produce results or data in a timely manner or may fail to perform at all.
While we have agreements governing the commitments of our third-party
vendor services, we have limited influence over their actual performance. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each
of our trials is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol and legal, regulatory and scientific standards, and our reliance
on the CROs does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities.
If our company, or any of our partners or CROs, fail to comply
with applicable regulations and good clinical practices, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable
and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving
our regulatory applications. We cannot assure you that upon inspection by a given regulatory authority, such regulatory authority
will determine that any of our clinical trials comply with applicable requirements. In addition, our clinical trials must be conducted
with product produced under cGMP and other requirements. We are also required to register ongoing clinical trials and post the
results of completed clinical trials on a government-sponsored database, clinicaltrials.gov, within a specified timeframe. Failure
to comply also would violate federal requirements in the United States and could result in other penalties, which would delay the
regulatory approval process and result in adverse publicity.
Our CROs, third-party vendors and contractors are not our employees,
and except for remedies available to us under our agreements with such CROs, third-party vendors and contractors, we cannot control
whether or not they devote sufficient time and resources, including experienced staff, to our ongoing clinical, nonclinical and
preclinical programs. They may also have relationships with other entities, some of which may be our competitors. If CROs, third-party
vendors and contractors do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations or meet expected deadlines or if
the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our clinical protocols,
regulatory requirements or for other reasons, our clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated and we may not be able
to obtain regulatory approval for or successfully commercialize our current or future product candidates. CRO, vendor or contractor
errors could cause our results of operations and the commercial prospects for our current or future product candidates to be harmed,
our costs to increase and our ability to generate revenues to be delayed.
In addition, the use of third-party service providers requires
us to disclose our proprietary information to these parties, which could increase the risk that this information will be misappropriated.
We currently have a small number of employees, which limits the internal resources we have available to identify and monitor our
third-party providers. To the extent we are unable to identify and successfully manage the performance of third-party service providers
in the future, our business may be adversely affected. Though we carefully manage our relationships with our CROs, there can be
no assurance that we will not encounter challenges or delays in the future or that these delays or challenges will not have a material
adverse impact on our business, financial condition and prospects.
If any of our relationships with our third-party CROs,
third-party vendors or contractors terminate, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative CROs, third-party
vendors or contractors on a timely basis, on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
Our CROs, third-party vendors and contractors have the right
to terminate their agreements with us in the event of an uncured material breach. In addition, some of our CROs, third-party vendors
and contractors have an ability to terminate their respective agreements with us if it can be reasonably demonstrated that the
safety of the subjects participating in our clinical trials warrants such termination, if we make a general assignment for the
benefit of our creditors or if we are liquidated. Identifying, qualifying and managing performance of third-party service providers
can be difficult, time consuming and cause delays in our development programs. In addition, there is a natural transition period
when a new CRO, third-party vendor or contractor commences work and the new CRO, third-party vendor or contractor may not provide
the same type or level of services as the original provider.
We are dependent on technologies we license, and if we
lose the right to license such technologies or we fail to license new technologies in the future, our ability to develop new products
would be harmed, and if we fail to meet our obligations under our license agreements, we may lose the ability to develop our product
candidates.
We currently are dependent on licenses from third parties for
technologies relating to our product candidates. Our current licenses impose, and any future licenses we enter into are likely
to impose, various development, funding, royalty, diligence, sublicensing, insurance and other obligations on us. If our license
with respect to any of these technologies is terminated for any reason, the development of the products contemplated by the licenses
would be delayed, or suspended altogether, while we seek to license similar technology or develop new non-infringing technology.
The costs of obtaining new licenses are high. For example, we are entirely dependent on our license from MSK to allow us to develop
and commercialize our lead product candidate, GPS, and any loss of or challenge to our license agreement with MSK could have a
material and adverse effect on our business and result of operations.
Under certain license agreements that we have already entered
into, we have minimum dollar amounts per year that we are obligated to spend on the development of the technology we have licensed
from our contract partners and other obligations to maintain certain licenses. If we fail to meet such requirements under any of
our licenses or if we fail to comply with any other obligations under these licenses, we may be in breach of our obligations under
such agreements, which may result in the loss of the technology licensed.
In addition, our business depends on our ability to license
therapeutic compounds from third parties. If we fail to meet our obligations under our license agreements, we may lose the ability
to develop our product candidates, which would adversely affect our business.
We have in-licensed a significant portion of our intellectual
property from MSK. If we breach our license agreement with MSK, we could lose the ability to continue the development and potential
commercialization of GPS.
We do not currently own any patents or patent applications related
to our lead product candidate, GPS. GPS is licensed-in from MSK and includes an exclusive license to United States and foreign
patent applications. Under the MSK license agreement, we are subject to various obligations, including diligence obligations with
respect to funding, development and commercialization activities, payment obligations upon achievement of certain milestones and
royalties on product sales, as well as other material obligations. If there is any conflict, dispute, disagreement or issue of
nonperformance between us and MSK regarding our rights or obligations under the license agreements, including any such conflict,
dispute or disagreement arising from our failure to satisfy diligence or payment obligations under any such agreement, we may be
liable to pay damages and MSK may have a right to terminate the affected license. In 2018, we did not make certain required payments
to MSK, which entitles MSK to terminate the license agreement if we are unable to make such payments after notice. To date, we
have not received such a notice from MSK. The loss of our license agreement with MSK could materially adversely affect our ability
to proceed to utilize the affected intellectual property in our development efforts, our ability to enter into future collaboration,
licensing and/or marketing agreements for GPS and our ability to commercialize GPS. The risks described elsewhere pertaining to
our patents and other intellectual property rights also apply to the intellectual property rights that we license, and any failure
by us or our licensors to obtain, maintain and enforce these rights could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We may not realize the benefits of our strategic alliances
that we may form in the future.
We may form strategic alliances, create joint ventures or collaborations
or enter into licensing arrangements with third parties that we believe will complement or augment our existing business. These
relationships, or those like them, may require us to incur nonrecurring and other charges, increase our near- and long-term expenditures,
issue securities that dilute our existing stockholders or disrupt our management and business. In addition, we face significant
competition in seeking appropriate strategic alliances and the negotiation process is time-consuming and complex. Moreover, we
may not be successful in our efforts to establish a strategic alliance or other alternative arrangements for any future product
candidates and programs because our research and development pipeline may be insufficient, our product candidates and programs
may be deemed to be at too early a stage of development for collaborative effort and third parties may not view our product candidates
and programs as having the requisite potential to demonstrate safety and efficacy. If we license products or acquire businesses,
we may not be able to realize the benefit of such transactions if we are unable to successfully integrate them with our existing
operations and company culture. We cannot be certain that, following a strategic transaction or license, we will achieve the revenues
or specific net income that justifies such transaction. Any delays in entering into new strategic alliances agreements related
to our product candidates could also delay the development and commercialization of our product candidates and reduce their competitiveness
even if they reach the market.
Our business involves the use of hazardous materials and
we and our third-party manufacturers and suppliers must comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, which
can be expensive and restrict how we do business.
Our third-party manufacturers’ and suppliers’ activities
involve the controlled storage, use and disposal of hazardous materials. We and our manufacturers and suppliers are subject to
laws and regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of these hazardous materials even after we
sell or otherwise dispose of the products. In some cases, these hazardous materials and various wastes resulting from their use
will be stored at our contractors or manufacturers’ facilities pending use and disposal. We cannot completely eliminate the
risk of contamination, which could cause injury to our employees and others, environmental damage resulting in costly cleanup and
liabilities under applicable laws and regulations governing the use, storage, handling and disposal of these materials and specified
waste products. Although we expect that the safety procedures utilized by our third-party contractors and manufacturers for handling
and disposing of these materials will generally comply with the standards prescribed by these laws and regulations, we cannot guarantee
that this will be the case or eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials. In such an event,
we may be held liable for any resulting damages and such liability could exceed our resources. We do not currently carry biological
or hazardous waste insurance coverage and our property and casualty, and general liability insurance policies specifically exclude
coverage for damages and fines arising from biological or hazardous waste exposure or contamination.
We may not be able to establish or maintain the third-party
relationships that are necessary to develop or potentially commercialize some or all of our product candidates.
We expect to depend on collaborators, partners, licensees, clinical
research organizations and other third parties to support our discovery efforts, to formulate product candidates, to manufacture
our product candidates, and to conduct clinical trials for some or all of our product candidates. We cannot guarantee that we will
be able to successfully negotiate agreements for or maintain relationships with collaborators, partners, licensees, clinical investigators,
vendors and other third parties on favorable terms, if at all. Our ability to successfully negotiate such agreements will depend
on, among other things, potential partners’ evaluation of the superiority of our technology over competing technologies and
the quality of the preclinical and clinical data that we have generated, and the perceived risks specific to developing our product
candidates. If we are unable to obtain or maintain these agreements, we may not be able to clinically develop, formulate, manufacture,
obtain regulatory approvals for or commercialize our product candidates. We cannot necessarily control the amount or timing of
resources that our contract partners will devote to our research and development programs, product candidates or potential product
candidates, and we cannot guarantee that these parties will fulfill their obligations to us under these arrangements in a timely
fashion. We may not be able to readily terminate any such agreements with contract partners even if such contract partners do not
fulfill their obligations to us.
In addition, we may receive notices from third parties from
time to time alleging that our technology or product candidates infringe upon the intellectual property rights of those third parties.
Any assertion by third parties that our activities or product candidates infringe upon the intellectual property rights of third
parties may adversely affect our ability to secure strategic partners or licensees for our technology or product candidates or
our ability to secure or maintain manufacturers for our compounds.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property
We may not be able to obtain and enforce patent rights
or other intellectual property rights that cover our product candidates and that are of sufficient breadth to prevent third parties
from competing against us.
Our success with respect to our product candidates will depend
in part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent protection in the United States and abroad, to preserve our trade secrets,
and to prevent third parties from infringing upon our proprietary rights. We seek to protect our proprietary position by filing
in the United States and in certain foreign jurisdictions patent applications related to our novel technologies and product candidates
that are important to our business. The patent prosecution process is expensive and time-consuming, and we may not be able to file
and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. It is also possible that
we will fail to identify patentable aspects of our research and development output before it is too late to obtain patent protection.
In addition, we may not pursue or obtain patent protection in all major markets. Moreover, in some circumstances, we do not have
the right to control the preparation, filing or prosecution of patent applications, or to maintain the patents, covering technology
that we license from third parties or covering technology that a collaboration or commercialization partner may develop. In some
circumstances, our licensors have the right to enforce the licensed patents without our involvement or consent, or to decide not
to enforce or to allow us to enforce the licensed patents. Therefore, these patents and applications may not be prosecuted and
enforced in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business. If any such licensors fail to maintain such patents, or
lose rights to those patents, the rights that we have licensed may be reduced or eliminated and our ability to develop and commercialize
any of our products that are the subject of such licensed rights could be adversely affected.
The patent position of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies
generally is highly uncertain, involves complex legal and factual questions and has in recent years been the subject of much litigation.
In addition, the laws of foreign jurisdictions may not protect our rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States For
example, European patent law restricts the patentability of methods of treatment of the human body more than U.S. law does. Publications
of discoveries in the scientific literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, and patent applications in the United States
and other jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing, or in some cases not at all. Therefore, we cannot
be certain that we or our licensors were the first to make the inventions claimed in our owned or licensed patents or pending patent
applications, or that we or our licensors were the first to file for patent protection of such inventions. Moreover, the U.S. Patent
and Trademark Office, or USPTO, might require that the term of a patent issuing from a pending patent application be disclaimed
and limited to the term of another patent that is commonly owned or names a common inventor. As a result, the issuance, scope,
validity, term, enforceability and commercial value of our patent rights are highly uncertain.
Our pending and future patent applications, and any collaboration
or commercialization partner’s pending and future patent applications, may not result in patents being issued which protect
our technology or products, in whole or in part, or which effectively prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies
and products.
During prosecution of any patent application, the issuance of
any patents based on the application may depend upon our or their ability to generate additional preclinical or clinical data that
support the patentability of our proposed claims. We or any collaboration or commercialization partner may not be able to generate
sufficient additional data on a timely basis, or at all. Moreover, changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent
laws in the United States or other countries may diminish the value of our or a collaboration or commercialization partner’s
patents or narrow the scope of our or their patent protection.
Changes in either the patent laws or in the interpretations
of patent laws in the United States or abroad may diminish the value of our intellectual property.
On September 16, 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents
Act, or the Leahy-Smith Act, was signed into law. The Leahy-Smith Act includes a number of significant changes to the U.S. patent
law. These include provisions that affect the way patent applications will be prosecuted and may also affect patent litigation.
Accordingly, it is not clear what, if any, impact the Leahy-Smith Act will have on the operation of our business. However, the
Leahy-Smith Act, in particular the first-to-file provision and our implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding
the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement of or defense of our issued patents, all of which could have a material
adverse effect on our business and financial condition. Accordingly, we cannot predict the breadth of claims that may be allowed
or enforced in our patents or in third-party patents.
In addition, U.S. Supreme Court rulings have narrowed the scope
of patent protection available in certain circumstances in certain situations. From time to time, the U.S. Supreme Court, other
federal courts, the U.S. Congress, or interpretation by the USPTO may change the standards of patentability and any such changes
could have a negative impact on our business.
Some cases decided by the U.S. Supreme Court have involved questions
of when claims reciting abstract ideas, laws of nature, natural phenomena and/or natural products are eligible for a patent, regardless
of whether the claimed subject matter is otherwise novel and inventive. These cases include
Association for Molecular Pathology
v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
, 569 U.S. 576 (2013), also known as the Myriad decision;
Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International
,
573 U.S. 13-298 (2014), also known as the Alice decision; and
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.
,
also known as the Prometheus decision, 566 U.S. 66 (2012). The full impact of these decisions is not yet known. In view of these
and subsequent court decisions, the USPTO has issued materials to patent examiners providing guidance for determining the patent
eligibility of claims reciting laws of nature, natural phenomena, or natural products.
Our current product candidates include products, or components,
derived to various extents from nature; therefore, these decisions and their interpretation by the courts and the USPTO may impact
prosecution, defense, and enforcement of certain types of patent claims in our patent portfolio. In addition to increasing uncertainty
with regard to our ability to obtain future patents, this combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the value
of patents, once obtained. Depending on these and other decisions by U.S. Congress, the federal courts, and the USPTO, the laws
and regulations governing patents could change or be interpreted in unpredictable ways that would weaken our ability to obtain
some patent claims or to enforce patents that may issue to us in the future. In addition, these events may adversely affect our
ability to defend patents that may issue in procedures in the USPTO or in U.S. courts.
While we intend to take actions reasonably necessary to
enforce our patent rights, we may not be able to detect infringement of our own or in-licensed patents, which may be especially
difficult for methods of manufacturing or formulation products.
We depend, in part, on our licensors and collaborators to protect
a substantial portion of our proprietary rights. In addition, third parties may challenge our in-licensed patents and any of our
own patents that we may obtain, which could result in the invalidation or unenforceability of some or all of the relevant patent
claims. Litigation or other proceedings to enforce or defend intellectual property rights is very complex, expensive, and may divert
our management’s attention from our core business and may result in unfavorable results that could adversely affect our ability
to prevent third parties from competing with us.
If another party has reason to assert a substantial new question
of patentability against any of our claims in our own and in-licensed patents, the third party can request that the patent claims
be reexamined, which may result in a loss of scope of some claims or a loss of the entire patent. In addition to potential infringement
suits, and interference and reexamination proceedings, we may become a party to patent opposition proceedings where either the
patentability of the inventions subject of our patents are challenged, or we are challenging the patents of others. The costs of
these proceedings could be substantial, and it is possible that such efforts would be unsuccessful. As the medical device, biotechnology
and pharmaceutical industries expand and more patents are issued, the risk increases that others may assert our commercial product
and/or product candidates infringe their patent rights. If a third-party’s patents were found to cover our commercial product
and product candidates, proprietary technologies or our uses, we or our collaborators could be enjoined by a court and required
to pay damages and could be unable to continue to commercialize our products or use our proprietary technologies unless we or it
obtained a license to the patent. A license may not be available to us or our collaborators on acceptable terms, if at all. In
addition, during litigation, the patent holder could obtain a preliminary injunction or other equitable relief, which could prohibit
us from making, using or selling our commercial product and product candidates pending a trial on the merits, which could be years
away.
Our product candidates may face competition sooner than
expected after the expiration of our composition of matter patent protection for such products.
Our composition of matter patents for certain of our product
candidates have expired or will expire prior to any product approval. We intend to seek data exclusivity or market exclusivity
for our GPS as well as our NPS, GALE-301 and GALE-302 product candidates provided under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act,
or FDCA, and similar laws in other countries. We believe that these product candidates will qualify for 12 years of data exclusivity
under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009, or BPCIA. Under the BPCIA, an application for a biosimilar product
or BLA cannot be submitted to the FDA until four years, or if approved by the FDA, until 12 years, after the original brand product
identified as the reference product is approved under a BLA. The BPCIA provides an abbreviated pathway for the approval of biosimilar
and interchangeable biological products. The abbreviated regulatory pathway establishes legal authority for the FDA to review and
approve biosimilar biologics, including the possible designation of a biosimilar as “interchangeable” based on our
similarity to an existing brand product. The law is complex and continues to be interpreted and implemented by the FDA. There is
also a risk that the U.S. Congress could amend the BPCIA to shorten this exclusivity period, potentially creating the opportunity
for biosimilar competition sooner than anticipated after the expiration of our patent protection. Moreover, the extent to which
a biosimilar, once approved, will be substituted for any reference product in a way that is similar to traditional generic substitution
for non-biological products is not yet clear, and will depend on a number of marketplace and regulatory factors that are still
developing.
Even if, as we expect, GPS, NPS, GALE-301 and GALE-302 are considered
to be reference products eligible for 12 years of exclusivity under the BPCIA or qualify for five years of exclusivity as drugs
under the FDCA, another company could market competing products if the FDA approves a full BLA or full NDA for such product containing
the sponsor’s own preclinical data and data from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to demonstrate the safety,
purity and potency of the products.
In some countries outside of the United States, peptide vaccines,
such as GPS, NPS, GALE-301 and GALE-302, are regulated as chemical drugs rather than as biologics and may or may not be eligible
for non-patent exclusivity.
If we are sued for infringing the intellectual property
rights of third parties, such litigation could be costly and time-consuming and could prevent or delay our development and commercialization
efforts.
Our commercial success depends, in part, on us and our collaborators
not infringing the patents and proprietary rights of third parties. There is a substantial amount of litigation and other adversarial
proceedings, both within and outside the United States, involving patent and other intellectual property rights in the biotechnology
and pharmaceutical industries, including patent infringement lawsuits, interference or derivation proceedings, oppositions, and
inter partes
and post-grant review proceedings before the USPTO and non-U.S. patent offices. Numerous U.S. and non-U.S.
issued patents and pending patent applications owned by third parties exist in the fields in which we are developing and may develop
our current and future product candidates. As the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries expand and more patents are issued,
and as our product pipeline grows, the risk increases that our product candidates may be subject to claims of infringement of third
parties’ patent rights as it may not always be clear to industry participants, including us, which patents cover various
types of products or methods of use. The coverage of patents is subject to interpretation by the courts, and the interpretation
is not always uniform or predictable.
If we are sued for patent infringement, we would need to demonstrate
that our product candidates, products and methods either do not infringe the patent claims of the relevant patent or that the patent
claims are invalid, and we may not be able to do this. Proving that a patent is invalid is difficult. If any issued third-party
patents were held by a court of competent jurisdiction to cover aspects of our materials, formulations, methods of manufacture
or methods for treatment, we could be forced, including by court order, to cease developing, manufacturing or commercializing the
relevant product candidate until such patent expired. Alternatively, we may be required to obtain a license from such third party
in order to use the infringing technology and to continue developing, manufacturing or marketing the infringing product candidate.
We could be prevented from commercializing a product candidate or be forced to cease some aspect of our business operations, if,
as a result of actual or threatened patent infringement claims, we are unable to enter into licenses on acceptable terms. In addition,
parties making claims against us may also obtain injunctive or other equitable relief, which could effectively block our ability
to further develop and commercialize one or more of our product candidates.
Defending against claims of patent infringement or misappropriation
of trade secrets could be costly and time consuming, regardless of the outcome. Thus, even if we were to ultimately prevail, or
to settle at an early stage, such litigation could burden us with substantial unanticipated costs. In addition, litigation or threatened
litigation could result in significant demands on the time and attention of our management team, distracting them from the pursuit
of other company business. In the event of a successful claim of infringement against us, we may have to pay substantial damages,
including treble damages and attorneys’ fees if we are found to have willfully infringed a patent, or to redesign our infringing
product candidates, which may be impossible or require substantial time and monetary expenditure. we may also elect to enter into
license agreements in order to settle patent infringement claims prior to litigation, and any such license agreement may require
us to pay royalties and other fees that could be significant. During the course of any patent or other intellectual property litigation,
there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, rulings on motions, and other interim proceedings in the litigation.
If securities analysts or investors regard these announcements as negative, the perceived value of our product candidates, programs
or intellectual property could be diminished. Accordingly, the market price of our shares of common stock may decline.
We may not be able to protect our intellectual property
rights throughout the world.
Filing, prosecuting, enforcing and defending patents on our
current and future product candidates in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive. We or our licensors’
intellectual property rights in certain countries outside the United States may be less extensive than those in the United States
In addition, the laws of certain foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as laws in the
United States Consequently, we and our licensors may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing our and our licensors’
inventions in countries outside the United States, or from selling or importing infringing products made using our and our licensors’
inventions in and into the United States or other jurisdictions. Competitors may use our and our licensors’ technologies
in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection or where we do not have exclusive rights under the relevant patent(s)
to develop their own products and, further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we and our licensors
have patent protection but where enforcement is not as strong as that in the United States These infringing products may compete
with our product candidates in jurisdictions where we or our licensors have no issued patents or where we do not have exclusive
rights under the relevant patent(s), or our patent claims and other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient
to prevent them from so competing.
Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting
and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain
developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property protection, particularly those relating
to biopharmaceuticals, which could make it difficult for us and our licensors to stop the infringement of our and our licensors’
patents or marketing of competing products in violation of our and our licensors’ proprietary rights generally. Proceedings
to enforce our and our licensors’ patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our
attention from other aspects of our business, could put our and our licensors’ patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted
narrowly, could put our and our licensors’ patent applications at risk of not issuing, and could provoke third parties to
assert claims against us or our licensors. We or our licensors may not prevail in any lawsuit that we or our licensors initiate,
and even if we or our licensors are successful the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful.
We may become involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce
our intellectual property, which could be expensive, time-consuming and unsuccessful and have a material adverse effect on the
success of our business and on our stock price.
Third parties may infringe our patents, the patents of our licensors,
or misappropriate or otherwise violate our or our licensors’ intellectual property rights. We and our licensors’ patent
applications cannot be enforced against third parties practicing the technology claimed in such applications unless and until a
patent issues from such applications, and then only to the extent the issued claims cover the technology. In the future, we or
our licensors may elect to initiate legal proceedings to enforce or defend our or our licensors’ intellectual property rights,
to protect our or our licensors’ trade secrets or to determine the validity or scope of intellectual property rights we own
or control. Any claims that we assert against perceived infringers could also provoke these parties to assert counterclaims against
us alleging that we infringe their intellectual property rights or that our intellectual property rights are invalid. In addition,
third parties may initiate legal proceedings against us or our licensors to challenge the validity or scope of intellectual property
rights we own or control. The proceedings can be expensive and time-consuming. Many of our or our licensors’ adversaries
in these proceedings may have the ability to dedicate substantially greater resources to prosecuting these legal actions than we
or our licensors can. Accordingly, despite our or our licensors’ efforts, we or our licensors may not be able to prevent
third parties from infringing upon or misappropriating intellectual property rights we own or control, particularly in countries
where the laws may not protect our rights as fully as in the United States Litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion
of management resources, which could harm our business and financial results. In addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court
may decide that a patent owned by or licensed to us is invalid or unenforceable, in whole or in part, or may refuse to stop the
other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our or our licensors’ patents do not cover the technology
in question. An adverse result in any litigation proceeding could put one or more of our or our licensors’ patents at risk
of being invalidated, held unenforceable or interpreted narrowly.
Interference or derivation proceedings provoked by third parties,
brought by us or our licensors or collaborators, or brought by the USPTO or any non-U.S. patent authority may be necessary to determine
the priority of inventions or matters of inventorship with respect to our or our licensors’ patents or patent applications.
We may also become involved in other proceedings, such as reexamination or opposition proceedings,
inter partes
review,
post-grant review or other pre-issuance or post-grant proceedings in the USPTO or its foreign counterparts relating to our intellectual
property or the intellectual property of others. An unfavorable outcome in any such proceeding could require us or our licensors
to cease using the related technology and commercializing the affected product candidate, or to attempt to license rights to it
from the prevailing party.
Our business could be harmed if the prevailing party does not
offer us or our licensors a license on commercially reasonable terms if any license is offered at all. Even if we or our licensors
obtain a license, it may be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us or our
licensors. In addition, if the breadth or strength of protection provided by our or our licensor’s patents and patent applications
is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to license, develop or commercialize current and future product
candidates. Even if we successfully defend such litigation or proceeding, we may incur substantial costs and it may distract our
management and other employees. We could be found liable for monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees,
if we are found to have willfully infringed a patent.
Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery
required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be
compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings,
motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative,
it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of shares of our common stock.
Although we have taken steps to protect our trade secrets
and unpatented know-how, by entering into confidentiality agreements with third parties, and proprietary information and invention
agreements with certain employees, consultants and advisors, third parties may still obtain this information or we may be unable
to protect our rights.
Proprietary trade secrets and unpatented know-how are also very
important to our business. We also have limited control over the protection of trade secrets used by our licensors, collaborators
and suppliers. There can be no assurance that binding agreements will not be breached, that we would have adequate remedies for
any breach, or that our trade secrets and unpatented know-how will not otherwise become known or be independently discovered by
our competitors. If trade secrets are independently discovered, we would not be able to prevent their use. Enforcing a claim that
a third party illegally obtained and is using our trade secrets or unpatented know-how is expensive and time consuming, and the
outcome is unpredictable.
We may be subject to claims that our employees, consultants
or independent contractors have wrongfully used or disclosed to us alleged trade secrets of their other clients or former employers.
As is common in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry, certain of our employees were formerly employed by other biotechnology
or pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. Moreover, we engage the services of consultants
to assist us in the development of our commercial product and product candidates, many of whom were previously employed at or may
have previously been or are currently providing consulting services to, other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including
our competitors or potential competitors. We may be subject to claims that these employees and consultants or we have inadvertently
or otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of their former employers or their former or current
customers. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these types of claims. Even if we are successful in defending against
any such claims, any such litigation would likely be protracted, expensive, a distraction to our management team, not viewed favorably
by investors and other third parties, and may potentially result in an unfavorable outcome.
If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our
trade secrets and other proprietary information, the value of our technology could be materially adversely affected, and our business
could be harmed.
In addition to seeking the protection afforded by patents, we
rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect proprietary know-how that is not patentable or that we
elect not to patent, processes for which patents are difficult to enforce, and other elements of our technology, discovery and
development processes that involve proprietary know-how, information or technology that is not covered by patents. Any disclosure
to or misappropriation by third parties of our confidential proprietary information could enable competitors to quickly duplicate
or surpass our technological achievements, including by enabling them to develop and commercialize products substantially similar
to or competitive with our current or future product candidates, thus eroding our competitive position in the market. Trade secrets
can be difficult to protect. We seek to protect our proprietary technology and processes, in part, by entering into confidentiality
agreements and invention assignment agreements with our employees, consultants, and outside scientific advisors, contractors and
collaborators. These agreements are designed to protect our proprietary information. Although we use reasonable efforts to protect
our trade secrets, our employees, consultants, contractors, or outside scientific advisors might intentionally or inadvertently
disclose our trade secrets or confidential, proprietary information to competitors. In addition, competitors may otherwise gain
access to our trade secrets or independently develop substantially equivalent information and techniques. If any of our confidential
proprietary information were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor, we would have no right to prevent
such competitor from using that technology or information to compete with us, which could harm our competitive position.
Enforcing a claim that a third party illegally obtained and
is using any of our trade secrets is expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, the laws of certain
foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights such as trade secrets to the same extent or in the same manner as the laws
of the United States Misappropriation or unauthorized disclosure of our trade secrets to third parties could impair our competitive
advantage in the market and could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Risks Related to Commercialization of Our Current and Future
Product Candidates
Our commercial success depends upon attaining significant
market acceptance of our current and future product candidates, if approved, among physicians, patients, healthcare payors and
cancer treatment centers.
Even if
we obtain regulatory approval for any of our current or future product candidates, the products may not gain market acceptance
among physicians, healthcare payors, patients or the medical community, including cancer treatment centers. Market acceptance of
any product candidates for which we receive approval depends on a number of factors, including:
|
•
|
the efficacy and safety of such product candidates
as demonstrated in clinical trials;
|
|
•
|
the clinical indications and patient populations for
which the product candidate is approved;
|
|
•
|
the clinical indications and patient populations for
which the product candidate is approved;
|
|
•
|
acceptance by physicians, major cancer treatment centers
and patients of the drug as a safe and effective treatment;
|
|
•
|
the adoption of novel immunotherapies by physicians,
hospitals and third-party payors;
|
|
•
|
the potential and perceived advantages of product
candidates over alternative treatments;
|
|
•
|
the safety of product candidates seen in a broader
patient group, including our use outside the approved indications;
|
|
•
|
any restrictions on use together with other medications;
|
|
•
|
the prevalence and severity of any side effects;
|
|
•
|
product labeling or product insert requirements of
the FDA or other regulatory authorities;
|
|
•
|
the timing of market introduction of our products
as well as competitive products;
|
|
•
|
the development of manufacturing and distribution
processes for commercial scale manufacturing for our novel WT1 peptide cancer immunotherapy product candidate;
|
|
•
|
the cost of treatment in relation to alternative treatments;
|
|
•
|
the availability of coverage and adequate reimbursement
from third-party payors and government authorities;
|
|
•
|
relative convenience and ease of administration; and
|
|
•
|
the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts
and those of our collaborators.
|
If any of our current and future product candidates are approved
but fail to achieve market acceptance among physicians, patients, healthcare payors or cancer treatment centers, we will not be
able to generate significant revenues, which would compromise our ability to become profitable.
Even if we are able to commercialize our current or future
product candidates, the products may not receive coverage and adequate reimbursement from third-party payors in the United States
and in other countries in which we seek to commercialize our products, which could harm our business.
Our ability to commercialize any product successfully will depend,
in part, on the extent to which coverage and adequate reimbursement for these products and related treatments will be available
from third-party payors, including government health administration authorities, private health insurers and other organizations.
Third-party payors determine which medications they will cover and
establish reimbursement levels. A primary trend in the healthcare industry is cost containment. Third-party payors have attempted
to control costs by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for particular medications. Increasingly, third-party payors
are requiring that drug companies provide them with predetermined discounts from list prices and are challenging the prices charged
for medical products. Third-party payors may also seek additional clinical evidence, beyond the data required to obtain regulatory
approval, demonstrating clinical benefit and value in specific patient populations before covering our products for those patients.
We cannot be sure that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be available for any product that we commercialize and, if coverage
is available, what the level of reimbursement will be. Coverage and reimbursement may impact the demand for, or the price of, any
product candidate for which we obtain regulatory approval. If reimbursement is not available or is available only at limited levels,
we may not be able to successfully commercialize any product candidate for which we obtain regulatory approval.
There may be significant delays in obtaining coverage and reimbursement
for newly approved drugs, and coverage may be more limited than the purposes for which the drug is approved by the FDA or comparable
foreign regulatory authorities. Moreover, eligibility for coverage and reimbursement does not imply that any drug will be paid
for in all cases or at a rate that covers our costs, including research, development, manufacture, sale and distribution. Interim
reimbursement levels for new drugs, if applicable, may also not be sufficient to cover our costs and may only be temporary. Reimbursement
rates may vary according to the use of the drug and the clinical setting in which it is used, may be based on reimbursement levels
already set for lower cost drugs and may be incorporated into existing payments for other services. Net prices for drugs may be
reduced by mandatory discounts or rebates required by third-party payors and by any future relaxation of laws that presently restrict
imports of drugs from countries where they may be sold at lower prices than in the United States. No uniform policy for coverage
and reimbursement exists in the United States, and coverage and reimbursement can differ significantly from payor to payor. Third-party
payors often rely upon Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own reimbursement policies, but also have
their own methods and approval process apart from Medicare determinations. Our inability to promptly obtain coverage and profitable
reimbursement rates from both government-funded and private payors for any approved products that we develop could have a material
adverse effect on our operating results, ability to raise capital needed to commercialize products and overall financial condition.
Recently enacted and future legislation, including potentially
unfavorable pricing regulations may increase the difficulty and cost for us to obtain regulatory approval of and commercialize
our current or future product candidates and affect the prices we may obtain.
The regulations that govern, among other things, regulatory approvals,
coverage, pricing and reimbursement for new drug products vary widely from country to country. In the United States and some foreign
jurisdictions, there have been a number of legislative and regulatory changes and proposed changes regarding the healthcare system
that could prevent or delay regulatory approval of our current or future product candidates, restrict or regulate post-approval
activities and affect our ability to successfully sell any product candidates for which we obtain regulatory approval. In the United
States, the European Union, United Kingdom and other potentially significant markets for our current and future product candidates,
government authorities and third-party payors are increasingly attempting to limit or regulate the price of medical products and
services, particularly for new and innovative products and therapies, which has resulted in lower average selling prices. Legislative
and regulatory proposals have also been made to expand post-approval requirements and restrict sales and promotional activities
for pharmaceutical products. For example, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, issued a final rule, effective
on July 9, 2019, that requires direct-to-consumer television advertisments of prescription drugs and biological products, for which
payment is available through or under Medicare or Medicaid, to include in the advertisement the Wholesale Acquisition Cost, or
list price, of that drug or biological product if it is equal to or greater than $35 for a monthly supply or usual course of treatment.
Prescription drugs and biological products that are in violation of these requirements will be included on a public list. Congress
and the Trump administration have each indicated that it will continue to seek new legislative and/or administrative measures to
control drug costs. At the state level, legislatures are increasingly passing legislation and implementing regulations designed
to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions
on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation
from other countries and bulk purchasing. We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted
in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcare products and services,
which could result in reduced demand for our product candidates or additional pricing pressures. We cannot be sure whether additional
legislative changes will be enacted, or whether the FDA regulations, guidance or interpretations will be changed, or what the impact
of such changes on the regulatory approvals of our product candidates, if any, may be.
Healthcare legislative measures aimed at reducing healthcare
costs may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Third-party payors, whether domestic or foreign,
or governmental or commercial, are developing increasingly sophisticated methods of controlling healthcare costs. In both the United
States and certain international jurisdictions, there have been a number of legislative and regulatory changes to the health care
system that could impact our ability to sell our products profitably. In particular, in 2010, the Affordable Care Act, or ACA,
was enacted, which, among other things, subjected biologic products to potential competition by lower-cost biosimilars, addressed
a new methodology by which rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program are calculated for drugs that are
inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted or injected, increased the minimum Medicaid rebates owed by most manufacturers under the
Medicaid Drug Rebate Program, extended the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program to utilization of prescriptions of individuals enrolled
in Medicaid managed care organizations, subjected manufacturers to new annual fees and taxes for certain branded prescription drugs,
and provided incentives to programs that increase the federal government’s comparative effectiveness research. Since its
enactment, there have been judicial and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the ACA, as well as recent efforts by the
current U.S. administration to repeal or repeal and replace certain aspects of the ACA. On December 14, 2018, a U.S. District Court
Judge in the Northern District of Texas, or the Texas District Court Judge, rules that the individual mandate is a critical and
inseverable feature of the ACA, and therefore, because it was repealed as a part of the Tax Act, the remaining provisions of the
ACA are invalid as well. While the Texas District Court Judge, as well as the Trump Administration and CMS, have stated that the
ruling will have no immediate effect, it is inclear how this decision, subsequent appeals and other efforts to repeal and replace
the ACA will impact the ACA. Until there is more certainty concerning the future of the ACA, it will be difficult to predict its
full impact and influence on our business.
In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted
in the United States since the ACA was enacted. In August 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011, among other things, created measures
for spending reductions by Congress. A Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, tasked with recommending a targeted deficit
reduction of at least $1.2 trillion for the years 2013 through 2021, was unable to reach required goals, thereby triggering the
legislation’s automatic reduction to several government programs. This includes aggregate reductions of Medicare payments
to providers of 2% per fiscal year, which went into effect in 2013, and will remain in effect through 2027 unless additional Congressional
action is taken. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 further reduced Medicare payments to several providers, including hospitals
and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers
from three to five years.
There have been, and likely will continue to be, legislative and
regulatory proposals at the foreign, federal and state levels directed at containing or lowering the cost of healthcare. We cannot
predict the initiatives that may be adopted in the future. The continuing efforts of the government, insurance companies, managed
care organizations and other payors of healthcare services to contain or reduce costs of healthcare and/or impose price controls
may adversely affect:
|
•
|
the demand for our product candidates, if we obtain regulatory
approval;
|
|
•
|
our ability to receive or set a price that we believe is
fair for our products;
|
|
•
|
our ability to generate revenue and achieve or maintain
profitability;
|
|
•
|
the level of taxes that we are required to pay; and
|
|
•
|
the availability of capital.
|
We expect that the ACA, as well as other healthcare reform measures
that may be adopted in the future, may result in additional reductions in Medicare and other healthcare funding, more rigorous
coverage criteria, lower reimbursement and new payment methodologies. This could lower the price that we receive for any approved
product. Any denial in coverage or reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government-funded programs may result in a
similar denial or reduction in payments from private payors, which may prevent us from being able to generate sufficient revenue,
attain profitability or commercialize our product candidates, if approved.
Price controls may be imposed in foreign markets, which may
adversely affect our future profitability.
In some countries, particularly member states of the European Union,
the pricing of prescription drugs is subject to governmental control. In these countries, pricing negotiations with governmental
authorities can take considerable time after receipt of regulatory approval for a product. In addition, there can be considerable
pressure by governments and other stakeholders on prices and reimbursement levels, including as part of cost containment measures.
Political, economic and regulatory developments may further complicate pricing negotiations, and pricing negotiations may continue
after reimbursement has been obtained. Reference pricing used by various European Union member states and parallel distribution,
or arbitrage between low-priced and high-priced member states, can further reduce prices. In some countries, we or our collaborators
may be required to conduct a clinical trial or other studies that compare the cost-effectiveness of our product candidates to other
available therapies in order to obtain or maintain reimbursement or pricing approval. Publication of discounts by third-party payors
or authorities may lead to further pressure on the prices or reimbursement levels within the country of publication and other countries.
If reimbursement of our products is unavailable or limited in scope or amount, or if pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels, our
business could be adversely affected.
Risks Related to Healthcare Compliance Regulations
Our relationships with customers and third-party payors will
be subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations, which could expose us to criminal
sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings. If we or they are
unable to comply with these provisions, we may become subject to civil and criminal investigations and proceedings that could have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and prospects.
Healthcare
providers, physicians and third-party payors will play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of any product candidates
for which we obtain regulatory approval. Our current and future arrangements with healthcare providers, healthcare entities, third-party
payors and customers may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations that may constrain
the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we research, develop and will market, sell and distribute
our products. As a pharmaceutical company, even though we do not and will not control referrals of healthcare services or bill
directly to Medicare, Medicaid or other third-party payors, federal and state healthcare laws and regulations pertaining to fraud
and abuse and patients’ rights are applicable to our business. Restrictions under applicable federal and state healthcare
laws and regulations that may affect our ability to operate include the following:
|
•
|
the federal healthcare Anti-Kickback Statute which prohibits,
among other things, individuals and entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing remuneration,
directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for, either the referral of
an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service, for which payment may be made under a federal
healthcare program such as Medicare and Medicaid;
|
|
•
|
federal civil and criminal false claims laws, including
the federal False Claims Act the can be enforced through civil whistleblower or qui tam actions, and civil monetary penalty laws,
prohibit individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government, including the
Medicare and Medicaid programs, claims for payment or approval that are false or fraudulent or making a false statement to avoid,
decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government;
|
|
•
|
the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act of 1996, or HIPAA, which imposes criminal and civil liability for executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program
and also created federal criminal laws that prohibit knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material
fact or making any materially false statements in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or
services, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, or HITECH, which imposes
obligations, including mandatory contractual terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security and transmission of individually
identifiable health information on entities subject to the law, such as certain healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare
clearinghouses, known as covered entities, and their respective business associates that perform services for them that involve
the creation, use, maintenance or disclosure of, individually identifiable health information;
|
|
•
|
the federal physician sunshine requirements under the Affordable
Care Act which requires certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies, with certain exceptions, to report
annually to HHS information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians, other healthcare providers, and teaching
hospitals, and ownership and investment interests held by physicians and other healthcare providers and their immediate family
members and applicable group purchasing organizations
|
|
•
|
analogous state and foreign laws and regulations, such
as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare
items or services reimbursed by non-governmental third-party payors, including private insurers; some state laws which require
pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance
guidance promulgated by the federal government and may require drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and
other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers, marketing expenditures or pricing information; and certain
state and local laws which require the registration of pharmaceutical sales representatives; and
|
|
•
|
state and foreign laws govern the privacy and security
of health information in specified circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted
by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.
|
Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements with third parties
will comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations will involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental authorities
will conclude that our business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable
fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws or
any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties,
damages, fines, imprisonment, disgorgement, exclusion from government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid,
integrity oversight and reporting obligations, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. If any physicians or other
healthcare providers or entities with whom we expect to do business are found to not be in compliance with applicable laws, they
may be subject to criminal, civil or administrative sanctions, including exclusions from government funded healthcare programs.
Our employees may engage in misconduct or other improper activities,
including noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements, which could cause significant liability for us and harm our
reputation.
We are exposed to the risk of employee fraud or other misconduct,
including intentional failures to comply with FDA regulations or similar regulations of comparable foreign regulatory authorities,
provide accurate information to the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, comply with manufacturing standards we have
established, comply with federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations and similar laws and regulations established
and enforced by comparable foreign regulatory authorities, report financial information or data accurately or disclose unauthorized
activities to us. Employee misconduct could also involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of clinical trials,
which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious harm to our reputation. It is not always possible to identify and deter
employee misconduct, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown
or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a
failure to be in compliance with such laws or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful
in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business and results of operations,
including the imposition of significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, imprisonment, exclusion from
government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and integrity oversight and reporting obligations.
We have been involved in multiple legal and governmental proceedings,
and may in the future be involved in proceedings, relating to the commercial activities of our predecessor that could adversely
affect our financial condition and our business.
Our predecessor company, Galena, was involved in multiple legal
and governmental proceedings, including stockholder class actions, both state and federal, some of which are ongoing. These legal
and governmental actions (the “Galena Legacy Matters”), included allegations relating to federal securities law violations,
claims under the False Claims Act and Anti-Kickback Statute, claims regarding breaches of contract, and other stockholder allegations,
including claims of breaches of fiduciary duty by our former directors, and fentanyl related litigation.
In December 2015, we announced we had received a subpoena from the
U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey, or the USAO NJ, requesting the production of a broad range of documents
pertaining to marketing and promotional practices related to Abstral, a fentanyl or synthetic opioid product, that we sold to Sentynl
Therapeutics Inc., or Sentynl, in November 2015. In January 2016, we announced that the U.S. Attorney’s Office of New Jersey,
of USAO NJ and the Department of Justice, or DOJ, were conducting a criminal and civil investigation of us, which came to involve
criminal investigations with respect to possibly one or more then-current and/or former employees. On September 8, 2017, the DOJ
announced a civil settlement agreement with our company regarding certain of the marketing and promotional practices at issue in
the USAO NJ and DOJ’s investigation. The settlement involved a civil resolution agreement and a civil payment of approximately
$7.551 million, plus interest accrued since the date of reaching an agreement in principle in return for a release of federal government
claims against our company in connection with the covered conduct in investigation. The civil payment was fully paid by us on or
about December 29, 2017. The settlement did not include releases of criminal claims by the USAO NJ and DOJ or claims by state agencies
or administrative claims by the Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, but each of these government authorities indicated
that they had no present intention to pursue claims in connection with the investigation. A qui tam action had been filed against
us and others as described in our settlement agreement with DOJ and USAO NJ. As set forth in that settlement agreement, for a release
of all claims against us and our former officers and directors and dismissal with prejudice of the qui tam lawsuit, the relator
received a portion of the $7.551 million payment to the federal government. As a result of the payment of the settlement amount,
the federal government and the relator filed a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice as to their claims against us in the qui
tam lawsuit. In a separate settlement agreement, we paid $0.3 million in cash to the relator’s counsel for the statutorily
mandated attorney’s fees.
We also received a subpoena from the U.S. Attorney’s Office
for the Southern District of New York, or USAO SDNY, in February 2018, seeking documents related to specific prescribing physicians
for Abstral who have been subsequently indicted, to which we responded. To our knowledge, we are not a target or subject of that
investigation and have had no further interaction with the USAO SDNY with regard to the matter after responding to the subpoena.
A federal investigation led by the U.S. Attorney’s Office
for the Southern District of Alabama, or the SDAL, of two of the high-prescribing physicians for Abstral (fentanyl) sublingual
tablets resulted in the criminal prosecution of the two physicians for alleged violations of the federal False Claims Act and other
federal statutes. On April 28, 2016, a second superseding indictment was filed in the criminal case, which added additional information
about the defendant physicians and provided information regarding the facts and circumstances involving a rebate agreement between
us and the defendant physicians’ pharmacy as well as their ownership of our common stock. The criminal trial, which began
on January 4, 2017, concluded with a jury verdict on February 23, 2017 finding these physicians guilty on 19 of 20 counts. In May
2017, one physician was sentenced to 20 years in prison, and the other physician was sentenced to 21 years in prison. At the end
of the SDAL case, SDAL dismissed count 18 of the indictment charging that the physicians conspired, through the C&R Pharmacy,
to receive illegal kickbacks in exchange for prescribing Abstral. To our knowledge, we were not a target or subject of that investigation.
There continues to be significant litigation and governmental activity
generally in the fentanyl and opioid area, and this activity is expected to continue and may increase in the future. We cannot
assure you we will not become subject to additional significant legal or governmental proceedings relating to Galena’s former
Abstral business in the future. Moreover, in addition to these ongoing and prior matters, we may be exposed to claims, or other
legal or governmental actions in the future relating to violations of the False Claims Act, Anti-Kickback Statute, the Affordable
Care Act, or any other applicable state or federal statutes or regulations, and thereby be subject to penalties, such as civil
and criminal penalties, damages, fines, or an administrative action of exclusion from government health care reimbursement programs.
There can be no assurance that we will not be exposed to other liabilities
or risks, including potential liabilities and risks not currently known to us, resulting from the prior operations of Galena. We
can make no assurances as to the time or resources that will need to be devoted to the Galena Legacy Matters, or any new or future
matters resulting from the prior operations of Galena or their outcome, or the impact, if any, that these matters or any resulting
legal or governmental proceedings may have on our business or financial condition but any further action in respect of any such
matter by a governmental agency could have a material adverse effect on our results of operation and our business and prospects.
Product liability lawsuits against us could cause us to incur
substantial liabilities and to limit commercialization of any products that we may develop.
We face an
inherent risk of product liability exposure related to the testing of our current or future product candidates in human clinical
trials and will face an even greater risk if we commercially sell any products that we may develop. Product liability claims may
be brought against us by subjects enrolled in our clinical trials, patients, healthcare providers or others using, administering
or selling our products. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against claims that our product candidates or products caused
injuries, we could incur substantial liabilities. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:
|
•
|
decreased demand for any product candidates or products
that we may develop;
|
|
•
|
termination of clinical trial sites or entire clinical
trial programs;
|
|
•
|
injury to our reputation and significant negative media
attention;
|
|
•
|
withdrawal of clinical trial participants;
|
|
•
|
significant costs to defend the related litigation;
|
|
•
|
substantial monetary awards to trial subjects or patients;
|
|
•
|
diversion of management and scientific resources from our
business operations; and
|
|
•
|
the inability to commercialize any products that we may
develop.
|
We currently hold product liability insurance coverage at a level
that we believe is customary for similarly situated companies and adequate to provide us with insurance coverage for foreseeable
risks, but which may not be adequate to cover all liabilities that we may incur. Insurance coverage is increasingly expensive.
We may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in an amount adequate to satisfy any liability that may
arise. We intend to expand our insurance coverage for products to include the sale of commercial products if we obtain regulatory
approval for our product candidates in development, but we may be unable to obtain commercially reasonable product liability insurance
for any products that receive regulatory approval. Large judgments have been awarded in class action lawsuits based on drugs that
had unanticipated side effects. A successful product liability claim or series of claims brought against us, particularly if judgments
exceed our insurance coverage, could decrease our cash and adversely affect our business.
We face product liability exposure from prior sales of Abstral
and Zuplenz (ondansetron) and, if successful claims are brought against us, we may incur substantial liability if our insurance
coverage for those claims is inadequate.
Because we previously sold Abstral and Zuplenz (ondansetron), an
anti-emetic, oral soluble film for chemotherapy-induced nausea we are exposed to possible product liability claims. In November
2015, Galena sold the rights to Abstral to Sentynl, and in December 2015, Galena sold the rights to Zuplenz to Midatech Pharma,
PLC, or Midatech. Under the respective asset purchase agreements with Sentynl and Midatech, our future obligations under our former
agreements with Orexo AB and MonoSol Rx have been assumed by Sentynl and Midatech, respectively, except that we will continue to
be responsible for chargebacks, rebates, patient assistance and certain other product distribution channel liabilities related
to Abstral and Zuplenz for a specified period of time post-closing. We are also required to indemnify Sentynl and Midatech for
contractual or product liability claims arising from actions occurring prior to the sale date. With respect to Zuplenz, we will
continue to be responsible for any downstream returns from end user customers or returns from wholesalers from inventory existing
as of December 24, 2015 that was sold by us prior to December 24, 2015.
We do not consider our responsibilities with regard to Sentynl and
Midatech to be material, but if substantial unknown liabilities were to arise, it could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against product liability claims we could incur substantial liabilities,
regardless of merit or eventual outcome. A successful product liability claim or series of claims brought against us could cause
our stock price to decline and, if judgments exceed our insurance coverage, could decrease our cash and have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
Risks Related to our Business Operations
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control
over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud. As a result, stockholders
could lose confidence in our financial and other public reports, which would harm our business, the trading price of our common
stock and our ability to raise additional capital in the future.
Effective internal controls over financial reporting are necessary
for us to provide reliable financial reports and, together with adequate disclosure controls and procedures, are designed to prevent
fraud. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could cause
us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. Ineffective internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our
reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of Common Stock, and which could impact
our ability to raise capital in the future. In addition, any future testing by us conducted in connection with Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended (“SOX”), or any required subsequent testing by our independent registered public
accounting firm, may reveal deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses
or that may require prospective or retroactive changes to our consolidated financial statements or identify other areas for further
attention or improvement.
We are required, pursuant to Section 404 of SOX, to furnish a
report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2018. However, our independent registered public accounting firm is not required to attest to the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404. Under the supervision and with the participation of
our Chief Executive Officer and Vice President Finance and Interim Principal Accounting Officer, our management conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the guidelines in the Internal
Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on
that evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31,
2018. An independent assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls could detect problems that our
management’s assessment might not. Undetected material weaknesses in our internal controls could lead to financial
statement restatements and require us to incur the expense of remediation.
We face substantial competition, which may result in others
discovering, developing or commercializing products before or more successfully than we do.
We face competition from numerous pharmaceutical and biotechnology
enterprises, as well as from academic institutions, government agencies and private and public research institutions for our current
product candidates. Our commercial opportunities will be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and commercialize products
that are safer, more effective, have fewer side effects or are less expensive than any products that we may develop. Competition
could result in reduced sales and pricing pressure on our current or future product candidates, if approved, which in turn would
reduce our ability to generate meaningful revenues and have a negative impact on our results of operations. In addition, significant
delays in the development of our product candidates could allow our competitors to bring products to market before we do and impair
our ability to commercialize our product candidates. The biotechnology industry, including the cancer immunotherapy market, is
intensely competitive and involves a high degree of risk. We compete with other companies that have far greater experience and
financial, research and technical resources than us. Potential competitors in the United States and worldwide are numerous and
include pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, educational institutions and research foundations, many of which have substantially
greater capital resources, marketing experience, research and development staffs and facilities than ours. Some of our competitors
may develop and commercialize products that compete directly with those incorporating our technology or may introduce products
to market earlier than our products or on a more cost-effective basis. In addition, our technology may be subject to competition
from other technology or methods developed using techniques other than those developed by traditional biotechnology methods. Our
competitors compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel as well as in acquiring technologies
complementary to our technology. Our company and our collaborators may face competition with respect to product efficacy and safety,
ease of use and adaptability to various modes of administration, acceptance by physicians, the timing and scope of regulatory approvals,
availability of resources, reimbursement coverage, price and patent position, including the potentially dominant patent positions
of others. An inability to successfully complete our product development or commercializing those product candidates could result
in our having limited prospects for establishing market share or generating revenue from our technology.
There are several agents in clinical development in similar settings
to our planned Phase 3 AML clinical development program for GPS. The most advanced of these products is oral Vidaza (azacytidine)
(also known as CC-486), under development by Celgene Corporation, which is anticipated to report results from a registration-enabling
Phase 3 study (named the QUAZAR or CC-486-AML-001 study) by the end of 2019. There are several of other investigational immunotherapies
advancing through Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials for target indications that we believe are also potential target indications for GPS.
If these or other therapies are successful in their development, it could negatively impact our ability to enroll our clinical
trials and could negatively impact the commercial potential of GPS.
We are also planning a clinical development program in combination
with cancer checkpoint inhibitors. This is a highly competitive field, with hundreds of such combination trials with various checkpoint
inhibitors ongoing. If one or more of these combinations produce positive results in indications that we believe are targets for
GPS (either in combination or in stand-alone administration) this could increase the difficulty for us to conduct our trials and
could negatively impact our path to regulatory approval and our ability to successfully commercialize our products.
Many of our competitors or potential competitors have significantly
greater established presence in the market, financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical
testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing approved products than we do, and as a result
may have a competitive advantage over us. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may result
in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. Smaller or early-stage companies may also
prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These
third parties compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, establishing clinical
trial sites and patient registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies and technology licenses complementary
to our programs or potentially advantageous to our business.
As a result of these factors, these competitors may obtain regulatory
approval of their products before we are able to obtain patent protection or other intellectual property rights, which will limit
our ability to develop or commercialize our current or future product candidates. Our competitors may also develop drugs that are
safer, more effective, more widely used and cheaper than ours, and may also be more successful than us in manufacturing and marketing
their products. These appreciable advantages could render our product candidates obsolete or noncompetitive before we can recover
the expenses of development and commercialization.
We enter into various contracts in the normal course of our
business in which we may be required to indemnify the other party to the contract under certain specific scenarios. In the event
we have to perform under these indemnification provisions, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
In the normal course of business, we periodically enter into academic,
commercial, service, collaboration, licensing, consulting and other agreements that contain indemnification provisions. With respect
to our academic and other research agreements, we typically agree to indemnify the institution and related parties from losses
arising from claims relating to the products, processes or services made, used, sold or performed pursuant to the agreements for
which we have secured licenses, and from claims arising from our or our sublicensees’ exercise of rights under the agreement.
With respect to our collaboration agreements, we indemnify our collaborators from any third-party product liability claims that
could result from the production, use or consumption of the product, as well as for alleged infringements of any patent or other
intellectual property right by a third party. With respect to consultants, we indemnify them from claims arising from the good
faith performance of their services.
Should our obligations under an indemnification provision exceed
applicable insurance coverage or if we were denied insurance coverage for any claim, our business, financial condition and results
of operations could be adversely affected. Similarly, if we are relying on a collaborator to indemnify us and the collaborator
is denied insurance coverage for the claim or the indemnification obligation exceeds the applicable insurance coverage, and if
the collaborator does not have other assets available to indemnify us, our business, financial condition and results of operations
could be adversely affected.
Significant disruptions of information technology systems,
computer system failures or breaches of information security could adversely affect our business.
We rely to a large extent upon sophisticated information technology
systems to operate our business. In the ordinary course of business, we collect, store and transmit large amounts of confidential
information (including, but not limited to, personal information and intellectual property). We also have outsourced significant
elements of our operations to third parties, including significant elements of our information technology infrastructure and, as
a result, we are managing many independent vendor relationships with third parties who may or could have access to our confidential
information. The size and complexity of our information technology and information security systems, and those of our third-party
vendors with whom we contract (and the large amounts of confidential information that is present on them), make such systems potentially
vulnerable to service interruptions or to security breaches from inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees or vendors,
or from malicious attacks by third parties. Such attacks are of ever-increasing levels of sophistication and are made by groups
and individuals with a wide range of motives (including, but not limited to, industrial espionage and market manipulation) and
expertise. While we have invested significantly in the protection of data and information technology, there can be no assurance
that our efforts will prevent service interruptions or security breaches.
Our internal computer systems, and those of MSK, our CROs, our CMOs,
and other business vendors on which we rely, are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, unauthorized access, natural disasters,
fire, terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures. We exercise little or no control over these third parties,
which increases our vulnerability to problems with their systems. If such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our
operations, it could result in a material disruption of our drug development programs. Any interruption or breach in our systems
could adversely affect our business operations and/or result in the loss of critical or sensitive confidential information or intellectual
property, and could result in financial, legal, business and reputational harm to us or allow third parties to gain material, inside
information that they use to trade in our securities. For example, the loss of clinical trial data from completed or ongoing clinical
trials could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the
data. To the extent that any disruption or security breach results in a loss of or damage to our data or applications, or inappropriate
disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability, the further development of our current and future
product candidates could be delayed and our business could be otherwise adversely affected.
We will likely need to grow the size of our organization in
the future, and we may experience difficulties in managing this growth.
As of May
16, 2019, we had 6 full-time employees. Depending on the outcome of our review of our strategic alternatives, we may need to grow
the size of our organization in order to support our continued development and potential commercialization of our product candidates.
As our development and commercialization plans and strategies continue to develop, our need for additional managerial, operational,
manufacturing, sales, marketing, financial and other resources may increase. Our management, personnel and systems currently in
place may not be adequate to support this future growth. Future growth would impose significant added responsibilities on members
of management, including:
|
•
|
managing our clinical trials effectively;
|
|
•
|
identifying, recruiting, maintaining, motivating and integrating
additional employees;
|
|
•
|
managing our internal development efforts effectively while
complying with our contractual obligations to licensors, licensees, contractors and other third parties;
|
|
•
|
improving our managerial, development, operational, information
technology, and finance systems; and
|
|
•
|
expanding our facilities.
|
If our operations expand, we will also need to manage additional
relationships with various strategic partners, suppliers and other third parties. Our future financial performance and our ability
to commercialize our product candidates and to compete effectively will depend, in part, on our ability to manage any future growth
effectively, as well as our ability to develop a sales and marketing force when appropriate for our company. To that end, we must
be able to manage our development efforts and preclinical studies and clinical trials effectively and hire, train and integrate
additional management, research and development, manufacturing, administrative and sales and marketing personnel. The failure to
accomplish any of these tasks could prevent us from successfully growing our company.
The requirements of being a public company may strain our
resources, divert management’s attention and affect our ability to attract and retain qualified board members.
As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements
of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, the listing requirements of Nasdaq and other applicable securities
rules and regulations. Compliance with these rules and regulations has increased, and will likely continue to increase, our legal
and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming or costly, and place significant strain on
our personnel, systems and resources. In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and
public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some
activities more time consuming. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due
to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time. This could result in continuing
uncertainty regarding compliance matters, higher administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention.
Further, if our compliance efforts differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related
to practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business may be harmed. Being a public company
that is subject to these rules and regulations also makes it more expensive for us to obtain and retain director and officer liability
insurance, and we may in the future be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain or retain
adequate coverage. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board
of directors and qualified executive officers.
We have in the past, and may in the future, become involved
in securities class action litigation that could divert management’s attention and harm our business, and insurance coverage
may not be sufficient to cover all costs and damages.
In the past, securities class action or stockholder derivative litigation
often follows certain significant business transactions, such as the sale of a business division or announcement of a merger. Additionally,
securities class action or stockholder derivative litigation has become common in our industry following the announcement of negative
data or adverse events. We have in the past, and may in the future, become involved in this type of litigation. Litigation often
is expensive and diverts management’s attention and resources, which could adversely affect the continuing company’s
business.
Our future success depends on our ability to retain our executive
officers and to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.
We are highly dependent upon our personnel, including Dr. Angelos M.
Stergiou (M.D., Sc.D. h.c.), our President and Chief Executive Officer, and member of our board of directors. Our employment agreement
with Dr. Stergiou does not prevent him from terminating his employment with us at any time. The loss of Dr. Stergiou’s
services could impede the achievement of our research, development and commercialization objectives. We have not obtained, do not
own, nor are we the beneficiary of, key-person life insurance.
Governance changes, becoming subject to enhanced regulatory requirements
and increased responsibilities associated with becoming a public company may influence our management personnel and our employees
to terminate their employment with us. To enhance our ability to retain our executive management personnel, we have entered into
retention agreements with certain executive officers and may find it beneficial to enter into additional retention agreements with
other key personnel in the future, potentially increasing payroll and operating expenses.
Our future growth and success depend on our ability to recruit,
retain, manage and motivate our employees. The loss of any member of our senior management team or the inability to hire or retain
experienced management personnel could compromise our ability to execute our business plan and harm our operating results. Because
of the specialized scientific and managerial nature of our business, we rely heavily on our ability to attract and retain qualified
scientific, technical and managerial personnel. The competition for qualified personnel in the pharmaceutical field is intense
and as a result, we may be unable to continue to attract and retain qualified personnel necessary for the development of our business.
If we and our third-party manufacturers fail to comply with
environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, we could become subject to fines or penalties or incur costs that could
have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.
We and our third-party manufacturers are subject to numerous environmental,
health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures and the handling, use, storage, treatment
and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes. Our operations involve the use of hazardous and flammable materials, including
chemicals and biological materials. Our operations also produce hazardous waste products. We generally contract with third parties
for the disposal of these materials and wastes. We cannot eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from these materials. In
the event of contamination or injury resulting from us or our third-party manufacturers’ use of hazardous materials, we could
be held liable for any resulting damages, and any liability could exceed our resources. We also could incur significant costs associated
with civil or criminal fines and penalties.
Although we maintain workers’ compensation insurance to cover
the costs and expenses we may incur due to injuries to our employees resulting from the use of hazardous materials with a policy
limit that we believe is customary for similarly situated companies and adequate to provide us with insurance coverage for foreseeable
risks, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. We do not maintain insurance for environmental
liability or toxic tort claims that may be asserted against us in connection with our storage or disposal of biological or hazardous
materials.
In addition, we may incur substantial costs in order to comply with
current or future environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. These current or future laws and regulations may impair
our research, development or production efforts. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations also may result in substantial
fines, penalties or other sanctions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and
prospects.
Risks Relating to Ownership of Our Common Stock
We need to secure additional capital which may cause dilution
to you and our existing stockholders, provide subsequent investors with rights and preference that are senior to yours, restrict
our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our product candidates on unfavorable terms to us.
We will need to raise additional capital in the future. If we raise
funds through the issuance of debt or equity, any debt securities or preferred stock issued will have rights, preferences and privileges
senior to those of holders of our common stock in the event of a liquidation. In such event, there is a possibility that once all
senior claims are settled, there may be no assets remaining to pay out to the holders of common stock. In addition, if we raise
funds through the issuance of additional equity, whether through private placements or additional public offerings, such an issuance
would dilute our stockholders and, similar to some of our past financings, may contain terms that could result in additional further
significant dilution in the future. Debt financing, if available, could include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to
take certain actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures, entering into licensing arrangements, or
declaring dividends, and may require us to grant security interests in our assets, including our intellectual property and for
our subsidiaries to guarantee our obligations.
The market price and trading volume of shares of our common
stock may be volatile.
The market
price of shares of our common stock has exhibited substantial volatility recently. Between January 2, 2018 and March 31, 2019,
the trading price of shares of our common stock as reported on Nasdaq ranged from a low of $0.80 to a high of $11.09. The market
price of shares of our common stock could continue to fluctuate significantly for many reasons, including the following factors:
|
•
|
reports of the results of our clinical trials regarding
the safety or efficacy of our product candidates and surrogate markers;
|
|
•
|
announcements of regulatory developments or technological
innovations by us or our competitors;
|
|
•
|
announcements of business or strategic transactions or
our success in finalizing such a transaction;
|
|
•
|
announcements of legal or regulatory actions against us
or any adverse outcome of any such actions;
|
|
•
|
changes in our relationships with our licensors, licensees
and other strategic partners;
|
|
•
|
low volume in the number of shares of our common stock
traded on Nasdaq;
|
|
•
|
our quarterly operating results;
|
|
•
|
announcements of dilutive financing;
|
|
•
|
announcements of additional potential reverse stock split;
|
|
•
|
developments in patent or other technology ownership rights;
|
|
•
|
additional funds may not be available on terms that are
favorable to us and, in the case of equity financings, may result in dilution to our stockholders;
|
|
•
|
government regulation of drug pricing; and
|
|
•
|
general changes in the economy, the financial markets or the pharmaceutical or biotechnology industries.
|
Factors beyond our control may also have an impact on the market
price of shares of our common stock. For example, to the extent that other companies within our industry experience declines in
their stock prices, the market price of shares of our common stock may decline as well.
Inadequate funding for the FDA, the SEC and other government
agencies could hinder their ability to hire and retain key leadership and other personnel, prevent new products and services from
being developed or commercialized in a timely manner or otherwise prevent those agencies from performing normal business functions
on which the operation of our business may rely, which could negatively impact our business.
The ability of the FDA to review and approve new products can be
affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, ability to hire and retain key personnel and
accept the payment of user fees, and statutory, regulatory, and policy changes. Average review times at the agency have fluctuated
in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of the SEC and other government agencies on which our operations may
rely, including those that fund research and development activities is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid
and unpredictable.
Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time
necessary for new drugs to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business.
For example, over the last several years, including beginning on December 22, 2018, the U.S. government has shut down several
times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA and the SEC, have had to furlough critical FDA, SEC and other government
employees and stop critical activities. If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, it could significantly impact the ability of
the FDA to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further,
upon completion of this offering and in our operations as a public company, future government shutdowns could impact our ability
to access the public markets and obtain necessary capital in order to properly capitalize and continue our operations.
Risks Relating to this Offering and Ownership of Our Common Stock
Management will have broad discretion as to the use of the
proceeds from this offering and we may not use the proceeds effectively.
Our management will have broad discretion with respect to the use
of proceeds of this offering, including for any of the purposes described in the section entitled “
Use of Proceeds
”
beginning on page 46 of this prospectus. You will be relying on the judgment of our management regarding the application
of the proceeds of this offering. The results and effectiveness of the use of proceeds are uncertain, and we could spend the proceeds
in ways that you do not agree with or that do not improve our results of operations or enhance the value of our common stock.
Our failure to apply these funds effectively could harm our business, delay the development of our product candidates and cause
the price of our common stock to decline.
You will experience immediate and substantial dilution as
a result of this offering and may experience additional dilution in the future
.
You will incur immediate and substantial dilution as a
result of this offering. After giving effect to the sale by us of securities offered in this offering at an assumed public
offering price of $ per share of common stock, and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
offering expenses payable by us, investors in this offering can expect an immediate dilution of approximately $ per share.
See the section entitled “
Dilution
” beginning on page 50 of this prospectus for a more detailed
discussion of the dilution you will incur if you purchase shares in this offering. The discussion above assumes no sale of
pre-funded warrants, which, if sold, would reduce the number of shares of common stock that we are offering on a one-for-one
basis.
There is no public market for the pre-funded warrants being
offered in this offering.
There is no established public trading market for the pre-funded
warrants being offered in this offering, and we do not expect a market to develop. In addition, we do not intend to apply to list
the pre-funded warrants on any securities exchange or nationally recognized trading system, including The Nasdaq Capital Market.
Without an active market, the liquidity of the pre-funded warrants will be limited.
Holders of pre-funded warrants purchased in this offering
will have no rights as common stockholders until such holders exercise their warrants and acquire our common stock.
Until holders of pre-funded warrants acquire shares of our common
stock upon exercise thereof, holders of warrants will have no rights with respect to the shares of our common stock underlying
such warrants. Upon exercise of the pre-funded warrants, the holders will be entitled to exercise the rights of a common stockholder
only as to matters for which the record date occurs after the exercise date.
The market price and trading volume of shares of our common
stock may be volatile.
The stock market in general, and Nasdaq in particular, as well as
biotechnology companies, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate
to the operating performance of small companies. The market price of shares of our common stock could continue to fluctuate significantly
for many reasons, including the following factors:
|
·
|
reports of the results of our clinical trials regarding the safety or efficacy of our product candidates and surrogate markers;
|
|
·
|
announcements of regulatory developments or technological innovations by us or our competitors;
|
|
·
|
announcements of business or strategic transactions or our success in finalizing such a transaction;
|
|
·
|
announcements of legal or regulatory actions against us or any adverse outcome of any such actions;
|
|
·
|
changes in our relationships with our licensors, licensees and other strategic partners;
|
|
·
|
low volume in the number of shares of our common stock traded on Nasdaq;
|
|
·
|
our quarterly operating results;
|
|
·
|
announcements of dilutive financing;
|
|
·
|
announcements of additional potential reverse stock split;
|
|
·
|
developments in patent or other technology ownership rights;
|
|
·
|
additional funds may not be available on terms that are favorable to us and, in the case of equity financings, may result in
dilution to our stockholders;
|
|
·
|
government regulation of drug pricing; and
|
|
·
|
general changes in the economy, the financial markets or the pharmaceutical or biotechnology industries.
|
Factors beyond our control may also have an impact on the market
price of shares of our common stock. For example, to the extent that other companies within our industry experience declines in
their stock prices, the market price of shares of our common stock may decline as well.
Future sales of substantial amounts of our common stock, or
the possibility that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Future sales in the public market of shares of our common stock,
including shares referred to in the foregoing risk factors or shares issued upon exercise of our outstanding stock options or warrants,
or the perception by the market that these sales could occur, could lower the market price of our common stock or make it difficult
for us to raise additional capital.
As of March 31, 2019, we had reserved for issuance 1,334,321
shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options at a weighted-average exercise price of
$11.94 per share, 12,758 shares of our common stock issuable upon settlement of outstanding RSUs, and 17,698,061 shares of
our common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants at a weighted-average exercise price of $5.31 per share.
Since March 31, 2019, we have issued 1,000,000 shares of our common stock in connection with the exercise of certain warrants
pursuant to the warrant exercise agreement and also issued warrants exercisable for additional 1,000,000 shares of
common stock at an exercise price per share of $1.40. Upon exercise or conversion, the underlying shares, similar to those issued
as the settlement payment, may be resold into the public market. In the case of outstanding securities that have exercise or
conversion prices that are below the market price of our common stock from time to time, our stockholders would experience
dilution upon the exercise or conversion of these securities.
Certain of our securityholders have registration rights and they
can require us, subject to certain limitations, to register their securities for resale, or require us to include their securities
for resale in any offering of our common stock we may propose. Any such resales into the public market could place downward pressure
on the price of our common stock.
We have issued and may issue additional preferred stock in
the future, and the terms of the preferred stock may reduce the value of our common stock.
We are authorized to issue up to five million shares of preferred
stock in one or more series. Our Board of Directors may determine the terms of future preferred stock offerings without further
action by our stockholders. If we issue shares of preferred stock, it could affect stockholder rights or reduce the market value
of our outstanding common stock. In particular, specific rights granted to future holders of preferred stock may include voting
rights, preferences as to dividends and liquidation, conversion and redemption rights, sinking fund provisions, and restrictions
on our ability to merge with or sell our assets to a third party.
We have in the past and expect in the future to settle legal
claims through the issuance of freely tradable shares of our common stock, which will result in dilution to holders of our common
stock and may adversely affect the market price of our common stock
We have in the past and expect in the future to settle legal claims
through the issuance of freely tradable shares of our common stock. In June 2018, we issued 228,672 unrestricted shares of our
common stock (or $1,250,000 based on the volume-weighted average closing price for the 20 trading days immediately preceding June
21, 2018, the day before the transfer of the settlement stock to the settlement fund) to settle the case entitled
Patel vs.
Galena Biopharma, Inc. et. al
. We may issue additional shares of common stock as settlement payments in the future. Payment
of these amounts in our common stock could cause significant dilution to our stockholders, and the amount of that dilution will
vary depending on the price of our common stock at the time of the payment. In addition, the issuance of such a significant number
of shares of our may cause a decrease in the trading price of our common stock.
Anti-takeover provisions of our Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation and our Amended and Restated Bylaws and provisions of Delaware law could delay or prevent a change of control.
Anti-takeover provisions of our Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation and our Amended and Restated Bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or other change of control that
stockholders may consider favorable or may impede the ability of the holders of our common stock to change our management and may
be constrained by other contractual agreements with third parties. These provisions of our Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation and our Amended and Restated Bylaws, among other things:
|
·
|
divide our Board of Directors into three classes, with members of each class to be elected for staggered three-year terms;
|
|
·
|
limit the right of securityholders to remove directors;
|
|
·
|
prohibit stockholders from acting by written consent;
|
|
·
|
regulate how stockholders may present proposals or nominate directors for election at annual meetings of stockholders; and
|
|
·
|
authorize our Board to issue preferred stock in one or more series, without stockholder approval.
|
In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
provides that, subject to limited exceptions, persons that acquire, or are affiliated with a person that acquires, more than 15%
of the outstanding voting stock of a Delaware corporation such as We shall not engage in any business combination with that corporation,
including by merger, consolidation or acquisitions of additional shares for a three-year period following the date on which that
person or our affiliate crosses the 15% stock ownership threshold. Section 203 could operate to delay or prevent a change of control
of us.
We are, and in the future may be, subject to legal or governmental
proceedings that could adversely affect our financial condition and our business.
Our predecessor company, Galena, was involved in multiple legal
and governmental proceedings, including stockholder class actions, both state and federal, some of which are ongoing and to which
the combined company continues to be subject. These legal and governmental actions, which we refer to as the Galena Legacy Matters,
included allegations relating to federal securities law violations, claims under the False Claims Act and Anti-Kickback Statute,
claims regarding breaches of contract, and other stockholder allegations, including claims of breaches of fiduciary duty by our
former directors, and fentanyl related litigation. As a result of a cease and desist order issued by the SEC on April 10, 2017
and our related settlement with the SEC, or the SEC Settlement, we are currently an “ineligible issuer” as the term
is defined under Rule 405 promulgated under the Securities Act. This could make it more difficult for us to raise necessary financing
in the future. If we fail to comply with the terms of the SEC Settlement in the future, it could have significant additional adverse
consequences to us. A number of the Galena Legacy Matters relate to Galena’s former commercial activities associated with
Abstral, a fentanyl, or synthetic opioid, product. There continues to be significant litigation and governmental activity generally
in the fentanyl and opioid area, and this activity is expected to continue and may increase in the future. We cannot assure you
we will not become subject to additional significant legal or governmental proceedings relating to Galena’s former Abstral
business in the future.
These Galena Legacy Matters have required and continue to require
our management and board of directors to devote a significant amount of time and resources to defending such claims and addressing
such allegations, rather than focusing on executing on our business plans and operations. We may, in the future, become subject
to additional legal and governmental actions that will also require us to expend time and resources. The settlement of the Galena
Legacy Matters has resulted in substantial payments, some of which have not been covered by our insurance policies. We may continue
to incur substantial unreimbursed legal fees and other expenses in connection with the Galena Legacy Matters. These ongoing and
other future legal and governmental proceedings may not qualify for coverage under, or may exceed the limit of, our applicable
directors and officers liability insurance policies and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity,
and results of operations. An unfavorable outcome in any of these matters could damage our business and reputation or result in
additional claims or proceedings against us. Moreover, in addition to these ongoing and prior matters, we may be exposed to claims
as a result of the Merger, or other legal or governmental actions in the future, which could result in the payment of additional
amounts and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. We can make no assurances as to
the time or resources that will need to be devoted to the Galena Legacy Matters, or any new or future matters or their outcome,
or the impact, if any, that these matters or any resulting legal or governmental proceedings may have on our business or financial
condition but any further action in respect of any such matter by a governmental agency could have a material adverse effect on
our results of operation and our business and prospects. See “
Business—Legal Proceedings
” for more information
regarding our legal and governmental proceedings.
If our common stock becomes subject to the penny stock rules,
it may be more difficult to sell our common stock.
The SEC has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices
in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 (other
than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or authorized for quotation on certain automated quotation
systems, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the
exchange or system). The OTC Bulletin Board does not meet such requirements and if the price of our common stock is less than $5.00
and our common stock is no longer listed on a national securities exchange such as Nasdaq, our stock may be deemed a penny stock.
The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, at least two business days prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise
exempt from those rules, to deliver to the customer a standardized risk disclosure document containing specified information and
to obtain from the customer a signed and date acknowledgment of receipt of that document. In addition, the penny stock rules require
that prior to effecting any transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, a broker-dealer must make a special
written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive: (i) the purchaser’s
written acknowledgment of the receipt of a risk disclosure statement; (ii) a written agreement to transactions involving penny
stocks; and (iii) a signed and dated copy of a written suitability statement. These disclosure requirements may have the effect
of reducing the trading activity in the secondary market for our common stock, and therefore stockholders may have difficulty selling
their shares.
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common
stock and we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
Our business requires significant funding. We currently plan to
invest all available funds and future earnings in the development and growth of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash
dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future and are prohibited by the terms of our outstanding indebtedness from paying
dividends on any common stock, except with the prior consent of our lenders. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our
common stock will be our stockholders’ sole source of potential gain for the foreseeable future.