Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The purpose of this discussion and analysis is to focus on significant changes in the financial condition of Red River Bancshares, Inc. and our wholly owned subsidiary, Red River Bank, from December 31, 2018 through September 30, 2019, and on our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2018, included in our Prospectus that was filed with the SEC on May 3, 2019, relating to the IPO, and information presented elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, particularly the unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing in Item 1.
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to, among other things, future events and our financial performance. We caution that assumptions, expectations, projections, intentions, or beliefs about future events may, and often do, vary from actual results and the differences can be material. See
“Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” Also, see risk factors and other cautionary statements described under the heading “Risk Factors” included in our Prospectus filed with the SEC on May 3, 2019. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements except as otherwise required by applicable law.
CORPORATE SUMMARY
Red River Bancshares, Inc. was founded in 1998 and is a bank holding company headquartered in Alexandria, Louisiana. Through our wholly owned subsidiary, Red River Bank, a Louisiana state-chartered bank, we provide a fully integrated suite of banking products and services tailored to the needs of our commercial and retail customers.
We operate from a network of 24 banking centers throughout Louisiana. Banking centers are located in the following markets: Central Louisiana, which includes the Alexandria MSA; Northwest Louisiana, which includes the Shreveport-Bossier City MSA; Southeast Louisiana, which includes the Baton Rouge MSA; Southwest Louisiana, which includes the Lake Charles MSA; and the Northshore, which includes Covington.
Our priority is to drive shareholder value through the establishment of a market-leading commercial banking franchise in Louisiana. We provide superior service through highly qualified, relationship-oriented bankers who are committed to their customers and the communities in which we offer our products and services. Our strategy is to expand geographically through the establishment of de novo banking centers in new markets and, to a lesser extent, through the acquisition of financial institutions with customer-oriented, compatible philosophies and in desirable geographic areas.
OVERVIEW
The third quarter of 2019 was our first full quarter of operations as a public company. In the third quarter, profitability increased with record high quarterly and year-to-date net income, the payoff of the junior subordinated debentures was completed, asset quality improved, and we opened a banking center in our newest market. As of September 30, 2019, we had assets of $1.94 billion.
We had record high net income for the quarter and year ended September 30, 2019. The third quarter net income was $6.8 million, which was $1.3 million, or 23.6%, higher compared to the second quarter of 2019, and was $705,000, or 11.5%, higher than the third quarter of 2018. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, was $18.1 million, an increase of $1.2 million, or 7.0%, compared to $16.9 million, for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.
As planned, a portion of the proceeds from the May 2019 IPO were used to redeem our junior subordinated debentures in June and August 2019. In August 2019, the remaining $5.2 million of the junior subordinated debentures were redeemed and the related business trust was terminated, leaving no outstanding long-term debt as of September 30, 2019. Interest expense for the junior subordinated debentures was $73,000 for the third quarter of 2019, $156,000 for the second quarter of 2019, and $150,000 for the third quarter of 2018.
The net interest margin (FTE) for the third quarter of 2019 was 3.55%. The net interest margin benefited from the payoff of the junior subordinated debentures and was partially offset by the impact from the two Federal Reserve rate decreases.
Asset quality improved in the third quarter of 2019. NPAs dropped to $8.0 million as of September 30, 2019, from $13.2 million as of June 30, 2019. The ratio of NPAs to total assets improved to 0.41% as of September 30, 2019, from 0.70% as of June 30, 2019.
In the third quarter of 2019, we continued to execute our organic growth plan in our newest market. The new Northshore market, including the city of Covington, Louisiana, is located on the north shore of Lake Pontchartrain, near New Orleans, Louisiana. In April 2019, we opened a temporary loan production office in Covington. In the second and third quarters of 2019, the Northshore banking team was fully staffed and trained to provide full banking services. In late September 2019, we closed the Covington loan production office and opened a full-service banking center. As of September 30, 2019, Red River Bank had approximately $21.1 million of loans in the Northshore market.
The following tables contain selected financial information regarding our financial position and performance as of and for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
Change from
December 31, 2018 to September 30, 2019
|
|
September 30,
2019
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Selected Period End Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
1,938,854
|
|
|
$
|
1,860,588
|
|
|
$
|
78,266
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
341,900
|
|
|
307,877
|
|
|
34,023
|
|
|
11.1
|
%
|
Loans held for investment
|
1,413,162
|
|
|
1,328,438
|
|
|
84,724
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
Total deposits
|
1,676,851
|
|
|
1,645,583
|
|
|
31,268
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
—
|
|
|
11,341
|
|
|
(11,341
|
)
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
245,389
|
|
|
193,703
|
|
|
51,686
|
|
|
26.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the
three months ended
|
|
As of and for the
nine months ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
6,847
|
|
|
$
|
5,538
|
|
|
$
|
6,142
|
|
|
$
|
18,081
|
|
|
$
|
16,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Common Share Data:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share, basic
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
$
|
2.59
|
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
Earnings per share, diluted
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
$
|
2.57
|
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
$
|
33.59
|
|
|
$
|
32.59
|
|
|
$
|
28.09
|
|
|
$
|
33.59
|
|
|
$
|
28.09
|
|
Tangible book value per share
|
|
$
|
33.37
|
|
|
$
|
32.38
|
|
|
$
|
27.86
|
|
|
$
|
33.37
|
|
|
$
|
27.86
|
|
Cash dividends per share
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic
|
|
7,304,273
|
|
|
7,037,834
|
|
|
6,732,886
|
|
|
6,993,990
|
|
|
6,726,487
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted
|
|
7,340,498
|
|
|
7,074,769
|
|
|
6,768,171
|
|
|
7,032,059
|
|
|
6,763,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Performance Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets
|
|
1.42
|
%
|
|
1.18
|
%
|
|
1.36
|
%
|
|
1.28
|
%
|
|
1.28
|
%
|
Return on average equity
|
|
11.20
|
%
|
|
9.92
|
%
|
|
12.96
|
%
|
|
10.91
|
%
|
|
12.35
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
3.46
|
%
|
|
3.49
|
%
|
|
3.48
|
%
|
|
3.42
|
%
|
Net interest margin (FTE)
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
|
3.51
|
%
|
|
3.54
|
%
|
|
3.53
|
%
|
|
3.46
|
%
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
57.75
|
%
|
|
62.81
|
%
|
|
58.12
|
%
|
|
60.00
|
%
|
|
59.48
|
%
|
Loans HFI to deposits ratio
|
|
84.27
|
%
|
|
85.23
|
%
|
|
83.04
|
%
|
|
84.27
|
%
|
|
83.04
|
%
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits to deposits ratio
|
|
36.68
|
%
|
|
35.30
|
%
|
|
35.04
|
%
|
|
36.68
|
%
|
|
35.04
|
%
|
Noninterest income to average assets
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
|
0.87
|
%
|
|
0.87
|
%
|
|
0.84
|
%
|
|
0.81
|
%
|
Operating expense to average assets
|
|
2.47
|
%
|
|
2.65
|
%
|
|
2.47
|
%
|
|
2.51
|
%
|
|
2.45
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Credit Quality Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPAs to total assets
|
|
0.41
|
%
|
|
0.70
|
%
|
|
0.57
|
%
|
|
0.41
|
%
|
|
0.57
|
%
|
Nonperforming loans to loans HFI
|
|
0.47
|
%
|
|
0.87
|
%
|
|
0.72
|
%
|
|
0.47
|
%
|
|
0.72
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to loans HFI
|
|
0.98
|
%
|
|
0.98
|
%
|
|
0.92
|
%
|
|
0.98
|
%
|
|
0.92
|
%
|
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity to total assets
|
|
12.66
|
%
|
|
12.57
|
%
|
|
10.41
|
%
|
|
12.66
|
%
|
|
10.41
|
%
|
Tangible common equity to tangible assets
|
|
12.59
|
%
|
|
12.50
|
%
|
|
10.34
|
%
|
|
12.59
|
%
|
|
10.34
|
%
|
Total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
17.76
|
%
|
|
17.90
|
%
|
|
16.36
|
%
|
|
17.76
|
%
|
|
16.36
|
%
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
16.80
|
%
|
|
16.95
|
%
|
|
15.46
|
%
|
|
16.80
|
%
|
|
15.46
|
%
|
Common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
16.80
|
%
|
|
16.60
|
%
|
|
14.64
|
%
|
|
16.80
|
%
|
|
14.64
|
%
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital to average assets
|
|
12.77
|
%
|
|
12.83
|
%
|
|
11.59
|
%
|
|
12.77
|
%
|
|
11.59
|
%
|
|
|
(1)
|
2018 amounts adjusted to give effect to the 2018 2-for-1 stock split.
|
FINANCIAL CONDITION
General
As of September 30, 2019, total assets were $1.94 billion which was $78.3 million, or 4.2%, higher than total assets of $1.86 billion as of December 31, 2018. Within total assets, compared to December 31, 2018, loans HFI increased by $84.7 million, AFS securities increased by $34.0 million, and interest-bearing deposits in other banks decreased by $44.2 million. For liabilities, compared to December 31, 2018, deposits increased $31.3 million and junior subordinated debentures decreased $11.3 million. In the second and third quarters of 2019, all of the junior subordinated debentures were completely paid off and the related trusts terminated. As of September 30, 2019, we had no outstanding long-term debt. As of September 30, 2019, the loans HFI to deposits ratio was 84.27% and the noninterest-bearing deposits to total deposits ratio was 36.68%. Stockholders' equity increased $51.7 million from December 31, 2018, mainly due to the $26.8 million of proceeds from the IPO, net of expenses and underwriting commissions and $18.1 million of net income.
Securities
Our securities portfolio is the second largest component of earning assets and provides a significant source of revenue. As of September 30, 2019, our securities portfolio was 17.8% of total assets. It is designed primarily to provide and maintain liquidity, generate a favorable return on investments without incurring unnecessary interest rate and credit risk, and complement our lending activities. As of September 30, 2019, all securities were classified as AFS within the portfolio. We may invest in various types of liquid assets that are permissible under governing regulations and approved by our investment policy, which include U.S. Treasury obligations, U.S. government agency obligations, certificates of deposit of insured domestic banks, mortgage-backed and mortgage-related securities, corporate notes having an investment rating of "A" or better, municipal bonds, and certain equity securities.
Total securities were $345.9 million as of September 30, 2019, an increase of $34.2 million, or 11.0%, from $311.7 million as of December 31, 2018. The $345.9 million was comprised of $341.9 million in AFS securities and $4.0 million in equity securities. Investment activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, included $109.4 million of securities purchased, offset by $35.0 million in sales, $49.3 million in maturities, prepayments, and calls, and a $9.9 million increase in the unrealized net gain on securities.
In the third quarter of 2019, we sold $35.0 million of securities, consisting of a mix across various sectors, that had short-term remaining maturities. This transaction included mostly lower yielding securities, along with a few strategic higher yielding securities which also had short average lives. We were able to obtain a small gain on this transaction, and the proceeds from the sale were used to purchase mortgage-backed securities at higher yields. This realignment transaction reduced the amount of securities repricing in the short term and is expected to partially mitigate our exposure to a decreasing rate environment.
The securities portfolio tax-equivalent yield was 2.31% for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to 2.17% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The increase in yield for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the same period for 2018, was primarily due to purchasing $122.8 million of securities from September 30, 2018 to September 30, 2019, at higher yields than the existing portfolio yield at the time of the purchases.
The carrying values of our securities classified as AFS are adjusted for unrealized gain or loss, and any unrealized gain or loss is reported on an after-tax basis as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity. Equity securities, consisting of a mutual fund, are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets with periodic changes in value recorded through the consolidated statements of income. As of September 30, 2019, the net unrealized gain of the AFS securities portfolio was $347,000, or 0.1% of the total carrying value of the portfolio, as compared to a net unrealized loss of $9.5 million, or 3.0% of the total carrying value of the portfolio, as of December 31, 2018.
The fair value of our equity securities was $4.0 million as of September 30, 2019, with a recognized gain of $133,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to a fair value of $3.8 million as of December 31, 2018, with a recognized loss of $85,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018. Prior to the 2018 adoption of ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10), mutual fund securities were included in AFS securities.
The following tables summarize the amortized cost and estimated fair value of our securities by type as of the dates indicated. As of September 30, 2019, other than securities issued by U.S. government agencies or government sponsored enterprises, our securities portfolio did not contain securities of any one issuer with an aggregate book value in excess of 10.0% of our stockholders’ equity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts as of September 30, 2019
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Securities AFS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
$
|
246,868
|
|
|
$
|
489
|
|
|
$
|
(1,225
|
)
|
|
$
|
246,132
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
84,660
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
85,696
|
|
U.S. agency securities
|
10,025
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
10,072
|
|
Total Securities AFS
|
$
|
341,553
|
|
|
$
|
1,848
|
|
|
$
|
(1,501
|
)
|
|
$
|
341,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts as of December 31,2018
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Securities AFS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
$
|
221,799
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
(7,122
|
)
|
|
$
|
214,688
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
70,416
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
(2,235
|
)
|
|
68,275
|
|
U.S. agency securities
|
23,170
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|
22,915
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
1,994
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
Total Securities AFS
|
$
|
317,379
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
(9,618
|
)
|
|
$
|
307,877
|
|
The following tables show the fair value of AFS securities which mature during each of the periods indicated. The contractual maturity of a mortgage-backed security is the date at which the last underlying mortgage matures. The yields shown in the tables indicate tax equivalent projected book yields as of the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts as of September 30, 2019 which mature
|
|
Within
One Year
|
|
After One Year
but Within
Five Years
|
|
After Five Years
but Within
Ten Years
|
|
After
Ten Years
|
|
Total
|
|
Amount
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Securities AFS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
2.93
|
%
|
|
$
|
21,178
|
|
|
1.77
|
%
|
|
$
|
36,707
|
|
|
1.99
|
%
|
|
$
|
188,186
|
|
|
2.35
|
%
|
|
$
|
246,132
|
|
|
2.25
|
%
|
Municipal bonds
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
12,594
|
|
|
2.05
|
%
|
|
36,405
|
|
|
2.73
|
%
|
|
36,697
|
|
|
3.37
|
%
|
|
85,696
|
|
|
2.90
|
%
|
U.S. agency securities
|
13
|
|
|
2.81
|
%
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
2.11
|
%
|
|
5,127
|
|
|
2.59
|
%
|
|
3,908
|
|
|
2.77
|
%
|
|
10,072
|
|
|
2.61
|
%
|
Total Securities AFS
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
2.91
|
%
|
|
$
|
34,796
|
|
|
1.88
|
%
|
|
$
|
78,239
|
|
|
2.37
|
%
|
|
$
|
228,791
|
|
|
2.52
|
%
|
|
$
|
341,900
|
|
|
2.42
|
%
|
|
|
(1)
|
Tax equivalent projected book yield as of the date indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts as of December 31, 2018 which mature
|
|
Within
One Year
|
|
After One Year
but Within
Five Years
|
|
After Five Years
but Within
Ten Years
|
|
After
Ten Years
|
|
Total
|
|
Amount
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Securities AFS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
2.70
|
%
|
|
$
|
29,591
|
|
|
1.73
|
%
|
|
$
|
45,409
|
|
|
1.98
|
%
|
|
$
|
139,679
|
|
|
2.23
|
%
|
|
$
|
214,688
|
|
|
2.11
|
%
|
Municipal bonds
|
5,647
|
|
|
2.35
|
%
|
|
10,084
|
|
|
2.26
|
%
|
|
35,727
|
|
|
2.60
|
%
|
|
16,817
|
|
|
3.51
|
%
|
|
68,275
|
|
|
2.76
|
%
|
U.S. agency securities
|
6,934
|
|
|
1.44
|
%
|
|
9,348
|
|
|
2.67
|
%
|
|
4,670
|
|
|
2.53
|
%
|
|
1,963
|
|
|
2.81
|
%
|
|
22,915
|
|
|
2.28
|
%
|
U.S. treasury securities
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
2.84
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
2.84
|
%
|
Total Securities AFS
|
$
|
12,590
|
|
|
1.85
|
%
|
|
$
|
51,022
|
|
|
2.05
|
%
|
|
$
|
85,806
|
|
|
2.27
|
%
|
|
$
|
158,459
|
|
|
2.37
|
%
|
|
$
|
307,877
|
|
|
2.27
|
%
|
|
|
(1)
|
Tax equivalent projected book yield as of the date indicated.
|
Loan Portfolio
Our loan portfolio is our largest category of earning assets, and interest income earned on our loan portfolio is our primary source of income. We maintain a diversified loan portfolio with a focus on commercial real estate, one-to-four family residential, and commercial and industrial loans. As of September 30, 2019, loans HFI were $1.41 billion, an increase of $84.7 million, or 6.4%, compared to $1.33 billion as of December 31, 2018. New loan origination activity was normal for the first nine months and spread across all of our markets, with our newer markets experiencing the most growth.
Loans HFI by category and loans HFS are summarized below as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2019
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
$
|
518,286
|
|
|
36.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
454,689
|
|
|
34.2
|
%
|
One-to-four family residential
|
417,318
|
|
|
29.5
|
%
|
|
406,963
|
|
|
30.7
|
%
|
Construction and development
|
120,025
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
102,868
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
Commercial and industrial
|
266,322
|
|
|
18.8
|
%
|
|
275,881
|
|
|
20.8
|
%
|
Tax-exempt
|
57,422
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
60,104
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
Consumer
|
33,789
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
27,933
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
Total loans HFI
|
$
|
1,413,162
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,328,438
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Total loans HFS
|
$
|
4,113
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,904
|
|
|
|
Loans to borrowers in the health care industry were 9.2% of loans HFI as of September 30, 2019, compared to 9.1% as of December 31, 2018. This group predominantly includes loans to the nursing and residential care facilities sector that were 5.1% of loans HFI as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, as well as loans to the ambulatory health care services sector that were 4.0% of loans HFI as of September 30, 2019, compared to 3.9% as of December 31, 2018. Energy related credits were 2.3% of loans HFI as of September 30, 2019, compared to 2.9% as of December 31, 2018.
Nonperforming Assets
NPAs consist of nonperforming loans and property acquired through foreclosures or repossession. Nonperforming loans include loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more and loans that are on nonaccrual status. Loans are considered past due when principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments are due.
Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when management determines that a borrower may be unable to meet future contractual payments as they become due. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, uncollected accrued interest is reversed, reducing interest income, and future interest income accrual is discontinued. Interest income is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments are received in excess of principal due. Loans are returned to accrual status when the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.
Asset quality is managed through disciplined underwriting policies, continual monitoring of loan performance, and focused management of NPAs. There can be no assurance, however, that the loan portfolio will not become subject to losses due to declines in economic conditions, deterioration in the financial condition of our borrowers, or a decline in the value of collateral.
Asset quality improved in the third quarter of 2019. NPAs as of September 30, 2019, dropped to $8.0 million compared to $13.2 million as of June 30, 2019, due to receipt of $5.1 million in payoffs on loans reported as past due in the second quarter of 2019. NPAs as of September 30, 2019 compared to December 31, 2018, increased $827,000, or 11.6%, from $7.1 million primarily due to foreclosed real estate acquired in resolution of nonperforming loans. The ratio of NPAs to total assets improved to 0.41% as of September 30, 2019, from 0.70% as of June 30, 2019. The ratio of NPAs to total assets was 0.38% as of December 31,2018.
Nonperforming loan and asset information is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2019
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Nonperforming loans:
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans
|
$
|
6,347
|
|
|
$
|
5,560
|
|
Accruing loans 90 or more days past due
|
301
|
|
|
939
|
|
Total nonperforming loans
|
6,648
|
|
|
6,499
|
|
Foreclosed assets:
|
|
|
|
Real estate
|
1,307
|
|
|
646
|
|
Other
|
17
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total foreclosed assets
|
1,324
|
|
|
646
|
|
Total NPAs
|
$
|
7,972
|
|
|
$
|
7,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troubled debt restructurings:(1)
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans
|
$
|
3,453
|
|
|
$
|
3,540
|
|
Accruing loans 90 or more days past due
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Performing loans
|
1,655
|
|
|
1,572
|
|
Total troubled debt restructurings
|
$
|
5,108
|
|
|
$
|
5,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans to loans HFI(1)
|
0.47
|
%
|
|
0.49
|
%
|
NPAs to total assets
|
0.41
|
%
|
|
0.38
|
%
|
|
|
(1)
|
Troubled debt restructurings – nonaccrual and accruing loans 90 or more days past due are included in the respective components of nonperforming loans.
|
Nonaccrual loans are summarized below by category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2019
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Nonaccrual loans by category:
|
|
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
$
|
1,949
|
|
|
$
|
1,362
|
|
One-to-four family residential
|
637
|
|
|
424
|
|
Construction and development
|
53
|
|
|
55
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
3,690
|
|
|
3,675
|
|
Tax-exempt
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Consumer
|
18
|
|
|
44
|
|
Total
|
$
|
6,347
|
|
|
$
|
5,560
|
|
Potential Problem Loans
From a credit risk standpoint, we classify loans in one of five categories: pass, special mention, substandard, doubtful, or loss. Loan classifications reflect a judgment about the risk of default and loss associated with the loans. Classifications are reviewed periodically and adjusted to reflect the degree of risk and loss believed to be inherent in each loan. The methodology is structured so that specific reserve allocations are increased in accordance with deterioration in credit quality (and a corresponding increase in risk and loss) or decreased in accordance with improvement in credit quality (and a corresponding decrease in risk and loss). Loans classified as pass are loans with very low to acceptable risk levels based on the borrower’s financial condition, financial trends, management strength, and collateral quality. Loans classified as special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If these weaknesses are not corrected, repayment possibilities for the loan may deteriorate. However, the loss potential does not pose sufficient risk to warrant substandard classification.
Loans classified as substandard have well defined weaknesses which jeopardize normal repayment of principal and interest. Prompt corrective action is required to reduce exposure and to assure adequate remedial actions are taken by the borrower. If these weaknesses do not improve, loss is possible. Loans classified as doubtful have well defined
weaknesses that make full collection improbable. Loans classified as loss are considered uncollectible and charged-off to the allowance for loan losses.
As of September 30, 2019, loans classified as pass were 97.4% of loans HFI and loans classified as special mention and substandard were 1.6% and 1.0%, respectively, of loans HFI. There were no loans as of September 30, 2019, classified as doubtful or loss. As of December 31, 2018, loans classified as pass were 96.7% of loans HFI and loans classified as special mention and substandard were 1.7% and 1.6%, respectively, of loans HFI. There were no loans as of December 31, 2018, classified as doubtful or loss.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses represents management’s best assessment of potential loan losses and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. It is maintained at a level estimated to be adequate to absorb these potential losses through periodic charges to the provision for loan losses. The amount of the allowance for loan losses should not be interpreted as an indication that charge-offs in future periods will necessarily occur in those amounts, or at all.
The allowance for loan losses is established in accordance with GAAP and consists of specific and general reserves. Specific reserves relate to loans classified as impaired. Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans include troubled debt restructurings and performing and nonperforming loans. Impaired loans are reviewed individually, and a specific allowance is allocated, if necessary, based on evaluation of either the fair value of the collateral underlying the loan or the present value of future cash flows calculated using the loan’s existing interest rate. General reserves relate to the remainder of the loan portfolio, including overdrawn deposit accounts, and are based on evaluation of a number of factors, such as current economic conditions, the quality and composition of the loan portfolio, loss history, and other relevant factors.
In connection with the review of the loan portfolio, risk elements attributable to particular loan types or categories are considered in assessing the quality of individual loans. Some of the risk elements considered include:
|
|
•
|
for commercial real estate loans, the debt service coverage ratio (income from the business in excess of operating expenses compared to loan repayment requirements); operating results of the owner in the case of owner occupied properties; the loan to value ratio; the age and condition of the collateral; and the volatility of income, property value, and future operating results typical of properties of that type;
|
|
|
•
|
for one-to-four family residential mortgage loans, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan, including a consideration of the debt to income ratio and employment and income stability; the loan-to-value ratio; and the age, condition, and marketability of the collateral;
|
|
|
•
|
for construction and development loans, the perceived feasibility of the project including the ability to sell developed lots or improvements constructed for resale or the ability to lease property constructed for lease; the quality and nature of contracts for presale or prelease, if any; experience and ability of the developer; and the loan to value ratio; and
|
|
|
•
|
for commercial and industrial loans, the debt service coverage ratio; the operating results of the commercial, industrial, or professional enterprise; the borrower’s business, professional, and financial ability and expertise; the specific risks and volatility of income and operating results typical for businesses in that category; the value, nature, and marketability of collateral; and the financial resources of the guarantor(s), if any.
|
When effective, the CECL allowance model, prescribed by ASU No. 2016-13, will require measurement of expected credit losses based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable supportable forecasts. This model will replace the existing incurred loss model. As an SEC registrant with smaller reporting company filing status, CECL is effective January 1, 2023. Refer to Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Recent Accounting Pronouncements in the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this report for more information on ASU No. 2016-13.
As of September 30, 2019, the allowance for loan losses totaled $13.9 million, or 0.98% of loans HFI. As of December 31, 2018, the allowance for loan losses totaled $12.5 million, or 0.94% of loans HFI. The increase of $1.4 million was due to the nine month provision for loan losses offset by a slight net charge-off position for the period. The increase in commercial charge-offs and recoveries was primarily due to commercial deposit accounts that were charged off and subsequently recovered in the second quarter of 2019.
The provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, was $1.4 million, down $32,000, or 2.2%, from $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.
The following table displays activity in the allowance for loan losses for the periods shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Loans HFI
|
$
|
1,413,162
|
|
|
$
|
1,333,362
|
|
Average loans outstanding
|
$
|
1,375,129
|
|
|
$
|
1,302,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period
|
$
|
12,524
|
|
|
$
|
10,895
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
1,432
|
|
|
1,464
|
|
Charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
—
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
One-to-four family residential
|
(15
|
)
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Commercial and industrial
|
(574
|
)
|
|
(86
|
)
|
Consumer
|
(240
|
)
|
|
(280
|
)
|
Total charge-offs
|
(829
|
)
|
|
(397
|
)
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
One-to-four family residential
|
3
|
|
|
153
|
|
Construction and development
|
88
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
582
|
|
|
8
|
|
Consumer
|
106
|
|
|
126
|
|
Total recoveries
|
779
|
|
|
287
|
|
Net (charge-offs) recoveries
|
(50
|
)
|
|
(110
|
)
|
Allowance for loan losses at end of period
|
$
|
13,906
|
|
|
$
|
12,249
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to loans HFI
|
0.98
|
%
|
|
0.92
|
%
|
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
We believe the allowance for loan losses was adequate to provide for known and inherent losses in the portfolio at all times shown above. Future provisions for loan losses are subject to ongoing evaluations of the factors and loan portfolio risks described above. A decline in market area economic conditions, deterioration of asset quality, or growth in portfolio size could cause the allowance to become inadequate and material additional provisions for loan losses could be required.
Deposits
We offer a variety of deposit products designed to attract and retain consumer, commercial, and public entity customers. These products consist of noninterest and interest-bearing checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, and time deposit accounts. Deposits are gathered from individuals, partnerships, corporations, and public entities located primarily in our market areas. We do not have any internet-sourced or brokered deposits.
Total deposits increased $31.3 million, or 1.9%, to $1.68 billion as of September 30, 2019, from $1.65 billion as of December 31, 2018. Noninterest-bearing deposits increased by $67.2 million, or 12.3%, to $615.1 million due to normal fluctuations in customer account balances and adding new accounts. Noninterest-bearing deposits as a percentage of total deposits were 36.68% as of September 30, 2019, compared to 33.29% as of December 31, 2018. Interest-bearing deposits decreased by $35.9 million, or 3.3%, to $1.06 billion with the largest decrease in NOW accounts. The NOW account decrease was primarily due to public entity customers utilizing their annual funds over the year.
The following table presents deposits by account type as of the dates indicated and the dollar and percentage change between periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2019
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
Change from
December 31, 2018 to September 30, 2019
|
|
Balance
|
|
% of Total
|
|
Balance
|
|
% of Total
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
$
|
615,051
|
|
|
36.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
547,880
|
|
|
33.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
67,171
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
Interest-bearing deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market accounts
|
352,030
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
358,575
|
|
|
21.8
|
%
|
|
(6,545
|
)
|
|
(1.8
|
)%
|
Time deposits <= $250,000
|
247,772
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
|
248,274
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
|
(502
|
)
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
Time deposits > $250,000
|
90,044
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
81,954
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
8,090
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
NOW accounts
|
268,169
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
|
304,545
|
|
|
18.5
|
%
|
|
(36,376
|
)
|
|
(11.9
|
)%
|
Savings accounts
|
103,785
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
104,355
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
(570
|
)
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
Total Interest-bearing deposits
|
$
|
1,061,800
|
|
|
63.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,097,703
|
|
|
66.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
(35,903
|
)
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
Total deposits
|
$
|
1,676,851
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,645,583
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
31,268
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
The following table presents deposits by customer type as of the dates indicated and the dollar and percentage change between periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2019
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
Change from
December 31, 2018 to September 30, 2019
|
|
Balance
|
|
% of Total
|
|
Balance
|
|
% of Total
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Consumer
|
$
|
874,735
|
|
|
52.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
869,725
|
|
|
52.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,010
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Commercial
|
683,854
|
|
|
40.8
|
%
|
|
611,903
|
|
|
37.2
|
%
|
|
71,951
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
Public
|
118,262
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
163,955
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
(45,693
|
)
|
|
(27.9
|
)%
|
Total deposits
|
$
|
1,676,851
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,645,583
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
31,268
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
The following table presents the maturity distribution of our time deposits of $100,000 or more as of September 30, 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2019
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Three months or less
|
$
|
36,704
|
|
Over three months through six months
|
34,441
|
|
Over six months through 12 months
|
72,117
|
|
Over 12 months through three years
|
56,775
|
|
Over three years
|
23,079
|
|
Total
|
$
|
223,116
|
|
Junior Subordinated Debentures
The Company has been the sponsor of three wholly owned business trusts that were established for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities. Prior to their redemption, the trust preferred securities accrued and paid distributions periodically at specified quarterly rates as provided in each trust agreement. The trusts used the net proceeds from each of the offerings to purchase a like amount of our floating rate junior subordinated debentures. The debentures were the sole assets of the trusts. Our obligations under the debentures and related documents, taken together, constituted a full and unconditional guarantee by us of the obligations of the trusts. Prior to redemption, a portion of these instruments qualified as Tier 1 capital under applicable regulatory capital rules. The trust preferred securities were mandatorily redeemable upon maturity of the debentures, or upon earlier redemption as provided in the indentures. We had the right to redeem the debentures in whole or in part on or after specific dates at a redemption price specified in the indentures governing the debentures plus any accrued but unpaid interest to the redemption date. As anticipated, we used a portion of the proceeds of the IPO to fully redeem Trust II and Trust III in the second quarter of 2019 and FBT CT I in the third quarter. On June 17, 2019, we redeemed all of our floating rate junior subordinated debentures held by Trust III at a redemption price of 100% of the outstanding principal amount of $3.1 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the date of redemption. On June 30, 2019, we redeemed all of our floating rate junior subordinated debentures
held by Trust II at a redemption price of 100% of the outstanding principal amount of $3.1 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the date of redemption. On August 8, 2019, we redeemed all of our floating rate junior subordinated debentures held by FBT CT I at a redemption price of 100% of the outstanding principal amount of $5.2 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the date of redemption.
The following table is a summary of the terms of our floating rate junior subordinated debentures as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
Date
|
|
Maturity
Date
|
|
Redemption Date
|
|
Amount Outstanding
September 30,
2019
|
|
Amount Outstanding
December 31,
2018
|
|
Interest Rate as of the Redemption Date
|
|
Rate as of
December 31,
2018
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Trust II
|
May 28, 2003
|
|
May 28, 2033
|
|
June 30, 2019
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,093
|
|
|
5.84
|
%
|
(2)
|
5.65
|
%
|
Trust III
|
April 20, 2005
|
|
June 15, 2035
|
|
June 17, 2019
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,093
|
|
|
4.58
|
%
|
(3)
|
4.30
|
%
|
FBT CT I(1)
|
September 4, 2003
|
|
August 8, 2033
|
|
August 8, 2019
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,155
|
|
|
5.58
|
%
|
(4)
|
5.34
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
11,341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
On April 1, 2013, we assumed $5.2 million of floating rate junior subordinated debentures and FBT CT I in conjunction with the acquisition of Fidelity Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
|
(2)
|
The trust preferred securities had a variable rate and repriced quarterly based on three-month LIBOR plus 3.25%, with the last reprice date on March 28, 2019.
|
|
|
(3)
|
The trust preferred securities had a variable rate and repriced quarterly based on three-month LIBOR plus 1.97%, with the last reprice date on March 13, 2019.
|
|
|
(4)
|
The trust preferred securities had a variable rate and repriced quarterly based on three-month LIBOR plus 3.00%, with the last reprice date on April 29, 2019.
|
Equity and Regulatory Capital Requirements
Total stockholders’ equity as of September 30, 2019, was $245.4 million, compared to $193.7 million as of December 31, 2018, an increase of $51.7 million, or 26.7%. This increase was attributable to the $26.8 million of proceeds from the IPO, net of expenses and underwriting commissions, that was completed on May 7, 2019, net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, of $18.1 million, and a $7.8 million, net of tax, market adjustment to AOCI related to AFS securities, partially offset by $1.3 million in cash dividends.
As of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, Red River Bank was in compliance with all applicable regulatory capital requirements, and was classified as “well capitalized,” for purposes of the prompt corrective action regulations. As we deploy our capital and continue to grow our operations, our capital levels may decrease depending on our level of earnings. However, we expect to monitor and control our growth in order to remain in compliance with all regulatory capital standards applicable to us. On September 17, 2019, the FDIC and other bank regulators passed a final rule on the community bank leverage ratio. The Bank has not yet determined whether it will elect to use the community bank leverage ratio to measure its capital adequacy following the time that the new rule becomes effective. Refer to Note 7 - Regulatory Capital Requirements in the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this report for more information on this ratio.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net income for the third quarter of 2019, was $6.8 million, or $0.93 per diluted common share, an increase of $705,000, or 11.5%, compared to $6.1 million, or $0.91 per diluted common share, in the third quarter of 2018, adjusted to give effect to the 2018 2-for-1 stock split. The increase in net income was due to a $899,000 increase in net interest income, a $148,000 decrease in the provision for loan losses, a $445,000 increase in noninterest income, offset by a $704,000 increase in operating expenses. The return on assets for the third quarter of 2019 was 1.42%, compared to 1.36% for the third quarter of 2018. The return on equity was 11.20% for the third quarter of 2019 and 12.96% for the third quarter of 2018. Our efficiency ratio for the third quarter of 2019, was 57.75% compared to 58.12% for the third quarter of 2018.
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, was $18.1 million, or $2.57 per diluted common share, an increase of $1.2 million, or 7.0%, compared to $16.9 million, or $2.50 per diluted common share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, adjusted to give effect to the 2018 2-for-1 stock split. The increase in net income is due to a $3.5 million increase in net interest income, a $1.0 million increase in noninterest income, offset by a $3.0 million increase in operating expenses. The return on assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and for the same period in the prior year was consistent at 1.28%. The return on equity was 10.91% for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 12.35% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. Our efficiency ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, was 60.00% compared to 59.48% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin
Our operating results depend primarily on our net interest income. Fluctuations in market interest rates impact the yield on interest-earning assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Changes in the amount and type of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities also impact our net interest income. To evaluate net interest income, we measure and monitor: (1) yields on loans and other interest-earning assets; (2) the costs of deposits and other funding sources; (3) net interest spread; and (4) net interest margin. Since noninterest-bearing sources of funds, such as noninterest-bearing deposits and stockholders’ equity, also fund interest-earning assets, net interest margin includes the benefit of these noninterest-bearing funding sources.
Net interest income increased by $899,000, or 5.9%, to $16.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019, from $15.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018. Net interest income increased primarily due to a $96.4 million, or 5.6%, increase in average interest-earning assets between the third quarter of 2019 and 2018. The junior subordinated debentures were paid off in June and August 2019, eliminating the higher rate, long-term debt.
The net interest margin, on an FTE basis, was 3.55% for the three months ended September 30, 2019, and 3.54% for the three months ended September 30, 2018. The average yield on interest-earning assets for the three months ended September 30, 2019, was 4.06%, an 11 basis point increase from 3.95% for the same period in 2018, while the average cost of deposits for the three months ended September 30, 2019, was 0.60%, 14 basis points higher than the 0.46% cost of deposits for the same period in 2018.
The following table presents average balance sheet information, interest income, interest expense, and the corresponding average yields earned and rates paid for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
Average
Balance
Outstanding
|
|
Interest
Earned/
Interest
Paid
|
|
Average
Yield/
Rate
|
|
Average
Balance
Outstanding
|
|
Interest
Earned/
Interest
Paid
|
|
Average
Yield/
Rate
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans(1,2)
|
$
|
1,408,146
|
|
|
$
|
16,578
|
|
|
4.61
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,333,720
|
|
|
$
|
15,285
|
|
|
4.49
|
%
|
Securities - taxable
|
255,846
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
2.11
|
%
|
|
270,179
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
|
2.02
|
%
|
Securities - tax-exempt
|
77,047
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
2.33
|
%
|
|
56,242
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
2.29
|
%
|
Federal funds sold
|
32,461
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
2.15
|
%
|
|
15,761
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
2.02
|
%
|
Interest-bearing balances due from banks
|
38,676
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
2.16
|
%
|
|
39,657
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
1.95
|
%
|
Nonmarketable equity securities
|
1,342
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
2.99
|
%
|
|
1,292
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
2.71
|
%
|
Investment in trusts
|
64
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
10.91
|
%
|
|
341
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5.23
|
%
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
1,813,582
|
|
|
$
|
18,781
|
|
|
4.06
|
%
|
|
1,717,192
|
|
|
$
|
17,266
|
|
|
3.95
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
(13,755
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,962
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest earning assets
|
110,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
1,909,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,794,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing transaction deposits
|
$
|
724,219
|
|
|
$
|
972
|
|
|
0.53
|
%
|
|
$
|
697,485
|
|
|
$
|
689
|
|
|
0.39
|
%
|
Time deposits
|
338,330
|
|
|
1,542
|
|
|
1.81
|
%
|
|
320,955
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
1.40
|
%
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
1,062,549
|
|
|
2,514
|
|
|
0.94
|
%
|
|
1,018,440
|
|
|
1,818
|
|
|
0.71
|
%
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
2,129
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
13.64
|
%
|
|
11,341
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
5.25
|
%
|
Other borrowings
|
22
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2.80
|
%
|
|
303
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3.24
|
%
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
1,064,700
|
|
|
$
|
2,587
|
|
|
0.96
|
%
|
|
1,030,084
|
|
|
$
|
1,971
|
|
|
0.76
|
%
|
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
586,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest and other liabilities
|
16,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities:
|
602,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
575,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
242,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
1,909,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,794,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
$
|
16,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,295
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread
|
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.19
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.49
|
%
|
Net interest margin FTE(3)
|
|
|
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.54
|
%
|
Cost of deposits
|
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
%
|
Cost of funds
|
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
%
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes average outstanding balances of loans HFS of $6.0 million and $3.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Nonaccrual loans are included as loans carrying a zero yield.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Net interest margin FTE includes an FTE adjustment using a 21% federal income tax rate on tax-exempt securities and tax-exempt loans.
|
Net interest income increased by $3.5 million, or 8.0%, to $47.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, from $43.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. Net interest income improved as a result of a $102.4 million, or 6.1%, increase in average interest-earning assets between the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, combined with a higher net interest margin. Interest expense on the junior subordinated debentures decreased with their payoff in June and August 2019.
The net interest margin, on an FTE basis, increased seven basis points to 3.53% for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, from 3.46% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The net interest margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 benefited from a higher interest rate environment between January and July 2019, compared to the interest rate environment for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The average yield on interest-
earning assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, was 4.05%, a 20 basis point increase from 3.85% for the same period in 2018, while the average cost of deposits for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, was 0.59%, 16 basis points higher than the 0.43% cost of deposits for the same period in 2018.
The following table presents average balance sheet information, interest income, interest expense, and the corresponding average yields earned and rates paid for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
Average
Balance
Outstanding
|
|
Interest
Earned/
Interest
Paid
|
|
Average
Yield/
Rate
|
|
Average
Balance
Outstanding
|
|
Interest
Earned/
Interest
Paid
|
|
Average
Yield/
Rate
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans(1,2)
|
$
|
1,375,129
|
|
|
$
|
48,026
|
|
|
4.61
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,302,848
|
|
|
$
|
43,307
|
|
|
4.38
|
%
|
Securities - taxable
|
256,618
|
|
|
4,074
|
|
|
2.12
|
%
|
|
281,683
|
|
|
4,255
|
|
|
2.01
|
%
|
Securities - tax-exempt
|
71,892
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
2.36
|
%
|
|
58,032
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
2.30
|
%
|
Federal funds sold
|
34,019
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
2.34
|
%
|
|
14,547
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
1.78
|
%
|
Interest-bearing balances due from banks
|
53,759
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
2.30
|
%
|
|
31,880
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
1.75
|
%
|
Nonmarketable equity securities
|
1,325
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
1.86
|
%
|
|
1,283
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
1.43
|
%
|
Investment in trusts
|
242
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
6.23
|
%
|
|
341
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
4.91
|
%
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
1,792,984
|
|
|
$
|
54,941
|
|
|
4.05
|
%
|
|
1,690,614
|
|
|
$
|
49,207
|
|
|
3.85
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
(13,267
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,482
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest earning assets
|
105,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
1,885,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,767,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing transaction deposits
|
$
|
736,947
|
|
|
$
|
2,930
|
|
|
0.53
|
%
|
|
$
|
705,099
|
|
|
$
|
1,909
|
|
|
0.36
|
%
|
Time deposits
|
335,201
|
|
|
4,330
|
|
|
1.73
|
%
|
|
319,239
|
|
|
3,109
|
|
|
1.30
|
%
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
1,072,148
|
|
|
7,260
|
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
|
1,024,338
|
|
|
5,018
|
|
|
0.65
|
%
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
8,044
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
6.39
|
%
|
|
11,341
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
4.83
|
%
|
Other borrowings
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2.80
|
%
|
|
246
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
3.46
|
%
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
1,080,199
|
|
|
$
|
7,645
|
|
|
0.95
|
%
|
|
1,035,925
|
|
|
$
|
5,434
|
|
|
0.70
|
%
|
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
568,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
539,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest and other liabilities
|
15,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities:
|
583,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
548,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
221,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
1,885,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,767,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
$
|
47,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,773
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread
|
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.15
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
3.48
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.42
|
%
|
Net interest margin FTE(3)
|
|
|
|
|
3.53
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.46
|
%
|
Cost of deposits
|
|
|
|
|
0.59
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
%
|
Cost of funds
|
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
%
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes average outstanding balances of loans HFS of $4.1 million and $2.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Nonaccrual loans are included as loans carrying a zero yield.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Net interest margin FTE includes an FTE adjustment using a 21% federal income tax rate on tax-exempt securities and tax-exempt loans.
|
Rate/Volume Analysis
Increases and decreases in interest income and interest expense result from changes in average balances (volume) of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as changes in average interest rates. The following table presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for major components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. It distinguishes between the changes related to outstanding balances and those due to changes in interest rates. The change in interest attributable to rate has been determined by applying the change in rate between periods to average balances outstanding in the earlier period. The change in interest due to volume has been determined by applying the rate from the earlier period to the change in average balances outstanding between periods. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume that cannot be segregated have been allocated to rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
September 30, 2019 vs 2018
|
|
September 30, 2019 vs 2018
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in
|
|
Total
Increase
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in
|
|
Total
Increase
|
|
Volume
|
|
Rate
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
Volume
|
|
Rate
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
$
|
789
|
|
|
$
|
504
|
|
|
$
|
1,293
|
|
|
$
|
2,381
|
|
|
$
|
2,338
|
|
|
$
|
4,719
|
|
Securities - taxable
|
(98
|
)
|
|
82
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
(474
|
)
|
|
293
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
Securities - tax-exempt
|
119
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
274
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
86
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
407
|
|
Interest-bearing balances due from banks
|
(7
|
)
|
|
23
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
512
|
|
Nonmarketable equity securities
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
Investment in trusts
|
(4
|
)
|
|
2
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
2
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Total interest income
|
$
|
885
|
|
|
$
|
630
|
|
|
$
|
1,515
|
|
|
$
|
2,688
|
|
|
$
|
3,046
|
|
|
$
|
5,734
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing transaction deposits
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
259
|
|
|
$
|
283
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
944
|
|
|
$
|
1,021
|
|
Time deposits
|
65
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
|
1,221
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
89
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
2,003
|
|
|
2,242
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
(122
|
)
|
|
45
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
94
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Other borrowings
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Total interest expense
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
$
|
651
|
|
|
$
|
616
|
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
2,097
|
|
|
$
|
2,211
|
|
Increase (decrease) in net interest income
|
$
|
920
|
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
899
|
|
|
$
|
2,574
|
|
|
$
|
949
|
|
|
$
|
3,523
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses is a charge to income necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level considered appropriate by management. Factors impacting the provision include loan portfolio growth, changes in the quality and composition of the loan portfolio, the level of nonperforming loans, delinquency and charge-off trends, and current economic conditions.
The provision for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2019, was $378,000, a decrease of $148,000, or 28.1%, from $526,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2018. The provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, was $1.4 million, a decrease of $32,000, or 2.2%, from $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The provision for loan losses decreased during the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2019, primarily as a result of improved asset quality.
The allowance for loan losses to loans HFI was 0.98% as of September 30, 2019, compared to 0.92% as of September 30, 2018.
Noninterest Income
Our primary sources of noninterest income are service charges on deposit accounts, debit card fees, fees related to the sale of mortgage loans, brokerage income from advisory services, and other loan and deposit fees. Noninterest income increased $445,000 to $4.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019, compared to $3.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018. The increase in noninterest income was mainly due to higher mortgage loan income,
higher brokerage income, and to a change in equity securities mark-to-market valuation. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in other income.
Noninterest income increased $1.0 million to $11.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to $10.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The increase in noninterest income was due to higher mortgage loan income, a change in equity securities mark-to-market valuation, higher loan and deposit income, higher brokerage income, and higher other income. These increases were partially offset by lower deposit service charge income.
The table below presents, for the periods indicated, the major categories of noninterest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Noninterest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
$
|
1,195
|
|
|
$
|
1,162
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,304
|
|
|
$
|
3,486
|
|
|
$
|
(182
|
)
|
|
(5.2
|
)%
|
Debit card income, net
|
833
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
2,314
|
|
|
2,254
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
Mortgage loan income
|
1,014
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
62.8
|
%
|
|
2,186
|
|
|
1,675
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
30.5
|
%
|
Brokerage income
|
561
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
19.6
|
%
|
|
1,552
|
|
|
1,395
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
Loan and deposit income
|
404
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
16.8
|
%
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
943
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
19.9
|
%
|
Bank-owned life insurance income
|
137
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
|
407
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
Gain (Loss) on equity securities
|
30
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
60
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
133
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
255
|
|
|
209.0
|
%
|
Gain (Loss) on sale of investments
|
5
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
14
|
|
|
155.6
|
%
|
|
5
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
(84.4
|
)%
|
Other income
|
207
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
(54.5
|
)%
|
|
749
|
|
|
686
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
Total Noninterest Income
|
$
|
4,386
|
|
|
$
|
3,941
|
|
|
$
|
445
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
11,781
|
|
|
$
|
10,764
|
|
|
$
|
1,017
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
Mortgage loan income increased $391,000 to $1.0 million for the third quarter of 2019, compared to the same quarter prior year and increased $511,000 to $2.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The increase in both periods was a result of increased demand for new and refinanced mortgage loans due to a lower mortgage interest rate environment and a higher dollar amount of mortgage loans closed.
Brokerage income increased $92,000 for the third quarter of 2019, compared to the third quarter of 2018. For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, brokerage income increased $157,000 to $1.6 million compared to $1.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. Red River Bank's investment group has experienced incremental revenue growth over the last 12 months.
The gain or loss on equity securities is a mark-to-market adjustment primarily driven by a change in the interest rate environment. Due to fluctuations in market rates between periods, equity securities had a mark-to-market gain of $30,000 for third quarter of 2019, compared to a $30,000 loss for the third quarter of 2018, and a mark-to-market gain of $133,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to a $122,000 loss for the same period in 2018.
Loan and deposit income increased $188,000 to $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the same period in 2018. Approximately $141,000 was attributed to higher credit card income due to a larger number of credit cards outstanding and more credit card transaction volume in 2019.
Other income decreased $248,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2019, compared to the same quarter prior year. This reduction related to a $211,000 decrease in gain on other real estate owned and a $51,000 decrease in distributions from an SBIC limited partnership of which Red River Bank is a member.
Other income increased $63,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The improvement in other income was mainly due to a $266,000 increase in distributions and dividends from an SBIC limited partnership of which Red River Bank is a member, which was partially offset by a $239,000 decrease in gain on other real estate owned.
Service charges on deposit accounts decreased $182,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the same period prior year. The decrease is mainly due to a system change relating to overdraft processing on electronic transactions that was made in late 2018 which was partially offset by new deposit fees implemented in June 2019.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses are composed of all employee expenses and costs associated with operating our facilities, obtaining and retaining customer relationships, and providing services. Operating expenses increased $704,000 to $11.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019, compared to $11.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018. The increase in operating expenses was mainly due to higher personnel expense and other taxes expense, offset by the lack of an FDIC insurance assessment in the third quarter of 2019.
Operating expenses increased $3.0 million to $35.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to $32.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The increase in operating expenses were primarily a result of higher personnel, occupancy, loan and deposit, advertising, and other taxes, partially offset by the lack of an FDIC insurance assessment in the third quarter of 2019.
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the major categories of operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Personnel expenses
|
$
|
7,007
|
|
|
$
|
6,625
|
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
20,652
|
|
|
$
|
19,255
|
|
|
$
|
1,397
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
Non-staff expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy and equipment expenses
|
1,199
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
3,708
|
|
|
3,313
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
Technology expenses
|
595
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
17.4
|
%
|
|
1,697
|
|
|
1,549
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
Advertising
|
216
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
821
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
41.8
|
%
|
Other business development expenses
|
266
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
(12.2
|
)%
|
|
827
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
Data processing expense
|
479
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
1,420
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
Other taxes
|
425
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
30.8
|
%
|
|
1,234
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
21.5
|
%
|
Loan and deposit expenses
|
285
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
901
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
39.9
|
%
|
Legal and professional expenses
|
436
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
1,138
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
Other operating expenses
|
977
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
(3.7
|
)%
|
|
3,049
|
|
|
2,924
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
Total operating expenses
|
$
|
11,885
|
|
|
$
|
11,181
|
|
|
$
|
704
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
35,447
|
|
|
$
|
32,437
|
|
|
$
|
3,010
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
Personnel expenses increased $382,000 to $7.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2018, and increased $1.4 million to $20.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2018. As of September 30, 2019 and 2018, we had 323 and 318 full-time equivalent employees, respectively, with an increase of five full-time equivalent employees. The increase in personnel related to an increase in back office staff to support increasing volumes and to prepare to operate as a public company, as well as personnel for the Covington area which opened as a full-service banking center in the third quarter of 2019. Also, revenue-based commission compensation increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the same periods in 2018, due to higher mortgage and brokerage income.
Occupancy and equipment expenses increased $395,000 to $3.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The increase was due to banking location improvements and expansion throughout Louisiana. In the second quarter of 2018, a small LPO in the Southwest (Lake Charles) market was closed and replaced with a larger banking center location resulting in higher occupancy expenses in 2019. In 2019, we expanded the market headquarters building in the Southeast (Baton Rouge) market, providing a central office for commercial, mortgage, investment, and private banking department operations. In the second quarter of 2019, we opened an LPO in a new market, Northshore (Covington, Louisiana), resulting in higher occupancy expenses.
Advertising expense increased $242,000 to $821,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The increase was due to more media campaigns and marketing events in our newer markets in the second quarter of 2019.
Other taxes increased $100,000 to $425,000 for the third quarter of 2019, as compared to the third quarter of 2018, and increased $218,000 to $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, as compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2018. The increase in both periods was due to higher State of Louisiana bank stock tax. Bank stock tax increased due to having higher deposit account balances and higher net income for the applicable tax years.
Loan and deposit expenses increased $257,000 to $901,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the first nine months of 2018. The increase was primarily a result of incurring approximately $87,000 of nonrecurring loan development expenses in the second quarter of 2019, $54,000 higher credit card expenses related to a larger number of credit cards outstanding and more credit card transaction volume in 2019, and $42,000 lower reimbursement of collection expenses related to receiving payoffs of past due loans in 2019. Additionally, the nine months ended September 30, 2018, benefited from the receipt of a $71,000 negotiated rebate from a vendor, resulting in lower loan and deposit expenses during that period.
FDIC insurance assessment expense is included in other operating expenses. The Bank was notified by the FDIC that it did not have an FDIC insurance assessment for the third quarter of 2019. Therefore, no FDIC insurance assessment expense was incurred for the third quarter of 2019 compared to $121,000 for the second quarter of 2019 and $134,000 for the third quarter of 2018. The FDIC insurance assessment expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, was $250,000 compared to $396,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.
Income Tax Expense
The amount of income tax expense is influenced by the amounts of our pre-tax income, tax-exempt income, and other nondeductible expenses. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected at currently enacted income tax rates in effect for the period in which the deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes.
Our effective income tax rates have differed from the U.S. statutory rate due to the effect of tax-exempt income from loans, securities and life insurance policies, and the income tax effects associated with stock-based compensation.
For the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, income tax expense totaled $1.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively. Our effective income tax rates for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, were 17.7% and 18.4%, respectively.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, income tax expense totaled $4.1 million and $3.7 million, respectively. Our effective income tax rates for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, were 18.5% and 18.1%, respectively.
LIQUIDITY AND ASSET-LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
Liquidity
Liquidity involves our ability to raise funds to support asset growth and potential acquisitions or to reduce assets to meet deposit withdrawals and other payment obligations, to maintain reserve requirements, and otherwise to operate on an ongoing basis and manage unexpected events. For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, and the year ended December 31, 2018, liquidity needs were primarily met by core deposits, security and loan maturities, and cash flows from amortizing security and loan portfolios. In addition, we used a portion of the proceeds received in the IPO to redeem our junior subordinated debentures. For more information on these redemptions, see "Financial Condition - Junior Subordinated Debentures."
Our primary source of funds is deposits, and our primary use of funds is the funding of loans. Our securities portfolio is another alternative source for meeting liquidity needs. Securities generate cash flow through principal payments and maturities, and they generally have readily available markets that allow for their conversion to cash. As of September 30, 2019, AFS securities totaled $341.9 million compared to $307.9 million as of December 31, 2018. Additionally, we maintain four federal funds lines of credit with commercial banks that provided for the availability to borrow up to an aggregate of $95.0 million as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. There were no outstanding funds under these lines of credit as of September 30, 2019 or December 31, 2018. Other sources available for meeting liquidity needs include FHLB advances as well as repurchase agreements. As of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, our net borrowing capacity from the FHLB was $584.5 million and $427.6 million, respectively. We had no borrowings from the FHLB, and we had not utilized any repurchase agreements, as of September 30, 2019 or December 31, 2018.
Our average total loans increased $63.1 million or 4.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, as compared to average total loans for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018. Our average deposits increased $65.1 million, or 4.1%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, as compared to the average deposits for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018.
As of September 30, 2019, we had $272.3 million in outstanding commitments to extend credit and $12.7 million in commitments associated with outstanding standby letters of credit. As of December 31, 2018, we had $231.5 million in outstanding commitments to extend credit and $11.6 million in commitments associated with outstanding standby letters of credit. As commitments associated with letters of credit and commitments to extend credit may expire unused, the total outstanding commitments may not necessarily reflect the actual future cash funding requirements.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, and the year ended December 31, 2018, we had no exposure to known future cash requirements or capital expenditures of a material nature. As of September 30, 2019, we had cash and cash equivalents of $106.3 million compared to $151.9 million as of December 31, 2018. The decrease of $45.6 million, or 30.0%, was primarily due to funding of loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2019.
Interest Rate Sensitivity and Market Risk
As a financial institution, our primary component of market risk is interest rate volatility. Our asset-liability management policies provide management with guidelines for effective funds management, and we have established a measurement system for monitoring our net interest rate sensitivity position.
Our exposure to interest rate risk is managed by Red River Bank’s Asset-Liability Management Committee. The committee formulates strategies based on appropriate levels of interest rate risk and monitors the results of those strategies. In determining the appropriate level of interest rate risk, the committee considers the impact on both earnings and capital given the current outlook on interest rates, regional economies, liquidity, business strategies, and other related factors.
On a quarterly basis, we run various simulation models including a static balance sheet and dynamic growth balance sheet. These models test the impact on net interest income and fair value of equity from changes in market interest rates under various scenarios. Under the static and dynamic growth models, rates are shocked instantaneously and ramped rates change over a 12-month and 24-month horizon based upon parallel yield curve shifts. Parallel shock scenarios assume instantaneous and parallel movements in the yield curve compared to a flat yield curve scenario. Our nonparallel rate shock model involves analysis of interest income and expense under various changes in the shape of the yield curve.
Internal policy regarding interest rate risk simulations performed by our risk model currently specifies that for instantaneous parallel shifts of the yield curve, estimated net interest income at risk for the subsequent one-year period should not decline by more than 10.0% for a 100 basis point shift and 15.0% for a 200 basis point shift. Internal policy regarding economic value at risk simulations currently specifies that for instantaneous parallel shifts of the yield curve, estimated fair value of equity for the subsequent one-year period should not decline by more than 20.0% for a 100 basis point shift and 25.0% for a 200 basis point shift.
The following table shows the impact of an instantaneous and parallel change in rates, at the levels indicated, and summarizes the simulated change in net interest income and fair value of equity over a 12-month horizon as of the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2019
|
|
As of December 31, 2018
|
|
% Change in
Net Interest
Income
|
|
% Change in
Fair Value
of Equity
|
|
% Change in
Net Interest
Income
|
|
% Change in
Fair Value
of Equity
|
Change in Interest Rates (Basis Points)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+300
|
18.5
|
%
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
19.2
|
%
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
+200
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
+100
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
Base
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
-100
|
(7.2
|
)%
|
|
(9.7
|
)%
|
|
(6.6
|
)%
|
|
(5.0
|
)%
|
-200
|
(11.9
|
)%
|
|
(22.0
|
)%
|
|
(14.6
|
)%
|
|
(13.4
|
)%
|
The results above, as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, demonstrate that our balance sheet is asset sensitive. The impact of our floating rate loans and floating rate transaction deposits are reflected in the results shown in the above table. As of September 30, 2019, floating rate loans were 16.0% of the loan portfolio and floating rate transaction deposits were 6.8% of interest-bearing transaction deposits.
The assumptions incorporated into the model are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely measure future net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from the model’s simulated results due to timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest rate changes, as well as changes in market conditions and the application and timing of various management strategies.
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
Our accounting and reporting policies conform to GAAP and the prevailing practices in the banking industry. Certain financial measures used by management to evaluate our operating performance are discussed in this report as supplemental non-GAAP performance measures. In accordance with the SEC’s rules, we classify a financial measure as being a non-GAAP financial measure if that financial measure excludes or includes amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have the effect of excluding or including amounts, that are included or excluded, as the case may be, in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP as in effect from time to time in the U.S. in the statements of income, balance sheets, or statements of cash flows. Non-GAAP financial measures do not include operating and other statistical measures or ratios or statistical measures calculated using exclusively either financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP, operating measures or other measures that are not non-GAAP financial measures, or both.
The non-GAAP financial measures that we discuss in this report should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the most directly comparable or other financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. Moreover, the manner in which we calculate the non-GAAP financial measures that are discussed in this report may differ from that of other companies reporting measures with similar names. It is important to understand how such other banking organizations calculate and name their financial measures similar to the non-GAAP financial measures discussed in this report when comparing such non-GAAP financial measures.
We provide these measures in addition to, not as a substitute for, net income and earnings per share, which are reported in adherence to GAAP. Management and the board of directors review tangible book value per share and tangible common equity to tangible assets as part of managing operating performance. We believe that these non-GAAP performance measures, while not substitutes for GAAP net income, earnings per share, and total expenses, are useful for both management and investors when evaluating underlying operating and financial performance and its available resources.
Tangible Book Value Per Common Share. Tangible book value per common share is a non-GAAP measure commonly used by analysts and investors to evaluate financial institutions. We believe that this measure is important to many investors in the marketplace who are interested in changes from period to period in book value per common share exclusive of changes in intangible assets. We calculate tangible book value per common share as total stockholders’ equity, less intangible assets, divided by the outstanding number of shares of our common stock at the end of the relevant period. Intangible assets have the effect of increasing total book value while not increasing tangible book value. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure for tangible book value per common share is book value per common share.
Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets. Tangible common equity to tangible assets is a non-GAAP measure generally used by investors, financial analysts, and investment bankers to evaluate financial institutions. We believe that this measure is important to many investors in the marketplace who are interested in the relative changes from period to period of tangible common equity to tangible assets, each exclusive of changes in intangible assets. Intangible assets have the effect of increasing both total stockholders’ equity and assets while not increasing our tangible common equity or tangible assets. We calculate tangible common equity as total stockholders’ equity, less intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization, and we calculate tangible assets as total assets, less intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure for tangible common equity to tangible assets is total common stockholders’ equity to total assets.
As a result of previous acquisitions, we have a small amount of intangible assets. As of September 30, 2019, total intangible assets were $1.5 million, which is less than 1.0% of total assets.
The following table reconciles, as of the dates set forth below, stockholders’ equity to tangible common equity, and assets to tangible assets, and presents related resulting ratios.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
2019
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
Tangible common equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders' equity
|
$
|
245,389
|
|
|
$
|
237,911
|
|
|
$
|
189,131
|
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
(1,546
|
)
|
|
(1,546
|
)
|
|
(1,546
|
)
|
Total tangible common equity
|
$
|
243,843
|
|
|
$
|
236,365
|
|
|
$
|
187,585
|
|
Common shares outstanding(1)
|
7,306,221
|
|
|
7,300,246
|
|
|
6,733,848
|
|
Book value per common share
|
$
|
33.59
|
|
|
$
|
32.59
|
|
|
$
|
28.09
|
|
Tangible book value per common share
|
$
|
33.37
|
|
|
$
|
32.38
|
|
|
$
|
27.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
1,938,854
|
|
|
$
|
1,892,918
|
|
|
$
|
1,816,296
|
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
(1,546
|
)
|
|
(1,546
|
)
|
|
(1,546
|
)
|
Total tangible assets
|
$
|
1,937,308
|
|
|
$
|
1,891,372
|
|
|
$
|
1,814,750
|
|
Total stockholder's equity to assets
|
12.66
|
%
|
|
12.57
|
%
|
|
10.41
|
%
|
Tangible common equity to tangible assets
|
12.59
|
%
|
|
12.50
|
%
|
|
10.34
|
%
|
|
|
(1)
|
September 30, 2018 amount adjusted to give effect to the 2018 2-for-1 stock split.
|