Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
Executive Summary
During the first three months of 2014, we continued to focus on our consumer-oriented business model through the origination of one- to four-family mortgage
loans. We have traditionally funded this loan production with customer deposits and borrowings. Despite an increase in market interest rates during 2013, market interest rates remained at historically low levels during the first three months of 2014
which provided limited opportunities for the reinvestment of payments received on our mortgage-related assets which account for 85.2% of our average interest-earning assets in the first quarter of 2014. As a result, we continued to reduce the size
of our balance sheet and we continue to carry an elevated level of overnight funds. Federal funds and other overnight deposits amounted to $5.1 billion, or 13.3%, of total assets at March 31, 2014. We believe that while carrying this level of
overnight funds impacts our current earnings, it better positions us for future initiatives such as a balance sheet restructuring and the completion of the Merger. Our total assets decreased $376.7 million, or 1.0%, to $38.23 billion at
March 31, 2014 from $38.61 billion at December 31, 2013.
Our results of operations depend primarily on net interest income, which, in part, is
a direct result of the market interest rate environment. Net interest income is the difference between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning assets, primarily mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities and investment securities, and
the interest we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities, primarily time deposits, interest-bearing transaction accounts and borrowed funds. Net interest income is affected by the shape of the market yield curve, the timing of the placement and
repricing of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities on our balance sheet, the prepayment rate on our mortgage-related assets and the puts of our borrowings. Our results of operations may also be affected significantly by general
and local economic and competitive conditions, particularly those with respect to changes in market interest rates, credit quality, government policies and actions of regulatory authorities. Our results are also affected by the market price of our
stock, as the expense of our employee stock ownership plan is related to the current price of our common stock.
The Federal Open Market Committee of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the FOMC) noted in its April 30, 2014 statement that economic activity has picked up recently after having slowed sharply during the winter in part because of adverse weather
conditions. The FOMC noted that labor market indicators were mixed but have shown further improvement. Household spending appears to be rising more quickly than in recent months, but business fixed investment edged down while the recovery in the
housing sector remained slow. The national unemployment rate decreased to 6.3% in April 2014 from 6.7% in December 2013 and 7.5% in March 2013.
The FOMC,
in its most recent statement, decided to reduce the rate of purchases of agency mortgage-backed securities to $20.0 billion per month from $25.0 billion per month and to reduce purchases of longer-term Treasury securities to $25.0 billion per month
from $30.0 billion per month. The FOMC has noted that its sizeable and increasing holdings of longer-term securities should maintain downward pressure on longer-term interest rates, support mortgage markets, promote a stronger economy and help to
ensure that inflation, over time, is at the rate most consistent with the FOMCs dual mandate regarding both inflation and unemployment. The FOMC decided to maintain the overnight lending target rate at zero to 0.25% during the first quarter of
2014. The FOMC stated that it likely will be appropriate to maintain the current target range for the federal funds rate for a considerable time after the asset program ends, taking into account a variety of factors including the unemployment rate
and inflation.
Net interest income decreased $45.1 million, or 25.4%, to $132.3 million for the first quarter of 2014 from $177.4 million for the first
quarter of 2013 reflecting the overall decrease in the average balance of
Page 38
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the continued low interest rate environment and an increase in the already high average balance of Federal funds sold and other overnight
deposits. Our interest rate spread decreased to 1.12% for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to 1.56% for the first quarter of 2013. Our net interest margin was 1.41% for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to 1.80% for the first quarter of
2013.
The decreases in our interest rate spread and net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2014 is primarily due to repayments of
higher yielding assets due to the low interest rate environment and the increase in the average balance of Federal funds and other overnight deposits. The average yield earned on Federal funds and other overnight deposits was 0.25% for the three
months ended March 31, 2014. The increase in the average balance of Federal funds and other overnight deposits was due primarily to the repayments on mortgage-related assets and the lack of attractive reinvestment opportunities due to low
market interest rates as available short term reinvestment opportunities continue to carry low yields, and medium and longer term opportunities are creating more significant duration risk at relatively low yields despite the recent increase in
rates. The large excess cash position, while negatively impacting our returns, better positions us for implementation of our strategic initiatives.
Mortgage-related assets represented 85.2% of our average interest-earning assets at March 31, 2014. Market interest rates on mortgage-related assets
remained at near-historic lows primarily due to the FRBs program to purchase mortgage-backed securities to keep mortgage rates low and provide stimulus to the housing markets. Given the current market environment and our concerns about taking
on additional interest rate risk, we expect to continue to reduce the size of our balance sheet in the near term.
There was no provision for loan losses
for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, as compared to $20.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2013. The decrease in our provision for loan losses was due primarily to improving economic conditions, increasing home prices, a decrease
in the size of the loan portfolio and a decrease in the amount of total delinquent loans. Early stage loan delinquencies (defined as loans that are 30 to 89 days delinquent) decreased $40.3 million to $433.1 million at March 31, 2014 from
$473.4 million at December 31, 2013. Non-performing loans, defined as non-accrual loans and accruing loans delinquent 90 days or more, amounted to $1.03 billion at March 31, 2014 as compared to $1.05 billion at December 31, 2013. The
ratio of non-performing loans to total loans was 4.32% at March 31, 2014 compared with 4.35% at December 31, 2013. Notwithstanding the decrease in non-performing loans, the foreclosure process and the time to complete a foreclosure, while
improving, continues to be prolonged, especially in New York and New Jersey where 68.2% of our non-performing loans are located at March 31, 2014 as we continue to experience a time frame to repayment or foreclosure of up to 48 months from the
initial non-performing period. This protracted foreclosure process delays our ability to resolve non-performing loans through the sale of the underlying collateral and our ability to maximize any recoveries.
Total non-interest income was $17.8 million for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to $2.5 million for the first quarter of 2013. Included in non-interest
income for the first quarter of 2014 was a $15.9 million gain on the sale of $419.3 million of mortgage-backed securities. The remainder of non-interest income is primarily made up of service fees and charges on deposit and loan accounts.
Total non-interest expense decreased $1.6 million to $79.7 million for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to $81.3 million for the first quarter of
2013. This decrease was due to a $10.2 million decrease in Federal deposit insurance expense partially offset by a $5.7 million increase in other non-interest expense and a $2.0 million increase in compensation and benefits.
Page 39
Net loans decreased $363.5 million to $23.58 billion at March 31, 2014 as compared to $23.94 billion at
December 31, 2013. Our loan production (originations and purchases) was $476.1 million during the first quarter of 2014 offset by $812.8 million in principal repayments. Loan production declined during the first three months of 2014 which
reflects our limited appetite for adding long-term fixed-rate mortgage loans in the current low market interest rate environment. In addition, our loan production has been impacted by the new qualified mortgage regulations issued by the CFPB which
went into effect in January 2014. We discontinued our reduced documentation loan program in January 2014 in order to comply with the CFPBs new requirements to validate a borrowers ability to repay and the corresponding safe harbor for
loans that meet the requirements for a qualified mortgage. During 2013, 22% of our total loan production consisted of reduced documentation loans.
Total mortgage-backed securities decreased $761.1 million to $8.19 billion at March 31, 2014 from $8.95 billion at December 31, 2013. The decrease
was due primarily to security sales of $419.3 million and repayments of $391.2 million of mortgage-backed securities during the first quarter of 2014. These decreases were partially offset by purchases of $41.4 million of mortgage-backed securities
issued by U.S. government-sponsored entities (GSEs) during the first quarter of 2014.
Total deposits amounted to $21.07 billion at
March 31, 2014 as compared to $21.47 billion at December 31, 2013. The decrease in deposits was due to our decision to maintain lower deposit rates allowing us to control deposit reductions at a time when we are experiencing limited
opportunities to reinvest at attractive yields the cash flows received from the repayments on mortgage-related assets.
Borrowings amounted to $12.18
billion at March 31, 2014 with an average cost of 4.59%, unchanged from December 31, 2013. There are no scheduled maturities through March 31, 2015.
On August 27, 2012, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with M&T and WTC, pursuant to which the Company will merge with and into
WTC, with WTC continuing as the surviving entity. As part of the Merger, the Bank will merge with and into Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, in the Merger, Hudson City Bancorp
shareholders will have the right to receive with respect to each of their shares of common stock of the Company, at their election (but subject to proration and adjustment procedures), 0.08403 of a share of common stock, or cash having a value equal
to the product of 0.08403 multiplied by the average closing price of the M&T common stock for the ten days immediately prior to the completion of the Merger. The Merger Agreement also provides that at the closing of the Merger, 40% of the
outstanding shares of Hudson City common stock will be converted into the right to receive cash and the remainder of the outstanding shares of Hudson City common stock will be converted into the right to receive shares of M&T common stock.
On April 12, 2013, M&T and the Company announced that additional time would be required to obtain a regulatory determination on the applications
necessary to complete the proposed Merger. On April 13, 2013, M&T and the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Merger Agreement. Amendment No. 1, among other things, extended the date after which either party may elect to
terminate the Merger Agreement from August 27, 2013 to January 31, 2014. On December 17, 2013, M&T and the Company announced that they entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Merger Agreement. Amendment No. 2 further extends
the date after which either party may terminate the Merger Agreement if the Merger has not yet been completed from January 31, 2014 to December 31, 2014, and provides that the Company may terminate the Merger Agreement at any time if it
reasonably determines that M&T is unlikely to be able to obtain the requisite regulatory approvals of the Merger to permit the closing to occur on or prior to December 31, 2014. Amendment No. 2 also permits the Company to take certain
interim actions,
Page 40
including with respect to our conduct of business, implementation of our Strategic Plan, retention incentives and certain other matters with respect to our personnel, prior to the completion of
the Merger. While Amendment No. 2 extends the date after which either party may elect to terminate the Merger Agreement from January 31, 2014 to December 31, 2014, there can be no assurances that the Merger will be completed by that
date or that the Company will not exercise its right to terminate the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms.
As part of our Strategic Plan, we
are continuing to explore ways to reduce our interest rate risk while strengthening our balance sheet, which may include a further restructuring of our balance sheet during 2014. The Company previously completed a series of restructuring
transactions in 2011 that reduced higher-cost structured borrowings on the Companys balance sheet. Management is continuing to consider a variety of different restructuring alternatives, including whether to restructure all or various portions
of our borrowed funds and various alternatives for replacement funding. No decision has been made at this time regarding the timing, structure and scope of any restructuring transaction. Decisions regarding any restructuring transaction are
dependent upon, among other things, market interest rates, overall economic conditions and the status of the Merger. However, any such transaction will likely not occur before the second half of 2014. Similar to the 2011 restructuring transactions,
we expect a restructuring to result in a net loss and reduction of stockholder equity, though we also expect an improvement in net interest margin and future earnings prospects. Any restructuring will focus on the prospects for long-term overall
earnings stability and growth. Any restructuring will likely reduce our excess cash position, but will not adversely affect the liquidity we need to operate in a safe and sound manner.
The Bank is currently subject to the Bank MOU. In accordance with the Bank MOU, the Bank has adopted and has implemented enhanced operating policies and
procedures that are intended to continue to (a) reduce our level of interest rate risk, (b) reduce our funding concentration, (c) diversify our funding sources, (d) enhance our liquidity position, (e) monitor and manage loan
modifications and (f) maintain our capital position in accordance with our existing capital plan. In addition, we developed the Strategic Plan which establishes objectives for the Banks overall risk profile, earnings performance, growth
and balance sheet mix and to enhance our enterprise risk management program.
The Company is currently subject to the Company MOU. In accordance with the
Company MOU, the Company must, among other things support the Banks compliance with the Bank MOU. The Company MOU also requires the Company to: (a) obtain approval from the FRB prior to receiving a capital distribution from the Bank or
declaring a dividend to shareholders and (b) obtain approval from the FRB prior to repurchasing or redeeming any Company stock or incurring any debt with a maturity of greater than one year. In accordance with the Company MOU, the Company
submitted a comprehensive Capital Plan and a comprehensive Earnings Plan to the FRB. These agreements will remain in effect until modified or terminated by the OCC (with respect to the Bank MOU) and the FRB (with respect to the Company MOU).
Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013
Total assets decreased $376.7 million, or 1.0%, to $38.23 billion at March 31, 2014 from $38.61 billion at December 31, 2013. The decrease in total
assets reflected a $761.1 million decrease in total mortgage-backed securities and a $363.5 million decrease in net loans, partially offset by a $778.3 million increase in cash and cash equivalents.
Page 41
Total cash and cash equivalents increased $778.3 million to $5.10 billion at March 31, 2014 as compared to
$4.32 billion at December 31, 2013. This increase is primarily due to repayments on mortgage-related assets and the lack of attractive reinvestment opportunities in the current low interest rate environment as available short term reinvestment
opportunities continue to carry low yields, and medium and longer term opportunities available to us are creating more significant duration risk at relatively low yields despite the recent increase in rates. The large excess cash position, while
negatively impacting our returns, better positions us for implementation of our strategic initiatives.
Net loans amounted to $23.58 billion at
March 31, 2014 as compared to $23.94 billion at December 31, 2013. During the first quarter of 2014, our loan production (origination and purchases) amounted to $476.1 million as compared to $824.8 million for the same period in 2013. Loan
production was offset by principal repayments of $812.8 million in the first quarter of 2014, as compared to $1.73 billion for the same period in 2013. Loan production declined during the first three months of 2014 as compared to the same period in
2013 which reflects our limited appetite for adding long-term fixed-rate mortgage loans to our portfolio in the current low market interest rate environment. In addition, loan production has been impacted by the new qualified mortgage regulations
issued by CFPB. Effective in January 2014, we discontinued our reduced documentation loan program in order to comply with the new requirements to validate a borrowers ability to repay and the corresponding safe harbor for loans that meet the
requirements for a qualified mortgage. During 2013, 22% of our total loan production consisted of reduced documentation loans.
Our first
mortgage loan production during the first quarter of 2014 was substantially all in one- to four-family mortgage loans. Approximately 80.0% of mortgage loan production for the first quarter of 2014 were variable-rate loans as compared to
approximately 81.0% for the corresponding period in 2013. Fixed-rate mortgage loans accounted for 54.9% of our first mortgage loan portfolio at March 31, 2014 as compared to 55.4% at December 31, 2013.
Our ALL amounted to $265.7 million at March 31, 2014 and $276.1 million at December 31, 2013. Non-performing loans amounted to $1.03 billion, or
4.32% of total loans, at March 31, 2014 as compared to $1.05 billion, or 4.35% of total loans, at December 31, 2013.
Total mortgage-backed
securities decreased $761.1 million to $8.19 billion at March 31, 2014 from $8.95 billion at December 31, 2013. The decrease was due primarily to security sales of $419.3 million and repayments of $391.2 million of mortgage-backed
securities during the first quarter of 2014. These decreases were partially offset by purchases of $41.4 million of mortgage-backed securities issued by GSEs during the first quarter of 2014.
Total liabilities decreased $417.0 million, or 1.2%, to $33.45 billion at March 31, 2014 from $33.86 billion at December 31, 2013. The decrease in
total liabilities primarily reflected a decrease in total deposits of $406.7 million, while total borrowed funds remained unchanged.
Total deposits
decreased $406.7 million, or 1.9%, to $21.07 billion at March 31, 2014 from $21.47 billion at December 31, 2013. The decrease in total deposits reflected a $252.4 million decrease in our money market accounts and a $179.2 million decrease
in our time deposits accounts. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in savings accounts of $28.1 million. The decrease in our money market and time deposit accounts was due to our decision to maintain lower deposit rates allowing us
to control deposit reductions at a time when there are limited investment opportunities with attractive yields to reinvest the funds received from payment activity on mortgage-related assets. We had 135 banking offices at both March 31, 2014
and December 31, 2013.
Page 42
Borrowings amounted to $12.18 billion at both March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. At March 31,
2014, we had $5.53 billion of borrowed funds with put dates within one year, including $3.13 billion that can be put back to the Company quarterly. If interest rates were to decrease, or remain consistent with current rates, we believe these
borrowings would likely not be put back and our average cost of existing borrowings would not decrease even as market interest rates decrease. Conversely, if interest rates increase above the market interest rate for similar borrowings, we believe
these borrowings would likely be put back at their next put date and our cost to replace these borrowings would increase. However, we believe, given current market conditions, that the likelihood that a significant portion of these borrowings would
be put back will not increase substantially unless interest rates were to increase by at least 250 basis points.
Total shareholders equity
increased $40.3 million to $4.78 billion at March 31, 2014 from $4.74 billion at December 31, 2013. The increase was primarily due to net income of $42.5 million and a $12.7 million change in accumulated other comprehensive income,
partially offset by cash dividends paid to common shareholders of $19.9 million.
Accumulated other comprehensive income amounted to $19.0 million at
March 31, 2014 as compared to $6.3 million at December 31, 2013. This increase was due primarily to an increase in the net unrealized gain on securities available for sale at March 31, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013.
As of March 31, 2014, there remained 50,123,550 shares that may be purchased under our existing stock repurchase programs. We did not repurchase any
shares of our common stock during the first quarter of 2014 pursuant to our repurchase programs. Pursuant to the Company MOU, any future share repurchases must be approved by the FRB. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, we
may not repurchase shares of Hudson City Bancorp common stock without the consent of M&T. At March 31, 2014, our capital ratios were in excess of the applicable regulatory requirements to be considered well-capitalized. See Liquidity
and Capital Resources.
At March 31, 2014, our shareholders equity to asset ratio was 12.51% compared with 12.28% at December 31,
2013. Our book value per share, using the period-end number of outstanding shares, less purchased but unallocated employee stock ownership plan shares and less purchased but unvested recognition and retention plan shares, was $9.60 at March 31,
2014 and $9.52 at December 31, 2013. Our tangible book value per share, calculated by deducting goodwill and the core deposit intangible from shareholders equity, was $9.29 as of March 31, 2014 and $9.21 at December 31, 2013.
Page 43
Comparison of Operating Results for the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013
Average Balance Sheet.
The following table presents the average balance sheets, average yields and costs and certain other information for the
three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. The table presents the annualized average yield on interest-earning assets and the annualized average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. We derived the yields and costs by dividing annualized
income or expense by the average balance of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, respectively, for the periods shown. We derived average balances from daily balances over the periods indicated. Interest income includes fees that
we considered to be adjustments to yields. Yields on tax-exempt obligations were not computed on a tax equivalent basis. Nonaccrual loans were included in the computation of average balances and therefore have a zero yield. The yields set forth
below include the effect of deferred loan origination fees and costs, and purchase discounts and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
Yield/
Cost
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
Yield/
Cost
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earnings assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage loans, net (1)
|
|
$
|
23,538,424
|
|
|
$
|
253,139
|
|
|
|
4.30
|
%
|
|
$
|
26,182,603
|
|
|
$
|
294,390
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
Consumer and other loans
|
|
|
212,098
|
|
|
|
2,278
|
|
|
|
4.30
|
|
|
|
245,687
|
|
|
|
2,705
|
|
|
|
4.40
|
|
Federal funds sold and other overnight deposits
|
|
|
4,629,158
|
|
|
|
2,886
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
1,677,616
|
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities at amortized cost
|
|
|
8,427,527
|
|
|
|
48,701
|
|
|
|
2.31
|
|
|
|
10,292,070
|
|
|
|
60,907
|
|
|
|
2.37
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
347,102
|
|
|
|
4,156
|
|
|
|
4.79
|
|
|
|
356,467
|
|
|
|
4,208
|
|
|
|
4.72
|
|
Investment securities, at amortized cost
|
|
|
344,351
|
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
|
|
1.60
|
|
|
|
452,367
|
|
|
|
2,983
|
|
|
|
2.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
37,498,660
|
|
|
|
312,539
|
|
|
|
3.33
|
|
|
|
39,206,810
|
|
|
|
366,065
|
|
|
|
3.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-earnings assets (2)
|
|
|
917,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,288,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
38,416,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,495,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
$
|
1,021,143
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
961,884
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
Interest-bearing transaction accounts
|
|
|
2,195,612
|
|
|
|
1,560
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
2,273,146
|
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
5,054,582
|
|
|
|
2,473
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
6,460,700
|
|
|
|
5,586
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
12,314,050
|
|
|
|
36,227
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
12,959,500
|
|
|
|
40,816
|
|
|
|
1.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
20,585,387
|
|
|
|
40,638
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
22,655,230
|
|
|
|
49,139
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
|
6,656,667
|
|
|
|
73,647
|
|
|
|
4.43
|
|
|
|
6,950,000
|
|
|
|
77,054
|
|
|
|
4.43
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York advances
|
|
|
5,518,333
|
|
|
|
65,918
|
|
|
|
4.78
|
|
|
|
5,225,000
|
|
|
|
62,489
|
|
|
|
4.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowed funds
|
|
|
12,175,000
|
|
|
|
139,565
|
|
|
|
4.59
|
|
|
|
12,175,000
|
|
|
|
139,543
|
|
|
|
4.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
32,760,387
|
|
|
|
180,203
|
|
|
|
2.21
|
|
|
|
34,830,230
|
|
|
|
188,682
|
|
|
|
2.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
651,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
631,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
218,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
869,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
930,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
33,629,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,760,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
4,786,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,734,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
$
|
38,416,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,495,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/net interest rate spread (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
132,336
|
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
177,383
|
|
|
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest-earning assets/net interest margin (4)
|
|
$
|
4,738,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.41
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,376,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.14x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.13x
|
|
(1)
|
Amount includes deferred loan costs and non-performing loans and is net of the allowance for loan losses.
|
(2)
|
Includes the average balance of principal receivable related to FHLMC mortgage-backed securities of $ 50.2 million and $ 111.8 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
|
(3)
|
Determined by subtracting the annualized weighted average cost of total interest-bearing liabilities from the annualized weighted average yield on total interest-earning assets.
|
(4)
|
Determined by dividing annualized net interest income by total average interest-earning assets.
|
Page 44
General.
Net income was $42.5 million for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to $47.9 million
for the first quarter of 2013. Both basic and diluted earnings per common share were $0.09 for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to both basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.10 for the first quarter of 2013. For the first quarter of 2014,
our annualized return on average shareholders equity was 3.55% as compared to 4.05% for the corresponding period in 2013. Our annualized return on average assets for the first quarter of 2014 was 0.44% as compared to 0.47% for the first
quarter of 2013. The decrease in the annualized return on average equity and assets is primarily due to the decrease in net income during the first quarter of 2014.
Interest and Dividend Income.
Total interest and dividend income for the first quarter of 2014 decreased $53.6 million, or 14.6%, to $312.5
million from $366.1 million for the first quarter of 2013. The decrease in total interest and dividend income was due to a $1.71 billion decrease in the average balance of total interest-earning assets during the first quarter of 2014 to $37.50
billion from $39.21 billion for the first quarter of 2013 as well as a 40 basis points decrease in the annualized weighted-average yield on total interest-earning assets. The decrease in the average balance of total interest-earning assets was due
primarily to repayments of mortgage-related assets during 2013 and the first quarter of 2014 as a result of the low interest rate environment and our decision not to reinvest these cash flows in low-yielding, long-term assets. The annualized
weighted-average yield on total interest-earning assets was 3.33% for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to 3.73% for the first quarter of 2013. The decrease in the annualized weighted average yield of interest-earning assets was due to lower
market interest rates earned on mortgage-related assets and a $2.95 billion increase in the average balance of Federal funds sold and other overnight deposits to $4.63 billion which had an average yield of 0.25% during the first quarter of 2014.
Interest on first mortgage loans decreased $41.3 million, or 14.0%, to $253.1 million for the first quarter of 2014 from $294.4 million for the first
quarter of 2013. The decrease in interest on first mortgage loans was primarily due to a $2.64 billion decrease in the average balance of first mortgage loans to $23.54 billion for the first quarter of 2014 from $26.18 billion for the same quarter
in 2013. The decrease in interest income on first mortgage loans was also due to a 20 basis point decrease in the annualized weighted-average yield to 4.30% for the first quarter of 2014 from 4.50% for the first quarter of 2013.
The decrease in the average yield earned on first mortgage loans for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to the first quarter of 2013 was due to mortgage
refinancing activity during 2013 and the rates on newly originated mortgage loans which have been below the average yield on our portfolio, reflecting overall low market rates during 2013. Consequently, the average yield on our loan portfolio
continued to decline during the first quarter of 2014. The low interest rate environment over the last several years resulted in elevated levels of mortgage refinancing activity. This refinancing activity slowed significantly during the first
quarter of 2014 but continued to exceed the amount of loan production which also decreased. As a result, the average balance of our first mortgage loans continued to decline. During the first quarter of 2014, our loan production (origination and
purchases) amounted to $476.1 million as compared to $824.8 million for the same period in 2013. Principal repayments amounted to $812.8 million in the first quarter of 2014, as compared to $1.73 billion for the same period in 2013. The decrease in
loan production reflects our low appetite for adding long-term fixed-rate mortgage loans to our portfolio in the current low interest rate environment. In addition the CFPBs new qualified mortgage regulations, which went into effect in January
2014, also impacted our loan production during the first quarter of 2014.
Interest on consumer and other loans decreased $427,000 to $2.3 million for the
first quarter of 2014 from $2.7 million for the first quarter of 2013 due to a decrease in the average balance of consumer and other loans. The average balance of consumer and other loans decreased $33.6 million to $212.1 million for the
Page 45
first quarter of 2014 from $245.7 million for the first quarter of 2013 and the average yield earned decreased 10 basis points to 4.30% from 4.40% for those same respective periods. The average
balance of consumer loans decreased as consumer loans is not a business that we actively pursue. The decrease in the annualized weighted-average yield is a result of current market interest rates.
Interest on mortgage-backed securities decreased $12.2 million to $48.7 million for the first quarter of 2014 from $60.9 million for the first quarter of
2013. This decrease was due primarily to a $1.86 billion decrease in the average balance of mortgage-backed securities to $8.43 billion for the first quarter of 2014 from $10.29 billion for the first quarter of 2013. The decrease in interest on
mortgage-backed securities was also due to a 6 basis point decrease in the annualized weighted-average yield to 2.31% for the first quarter of 2014 from 2.37% for the first quarter of 2013.
The decrease in the average yield earned on mortgage-backed securities during the first quarter of 2014 was a result of principal repayments on securities
that have higher yields than the existing portfolio as well as the re-pricing of variable rate mortgage-backed securities in this low interest rate environment. The decrease in the average balance of mortgage-backed securities during this same
period was due to sales of mortgage-backed securities as well as principal repayments during 2013 and the first quarter of 2014. During the first quarter of 2014, we sold $419.3 million of mortgage-backed securities to realize gains that would
likely decrease as market interest rates increase and as the outstanding principal balance of these securities decreases due to repayments.
Interest on
investment securities decreased $1.6 million to $1.4 million for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to $3.0 million for the first quarter of 2013. This decrease was due to a 104 basis point decrease in the annualized weighted-average yield to
1.60% for the first quarter of 2014 from 2.64% for the first quarter of 2013. The decrease in the average yield earned reflects current market interest rates. This decrease in interest on investment securities was also due to a $108.0 million
decrease in the average balance of investment securities to $344.4 million for the first quarter of 2014 from $452.4 million for the first quarter of 2013. The decrease in the average balance of investment securities was primarily due to the sale of
corporate bonds with an amortized cost of $405.7 million partially offset by purchases of $298.0 million of investment securities during 2013.
Interest
on Federal funds sold and other overnight deposits amounted to $2.9 million for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to $872,000 for the first quarter of 2013. The increase in interest income on Federal funds sold and other overnight deposits was
primarily due to an increase in the average balance of Federal funds sold and other overnight deposits. The average balance of Federal funds sold and other overnight deposits amounted to $4.63 billion for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to
$1.68 billion for the first quarter of 2013. The yield earned on Federal funds sold and other overnight deposits was 0.25% for the 2014 first quarter and 0.21% for the 2013 first quarter.
The increase in the average balance of Federal funds sold and other overnight deposits for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to the first quarter of 2013
was due primarily to the elevated levels of repayments on mortgage-related assets and our low appetite for adding long-term fixed-rate mortgage loans to our portfolio in the current low interest rate environment.
Interest Expense.
Total interest expense for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 decreased $8.5 million, or 4.5%, to $180.2 million from
$188.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2013. This decrease was primarily due to a $2.07 billion, or 5.9%, decrease in the average balance of total interest-bearing liabilities to $32.76 billion for the quarter ended March 31,
2014 from $34.83 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2013. The annualized weighted-average cost of total interest-bearing liabilities was 2.21% for
Page 46
the quarter ended March 31, 2014 as compared to 2.17% for the quarter ended March 31, 2013. The decrease in the average balance of total interest-bearing liabilities was due to a
$2.07 billion decrease in the average balance of total deposits.
Interest expense on deposits decreased $8.5 million, or 17.3%, to $40.6 million for the
first quarter of 2014 from $49.1 million for the first quarter of 2013. The decrease is primarily due to the decline in the average cost of interest-bearing deposits of 8 basis points to 0.80% for the first quarter of 2014 from 0.88% for the
first quarter of 2013. This decrease was also due to a $2.07 billion decrease in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits to $20.59 billion for the first quarter of 2014 from $22.66 billion for the first quarter of 2013.
Interest expense on time deposits decreased $4.6 million to $36.2 million for the first quarter of 2014 from $40.8 million for the first quarter of 2013. This
was due primarily to a decrease of $645.5 million in the average balance of time deposit accounts to $12.31 billion for the first quarter of 2014 from $12.96 billion in the first quarter of 2013. In addition, the average cost of time deposits
decreased 9 basis points to 1.19% for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to 1.28% for the first quarter of 2013.
Interest expense on money market
accounts decreased $3.1 million to $2.5 million for the first quarter of 2014 from $5.6 million for the first quarter of 2013. This was due primarily to a decrease of $1.41 billion in the average balance of money market accounts to $5.05 billion for
the first quarter of 2014 as compared to $6.46 billion for the first quarter of 2013. In addition, the annualized weighted-average cost decreased 15 basis points to 0.20% for the first quarter of 2014 from 0.35% for the first quarter of 2013.
The decrease in the average cost of deposits for the first quarter of 2014 reflected lower market interest rates and our decision to maintain lower deposit
rates to continue our balance sheet reduction.
Interest expense on borrowed funds increased slightly to $139.6 million for the first quarter of 2014 from
$139.5 million for the first quarter of 2013. Borrowings amounted to $12.18 billion at March 31, 2014 with an average cost of 4.59%. There are no scheduled maturities for 2014. During the first quarter of 2014, we modified $800.0 million
of FHLB repurchase agreements to be FHLB advances. This reduced our collateral requirements related to the repurchase agreements, which use securities as collateral. FHLB advances are secured by a blanket lien on our loan portfolio. The modification
resulted in an increase of six basis points in the weighted average cost of the borrowings that were modified.
Borrowings amounted to $12.18 billion at
March 31, 2014 with an average cost of 4.59%. There are no scheduled maturities through March 31, 2015.
At March 31, 2014 we had $5.53
billion of borrowings with put dates within one year. We believe, given current market conditions, that the likelihood that a significant portion of these borrowings would be put back will not increase substantially unless interest rates were to
increase by at least 250 basis points. See Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Net Interest Income.
Net interest income decreased
$45.1 million, or 25.4%, to $132.3 million for the first quarter of 2014 from $177.4 million for the first quarter of 2013. The decrease in net interest income reflects the overall decrease in the average balance of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities, the continued low interest rate environment and an increase in the already high average balance of Federal funds sold and other overnight deposits. Our interest rate spread decreased to 1.12% for the first quarter of
2014 as compared to 1.56% for the first quarter of 2013. Our net interest margin was 1.41% for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to 1.80% for the first quarter of 2013.
Page 47
The decreases in our interest rate spread and net interest margin for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to
the first quarter of 2013 are primarily due to repayments of higher yielding assets due to the low interest rate environment and a $2.95 billion increase in the average balance of Federal funds and other overnight deposits, which yielded 0.25%
during this same period. The compression of our net interest margin and the reduction in the size of our balance sheet may result in a decline in our net interest income in future periods.
Provision for Loan Losses.
The was no provision for loan losses for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 as compared to $20.0 million for the
quarter ended March 31, 2013. The ALL amounted to $265.7 million at March 31, 2014 and $276.1 million at December 31, 2013. The decrease in the provision for loan losses for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 is due primarily to
improving home prices and economic conditions in our lending market areas, a decrease in the size of the loan portfolio, a decrease in net charge-offs and a decrease in the amount of both non-performing loans and early stage delinquencies. We did
not record a provision for loan losses during the first quarter of 2014 based on our ALL methodology that considers a number of quantitative and qualitative factors, including the amount of non-performing loans, the loss experience of our
non-performing loans, recent collateral valuations, conditions in the real estate and housing markets, current economic conditions, particularly continued elevated levels of unemployment, and growth or shrinkage in the loan portfolio. See
Critical Accounting Policies Allowance for Loan Losses.
Our primary lending emphasis is the origination and purchase of
one- to four-family first mortgage loans on residential properties and, to a lesser extent, second mortgage loans on one- to four-family residential properties. Our loan production is primarily concentrated in one- to four-family mortgage loans with
original loan-to-value (LTV) ratios of less than 80%. For the first quarter of 2014, the average LTV ratio for our first mortgage loan originations was 58.7%. The weighted average LTV ratio for our one-to four-family mortgage loan
portfolio was 58.9% at March 31, 2014, using the appraised value of the collateral property at the time of origination. The value of the property used as collateral for our loans is dependent upon local market conditions. As part of our
estimation of the ALL, we monitor changes in the values of homes in each market using indices published by various organizations. Based on our analysis of the data for the first quarter of 2014, we concluded that home values in our primary lending
markets have increased approximately 7.0% since the first quarter of 2013.
Economic conditions in our primary market area continued to improve modestly
during the first quarter of 2014 as evidenced by increased levels of home sale activity, higher real estate valuations and a decrease in the unemployment rate which, while improving, remains at elevated levels. We continue to closely monitor the
local and national real estate markets and other factors related to risks inherent in our loan portfolio.
Non-performing loans amounted to $1.03 billion
at March 31, 2014 as compared to $1.05 billion at December 31, 2013 and $1.14 billion at March 31, 2013. Non-performing loans at March 31, 2014 included $1.02 billion of one- to four-family first mortgage loans as compared to
$1.04 billion at December 31, 2013 and $1.12 billion at March 31, 2013. The ratio of non-performing loans to total loans was 4.32% at March 31, 2014 as compared to 4.35% at both December 31, 2013 and March 31, 2013. Loans
delinquent 30 to 59 days amounted to $276.0 million at March 31, 2014 as compared to $311.9 million at December 31, 2013 and $372.0 million at March 31, 2013. Loans delinquent 60 to 89 days amounted to $157.1 million at March 31,
2014 as compared to $161.5 million at December 31, 2013 and
Page 48
$188.8 million at March 31, 2013. Accordingly, total early stage delinquencies (loans 30 to 89 days past due) decreased $40.3 million to $433.1 million at March 31, 2014 from $473.4
million at December 31, 2013 and decreased $127.7 million from $560.8 million at March 31, 2013. Foreclosed real estate amounted to $78.6 million at March 31, 2014 as compared to $70.4 million at December 31, 2013, and $63.7
million at March 31, 2013. As a result of our underwriting policies, our borrowers typically have a significant amount of equity, at the time of origination, in the underlying real estate that we use as collateral for our loans. Due to the
steady deterioration of real estate values during the recent economic recession, the LTV ratios based on appraisals obtained at time of origination do not necessarily indicate the extent to which we may incur a loss on any given loan that may go
into foreclosure.
At March 31, 2014, the ratio of the ALL to non-performing loans was 25.88% as compared to 26.31% at December 31, 2013 and
26.50% at March 31, 2013. The ratio of the ALL to total loans was 1.12% at March 31, 2014 as compared to 1.15% at both December 31, 2013 and March 31, 2013. Changes in the ratio of the ALL to non-performing loans are not, absent
other factors, an indication of the adequacy of the ALL since there is not necessarily a direct relationship between changes in various asset quality ratios and changes in the ALL, non-performing loans and losses we may incur on our loan portfolio.
A loan generally becomes non-performing when the borrower experiences financial difficulty. In many cases, the borrower also has a second mortgage or home equity loan on the property. In substantially all of these cases, we do not hold the second
mortgage or home equity loan as that is not a business we have actively pursued.
We obtain new collateral values by the time a loan becomes 180 days past
due. If the estimated fair value of the collateral (less estimated selling costs) is less than the recorded investment in the loan, we charge-off an amount to reduce the loan to the fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs. As a
result, certain losses inherent in our non-performing loans are being recognized as charge-offs which may result in a lower ratio of the ALL to non-performing loans. Charge-offs, net of recoveries amounted to $10.4 million for the first quarter of
2014 as compared to $21.3 million for the first quarter of 2013. Write-downs and net gains or losses on the sale of foreclosed real estate amounted to a net gain of $78,000 for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to a net loss of $396,000 for the
first quarter of 2013. The results of our reappraisal process, our recent charge-off history and our loss experience related to the sale of foreclosed real estate are considered in the determination of the ALL. Our loss experience on the sale of
foreclosed real estate, calculated without regard for previous charge-offs and write-downs, was 15% for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to 22% for the three months ended March 31, 2013.
As part of our estimation of the ALL, we monitor changes in the values of homes in each market using indices published by various organizations including the
FHFA and Case Shiller. Our Asset Quality Committee (AQC) uses these indices and a stratification of our loan portfolio by state as part of its quarterly determination of the ALL. We do not apply different loss factors based on geographic
locations since, at March 31, 2014, 84.6% of our loan portfolio and 76.3% of our non-performing loans are located in the New York metropolitan area. We obtain updated collateral values by the time a loan becomes 180 days past due and annually
thereafter, which we believe identifies potential charge-offs more accurately than a house price index that is based on a wide geographic area and includes many different types of houses. However, we use house price indices to identify geographic
trends in housing markets to determine if an overall adjustment to the ALL is required based on loans we have in those geographic areas and to determine if changes in the loss factors used in the ALL quantitative analysis are necessary. Our
quantitative analysis of the ALL accounts for increases in non-performing loans by applying progressively higher risk factors to loans as they become more delinquent.
Page 49
Due to the nature of our loan portfolio, our evaluation of the adequacy of our ALL is performed primarily on a
pooled basis. Each quarter we prepare an analysis which categorizes the entire loan portfolio by certain risk characteristics such as loan type (fixed and variable one- to four-family, interest-only, reduced documentation, multi-family,
commercial, construction, etc.), loan source (originated or purchased) and payment status (i.e., current or number of days delinquent). Loans with known potential losses are categorized separately. We assign estimated loss factors to the payment
status categories on the basis of our assessment of the potential risk inherent in each loan type. These factors are periodically reviewed for appropriateness giving consideration to our loss experience, delinquency trends, portfolio growth and
environmental factors such as the status of the regional economy and housing market, in order to ascertain that the loss factors cover probable and estimable losses inherent in the portfolio. We define our loss experience on non-performing loans as
the ratio of the excess of the loan balance (including selling costs) over the updated collateral value to the principal balance of loans for which we have updated valuations. We obtain updated collateral values by the time a loan becomes 180 days
past due and on an annual basis thereafter for as long as the loan remains non-performing. Based on our analysis, our loss experience on our non-performing one- to four-family first mortgage loans was approximately 13.5% at March 31, 2014
compared to 13.6% at December 31, 2013.
In addition to our loss experience, we also use environmental factors and qualitative analyses to determine
the adequacy of our ALL. This analysis includes further evaluation of economic factors, such as trends in the unemployment rate, as well as a ratio analysis to evaluate the overall measurement of the ALL, a review of delinquency ratios, net
charge-off ratios and the ratio of the ALL to both non-performing loans and total loans. The qualitative review is used to reassess the overall determination of the ALL and to ensure that directional changes in the ALL and the provision for loan
losses are supported by relevant internal and external data. Based on our recent loss experience on non-performing loans and the sale of foreclosed real estate as well as our consideration of environmental factors, we changed certain loss factors
used in our quantitative analysis of the ALL for our one- to four- family first mortgage loans during the first quarter of 2014. The recent adjustment to our loss factors did not have a material effect on the ultimate level of our ALL or on our
provision for loan losses. If our future loss experience requires additional increases in our loss factors, this may result in increased levels of loan loss provisions.
We consider the average LTV of our non-performing loans and our total portfolio in relation to the overall changes in house prices in our lending markets when
determining the ALL. This provides us with a macro indication of the severity of potential losses that might be expected. Since substantially all our portfolio consists of first mortgage loans on residential properties, the LTV is
particularly important to us when a loan becomes non-performing. The weighted average LTV ratio in our one- to four-family mortgage loan portfolio at March 31, 2014 was 58.9%, using the appraised value of the collateral property at the time of
origination. Based on the valuation indices, house prices have declined in the New York metropolitan area, where 76.3% of our non-performing loans were located at March 31, 2014, by approximately 20% from the peak of the market in 2006 through
January 2014 and by 19% nationwide during that period. The average LTV ratio of our non-performing loans was approximately 75.4% at March 31, 2014 using appraised values at the time of origination. Changes in house values may affect our loss
experience which may require that we change the loss factors used in our quantitative analysis of the ALL. There can be no assurance whether significant further declines in house values may occur and result in higher loss experience and increased
levels of charge-offs and loan loss provisions.
Net charge-offs amounted to $10.4 million for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to net charge-offs of
$21.3 million for the first quarter of 2013. Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans was 0.18% for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 as compared to 0.32% for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.
Page 50
Due to the unprecedented level of foreclosures and the desire by many states to slow the foreclosure process, we
continue to experience a time frame to repayment or foreclosure of up to 48 months from the initial non-performing period. These delays have impacted our level of non-performing loans as these loans take longer to migrate to real estate owned and
ultimate disposition. In addition, the highly publicized foreclosure issues that have affected the nations largest mortgage loan servicers has resulted in greater court and state attorney general scrutiny, and the time to complete a
foreclosure continues to be prolonged, especially in New York and New Jersey where 68.2% of our non-performing loans are located. If real estate prices do not continue to improve or begin to decline, this extended time may result in further
charge-offs. In addition, current conditions in the housing market have made it more difficult for borrowers to sell homes to satisfy the mortgage and second lien holders and are less likely to repay our loan if the value of the property is not
enough to satisfy their loan. We continue to closely monitor the property values underlying our non-performing loans during this timeframe and take appropriate charge-offs when the loan balances exceed the underlying property values.
At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, commercial and construction loans evaluated for impairment amounted to $8.3 million and $8.7 million,
respectively. Based on this evaluation, we established an ALL of $181,000 for these loans classified as impaired at March 31, 2014 compared to $527,000 at December 31, 2013.
Although we believe that we have established and maintained the ALL at adequate levels, additions may be necessary if future economic and other conditions
differ substantially from the current operating environment. Changes in our loss experience on non-performing loans, the loss factors used in our quantitative analysis of the ALL and continued increases in overall loan delinquencies can have a
significant impact on our need for increased levels of loan loss provisions in the future. Although we use the best information available, the level of the ALL remains an estimate that is subject to significant judgment and short-term change. See
Critical Accounting Policies.
Non-Interest Income.
Total non-interest income was $17.8 million for the first quarter of 2014 as
compared to $2.5 million for the first quarter of 2013. Included in non-interest income for the first quarter of 2014 was a $15.9 million gain on the sale of $419.3 million of mortgage-backed securities. The remainder of non-interest income is
primarily made up of service fees and charges on deposit and loan accounts.
Non-Interest Expense.
Total non-interest expense decreased $1.6
million to $79.7 million for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to $81.3 million for the first quarter of 2013. This decrease was due to a $10.2 million decrease in Federal deposit insurance expense partially offset by a $5.7 million
increase in other non-interest expense and a $2.0 million increase in compensation and benefits.
Compensation and employee benefit costs
increased $2.0 million, or 6.3%, to $33.6 million for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to $31.6 million for the same period in 2013. The increase in compensation and employee benefit costs is primarily due to increases of $1.9 million in stock
benefit plan expense and $950,000 in medical plan expenses partially offset by a $1.6 million decrease in postretirement benefit costs. The increase in stock benefit plan expense was due primarily to an increase in the market price of our
common stock. At March 31, 2014, we had 1,535 full-time equivalent employees as compared to 1,580 at March 31, 2013.
For the quarter ended
March 31, 2014, Federal deposit insurance expense decreased $10.2 million, or 42.2%, to $13.9 million from $24.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2013. The decrease in Federal deposit insurance expense for the quarter ended
March 31, 2014 is primarily due to a reduction in the size of our balance sheet and a decrease in our assessment rate.
Page 51
Other non-interest expense increased $5.7 million to $22.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 as
compared to $16.8 million for the first quarter of 2013. This increase was due primarily to a $3.0 million write-down in the receivable related to the Lehman Brothers, Inc. liquidation, an increase of $2.2 million in professional service fees,
and an increase of $1.6 million in foreclosed real estate expenses.
The increase in professional service fees is due primarily to fees related to the use
of consultants to assist the Company in preparing its capital stress tests and capital plan as well the use of consultants to supplement staffing during the pendency of the Merger.
The Bank had two collateralized borrowings in the form of repurchase agreements totaling $100.0 million with Lehman Brothers, Inc. that were secured by
mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost of approximately $114.1 million. The Trustee for the liquidation of Lehman Brothers, Inc. notified the Bank in the fourth quarter of 2011 that it considered our claim to be a non-customer claim,
which has a lower payment preference than a customer claim and that the value of such claim is approximately $13.9 million representing the excess of the fair value of the collateral over the $100.0 million repurchase price. At that time we
established a reserve of $3.9 million against the receivable balance at December 31, 2011. On June 25, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court affirmed the Trustees determination that the repurchase agreements did not entitle the Bank to customer
status. On February 26, 2014, the U.S. District Court upheld the Bankruptcy Courts decision that our claim should be treated as a non-customer claim. As a result of the U.S. District Courts decision, we increased our reserve by $3.0
million to $6.9 million against the receivable balance at March 31, 2014.
Included in other non-interest expense were write-downs on foreclosed real
estate and net gains and losses on the sale of foreclosed real estate which amounted to a net gain of $78,000 for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to net losses of $396,000 for the first quarter of 2013. We sold 46 properties during the
first quarter of 2014 and had 235 properties in foreclosed real estate with a carrying value of $78.6 million, 24 of which were under contract to sell as of March 31, 2014. For the first quarter of 2013, we sold 33 properties and had 168
properties in foreclosed real estate with a carrying value of $63.7 million, of which 55 were under contract to sell as of March 31, 2013. At March 31, 2014, 128 loans were scheduled for foreclosure sale as compared to 120 loans at
March 31, 2013.
Income Taxes.
Income tax expense amounted to $27.9 million for the first quarter of 2014 compared with an income tax
expense of $30.7 million for the same quarter in 2013. Our effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2014 was 39.58% compared with 39.07% for the first quarter of 2013.
On March 31, 2014, New York tax legislation was signed into law in connection with the approval of the New York State 2014-2015 budget that will generally
become effective on January 1, 2015. Portions of the new legislation will result in significant changes in the method of calculation of income taxes for banks and thrifts operating in New York State, including changes to (1) future period tax rates
and (2) rules related to the sourcing of revenue. At this time, we expect the changes to the New York tax code will cause our effective tax rate to increase. The amount of such increase will depend on the amount of our revenues that are sourced to
New York State under the new legislation, which can be expected to fluctuate over time. The changes in the tax code had an immaterial effect on the carrying value of the Companys net deferred tax asset at March 31, 2014.
Page 52
Asset Quality
Credit Quality
Historically, our primary lending emphasis
is the origination and purchase of one- to four-family first mortgage loans on residential properties. Our lending market areas generally consist of those states that are east of the Mississippi River and as far south as South Carolina. Loans
located outside of the New York metropolitan area were part of our loan purchases. Our loan purchase activity has declined significantly as sellers from whom we have historically purchased loans are either retaining these loans in their portfolios
or selling them to the GSEs.
The following table presents the composition of our loan portfolio in dollar amounts and in percentages of the total
portfolio at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2014
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of Total
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortizing
|
|
$
|
19,288,810
|
|
|
|
81.25
|
%
|
|
$
|
19,518,912
|
|
|
|
80.95
|
%
|
Interest-only
|
|
|
3,489,064
|
|
|
|
14.70
|
|
|
|
3,648,732
|
|
|
|
15.13
|
|
FHA/VA
|
|
|
727,706
|
|
|
|
3.07
|
|
|
|
704,532
|
|
|
|
2.92
|
|
Multi-family and commercial
|
|
|
24,080
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
25,671
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total first mortgage loans
|
|
|
23,529,837
|
|
|
|
99.12
|
|
|
|
23,898,141
|
|
|
|
99.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and other loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate second mortgages
|
|
|
83,232
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
86,079
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
Home equity credit lines
|
|
|
106,207
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
108,550
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
Other
|
|
|
19,413
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
20,059
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer and other loans
|
|
|
208,852
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
214,688
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
23,738,689
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
24,112,829
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred loan costs
|
|
|
105,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(265,732
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(276,097
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
$
|
23,578,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,942,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2014, first mortgage loans secured by one-to four-family properties accounted for 99.0% of total loans.
Fixed-rate mortgage loans represent 54.9% of our first mortgage loans. Compared to adjustable-rate loans, fixed-rate loans possess less inherent credit risk since loan payments do not change in response to changes in interest rates. In addition, we
do not originate or purchase loans with payment options, negative amortization loans or sub-prime loans. We believe our loans, when made, were amply collateralized and otherwise conformed to our lending standards.
Included in our loan portfolio at March 31, 2014 are interest-only loans of approximately $3.49 billion, or 14.7% of total loans, as compared to $3.65
billion, or 15.1% of total loans, at December 31, 2013. These loans are originated as adjustable rate mortgage loans with initial terms of five, seven or ten years with the interest-only portion of the payment based upon the initial loan term,
or offered on a 30-year fixed-rate loan, with interest-only payments for the first 10 years of the obligation. At the end of the initial 5-, 7- or 10-year interest-only period, the loan payment will adjust to include both principal and interest and
will amortize over the remaining term so the loan will be repaid at the end of its original life. These loans are
Page 53
underwritten using the fully-amortizing payment amount. Non-performing interest-only loans amounted to $123.5 million, or 12.0% of non-performing loans at March 31, 2014 as compared to
non-performing interest-only loans of $135.2 million, or 12.9% of non-performing loans at December 31, 2013.
In addition to our full documentation
loan program, prior to January 2014, we originated and purchased loans to certain eligible borrowers as reduced documentation loans. Generally the maximum loan amount for reduced documentation loans was $750,000 and these loans were subject to
higher interest rates than our full documentation loan products. We required applicants for reduced documentation loans to complete a Freddie Mac/Fannie Mae loan application and requested income, asset and credit history information from the
borrower. Additionally, we verified asset holdings and obtained credit reports from outside vendors on all borrowers to ascertain the credit history of the borrower. Applicants with delinquent credit histories generally did not qualify for the
reduced documentation processing, although delinquencies that were adequately explained did not prohibit processing as a reduced documentation loan. We reserved the right to verify income and required asset verification, but on a case by case basis
we elected to not verify or corroborate certain income information. Reduced documentation loans represent 21.6% of our one- to four-family first mortgage loans at March 31, 2014 and 21.3% at December 31, 2013. Included in our loan
portfolio at March 31, 2014 are $4.29 billion of amortizing reduced documentation loans and $782.2 million of reduced documentation interest-only loans as compared to $4.27 billion and $826.5 million, respectively, at December 31, 2013.
Non-performing loans at March 31, 2014 include $193.6 million of amortizing reduced documentation loans and $41.9 million of interest-only reduced documentation loans as compared to $182.9 million and $48.8 million, respectively, at
December 31, 2013. Beginning in January 2014, we only originate loans that meet the CFPBs requirements of a qualified mortgage, except we may continue to originate interest only loans, subject to our compliance with the
ability to repay provisions of the rule. As a result, in January 2014 we discontinued our reduced documentation loan program in order to comply with the newly effective CFPB requirements to validate a borrowers ability to repay and the
corresponding safe harbor for qualified mortgages.
The following table presents the geographic distribution of our total loan portfolio, as
well as the geographic distribution of our non-performing loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2014
|
|
|
At December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
Non-performing
Loans
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
Non-performing
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
42.4
|
%
|
|
|
43.3
|
%
|
|
|
42.5
|
%
|
|
|
44.2
|
%
|
New York
|
|
|
27.4
|
|
|
|
24.9
|
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total New York metropolitan area
|
|
|
84.6
|
|
|
|
76.3
|
|
|
|
84.5
|
|
|
|
76.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Illinois
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Maryland
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
All others
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total outside New York metropolitan area
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 54
Non-Performing Assets
The following table presents information regarding non-performing assets as of the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2014
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Non-accrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family amortizing loans
|
|
$
|
757,777
|
|
|
$
|
770,641
|
|
One-to four-family interest-only loans
|
|
|
123,538
|
|
|
|
135,228
|
|
Multi-family and commercial mortgages
|
|
|
2,066
|
|
|
|
3,189
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
Consumer and other loans
|
|
|
7,096
|
|
|
|
7,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans
|
|
|
890,654
|
|
|
|
916,400
|
|
Accruing loans delinquent 90 days or more (1)
|
|
|
135,937
|
|
|
|
132,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
|
1,026,591
|
|
|
|
1,049,244
|
|
Foreclosed real estate, net
|
|
|
78,591
|
|
|
|
70,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
$
|
1,105,182
|
|
|
$
|
1,119,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans to total loans
|
|
|
4.32
|
%
|
|
|
4.35
|
%
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
2.89
|
|
|
|
2.90
|
|
(1)
|
Loans that are past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest are loans that are insured by the FHA.
|
Non-performing loans exclude loans which have been restructured and are accruing and performing in accordance with the terms of their restructure agreement
for at least six months. We discontinue accruing and reverse accrued, but unpaid interest on troubled debt restructurings that are past due 90 days or more or if we believe we will not collect all amounts contractually due. Approximately $6.1
million of troubled debt restructurings that were previously accruing interest became 90 days or more past due during the first quarter of 2014 for which we discontinued accruing and reversed accrued, but unpaid interest.
Page 55
The following table is a comparison of our delinquent loans at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30-59 Days
|
|
|
60-89 Days
|
|
|
90 Days or More
|
|
At March 31, 2014
|
|
Number
of
Loans
|
|
|
Principal
Balance
of Loans
|
|
|
Number
of
Loans
|
|
|
Principal
Balance
of Loans
|
|
|
Number
of
Loans
|
|
|
Principal
Balance
of Loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
One- to four- family first mortgages:
|
|
|
|
|
Amortizing
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
$
|
211,262
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
$
|
122,562
|
|
|
|
2,323
|
|
|
$
|
757,777
|
|
Interest-only
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
37,413
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
19,786
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
123,538
|
|
FHA/VA first mortgages
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
23,679
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
8,185
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
135,937
|
|
Multi-family and commercial mortgages
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1,135
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5,983
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2,066
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
Consumer and other loans
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
2,508
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
7,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
$
|
275,997
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
$
|
157,097
|
|
|
|
3,185
|
|
|
$
|
1,026,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delinquent loans to total loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four- family first mortgages:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortizing
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
$
|
246,435
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
$
|
118,947
|
|
|
|
2,366
|
|
|
$
|
770,641
|
|
Interest-only
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
34,277
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
21,283
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
135,228
|
|
FHA/VA first mortgages
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
27,868
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
13,963
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
132,844
|
|
Multi-family and commercial mortgages
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1,384
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5,983
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3,189
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
Consumer and other loans
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
1,931
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
7,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
972
|
|
|
$
|
311,894
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
$
|
161,513
|
|
|
|
3,233
|
|
|
$
|
1,049,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delinquent loans to total loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.67
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.35
|
%
|
Potential problem loans consist of early-stage delinquencies and troubled debt restructurings that are not included in
non-accrual loans. The following table presents information regarding loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2014
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Troubled debt restructurings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
116,261
|
|
|
$
|
108,413
|
|
30-59 days
|
|
|
13,720
|
|
|
|
19,931
|
|
60-89 days
|
|
|
20,414
|
|
|
|
17,407
|
|
90 days or more
|
|
|
170,646
|
|
|
|
176,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total troubled debt restructurings
|
|
$
|
321,041
|
|
|
$
|
322,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans that were modified in a troubled debt restructuring primarily represent loans that have been in a deferred principal
payment plan for an extended period of time, generally in excess of nine months, loans that have had past due amounts capitalized as part of the loan balance, loans that have a confirmed Chapter 13 bankruptcy status, loans to borrowers that have
completed Chapter 7 bankruptcy and other repayment plans. These loans are individually evaluated for impairment to determine if the carrying value of the loan is in excess of the fair value of the collateral or the present value of the loans
expected future cash flows.
Page 56
The following table presents loan portfolio class modified as troubled debt restructurings. The pre-restructuring
and post-restructuring outstanding recorded investments disclosed in the table below represent the loan carrying amounts immediately prior to the restructuring and the carrying amounts as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2014
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
Number
of
Contracts
|
|
|
Pre-restructuring
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Post-restructuring
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Number
of
Contracts
|
|
|
Pre-restructuring
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Post-restructuring
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troubled debt restructurings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four family first mortgages:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortizing
|
|
|
909
|
|
|
$
|
323,662
|
|
|
$
|
279,979
|
|
|
|
933
|
|
|
$
|
318,908
|
|
|
$
|
281,481
|
|
Interest-only
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
35,024
|
|
|
|
31,436
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
35,226
|
|
|
|
31,564
|
|
Multi-family and commercial mortgages
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
7,029
|
|
|
|
7,029
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
7,029
|
|
|
|
7,029
|
|
Consumer and other loans
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
2,815
|
|
|
|
2,597
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
2,672
|
|
|
|
2,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
$
|
368,530
|
|
|
$
|
321,041
|
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
|
$
|
363,835
|
|
|
$
|
322,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed real estate amounted to $78.6 million and $70.4 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013,
respectively. During the first three months of 2014 we sold 46 properties as compared to 33 properties during the first three months of 2013. Write-downs and net gains on the sale of foreclosed real estate amounted to a net gain of $78,000 for the
first quarter of 2014 as compared to a net loss of $396,000 for the comparable period in 2013. Holding costs associated with foreclosed real estate amounted to $4.2 million and $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013,
respectively.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The
following table presents the activity in our allowance for loan losses at or for the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
276,097
|
|
|
$
|
302,348
|
|
|
$
|
302,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
36,500
|
|
Charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage loans
|
|
|
(16,361
|
)
|
|
|
(27,139
|
)
|
|
|
(87,288
|
)
|
Consumer and other loans
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
|
(566
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs
|
|
|
(16,532
|
)
|
|
|
(27,387
|
)
|
|
|
(87,854
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
6,167
|
|
|
|
6,132
|
|
|
|
25,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
(10,365
|
)
|
|
|
(21,255
|
)
|
|
|
(62,751
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
265,732
|
|
|
$
|
301,093
|
|
|
$
|
276,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
|
|
|
1.12
|
%
|
|
|
1.15
|
%
|
|
|
1.15
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans
|
|
|
25.88
|
|
|
|
26.50
|
|
|
|
26.31
|
|
Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
Page 57
The following table presents our allocation of the ALL by loan category and the percentage of loans in each
category to total loans at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2014
|
|
|
At December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percentage
of Loans in
Category to
Total Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percentage
of Loans in
Category to
Total Loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family
|
|
$
|
261,246
|
|
|
|
99.02
|
%
|
|
$
|
271,261
|
|
|
|
99.00
|
%
|
Other first mortgages
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
918
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total first mortgage loans
|
|
|
261,826
|
|
|
|
99.12
|
|
|
|
272,179
|
|
|
|
99.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and other loans
|
|
|
3,906
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
3,918
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
265,732
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
276,097
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The term liquidity refers to our ability to generate adequate amounts of cash to fund loan originations, loan and security purchases, deposit
withdrawals, repayment of borrowings and operating expenses. Our primary sources of funds are deposits, borrowings, the proceeds from principal and interest payments on loans and mortgage-backed securities, the maturities and calls of investment
securities and funds provided by our operations. Deposit flows, calls of investment securities and borrowed funds, and prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities are strongly influenced by interest rates, national and local economic
conditions and competition in the marketplace. These factors reduce the predictability of the receipt of these sources of funds. Our membership in the FHLB provides us access to additional sources of borrowed funds. We also have the ability to
access the capital markets, depending on market conditions.
Historically, our primary investing activities have been the origination and purchase of
one-to four-family real estate loans and consumer and other loans, the purchase of mortgage-backed securities, and the purchase of investment securities. These activities are funded primarily by borrowings, deposits and the proceeds from principal
and interest payments on loans, mortgage-backed securities and investment securities. Our loan production (originations and purchases) was $476.1 million during the first three months of 2014 as compared to $824.8 million during the first three
months of 2013. Principal repayments on loans amounted to $812.8 million and $1.73 billion for those same respective periods. At March 31, 2014, commitments to originate and purchase mortgage loans amounted to $137.3 million and $140,000
respectively, as compared to $365.0 million and $140,000 respectively, at March 31, 2013.
Purchases of mortgage-backed securities during the three
months ended March 31, 2014 were $41.4 million. There were no purchases of mortgage-backed securities during the three months ended March 31, 2013. Principal repayments on mortgage-backed securities amounted to $391.2 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to $880.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. Proceeds from sales of mortgage-backed securities during the three months ended March 31, 2014 were $435.3 million. There were no
sales of mortgage-backed securities during the three months ended March 31, 2013.
Page 58
At March 31, 2014, mortgage-backed securities and investment securities with an amortized cost of $7.03
billion were used as collateral for securities sold under agreements to repurchase and at that date we had $1.42 billion of unencumbered securities.
As
part of the membership requirements of the FHLB, we are required to hold a certain dollar amount of FHLB common stock based on our mortgage-related assets and borrowings from the FHLB. During the first quarter of 2014, we had no purchases or
redemptions of FHLB common stock.
During the first three months of 2014, total cash and cash equivalents increased $778.3 million to $5.10 billion. The
increase in total cash and cash equivalents was due primarily to the repayments on mortgage-related assets and the lack of attractive reinvestment opportunities due to low market interest rates as available short term reinvestment opportunities
continue to carry low yields, and medium and longer term opportunities are creating more significant duration risk at relatively low yields despite the recent increase in rates. The large excess cash position, while negatively impacting our returns,
better positions us for implementation of our strategic initiatives.
Our primary financing activities consist of gathering deposits, engaging in
wholesale borrowings, repurchases of our common stock and the payment of dividends.
Total deposits decreased $406.7 million during the first quarter of
2014 as compared to a decrease of $320.8 million for the first quarter of 2013. Deposit flows are typically affected by the level of market interest rates, the interest rates and products offered by competitors, the volatility of equity markets and
other factors. We maintained our deposit rates at low levels during the first three months of 2014 to continue our balance sheet reduction. At March 31, 2014, time deposits scheduled to mature within one year totaled $6.90 billion with an
average cost of 0.89%. These time deposits are scheduled to mature as follows: $2.93 billion with an average cost of 0.62% in the second quarter of 2014, $1.93 billion with an average cost of 0.73% in the third quarter of 2014, $1.04 billion
with an average cost of 1.34% in the fourth quarter of 2014 and $1.00 billion with an average cost of 1.49% in the first quarter of 2015.
We have, in the
past, primarily used wholesale borrowings to fund our investing activities. Structured putable borrowings amounted to $5.73 billion at March 31, 2014, including $5.53 billion with put dates within one year. These structured putable borrowings
consist of $2.40 billion of one-time putable borrowings and $3.33 billion of quarterly putable borrowings. We anticipate that none of these borrowings will be put back assuming current market interest rates remain stable. We believe, given current
market conditions, that the likelihood that a significant portion of these borrowings would be put back will not increase substantially unless interest rates were to increase by at least 250 basis points. Our remaining borrowings are fixed-rate,
fixed maturity borrowings of $6.45 billion with a weighted-average rate of 4.76%. There are no scheduled maturities through March 31, 2015.
As part
of our Strategic Plan, we are continuing to explore ways to reduce our interest rate risk while strengthening our balance sheet, which may include a further restructuring of our balance sheet during 2014. The Company previously completed a series of
restructuring transactions in 2011 that reduced higher-cost structured borrowings on the Companys balance sheet. Management is continuing to consider a variety of different restructuring alternatives, including whether to restructure all or
various portions of our borrowed funds and various alternatives for replacement funding. No decision has been made at this time regarding the timing, structure and scope of any restructuring transaction. Decisions regarding any restructuring
transaction are dependent upon, among other things, market interest rates, overall economic conditions and the status of the Merger. However, any such transaction will likely not occur before the second half of 2014. Similar to the 2011
restructuring transactions, we expect a restructuring to result in a net loss and reduction of stockholder equity, though we also expect an
Page 59
improvement in net interest margin and future earnings prospects. Any restructuring will focus on the prospects for long-term overall earnings stability and growth. Any restructuring will likely
reduce our excess cash position, but will not adversely affect the liquidity we need to operate in a safe and sound manner.
At March 31, 2014 we had
a concentration of borrowings with a single counterparty with $6.03 billion of borrowings with the FHLB. We do not believe this concentration creates a material liquidity risk to us.
Our liquidity management process is structured to meet our daily funding needs and to cover both expected and unexpected deviations from normal daily
operations. The primary tools we use for measuring and managing liquidity risk include cash flow projections, diversified funding sources, stress testing, a cushion of liquid assets, and a formal, well developed contingency funding plan.
Cash dividends paid during the first quarter of 2014 were $19.9 million as compared to $39.8 million for the first quarter of 2013. We did not purchase any of
our common shares during the first quarter ended March 31, 2014 pursuant to our repurchase programs. Pursuant to the Company MOU, any future share repurchases must be approved by the FRB. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, we may not repurchase
any shares without the consent of M&T. At March 31, 2014, there remained 50,123,550 shares available for purchase under existing stock repurchase programs.
The primary source of liquidity for Hudson City Bancorp, the holding company of Hudson City Savings, is capital distributions from Hudson City Savings. At
March 31, 2014, Hudson City Bancorp had total cash and due from banks of $135.3 million. The primary use of these funds is the payment of dividends to our shareholders and, when appropriate as part of our capital management strategy, the
repurchase of our outstanding common stock. Hudson City Bancorps ability to continue these activities is dependent upon capital distributions from Hudson City Savings. Applicable federal law, regulations and regulatory actions may limit the
amount of capital distributions Hudson City Savings may make. Currently, Hudson City Savings must seek approval from the OCC and the FRB for future capital distributions.
In accordance with the Bank MOU, the Bank has adopted and has implemented enhanced operating policies and procedures that will enable us to continue to:
(a) reduce our level of interest rate risk, (b) reduce our funding concentration, (c) diversify our funding sources, (d) enhance our liquidity position, (e) monitor and manage loan modifications and (f) maintain our
capital position in accordance with our existing capital plan. In addition, we developed a written strategic plan for the Bank which establishes various objectives, including, but not limited to, objectives for the Banks overall risk profile,
earnings performance, growth and balance sheet mix and to enhance our enterprise risk management program. Prior to the execution of Amendment No. 1, the implementation of the strategic plan had been suspended pending the completion of the
Merger. Since the execution of Amendment No. 1, we have updated the strategic plan, prioritizing certain matters that can be achieved during the pendency of the Merger. The Company is proceeding with implementation of the prioritized aspects of
the updated strategic plan.
In accordance with the Company MOU, the Company must, among other things support the Banks compliance with the Bank
MOU. The Company MOU also requires the Company to: (a) obtain approval from the FRB prior to receiving a capital distribution from the Bank or declaring a dividend to shareholders, (b) obtain approval from the FRB prior to repurchasing or
redeeming any Company stock or incurring any debt with a maturity date of greater than one year and (c) submit a comprehensive Capital Plan and a comprehensive Earnings Plan to the FRB.
Page 60
These agreements will remain in effect until modified or terminated by the OCC (with respect to the Bank MOU) and
the FRB (with respect to the Company MOU).
At March 31, 2014, Hudson City Savings exceeded all regulatory capital requirements and is in compliance
with our capital plan. Hudson City Savings tangible capital ratio, leverage (core) capital ratio and total risk-based capital ratio were 11.03%, 11.03% and 26.10%, respectively. We have agreed in the Bank MOU not to materially deviate from our
capital plan without regulatory approval.
Pursuant to the Reform Act, we will become subject to new minimum capital requirements. In July 2013, the
Agencies issued rules that will subject many savings and loan holding companies, including Hudson City Bancorp, to consolidated capital requirements. The rules also revise the quantity and quality of required minimum risk-based and leverage capital
requirements applicable to Hudson City Bancorp and Hudson City Savings, consistent with the Reform Act and the Basel III capital standards, add a new common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio and add an additional common equity Tier 1 capital
conservation buffer, or Conservation Buffer, of 2.50% of risk-weighted assets, to be applied to the new common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, the Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio and the total risk-based capital ratio. The rules impose
restrictions on capital distributions and certain discretionary cash bonus payments if the minimum Conservation Buffer is not met. The rules also revise the calculation of risk-weighted assets to enhance their risk sensitivity and phase out trust
preferred securities and cumulative perpetual preferred stock as Tier 1 capital. The new minimum regulatory capital ratios and changes to the calculation of risk-weighted assets will be phased in to allow banking organizations to meet the new
capital standards, with the initial provisions effective for Hudson City Bancorp and Hudson City Savings on January 1, 2015. We are continuing to review and prepare for the impact that the Reform Act, Basel III capital standards and related
rulemaking will have on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For additional information, see Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our December 31, 2013 Form 10-K.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
The Bank is a party to certain off-balance sheet arrangements, which occur in the normal course of our business, to meet the credit needs of our customers and
the growth initiatives of the Bank. These arrangements are primarily commitments to originate and purchase mortgage loans, and to purchase mortgage-backed securities. We are also obligated under a number of non-cancellable operating leases.
The following table reports the amounts of our contractual obligations as of March 31, 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due By Period
|
|
Contractual Obligation
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less Than
One Year
|
|
|
One Year to
Three Years
|
|
|
Three Years to
Five Years
|
|
|
More Than
Five Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loan originations
|
|
$
|
137,304
|
|
|
$
|
137,304
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Mortgage loan purchases
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of borrowed funds
|
|
|
12,175,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,350,000
|
|
|
|
2,825,000
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
141,385
|
|
|
|
10,637
|
|
|
|
21,021
|
|
|
|
20,193
|
|
|
|
89,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
12,453,829
|
|
|
$
|
148,081
|
|
|
$
|
4,371,021
|
|
|
$
|
2,845,193
|
|
|
$
|
5,089,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend money to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition
established in the contract. Commitments to fund first mortgage loans generally have fixed expiration dates of approximately 90 days and other termination clauses. Since some commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total
commitment amounts do not necessarily
Page 61
represent future cash requirements. Hudson City Savings evaluates each customers credit-worthiness on a case-by-case basis. Additionally, we have available home equity,
commercial/construction lines of credit and overdraft lines of credit, which do not have fixed expiration dates, of approximately $152.2 million, $157,000, and $2.3 million, respectively. We are not obligated to advance further amounts on credit
lines if the customer is delinquent, or otherwise in violation of the agreement. The commitments to purchase first mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities had a normal period from trade date to settlement date of approximately 60 days.
Critical Accounting Policies
Note 2 to our Audited
Consolidated Financial Statements, included in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K, contains a summary of our significant accounting policies. We believe our policies with respect to the methodology for our determination of the ALL, the measurement
of stock-based compensation expense, the impairment of securities, the impairment of goodwill and the measurement of the funded status and cost of our pension and other post-retirement benefit plans involve a higher degree of complexity and require
management to make difficult and subjective judgments which often require assumptions or estimates about highly uncertain matters. Changes in these judgments, assumptions or estimates could cause reported results to differ materially. These critical
policies and their application are continually reviewed by management, and are periodically reviewed with the Audit Committee and our Board of Directors.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The ALL has been determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, under which we are required to maintain an adequate ALL at
March 31, 2014. We are responsible for the timely and periodic determination of the amount of the allowance required. We believe that our ALL is adequate to cover specifically identifiable loan losses, as well as estimated losses inherent in
our portfolio for which certain losses are probable but not specifically identifiable.
Our primary lending emphasis is the origination and purchase of
one- to four-family first mortgage loans on residential properties and, to a lesser extent, second mortgage loans on one- to four-family residential properties resulting in a loan concentration in residential first mortgage loans at March 31,
2014. As a result of our lending practices, we also have a concentration of loans secured by real property located primarily in New Jersey, New York and Connecticut. At March 31, 2014, approximately 84.6% of our total loans are in the New York
metropolitan area. Additionally, the states of Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Virginia, Illinois and Maryland, accounted for 4.9%, 1.9%, 1.8%, 1.6% and 1.6%, respectively of total loans. The remaining 3.6% of the loan portfolio is secured by real
estate primarily in the remainder of our lending markets. Based on the composition of our loan portfolio and the growth in our loan portfolio, we believe the primary risks inherent in our portfolio are the continued weakened economic conditions due
to the recent U.S. recession, continued high levels of unemployment, rising interest rates in the markets we lend and the potential for future declines in real estate market values. Any one or a combination of these adverse trends may adversely
affect our loan portfolio resulting in increased delinquencies, non-performing assets, loan losses and future levels of loan loss provisions. We consider these trends in market conditions in determining the ALL.
Due to the nature of our loan portfolio, our evaluation of the adequacy of our ALL is performed primarily on a pooled basis. Each month we prepare
an analysis which categorizes the entire loan portfolio by certain risk characteristics such as loan type (fixed and variable one- to four-family, interest-only, reduced documentation, multi-family, commercial, construction, etc.), loan source
(originated or purchased) and
Page 62
payment status (i.e., current or number of days delinquent). Loans with known potential losses are categorized separately. We assign potential loss factors to the payment status categories on the
basis of our assessment of the potential risk inherent in each loan type. These factors are periodically reviewed for appropriateness giving consideration to charge-off history, delinquency trends, portfolio growth and the status of the regional
economy and housing market, in order to ascertain that the loss factors cover probable and estimable losses inherent in the portfolio. Based on our recent loss experience on non-performing loans and our consideration of environmental factors, we
changed certain loss factors used in our quantitative analysis of the ALL for one- to four- family first mortgage loans during the first three months of 2014. This adjustment in our loss factors did not have a material effect on the ultimate level
of our ALL or on our provision for loan losses. We use this analysis, as a tool, together with principal balances and delinquency reports, to evaluate the adequacy of the ALL. Other key factors we consider in this process are current real estate
market conditions in geographic areas where our loans are located, changes in the trend of non-performing loans, the results of our foreclosed property transactions, the current state of the local and national economy, changes in interest rates and
loan portfolio growth. Any one or a combination of these adverse trends may adversely affect our loan portfolio resulting in increased delinquencies, loan losses and higher future levels of provisions.
We maintain the ALL through provisions for loan losses that we charge to income. We charge losses on loans against the ALL when we believe the collection of
loan principal is unlikely. We establish the provision for loan losses after considering the results of our review as described above. We apply this process and methodology in a consistent manner and we reassess and modify the estimation methods and
assumptions used in response to changing conditions. Such changes, if any, are approved by our AQC each quarter.
Hudson City Savings defines the
population of potential impaired loans to be all non-accrual construction, commercial real estate and multi-family loans as well as loans classified as troubled debt restructurings. Impaired loans are individually assessed to determine that the
loans carrying value is not in excess of the fair value of the collateral or the present value of the loans expected future cash flows. Smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment, such as residential
mortgage loans and consumer loans, are specifically excluded from the impaired loan analysis.
We believe that we have established and maintained the ALL
at adequate levels. Additions may be necessary if future economic and other conditions differ substantially from the current operating environment. Although management uses the best information available, the level of the ALL remains an estimate
that is subject to significant judgment and short-term change.
Stock-Based Compensation
We recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of such awards in
accordance with ASC 718-10. We made annual grants of performance-based stock options and stock unit awards that vest if certain financial performance measures are met. In accordance with ASC 718-10-30-6, we assess the probability of achieving these
financial performance measures and recognize the cost of these performance-based grants if it is probable that the financial performance measures will be met. This probability assessment is subjective in nature and may change over the assessment
period for the performance measures. We made grants of stock units in 2012 for which the sizes of the awards depended in part on market conditions based on the performance of our common stock. In accordance with ASC 718-10-30-15, we include the
impact of these market conditions when estimating the grant date fair value of the awards. In accordance with ASC 718-10-55-61, we recognize compensation cost for these awards if service conditions are satisfied, even if the market condition is not
satisfied.
Page 63
We estimate the per share fair value of option grants on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model using assumptions for the expected dividend yield, expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected option term. These assumptions are based on our analysis of our historical option exercise experience and our judgments
regarding future option exercise experience and market conditions. These assumptions are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. The Black-Scholes option pricing model also contains certain
inherent limitations when applied to options that are not traded on public markets.
The per share fair value of options is highly sensitive to changes in
assumptions. In general, the per share fair value of options will move in the same direction as changes in the expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected option term, and in the opposite direction of changes in the
expected dividend yield. For example, the per share fair value of options will generally increase as expected stock price volatility increases, risk-free interest rate increases, expected option term increases and expected dividend yield decreases.
The use of different assumptions or different option pricing models could result in materially different per share fair values of options.
Pension
and Other Post-Retirement Benefit Assumptions
Non-contributory retirement and post-retirement defined benefit plans are maintained for certain
employees, including retired employees hired on or before July 31, 2005 who have met other eligibility requirements of the plans. In accordance with ASC 715, Retirement Benefits, we: (a) recognize in the statement of financial condition an
asset for a plans overfunded status or a liability for a plans underfunded status; (b) measure plan assets and obligations that determine the plans funded status as of the end of our fiscal year; and (c) recognize, in
comprehensive income, changes in the funded status of our defined benefit post-retirement plan in the year in which the changes occur.
We provide our
actuary with certain rate assumptions used in measuring our benefit obligation. We monitor these rates in relation to the current market interest rate environment and update our actuarial analysis accordingly. The most significant of these is the
discount rate used to calculate the period-end present value of the benefit obligations, and the expense to be included in the following years financial statements. A lower discount rate will result in a higher benefit obligation and expense,
while a higher discount rate will result in a lower benefit obligation and expense. The discount rate assumption was determined based on a cash flow/yield curve model specific to our pension and post-retirement plans. We compare this rate to certain
market indices, such as long-term treasury bonds, or the Moodys bond indices, for reasonableness. For our pension plan, a discount rate of 4.75% was selected for the December 31, 2013 measurement date and for the 2014 expense calculation.
For our pension plan, we also assumed an annual rate of salary increase of 3.50% for future periods. This rate is corresponding to actual salary
increases experienced over prior years. We assumed a return on plan assets of 8.25% for future periods. We actuarially determine the return on plan assets based on actual plan experience over the previous ten years. The actual return on plan assets
was 14.7% for 2013 and 11.4% for 2012. There can be no assurances with respect to actual return on plan assets in the future. We periodically review and evaluate all actuarial assumptions affecting the pension plan, including assumed return on
assets.
Page 64
For our post-retirement benefit plan, a discount rate of 4.70% was used for the December 31, 2013
measurement date and for the 2014 expense calculation. The assumed health care cost trend rate used to measure the expected cost of other benefits for 2013 was 8.0%. The rate was assumed to decrease gradually to 4.50% for 2021 and remain at that
level thereafter. Changes to the assumed health care cost trend rate are expected to have an immaterial impact as we capped our obligations to contribute to the premium cost of coverage to the post-retirement health benefit plan at the 2007 premium
level.
Securities Impairment
Our
available-for-sale securities portfolio is carried at estimated fair value with any unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, reported as accumulated other comprehensive income/loss in shareholders equity. Debt securities which we have the
positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and are carried at amortized cost. The fair values for our securities are obtained from an independent nationally recognized pricing service. On a monthly basis, we
assess the reasonableness of the fair values obtained by reference to a second independent nationally recognized pricing service.
Substantially all of
our securities portfolio is comprised of mortgage-backed securities and debt securities issued by GSEs. The fair value of these securities is primarily impacted by changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds. We generally view changes in fair
value caused by changes in interest rates as temporary, which is consistent with our experience.
Accounting guidance requires that an entity assess
whether an impairment of a debt security is other-than-temporary and, as part of that assessment, determine its intent and ability to hold the security. If the entity intends to sell the debt security, an other-than-temporary impairment shall be
considered to have occurred. In addition, an other-than-temporary impairment shall be considered to have occurred if it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost.
We conduct a periodic review and evaluation of the securities portfolio to determine if a decline in the fair value of any security below its cost basis is
other-than-temporary. Our evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment considers the duration and severity of the impairment, our intent and ability to hold the securities, whether it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the
security before recovery of the amortized cost and our assessments of the reason for the decline in value and the likelihood of a near-term recovery. The unrealized losses on securities in our portfolio were due primarily to changes in market
interest rates subsequent to purchase. As a result, the unrealized losses on our securities were not considered to be other-than-temporary and, accordingly, no impairment loss was recognized during the first three months of 2014.
Impairment of Goodwill
Goodwill and intangible
assets with indefinite useful lives are tested for impairment at least annually using a fair-value based two-step approach. Goodwill and other intangible assets amounted to $153.5 million and were recorded as a result of Hudson City Bancorps
acquisition of Sound Federal Bancorp, Inc. in 2006.
The first step (Step 1) used to identify potential impairment involves comparing each
reporting units estimated fair value to its carrying amount, including goodwill. As a community-oriented bank, substantially all of the Companys operations involve the delivery of loan and deposit products to customers and these
operations constitute the Companys only segment for financial reporting purposes. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill is not considered to be
Page 65
impaired. If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value, there is an indication of potential impairment and the second step (Step 2) is performed to measure the amount. Step
2 involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill for each reporting unit for which impairment was indicated in Step 1. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in a manner similar to the amount of goodwill calculated in a business
combination by measuring the excess of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in Step 1, over the aggregate estimated fair values of the individual assets, liabilities, and identifiable intangibles, as if the reporting unit
was being acquired at the impairment test date. Subsequent reversal of goodwill impairment losses is not permitted.
We performed our annual goodwill
impairment analysis as of June 30, 2013. We also perform interim impairment reviews if events, circumstances, or triggering events occur which may indicate that goodwill and other intangible assets may be impaired.
Based on the results of the goodwill impairment analyses we completed in 2013, we concluded that goodwill was not impaired. Therefore, we did not recognize
any impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets during 2013.
We do not believe that any events, circumstances or triggering events occurred during
the first quarter of 2014 which indicated goodwill and other intangible required reassessment. Accordingly, we did not perform an interim impairment review and did not recognize any impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets during the
quarter ended March 31, 2014.
The estimation of the fair value of the Company requires the use of estimates and assumptions that results in a
greater degree of uncertainty. In addition, the estimated fair value of the Company is based on, among other things, the market price of our common stock as calculated per the terms of the merger. As a result of the current volatility in market and
economic conditions, these estimates and assumptions are subject to change in the near-term and may result in the impairment in future periods of some or all of the goodwill on our balance sheet.