UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended March 28, 2008
or
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission File Number 001-31305
FOSTER WHEELER LTD.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Bermuda
|
|
22-3802649
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
Perryville Corporate Park
|
|
|
Clinton, New Jersey
|
|
08809-4000
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(908) 730-4000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date: 144,146,806 common shares ($0.01 par value) were outstanding as of
April 25, 2008.
FOSTER WHEELER LTD.
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOSTER WHEELER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
1,795,724
|
|
|
$
|
1,152,122
|
|
Cost of operating revenues
|
|
|
(1,578,753
|
)
|
|
|
(944,610
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract profit
|
|
|
216,971
|
|
|
|
207,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(64,896
|
)
|
|
|
(55,088
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
19,534
|
|
|
|
5,764
|
|
Other deductions
|
|
|
(11,891
|
)
|
|
|
(8,172
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
10,531
|
|
|
|
5,752
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(6,151
|
)
|
|
|
(4,725
|
)
|
Minority interest in income of consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(473
|
)
|
|
|
(2,309
|
)
|
Net asbestos-related gain
|
|
|
14,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
177,813
|
|
|
|
148,734
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(39,750
|
)
|
|
|
(33,909
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
138,063
|
|
|
$
|
114,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share (see Note 1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.95
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
FOSTER WHEELER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,160,191
|
|
|
$
|
1,048,544
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
|
575,171
|
|
|
|
580,883
|
|
Other
|
|
|
134,113
|
|
|
|
98,708
|
|
Contracts in process
|
|
|
239,918
|
|
|
|
239,737
|
|
Prepaid, deferred and refundable income taxes
|
|
|
39,162
|
|
|
|
36,532
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
44,798
|
|
|
|
39,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,193,353
|
|
|
|
2,044,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land, buildings and equipment, net
|
|
|
349,903
|
|
|
|
337,485
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
36,183
|
|
|
|
20,937
|
|
Notes and accounts receivable long-term
|
|
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
2,941
|
|
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
220,748
|
|
|
|
198,346
|
|
Goodwill, net
|
|
|
62,672
|
|
|
|
53,345
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
64,869
|
|
|
|
61,190
|
|
Asbestos-related insurance recovery receivable
|
|
|
307,053
|
|
|
|
324,588
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
94,781
|
|
|
|
93,737
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
110,946
|
|
|
|
112,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
3,443,072
|
|
|
$
|
3,248,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES, TEMPORARY EQUITY AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current installments on long-term debt
|
|
$
|
19,520
|
|
|
$
|
19,368
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
327,591
|
|
|
|
372,531
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
308,153
|
|
|
|
331,814
|
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
835,542
|
|
|
|
744,236
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
79,655
|
|
|
|
55,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,570,461
|
|
|
|
1,523,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
193,386
|
|
|
|
185,978
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
81,998
|
|
|
|
81,008
|
|
Pension, postretirement and other employee benefits
|
|
|
285,915
|
|
|
|
290,741
|
|
Asbestos-related liability
|
|
|
359,429
|
|
|
|
376,803
|
|
Other long-term liabilities and minority interest
|
|
|
213,303
|
|
|
|
216,916
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
|
2,704,492
|
|
|
|
2,675,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested restricted awards subject to redemption
|
|
|
2,425
|
|
|
|
2,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL TEMPORARY EQUITY
|
|
|
2,425
|
|
|
|
2,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.01 par value; authorized: March 28, 2008 - 901,564 shares and
December 28, 2007 - 901,943 shares; issued and outstanding: March 28, 2008 - 1,508 shares and December 28, 2007 - 1,887 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.01 par value; authorized: March 28, 2008 - 296,007,390 shares and
December 28, 2007 - 296,007,011 shares; issued and outstanding: March 28, 2008 - 144,135,031 shares and December 28, 2007 - 143,877,804 shares
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
|
|
1,439
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,389,952
|
|
|
|
1,385,311
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(416,532
|
)
|
|
|
(554,595
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(238,706
|
)
|
|
|
(261,114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
736,155
|
|
|
|
571,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES, TEMPORARY EQUITY AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$
|
3,443,072
|
|
|
$
|
3,248,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
FOSTER WHEELER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands of dollars, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28, 2008
|
|
|
March 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Preferred Shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
1,887
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
3,658
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Preferred shares converted into common shares
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
3,469
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
143,877,804
|
|
|
$
|
1,439
|
|
|
|
138,182,948
|
|
|
$
|
1,382
|
|
Issuance of common shares upon exercise of common share
purchase warrants
|
|
|
63,465
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
22,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
82,446
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,744,752
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Issuance of common shares upon vesting of restricted awards
|
|
|
62,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
679,600
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Issuance of common shares upon conversion of preferred shares
|
|
|
49,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
144,135,031
|
|
|
$
|
1,441
|
|
|
|
140,653,874
|
|
|
$
|
1,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in Capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,385,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,348,800
|
|
Issuance of common shares upon exercise of common share
purchase warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
Issuance of common shares upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,985
|
|
Share-based compensation expense-stock options and
restricted awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
809
|
|
Excess tax benefit related to equity-based incentive program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,712
|
|
Issuance of common shares upon vesting of restricted awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,389,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,360,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Deficit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(554,595
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(944,113
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,356
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period, as adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(554,595
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(948,469
|
)
|
Net income for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(416,532
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(833,644
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(261,114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(343,342
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,064
|
|
Net (loss)/gain on derivative instruments designated
as cash flow hedges, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,355
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
Pension and other postretirement benefits, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(238,706
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(333,875
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
736,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
194,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
FOSTER WHEELER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands of dollars)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
138,063
|
|
|
$
|
114,825
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
21,062
|
|
|
|
5,064
|
|
Net (loss)/gain on derivative instruments designated
as cash flow hedges, net of tax
|
|
|
(2,355
|
)
|
|
|
353
|
|
Pension and other postretirement benefits, net of tax
|
|
|
3,701
|
|
|
|
4,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
160,471
|
|
|
$
|
124,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
FOSTER WHEELER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands of dollars)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
138,063
|
|
|
$
|
114,825
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows
from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11,356
|
|
|
|
8,838
|
|
Net asbestos-related gain
|
|
|
(14,188
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense-stock options and restricted awards
|
|
|
2,494
|
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
Excess tax benefit related to equity-based incentive program
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(1,308
|
)
|
Deferred tax
|
|
|
2,528
|
|
|
|
5,640
|
|
Loss/(gain) on sale of assets
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
Equity in the net earnings of partially-owned affiliates, net of dividends
|
|
|
(11,782
|
)
|
|
|
359
|
|
Other noncash items
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease/(increase) in receivables
|
|
|
19,104
|
|
|
|
(31,372
|
)
|
Net change in contracts in process and billings in excess
of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
63,886
|
|
|
|
(71,955
|
)
|
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(105,133
|
)
|
|
|
(30,134
|
)
|
Increase in income taxes payable
|
|
|
21,910
|
|
|
|
13,622
|
|
Net change in other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(14,254
|
)
|
|
|
(38,875
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities
|
|
|
114,423
|
|
|
|
(26,402
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(7,740
|
)
|
|
|
(1,473
|
)
|
Change in restricted cash
|
|
|
(13,424
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(14,536
|
)
|
|
|
(6,140
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(1,070
|
)
|
|
|
(461
|
)
|
Return of investment from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(36,705
|
)
|
|
|
(1,690
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership distributions to minority partners
|
|
|
(6,684
|
)
|
|
|
(2,063
|
)
|
Proceeds from common share purchase warrant exercises
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
|
|
9,003
|
|
Excess tax benefit related to equity-based incentive program
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
3,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(420
|
)
|
|
|
(434
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(2,150
|
)
|
|
|
7,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
36,079
|
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
111,647
|
|
|
|
(17,550
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
1,048,544
|
|
|
|
610,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,160,191
|
|
|
$
|
593,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
FOSTER WHEELER LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are
unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of such
financial statements have been included. Such adjustments only consisted of normal recurring
items. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.
The financial statements and notes are presented in accordance with the requirements of Form
10-Q and do not contain certain information included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 28, 2007 (2007 Form 10-K), filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on February 26, 2008. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 28, 2007
was derived from the audited financial statements included in our 2007 Form 10-K, but does not
include all the disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America for annual consolidated financial statements. A summary of our significant
accounting policies is presented below.
Principles of Consolidation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Foster Wheeler Ltd. and all significant domestic and foreign subsidiaries as well as
certain entities in which we have a controlling interest. Intercompany transactions and balances
have been eliminated.
Our fiscal year is the 52- or 53-week annual accounting period ending the last Friday in
December for domestic operations and December 31 for foreign operations. There were 13 weeks in
the first quarter in both fiscal years 2008 and 2007.
Capital Alterations
On January 8, 2008, our shareholders approved an increase in our
authorized share capital at a special general meeting of common shareholders. The increase in
authorized share capital was necessary in order to effect a two-for-one stock split of our common
shares which was approved by our Board of Directors on November 6, 2007. The stock split was
effected on January 22, 2008 in the form of a stock dividend to common shareholders of record at
the close of business on January 8, 2008 in the ratio of one additional Foster Wheeler Ltd. common
share in respect of each common share outstanding. As a result, all references to share capital,
the number of shares, stock options, restricted awards, per share amounts, cash dividends, and any
other reference to shares in the condensed consolidated financial statements, unless otherwise
noted, have been adjusted to reflect the stock split on a retroactive basis.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and revenues and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could
differ from those estimates. Changes in estimates are reflected in the periods in which they
become known. Significant estimates are used when accounting for long-term contracts including
estimates of total costs and customer and vendor claims, employee benefit plan obligations,
share-based compensation plans, uncertain tax positions and deferred taxes, and asbestos
liabilities and expected recoveries, among others.
Revenue Recognition on Long-Term Contracts
Revenues and profits on long-term fixed-price
contracts are recorded under the percentage-of-completion method. Progress towards completion is
measured using physical completion of individual tasks for all contracts with a value of $5,000 or
greater. Progress toward completion of fixed-priced contracts with a value less than $5,000 is
measured using the cost-to-cost method.
Revenues and profits on cost-reimbursable contracts are recorded as the services are rendered
based on the estimated revenue per man-hour, including any incentives assessed as probable. We
include flow-through costs consisting of materials, equipment or subcontractor services as revenue
on cost-reimbursable contracts when we have overall responsibility as the contractor for the
engineering specifications and procurement or procurement services for such costs.
Contracts in process are stated at cost, increased for profits recorded on the completed
effort or decreased for estimated losses, less billings to the customer and progress payments on
uncompleted contracts.
8
We have numerous contracts that are in various stages of completion. Such contracts require
estimates to determine the extent of revenue and profit recognition. These estimates may be
revised from time to time as
additional information becomes available. In accordance with the accounting and disclosure
requirements of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position
(SOP) 81-1, Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type
Contracts and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 154, Accounting Changes
and Error Correctionsa replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3, we review all
of our material contracts monthly and revise our estimates as appropriate. These estimate
revisions, which include both increases and decreases in estimated profit, result from events such
as earning project incentive bonuses or the incurrence or forecasted incurrence of contractual
liquidated damages for performance or schedule issues, providing services and purchasing
third-party materials and equipment at costs differing from those previously estimated and testing
of completed facilities which, in turn, eliminates or confirms completion and warranty-related
costs. Project incentives are recognized when it is probable they will be earned. Project
incentives are frequently tied to cost, schedule and/or safety targets and, therefore, tend to be
earned late in a projects life cycle. There were 6 and 16 separate projects that had final
estimated profit revisions exceeding $1,000 during the first quarter of fiscal years 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The changes in final estimated profits resulted in net increases to contract profit
of $2,130 and $18,460 in the first quarter of fiscal years 2008 and 2007, respectively. Please see
Note 11 for further information related to changes in final estimated profits.
Claims are amounts in excess of the agreed contract price (or amounts not included in the
original contract price) that we seek to collect from customers or others for delays, errors in
specifications and designs, contract terminations, disputed or unapproved change orders as to both
scope and price or other causes of unanticipated additional costs. We record claims in accordance
with paragraph 65 of SOP 81-1, which states that recognition of amounts as additional contract
revenue related to claims is appropriate only if it is probable that the claims will result in
additional contract revenue and if the amount can be reliably estimated. Under SOP 81-1, those two
requirements are satisfied by the existence of all of the following conditions: the contract or
other evidence provides a legal basis for the claim; additional costs are caused by circumstances
that were unforeseen at the contract date and are not the result of deficiencies in our
performance; costs associated with the claim are identifiable or otherwise determinable and are
reasonable in view of the work performed; and the evidence supporting the claim is objective and
verifiable. If such requirements are met, revenue from a claim may be recorded only to the extent
that contract costs relating to the claim have been incurred. Costs attributable to claims are
treated as costs of contract performance as incurred and are recorded in contracts in process. As
of March 28, 2008, our condensed consolidated financial statements assumed recovery of commercial
claims of $26,400, of which $1,700 was yet to be expended. Similarly, as of December 28, 2007, our
condensed consolidated financial statements assumed recovery of commercial claims of $22,200, of
which $3,700 was yet to be expended.
In certain circumstances, we may defer pre-contract costs when it is probable that these costs
will be recovered under a future contract. Such deferred costs would then be included in contract
costs upon execution of the anticipated contract. We had no deferred pre-contract costs as of
March 28, 2008 or December 28, 2007.
Certain special-purpose subsidiaries in our global power business group are reimbursed by
customers for their costs, including amounts related to principal repayments of non-recourse
project debt, for building and operating certain facilities over the lives of the corresponding
service contracts.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid short-term
investments with original maturities of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents of
$883,155 and $800,036 were maintained by our foreign subsidiaries as of March 28, 2008 and December
28, 2007, respectively. These subsidiaries require a portion of these funds to support their
liquidity and working capital needs, as well as to comply with required minimum capitalization and
contractual restrictions. Accordingly, a portion of these funds may not be readily available for
repatriation to U.S. entities.
Trade Accounts Receivable
Trade accounts receivable represent amounts billed to customers.
In accordance with terms under our long-term contracts, our customers may withhold certain
percentages of such billings until completion and acceptance of the work performed. Final payments
of all such amounts withheld might not be received within a one-year period. In conformity with
industry practice, however, the full amount of accounts receivable, including such amounts
withheld, are included in current assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Trade accounts receivable are continually evaluated for collectibility. Provisions are
established on a project-specific basis when there is an issue associated with the clients ability
to make payments or there are circumstances where the client is not making payment due to
contractual issues.
9
Contracts in Process and Billings in Excess of Costs and Estimated Earnings on Uncompleted
Contracts
Under long-term contracts, amounts recorded in contracts in process and billings in
excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts may not be realized or paid,
respectively, within a one-year period. In conformity with industry practice, however, the full
amount of contracts in process and billings in excess of costs and estimated
earnings on uncompleted contracts is included in current assets and current liabilities on the
condensed consolidated balance sheet, respectively.
Land, Buildings and Equipment
Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis using
estimated lives ranging from 10 to 50 years for buildings and from 3 to 35 years for equipment.
Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Renewals and
betterments are capitalized. Upon retirement or other disposition of fixed assets, the cost and
related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gains or losses,
if any, are reflected in earnings.
Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Affiliates
We use the equity method of
accounting for affiliates in which our investment ownership ranges from 20% to 50% unless
significant economic or governance considerations indicate that we are unable to exert significant
influence in which case the cost method is used. The equity method is also used for affiliates in
which our investment ownership is greater than 50% but we do not have a controlling interest.
Currently, all of our investments in affiliates in which our investment ownership is 20% or greater
and that are not consolidated are recorded using the equity method. Affiliates in which our
investment ownership is less than 20% are carried at cost.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist principally of goodwill, trademarks and patents.
Goodwill is allocated to our reporting units on a relative fair value basis at the time of the
original purchase price allocation. Patents and trademarks are amortized on a straight-line basis
over periods of 11 to 40 years.
We test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level as defined in SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This test is a two-step process. The first step of the
goodwill impairment test, used to identify potential impairment, compares the fair value of the
reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value, which is estimated
based on discounted future cash flows, exceeds the carrying amount, goodwill is not considered
impaired. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, the second step must be performed to
measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value
of the reporting units goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. In the fourth quarter
of each fiscal year, we evaluate goodwill at each reporting unit to assess recoverability, and
impairments, if any, are recognized in earnings. An impairment loss would be recognized in an
amount equal to the excess of the carrying amount of the goodwill over the implied fair value of
the goodwill. SFAS No. 142 also requires that intangible assets with determinable useful lives be
amortized over their respective estimated useful lives and reviewed for impairment in accordance
with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
As described further in Note 2, in February 2008, we
acquired a biopharmaceutical engineering
company. In conjunction with the acquisition, we recorded
$5,434 of goodwill and $3,600 of
identifiable intangible assets. We are in the process of obtaining appraisals of the tangible and
intangible assets acquired and we will evaluate and may adjust the initial purchase price
allocation as additional information related to the fair values of the assets and liabilities
become known.
We
had total goodwill of $62,672 and $53,345 as of March 28, 2008 and December 28, 2007,
respectively. Of the $62,672 of goodwill as of March 28, 2008, $57,238 is related to our global
power business group and $5,434 is related to our global engineering and construction group. In
fiscal year 2007, the fair value of all reporting units exceeded the carrying amounts except for a
domestic reporting unit, where a goodwill impairment charge of $2,401 was recorded related to
winding down of certain operations.
10
We
had total unamortized identifiable intangible assets of $64,869 and $61,190 as of March 28,
2008 and December 28, 2007, respectively. Of the
$64,869 of identifiable intangible assets as of
March 28, 2008, $61,269 is related to our global power business
group and $3,600 is related to our
global engineering and construction group. The following table details amounts relating to our
identifiable intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 28, 2008
|
|
|
December 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Patents
|
|
$
|
39,905
|
|
|
$
|
(21,545
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,360
|
|
|
$
|
39,375
|
|
|
$
|
(21,026
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,349
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
64,270
|
|
|
|
(21,061
|
)
|
|
|
43,209
|
|
|
|
63,344
|
|
|
|
(20,503
|
)
|
|
|
42,841
|
|
Customer
relationships and backlog
|
|
|
3,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
107,475
|
|
|
$
|
(42,606
|
)
|
|
$
|
64,869
|
|
|
$
|
102,719
|
|
|
$
|
(41,529
|
)
|
|
$
|
61,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense related to patents and trademarks which is recorded within cost of
operating revenues on the condensed consolidated statement of operations, totaled $1,077 and $900
for the fiscal quarters ended March 28, 2008 and March 30, 2007, respectively. Amortization
expense is expected to approximate $4,000 each year in the next five years.
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets/liabilities are established for the difference between the
financial reporting and income tax basis of assets and liabilities, as well as for operating loss
and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is
more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates
on the date of enactment.
We do not make a provision for U.S. federal income taxes on foreign subsidiary earnings if we
expect such earnings to be permanently reinvested outside the United States.
We recognize interest accrued on the unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and
penalties on the unrecognized tax benefits in other deductions on our consolidated statement of
operations.
Foreign Currency
The functional currency of our foreign operations is the local currency of
their country of domicile. Assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into
U.S. dollars at period-end exchange rates with the resulting translation adjustment recorded as a
separate component within accumulated other comprehensive loss. Income and expense accounts and
cash flows are translated at weighted-average exchange rates for the period. Transaction gains and
losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a currency other
than the functional currency are included in other income and other expense, respectively.
We maintain a foreign currency risk-management strategy that uses foreign currency forward
contracts to protect us from unanticipated fluctuations in cash flows that may arise from
volatility in currency exchange rates between the functional currencies of our subsidiaries and the
foreign currencies in which some of our operating purchases and sales are denominated. We utilize
these contracts solely to hedge specific foreign currency exposures, whether or not they qualify
for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities. During the fiscal quarters ended March 28, 2008 and March 30, 2007, none of the
contracts met the requirements for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133. Accordingly, we recorded
pretax foreign exchange losses of $636 and $447 for the fiscal quarters ended March 28, 2008 and
March 30, 2007, respectively. These amounts were recorded in the following line items on the
condensed consolidated statement of operations for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Cost of operating revenues
|
|
$
|
(772
|
)
|
|
$
|
(356
|
)
|
Other income/(deductions)
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax loss
|
|
$
|
(636
|
)
|
|
$
|
(447
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
The mark-to-market adjustments on foreign exchange contracts for these unrealized gains or
losses are recorded in either contracts in process or billings in excess of costs and estimated
earnings on uncompleted contracts on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.
During the fiscal quarters ended March 28, 2008 and March 30, 2007, we included cash
inflows/(outflows) on the settlement of derivatives of $975 and $1,152, respectively, within the
net change in contracts in process and billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts, a component of cash flows from operating activities in the condensed
consolidated statement of cash flows.
Interest Rate Risk
We use interest rate swap contracts to manage interest rate risk
associated with some of our variable rate special-purpose limited recourse project debt. Certain
of our affiliates in which we have an equity interest also use interest rate swap contracts to
manage interest rate risk associated with their limited recourse project debt. Upon entering into
the swap contracts, we designate the interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges in accordance with
SFAS No. 133. We assess at inception, and on an ongoing basis, whether the interest rate swaps are
highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the project debt. Consequently, we
record the fair value of our interest rate swap contracts in our condensed consolidated balance
sheet at each balance sheet date. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap contracts
are recorded as a component of comprehensive income on our condensed consolidated statement of
comprehensive income. As of March 28, 2008 and December 28, 2007, we had a net (loss)/gain on the
swap contracts of $(682) and $1,673, respectively, which net of a tax (benefit)/provision of $(259)
and $635, respectively, was included in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the condensed
consolidated balance sheet.
Earnings per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income
by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period, excluding
non-vested restricted shares of 165,960 and 248,940 as of March 28, 2008 and March 30, 2007,
respectively. Restricted shares and restricted share units (collectively, restricted awards) are
included in the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding when such restricted awards
vest.
Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the combination of the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period and the impact of
dilutive securities, if any, such as outstanding stock options, warrants to purchase common shares
and the non-vested portion of restricted awards to the extent such securities are dilutive.
In profitable periods, outstanding stock options and warrants have a dilutive effect under the
treasury stock method when the average common share price for the period exceeds the assumed
proceeds from the exercise of the warrant or option. The assumed proceeds include the exercise
price, compensation cost, if any, for future service that has not yet been recognized in the
condensed consolidated statement of operations, and any tax benefits that would be recorded in
paid-in capital when the option or warrant is exercised. Under the treasury stock method, the
assumed proceeds are assumed to be used to repurchase common shares in the current period. The
dilutive impact of the non-vested portion of restricted awards is determined using the treasury
stock method, but the proceeds include only the unrecognized compensation cost and tax benefits as
assumed proceeds.
12
The computations of basic and diluted earnings per common share were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Basic earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
138,063
|
|
|
$
|
114,825
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
for basic earnings per common share
|
|
|
143,917,790
|
|
|
|
139,507,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
138,063
|
|
|
$
|
114,825
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
for basic earnings per common share
|
|
|
143,917,790
|
|
|
|
139,507,752
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase common shares
|
|
|
595,867
|
|
|
|
1,593,904
|
|
Warrants to purchase common shares
|
|
|
615,050
|
|
|
|
2,304,972
|
|
Non-vested portion of restricted awards
|
|
|
169,807
|
|
|
|
124,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding for
diluted earnings per common share
|
|
|
145,298,514
|
|
|
|
143,531,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
0.95
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the common share equivalent of potentially dilutive securities
that have been excluded from the denominator used in the calculation of diluted earnings per common
share due to their antidilutive effect:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
Common shares issuable under outstanding options not
included in
the computation of diluted earnings per common share
because the assumed proceeds were greater than the average
common share price for the period
|
|
|
472,955
|
|
|
|
1,353,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Plans
Our share-based compensation plans are accounted for in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. We estimate the fair value
of each option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. We then
recognize the grant date fair value of each option as compensation expense ratably using the
straight-line attribution method over the service period (generally the vesting period). The
Black-Scholes model incorporates the following assumptions:
|
|
|
Expected volatility we estimate the volatility of our common share price at the
date of grant using historical volatility adjusted for periods of unusual stock price
activity.
|
|
|
|
|
Expected term we estimate the expected term of options granted to our chief
executive officer based on a combination of vesting schedules, contractual life of the
option, past history and estimates of future exercise behavior patterns as outlined in
SFAS No. 123R. For grants to other employees and the remaining directors, we estimate
the expected term using the simplified method, as outlined in Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based Payment.
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate we estimate the risk-free interest rate using the U.S.
Treasury yield curve for periods equal to the expected term of the options in effect at
the time of grant.
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends we use an expected dividend yield of zero because we have not declared
or paid a cash dividend since July 2001 and we do not have any plans to declare or pay
any cash dividends.
|
13
We used the following weighted-average assumptions to estimate the fair value of the options
granted for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
45.91
|
%
|
|
|
42.23
|
%
|
Expected term
|
|
3.63 years
|
|
3.29 years
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.13
|
%
|
|
|
4.48
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
We estimate the fair value of restricted awards using the market price of our common shares on
the date of grant. We then recognize the fair value of each restricted award as compensation cost
ratably using the straight-line attribution method over the service period (generally the vesting
period).
We estimate pre-vesting forfeitures at the time of grant using a combination of historical
data and demographic characteristics, and we revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual
forfeitures differ from those estimates. We record share-based compensation expense only for those
awards that are expected to vest.
Recent Accounting Developments
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The standard is effective for financial assets
and liabilities, as well as for any other assets and liabilities that are required to be measured
at fair value on a recurring basis, in financial statements for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued a partial one-year deferral of SFAS No. 157
for nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are only subject to fair value measurement on a
non-recurring basis. We have elected to defer the application of SFAS No. 157 for our nonfinancial
assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis until the fiscal year
beginning December 27, 2008, and are in the process of assessing its impact on our financial
position and results of operations related to such assets and liabilities. Our financial assets
and liabilities that are recorded at fair value consist primarily of the assets or liabilities
arising from derivative financial instruments. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a
material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid
to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date. We utilize market data or assumptions that we believe market participants would use in
pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the
inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated or
generally unobservable.
14
SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure
fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three
levels of the fair value hierarchy defined by SFAS No. 157 are as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1: Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities as of the reporting date.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in
Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are valued using models or other
valuation methodologies.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less
observable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with internally developed
methodologies that result in managements best estimate of fair value from the
perspective of a market participant.
|
We utilize foreign currency forward contracts to protect us from unanticipated fluctuations in
cash flows that may arise from volatility in currency exchange rates. We also use interest rate
swap contracts to manage interest rate risk associated with some of our variable rate debt. The
foreign currency forward contracts and interest rate swap contracts are valued using broker
quotations, or market transactions in either the listed or over-the-counter markets. As such,
these derivative instruments are classified within level 2.
The following table sets forth our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at
fair value on a recurring basis as of March 28, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
2008
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
$
|
11,358
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
|
3,511
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
|
|
2,566
|
|
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations. SFAS
No. 141R replaces SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations and changes the accounting treatment for
business acquisitions. SFAS No. 141R requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to
recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction and
establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Certain provisions of this standard will, among
other things, impact the determination of acquisition-date fair value of consideration paid in a
business combination (including contingent consideration); exclude transaction costs from
acquisition accounting; and change accounting practices for acquired contingencies,
acquisition-related restructuring costs, in-process research and development, indemnification
assets, and tax benefits. Most of the provisions of SFAS No. 141R apply prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is not permitted. We are
currently assessing the impact that SFAS No. 141R may have on our financial position, results of
operations and cash flows.
15
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51. SFAS No. 160, amends the accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (often referred to as minority
interest) and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Under SFAS No. 160, the noncontrolling
interest in a subsidiary is reported as equity in the parent companys consolidated financial
statements. SFAS No. 160 also requires that the parent companys consolidated statement of
operations include both the parent and noncontrolling interest share of the subsidiarys statement
of operations. Formerly, the noncontrolling interest share was shown as a reduction of income on
the parents consolidated statement of operations. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and
interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. SFAS No. 160 is
to be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which this statement is
initially applied; however, presentation and disclosure requirements shall be applied
retrospectively for all periods presented. We are currently assessing the impact that SFAS No. 160
may have on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better
understand the effects of derivative instruments and hedging activities on an entitys financial
position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 changes the disclosure requirements
about the location and amounts of derivative instruments in an entitys financial statements, how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, and how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect the companys financial position, financial
performance and cash flows. Additionally, SFAS No. 161 requires disclosure of the fair values of
derivative instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular format. SFAS No. 161 also provides
more information about an entitys liquidity by requiring disclosure of derivative features that
are credit risk-related. Finally, SFAS No. 161 requires cross-referencing within the footnotes to
enable financial statement users to locate important information about derivative instruments. SFAS
No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. We are currently assessing the impact
that SFAS No. 161 may have on our financial statement disclosures.
2. Business Combinations
In February 2008, we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of a biopharmaceutical
engineering company, based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for $8,490 plus up to $3,638 to be paid
over the following three years if certain conditions are met, plus up to an additional $8,700 to be
paid if certain performance milestones are met over the following three years. This company
provides design, engineering, manufacture, installation, validation and startup/commissioning
services to the life sciences industry. The purchase price allocation and pro forma information
for this acquisition was not material to our condensed consolidated financial statements. This
companys financial results are included within our global engineering and construction business
segment.
In February 2007, we purchased the stock of a Finnish company that owns patented coal flow
measuring technology. The purchase price, net of cash acquired was
1,112 (approximately $1,473 at
the exchange rate in effect at the time of the acquisition). The purchase price allocation and pro
forma financial information for this acquisition was not material to our condensed consolidated
financial statements. This companys financial results are included within our global power
business segment.
16
We own a non-controlling equity interest in three electric power generation projects, one
waste-to-energy project and one wind farm project in Italy and in a refinery/electric power
generation project in Chile. Two electric power generation projects in Italy are each 42% owned by
us and the third is 50% owned by us, the waste-to-energy project is 39% owned by us and the wind
farm project is 50% owned by us. The project in Chile is 85% owned by us; however, we do not have
a controlling interest in the Chilean project as a result of participating rights held by the
minority shareholder. We account for these investments in Italy and Chile under the equity method.
The following is summarized financial information for the entities (each as a whole) in which we
have an equity interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 28, 2008
|
|
December 28, 2007
|
|
|
Italian
|
|
Chilean
|
|
Italian
|
|
Chilean
|
|
|
Projects
|
|
Project
|
|
Projects
|
|
Project
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
360,491
|
|
|
$
|
66,550
|
|
|
$
|
294,482
|
|
|
$
|
49,353
|
|
Other assets (primarily buildings and
equipment)
|
|
|
702,095
|
|
|
|
144,218
|
|
|
|
656,796
|
|
|
|
146,665
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
100,392
|
|
|
|
45,984
|
|
|
|
72,009
|
|
|
|
21,044
|
|
Other liabilities (primarily long-term debt)
|
|
|
627,383
|
|
|
|
76,436
|
|
|
|
576,545
|
|
|
|
81,696
|
|
Net assets
|
|
|
334,811
|
|
|
|
88,348
|
|
|
|
302,724
|
|
|
|
93,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
March 28, 2008
|
|
March 30, 2007
|
|
|
Italian
|
|
Chilean
|
|
Italian
|
|
Chilean
|
|
|
Projects
|
|
Project
|
|
Projects
|
|
Project
|
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
109,733
|
|
|
$
|
26,585
|
|
|
$
|
74,573
|
|
|
$
|
10,969
|
|
Gross earnings
|
|
|
28,930
|
|
|
|
16,161
|
|
|
|
9,084
|
|
|
|
5,132
|
|
Income
before income taxes
|
|
|
17,266
|
|
|
|
15,876
|
|
|
|
6,211
|
|
|
|
3,262
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
10,339
|
|
|
|
13,177
|
|
|
|
3,713
|
|
|
|
3,262
|
|
Our share of equity in the net earnings of these partially-owned affiliates, which is recorded
within other income on the condensed consolidated statement of operations, totaled $11,563 and
$3,451 for the fiscal quarters ended March 28, 2008 and March 30, 2007, respectively.
Our investment in the equity affiliates, which is recorded within investments in and advances
to unconsolidated affiliates on the condensed consolidated balance sheet, totaled $211,337 and
$190,887 as of March 28, 2008 and December 28, 2007, respectively. There were no distributions
received in the fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2008 and distributions of $10,851 were received
during the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2007.
We have guaranteed certain performance obligations of the Chilean project. We have a
contingent obligation, which is measured annually based on the operating results of the Chilean
project for the preceding year. We did not have a current payment obligation under this guarantee
as of December 28, 2007.
We also have guaranteed the obligations of our subsidiary under the Chilean projects
operations and maintenance agreement. The guarantee is limited to $20,000 over the life of the
operations and maintenance agreement, which extends through 2016. No amounts have ever been paid
under the guarantee.
17
In addition, we have provided a $10,000 debt service reserve letter of credit to cover debt
service payments in the event that the Chilean project does not generate sufficient cash flow to
make such payments. We are required to maintain the debt service reserve letter of credit during
the term of the Chilean projects debt, which matures in 2014. As of March 28, 2008, no amounts
have been drawn under this letter of credit.
Under the Chilean projects operations and maintenance agreement, our subsidiary provides
services for the management, operation and maintenance of the refinery/electric power generation
facility. Our fees for these services were $2,333 and $2,069 for the fiscal quarters ended March
28, 2008 and March 30, 2007, respectively, and were recorded in operating revenues on our condensed
consolidated statement of operations. We had a receivable from our partially-owned affiliate in
Chile of $12,542 and $6,168 recorded in trade accounts and notes receivable on our condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of March 28, 2008 and December 28, 2007, respectively.
4. Long-term Debt
The following table shows the components of our long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 28, 2008
|
|
|
December 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Capital Lease Obligations
|
|
$
|
1,299
|
|
|
$
|
67,902
|
|
|
$
|
69,201
|
|
|
$
|
1,318
|
|
|
$
|
67,095
|
|
|
$
|
68,413
|
|
Special-Purpose Limited Recourse Project Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camden County Energy Recovery Associates
|
|
|
9,648
|
|
|
|
31,779
|
|
|
|
41,427
|
|
|
|
9,648
|
|
|
|
31,779
|
|
|
|
41,427
|
|
FW Power S.r.L.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,670
|
|
|
|
51,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,041
|
|
|
|
45,041
|
|
Energia Holdings, LLC
|
|
|
4,144
|
|
|
|
21,101
|
|
|
|
25,245
|
|
|
|
4,144
|
|
|
|
21,101
|
|
|
|
25,245
|
|
Subordinated Robbins Facility Exit Funding Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1999C Bonds at 7.25% interest, due October 15, 2009
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
1999C Bonds at 7.25% interest, due October 15, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,491
|
|
|
|
20,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,491
|
|
|
|
20,491
|
|
1999D Accretion Bonds at 7% interest, due October
15, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
Intermediate Term Loans in China at 7.02% interest
|
|
|
4,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,278
|
|
|
|
4,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,107
|
|
Other
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
19,520
|
|
|
$
|
193,386
|
|
|
$
|
212,906
|
|
|
$
|
19,368
|
|
|
$
|
185,978
|
|
|
$
|
205,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic Senior Credit Agreement
In October 2006, we executed a five-year domestic senior
credit agreement to be used for our domestic and foreign operations. In May 2007, we executed an
amendment to our domestic senior credit agreement to increase the facility by $100,000 to $450,000,
to reduce the pricing on a portion of the letters of credit issued under the facility and to
restore a provision which permits future incremental increases of up to $100,000 in total
availability under the facility. We can issue up to $450,000 under the letter of credit facility.
A portion of the letters of credit issued under the domestic senior credit agreement have
performance pricing that is decreased (or increased) as a result of improvements (or reductions) in
the credit rating of the domestic senior credit agreement as reported by Moodys Investors Service
and/or Standard & Poors (S&P). We also have the option to use up to $100,000 of the $450,000
for revolving borrowings at a rate equal to adjusted LIBOR plus 1.50%, subject also to the
performance pricing noted above. As a result of the improvement in our S&P credit rating in March
2007, we have achieved the lowest possible pricing under the performance pricing provisions of our
domestic senior credit agreement.
We had $269,658 and $245,765 of letters of credit outstanding under this agreement as of March
28, 2008 and December 28, 2007, respectively. The letter of credit fees ranged from 1.50% to 1.60%
of the outstanding amount, excluding a fronting fee of 0.125% per annum. There were no funded
borrowings under this agreement as of March 28, 2008 or December 28, 2007.
18
5. Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits
We have defined benefit pension plans in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Canada
and Finland, and we have other postretirement benefit plans for health care and life insurance
benefits in the United States and Canada.
Pension Benefits
Our defined benefit pension plans cover certain full-time employees. Under
the plans, retirement benefits are primarily a function of both years of service and level of
compensation. The components of benefit cost for our pension plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 28, 2008
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States
|
|
|
Kingdom
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
States
|
|
|
Kingdom
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,715
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
2,891
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,426
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
3,573
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
4,971
|
|
|
|
12,669
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
18,134
|
|
|
|
4,644
|
|
|
|
11,061
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
16,090
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(6,145
|
)
|
|
|
(12,444
|
)
|
|
|
(433
|
)
|
|
|
(19,022
|
)
|
|
|
(4,244
|
)
|
|
|
(11,753
|
)
|
|
|
(402
|
)
|
|
|
(16,399
|
)
|
Amortization of transition
(asset)/obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1,272
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
|
4,266
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
5,059
|
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
4,280
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
5,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
(496
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,472
|
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
|
$
|
8,358
|
|
|
$
|
1,179
|
|
|
$
|
8,267
|
|
|
$
|
304
|
|
|
$
|
9,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes recognized in other
comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of transition
asset/(obligation)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
(25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(1,286
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,268
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(1,272
|
)
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
|
|
(678
|
)
|
|
|
(4,266
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(5,059
|
)
|
|
|
(779
|
)
|
|
|
(4,280
|
)
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
(5,208
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income recognized in other
comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
(678
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,532
|
)
|
|
$
|
(145
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,355
|
)
|
|
$
|
(779
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,533
|
)
|
|
$
|
(174
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,486
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The U.S. pension plans, which are frozen to new entrants and additional benefit accruals, and
the Canadian, Finnish and French plans are non-contributory. The U.K. plan, which is closed to new
entrants, is contributory.
Based on the funded status at fiscal year-end 2007 and upon our most recent annual valuation
report, we do not expect to be required to make any mandatory contributions to our U.S. pension
plans in fiscal year 2008. We made mandatory contributions of approximately $7,900 to our foreign
pension plans during the fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2008. We expect to make total mandatory
contributions of approximately $33,100 to our foreign plans in fiscal year 2008.
Other Postretirement Benefits
Certain employees in the United States and Canada may become
eligible for health care and life insurance benefits (other postretirement benefits) if they
qualify for and commence normal or early retirement pension benefits as defined in the U.S. and
Canadian pension plans while working for us. Additionally, one of our subsidiaries in the United
States also has a benefit plan, referred to as the Survivor Income Plan (SIP), which provides
coverage for an employees beneficiary upon the death of the employee. This plan has been closed
to new entrants since 1988.
19
The components of benefit cost for our other postretirement plans, including the SIP, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Net periodic postretirement benefit
cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
|
1,332
|
|
Amortization of prior service credit
|
|
|
(1,190
|
)
|
|
|
(1,190
|
)
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost
|
|
$
|
230
|
|
|
$
|
674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes recognized in other
comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service credit
|
|
$
|
1,190
|
|
|
$
|
1,190
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
(408
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss recognized in other
comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
992
|
|
|
$
|
782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Guarantees and Warranties
We have agreed to indemnify certain third parties relating to businesses and/or assets that we
previously owned and sold to such third parties. Such indemnifications relate primarily to
potential environmental and tax exposures for activities conducted by us prior to the sale of such
businesses and/or assets. It is not possible to predict the maximum potential amount of future
payments under these or similar indemnifications due to the conditional nature of the obligations
and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular indemnification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Carrying Amount of Liability
|
|
|
Potential
|
|
March 28,
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
Payment
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
Environmental indemnifications
|
|
No limit
|
|
$
|
8,100
|
|
|
$
|
6,900
|
|
Tax indemnifications
|
|
No limit
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We also maintain contingencies for warranty expenses on certain of our long-term contracts.
Generally, warranty contingencies are accrued over the life of the contract so that a sufficient
balance is maintained to cover our aggregate exposure at the conclusion of the project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
87,800
|
|
|
$
|
69,900
|
|
Accruals
|
|
|
13,700
|
|
|
|
8,800
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
(3,700
|
)
|
Adjustments to provisions
|
|
|
(2,300
|
)
|
|
|
(3,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
98,200
|
|
|
$
|
71,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are contingently liable for performance under standby letters of credit, bank guarantees
and surety bonds totaling $927,300 and $818,600 as of March 28, 2008 and December 28, 2007,
respectively. These balances include the standby letters of credit issued under the domestic
senior credit agreement discussed in Note 4 and from other facilities worldwide. No material
claims have been made against these financial guarantees.
20
We have also guaranteed certain performance obligations in a Chilean refinery/electric power
generation project in which we hold a noncontrolling equity interest. See Note 3 for further
information.
7. Preferred Shares
We issued 599,944 preferred shares in connection with our 2004 equity-for-debt exchange.
There were approximately 1,508 preferred shares outstanding as of March 28, 2008. Each preferred
share is convertible at the holders option into 130 common shares, or up to approximately 196,093
additional common shares if all outstanding preferred shares as of March 28, 2008 are converted.
The preferred shareholders have no voting rights except in certain limited circumstances. The
preferred shares have the right to receive dividends and other distributions, including liquidating
distributions, on an as-if-converted basis when and if declared and paid on the common shares. The
preferred shares have a $0.01 liquidation preference per share.
8. Share-Based Compensation Plans
Our share-based compensation plans include both restricted awards and stock option awards.
Compensation cost for our share-based plans of $2,494 and $1,647 was charged against income for the
fiscal quarters ended March 28, 2008 and March 30, 2007, respectively. The related income tax
benefit recognized in the condensed consolidated statement of operations was $120 and $22 for the
first quarter of fiscal years 2008 and 2007, respectively. We received $1,520 and $9,003 in cash
from option exercises under our share-based compensation plans for the fiscal quarters ended March
28, 2008 and March 30, 2007, respectively.
As of March 28, 2008, we had $12,389 and $13,931 of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to stock options and restricted awards, respectively. Those costs are expected to be
recognized as expense over a weighted-average period of approximately 32 months.
9. Common Share Purchase Warrants
In connection with the equity-for-debt exchange consummated in 2004, we issued 4,152,914 Class
A common share purchase warrants and 40,771,560 Class B common share purchase warrants. Each Class
A warrant entitles its owner to purchase 3.3682 common shares at an exercise price of $4.689 per
common share thereunder, subject to the terms of the warrant agreement between the warrant agent
and us. The Class A warrants are exercisable on or before September 24, 2009. Each Class B
warrant entitled its owner to purchase 0.1446 common shares at an exercise price of $4.689 per
common share thereunder, subject to the terms and conditions of the warrant agreement between the
warrant agent and us. The Class B warrants were exercisable on or before September 24, 2007.
In January 2006, we completed transactions that increased the number of common shares to be
delivered upon the exercise of our Class A and Class B common share purchase warrants during the
offer period and raised $75,336 in net proceeds. The exercise price per warrant was not increased
in the offers. Holders of approximately 95% of the Class A warrants and 57% of the Class B
warrants participated in the offers resulting in the aggregate issuance of approximately 16,807,000
common shares.
Cumulatively through March 28, 2008, 3,964,429 Class A warrants and 38,730,407 Class B
warrants have been exercised for 19,702,996 common shares. The number of common shares issuable
upon the exercise of the remaining outstanding Class A warrants is approximately 634,855 as of
March 28, 2008. The remaining outstanding Class B warrants expired on September 24, 2007.
The holders of the Class A warrants are not entitled to vote, to receive dividends or to
exercise any of the rights of common shareholders for any purpose until such warrants have been
duly exercised. We currently maintain and intend to continue to maintain at all times during which
the warrants are exercisable, a shelf registration statement relating to the issuance of common
shares underlying the warrants for the benefit of the warrant holders, subject to the terms of the
registration rights agreement. The registration statement became effective on December 28, 2005.
21
Also in connection with the equity-for-debt exchange consummated in 2004, we entered into a
registration rights agreement with certain selling security holders in which we agreed to file a
registration statement to cover resales of our securities held by them immediately following the
exchange offer. We filed a registration statement in accordance with this agreement on October 29,
2004. The registration statement, which became effective on December 23, 2004, must remain in
effect until December 23, 2009 unless certain events occur to terminate our obligations under the
registration rights agreement prior to that date. If we fail to maintain the registration
statement as required or it becomes unavailable for more than two 45-day periods in any consecutive
12-month period, we are required to pay damages at a rate of $13.7 per day for each day that the
registration statement is not effective. As of March 28, 2008, the maximum exposure under this
provision is approximately $7,500. We have not, and do not, expect to incur any damages under the
registration rights agreement.
10. Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate is dependent on the location and amount of our taxable earnings and the
effects of changes in valuation allowances. Our effective tax rates for the fiscal quarters ended
March 28, 2008 and March 30, 2007 were lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35% due principally
to:
|
|
|
Income earned in tax jurisdictions with tax rates being lower than the U.S.
statutory rate; and
|
|
|
|
|
A valuation allowance decrease.
|
A decrease in our valuation allowance occurred because we recognized earnings in jurisdictions
where we have previously recorded a full valuation allowance (primarily the United States and
Finland). These variances were partially offset by losses subject to valuation allowance in
certain other non-U.S. jurisdictions and other permanent differences.
As we currently have positive earnings in most jurisdictions, we evaluate on a quarterly basis
the need for the valuation allowances against deferred tax assets in those jurisdictions. Such
evaluation includes a review of all available evidence, both positive and negative, in determining
whether a valuation allowance is necessary.
Our subsidiaries file income tax returns in numerous tax jurisdictions, including the United
States, several U.S. states and numerous non-U.S. jurisdictions around the world. Tax returns are
also filed in jurisdictions where our subsidiaries execute project-related work. The statute of
limitations varies by the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Because of the number of
jurisdictions in which we file tax returns, in any given year the statute of limitations in certain
jurisdictions may expire without examination within the 12-month period from the balance sheet
date. As a result, we expect recurring changes in unrecognized tax benefits due to the expiration
of the statute of limitations, none of which are expected to be individually significant. With few
exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. (including federal, state and local) or non-U.S.
income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before fiscal year 2002.
A number of tax years are under audit by the relevant state and foreign tax authorities. We
anticipate that several of these audits may be concluded in the foreseeable future, including in
fiscal year 2008. Based on the status of these audits, it is reasonably possible that the
conclusion of the audits may result in a reduction of unrecognized tax benefits. However, it is
not possible to estimate the impact of this change at this time.
We recognize interest accrued on the unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and
penalties on the unrecognized tax benefits in other deductions on our condensed consolidated
statement of operations. We recorded $2,005 and $246 in interest expense and penalties during the
fiscal quarters ended March 28, 2008 and March 30, 2007, respectively.
22
11. Business Segments
We operate through two business groups: our
Global Engineering and Construction Group
(Global
E&C Group) and our
Global Power Group
.
Global Engineering and Construction Group
Our Global E&C Group, which operates worldwide, designs, engineers and constructs onshore and
offshore upstream oil and gas processing facilities, natural gas liquefaction facilities and
receiving terminals, gas-to-liquids facilities, oil refining, chemical and petrochemical,
pharmaceutical and biotechnology facilities and related infrastructure, including power generation
and distribution facilities, and gasification facilities. Our Global E&C Group generates revenues
from engineering and construction activities pursuant to contracts spanning up to approximately
four years in duration and from returns on its equity investments in various power production
facilities.
Our Global E&C Group provides the following services:
|
|
|
Engineering, project management and construction management services, including the
procurement of equipment, materials and services from third-party suppliers and
contractors.
|
|
|
|
|
Design of facilities in new or developing market sectors, including carbon capture and
storage, solid fuel-fired integrated gasification combined-cycle power plants,
coal-to-liquids and biofuels.
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental remediation services, together with related technical, engineering, design
and regulatory services.
|
|
|
|
|
Development, engineering, construction, ownership and operation of power generation
facilities, from conventional and renewable sources, and waste-to-energy facilities in
Europe.
|
Our Global E&C Group owns one of the leading technologies used in refinery residue upgrading
and a hydrogen production process used in oil refineries and petrochemical plants. Additionally,
our Global E&C Group has experience with, and is able to work with, a wide range of processes owned
by others.
Global Power Group
Our Global Power Group designs, manufactures and erects steam generating and auxiliary
equipment for electric power generating stations and industrial facilities worldwide and owns and
operates several cogeneration, independent power production and waste-to-energy facilities, as well
as power generation facilities for the process and petrochemical industries. Our Global Power
Group generates revenues from engineering activities, equipment supply, construction contracts,
operating and maintenance agreements, royalties from licensing its technology, and from returns on
its investments in various power production facilities.
Our Global Power Groups steam generating equipment includes a full range of technologies,
offering independent power producers, utilities and industrial clients high-value technology
solutions for converting a wide range of fuels, such as coal, petroleum coke, oil, gas, biomass and
municipal solid waste, into steam and power.
Our Global Power Group offers several other products and services related to steam generators:
|
|
|
Design, manufacture and installation of auxiliary equipment, which includes feedwater
heaters, steam condensers and heat-recovery equipment.
|
|
|
|
|
A full line of new and retrofit nitrogen-oxide (NO
x
) reduction systems such
as selective non-catalytic and catalytic NO
x
reduction systems as well as
complete low- NO
x
combustion systems.
|
|
|
|
|
A broad range of steam generator site services, including construction and erection
services, maintenance engineering, plant upgrading and life extensions.
|
|
|
|
|
Research, analysis and experimental work in fluid dynamics, heat transfer, combustion,
fuel technology, materials engineering and solid mechanics.
|
23
Corporate and Finance Group
In addition to these two business groups, which also represent operating segments for
financial reporting purposes, we report corporate center expenses and expenses related to certain
legacy liabilities, such as asbestos, in
the Corporate and Finance Group (C&F Group), which we also treat as an operating segment for
financial reporting purposes.
EBITDA is the primary measure of operating performance used by our chief operating decision
maker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global
|
|
|
Global
|
|
|
C&F
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
E&C Group
|
|
|
Power Group
|
|
|
Group (1)
|
|
Three months ended March 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third-party revenues
|
|
$
|
1,795,724
|
|
|
$
|
1,391,001
|
|
|
$
|
404,723
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
(2)
|
|
$
|
195,320
|
|
|
$
|
134,460
|
|
|
$
|
64,416
|
|
|
$
|
(3,556
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Interest expense
|
|
|
(6,151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(11,356
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
177,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(39,750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
138,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third-party revenues
|
|
$
|
1,152,122
|
|
|
$
|
824,169
|
|
|
$
|
327,953
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
(3)
|
|
$
|
162,297
|
|
|
$
|
141,133
|
|
|
$
|
37,024
|
|
|
$
|
(15,860
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Interest expense
|
|
|
(4,725
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(8,838
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
148,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(33,909
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
114,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes general corporate income and expense, our captive insurance operation and
eliminations.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes in the fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2008: increased/(decreased) contract profit of
$2,130 from the regular re-evaluation of contract profit estimates: $5,350 in our Global E&C
Group and $(3,220) in our Global Power Group; a gain of $15,913 in our C&F Group on the
settlement of coverage litigation with an asbestos insurance carrier; and a charge of $1,725
in our C&F Group on the revaluation of our asbestos liability and related asset resulting from
our rolling 15-year asbestos liability estimate.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes in the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2007: increased/(decreased) contract profit of
$18,460 from the regular re-evaluation of contract profit estimates: $18,580 in our Global E&C
Group and $(120) in our Global Power Group.
|
24
Operating revenues by industry were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28, 2008
|
|
|
March 30, 2007
|
|
Power generation
|
|
$
|
387,735
|
|
|
$
|
322,815
|
|
Oil refining
|
|
|
406,970
|
|
|
|
294,288
|
|
Pharmaceutical
|
|
|
18,435
|
|
|
|
29,687
|
|
Oil and gas
|
|
|
574,773
|
|
|
|
224,814
|
|
Chemical/petrochemical
|
|
|
365,315
|
|
|
|
227,655
|
|
Power plant operation and maintenance
|
|
|
29,216
|
|
|
|
29,303
|
|
Environmental
|
|
|
10,537
|
|
|
|
11,957
|
|
Other, net of eliminations
|
|
|
2,743
|
|
|
|
11,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total third-party revenues
|
|
$
|
1,795,724
|
|
|
$
|
1,152,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Litigation and Uncertainties
Asbestos
Some of our U.S. and U.K. subsidiaries are defendants in numerous asbestos-related lawsuits
and out-of-court informal claims pending in the United States and United Kingdom. Plaintiffs claim
damages for personal injury alleged to have arisen from exposure to or use of asbestos in
connection with work allegedly performed by our subsidiaries during the 1970s and earlier.
United States
A summary of U.S. claim activity is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Claims
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Open claims at beginning of period
|
|
|
131,340
|
|
|
|
135,890
|
|
New claims
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
Claims resolved
|
|
|
(1,550
|
)
|
|
|
(2,270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open claims at end of period
|
|
|
130,810
|
|
|
|
135,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We had the following U.S. asbestos-related assets and liabilities recorded on our condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of the dates set forth below. Total U.S. asbestos-related
liabilities are estimated through the first quarter of fiscal year 2023. Although it is likely
that claims will continue to be filed after that date, the uncertainties inherent in any long-term
forecast prevent us from making reliable estimates of the indemnity and defense costs that might be
incurred after that date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Asbestos-related
assets recorded within:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable-other
|
|
$
|
66,300
|
|
|
$
|
47,100
|
|
Asbestos-related insurance recovery receivable
|
|
|
261,000
|
|
|
|
279,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asbestos-related assets
|
|
$
|
327,300
|
|
|
$
|
326,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asbestos-related
liabilities recorded within:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
72,000
|
|
|
$
|
72,000
|
|
Asbestos-related liability
|
|
|
313,400
|
|
|
|
331,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asbestos-related liabilities
|
|
$
|
385,400
|
|
|
$
|
403,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Since fiscal year-end 2004, we have worked with Analysis Research Planning Corporation
(ARPC), nationally recognized consultants in projecting asbestos liabilities, to estimate the
amount of asbestos-related indemnity and defense costs at year-end for the next 15 years. Based on
its review of fiscal year 2007 activity, ARPC recommended that the assumptions used to estimate our
future asbestos liability be updated as of fiscal year-end 2007. Accordingly, we developed a
revised estimate of our indemnity and defense costs through fiscal year-end 2022 considering the
advice of ARPC. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007, we increased our liability for asbestos
indemnity and defense costs through fiscal year-end 2022 to $403,300, which brought our liability
to a level consistent with ARPCs reasonable best estimate. In connection with updating our
estimated asbestos liability and related asset, we recorded a charge of $7,400 in the fourth
quarter of fiscal year 2007. Our estimated fiscal year-end 2007 liability was increased during the
fiscal first quarter of 2008 by $2,100, which represents the rolling 15-year asbestos-related
liability estimate, and was reduced by payments amounting to approximately $20,000.
The amount paid on asbestos litigation, defense and case resolution was $20,000 and $23,600
for the fiscal quarters ended March 28, 2008 and March 30, 2007, respectively. We funded $4,900 of
the payments made during the fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2008, while all remaining amounts were
paid from insurance proceeds. Through March 28, 2008, total cumulative indemnity costs paid were
approximately $635,400 and total cumulative defense costs paid were approximately $258,400.
As of March 28, 2008, total asbestos-related liabilities were comprised of an estimated
liability of $ 152,200 relating to open (outstanding) claims being valued and an estimated
liability of $233,200 relating to future unasserted claims through the first quarter of fiscal year
2023.
Our liability estimate is based upon the following information and/or assumptions: number of
open claims, forecasted number of future claims, estimated average cost per claim by disease type -
mesothelioma, lung cancer and non-malignancies and the breakdown of known and future claims into
disease type mesothelioma, lung cancer or non-malignancies. The total estimated liability, which
has not been discounted for the time value of money, includes both the estimate of forecasted
indemnity amounts and forecasted defense costs. Total defense costs and indemnity liability
payments are estimated to be incurred through the first quarter of fiscal year 2023, during which
period the incidence of new claims is forecasted to decrease each year. We believe that it is
likely that there will be new claims filed after the first quarter of fiscal year 2023, but in
light of uncertainties inherent in long-term forecasts, we do not believe that we can reasonably
estimate the indemnity and defense costs that might be incurred after the first quarter of fiscal
year 2023. Historically, defense costs have represented approximately 29% of total defense and
indemnity costs.
The overall historic average combined indemnity and defense cost per resolved claim through
March 28, 2008 has been approximately $2.6. The average cost per resolved claim is increasing and
we believe will continue to increase in the future.
The asbestos-related asset recorded within accounts and notes receivable-other as of March 28,
2008 reflects amounts due in the next 12 months under executed settlement agreements with insurers
and does not include any estimate for future settlements. The recorded asbestos-related insurance
recovery receivable includes an estimate of recoveries from insurers in the unsettled insurance
coverage litigation referred to below based upon the application of New Jersey law to certain
insurance coverage issues and assumptions relating to cost allocation and other factors as well as
an estimate of the amount of recoveries under existing settlements with other insurers. Such
amounts have not been discounted for the time value of money.
Since fiscal year-end 2005, we have worked with Peterson Risk Consulting, nationally
recognized experts in the estimation of insurance recoveries, to review our estimate of the value
of the settled insurance asset and assist in
the estimation of our unsettled asbestos insurance asset. Based on insurance policy data,
historical claim data, future liability estimates including the expected timing of payments and
allocation methodology assumptions we provided them, Peterson Risk Consulting provided an analysis
of the unsettled insurance asset as of March 28, 2008. We utilized that analysis to determine our
estimate of the value of the unsettled insurance asset as of March 28, 2008.
As of March 28, 2008, we estimated the value of our unsettled asbestos insurance asset related
to ongoing litigation in New York state court with our subsidiaries insurers at $23,100. The
litigation relates to the amounts of insurance coverage available for asbestos-related claims and
the proper allocation of the coverage among our subsidiaries various insurers and our subsidiaries
as self-insurers. We believe that any amounts that our subsidiaries might be allocated as
self-insurer would be immaterial.
26
An adverse outcome in the pending insurance litigation described above could limit our
remaining insurance recoveries and result in a reduction in our insurance asset. However, a
favorable outcome in all or part of the litigation could increase remaining insurance recoveries
above our current estimate. If we prevail in whole or in part in the litigation, we will re-value
our asset relating to remaining available insurance recoveries based on the asbestos liability
estimated at that time.
Over the last several years, certain of our subsidiaries have entered into settlement
agreements calling for insurers to make lump-sum payments, as well as payments over time, for use
by our subsidiaries to fund asbestos-related indemnity and defense costs and, in certain cases, for
reimbursement for portions of out-of-pocket costs previously incurred. In fiscal year 2007, our
subsidiaries reached an agreement to settle their disputed asbestos-related insurance coverage with
four additional insurers. As a result of these settlements, we increased our asbestos-related
insurance asset and recorded a gain of $13,500 in fiscal year 2007.
In the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, our subsidiaries reached an agreement to settle
their disputed asbestos-related insurance coverage with an additional insurer. As a result of this
settlement, we increased our asbestos-related insurance asset and recorded a gain of $15,900 in the
fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2008.
We intend to continue to attempt to negotiate additional settlements where achievable on a
reasonable basis in order to minimize the amount of future costs that we would be required to fund
out of the cash flow generated from our operations. Unless we settle with the remaining insurers
at recovery amounts significantly in excess of our current estimate, it is likely that the amount
of our insurance settlements will not cover all future asbestos-related costs and we will be
required to fund a portion of such future costs, which will reduce our cash flows and working
capital.
In fiscal year 2006, we were successful in our appeal of a New York state trial court decision
that previously had held that New York, rather than New Jersey, law applies in the above coverage
litigation with our subsidiaries insurers, and as a result, we increased our insurance asset and
recorded a gain of $19,500. On February 13, 2007, our subsidiaries insurers were granted
permission by the appellate court to appeal the decision to the New York Court of Appeals, the
states highest court. On October 11, 2007, the New York Court of Appeals upheld the appellate
court decision in our favor.
Even if the coverage litigation is resolved in a manner favorable to us, our insurance
recoveries (both from the litigation and from settlements) may be limited by insolvencies among our
insurers. We have not assumed recovery in the estimate of our asbestos insurance asset from any of
our currently insolvent insurers. Other insurers may become insolvent in the future and our
insurers may fail to reimburse amounts owed to us on a timely basis. Failure to realize the
expected insurance recoveries, or delays in receiving material amounts from our insurers could have
a material adverse effect on our financial condition and our cash flows.
Based on the fiscal year-end 2007 liability estimate, an increase of 25% in the average per
claim indemnity settlement amount would increase the liability by $70,400 and the impact on expense
would be dependent upon available insurance recoveries. Assuming no change to the assumptions
currently used to estimate our insurance asset, this increase would result in a charge in the
statement of operations in the range of approximately 70% to 80% of the increase in the liability.
Long-term cash flows would ultimately change by the same amount. Should there be an increase in
the estimated liability in excess of this 25%, the percentage of that increase that would be
expected to be funded by additional insurance recoveries will decline.
We have funded $4,900 of the asbestos liability indemnity payments and defense costs from our
cash flows in the first fiscal quarter of fiscal year 2008, net of the cash received from insurance
settlements. We expect to fund $4,500 of the asbestos liability indemnity and defense costs from
our cash flows in fiscal year 2008, net of the cash expected to be received from existing insurance
settlements. As we continue to collect cash from insurance settlements and assuming no increase in
our asbestos-related insurance liability or any future insurance settlements,
the asbestos-related insurance receivable recorded on our condensed consolidated balance sheet
will continue to decrease.
27
The estimate of the liabilities and assets related to asbestos claims and recoveries is
subject to a number of uncertainties that may result in significant changes in the current
estimates. Among these are uncertainties as to the ultimate number and type of claims filed, the
amounts of claim costs, the impact of bankruptcies of other companies with asbestos claims,
uncertainties surrounding the litigation process from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and from case to
case, as well as potential legislative changes. Increases in the number of claims filed or costs
to resolve those claims could cause us to increase further the estimates of the costs associated
with asbestos claims and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows.
United Kingdom
Some of our subsidiaries in the United Kingdom have also received claims alleging personal
injury arising from exposure to asbestos. To date, 873 claims have been brought against our U.K.
subsidiaries of which 346 remained open as of March 28, 2008. None of the settled claims has
resulted in material costs to us.
As of March 28, 2008, we had recorded total liabilities of $49,000 comprised of an estimated
liability relating to open (outstanding) claims of $8,900 and an estimated liability relating to
future unasserted claims through the first quarter of fiscal year 2023 of $40,100. Of the total,
$3,000 was recorded in accrued expenses and $46,000 was recorded in asbestos-related liability on
the condensed consolidated balance sheet. An asset in an equal amount was recorded for the
expected U.K. asbestos-related insurance recoveries, of which $3,000 was recorded in accounts and
notes receivable-other and $46,000 was recorded as asbestos-related insurance recovery receivable
on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The liability estimates are based on a U.K. House of
Lords judgment that pleural plaque claims do not amount to a compensable injury and accordingly, we
have reduced our liability assessment. If this ruling is reversed by legislation, the asbestos
liability and related asset recorded in the U.K. would be approximately $66,600.
28
Project Claims
In the ordinary course of business, we are parties to litigation involving clients and
subcontractors arising out of project contracts. Such litigation includes claims and counterclaims
by and against us for canceled contracts, for additional costs incurred in excess of current
contract provisions, as well as for back charges for alleged breaches of warranty and other
contract commitments. If we were found to be liable for any of the claims/counterclaims against
us, we would incur a charge against earnings to the extent a reserve had not been established for
the matter in our accounts or if the liability exceeds established reserves.
Power Plant Arbitration Eastern Europe
In June 2006, we commenced arbitration against a client seeking final payment for our services
in connection with two power plants that we designed and built in Eastern Europe. The dispute
primarily concerns whether we are liable to the client for liquidated damages (LDs) under the
contract for delayed completion of the projects. The client contends that it is owed LDs, limited
under the contract at approximately 37,600 (approximately $59,400 at the exchange rate in
effect as of March 28, 2008), and is retaining as security for these LDs approximately 22,000
(approximately $34,700 at the exchange rate in effect as of March 28, 2008) in contract payments
otherwise due to us for work performed. The client contends that it is owed an additional
6,900 (approximately $10,900 at the exchange rate in effect as of March 28, 2008) for the cost
of consumable materials it had to incur due to the extended commissioning period on both projects,
the cost to relocate a piece of equipment on one of the projects and the cost of various warranty
repairs and punch list work. We are seeking payment of the 22,000 (approximately $34,700 at
the exchange rate in effect as of March 28, 2008 and which is recorded within contracts in process
on the condensed consolidated balance sheet) in retention that is being held by the client for LDs,
plus approximately 4,900 (approximately $7,700 at the exchange rate in effect as of March 28,
2008) in interest on the retained funds, as well as approximately 9,100 (approximately $14,400
at the exchange rate in effect as of March 28, 2008) in additional compensation for extra work
performed beyond the original scope of the contracts and the clients failure to procure the
required property insurance for the project, which should have provided coverage for some of the
damages we incurred on the project related to turbine repairs. The arbitration hearing on
liability is currently underway. Accordingly, it is premature to predict the outcome of this
matter.
Power Plant Dispute Ireland
In 2006, a dispute arose with a client because of material corrosion that is occurring at two
power plants we designed and built in Ireland, which began operation in December 2005 and June
2006. The boilers at both plants are designed to burn milled peat as the primary fuel, supplied
from different local sources. The peat being supplied is out of the range specified by our
contract and, while the matter is still under investigation, we believe this variation from the
agreed specifications is the cause of alkali halides corrosion that is affecting the boiler tubes.
We have identified a technical solution to ameliorate the boiler tube corrosion, and we and the
client are in the process of evaluating the proposed solution for the boiler tube corrosion in
light of continued investigation and data collection and analysis. Disavowing responsibility for
the fuel specification, the client has refused to pay for the cost of the corrective work and has
reserved its rights against us under the contract, which could include repairing or rejecting the
plants and recovering consequential damages in the event we are determined to be grossly negligent.
We have advised the client that we are not responsible for the cost of corrective work to address
corrosion resulting from out-of-specification fuel and we have been engaging in discussions with
the client regarding our respective claims.
There is also corrosion occurring to subcontractor-provided emissions control equipment and
induction fans at the back-end of the power plants. The cause of this back-end corrosion, which we
discovered during the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 to be more extensive than previously
assessed, is under investigation. Based upon the information gathered to date, we believe the
corrosion is due principally to the low set point temperature design of the emissions control
equipment that was set by our subcontractor. If this proves to be the case, we believe the
subcontractor would be responsible for the cost to remedy this problem under our agreement with
them, although we may have direct responsibility for this cost to the client under our agreement
with them. To date, the subcontractor has denied responsibility for the corrosion, contending it is
the result of out-of-specification fuel supplied by the client. We have reserved our rights
against the client if this proves to be the case. To the extent that we incur costs for correcting
this problem, we intend to pursue claims against our subcontractor and/or our client, depending
upon the cause of the corrosion. Due to the potential magnitude of the amounts involved, there can
be no assurance that we will collect amounts for which our subcontractor may be determined to be
liable. From a plant rejection standpoint, we do not believe that the back-end corrective work
will materially impact our availability guaranty to the client described below.
29
The contract for these plants contains an availability guaranty requiring the plants to meet
specified energy generation levels over a three year period. The availability guaranty is
expressly conditioned upon the use of the contract-specified fuel. The availability guaranty
provides for liquidated damages which could reach the contract cap for liquidated damages of
17,500 (approximately $27,600 at the exchange rate in effect as of March 28, 2008). In
addition to liquidated damages, in the event that availability of either of the plants as an
average of the best two out of the first three years of operation is 80% or below, the client may
be entitled to certain remedies, the most significant of which would be the right to reject both
plants and seek reimbursement of the 351,000 contract price paid for the plants (approximately
$554,400 at the exchange rate in effect as of March 28, 2008) plus restoration costs at the sites.
The client has alleged that at least one of the plants has failed to meet the availability guaranty
which we have disputed. We have advised the client that we do not believe we are responsible under
our availability guaranty (which is expressly subject to the clients provision of specified fuel).
In the event that the parties are not able to resolve the dispute, the contract provides for
arbitration conducted under The Institution of Engineers of Ireland Arbitration Procedure.
Although the client has indicated that it intends to commence an arbitration, it has not done so at
this point, and we continue to engage in discussions with the client at its request to resolve this
dispute as referenced above. In such an arbitration proceeding, damages that the client may seek
could include, but may not be limited to, the cost to correct the corrosion in the boiler tubes and
emissions control equipment, liquidated damages under the availability guaranty, consequential
damages, including but not limited to lost profits, in the event gross negligence is proven and, in
the event of rejection, the total amount paid in respect of the plants, under the contract or
otherwise, plus the cost to dismantle the plants. As such, the costs claimed could exceed the
above-stated contract price paid for the plants and liquidated damages. We would vigorously oppose
such claims in any such arbitration.
We have completed the necessary corrective actions for certain defects in the conveyor
equipment at the plants. While we believe that the subcontractor that provided the equipment is
responsible for the defects, our investigation is continuing.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, we established a contingency of $25,000 in
relation to this project. Primarily as a result of the second quarter of fiscal year 2007
discovery of the more extensive back-end corrosion, the contingency was increased by $30,000 during
the second quarter of fiscal year 2007.
The performance of our subsidiary executing the foregoing contract in Ireland is guaranteed by
Foster Wheeler Ltd. In addition, there are 16,700 (approximately $26,400 at the exchange rate
in effect as of March 28, 2008) of outstanding retention bonds that have been issued in favor of
the client.
Due to the inherent commercial, legal and technical uncertainties underlying the estimation of
all of the project claims described above, the amounts ultimately realized or paid by us could
differ materially from the balances, if any, included in our financial statements, which could
result in additional material charges against earnings, and which could also materially adversely
impact our financial condition and cash flows.
Camden County Waste-to-Energy Project
One of our project subsidiaries, Camden County Energy Recovery Associates, LP (CCERA) owns
and operates a waste-to-energy facility in Camden County, New Jersey (the Project). The
Pollution Control Finance Authority of Camden County (PCFA) issued bonds to finance the
construction of the Project and to acquire a landfill for Camden Countys use. Pursuant to a loan
agreement between the PCFA and CCERA, proceeds from the bonds were loaned by the PCFA to CCERA and
used by CCERA to finance the construction of the facility. Accordingly, the proceeds of this loan
were recorded as debt on CCERAs balance sheet and, therefore, are included in our condensed
consolidated balance sheet. CCERAs obligation to service the debt incurred pursuant to the loan
agreement is limited to depositing all tipping fees and electric revenues received with the trustee
of the PCFA bonds. The trustee is required to pay CCERA its service fees prior to servicing the
PCFA bonds. CCERA has no other debt repayment obligations under the loan agreement with the PCFA.
In 1997, the United States Supreme Court effectively invalidated New Jerseys long-standing
municipal solid waste flow rules and regulations, eliminating the guaranteed supply of municipal
solid waste to the Project with its corresponding tipping fee revenue. As a result, tipping fees
have been reduced to market rate in order to provide a steady supply of fuel to the Project. Since
the ruling, those market-based revenues have not been, and are not expected to be, sufficient to
service the debt on outstanding bonds issued by the PCFA to finance the construction of the
Project.
30
In 1998, CCERA filed suit against the PCFA and other parties seeking, among other things, to
void the applicable contracts and agreements governing the Project (Camden County Energy Recovery
Assoc. v. N.J. Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Superior Court of New Jersey, Mercer
County, L-268-98). Since 1999, the State of New Jersey has provided subsidies sufficient to ensure
the payment of each of the PCFAs debt service payments as they became due. The bonds outstanding
in connection with the Project were issued by the PCFA, not by us or CCERA, and the bonds are not
guaranteed by either us or CCERA. In the litigation, the defendants have asserted, among other
things, that an equitable portion of the outstanding debt on the Project should be allocated to
CCERA even though CCERA did not guarantee the bonds.
At this time, we cannot determine the ultimate outcome of the foregoing and the potential
effects on CCERA and the Project. If the State of New Jersey were to fail to subsidize the debt
service, and there were to be a default on a debt service payment, the bondholders might proceed to
attempt to exercise their remedies, by among other things, seizing the collateral securing the
bonds. We do not believe this collateral includes CCERAs plant.
Environmental Matters
CERCLA and Other Remedial Matters
Under U.S. federal statutes, such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), the Clean Water Act and
the Clean Air Act, and similar state laws, the current owner or operator of real property and the
past owners or operators of real property (if disposal of toxic or hazardous substances took place
during such past ownership or operation) may be jointly and severally liable for the costs of
removal or remediation of toxic or hazardous substances on or under their property, regardless of
whether such materials were released in violation of law or whether the owner or operator knew of,
or was responsible for, the presence of such substances. Moreover, under CERCLA and similar state
laws, persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances may also
be jointly and severally liable for the costs of the removal or remediation of such substances at a
disposal or treatment site, whether or not such site was owned or operated by such person, which we
refer to as an off-site facility. Liability at such off-site facilities is typically allocated
among all of the financially viable responsible parties based on such factors as the relative
amount of waste contributed to a site, toxicity of such waste, relationship of the waste
contributed by a party to the remedy chosen for the site and other factors.
We currently own and operate industrial facilities and we have also transferred our interests
in industrial facilities that we formerly owned or operated. It is likely that as a result of our
current or former operations, hazardous substances have affected the facilities or the real
property on which they are or were situated. We also have received and may continue to receive
claims pursuant to indemnity obligations from the present owners of facilities we have transferred,
which claims may require us to incur costs for investigation and/or remediation.
We are currently engaged in the investigation and/or remediation under the supervision of the
applicable regulatory authorities at four of our or our subsidiaries former facilities. In
addition, we sometimes engage in investigation and/or remediation without the supervision of a
regulatory authority. Although we do not expect the environmental conditions at our present or
former facilities to cause us to incur material costs in excess of those for which reserves have
been established, it is possible that various events could cause us to incur costs materially in
excess of our present reserves in order to fully resolve any issues surrounding those conditions.
Further, no assurance can be provided that we will not discover additional environmental conditions
at our currently or formerly owned or operated properties, or that additional claims will not be
made with respect to formerly owned properties, requiring us to incur material expenditures to
investigate and/or remediate such conditions.
We have been notified that we are a potentially responsible party (PRP) under CERCLA or
similar state laws at three off-site facilities. At each of these sites, our liability should be
substantially less than the total site remediation costs because the percentage of waste
attributable to us compared to that attributable to all other PRPs is low. We do not believe that
our share of cleanup obligations at any of the off-site facilities as to which we have received a
notice of potential liability will exceed $500 in the aggregate. We have also received and
responded to a request for information from the United States Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) regarding a fourth off-site facility. We do not know what, if any, further actions USEPA
may take regarding this fourth off-site facility.
31
Mountain Top
In February 1988, one of our subsidiaries, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation (FWEC), entered
into a Consent Agreement and Order with the USEPA and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Protection (PADEP) regarding its former manufacturing facility in Mountain Top, Pennsylvania.
The order essentially required FWEC to investigate and remediate as necessary contaminants,
including trichloroethylene (TCE), in the soil and groundwater at the facility. Pursuant to the
order, in 1993 FWEC installed a pump and treat system to remove TCE from the groundwater. It is
not possible at the present time to predict how long FWEC will be required to operate and maintain
this system.
In the fall of 2004, FWEC sampled the private domestic water supply wells of certain
residences in Mountain Top and identified approximately 30 residences whose water supply contained
TCE at levels in excess of Safe Drinking Water Act standards. The subject residences are located
approximately one mile to the southwest of where the TCE previously was discovered in the soils at
the former FWEC facility.
Since that time, FWEC, USEPA and PADEP have cooperated in an investigation to, among other
things, attempt to identify the source(s) of the TCE in the residential wells. Although FWEC
believed the evidence available at that time was not sufficient to support a determination by a
governmental entity that FWEC was a PRP as to the TCE in the residential wells, FWEC in October
2004 began providing the potentially affected residences with bottled water. It thereafter
arranged for the installation, maintenance and testing of filters to remove the TCE from the water
being drawn from the wells. In August 2005, FWEC entered into a settlement agreement with USEPA
whereby FWEC agreed to arrange and pay for the hookup of public water to the affected residences,
which involved the extension of a water main and the installation of laterals from the main to the
affected residences. The foregoing hookups have been completed, but there may be a limited number
of additional hookups in the future. As residences were hooked up, FWEC ceased providing bottled
water and filters to them. FWEC is incurring costs related to public outreach and communications
in the affected area. FWEC may be required to pay the agencies costs in overseeing and responding
to the situation. There is also a possibility that FWEC would incur further costs if it were to
conduct further investigation regarding the TCE and/or to continue to monitor the groundwater in
the area of the affected residences. We have accrued our best estimate of the cost related to the
foregoing and review this estimate on a quarterly basis.
Other costs to which FWEC could be exposed could include, among other things, FWECs counsel
and consulting fees, further agency oversight and/or response costs, costs and/or exposure related
to the litigation described below beyond those for which accruals have been made and other costs
related to possible further investigation and/or remediation. At present, it is not possible to
determine whether FWEC will be determined to be liable for some or all of the items described in
this paragraph, nor is it possible to reliably estimate the potential liability associated with the
items.
If one or more third-parties are determined to be a source of the TCE, FWEC will evaluate its
options regarding the potential recovery of the costs FWEC has incurred, which options could
include seeking to recover those costs from those determined to be a source.
In March 2006, a complaint was filed in an action entitled
Sarah Martin and Jeffrey Martin v.
Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation
, Case No. 3376-06, Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County,
Pennsylvania (subsequently removed to the United States District Court, Middle District of
Pennsylvania). The complaint alleged that it was filed on behalf of the Martins and more than 25
others similarly situated owning or residing on property impacted or threatened with impacts of the
TCE released from the former FWEC facility. The complaint sought to recover costs of environmental
remediation and continued environmental monitoring of alleged class members property, diminution
in property value, costs associated with obtaining healthy water, the establishment of a medical
monitoring trust fund, statutory, treble and punitive damages and interest and the costs of the
suit.
In April 2007, the court in the
Martin
case preliminarily approved a class action settlement
that had been jointly filed by the plaintiffs and FWEC. The preliminary settlement was subject to
the class members opt-in/opt-out process and the holding of a fairness hearing before the court.
A number of the class members opted-out of the preliminary settlement, and a number of them
objected that the preliminary settlement was not fair. After the fairness hearing the court, in
December 2007, entered an order finally approving the settlement.
32
Under the terms of the settlement, FWEC will pay the class and its counsel a total of
approximately $1,600 in exchange for a release by class members of all claims with respect to the
matters that are the subject of the litigation. The release will not extend to the claims of those
who opt-out of the settlement. The class, which was agreed upon only for the purposes of the
settlement, consists of three categories of persons who own or live on property in, or within
approximately 150 feet of, the area in which TCE is inferred to exist in the groundwater. One of
the three categories of the class includes those persons who live in residences at which TCE was
detected in private wells in 2004. We have accrued a provision sufficient to cover the settlement.
In April 2006, a complaint was filed in an action entitled
Donna Rose Cunningham and Michael
A. Cunningham v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation
, United States District Court, Middle District
of Pennsylvania. The complaints allegations are generally similar to those in the
Martin
case,
except that the complaint is on behalf of the Cunninghams only, not an alleged class, and except
that the Cunninghams have included a claim for embarrassment, humiliation and emotional distress.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2008, we reached a settlement in principle of this claim
for an amount that we do not believe will have a material impact on our financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.
In May 2006, a complaint was filed in an action entitled
Gary Prezkop, Personal Representative
of the Estate of Mary Prezkop, Deceased, and Gary Prezkop, in his own right, v. Foster Wheeler
Energy Corporation and Leonard M. Lulis.
Case No. 000545
,
Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia
County, Pennsylvania. The complaints allegations were generally similar to those in the
Martin
and
Cunningham
cases, but they also included claims for Mary Prezkops alleged wrongful death.
During fiscal year 2007, the matter was settled for an amount that did not have a material impact
on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Other Environmental Matters
Our operations, especially our manufacturing and power plants, are subject to comprehensive
laws adopted for the protection of the environment and to regulate land use. The laws of primary
relevance to our operations regulate the discharge of emissions into the water and air, but can
also include hazardous materials handling and disposal, waste disposal and other types of
environmental regulation. These laws and regulations in many cases require a lengthy and complex
process of obtaining licenses, permits and approvals from the applicable regulatory agencies.
Noncompliance with these laws can result in the imposition of material civil or criminal fines or
penalties. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with existing environmental laws.
However, no assurance can be provided that we will not become the subject of enforcement
proceedings that could cause us to incur material expenditures. Further, no assurance can be
provided that we will not need to incur material expenditures beyond our existing reserves to make
capital improvements or operational changes necessary to allow us to comply with future
environmental laws.
With regard to the foregoing, the waste-to-energy facility operated by our CCERA project
subsidiary is subject to certain revisions to New Jerseys mercury air emission regulations. The
revisions make CCERAs mercury control requirements more stringent, especially when the last phase
of the revisions becomes effective in 2012. CCERAs management believes that the data generated
during recent stack testing tends to indicate that the facility will be able to comply with even
the most stringent of the regulatory revisions without installing additional control equipment.
Even if the equipment had to be installed, CCERA believes that the projects sponsor would be
responsible to pay for the equipment. However, the sponsor may not have sufficient funds to do so
or may assert that it is not so responsible. Budgetary estimates of the cost of installing the
additional control equipment are approximately $30,000 based on our last assessment.
33
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
The following is managements discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have
affected our financial condition and results of operations for the periods indicated below. This
discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements
and notes thereto included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and our annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 28, 2007, which we refer to as our 2007 Form 10-K.
Safe Harbor Statement
This managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations,
other sections of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and other reports and oral statements made by
our representatives from time to time may contain forward-looking statements that are based on our
assumptions, expectations and projections about Foster Wheeler Ltd. and the various industries
within which we operate. These include statements regarding our expectation about revenues
(including as expressed by our backlog), our liquidity, the outcome of litigation and legal
proceedings and recoveries from customers for claims and the costs of current and future asbestos
claims and the amount and timing of related insurance recoveries. Such forward-looking statements
by their nature involve a degree of risk and uncertainty. We caution that a variety of factors,
including but not limited to the factors described under Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors and the
following, could cause business conditions and our results to differ materially from what is
contained in forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
changes in the rate of economic growth in the United States and other major
international economies;
|
|
|
|
|
changes in investment by the oil and gas, oil refining, chemical/petrochemical and power
industries;
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the financial condition of our customers;
|
|
|
|
|
changes in regulatory environments;
|
|
|
|
|
changes in project design or schedules;
|
|
|
|
|
contract cancellations;
|
|
|
|
|
changes in our estimates of costs to complete projects;
|
|
|
|
|
changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies worldwide;
|
|
|
|
|
compliance with laws and regulations relating to our global operations;
|
|
|
|
|
currency fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
|
war and/or terrorist attacks on facilities either owned or where equipment or services
are or may be provided;
|
|
|
|
|
interruptions to shipping lanes or other methods of transit;
|
|
|
|
|
outcomes of pending and future litigation, including litigation regarding our liability
for damages and insurance coverage for asbestos exposure;
|
|
|
|
|
protection and validity of our patents and other intellectual property rights;
|
|
|
|
|
increasing competition by foreign and domestic companies;
|
|
|
|
|
compliance with our debt covenants;
|
|
|
|
|
recoverability of claims against our customers and others by us and claims by third
parties against us; and
|
|
|
|
|
changes in estimates used in our critical accounting policies.
|
34
Other factors and assumptions not identified above were also involved in the formation of
these forward-looking statements and the failure of such other assumptions to be realized, as well
as other factors, may also cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Most of
these factors are difficult to predict accurately and are generally beyond our control. You should
consider the areas of risk described above in connection with any forward-looking statements that
may be made by us.
In addition, this managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations contains several statements regarding current and future general global economic
conditions. These statements are based on our compilation of economic data and analyses from a
variety of external sources. While we believe these statements to be reasonably accurate, global
economic conditions are difficult to analyze and predict and are subject to significant uncertainty
and as a result, these statements may prove to be wrong.
We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are advised, however, to consult any
additional disclosures we make in proxy statements, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, annual reports
on Form 10-K and current reports on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Overview
We operate through two business groups the Global Engineering & Construction Group, which we
refer to as our Global E&C Group, and our Global Power Group. In addition to these two business
groups, we also report corporate center expenses and expenses related to certain legacy
liabilities, such as asbestos, in the Corporate and Finance Group, which we refer to as the C&F
Group.
Since 2007, we have been exploring strategic acquisitions within the engineering and
construction industry to complement or expand on our technical capabilities or access to new market
segments. In February 2008, we acquired a U.S.-based biopharmaceutical engineering company as part
of our strategy to enhance our positioning in the pharmaceutical marketplace, especially in the
U.S. We are also exploring acquisitions within the power industry to complement our product
offering. However, there is no assurance that we will consummate acquisitions in the future.
Fiscal First Quarter 2008 Results
We had net income of $138,100 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, compared to net income
of $114,800 in the comparable period in fiscal year 2007. The improvement in the first quarter of
fiscal year 2008, compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2007,
reflects the sharply improved operating
performance by our Global Power Group and continued strong operating
performance by our Global E&C Group. Additional highlights included the following:
|
|
|
Our consolidated operating revenues increased 56% to $1,795,700 in the first quarter of
fiscal year 2008, as compared to $1,152,100 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2007,
reflecting increased flow-through revenues and greater business activity in both our Global
E&C Group and our Global Power Group.
|
|
|
|
|
Our consolidated new orders, measured in terms of future revenues, were $1,243,700 in
the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, as compared to $4,604,500 in the fourth quarter of
fiscal year 2007 and $1,416,500 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Our consolidated backlog of unfilled orders, measured in future revenues, as of March
28, 2008 was $8,951,400, a decrease as compared to $9,420,400 as of December 28, 2007 and
an increase as compared to $5,706,500 as of March 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Our consolidated backlog, measured in terms of Foster Wheeler scope (as defined below),
as of March 28, 2008, increased to $3,564,200, as compared to $3,294,600 as of December 28,
2007 and $2,740,000 as of March 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
E&C man-hours in backlog (in thousands) as of March 28, 2008 increased to 14,200, as
compared to 13,400 as of December 28, 2007 and 12,300 as of March 30, 2007.
|
35
Challenges and Drivers
Our primary operating focus continues to be booking quality new business and executing our
contracts well. The global markets in which we operate are largely dependent on overall economic
growth and the resultant demand for oil and gas, electric power, petrochemicals and refined
products.
In our Global E&C business, end product demand remains strong and continues to stimulate
investment by our clients in new and expanded plants. Therefore, attracting and retaining
qualified technical personnel to execute the existing backlog of unfilled orders and future
bookings will continue to be a management priority. Equally important is ensuring that we maintain
an appropriate management infrastructure to integrate and manage the technical personnel. We
believe the primary drivers and constraints in our Global E&C market today are: end product demand,
global economic outlook, oil and natural gas prices and scope and timing of client investments.
See Results of Operations-Business Segments-Global E&C Group-Overview of Segment below for a
more detailed discussion of the challenges and drivers that impact our Global E&C Group, including
the current global economic outlook.
In our Global Power Group business, we believe the primary drivers and constraints in the
global steam generator market today are: economic growth, power plant price inflation, concern
related to greenhouse gas emissions, entry into new geographic markets, impact of environmental
regulation, and capacity constraints of electricity markets. These drivers differ across world
regions, countries and provinces. See Results of Operations-Business Segments-Global Power
Group-Overview of Segment below for a more detailed discussion of the challenges and drivers that
impact our Global Power Group, including the current global economic outlook.
New Orders
The Global E&C Groups new orders, measured in future revenues, decreased to $707,300 in the
first quarter of fiscal year 2008, as compared to $3,999,400 in the fourth quarter of fiscal year
2007 and $872,700 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2007. These new orders are inclusive of
estimated flow-through revenues, as defined below, of $94,800, $3,395,900 and $339,400 for the
first quarter of fiscal year 2008, fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 and first quarter of fiscal
year 2007, respectively. We expect capital investments in the markets served by our Global E&C
Group, including the chemical, petrochemical, oil refining, liquefied natural gas, which we refer
to as LNG, and upstream oil and gas industries, to be strong for the remainder of fiscal year 2008.
As a result, we also expect the demand for the services and equipment supplied by engineering and
construction contractors such as us to be strong throughout the remainder of fiscal year 2008.
The Global Power Groups new orders decreased to $536,400 in the first quarter of fiscal year
2008, as compared to $605,100 in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 and $543,800 in the first
quarter of fiscal year 2007. However, we believe that there are solid opportunities throughout
the remainder of fiscal year 2008 in the power markets we serve, such as solid fuel-fired steam
generators, steam generator services, steam generator environmental products and steam
generator-related construction services.
36
Results of Operations:
Operating Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
March 28,
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
$1,795,724
|
|
$1,152,122
|
|
|
$643,602
|
|
|
|
55.9
|
%
|
The increase in operating revenues in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, compared to the
corresponding period of fiscal year 2007, reflects our success in addressing the strong market
demand in both our Global E&C Group and our Global Power Group (please refer to the section
entitled Business Segments within this Item 2 and Note 11 to the condensed consolidated
financial statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for further information). However,
$549,255 of the increase during the first quarter of fiscal year 2008 results from an increase
versus the corresponding period of fiscal year 2007 in flow-through revenues and costs in our
Global E&C Group on projects executed by our Asia-Pacific, Continental Europe and United Kingdom
operations. Flow-through revenues and costs arise on projects where we purchase materials,
equipment or subcontractor services on behalf of our customers on a reimbursable basis with no
mark-up but for which we have overall responsibility as the contractor for the engineering
specifications and procurement or procurement services for such costs. Flow-through revenues and
costs do not impact contract profit or net earnings, but increased amounts of flow-through revenues
and costs have the effect of reducing our reported profit margins as a percent of operating
revenues. We expect flow-through revenues and costs in fiscal year 2008 to be greater than fiscal
year 2007 on an absolute basis.
Contract Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
March 28,
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
$216,971
|
|
$207,512
|
|
|
$9,459
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
Contract profit is computed as operating revenues less cost of operating revenues. The
increase in contract profit for the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, compared to the
corresponding period of fiscal year 2007, includes a $7,500 commitment fee our Global Power Group
received on a contract that we were not awarded. Contract profit also reflects an increase in
revenues, excluding the flow-through revenues and their associated costs described above. Please
refer to the section entitled Business Segments within this Item 2 for further information.
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
March 28,
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
$64,896
|
|
$55,088
|
|
|
$9,808
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
SG&A expenses include the costs associated with general management, sales pursuit, including
proposal expenses, and research and development costs. The increase in SG&A expenses in the first
quarter of fiscal year 2008, compared to the same period in fiscal year 2007, results from
increases in general overhead costs of $6,100 and sales pursuit costs of $3,800, and a decrease of
$(100) from research and development costs. The increase in SG&A results primarily from the
increased volume of business in fiscal year 2007 and the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, which
drove an increase in the number of non-technical support staff and related costs.
37
Other Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
March 28,
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
$19,534
|
|
$5,764
|
|
|
$13,770
|
|
|
|
238.9
|
%
|
Other income in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008 consists primarily of $11,800 in equity
earnings generated from our ownership interests, in build, own and operate projects in Italy and
Chile, and $5,500 of foreign exchange gains.
Other income in the first quarter of fiscal year 2007 consists primarily $4,200 in equity
earnings generated from our interests, in build, own and operate projects in Italy and Chile, and
$700 of investment income.
Other Deductions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
March 28,
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
$11,891
|
|
$8,172
|
|
|
$3,719
|
|
|
|
45.5
|
%
|
Other deductions in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008 consists primarily of $6,100 of
legal fees, a $1,400 provision for environmental dispute resolution and remediation costs, $1,300
of bank fees, $900 of consulting fees, and a $800 charge for tax penalties.
Other deductions in the first quarter of fiscal year 2007 consists primarily of $600 of bank
fees, $4,200 of legal fees, $1,300 of foreign exchange losses, a $500 provision for environmental
dispute resolution and remediation costs and a $300 charge for tax penalties.
Interest Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
March 28,
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
$10,531
|
|
$5,752
|
|
|
$4,779
|
|
|
|
83.1
|
%
|
The increase in interest income in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, compared to the
corresponding period of fiscal year 2007, resulted primarily from a higher average cash and cash
equivalents balance.
Interest Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
March 28,
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
$6,151
|
|
$4,725
|
|
|
$1,426
|
|
|
|
30.2
|
%
|
The increase in interest expense in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, compared to the
corresponding period of fiscal year 2007, reflects the increased borrowings under our FW Power
S.r.L. special-purpose limited recourse project debt as we continue construction of the electric
power generating wind farm projects in Italy.
38
Minority Interest in Income of Consolidated Affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
March 28,
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
$473
|
|
$2,309
|
|
|
$(1,836)
|
|
|
|
(79.5
|
)%
|
Minority interest in income of consolidated affiliates reflects third-party ownership
interests in the results of our Global Power Groups Martinez, California gas-fired cogeneration
facility and our manufacturing facilities in Poland and the Peoples Republic of China. The change
in minority interest in income of consolidated affiliates is based upon changes in the underlying
earnings of the subsidiaries. The decrease in minority interest in income of consolidated
affiliates in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008 primarily reflects decreased earnings from the
Martinez, California facility driven by decreased power production
due to increased scheduled repair outages.
Net Asbestos-Related Gain:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
March 28,
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
$14,188
|
|
$
|
|
|
$14,188
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
In the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, our subsidiaries reached an agreement to settle
their disputed asbestos-related insurance coverage with an insurer. As a result of this
settlement, we recorded a gain of $15,900 in the fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2008, which is
partially offset by a charge of $1,700 on the revaluation of our asbestos liability and related
asset resulting from our rolling 15-year asbestos liability estimate. Please refer to Note 12 to
the condensed consolidated financial statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for further
information.
Provision for Income Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
March 28,
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
$39,750
|
|
$33,909
|
|
|
$5,841
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
The tax provision is calculated by multiplying pre-tax income by the estimated annual
effective tax rate. Our effective tax rate can fluctuate significantly from period to period and
may differ significantly from the U.S. federal statutory rate as a result of the fact that most of
our operating units are profitable and are recording a provision for national and/or local income
taxes, while others are unprofitable and are unable to recognize a tax benefit for losses.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard, or SFAS, No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
requires us to reduce our deferred tax benefits by a valuation allowance when, based upon available
evidence, it is more likely than not that the tax benefit of losses (or other deferred tax assets)
will not be realized in the future. In periods when operating units subject to a valuation
allowance generate pretax earnings, the corresponding reduction in the valuation allowance
favorably impacts our effective tax rate.
Our effective tax rate is, therefore, dependent on the location and amount of our taxable
earnings and the effects of changes in valuation allowances. Our effective tax rates for the
fiscal quarters ended March 28, 2008 and March 30, 2007 were lower than the U.S. statutory rate of
35% due principally to:
|
|
|
Income earned in tax jurisdictions with tax rates being lower than the U.S.
statutory rate; and
|
|
|
|
|
A valuation allowance decrease.
|
39
A decrease in our valuation allowance occurred because we recognized earnings in jurisdictions
where we have previously recorded a full valuation allowance (primarily the United States and
Finland). These variances were partially offset by losses subject to valuation allowance in
certain other non-U.S. jurisdictions and other permanent differences.
We monitor the jurisdictions for which valuation allowances against deferred tax assets were
established in previous years. As we currently have positive earnings in most jurisdictions, we
evaluate on a quarterly basis the need for the valuation allowances against deferred tax assets in
those jurisdictions. Such evaluation includes a
review of all available evidence, both positive and negative, in determining whether a valuation
allowance is necessary.
For statutory purposes, the majority of the U.S. federal tax benefits, against which valuation
allowances have been established, do not expire until 2024 and beyond, based on current tax laws.
EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
March 28,
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
$195,320
|
|
$162,297
|
|
|
$33,023
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
%
|
EBITDA for the fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2008 reflects increased volumes of business,
strong operating performance, and increased margins in our Global Power Group. EBITDA in the
fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2008 includes $14,200 of net asbestos-related gains in the C&F Group
and a $7,500 commitment fee received on a contract that we were not awarded in our Global Power
Group. EBITDA was also positively impacted by an increase in equity earnings, from one of our
Global Power Groups equity interest investments, of approximately $4,900 during the first quarter
of fiscal year 2008 due to an increase in electric tariff rates in Chile when compared to the
fiscal year 2007 average electric tariff rates.
See the individual segment explanations below for additional details.
EBITDA is a supplemental financial measure not defined in generally accepted accounting
principles, or GAAP. We define EBITDA as income before interest expense, income taxes,
depreciation and amortization. We have presented EBITDA because we believe it is an important
supplemental measure of operating performance. EBITDA, after adjustment for certain unusual and
infrequent items specifically excluded in the terms of our current and prior senior credit
agreements, is used for certain covenants under our current and prior senior credit agreements. We
believe that the line item on the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive
income entitled net income is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to EBITDA.
Since EBITDA is not a measure of performance calculated in accordance with GAAP, it should not be
considered in isolation of, or as a substitute for, net income as an indicator of operating
performance or any other GAAP financial measure. EBITDA, as calculated by us, may not be
comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies. In addition, this measure
does not necessarily represent funds available for discretionary use and is not necessarily a
measure of our ability to fund our cash needs. As EBITDA excludes certain financial information
that is included in net income, users of this financial information should consider the type of
events and transactions that are excluded. Our non-GAAP performance measure, EBITDA, has certain
material limitations as follows:
|
|
|
It does not include interest expense. Because we have borrowed money to finance
some of our operations, interest is a necessary and ongoing part of our costs and
has assisted us in generating revenue. Therefore, any measure that excludes
interest expense has material limitations;
|
|
|
|
|
It does not include taxes. Because the payment of taxes is a necessary and
ongoing part of our operations, any measure that excludes taxes has material
limitations; and
|
|
|
|
|
It does not include depreciation and amortization. Because we must utilize
property, plant and equipment and intangible assets in order to generate revenues
in our operations, depreciation and amortization are necessary and ongoing costs of
our operations. Therefore, any measure that excludes depreciation and amortization
has material limitations.
|
40
A reconciliation of EBITDA to net income is shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global
|
|
|
Global
|
|
|
C&F
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
E&C Group
|
|
|
Power Group
|
|
|
Group
(1)
|
|
Three
months ended March 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
(2)
|
|
$
|
195,320
|
|
|
$134,460
|
|
|
$64,416
|
|
|
$(3,556)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Interest expense
|
|
|
(6,151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(11,356
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
177,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(39,750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
138,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended March 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
(3)
|
|
$
|
162,297
|
|
|
$141,133
|
|
|
$37,024
|
|
|
$(15,860)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Interest expense
|
|
|
(4,725
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(8,838
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
148,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(33,909
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
114,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes general corporate income and expense, our captive insurance operation and
eliminations.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes in the fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2008: increased/(decreased) contract profit of
$2,100 from the regular re-evaluation of contract profit estimates: $5,300 in our Global E&C
Group and $(3,200) in our Global Power Group; a gain of $15,900 in our C&F Group on the
settlement of coverage litigation with an asbestos insurance carrier; and a charge of $1,700
in our C&F Group on the revaluation of our asbestos liability and related asset resulting from
our rolling 15-year asbestos liability estimate.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes in the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2007: increased/(decreased) contract profit of
$18,460 from the regular re-evaluation of contract profit estimates: $18,580 in our Global E&C
Group and $(120) in our Global Power Group.
|
Business Segments
EBITDA, as discussed and defined above, is the primary measure of operating performance used
by our chief operating decision maker.
Global E&C Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
1,391,001
|
|
|
$
|
824,169
|
|
|
$
|
566,832
|
|
|
|
68.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
134,460
|
|
|
$
|
141,133
|
|
|
$
|
(6,673
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results
The increase in operating revenues in the fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2008, as compared to
the corresponding period of fiscal year 2007, reflects increased flow-through revenues and volumes
of work in Asia, Australasia, Europe and the Middle East, partially offset by decreases in North
America and South America. Major projects in Asia, Australasia, Europe and the Middle East in the
oil and gas, refining, chemical/petrochemical and LNG industries led the increase in activities.
Flow-through revenues increased $549,300 in the first quarter of fiscal
year 2008 versus the corresponding period of fiscal year 2007 as a result of projects executed by
our Asia-Pacific, Continental Europe and United Kingdom offices.
41
The decrease in EBITDA in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, as compared to the
corresponding period for fiscal year 2007, results primarily from a change in contract portfolio
mix.
Our direct technical manpower, which includes agency workforce, was relatively unchanged
during the first quarter of fiscal year 2008; however, we did increase our direct technical
manpower at our low-cost engineering center in India as we continue to address growing market
opportunities. We plan to continue to expand our operational capacity throughout the remainder of
fiscal year 2008 through the combination of organic growth and selective acquisitions.
Overview of Segment
Our Global E&C Group, which operates worldwide, designs, engineers and constructs onshore and
offshore upstream oil and gas processing facilities, natural gas liquefaction facilities and
receiving terminals, gas-to-liquids facilities, oil refining, chemical and petrochemical,
pharmaceutical and biotechnology facilities and related infrastructure, including power generation
and distribution facilities, and gasification facilities. Our Global E&C Group generates revenues
from engineering and construction activities pursuant to contracts spanning up to approximately
four years in duration and from returns on its equity investments in various power production
facilities.
Below is an overview of the primary drivers and constraints applicable to our Global E&C
Group.
Demand for Oil and Gas, Petrochemicals and Refined Products and Global Economic Outlook
We expect investment in new oil and gas, refining and petrochemicals/chemicals facilities, and
modernization, expansion and upgrading of existing facilities in these sectors, to continue to be
robust throughout the remainder of fiscal year 2008.
While our business has not been directly impacted to date by the U.S. credit crunch resulting
from the sub-prime mortgage crisis, as our clients typically do not rely on financing for their
capital investment programs, we believe that the full impact of the U.S. sub-prime mortgage crisis
on the U.S. and global economies is becoming more significant and therefore the possibility exists
that credit conditions, as well as a slowdown or recession in economic growth, could adversely
affect the industries in which our clients operate and as a result, our Global E&C Groups
business. While the rate of global economic growth is expected to be lower in fiscal year 2008
relative to fiscal year 2007, the emerging markets currently show few or limited signs of any
growth impact from recent financial and economic volatility and we believe that the downside risks
in the emerging markets may be mitigated, at least in part, by the forecast for continued strong
economic growth in key emerging markets, such as China and India.
We believe that the overall global refining system is still running at high utilization rates
and that global demand for many refined products, particularly middle distillates (diesel, jet
fuel, and heating oil), will continue to grow strongly. We believe that refining capacity will
therefore continue to be added through the development of grassroots refineries, notably in the
Middle East and Asia. Significant upgrades and expansions also continue to be planned or are
underway at existing refineries in many regions. Clean fuel programs are also being implemented to
meet tighter fuel specifications in refiners domestic and/or export markets. We are currently
working on refinery projects in the Americas, Europe, Asia and the Middle East.
Some refiners are also investing in refinery/petrochemical integration. We believe that the
drivers for this investment include: adding value to their refinery streams, diversification of
their production, and margin enhancement. We are working on a number of integrated
refinery/petrochemical projects in Asia and the Middle East.
The price differentials between heavier, higher-sulfur crude oil and lighter, sweeter crudes
remain higher than the historic average. These differentials, and the expected growth in demand for
transportation fuels, continue to stimulate refinery investment in facilities which enable refiners
to process the cheaper, higher-sulfur crudes instead of the lighter, more expensive crudes, or to
upgrade their lower-value refinery residues to higher-value transportation fuels. We expect to see
continued investment in these projects.
42
We have considerable experience and expertise in this area, including our proprietary delayed
coking technology, which enables refineries to upgrade lower quality crude oil or refinery residue
to high value refined products such as transportation fuels. We are currently executing a
significant number of delayed coking projects, including:
|
|
|
Feasibility studies;
|
|
|
|
|
Delayed coking technology license agreements and process design packages;
|
|
|
|
|
Front-end engineering and design, or FEED, contracts;
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering, procurement and construction supervision contracts; and
|
|
|
|
|
Full engineering, procurement and construction contracts.
|
These projects are located in Asia, Europe, the Middle East, North America, and South America.
The subsequent phases of some of these projects for which we are working on the early phases,
offer us further opportunities. We believe further coking opportunities exist in regions such as
Asia which are now looking at residue upgrading as an option, but where investment in residue
upgrading has not previously been a prime focus for refiners.
Investment in Petrochemical Plants
Investment in petrochemical plants began to rise sharply in 2004 in response to strong growth
in demand for petrochemicals. The majority of this investment has been centered in Asia and the
Middle East. We are seeing:
|
|
|
Continued strong demand supporting further new investment in these regions,
which we expect to continue throughout the remainder of fiscal year 2008;
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in specialty chemicals, particularly in the Middle East, stimulated
by governmental desire to further diversify their economies to lessen their
dependence on crude oil exports and to provide sustained employment for their
growing young populations; and
|
|
|
|
|
Increasing interest in developing new chemical facilities and expanding
existing plants in North Africa, the Commonwealth of Independent States and South
America.
|
Oil and Natural Gas Prices
We believe that high oil prices, together with longer-term projections for robust growth in
global oil and gas demand, provide a strong stimulus to clients to invest in upstream oil and gas
facilities, particularly in Africa, the Commonwealth of Independent States and the Middle East.
We believe that rising demand for natural gas in Europe, Asia and the United States, combined
with a shortfall in indigenous production, will continue to act as a stimulant to the LNG business.
Although LNG demand continues to grow strongly, the pace at which new liquefaction train
construction projects have received approval to proceed has slowed over the last two or three
years. We believe this indicates that significant additional liquefaction capacity over and above
the approved projects will need to be developed.
Scope and Timing of Investments in Engineering and Construction Services, Equipment and
Materials
While the outlook for oil and gas, refining and petrochemicals investment for the remainder of
fiscal year 2008 remains positive, we are seeing that, as the demand for and cost of engineering
and construction services, materials and equipment and commodities continues to rise, some
companies are electing to commit to only partial or staged investments, to reduce the scope of
their investments, or to postpone or cancel contemplated investments, until the market slows. As
we work with our clients in the early study and front-end design phases of their projects, we are
helping some of them develop a revised project that meets their investment parameters, develop a
staged investment plan, or revise the scope of or configuration of their original project so that
they are able to obtain approval to proceed with their investment. In addition, as discussed
above, although the U.S. credit crisis has not directly impacted our business as yet, we believe
that the impact on general economic conditions appears to be deepening and becoming more widespread
and the full impact has yet to be realized. There are a number of substantial downside risks to the
current global economic growth forecasts for the remainder of fiscal year 2008.
43
Pharmaceutical Facility Investment
Investment in new pharmaceutical production facilities has slowed since 2003. We believe this
is attributable to a range of factors including industry cost pressure. Investment has focused on
plant rationalization, upgrading and improvement projects rather than on major new greenfield
production facilities and on biotechnology facilities. There are now indications of some renewed
interest in more significant plant investment in the key pharmaceutical investment hubs
Singapore, the U.S., Ireland and Puerto Rico. In February 2008, we acquired a U.S.-based
biopharmaceutical engineering company as part of our strategy to enhance our positioning in the
pharmaceutical marketplace, especially in the U.S.
Global Power Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
404,723
|
|
|
$
|
327,953
|
|
|
$
|
76,770
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
64,416
|
|
|
$
|
37,024
|
|
|
$
|
27,392
|
|
|
|
74.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results
The increase in operating revenues in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, as compared to
the corresponding period in fiscal year 2007, results from the volume of business in our operations
in North America, Europe and Asia.
Our Global Power Group experienced higher levels of EBITDA in the first quarter of fiscal year
2008, as compared to the comparable period for fiscal year 2007, as a result of increased volumes
of business and increased margins experienced by our contracts executed in Europe and Asia. EBITDA
in fiscal year 2008 includes a $7,500 commitment fee received on a contract that we were not
awarded. EBITDA was also positively impacted by approximately $4,900 during the first quarter of
fiscal year 2008, by one of our Global Power Groups equity interest investments, due to an
increase in electric tariff rates in Chile during the first quarter of fiscal year 2008 compared to
the average electric tariff rates experienced during fiscal year 2007.
Overview of Segment
Our Global Power Group designs, manufactures and erects steam generators for electric power
generating stations and industrial facilities worldwide. The vast majority of the global steam
generator market utilizes coal as the primary fuel for the steam generator. Therefore, the market
drivers and constraints associated with coal use, strongly affect the steam generator market and
our Global Power Groups business. Additionally, our Global Power Group designs, manufactures and
erects auxiliary equipment for electric power generating stations and industrial facilities
worldwide and owns and operates several cogeneration, independent power production and
waste-to-energy facilities, as well as power generation facilities for the process and
petrochemical industries.
Below is an overview of the primary drivers and constraints applicable to the business areas
within our Global Power Group.
Economic Growth
Historically, demand for our steam generators has been significantly affected by electricity
demand, which in turn has been significantly affected by economic growth. While our business has
not been directly impacted to date by the U.S. credit crunch resulting from the sub-prime mortgage
crisis, we believe that the full impact of the U.S. sub-prime mortgage crisis on the U.S. and global economies
is becoming more significant and therefore the possibility exists that credit conditions, as well
as a slowdown or recession in economic growth, could adversely affect the industries in which our
clients operate and as a result, our Global Power Groups business. In particular, we believe that
both the U.S. and Europe may experience a slowdown in economic growth that could cause a softening
in demand for steam generators and, as a result, could adversely affect our Global Power Groups
business in these regions. However, we believe that economic growth in China, India, Vietnam,
Indonesia, Philippines, Russia, South Africa, Turkey, and parts of South America and the Middle
East will continue to drive strong demand for steam generators by electric power generating
stations and industrial facilities in these countries.
44
Power Plant Price Inflation
We believe that substantial price inflation for new coal power plants may suppress
future demand for steam generators, which in turn could adversely affect our Global Power Groups
business opportunities in both the U.S. and Europe.
Concern Related to Greenhouse Gases
Concern for emissions related to greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, or CO
2,
from coal power plants, could suppress future demand for utility steam generators and in turn
adversely affect our Global Power Groups business opportunities. We believe that this concern is
currently strongest in the U.S. and Europe and could adversely affect our Global Power Groups
business opportunities in these regions. Most of the concern
in the U.S. has been aimed at the large pulverized coal, which we
refer to as PC, market and has
not impacted the circulating fluidized-bed, which we refer to as CFB,
market as significantly. However, we have recently experienced
instances of delays in certain projects we view as prospects. We
believe this is a result of a combination of these environmental
pressures faced by our customers coupled with their concerns over the
U.S. economic outlook and price inflation discussed above. We
believe that concern related to greenhouse gases is not currently as strong in Asia, Latin America,
or Africa, and is not significantly suppressing the demand for utility steam generators in these
regions and that these regions continue to offer business opportunities to our Global Power Group.
We believe our Global Power Group is well positioned to serve the global utility steam
generator market with its CFB steam generator technology, even with continued concern related to
greenhouse gases. In addition to cleanly burning a wide spectrum of coal types, CFBs can also burn
biomass and recycled fuels (such as tires, demolition wood, plastics, waste paper, waste and coal).
These fuels, in many regions, are considered to be carbon neutral or low carbon fuels, allowing
owners of CFB power plants to achieve substantially lower carbon emission as compared to
conventional PC steam generator technology.
We believe that concern related to greenhouse gases is driving a strong preference for
supercritical once-through-unit, which we refer to as OTU, steam generators, which produce steam at
supercritical conditions, in nearly all world regions within the utility steam generator market.
OTU steam generator technology offers higher efficiency and hence reduced CO
2
emissions.
We believe our Global Power Group is well positioned to serve the supercritical OTU market as
evidenced by our Global Power Groups success in securing three projects based on supercritical OTU
technology: (i) a project, awarded in fiscal year 2005 and planned to be commercially operational
by fiscal year 2009, in Poland where we will be supplying the worlds first supercritical OTU CFB
steam generator which will utilize advanced BENSON vertical tube technology; (ii) a project,
awarded in fiscal year 2007 and planned to be commercially operational by fiscal year 2011, for the
design and supply, or D&S, of a supercritical OTU PC steam generator for a coal-fired generating
facility located in West Virginia; and (iii) a D&S project, awarded in 2008, for our second
supercritical OTU CFB project which is located in Russia and is the first CFB in that country. A
key component of our strategy is to leverage these key wins to further grow our position in the
supercritical utility steam generator market for both PC and CFB steam generators.
We believe that supercritical CFB steam generator technology has the potential to penetrate
the supercritical utility steam generator market, especially for non-premium solid fuels such as
biomass, lignite, brown coals and waste coals. Since we expect to be the first steam generator
supplier with an operational supercritical CFB reference plant (which is expected to be
commissioned in Poland in fiscal year 2009), and have recently been awarded a contract in Russia
for the second supercritical CFB ordered in the world, we believe we are well positioned to pursue
this market opportunity.
45
Entry into New Geographic Markets
We believe that the worlds largest utility steam generator markets will continue to be in
Asia, such as China and India, offering both opportunity and challenges to our Global Power Groups
business. Historically, we believe it has been difficult for foreign companies to significantly
penetrate these markets due to entrenched low-cost domestic steam generator suppliers, government
controlled and owned steam generator companies, and national trade policies favoring domestic
suppliers. Our Global Power Group is participating in these markets
only on a limited basis while
growing its manufacturing and engineering operations in China to provide high quality products
competitive in these regions as well as the rest of the world.
To maximize business opportunities, our Global Power Group is executing a licensing strategy
for selling and manufacturing steam generators which allows our Global Power Group to indirectly
penetrate otherwise inaccessible markets, while expanding our Global Power Group capacity through
licensees.
Impact of Environmental Regulations
We believe that environmental regulations will continue to become more restrictive globally
and that this will drive continued global demand for our Global Power Groups environmental
products and services, such as selective non-catalytic and catalytic NO
x
reduction
systems, low NOx burners, over-fire air systems, coal/air balancing systems and coal mill upgrade equipment.
Capacity Constraints in Electricity Markets
We believe that the amount of unused available electric generating capacity as a percentage of
total electric capacity will remain tight globally over the next three years and that steam
generator power plant owners and operators will continue to run these plants at historically high
utilization rates. The high utilization rates are expected to increase the need for increased
output and maintenance, which we believe will continue to spur overhaul and additional maintenance
investment by owners and operators of these plants, especially in the U.S. and Europe, which have
sizable older steam generator power plant fleets. In addition, we believe owners are making larger
capital investments in these plants to extend their useful lives. We believe these factors are
contributing to a strong demand for our Global Power Groups steam generator aftermarket products
and services.
46
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Fiscal First Quarter 2008 Activities
As of March 28, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents on hand, short-term investments and
restricted cash totaling $1,196,400, compared to $1,069,500 as of December 28, 2007. The increase
was primarily driven by an increase in cash and cash equivalents of $111,600 which results
primarily from net cash provided by operations of $114,400 and favorable exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents of $36,100, partially offset by net cash used in investing activities of
$36,700 and net cash used in financing activities of $2,200. Restricted cash was $36,200 and
$20,900 as of March 28, 2008 and December 28, 2007, respectively. Of the $1,196,400 total at March
28, 2008, $917,800 was held by our foreign subsidiaries. Please refer to Note 1 to the condensed
consolidated financial statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for additional details on
cash balances.
Net cash provided by operations in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008 was $114,400,
compared to net cash used in operations of $26,400 in the comparable period of fiscal year 2007.
Net cash from operations in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008 was positively impacted by our
strong operating performance with an insignificant increase in our working capital of $200. Net
cash from operations in the corresponding period of fiscal year 2007 was also positively impacted
by our strong operating performance, but was significantly offset by an increase in our working
capital of $119,800. Our working capital varies from period to period depending on the mix, stage
of completion and commercial terms and conditions of our contracts. Working capital in our Global
E&C Group tends to rise as the workload of reimbursable contracts increases since services are
rendered prior to billing clients while working capital tends to decrease in our Global Power Group
when the workload increases as cash tends to be received prior to ordering materials and equipment.
The change in working capital in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, compared to
the corresponding period of fiscal year 2007, reflects an increase in the workload experienced by
our Global Power Group but a relatively consistent workload of reimbursable contracts in our Global
E&C Group from period to period. The net cash from operations in the first quarter of fiscal year
2007 also includes $35,000 of mandatory and discretionary contributions to our domestic pension
plan and funding of $10,600 related to asbestos liability indemnity payments and defense costs.
Net cash used in investing activities in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008 was $36,700,
compared to net cash used in investing activities of $1,700 in the comparable period in fiscal year
2007. The net cash used in investing activities in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008 is
attributable primarily to capital expenditures of $14,500 (which includes $5,000 of expenditures in
FW Power S.r.L. as we continue construction of the electric power generating wind farm projects in
Italy), an increase in restricted cash of $13,400 primarily driven by an increase in the balance
required for collateralized letters of credit and bank guarantees, and the $7,700 purchase price,
net of cash acquired, paid in February 2008 for the outstanding capital stock of a
biopharmaceutical engineering company. Net cash used in investing activities in the first quarter
of fiscal year 2007 was driven by capital expenditures of $6,100 and the $1,500 purchase of a
Finnish company that owns patented coal flow measuring technology, partially offset by a $6,300
return of investment from our unconsolidated affiliates in the first quarter of fiscal year 2007.
The capital expenditures in both fiscal quarters related primarily to project construction
(including the FW Power S.r.L. electric power generating wind farm projects in Italy noted above),
leasehold improvements, information technology equipment and office equipment. These expenditures
reflect increased spending on project construction and the increased volumes of business in the
first quarter of fiscal years 2008 and 2007. The increase in capital expenditures has been driven
primarily by our Global E&C Group, with particular increases driven by operations in Asia,
Continental Europe and the United Kingdom. Our Global Power Group capital expenditure increase was
driven by our European operations.
Net cash used in financing activities in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008 was $2,200,
compared to $7,900 of net cash provided by financing activities in the comparable period in fiscal
year 2007. The net cash used in financing activities in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008 is
attributable primarily to partnership distributions to minority partners of $6,700, partially
offset by proceeds from the issuance of long-term project debt of $3,100 and cash provided from
exercises of stock options of $1,500. The net cash provided by financing activities in the first
quarter of fiscal year 2007, primarily reflects cash provided from exercises of stock options,
offset in part by distributions to our minority partners.
47
Outlook
Our liquidity forecasts cover, among other analyses, existing cash balances, cash flows from
operations, cash repatriations from non U.S. subsidiaries, working capital needs, unused credit
line availability and claim recoveries and proceeds from asset sales, if any. These forecasts
extend over a rolling 12-month period. Based on these forecasts, we believe our existing cash
balances and forecasted net cash provided by operating activities will be sufficient to fund our
operations throughout the next 12 months. Based on these forecasts, our primary cash needs for
fiscal year 2008 will be to fund working capital, capital expenditures, asbestos liability
indemnity and defense costs, and acquisitions. The majority of our cash
balances are invested in short-term interest bearing accounts. We continue to consider investing
some of our cash in longer-term investment opportunities, including the acquisition of other
entities or operations in the engineering and construction industry or power industry and/or the
reduction of certain liabilities such as unfunded pension liabilities.
It is customary in the industries in which we operate to provide standby letters of credit,
bank guarantees or performance bonds in favor of clients to secure obligations under contracts. We
believe that we will have sufficient letter of credit capacity from existing facilities throughout
the next 12 months.
Our domestic operating entities do not generate sufficient cash flows to fund our obligations
related to corporate overhead expenses and asbestos-related liabilities. Consequently, we require
cash repatriations from our non-U.S. subsidiaries in the normal course of our operations to meet
our domestic cash needs and have successfully repatriated cash for many years. We believe we can
repatriate the required amount of cash from our foreign subsidiaries and we continue to have access
to the revolving credit portion of our domestic senior credit facility, if needed.
We funded $4,900 of the asbestos liability indemnity payments and defense costs from our cash
flows in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, net of the cash received from insurance
settlements. We expect to fund a total of $4,500 of the asbestos liability indemnity and defense
costs from our cash flows in fiscal year 2008, net of the cash expected to be received from
existing insurance settlements. This estimate assumes no additional settlements with insurance
companies or elections by us to fund additional payments. As we continue to collect cash from
insurance settlements and assuming no increase in our asbestos-related insurance liability or any
future insurance settlements, the asbestos-related insurance receivable recorded on our balance
sheet will continue to decrease.
We anticipate spending
42,990 (approximately $67,900 at the exchange rate as of March 28,
2008) in FW Power S.r.L. in fiscal year 2008 as we continue construction of the electric power
generating wind farm projects in Italy. We have secured total borrowing capacity under the FW
Power S.r.L. credit facilities of
75,350 (approximately $119,000 at the exchange rate as of March
28, 2008).
We had $269,700 and $245,800 of letters of credit outstanding under our domestic senior credit
agreement as of March 28, 2008 and December 28, 2007, respectively. The letter of credit fees now
range from 1.50% to 1.60%, excluding a fronting fee of 0.125% per annum. We do not intend to
borrow under our domestic senior revolving credit facility during fiscal year 2008. A portion of
the letters of credit issued under the domestic senior credit agreement have performance pricing
that is decreased (or increased) as a result of improvements (or reductions) in the credit rating
assigned to the domestic senior credit agreement by Moodys Investors Service and/or Standard &
Poors. However, this performance pricing is not expected to materially impact our liquidity or
capital resources in fiscal year 2008.
Please refer to Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements in this quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for further information regarding our debt obligations.
We have not declared or paid a cash dividend since July 2001 and we do not have any plans to
declare or pay any cash dividends. Our current credit agreement contains limitations on cash
dividend payments as well as other restricted payments.
48
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We own several non-controlling equity interests in power projects in Chile and Italy. Certain
of the projects have third-party debt that is not consolidated in our balance sheet. We have also
issued certain guarantees for the Chilean project. Please refer to Note 3 to the condensed
consolidated financial statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for further information
related to these projects.
Backlog and New Orders
The backlog of unfilled orders includes amounts based on signed contracts as well as agreed
letters of intent, which we have determined are legally binding and likely to proceed. Although
backlog represents only business that is considered likely to be performed, cancellations or scope
adjustments may and do occur. The elapsed time from the award of a contract to completion of
performance may be up to approximately four years. The dollar amount of backlog is not necessarily
indicative of our future earnings related to the performance of such work due to factors outside
our control, such as changes in project schedules, scope adjustments or project cancellations. We
cannot predict with certainty the portion of backlog to be performed in a given year. Backlog is
adjusted quarterly to reflect project cancellations, deferrals, revised project scope and cost, and
sales of subsidiaries, if any.
Backlog measured in Foster Wheeler scope reflects the dollar value of backlog excluding
third-party costs incurred by us on a reimbursable basis as agent or principal, which we refer to
as flow-through costs. Foster Wheeler scope measures the component of backlog with profit
potential and corresponds to our services plus fees for reimbursable contracts and total selling
price for fixed-price or lump-sum contracts.
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 28, 2008
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Global
|
|
|
Global
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global
|
|
|
Global
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E&C
|
|
|
Power
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E&C
|
|
|
Power
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Total
|
|
NEW ORDERS (FUTURE REVENUES)
BY PROJECT LOCATION :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
165,500
|
|
|
$
|
315,300
|
|
|
$
|
480,800
|
|
|
$
|
28,600
|
|
|
$
|
402,500
|
|
|
$
|
431,100
|
|
South America
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
11,700
|
|
|
|
12,700
|
|
|
|
4,300
|
|
|
|
5,300
|
|
|
|
9,600
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
267,500
|
|
|
|
191,000
|
|
|
|
458,500
|
|
|
|
224,900
|
|
|
|
60,100
|
|
|
|
285,000
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
182,200
|
|
|
|
18,200
|
|
|
|
200,400
|
|
|
|
337,300
|
|
|
|
70,800
|
|
|
|
408,100
|
|
Middle East
|
|
|
60,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,300
|
|
|
|
184,500
|
|
|
|
4,700
|
|
|
|
189,200
|
|
Australasia and other
|
|
|
30,800
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
31,000
|
|
|
|
93,100
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
93,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
707,300
|
|
|
$
|
536,400
|
|
|
$
|
1,243,700
|
|
|
$
|
872,700
|
|
|
$
|
543,800
|
|
|
$
|
1,416,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEW ORDERS (FUTURE REVENUES)
BY INDUSTRY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power generation
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
|
$
|
507,200
|
|
|
$
|
519,200
|
|
|
$
|
10,900
|
|
|
$
|
513,600
|
|
|
$
|
524,500
|
|
Oil refining
|
|
|
437,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
437,400
|
|
|
|
508,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508,800
|
|
Pharmaceutical
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
42,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,800
|
|
Oil and gas
|
|
|
110,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,300
|
|
|
|
173,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,100
|
|
Chemical/petrochemical
|
|
|
113,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,800
|
|
|
|
119,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,300
|
|
Power plant operation and maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,200
|
|
|
|
29,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,200
|
|
|
|
30,200
|
|
Environmental
|
|
|
9,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,700
|
|
|
|
4,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,200
|
|
Other, net of eliminations
|
|
|
5,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,700
|
|
|
|
13,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
707,300
|
|
|
$
|
536,400
|
|
|
$
|
1,243,700
|
|
|
$
|
872,700
|
|
|
$
|
543,800
|
|
|
$
|
1,416,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 28, 2008
|
|
|
March 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Global
|
|
|
Global
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global
|
|
|
Global
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E&C
|
|
|
Power
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E&C
|
|
|
Power
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Total
|
|
BACKLOG (FUTURE REVENUES)
BY CONTRACT TYPE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lump-sum turnkey
|
|
$
|
44,700
|
|
|
$
|
424,600
|
|
|
$
|
469,300
|
|
|
$
|
175,500
|
|
|
$
|
197,000
|
|
|
$
|
372,500
|
|
Other fixed-price
|
|
|
501,000
|
|
|
|
1,181,300
|
|
|
|
1,682,300
|
|
|
|
384,000
|
|
|
|
839,500
|
|
|
|
1,223,500
|
|
Reimbursable
|
|
|
6,635,100
|
|
|
|
179,800
|
|
|
|
6,814,900
|
|
|
|
4,026,300
|
|
|
|
121,400
|
|
|
|
4,147,700
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(2,900
|
)
|
|
|
(12,200
|
)
|
|
|
(15,100
|
)
|
|
|
(31,100
|
)
|
|
|
(6,100
|
)
|
|
|
(37,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,177,900
|
|
|
$
|
1,773,500
|
|
|
$
|
8,951,400
|
|
|
$
|
4,554,700
|
|
|
$
|
1,151,800
|
|
|
$
|
5,706,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BACKLOG (FUTURE REVENUES)
BY PROJECT LOCATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
271,900
|
|
|
$
|
879,200
|
|
|
$
|
1,151,100
|
|
|
$
|
186,400
|
|
|
$
|
662,200
|
|
|
$
|
848,600
|
|
South America
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
|
108,300
|
|
|
|
130,800
|
|
|
|
38,900
|
|
|
|
37,000
|
|
|
|
75,900
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
679,400
|
|
|
|
662,700
|
|
|
|
1,342,100
|
|
|
|
624,100
|
|
|
|
321,200
|
|
|
|
945,300
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
1,987,000
|
|
|
|
119,700
|
|
|
|
2,106,700
|
|
|
|
1,466,300
|
|
|
|
129,700
|
|
|
|
1,596,000
|
|
Middle East
|
|
|
770,300
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
770,900
|
|
|
|
1,568,500
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
1,569,100
|
|
Australasia and other
|
|
|
3,446,800
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,449,800
|
|
|
|
670,500
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
671,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,177,900
|
|
|
$
|
1,773,500
|
|
|
$
|
8,951,400
|
|
|
$
|
4,554,700
|
|
|
$
|
1,151,800
|
|
|
$
|
5,706,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BACKLOG (FUTURE REVENUES)
BY INDUSTRY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power generation
|
|
$
|
59,800
|
|
|
$
|
1,651,700
|
|
|
$
|
1,711,500
|
|
|
$
|
49,300
|
|
|
$
|
1,033,300
|
|
|
$
|
1,082,600
|
|
Oil refining
|
|
|
1,705,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,705,500
|
|
|
|
1,926,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,926,200
|
|
Pharmaceutical
|
|
|
42,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,900
|
|
|
|
105,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,800
|
|
Oil and gas
|
|
|
3,599,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,599,300
|
|
|
|
831,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
831,200
|
|
Chemical/petrochemical
|
|
|
1,749,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,749,700
|
|
|
|
1,506,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,506,700
|
|
Power plant operation and maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,800
|
|
|
|
121,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,500
|
|
|
|
118,500
|
|
Environmental
|
|
|
12,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,700
|
|
|
|
58,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,500
|
|
Other, net of eliminations
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
77,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,177,900
|
|
|
$
|
1,773,500
|
|
|
$
|
8,951,400
|
|
|
$
|
4,554,700
|
|
|
$
|
1,151,800
|
|
|
$
|
5,706,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOSTER WHEELER SCOPE
IN BACKLOG
|
|
$
|
1,803,600
|
|
|
$
|
1,760,600
|
|
|
$
|
3,564,200
|
|
|
$
|
1,601,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,138,500
|
|
|
$
|
2,740,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E&C MAN-HOURS
IN BACKLOG (in thousands)
|
|
|
14,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,200
|
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inflation
The effect of inflation on our financial results is minimal. Although a majority of our
revenues are realized under long-term contracts, the selling prices of such contracts, established
for deliveries in the future, generally reflect estimated costs to complete the projects in these
future periods. In addition, many of our projects are reimbursable at actual cost plus a fee,
while some of the fixed-price contracts provide for price adjustments through escalation clauses.
Application of Critical Accounting Estimates
Our condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Management and the Audit Committee
of our Board of Directors approve the critical accounting policies.
A full discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates is included in our 2007
Form 10-K. We did not have a significant change to the application of our critical accounting
policies and estimates during the first quarter of fiscal year 2008.
51
Accounting Developments
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. The standard is effective for financial assets and liabilities, as well as for any
other assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis,
in financial statements for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the
FASB issued a partial one-year deferral of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities
that are only subject to fair value measurement on a non-recurring basis. We have elected to defer
the application of SFAS No. 157 for our nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured at fair value
on a nonrecurring basis until the fiscal year beginning December 27, 2008, and are in the process
of assessing its impact on our financial position and results of operations related to such assets
and liabilities. Our financial assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value consist
primarily of the assets or liabilities arising from derivative financial instruments. The adoption
of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations. SFAS
No. 141R replaces SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations and changes the accounting treatment for
business acquisitions. SFAS No. 141R requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to
recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction and
establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Certain provisions of this standard will, among
other things, impact the determination of acquisition-date fair value of consideration paid in a
business combination (including contingent consideration); exclude transaction costs from
acquisition accounting; and change accounting practices for acquired contingencies,
acquisition-related restructuring costs, in-process research and development, indemnification
assets, and tax benefits. Most of the provisions of SFAS No. 141R apply prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is not permitted. We are
currently assessing the impact that SFAS No. 141R may have on our financial position, results of
operations and cash flows.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51. SFAS No. 160 amends the accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (often referred to as minority
interest) and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Under SFAS No. 160, the noncontrolling
interest in a subsidiary is reported as equity in the parent companys consolidated financial
statements. SFAS No. 160 also requires that the parent companys consolidated statement of
operations include both the parent and noncontrolling interest share of the subsidiarys statement
of operations. Formerly, the noncontrolling interest share was shown as a reduction of income on
the parents consolidated statement of operations. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and
interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. SFAS No. 160 is
to be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which this statement is
initially applied; however, presentation and disclosure requirements shall be applied
retrospectively for all periods presented. We are currently assessing the impact that SFAS No. 160
may have on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better
understand the effects of derivative instruments and hedging activities on an entitys financial
position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 changes the disclosure requirements
about the location and amounts of derivative instruments in an entitys financial statements, how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, and how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect the companys financial position, financial
performance and cash flows. Additionally, SFAS No. 161 requires disclosure of the fair values of
derivative instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular format. SFAS No. 161 also provides
more information about an entitys liquidity by requiring disclosure of derivative features that
are credit riskrelated. Finally, SFAS No. 161 requires cross-referencing within footnotes to
enable financial statement users to locate important information about derivative instruments. SFAS
No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. We are currently assessing the impact
that SFAS No. 161 may have on our financial statement disclosures.
52
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, there were no material changes in the market
risks as described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2007.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to
be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the Exchange Act), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include,
without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that the information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers,
or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we
recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and we necessarily are
required to apply our judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and
procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, our chief executive officer and our chief
financial officer carried out an evaluation, with the participation of our Disclosure Committee and
management, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and our chief
financial officer concluded, at the reasonable assurance level, that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting in the fiscal quarter
ended March 28, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
53
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Please refer to Note 12 to the condensed consolidated financial statements in this quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of legal proceedings, which is incorporated by reference in
this Part II.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Information regarding our risk factors appears in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2007, which we filed with the SEC on
February 26, 2008. There have been no material changes from those risk factors.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
We reported the information required pursuant to this Item with respect to the Special General
Meeting of Shareholders held on January 8, 2008 in Part I, Item 4 in our annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 28, 2007, which we filed with the SEC on February 26, 2008, and such
information is incorporated by reference herein.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
54
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Exhibits
|
3.1
|
|
Memorandum of Association of Foster Wheeler Ltd. (Filed as Annex II to Foster Wheeler
Ltd.s Form S-4/A (File No. 333-52468) filed on March 9, 2001, and incorporated herein by
reference.)
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Memoranda of Reduction of Share Capital and Memorandum of Increase in Share Capital each
dated December 1, 2004. (Filed as Exhibit 99.2 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.s Form 8-K, dated
November 29, 2004 and filed on December 2, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Designation relating to Foster Wheeler Ltd.s Series B Convertible
Preferred Shares, adopted on September 24, 2004. (Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Foster Wheeler
Ltd.s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 24, 2004, and incorporated herein by
reference.)
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Bye-Laws of Foster Wheeler Ltd., amended May 9, 2006. (Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Foster
Wheeler Ltd.s Form 8-K, dated May 9, 2006 and filed on May 12, 2006, and incorporated
herein by reference.)
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Memorandum of Increase of Share Capital dated February 7, 2008. (Filed as Exhibit 3.5 to
Foster Wheeler Ltd.s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2007, and
incorporated herein by reference.)
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Unofficial English Translation of Fixed Term Employment Agreement, effective as of April
1, 2008, between Foster Wheeler Continental Europe S.r.L. and Umberto della Sala. (Filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.s Form 8-K, dated February 22, 2008 and filed on
February 28, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2008, between Foster Wheeler Ltd. and Umberto
della Sala. (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.s Form 8-K, dated February 22,
2008 and filed on February 28, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of April 7, 2008, between Foster Wheeler Ltd. and Beth
Sexton.
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Raymond J.
Milchovich.
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Franco Baseotto.
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Raymond J. Milchovich.
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Franco Baseotto.
|
55
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOSTER WHEELER LTD.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: May 7, 2008
|
/s/ Raymond J. Milchovich
|
|
|
Raymond J. Milchovich
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 7, 2008
|
/s/ Franco Baseotto
|
|
|
Franco Baseotto
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer
|
|
56
Foster Wheeler (NASDAQ:FWLT)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2024 to Jun 2024
Foster Wheeler (NASDAQ:FWLT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2023 to Jun 2024