By John D. McKinnon and Rebecca Ballhaus
WASHINGTON -- An executive order President Trump is expected to
sign on Thursday would seek to limit the broad legal protection
that federal law currently provides to social-media and other
online platforms, according to a draft.
As drafted, the order would make it easier for federal
regulators to hold companies such as Twitter Inc. and Facebook Inc.
liable for unfairly curbing users' speech, for example, by
suspending their accounts or deleting their posts.
The draft, which has been viewed by The Wall Street Journal,
isn't yet finalized and is subject to change, people familiar with
the administration's deliberations said. It comes after Twitter on
Tuesday moved for the first time to apply a fact-checking notice to
tweets by the president on the subject of voter fraud. Mr. Trump in
a tweet on Tuesday accused the company of "stifling FREE SPEECH"
and vowed to take action.
The executive order would mark the Trump administration's most
aggressive effort to take action against social-media companies,
something the president has threatened to do for years to
counteract what he and many of his supporters see as their systemic
bias against conservative political positions.
The order would also likely be challenged in court, experts
said, on grounds that it oversteps the government's authority in
restricting the platforms' legal protections, which federal courts
have interpreted broadly. It also could be challenged on grounds
that it violates their First Amendment protections.
The White House declined to comment.
Facebook Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg, in a CNBC interview
aired Thursday, backed his stance of largely not interfering with
politicians' posts on the company's platform.
"I don't think Facebook or internet platforms in general should
be arbiters of truth," Mr. Zuckerberg said. "I think that's kind of
a dangerous line to get to in terms of deciding what is true and
what isn't."
Other tech-industry officials criticized the president's plan.
"All Americans should be concerned to find a U.S. president issuing
executive orders in response to a company that challenges the
veracity of his statements," said Matt Schruers, president of the
Computer & Communications Industry Association.
Jon Berroya, the interim president of the Internet Association,
another industry group, said: "Claims of so-called viewpoint bias
rely on isolated anecdotes that are undermined by the fact that
politicians and political groups successfully use social media to
reach millions of followers every day."
The White House order as drafted would seek to reshape the way
federal regulators view Twitter and other social-media companies --
not as hosts of speech but as monopolies that control millions of
Americans' daily experiences on their platforms.
"In a country that has long cherished the freedom of expression,
we cannot allow a limited number of online platforms to hand-pick
the speech that Americans may access and convey online," the draft
order says. "When large, powerful social media companies censor
opinions with which they disagree, they exercise a dangerous
power."
The draft order also lays groundwork for treating the platforms
as places where individuals' First Amendment rights should be
protected, terming them "a 21st-century equivalent of the public
square."
The draft order is far-reaching in scope, setting up multiple
ways for the government to attack what the administration views as
the problem of online censorship.
The most important way is by seeking to scale back the sweeping
legal protections that Washington established for online platforms
in the 1990s, in the internet's early days. Those protections were
created by Congress in Section 230 of the 1996 Communications
Decency Act. That law gives online companies broad immunity from
liability for their users' actions, as well as wide latitude to
police content on their sites.
Critics across the political spectrum have argued that the law
now provides the tech giants too much power, while the platforms
argue that it is essential to the internet's functioning.
In essence, the White House draft order would assert that tech
companies should lose their Section 230 protection if they take
action to discriminate against users or limit their access to a
platform without providing a fair hearing, or in ways that aren't
spelled out in the platform's terms of service.
The order would direct the Commerce Department to petition the
Federal Communications Commission to set up a rule-making
proceeding to clarify the scope of Section 230. A key focus of that
proceeding would be to determine when platforms have failed to live
up to their obligations to act in "good faith" under the law when
they police content.
Some experts say the FCC has no legal authority to enforce
Section 230.
Federal regulators, including the Federal Trade Commission, also
could begin to look into complaints of online bias once the
executive order is promulgated. A reporting tool the administration
set up earlier collected more than 16,000 complaints in a matter of
weeks, the draft order says. The FTC, for example, could begin to
take enforcement action against companies that limit users' speech
in a manner that isn't fully disclosed in their terms of service,
or is contrary to the platforms' public claims, on grounds that
that constitutes an unfair or deceptive trade practice.
The Justice Department also would convene a working group of
state attorneys general to look into complaints under the order,
and federal agencies would be directed to review their advertising
contracts with companies that engage in speech censorship.
Trump administration officials have been discussing the
executive order in various forms since 2018, as the president grew
increasingly frustrated with tech companies, people familiar with
the discussions said. In recent weeks, those discussions have
picked up again. In mid-May, Mr. Trump tweeted that the "Radical
Left" was in "total command & control" of Facebook, Instagram,
Twitter and Google and said the administration was "working to
remedy this illegal situation."
Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer of New York said in a
tweet on Thursday: "If President Trump doesn't like Twitter, he can
do everyone a favor and stop tweeting."
Write to John D. McKinnon at john.mckinnon@wsj.com and Rebecca
Ballhaus at Rebecca.Ballhaus@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
May 28, 2020 12:20 ET (16:20 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2020 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META)
Historical Stock Chart
From Aug 2024 to Sep 2024
Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META)
Historical Stock Chart
From Sep 2023 to Sep 2024