UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
|
(X)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For the
fiscal year ended February 3, 2008
or
|
(
)
TRANSITION REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
Commission
File Number
0-20269
DUCKWALL-ALCO
STORES, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Kansas
|
48-0201080
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
401
Cottage Street
Abilene,
Kansas
|
67410-2832
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant's
telephone number including area code:
(785)
263-3350
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
NONE
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value
$.0001 per share
(Title of
Class)
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes_____ No __
X
_
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes___ No _
X
__
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes
X
No
_____
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [X]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.
See definitions of “accelerated filer", "large accelerated filer” and "smaller
reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer [
] Accelerated filer [X] Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller
reporting company) [ ] Smaller reporting company [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ____ No _
_X
__
The
aggregate market value of the 3,809,341 shares of Common Stock, par value $.0001
per share, of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant is
$150,354,689 on July 30, 2007, based on a closing sale price of $39.47. As of
April 25, 2008, there were 3,810,591 shares of Common Stock
outstanding.
Documents
incorporated by reference: portions of the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the
2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III
hereof.
DUCKWALL-ALCO
FISCAL 2008 FORM 10-K
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART
I
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
|
Business.
|
|
3
|
|
Item
1A.
|
|
Risk
Factors.
|
|
5
|
|
Item
1B.
|
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments.
|
|
7
|
|
Item
2.
|
|
Properties.
|
|
7
|
|
Item
3.
|
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
|
7
|
|
Item
4.
|
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
PART
II
|
|
|
|
Item
5.
|
|
Market
for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities.
|
|
7
|
|
Item
6.
|
|
Selected
Financial Data.
|
|
9
|
|
Item
7.
|
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
|
10
|
|
Item
7A.
|
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
|
16
|
|
Item
8.
|
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
|
17
|
|
Item
9.
|
|
Changes
in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure.
|
|
31
|
|
Item
9A.
|
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
|
32
|
|
Item
9B.
|
|
Other
Information.
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
PART
III
|
|
|
|
Item
10.
|
|
Directors
and Executive Officers of the Registrant.
|
|
33
|
|
Item
11.
|
|
Executive
Compensation.
|
|
34
|
|
Item
12.
|
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters.
|
|
34
|
|
Item
13.
|
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions.
|
|
34
|
|
Item
14.
|
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services.
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
PART
IV
|
|
|
|
Item
15.
|
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules.
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART
I
ITEM
1. BUSINESS.
History
Duckwall-ALCO
Stores, Inc., (the “Company” or “Registrant”), was founded as a general
merchandising operation in 1901 in Abilene, Kansas by A. L. Duckwall. From its
founding until 1968, the Company conducted its retail operations as small
variety or “dime” stores. In 1968, the Company followed an emerging trend to
discount retailing when it opened its first ALCO discount store. The Company's
overall business strategy involves identifying and opening stores in towns that
will provide the Company with the highest return on investment. Although the
Company prefers markets that don’t have direct competition from national or
regional full-line discount stores, its strategy does not preclude it from
entering competitive markets. This strategy includes opening ALCO discount
stores. As of February 3, 2008, the Company operates 262 retail stores located
in the central United States, consisting of 204 ALCO retail discount stores and
58 Duckwall variety stores.
The
Company was incorporated on July 2, 1915 under the laws of Kansas. The Company's
executive offices are located at 401 Cottage Street, Abilene, Kansas 67410-2832,
and its telephone number is (785) 263-3350.
General
The
Company is a regional retailer operating 262 stores in 22 states in the central
United States. The Company's strategy is to target smaller markets not served by
other regional or national full-line retail discount chains and to provide the
most convenient access to retail shopping within each market. The Company's ALCO
discount stores offer a full line of merchandise consisting of approximately
35,000 items, including automotive, candy, crafts, domestics, electronics,
fabrics, furniture, hardware, health and beauty aids, housewares, jewelry,
ladies', men's and children's apparel and shoes, pre-recorded music and video,
sporting goods, seasonal items, stationery and toys. The Company's smaller
Duckwall variety stores offer a more limited selection of similar
merchandise.
Of the
Company's 204 ALCO discount stores, 157 stores are located in communities that
do not have another full-line discounter. The ALCO discount stores account for
95% of the Company's net sales. The current ALCO store averages 20,410 square
feet of selling space. However, the Company's store expansion program is
primarily directed toward opening stores with a design prototype of
approximately 21,500 square feet of selling space. Based on the Company’s
experience, the design of the Class 20 Stores produces the greatest return on
investment for newly opened stores.
All of
the Company's discount and variety stores are serviced by the Company's 352,000
square foot distribution center in Abilene, Kansas.
For 2008
and 2007, the percentage of sales by product category were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
of Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Merchandise
Category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumables
and commodities
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
Electronics,
entertainment, sporting goods, toys and outdoor living
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Apparel
and accessories
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Home
furnishings and décor
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Business
Strategy
The
Company intends to focus on executing a business strategy that includes the
following key components:
Markets:
The Company intends
to open ALCO stores primarily in towns with populations of typically less than
5,000 that are in trade areas with populations of less than 16,000 where: (1)
there is no direct competition from national or regional full-line discount
retailers; (2) economic and demographic criteria indicate the market is able to
commercially support a discount retailer; and (3) the opening of an ALCO store
would significantly reduce the likelihood of the entry into such market by
another full-line discount retailer. This key component of the Company's
strategy has guided the Company in both its opening of new stores and in its
closing of existing stores.
Market Selection:
The Company
utilizes a detailed process to analyze under-served markets which includes
examining factors such as distance from competition, trade area, demographics,
retail sales levels, existence and stability of major employers, location of
county government, disposable income, and distance from the Company’s
distribution center. Markets that are determined to be sizable enough to support
an ALCO and that have no direct competition from another full-line discount
retailer are examined closely and eventually selected or passed over by the
Company's experienced management team.
Store Expansion:
The
Company's expansion program is designed primarily around the prototype Class 20
Store. This prototype details shelf space, merchandise presentation, store items
to be offered, parking, storage requirements, as well as other store design
considerations. The 21,500 square feet of selling space is large enough to
permit a full line of the Company's merchandise, while minimizing capital
expenditures, labor costs and general overhead costs. The Company will also
consider opportunities in acceptable markets to open ALCO stores in available
space in buildings already constructed.
Technology
: The Company went
live on its Point-of-Sale (POS) system in the third quarter of fiscal 2007.
Financial Planning, Performance Analysis, and Merchandise Allocation systems
went live in the second quarter of fiscal 2007. The Company is expanding
functionality of its POS system during fiscal 2009; this includes, but is not
limited to, automated time and attendance, Corporate Daily Dashboard
intelligence and automating other manual store level functions.
Advertising and Promotion:
The Company utilizes full-color photography advertising circulars of eight to 24
pages distributed through newspaper insertion or, in the case of inadequate
newspaper coverage, through direct mail. During fiscal 2008, these circulars
were distributed 43 times in ALCO markets. In its Duckwall markets, the Company
discontinued advertising in fiscal year 2008. The Company’s marketing program is
designed to create awareness and recognition of its competitive pricing on a
comprehensive merchandise selection for the whole family. During fiscal 2009,
the Company will distribute approximately 40 circulars in ALCO
markets.
Store Environment:
The
Company's stores are open, clean, bright and offer a pleasant atmosphere with
disciplined product presentation, attractive displays and efficient check-out
procedures. The Company endeavors to staff its stores with courteous, highly
motivated, knowledgeable store associates in order to provide a convenient,
friendly and enjoyable shopping experience.
Store
Development
The
Company expects to open approximately 15 ALCO stores and relocate 3 smaller ALCO
stores to larger, prototype locations during fiscal year 2009. Of the
15 ALCO stores, four are Duckwall store conversions. In fiscal year 2008, the
Company converted two Duckwall and two Class 12 locations to Class 20 stores.
The Company's strategy regarding store development is to increase sales and
profitability at existing stores by continually refining the merchandising mix
and improving operating efficiencies, and through new store openings in the
Company's targeted base of under-served markets in the central United States.
The following table summarizes the Company's store development during the past
three fiscal years:
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
ALCO
|
|
Duckwall
|
|
ALCO
|
|
Duckwall
|
|
ALCO
|
|
Duckwall
|
Stores
Opened
|
18
|
|
-
|
|
7
|
|
-
|
|
7
|
|
1
|
Stores
Closed
|
3
|
|
9
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
10
|
|
13
|
Net
New Stores
|
15
|
|
(9)
|
|
6
|
|
(1)
|
|
(3)
|
|
(12)
|
As of
February 3, 2008, the Company owned four ALCO and one Duckwall location, and
leased 200 ALCO and 57 Duckwall locations. The Company's present intention is to
lease all new stores; however, the Company may own some of the ALCO locations.
The estimated investment to open a new prototype ALCO store that is leased is
approximately $800,000 for the equipment and inventory.
Store
Environment and Merchandising
The
Company manages its stores to attractively and conveniently display a full line
of merchandise within the confines of the stores' available square footage.
Corporate merchandising direction is provided to each store to ensure a
consistent company-wide store presentation. To facilitate long-term
merchandising planning, the Company divides its merchandise into three core
categories driven by the Company's customer profile: primary, secondary, and
convenience. The primary core receives management's primary focus, with a wide
assortment of merchandise being placed in the most accessible locations within
the stores and receiving significant promotional consideration. The secondary
core consists of categories of merchandise for which the Company maintains a
strong assortment that is easily and readily identifiable by its customers. The
convenience core consists of categories of merchandise for which ALCO will
maintain convenient (but limited) assortments, focusing on key items that are in
keeping with customers' expectations for a discount store. Secondary and
convenience cores include merchandise that the Company feels is important to
carry, as the target customer expects to find them within a discount store and
they ensure a high level of customer traffic. The Company continually evaluates
and ranks all product lines, shifting product classifications when necessary to
reflect the changing demand for products.
Purchasing
Procurement
and merchandising of products is directed by a staff of a Vice
President - General Merchandise Manager who is responsible for
specific product categories. The Company employs twenty merchandise buyers.
Buyers are assisted by a management information system that provides them with
current price, volume information and on-hand quantities by SKU (stock keeping
unit), thus allowing them to react quickly with buying and pricing adjustments
dictated by customer buying patterns.
The
Company purchases its merchandise from approximately 2,200 suppliers. The
Company generally does not utilize long-term supply contracts. Only one supplier
accounted for more than 5% of the Company's total purchases in fiscal 2008 and
competing brand name and private label products are available from other
suppliers at competitive prices. The Company believes that its relationships
with its suppliers are good and that the loss of any one or more of its
suppliers would not have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Pricing
The
Company's pricing strategy, with its promotional activities, is designed to
bring consistent value to the customer. In fiscal 2009, promotions on various
items will be offered approximately 40 times through advertising
circulars.
Distribution
and Transportation
The
Company operates a 352,000 square foot distribution center in Abilene, Kansas,
from which it services all stores. The distribution center is responsible for
distributing approximately 80% of the Company's merchandise, with the balance
being delivered directly to the Company's stores by its vendors. The
distribution center maintains an integrated management information system,
allowing the Company to utilize such cost cutting efficiencies as perpetual
inventories, safety programs, and employee productivity software.
Management
Information Systems
The
Company has committed significant resources to the purchase and application of
available computer hardware and software to its discount retailing operations
with the intent to lower costs, improve customer service and enhance general
business planning. In general, the Company's merchandising systems are designed
to integrate the key retailing functions of seasonal merchandise planning,
purchase order management, merchandise distribution, sales information and
inventory maintenance and replenishment. All of the Company's ALCO discount
stores have POS computer terminals that record certain sales data in a format
that can be transmitted nightly to the Company's data processing facility where
it is used to produce daily and weekly management reports. During the last five
fiscal years, the Company has devoted resources to development of systems that
have improved information available to management and improved specific
operational efficiencies.
Approximately
2,000 of the Company's merchandise suppliers currently participate in the
Company's electronic data interchange (“EDI”) system, which makes it possible
for the Company to place purchase orders electronically. A number of these
suppliers are able to utilize additional EDI functions, including transmitting
invoices and advance shipment notices to the Company and receiving sales history
from the Company. Refer to the section above: Business Strategy: Technology, for
additional discussion on the Company’s planned technology upgrades.
Store
Locations
As of
February 3, 2008, the Company operated 204 ALCO stores in 22 states located in
smaller communities in the central United States. The ALCO stores average
approximately 20,410 square feet of selling space, with an additional 5,000
square feet utilized for merchandise processing, temporary storage and
administration. The Company also operates 58 Duckwall stores in 9 states. The
geographic distribution of the Company's stores is as follows:
Duckwall
Stores
|
|
ALCO
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado
|
5
|
|
Arizona
|
8
|
|
Montana
|
1
|
Iowa
|
4
|
|
Arkansas
|
5
|
|
Nebraska
|
16
|
Kansas
|
23
|
|
Colorado
|
12
|
|
New
Mexico
|
9
|
Nebraska
|
6
|
|
Idaho
|
3
|
|
North
Dakota
|
8
|
New
Mexico
|
1
|
|
Georgia
|
3
|
|
Ohio
|
5
|
North
Dakota
|
2
|
|
Illinois
|
11
|
|
Oklahoma
|
8
|
Oklahoma
|
6
|
|
Indiana
|
14
|
|
South
Dakota
|
9
|
South
Dakota
|
2
|
|
Iowa
|
10
|
|
Texas
|
27
|
Texas
|
9
|
|
Kansas
|
28
|
|
Utah
|
6
|
|
|
|
Minnesota
|
11
|
|
Wisconsin
|
1
|
|
|
|
Missouri
|
6
|
|
Wyoming
|
3
|
Competition
While the
discount retail business in general is highly competitive, the Company's
business strategy is to locate its ALCO discount stores in smaller markets where
there is no direct competition with larger national or regional full-line
discount chains, and where it is believed no such competition is likely to
develop. Accordingly, the Company's primary method of competing is to offer its
customers a conveniently located store with a wide range of merchandise at
discount prices in a primary trade area population under 16,000 that does not
have a large national or regional full-line discount store. The Company believes
that trade area size is a significant deterrent to larger national and regional
full-line discount chains. Duckwall variety stores are located in very small
markets, and like the ALCO stores, emphasize the convenience of location to the
primary customer base.
In the
discount retail business in general, price, merchandise selection, merchandise
quality, advertising and customer service are all important aspects of
competing. The Company encounters direct competition with national full-line
discount stores in 32 of its ALCO markets, and another 15 ALCO stores are in
direct competition with regional full-line discount stores. The competing
regional and national full-line discount retailers are generally larger than the
Company and the stores of such competitors in the Company's markets are
substantially larger, have a somewhat wider selection of merchandise and are
very price competitive in some lines of merchandise. Where there are no national
or regional full-line discount retail stores directly competing with the
Company's ALCO stores, the Company's customers nevertheless shop at retail
discount stores and other retailers located in regional trade centers, and to
that extent the Company competes with such discount stores and retailers. The
Company also competes for retail sales with mail order companies, specialty
retailers, mass merchandisers, dollar stores, manufacturer’s outlets, and the
internet. In the 123 markets in which the Company operates a Class 18 Store,
only 23 markets have direct competition from a national or regional full-line
discount retailer. The Company competes with dollar stores in approximately 80
percent of its ALCO stores and approximately 30 percent of its Duckwall
stores.
Employees
As of
February 3, 2008, the Company employed approximately 4,675 people. Of these
employees, approximately 425 were employed in the general office and
distribution center in Abilene Kansas, and 4,250 in the store locations.
Additional employees are hired on a seasonal basis, most of whom are sales
personnel. We offer a broad range of company-paid benefits to our employees,
including a 401(k) plan, medical and dental plans, short-term and long-term
disability insurance, paid vacation and merchandise discounts. Eligibility for
and the level of these benefits varies depending on the employees' full-time or
part-time status and/or length of service. There is no collective bargaining
agent for any of the Company's employees. The Company considers its relations
with its employees to be excellent.
Seasonality
The Company, like that of most
retailers, is subject to seasonal influences. The Company’s highest
sales levels occur in the fourth quarter of its fiscal year, which includes the
Christmas holiday selling season. For more information on
seasonality, see “Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation – Seasonality and Quarterly
Results.”
Trademarks
and Service Marks
The names “Duckwall” and “ALCO” are
registered service marks of the Company. The Company considers these
marks and the accompanying name recognition to be valuable to the
business.
Available
Information
The Company’s internet website is
www.ALCOstores.com
. Through
the “Investors” portion of this website, we make available, free of charge, our
proxy statements, Annual Reports on Form 10-K, SEC Forms 3, 4 and 5 and any
amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such
material has been filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Charters of our Board of Directors’
Audit Committee and Compensation Committee; and Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics for Directors and Senior Officers as well as for Associates have also
been posted on our website, under the caption “Investors - Corporate
Governance.”
Information contained on the Company’s
website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The materials listed
above will be provided without charge to any stockholder submitting a written
request to the Company’s Secretary at 401 Cottage, Abilene, Kansas
67410-2832.
ITEM
1A. RISK
FACTORS.
The
Company encourages investors to carefully consider the risks described below and
other information contained in this document when considering an investment
decision with respect to he Company’s securities. Additional risks and
uncertainties not presently known to management, or that management currently
deems immaterial, may also impair the Company’s business operations. Any of the
events discussed in the risk factors below may occur. If one or more of these
events do occur, business, results of operations or financial condition could be
materially adversely affected. In that instance, the trading price of the
Company’s securities could decline, and investors might lose part or all of
their investment.
Economic
Conditions
Similar
to other retail businesses, the Company’s operations may be affected adversely
by general economic conditions and events which result in reduced consumer
spending in the markets served by its stores. Also, smaller communities where
the Company’s stores are located may be dependent upon a few large employers or
may be significantly affected by economic conditions in the industry upon which
the community relies for its economic viability, such as the agricultural
industry. This may make the Company’s stores more vulnerable to a downturn in a
particular segment of the economy than the Company’s competitors, which operate
in markets which are larger metropolitan areas where the local economy is more
diverse.
Competition
The
Company operates in the discount retail business, which is highly competitive.
Although the Company prefers markets that don’t have direct competition from
national or regional full-line discount stores, competition still exists. Even
in non-competitive markets, the Company’s customers shop at retail discount
stores and other retailers located in regional trade centers. The Company also
competes for retail sales with other entities, such as mail order companies,
specialty retailers, mass merchandisers, dollar stores, manufacturer’s outlets,
and the internet. This competitive environment subjects the Company to the risk
of reduced profitability because the Company may be forced to lower its prices,
resulting in lower margins, in order to maintain its competitive
position.
Store
Expansion
The
growth in the Company’s sales and operating net income depends to a substantial
degree on its expansion program. This expansion strategy is dependent upon the
Company’s ability to open and operate new stores effectively, efficiently, and
on a profitable basis. The Company prefers to locate its ALCO stores in smaller
retail markets where no competing full-line discount retail store is located
within the primary trade area. The Company’s ability to timely open new stores
and to expand into additional market areas depends in part on the following
factors: availability of store locations, the ability to hire and train new
store personnel, the ability to react to consumer needs and trends on a timely
basis, and the availability of sufficient capital for expansion.
Financing
In the
event we need additional financing, there can be no assurances that these funds
will be available on a timely basis or on reasonable terms. Failure to obtain
such financing could constrain our ability to operate or grow the business. In
addition, any ratings downgrade of our securities, or any negative impacts on
the credit market, generally, could negatively impact the cost or availability
of capital. We believe operating cash flows and current credit facilities will
be adequate to fund our working capital requirements, scheduled debt repayments,
and to support the development of our short-term and long-term operating
strategies.
Information
Technology
The
Company’s ability to utilize technology upgrades could have a material impact on
the Company’s results of operations. The Company depends on
information systems to process transactions, manage inventory, purchase, sell
and ship goods on a timely basis. Any material disruption or slowdown of our
systems could cause information to be lost or delayed which could have a
negative effect on our business.
Government
Regulation
The
Company is subject to numerous federal, state and local government laws and
regulations, including those relating to the development, construction and
operation of the Company’s stores. The Company is also subject to laws governing
its relationship with employees, including minimum wage requirements, laws and
regulations relating to overtime, working and safety conditions, and citizenship
requirements. Material increases in the cost of compliance with any applicable
law or regulation and similar matters could materially and adversely affect the
Company.
Internal
Control
The
Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting
includes: maintaining records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly
reflect our transactions; providing reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary for preparation of the financial statements; providing
reasonable assurance that our receipts and expenditures of our assets are made
in accordance with management authorization; and providing reasonable assurance
that unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have
a material effect on the financial statements would be prevented or detected on
a timely basis. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a
misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected. Any
failure to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial
reporting could limit our ability to report our financial results accurately and
timely or to detect and prevent fraud.
The
Company continues to refine and test its internal control over financial
reporting processes.
Quarterly
Fluctuations
Quarterly
results of operations have historically fluctuated as a result of retail
consumers purchasing patterns, with the highest quarter in terms of sales and
profitability being the fourth quarter. Quarterly results of operations will
likely continue to fluctuate significantly as a result of such patterns and may
fluctuate due to the timing of new store openings.
Stock
Price
No
assurance can be given that operating results will not vary from quarter to
quarter, and any fluctuations in quarterly operating results may result in
volatility in the Company’s stock price.
Dependence
on Officers
The
development of the Company’s business is largely dependent on the efforts of its
current management team headed by Donny R. Johnson and four other executive
officers. The loss of the services of one or more of these officers could have a
material adverse effect on the Company.
Interest
Rate Risk
The
Company is subject to market risk from exposure to changes in interest rates
based on its financing requirements. Changes in interest rates could have a
negative impact on the Company’s profitability.
ITEM
1B.
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF
COMMENTS.
|
None.
The
Company owns facilities in Abilene, Kansas that consist of a general office
(approximately 35,000 square feet), the Distribution Center (approximately
352,000 square feet) and additional warehouse space adjacent to the general
office (approximately 95,500 square feet).
Four of
the ALCO stores and one of the Duckwall stores operate in buildings owned by the
Company. The remainder of the stores operate in properties leased by the
Company. As of February 3, 2008, such ALCO leases account for approximately
5,100,000 square feet of lease space, which expire as follows: approximately
343,298 square feet (6.7%) expire between February 3, 2008 and February 1, 2009;
approximately 655,449 square feet (12.9%) expire between February 2, 2009 and
January 31, 2010; and approximately 655,449 square feet (12.9%) expire between
February 1, 2010 and January 30, 2011. The remainder of the leases expire
through 2023. All Duckwall store leases have terms remaining of fifty months or
less. The majority of the leases that are about to expire have renewal options
with lease terms that are the same as the existing lease.
ITEM
3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS.
|
Other
than routine litigation from time to time in the ordinary course of business,
the Company is not a party to any material litigation.
ITEM
4.
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VORE
OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
|
No
matters were submitted to a vote of the stockholders of the Company during the
fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended February 3, 2008.
PART II
ITEM
5.
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON
EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES.
|
The
Common Stock of the Company is quoted on the NASDAQ National Market tier of The
NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol “DUCK”. The following table sets forth the
range of high and low bid information for the Company's Common Stock for each
quarter of fiscal 2008 and 2007.
Fiscal
2008
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
First
quarter
|
|
|
|
$41.49
|
|
$34.44
|
Second
quarter
|
|
|
|
$40.50
|
|
$36.51
|
Third
quarter
|
|
|
|
$40.88
|
|
$35.13
|
Fourth
quarter
|
|
|
|
$37.00
|
|
$21.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2007
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
First
quarter
|
|
|
|
$26.70
|
|
$22.34
|
Second
quarter
|
|
|
|
$34.93
|
|
$25.40
|
Third
quarter
|
|
|
|
$38.54
|
|
$33.65
|
Fourth
quarter
|
|
|
|
$42.06
|
|
$33.77
|
The
following graph compares the cumulative total return of the Company, the NASDAQ
Stock Market Index, and the S&P Retail Index (assuming dividends reinvested
at the end of each subsequent fiscal year). The graph assumes $100 was invested
on February 1, 2003 in Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. Common Stock, the NASDAQ Stock
Market Index, and the S&P Retail Index.
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
NASDAQ
Composite Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
156.42
|
|
|
|
154.12
|
|
|
|
174.44
|
|
|
|
184.38
|
|
|
|
182.70
|
|
S&P
Retail Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
148.35
|
|
|
|
169.05
|
|
|
|
182.31
|
|
|
|
201.55
|
|
|
|
167.80
|
|
Duckwall-ALCO
Stores, Inc.
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
156.04
|
|
|
|
194.79
|
|
|
|
266.56
|
|
|
|
376.88
|
|
|
|
227.71
|
|
Based
upon the data reflected in the table, a $100 investment in the Company's Common
Stock would have a total return value of $227.71 at February 3, 2008, as
compared to $182.70 for the Composite NASDAQ Index and $167.80 for the S&P
Retail Index.
There can
be no assurances that the Company's stock performance will continue into the
future with the same or similar trends depicted in the graph
above. The Company does not make or endorse any predictions as to
future stock performance. We did not sell any equity securities during
fiscal 2008 which were not registered under the Securities Act.
As of
April 25, 2008, there were approximately
1,200 holders of record
of the Common Stock of the Company. The Company has not paid cash dividends on
its Common Stock during the last five fiscal years. The terms of the
Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of January 18, 2008, between the Company
and Bank of America allow for the payment of dividends unless certain loan
covenants are triggered, which are not expected to occur during fiscal
2009.
Company
Repurchases of Common Stock
The
Company did not repurchase any shares of the Common Stock during the fourth
quarter ended February 3, 2008.
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered
Securities
The Company did not sell any equity
securities during fiscal 2008 that were not registered under the Securities
Act.
Securities
Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
See the information provided in the
“Equity Compensation Plan Information” section of the Proxy Statement for our
June 4, 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which information is incorporated
herein by reference.
ITEM
6. SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA.
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
DATA
(Dollars in
thousands, except per share and store data)
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
53
Weeks
|
|
|
52
Weeks
|
|
|
52
Weeks
|
|
|
52
Weeks
|
|
|
52
Weeks
|
|
|
|
February
3,
|
|
|
January
28,
|
|
|
January
29,
|
|
|
January
30,
|
|
|
February
1,
|
|
Statement
of Operations Data
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
499,032
|
|
|
|
467,321
|
|
|
|
425,756
|
|
|
|
400,545
|
|
|
|
390,331
|
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
341,393
|
|
|
|
318,999
|
|
|
|
289,621
|
|
|
|
267,105
|
|
|
|
259,123
|
|
Gross
margin
|
|
|
157,639
|
|
|
|
148,322
|
|
|
|
136,135
|
|
|
|
133,440
|
|
|
|
131,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses (SG&A) (1)
|
|
|
144,937
|
|
|
|
130,445
|
|
|
|
122,705
|
|
|
|
119,825
|
|
|
|
115,198
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization (4)
|
|
|
9,817
|
|
|
|
6,868
|
|
|
|
5,873
|
|
|
|
6,333
|
|
|
|
6,735
|
|
Income
from continuing operations
|
|
|
2,885
|
|
|
|
11,009
|
|
|
|
7,557
|
|
|
|
7,282
|
|
|
|
9,275
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
3,382
|
|
|
|
2,730
|
|
|
|
1,272
|
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
Earnings
(loss) from continuing operations before
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
income
taxes and discontinued operations
|
|
|
(497
|
)
|
|
|
8,279
|
|
|
|
6,285
|
|
|
|
6,051
|
|
|
|
7,889
|
|
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
2,893
|
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
|
|
2,077
|
|
|
|
2,387
|
|
Earning
(loss) from continuing operations before
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
5,386
|
|
|
|
4,575
|
|
|
|
3,974
|
|
|
|
5,502
|
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
income tax
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
(2,626
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
Net
earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
5,704
|
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
|
3,923
|
|
|
|
6,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
share information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) per share - basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) before discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
1.42
|
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
|
|
1.30
|
|
Discontinued
operations
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
Net
earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
1.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) per share - diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) before discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
1.27
|
|
Discontinued
operations
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
Net
earnings
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
3,807,033
|
|
|
|
3,792,202
|
|
|
|
4,083,798
|
|
|
|
4,391,538
|
|
|
|
4,243,441
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
3,807,033
|
|
|
|
3,828,928
|
|
|
|
4,117,922
|
|
|
|
4,464,416
|
|
|
|
4,343,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stores
open at year-end
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
Stores
in non-competitive markets at year-end (2)
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
of total stores in non-competitive markets (2)
|
|
|
82.06
|
%
|
|
|
86.72
|
%
|
|
|
88.45
|
%
|
|
|
86.84
|
%
|
|
|
87.12
|
%
|
Net
sales of stores in non-competitive markets (2)
|
|
$
|
391,913
|
|
|
$
|
404,196
|
|
|
$
|
381,863
|
|
|
$
|
366,637
|
|
|
$
|
363,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
of net sales from stores in non-competitive markets (2)
|
|
|
78.54
|
%
|
|
|
85.05
|
%
|
|
|
87.78
|
%
|
|
|
84.59
|
%
|
|
|
83.99
|
%
|
Same-store
sales increase for all stores (3)
|
|
|
0.80
|
%
|
|
|
6.02
|
%
|
|
|
3.12
|
%
|
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
|
|
0.98
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-store sales increase for
stores in
non-competitive markets (2)(3)
|
|
|
3.31
|
%
|
|
|
6.43
|
%
|
|
|
3.67
|
%
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
|
|
2.09
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
185,386
|
|
|
$
|
195,420
|
|
|
$
|
178,922
|
|
|
$
|
163,118
|
|
|
$
|
167,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt (includes capital
lease
obligation and current maturities)
|
|
|
33,013
|
|
|
|
29,988
|
|
|
|
26,240
|
|
|
|
8,605
|
|
|
|
10,876
|
|
Stockholders'
equity
|
|
|
107,172
|
|
|
|
106,060
|
|
|
|
102,147
|
|
|
|
114,676
|
|
|
|
109,193
|
|
(1)
|
Effective
January 29, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS no 123(R),
Share-Based Payments
.
Included in selling, general and administrative expenses is $1.1 million
of share-based compensation expense in fiscal 2008 and $821 in fiscal
2007, respectively. No expense was recorded for share-based
compensation in earlier
years.
|
(2)
|
“Non-competitive”
markets
refer to those markets where there is not a national or regional full-line
discount store located in the primary market served by the Company. The
Company's stores in such non-competitive markets nevertheless face
competition from various sources. See Item 1
“Business-Competition”.
|
(3)
|
Percentages,
as adjusted to a comparable 52 week year, reflect the increase or decrease
based upon a comparison of the applicable fiscal year with the immediately
preceding fiscal year for stores open during the entirety of both
years. For fiscal 2008, sales were reduced by the week 53
amount.
|
(4)
|
In
fiscal 2008, a provision for asset impairment of $2.1 million is included
in depreciation and amortization.
|
ITEM
7.
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATION.
|
Overview
Operations
. The Company is a
regional discount retailer operating in 22 states in the central United
States.
The
Company’s fiscal year ends on the Sunday closest to January 31. Fiscal year 2008
consisted of 53 weeks, fiscal years 2007 and 2006 each consisted of 52 weeks.
For purposes of this management's discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations, the financial numbers are presented in
thousands.
Strategy.
The Company's
overall business strategy involves identifying and opening stores in towns that
will provide the Company with the highest return on investment. Although the
Company prefers markets that do not have direct competition from national or
regional full-line discount stores, its strategy does not preclude it from
entering competitive markets. Even in non-competitive markets, competition still
exists, as the Company's customers still shop at retail discount stores and
other retailers located in regional trade centers. The Company also competes for
retail sales with other entities, such as mail order companies, specialty
retailers, mass merchandisers, dollar stores, manufacturer's outlets, and the
internet.
The
Company is constantly evaluating the appropriate mix of merchandise to improve
sales and gross margin performance. The Company uses centralized purchasing,
merchandising, pricing and warehousing to obtain volume discounts, improve
efficiencies and achieve consistency among stores and the best overall results.
The Company utilizes information obtained from its POS system and regular input
from its store associates to determine its merchandise offerings.
The
Company, when appropriate, implements new merchandising and marketing
initiatives in an effort to increase customer traffic and same-store sales. The
Company is changing its focus from consumable products that carry a lower margin
to higher margin soft goods. This includes more fashion apparel that will appeal
to a broad base of customers. The Company is also adding new items to its
assortments and has made changes to its advertising program that reduces the
number of items advertised, but increases the frequency of the
advertising.
Recent Events.
On
January 18, 2008, the Company closed on an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
(the "Facility") with Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Retail Finance, LLC.
The $105 million Facility has a term of three years and replaces the Company's
previous revolving credit facility which was in the amount of $70
million.
The
amount advanced (through a note or letters of credit) to the Company bears
interest at (i) the higher of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus ½ of 1% or (b)
Bank of America, N.A. prime rate plus a margin, as defined in the Facility,
which varies based on the amount outstanding or (ii) based on the LIBOR rate
plus a margin, as defined in the Facility. The amount advanced is
generally limited to 85% of eligible inventory and eligible receivables.
The loan agreement contains various restrictions that are applicable when
outstanding borrowings reach certain thresholds, including limitations on
additional indebtedness, prepayments, acquisition of assets, granting of liens,
certain investments and payments of dividends.
On
February 22, 2008, former President and Chief Executive Officer Bruce C. Dale
resigned. Senior Vice President – Chief Financial Officer Donny R.
Johnson was named Interim President and Chief Executive Officer. Vice
President – Controller Jon A. Ramsey was named Interim Chief Financial
Officer. On April 11, 2008
the
Company announced that four members of corporate management were
terminated: John Sturdivant, Senior Vice President Store
Operations; Ron Mapp, Senior Vice President Merchandising; Mike Gawin, Vice
President and Divisional Merchandise Manager Softlines; and Virginia Meyer, Vice
President Marketing.
During
the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company has had changes made to its board
of directors. These have been reported by the Company on various 8-K
filings.
During
fiscal 2008, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $2.1 million to
write-down long-lived assets such as store fixtures and leasehold improvements
to their estimated fair value for 14 stores (10 ALCO stores and 4 Duckwall
stores) to be closed in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Management anticipates
additional costs related to the store closings, primarily future lease costs
(net of estimated sublease income) and severance costs of $1.5 to $1.8 million
will be recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
Items Impacting Specific Periods.
The Company had items impacting specific periods. During the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 the Company experienced store physical inventory
shrinkage $795 higher than expected.
Key Items in Fiscal 2008.
The
Company measures itself against a number of financial metrics to assess its
performance. Some of the important financial items during fiscal 2008
were:
|
·
|
Net
sales increased 6.8% to $499,032. Same store sales increased 2.8% compared
to the prior year.
|
|
·
|
Gross
margin decreased to 31.6% of sales, compared to 31.7% in the prior
year.
|
|
·
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses were 29.0% of sales, compared to 27.9%
in the prior year.
|
|
·
|
Net
earnings (loss) per share was $(0.05), compared to earnings of $1.49 per
share in the prior year.
|
|
·
|
Return
on average equity was (0.2) %, compared to 5.5% in the prior
year.
|
Same
store sales growth is a measure which may indicate whether existing stores are
maintaining their market share. Other factors, such as the overall economy, may
also affect same store sales. The Company defines same stores as those stores
that were open as of the first day of the prior fiscal year and remain open at
the end of the reporting period (this may also be referred to
as same-stores).
Gross
margin percentage is a key measure of the Company's ability to maximize profit
on the purchase and subsequent sale of merchandise, while minimizing promotional
and clearance markdowns, shrinkage, damage, and returns. Gross margin percentage
is defined as sales less cost of sales, expressed as a percentage of
sales.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses are a measure of the Company’s ability to
manage and control its expenses to purchase, distribute and sell
merchandise.
Earnings
per share ("EPS") growth is an indicator of the returns generated for the
Company's stockholders. EPS from continuing operations was $(0.06) per basic
share for fiscal 2008, compared to $1.41 per diluted share for the prior fiscal
year. Return on average equity is a measure of how much income was
produced on the average equity of the Company.
Results of Operations.
The
following table sets forth, for the fiscal years indicated, the components of
the Company's consolidated statements of operations expressed as a percentage of
net sales:
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
53
Weeks
|
|
|
52
Weeks
|
|
|
52
Weeks
|
|
|
|
February
3,
|
|
|
January
28,
|
|
|
January
29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
68.4
|
|
|
|
68.3
|
|
|
|
68.0
|
|
Gross
margin
|
|
|
31.6
|
|
|
|
31.7
|
|
|
|
32.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
29.0
|
|
|
|
27.9
|
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
29.3
|
|
|
|
30.2
|
|
Income
from continuing operations
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Earnings
(loss) from continuing operations before income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
taxes
and discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Earnings
(loss) from continuing operations before discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Net
earnings (loss)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
%
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our
analysis of operations and financial condition is based on our consolidated
financial statements, prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP). Preparation of these consolidated financial
statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements,
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period and
related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. In the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements, we describe our significant accounting
policies used in preparing the consolidated financial statements. Our estimates
are evaluated on an ongoing basis and are drawn from historical experience and
other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.
Actual results could differ under different assumptions or conditions. The
following items in our consolidated financial statements require significant
estimation or judgment:
Inventory
: As discussed in
Note 1(d) to the Consolidated Financial Statements, inventories are stated at
the lower of cost or net realizable value with cost determined using the
last-in, first-out “LIFO” method. Merchandise inventories in our stores are
valued by the retail method. The retail method is widely used in the retail
industry due to its practicality. Under the retail method, cost is determined by
applying a calculated cost-to-retail ratio across groupings of similar items,
known as departments. As a result, the retail method results in an averaging of
inventory costs across similar items within a department. The cost-to-retail
ratio is applied to ending inventory at its current owned retail valuation to
determine the cost of ending inventory on a department basis. Current owned
retail represents the retail price for which merchandise is offered for sale on
a regular basis reduced for any permanent or clearance markdowns. Use
of the retail method does not eliminate the use of management judgments and
estimates, including markdowns and shrinkage, which significantly impact the
ending inventory valuation at cost and the resulting gross margins. The Company
continually evaluates product categories to determine if markdown action is
appropriate, or if a markdown reserve should be established. The Company
recognizes that the use of the retail method will result in valuing inventories
at lower of cost or market if markdowns are currently taken as a reduction of
the retail value of inventories. Management believes that the retail
method provides an inventory valuation which reasonably approximates cost and
results in carrying inventory at the lower of cost or market. For LIFO, the
Company determines lower of cost or market by pool.
Insurance
: The Company
retains significant deductibles on its insurance policies for workers
compensation, general liability and medical claims. Due to the fact that it
takes more than one year to determine the actual costs, these costs are
estimated based on the Company’s historical loss experience and estimates from
the insurance carriers and consultants. The Company completes an actuarial
evaluation of its loss experience twice each year. In between actuarial
evaluations, management monitors the cost and number of claims and compares
those results to historical amounts. The Company’s actuarial method is the fully
developed method. This method includes a loss conversion factor that includes
administrative, legal and claims handling expenses. The Company records its
reserves on an undiscounted basis. The Company’s prior estimates have varied
based on changes in assumptions related to actual claims versus estimated
ultimate loss calculations. Current and future estimates could be affected by
changes in those same assumptions and are reasonably likely to
occur.
Consideration received from
vendors:
Cost of
sales and SG&A expenses are partially offset by various forms of
consideration received from our vendors. This “vendor income” is
earned for a variety of vendor-sponsored programs, such as volume rebates,
markdown allowances, promotions, warehouse cost reimbursement and
advertising. Consideration received, to the extent that it reimburses
specific, incremental, and identifiable costs incurred to date, is recorded in
selling, general and administrative expenses in the same period as the
associated expenses are incurred. Reimbursements received that are in excess of
specific, incremental and identifiable costs incurred to date are recognized as
a reduction to the cost of the merchandise and are reflected in costs of sales
as the merchandise is sold. The Company establishes a receivable for
the vendor income that is earned but not yet received. Based on
provisions of the agreements in place, this receivable is computed by estimating
when the Company has completed its performance and the amount has been
earned. The majority of year-end receivables associated with these
activities are collected within the following fiscal quarter.
Analysis of long-lived assets
for impairment:
The
Company reviews assets for impairment at the lowest level for which there are
identifiable cash flows, usually at the store level. The carrying
amount of assets is compared with the expected undiscounted future cash flows to
be generated by those assets over their estimated remaining economic
lives. If the undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying
amount of the asset, the asset is written down to fair value.
Factors
that could result in an impairment review include, but are not limited to, a
current period cash flow loss combined with a history of cash flow losses or a
projection that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a
long-lived asset or significant changes in a manner of use of the assets due to
business strategies or competitive environment. Additionally, when a commitment
is made to close a store beyond the quarter in which the disclosure commitment
is made, it is reviewed for impairment and depreciable lives are adjusted.
The
impairment evaluation is based on the estimated cash flows from continuing use
until the expected disposal date plus the expected terminal value.
Actual results could vary from
management estimates.
Income Taxes:
The Company
adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board, (“FASB”)
interpretation No 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”), on January 29, 2007.
FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement standard for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. The recognition and measurement of tax
benefits is often highly judgmental. Determinations regarding the recognition
and measurement of a tax benefit can change as additional developments occur
relative to the issue. Accordingly, the Company’s future results may include
favorable or unfavorable adjustments to our unrecognized tax
benefits.
The
Company records valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets, when
necessary, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 109,
“Accounting for Income
Taxes.”
Realization of deferred tax assets (such as net operating loss
carryforwards) is dependent on future taxable earnings and is therefore
uncertain. The Company will assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets
in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates will be recovered from future
taxable income. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to
recognize the extent to which, more likely than not, the future tax benefits
will not be realized.
Share-Based Payments:
Effective January 30, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123 "
Share-Based Payment
" ("SFAS
123(R)") and began recognizing share-based compensation expense for its
share-based payments based on the fair value of the awards. Share-based payments
consist of stock option grants. SFAS 123(R) requires share-based compensation
expense recognized since January 30, 2006 to be based on the following: a) grant
date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123
for unvested options granted prior to the adoption date and b) grant date fair
value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R) for all
share-based payments granted subsequent to the adoption date. For Executives and
Directors, the Company estimates a forfeiture rate. For
non-Executives, the Company estimates a higher forfeiture rate. An actual
turnover rate, lower or higher than historical trends, and changes in estimated
forfeiture rates would impact the share-based compensation expense recorded by
the Company.
Fiscal
2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
Net sales
for fiscal 2008 increased $31.7 million or 6.8% to $499.0 million compared to
$467.3 million for fiscal 2007. During fiscal 2008, the Company opened eighteen
ALCO stores. Three ALCO stores were closed and nine Duckwall stores were closed
and two were replaced by an ALCO store, resulting in a year end total of 262
stores. Net sales for all stores open the full year in both fiscal 2008 and 2007
(same stores), increased by $12.7 million or 2.8% in fiscal 2008 compared to
fiscal 2007. The average sale for fiscal 2008 increased 2.6% compared to fiscal
2007. The Company had two of its merchandise departments experience greater than
15% increase in sales for fiscal 2008 when compared to fiscal 2007 and had one
of its merchandise departments experience greater than 20% decrease in sales for
the same periods.
Gross
margin for fiscal 2008 increased $9.3 million, or 6.3%, to $157.6 million
compared to $148.3 million in fiscal 2007. As a percentage of net sales, gross
margin decreased to 31.6% in fiscal 2008 compared to 31.7% in fiscal
2007. Fiscal 2008 gross margin was positively impacted by an increased
initial mark-on percentage, offset by reduced vendor participation and
additional shrinkage reserve.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased $14.5 million or 11.1% to $144.9
million in fiscal 2008 compared to $130.4 million in fiscal 2007. As a
percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses were 29.0%
in fiscal 2008 and 27.9% in fiscal 2007. The increase in selling, general
and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales was due in part to
decreased vendor participation in CO-OP advertising, increased
payroll, credit card fees, advertising, utilities, new store rents and
professional services and software maintenance fees associated with rollout of
IT initiative.
Depreciation
and amortization expense increased $2.9 million or 42.9% to $9.8 million in
fiscal 2008 compared to $6.9 million in fiscal 2007. The increase is
attributable to a full year depreciation on stores opened in fiscal 2007, new
stores opened in fiscal 2008 and a long-lived asset impairment of $2.1
million.
Income
from continuing operations decreased $8.1 million, or (73.8%), to $2.9 million
in fiscal 2008 compared to $11.0 million in fiscal 2007. Income from continuing
operations as a percentage of net sales was 0.6% in fiscal 2008 compared to 2.4%
in fiscal 2007.
Interest
expense increased $652 or 23.9%, to $3.4 million in fiscal 2008 compared to $2.7
million in fiscal 2007. The increase in interest expense was attributable to
increased borrowings by the Company during fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007.
Interest expense may increase if the Company expands its borrowing to fund
capital expenditures or other programs.
Income
taxes on continuing operations were ($252) in fiscal 2008 compared to $2.9
million in fiscal 2007. The Company's effective tax rate was 50.7% in fiscal
2008 and 34.9% in fiscal 2007. The effective tax rate is higher due to the
decrease in fiscal 2008 net income before taxes and the relationship
of net income before taxes to the permanent adjustments.
Therefore, because the permanent adjustments make up a much
larger percentage of net income before taxes, such adjustments yield a much
larger percentage increase in the income tax rate. The permanent adjustments are
similar to fiscal 2007 and were primarily driven by the benefit of federal
credits, share-based compensation expense, and an increase in the overall state
tax rate.
Income
from discontinued operations, net of income taxes was $21 in fiscal 2008,
compared to $318 in fiscal 2007.
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Net sales
for fiscal 2007 increased $41.5 million or 9.8% to $467.3 million compared to
$425.8 million for fiscal 2006. During fiscal 2007, the Company opened seven
ALCO stores. One ALCO was closed and one Duckwall store was closed and replaced
by an ALCO store, resulting in a year end total of 256 stores. Net sales for all
stores open the full year in both fiscal 2007 and 2006 (same stores), increased
by $25.6 million or 6.0% in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006. The average
sale for fiscal 2007 increased 7.2% compared to fiscal 2006. The Company had
four of its merchandise departments experience greater than 15% increase in
sales for fiscal 2007 when compared to fiscal 2006.
Gross
margin for fiscal 2007 increased $12.2 million, or 9.0%, to $148.3 million
compared to $136.1 million in fiscal 2006. As a percentage of net sales, gross
margin decreased to 31.7% in fiscal 2007 compared to 32.0% in fiscal 2006.
Fiscal 2007 gross margin was positively impacted by and increased vendor
participation support, offset by increased transportation
costs.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased $7.7 million or 6.3% to $130.4
million in fiscal 2007 compared to $122.7 million in fiscal 2006. As a
percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses were 27.9%
in fiscal 2007 and 28.8% in fiscal 2006. The decrease in selling, general and
administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales was due in part to an
increase in vendor participation in CO-OP advertising, offset by increased
payroll, increase in expenses related to stock options, increase in credit card
fees, increase in advertising, professional services and software maintenance
fees associated with rollout of IT initiative and increase in utilities and new
store rents.
Depreciation
and amortization expense increased $1.0 million or 16.9% to $6.9 million in
fiscal 2007 compared to $5.9 million in fiscal 2006. The increase in
depreciation and amortization expense was attributable to a full year’s
depreciation on capitalized software which was purchased in the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2006.
Income
from continuing operations increased $3.4 million, or 45.7%, to $11.0 million in
fiscal 2007 compared to $7.6 million in fiscal 2006. Income from continuing
operations as a percentage of net sales was 2.4% in fiscal 2007 compared to 1.8%
in fiscal 2006. The increase in gross margin, as described above, had the
largest impact on the increased income from continuing operations.
Interest
expense increased $1.4 million or 114.6%, to $2.7 million in fiscal 2007
compared to $1.3 million in fiscal 2006. The increase in interest expense was
attributable to increased borrowings by the Company during fiscal 2007 compared
to fiscal 2006.
Income
taxes on continuing operations were $2.9 million in fiscal 2007 compared to $1.7
million in fiscal 2006. The Company's effective tax rate was 34.9% in fiscal
2007 and 27.2% in fiscal 2006. The effective tax rate is higher due to permanent
tax differences relating to share-based compensation expense and reversal of
over-accrual of approximately $371 during the fourth quarter of
2006.
Income
from discontinued operations, net of income taxes was $318 in fiscal 2007,
compared to a loss of $2.6 million in fiscal 2006.
SG&A Detail; Certain
Financial Matters
The
Company has included EBITDA, a non-GAAP performance measure, as part of its
disclosure as a means to enhance its communications with stockholders. Certain
stockholders have specifically requested this information as a means of
comparing the Company to other retailers that disclose similar non-GAAP
performance measures. Further, management utilizes this measure in internal
evaluation; review of performance and to compare the Company’s financial measure
to that of its peers. EBITDA differs from the most comparable GAAP financial
measure (earnings from continuing operations before discontinued operations) in
that it does not include non-cash items. As a result, it may not reflect
important aspects of the results of the Company’s operations.
|
|
For
the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
53
Weeks
|
|
|
52
Weeks
|
|
SG&A
Expenses Breakout
|
|
February
3, 2008
|
|
|
January
28, 2007
|
|
General
office
|
|
$
|
21,641
|
|
|
|
19,021
|
|
Distribution
center
|
|
|
9,327
|
|
|
|
9,225
|
|
401K
expense
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
Same-store
SG&A
|
|
|
101,413
|
|
|
|
97,183
|
|
Non same-store
SG&A (1)
|
|
|
10,946
|
|
|
|
3,717
|
|
Share-based
compensation expense
|
|
|
1,130
|
|
|
|
821
|
|
Final
SG&A as reported
|
|
$
|
144,937
|
|
|
|
130,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
(2)
|
|
|
-0.21
|
%
|
|
|
5.48
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
499,032
|
|
|
$
|
467,321
|
|
SG&A
as % of sales
|
|
|
29.04
|
%
|
|
|
27.91
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A
per average selling square foot
|
|
$
|
33.75
|
|
|
$
|
31.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
(3)
|
|
$
|
13,832
|
|
|
$
|
18,698
|
|
EBITDA
per average selling square foot (4)
|
|
$
|
3.22
|
|
|
$
|
4.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
per average selling square feet (5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALCO
|
|
$
|
118.87
|
|
|
$
|
116.46
|
|
Duckwall
|
|
$
|
80.82
|
|
|
$
|
80.45
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
116.21
|
|
|
$
|
113.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
inventory per average selling square feet (5)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALCO
(7)
|
|
$
|
27.37
|
|
|
$
|
30.64
|
|
Duckwall
|
|
$
|
20.21
|
|
|
$
|
23.60
|
|
Total
(7)
|
|
$
|
26.83
|
|
|
$
|
30.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
selling square feet (in thousands) (5)
|
|
|
4,294
|
|
|
|
4,104
|
|
Average
square feet % change
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
stores operating beginning of period
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
Total
stores operating end of period
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Data: (8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-store
sales change
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Same-store
gross margin percentage change
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
-.05
|
%
|
Same-store
SG&A percentage change
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
Total
customer count change
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
Average
sale per ticket change
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
Non same-stores are those stores opened in Fiscal 2008 & Fiscal
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
Return on average equity (ROE) is calculated as net earnings (loss)
divided by average stockholders' equity
|
|
Average
Stockholders' Equity is calculated as (beginning of period stockholders'
equity plus end of period stockholders' equity) divided by
2
|
|
(3)
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure and is calculated as
earnings (loss) from continuing operations before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization, and stock option expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
Adjusted EBITDA per selling square foot is a non-GAAP financial measure
and is calculated as EBITDA divided by selling square
feet.
|
|
(5)
Average selling square feet is (beginning square feet plus ending square
feet) divided by 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
Average inventory is (beginning inventory plus ending inventory) divided
by 2. This includes only the merchandise inventory at store
level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7)
Excludes inventory for unopened stores.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8)
Fiscal 2008 amounts are for 53 weeks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008 Compared to Fiscal
2007
General
Office expenses for fiscal 2008 increased $2.6 million, or 13.8%. The
increase is primarily due to:
·
|
increased
payroll and benefits of $1.8 million
|
·
|
increased
professional fees of $376
|
·
|
decreased
information technology systems related expenses of
$296
|
Distribution
center expenses increased $102, or 1.1%. C
ontract
transportation expenses are capitalized into inventory and included in cost
of goods sold.
Same-store
SG&A expenses increased $4.2 million, or 4.4%. The increase is primarily due
to:
·
|
increased
information technology systems related expenses of $1.8
million
|
·
|
increased
floor care expenses of $1.4 million
|
·
|
increased
real property rent of $432
|
·
|
increased
utilities of $367
|
·
|
decreased
payroll and benefits of $168
|
·
|
decreased
personal and real property taxes of
$332
|
Non
same-store SG&A expenses increased $7.2 million. The Company opened 18
stores in 2008 and seven in 2007.
Reconciliation and
Explanation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The
following table shows the reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA per selling square
foot from earnings (loss) from continuing operations:
|
|
For
the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
53
Weeks
|
|
|
52
Weeks
|
|
|
|
February
3, 2008
|
|
|
January
28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(245
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,386
|
|
Plus
interest
|
|
|
3,382
|
|
|
|
2,730
|
|
Plus
taxes
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
2,893
|
|
Plus
depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,817
|
|
|
|
6,868
|
|
Plus
share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
1,130
|
|
|
|
821
|
|
=Adjusted
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
13,832
|
|
|
$
|
18,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) from continuing operations per square foot
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
Plus
interest per square foot
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
0.67
|
|
Plus
taxes per square foot
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
Plus
depreciation and amortization per square foot
|
|
|
2.29
|
|
|
|
1.67
|
|
Plus
share-based compensation expense per square foot
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
=Adjusted
EBITDA per selling square foot
|
|
$
|
3.22
|
|
|
$
|
4.55
|
|
Seasonality
and Quarterly Results
The
following table sets forth the Company's net sales, gross margin, income from
operations, and net earnings during each quarter of fiscal 2008 and
2007.
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2008
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
110.1
|
|
|
|
122.8
|
|
|
|
113.8
|
|
|
|
152.3
|
|
|
Gross
margin
|
|
|
33.9
|
|
|
|
40.7
|
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
46.2
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
Net
earnings (loss)
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2007
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
106.9
|
|
|
|
118.3
|
|
|
|
108.3
|
|
|
|
133.8
|
|
|
Gross
margin
|
|
|
31.9
|
|
|
|
35.9
|
|
|
|
33.7
|
|
|
|
46.8
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
Net
earnings (loss)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
(1)
|
In
fiscal 2008, a provision for asset impairment of $2.1 million
negatively impacted net earnings.
|
|
(2)
|
In
fiscal 2007, an increase in shrinkage of $795 in the fourth quarter
negatively impacted gross margin. A LIFO, lower of cost or market
adjustment of $795 positively impacted gross margin. A shrinkage reserve
of $300 negatively impacted gross
margin.
|
See
Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for quarterly
earnings per share information.
The
Company’s business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. The Company’s highest
sales levels occur in the fourth quarter of its fiscal year which includes the
Christmas holiday selling season. The Company's results of operations in any one
quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that can be
expected for any other quarter or for the full fiscal year. The Company's
results of operations may also fluctuate from quarter to quarter as a result of
the amount and timing of sales contributed by new stores and the integration of
the new stores into the operations of the Company, as well as other factors. The
addition of a large number of new stores can, therefore, significantly affect
the quarterly results of operations.
Inflation
Management
does not believe that its merchandising operations have been materially affected
by inflation over the past few years. The Company will continue to monitor
costs, take advantage of vendor incentive programs, selectively buy from
competitive vendors and adjust merchandise prices based on market
conditions.
The
Company’s operating expenses have been impacted by increases in insurance
expenses, as well as competitive pressures in wages in selected markets. See
additional discussion of wages in the “Government Regulation”
section.
The
increase in the price of oil adversely affects the Company’s transportation
costs, both on inbound shipments to the Company’s distribution center, and on
outbound shipments of merchandise to the stores. The Company also believes the
higher retail price of gasoline adversely affects the amount of discretionary
spending dollars our customers have to spend at our stores.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At the
end of fiscal 2008, working capital (defined as current assets less current
liabilities) was $107.7 million compared to $106.4 million at the end of fiscal
2007 and $90.6 million at the end of fiscal 2006.
The
Company's primary sources of funds are cash flow from operations, borrowings
under its revolving loan credit facility, vendor trade credit financing, term
loan and lease financing. In fiscal 2007 the Company completed a sale-leaseback
of a number of its owned stores. The proceeds from this transaction amounted to
$12.6 million. No sale-leaseback transactions were completed in fiscal 2008 or
2006.
Cash provided
by (used in) operating activities aggregated $11.1 million, ($4.0) million, and
$12.0 million, in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase is cash
provided in fiscal 2008 relative to fiscal 2007 resulted primarily from a
decrease in merchandise inventory. The decrease in cash provided in
fiscal 2007 relative to fiscal 2006 resulted primarily from an increase in
merchandise inventory. In addition to the six new locations, the Company
maintained a strategic program to remain in stock at all times.
The
Company uses its revolving loan credit facility and vendor trade credit
financing to fund the build up of inventories periodically during the year for
its peak selling seasons and to meet other short-term cash requirements. The
revolving loan credit facility provides up to $105 million of financing in the
form of notes payable and letters of credit. The loan agreement expires in
January 2011. The revolving loan note payable and letter of credit balance at
February 3, 2008 was $24.7 million, resulting in an available line of credit at
that date of $80.3 million, subject to a borrowing base calculation. Loan
advances are secured by a security interest in the Company’s inventory and
credit card receivables.
The loan
agreement contains various restrictions that are applicable when outstanding
borrowings exceed $77.5 million, including limitations on additional
indebtedness, prepayments, acquisition of assets, granting of liens, certain
investments and payments of dividends. The Company's loan agreement contains
various covenants including limitations on additional indebtedness and certain
financial tests, as well as various subjective acceleration clauses. The balance
sheet classification of the borrowings under the revolving loan credit facility
have been determined in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force of the
Financial Accounting Standards Board as set forth in EITF Issue 95- 22,
Balance Sheet Classification of
Borrowings Outstanding under Revolving Credit Agreements that Include both a
Subjective Acceleration Clause and a Lock-Box
Arrangement
. As of April 28,
2008, the Company was in compliance with all covenants and subjective
acceleration clauses of the debt agreements. Accordingly, this obligation has
been classified as a long-term liability in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet.
Short-term
trade credit represents a significant source of financing for inventory to the
Company. Trade credit arises from the willingness of the Company's vendors to
grant payment terms for inventory purchases.
In fiscal
2008, the Company had net cash pay downs of $362 on its revolving credit
facility and made cash payments of $2.1 million to reduce its capital lease
obligations. The Company received $307 in proceeds from the exercise of
outstanding stock options. In fiscal 2007, the Company had net cash borrowings
on its revolving credit facility of $4.0 million and made cash payments of $2.1
million to reduce its long-term debt and capital lease obligations, and
repurchased $2.0 million of Company stock. The Company received $113 in proceeds
from the exercise of outstanding stock options. In fiscal 2006, the
Company had net cash borrowing on its revolving credit facility of
$13.0 and made cash payments of $1.1 million to reduce its long-term debt and
capital lease obligations, and repurchased $13.1 of Company stock. The Company
received $423 in proceeds from the exercise of outstanding stock
options. The Company’s long-range plan assumes growth in the number of
stores and, in accordance with this plan, 18 new ALCO stores and two Duckwall
store conversions were opened in fiscal 2008. Seven new ALCO stores
were opened in fiscal 2007 and seven new ALCO stores and one new Duckwall store
were opened in fiscal 2006. Approximately 15 new ALCO stores are
expected to be opened in fiscal 2009. The Company believes that with the $105
million line of credit, sufficient capital is available to fund the Company’s
planned expansion.
Cash used
for acquisition of property and equipment in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 totaled
$12.3 million, $7.6 million, and $11.1 million, respectively. A sale-leaseback
transaction of several store buildings was completed in fiscal 2007 in the
amount of $12.6 million and $1.6 from the sale of other assets. The net
cash used in investing activities was $11.7 million in fiscal 2008. The net cash
provided by investing activities in fiscal 2007 was $6.5 million and net cash
used in fiscal 2006 was $11.1 million, respectively.
On March
23, 2006, the Board of Directors approved a new plan authorizing the repurchase
of 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, of which 3,337 shares have been
repurchased at an average cost of $30.46. As of February 3, 2008, 196,663 shares
remain available to be repurchased.
The
following table summarizes the Company’s significant contractual obligations
payable as of February 3, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
due by Period (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less
than
|
|
|
|
2 -
3
|
|
|
|
4 -
5
|
|
|
After
|
|
Contractual
obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1
year (2)
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
5
years
|
|
Revolving
loan credit facility
|
|
$
|
20,715
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20,715
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
FF&E
term loan, including interest
|
|
|
6,236
|
|
|
|
1,592
|
|
|
|
3,184
|
|
|
|
1,460
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Capital
lease obligations
|
|
|
8,043
|
|
|
|
2,375
|
|
|
|
4,193
|
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
Operating
leases
|
|
|
161,901
|
|
|
|
19,768
|
|
|
|
32,431
|
|
|
|
24,105
|
|
|
|
85,597
|
|
Transportation
contract
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Contingent
rentals
|
|
|
12,957
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
3,137
|
|
|
|
3,328
|
|
|
|
4,992
|
|
|
|
$
|
210,099
|
|
|
|
25,482
|
|
|
|
63,660
|
|
|
|
30,048
|
|
|
|
90,909
|
|
(1)
|
The
principal amount of the Company’s Revolving Loan Credit Facility is shown
in its contractual obligations table as the amount being paid during the
year that the current agreement on the credit facility expires. Interest
related to the Revolving Loan Credit Facility is dependent on the level of
borrowing and variable interest rates as more fully described in Note 3 to
the consolidated financial statements and is not shown in this
table.
|
(2)
|
Total
liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits as of February 3, 2008, were
$2.5 million and are classified on the Company's consolidated balance
sheet within "Other current liabilities" and are not included in the
table.
|
Expansion
Plans
The
continued growth of the Company is dependent, in large part, upon the Company’s
ability to open and operate new stores on a timely and profitable basis. The
Company plans to open approximately 15 ALCO stores in fiscal 2009. While the
Company believes that adequate sites are currently available, the rate of new
store openings is subject to various contingencies, many of which are beyond the
Company’s control. These contingencies include the Company’s ability to hire,
train and retain qualified personnel, the availability of adequate capital
resources and the successful integration of new stores into existing operations.
There can be no assurance that the Company will achieve satisfactory sales
or profitability.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
The Company has not provided any
financial guarantees as of year-end fiscal 2008.
The Company has not created, and is not
party to, any special-purpose or off-balance sheet entities for the purpose of
raising capital, incurring debt or operating the business. The
Company does not have any arrangements or relationships with entities that are
not consolidated into the financial statements that are reasonably likely to
materially affect the Company’s liquidity or the availability of capital
resources.
New
Accounting Standard
2008
Adoptions
In
July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB
Interpretation No. 48, "
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
" (FIN 48). FIN 48
prescribes the financial statement recognition and measurement criteria for tax
positions taken in a tax return, clarifies when tax benefits should be recorded
and how they should be classified in financial statements, and requires certain
disclosures of uncertain tax matters. The Company adopted the
provisions of FIN 48 at the beginning of the first quarter of 2008, and the
details of our adoption of FIN 48 are described in
Note 7.
2009
and Future Adoptions
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 157, "
Fair Value
Measurement
" (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 provides a definition of fair
value, provides guidance for measuring fair value in U.S. GAAP and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 will be effective at
the beginning of fiscal 2009. The Company is presently evaluating the impact of
the adoption of SFAS 157 on our results of operations and financial
position.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 159, "
The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities"
(SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items
at fair value. SFAS 159 will be effective at the beginning of fiscal 2009.
The adoption of this statement will not have a material impact on our
consolidated net earnings, cash flows or financial position.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 141(R),
"Business
Combinations"
(SFAS 141(R)), which changes the accounting for
business combinations and their effects on the financial statements.
SFAS 141(R) will be effective at the beginning of fiscal 2010. The adoption
of this statement is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated
net earnings, cash flows or financial position.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 160,
"Accounting and
Reporting of Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an
amendment of ARB No. 51"
(SFAS 160). SFAS 160 requires
entities to report non-controlling interests in subsidiaries as equity in their
consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 will be effective at the
beginning of fiscal 2010. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have
a material impact on our consolidated net earnings, cash flows or financial
position.
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT
FUTURE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, FINANCIAL CONDITION OR BUSINESS
Certain
statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that are not statements
of historical fact may constitute "forward-looking statements" within the
meaning of Section 21E of the Exchange Act. These statements are subject to
risks and uncertainties, as described below. Examples of forward-looking
statements include, but are not limited to: (i) projections of revenues,
income or loss, earnings or loss per share, capital expenditures, store
openings, store closings, payment or non-payment of dividends, capital structure
and other financial items, (ii) statements of plans and objectives of the
Company’s management or Board of Directors, including plans or objectives
relating to inventory, store development, marketing, competition, business
strategy, store environment, merchandising, purchasing, pricing, distribution,
transportation, store locations and information systems, (iii) statements of
future economic performance, and (iv) statements of assumptions underlying the
statements described in (i), (ii) and (iii). Forward-looking statements can
often be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as
“believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “intends,” “plans,”
“estimates”, “projects” or “anticipates,” variations thereof or similar
expressions.
Forward-looking
statements are not guarantees of future performance or results. They involve
risks, uncertainties and assumptions. The Company’s future results of
operations, financial condition and business operations may differ materially
from the forward-looking statements or the historical information stated in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. Stockholders and investors are cautioned not to put
undue reliance on any forward-looking statement.
There are
a number of factors and uncertainties that could cause actual results of
operations, financial condition or business contemplated by the forward-looking
statements to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking
statements made herein or elsewhere orally or in writing, by, or on behalf of,
the Company, including those factors described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” above.
Other factors not identified herein could also have such an effect.
ITEM
7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT
MARKET RISK.
The
Company is subject to market risk from exposure to changes in interest rates
based on its financing, investing and cash management activities. The Company
maintains a secured line of credit at variable interest rates to meet the
short-term needs of its expansion program and seasonal inventory increases. The
credit line available is $105 million which carries a variable rate of interest.
On January 18, 2008, the Company agreed to extend the existing line of credit
with Bank of America, which was due on April 15, 2010. The repayment of funds
borrowed under the line of credit is now due on January 18, 2011.
The
Company’s borrowing arrangement contains no limitation on the change in the
variable interest rate paid by the Company. Based on the Company’s average
borrowing outstanding during the year of approximately $31.1 million, a 1%
change either up or down in the LIBOR rate would have changed the Company’s
interest expense by approximately $311.
The Company was not party to any derivative financial instruments in
fiscal 2008.
ITEM
8. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
INDEX
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm……………………..
|
18
|
|
|
|
Financial
Statements:
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets --
|
|
|
February
3, 2008 and January 28, 2007………………………………..
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations --
|
|
|
Fiscal
years Ended February 3, 2008,
|
|
|
January
28, 2007 and January 29, 2006……………………………….
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders'
|
|
|
Equity
-- Fiscal years Ended February 3, 2008,
|
|
|
January
28, 2007 and January 29, 2006……………………..………..
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows --
|
|
|
Fiscal
years Ended February 3, 2008,
|
|
|
January
28, 2007 and January 29, 2006………………………………..
|
22
|
|
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements……………………………………..
|
23
|
|
|
|
Financial
Statement Schedules:
|
|
|
|
|
|
No
financial statement schedules are included as they are
|
|
|
not
applicable to the Company
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board
of Directors and Stockholders
Duckwall-ALCO
Stores, Inc.:
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Duckwall-ALCO Stores,
Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of February 3, 2008 and January 28, 2007,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended February 3,
2008. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of February
3, 2008 and January 28, 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended February 3, 2008, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As
discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January
29, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes
. As discussed in Notes 1 and 14 to the consolidated
financial statements, effective January 30, 2006, the Company adopted the fair
value method of accounting for share-based compensation as required by Statement
of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment
and
adopted Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108,
Considering the Effects of Prior
Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements
.
We also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting as of February 3, 2008 based on criteria established in
Internal Control – Integrated
Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO)”), and our report dated April 28, 2008 expressed an
adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG
LLP
Kansas
City, Missouri
April 28,
2008
Duckwall-ALCO
Stores, Inc.
|
|
And
Subsidiaries
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|
(dollars
in thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February
3,
|
|
|
January
28,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
5,501
|
|
|
|
2,983
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
4,905
|
|
|
|
3,059
|
|
Prepaid
income taxes
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
128,545
|
|
|
|
151,406
|
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
3,101
|
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
7,094
|
|
|
|
3,037
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
149,914
|
|
|
|
162,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment, at cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
and land improvements
|
|
|
2,205
|
|
|
|
1,719
|
|
Buildings
and building improvements
|
|
|
11,931
|
|
|
|
12,023
|
|
Furniture,
fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
58,911
|
|
|
|
56,703
|
|
Transportation
equipment
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
|
|
15,419
|
|
|
|
15,410
|
|
Construction
work in progress
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
Total
property and equipment
|
|
|
91,058
|
|
|
|
87,484
|
|
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
64,019
|
|
|
|
64,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
property and equipment
|
|
|
27,039
|
|
|
|
23,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
under capital leases
|
|
|
13,571
|
|
|
|
24,571
|
|
Less
accumulated amortization
|
|
|
8,654
|
|
|
|
17,618
|
|
Net
property under capital leases
|
|
|
4,917
|
|
|
|
6,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
non-current assets
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
3,254
|
|
|
|
3,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
185,386
|
|
|
|
195,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
maturities of long-tem debt
|
|
$
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Current
maturities of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
1,860
|
|
|
|
2,128
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
19,134
|
|
|
|
35,263
|
|
Income
taxes payable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,915
|
|
Accrued
salaries and commissions
|
|
|
3,711
|
|
|
|
4,180
|
|
Accrued
taxes other than income
|
|
|
4,301
|
|
|
|
4,242
|
|
Self-insurance
claim reserves
|
|
|
4,571
|
|
|
|
4,322
|
|
Other
current liabilities
|
|
|
7,360
|
|
|
|
3,634
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
42,215
|
|
|
|
55,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long
term debt, less current maturities
|
|
|
4,227
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Notes
payable under revolving loan
|
|
|
20,715
|
|
|
|
21,077
|
|
Capital
lease obligations - less current maturities
|
|
|
4,933
|
|
|
|
6,783
|
|
Deferred
gain on leases
|
|
|
4,985
|
|
|
|
5,372
|
|
Other
noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
1,139
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
78,214
|
|
|
|
89,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, $.0001 par value, authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000,000
shares; issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,810,591
shares and 3,794,303 shares respectively
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
38,766
|
|
|
|
37,315
|
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
68,405
|
|
|
|
68,744
|
|
Total
stockholders' equity
|
|
|
107,172
|
|
|
|
106,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$
|
185,386
|
|
|
|
195,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duckwall-ALCO
Stores, Inc.
|
|
And
Subsidiaries
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
|
Fiscal
years ended February 3, 2008, January 28, 2007 and January 29,
2006
|
|
(dollars
in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
Weeks
|
|
|
52
Weeks
|
|
|
52
Weeks
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
499,032
|
|
|
|
467,321
|
|
|
|
425,756
|
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
341,393
|
|
|
|
318,999
|
|
|
|
289,621
|
|
Gross
margin
|
|
|
157,639
|
|
|
|
148,322
|
|
|
|
136,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
144,937
|
|
|
|
130,445
|
|
|
|
122,705
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
9,817
|
|
|
|
6,868
|
|
|
|
5,873
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
154,754
|
|
|
|
137,313
|
|
|
|
128,578
|
|
Operating
income from continuing operations
|
|
|
2,885
|
|
|
|
11,009
|
|
|
|
7,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
3,382
|
|
|
|
2,730
|
|
|
|
1,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(497
|
)
|
|
|
8,279
|
|
|
|
6,285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
2,893
|
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
5,386
|
|
|
|
4,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) from discontinued operations, net of income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tax
expense (benefit) of $14, $195 and ($1,426) in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
(2,626
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
5,704
|
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
1.42
|
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
Discontinued
operations
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
Discontinued
operations
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DUCKWALL-ALCO
STORES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
February
3, 2008, January 28, 2007 and January 29, 2006
(dollars
in thousand, except for per share amounts)
1.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Duckwall-ALCO
Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) is engaged in the business of
retailing general merchandise throughout the central portion of the United
States of America through discount department and variety store outlets.
Merchandise is purchased for resale from many vendors, and transactions with
individual vendors and customers do not represent a significant portion of total
purchases and sales.
|
(b)
|
Principles
of Consolidation
|
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly owned subsidiaries. Intercompany account balances have been eliminated in
consolidation.
|
(c)
|
Basis
of Presentation
|
The
Company’s fiscal year ends on the Sunday nearest to January 31.
Fiscal 2008 consists of 53 weeks, while fiscal 2007 and 2006 each consist
of 52 weeks.
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value with cost determined
using the last-in, first-out “LIFO” method. Merchandise inventories in our
stores are valued by the retail method. The retail method is widely used in the
retail industry due to its practicality. Under the retail method, cost is
determined by applying a calculated cost-to-retail ratio across groupings of
similar items, known as departments. As a result, the retail method results in
an averaging of inventory costs across similar items within a department. The
cost-to-retail ratio is applied to ending inventory at its current owned retail
valuation to determine the cost of ending inventory on a department basis.
Current owned retail represents the retail price for which merchandise is
offered for sale on a regular basis reduced for any permanent or clearance
markdowns. Use of the retail method does not eliminate the use of
management judgments and estimates, including markdowns and shrinkage, which
significantly impact the ending inventory valuation at cost and the resulting
gross margins. The Company continually evaluates product categories to determine
if markdown action is appropriate, or if a markdown reserve should be
established. The Company recognizes that the use of the retail method will
result in valuing inventories at lower of cost or market if markdowns are
currently taken as a reduction of the retail value of inventories.
Management believes that the retail method provides an inventory valuation which
reasonably approximates cost and results in carrying inventory at the lower of
cost or market. For LIFO, the Company determines lower of cost or market by
pool.
|
(e)
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Depreciation
is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the
assets. Amortization of capital leases is computed on a straight-line basis over
the terms of the lease agreements. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a
straight-line basis over the lesser of the remaining lease term, or
10 years, unless the cost of the improvement is considered major and the
lease is within three years of its remaining term, in which case one renewal
term of the lease is considered. Estimated useful lives are as
follows:
Buildings
|
25
years
|
Building
improvements
|
10
years
|
Coolers
and freezers
|
15
years
|
Software
|
3 -
5 years
|
Furniture,
fixtures and equipment
|
3 -
8 years
|
Transportation
equipment
|
3 -
5 years
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
2 -
10 years
|
For fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, depreciation and amortization was
$7.7 million, $6.9 million and $5.9 million, respectively.
Major
improvements are capitalized, while maintenance and repairs that do not extend
the useful life of the asset are charged to expense as incurred.
The
Company has sold and leased back certain stores (land and buildings) and the
resulting leases qualify and are accounted for as operating leases. The
Company does not have any retained or contingent interests in the
stores, nor does the Company provide any guarantees, other than a
guarantee of lease payments, in connection with the sale-leasebacks. The net
proceeds from the sale-leaseback transactions amounted to approximately $0,
$12,563, and $0 for fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. If a gain results
from the sale-leaseback transaction, such gains are deferred and are being
amortized over the term of the related leases (15 - 20 years).
The
Company accounts for operating leases over the initial lease term without regard
to available renewal options. The Company considers free rent periods and
scheduled rent increases in determining total rent expense for the initial lease
term. Total rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over that
term.
The
Company retains significant deductibles on its insurance policies for workers
compensation, general liability and medical claims. Due to the fact that it
takes more than one year to determine the actual costs, these costs are
estimated based on the Company’s historical loss experience and estimates from
the insurance carriers and consultants. The Company completes an actuarial
evaluation of its loss experience twice each year. In between actuarial
evaluations, management monitors the cost and number of claims and compares
those results to historical amounts. The Company’s actuarial method is the fully
developed method. This method includes a loss conversion factor that includes
administrative, legal and claims handling expenses. The Company records its
reserves on an undiscounted basis. The Company’s prior estimates have varied
based on changes in assumptions related to actual claims versus estimated
ultimate loss calculations. Current and future estimates could be affected by
changes in those same assumptions and are reasonably likely to
occur.
The
Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating
loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the
years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax
rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company reflects changes in estimates related to prior period income taxes
as a component of current period income tax expense.
Sales are
recorded in the period of sale. The Company excludes sales taxes from revenue.
The Company has established sales returns allowance based on the historical
returns pattern experienced by the Company.
|
(j)
|
Net
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
|
Basic net
earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net earnings (loss) by the
weighted average number of shares outstanding. Diluted net earnings (loss) per
share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if contracts to issue
securities (such as stock options) were exercised. See note 9.
|
(k)
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
For
purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company considers
cash and cash equivalents to include currency on hand and money market funds.
During fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006, the following amounts were paid for
interest and income taxes:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Interest,
excluding interest on capital lease obligations and amortization of debt
financing costs (net of capitalized interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of $0, in fiscal 2008, $0 in fiscal 2007 and $54 in fiscal
2006)
|
|
$
|
2,823
|
|
|
|
1,713
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
Income
taxes
|
|
|
3,716
|
|
|
|
5,738
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
The
Company reclassified certain accounts receivable on its Consolidated Balance
Sheets, which were previously presented as cash and cash equivalents. The
amounts reclassified on the consolidated balance sheet totaled $1,094 in
2007.
Management
of the Company has made certain estimates and assumptions in the reporting of
assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses to prepare these consolidated
financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The
Company reviews assets for impairment at the lowest level for which there are
identifiable cash flows, usually at the store level. The carrying
amount of assets is compared with the expected undiscounted future cash flows to
be generated by those assets over their estimated remaining economic
lives. If the undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying
amount of the asset, the asset is written down to fair value. Factors
that could result in an impairment review include, but are not limited to, a
current period cash flow loss combined with a history of cash flow losses or a
projection that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a
long-lived asset or significant changes in a manner of use of the assets due to
business strategies or competitive environment. Additionally, when a commitment
is made to close a store beyond the quarter in which the disclosure commitment
is made, it is reviewed for impairment and depreciable lives are
adjusted. The impairment evaluation is based on the estimated cash
flows from continuing use until the expected disposal date plus the
expected terminal value. Actual results could vary from management
estimates.
Provisions
for asset impairment of $2.1 million, $130 and $0 in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, are included in depreciation and amortization expense in the
consolidated statements of operations.
|
(n)
|
Store
Closings and Discontinued
Operations
|
A
provision for store closure expenses is recorded when the Company discontinues
using the facility. A summary of the expense and liability (included in other
current liabilities) related to store closures as of and for the years ended
February 3, 2008; January 28, 2007; and January 29, 2006 is as
follows:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Store
closure liability at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
Store
closure (income) expense (included in discontinued
operations)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
808
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(342
|
)
|
|
|
(438
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Store
closure liability at end of year
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
The
Company has determined that generally each store is a component of the entity
and that for each closed store (i) the operations and cash flows of the
component have been eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity and
(ii) the entity will not have any significant continuing involvement in the
operations of the component after the store is closed. This is a result of the
Company’s stores being geographically disbursed. The results of operations for
stores that have been closed by the Company (10, one and 23 stores in fiscal
years 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively) have been reclassified to discontinued
operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for all
periods presented. The Company does not allocate interest expense to
discontinued operations.
A
liability is recognized for costs associated with store closings, primarily
future lease costs (net of estimated sublease income), and is charged to income
when the Company ceases to use the leased location.
The Company closed 14 stores (ten ALCO stores and four Duckwall
stores) in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Management anticipated costs
associated with the store closings to consist primarily of future lease costs
(net of estimated sublease income) and severance costs of approximately $1.5 to
$1.8 million. Excluding one store, the operations of these stores will be
reclassified to discontinued operation in fiscal 2009. The one store will
remain in continuing operations due to the distance to the closest existing
store being less than 20 miles.
|
(o)
|
Consideration
Received from Vendors
|
Cost of
sales and selling, general and administrative expenses are partially offset
by various forms of consideration received from our vendors. This
“vendor income” is earned for a variety of vendor-sponsored programs, such as
volume rebates, markdown allowances, promotions, warehouse cost reimbursement
and advertising. Consideration received, to the extent that it
reimburses specific, incremental, and identifiable costs incurred to date, is
recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the same period as
the associated expenses are incurred. Reimbursements received that are in excess
of specific, incremental and identifiable costs incurred to date are recognized
as a reduction to the cost of the merchandise and are reflected in costs of
sales as the merchandise is sold. The Company establishes a
receivable for the vendor income that is earned but not yet
received. Based on provisions of the agreements in place, this
receivable is computed by estimating when the Company has completed its
performance and the amount has been earned. The Company performs
detailed analyses to determine the appropriate level of the receivable in the
aggregate. The majority of year-end receivables associated with these
activities are collected within the following fiscal quarter.
The
Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. The Company records payments
from vendors representing reimbursements of specific identifiable costs as a
reduction of that cost. Net advertising expenses of $4.7 million, $3.7
million and $5.9 million in the fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively,
are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated
statements of operations.
|
(q)
|
Share-based
Compensation
|
Prior to
January 30, 2006, the Company accounted for share-based payments using the
intrinsic-value-based recognition method allowed by Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25, "
Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees
," ("APB 25"). As stock options were granted
at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying common
stock on the date of grant, no share-based employee compensation cost was
reflected in operations prior to adopting Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123(R) "
Share-Based Payment
" ("SFAS
123(R)").
Effective
January 30, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS 123(R) and began recognizing
compensation expense for its share-based payments based on the fair value of the
awards. As the Company adopted SFAS 123(R) under the
modified-prospective-transition method, results from prior periods have not been
restated. The Company has elected to amortize the compensation expense on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period.
The
following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and net earnings per
share as if the Company applied the fair value recognition provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation"
("SFAS 123")
to options granted under the Company's
stock plans in all periods presented prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R).
SFAS 123
established a fair value based method of accounting for employee stock options
or similar equity instruments. In order to calculate fair value under
SFAS 123, the Company used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to
estimate the grant date fair value of options granted in fiscal years through
2006.
For purposes of this pro forma disclosure, the value of
the options is estimated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model for all
option grants:
|
|
2006
|
|
Net
earnings as reported
|
|
$
|
1,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro
forma share-based employee compensation cost, net of tax
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
Pro
forma net earnings
|
|
|
1,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings per share as reported:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings per share, pro forma:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
Under
SFAS 123(R), forfeitures are estimated at the time of valuation and reduce
expense ratably over the vesting period. This estimate is adjusted periodically
based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to
differ, from the previous estimate. Under SFAS 123 and APB 25, the Company
elected to account for forfeitures as they occurred.
|
(r)
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
|
The
Company has determined the fair value of its financial instruments in accordance
with SFAS No. 107,
Disclosures About Fair Value of
Financial Instruments.
For notes payable under revolving loan, fair value
approximates the carrying value due to the variable interest rate. Based on the
borrowing rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms,
the fair value of long-term debt at February 3, 2008 approximates its carrying
amount of $5.5 million. For all other financial instruments including
cash, receivables, accounts payable, and accrued expenses, the carrying amounts
approximate fair value due to the short maturity of those
instruments.
The costs
of start-up activities, including organization costs and new store openings, are
expenses as incurred.
|
(t)
|
Future
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 157, "
Fair Value
Measurement
" (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 provides a definition of fair
value, provides guidance for measuring fair value in U.S. GAAP and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 will be effective at
the beginning of fiscal 2009. The Company is presently evaluating the impact of
the adoption of SFAS 157 on our consolidated net earnings, cash flows or
financial position.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 159, "
The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities"
(SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items
at fair value. SFAS 159 will be effective at the beginning of fiscal 2009.
The adoption of this statement will not have a material impact on our
consolidated net earnings, cash flows or financial position.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 141(R),
"Business Combinations"
(SFAS 141(R)), which changes the accounting for business combinations and
their effects on the financial statements. SFAS 141(R) will be effective at
the beginning of fiscal 2010. The adoption of this statement is not expected to
have a material impact on our consolidated net earnings, cash flows or financial
position.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 160,
"Accounting and Reporting of
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of
ARB No. 51"
(SFAS 160). SFAS 160 requires entities to
report non-controlling interests in subsidiaries as equity in their consolidated
financial statements. SFAS 160 will be effective at the beginning of fiscal
2010. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material impact
on our consolidated net earnings, cash flows or financial position.
Inventories
at February 3, 2008 and January 28, 2007 are stated at the lower of cost or
net realizable value as determined under the LIFO method of accounting.
Inventories at February 3, 2008 and January 28, 2007 are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIFO
cost
|
|
$
|
132,385
|
|
|
|
155,153
|
|
Less
LIFO and markdown reserves
|
|
|
(3,840
|
)
|
|
|
(3,747
|
)
|
LIFO
Cost
|
|
$
|
128,545
|
|
|
|
151,406
|
|
3.
|
Credit
Arrangements, Notes Payable and Long-term
Debt
|
The
Company has a loan agreement that provides a revolving loan credit facility of
up to $105 million of long-term financing which expires January 18,
2011. The amount advanced (through a note or letters of credit) to
the Company bears interest at (i) the higher of (a) the Federal Funds Rate
plus ½ of 1% or (b) Bank of America, N.A. prime rate plus a margin, as defined
in the agreement, which varies based on the amount outstanding or (ii) based on
the LIBOR rate plus a margin, as defined in the agreement. Additionally,
the Company is currently obligated to pay a commitment fee equal to 0.25% of the
unused capacity. The amount advanced is generally limited to 85% of
eligible inventory and eligible receivables. The loan agreement contains
various restrictions that are applicable when outstanding borrowings reach
certain thresholds, including limitations on additional indebtedness,
prepayments, acquisition of assets, granting of liens, certain investments and
payments of dividends.
The
Company's loan agreement contains various covenants including limitations
on additional indebtedness and certain financial tests, as well as various
subjective acceleration clauses.
The
balance sheet classification of the borrowings under the revolving loan credit
facility have been determined in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force of
the Financial Accounting Standards Board as set forth in EITF Issue 95-22,
Balance Sheet Classification of
Borrowings Outstanding under Revolving Credit Agreements that Include both a
Subjective Acceleration Clause and a Lock-Box Arrangement
. As
of April 28, 2008, the Company was in compliance with all covenants and
subjective acceleration clauses of the debt
agreements. Accordingly, this obligation has been classified as
a long-term liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
Notes
payable outstanding at February 3, 2008 and January 28, 2007 under the revolving
loan credit facility aggregated $20.7 million and $21.1 million,
respectively. The lender had also issued letters of credit aggregating $4.0
million and $3.3 million, respectively, at such dates on behalf of the
Company. The interest rate on $10 million of the outstanding borrowings at
February 3, 2008 was 4.23% and the remaining $10.7 million was at 6.0%. The
Company had additional borrowings available at February 3, 2008 under the
revolving loan credit facility amounting to approximately $80.3
million.
The
Company also had a term loan to fund new store fixtures and equipment and
is secured by such fixtures and equipment. The interest rate on $4.6
million of the outstanding borrowings at February 3, 2008 was 6.35% and the
remaining $857 was at 6.54%. Principle and interest payments are due
in monthly installments through December 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
due by Fiscal Period
|
|
Contractual
Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Revolving
loan credit facility
|
|
$
|
20,715
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20,715
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
FF&E
term loan
|
|
|
5,505
|
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,220
|
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
|
|
22,166
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Interest
expense on notes payable and long-term debt in fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006
aggregated $2.8 million, $1.7 million, and $644, respectively.
On
February 1, 2006, the Company amended its Profit Sharing Plan to include a
401(k) component. The Company matches the employee’s contribution to half of the
first 4% contributed by the employee with a cash contribution to the plan.
Contributions by the Company vest with the participants over a seven-year
period. Expense arising due to Company matches for fiscal 2008 amounted to $480
and $478 for fiscal 2007, respectfully.
For
fiscal 2006 and before, the Company had a trusteed Profit Sharing Plan
(the Plan) for the benefit of eligible employees. The Plan provides for an
annual contribution of not more than 20% of earnings for the year before the
profit sharing contribution and Federal and state income taxes, limited to 15%
of the annual compensation of the participants in the Plan. Contributions by the
Company vest with the participants over a seven-year period. The Company
reserves the right to discontinue its contributions at any time. Expense arising
from profit sharing for all years presented is $0.
5.
|
Self-Insurance
Reserves
|
Changes
to the self-insurance reserves for fiscal 2008 and 2007 are as
follows:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
|
$
|
4,322
|
|
|
|
3,755
|
|
Reserve
additions
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
|
|
2,234
|
|
Claims
paid
|
|
|
(1,542
|
)
|
|
|
(1,667
|
)
|
Ending
balance
|
|
$
|
4,571
|
|
|
|
4,322
|
|
The
Company is lessee under long-term capital leases expiring at various dates. The
components of property under capital leases as of February 3, 2008 and
January 28, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Buildings
|
|
$
|
3,375
|
|
|
|
14,375
|
|
Fixtures
|
|
|
3,338
|
|
|
|
3,338
|
|
Software
|
|
|
6,858
|
|
|
|
6,858
|
|
|
|
|
13,571
|
|
|
|
24,571
|
|
Less
accumulated amortization
|
|
|
8,654
|
|
|
|
17,618
|
|
Net
property under capital leases
|
|
$
|
4,917
|
|
|
|
6,953
|
|
The
Company also has noncancelable operating leases, primarily for buildings that
expire at various dates.
Future
minimum lease payments under all noncancelable leases, together with the present
value of the net minimum lease payments pursuant to capital leases, as of
February 3, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
Fiscal
year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
2,375
|
|
|
|
19,768
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2,263
|
|
|
|
17,581
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
|
|
14,850
|
|
2012
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
12,499
|
|
2013
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
11,606
|
|
Later
years
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
85,597
|
|
Total
minimum lease payments
|
|
|
8,043
|
|
|
$
|
161,901
|
|
Less amount representing interest
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present
value of net minimum lease payments
|
|
|
6,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
1,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
lease obligations, less current maturities
|
|
$
|
4,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $20 under
operating leases due in the future under noncancelable subleases. They also do
not include contingent rentals, which may be paid under certain store leases on
the basis of percentage of sales in excess of stipulated amounts. Contingent
rentals applicable to capital leases amounted to $95, $120 and $100 for fiscal
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The
Company entered into a software lease and a flexible lease financing proposal
regarding the lease of point-of-sale hardware with General Electric Capital
Corporation (“GECC”) on December 1, 2005 and December 5, 2005, respectively. The
software lease, which is a capital lease, began on January 1, 2006 and has a
term of five years. The Company leased an additional $1.9 million during fiscal
2007 under this capital lease. The hardware lease, which is an operating
lease, began on September 30, 2006, and has a term of four years.
The
interest on capital lease obligations in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 aggregated
$306, $381 and $544, respectively.
The
following schedule presents the composition of total rent expense for all
operating leases for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Minimum
rentals
|
|
$
|
16,106
|
|
|
|
12,261
|
|
|
|
10,768
|
|
Contingent
rentals
|
|
|
1,468
|
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
1,120
|
|
Less
sublease rentals
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
17,523
|
|
|
|
13,711
|
|
|
|
11,835
|
|
The
Company’s income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Income
tax expense (benefit) allocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to
continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
2,893
|
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
Income
tax expense (benefit) allocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to
discontinued operations
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
(1,426
|
)
|
Total
income tax expense
|
|
$
|
(238
|
)
|
|
|
3,088
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
Income
tax expense (benefit) attributable to continuing operations for fiscal 2008,
2007, and 2006 consists of:
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Total
|
|
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
(1,221
|
)
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
|
|
(1,428
|
)
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
5,510
|
|
|
|
(2,889
|
)
|
|
|
2,621
|
|
State
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
(576
|
)
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
6,358
|
|
|
|
(3,465
|
)
|
|
|
2,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
(626
|
)
|
|
|
1,474
|
|
State
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,541
|
|
|
|
(831
|
)
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
Income
tax expense (benefit) attributable to continuing operations differs from the
amounts computed by applying the Federal income tax rate of 34% in 2008 and
35% in 2007 and 2006 as a result of the following:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Computed
“expected” tax expense
|
|
$
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
2,898
|
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
State
income taxes, net of the Federal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
income
tax benefit
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
Adjustment
for prior period taxes
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(391
|
)
|
Other,
net
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
2,893
|
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
The
tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of
deferred tax assets and liabilities at February 3, 2008 and
January 28, 2007 are presented below:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Deferred
tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
$
|
335
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
803
|
|
Insurance reserves
|
|
|
1,863
|
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
Vacation
and sick pay accrual
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
862
|
|
Property
and equipment
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
3,939
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
Deferred gain property and equipment
|
|
|
1,989
|
|
|
|
2,042
|
|
State
net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
Total
deferred tax assets
|
|
|
10,475
|
|
|
|
6,727
|
|
Deferred
tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
Net
deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
10,348
|
|
|
|
6,381
|
|
At
February 3, 2008, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards and
credits for state income tax purposes of $449 and $27, respectively,
which are available to offset future state taxable income in those
states. These net operating losses and state income tax credits begin
expiring in fiscal year 2020. Due to the history of earnings and
projected future results, the Company believes it is more likely than not those
future operations will generate sufficient taxable income to realize the
deferred tax assets. As such, at February 3, 2008 and January 28,
2007 there is no valuation allowance on the net operating losses.
The
Company was under exam by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for fiscal
2006. The Company believes the exam will be resolved with no
significant adjustments.
The
Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”)
,
on January 29,
2007. In accordance with the recognition standards established by FIN
48, the Company performed a comprehensive review of potential uncertain tax
positions in each jurisdiction in which the Company operates. As a
result of the Company’s review, the Company adjusted the carrying amount of the
liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting in a reduction to retained
earnings of $115. Upon adoption, the Company also decreased accrued
taxes by $123, increased deferred tax assets by $2.4 million and increased the
liability for unrecognized tax benefits by $2.2 million. The adoption of FIN 48
resulted in the accruals for uncertain tax positions being reclassified from
income taxes payable to accrued expenses and other non-current liabilities in
the balance sheet. Also with the adoption of FIN 48, the Company
elected to make an accounting policy change to recognize interest related to
unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in selling, general
and administrative expense.
A
reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the total amounts of
gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
Gross
unrecognized tax benefits at January 29, 2007
|
|
$
|
2,124
|
|
Increases
related to prior period tax positions
|
|
|
50
|
|
Decreases
related to prior period tax positions
|
|
|
-
|
|
Increases
related to current year tax positions
|
|
|
346
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
-
|
|
Expiration
of the statute of limitations for the assessment of taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
Gross
unrecognized tax benefits at February 3, 2008
|
|
$
|
2,520
|
|
None of
the amounts included in the $2.5 million of unrecognized tax benefits at
February 3, 2008 would affect the effective tax rate if recognized. The Company
also accrued potential interest of $134 related to these unrecognized tax
benefits during fiscal 2008, and in total, as of February 3, 2008, has accrued
$517 for the payment of interest. No amounts were accrued for
penalties with respect to unrecognized tax benefits.
It is
expected that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next
twelve months due to the finalization of an IRS exam for fiscal 2006. The final
assessment was issued by the IRS on February 25, 2008. The assessment
is not expected to have a significant impact on the results of the Company’s
operations or financial position. It is estimated that gross
unrecognized tax benefits may decrease by approximately $48, with an immaterial
impact to interest expense. In addition to the finalization of the
IRS exam, the Company is pursuing tax planning opportunities which would
eliminate the remainder of the gross unrecognized tax benefits of approximately
$2.5 million. This tax planning, coupled with the impact of the IRS
exam, would also eliminate the interest accrual.
The
statute of limitations for the Company’s federal income tax returns is open for
fiscal 2005 through fiscal 2007. The Company files in numerous state
jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitation. The statute of
limitations for the Company’s state returns are open from fiscal 2004 through
fiscal 2007 or fiscal 2005 through fiscal 2007, depending on each state’s
statute of limitations. The Company is not currently under audit of
income taxes by any state jurisdiction.
On March
23, 2006, the Board of Directors approved a plan authorizing the repurchase
200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, of which 3,337 shares have been
repurchased at an average cost of $30.46. As of February 3, 2008,196,663 shares
remain available to be repurchased.
The
following is a reconciliation of the outstanding shares utilized in the
computation of earnings per share:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding (basic)
|
|
|
3,807,033
|
|
|
|
3,792,202
|
|
|
|
4,083,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of dilutive options to purchase common stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
36,726
|
|
|
|
34,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
adjusted for diluted calculation
|
|
|
3,807,033
|
|
|
|
3,828,928
|
|
|
|
4,117,922
|
|
The impact of certain options was
excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the effects
are antidilutive. For fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, antidilutive options
were 42,702, 0 and 0, respectively.
10.
|
Share-Based
Compensation
|
Effective
with fiscal 2007, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123(R)
Share-Based Payment
(SFAS
123(R)), using the modified-prospective-transition method, and began
recognizing compensation expense for its share based payments based on the fair
value of the awards. Share based payments consist of stock option grants, which
are equity classified in accordance with SFAS 123(R). SFAS 123(R) requires share
based compensation expense to be based on the following: a) grant date fair
value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123 for
unvested options granted prior to the adoption date and b) grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R) for all share based
payments granted subsequent to the adoption date. The benefits of tax
deductions in excess of recognized compensation expense are reported as a
financing cash flow.
Total
share-based compensation expense (a component of selling and general and
administrative expenses) is summarized as follows:
|
|
February
3,
|
|
|
January
28,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based
compensation expense before income taxes
|
|
$
|
1,130
|
|
|
|
821
|
|
Income
tax benefits
|
|
|
(429
|
)
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based
compensation expense net of income benefits
|
|
$
|
701
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
Diluted
earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
Under
SFAS 123(R), forfeitures are estimated at the time of valuation and reduce
expense ratably over the vesting period. This estimate is adjusted periodically
based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to
differ, from the previous estimate.
Stock
Incentive Plan
Under the
Company's 2003 Incentive Stock Option Plan, options may be granted to officers
and key employees, not to exceed 500,000 shares. According to the terms of the
plan, the per share exercise price of options granted shall not be less than the
fair market value of the stock on the date of grant and such options will expire
no later than five years from the date of grant. The options vest in equal
amounts over a four year requisite service period beginning from the grant date.
In the case of a stockholder owning more than 10% of the outstanding voting
stock of the Company, the exercise price of an incentive stock option may not be
less than 110% of the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant and
such options will expire no later than five years from the date of grant. Also,
the aggregate fair market value of the stock with respect to which incentive
stock options are exercisable on a tax deferred basis for the first time by an
individual in any calendar year may not exceed $100,000. In the event that the
foregoing results in a portion of an option exceeding the $100,000 limitation,
such portion of the option in excess of the limitation shall be treated as a
nonqualified stock option. At February 3, 2008, the Company had 82,250 remaining
shares authorized for future option grants. Upon exercise, the
Company issues these shares from the unissued shares
authorized.
Under the
Company’s Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Management Directors, up to
120,000 options to purchase shares may be granted to Directors of the Company
who are not otherwise officers or employees of the Company. According to the
terms of the plan, the per share exercise price of options granted shall not be
less than the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant and such
options will expire five years from the date of grant. The options vest in equal
amounts over a four year requisite service period beginning from the grant date.
All options under the plan shall be non-qualified stock options. As of February
3, 2008, there are no shares remaining to be issued under this
plan.
The
estimated fair value of each option is recorded as compensation expense recorded
a straight-line basis beginning with the grant date for the respective award.
The Company has estimated the fair value of all stock option awards as of the
date of the grant by applying a Black-Scholes pricing valuation model. The
application of this valuation model involves assumptions that are judgmental and
highly sensitive in the determination of the fair value. The weighted
average assumptions used in determining the fair value of options granted
in the last three fiscal years and a summary of the methodology applied to
develop each assumption are as follows:
|
|
February
3,
|
|
|
January
28,
|
|
|
January
29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected
price volatility
|
|
|
25.64
|
%
|
|
|
37.40
|
%
|
|
|
38.40
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
|
|
4.79
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average expected lives in years
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend
yield
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
EXPECTED
PRICE VOLATILITY -- This is a measure of the amount by which the stock price has
fluctuated or is expected to fluctuate. The Company uses actual historical
changes in the market value of its stock to calculate expected price volatility
because management believes that this is the best indicator of future
volatility. The Company calculates daily market value changes from the date of
grant over a historical period equal to the expected life to determine
volatility. An increase in the expected volatility will increase compensation
expense.
RISK-FREE
INTEREST RATE -- This is the U.S. Treasury rate for the date of the grant over
the expected term. An increase in the risk-free interest rate will increase
compensation expense.
EXPECTED
LIVES -- This is the period of time over which the options granted are expected
to remain outstanding and is based on management’s expectations in relation to
the holders of the options. Options granted have a maximum term of five years.
An increase in the expected life will increase compensation
expense.
DIVIDEND
YIELD --- The Company has not made any dividend payments nor does it have plans
to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.
A summary
of stock option activity since the Company’s most recent fiscal year-end is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighed
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Value
(in
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
thousands)
|
|
Outstanding
January 28, 2007
|
|
|
501,951
|
|
|
$
|
26.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
88,000
|
|
|
|
39.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(16,288
|
)
|
|
|
14.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(40,250
|
)
|
|
|
29.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(2,038
|
)
|
|
|
12.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
February 3, 2008
|
|
|
531,375
|
|
|
$
|
29.39
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
and expected to vest at February 3, 2008
|
|
|
474,689
|
|
|
$
|
29.43
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable
at February 3, 2008
|
|
|
140,625
|
|
|
$
|
24.70
|
|
|
|
2.80
|
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
The
aggregate intrinsic values in the table above represents the total difference
between the Company's closing stock price on February 3, 2008 and the option
respective exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options as
of February 3, 2008. As of February 3, 2008, total unrecognized compensation
expense related to non-vested stock options is $2.6 million with a weighted
average expense recognition period of 3.3 years.
Other
information relative to option activity during the fiscal years ended February
3, 2008 and January 28, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
February
3,
|
|
|
January
28,
|
|
|
January
29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average grant date fair value of stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
granted (per share)
|
|
$
|
10.93
|
|
|
|
10.59
|
|
|
|
7.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
fair value of stock options vested
|
|
|
1,262
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
intrinsic value of stock options exercised
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
11.
|
Quarterly
Financial Information (Unaudited)
|
Financial
results by quarter are as follows:
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2008
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
110,089
|
|
|
|
122,837
|
|
|
|
113,838
|
|
|
|
152,268
|
|
|
Gross
margin
|
|
|
33,934
|
|
|
|
40,710
|
|
|
|
36,831
|
|
|
|
46,164
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(2,175
|
)
|
|
|
2,846
|
|
|
|
(1,859
|
)
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
Net
earnings (loss)
|
|
|
(2,232
|
)
|
|
|
2,594
|
|
|
|
(1,635
|
)
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
|
Net
earnings (loss) per share (2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
(0.59
|
)
|
|
|
0.68
|
|
|
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(0.59
|
)
|
|
|
0.67
|
|
|
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2007
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
106,877
|
|
|
|
118,268
|
|
|
|
108,332
|
|
|
|
133,844
|
|
|
Gross
margin
|
|
|
31,902
|
|
|
|
35,950
|
|
|
|
33,698
|
|
|
|
46,771
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
1,359
|
|
|
|
(548
|
)
|
|
|
4,232
|
|
|
Net
earnings (loss)
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
1,417
|
|
|
|
(646
|
)
|
|
|
4,393
|
|
|
Net
earnings (loss) per share (2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
1.16
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
(1)
|
In
fiscal 2008, a provision for asset impairment of $2.1 million
negatively impacted net
earnings.
|
|
(2)
|
Earnings
per share amounts are computed independently for each of the quarters
presented. Therefore, the sum of the quarterly earnings per share in
fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 does not equal the total computed for the
year.
|
12.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
Operating
lease payments to related parties (board members and related companies) amounted
to approximately $607, $699 and $680, in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. All of these lease agreements were initiated prior to fiscal 2005
and have not been modified.
The
Company’s business activities include operation of ALCO discount stores and
Duckwall variety stores. Even though the Company has two types of stores, it is
operating them as a single segment.
The
Company has many suppliers with which it conducts business. For fiscal years
2008 and 2007, only one vendor represented more than 5% of the Company
merchandise purchases. For both years, the supplier was Proctor & Gamble.
The loss of this one vendor would not have adverse effects on the ability to
obtain like products and overall results of operations.
For 2008
and 2007, the percentage of sales by product category were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
of Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Merchandise
Category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumables
and commodities
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
Electronics,
entertainment, sporting goods, toys and outdoor living
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Apparel
and accessories
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Home
furnishings and décor
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
14.
|
Staff
Accounting Bulletin 108 (SAB 108)
|
In
September 2006, the SEC staff published Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108,
"Considering the Effects of Prior
Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements"
(SAB 108). The transition provisions of
SAB 108 permit the Company to adjust for the cumulative effect on retained
earnings of errors relating to prior years. In accordance with SAB 108, the
Company adjusted beginning retained earnings for fiscal 2006 in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements for the items described below which had
previously been considered immaterial.
Capitalized Cash Discounts:
The Company adjusted its beginning retained earnings for
fiscal 2007 related to recording cash discounts taken directly to cost of goods
sold rather than being shown as a reduction in inventory. It was determined that
the Company had improperly excluded approximately $752 which should have been
shown as a reduction in inventory.
LIFO:
The Company
adjusted its beginning retained earnings for fiscal 2007 related to a historical
difference between the previously established policy of determining lower of
cost or market adjustments on the aggregate for all LIFO pools rather than on a
pool by pool basis. It was determined that the Company had improperly not
recorded a LIFO reserve of $4.2 million.
The
cumulative effect of each of the items noted above for fiscal 2007 beginning
balances are presented below:
Description
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Income
Taxes
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Inventory
|
|
$
|
(4,344
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,344
|
|
Deferred
tax asset
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,649
|
|
|
|
(1,649
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(4,344
|
)
|
|
|
1,649
|
|
|
|
2,695
|
|
ITEM
9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE.
|
None
ITEM
9A. CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES.
(a)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management
of the Company, with the participation of the Interim Chief Executive Officer
and the Interim Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the
design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended) as of February 3, 2008. Based upon this evaluation, the Interim Chief
Executive Officer and the Interim Chief Financial Officer have concluded that
the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of
February 3, 2008 because of the material weakness described in internal control
over financial reporting described below in Item 9A(b).
(b) Management’s
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management
of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal
control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company’s internal control
system is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control
over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to
the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
A
material weakness represents a deficiency or a combination
of deficiencies in internal controls over financial reporting, such that
there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the
Company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or
detected on a timely basis.
Management
assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting as of February 3, 2008 based on the criteria established in
Internal Control- Integrated
Framework
issued
by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). As a result of
this assessment, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting was not effective as of February 3, 2008.
·
|
The
Company did not have adequate transition plans to address turnover in
finance and accounting personnel. As a result, due to
significant changes in these personnel that occurred around the Company’s
February 3, 2008 year-end closing process, the Company did not have
sufficient trained resources to effectively operate the year-end closing
process controls. This resulted in misstatements that were
corrected prior to the issuance of the consolidated financial
statements. As a result of this material weakness, there is more
than a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the
Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or
detected on a timely basis.
|
Our
independent auditor, KPMG LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm
that audited the financial statements included in this report on Form 10-K and,
as part of its audit, has issued an attestation report, included herein, on the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
(c) Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The
Company had significant changes to its accounting and finance personnel during
the first quarter of fiscal 2009. These changes resulted in
improvement in each position. The Company replaced three positions
with Bachelors of Science accounting degrees individuals. These
positions were previously held by individuals without this
education. The Company replaced one position with an individual who
has achieved their certified public accountant license. The person
who had previously held this particular position did not have this
license. The Company believes that these changes have significantly
strengthened the Finance Department for the future.
The
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company resigned on February 22,
2008. At that time the Board of Directors appointed the current
Senior Vice President – Chief Financial Officer to assume the duties of Interim
President and Chief Executive Officer. The Vice President –
Controller was appointed to assume the duties of Interim Chief Financial
Officer.
|
(d)
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
The Board
of Directors and Stockholders
Duckwall-ALCO
Stores, Inc.:
We have
audited Duckwall-ALCO Stores Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the Company’s) internal
control over financial reporting as of February 3, 2008, based on criteria
established in
Internal
Control – Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, included in the accompanying Item 9A(b)
Management’s Report on Internal
Control over Financial Reporting
. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our
audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and
testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of
the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A
material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal
control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility
that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. A material
weakness has been identified and included in management’s assessment related to
the lack of adequate transition planning for turnover in finance and accounting
personnel, which resulted in ineffective operation of year-end closing process
controls.
We also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company
as of February 3, 2008 and January 28, 2007, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended February 3, 2008. This material weakness
was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests
applied in our audit of the 2008 consolidated financial statements, and this
report does not affect our report dated April 28, 2008, which expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
In our
opinion, because of the effect of the aforementioned material weakness on the
achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 3,
2008, based on criteria
established in
Internal Control – Integrated
Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Kansas
City, Missouri
April 28,
2008
ITEM
9B.
OTHER
INFORMATION
.
None
PART
III
ITEM
10. DIRECTORS AND
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
For
information with respect to the Company’s Directors, the Board of Directors’
Audit Committee and the written code of ethics, see the information provided in
the “Proposal One – Election of Directors,” “Information About Directors
Nominees,” “Code of Ethics” and “Certain Information Concerning the Board and
Its Committees” sections of the Proxy Statement for the June 4, 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, which information is incorporated herein by
reference. For information with respect to Section 16 reports, see
the information provided in the “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance” section of the Proxy Statement for the June 4, 2008 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders, which information is incorporated herein by
reference.
The Company’s executive officers as of
April 28, 2008, are as follows:
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
|
|
|
Donny
R. Johnson
|
47
|
Interim
- Chief Executive Officer
|
Tom
L. Canfield, Jr.
|
54
|
Senior
Vice President
|
Anthony
C. Corradi
|
47
|
Senior
Vice President
|
Phillip
D. Hixon
|
54
|
Senior
Vice President
|
Jon
A. Ramsey
|
40
|
Interim -
Chief Financial Officer
|
Except as
set forth below, all of the executive officers have been associated with the
Company in their present position or other capacity for more than the past five
years. There are no family relationships among the executive officers of the
Company.
Donny R. Johnson
has served
as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer since February 22, 2008. Mr.
Johnson served as Senior Vice President - Chief Financial Officer from August 1,
2007 until February 21, 2008. For the five years prior to that, he was Executive
V.P. & Chief Financial Officer for Brookshire Brothers. Mr. Johnson has
approximately 20 years experience in the retail industry.
Tom L. Canfield, Jr
. has
served as Senior Vice President - Logistics and Administration since 2006. From
1973 to 2006, Mr. Canfield served in various capacities with the Company. Mr.
Canfield has approximately 35 years of experience in the retail
industry.
Phillip D. Hixon
has served
as Senior Vice President - Store Operations since April 11, 2008. Mr. Hixon
served as Senior Vice President - Store Development from February 4, 2008 until
April 10, 2008. Mr. Hixon served as Vice President - Store Development
from December 4, 2006 until February 3, 2008. For the one year prior he served
as Owner and President of Diversified Resources, L.L.C and for more than five
years prior to that, he served as Vice President - Store Planning &
Development of Michaels Stores, Inc. Mr. Hixon has approximately 32 years
experience in the retail industry.
Anthony C. Corradi
has served
as Senior Vice President - Technology and Supply Chain Management since 2007.
Mr. Corradi served as Vice President - Chief Technology Officer from 2005
to 2007. For five years prior to that, he was an independent consultant. Mr.
Corradi has approximately 25 years experience in the retail technology
industry.
Jon A. Ramsey
has served as
Interim Chief Financial Officer since February 22, 2008. Mr. Ramsey served as
Vice President - Controller since 2007. From 1993 to 1999, Mr. Ramsey served in
various capacities with the Company. Mr. Ramsey served as Controller for Salina
Supply, Inc., from 1999 to 2005. Mr. Ramsey has approximately 9 years
experience in the retail industry.
ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION.
The
Registrant's Proxy Statement to be used in connection with the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held on June 4, 2008, contains under the caption “Executive
Compensation and Other Information” the information required by Item 11 of Form
10-K, and such information is incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM
12. SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS.
The
Registrant's Proxy Statement to be used in connection with the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held on June 4, 2008, contains under the caption “Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners, Directors and Management” the
information required by Item 12 of Form 10-K and such information is
incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM
13. CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
The
Registrant's Proxy Statement to be used in connection with the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held on June 4, 2008, contains under the caption
“Compensation Committee Interlocks and Related Party Transactions” the
information required by Item 13 of Form 10-K and such information is
incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM
14. PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
The Registrant's Proxy Statement to be used in connection with the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 4, 2008, contains under the caption
“Ratification of Selection of Independent Public Accountants” the information
required by Item 14 of Form 10-K and such information is incorporated herein by
this reference.
PART
IV
ITEM
15. EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
(a)
|
Documents
filed as part of this report
|
(1)
|
Consolidated
Financial Statements
|
|
The
financial statements are listed in the index for Item 8 of this Form
10-K.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Financial
Statement Schedules
|
|
All
schedules are omitted because they are inapplicable, not required, or the
information is included elsewhere in the Consolidated Financial Statements
or the notes thereto.
|
|
|
|
The
exhibits filed with or incorporated by reference in this report are listed
below:
|
Number
Description
3.1
|
Amended
and Restated Articles of Incorporation (filed as Exhibit 3(a) to Company’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 and hereby incorporated herein by
reference).
|
3.2
|
Certificate
of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation (filed as Exhibit 3(b) to
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29,
1995, and incorporated herein by reference)
|
3.3
|
Bylaws
(filed as Exhibit 3(b) to Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and
hereby incorporated herein by
reference).
|
4.1
|
Specimen
Common Stock Certificates (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Company’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
4.2
|
Reference
is made to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
described above under 3(1) and 3(3), respectively (filed as Exhibit 4(a)
to Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and hereby incorporated
herein by reference).
|
4.3
|
Reference
is made to the Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation
described above under 3(2) (filed as Exhibit 3(2) to Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 1995, and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
10.1
|
Employment
Agreement dated March 23, 2006 between the Company and Michael S. Marcus
is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form
8-K of the Company dated March 28,
2006.
|
10.2
|
Separation
Agreement and Release, dated as of February 22, 2008, between the Company
and Bruce C. Dale is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company dated February 28,
2008.
|
10.3
|
Employment
Agreement dated July 23, 2007 between the Company and Ron V. Mapp is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form
8-K of the Company dated July 30,
2007.
|
10.4
|
Employment
Agreement dated August 1, 2007 between the Company and Donny R. Johnson is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form
8-K of the Company dated August 6,
2007.
|
10.5
|
Loan
and Security Agreement, dated as of January 18, 2008, between the Company
and Fleet Retail Finance Inc.
|
10.6
|
Joinder
Agreement and First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated
September 9, 2002 among the Company, Fleet Retail Finance Inc., and DA
Good Buys, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2003 and hereby
incorporated by reference).
|
21.1
|
Amended
and Restated List of Subsidiaries of the Company (filed as Exhibit 21.1 to
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
February 2, 2003 and hereby incorporated by
reference).
|
23.1
|
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Interim Chief Executive Officer of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. dated
April 28, 2008, pursuant to Rule 13a-4(a) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2003.
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Interim Chief Financial Officer of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. dated
April 28, 2008, pursuant to Rule 13a-4(a) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2003.
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Interim Chief Executive Officer of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc, dated
April 28, 2008, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which is furnished with
this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 2008 and is
not treated as filed in reliance upon § 601(b)(32) of Regulations
S-K.
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Interim Chief Financial Officer of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc., dated
April 28, 2008, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which is furnished with
this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 2008 and is
not treated as filed in reliance upon § 601(b)(32) of Regulations
S-K.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DUCKWALL-ALCO
STORES, INC.
by
/s/
Donny R. Johnson
Donny R.
Johnson, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer
Dated:
April 28, 2008
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated:
Signature
and Title
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Donny R. Johnson
|
|
|
April
28, 2008
|
|
Donny
R. Johnson
|
|
|
|
|
Interim
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Jon A. Ramsey
|
|
|
April
28, 2008
|
|
Jon
A. Ramsey
|
|
|
|
|
Interim
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Royce L. Winsten
|
|
|
April
28, 2008
|
|
Royce
L. Winsten
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Raymond A.D. French
|
|
|
April
28, 2008
|
|
Raymond
A.D. French
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Lolan C. Mackey
|
|
|
April
28, 2008
|
|
Lolan
C. Mackey
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
James G. Hyde
|
|
|
April
28, 2008
|
|
James
G. Hyde
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Dennis E. Logue
|
|
|
April
28, 2008
|
|
Dennis
E. Logue
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|