ADL Amdl,

 

 

U. S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009.

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______ to ______.

Commission File Number: 001-16695

 

AMDL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		33-0413161
(State of Incorporation)		(I.R.S. employer identification no.)
2492 Walnut Avenue, Suite 100
Tustin, California		92780-7039
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (714) 505-4460

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company þ
				(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No

The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock on August 18th, 2009 was 17,188,074.

 

 

AMDL, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

		Page
Part I Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements			3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2009 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2008 (Audited)			3
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008			4
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008			5
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements			6
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			25
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			41
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			41
Part II Other Information
Item 1 Legal Proceedings			44
Item 1A. Risk Factors			44
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			51
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities			51
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders			51
Item 5. Other Information			51
Item 6. Exhibits			51
Signatures			52
Exhibit Index:			53
EX-10.50
EX-10.51
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2

PART 1 — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AMDL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

		June 30,				December 31,
		2009				2008
		(Unaudited)				(Audited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	2,072,904			$	2,287,283
Accounts receivable, net			6,550,721				13,575,534
Inventories			1,290,934				1,563,991
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			6,242,691				1,006,960
Current assets of discontinued operations			—				1,435,021
Total current assets			16,157,250				19,868,789
Property and equipment, net			9,807,757				11,709,508
Intangible assets, net			4,550,310				5,311,568
Other assets			4,725,385				4,072,432
Non-current assets of discontinued operations			—				1,789,934
Total assets		$	35,240,702			$	42,752,231
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		$	1,891,582			$	1,675,539
Accrued salaries and wages			1,179,190				822,201
Income taxes payable			61,768				472,860
Deferred revenue			—				87,538
Current portion of notes payable			2,666,670				2,662,610
Current liabilities of discontinued operations			—				1,151,515
Total current liabilities			5,799,209				6,872,263
Other long-term liabilities			373,745				353,811
Notes payable, net of current portion and debt discount			1,554,788				581,305
Total liabilities			7,727,742				7,807,379
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding			—				—
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 17,150,174 and 16,006,074 shares issued at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively; 16,001,904 and 15,826,074 shares outstanding at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively			16,002				15,826
Additional paid-in capital			70,474,045				68,192,411
Accumulated other comprehensive income			2,369,778				2,443,452
Accumulated deficit			(45,346,867	)			(35,706,837	)
Total stockholders’ equity			27,512,958				34,944,852
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	35,240,702			$	42,752,231

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

AMDL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Unaudited)

		Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
		2009				2008				2009				2008
Net revenues		$	3,181,043			$	4,878,192			$	5,892,780			$	7,819,385
Cost of sales			2,150,405				2,459,322				3,735,978				3,976,862
Gross profit			1,030,639				2,418,870				2,156,802				3,842,523
Operating expenses:
Research and development			332,779				57,052				425,463				65,747
Selling, general and administrative			3,784,801				2,714,487				6,375,570				5,512,436
			4,114,580				2,771,539				6,801,033				5,578,183
Income (loss) from operations			(3,086,941	)			(352,669	)			(4,644,231	)			(1,735,660	)
Other income (expense):
Interest and other income (expense), net			(36,721	)			4,112				(72,830	)			(80,408	)
Interest expense			(332,034	)			(199,814	)			(566,251	)			(261,779	)
Total other expense, net			(368,755	)			(195,702	)			(639,080	)			(342,187	)
Loss before provision for income taxes			(3,455,696	)			(548,868	)			(5,283,311	)			(2,077,847	)
Provision for income taxes			417,165				257,572				527,667				406,633
Loss before discontinued operation			(3,872,861	)			(805,943	)			(5,810,978	)			(2,484,480	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net			(4,222,696	)			376,376				(3,975,670	)			582,717
Net loss			(8,095,755	)			(429,567	)			(9,786,648	)			(1,901,763	)
Other comprehensive loss:
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)			(54	)			524,015				(42,485	)			1,307,444
Comprehensive gain (loss)		$	(8,095,502	)		$	,94,448			$	(9,744,162	)		$	(594,319	)
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
Loss before discontinued operations		$	(0.24	)		$	(0.05	)		$	(0.37	)		$	(0.16	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		$	(0.27	)		$	0.02			$	(0.25	)		$	0.04
Net loss		$	(0.51	)		$	(0.03	)		$	(0.62	)		$	(0.12	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic and diluted			15,851,815				15,564,208				15,916,133				15,347,277

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

AMDL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

		Six Months Ended June 30,
		2009				2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss		$	(9,786,648	)		$	(1,901,763	)
Less: income from discontinued operations			(3,975,670	)			582,717
			(5,810,978	)			(2,484,480	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss before discontinued operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization			1,300,413				637,931
Accretion of debt discount and amortization of debt issuance costs			194,291				—
Fair market value of options granted to employees and directors for services			154,056				422,168
Fair market value of common stock, warrants and options expensed for services			314,310				1,116,753
Fair value adjustment to warrants accounted for as liabilities			35,557				—
Provision for bad debts			1,932,384				148,379
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable			5,116,069				(2,743,228	)
Related party account with Jade Capital			—				(47,375	)
Inventories			275,284				82.816
Prepaid expenses and other assets			(5,674,930	)			399,979
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and accrued salaries and wages			539,155				733,327
Income taxes payable			(412,035	)			(20,930	)
Deferred revenue			(87,720	)			(84,851	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations			(2,124,145	)			(1,839,511	)
Net cash provided by operating activities of discontinued operations			1,853,502				491,270
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities			(270,643	)			(1,348,241	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment			(2,034,324	)			(1,196,775	)
Funds advanced to Kangda							(644,426	)
Return of amounts advanced on note receivable			—				13,936
Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations			(2,034,324	)			(1,827,265	)
Net cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations			—				(14,909	)
Net cash used in investing activities			(2,034,324	)			(1,842,174	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of Senior Notes, net of cash issuance costs of $656,426			2,088,593				—
Payments on notes payable			—				(2,197,969	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of cash offering costs of $123,875			—				860,421
Proceeds from the exercise of warrants			—				6,983
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations			2,088,593				(1,414,741	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of discontinued operations			—				(84,176	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations			2,088,593				(1,414,741	)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents			1,996				59,484
Net change in cash and cash equivalents			(214,379	)			(4,545,672	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period			2,287,283				6,157,493
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period		$	2,072,904			$	1,611,821

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

AMDL, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

NOTE 1 — MANAGEMENT’S REPRESENTATION

The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008, which has been derived from audited financial statements, and the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by AMDL, Inc. (the “Company”) in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statement presentation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included and the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading.

Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009. It is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2008 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. The report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm on the consolidated financial statements included in Form 10-K contains a qualification regarding the substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 2 — ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Business

The predecessor to the Company was incorporated May 13, 1988 and the Company reorganized as a Delaware corporation on June 7, 1989.

Since inception, the Company has primarily been engaged in the commercial development of and obtaining various governmental regulatory approvals for the marketing of its proprietary diagnostic tumor-marker test kit (DR-70®) to detect the presence of multiple types of cancer.

On September 28, 2006, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Jade Pharmaceutical, Inc. (“JPI”). JPI operates primarily through two wholly owned People’s Republic of China (“PRC” or “China”) based subsidiaries, Jiangxi Bio-Chemical Pharmacy Company Limited (“JJB”) and Yangbian Yiqiao Bio-Chemical Pharmacy Company Limited (“YYB”). Through JPI, the Company manufactures and distributes generic, homeopathic, and over-the-counter pharmaceutical products, beauty products and supplements in China.

Discontinued Operations and Dispositions

On January 22, 2009, the Company’s board of directors authorized management to sell the operations of YYB. In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets (“SFAS 144”), the Company has classified the assets, liabilities, operations and cash flows of YYB as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The Company sold YYB in June 2009. No significant activity occurred during the second quarter of 2009. The sales price was 16 million Rmb to be remitted directly to the bank holding the mortgage on JJB assets.

Summarized operating results of discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

		Six months ended June 30,
		2009				2008
Revenue		$	594,839			$	1,549,193
Income before income taxes		$	277,743			$	754,359

Included in loss from discontinued operations, net are income tax expenses of $30,717 and $134,086 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. YYB’s tax rate is 15% through 2010 in accordance with the “Western Region Development Concession Policy” of the PRC government.

The following table summarizes the carrying amount at December 31, 2008 of the major classes of assets and liabilities of the Company’s business classified as discontinued operations:

		December 31,
		2008
Current assets:
Accounts receivable, net		$	930,769
Inventories			423,842
Other current assets			80,410
		$	1,435,021
Long-lived assets:
Property and equipment		$	1,742,739
Other			47,195
		$	1,789,934
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		$	685,360
Debt			466,155
		$	1,151,515

Going Concern

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates, among other things, the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company incurred net losses before discontinued operations of $3,872,861 and $805,943 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, bringing the net losses before discontinued operations to $5,810,978 and 2,484,480 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and had an accumulated deficit of $45,346,867 at June 30, 2009. In addition, despite generating cash from financing activities of $         for the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company had a net decrease in cash of $214,379 for the six months ended June 30, 2009.

At August 17, 2009, the Company had cash on hand in the U.S. $16,000. The Company’s operations in China currently generate positive cash from operations, but the availability of any cash from the Company’s operations in China and the timing thereof is uncertain. The Company’s receivables in China have been outstanding for extended periods, and the Company has experienced increased delays in collection. The Company’s U.S. operations currently require approximately $400,000 per month to fund the cost associated with its general U.S. corporate functions, payment by corporate of the salaries of the Company’s executives in China, and the expenses related to the further development of the DR-70 test kit. Assuming (i) JJB does not undertake significant new activities which require additional capital, (ii) the current level of revenue from the sale of DR-70 test kits does not increase in the near future, (iii) the Company does not conduct any full scale clinical trials for the DR-70 test kit or the combination immunogene therapy (“CIT”) technology in the U.S. or China, (iv) JPI continues to generate sufficient cash to exceed its cash requirements, (v) no outstanding warrants are exercised, and (vi) no additional equity or debt financings are completed, the amount of cash on hand is not expected to be sufficient to meet the Company’s projected operating expenses on a month to month basis. Accordingly the Company must @@@ addictional ### or equity financing for its continued operations.

The monthly cash requirement does not include any extraordinary items or expenditures, including payments to the Mayo Clinic on clinical trials for the DR-70 test kit or expenditures related to further development of the CIT technology, as no significant expenditures are anticipated other than the legal fees incurred in furtherance of patent protection for the CIT technology.

Management’s near and long-term operating strategies focus on (i) obtaining China State Food and Drug Administration (“SFDA”) approval for the DR-70 test kit, (ii) further developing and marketing of the DR-70 test kit, (iii) funding the growth of JPI’s existing products, (iv) seeking a large pharmaceutical partner for the Company’s CIT technology, (v) selling different formulations of Human Placental Extract (“HPE”)-based products in the U.S. and internationally, and (vi) introduction of new products. Management recognizes that the Company must generate additional capital resources to enable it to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans include seeking financing, alliances or other partnership agreements with entities interested in the Company’s technologies, or

other business transactions that would generate sufficient resources to assure continuation of the Company’s operations and research and development programs.

There are significant risks and uncertainties which could negatively affect the Company’s operations. These are principally related to (i) the absence of a distribution network for the Company’s DR-70 test kits, (ii) the early stage of development of the Company’s CIT technology and the need to enter into a strategic relationship with a larger company capable of completing the development of any ultimate product line including the subsequent marketing of such product, (iii) the absence of any commitments or firm orders from the Company’s distributors, (iv) possible disruption in producing products in China as a result of relocation of the Company’s facilities and/or delays or failure in either the Good Manufacturing Process (“GMP”) recertification process or the SFDA production license approval process, and (v) credit risks associated with new distribution agreements in China. The Company’s limited sales to date for the DR-70 test kit and the lack of any purchase requirements in the existing distribution agreements make it impossible to identify any trends in the Company’s business prospects. Moreover, if either AcuVector and/or the University of Alberta are successful in their claims (See Note 9), the Company may be liable for substantial damages, the Company’s rights to the CIT technology will be adversely affected, and the Company’s future prospects for licensing the CIT technology will be significantly impaired.

The Company’s only sources of additional funds to meet continuing operating expenses, fund additional research and development, complete the acquisition of production rights for new products, fund additional working capital, and conduct clinical trials which may be required to receive SFDA approval are the sale of securities, and cash flow generated from JPI’s operations. Management is actively seeking additional debt and/or equity financing, but no assurances can be given that such financing will be obtained or what the terms thereof will be. Additionally, there is no assurance as to whether the Company will continue to conduct JPI’s operations on a profitable basis or that JPI’s operations will generate positive cash flow. The Company may need to discontinue a portion or all of its operations if it is unsuccessful in generating positive cash flow or financing its operations through the issuance of securities.

These items, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amount and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts and transactions of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates made by management are, among others, provisions for doubtful accounts, realizability of inventories, recoverability of long-lived assets, valuation and useful lives of intangible assets, and valuation of options, warrants and deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues from the wholesale sales of over-the counter and prescription pharmaceuticals are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, title and risk of loss have passed to the buyer, the price is fixed or readily determinable and collection is reasonably assured, provided the criteria in the Security and SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 101 Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements , (as amended by SAB No. 104) are met.

In conjunction with the launch of the Company’s Nalefen Skin Care HPE products, distributors of the products were offered limited-time discounts to allow for promotional expenses incurred in the distribution channel. Distributors are not required to submit proof of the promotional expenses incurred. The Company accounts for the promotional expenses in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 01-9, Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendor’s Products) . Accordingly, the promotional discounts granted in prior periods were netted against revenue in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Accounts receivable presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance

JPI’s management has encountered difficulties in the collection of Accounts receivables from the above distributors. Since collectability is questionable, a provision for doubtful accounts has been made in the amount of approximately $2.6 million.

sheets have been reduced by the promotional discounts, as customers are permitted by the terms of the distribution contracts to net the discounts against payments on the related invoices.

JJB signed four new distribution agreement for the distribution of the Good nak beauty series of produces. These distribution agreements include up front payments for promotion and advertising. As of June 30, 2009, approximately $2.2 million was remitted.

Inventories Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined on an average cost basis which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis and includes raw materials, labor and manufacturing overhead. At each balance sheet date, the Company evaluates its ending inventories for excess quantities and obsolescence, Among other factors, the Company considers historical demand and forecasted demand in relation to the inventory on hand, market conditions and product life cycles when determining obsolescence and net realizable value. Provisions are made to reduce excess or obsolete inventories to their estimated net realizable values. Once established, write-dawns are considered permanent adjustments to the cost basis of the excess or obsolete inventories.

Any provision for sales promotion discounts and estimated returns are accounted for in the period the related sales are recorded. Buyers generally have limited rights of return, and the Company provides for estimated returns at the time of sale based on historical experience. Returns from customers historically have not been material. Actual returns and claims in any future period may differ from the Company’s estimates.

In accordance with EITF Issue No. 06-3, How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross Versus Net Presentation) , JPI’s revenues are reported net of value added taxes (“VAT”) collected.

Deferred Revenue

On June 14, 2007, JPI (through JJB) entered into an agreement and letter of intent with Shanghai Jiezheng (formerly known as Shanghai XiangEn) to begin direct distribution of pharmaceutical products through retail stores. The retail stores are owned by independent third parties who sell JJB’s products at retail to consumers. Shanghai Jiezheng and JPI collaborated with the owners in re-branding the retail stores as JPGreen Health and Beauty Clinics.

During 2007, JJB received a one-time, non-refundable up front fee from each of eight sub-operators of the retail stores in the aggregate amount of $314,762, which will be recognized over the two year contract period with the sub-operators. The Company deferred recognition of these fees until the retail stores opened. JJB is amortizing the up-front fees over the two year contract period. The Company recorded up-front fees of approximately $40,000 as revenues for each of the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In the first half of 2008, numerous existing beauty and spa businesses indicated their interest in becoming JP Green product sellers, without JPI’s involvement in direct ownership or management. Based on the perceived level of interest and the relative low cost of this strategy, the Company decided to abandon the JP Green store concept and pursue a strategy of retail distribution through independent, non-branded stores. Since the Company does not expect any significant additional involvement in the operations of the eight sub-operators, the up-front fees were recorded as revenue during the quarter ended June 30, 2009. Deferred revenue related to the unamortized up-front fees amounted to $87,538 at December 31, 2008.

Accounting for Shipping and Handling Revenue, Fees and Costs

The Company classifies amounts billed for shipping and handling as revenue in accordance with EITF Issue No. 00-10, Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs. Shipping and handling fees and costs are included in cost of sales.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with SFAS 144, the Company evaluates the carrying value of its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such carrying values may not be recoverable. The Company uses its best judgment based on the current facts and circumstances relating to its business when determining whether any significant impairment factors exist. The Company considers the following factors or conditions, among others, that could indicate the need for an impairment review:

	•		significant under performance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;
	•		market projections for cancer research technology;
	•		its ability to obtain patents, including continuation patents, on technology;
	•		significant changes in its strategic business objectives and utilization of the assets;
	•		significant negative industry or economic trends, including legal factors;
	•		potential for strategic partnerships for the development of its patented technology;
	•		changing or implementation of rules regarding manufacture or sale of pharmaceuticals in China; and
	•		ability to maintain GMP certifications.

If the Company determines that the carrying values of long-lived assets may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, the Company’s management performs an undiscounted cash flow analysis to determine if impairment exists. If impairment exists, the Company measures the impairment based on the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and its fair value, and the impairment is charged to operations in the period in which the long-lived asset impairment is determined by management. Based on its analysis, the Company believes that no indicators of impairment of the carrying value of its long-lived assets existed at June 30, 2009. There can be no assurance, however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the Company’s products will continue or allow the Company to realize the value of its long-lived assets and prevent future impairment.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company applies the provisions of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 133”). Derivatives within the scope of SFAS 133 must be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. The Company issued Convertible Debt in September 2008, and recorded a derivative asset related to the limitation on bonus interest rights held by Convertible Debt holders in the event of a change in control or bankruptcy. The fair value of the derivative asset was $125,000 at both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

Risks and Uncertainties

Manufacturing and Distribution Operations in China

JJB, and Golden Success, a minimally active shell corporation acquired in 2008, operate as wholly owned foreign enterprises (“WFOE”) in the PRC. Risks associated with operating as a WFOE include unlimited liability for claims arising from operations in China and potentially less favorable treatment from governmental agencies in China than such entities would receive if they operated through a joint venture with a Chinese partner.

JJB is subject to the Pharmaceutical Administrative Law, which governs the licensing, manufacture, marketing and distribution of pharmaceutical products in China and sets penalty provisions for violations of provisions of the Pharmaceutical Administrative Law. Compliance with changes in law may require the Company to incur additional expenditures which could have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

The value of the RMB fluctuates and is subject to changes in China’s political and economic conditions. Historically, the Chinese government has benchmarked the RMB exchange ratio against the United States dollar, thereby mitigating the associated foreign currency exchange rate fluctuation risk; however, no assurances can be given that the risks related to currency deviations of the RMB will not increase in the future. Additionally, the RMB is not freely convertible into foreign currency. All foreign exchange transactions must take place through authorized institutions and are subject to various currency exchange, corporate and tax regulations.

Regulatory Environment

The Company’s proprietary test kit is deemed a medical device or biologic, and as such is governed by the Federal Food and Drug and Cosmetics Act and by the regulations of state agencies and various foreign government agencies. Prior to July 3, 2008, the Company was not permitted to sell the DR-70 test kit in the U.S. except on a “research use only” basis, as regulated by the United States Food and Drug Administration (“USFDA”). The Company has received regulatory approval from various foreign governments to sell its products and is in the process of obtaining regulatory approval in other foreign markets. There can be no assurance that the Company will maintain the regulatory approvals required to market its DR-70 test kit or that they will not be withdrawn.

Prior to May 2002, the Company’s focus was on obtaining foreign distributors for its DR-70 test kit. In May 2002, the Company decided to begin the USFDA process under Section 510(k) of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act for approval of its intent to market the DR-70 test kit as an aid in monitoring patients with colorectal cancer. On July 3, 2008, the Company received a letter of determination from the USFDA that the DR-70 test kit was “substantially equivalent” to the existing predicate device being marketed. The letter grants the Company the right to market the DR-70 test kit as a device to monitor patients who have been previously diagnosed with colorectal cancer.

Although the Company has obtained approval from the USFDA to market the then current formulation of the DR-70 test kit, it has been determined that one of the key components of the DR-70 test kit, the anti-fibrinogen-HRP is limited in supply and additional quantities cannot be purchased. There are currently enough DR-70 test kit components to perform approximately 1.2 million individual tests (31,000 test kits) over the next 12-18 months. Based on current and anticipated orders, this supply is adequate to fill all orders. The Company now anticipates that it will attempt to locate a substitute anti-fibrinogen-HRP and perform additional quality assurance testing in order to create a significant supply of the current version of the DR-70 test kit.

Part of the Company’s research and development efforts through 2010 will include the testing and development of an enhanced and improved version of the DR-70 test kit. Pilot studies show that the new version could be superior to the current version. The Company has completed negotiations with a third party to take the lead on necessary clinical studies. It is anticipated that this version will be submitted to the USFDA in the latter half of 2010.

In June 2007, the Chinese approval process fundamentally changed. Under the new SFDA guidelines, the SFDA is unlikely to approve the marketing of the DR-70 test kit without one of the following: approval by the USFDA, sufficient clinical trials in China, or product approval from a country where the DR-70 test kit is registered and approved for marketing and export. JPI intends to proceed with all of these options in an attempt to meet the new SFDA guidelines, but even though USFDA approval of a limited supply formulation of the DR-70 test kit has been received, there can be no assurances that JPI will obtain approval for marketing the DR-70 test kit in China or what the timing thereof may be. The estimated time to complete the SFDA approval process is a year and a half to two years.

In order to comply with the new SFDA guidelines, in September of 2008, the Company retained Jyton & Emergo Medical Technology, a China based company to:

	•		Compile technical file and prepare clinical protocol;
	•		Clinical trial preparation and design;
	•		Clinical trial supervision and monitoring;
	•		When appropriate, apply for SFDA approval.

The Company is subject to the risk of failure in maintaining its existing regulatory approvals, in obtaining other regulatory approval, as well as the delays until receipt of such approval, if obtained. Therefore, the Company is subject to substantial business risks and uncertainties inherent in such an entity, including the potential of business failure.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Cash

From time to time, the Company maintains cash balances at certain institutions in excess of the FDIC limit. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had no cash balances in excess of this limit. Additionally, the Company held $1,900,012 in uninsured cash accounts at its foreign subsidiaries.

Customers

The Company grants credit to customers within the PRC, and does not require collateral. The Company’s ability to collect receivables is affected by economic fluctuations in the geographic areas and the industry served by the Company. A reserve for uncollectible amounts and estimated sales returns is provided based on historical experience and a specific analysis of the accounts which management believes is sufficient. Accounts receivable is net of a reserve of doubtful accounts and sales returns of $2,004,751 and $73,446 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Although the Company expects to collect amounts due, actual collections may differ from the estimated amounts.

As of June 30, 2009, amounts due from three customers, each with receivables in excess of 10% of accounts receivable, comprised 28%, 15% and 15% of outstanding accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2008, amounts due from six customers, each with receivables in excess of 10% of accounts receivable, comprised 19%, 14%, 13%, 13%, 12% and 12% of outstanding accounts receivable. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, one customer comprised 11% of net revenues. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, two customers comprised 17% and 12% of net revenues.

Historically, the majority of the Company’s customers were in the pharmaceutical industry. Consequently, there has been a concentration of receivables and revenues within that industry, which is subject to normal credit risk. Beginning in the third quarter of 2008, the Company entered into contracts with three new customers and a fourth contract with an existing customer for the regional distribution of HPE-based beauty products, marketed under the brand name Nalefen, within China. The new customers specialize in the distribution of cosmetic products and were granted credit terms of 120 days. There were no significant sales of the beauty products to the new customers during the six months ended June 30, 2009. Accounts receivable from such customers represented 20% and 58% of outstanding accounts receivable at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Although the Company has limited history with customers in the cosmetic distribution industry, management considers the industry to be subject to normal credit risk.

Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic net loss per common share from continuing operations is computed based on the weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net loss per share from continuing operations is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average shares outstanding assuming all dilutive potential common shares were issued. In periods of losses from continuing operations, basic and diluted loss per share before discontinued operations are the same as the effect of shares issuable upon the conversion of debt and issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants is anti-dilutive. Basic and diluted income per share from discontinued operations are also the same, as SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share , requires the use of the denominator used in the calculation of loss per share from continuing operations in all other calculations of earnings per share presented, despite the dilutive effect of potential common shares.

The impact under the treasury stock method of stock options and warrants would have been incremental shares of none and 374,538 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Additionally, 2,204,559 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of debt would have been considered in calculating diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, had the inclusion of such shares been dilutive.

Diluted income per share excludes the impact of 10,451,125 and 5,582,814 options and warrants outstanding or issuable upon the conversion of debt because the exercise price per share for those options and warrants exceeds the average market price of the Company’s common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

		Six months ended June 30,
		2009				2008
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for interest		$	207,356			$	184,960
Cash paid during the period for taxes		$	736,506			$	438,198
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities:
Warrants issued in connection with Senior Notes, included in debt issuance costs and debt discount		$	1,853,120			$	—
Reclassification of amounts recorded to additional paid-in capital to warrant liability, including $110,858 recorded to retained earnings upon implementation of EITF 07-5, representing the change in value of the warrants from date of issuance to January 1, 2009		$	209,166			$	—
Reclassification of warrant liability to additional paid-in capital upon expiration of share adjustment terms		$	133,866			$	—
Fair market value of common stock recorded as prepaid consulting						$	1,011,000
Fair value of warrants issued for services, included in prepaid expense		$	35,625			$	—

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined on an average cost basis which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis and includes raw materials, labor and manufacturing overhead. At each balance sheet date, the Company evaluates its ending inventories for excess quantities and obsolescence, Among other factors, the Company considers historical demand and forecasted demand in relation to the inventory on hand, market conditions and product life cycles when determining obsolescence and net realizable value. Provisions are made to reduce excess or obsolete inventories to their estimated net realizable values. Once established, write-dawns are considered permanent adjustments to the cost basis of the excess or obsolete inventories.

and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value at least once a year, to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 for its nonfinancial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 had no impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In November 2007, the FASB’s EITF ratified Issue No. 07-1, Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements, (“EITF 07-1”) which defines collaborative arrangements and establishes reporting and disclosure requirements for such arrangements. The Company adopted EITF 07-1 on January 1, 2009. The adoption of EITF 07-1 had no impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — An Amendment of ARB No. 51 . SFAS No. 160 establishes new accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The Company adopted SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 160 did not have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations . SFAS No. 141(R) replaces SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) retains the fundamental requirements in SFAS No. 141 that the acquisition method of accounting be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) amends the recognition provisions for assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination, including those arising from contractual and non-contractual contingencies. SFAS No. 141(R) also amends the recognition criteria for contingent consideration. In addition, under SFAS No. 141(R), changes in an acquired entity’s deferred tax assets and uncertain tax positions after the measurement period will impact income tax expense. The Company adopted SFAS No. 141(R) on January 1, 2009. SFAS No. 141(R) will impact the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements if and when the Company engages in a business combination.

In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets (“FSP 142-3”). FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets . The Company adopted FSP 142-3 on January 1, 2009. The adoption of FSP No. 142-3 had no impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In May 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. APB 14-1 (“FSP APB 14-1”), which clarifies the accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled fully or partially in cash upon conversion. FSP APB 14-1 requires entities to separately measure and account for the liability and equity components of qualifying convertible debt and amortize the value of the equity component to interest cost over the estimated life of the convertible debt instrument. By amortizing the value of the equity component, an entity will effectively recognize interest cost at its non-convertible debt borrowing rate. FSP APB 14-1 also requires re-measurement of the liability and equity components upon extinguishment of a convertible debt instrument, which may result in a gain or loss recognized in the financial statements for the extinguishment of the liability component. FSP APB 14-1 requires retrospective application for all instruments that were outstanding during any periods presented. The Company adopted FSP APB 14-1 on January 1, 2009. The adoption of FSP APB 14-1 had no impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In June 2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 07-5, Determining Whether an Instrument (or an Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock (“EITF 07-5”). EITF 07-5 provides that an entity should use a two step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions. The Company adopted EITF 07-5 on January 1, 2009. As a result, the Company reclassified certain warrants as liabilities and recorded a cumulative effect gain of approximately $111,000 to retained earnings for the decrease in fair value of the warrants at the date of issuance compared with the fair value at the date of implementation of EITF 07-5. Adjustment features within the warrants that resulted in liability classification expired prior to March 31, 2009. As a result, the warrants were reclassified back to equity as of March 31, 2009. The Company recorded a loss of approximately $36,000 to other expense in the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as a result of adjusting the warrant liability to fair value at the date that the adjustment features expired.

In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (“FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1”), which requires publicly traded companies to include in their interim financial reports certain disclosures about the carrying value and fair value of financial instruments previously required only in annual financial statements and to disclose changes in significant assumptions used to calculate the fair value of financial instruments. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 is effective for all interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for interim reporting periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company is evaluating the effect that FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 will have on its disclosures for the second quarter of 2009.

NOTE 3 — INVENTORIES

Inventories consist of the following:

		June 30,				December 31,
		2009				2008
		(Unaudited)				(Audited)
Raw materials		$	1,024,644			$	719,389
Work-in-process			5,332				11,808
Finished goods			260,959				832,794
		$	1,290,934			$	1,563,991

NOTE 4 — PREPAID EXPENSES, OTHER CURRENT ASSETS, AND OTHER ASSETS

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:

		June 30,				December 31,
		2009				2008
		(Unaudited)				(Audited)
Material deposits		$	1,182,463			$	627,390
Due from officers and directors			12,770				9,693
Current deferred tax asset							92,798
Receivable from sale of YYB			2,337,541				—
Advertising and sales			2,191,445				—
Other			518,472				277,079
		$	6,242,691			$	1,006,960

Other assets consist of the following:

		June 30,				December 31,
		2009				2008
		(Unaudited)				(Audited)
Deposits, primarily product licenses		$	3,013,055			$	3,000,354
Debt issuance costs (Note 7)			1,550,665				906,408
Convertible Debt derivative			125,000				125,000
Refundable deposits			36,665				40,670
		$	4,725,385			$	4,072,432

Revenues have not yet been generated from the product licenses. At the time commercial sales of the product begin, the product licenses will be reclassified to intangible assets and amortized to cost of goods sold using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the related product.

NOTE 5 — INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets consist of the following at June 30, 2009 (Unaudited):

										Effect of
		Gross								Foreign
		Carrying				Accumulated				Currency
		Value				Amortization				Translation				Net
Assets subject to amortization:
Intellectual property		$	2,000,000			$	(791,667	)		$	—			$	1,208,333
Production rights			1,916,622				(436,783	)			169,389				1,649,638
Land use rights			1,354,765				(92,854	)			(260,299	)			1,001,613
Non-compete agreements			324,415				(216,925	)			48,789				156,159
Customer relationships			214,328				(103,299	)			34,421				145,451
Trade name and logo			530,829				(172,462	)			91,047				449,413
		$	6,340,959			$	(1,813,990	)		$	83,268			$	4,610,238

Intangible assets consist of the following at December 31, 2008 (Audited):

										Effect of
		Gross								Foreign
		Carrying				Accumulated				Currency
		Value				Amortization				Translation				Net
Assets subject to amortization:
Intellectual property		$	2,000,000			$	(741,667	)		$	—			$	1,258,333
Production rights			1,916,622				(318,986	)			154,007				1,751,643
Land use rights			1,354,765				(99,094	)			209,839				1,465,510
Non-compete agreements			324,415				(163,652	)			32,483				193,246
Customer relationships			214,328				(77,904	)			26,569				162,993
Trade name and logo			530,829				(129,041	)			78,055				479,843
		$	6,340,959			$	(1,530,344	)		$	500,953			$	5,311,568

In August 2001, the Company acquired intellectual property rights and an assignment of a US patent application for its CIT technology for $2,000,000. The technology was purchased from Dr. Lung-Ji Chang, who developed it while at the University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. During 2003, two lawsuits were filed challenging the Company’s ownership of this intellectual property. The value of the intellectual property will be diminished if either of the lawsuits is successful (see Note 9).

As part of the acquisition of the technology, the Company agreed to pay Dr. Chang a 5% royalty on net sales of products developed with the Company’s CIT technology. The Company has not paid any royalties to Dr. Chang to date as there have been no sales of such products.

NOTE 6 — INCOME TAXES

The Company recorded tax provisions of $417,165 and $257,572 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, or 12% and 10% of its pre-tax losses for the respective periods. The Company recorded tax provisions of $527,667 and $406,633 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, or 37% and 18% of its pre-tax losses for the respective periods. The difference between the effective tax rates and the 34% federal statutory rate resulted primarily from losses generated in the United States with no corresponding tax benefit, due to the full valuation reserve on net deferred tax assets, and foreign earnings taxed at the rates in effect in local jurisdictions. The Company’s Chinese operations operate under tax holiday and incentive programs. JJB has been granted a 50% waiver of income taxes for 2008 through 2010.

The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes as set forth in SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes . As a result of the Company’s cumulative losses in the U.S., management has concluded that a full valuation allowance should be recorded in the U.S.

The Company files federal, state and foreign income tax returns in jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. The 2005 through 2008 tax years generally remain subject to examination by federal and most state tax authorities. In China, the 2002 through 2008 tax years generally remain subject to examination by tax authorities. The Company is not currently under examination for any tax year by any jurisdiction.

Current deferred tax assets of $-0- and $92,798 have been included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

NOTE 7 — NOTES PAYABLE

     Notes payable consists of the following:

		June 30,				December 31,
		2009				2008
		(Unaudited)				(Audited)
Convertible Debt, net of unamortized discount, inclusive of bonus interest, of $3,761,588 and $3,762,000 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively		$	412			$	—
Senior Notes payable, net of unamortized discount of $1,946,406 and $496,195 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively			1,554,788				581,305
Bank debt			2,666,258				3,128,765
			4,221,458				3,710,070
Less: Bank debt associated with discontinued operations of YYB			—				466,155
Less: Current portion of long-term debt			2,666,670				2,662,610
		$	1,554,788			$	581,305

Convertible Debt

The significant terms of the Company’s convertible debt are described in the notes to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Senior Notes Payable

The significant terms of the Company’s Senior Notes Payable (Series 1) are described in the notes to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Series 1 Senior Notes outstanding at December 31, 2008 mature on the earlier of December 8, 2010 or upon the completion of the closing of a credit facility or loans by the Company or its subsidiaries with a financial institution or bank of not less than $8 million in a transaction or series of transactions.

On January 30, 2009, the Company conducted the second and final closing (the “Final Closing”) of the 12% (Series 1) Senior Note offering whereby the Company sold an additional $680,000 principal amount of 12% Senior Notes and five year warrants to purchase a total of 544,000 shares of common stock at $1.13 per share. Accordingly, a total of $1,757,500 in 12% Senior Notes and Warrants to purchase 1,406,000 shares of common stock in the 12% Senior Note Offering were sold in 2008 and 2009. The Senior Notes issued in January 2009 mature on the earlier of the second anniversary of the closing date or upon the completion of the closing of a credit facility or loans by the Company or its subsidiaries with a financial institution or bank of not less than $8 million in a transaction or series of transactions.

The Company incurred debt issuance costs of $156,376 and debt discounts of $429,760 in association with the Final Closing of the Senior Notes, (Series 1) including $42,976 and $429,760, respectively, related to the issuance of 54,400 and 544,000 warrants for the purchase of the Company’s common stock at $1.13 per share, issued to brokers and Senior Note (Series 1) holders, respectively. These warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, using the following assumptions: (i) no dividend yield, (ii) weighted-average volatility of 120% (iii) weighted-average risk-free interest rate of 1.85%, and (iv) weighted-average expected life of 5 years. Those debt issuance costs are included in other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2009. Debt issuance costs and debt discount are being amortized over the life of the debt using the effective interest method.

In connection with the 12% Senior Note (Series 1) offering, the Company agreed to file a registration statement with the SEC on From S-3 by July 31, 2009 (which was filed on July 2, 2009), covering the secondary offering and resale of the Warrant Shares sold in the 12% Senior Note offering. In the event the registration statement is not declared effective prior to October 31, 2009, or the Company does not maintain effectiveness of the registration statement, the Company must issue additional warrants in an amount equal to 1% of the warrant shares per month, up to a maximum of 6% (or warrants to purchase up to 56,892 shares), issuable upon exercise of the warrants subject to registration. Based upon management’s consideration of the likelihood of completing the required registration, the Company has not accrued any liability related to the additional warrants issuable pursuant to the registration rights agreement. If it becomes probable that the Company will

be required to issue additional warrants, the estimated value of the warrants will be recognized in earnings pursuant to FSP EITF 00-19-2, Accounting for Registration Payment Arrangements.

On May 4, 2009, the Company conducted a first closing (“First Closing”) of a private offering under Regulation D for the sale to accredited investors of units consisting of $1,327,250 principal amount of 12% Series 2 Senior Notes (“Series 2 Notes”) and five year warrants to purchase a total of 2,123,600 shares of our common stock at $0.98 per share (the “Warrant Shares”). Under the terms of the offering, the exercise price of the Warrant Shares was 115% of the five (5) day volume weighted average closing price of the Company’s common stock on NYSE Alternex US for the five (5) trading days prior to the date of the First Closing.

In connection with the offer and sale of securities to the purchasers in the First Closing of the offering, our exclusive placement agent and all participating brokers received aggregate cash sales commissions of $132,725 and $39,817.50 in non-accountable expenses for services in connection with the First Closing. In addition, in the First Closing we issued placement agent warrants to our exclusive placement agent to purchase a total of 212,360 shares, of which warrants to purchase 54,472 shares and warrants to purchase 6,000 shares were assigned to other individuals.

On June 12, 2009, the Company conducted the second closing (the “Second Closing”) of a private offering under Regulation D for the sale to accredited investors of units consisting of $468,500 principal amount of 12% Series 2 Senior Notes (“Notes”) and five year warrants to purchase a total of 749,600 shares of our common stock at $1.11 per share (the “Warrant Shares”). Under the terms of the offering, the exercise price of the Warrant Shares was to be greater of 115% of the five day weighted average closing prices of our common stock as reported by NYSE Alternext US for the five trading days ended on June 11, 2009.

In connection with the offer and sale of securities to the purchasers in the offering, our exclusive placement agent received sales commissions of $46,850 and $14,055 of non-accountable expenses for services in connection with the Second Closing. In addition, in the Second Closing we issued placement agent warrants to purchase a total of 74,960 shares, of which our exclusive placement agent received placement agent warrants to purchase 58,360 shares, and two other brokers received warrants to purchase 14,992 shares and 1,600 shares, respectively.

Bank Debt

At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had RMB denominated indebtedness equal to $2,666,670 (RMB 21.4 million) and $3,128,765 (RMB 21.4 million), respectively, owed to two financial institutions, representing working capital and construction advances made to JJB and YYB prior to the Company’s acquisition of JPI. These notes are secured by certain assets of JJB and YYB and bear interest at rates ranging from 5.3% — 9.5% per annum. The buyer of YYB has contractually agreed to pay off the balance of the RMB 16 million obligation secured by a mortgage on certain land owned by JJB.

The Company acquired JPI and its subsidiaries in September 2006 from Jade Capital Group Limited (“Jade”). Prior to Jade’s purchase of certain assets, including land and buildings, of JiangXi Shangrao Pharmacy Co. Ltd (“KangDa”), and the subsequent sale of those assets and liabilities to the Company, KangDa had bank loans of $5,692,000 secured by the assets transferred to Jade. Pursuant to an agreement between Jade and KangDa, Jade assumed bank loans of $4,667,000, and KangDa continued to owe the bank $1,025,000. The loans were not separable or assumable, and therefore became technically due when the assets of JJB and YYB were acquired. The Company reached a verbal agreement with the bank to allow repayment by JPI of the loans under their original terms through December 31, 2008, however, this agreement was not formalized in writing. The RMB 16 million loan term was modified and extended in connection with the date 8 YYB in June 2009.

In March 2008, the Company agreed to repay RMB 17.1 million ($2,412,145) of mature loans to the bank by the second quarter of 2008. The Company made payments totaling RMB 16.2 million ($2,282,402) in the year ended December 31, 2008. In March, 2009, the Company and the bank agreed to extend the due date on approximately $2.5 million (RMB 17.2 million) to December 31, 2009. The remaining $0.6 million, owed primarily by YYB, is due and payable.

Debt Repayment Obligations

The following table sets forth the contractual repayment obligations under the Company’s notes payable, excluding those related to discontinued operations. The table assumes that Convertible Debt will be repaid at maturity, and excludes interest payments, except for bonus interest payable under the terms of the Convertible Debt instruments. The table also assumes that maturity of the Senior Notes will not occur before the two year anniversary of the date of issuance.

2009		$	2,665,946
2010			4,998,668
2011			888,224
2012			1,431,358
		$	9,984,196

NOTE 8 — EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT TERMINATION LIABILITY

In October 2008, the Company’s former chief executive officer agreed to retire from his employment with the Company. The Company negotiated a settlement of its employment contract with the former chief executive under which he received $150,000 upon the effective date of the agreement, including $25,000 for reimbursement of his legal expenses. In addition the Company agreed to pay $540,000 in monthly installments of $18,000, commencing January 31, 2009, to continue certain insurance coverages, and to extend the term of options previously granted which would have expired shortly after termination of employment. Pursuant to SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities , the Company recorded a liability of approximately $517,000 for the present value of the monthly installments and insurance coverages due under the settlement agreement. Approximately $214,242 and $237,000 are included in accrued salaries and wages and $175,696 and $280,000 are included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The Company has not made the $18,000 payment due for July 2009 nor paid the premium on a life insurance policy on the former officer and is currently in default under this obligation.

NOTE 9 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation

On February 22, 2002, AcuVector Group, Inc. (“AcuVector”) filed a Statement of Claim in the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Judicial District of Edmonton relating to the Company’s CIT technology acquired from Dr. Chang in August 2001. The claim alleges damages of $CDN 20 million and seeks injunctive relief against Dr. Chang for, among other things, breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty, and against us for interference with the alleged relationship between Dr. Chang and AcuVector. The claim for injunctive relief seeks to establish that the AcuVector license agreement with Dr. Chang is still in effect. The Company performed extensive due diligence to determine that AcuVector had no interest in the technology when the Company acquired it. The Company is confident that AcuVector’s claims are without merit and that the Company will receive a favorable result in the case. As the final outcome is not determinable, no accrual or loss relating to this action is reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

The Company is also defending a companion case filed in the same court by the Governors of the University of Alberta filed against the Company and Dr. Chang in August 2003. The University of Alberta claims, among other things, that Dr. Chang failed to remit the payment of the University’s portion of the monies paid by the Company to Dr. Chang for the CIT technology purchased by us from Dr. Chang in 2001. In addition to other claims against Dr. Chang relating to other technologies developed by him while at the University, the University also claims that the Company conspired with Dr. Chang and interfered with the University’s contractual relations under certain agreements with Dr. Chang, thereby damaging the University in an amount which is unknown to the University at this time. The University has not claimed that the Company is not the owner of the CIT technology, just that the University has an equitable interest therein or the revenues there from.

If either AcuVector or the University is successful in their claims, the Company may be liable for substantial damages, its rights to the technology will be adversely affected and its future prospects for exploiting or licensing the CIT technology will be significantly impaired.

In the ordinary course of business, there are other potential claims and lawsuits brought by or against the Company. In the opinion of management, the ultimate outcome of these matters will not materially affect the Company’s operations or financial position or are covered by insurance.

Production License Acquisition Agreements

In 2006 and 2007, the Company entered into a $6.7 million purchase commitment with Jiangxi YiBo Medicine Technology Development Co., Ltd (“YiBo”) for the acquisition of generic drug production technical information to be used in the Company’s SFDA generic drug applications for ten medicines. The Company has received regulatory approval for three of the medicines and has made deposits to YiBo for the remaining seven medicines. The deposits paid to YiBo are refundable if the Company is unsuccessful in obtaining SFDA manufacturing licenses for the products purchased. When paid, these amounts will be capitalized and amortized over the expected economic life of the products which are subject to the production licenses obtained from the SFDA.

Licensing Agreements

The Company has agreed to pay a 5% royalty on net sales of products developed from the Company’s CIT technology. The Company has not paid any royalties to date as there have been no sales of such products.

Contingent Issuance of Shares — Acquisition of JPI

In 2006, pursuant to the Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of JPI from Jade. The terms of the Purchase Agreement provided that additional purchase consideration of 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Escrow Shares”) was deposited in an escrow account held by a third party escrow agent and administered pursuant to an Escrow Agreement. The Escrow Agreement provided that if, within one year from and after the closing of the Purchase Agreement, Jade or its shareholders demonstrated that the SFDA had issued a permit or the equivalent regulatory approval for the Company to sell and distribute the DR-70 test kit in the PRC without qualification, in form and substance satisfactory to the Company, then the escrow agent would promptly disburse the Escrow Shares to Jade or its shareholders.

Due to changes in the SFDA’s regulatory and administrative processes regarding the approval of both drug and device applications, approval of the DR-70 test kit by the SFDA has been delayed in ways that could not have been anticipated at the date of the Purchase Agreement. The Board of Directors has amended the Escrow Agreement on three occasions, to extend the date by which the SFDA’s approval of the DR-70 test kit must be achieved. The most recent amendment, which became effective March 24, 2009, provided that if Jade has not notified the escrow agent that the SFDA has issued the approval to market the DR-70 test kit before March 28, 2010, or if the Company disputes that the purported approval is satisfactory, the Escrow Shares shall be delivered by the escrow agent to the Company for cancellation. The shares are included in the number of shares issued as presented on the face of the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, however, they are not considered issued for financial accounting purposes. In the event the Escrow Shares are released to Jade, the Company will record the fair value of the Escrow Shares issued as goodwill.

Indemnities and Guarantees

The Company has executed certain contractual indemnities and guarantees, under which it may be required to make payments to a guaranteed or indemnified party. The Company has agreed to indemnify its directors, officers, employees and agents to the maximum extent permitted under the laws of the State of Delaware. In connection with a certain facility lease, the Company has indemnified its lessor for certain claims arising from the use of the facilities. Pursuant to the Sale and Purchase Agreement, the Company has indemnified the holders of registrable securities for any claims or losses resulting from any untrue, allegedly untrue or misleading statement made in a registration statement, prospectus or similar document. Additionally, the Company has agreed to indemnify the former owners of JPI against losses up to a maximum of $2,500,000 for damages resulting from breach of representations or warranties in connection with the JPI acquisition. The duration of the guarantees and indemnities varies, and in many cases is indefinite. These guarantees and indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company could be obligated to make. Historically, the Company has not been obligated to make any payments for these obligations and no liabilities have been recorded for these indemnities and guarantees in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Tax Matters

The Company is required to file federal and state income tax returns in the United States and various other income tax returns in foreign jurisdictions. The preparation of these income tax returns requires the Company to interpret the applicable tax laws and regulations in effect in such jurisdictions, which could affect the amount of tax paid by the Company. The Company, in consultation with its tax advisors, bases its income tax returns on interpretations that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The income tax returns, however, are subject to routine reviews by the various taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which the Company files its income tax returns. As part of these reviews, a taxing authority may disagree with respect to the interpretations the Company used to calculate its tax liability and therefore require the Company to pay additional taxes.

Change in Control Severance Plan

On November 15, 2001, the board of directors adopted an Executive Management Change in Control Severance Pay Plan. The plan covered the persons who at any time during the 90-day period ending on the date of a change in control (as defined in the plan), were employed by the Company as Chief Executive Officer and/or president and provided for cash payments upon a change in control. The Change in Control Severance Pay Plan was terminated in April 2009.

NOTE 10 — SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company has six share-based compensation plans under which it may grant common stock or incentive and non-qualified stock options to officers, employees, directors and independent contractors. A detailed description of the Company’s share-based compensation plans and option grants outside the option plans is contained in the notes to the audited December 31, 2008 financial statements.

On January 7, 2009, the Company adopted the 2008-2009 Performance and Equity Incentive Plan (“Performance Plan”) whereby up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock may be issued under the Performance Plan. The Board of Directors approved the grant of 870,000 shares of the Company’s common stock under the Performance Plan, subject to stockholder approval of the Performance Plan. The grant of the 870,000 shares is also subject to the attainment of specific comprehensive income targets during the five quarterly periods beginning with the quarter ended December 31, 2008. Because stockholder approval of the Performance Plan is required, expense related to options earned for periods prior to the receipt of such approval will not be recorded until the approval is obtained. As of June 30, 2009, the Company’s stockholders have not approved the Performance Plan. Of the shares available under the performance plan, 174,000 shares of the Company’s common stock have been earned, and the “Income Targets” were not met for first quarter 2009 and on June 8, 2009, 223,000 shares that were previously issued under the Performance Plan were cancelled and returned to treasury. It is unlikely that any of the Income Targets for Q3 and Q4 of 2009 will be met, and accordingly the balance of the shares issued under the Performance Plan will be cancelled and returned to the treasury of the Company.

Also, on January 7, 2009, the Company granted 120,000 shares of common stock to the Company’s independent directors, subject to stockholder approval. The grant of the 120,000 shares is based on performance through 2008. However, because shareholder approval is required, the shares will be expensed when the approval is obtained. As of June 30, 2009, the Company’s stockholders have not approved this grant of common stock to the Company’s independent directors.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded share-based compensation expense of $154,056 and $422,168, respectively. Substantially all of such compensation expense is reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss within the selling, general and administrative line item. Share-based compensation expense recognized in the periods presented is based on awards that have vested or are ultimately expected to vest. Historically, options have vested upon grant, thus it was not necessary for management to estimate forfeitures. Options granted in 2008 vest ratably over 24 months. Based on historical turnover rates and the vesting pattern of the options, the Company’s management has assumed that there will be no forfeitures of unvested options.

Summary of Assumptions and Activity

The fair value of stock-based awards to employees and directors is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes model requires subjective assumptions, including future stock price volatility and expected time to exercise, which greatly affect the calculated values. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price. The

expected term of options granted is derived from historical data on employee exercises and post-vesting employment termination behavior. The risk-free rate selected to value any particular grant is based on the U.S. Treasury rate that corresponds to the pricing term of the grant effective as of the date of the grant. The Company does not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future, thus the dividend yield is zero. These factors could change in the future, affecting the determination of stock-based compensation expense in future periods.

The Company did not grant options in the six months ended June 30, 2009. The Company used the following weighted-average assumptions in determining fair value of its employee and director stock options granted in the six months ended June 30, 2008:

Expected volatility			111	%
Expected term		5 years
Risk-free interest rate			2.48	%
Dividend yield			—	%

The weighted-average grant date fair value of employee and director stock options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $2.98.

The following is a summary of the changes in stock options outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2009:

										Weighted
						Weighted				Average
						Average				Remaining
						Exercise				Contractual
		Options				Price				Life (Years)
Outstanding, December 31, 2008			2,757,001			$	3.75
Expired			(305,000	)			5.76
Outstanding and expected to vest, June 30, 2009			2,452,001			$	3.50				2.33
Vested and Exercisable at June 30, 2009			2,348,668			$	3.50				2.27

The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding at June 30, 2009, considering only options with positive intrinsic values and based on the closing stock price, was $0.

At June 30, 2009, total unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to unvested stock options was $419,083, which is expected to be expensed over a weighted average period of 0.9 years.

NOTE 11 — FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Cash Financing Activities

December 2007 Offering

In December, 2007, the Company conducted the closing of a private placement (“December 2007 Offering”) of Units. On March 5, 2008 the Company conducted the second closing of the December 2007 Offering. In the second closing the Company received $1,000,000 in aggregate gross proceeds from the sale of a total of 323,626 units at $3.09 per unit and issued warrants to purchase 161,813 shares at an exercise price of $4.74 per share. In connection with the second closing of the December 2007 Offering, the Company paid a finder’s fee of $100,000 and other expenses and fees of $42,729, including $18,854 that were paid subsequent to the first quarter of 2008.

After the closing of the December 2007 Offering, the Company filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission to register the shares of the Company’s common stock, shares issuable upon exercise of the related investor warrants, and shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants issued to the placement agents. The registration statement was declared effective on April 22, 2008.

Convertible Debt

In September 2008, the Company raised $2,084,401, net of cash issuance costs of $425,599, from the issuance of Convertible Debt, consisting primarily of broker commissions and legal fees. See Note 7. Additionally, the Company issued broker warrants to purchase 209,166 shares at an exercise price of $2.69, which were valued at $209,166. The warrants are exercisable after March 15, 2009. The warrants issued were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected volatility of 95%; risk-free interest rate of 2.59%; expected term of five years; and dividend yield of 0%. The warrants were recorded as a component of additional paid-in capital and debt issuance costs, included in other assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The Company has reserved approximately 3,796,000 shares for the conversion of principal and interest due under the debt, and the shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants that will be issued upon conversion of the debt.

Senior Notes — Warrants

In December 2008, the Company issued warrants to purchase a total of 948,200 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share in connection with the first closing of the Senior Note financing. In January 2009, the Company issued warrants to purchase a total of 598,400 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.13 per share in connection with the final closing of the Senior Note financing. In May 2009, The Company issued warrants to purchase a total as 2,123,600 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.98 per share In June 2009, The Company issued warrants to purchase a total of of 749,600 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.11 per share

Non-Cash Financing Activities

On September 14, 2007, the Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 250,000 shares of common stock to First International pursuant to an amendment to the consulting agreement dated July 22, 2005, for financial advisory services to be provided from September 22, 2007 through September 22, 2008. The shares were valued at $817,500 based on the trading price of the common stock on the measurement date. The Shares were issued pursuant to an exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. No underwriter was involved in this issuance. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company recorded selling, general and administrative expense of $204,375 related to the agreement.

On November 27, 2007, the Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 75,000 shares of common stock to Boston Financial Partners Inc. pursuant to an amendment to the consulting agreement dated September 16, 2003, for financial advisory services to be provided from November 1, 2007 through October 31, 2008. The shares were valued at $336,000 based on the trading price of the common stock on the measurement date. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company recorded general and administrative expense of $84,000 related to the agreement.

On November 27, 2007, the Board of Directors authorized the issuance of up to 300,000 shares of common stock, to be earned at the rate of 25,000 shares per month to Madden Consulting, Inc. for financial advisory services to be provided from December 26, 2007 through December 26, 2008. The Company issued 25,000 shares in the three months ended March 31, 2008 that were valued at $104,250 based on the trading price of the common stock on the measurement date. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company recorded general and administrative expense of $104,250 related to the agreement and the January 2008 issuance of 25,000 shares. This agreement was terminated on January 29, 2008 and the remaining obligation to issue 250,000 shares was cancelled.

On February 5, 2008, the Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 300,000 shares of common stock to LWP1 pursuant to a consulting agreement dated February 3, 2008 for financial advisory services to be provided from February 3, 2008 through May 3, 2009. The shares are issuable in two increments of 150,000. The shares vest over a fifteen month period and are being valued monthly as the shares are earned based on the trading price of the common stock on the monthly anniversary date. In accordance with EITF 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services (“EITF 96-18”), the shares issued will be periodically valued through the vesting period. During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded general and administrative expense of $55,000 and $134,800 related to the agreement.

On June 17, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement for financial consulting services. In connection with the agreement, the Company granted warrants to purchase 150,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.50. The warrants, which were approved by the Company’s board of directors, were granted in partial consideration for financial consulting services, vests over a

twelve month period, and expire in five years. The warrants were initially valued at $315,000, based on the application of the Black Scholes option valuation model with the following assumptions: expected volatility of 95%; average risk-free interest rate of 3.66%; expected term of 5 years; and dividend yield of 0%. In accordance with EITF 96-18, the warrants will be periodically revalued through the vesting period. As of June 30, 2009, the estimated cumulative value of the vested and unvested warrants, based on the periodic revaluation, is $116,000. The value of the vested portion of the warrants is recorded to additional paid in capital and prepaid expense in the month that vesting occurs. The resulting prepaid asset is being expensed over the 36 month term of the consulting contract. The Company recognized $121,326 of expense in the quarter ended June 30, 2009 with respect to the warrants.

On January 22, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with B&D Consulting for investor relations services through July 7, 2010. The Company granted B&D Consulting 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for services. In accordance with EITF 96-18, the shares issued will be periodically valued through the vesting period. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded general and administrative expense of $42,615 and $72,247, respectively, related to the agreement.

On March 31, 2009, the Company issued 12,500 shares of the Company’s common stock to a consultant for investor relations services. The Company recorded $10,126 of expense in the quarter ended March 31, 2009 with respect to the shares issued, based on the value of the stock at the date the shares were earned.

Warrants

A summary of activity with respect to warrants outstanding follows:

						Weighted
						Average
						Exercise
		Warrants				Price
Outstanding, December 31, 2008			5,252,699			$	3.38
Issued			3,758,920				1.03
Outstanding, June 30, 2009			7,999,124			$	2.35

NOTE 12 — SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company evaluates performance based on sales, gross profit and income (loss) before discontinued operations. In 2009, the Company has two reportable segments: (i) China, which consists of manufacturing and wholesale distribution of pharmaceutical and cosmetic products to distributors, hospitals, clinics and similar institutional entities in China, and (ii) Corporate, which comprises the development of in-vitro diagnostics and the Company’s CIT technology, as well as the development of the Company’s HPE-based products for markets outside of China. The 2008 segment information has been restated to eliminate separate reporting for China-Direct, a retail concept that was under development, but abandoned in favor of an expanded distributor-based strategy in 2008. The results previously reported for China-Direct have been combined with China.

The following is information for the Company’s reportable segments for the six months ended June 30, 2009:

		China				Corporate				Total
Net revenue		$	3,152,693			$	28,350			$	3,181,043
Gross profit		$	1,013,903			$	16,737			$	1,030,640
Depreciation		$	263,512			$	31,777			$	295,289
Amortization		$	602,684			$	50,000			$	652,684
Interest expense		$	55,756			$	276,278			$	332,034
Income (loss) before discontinued operations		$	(1,532,428	)		$	(2,340,433	)		$	(3,872,861	)
Identifiable assets of continuing operations		$	29,411,505			$	3,551,994			$	32,963,499
Capital expenditures		$	849,660			$	646			$	850,306

The following is information for the Company’s reportable segments for the six months ended June 30, 2008:

		China				Corporate				Total
Net revenue		$	5,841,360			$	51,420			$	5,892,780
Gross profit		$	2,125,072			$	31,732			$	2,156,804
Depreciation		$	469,899			$	45,678			$	515,577
Amortization		$	709,837			$	75,000			$	784,837
Interest expense		$	111,458			$	454,793			$	566,251
Income (loss) before discontinued operations		$	(1,133,864	)		$	(4,677,114	)		$	(5,810,978	)
Capital expenditures		$	1,661,401			$	107,083			$	1,768,484

At December 31, 2008, identifiable assets associated with continuing operations of the China and Corporate segments totaled $35,803,941 and $3,723,335, respectively, and $39,527,276 in the aggregate.

Virtually all of the Company’s revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were from foreign customers.

NOTE 13 — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company has a receivable of $12,779 and $9,693, respectively, due from certain former directors of YYB and JJB for advances. These advances are non-interest bearing and are due on demand.

NOTE 14 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On May 28, 2009, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement and Release with Strategic Growth International Inc. (“SGI”), a consultant who provided investor relations services. Under the SGI Settlement Agreement and Release, the Company agreed to issue 56,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to SGI, which shares are subject to listing approval by the NYSE Alternext US. The shares have not yet been approved for listing and have not been issued. If they are not so approved, the Company will owe SGI $56,089 for services rendered.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

           Our management intends for this discussion and analysis to provide the reader with information that will assist in understanding our financial statements, the changes in certain key items in those financial statements from period to period, and the primary factors that accounted for those changes, as well as how certain accounting principles affect our financial statements. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto included in this report on Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Operating results are not necessarily indicative of results that may occur in future periods.

           This report includes various forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward looking statements as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to, risks associated with doing business in China and internationally, demand for our products, governmental regulation and required licensing of our products and manufacturing operations, dependence on distributors, foreign currency fluctuation, technological changes, intense competition and dependence on management and those risks set forth below under Part II — Item 1A “Risk Factors” and set forth in Part I — Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Forward-looking statements discuss matters that are not historical facts and include, but are not limited to, discussions regarding our operating strategy, sales and marketing strategy, regulatory strategy, industry, economic conditions, financial condition, liquidity and capital resources and results of operations. Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements preceded by, followed by or that otherwise include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects,” “can,” “could,” “may,” “will,” “would,” or similar expressions. For those statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You should not unduly rely on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they were made. They give our expectations regarding the future, but are not guarantees. We undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events or otherwise, unless required by law.

Overview

The Company

          We are an integrated pharmaceutical company with three distinct business divisions that include: (i) AMDL Diagnostics, (ii) China-based Integrated Pharmaceuticals and (iii) Cancer Therapeutics. Collectively, these business units focus on the development, manufacturing, distribution and sales of high quality generic pharmaceuticals, nutritional supplements, cosmetic and medical diagnostic products in the U.S., China, Korea, Taiwan and other markets throughout the world. We currently employ approximately 500 people, of which 490 are located in China.

U. S. Operations

AMDL IVD Cancer Diagnostics

DR-70 Test Kit

          AMDL was founded in 1987 as a bio-tech research and development firm that had one product, its proprietary AMDL-ELISA DR-70 (FDP) cancer test kit. AMDL-ELISA DR-70 ^® (FDP) is best described as a simple, non-invasive blood test used for the detection and/or monitoring of 14 different types of cancer. The AMDL-ELISA DR-70 ^® (FDP) is licensed and imported as a non-approved general cancer screen in Europe, Taiwan, Korea, Australia, Singapore & Vietnam. and approved in Canada for the detection and monitoring of lung cancer. Most importantly, in nearly all global markets, our DR-70 test, recently rebranded and to be marketed under the name “Onko-Sure™” could be used as a (non-regulatory approved) general cancer screening test. In regards to the U.S, market, on July 3, 2008, we received a letter of determination from the USFDA that the DR-70 test kit was “substantially equivalent” to the existing predicate device, carcinoembryonic antigen, being marketed. The determination letter grants us the right to market the DR-70 test kit as a device to monitor patients who have previously been diagnosed with colorectal cancer. We are selling our DR-70 test kit to reference and clinical laboratories in the U.S. and internationally. In the fourth quarter of 2008, AMDL formed AMDL Diagnostics, Inc. (ADI) in order to focus resources on the commercialization of our DR-70 cancer test.

Elleuxe Brand of Premium Anti-Aging Skin Care Products

          A variety of cosmetic products were developed by JPI in 2008, based upon their HPE anti-aging therepudic products. AMDL has reformulated these products for international markets under the brand name Elleuxe. AMDL currently anticipates the launch of the sales of these U.S. manufactured skin care products during the fourth quarter 2009. This family of skin care products include:

	•		Hydrating Firming Cream (Dry-Mix skin)
	•		Hydrating Firming Cream (Oily skin)
	•		Renergie Hydrating Cleanser
	•		Intense Hydrating Cleanser
	•		Visable Renewing Hydrating Softener
	•		Smoothing Renewing Eye Moisturizer

New Corporate and Product Brand Launch

          On August 22, 2009, AMDL, anticipates receiving shareholder approval in order to change its name to Radiant Pharmaceuticals Corporation, (“Radient Pharma”) in order to launch a new brand identification of the company and its innovative line of promising IVD & Skin Care products. We anticipate posting a new corporate website which is expected to go live by the end of the 3rd quarter of 2009. Until this site is up and running, please continue to go to www.amdl.com in order to gain updated information on our company.

IVD Cancer Research and Development

          During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we spent $332,779 on research and development related to the DR-70 test kit, as compared to $57,052 for the same period in 2008. These expenditures were incurred as part of the Company’s efforts to improve the existing DR-70 test kit and develop the next generation DR-70 test kit.

          We expect expenditures for research and development to grow in the second half of 2009 due to additional staff and consultants needed to support an agreement with Mayo Clinic to conduct a clinical study for the validation of AMDL’s next generation version of its USFDA-approved DR-70 test kit and additional development costs associated with entry into new markets. Through this validation study, AMDL and Mayo Clinic will perform clinical diagnostic testing to compare AMDL’s DR-70 test kit with a newly developed, next generation test. The primary goal of the study is to determine whether AMDL’s next generation DR-70 test kit serves as a higher-performing test to its existing predicate test and can lead to improved accuracy in the detection of early-stage cancers.

          For USFDA regulatory approval on the new test, AMDL intends to perform an additional study to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the next generation test for monitoring colorectal cancer. The validation study will run for three months and final results are expected in the third or fourth quarter of 2009. In addition, additional expenses will be incurred for consultants and laboratories for the reformulation of the HPE-based cosmetics as well as laboratories involved in testing the safety and effectiveness of the product.

License Agreement with MyGene International, Inc.

          On April 3, 2008, we announced that we had entered into an exclusive sublicense (subject to certain terms and conditions) agreement with MyGene International, Inc. (“MGI,” USA) for the MyHPV chip kit, a diagnostic product for screening cervical cancer through in-vitro genotype testing in women with the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV). The agreement between us and MGI provided for an exclusive sublicense to use the patents, trademark, and technology in manufacturing, promoting, marketing, distributing, and selling the MyHPV chip kit in the countries of China (including Hong Kong), Taiwan, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Cambodia, and Vietnam. This agreement is considered null and void as of the original date of execution because MGI did not have direct ownership of the intellectual property necessary to offer the sub-license to AMDL. We explored the opportunity to become the exclusive distributor of the MyHPV chip kit in the countries noted previously through an agreement with BIOMEDLAB (BML) of Seoul, South Korea. BML is the manufacturer of the MyHPV chip kit in South Korea, which has Korean FDA approval for this product. Subsequent to due diligence regarding market acceptance, price points and ability to commercialize this product in the aforementioned markets, we have determined that the cost of entry into this market is prohibitive and decided discontinue development of this project. As such, we have requested refunds of amounts advanced and have received a partial refund and expect the balance to be paid on or before year end.

China-based Integrated Pharmaceuticals Operations

          Through JPI, we manufacture and distribute generic, homeopathic over-the-counter pharmaceutical products and supplements. JPI manufactures and distributes its products through JJB and YYB.

          During the second quarter AMDL management became aware of internal disputes in China that resulted in the loss of both operational and financial controls by JPI’s management over the operating entity JJB. These disputes have led to (a) the inability of JPI’s management to direct management at JJB to timely compile the required financial information, (b) inability of JPI’s management to gain access to operational information and/or to direct operations. (c) the sale and/or disposal of assets without informing AMDL’s management or following directives from AMDL’s management regarding internal controls surrounding the sale/disposal of assets and (d) the inability to repatriate funds of JPI and/or JJB back to the US .

          As a result of the loss of control by JPI’s management of its operating subsidiaries, AMDL’s management is of the opinion that it is in the best interest of the Company to divest itself of JPI. The Company is currently working on a plan to monetize its investment in JPI beginning in the third quarter of 2009.

AMDL Planned Spin-Off of JPI/JJB

          As discussed above, we have recently become aware of significant internal disputes between the management of China operating subsidiaries, JJB and JPI. Although we are currently taking steps to resolve these issues, we have recently begun discussions to divest and deconsolidate all or a portion of our China based operations. The management of both JPI and JJB have indicated that they believe the most prudent path to raising additional capital for our Chinese operating division is for JJB to complete one or more private placements of equity during the third and fourth quarters of 2009. They have also indicated that they believe the best path for AMDL to monetize its investments in JPI and JJB would be for JJB to seek a public listing on the Growth Enterprise Market (“GEM”) located in Shenzhen, China during the first half of 2010. AMDL’s executive management and Board are in agreement with JPI and JJB’s management on this “Spin-off” strategy and anticipate working with JPI and JJB to successfully complete their development plans that are currently anticipated to provide a path for a potential return for AMDL’s shareholders in the future. It is anticipated that during the third quarter AMDL, JPI, JJB and our China divisional management will complete various agreements in order for this spin-off process to be commenced. It is currently anticipated that AMDL, beginning in the 3rd quarter of 2009 will deconsolidate JPI and JJB in its financial statements and will account for this asset as an investment on its balance sheet. This deconsolidation accounting treatment is anticipated to create one-time restructuring charges of at least $14 million. Despite the planned deconsolidation of JPI and JJB, we still believe JPI and JJB has a promising future. We anticipate that we may be able to sell off a portion or all of our ownership in JPI and JJB during the next 30 months; alternatively we would seek an exit from our investment at or after any public listing. We also could retain all or a portion of our equity stake in JPI and JJB, if ownership continues to look promising. The goal is to gain the best valuation possible for this strategic asset. Additionally, we also believe that JPI/JJB’s business and brand recognition make it a potential buyout target.

          The management of JPI/JJB have indicated that the believe the most prudent path to raising additional capital for our Chinese operating division is for JJB to complete one or more private placements of equity during the third and fourth quarters of 2009. They have also indicated that they believe the best path for AMDL to monetize its investments in JPI/JJB would be for JJB to seek a public listing on the Growth Enterprise Market (“GEM”) located in Shenzhen China during the first half of 2010. AMDL’s executive management and Board are in agreement with JPI/JJB’s management on this “Spin-off” strategy and anticipate working with JPI/JJB to successfully complete their development plans that are currently anticipated to provide a path for a promising return for AMDL’s shareholders in the future. It is anticipated that during the third quarter AMDL, JPI, JJB and our China divisional management will complete various agreements in order for this spin-off process to be commenced. It is currently anticipated that AMDL, beginning in the 3rd quarter of 2009 will de-consolidate JPI/JJB in its financials and will account for this asset as an investment on its balance sheet.

Post Deconsolidation Business Model

          This China operations spin-off process is anticipated to significantly affect our 2009 earnings and sales guidance. AMDL now anticipates recording a loss excluding one-time charges from the sales of YYB and the deconsolidation of JPI/JJB of approximately $14 million. AMDL currently anticipates generating approximately $1.1 million in sales from the sales of its Onko-Sure IVD cancer diagnostic test kits and its Elleuxe brand of skin care products during 2009. These two business segments are anticipated to be the key products for AMDL in the near future. Sales of these products in 2010 are anticipated to expand significantly due to the creation of

various new 5-year regional distribution agreements that are anticipated to move the IVD cancer diagnostic test kits and the Elleuxe brand of skin care products into broad commercial channels in nearly ever market in the world. The success of our distribution strategy is contingent upon the Company gaining adequate financing during the 3rd quarter of 2009.

Discontinued Operations and Dispositions

          On January 22, 2009, our board of directors authorized management to sell the operations of YYB. In accordance with SFAS 144, we classified the assets, liabilities, operations and cash flows of YYB as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

          The sale of YYB was completed in June 2009. Shares in YYB were transferred to the buyer (an individual) in consideration of:

	•		The forgiveness of amounts owed to YYB from JJB; and
	•		The buyer of YYB has contractually agreed to pay off the balance of the 16 million RMB obligation secured by a mortgage on certain land owned by JJB.

          Detailed information regarding the buyer’s ability to repay the bank has not been verified. As such, we have reserved 100 percent of the proceeds anticipated to be received from the buyer’s agreement to pay the bank and will recognize income upon receipt of funds and pay down of the debt.

Operations of JJB

          JJB manufactures and markets numerous diagnostic, pharmaceutical, nutritional supplement and cosmetic products. JJB is acquiring production rights for other pharmaceutical products which will require the approval of the SFDA. Historically, the top selling products in China are HPE-based Solutions (anti-aging cosmecutical), Domperidone (anti-emetic), Levofloxacin Lactate Injections (IV antibiotics) and Glucose solutions (pharmaceutical).

Facilities

          The SFDA requires that all facilities engaged in the manufacture of pharmaceutical products obtain GMP certification. In February 2008, JJB’s GMP certification expired for the small volume parenteral solutions injection plant lines that were engaged in manufacturing the Company’s HPE injectible product, Goodnak, and all other small volume parenteral solutions. JJB ceased small volume parenteral solutions operations at this facility while undertaking $1.5 million in modifications necessary to bring the facility and its operations into compliance. The renovations are complete and JJB resumed operation of the parenteral small injectible lines in the second quarter of 2009.

          We were notified by the Chinese Military Department of its intent to annex one of JJB’s plants that is located near a military installation. The proposed area to be annexed contains the facilities that are used to manufacture large and small volume parenteral

solutions, including the production lines for which the Company is attempting to obtain GMP certification. Discussions regarding annexation are proceeding and we expect that JJB will be compensated fairly for the transfer of the facility upon annexation. JJB intends to find a new single center site in Jiangxi Province, China to relocate its operations.

          For purposes of reporting the results of discontinued operations, we have assumed that all products previously manufactured and sold by YYB were sold with the business. We may have to spend significant time and resources finding, building and equipping the new location and restarting the relocated operations. In addition, such new facilities will need to obtain GMP certification for all manufacturing operations.

Marketing and Distribution

          JJB has established a marketing program consisting of approximately forty sales managers and a network of distributors who market JJB’s products.

          JJB sells directly to hospitals and retail stores and indirectly to other customers through distributors. One primary distributor has 29 retail outlets throughout China. JJB is developing educational programs for hospitals, doctors, clinics and distributors with respect to JJB’s product lines. These educational programs are intended to improve sales and promotion of JJB’s products.

          As resources permit, we anticipate expanding our current domestic Chinese distribution beyond the cities in which they currently sell through the utilization of new distribution firms in regions currently not covered by existing distributors or the in-house sales force.

New Beauty Formulations of the HPE-Based Anti-Aging Product

          During 2008, JJB finalized the formulations of the following HPE-based cosmetic products. These new products consist of capsules and an easy-to-apply lotion version and are marketed under the trade name “Nalefen Skin Care”. These new products complement our existing high quality injectible and extract formulations. Additionally, the Company has contracted with YiBo to develop a capsule version of the Goodnak product. We plan to sell both products through both new and existing distribution channels within the Henan, Sichuan, Guizhou, Shanxi, Xinjiang, Gansu, Hunan, Zhejiang, Fujian, Liaoning and Heilongjiang Provinces of China. Together these regions have a combined population of more than 376 million people.

Distribution Channels for Beauty Product Lines

          During the third quarter 2008, JJB entered into distribution agreements with four beauty product distribution companies to open new distribution lines. Sales to these distributors in 2008 consisted primarily of our HPE Solutions. In order to support the development of this channel, the distribution agreements included an allowance for the promotion and marketing of new Goodnak/Nalefen line of skin care lotions. This allowance was necessary to develop extensive distribution of the Nalefen line. In addition to the allowance described above, the Company granted distributors of the Nalefen line payment terms of 120 days.

          In the second quarter of 2009, JPI’s management was not been able to collect significant amounts due from these distributors and future collectability is questionable. Therefore, we have provided an allowance for bad debts for the entire outstanding balance as of June 30, 2009.

          The existing distribution contracts expired and JJB has not renewed the agreements. As a result, revenue in the second quarter of 2009 was adversely impacted, as there were no sales of HPE solutions. At this time, we do not anticipate the new lotion formulations will also be sold through these same distributors. JPI’s management has indicated that they have developed various new distribution relationships with more reliable distributors that will be selling their HPE solutions in the future.

          However, in addition to China, we believe that some of the beauty products will be good candidates for export to the North American and South American markets. We have completed the reformulation of the China based formula and will submit to a US laboratory to be tested for safety and effectiveness. In conjunction with the testing, we are collaborating with an industry specialist to develop a unique packaging scheme for the market. It is estimated that this process will be complete by the end of the third quarter of 2009.

The Current Chinese Economic and Market Environment

          We operate in a challenging economic and regulatory environment that has undergone significant changes in technology and in patterns of global trade. The current economic and market environment in China is uncertain. In its January 28, 2009 report, the International Monetary Fund estimated that China’s economy will grow at a rate of approximately 6.7 percent in 2009, as measured by the gross domestic product. In addition, China’s health care spending is projected to increase by nearly 40% to $17.3 billion, with a government proposal to bring universal healthcare to 90% of its 1.3 billion citizens by 2011, as reported by the American Free Press. While this data appears promising, the proposal, however, could result in additional controls over the pricing of certain drugs which could, in turn, negatively impact our business prospects in China and the carrying amount of production rights acquired from YiBo.

Research and Development

          In the past, JJB entered into joint research and development agreements with outside research institutes, but all of the prior joint research agreements have expired.

          JJB has been in informal discussion with the local government in Nanchang, Jiangxi Pharmaceutical Research Institute and the Academy of Military Medical Sciences to create a “Cancer Therapeutic & Rapid Test Research and Development” base. The laboratory will use the equipment, facilities and human resources from Jiangxi Pharmaceutical Research institute together with professional guidance from the Academy of Military Medical Sciences. Discussions are in a preliminary stage, and the potential impact on our operations cannot be ascertained at this time.

Cancer Therapeutics

     In 2001, AMDL acquired the CIT technology, which forms the basis for a proprietary cancer vaccine. Our CIT technology is a U.S. patented technology (patent issued May 25, 2004). The Cancer Therapeutics division is engaged in commercializing the CIT technology.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

     Our condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions and the differences could be material.

     We believe the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements:

      Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on specific identification of customer accounts and our best estimate of the likelihood of potential loss, taking into account such factors as the financial condition and payment history of major customers. We evaluate the collectibility of our receivables at least quarterly. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. The differences could be material and could significantly impact cash flows from operating activities.

      Inventories. JPI records inventories at the lower of weighted average cost or net realizable value. Major components of inventories are raw materials, packaging materials, direct labor and production overhead. AMDL’s inventories consist primarily of raw materials and related materials, and are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined on a first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) basis. The Company regularly monitors inventories for excess or obsolete items and makes any valuation corrections when such adjustments are needed. Once established, write-downs are considered permanent adjustments to the cost basis of the obsolete or excess inventories. We write down our inventories for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventories and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand, future pricing and market conditions. If actual future demand, future pricing or market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional write-downs may be required and the differences could be material. Such differences might significantly impact cash flows from operating activities.

      Sales Allowances. A portion of our business is to sell products to distributors who resell the products to end customers. In certain instances, these distributors obtain discounts based on the contractual terms of these arrangements. Sales discounts are usually based upon the volume of purchases or by reference to a specific price in the related distribution agreement. We recognize the amount of these discounts at the time the sale is recognized. Additionally, sales returns allowances are estimated based on historical return data, and recorded at the time of sale. If the quality or efficacy of our products deteriorates or market conditions otherwise change, actual discounts and returns could be significantly higher than estimated, resulting in potentially material differences in cash flows from operating activities.

      Valuation of Intangible Assets. In accordance with SFAS 144, the Company evaluates the carrying value of its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such carrying values may not be recoverable. The Company uses its best judgment based on the current facts and circumstances relating to its business when determining whether any significant impairment factors exist. The Company considers the following factors or conditions, among others, that could indicate the need for an impairment review:

	•		significant under performance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;
	•		market projections for cancer research technology;
	•		its ability to obtain patents, including continuation patents, on technology;
	•		significant changes in its strategic business objectives and utilization of the assets;
	•		significant negative industry or economic trends, including legal factors;
	•		potential for strategic partnerships for the development of its patented technology;
	•		changing or implementation of rules regarding manufacture or sale of pharmaceuticals in China; and
	•		ability to maintain GMP certifications.

     If the Company determines that the carrying values of long-lived assets may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, the Company’s management performs an undiscounted cash flow analysis to determine if impairment exists. If impairment exists, the Company measures the impairment based on the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and its fair value, and the impairment is charged to operations in the period in which the long-lived asset impairment is determined by management. Based on its analysis, the Company believes that no indicators of impairment of the carrying value of its long-lived assets existed at June 30, 2009. There can be no assurance, however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the Company’s products will continue or allow the Company to realize the value of its technologies and prevent future long-lived asset impairment.

      Revenue Recognition. Revenues from the wholesale sales of over-the counter and prescription pharmaceuticals are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, title and risk of loss have passed to the buyer, the price is fixed or readily determinable and collection is reasonably assured, provided the criteria in the Security and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 101 Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements , (as amended by SAB No. 104) are met.

     In conjunction with the launch of the Company’s Nalefen Skin Care HPE products, distributors of the products were offered limited-time discounts to allow for promotional expenses incurred in the distribution channel. Distributors are not required to submit proof of the promotional expenses incurred. We account for the promotional expenses in accordance with EITF Issue No. 01-9, Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendor’s Products) . Accordingly, the promotional discounts granted in prior periods were netted against revenue in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Accounts receivable presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets have been reduced by the promotional discounts, as customers are permitted by the terms of the distribution contracts to net the discounts against payments on the related invoices.

     Any provision for sales promotion discounts and estimated returns are accounted for in the period the related sales are recorded. Buyers generally have limited rights of return, and the Company provides for estimated returns at the time of sale based on historical experience. Returns from customers historically have not been material. Actual returns and claims in any future period may differ from the Company’s estimates. In accordance with EITF Issue No. 06-3, How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to

Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross Versus Net Presentation) , JPI’s revenues are reported net of value added taxes (“VAT”) collected.

      Deferred Taxes. We record a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. We have considered estimated future taxable income and ongoing tax planning strategies in assessing the amount needed for the valuation allowance. Based on these estimates, all of our deferred tax assets have been reserved. If actual results differ favorably from those estimates used, we may be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets. Such realization could positively impact our condensed consolidated operating results and cash flows from operating activities.

      Litigation. We account for litigation losses in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies . Under SFAS No. 5, loss contingency provisions are recorded for probable losses at management’s best estimate of a loss, or when a best estimate cannot be made, a minimum loss contingency amount is recorded. These estimates are often initially developed substantially earlier than when the ultimate loss is known, and the estimates are refined each accounting period, as additional information is known. Accordingly, we are often initially unable to develop a best estimate of loss; therefore, the minimum amount, which could be zero, is recorded. As information becomes known, either the minimum loss amount is increased or a best estimate can be made, resulting in additional loss provisions. Occasionally, a best estimate amount is changed to a lower amount when events result in an expectation of a more favorable outcome than previously expected. Due to the nature of current litigation matters, the factors that could lead to changes in loss reserves might change quickly and the range of actual losses could be significant, which could materially impact our condensed consolidated results of operations and comprehensive loss and cash flows from operating activities.

      Stock-Based Compensation Expense. All issuances of the Company’s common stock for non-cash consideration have been assigned a per share amount equaling either the market value of the shares issued or the value of consideration received, whichever is more readily determinable. The majority of non-cash consideration received pertains to services rendered by consultants and others and has been valued at the market value of the shares on the measurement date.

     The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to consultants and vendors in exchange for goods and services in accordance with the provisions of EITF Issue No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods or Services, and EITF Issue No. 00-18, Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other than Employees. The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued is determined at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the date at which the consultant or vendor’s performance is complete. In the case of equity instruments issued to consultants, the fair value of the equity instrument is recognized over the term of the consulting agreement.

     We account for equity awards issued to employees in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123(R)”). SFAS 123(R) requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments, including stock options, based on the grant-date fair value of the award and to recognize the portion expected to vest as compensation expense over the period the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, usually the vesting period.

      Derivative Financial Instruments. We apply the provisions of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 133”). Derivatives within the scope of SFAS 133 must be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. We issued convertible debt in September 2008, and recorded a derivative asset related to the limitation on bonus interest rights held by convertible debt holders in the event of a change in control or bankruptcy.

Results of Operations

Quarter Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to Quarter Ended June 30, 2008

      Net Revenues. For the quarter ended June 30, 2009, our aggregate net revenues from product sales decreased 45% to $3,181,043 from $4,878,192 for the same period in 2008.

Corporate

     Net revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 for AMDL was $28,350 compared to $27,442 for the same period in 2008. This increase is due to increased orders for the DR-70 test kits.

     With USFDA approval of DR-70 test kit, our goal is to enter either exclusive or non-exclusive distribution agreements for various regions, and due to our overall commercialization efforts, we expect sales to increase in 2009. We have executed or are in the final stage of negotiating exclusive/non-exclusive distribution agreements with distributors for the DR-70 test kit. The proposed agreements would grant our distributor an exclusive right to distribute the DR-70 test kit within the US, Vietnam, Israel and Latin America. It is anticipated that one or more of the aforementioned distribution agreements will be in place by the third quarter of 2009.

     The statement concerning future sales is a forward-looking statement that involves certain risks and uncertainties which could result in sales below those achieved for the year ended December 31, 2008. Sales of DR-70 test kits in 2009 could be negatively impacted by potential competing products, lack of adequate supply and overall market acceptance of our products.

     We are currently unable to conduct a marketing program for the DR-70 test kit to a limited supply of one of the key components of the DR- 70 test kit. The anti-fibrinogen-HRP is limited in supply and additional quantities cannot be purchased. We currently have two lots remaining which are estimated to produce approximately 31,000 kits. Based on our current and anticipated orders, this supply is adequate to fill all orders.

     An integral part of our research and development through 2010 is the testing and development of an improved version of the DR-70 test kit. The Company is reviewing various alternatives and believes that a replacement anti-fibrinogen-HRP will be identified, tested and USFDA approved before the current supply is exhausted.

     Pilot studies show that the new version could be superior to the current version. It is anticipated that this version will be submitted to the USFDA in the latter half of 2010.

China

     China net revenues were $3,152,693 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $4,850,750 for the same period in 2008. This decrease was primarily due:

	•		Management conflicts between JPI and the operating entity JJB;
	•		The Sale of YYB; and
	•		The lack of sales of HPE solutions due to the mandatory 5-year cGMP recertification by the SFDA of JJB’s small injectible line and the expiration of contracts with beauty distributors that sell topical HPE solution.

Our China operations began experiencing various conflicts and cohesive management issues during the second quarter.
AMDL’s management has incurred extraordinary expenses such as attorney fees in China and the US, international travel expenses for AMDL’s management and efforts made by members of the board of directors in attempting to resolve these internal confict and issues without success. This in part is the reason why it is Management’s opinion that AMDL should seek a monetization plan for its investment in this subsidiary.

     The small injectible line received GMP recertification in the second quarter of 2009.

      Gross Profit. The Company’s gross profit for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 was $1,030,639 as compared to $2,418,870 for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. This decline was due to sales of products with lower margins, the write off products advanced to a customer, and the sale of YYB

Corporate

          Gross profit decreased approximately 33.6% to $16,737 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 from $25,207 for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 due to increased cost of raw materials and labor.

China

          China’s gross profit was $1,013,902 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, a 57.6% decrease over the same period in 2008 where gross profit was $2,393,663. Gross profit as compared to sales decreased from 49.6% for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 to 32.4% for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. This decrease can be attributed to a change in the product mix which shifted away from those

produced on the small injectible manufacturing line and HPE Solutions to other less profitable products, as well as an increase in the cost of raw materials and an increase in manufacturing overhead.

          The major components of cost of sales include raw materials, wages and salary and production overhead. Production overhead is comprised of depreciation of building, land use rights, and manufacturing equipment, amortization of production rights, utilities and repairs and maintenance.

      Research and Development. In the past, JJB entered into joint research and development agreements with outside research institutes, but all of the prior joint research agreements have expired.

          All research and development costs incurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 were incurred by AMDL. These costs comprised of funding the necessary research and development of the current DR-70 test kit and preparing for the next generation DR-70 test kit.

          During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we spent $332,779 on research and development related to the DR-70 test kit, compared to $57,052 for the same period in 2008.

     We expect research and development expenditures to increase during the remainder of 2009 due to:

	•		The need for research and development for an updated version of the DR-70 test kit in the US, clinical trials for such tests and funds for ultimate USFDA approval; and
	•		Research and development for the HPE-based cosmetic product.

      Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling , general and administrative expenses for the Company were $3,784,801 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $2,714,487 for the same period in 2008.

          Selling, general and administrative expenses are anticipated to decrease in 2009 as AMDL is initiating programs to review all contracts and agreements to reduce costs and the sale of YYB.

Corporate

          We incurred selling, general and administrative expenses of $1,712,665 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $2,346,838 for the same period in 2008. Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of consulting (including financial consulting) and legal expenses, director and commitment fees, regulatory compliance, professional fees related to patent protection, payroll, payroll taxes, investor and public relations, professional fees, and stock exchange and shareholder services expenses. Also included in selling, general and administrative expenses were non-cash expenses incurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 of approximately $157,000 for options issued to employees and directors and approximately $77,000 for common stock, options and warrants issued to consultants for services. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expense incurred is primarily a result of decreases in payroll expenses and professional fees.

     The table below details the major components of selling, general and administrative expenses incurred at Corporate:

		Three months ended June 30,
		2009				2008
Investor relations (including value of warrants/options)		$	244,932			$	526,577
Salary and wages (including value of options)		$	734,646			$	756,650
Directors fees (including value of options)		$	73,720			$	170,575
Consulting fees		$	55,572			$	65,608
Accounting and other professional fees		$	166,478			$	251,847
Legal		$	149,889			$	158,480

China

          China incurred selling, general and administrative expenses of $2,072,136 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $367,649 for the same period as in 2008. Major components were amortization, payroll and related taxes, transportation charges, meals and entertainment and insurance. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 314.2% for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 when compared to the same period 2008. The increase is primarily due to expenses for bad debts of approximately $1,730,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2009.. Accounts receivables written off represent customers who have not regularly remitted payments and doubt exists as to the ultimate collectability. JJB’s management is still making efforts to collect these accounts receivables but has decided, based on current information and policy to write these accounts receivables off.

      Interest Expense. Interest expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $332,034 and $199,814, respectively. The increase relates to interest on our Convertible Debt financing in September 2008 and the Senior Note financings in December 2008 and January 2009.

Corporate

          Interest expense increased to $276,278 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 from $4,526 for the same period in 2008 as a result of the issuance of our 10% Convertible Debt and 12% Senior Notes.

China

          JPI incurred interest expense of $55,756 and $195,288 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These expenses represent interest paid to financial institutions in connection with debt obligations. Approximately $2.3 million of debt was repaid by JPI in 2008, resulting in a reduction in interest expense in 2009.

      Loss before discontinued operations. As a result of the factors described above, for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 the Company’s loss before discontinued operations was $3,872,861, or $0.24 per share compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2008 when the Company’s loss before discontinued operations was $429,567, or $0.05 per share.

Results of Discontinued Operations

Summarized operating results of discontinued operations for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

		2009				2008
Revenue		$	594,839			$	646,553
Income before income taxes		$	277,743			$	257,935

Included in income from discontinued operations, net are income tax expenses of $30,717 and $51,594 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The Company sold YYB in June 2009. YYB had no significant operations during the second quarter of 2009. The sales price was 16 million RMB to be remitted directly to the bank holding the mortgage on land owned by JJB.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

      Net Revenues. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, our aggregate net revenues from product sales decreased 37.1% to $5,892,780 from $7,819,385 for the same period in 2008.

Corporate

     Net revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009 for AMDL was $51,420 compared to $35,662 for the same period in 2008. This increase is due to increased orders for the DR-70 test kits due to distribution agreements for Vietnam and Canada

     With USFDA approval of DR-70 test kit, we expect sales to increase in 2009. We are currently in discussions with distributors for the DR-70 test kit. The proposed agreements would grant our distributor an exclusive right to distribute the DR-70 test kit within the Israel, and Latin America. It is anticipated that one or more distribution agreements will be in place by the third quarter of 2009.

     The statement concerning future sales is a forward-looking statement that involves certain risks and uncertainties which could result in sales below those achieved for the year ended December 31, 2008. Sales of DR-70 test kits in 2009 could be negatively impacted by potential competing products, lack of adequate supply and overall market acceptance of our products.

     We are currently unable to conduct a marketing program for the DR-70 test kit to a limited supply of one of the key components of the DR- 70 test kit. The anti-fibrinogen-HRP is limited in supply and additional quantities cannot be purchased. We currently have two lots remaining which are estimated to produce approximately 31,000 kits. Based on our current and anticipated orders, this supply is adequate to fill all orders.

     An integral part of our research and development through 2010 is the testing and development of an improved version of the DR-70 test kit. The Company is reviewing various alternatives and believes that a replacement anti-fibrinogen-HRP will be identified, tested and USFDA approved before the current supply is exhausted.

     Pilot studies show that the new version could be superior to the current version. It is anticipated that this version will be submitted to the USFDA in the latter half of 2010.

China

     China net revenues were $5,841,360 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $7,783,723 for the same period in 2008 primarily due the lack of sales of HPE solutions due to cessation of production in the small injectible line, expiration of contracts with beauty distributors that sell topical HPE solution and sale of YYB.

     China sales by product as a percentage of total China sales were as follows:

		Six Months ended June 30,
		2009				2008
Domperidone Tablet			59.72	%			44.61	%
Compound Benzoic Acid and Camphor Solution			8.99	%			0.00	%
5% GS			4.65	%			0.00	%
GNS			3.58	%			0.00	%
NaCL			3.03	%			0.00	%
Other			2.16	%			0.00	%
Levofloxacin Lactate Injuection			17.86	%			7.25	%
Guyanlin Tablets			0.00	%			3.83	%
HPE Based Products			0.00	%			12.16	%
Diavitamin, Calcium Hydrogen Phosphate and Lysine Tablets			0.00	%			9.92	%
			99.99	%			77.77	%

     The small injectible line received GMP recertification in the second quarter of 2009.

      Gross Profit. The Company’s gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $2,156,802 as compared to $3,842,523 for the six months ended June 30, 2008. This decline was due in part to decline in sales, a decline in HPE solution sales, sale of YYB as well as sales of product with lower sales margins..

Corporate

          Gross profit increased approximately 19.2% to $31,732 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 from $26,630 for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 due to increased sales volume of the DR-70 test kit offset by increases in cost of raw material and labor.

China

          China’s gross profit was $2,125,070 for the six months ended June 30, 2009, a 53.3% decrease over the same period in 2008 where gross profit was $3,815,893. Gross profit as compared to sales decreased from 49.1% for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 to

36.6% for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. This decrease can be attributed to a change in the product mix which shifted away from those produced on the small injectible manufacturing line and HPE Solutions to other less profitable products, as well as an increase in the cost of raw materials and an increase in manufacturing overhead.

          The major components of cost of sales include raw materials, wages and salary and production overhead. Production overhead is comprised of depreciation of building, land use rights, and manufacturing equipment, amortization of production rights, utilities and repairs and maintenance.

      Research and Development. In the past, JJB entered into joint research and development agreements with outside research institutes, but all of the prior joint research agreements have expired.

          All research and development costs incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2009 were incurred by AMDL. These costs comprised of funding the necessary research and development of the current DR-70 test kit and preparing for the next generation DR-70 test kit.

          During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we spent $425,463 on research and development related to the DR-70 test kit, compared to $65,747 for the same period in 2008.

     We expect research and development expenditures to increase during the remainder of 2009 due to:

	•		The need for research and development for an updated version of the DR-70 test kit in the US, clinical trials for such tests and funds for ultimate USFDA approval;
	•		Additional research and development costs incurred in response to questions and requests by new distribution partners; and
	•		Research and development for the HPE-based cosmetic product.

      Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling , general and administrative expenses for the Company were $6,375,570 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $5,512,436 for the same period in 2008.

Corporate

          We incurred selling, general and administrative expenses of $3,757,049 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $4,755,731 for the same period in 2008. Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of consulting (including financial consulting) and legal expenses, director and commitment fees, regulatory compliance, professional fees related to patent protection, payroll, payroll taxes, investor and public relations, professional fees, and stock exchange and shareholder services expenses. Also included in selling, general and administrative expenses were non-cash expenses incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2009 of approximately $154,000 for options issued to employees and directors and approximately $314,000 for common stock, options and warrants issued to consultants for services. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expense incurred is primarily a result of decreases in payroll expenses and professional fees.

     The table below details the major components of selling, general and administrative expenses incurred at Corporate:

		Six months ended June 30,
		2009				2008
Investor relations (including value of warrants/options)		$	547,797			$	1,054,001
Salary and wages (including value of options)		$	1,446,979			$	1,690,733
Directors fees (including value of options)		$	170,096			$	376,600
Consulting fees		$	130,296			$	116,059
Accounting and other professional fees		$	492,910			$	525,465
Legal		$	356,113			$	332,529

China

          China incurred selling, general and administrative expenses of $2,618,521 for the six ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $756,705 for the same period as in 2008. Major components were amortization, payroll and related taxes, transportation charges, meals and entertainment, insurance and provision for bad debts. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 246.0% for the six ended June 30, 2009 when compared to the same period 2008. The increase is primarily due to an increase in bad debt expense of approximately $1,933,000 incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2009. Accounts receivables written off represent customers who have not regularly remitted payments and doubt exists as to the ultimate collectability. JJB’s management is still making efforts to collect these accounts receivables but has decided, based on current information and policy to write these accounts receivables off.

      Interest Expense. Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $566,251 and $261,779, respectively. The increase relates to interest on our Convertible Debt financing in September 2008 and the Senior Note financings in December 2008 and January 2009.

Corporate

          Interest expense increased to $454,793 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 from $5,431 for the same period in 2008 as a result of the issuance of our 10% Convertible Debt and 12% Senior Notes.

China

          JPI incurred interest expense of $111,458 and $256,348 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These expenses represent interest paid to financial institutions in connection with debt obligations. Approximately $2.3 million of debt was repaid by JPI in 2008, resulting in a reduction in interest expense in 2009.

      Loss before discontinued operations. As a result of the factors described above, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 the Company’s loss before discontinued operations was $5,810,978, or $0.37 per share compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008 when the Company’s loss before discontinued operations was $1,901,763, or $0.16 per share.

Results of Discontinued Operations

Summarized operating results of discontinued operations for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

		2009				2008
Revenue		$	594,839			$	646,553
Income before income taxes		$	277,743			$	257,935

Included in income from discontinued operations, net are income tax expenses of $30,717 and $51,594 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

          From December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009, our cash and cash equivalents decreased by $214,379, compared to a net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $4,545,672 for the six months of 2008. We continue to attempt to raise additional debt or equity financing as our operations historically have not produced sufficient cash to offset the cash drain of growth in our pharmaceutical business and our general operating and administrative expenses. Our US operations require approximately $400,000 per month. Our China operations may not generate cash flow in the future or such cash flows may not be available to support the US operations on a timely basis. To the extent that funds are not available to meet these operating needs, we will have to restrict or discontinue operations.

           Operating activities . We used $2,124,145 from continuing operating activities in the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared with cash used in continuing operating activities of $1,839,511 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were offset by non-cash expenses, including depreciation, amortization, debt discount accretion, stock-based compensation to management, directors and consultants, warrant revaluation and provision for bad debts of $3,931,011 and $2,325,23 for the respective periods. The Company generated $1,853,502 in cash from discontinued operating activities from changes in operating assets and liabilities in the six months ended

June 30, 2009, as compared to generating working capital from changes in operating assets and liabilities of $491,270 for the Six months ended June 30, 2008. The decline in our working capital position from continuing operations is primarily due to entering into distribution agreement where approximately $2.2 million dollars in advertising costs were prepaid. .

          The Company granted 120 day terms to four large customers in the third and fourth quarter of 2008 which accommodation was needed to properly market our Nalefen product line. These agreements expired in the first quarter of 2009, and we are in the process of negotiating new contracts with these distributors. JPI’s management has encountered severe difficulties in collection of these receivables and as collection is in doubt, has written off these receivables at June 30, 2008. JPI’s management continues to try and collect these receivables.

          As of June 30, 2009, there was approximately $5,600,000 in accounts receivable aging in excess of 120 days. The majority of these receivables are related to the beauty distributors that were granted 120 day terms. JPI’s Management in China has not been able to collect significant amounts of outstanding receivables and has therefore increased the allowance for doubtful accounts to approximately $2,005,000 for the second quarter of 2009. JPI’s management remains committed to closely monitoring the accounts receivable aging and collection efforts. The cessation of revenues from the HPE solutions while the renegotiations are taking place will have a materially negative impact on cash flow in the second half of 2009.

          JJB has an outstanding loan with ICBC. According to management at JPI and JJB, we are currently in default, but the bank is working with us to create a compromise. In regards to this compromise, the purchaser of YYB has directly negotiated with ICBC with our cooperation, wherein approximate $2.3 million from the sale of YYB will go directly to pay down principle and interest of the ICBC loan. Based upon this payment, ICBC will extend the repayment of the remaining portion of the noted and any interest until December 31, 2009.

           Investing activities. We used $2,034,324 in investing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared with $1,827,265 in the six months ended June 30, 2008. In both periods, we made expenditures in an effort to regain our GMP certification for JJB’s small injectible manufacturing lines. Renovations necessary for GMP recertification of the facility at JJB are complete and recertification was received in the second quarter of 2009. In 2009, we also acquired lab and office equipment for our U.S. facility to support our DR-70 test kit initiatives.

           Financing activities. In the six months ended June 30, 2009, we raised $2,088,593, net of offering expenses, from the issuance of senior debt.

Future Capital Needs

          We expect to incur additional capital expenditures at our U.S. facilities in 2009 in the form of upgrading our information technology systems, collaboration with the Mayo Clinic, costs associated with the development of the HPE-based product line, further development of the DR-70 product and upgrading manufacturing lines in Tustin.. It is anticipated that these projects will be funded primarily through additional debt or equity financing.

          There is no assurance we will be able to generate sufficient funds internally or sell any debt or equity securities to generate sufficient funds for these activities, or whether such funds, if available, will be obtained on terms satisfactory to us. The Company may need to discontinue or delay its capital expenditures, research activities and other investments if funds are not available to support management’s operational plans.

China Credit Facilities

     When JPI acquired JJB and YYB, KangDa Pharmaceutical Company, a predecessor of JJB, had a credit facility and bank loan from Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (“ICBC”) of approximately RMB 38 million, or $4.7 million, (the “KangDa Credit Facility”), which was assumed by JPI through agreement with KangDa. The assumption of the loan was not formalized with the bank, however, the bank made a verbal agreement to allow the Company to continue under the original terms of the credit agreement. The loan from ICBC is secured by a pledge of the real property on which our Chinese manufacturing facilities are located. Currently, approximately $3.1 million is due and payable on the KangDa Credit Facility. We are currently in default, but the bank is cooperating with JPI’s management to resolve this issue. As part of the resolution, the purchaser of YYB has directly negotiated with the bank, wherein approximately $2.3 million from the sale of YYB will be remitted to pay down principal and interest. Based on this commitment, the bank will extend the remaining portion of the note and interest until December 31, 2009. The remaining $0.6 million debt, owed primarily by YYB, is due and payable.

Going Concern

          The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern, which contemplates, among other things, the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. We incurred net losses before discontinued operations of $3,872,861 and $5,810,978 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and had an accumulated deficit of $45,346,867 at June 30, 2009. In addition, we used cash from operating activities of continuing operations of $2,124,145 for the six months ended June 30, 2009, we generated cash in operating activities of discontinued operations of $1,853,502 during the six months ended June 30, 2009.

          On May 4, 2009, we closed the first tranche of our Series 2 note offering, generating net cash proceeds of $92,900, before legal costs and regulatory fees. A second closing ocurred on June 12, 2009, where the Company sold $468,500 of 12% Series 2 convertible notes. An aggregate of $1,658,250 in notes was sold. At August 17, 2009, we had cash on hand in the U.S. of approximately $16,000. Cash in China was not included as we are unable to verify deposits and the ability to repatriate such funds are questionable.Our receivables in China have been outstanding for extended periods, and we have experienced increased delays in collection. Therefore, in accordance with our allowance for doubtful accounts policy, have increased our allowance accordingly. Our U.S. operations currently require approximately $400,000 per month exclusive of interest payments, to fund the cost associated with our general U.S. corporate functions, payment by corporate of the salaries of our executives in China, and the expenses related to the further development of the DR-70 test kit.

          Assuming (i) JJB does not undertake significant new activities which require additional capital, (ii) the current level of revenue from the sale of DR-70 test kits does not increase in the near future, (iii) we do not conduct any full scale clinical trials for the DR-70 test kit or our CIT technology in the U.S. or China, (iv) JPI continues to generate sufficient cash to exceed its cash requirements, (v) no outstanding warrants are exercised, and (vi) no additional equity or debt financings are completed, the amount of cash on hand is expected to be sufficient to meet our projected operating expenses on a month to month basis as long as JPI or JJB continues to generate enough cash from operations that can be timely sent to the U.S. to meet the cash needs of the Company in the U.S.

          The monthly cash requirement does not include any extraordinary items or expenditures, including payments to the Mayo Clinic on clinical trials for our DR-70 test kit or expenditures related to further development of our CIT technology, as no significant expenditures are anticipated other than the legal fees incurred in furtherance of patent protection for the CIT technology.

          Our near and long-term operating strategies focus on (i) obtaining SFDA approval for the DR-70 test kit, (ii) further developing and marketing of DR-70, (iii) seeking a large pharmaceutical partner for our CIT technology, (iv) selling different formulations of HPE-based products in the U.S. and internationally and (v) introduction of new products. Management recognizes that the Company must generate additional capital resources to enable it to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans include seeking financing, alliances or other partnership agreements with entities interested in our technologies, or other business transactions that would generate sufficient resources to assure continuation of our operations and research and development programs.

          There are significant risks and uncertainties which could negatively affect our operations. These are principally related to (i) the absence of a distribution network for our DR-70 test kits, (ii) the early stage of development of our CIT technology and the need to enter into a strategic relationship with a larger company capable of completing the development of any ultimate product line including the subsequent marketing of such product, (iii) the absence of any commitments or firm orders from our distributors, (iv) possible disruption in producing products in China as a result of relocation of our facilities and/or delays or failure in either the GMP recertification process or the SFDA production license approval process and (v) credit risks associated with new distribution agreements in China. Our limited sales to date for the DR-70 test kit and the lack of any purchase requirements in the existing distribution agreements make it impossible to identify any trends in our business prospects. Moreover, if either AcuVector and/or the University of Alberta is successful in their claims, we may be liable for substantial damages, our rights to the CIT technology will be adversely affected, and our future prospects for licensing the CIT technology will be significantly impaired.

          Our only sources of additional funds to meet continuing operating expenses, fund additional research and development, complete the acquisition of production rights for new products, fund additional working capital, and conduct clinical trials which may be required to receive SFDA approval are the sale of securities, and cash flow generated from JPI’s operations. We are actively seeking additional debt or equity financing, but no assurances can be given that such financing will be obtained or what the terms thereof will be. Additionally, there is no assurance as to whether we will continue to conduct JPI’s operations on a profitable basis or that JPI’s operations will generate positive cash flow. We may need to discontinue a portion or all of its operations if we are unsuccessful in generating positive cash flow or financing for our operations through the issuance of securities.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

The functional currency of our Company is United States dollars (“US$”). The functional currency of our Company’s PRC Operating Entities is the Renminbi, and PRC is the primary economic environment in which we operate. The value of stockholders’ investment in our stock will be affected by the foreign exchange rate between US$ and RMB. To the extent we hold assets denominated in U.S. dollars any appreciation of the RMB against the U.S. dollar could result in a change to our statement of operations and a reduction in the value of our U.S. dollar denominated assets. On the other hand, a decline in the value of RMB against the U.S. dollar could reduce the U.S. dollar equivalent amounts of our financial results, the value of stockholders' investment in our company and the dividends we may pay in the future, if any, all of which may have a material adverse effect on the price of our stock.

Our exposure to foreign exchange risk primarily relates to currency gains or losses resulting from timing differences between signing of sales contracts and settling of these contracts. Furthermore, we translate monetary assets and liabilities denominated in other currencies into RMB, the functional currency of our operating business. Our results of operations and cash flow are translated at average exchange rates during the period, and assets and liabilities are translated at the foreign exchange rate at the end of the period. Translation adjustments resulting from this process are included in accumulated other comprehensive income in our statement of shareholders’ equity. We have not used any forward contracts, currency options or borrowings to hedge our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. We cannot predict the impact of future exchange rate fluctuations on our results of operations and may incur net foreign currency losses in the future.

Interest Rate Risk

Changes in interest rates may affect the interest paid (or earned) and therefore affect our cash flows and results of operations. However, we do not believe that this interest rate change risk is significant.

Inflation

Inflation has not had a material impact on the Company’s business in recent years.

Currency Exchange Fluctuations

All of the Company’s revenues are denominated in RMB, as are expenses. The value of the RMB-to-US$ and other currencies may fluctuate and is affected by, among other things, changes in political and economic conditions. Since 1994, the conversion of Renminbi into foreign currencies, including US$, has been based on rates set by the People’s Bank of China, which are set daily based on the previous day’s inter-bank foreign exchange market rates and current exchange rates on the world financial markets. Since 1994, the official exchange rate for the conversion of RRMB to US$ had generally been stable and the RMB had appreciated slightly against the US$. However, on July 21, 2005, the Chinese government changed its policy of pegging the value of RMB to the US$. Under the new policy, RMB may fluctuate within a narrow and managed band against a basket of certain foreign currencies. Recently there has been increased political pressure on the Chinese government to decouple the RMB from the US$. At the recent quarterly regular meeting of People’s Bank of China, its Currency Policy Committee affirmed the effects of the reform on RMB exchange rate. Since February 2006, the new currency rate system has been operated; the currency rate of RMB has become more flexible while basically maintaining stable and the expectation for a larger appreciation range is shrinking. The Company has never engaged in currency hedging operations and has no present intention to do so.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Credit risk represents the accounting loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counterparties failed completely to perform as contracted. Concentrations of credit risk (whether on or off balance sheet) that arise from financial instruments exist for groups of customers or counterparties when they have similar economic characteristics that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions as described below:

Seasonality and Quarterly Fluctuations

Our businesses experience fluctuations in quarterly performance. Traditionally, the first quarter from January to March has a lower number of sales reflected by our business due to the New Year holidays in China occurring during that period. This is traditionally a period where business activities are suspended for many people as they begin to prepare for the most important Chinese festival for the year. In addition, during the third quarter from July to August our business sees reduced revenues due to the fact that many Chinese workers and families take their annual summer leaves.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure of Controls and Procedures

          We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that material information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that the information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We performed an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the existence of the material weaknesses discussed below under the heading “Material Weaknesses” our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level as of the end of the period covered by this report.

We do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all instances of fraud. Disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Further, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all disclosure controls and procedures, no evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures can provide absolute assurance that we have detected all our control deficiencies and instances of fraud, if any. The design of disclosure controls and procedures also is based partly on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Material Weaknesses

In our Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting included in our Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective due to the existence of the material weaknesses as of December 31, 2008, discussed below. A material weakness is a control deficiency, or a combination of

control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.

     a) Shortage of qualified financial reporting personnel with sufficient depth, skills and experience to apply accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

     b) We did not maintain effective controls to ensure there are adequate analysis, documentation, reconciliation, and review of accounting records and supporting data.

     c) We do not have adequate controls in place to identify and approve non-recurring transactions such that the validity and proper accounting can be determined on a timely basis.

     d) We do not have adequate procedures in place to detect related party transactions which give rise to potential conflicts of interest.

     e) A lack of clear policy regarding delegated authority has contributed to a lapse in corporate oversight regarding such transactions.

     The Company has implemented and is in the process of testing the following remediation plans;

1. Remediation Plan for Material Weaknesses

          The material weaknesses described above comprise control deficiencies that we discovered in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008 and during the financial close process for fiscal year 2008.

          Beginning and during the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we formulated a remediation plan and initiated remedial action to address those material weaknesses. We have continued our remediation actions through the second quarter of 2009 and expect to continue working on our remediation plan through December 31, 2009, however, because of resource constraints at our US parent company we have not been able to implement the remediation plans at the speed and to the extent that we would like. Additionally, internal disputes between our China based management at our subsidiary, JPI and our indirect subsidiary, JJB during the period covered by this report have further complicated our ability to implement the remediation plan and may have contributed to a further weakening of our internal controls and procedures particularly as they relate to our ability to (a) to direct management at JJB to compile financial information, (b) to gain access to operational information at JPI (c) and control the sale and/or disposal of assets or implement internal controls surrounding the sale/disposal of assets by JPI and (d) our ability to repatriate funds back to the US.

The elements of the remediation plan are as follows:

1. authorized the addition of staff members and outside consultants with appropriate levels of experience and accounting expertise to the finance department and information technology department to ensure that there is sufficient depth and experience to implement and monitor the appropriate level of control procedures related to all of our US and China locations;

2. taken steps to unify the financial reporting of all of our China entities and are in the initial planning phase of upgrading, where possible, certain of our information technology systems impacting financial reporting. We are currently planning further integration of information technology policy and procedures and evaluating them as they impact all our subsidiaries to provide accurate and complete financial reporting information;

3. hired an accounting manager for our Chinese operating entities who is familiar with recording transactions in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and who reports to the Chief Financial Officer. Management will monitor the progress of the accounting manager who will manage the process of instituting additional procedures for future accounting periods that will cause transactions in China to be reported in a timely manner and according to the appropriate accounting principles;

4. purchased and are instituting a company wide accounting software system that will increase the efficiency of information transfer between JJB, YYB, JPI and AMDL. The implementation process began in April of 2008 in the United States and will roll out to China by mid-year 2009.

5. issued policies and procedures regarding the delegation of authority and conducted training sessions with appropriate individuals at our subsidiary locations. We are monitoring the implementation of such policies through detailed review of significant transactions on a quarterly basis.

     Additionally, as a result of the internal disputes between management at JPI and JJB, we have initiated the following additional actions:

	•		We have passed board of directors resolutions to change the signatures on certain bank accounts and implement new policies and procedures to ensure that in the future there are more regular communications, access to relevant documentation, and more frequent collaboration protocols among our management in China and our accounting department personnel and Chief Financial Officer.
	•		We strengthened the period-end closing procedures of our China based operating subsidiaries by: (i) requiring all significant estimate transactions to be reviewed by corporate in the US, (ii) ensuring that account reconciliations and analyses for significant financial statement accounts are reviewed for completeness and accuracy by qualified accounting personnel in the US, and (iii) continued developing better monitoring controls for our China based subsidiaries.

     Notwithstanding the material weaknesses discussed above, our management has concluded that the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly present in all material respects the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows for the period ended June 30, 2009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

     Except as set forth above, there have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the six months ended June 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

AMDL, INC.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

          On February 22, 2002, AcuVector Group, Inc. (“AcuVector”) filed a Statement of Claim in the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Judicial District of Edmonton relating to the Company’s CIT technology acquired from Dr. Chang in August 2001. The claim alleges damages of $CDN 20 million and seeks injunctive relief against Dr. Chang for, among other things, breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty, and against the Company for interference with the alleged relationship between Dr. Chang and AcuVector. The claim for injunctive relief seeks to establish that the AcuVector license agreement with Dr. Chang is still in effect. The Company has performed extensive due diligence to determine that AcuVector had no interest in the technology when the Company acquired it. The Company has recently initiated action to commence discovery in this case, and AcuVector has taken no action to advance the proceedings since filing the complaint in 2002. The Company is confident that AcuVector’s claims are without merit and that the Company will receive a favorable judgment. As the final outcome is not determinable, no accrual or loss relating to this action is reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

     We are also defending a companion case filed in the same court by the Governors of the University of Alberta against us and Dr. Chang. The University of Alberta claims, among other things, that Dr. Chang failed to remit the payment of the University’s portion of the monies paid by us to Dr. Chang for the CIT technology purchased by us from Dr. Chang in 2001. In addition to other claims against Dr. Chang relating to other technologies developed by him while at the University, the University also claims that the Company conspired with Dr. Chang and interfered with the University’s contractual relations under certain agreements with Dr. Chang, thereby damaging the University in an amount which is unknown to the University at this time. The University has not claimed that AMDL is not the owner of the CIT technology, just that the University has an equitable interest therein for the revenues there from. As the final outcome is not determinable, no accrual or loss relating to this action is reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. No significant discovery has as yet been conducted in the case.

     Accordingly, if either AcuVector and/or the University is successful in their claims, we may be liable for substantial damages, our rights to the technology will be adversely affected, and our future prospects for exploiting or licensing the CIT technology will be significantly impaired.

     On August 11, 2009 we received correspondence from counsel to our former CEO, Gary L. Dreher, alleging that the Company has breached its severance agreement with Mr. Dreher, a copy of which was filed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 5, 2008, for our failure to pay Mr. Dreher’s monthly severance payment of $18,000 on July 29, 2009, and to pay the premium on a life insurance policy on Mr. Dreher for the month of July 2009. Mr. Dreher has demanded payment of $18,000 plus 10% per annum simple interest, together reimbursement of $1,089.15 for the premium payment of the life insurance policy. Mr. Dreher has not yet instituted any formal proceedings against the Company for breach of the severance agreement however if we are unable to agree to a settlement or forbearance of his claim it is likely that he will institute litigation against us.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

     Our business involves significant risks which are described below.

Limited product development activities; our product development efforts may not result in commercial products.

     We intend to continue to pursue SFDA approval of the DR-70 test kit and licensing of our CIT technology. Due to limited cash resources, we are limited in the number of additional products we can develop at this time. Successful cancer detection and treatment product development is highly uncertain, and very few research and development projects produce a commercial product. Product candidates like the DR-70 test kit or the CIT technology that appear promising in the early phases of development, such as in early animal or human clinical trials, may fail to reach the market for a number of reasons, such as:

	•		the product candidate did not demonstrate acceptable clinical trial results even though it demonstrated positive preclinical trial results;
	•		the product candidate was not effective in treating a specified condition or illness;

	•		the product candidate had harmful side effects on humans;
	•		the necessary regulatory bodies, such as the SFDA, did not approve our product candidate for an intended use;
	•		the product candidate was not economical for us to manufacture and commercialize; and
	•		the product candidate is not cost effective in light of existing therapeutics.

     Of course, there may be other factors that prevent us from marketing a product including, but not limited to, our limited cash resources. We cannot guarantee we will be able to produce commercially successful products. Further, clinical trial results are frequently susceptible to varying interpretations by scientists, medical personnel, regulatory personnel, statisticians and others, which may delay, limit or prevent further clinical development or regulatory approvals of a product candidate. Also, the length of time that it takes for us to complete clinical trials and obtain regulatory approval in multiple jurisdictions for a product varies by jurisdiction and by product. We cannot predict the length of time to complete necessary clinical trials and obtain regulatory approval.

     Our cash position in the U.S. as of August 17, 2009 of approximately $16,000 is not sufficient to fully implement all of our various business strategies for the DR-70 test kit or to market the DR-70 test kit or our HPE-based products internationally by ourselves. Even if we are successful in obtaining additional financing, and notwithstanding any cash generated from our pharmaceutical operations in China which may be available to us, our short-term strategies are to engage outside distributors and license our products to others, although there can be no assurances that our products can be successfully licensed and/or marketed.

Our operations in China involve significant risk.

     JJB, YYB and Golden Success Technologies, Ltd. were formed to operate as WFOEs in China. During second quarter 2009 all active operations at YYB were terminated due to expiration of its GMP license and YYB was eventually sold to an independent third party. Risks associated with operating as a WFOE include unlimited liability for claims arising from operations in China and potentially less favorable treatment from governmental agencies in China than JJB and YYB would receive if JJB and YYB operated through a joint venture with a Chinese partner.

     JJB and YYB are subject to the Pharmaceutical Administrative Law, which governs the licensing, manufacture, marketing and distribution of pharmaceutical products in China and sets penalty provisions for violations of provisions of the Pharmaceutical Administrative Law. Compliance with changes in law may require us to incur additional expenditures or could impose additional regulation on the prices charged for our pharmaceutical products, which could have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

     As in the case of JJB, the Chinese government has the right to annex or take facilities it deems necessary. Currently, a portion of JJB’s facility that produces large and small volume parenteral solutions has been identified for annexation by the Chinese Military Department. The outcome of this event cannot be predicted at this time, but if the Chinese government takes this facility, although we expect that JJB will be compensated fairly for the facility, JJB will have to spend significant time and resources finding another location and restarting those operations in another area. We intend to consolidate JJB and any operations related to product lines formerly manufactured by YYB in a single facility in a new location. Such new location will need to obtain GMP certification. Such annexation, or the threat of such annexation, may negatively impact our results of operation and financial condition.

     The value of the RMB fluctuates and is subject to changes in China’s political and economic conditions. Historically, the Chinese government has benchmarked the RMB exchange ratio against the U.S. dollar, thereby mitigating the associated foreign currency exchange rate fluctuation risk; however, no assurances can be given that the risks related to currency deviations of the RMB will not increase in the future. Additionally, the RMB is not freely convertible into foreign currency and all foreign exchange transactions must take place through authorized institutions.

We may not be able to continue to operate our business if we are unable to attract additional operating capital.

     The current level of our revenues is not sufficient to finance our operations.. Due to the recent reduction in China’s operations and limited sales, China did not supplement our U.S. operating cash needs. Accordingly, our U.S. accounts payable have dramatically increased. We continue to attempt to raise additional debt or equity financing as our operations do not produce sufficient cash to offset the cash drain of growth in pharmaceutical sales and our general operating and administrative expenses. Accordingly, our business and operations are substantially dependent on our ability to raise additional capital to: (i) finance the costs of SFDA approval for the DR-

70 test kit in China; (ii) supply capital to JPI to move JJB to new facilities; (iii) supply working capital for the expansion of sales and the costs of marketing of new and existing products; and (iv) fund ongoing selling, general and administrative expenses of our business. If we do not receive additional financing,., the Company will have to restrict or discontinue certain operations in both China and the U.S. No assurances can be given that we will raise additional debt or equity financing or generate enough cash to meet our cash needs in the US to enable us to pay our continuing obligations when due or to continue to operate our business.

     At August 17, 2009, we had cash on hand in the U.S. China of approximately $16,000. Our US operations require approximately $425,000 per month to fund the costs associated with our financing activities; SEC and NYSE reporting; legal and accounting expenses of being a public company; other general administrative expenses; research and development, regulatory compliance, and distribution activities related to DR-70 test kit; the operation of a USFDA approved pharmaceutical manufacturing facility; the development of international distribution of the Company’s planned HPE-based cosmetics product line; and compensation of executive management in the US and China.. Even assuming (i) JJB does not undertake significant new activities which require additional capital, (ii) the current level of revenue from the sale of DR-70 test kits does not increase in the near future, (iii) we do not conduct any full scale clinical trials for the DR-70 test kit or our CIT technology in the U.S. or China, (iv) JPI continues to generate sufficient cash to meet or exceed its cash requirements, (v) no outstanding warrants are exercised, and (vi) no additional equity or debt financings are completed, our sources of cash from operations in the U. S. are insufficient to meet our projected operating expenses on a month to month basis.

We have a significant amout of relatively short term indebtedness and may be unable to satisfy our obligations to pay interest and principal thereon when due.

As of August 17, 2009, we have the following approximate amounts of outstanding short term indebtedness:

	(i)		$3.1 million in a secured loan with Chinese Industrial Bank of Commerce bearing interest at 5.3%-9.5% per annum which is due on or before December 31, 2009. which indebtedness is secured by a mortgage on one of the JJB factories in Shangro, China;
	(ii)		$2.56 million in unsecured convertible notes bearing interest at 10% per annum due September 15, 2010; and
	(iii)		$3.3 million senior unsecured promissory notes bearing interest at 12% interest payable quarterly in cash, portions of which principal are due in December 2010 and the balance of the principal is due at varying dates in early 2011.

Absent a new financing or series of financings, our current operations do not generate sufficient cash to pay the interest and principal on these obligations when they become due. Accordingly, we may default in these obligations in the future.

      Disputes between the management of our China operating subsidiaries could lead to a decrease in our ability to direct our China based operations.

          In connection with the preparation of our Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, we became aware of significant disputes between the management of our China based operating subsidiaries, JPI and JJB, respectively. These disputes have led to (a) the inability of JPI’s management to direct management at JJB to compile financial information on a timely basis; (b) inability of JPI’s management to gain access to operational information and/or direct operations; (c) sale and/or disposal of assets without informing AMDL’s management or following directives from AMDL’s management regarding internal controls surrounding the sale/disposal of assets and; (d) the inability to repatriate funds back to the US . If we are unable to resolve these issues through further strengthening of our controls and procedures or otherwise through negotiation between the parties, it could have a material adverse effect on our ability to direct our operations in China.

Our independent registered public accounting firm has included a going concern paragraph in their report on our consolidated financial statements.

     While our independent registered public accounting firm expressed an unqualified opinion on our consolidated financial statements, our independent registered public accounting firm did include an explanatory paragraph indicating that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern due to our significant operating loss in 2007, our negative cash flows from operations through December 31, 2008 and our accumulated deficit at December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009. Our ability to continue as an operating entity currently depends, in large measure, upon our ability to generate additional capital resources. In light of this situation, it is not likely that we will be able to raise equity. While we seek ways to continue to operate by securing additional financing resources or alliances or other partnership agreements, we do not at this time have any commitments or agreements that

provide for additional capital resources. Our financial condition and the going concern emphasis paragraph may also make it more difficult for us to maintain existing customer relationships and to initiate and secure new customer relationships.

Adverse conditions in the global economy and disruption in financial markets could impair our revenues and results of operations.

     As widely reported, financial markets in the United States, Europe and Asia have been experiencing extreme disruption in recent months, including, among other things, extreme volatility in security prices, severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, rating downgrades of certain investments and declining valuations of others. These conditions have impaired our ability to access credit markets and finance operations already. There can be no assurance that there will not be a further deterioration in financial markets and confidence in major economies. We are impacted by these economic developments, both domestically and globally, as our business requires additional capital to build inventories and exploit new markets. In addition, the current tightening of credit in financial markets adversely affects the ability of our customers to obtain financing for significant purchases and operations, and has resulted in a decrease in orders for our products, and increases the number of days outstanding of our accounts receivable in China. Our customers’ ability to pay for our products may also be impaired, which may lead to an increase in our allowance for doubtful accounts and write-offs of accounts receivable. We are unable to predict the likely duration and severity of the current disruption in financial markets and adverse economic conditions in the U.S., China and other countries. Should these economic conditions result in us not meeting our revenue objectives, our operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Our current products cannot be sold in certain countries if we do not obtain and maintain regulatory approval.

     We manufacture, distribute and market our products for their approved indications. These activities are subject to extensive regulation by numerous state and federal governmental authorities in the U.S., such as the USFDA and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (formerly Health Care Financing Administration) and the SFDA in China as well as by certain foreign countries, including some in the European Union. Currently, we (or our distributors) are required in the U.S. and in foreign countries to obtain approval from those countries’ regulatory authorities before we can market and sell our products in those countries. Obtaining regulatory approval is costly and may take many years, and after it is obtained, it remains costly to maintain. The USFDA and foreign regulatory agencies have substantial discretion to terminate any clinical trials, require additional testing, delay or withhold registration and marketing approval and mandate product withdrawals. In addition, later discovery of unknown problems with our products or manufacturing processes could result in restrictions on such products and manufacturing processes, including potential withdrawal of the products from the market. If regulatory authorities determine that we have violated regulations or if they restrict, suspend or revoke our prior approvals, they could prohibit us from manufacturing or selling our products until we comply, or indefinitely.

Our future prospects will be negatively impacted if we are unsuccessful in pending litigation over the CIT technology.

     As noted above, we are engaged in litigation with AcuVector and with the Governors of the University of Alberta over our CIT technology. Although these cases are still in the early stages of discovery, we believe they are without merit and that we will receive a favorable judgment in both. However, if either AcuVector or the University is successful in their claims, we may be liable for substantial damages, our rights to the technology will be adversely affected, and our future prospects for exploiting or licensing the CIT technology will be significantly impaired.

The value of intangible assets may not be equal to their carrying values.

     One of our intangible assets includes the CIT technology, which we acquired from Dr. Chang in August 2001. We also purchased certain intangible assets in our acquisition of JPI and purchased additional production rights in 2007. Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable, we are required to evaluate the carrying value of such intangibles, including the related amortization periods. Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an intangible asset may not be recoverable, we determine whether there has been impairment by comparing the anticipated undiscounted cash flows from the operation and eventual disposition of the product line with its carrying value. If the undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value, the amount of the impairment, if any, will be determined by comparing the carrying value of each intangible asset with its fair value. Fair value is generally based on either a discounted cash flows analysis or market analysis. Future operating income is based on various assumptions, including regulatory approvals, patents being granted, and the type and nature of competing products.

     Patent approval for eight original claims related to the CIT technology was obtained in May 2004 and a continuation patent application was filed in 2004 for a number of additional claims. No regulatory approval has been requested for our CIT technology and we do not have the funds to conduct the clinical trials which would be required to obtain regulatory approval for our CIT

technology. Accordingly, we are seeking a strategic partner to license the CIT technology from us. If we cannot attract a large pharmaceutical company to license our CIT technology and conduct the trials required to obtain regulatory approval, or if regulatory approvals or patents are not obtained or are substantially delayed, or other competing technologies are developed and obtain general market acceptance, or market conditions otherwise change, our CIT technology and other intangible technology may have a substantially reduced value, which could be material. As intangible assets represent a substantial portion of assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheet, any substantial deterioration of value would significantly impact our reported condensed consolidated financial position and our reported condensed consolidated operating results.

     Some of the production right intangible assets purchased from YiBo by JPI have not yet received manufacturing permits or been commercialized. We may have to recognize impairments of some of these intangible assets in the future.

If our intellectual property positions are challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or if we fail to prevail in future intellectual property litigation, our business could be adversely affected.

     The patent positions of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies can be highly uncertain and often involve complex legal, scientific and factual questions. To date, there has emerged no consistent policy regarding breadth of claims allowed in such companies’ patents. Third parties may challenge, invalidate or circumvent our patents and patent applications relating to our products, product candidates and technologies. In addition, our patent positions might not protect us against competitors with similar products or technologies because competing products or technologies may not infringe our patents.

We face substantial competition, and others may discover, develop, acquire or commercialize products before or more successfully than we do.

     We operate in a highly competitive environment. Our products compete with other products or treatments for diseases for which our products may be indicated. Additionally, some of our competitors market products or are actively engaged in research and development in areas where we are developing product candidates. Large pharmaceutical corporations have greater clinical, research, regulatory and marketing resources than we do. In addition, some of our competitors may have technical or competitive advantages over us for the development of technologies and processes. These resources may make it difficult for us to compete with them to successfully discover, develop and market new products.

We have limited sales of the DR-70 test kit and are reliant on our distributors for sales of our products.

     Prior to the acquisition of JPI, virtually all of our operating revenues came from sales to two distributors of the DR-70 test kits in foreign countries and from sales to a few domestic customers of certain OEM products. For the year ended December 31, 2008, and the quarter ended June 30, 2009, virtually all of our revenues in the U.S. were derived from sales of DR-70 test kits. Historically, we have not received any substantial orders from any of our customers or distributors of DR-70 test kits. Moreover, none of our distributors or customers is contractually required to buy any specific number of DR-70 test kits from us. Accordingly, based upon this fact, historical sales, any projection of future orders or sales of DR-70 test kits is unreliable. In addition, the amount of DR-70 test kits purchased by our distributors or customers can be adversely affected by a number of factors, including their budget cycles and the amount of funds available to them for product promotion and marketing.

JPI is reliant on its distributors for sales of its products.

     Most of JPI’s products are sold to distributors. JPI’s distributors are not required to purchase any minimum quantity of products; however, many of JPI’s distribution agreements are subject to termination and cancellation if minimum quantities of specified products are not purchased by the distributors. JPI has never terminated any distributor for failure to meet the minimum quantity sales targets.

We are subject to risks associated with our foreign distributors.

     Our business strategy includes the continued dependence on foreign distributors for our DR-70 test kits and local distributors in China for JPI’s products. To date, we have not been successful in generating a significant increase in sales for DR-70 test kits through distribution channels in existing markets or in developing distribution channels in new markets. We are also subject to the risks associated with our distributor’s operations, including: (i) fluctuations in currency exchange rates; (ii) compliance with local laws and other regulatory requirements; (iii) restrictions on the repatriation of funds; (iv) inflationary conditions; (v) political and economic instability; (vi) war or other hostilities; (vii) overlap of tax structures; and (viii) expropriation or nationalization of assets. The inability to manage these and other risks effectively could adversely affect our business.

We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

     We currently intend to retain any earnings to support our growth strategy and do not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future.

If we fail to comply with the rules under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act related to accounting controls and procedures or if the material weaknesses or other deficiencies in our internal accounting procedures are not remediated, our stock price could decline significantly.

     Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act required annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting commencing December 31, 2007 and requires a report by our independent registered public accounting firm addressing the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting commencing for the year ending December 31, 2009.

     Our management has concluded that the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the two years ended December 31, 2008, fairly present in all material respects our consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S.

     Our management has evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 based on the control criteria established in a report entitled Internal Control — Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and continues to be ineffective as of the end of the period covered by this report.During its evaluation, as of December 31, 2008 our management identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and other deficiencies as described in Item 9A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K. As a result, our investors could lose confidence in us, which could result in a decline in our stock price.

     We are taking steps to remediate our material weaknesses, as described in Item 9A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K. If we fail to achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude in the future that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Moreover, effective internal controls, particularly those related to revenue recognition, are necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important to helping prevent financial fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and the trading price of our stock could decline significantly. In addition, we cannot be certain that additional material weaknesses or other significant deficiencies in our internal controls will not be discovered in the future.

Our stock price is volatile, which could adversely affect your investment.

     Our stock price, like that of other international bio-pharma and/or cancer diagnostic and treatment companies, is highly volatile. Our stock price may be affected by such factors as:

	•		clinical trial results;
	•		product development announcements by us or our competitors;
	•		regulatory matters;
	•		announcements in the scientific and research community;
	•		intellectual property and legal matters;
	•		broader industry and market trends unrelated to our performance;
	•		economic markets in Asia; and
	•		competition in local Chinese markets where we sell JPI’s product.

     In addition, if our revenues or operating results in any period fail to meet the investment community’s expectations, there could be an immediate adverse impact on our stock price.

Our stock price and financing may be adversely affected by outstanding warrants and convertible securities.

     We have a significant number of warrants outstanding and a large amount of convertible notes which “over hang” the market for the Company’s common stock. As of June 30, 2009, we had (i) warrants outstanding that are currently exercisable for up to an aggregate of 7,999,124 shares of common stock at a weighted average of $2.35 per share, and (ii) 2,530,917 shares of common stock potentially issuable on conversion of our 10% convertible notes at $1.20 per share. The existence of, and/or exercise of all or a portion of these securities, create a negative and potentially depressive effect on our stock price because investors recognize that they “over hang” the market at this time.

We have limited product liability insurance.

     We currently produce products for clinical studies and for investigational purposes. We are producing our products in commercial sale quantities, which will increase as we receive various regulatory approvals in the future. There can be no assurance, however, that users will not claim that effects other than those intended may result from our products, including, but not limited to claims alleged to be related to incorrect diagnoses leading to improper or lack of treatment in reliance on test results. In the event that liability claims arise out of allegations of defects in the design or manufacture of our products, one or more claims for damages may require the expenditure of funds in defense of such claims or one or more substantial awards of damages against us, and may have a material adverse effect on us by reason of our inability to defend against or pay such claims. We carry product liability insurance for any such claims, but only in an amount equal to $2,000,000 per occurrence, and $2,000,000 aggregate liability, which may be insufficient to cover all claims that may be made against us.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

(a) On May 4, 2009, the Company sold units consisting of $1,327,250 principal amount of 12% Series 2 Senior Notes and five year warrants to purchase a total of 2,123,600 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.98 per share. In addition, we issued placement agent warrants to purchase a total of 212,360 shares. The securities were issued to these investors pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for issuances not involving any public offering and Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder.

      On June 12, 2009, the Company sold units consisting of $468,500 principal amount of the Series 2 Senior Notes and the Warrant Shares to purchase a total of 749,600 shares of our common stock at $1.11 per share. In addition, we issued placement agent warrants to purchase a total of 74,960 shares. The securities were issued to these investors pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for issuances not involving any public offering and Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder.

(b) Not applicable

(c) Not applicable

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

          (a) Not applicable

          (b) Not applicable

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

          Not Applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

On June 25, 2009, an agreement was reached among JJB, YYB and Shangrao Branch of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (the “Shangrao ICBC”). Under this agreement, JJB agreed to transfer its use right of 6,023 square meter land located at No. 245 Tumen Avenue, Tumen, Yanbian, Jilin Province China (the “Land”) and ownership of the real estate on the Land to YYB and YYB agreed to pay back the loan with principle and interest in a total amount of RMB 16,000,000 owed by JJB to Shangrao ICBC where the real estate and the Land use right was pledged to (the “Loan”). However, JJB will still be liable for the Loan if YYB fails to make such payment.

     In addition, on the same day, JPI entered into a share transfer agreement with Kai Liu to transfer its shares and ownership of YYB to Kai Liu whereby Kai Liu acquired 100% outstanding shares and all the assets of YYB and agreed to pay off all the debts and loan owed by YYB including the Loan.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

          (a) Exhibits: See Exhibit Index herein

AMDL, INC.

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number		Description:
10.50		YYB Share Transfer Agreement
10.51		JJB Real Estate Transfer Repayment Agreement
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed herewith.)
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed herewith.)
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed herewith.)
32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed herewith.)

Amdl (AMEX:ADL)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2024 to May 2024

Amdl (AMEX:ADL)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2023 to May 2024