By Kristina Peterson and Rebecca Ballhaus
WASHINGTON -- The White House signaled on Tuesday it wanted to
avoid a partial government shutdown this weekend, even if Congress
doesn't meet President Trump's full demands on border security, but
partisan divisions stymied new negotiations, prompting Senate
Republican leaders to start readying a short-term spending deal to
keep the government running.
Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard Shelby (R.,
Ala.) said Tuesday night he was preparing a short-term spending
bill keeping the government open until early February.
"Barring some unforeseen development, I think that's where we're
headed, " Mr. Shelby said.
Mr. Trump hasn't indicated if he would sign a short-term
measure, which would continue funding for border security but not
for a wall, but Mr. Shelby said Tuesday night he assumed Mr. Trump
would. Last week, Mr. Trump said publicly he would be "proud" to
shut down the government if lawmakers don't include $5 billion in
funding for a Mexico border wall in their spending package.
Senate Democrats earlier Tuesday signaled an openness to a
short-term extension, which often becomes more appealing to
lawmakers as spending deadlines approach and they become eager to
return home for the holidays. "We'd certainly very seriously look
at it," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) said.
Negotiations had accelerated Tuesday after White House press
secretary Sarah Sanders said that Mr. Trump didn't want a shutdown
and the administration could find "other ways" to obtain the wall
funding amid continued Democratic opposition.
In an interview with Fox News, Ms. Sanders indicated Mr. Trump
could support a bipartisan Senate bill funding the Homeland
Security Department, which oversees the border, if other funding
were diverted to the wall. That bill includes $1.6 billion for
border security, including fencing and new technology, but wouldn't
permit the construction of a concrete wall.
Asked about the possibility of a government shutdown Tuesday
afternoon, Mr. Trump said: "We'll see what happens." He declined to
answer a question about whether he would insist a spending bill
include funding for a wall, saying: "We need border security."
The White House's softer tone comes as the Republican president
faces diminished leverage to wrest money for border security from a
Congress whose chambers will be evenly divided between the
Republican and Democratic parties starting in January.
Mr. Trump has made building the wall a central rallying cry of
his presidency, and in recent weeks, his campaign has sent
fundraising pleas highlighting his fight with Democrats on this
issue.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) said he was
convinced there wouldn't be a shutdown.
Late Tuesday morning, Mr. McConnell, after consulting with the
White House, made a new offer to Senate Democrats that included the
$1.6 billion for border security, plus a roughly $1 billion fund
for Mr. Trump to use for his immigration agenda.
Mr. Schumer, after calling Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, the
House Democratic leader, said he rejected the offer due to concerns
over the "slush fund" for Mr. Trump's immigration proposals.
"I think that the White House has backed off the wall and that
terminology, but what they might want to do with that billion
dollars is problematic," Mrs. Pelosi said.
Mr. McConnell said he was "now in consultations with the White
House about the way forward," including what Mr. Trump would be
willing to sign.
Democrats said the administration's latest stance signaled Mr.
Trump's desire to avoid a partial shutdown when seven spending
bills expire at 12:01 a.m. Saturday, and a recognition that
Democrats won't agree to wall funding.
"They're looking for a solution and an exit," Sen. Dick Durbin
of Illinois, the No. 2 Senate Democrat, said of the White
House.
Senate leaders didn't indicate that negotiations over the
package of new fiscal 2019 spending bills had ended, leaving open
the possibility they could be reignited. But with no new deal from
the fresh round of negotiations Tuesday, many Senate Republicans
predicted Congress would end up passing a short-term extension of
current funding into early 2019, when Democrats take back control
of the House.
"If we want to keep government open, it probably looks like some
kind of continuing resolution that gets us through the early part
of next year," said Sen. Marco Rubio (R., Fla.), a member of the
Senate Appropriations Committee. "I think a number of people have
expressed that, at this point, it might be the only route
forward."
Earlier Tuesday, Mr. Shelby had said a stopgap fix was more
likely after Democrats rejected the latest GOP offer.
"Continuing resolutions...they're looming in the background,
maybe over our shoulder, but we're not quite there yet," Mr. Shelby
said. "There's still hope, maybe not as much as it was a couple of
hours ago, but maybe a little bit."
Meanwhile, Senate Republicans emphasized how a new spending
deadline in early 2019 might interfere with the plans of House
Democrats and Mrs. Pelosi, who is expected to be elected speaker on
Jan. 3. "If I were in her shoes, I would rather not be dealing with
this year's business next year," Mr. McConnell said.
Mrs. Pelosi has said the House next year would quickly pass the
six less controversial fiscal 2019 spending bills and extend
current funding for Homeland Security, sending it back to the
Senate.
Democrats rejected the idea that the White House could shift
money around from the defense budget or elsewhere to fund the wall.
"They need congressional approval. They're not getting it for the
wall," Mr. Schumer said.
--Joshua Jamerson contributed to this article.
Write to Kristina Peterson at kristina.peterson@wsj.com and
Rebecca Ballhaus at Rebecca.Ballhaus@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
December 18, 2018 20:38 ET (01:38 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2018 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.