One Website's Facebook Apocalypse Is Another's Opportunity to Shine
January 12 2018 - 5:57PM
Dow Jones News
By Benjamin Mullin
Digital publishers are reckoning with the potential impact of
Facebook's planned changes to its news feed, with reactions ranging
from trepidation to confidence to reflection on the folly of
depending on the social network for web traffic in the first
place.
Facebook on Thursday said it will introduce changes to the feed
in coming months to promote content shared by friends and family
that provokes conversation among users, and in the process will
de-emphasize content pushed into feeds from news publishers,
brands, nonprofits and others.
Even before Facebook's latest announcement, the company already
had tweaked the news feed in ways publishers blamed for reducing
the traffic they receive through the social network. The percentage
of publishers' online traffic coming from Facebook fell from an
average of 40% at the end of 2016 to 24% as of last month,
according to analytics firm Parse.ly.
The latest change could have an even more pronounced effect over
time, some media executives say. Some are viewing Facebook's move
as a wake-up call for publishers to wean themselves off their
dependence on Facebook and build businesses -- even if smaller ones
-- that can thrive and grow in other ways.
Turning to Facebook and its 2 billion users to find readers is
tempting. But it shouldn't be Facebook's job, they say, to prop up
a publishing industry that has struggled to find the right formula
to build online businesses.
"People should chill out: Facebook is a public company that
controls its own decisions and destiny," said Jim Vandehei,
co-founder and chief executive of Axios. "Publishers should do the
same damn thing."
It isn't clear which types of content and sites Facebook's
change will hit the hardest, since those sparking what Facebook
determines are "meaningful interactions" among users will
apparently be in a better position.
Several publishers said the change would create a
survival-of-the-fittest contest that would weed out low-quality
content.
Ben Lerer, chief executive of Group Nine Media, owner of sites
like NowThis and The Dodo that rely on distribution via Facebook
and Instagram, said in an interview that the company can thrive
under the new Facebook approach.
"There will be adjustment, but we aren't the folks that lead to
people having bad experiences on Facebook," Mr. Lerer said in note
to staff. "To the contrary, we are the most optimistic and beloved
publishers on the platform."
Facebook's changes also have major implications for advertisers,
who may have to spend more money to get their messages in front of
Facebook users as the media content available in the news feed
shrinks and content published directly by brands for free is pushed
down in the pecking order.
Despite the public expressions of confidence by some media
executives, others privately expressed frustration at Facebook's
decision after having spent considerable time and money to gear
their businesses toward attracting its users. One media executive
expressed dismay with a perceived lack of transparency on the part
of the social network.
"Facebook says: 'If you don't have meaningful interactions,
you're going to be downranked,'" the executive said. "So we ask
Facebook, 'explain what a meaningful interaction is.' And they say,
'we can't tell you that.'"
Adam Mosseri, the executive who oversees Facebook's news feed,
explained on Twitter Thursday evening that Facebook has a
multipronged approach to determine what constitutes a meaningful
interaction on the social network. The company studies how users
interact with one another on the platform and then listens to what
they say about those reactions.
Facebook declined to comment. In a post announcing the change,
Facebook Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg noted that "some news
helps start conversations on important issues."
Other publishers sought to seize the moment by directing readers
to platforms they own. BuzzFeed News published an ad on Facebook
directing readers to download its app with the caption "Facebook is
breaking up with news."
BuzzFeed also released a statement saying the algorithm change
is in line with trends the company was already beginning to
anticipate.
"BuzzFeed's mission from day one has been to create shareable
content that enables meaningful interaction among families and
friends; meaningful social content is our sweet spot," the
statement said.
No publishing executives can say for sure what the impact will
be on their traffic. Sites specializing on hard global and business
news may have a tougher time than those with lifestyle content
under the new algorithm, depending on what users engage with.
In his note to staff, Business Insider Editor-in-Chief Nicholas
Carlson called Facebook's decision "an opportunity to excel"
because the company isn't overly reliant on any one social
network.
Neil Vogel, CEO of the media company Dotdash, said the situation
is reminiscent of a period about five years ago when Google made a
series of algorithm changes that deprioritized low-quality content
designed to game its search results. Then, as now, a major source
of traffic was acting in its best interest to the detriment of some
publishers.
"Facebook is not a public utility," Mr. Vogel said. "Facebook is
going to do what's in the best interest of Facebook."
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
January 12, 2018 17:42 ET (22:42 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2018 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META)
Historical Stock Chart
From Aug 2024 to Sep 2024
Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META)
Historical Stock Chart
From Sep 2023 to Sep 2024