navycmdr
19 minutes ago
Bessent "Shocked" By Scale Of Fraud Already Uncovered By DOGE, Mocks MSM's Biden "Vibecession" Narrative
by Tyler Durden - Monday, Mar 03, 2025 - 05:10 AM
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/bessent-shocked-scale-fraud-already-uncovered-doge-mocks-msms-biden-vibecession-narrative
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent did the mainstream media press tour this weekend, clarifying two critical bullshit talking points to the propagandists: first, DOGE is doing a good job; and second, the US economy faces some significant headwinds as a hangover from 'Bidenomics' spendfest.
TightCoil
1 hour ago
HOT HOT HOT
Quarterbacking GSE Reform: The HUD Secretary?
dhol...@imfpubs.com
Shortly after his confirmation as secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Scott Turner surprised the mortgage industry by saying he would “quarterback” the process of releasing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from conservatorship.
The reason for the surprise: As most industry executives know, HUD has no oversight authority whatsoever over the GSEs or their regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
Since then, Democratic members of the Senate Banking Committee have written Turner seeking more details about his proposed role in reprivatizing the two mortgage giants. One basic question asked: “Will HUD, and you as HUD Secretary, be the quarterback of any effort to make changes to Fannie and Freddie?”
Meanwhile, in the interest of transparency, the Democrats asked the HUD secretary if he would commit to ensuring that the hedge funds and other wealthy investors speculating in GSE stocks don’t have an opportunity to unduly influence the process for GSE reform.
For more on the story, see the new edition of Inside The GSEs, now available online.
CCSAB
3 hours ago
In B - current sharecount roughly 1.2b. With warrants exercised that goes to 5.8b. Sr pfd claim around $130b + 11b for Jr pfd. If assume both converted to common that's 141b. If converted at current share price that's 21b more shares for a total of just under 27b shares. Take a valuation of $200b-250b and divide by 27b shares gets you to $7.40-9.25/share. This is a super simplified version and obviously tons of factors involved (conversion price, notional converted, new equity, cap requirements, timing, etc). It's just meant to start to highlight how to go about scenario play to allow people to come up with their own risk and scenario adjusted average weighted share price.
NeoSunTzu
5 hours ago
Scott Bessent announced some changes at Treasury yesterday, March 2, 2025, with respect to the "beneficial ownership information rule" associated with the Corporate Transparency Act ...
a federal law that requires certain businesses, primarily corporations and limited liability companies (LLCs), to file information about their beneficial owners with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), aiming to combat money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit activities by making it harder to hide ownership of companies involved in criminal activity
it will NO LONGER ENFORCE any penalties or fines against U.S. companies associated with failing to report beneficial ownership information as required by the Corporate Transparency Act they WILL still ENFORCE these rules on foreign companies
Today’s action is part of President Trump’s bold agenda to unleash American prosperity by reining in burdensome regulations, in particular for small businesses that are the backbone of the American economy
the final quote above from Bessent signals there IS A NEW ERA at Treasury ... if they are willing to deviate this far, especially regarding the FinCEN, in favor of giving American businesses the benefit of the doubt, and in the name of releasing burdensome regulation for American's and private business prosperity, AND with the GSE narrative change / release mantra building steam and support, Trump, Pulte, Bessent, and Turner may be slowly acquiring all the media outcry immunity, incentive, power, and authority to do much more positive things for shareholders ... we'll see
Oh, and finally, President Trump will be addressing a full session of Congress tomorrow, NEVER before has this occurred this early in a presidency. Incidentally, tomorrow is March 4th, the day the Constitution originally prescribed as Inauguration Day ... is this a sign? ... FDR was the last president inaugurated on March 4th ...
JSmith5
6 hours ago
nothing is an absolute here in the Twins saga IMO
Completely agree - I think you have to be on the extreme to be a pumper or basher - as its all just opinion. But its also the folks who obviously disagree with whatever is said - and label it lies, obfuscation, etc. no matter what. A lot of these folks don't even read what is written - and automatically go on the attack as that is what turns them on, I guess.
My own opinion re the stock price is not set in stone - but has never been extreme one way or the other - and I think my posts have reflected this. I am mostly JPS as I am too conservative to go all in on the common. But I am not overly risk averse and got into FNMA at an average below $2 - and am very happy with all my positions. As I have said, if the stockholders were fully restored to full ownership - which, again in my opinion has less than a snowball's chance - but not a zero chance - on a combined basis - we are talking $30B in earnings divided among 1.8B shares or $16.65/sh. So, to me, the folks advocating for $300/share (a P/E below 20) are not pumping - dreaming, yes; unrealistic under all the circumstance? Hell, yes. Going to happen? - no way Jose (again, just an opinion). But that is what the math would at least be now if the companies had remained unmolested 17 years ago.
As to a wipeout - the conditions are set up much more favorable for this - and with Elon running around looking under all the mattresses for money - it's getting a little scary. But, again, my opinion, given all the circumstances and what has happened over the last 17 years and, especially since the election - snowball's chance. Not zero chance - and I have been a buyer of more JPS since about a month before the debate when it became obvious that there was going to be a change of horses. I wish, in retrospect, that some of those recent buys would have been more common shares, but it is what it is, and I am satisfied with where I sit.
I am paying close attention to what John Paulson, Bill Ackman, and, yes, Mark Calabria, are saying. What Bessent and Pulte say is important also - but statements like "we intend to release them" are not all that helpful at this point as - we all got the gist of that. I do expect the release to be in the form of an EO - short on detail - but hoping it includes a target date. When the smoke clears - what the price will be is the issue - and, at this point anything is possible - not probable, but possible. So I would not be too dismissive of other posters on this board. I try not to be - but, as you know, its hard sometimes.
Nats