The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these financial statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION
Adino was incorporated under the laws of
the State of Montana on August 13, 1981, under the name Golden Maple Mining and Leaching Company, Inc. In 1985, the Company ceased
its mining operations and discontinued all business operations in 1990. The Company then acquired Consolidated Medical Management,
Inc. (“CMMI”) and kept the CMMI name. The Company initially focused its efforts on the continuation of the business
services offered by CMMI. These services focused on the delivery of turn-key management services for the home health industry,
predominately in south Louisiana. The Company exited the medical business in December 2000. In August 2001, the Company decided
to refocus on the oil and gas industry. In 2003, we decided to cease our oil and gas activities and focus on becoming a fuel company.
The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary,
Intercontinental Fuels, LLC (“IFL”), a Texas limited liability company, was founded in 2003. Adino first acquired 75%
of IFL’s membership interests in 2003. The Company acquired 100% ownership of IFL shortly thereafter.
In January 2008, the Company changed its
name to Adino Energy Corporation. We believed that this name better reflected our current and future business activities.
As of July 1, 2010, the Company acquired
PetroGreen Energy LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, and AACM3, LLC, a Texas limited liability company d/b/a Petro 2000 Exploration
Co. (together "Petro Energy"). Petro Energy was a licensed Texas oilfield operator currently operating 11 wells on two
leases covering approximately 300 acres in Coleman County, Texas. Petro Energy also owned a drilling rig, two service rigs and
associated tools and equipment. The Company also acquired the operator license held by the principal of Petro Energy.
After the acquisition of Petro
Energy, the Company created two wholly owned subsidiaries: Adino Exploration, LLC (“Adino Exploration”) and Adino
Drilling, LLC (“Adino Drilling”). All oil and gas leases were transferred from the Petro Energy companies to
Adino Exploration and future oil and gas exploration acquisitions and activity are to be operated through this company.
The large drilling rig acquired in the Petro Energy transaction and other associated drilling machinery and equipment
were transferred to Adino Drilling.
On March 31, 2011, the Company sold the
membership interest of Adino Drilling, LLC to a related party. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company realized a reduction
in accrued liability of $100,000 and acquired a $500,000 six year, 5.24% interest note receivable, for a total sale price of $600,000.
However, the transaction’s related party note of $500,000 is not allowed for reporting purposes, therefore the Company had
a reportable loss of $252,624.
In October 2011 Adino signed a letter of
intent to purchase all of the assets of Ashton, AOS 1A, and AOS 1-B. The proposed purchase price for the assets was $6,000,000
in face value of convertible preferred stock of the Company, with the preferred stock converting to common stock at the rate of
$0.15 per share. The parties agreed that partial closing of the purchase would occur once the sellers received clear title to the
assets subject to the agreement. The first partial closing of purchase occurred on November 3, 2011, and the Company issued 100,000
shares of Adino's Class "B" Preferred Stock Series 1 (the "Preferred Stock"), as follows: 95,534 shares to
AOS 1A, and 4,466 shares to AOS 1-B. The Preferred Stock shall be convertible into common shares at AOS 1A or AOS 1-B's option
at any time after six months, provided that (a) immediately after the first six months, only 25% of the Preferred Stock may be
converted to common stock, and (b) each month thereafter, only up to 12.5% of the Preferred Stock may be converted to common stock.
The Preferred Stock shall have other terms as determined by Adino's Board of Directors. The number of shares of Preferred Stock
was chosen to conform to the agreed upon value of $1,500,000 for the assets. The Company later decided not to acquire the remaining
Ashton assets. On February 7, 2012, the Company sold all oilfield machinery and equipment it had purchased from Ashton Oilfield
Services in its November 2011 acquisition for $500,000.
With the Company’s focus on oil and
gas exploration and production, the Company decided to sell its interest in IFL. To that end, on February 7, 2012, Adino sold all
of its membership interest in IFL to Pomisu XXI S.L. (“Buyer”). The purchase price to be paid by the Buyer was $900,000,
paid in two installments with the first installment of $244,825 paid on February 7, 2012, and the balance due not later than May
7, 2012. The balance of the purchase price shall be computed as follows: $900,000 minus $244,825 (initial installment) minus $655,157
of IFL liabilities assumed and settled by the Buyer. The liabilities included $106,520 in accounts payable, $1,500 to a related
party, $110,000 in retained customer deposit and $437,155 for the G J Capital lawsuit judgment (see Note 21 for a more thorough
discussion). The balance due had not been paid as of September 30, 2012 and the full receivable balance has been reserved.
On June 29, 2012, the Company executed
a multi-party agreement with the Sellers of the PetroGreen assets and Gator-Dawg Drilling, LLC (“Gator-Dawg”). In the
agreement, the Company released the restriction on the 10 million shares of common stock held in escrow on behalf of the Sellers
in the PetroGreen asset purchase in July of 2010. In exchange, the Sellers released all claims to the contract clawback agreement,
which stated that the Sellers could repurchase the assets sold to the Company for $1.00 if the price of the Company’s stock
did not reach $0.25 per share by the specified date. The Company also transferred the membership shares of AACM3, LLC to its former
owner, Alex Perales. AACM3, LLC did not hold any assets at the time of transfer. Gator-Dawg agreed to transfer the drilling rig
and associated assets purchased from the Company in March, 2011 to AACM3, LLC. In exchange for the drilling rig transfer, the Company
forfeited the $500,000 note due from Gator-Dawg for purchase of those assets (disallowed for consolidation), executed a $100,000
note payable to Gator-Dawg for rig improvements and transferred a truck and trailer purchased in early 2012 to Gator-Dawg. The
completion of this multi-party agreement extinguished the contract clawback provision at June 29, 2012.
On October 31, 2012 the Company and Adino
Exploration, LLC (“Exploration”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into an Asset Purchase and Sales
Agreement (“Agreement”) with Broadway Resources, LLC (“Buyer”). The Agreement provides that Exploration
has agreed to sell all of its rights, title and interest to its oil and gas leases located in Coleman and Runnels Counties, Texas.
The purchase price paid by the Buyer was $2,921,616, which includes a cash payment of $811,825 and the elimination of the Company
and Exploration debts in the amount of $2,109,791.
The Company’s Chairman and Chief
Financial Officer have an ownership interest in the Buyer. Exploration’s members approved the sale of assets and the terms
of the Agreement as being fair and reasonable. In evaluating the sale of Exploration’s assets, including the determination
of an appropriate purchase price paid, the Company considered a variety of factors, including the estimated future net oil reserves
of the oil and gas leases, comparable sales of other oil and gas leases in the area, and the value of the equipment sold.
On October 31, 2012, Shannon McAdams, the
Company’s chief financial officer, resigned his employment with the Company and with Adino Exploration, LLC.
NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of presentation
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated
financial statements of Adino Energy Corporation have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and should be read
in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in Adino Energy Corporation’s Annual Report
filed with the SEC on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary
for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the interim periods presented have been reflected
herein. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full
year.
Significant accounting policies
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include
all of the assets, liabilities and results of operations of subsidiaries in which the Company has a controlling interest. All significant
inter-company accounts and transactions among consolidated entities have been eliminated.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments which subject the
Company to concentrations of credit risk include cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable.
The Company maintains its cash in well-known
banks selected based upon management’s assessment of the banks’ financial stability. Balances rarely exceed the $250,000
federal depository insurance limit. The Company has not experienced any losses on deposits and believes the risk of loss is minimal.
Management assesses the need for an allowance
for doubtful accounts based upon the financial strength of our customers, historical experience with our customers and the aging
of the amounts due. For the year ended December 31, 2011, we had no reserve for doubtful accounts as all of our receivables were
collected early in the subsequent period and had no expectation of loss. At September 30, 2012, the Company reserved the amount
due from the sale of IFL, or $358,401.
Cash Equivalents
For purposes of reporting cash flows, the
Company considers all short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. We had no
cash equivalents at either September 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011.
Investments
The Company from time to time maintains
a portfolio of marketable investment securities for deposit requirements associated with our oil and gas operator licenses. The
securities have an investment grade and a term to earliest maturity generally of ten months to over one year and include certificates
of deposit. These securities are carried at cost, which approximates market. The Company’s securities are classified as held-to-maturity
because the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity.
Other Assets
Supplies consisting of equipment
and parts to be used for future drilling projects and repair to existing wells are stated at cost. As the supplies are
assigned to a particular project, they are then capitalized or expensed, accordingly. Supplies are evaluated at each balance
sheet date for obsolescence and impairment.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at
cost. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three
to fifteen years. Expenditures for major renewals and betterments that extend the original estimated economic useful lives of the
applicable assets are capitalized. Expenditures for normal repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. The cost
and related accumulated depreciation of assets sold or otherwise disposed of are removed from the accounts, and any gain or loss
is included in operations.
Oil and Gas Producing Activities
The Company follows the full cost method
of accounting for oil and gas operations whereby all costs associated with the exploration and development of oil and gas properties
are initially capitalized into a single cost center (full cost pool”). Such costs include land acquisition costs, geological
and geophysical expenses, carrying charges on non-producing properties and costs of drilling directly related to acquisition and
exploration activities. Proceeds from property sales are generally credited to the full cost pool, with no gain or loss recognized,
unless such a sale would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and the proved reserves attributable to
these costs. A significant alteration would typically involve a sale of 25% or more of the proved reserves related to a full cost
pool.
Depletion of exploration and production
costs and depreciation of production equipment is computed using the units of production method based upon estimated proved oil
and gas reserves as determined by consulting engineers and prepared (annually) by independent petroleum engineers. Costs included
in the depletion base to be amortized include (a) all proved capitalized costs including capitalized asset retirement costs, net
of estimated salvage values, less accumulated depletion, (b) estimated future development cost to be incurred in developing proved
reserves; and (c) estimated dismantlement and abandonment costs, net of estimated salvage values that have not been included as
capitalized costs because they have not yet been capitalized in asset retirement costs. The costs of unproved properties are withheld
from the depletion base until it is determined whether or not proved reserves can be assigned to the properties. The unproved properties
are reviewed quarterly for impairment. When proved reserves are assigned or the unproved property is considered to be impaired,
the cost of the property or the amount of the impairment is added to the costs subject to depletion calculations.
Current guidance requires
that unamortized capitalized costs (less certain adjustments) for each cost center not exceed the cost ceiling, which is
defined as the present value of future net revenues from estimated production of proved oil and gas reserves (plus certain
adjustments). If adjusted unamortized costs capitalized within a cost center exceed the cost center ceiling, the excess is
charged to expenses and separately disclosed during the period it occurs. The Company evaluates the carrying cost of the
applicable oil producing properties for any impairment as required.
Derivatives
The Company does not use derivative instruments
to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. Derivative financial instruments are initially measured at
their fair value. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially
recorded at its fair value and is then revalued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported as charges or credits
to income. For option−based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses the lattice model to value the derivative
instruments. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities
or as equity, is reassessed at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance
sheet as current or non−current based on whether or not cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within
12 months of the balance sheet date.
Asset Retirement Obligation
The Company accounts for its asset retirement
obligations by recording the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation recognized for the period in which it
was incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value could be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part
of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. The increase in carrying value of a property associated with the capitalization
of an asset retirement cost is included in proved oil and gas properties in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company depletes
the amount added to proved oil and gas property costs. The future cash outflows associated with settling the asset retirement obligation
that have been accrued in the accompanying balance sheets are excluded from the ceiling test calculations. The Company also depletes
the estimated dismantlement and abandonment costs, net of salvage values, associated with future development activities that have
not yet been capitalized as asset retirement obligations. These costs are also included in the ceiling test calculations. Accretion
of the asset retirement liability is allocated to operating expense using the discount method.
Revenue Recognition
IFL earns revenue from customer contract
payments on a monthly basis. The Company recognizes revenue from the contracts in the month that the services are provided based
upon contractually determined rates.
As described above, in accordance with
the requirement of current guidance, the Company recognizes revenue when (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists (contracts)
(2) delivery has occurred (monthly) (3) the seller’s price is fixed or determinable (per the customer’s contract or
current market price) and (4) collectability is reasonably assured (based upon our credit policy).
The Company has performed an analysis and
determined that gross revenue reporting is appropriate since (1) the Company is the primary obligor in the transaction (2) the
Company has latitude in establishing price and (3) the Company provides the product and performs part of the service.
Adino Exploration earns revenue from
the sale of oil. The Company recognizes oil, gas and natural gas condensate revenue in the period of delivery. Settlement for
oil sales occurs 30 days after the oil has been sold; and settlement for gas sales would occur 60 days after the gas had been
sold. The Company recognizes revenue when an arrangement exists, the product or service has been provided, the sales price is
fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.
Income Taxes
The Company uses the asset and liability
approach to account for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future
tax consequences of differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases using tax
rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period when the change is enacted.
On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted
an accounting standard which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial statements. This
standard provides guidance on recognizing, measuring, presenting and disclosing in the financial statements uncertain tax positions
that a company has taken or expects to take on a tax return.
Income (Loss) Per Share
Current guidance requires earnings
per share (“EPS”) to be computed and reported as both basic EPS and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is computed by
dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed by
dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common stock equivalents (convertible notes
and interest on the notes, stock awards and stock options) outstanding during the period. Dilutive EPS reflects the potential
dilution that could occur if options to purchase common stock were exercised for shares of common stock. The dilutive effect
of convertible instruments on earnings per share is not presented in the consolidated statements of operations for periods
with a net loss.
Stock-Based Compensation
We record stock-based compensation as a
charge to earnings, net of the estimated impact of forfeited awards. As such, we recognize stock-based compensation cost only for
those stock-based awards that are estimated to ultimately vest over their requisite service period, based on the vesting provisions
of the individual grants. The process of estimating the fair value of stock-based compensation awards and recognizing stock-based
compensation cost over their requisite service periods involves significant assumptions and judgments.
We estimate the fair value of stock option
awards on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes valuation model which requires management to make certain assumptions regarding:
(i) the expected volatility in the market price of the Company’s common stock; (ii) dividend yield; (iii) risk-free interest
rates; and (iv) the period of time employees are expected to hold the award prior to exercise (referred to as the expected holding
period). The dividend yield is based on the approved annual dividend rate in effect and current market price of the underlying
common stock at the time of grant. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time
of grant for bonds with maturities ranging from one month to ten years. The expected holding period of the awards granted is estimated
using the historical exercise behavior of employees. In addition, we estimate the expected impact of forfeited awards and recognize
stock-based compensation cost only for those awards expected to vest. We use historical experience to estimate projected forfeitures.
If actual forfeiture rates are materially different from our estimates, stock-based compensation expense could be significantly
different from what we have recorded in the current period. We periodically review actual forfeiture experience and revise our
estimates, as considered necessary. The cumulative effect on current and prior periods of a change in the estimated forfeiture
rate is recognized as compensation cost in earnings in the period of the revision.
The Company has granted options and warrants
to purchase Adino’s common stock. These instruments have been valued using the Black-Scholes model.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
In the event that facts and circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of a long-lived asset may be impaired, an evaluation of recoverability is performed by comparing
the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset or the asset’s estimated fair value to the asset’s
carrying amount to determine if a write-down to market value or discounted cash flow is required.
At September 30, 2012 and
December 31, 2011, Adino evaluated and determined that no impairment was warranted on the fixed assets of the Company.
Additionally, no impairment was required on the oil and gas assets of the Company. There was no change to the impairment
analysis performed at the December 31, 2011 audit and no indicators of impairment at the review. See Notes 12 and 13 for a
more thorough discussion of the Company’s fixed assets and oil and gas assets as of September 30, 2012 and December 31,
2011.
Goodwill
Through December 31, 2011, goodwill had
been our single largest asset. We evaluated the recoverability and measure the potential impairment of our goodwill annually. The
annual impairment test is a two-step process that begins with the estimation of the fair value of the reporting unit. The first
step screens for potential impairment and the second step measures the amount of the impairment, if any. Our estimate of fair value
considers the financial projections and future prospects of our business, including its growth opportunities and likely operational
improvements. As part of the first step to assess potential impairment, we compared our estimate of fair value for the reporting
unit to the book value of the reporting unit. We determined the fair value of the reporting units based on the income approach.
Under the income approach, we calculated the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash
flows. If the book value was greater than our estimate of fair value, we would then proceed to the second step to measure the impairment,
if any. The second step compared the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying value. The implied fair value was determined
by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit as if the reporting unit had
been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid to acquire the reporting
unit. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied
fair value of goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill is greater than its implied fair value, an
impairment loss is recognized in the amount of the excess. We believe our estimation methods were reasonable and reflected common
valuation practices.
In December 2010, the FASB issued FASB
ASU No. 2010-28, When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts,”
which is now codified under FASB ASC Topic 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other.” This ASU provides amendments to Step 1
of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity
is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not goodwill impairment exists. When determining
whether it is more likely than not impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors,
such as a significant deterioration in market conditions, indicating impairment may exist. FASB ASU No. 2010-28 is effective for
fiscal years (and interim periods within those years) beginning after December 15, 2010. Upon adoption of the amendments, an entity
with reporting units having carrying amounts which are zero or negative is required to assess whether it is more likely than not
the reporting units’ goodwill is impaired. If the entity determines impairment exists, the entity must perform Step 2 of
the goodwill impairment test for that reporting unit or units. Step 2 involves allocating the fair value of the reporting unit
to each asset and liability, with the excess being implied goodwill. An impairment loss results if the amount of recorded goodwill
exceeds the implied goodwill. Any resulting goodwill impairment should be recorded as a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning
retained earnings in the period of adoption.
On a quarterly basis, we performed a review
of our business to determine if events or changes in circumstances have occurred which could have a material adverse effect on
the fair value of the Company and its goodwill. If such events or changes in circumstances were deemed to have occurred, we would
perform an impairment test of goodwill as of the end of the quarter, consistent with the annual impairment test performed at the
end of our fiscal year on December 31, and record any noted impairment loss.
With the sale of IFL in February 2012,
the Company has removed all IFL goodwill at September 30, 2012.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted
a new standard related to the accounting for financial assets and financial liabilities and items that are recognized or disclosed
at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis, at least annually. This standard provides a single definition of
fair value and a common framework for measuring fair value as well as new disclosure requirements for fair value measurements used
in financial statements. Fair value measurements are based upon the exit price that would be received to sell an asset or paid
to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants exclusive of any transaction costs, and are determined
by either the principal market or the most advantageous market. The principal market is the market with the greatest level of activity
and volume for the asset or liability. Absent a principal market to measure fair value, the Company would use the most advantageous
market, which is the market that the Company would receive the highest selling price for the asset or pay the lowest price to settle
the liability, after considering transaction costs. However, when using the most advantageous market, transaction costs are only
considered to determine which market is the most advantageous and these costs are then excluded when applying a fair value measurement.
The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted
an accounting standard for applying fair value measurements to certain assets, liabilities and transactions that are periodically
measured at fair value. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.
In August 2009, the FASB issued an amendment
to the accounting standards related to the measurement of liabilities that are routinely recognized or disclosed at fair value.
This standard clarifies how a company should measure the fair value of liabilities, and that restrictions preventing the transfer
of a liability should not be considered as a factor in the measurement of liabilities within the scope of this standard. This standard
became effective for the Company on October 1, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
The fair value accounting standard creates
a three-level hierarchy to prioritize the inputs used in the valuation techniques to derive fair values. The basis for fair value
measurements for each level within the hierarchy is described below with Level 1 having the highest priority and Level 3 having
the lowest.
|
Level 1:
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
Level 2:
|
Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets
that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets.
|
|
Level 3:
|
Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are unobservable.
|
Discontinued Operations
The results of operations of a component of an entity that either
has been disposed of or is classified as held for sale is reported in discontinued operations if both of the following conditions
are met:
a. The operations and cash flows
of the component have been (or will be) eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity as a result of the disposal transaction.
b. The entity will not have
any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction.
In a period in which a component of an
entity either has been disposed of or is classified as held for sale, the income statement of the Company for current and prior
periods will report the results of operations of the component, including any gain or loss recognized, in discontinued operations.
The results of operations of a component classified as held for sale shall be reported in discontinued operations in the period(s)
in which they occur.
Reclassification
Certain amounts reported in the prior period
financial statements may have been reclassified to the current period presentation.
NOTE 3 -GOING CONCERN
As of September 30, 2012, the
Company has a working capital deficit of $3,443,707 and total shareholders’ deficit of $3,032,519. These factors
raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company
to continue as a going concern depends upon its ability to obtain funding for its working capital deficit. Of the
outstanding current liabilities at September 30, 2012, $860,081 of the outstanding current liabilities is due to certain
officers and directors for prior years’ accrued compensation. These officers and directors have agreed in writing to
postpone payment if necessary, should the Company need capital it would otherwise pay these individuals. Additionally,
non-cash items include a derivative liability of $108,286. The Company plans to satisfy current year and future cash flow
requirements through its oil and gas operations and merger and acquisition opportunities including the expansion of existing
business opportunities. The Company expects these growth opportunities to be financed by a combination of equity and debt
capital; however, in the event the Company is unable to obtain additional debt and equity financing, the Company may not be
able to continue its operations.
NOTE 4 - LEASE COMMITMENTS
On April 1, 2007, IFL agreed to lease
a fuel storage terminal from 17617 Aldine Westfield Road, LLC for 18 months at $15,000 per month. The lease contained an
option to purchase the terminal for $3.55 million by September 30, 2008. The Company evaluated this lease and determined that
it qualified as a capital lease for accounting purposes. The terminal was capitalized at $3,179,572, calculated using the
present value of monthly rent at $15,000 for the months April 2007 - September 2008 and the final purchase price of $3.55
million discounted at IFL’s incremental borrowing rate of 12.75%. The terminal was depreciated over its useful life of
15 years resulting in monthly depreciation expense of $17,664. As of December 31, 2007, the carrying value of the capital
lease liability was $3,355,984.
Due to the difficult credit
markets, the Company was unable to secure financing for the Houston terminal facility and assigned its rights under the
terminal purchase option to Lone Star Fuel Storage and Transfer, LLC (“Lone Star”). Lone Star purchased the
terminal from 17617 Aldine Westfield Road, LLC on September 30, 2008. Lone Star then entered into a five year operating lease
with option to purchase with IFL. The five year lease has monthly rental payments of $30,000, escalating 3% per
year. IFL’s purchase option allows for the terminal to be purchased at any time prior to October 1, 2009 for
$7,775,552. The sale price escalated $1,000,000 per year after this date, through the lease expiration date of September 30,
2013. The Company recognized the escalating lease payments on a straight line basis.
The Lone Star lease was evaluated and was deemed to be an operating
lease.
The transactions that led to the
above two leases both resulted in gains to the Company. The lawsuit settlement just prior to the lease with 17617 Aldine
Westfield Road, LLC resulted in a gain to the Company of $1,480,383. The Company amortized this amount over the life of the
capital asset, or 15 years.
At the expiration of the capital
lease, September 30, 2008, the above remaining gain of $1,332,345 was rolled into the gain on the sale assignment transaction
with Lone Star of $624,047. The total remaining gain to be amortized as of September 30, 2008 was $1,956,392. This amount is
being amortized over the life of the Lone Star operating lease, or 60 months. The operating lease expires on September 30,
2013. This treatment is consistent with sale leaseback gain recognition rules.
With the Company’s focus on oil and
gas exploration and production, the Company decided to sell its interest in IFL. To that end, on February 7, 2012, Adino sold all
of its membership interest in IFL to Pomisu XXI S.L. (“Buyer”). The purchase price to be paid by the Buyer was $900,000,
paid in two installments with the first installment of $244,825 paid on February 7, 2012, and the balance due not later than May
7, 2012. The balance of the purchase price shall be computed as follows: $900,000 minus $244,825 (initial installment) minus $655,157
of IFL liabilities assumed and settled by the Buyer. The liabilities included $106,520 in accounts payable, $1,500 to a related
party, $110,000 in retained customer deposit and $437,155 for the G J Capital lawsuit judgment (see Part II, Item 1 for a more
thorough discussion). At September 30, 2012, the balance due from Buyer had not been paid. The Company has reserved the full receivable
amount.
NOTE 5 - CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT
At September 30, 2012 and December 31,
2011, the Company has $50,056 and $50,000, respectively, of restricted certificates of deposit (CDs”). These investments
are classified as either a current or long-term asset based on their maturity date. The securities generally have maturity dates
of ten months to over one year. The restricted investments serve as collateral for an oil and gas operator license held by the
Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Adino Exploration, LLC. The cash is held in custody by the issuing bank, is restricted
as to withdrawal or use, and is currently invested in certificates of deposit. Income from these investments is paid to the Company
at maturity of the certificates of deposit. These investments are classified as held-to-maturity and are recorded as either short-term
or long-term on the balance sheet based on contractual maturity date and are recorded at amortized cost. The Company’s securities
are classified as held-to-maturity because the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity.
NOTE 6 - ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
The Company advanced $10,000 to a business
associate in December 2011 for repayment in 2012.
|
|
September 30, 2012
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
NOTE 7 - PETRO ENERGY ACQUISITION PURCHASE PRICE ALLOCATION
The Company’s acquisition of Petro
Energy (see Note 1) included operating wells and fixed assets. The transaction, treated as a business combination, was valued under
current guidance using fair value methods. To arrive at the acquired asset’s fair value, the valuation considered the value
to be the price, in cash or equivalent, that a buyer could reasonably be expected to pay, and a seller could reasonably be expected
to accept, if the business were exposed for sale on the open market for a reasonable period of time, with both buyer and seller
being in possession of the pertinent facts and neither being under any compulsion to act.
The Company issued ten million (10,000,000)
shares of common stock at closing as consideration for the companies. The stock price as of July 1, 2010 was $0.015 per common
share, representing a value of $150,000.
The tangible assets acquired were valued
based on the appropriate application of the market or cost approaches. The fair value was estimated at the depreciable value of
the current replacement costs based on the age of the assets, assuming they are in good, working order. Additionally, the Company
had an independent third party value the oil reserves for the Felix Brandt wells in Coleman, Texas.
A component of the acquisition
agreement with PetroGreen Energy and AACM3, LLC gave the former owners of these companies the option to repurchase for $1.00
the assets held by the companies as of July 1, 2010 if the Company’s common stock price fails to reach $0.25 per share
within three years of the original acquisition date. This contract clawback provision was valued as a liability at July 1,
2010 at $408,760.
The above valuations resulted in a goodwill
calculation on acquisition of $7,139 at July 1, 2010.
Below is the acquisition summary including
fair value of assets acquired, liabilities assumed and consideration given as of July 1, 2010:
|
|
Fair Value at July 1, 2010
|
|
Assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible drilling costs
|
|
$
|
155,700
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties
|
|
|
71,060
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
324,861
|
|
Total acquired asset fair value
|
|
|
551,621
|
|
Less liability assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
Contract clawback provision
|
|
|
(408,760
|
)
|
Consideration - Common stock
|
|
|
(150,000
|
)
|
Goodwill from acquisition
|
|
$
|
7,139
|
|
After acquisition of the Petro
Energy companies, the Company created two wholly owned subsidiaries: Adino Exploration, LLC (“Adino Exploration”)
and Adino Drilling, LLC (“Adino Drilling”). All oil and gas leases and a portion of the machinery and equipment
were transferred from the Petro Energy companies to Adino Exploration and future oil and gas exploration acquisitions and
activity are to be operated through this company. The large drilling rig acquired in the Petro Energy transaction and other
associated drilling machinery and equipment were transferred to Adino Drilling.
NOTE 8 - SALE OF ADINO DRILLING, LLC
On March 31, 2011, the Company sold the
membership shares of Adino Drilling, LLC to a related party. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company realized a reduction
in accrued liability of $100,000 and acquired a $500,000 six year, 5.24% interest note receivable, for a total sale price of $600,000.
The sale resulted in a gain to the Company of $247,376; however the transaction’s related party note of $500,000 is not allowed
for reporting purposes, therefore the Company realized a reportable loss of $252,624. Adino’s management believes that the
sale of the drilling rig and associated equipment was in the best interest of the Company and the shareholders. The rig held by
the Company was primarily suited for drilling up to 3,500 feet. However, the Company is currently drilling shallower wells. This
large rig would be uneconomical for drilling smaller wells. The Company has decided to contract with service companies that specialize
in shallower wells, thus reducing drilling expense. The cash flow to be realized from the $500,000 note, accompanied by the decreased
related party compensation of $100,000, is expected to increase Adino’s cash flow.
With the sale of Adino Drilling, LLC,
the $7,139 of goodwill resulting from the original PetroGreen acquisition, discussed in Note 7 was written off. The
transaction has been accounted for as a discontinued operation.
Below are the asset and liability values
for Adino Drilling, LLC at March 31, 2011:
|
|
Assets disposed at
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
Fixed assets, net of depreciation of $34,837 and $21,186 at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
350,702
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
350,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
5,317
|
|
Accounts payable - related party
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
5,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets - discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
345,485
|
|
NOTE 9 - FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company’s $50,000 CD is carried
at cost, which approximates market. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company realized $56 in interest income
on the CD. The Company valued the current convertible note and warrant derivatives using Level 3 criterion, shown below. As of
September 30, 2012, the valuations resulted in a gain on derivatives of $15,986 and loss on contract clawback provision of $198,643
for a net loss of $182,657. As of December 31, 2011, the valuations resulted in a gain on derivatives of $10,850, loss on contract
clawback provision of $49,385 and goodwill impairment of $4,827 for a net loss of $53,859.
September 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total Realized
Gain (Loss) due to
Valuation
at
|
|
|
Total Unrealized
Gain (Loss) due to
valuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable security - CD
|
|
$
|
50,056
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable - derivative
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
108,239
|
|
|
|
(12,374
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Haag warrants - derivative
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(3,612
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract clawback provision
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
198,643
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
50,056
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
108,286
|
|
|
$
|
182,713
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total Realized
Gain (Loss) due to
Valuation
|
|
|
Total Unrealized
Gain (Loss) due to
Valuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable security - CD
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,554,413
|
|
|
|
(4,827
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable - derivative
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
133,235
|
|
|
|
14,541
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Haag warrants - derivative
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,659
|
|
|
|
(3,691
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract clawback provision
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
386,739
|
|
|
|
49,385
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,078,046
|
|
|
$
|
53,859
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
With the sale of IFL, the Company removed
all associated goodwill at the sale date, February 7, 2012. At December 31, 2011, the Company recognized a loss on goodwill of
$4,827 for an ending balance of $1,554,413.
On June 29, 2012, the Company executed
a multi-party agreement with the Sellers of the PetroGreen assets and Gator-Dawg Drilling, LLC (“Gator-Dawg”). In the
agreement, the Company released the restriction on the 10 million shares of common stock held in escrow on behalf of the Sellers
in the PetroGreen asset purchase in July of 2010. In exchange, the Sellers released all claims to the contract clawback agreement,
which stated that the Sellers could repurchase the assets sold to the Company for $1.00 if the price of the Company’s stock
did not reach $0.25 per share by the specified date. The Company also transferred the membership shares of AACM3, LLC to its former
owner, Alex Perales. AACM3, LLC did not hold any assets at the time of transfer. Gator-Dawg agreed to transfer the drilling rig
and associated assets purchased from the Company in March, 2011 to AACM3, LLC. In exchange for the drilling rig transfer, the Company
forfeited the $500,000 note due from Gator-Dawg for purchase of those assets (disallowed for consolidation), executed a $100,000
note payable to Gator-Dawg for rig improvements and transferred a truck and trailer purchased in early 2012 to Gator-Dawg. The
completion of this multi-party agreement extinguished the contract clawback provision at June 29, 2012.
The clawback was valued at the agreement
date, June 29, 2012, resulting in an additional loss on clawback of $78,994 during the quarter, for a total change in clawback
value of $198,643 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
NOTE 10 - RECEIVABLE - ASSET SALES
In October 2011, Adino signed a letter
of intent to purchase all of the assets of Ashton, AOS 1A, and AOS 1-B. The proposed purchase price for the assets was $6,000,000
in face value of convertible preferred stock of the Company, with the preferred stock converting to common stock at the rate of
$0.15 per share. The parties agreed that partial closing of the purchase would occur once the sellers received clear title to the
assets subject to the agreement. The first partial closing of purchase occurred on November 3, 2011, and the Company issued 100,000
shares of Adino's Class "B" Preferred Stock Series 1 (the "Preferred Stock"), as follows: 95,534 shares to
AOS 1A, and 4,466 shares to AOS 1-B. The Preferred Stock shall be convertible into common shares at AOS 1A or AOS 1-B's option
at any time after six months, provided that (a) immediately after the first six months, only 25% of the Preferred Stock may be
converted to common stock, and (b) each month thereafter, only up to 12.5% of the Preferred Stock may be converted to common stock.
The Preferred Stock shall have other terms as determined by Adino's Board of Directors. The number of shares of Preferred Stock
was chosen to conform to the agreed upon value of $1,500,000 for the assets. The Company later decided not to acquire the remaining
Ashton assets. On February 7, 2012, the Company sold all oilfield machinery and equipment it had purchased from Ashton Oilfield
Services in its November 2011 acquisition for $500,000. At September 30, 2012, the outstanding balance on the purchase was fully
collected.
With the Company’s focus on oil and
gas exploration and production, the Company decided to sell its interest in IFL. To that end, on February 7, 2012, Adino sold all
of its membership interest in IFL to Pomisu XXI S.L. (“Buyer”). The purchase price to be paid by the Buyer was $900,000,
paid in two installments with the first installment of $244,825 paid on February 7, 2012, and the balance due not later than May
7, 2012. The balance of the purchase price shall be computed as follows: $900,000 minus $244,825 (initial installment) minus $655,157
of IFL liabilities assumed and settled by the Buyer. The agreement also called for any cash payments made by the Company, on behalf
of the Buyer, to be repaid to the Company at the settlement. As of March 31, 2012, the Company had paid $200,321 in partial settlement
of the G J Capital lawsuit judgment. The full receivable balance due from Buyer of $358,401 has been reserved, as the balance had
not been collected by the May 7, 2012 settlement date.
A schedule of the balances at September
30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is as follows:
|
|
September 30, 2012
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFL membership sale
|
|
$
|
358,401
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Less: allowance for uncollectible accounts
|
|
|
(358,401
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total receivable - asset sales
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
NOTE 11 - FIXED ASSETS
The following is a summary of this category:
|
|
September 30, 2012
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
350,001
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
60,927
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
410,928
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(55,599
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
355,329
|
|
The Company owned a vehicle that was no
longer needed. The Company chose to allow the vehicle to be repossessed, in settlement of the auto note outstanding. The repossession
resulted in a gain to the Company of $13,277.
Machinery and equipment has a useful
life of seven years and vehicles’ useful life is five years. Depreciation expense for the quarter and nine months ended
September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $0 and $17,650 and $5,083 and $790, respectively.
NOTE 12 - ACCRUED LIABILITIES / ACCRUED
LIABILITIES - RELATED PARTY
Other liabilities and accrued expenses
consisted of the following as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
|
|
September 30, 2012
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued accounting and legal fees
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
104,000
|
|
Property and payroll tax accrual
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
2,445
|
|
Dividend payable
|
|
|
9,750
|
|
|
|
1,942
|
|
Total accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
9,777
|
|
|
$
|
129,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued salaries-related party
|
|
$
|
537,959
|
|
|
$
|
568,689
|
|
Accrued accounting and legal fees:
On April 18, 2012, the Company converted the accrued consultant debt of $104,000 into 2,060,000 shares of Rule 144 common
stock. See Note 16 for further discussion.
Dividend payable:
Of the current
year dividend expense of $29,103 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, $19,353 has been paid prior to quarter end.
Accrued salaries - related party:
This
liability is due to a Company officer for prior years’ accrued compensation. He has agreed to postpone payment if
necessary, should the Company need capital it would otherwise pay these individuals.
NOTE 13 - NOTES PAYABLE / CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
|
|
September 30,
2012
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTES PAYABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable - Gulf Coast Fuels/GJ Capital
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
436,380
|
|
Note payable - GMAC, bearing interest
of 11.7% per annum with 60 monthly payments of $895, due May 13, 2013
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
14,622
|
|
Total notes payable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
451,002
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(445,995
|
)
|
Long term notes payable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable - Asher notes, net of discount of $3,922
and $50,986 at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively
|
|
|
138,578
|
|
|
|
119,514
|
|
bearing interest of 8% per annum, due February 16,
2012 (balance $0 at 9/30/12; $5,000 at 12/31/11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bearing interest of 8% per annum, due March 23,2012
(balance $0 at96/30/12; $53,000 at 12/31/11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bearing interest of 8% per annum, due April 7, 2012
(balance $27,500 at 9/30/12 and 12/31/11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bearing interest of 8% per annum, due June 12, 2012
(balance $37,500 at 9/30/12 and 12/31/11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bearing interest of 8% per annum, due August 28, 2012
(balance $37,500 at 9/30/12 and 12/31/11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bearing interest of 8% per annum, due October 23,
2012 (balance $40,000 at 9/30/12; $0 at 12/31/11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable - Schwartz group,
bearing interest at 6%, due January 9, 2013
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
Total convertible notes payable
|
|
$
|
201,078
|
|
|
$
|
204,514
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
(201,078
|
)
|
|
|
(119,514
|
)
|
Long term convertible notes payable
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
Gulf Coast Fuels / GJ Capital:
In December 2011, the court rendered judgment for G J Capital and against Adino and IFL in the amount of $250,000, plus $152,988
in attorneys’ fees, $9,300 in court costs, plus $20,616 in prejudgment interest. The Company did not appeal this judgment
.In February 2012, the Company paid $200,321 in partial settlement of the amount due. The balance due at March 31, 2012 was $236,834.
On May 1, 2012, the Company paid the final balance due on the GJ Capital suit, receiving a full release on all liability.
Asher Notes:
On August 11, 2010,
the Company issued a convertible promissory note to Asher Enterprises, Inc. (Asher”), in the amount of $57,500. The note
had a maturity date of May 13, 2011 and an annual interest rate of eight percent (8%) per annum. The holders have the right from
and after the date of issuance, and until any time until the note is fully paid, to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal
portion of the note, and accrued interest, into fully paid and non-assessable shares of common stock. The note has an initial
conversion price of fifty eight percent (58%) of the 3 lowest closing bid prices for the 10 days preceding the conversion date
and full reset provision. The note’s convertible feature was valued and resulted in a debt discount of $35,838, which is
being amortized over the nine month note life, using the straight line method. In this case, using the straight line method approximates
the effective interest method, given the short time to maturity.
With the Asher notes, the Company has
the right to redeem the notes within 90 days from the date of issuance for 135% of the redemption amount and accrued interest,
from days 91-120, the Company has the right to redeem the notes for 145% of the redemption amount and accrued interest, and from
days 121-180, the Company has the right to redeem the notes for 150% of the redemption amount and accrued interest.
During the first quarter of 2011, Asher
converted $34,000 of the notes into the Company’s common stock, resulting in an issuance of 1,862,833 shares to Asher. During
the second quarter of 2011, Asher converted the remaining balance of $23,500 into the Company’s common stock, resulting
in an issuance of 2,036,820 shares to Asher. No amounts were converted during the third quarter, 2011. During the fourth
quarter of 2011, Asher converted $48,000 into the Company’s common stock, resulting in an issuance of 2,664,063 shares to
Asher. See Note 16 for a detailed description of each conversion.
During the second quarter of 2011, the
Company issued two nine-month convertible promissory notes to Asher in the amount of $53,000 each. The notes have maturity dates
of February 16, 2012 and March 23, 2012 and an annual interest rate of eight percent (8%) per annum. The holders have the right
from and after the date of issuance, and until any time until the note is fully paid, to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal
portion of the note, and accrued interest, into fully paid and non-assessable shares of common stock. The note has an initial
conversion price of sixty five percent (65%) of the three lowest closing bid prices for the ten days preceding the conversion
date. The notes’ convertible features were valued and resulted in debt discounts of $23,918 and $23,998 respectively, which
is being amortized over the nine month note life, using the straight line method. In this case, using the straight line method
approximates the effective interest method, given the short time to maturity.
During the third quarter of 2011, the
Company issued two nine-month convertible promissory notes to Asher in the amount of $37,500 each. The notes have maturity dates
of April 17, 2012 and June 12, 2012 and an annual interest rate of eight percent (8%) per annum. The holders have the right from
and after the date of issuance, and until any time until the note is fully paid, to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal
portion of the note, and accrued interest, into fully paid and non-assessable shares of common stock. The note due April 17, 2012
has an initial conversion price of sixty five percent (65%) of the three lowest closing bid prices for the ten days preceding
the conversion date. The note due June 12, 2012 has an initial conversion price of fifty six percent (56%) of the three lowest
closing bid prices for the ten days preceding the conversion date. The notes’ convertible features were valued and resulted
in debt discounts of $15,943 and $21,720 respectively, which is being amortized over the nine month note life, using the straight
line method. In this case, using the straight line method approximates the effective interest method, given the short time to
maturity.
On November 22, 2011, the Company issued
a nine-month convertible promissory note to Asher in the amount of $37,500. The note has a maturity date of August 28, 2012 and
an annual interest rate of eight percent (8%) per annum. The holders have the right from and after the date of issuance, and until
any time until the note is fully paid, to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal portion of the note, and accrued interest,
into fully paid and non-assessable shares of common stock. The note has an initial conversion price of fifty eight percent (58%)
of the three lowest closing bid prices for the ten days preceding the conversion date. The note’s convertible feature was
valued and resulted in a debt discount of $21,477, which is being amortized over the nine month note life, using the straight
line method. In this case, using the straight line method approximates the effective interest method, given the short time to
maturity.
On January 19, 2012, the Company issued
a nine-month convertible promissory note to Asher in the amount of $40,000. The note has a maturity date of October 23, 2012 and
an annual interest rate of eight percent (8%) per annum. The holders have the right from and after the date of issuance, and until
any time until the note is fully paid, to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal portion of the note, and accrued interest,
into fully paid and non-assessable shares of common stock. The note has an initial conversion price of fifty eight percent (58%)
of the three lowest closing bid prices for the ten days preceding the conversion date. The note’s convertible feature was
valued and resulted in a debt discount of $21,119, which is being amortized over the nine month note life, using the effective
interest method.
During the first quarter of 2012, Asher
converted $45,000 of the notes and $2,120 in interest into the Company’s common stock, resulting in an issuance of 9,912,748
shares to Asher. There was no gain or loss on the transaction.
During the second quarter of 2012, Asher
converted $23,000 of the notes and $2,120 in interest into the Company’s common stock, resulting in an issuance of 11,341,176
shares to Asher. There was no gain or loss on the transaction.
There were no conversions of the notes
during the quarter ended September 30, 2012.
The Company fully settled all notes due
to Asher on November 1, 2012, receiving full release on the notes and reserved common shares.
Schwartz Notes:
On January 10,
2011, the Company issued convertible promissory notes to investors in the amount of $272,500, to fund drilling activities associated
with the recent Petro Energy acquisition. The notes have a maturity date of January 9, 2013, with interest accrued and paid at
the option of the holder at an annual interest rate of six percent (6%) per annum. The holders have the right from and after the
date of issuance, and until any time until the note is fully paid, to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal portion of
the note, and accrued interest, into fully paid and non-assessable shares of common stock. The note has a fixed conversion price
of $0.35. During December 2011, the Company offered to convert the notes into shares of the Company’s Class B Preferred
Stock, Series 3. Three of the investors then chose to convert their notes, totaling $187,500 into shares of the preferred stock.
In January 2012, a fourth investor chose to convert his note balance of $22,500 into shares of the Company’s Class B Preferred
Stock, Series 3. The final note of $62,500 remains outstanding at September 30, 2012.
The table below reflects the aggregate principal maturities
of long-term debt for years ended December 31:
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
$
|
201,078
|
|
2014
|
|
|
-
|
|
2015
|
|
|
-
|
|
2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
2017
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
201,078
|
|
NOTE 14 - CONTRACT CLAWBACK PROVISION
A component of the acquisition agreement
with PetroGreen Energy and AACM3, LLC gave the former owners of these companies the option to repurchase for $1.00 the assets
held by the companies as of July 1, 2010 if the Company’s common stock price fails to reach $0.25 per share within three
years of the original acquisition date. The contract clawback provision was valued at December 31, 2011 at $386,739.
The contract clawback was valued at March
31 and June 29, 2012 and the increase in provision for the quarters was recorded as a loss on contract clawback in the statement
of operations.
On June 29, 2012, the Company executed
a multi-party agreement with the Sellers of the PetroGreen assets and Gator-Dawg Drilling, LLC (“Gator-Dawg”). In
the agreement, the Company released the restriction on the 10 million shares of common stock held in escrow on behalf of the Sellers
in the PetroGreen asset purchase in July of 2010. In exchange, the Sellers released all claims to the contract clawback agreement,
which stated that the Sellers could repurchase the assets sold to the Company for $1.00 if the price of the Company’s stock
did not reach $0.25 per share by the specified date. The Company also transferred the membership shares of AACM3, LLC to its former
owner, Alex Perales. AACM3, LLC did not hold any assets at the time of transfer. Gator-Dawg agreed to transfer the drilling rig
and associated assets purchased from the Company in March 2011 to AACM3, LLC. In exchange for the drilling rig transfer, the Company
forfeited the $500,000 note due from Gator-Dawg for purchase of those assets (disallowed for consolidation), executed a $100,000
note payable to Gator-Dawg for rig improvements and transferred a truck and trailer purchased in early 2012 to Gator-Dawg. The
completion of this multi-party agreement extinguished the contract clawback provision at June 29, 2012.
NOTE 15 - DERIVATIVE LIABILITY
Based on current guidance, the Company
concluded that the convertible notes payable to Asher referred to in Note 16 were required to be accounted for as a derivative.
This guidance requires the Company to bifurcate and separately account for the conversion features of the convertible notes issued
as embedded derivatives.
With convertible notes in general,
there are three primary events that can occur: the holder can convert the note into stock; the Company can force conversion of
the convertible note; or the Company can default on the note or liquidate. The model analyzed the underlying economic factors
that influenced which of these events would occur, when they were likely to occur, and the specific terms that would
be in effect at the time (i.e. interest rates, stock price, conversion price etc.). Projections were then made on these underlying
factors which led to a set of potential scenarios. Probabilities were assigned to each of these scenarios based on management
projections. This led to a cash flow projection and a probability associated with that cash flow. A discounted weighted
average cash flow over the various scenarios was completed, and it was compared to the discounted cash flow of a hypothetical
one year 0% debt instrument without the embedded derivatives, thus determining a value for the compound embedded derivatives
at the date of issue.
Derivative financial instruments are initially
measured at their fair value. For derivative financial instruments that
are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and
is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported as
charges or credits to income.
The Company used a lattice model that
values the compound embedded derivatives based on a probability weighted discounted cash flow model. This model is based on future
projections of the various potential outcomes. The Asher notes contained embedded derivatives that were analyzed. Certain features
of the Asher notes were incorporated into the derivative valuation model, including the conversion feature with a reduction
of the conversion rate based upon future below-market issuances and the redemption options.
The structure of the Asher notes caused
two other financial instruments held by the Company to be deemed derivatives: The BWME notes and the Haag warrants. Both were
valued as derivatives as of the date of the Asher note issuance (Haag warrants) or date of issuance (BWME notes) and are revalued
at each balance sheet reporting date.
Below is detail of the derivative liability
balances as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
Derivative Liability
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
from valuation
|
|
|
September 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asher note / BWME notes
|
|
$
|
133,234
|
|
|
$
|
21,119
|
|
|
$
|
(46,114
|
)
|
|
$
|
108,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Haag warrants
|
|
|
3,660
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,613
|
)
|
|
|
47
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
136,894
|
|
|
$
|
21,119
|
|
|
$
|
(49,727
|
)
|
|
$
|
108,286
|
|
The net decrease of $28,608 is split between
changes to derivative liability due to new note addition of $21,119, a reduction of $33,741 to additional paid-in-capital for
the derivative reduction attributable to the Asher note conversions discussed in Notes 17 and 20. The remaining $15,986
is reflected as gain on derivatives in the statement of operations.
NOTE 16 - STOCK
COMMON STOCK
The Company's common stock has a par value
of $0.001. There were 50,000,000 shares authorized as of December 31, 2007. At the Company’s January 2008 shareholder
meeting, the shareholders voted to increase the authorized common stock to 500,000,000 shares. As of September 30,
2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had 135,487,043 and 125,574,295 shares issued and outstanding, respectively.
On January 11, 2012, Asher converted $5,000
of its note and $2,120 in accrued interest into 569,600 shares of the Company’s common stock.
On January 24, 2012, Asher converted $12,000
of its note into 2,181,818 shares of the Company’s common stock.
On February 21, 2012, Asher converted
$15,000 of its note into 2,678,571 shares of the Company’s common stock.
On March 12, 2012, Asher converted $13,000
of its note into 4,482,759 shares of the Company’s common stock.
On April 16, 2012, Asher converted $12,000
of its note into 6,666,667 shares of the Company’s common stock.
On May 23, 2012, Asher converted $10,000
of its note into 2,941,176 shares of the Company’s common stock.
On May 23, 2012, Asher converted $1,000
of its note and $2,120 in accrued interest into 1,733,333 shares of the Company’s common stock.
There were no Asher shares converted in
the third quarter, 2012.
All note conversions were within the terms
of the agreement and did not result in a gain or loss.
On April 18, 2012, The Board of Directors approved a stock
conversion of $103,000 in accrued consulting expense into Rule 144 common stock, at a conversion rate of $0.05 per share. The
conversion resulted in issuance of 2,060,000 shares of stock and a gain to the Company of $87,962, based on the difference between
the conversion rate and the market price on the date of conversion.
As a result of the above common stock
issuances, there were 148,888,219 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2012.
PREFERRED STOCK
In 1998, the Company amended its articles
to authorize Preferred Stock. There are 20,000,000 shares authorized with a par value of $0.001. The shares are non-voting and
non-redeemable by the Company. The Company further designated two series of its Preferred Stock: "Series 'A' $12.50 Preferred
Stock" with 2,159,193 shares of the total shares authorized and "Series "A" $8.00 Preferred Stock," with
the number of authorized shares set at 1,079,957 shares.
Any holder of either series may convert
any or all of such shares into shares of common stock of the Company at any time. Said shares shall be convertible at a rate equal
to three (3) shares of common stock of the Company for each one (1) share of Series "A" $12.50 Preferred Stock. The
Series "A" 12.50 Preferred Stock shall be convertible, in whole or in part, at any time after the common stock of the
Company shall maintain an average bid price per share of at least $12.50 for ten (10) consecutive trading days.
Series "A" $8.00 Preferred Stock
shall be convertible at a rate equal to three (3) shares of common stock of the Company for each one (1) share of Series "A"
$8.00 Preferred Stock. The Series "A" $8.00 Preferred Stock shall be convertible, in whole or in part, at any time after
the common stock of the Company shall maintain an average bid price per share of at least $8.00 for ten (10) consecutive trading
days.
The preferential amount payable with respect
to shares of either Series of Preferred Stock in the event of voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution, or winding-up,
shall be an amount equal to $5.00 per share, plus the amount of any dividends declared and unpaid thereon.
As of September 30, 2012, the Company
has also designated two series of Class B Preferred Stock.
The number of authorized shares of Class
B Preferred Stock Series 1 is 666,680 shares. At any time after six months from the date of issuance of Class B Preferred Stock
Series 1, any holder may convert up to 25% of such holder’s initial holdings (i.e. before taking into account any prior
conversions, but taking into account any sales or transfers) of Class B Preferred Stock Series 1 into fully paid and nonassessable
shares of common stock of the Company at the rate of one hundred (100) shares of common stock per share of Class B Preferred Stock
Series 1. Every month thereafter, any holder of Class B Preferred Stock Series 1 may convert up to 12.5% of such stockholder’s
initial holdings of Class B Preferred Stock Series 1 (i.e. before taking into account any prior conversions, but taking into account
any sales or transfers) into fully paid and nonassessable shares of common stock of the Company at the rate of one hundred (100)
shares of common stock per share of Class B Preferred Stock Series 1. Any such conversion may be effected by giving to the Secretary
of the Company written notice of conversion, accompanied by the surrender of the certificate(s) of the stock to be converted,
duly endorsed, along with any other information or documents reasonably requested by the Secretary to effect the conversion. The
shares of Class B Preferred Stock Series 1 shall not have any voting rights. Any outstanding shares of Class B Preferred Stock
Series 1 may be redeemed by the Company, at the Company’s option, at any time for $15.00 per share.
On November 3, 2011, The Company acquired
all unencumbered assets owned by two limited partnerships managed by Ashton Oilfield Services, LLC (Ashton”). The assets
were purchased for one million five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000) and the Company issued 100,000 shares of Class B Preferred
Stock Series 1 to Ashton. The assets were valued based on fair market value for similar assets in good, working condition.
At September 30, 2012 and December 31,
2011, there were 100,000 shares of Class B Preferred Stock Series 1 issued and outstanding.
The number of authorized shares of Class
B Preferred Stock Series 3 is 18,570 shares. The issue price for Class B Preferred Stock Series 3 is $35.00. The holders of Class
B Preferred Stock Series 3 shall be entitled to receive a quarterly dividend equal to 2.5% of the issue price of each share. The
dividends shall be paid quarterly, when as and if declared payable by the Company’s Board of Directors from funds legally
available for the payment thereof. If in any quarter the Company does not pay any accrued dividends, such dividends shall cumulate.
Interest shall not be paid on cumulated dividends. Each share of Class B Preferred Stock Series 3 shall rank on the same parity
with each other share of preferred stock, irrespective of series, with respect to dividends at the respective fixed or maximum
rate for such series. Any holder of Class B Preferred Stock Series 3 may convert, at any time, any or all shares held into common
stock of the Company. Each Class B Preferred Stock Series 3 share held may be converted into one hundred (100) fully paid and
nonassessable shares of common stock of the Company at the conversion rate of $0.35 per common stock .
On December 10, 2011, three of the Schwartz
investors, each holding a note for $62,500, converted their notes into 1,786 shares of the Company’s Class B Preferred Stock
Series 3, for a total issuance of 5,358 shares. Additionally, each investor invested an additional $50,000 in the Company through
the purchase of 1,428 shares of Class B Preferred Stock Series 3 shares, for a total issuance of 4,284 shares. The conversion
was within the terms of the agreement and there was no gain or loss on the transaction.
On January 9, 2012, one of the Schwartz
investors converted his $22,500 note into 681 shares of the Company’s Class B Preferred Stock Series 3. Additionally, he
invested an additional $30,000 in the Company through the purchase of 857 shares of Class B Preferred Stock Series 3 shares. The
conversion was within the terms of the agreement and there was no gain or loss on the transaction.
At September 30, 2012 and December 31,
2011, there were 11,180 and 9,642 shares of Class B Preferred Stock Series 3 issued and outstanding, respectively.
DIVIDENDS
Dividends for Class B Preferred Stock
Series 3 are cumulative. The holders of Class B Preferred Stock Series 3 shall be entitled to receive a quarterly dividend equal
to 2.5% of the issue price of each share. The dividends shall be paid quarterly, when as and if declared payable by the Company’s
Board of Directors from funds legally available for the payment thereof. If in any quarter the Company does not pay any accrued
dividends, such dividends shall cumulate. Interest shall not be paid on cumulated dividends.
Dividends for Class A Preferred Stock
and Class B Series 1 Preferred Stock are non-cumulative, however, the holders of such series, in preference to the holders of
any common stock, shall be entitled to receive, as and when declared payable by the Board of Directors from funds legally available
for the payment thereof, dividends in lawful money of the United States of America at the rate per annum fixed and determined
as herein authorized for the shares of such series, but no more.
Dividends for Class A Preferred Stock
are payable quarterly on the last days of March, June, September, and December in each year with respect to the quarterly period
ending on the day prior to each such respective dividend payment date. In no event shall the holders of Class A Preferred Stock
receive dividends of more than percent (1%) in any fiscal year, and each share shall rank on parity with each other share of preferred
stock, irrespective of class or series, with respect to dividends at the respective fixed or maximum rates for such series.
At September 30, 2012 and December 31,
2011, the Company recorded dividends paid for the Class B Preferred Stock Series 3 shares of $29,103 and $1,942 respectively,
for those shares issued in the Schwartz debt conversions, discussed above.
NOTE 17 - STOCK OPTIONS / STOCK WARRANTS
In September 2007, the Company entered
into a consulting agreement with Small Cap Support Services, Inc. (Small Cap”) to provide investor relations services. In
addition to monthly compensation, Small Cap was entitled to 500,000 options, vesting ratably over 8 quarters through August 30,
2009, priced at 166,667 shares at $0.15, $0.25, and $0.35 each. Using the Black-Scholes valuation model and an expected
life of 3.5 years, volatility of 271.33%, and a discount rate of 4.53%, the Company determined the aggregate value of the 500,000
seven year options to be $59,126. The options became fully expensed and vested as of June 30, 2009. All options are outstanding
at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
NOTE 18 - EARNINGS PER SHARE
The table below sets forth the computation
of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
|
|
For the quarter ended September 30
|
|
|
For the nine months ended
September 30
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(118,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
(307,871
|
)
|
|
$
|
(279,059
|
)
|
|
$
|
(973,783
|
)
|
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(78,369
|
)
|
|
$
|
(93,418
|
)
|
|
$
|
(181,631
|
)
|
|
$
|
122,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(197,309
|
)
|
|
$
|
(401,289
|
)
|
|
$
|
(460,690
|
)
|
|
$
|
(851,570
|
)
|
Diluted net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(197,309
|
)
|
|
$
|
(401,289
|
)
|
|
$
|
(460,690
|
)
|
|
$
|
(851,570
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
148,888,219
|
|
|
|
117,505,341
|
|
|
|
141,108,379
|
|
|
|
107,685,367
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities
Convertible note
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Dilutive weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
148,888,219
|
|
|
|
117,505,341
|
|
|
|
141,108,379
|
|
|
|
107,685,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) per share, basic and fully diluted - continuing operations
|
|
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per share, basic and fully diluted - discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
As of September 30, 2012, Adino had 148,888,219
shares outstanding, with no shares payable outstanding. The Company uses the treasury stock method to determine whether any
outstanding options or warrants are to be included in the diluted earnings per share calculation.
At September 30, 2012, the Company has
500,000 options outstanding to a former consultant, exercisable between $0.15 and $0.35 each. Using an average
share price for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 of $0.005 and $0.01, and $0.02 and $0.03 respectively,
the options resulted in no additional dilution to the Company.
The Company calculated the dilutive effect
of the convertibility of the Asher notes, resulting in additional weighted average share additions of 33,352,494 for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2012. The Company’s conversion of several of the Schwartz notes into Preferred Class
B Series 3 shares (discussed in Note 16) resulted in dilution of 1,114,286 common shares. Additional dilution of 10,000,000 shares
resulted from the Company’s purchase of the Ashton assets (see Notes 1 and 19). The effect on earnings per share from the
Company’s BWME, Schwartz and Gator-Dawg convertible notes was excluded from the diluted weighted average shares outstanding
because the conversion of these instruments would have been non-dilutive since the strike price is above the market price for
our stock.
There were no dilutive note instruments
in place at September 30, 2011.
The dilutive effect of convertible instruments
on earnings per share is not presented in the consolidated statements of operations for periods with a net loss.
NOTE 19 - CONCENTRATIONS
The following table sets forth the amount
and percentage of revenue from those customers that accounted for at least 10% of revenues for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2012 and 2011.
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months
ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months
ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2012
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
September 30,
2011
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
September 30,
2012
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
September 30,
2011
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer A
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
456,000
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
152,000
|
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,368,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Customer B
|
|
$
|
111,575
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
332,524
|
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
111,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
456,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
484,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,368,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company had $10,000 due from a third party at both December
31, 2011 and September 30, 2012.
NOTE 20 - SALE OF INTERCONTINENTAL
FUELS, LLC
On February 7, 2012, Adino sold all of
its membership interest in IFL to Pomisu XXI S.L. (“Buyer”). The purchase price paid by the Buyer was $900,000, paid
in two installments with the first installment of $244,825 paid on February 7, 2012, and the balance due not later than May 7,
2012. The balance of the purchase price shall be computed as follows: $900,000 minus $244,825 (initial installment) minus any
IFL liabilities plus any cash on deposit with Regions Bank for the benefit of IFL or cash on deposit with J.P. Morgan Bank for
the benefit of the Company.
The Buyer agreed to assume the following
liabilities in the transaction:
Description
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
106,520
|
|
G J Capital judgment
|
|
|
437,154
|
|
Due to related party
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Prepaid rent deposit
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
655,175
|
|
The February 7, 2012 IFL balance sheet
(unconsolidated) is presented below:
|
|
February 7, 2012
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
82,409
|
|
Fixed Assets net of depreciation
|
|
|
6,131
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
88,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
148,258
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
76,215
|
|
Due to related party
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Deferred gain on sale/leaseback
|
|
|
171,293
|
|
Due to G J Capital
|
|
|
437,155
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
834,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in-capital
|
|
|
1,870,100
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(663,476
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
(2,069,189
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
116,684
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
(745,881
|
)
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
88,540
|
|
IFL net income for the three months ended
March 31, 2012 and 2011, reflected as discontinued operations on this quarter’s Statement of Operations is as follows:
|
|
IFL
|
|
|
IFL
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
3/31/12
|
|
|
3/31/11
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminal operations revenue
|
|
$
|
152,000
|
|
|
$
|
456,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminal management
|
|
|
33,430
|
|
|
|
100,290
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
43,949
|
|
|
|
125,281
|
|
Legal and professional
|
|
|
8,762
|
|
|
|
27,248
|
|
Consulting fees
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
8,173
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
114,291
|
|
|
|
302,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (expense)
|
|
|
37,709
|
|
|
|
153,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(741
|
)
|
|
|
(2,125
|
)
|
Gain from lawsuit/sale leaseback
|
|
|
32,607
|
|
|
|
97,820
|
|
Total other income and expense
|
|
|
32,216
|
|
|
|
95,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
69,925
|
|
|
$
|
248,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss on sale
|
|
|
8,416
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
61,509
|
|
|
$
|
248,961
|
|
NOTE 21 - LAWSUIT SETTLEMENT - G J
CAPITAL
On March 15, 2010, G J Capital, Ltd. (G
J Capital”) filed suit against Adino Energy Corporation and IFL in the 129th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas.
G J Capital’s claim relates to a repurchase agreement whereby IFL sold to G J Capital certain assets for $250,000 and retained
the ability to repurchase the assets in sixty days by paying to G J Capital the amount of $275,000. G J Capital’s petition
alleged claims of breach of contract, money had and received, and fraudulent misrepresentation. G J Capital later amended its
petition to allege that certain of Adino’s directors and officers (Mr. Timothy Byrd and Mr. Sonny Wooley) fraudulently transferred
assets of Adino and/or IFL. G J Capital has also alleged that Mr. Wooley and Mr. Byrd are the
alter ego
of
Adino and IFL, and/or that Adino and/or IFL are
alter egos
of one another. G J Capital also alleged fraudulent conduct
by one or more of the defendants.
Adino, IFL, Mr. Byrd and Mr. Wooley countersued
G J Capital and filed third-party claims against CapNet Securities Corporation (CapNet”), Daniel L. Ritz, Jr. (Ritz”),
Gulf Coast Fuels, Inc. (Gulf Coast”) and Paul Groat (Groat”), alleging that they conspired to damage IFL and Adino
by involving it in the transaction described above. In this action, Adino, IFL, Mr. Byrd and Mr. Wooley contended that Ritz, CapNet,
Gulf Coast, and Groat were involved together for the common, improper scheme to cause IFL immense financial hardship so that Gulf
Coast could acquire the fuel terminal currently leased by IFL at an unfairly low price; that as part of this conspiracy they also
effected a settlement of the Gulf Coast claim (which, if true, would mean that G J Capital acquired no claim at all against any
of the defendants); and that in addition or in the alternative, even if G J Capital acquired some cognizable interest against
IFL, Adino, IFL, Byrd and Wooley are entitled to indemnification by and contribution by Ritz, CapNet, Gulf Coast, and Groat.
In December 2011, G J Capital dismissed
its claims against Mr. Byrd and Mr. Wooley. Also in December 2011, the court rendered judgment for G J Capital and against Adino
and IFL in the amount of $250,000, plus $152,988 in attorneys’ fees, $9,300 in court costs, plus $20,616 in prejudgment
interest. The Company did not appeal this judgment. In February 2012, the Company paid $200,321 in partial settlement of the amount
due. The balance due at March 31, 2012 was $236,834. On May 1, 2012, the Company paid the final balance due on the GJ Capital
suit, receiving a full release on all liability.
NOTE 22 - GAIN ON SALE / RELINQUISHMENT
On June 29, 2012, the Company executed
a multi-party agreement with the Sellers of the PetroGreen assets and Gator-Dawg Drilling, LLC (“Gator-Dawg”). In
the agreement, the Company released the restriction on the 10 million shares of common stock held in escrow on behalf of the Sellers
in the PetroGreen asset purchase in July of 2010. In exchange, the Sellers released all claims to the contract clawback agreement,
which stated that the Sellers could repurchase the assets sold to the Company for $1.00 if the price of the Company’s stock
did not reach $0.25 per share by the specified date. The Company also transferred the membership shares of AACM3, LLC to its former
owner, Alex Perales. AACM3, LLC did not hold any assets at the time of transfer. Gator-Dawg agreed to transfer the drilling rig
and associated assets purchased from the Company in March 2011 to AACM3, LLC. In exchange for the drilling rig transfer, the Company
forfeited the $500,000 note due from Gator-Dawg for purchase of those assets (disallowed for consolidation), executed a $100,000
note payable to Gator-Dawg for rig improvements and transferred a truck and trailer purchased in early 2012 to Gator-Dawg.
The contract clawback was valued at March
31 and June 29, 2012 and the increase in provision for the quarters was recorded as a loss on contract clawback in the statement
of operations. The completion of this multi-party agreement extinguished the contract clawback provision at June 29, 2012.
|
|
Gain (loss) at
September 30,
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract clawback
|
|
$
|
585,382
|
|
Note payable related party - Gator Dawg
|
|
|
(100,000
|
)
|
Truck and trailer to Gator Dawg, net of accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(12,150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
473,232
|
|
NOTE 23 - SALE OF OIL AND GAS INTERESTS
On October 31, 2012 the Company and Adino
Exploration, LLC (“Exploration”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into an Asset Purchase and Sales
Agreement (“Agreement”) with Broadway Resources, LLC (“Buyer”), The Agreement provided that Exploration
agreed to sell all of its rights, title and interest to its oil and gas leases located in Coleman and Runnels Counties, Texas.
The purchase price paid by the Buyer was $2,921,616, which includes a cash payment of $811,825 and the elimination of the Company
and Exploration debts in the amount of $2,109,791.
The Company’s Chairman and Chief
Financial Officer have an ownership interest in the Buyer. Exploration’s members approved the sale of assets and the terms
of the Agreement as being fair and reasonable. In evaluating the sale of Exploration’s assets, including the determination
of an appropriate purchase price paid, the Company considered a variety of factors, including the estimated future net oil reserves
of the oil and gas leases, comparable sales of other oil and gas leases in the area, and the value of the equipment sold.
On October 31, 2012, Shannon McAdams,
the Company’s chief financial officer, resigned his employment with the Company and with Adino Exploration, LLC.
The cash payment at closing was comprised
of a payment to the Company of $300,000 and payment of liabilities, shown below.
Description
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
227,996
|
|
Note payable – BlueRock Energy Capital II, LLC
|
|
|
283,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
511,825
|
|
In the sale, Broadway acquired the following
assets and liabilities from both Adino Exploration and Adino Energy Corporation, reflected as assets held for sale, and liabilities
associated with assets held for sale at September 30, 2012:
|
|
9/30/2012
|
|
|
9/30/2012
|
|
|
9/30/2012
|
|
|
|
AE
|
|
|
ADNY
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Cash in bank
|
|
$
|
8,300
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
8,300
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances
|
|
|
12,070
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12,070
|
|
Note Receivable - current portion
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
26,208
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
26,208
|
|
Interest receivable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
375,208
|
|
|
|
375,208
|
|
Deposits and Prepaid assets
|
|
|
2,438
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
49,016
|
|
|
|
1,125,208
|
|
|
|
1,174,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets, net of depreciation
|
|
|
150,817
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
150,817
|
|
Oil and gas properties
|
|
|
660,371
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
660,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
811,188
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
811,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
860,204
|
|
|
$
|
1,125,208
|
|
|
$
|
1,985,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
189,557
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
189,557
|
|
Accounts payable - related party
|
|
|
21,765
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21,765
|
|
Accrued liabilities - related party
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
322,122
|
|
|
|
322,122
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
54,142
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
54,142
|
|
Notes payable - current portion
|
|
|
241,023
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,741,023
|
|
Convertible notes payable - current portion
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
2,138
|
|
|
|
938,500
|
|
|
|
940,638
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
508,625
|
|
|
$
|
2,860,622
|
|
|
|
3,369,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible notes payable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
$
|
508,625
|
|
|
$
|
3,260,622
|
|
|
$
|
3,769,247
|
|
The Company classified all similar assets
and liabilities at December 31, 2011 as assets held for sale, for comparative purposes.
Net loss for Adino Exploration for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 is reflected as Loss from Discontinued Operations. The Statement of Operations
information for those periods is detailed as follows:
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
For the nine months ended
|
|
|
|
9/30/2012
|
|
|
9/30/2011
|
|
|
9/30/2012
|
|
|
9/30/2011
|
|
REVENUES AND GROSS MARGINS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas operations
|
|
$
|
111,574
|
|
|
$
|
233,828
|
|
|
$
|
386,903
|
|
|
$
|
258,581
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
111,574
|
|
|
|
233,828
|
|
|
|
386,903
|
|
|
|
258,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product sales
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
36,907
|
|
|
|
64,380
|
|
|
|
36,907
|
|
Payroll and related expenses
|
|
|
20,236
|
|
|
|
16,643
|
|
|
|
72,020
|
|
|
|
46,644
|
|
Terminal management
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,222
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,543
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
28,318
|
|
|
|
108,324
|
|
|
|
102,791
|
|
|
|
127,641
|
|
Legal and professional
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
3,475
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
Consulting fees
|
|
|
66,200
|
|
|
|
57,160
|
|
|
|
143,200
|
|
|
|
100,860
|
|
Repairs
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
3,352
|
|
|
|
3,743
|
|
|
|
9,392
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
41,340
|
|
|
|
43,795
|
|
|
|
119,083
|
|
|
|
53,411
|
|
Operating supplies
|
|
|
20,925
|
|
|
|
9,249
|
|
|
|
78,652
|
|
|
|
11,444
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
177,448
|
|
|
|
286,887
|
|
|
|
587,344
|
|
|
|
398,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING (LOSS)
|
|
|
(65,874
|
)
|
|
|
(53,059
|
)
|
|
|
(200,441
|
)
|
|
|
(139,837
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(12,514
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(44,065
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Gain from lawsuit/sale leaseback
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(7,671
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(11,807
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
29,934
|
|
Total other income and expense
|
|
|
(12,495
|
)
|
|
|
(7,672
|
)
|
|
|
(42,699
|
)
|
|
|
18,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(78,369
|
)
|
|
$
|
(60,731
|
)
|
|
$
|
(243,140
|
)
|
|
$
|
(121,652
|
)
|
NOTE 24 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On October 5, 2012, Asher converted $5,300
of its note into 7,361,111 shares of the Company’s common stock. The note conversion was within the terms of the agreement
and did not result in a gain or loss.
On October 31, 2012 the Company and Adino
Exploration, LLC (“Exploration”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into an Asset Purchase and Sales
Agreement (“Agreement”) with Broadway Resources, LLC (“Buyer”), The Agreement provides that Exploration
has agreed to sell all of its rights, title and interest to its oil and gas leases located in Coleman and Runnels Counties, Texas.
The purchase price paid by the Buyer was $2,921,616, which includes a cash payment of $811,825 and the elimination of the Company
and Exploration debts in the amount of $2,109,791.
The Company’s Chairman and Chief
Financial Officer have an ownership interest in the Buyer. Exploration’s members approved the sale of assets and the terms
of the Agreement as being fair and reasonable. In evaluating the sale of Exploration’s assets, including the determination
of an appropriate purchase price paid, the Company considered a variety of factors, including the estimated future net oil reserves
of the oil and gas leases, comparable sales of other oil and gas leases in the area, and the value of the equipment sold.
On October 31, 2012, Shannon McAdams,
the Company’s chief financial officer, resigned his employment with the Company and with Adino Exploration, LLC. See Note
23 for a detailed presentation.
On November 1, 2012, the Company fully
paid all notes due to Asher for $145,000 and received full release on the notes and reserved common stock shares.