barnyarddog
8 months ago
20 Biggest Snack Companies in the World
March 14, 2024
https://www.insidermonkey.com/blog/20-biggest-snack-companies-in-the-world-1274317/
8. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (NYSE:ADM)
Market Capitalization: $31.08 billion
One of the leading snack companies globally, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (NYSE:ADM), also known as ADM, is an American multinational food processing and commodities trading corporation established in 1902 and based in Chicago, Illinois. ADM’s diverse range of snack offerings, from meat snacks to puffed snacks, features global and spicy flavor profiles that are reshaping the snack industry.
Anticipating adjusted earnings per share between $5.25 to $6.25 for 2024, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (NYSE:ADM) factors in moderating margin conditions and increased costs balanced by enhanced volumes. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company is 6th company on our list of Biggest Snack Companies in the World.
stocktrademan
3 years ago
ADM buy 95.02
Peter Lynch, a legendary investor, once said to find great investing ideas "look in your refrigerator." If you bought it there is probably one or more good reasons why. Look at what you purchase that has been valuable and satisfactory.
Note the videos here are from long ago, markets change, and the companies and trends he is discussing are not current. However his rationale still is worthy of checking out. It worked for him and he emphasizes it is only a starting point for more research.
https://www.adm.com/
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/ADM/profile?p=ADM
https://www.barchart.com/stocks/quotes/ADM
https://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=ADM
https://www.stockconsultant.com/consultnow/basicplus.cgi?symbol=ADM
https://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?chart=ADM,uu[e,a]dhclyiay[uu][pb5!b10!b50!b100!b200!d20,2!h.02,.20!f][vb5!b20][iut!lv8!lk9!LE12,26,9!ll14!la6,13,5!la8,17,9!la12,26,9!uc14!ub14!ub6!lo!lp7,3!lh9,3!LI14,3!lxa!ld8!lq!lg14!lf14][j20444984,y]&r=3555b
https://www.barchart.com/etfs-funds/quotes/ADM/technical-chart?plot=CANDLE&volume=toADM&data=DO&density=X&pricesOn=1&asPctChange=0&logscale=1&indicators=TREND&sym=ADM&grid=1&height=500&studyheight=100&timeframe=2%20Months
normal chart
log chart
normal chart
log chart
Slashnuts
3 years ago
GERS Receives Contingency Offer To Restart Litigation Against Ethanol Industry...
This includes ADM's unlicensed use of GERS' oil extraction technology.
CleanTech subsequently received an opinion of counsel that its remaining seven of twelve corn oil extraction patents are clearly valid and enforceable, along with a contingency-based offer to restart the infringement litigation from scratch. We are evaluating our rights and remedies in connection with all applicable matters, and we are unable to characterize or evaluate the probability of any outcome at this time
Further, in connection with ongoing patent filings, the USPTO allowed CleanTech’s new corn oil extraction patents after considering the very information that the District Court found to have been withheld, and upon which the bulk of the District Court’s rulings were based. All of the information alleged to have been “knowingly withheld” from the USPTO in connection with the patents in suit was provided to and considered by the USPTO prior to issuance of several additional patents that are not covered by the District Court’s prior rulings (the “New Patents”). The USPTO subsequently disagreed that deception of any kind occurred when, on February 21, 2020, it issued another patent to us after reviewing the very evidence that was allegedly “withheld,” along with everything the defendants ever submitted and claimed, as well as the District Court’s 2014 and 2016 rulings – all in light of the facts that were never presented to a jury. Significantly, the new patent was allowed by the same examiner that the District Court said was deceived. In other words, the same patent examiner that was allegedly deceived looked at the purported evidence and claims of deception, and disagreed that she had ever been deceived. Thus, in issuing that patent, the examiner concluded that the inventive process was not “ready for patenting” in July 2003, that an invalidating “offer for sale” did not occur in July 2003, and that the “ready for patenting” and “offer for sale” information that the District Court determined to have been “deliberately withheld” from the USPTO was immaterial to patentability.
Slashnuts
11 years ago
GERS Sues Iowa Plant Owned by BG(Bunge)/ICM.
SIRE, a 110 MGY plant in Iowa (partly owned by BG and ICM) is now being brought to justice.
"SIRE raised $74 million in total equity with Bunge and ICM investing in the company... "
RFC Case Number: P-G13-21S
Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00021-JAJ-CFB
File Date: Monday, August 05, 2013
Plaintiff: GS CleanTech Corporation
Plaintiff Counsel: Gregory G Barntsen, Jacob C. Langeveld of Smith Peterson Law Firm, LLP
Andrew C. Ryan of Cantor Colburn, LLP
Defendant: Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy, LLC
Cause: 15:1126 Patent Infringement
Court: Iowa Southern District Court
Judge: Judge John A. Jarvey
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Celeste F. Bremer
http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/patent-lawsuits/iowa-southern-district-court/559228/gs-cleantech-corporation-v-southwest-iowa-renewable-energy-llc/summary/
The Aggressive Pursuit of Justice Through Patent Enforcement Rages On...
RFC Case Number: P-G13-4065L
Court Case Number: 5:13-cv-04065-MWB
File Date: Friday, July 19, 2013
Plaintiff: GS Cleantech Corporation
Plaintiff Counsel: Douglas L Phillips of Klass Law Firm, L.L.P.
Defendant: Little Sioux Corn Processors, LLLP
Cause: 35:145 Patent Infringement
Court: Iowa Northern District Court
Judge: Judge Mark W Bennett
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Leonard T Strand
RFC Case Number: P-G13-1387G
Court Case Number: 0:13-cv-01387-JNE-SER
File Date: Friday, June 07, 2013
Plaintiff: GS Cleantech Corporation
Plaintiff Counsel: Stephen J. Snyder, Craig A. Brandt of Snyder & Brandt PA
Defendant: Guardian Energy, LLC
Cause: 35:271 Patent Infringement
Court: Minnesota District Court
Judge: Judge Joan N. Ericksen
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau
RFC Case Number: P-G13-1042P
Court Case Number: 2:13-cv-01042-JAM-AC
File Date: Friday, May 24, 2013
Plaintiff: GS Cleantech Corporation
Plaintiff Counsel: Megan Alicia Lewis of Wilke Fleury Hoffelt Gould & Birney LLP
Daniel L. Egan, Megan Alicia Lewis, Steven J. Williamson of Wilke Fleury Hoffelt Gould & Birney LLP
Defendant: Pacific Ethanol, Inc.
Cause: 15:1126 Patent Infringement
Court: California Eastern District Court
Judge: Judge John A. Mendez
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Allison Claire
RFC Case Number: P-G13-724W
Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00724-WMS
File Date: Friday, July 12, 2013
Plaintiff: GS Cleantech Corporation
Plaintiff Counsel: Robert G. Scumaci, Melissa M. Morton of Gibson McAskill & Crosby LLP
Defendant: Western New York Energy, LLC
Cause: 28:1338 Patent Infringement
Court: New York Western District Court
Judge: Hon. William M. Skretny
GS Cleantech Corp. v. Western New York Energy, LLC
GS Cleantech recently filed another lawsuit, this one against Western New York Energy in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York on July 12, 2013.
The asserted patents are U.S. Patent Nos. 7,601,858, 8,008,516, and 8,283,484, each entitled “Method of processing ethanol byproducts and related subsystems,” and U.S. Patent No. 8,008,517, entitled “Method of recovering oil from thin stillage.” The patents relate to methods of recovering oil from byproducts of ethanol production using the process of dry milling, which creates a waste stream comprised of byproducts called whole stillage.
According to the complaint, Western New York uses infringing processes performed by ethanol production plants purchased from a plant designer called ICM. ICM was involved in prior litigation with GS.
GS has been on an aggressive patent enforcement campaign over the last several years. The multiple cases were consolidated in the Southern District of Indiana, where the asserted patents were construed and re-construed.
http://www.greenpatentblog.com/category/ip-litigation/
http://greenshift-gers.blogspot.com/
Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$!$!$
DewDiligence
13 years ago
I’m lukewarm on ADM and consider it a weak beneficiary of The Global Demographic Tailwind. ADM does not directly benefit from farmers’ imperative to increase yield per acre (the way such companies as MON and DE do), nor does ADM produce branded food products that are highly desired in emerging markets (the way HNZ, for instance, does). Thus, to exploit the ag component of TGDT, I would rather own such companies as MON, DE, and HNZ.
News
Market Data
Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
Monksdream
9 months ago
retired early
11 months ago
whytestocks
6 years ago
QUANTUM314
6 years ago
Cannabisprince
6 years ago
ValueInvestor15
8 years ago
$Pistol Pete$
9 years ago
Renee
11 years ago
Penny Roger$
13 years ago
TheFinalCD
13 years ago
thetechtrader
14 years ago
