Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.
See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,”
and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
If an emerging growth company, indicate by
check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial
accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s
common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant computed by reference to the price at which the common stock was last sold
on June 30, 2017 was $2,942,555.
Certain information included in this report
or in other materials we have filed or will file with the SEC (as well as information included in oral statements or other written
statements made or to be made by us) contains or may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You can identify these statements by
the fact that they do not relate to matters of strictly historical or factual nature and generally discuss or relate to estimates
or other expectations regarding future events. They contain words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,”
“project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “may,” “can,” “could,”
“might,” “should” and other words or phrases of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future
operating or financial performance. Such statements may include, but are not limited to, information related to: anticipated operating
results; consumer demand; financial resources and condition; changes in revenues; changes in profitability; changes in margins;
changes in accounting treatment; cost of revenues; selling, general and administrative expenses; interest expense; growth and expansion;
anticipated income or benefits to be realized from our investments in unconsolidated entities; the ability to produce the liquidity
and capital necessary to expand and take advantage of opportunities; legal proceedings and claims.
From time to time, forward-looking statements
also are included in other periodic reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K, in press releases, in presentations, on our website and in other
materials released to the public. Any or all of the forward-looking statements included in this report and in any other reports
or public statements made by us are not guarantees of future performance and may turn out to be inaccurate. This can occur as a
result of incorrect assumptions or as a consequence of known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Many factors mentioned in this
report or in other reports or public statements made by us, such as government regulation and the competitive environment, will
be important in determining our future performance. Consequently, actual results may differ materially from those that might be
anticipated from our forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of
the date they are made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The
following table sets forth the names and ages of officers and directors as of March 30, 2018. Our executive officers are elected
annually by our Board of Directors. Our executive officers hold their offices until they resign, are removed by the Board,
or a successor is elected and qualified.
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
Steve Berke
|
|
36
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Director
|
Adam Mutchler
|
|
38
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer and Director
|
William Berke
|
|
73
|
|
Chief Medical Officer and Director
|
Set forth below is a brief description of the background and business
experience of our executive officer and director for the past five years.
Steve Berke
was born and
raised in North Miami, Florida. He graduated from Yale University in 2003. Steve has been President and Chief Executive
Officer (“CEO”) of the Company since May 2014. From 2010 through his engagement with the Company, Steve was a
Sales Associate of Condonomics. Inc., a real estate company involved in sales and leasing of properties. In 2004, Mr. Berke
was invited to be one of 16 young entrepreneurs on a primetime FOX network television show with Virgin Group CEO, Sir Richard
Branson. Having learned the importance of branding and showmanship from his mentor Sir Richard, Mr. Berke began developing
his own brand by performing stand-up comedy and creating a YouTube channel, where he produced comedic videos - which now have
more than 30 million views.
In 2011, Mr. Berke ran for Mayor of Miami Beach
against a popular two-term incumbent – he came second out of four candidates, and won almost 30 percent of the votes cast
on Election Day. His unorthodox campaign utilized comedy and his YouTube channel as a vehicle to appeal to young and disenfranchised
voters. Mr. Berke’s campaign gained national attention and was featured in Maxim magazine, the New York Times, the Houston
Chronicle and the San Francisco Gate along with dozens of other publications from coast to coast. Two years later, Mr. Berke threw
his hat in the mayoral race once more – this time with MTV2 filming his every move for a fly-on-the-wall style documentary.
Adam
Mutchler
graduated from Yale University in 2002. Adam has been the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) of the Company since May 2014.
From 2012-2013, Adam was a Freelance Producer, Project Manager and Visual Effect Manger for the films “Eden” and “Burned”.
In 2012 and 2013, Adam was involved in Project Management for 5D organization. In 2011 and 2012, Adam was a Freelance Producer,
Line Producer ad VFX Film and Viral Content for Steve Berke Comedy, Ghost Team One and Sixth World. He produced the feature film
comedy Ghost Team One which sold to Paramount Pictures after premiering at the Slamdance Film Festival, and Eden, to be distributed
by Voltage Pictures. Past credits include Swimfan, The Station Agent, Serenity and Catch That Kid. Mr. Mutchler leverages his
abilities as a storyteller & filmmaker, his knack for viral content, his VFX & technical know-how, along with his ability
to build and lead world-class teams in all his projects and endeavors.
William Berke
is a licensed family
physician and has practiced medicine for more than 40 years. For 25 of those years, Dr. Berke served as a ring physician for
both amateur and professional boxing federations - which included a dozen world championship bouts. He was a volunteer
physician for the 1996 and 2000 Olympic Games, and also served on the Florida Governor’s Medical Advisory Committee. He is currently
a Senior Medical Examiner for the Federal Aviation Administration where he has served in that role since 1996.
Family Relationships
William Berke and Steve Berke are father and
son, respectively. There are no other family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.
Board Composition and Committees and Director
Independence
Our board of directors consists of 3 members:
Steve Berke, Adam Mutchler and William Berke. The directors will serve until our next annual meeting and until their successors
are duly elected and qualified. The Company defines “independent” as that term is defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the
NASDAQ listing standards.
In making the determination of whether a member of the board is independent, our board considers, among other
things, transactions and relationships between each director and his immediate family and the Company, including those reported
under the caption “Related Party Transactions”. The purpose of this review is to determine whether any such relationships
or transactions are material and, therefore, inconsistent with a determination that the directors are independent. On the basis
of such review and its understanding of such relationships and transactions, our board affirmatively determined that Steve Berke,
Adam Mutchler and William Berke are not qualified as independent directors.
Board Committees
Our Board of Directors has no separate committees
and our Board of Directors acts as the audit committee and the compensation committee. We do not have an audit committee
financial expert serving on our Board of Directors.
Term of Office
Our directors are appointed for a one-year
term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our
bylaws. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed by the board.
Certain Legal Proceedings
To the best of our knowledge, none of our directors
or executive officers has, during the past ten years:
|
●
|
been convicted in a criminal proceeding or been subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding
traffic violations and other minor offenses);
|
|
●
|
had any bankruptcy petition filed by or against the business or property of the person, or of any
partnership, corporation or business association of which he was a general partner or executive officer, either at the time of
the bankruptcy filing or within two years prior to that time;
|
|
●
|
been subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated,
of any court of competent jurisdiction or federal or state authority, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending
or otherwise limiting, his involvement in any type of business, securities, futures, commodities, investment, banking, savings
and loan, or insurance activities, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;
|
|
●
|
been found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission or the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed,
suspended, or vacated;
|
|
●
|
been the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment,
decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated (not including any settlement of a civil proceeding among private
litigants), relating to an alleged violation of any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation, any law or regulation
respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order
of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition
order, or any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or
|
|
●
|
been the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended
or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act), any registered entity (as
defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that
has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.
|
Except as set forth in our discussion below
in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,” none of our directors or executive officers has been involved
in any transactions with us or any of our directors, executive officers, affiliates or associates which are required to be disclosed
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance
The Company does not have a class of securities
registered under the Exchange Act and therefore its directors, executive officers, and any persons holding more than ten percent
of the Company’s common stock are not required to comply with Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
Code of Ethics
We have not adopted a code of ethics that applies
to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, or persons performing similar functions,
because of the small number of persons involved in the management of the Company.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth information
regarding compensation earned in or with respect to our fiscal year 2017 and 2016 by:
|
●
|
each person who served as our chief executive officer in 2017 and 2016; and
|
|
●
|
each person who served as our chief financial officer in 2017 and 2016.
|
We had no other executive officers during any
part of fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 or 2016.
Summary Compensation Table
Name and
Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
|
Bonus
($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Berke, Chief
|
|
2016
|
|
$
|
156,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
156,000
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
2017
|
|
$
|
156,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
156,000
|
|
Adam Mutchler, Chief
|
|
2016
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
47,873
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
112,873
|
|
Financial Officer
|
|
2017
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,222
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
87,222
|
|
Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Additional
Narrative Disclosure
Employment Agreements
On November 1, 2014, the Company entered into
employment agreements with Lee Molloy, Adam Mutchler, Stian Roenning (Marketing Officer) and Angie Hargot (Marketing Officer, together,
the “Employees”). Pursuant to each agreement, in addition to a salary, each Employee would be entitled to receive (1)
a stock award on June 1, 2015, June 1, 2016 and June 1, 2017 and (2) a stock option to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share vesting on July 1, 2015. Prior to the delivery of any stock award or stock
option, these agreements were cancelled and replaced with the employment agreements discussed below.
On April 9, 2015,
the Company entered into an employment agreement with Adam Mutchler for a period of three years. Pursuant to the terms of the employment
agreement, Mr. Mutchler shall receive an annual salary of $65,000 payable every two weeks. On July 1, 2015, he shall be entitled
to purchase 60,000 shares of the Company at an exercise price of $0.001 per share and 50,000 shares of the Company at an exercise
price of $0.50 per share. He is also entitled to 100,000 shares of the Company at an exercise price of $0.001 per share and 50,000
shares of the Company at an exercise price of $0.50 per share on July 1, 2016. On July 1, 2017, Mr. Mutchler is entitled to 150,000
shares of the Company at an exercise price of $0.001 per share and 50,000 shares of the Company at an exercise price of $0.50 per
share. All options shall be exercisable for two years from the date of issuance and Mr. Mutchler must continue to be employed by
the Company in order to be eligible to receive stock options.
On April 9, 2015,
the Company entered into an employment agreement with Lee Molloy for a period of three years. Pursuant to the terms of the employment
agreement, Mr. Molloy shall receive an annual salary of $45,000 payable every two weeks. On June 2, 2015, he shall be entitled
to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company at an exercise price of $0.001 per share and 50,000 shares of the Company at an exercise
price of $0.50 per share. He is also entitled to 100,000 shares of the Company at an exercise price of $0.001 per share and 50,000
shares of the Company at an exercise price of $0.50 per share on June 2, 2016. On June 2, 2017, Mr. Molloy is entitled to 150,000
shares of the Company at an exercise price of $0.001 per share and 50,000 shares of the Company at an exercise price of $0.50 per
share. All options shall be exercisable for two years from the date of issuance and Mr. Molloy must continue to be employed by
the Company in order to be eligible to receive stock options.
Outstanding Equity Awards as of December 31,
2017
The following table provides information as
of December 31, 2017 regarding unexercised stock options and restricted stock outstanding held by Messrs. Berke and Mutchler.
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
|
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|
|
Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
|
|
|
Market
Value
of
Shares
or
Units
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adam Mutchler
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
0.001
|
|
|
|
07/01/18
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Adam Mutchler
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
0.001
|
|
|
|
07/01/19
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Adam Mutchler
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
07/01/18
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Adam Mutchler
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
07/01/19
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners And
Management
The
following table sets forth certain information as of March 30, 2018 with respect to the holdings of: (1) each person known to
us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock; (2) each of our directors and named executive officers; and
(3) all directors and executive officers as a group. To the best of our knowledge, each of the persons named in the table below
as beneficially owning the shares set forth therein has sole voting power and sole investment power with respect to such shares,
unless otherwise indicated. Unless otherwise specified, the address of each of the persons set forth below is in care of the Company.
The
following table is based upon 23,598,480 shares outstanding as of March 30, 2018:
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned (#)
|
|
|
Percent of
Outstanding
Shares (%)
|
|
Named Executive Officers
and Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Berke, Chief Executive Officer, President
and Director (1)
|
|
|
12,322,434
|
|
|
|
52.15
|
|
Adam Mutchler, Chief Financial Officer and Director
(2)
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
1.46
|
|
William Berke, Director (3)
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
1.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officers and Directors as a group
(3 persons)
|
|
|
12,922,434
|
|
|
|
53.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% or greater stockholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Holdings (4)
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
|
14.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Labs (5)
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
2.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zenith Equity Holdings (6)
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
12.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bulldog Capital, LLC (7)
|
|
|
3,857,105
|
|
|
|
15.12
|
|
|
(1)
|
Including (i) 12,292,434 shares of Common Stock and (ii) an aggregate of 30,000 shares of Common
Stock issuable upon the exercise of the warrants held by such holder.
|
|
(2)
|
Including (i) an aggregate of 350,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of the
options held by such holder.
|
|
(3)
|
William Berke is
the father of Steve Berke.
|
|
(4)
|
Michael D. Farkas
has investing
and dispositive power of shares beneficially owned by
Balance Holdings.
|
|
(5)
|
Michael D. Farkas
has investing
and dispositive power of shares beneficially owned by
Balance Labs.
|
|
(6)
|
Michael I. Bernstein
has investing
and dispositive power of shares beneficially owned by
Zenith Equity Holdings.
|
|
(7)
|
Including
an aggregate of 1,909,198 shares of Common Stock upon the conversion of notes held by such holder. Alam Berke, the mother of Steve
Berke, has investing and dispositive power of shares beneficially owned by Bulldog Capital, LLC
|
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The Company does not currently have an equity
compensation plan in place.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and
Director Independence
On August 22, 2014, the Company entered into
an agreement to issue an unsecured convertible promissory note for $500,000 and security purchase agreement for 1,000,000 shares
of common stock for $350,000 ($0.35 per share), respectively with a related party. The note bears interest at an annual rate of
10% and is payable on or before 12 months from the date of issuance. The Company issued the holder a total of 1,500,000 warrants
exercisable at a cashless conversion price of $.35 for a period of 5 years. In addition, the note may be converted at any time,
at the option of the holder, into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.35 per share, subject
to adjustment.
The outstanding principal balance on the note at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $500,000. Accrued and unpaid
interest on the note at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $168,219 and $118,219, respectively. The Company is currently in default
of the note, making the entire unpaid principal and interest due and payable. See Note 6 to the accompanying consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this document. The note was purchased from the original investor by a company controlled
by our CEO’s mother, Alam Berke during 2017.
On October 1, 2015, the Company entered into
a property lease agreement with a Director of the Company and father of the President. The term of the lease is for one year with
an annual rent of $30,000 per year. The Company at its option had the right to extend for 9 additional years. On July 1, 2016,
the lease was cancelled and the Company entered into a new lease agreement (see below). As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company
accrued rent of $22,500 and $22,500, respectively under the lease agreement and is included in due to related party at December
31, 2017 and 2016. Rent expense under the lease for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $0 and $15,000, respectively.
On
July 1, 2016, the Company entered into a property lease agreement with a Director of the Company and father of the President.
The term of the lease is for one year with an annual rent of $30,000 per year. The Company at it option has the right to extend
for 10 additional years. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company accrued rent of $45,000 and $15,000, respectively, under
the lease agreement and is included in due to related party at December 31, 2017 and 2016. Rent expense under the lease for year
ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $30,000 and $15,000, respectively.
On January 29, 2016, the Company’s President
loaned the Company $30,000 pursuant to a convertible debenture. The Loan bears interest at 10% per annum, is due on January 29,
2017 and is convertible into common stock at the discretion of the holder. In addition, the Company agreed to issue 30,000 warrants
that expire January 29, 2021. In addition, the note may be converted at any time, at the option of the holder, into shares of the
Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.35 per share, subject to adjustment. The Company recorded a debt discount
of $10,500 for the value of the warrants received. As of December 31, 2017, the Company amortized $10,500 and accrued interest
of $1,911, respectively and fully paid off the note principal. See Note 6 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this document.
In February, 2016, the Company’s President
advanced the Company an additional $7,500. These amounts were repaid as of December 31, 2017.
Prior
to July 1, 2016, the Company leased office space on a month to month basis from the Company president. The monthly rental payment
was $2,000 per month. No formal lease existed under the agreement. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company
recorded rent expense of $0 and $12,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company accrued rent of $10,000 and
$28,000, respectively, and is included in due to related party at December 31, 2017 and 2016.
As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016,
the Company owed its President accrued salary of $344,000 and $188,000, respectively.
On December 6, 2016, the Company made a pre-payment of $10,000 to a non-profit church (the “Church”),
for usage of the Church’s facilities on April 20, 2017. The Company’s CEO and director Steve Berke, CFO and director
Adam Mutchler, Chief Marketing Officer Lee Molloy along with William Berke, director and Alam Berke, the parents of Steve Berke,
are members of the board of directors of the Church. In addition, the Church’s facilities are housed in a property owned
by a Company controlled by Steve Berke and William and Alam Berke.
On March 20, 2017, the Company
entered into an agreement with the Church to provide social media services. The agreement is for two years, starting April 1, 2017,
and the Company will be compensated $10,000 monthly along with compensation based on online views and impressions (the “performance
based compensation”) calculated at a cost per thousand (“CPM”) of $10, to be calculated and paid by the Church
on a monthly basis. The CPM rate can be modified by the Company, at its sole discretion, every ninety days to reflect prevailing
market rates. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded revenue of $118,281 related to the agreement which
included performance based compensation of $28,281. These sales are included in advertising sales – related party in the
consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2017, the Company is reflecting an accounts receivable balance
due from the Church of $88,281 and is shown separately on the consolidated balance sheets.
On August 23, 2017, the Company sold, under a Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”), 150,000 shares
of common stock, and a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $0.35 per
share for a purchase price of $150,000 to a company controlled by our CEO’s mother, Alam Berke.
Director Independence
We do not have any
independent directors. Because our common stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange, we have used the definition
of “independence” of The NASDAQ Stock Market to make this determination. NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2) provides that
an “independent director” is a person other than an officer or employee of the company or any other individual having
a relationship which, in the opinion of the Company’s Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent
judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The NASDAQ listing rules provide that a director cannot be considered
independent if:
|
●
|
the director is, or at any time during the past three years was, an employee of the company;
|
|
●
|
the director or a family member of the director accepted any compensation from the company in excess
of $120,000 during any period of 12 consecutive months within the three years preceding the independence determination (subject
to certain exclusions, including, among other things, compensation for board or board committee service);
|
|
●
|
a family member of the director is, or at any time during the past three years was, an executive
officer of the company;
|
|
●
|
the director or a family member of the director is a partner in, controlling stockholder of, or
an executive officer of an entity to which the company made, or from which the company received, payments in the current or any
of the past three fiscal years that exceed 5% of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenue for that year or $200,000, whichever
is greater (subject to certain exclusions);
|
|
●
|
the director or a family member of the director is employed as an executive officer of an entity
where, at any time during the past three years, any of the executive officers of the company served on the compensation committee
of such other entity; or
|
|
●
|
the director or a family member of the director is a current partner of the company’s outside
auditor, or at any time during the past three years was a partner or employee of the company’s outside auditor, and who worked
on the company’s audit.
|
We do not currently have a separately designated
audit, nominating or compensation committee.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
For the fiscal years ended December 31,
2017 and 2016, fees for audit and audit related services were as follows:
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
$
|
34,381
|
|
|
$
|
43,588
|
|
Audit Related Fees
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
$
|
35,881
|
|
|
$
|
44,588
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.
The full Board of Directors pre-approves all
audit and non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with the rules
and regulations promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Board of Directors pre-approved
100% of the audit and audit-related services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm in the past fiscal
year.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016
NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION, NATURE OF BUSINESS
AND GOING CONCERN
(A) Organization
Bang Holdings Corp. was
incorporated in the State of Colorado on May 13, 2014. The Company was organized to develop and sell E-Cigarette products.
Bang Vapor, Inc. was incorporated
in the State of Florida on October 27, 2014. The Company was organized to develop and sell E-Cigarette products. Bang Vapor, Inc.
was dissolved in June 2017.
Bang Digital Media, Inc.
was incorporated in the State of Florida on November 23, 2015. The Company was organized to develop digital and electronic media.
Bang
Technologies, Inc. was incorporated in the State of Colorado on March 27, 2018. Bang Technologies will focus on investing in the
research and development of artificial intelligence (A.I.) — specifically with regards to its implementation within the
cannabis industry.
(B) Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated
financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
(C) Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of Bang Holdings Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiaries Bang Vapor, Inc. (from October
27, 2014 through June 7, 2017) and Bang Digital Media, Inc. (from November 23, 2015) and are hereafter referred to as (the “Company’).
All intercompany accounts have been eliminated in the consolidation.
(D) Going Concern and Management’s
Liquidity Plans
The Company has generated
minimal revenues since inception and continues to incur recurring losses from operations and has an accumulated deficit. Accordingly,
the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.
The Company has incurred a net loss of approximately $695,000 and net cash used in operations of approximately $315,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2017. In addition, the Company has notes payable in default (see Notes 5 & 6). These conditions indicate
that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year from the issuance date
of the consolidated financial statements.
The Company’s primary source
of operating funds since inception has been cash proceeds from the sale of common stock and common stock warrants, convertible
debentures, notes payable and exercise of common stock warrants. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent
upon its ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds
by way of a public or private offering.
The Company requires immediate
capital to remain viable. The Company can give no assurance that such financing will be available on terms advantageous to the
Company, or at all. Should the Company not be successful in obtaining the necessary financing to fund its operations, the Company
would need to curtail certain or all of its operational activities. There can be no assurance that such a plan will be successful.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be
unable to continue as a going concern.
Accordingly, the accompanying
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP, which contemplates continuation of the Company
as a going concern and the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities presented in the consolidated financial statements do not necessarily purport to represent realizable
or settlement values. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustment that might result from the outcome of
this uncertainty.
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
(A) Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all
highly liquid temporary cash instruments with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
(B) Use of Estimates in Financial Statements
The
presentation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates
during the period covered by these financial statements include the valuation of website costs, allowance for doubtful accounts,
valuation of deferred tax asset, stock based compensation and beneficial conversion features on convertible debt.
(C) Fair value measurements and Fair
value of Financial Instruments
The Company adopted FASB
ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. ASC Topic 820 clarifies the definition of fair value, prescribes methods for measuring
fair value, and establishes a fair value hierarchy to classify the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1-Inputs are unadjusted
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities available at the measurement date.
Level 2-Inputs are unadjusted
quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities
in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs derived from or corroborated by
observable market data.
Level 3-Inputs are unobservable
inputs which reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions on what assumptions the market participants would use in pricing
the asset or liability based on the best available information.
The Company did not identify
any assets or liabilities that are required to be presented on the balance sheets at fair value in accordance with ASC Topic 820.
Due to the short-term nature
of all financial assets and liabilities, their carrying value approximates their fair value as of the balance sheet dates.
(D) Computer and Equipment and Website
Costs
Computer Equipment and
Website Costs are capitalized at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated by using the straight-line method
over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which is three to five years for all categories. Repairs and maintenance are charged
to expense as incurred. Expenditures for betterments and renewals are capitalized. The cost of computer equipment and the related
accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts upon retirement or disposal with any resulting gain or loss being recorded
in operations.
Software maintenance costs
are charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures for enhanced functionality are capitalized.
The Company has adopted
the provisions of ASC 350-50-15, “Accounting for Web Site Development Costs.” Costs inured in the planning stage of
a website are expensed as research and development while costs incurred in the development stage are capitalized and amortized
over the life of the asset, estimated to be three years.
|
|
Depreciation/
|
|
|
Amortization
|
Asset Category
|
|
Period
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
5 Years
|
Computer equipment
|
|
3 Years
|
Website costs
|
|
3 Years
|
Computer and equipment
and website costs consisted of the following:
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
$
|
11,745
|
|
|
$
|
6,845
|
|
Website development
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
11,745
|
|
|
|
6,845
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(5,157
|
)
|
|
|
(2,789
|
)
|
Balance
|
|
$
|
6,588
|
|
|
$
|
4,056
|
|
Depreciation expense for
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $2,368 and $1,369, respectively.
(E) Inventories
The
Company’s inventories consisted entirely of purchased finished goods. Inventories are stated at lower of cost or market.
Cost is determined on the first-in, first-out basis. The Company wrote down inventory to net realizable value as of December 31,
2016 and recorded an inventory valuation allowance of $72,332 and a loss on write-off of inventory of $72,332 for the year ended
December 31, 2016 in the consolidated statements of operations. In July 2017, the inventory was sold for $15,000 to a third party.
The Company had no inventory as of December 31, 2017.
(F) Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes
revenue on arrangements in accordance with FASB ASC Topic. 605 “Revenue Recognition”. In all cases, revenue is
recognized only when the price is fixed and determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is performed
and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. The Company recognizes revenue when the products are shipped
to the customers and collectability is reasonable assured.
The Company recognizes
revenue from advertising transactions when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, services have been performed, the sales
price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.
(G)Accounts Receivable and Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts
receivable are stated at the amount management expects to collect from outstanding balances. The Company generally does not require
collateral to support customer receivables. The Company determines if receivables are past due based on days outstanding, and
amounts are written off when determined to be uncollectible by management.
(H) Significant Customers
The Company’s business
focuses on securing a smaller number of high quality, highly profitable projects, which sometimes results in having a concentration
of sales and accounts receivable among a few customers. This concentration is customary among the design and build industry for
a company of our size. As we continue to grow and are awarded more projects, this concentration will continue to decrease.
At December 31, 2017 the Company had two customers representing 92%, a related party (See Note 10), and 8%
of the total accounts receivable balance.
At December 31, 2016, the
Company had no accounts receivable balance.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company had two customers that represented 72%, a related party
(See Note 10), and 25% of the total advertising revenue and for the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company had one customer
that represented 100% of the total revenue.
(I) Advertising, Marketing and Promotion Costs
Advertising, marketing
and promotion expenses are expensed as incurred and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses on the accompanying
statement of operations. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, advertising, marketing and promotion expense was $50,372
and $48,440, respectively.
(J) Segments
The Company operates in
one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.
(K) Loss Per Share
The basic loss per share
is calculated by dividing the Company’s net loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common
shares during the period. The diluted loss per share is calculated by dividing the Company’s net loss by the diluted weighted
average number of shares outstanding during the period. The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding is the basic
weighted number of shares adjusted for any potentially dilutive debt or equity. The Company had 1,769,107 shares issuable upon
the exercise of options and warrants and 1,974,931 shares issuable upon conversion of convertible notes payable that were not included
in the computation of dilutive loss per share because their inclusion is anti-dilutive for year ended December 31, 2017. The Company
had 2,029,107 shares issuable upon the exercise of options and warrants and 1,826,407 shares issuable upon conversion of convertible
notes payable that were not included in the computation of dilutive loss per share because their inclusion is anti-dilutive for
year ended December 31, 2016.
(L) Stock-Based Compensation
The Company recognizes
compensation costs to employees under FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. Under FASB ASC Topic. 718,
companies are required to measure the compensation costs of share-based compensation arrangements based on the grant-date fair
value and recognize the costs in the financial statements over the period during which employees are required to provide services.
Share based compensation arrangements include stock options, restricted share plans, performance based awards, share appreciation
rights and employee share purchase plans. As such, compensation cost is measured on the date of grant at their fair value. Such
compensation amounts, if any, are amortized over the respective vesting periods of the option grant.
Equity instruments issued
to other than employees are recorded on the basis of the fair value of the instruments, as required by FASB ASC Topic 505, Equity
Based Payments to Non-Employees. In general, the measurement date is when either a (a) performance commitment, as defined, is reached
or (b) the earlier of (i) the non-employee performance is complete or (ii) the instruments are vested. The measured value related
to the instruments is recognized over a period based on the facts and circumstances of each particular grant as defined in the
FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
(M) Income Taxes
The Company accounts for
income taxes pursuant to the provision of ASC 740-10, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“ASC 740-10”), which
requires, among other things, an asset and liability approach to calculating deferred income taxes. The asset and liability approach
requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is provided to offset any net deferred
tax assets for which management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred asset will not be realized.
The Company follows the
provision of ASC 740-10 related to Accounting for Uncertain Income Tax Positions. When tax returns are filed, there may be uncertainty
about the merits of positions taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. In accordance with the guidance
of ASC 740-10, the benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all
available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including
the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions.
Tax positions that meet
the more likely than not recognition threshold are measured at the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely
of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefit associated with tax positions
taken that exceed the amount measured as described above should be reflected as a liability for uncertain tax benefits in the accompanying
balance sheet along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination.
The Company believes its tax positions are all more likely than not to be upheld upon examination. As such, the Company has not
recorded a liability for uncertain tax benefits.
The Company has adopted
ASC 740-10-25, “Definition of Settlement”, which provides guidance on how an entity should determine whether a tax
position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits and provides that a tax position
can be effectively settled upon the completion and examination by a taxing authority without being legally extinguished. For tax
positions considered effectively settled, an entity would recognize the full amount of tax benefit, even if the tax position is
not considered more likely than not to be sustained based solely on the basis of its technical merits and the statute of limitations
remains open. The federal and state income tax returns of the Company are subject to examination by the IRS and state taxing authorities,
generally for three years after they are filed.
In December 2017, the Tax
Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was signed into law. The Tax Act makes changes to U.S. tax law, including a reduction
in the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. As a result of the enacted law, the Company was required to revalue deferred tax assets
and liabilities at the enacted rate. The revaluation resulted in a $313,614 reduction in the Company’s net deferred tax asset.
Due to the timing of the enactment and the complexity involved in applying the provisions of the Tax Act, the Company has made
reasonable estimates of the effects in its consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2017. As the Company collects and
prepares necessary data and interprets the Tax Act and any additional guidance issued by the U.S. Treasury Department, the IRS,
the SEC, and other standard-setting bodies, it may make adjustments to the provisional amounts. The accounting for the tax effects
of the Tax Act will be completed in 2018.
The Company’s income tax expense differs
from the “expected” tax expense for federal income tax purpose by applying the Federal & State blended rate of
37.63% as follows:
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Expected income tax (benefit) expense at the statutory rate of 37.63%
|
|
$
|
(261,352
|
)
|
|
$
|
(447,667
|
)
|
Tax effect of expenses that are not deductible for income tax purposes (net of other amounts deductible for tax purposes)
|
|
|
73,990
|
|
|
|
145,015
|
|
Tax rate change
|
|
|
310,140
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Deferred tax true-up
|
|
|
1,731
|
|
|
|
21,260
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(124,509
|
)
|
|
|
281,392
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
The components of deferred income taxes are as follows:
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Deferred income tax asset:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,154
|
|
Inventory valuation allowance
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
27,219
|
|
Accrued payroll and related expenses - officer
|
|
|
92,596
|
|
|
|
75,106
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
547,248
|
|
|
|
659,874
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(639,844
|
)
|
|
|
(764,353
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
As of December 31, 2017, the Company has a net operating loss carry forward of approximately $2.2 million,
and a deferred tax asset related to the timing difference on accrued officer payroll of $365,342 available to offset future taxable
income. This results in deferred tax assets of approximately $640,000 as of December 31, 2017. The valuation allowance decreased
during the year ended December 31, 2017 by approximately $125,000. Tax returns for the year ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017
remain open to Internal Revenue Service and State audits.
(N) Shipping and Handling Costs
The Company includes shipping
and handling fees billed to customers as revenue and shipping and handling costs to customers as cost of revenue.
(O) Reclassifications
Certain items in the prior
year financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
(P) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2014, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-15,
Presentation of Financial
Statements-Going Concern.
The Update provides U.S. GAAP guidance on management’s responsibility in evaluating
whether there is substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern and about related footnote
disclosures. For each reporting period, management will be required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events that
raise substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year from the date the
financial statements are issued. This Accounting Standards Update is the final version of Proposed Accounting Standards
Update 2013-300-Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Going
Concern Presumption, which has been deleted. The amendments in this update are effective for the annual period ending
after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. We adopted the provisions of ASU 2014-15
on January 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2014-15 did not materially impact our consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In March 2016, the FASB
issued ASU No. 2016-06, “Derivatives and Hedging” (topic 815). The FASB issued this update to clarify the requirements
for assessing whether contingent call (put) options that can accelerate the payment of principal on debt instruments are clearly
and closely related to their debt hosts. An entity performing the assessment under the amendments in this update is required to
assess the embedded call (put) options solely in accordance with the four-step decision sequence. The updated guidance is effective
for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the
update is permitted. We adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-06 on January 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2016-06 did not materially
impact our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In July 2017, the FASB
issued ASU 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480) and Derivatives and Hedging
(Topic 815): I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features; II. Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral
for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling
Interests with a Scope Exception. Part I of this update addresses the complexity of accounting for certain financial instruments
with down round features. Down round features are features of certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that result
in the strike price being reduced on the basis of the pricing of future equity offerings. Current accounting guidance creates cost
and complexity for entities that issue financial instruments (such as warrants and convertible instruments) with down round features
that require fair value measurement of the entire instrument or conversion option. Part II of this update addresses the difficulty
of navigating Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, because of the existence of extensive pending content in the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification. This pending content is the result of the indefinite deferral of accounting requirements about
mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of certain nonpublic entities and certain mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests.
The amendments in Part II of this update do not have an accounting effect. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company early adopted this ASU on October 1, 2017, and expects
that the adoption of this ASU will not have a material impact on future consolidated financial statements.
Other recent accounting
pronouncements issued by FASB (including the Emerging Issues Task Force), the AICPA and the SEC, did not or are not believed by
the Company management, to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements.
NOTE 3 – PREPAID EXPENSES
On November 12, 2015, the
Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $50,000 for a consulting agreement expiring on February 1, 2016.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company expensed $19,753 related to the above common stock issuance. The balance in prepaid
expenses related to the above common stock issuance was $0 as of December 31, 2016.
On December 6, 2016, the Company made a pre-payment of $10,000 to a non-profit church (the “Church”),
a related party, for usage of the Church’s facilities on April 20, 2017. (See Note 10). The balance in prepaid expenses related
to the above pre-payment was $0 and $10,000 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
NOTE 4 – LOAN PAYABLE
The Company entered in
an agreement with a third party for a loan for gross proceeds of $6,500. The loan is non-interest bearing and matured in April
2017. The outstanding principal balance on the loan at December 31, 2017 was $6,500.
NOTE 5 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
On July 25, 2016, the Company
entered into an agreement for the issuance of a convertible note to a third party lender for $50,000. The note accrues interest
at 10% per annum maturing on July 25, 2017 and is convertible into common stock at the discretion of the holder at a conversion
price of $1.50 per share, subject to adjustment. The outstanding principal balance on the note at December 31, 2017 and December
31, 2016 was $50,000. Accrued and unpaid interest on the note at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $8,934 and $2,192,
respectively. The note is currently in default.
On July 29, 2016, the Company
entered in an agreement with a third party for a convertible promissory note for gross proceeds of $10,000. The note bears interest
at 10% per annum, is due on July 29, 2017 and is convertible into common stock at the discretion of the holder at a conversion
price of $1.50 per share, subject to adjustment. The outstanding principal balance on the note at December 31, 2017 and December
31, 2016 was $10,000. Accrued and unpaid interest on the note at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $1,767 and $427, respectively. The
note is currently in default.
On October 10, 2016, the
Company entered in an agreement with a third party for a convertible promissory note for gross proceeds of $25,000. The note bears
interest at 10% per annum, is due on October 10, 2017 and is convertible into common stock at the discretion of the holder at a
conversion price of $1.50 per share, subject to adjustment. The outstanding principal balance on the note at December 31, 2017
and December 31, 2016 was $25,000. Accrued and unpaid interest on the note at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $3,519
and $569, respectively. The Company may prepay the note in cash in full according to the following schedule:
0-180 days: 117.5% of principal
amount
180-270 days: 115.0% of
principal amount
270-360 days: 112.5% of
principal amount
The note is currently in default.
NOTE 6 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE – RELATED PARTIES
On August 22, 2014, the
Company entered into an agreement to issue an unsecured convertible promissory note for $500,000 and security purchase agreement
for 1,000,000 shares of common stock for $350,000 ($0.35 per share), respectively with a related party. The note bears interest
at an annual rate of 10% and is payable on or before 12 months from the date of issuance. The Company issued the holder a total
of 1,500,000 warrants exercisable at a cashless conversion price of $.35 for a period of 5 years. In addition, the note may be
converted at any time, at the option of the holder, into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.35
per share, subject to adjustment.
The outstanding principal balance on the note at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $500,000. Accrued and unpaid
interest on the note at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $168,219 and $118,219, respectively. The Company is currently in default
of the note, making the entire unpaid principal and interest due and payable. The note was purchased from the original investor
by a company controlled by our CEO’s mother, Alam Berke during 2017.
On January 29, 2016, the
Company’s President loaned the Company $30,000 pursuant to a convertible debenture. The Loan bears interest at 10% per annum,
became due on January 29, 2017 and is convertible into common stock at the discretion of the holder at a conversion price of $2.00
per share, subject to adjustment. Pursuant to the note agreement, for a period of one year following the Initial Closing Date,
the Company shall agree to or not issue any Common Stock or securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of Common Stock
(or modify any of the foregoing which may be outstanding) to any person or entity at a price per share or conversion or exercise
price per share which shall be less than the conversion price in effect at such time without the consent of the purchaser, then
the conversion price shall be reduced to such lower price. Under ASC 815-40-15, the Company is required to account for convertible
debt with reset provisions when the following three items are present (1) one or more underlying amounts or payments are required
(2) no initial net investment or an initial net investment that is smaller than would be required for other types of contracts
(3) its terms require or permit net settlement, it can be readily settled net by means outside the contract or it provides for
delivery of an asset that puts the recipient in a position not substantially different from the net settlement. ASC 815-40-15 further
defines the requirement that the assets are readily convertible to cash. During 2016, due to the lack of a public market for the
Company’s securities, the Company determined that the convertible notes payable were not readily convertible to cash and
therefore no derivative liability was recorded.
In addition, the Company
agreed to issue 30,000 warrants with an exercise price of $1.50 per share that expire on January 29, 2021. The Company recorded
a debt discount of $10,500 for the value of the warrants received. As of December 31, 2016, the debt discount on the note was fully
amortized. Amortization of the debt discount on the note for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $10,500.
During the year ended December
31, 2016, the note principal was repaid. Accrued and unpaid interest on the note at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $1,911.
NOTE 7 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
On April 9, 2015, the Company
entered into an employment agreement with an employee. The agreement is for a period of three years, provides for an annual base
salary totaling $45,000. In addition the employee is to be issued stock options as follows:
|
●
|
On June 2, 2015, the Employee shall
receive stock options to purchase 100,000 shares of Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share,
and 50,000 shares of Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share.
|
|
●
|
On June 2, 2016, the Employee shall
receive stock options to purchase 100,000 shares of Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share,
and 50,000 shares of the Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share.
|
|
●
|
On June 2, 2017, the Employee shall receive
stock option to purchase 150,000 shares of the Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share, and 50,000
shares of Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share.
|
On April 9, 2015, the Company
entered into an employment agreement with an employee. The agreement is for a period of three years, provides for an annual base
salary totaling $65,000. In addition the employee is to be issued stock options as follows:
|
●
|
On July 1, 2015, the Employee shall
receive stock options to purchase 60,000 shares of Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share, and
50,000 shares of Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share.
|
|
●
|
On July 1, 2016, the Employee shall
receive stock options to purchase 100,000 shares of Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share,
and 50,000 shares of the Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share.
|
|
●
|
On July 1, 2017, the Employee shall receive
stock option to purchase 150,000 shares of the Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share, and 50,000
shares of Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share.
|
On April 9, 2015, the Company
entered into an employment agreement with an employee. The agreement is for a period of three years, provides for an annual base
salary totaling $50,000. In addition the employee is to be issued stock options as follows:
|
●
|
On July 1, 2015, the Employee shall
receive stock options to purchase 50,000 shares of Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share, and
50,000 shares of Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share.
|
|
●
|
On July 1, 2016, the Employee shall
receive stock options to purchase 100,000 shares of Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share,
and 50,000 shares of the Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share.
|
|
●
|
On July 1, 2017, the Employee shall receive
stock option to purchase 150,000 shares of the Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share, and 50,000
shares of Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share.
|
The employee left the Company
in February of 2016. As a result, 350,000 unvested stock options were cancelled as per the terms of the employment agreement.
On September 1, 2015, the
Company entered into an employment agreement with an employee. The agreement is for a period of three years, provides for an annual
base salary totaling $25,000. In addition the employee is to be issued stock options as follows:
|
●
|
On February 2, 2016, the Employee
shall receive stock options to purchase 50,000 shares of Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share,
and 50,000 shares of Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share.
|
|
●
|
On February 2, 2017, the Employee
shall receive stock options to purchase 50,000 shares of Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share,
and 50,000 shares of the Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share.
|
|
●
|
On February 2, 2018, the Employee
shall receive stock option to purchase 50,000 shares of the Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per
share, and 50,000 shares of Bang Holdings Corp. common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share.
|
On September 9, 2015, the
Company agreed to issue 10,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $5,000 ($0.50 per share) the fair value on the date
of issuance to a consultant for media relations. The Company agreed to issue an additional 10,000 shares of common stock with a
fair value of $5,000 ($0.50 per share) the fair value on the date of issuance on the 18 month anniversary of the agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 the Company has expensed $3,333 and $4,444, respectively.
On November 12, 2015, the
Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $50,000 for a consulting agreement expiring on February 1, 2016.
During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 the Company has expensed $0 and $19,753, respectively.
On April 5, 2016 the Company
entered into a consulting agreement for investor relation services for a monthly retainer of $5,000 per month for the first three
months and $7,500 per month thereafter in addition the Company agreed to issue 75,000 shares of common stock payable 15,000 shares
due within 10 days and 6,000 shares per month for 10 months commencing on the 3-month anniversary of this agreement. These terms
are for a twelve month (12) period and either party may terminate this agreement with a 14-day written notice. On October 10, 2016,
the agreement was amended, removing the monthly cash retainer fee. As per the terms of the amendment, the Company will issue the
consultant 6,000 shares of common stock on a monthly basis for the remaining term of the agreement. The Company recorded compensation
expense relating to the equity portion of the agreement of $36,000 and $69,000 during years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
NOTE 8 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
The Company is authorized
to issue 500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001, and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001.
During the year ended December
31, 2016, the Company issued 308,971 shares for the receipt of gross proceeds of $379,956.
During the year ended December
31, 2016, the Company issued 3,000 shares for the settlement of an outstanding payable of $1,500.
During the year ended December
31, 2016, a related party converted 600,179 warrants into 600,179 shares of common stock and the Company received proceeds of $210,000.
During the year ended December
31, 2016, the Company issued 112,058 shares of common stock and recorded stock-based compensation with a fair value of $132,279
which is included in total stock-based compensation.
On August 23, 2017, the Company sold, under a Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”), 150,000 shares
of common stock, and a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $0.35 per
share for a purchase price of $150,000 to a related party. See Note 10.
During the year ended December
31, 2017, the Company issued 105,908 shares of common stock and recorded stock-based compensation with a fair value of $114,102
which is included in total stock-based compensation.
NOTE 9 – OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
The Company uses the Black-Scholes
option pricing model to determine the fair value of options granted.
The following tables summarize
all options grants to employees for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and the related changes during the years are presented
below.
|
|
Number of Options
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
1,710,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
|
(350,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
1,360,000
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
|
(360,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2017
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
Price Range
|
|
|
Number
Outstanding at
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Number
Exercisable at
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
$.001 - $0.50
|
|
|
|
1,00,000
|
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
During the year ended December
31, 2017, the Company recorded total option expense of $79,829. As of December 31, 2017, the Company has $8,621 in stock-based
compensation related to stock options that is yet to be vested. The intrinsic value of the vested stock options at December 31,
2017 was $96,600, calculated based on the fair value of the Company’s common stock at December 31, 2017.
During the year ended December
31, 2016, the Company recorded total option expense of $194,482. As of December 31, 2016, the Company has $88,449 in stock-based
compensation related to stock options that is yet to be vested. The intrinsic value of the vested stock options at December 31,
2016 was $1,154,530.
The following tables summarize
all warrant grants during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and the related changes during the years are presented below.
|
|
Number of Warrants
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
|
|
Stock Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
1,214,286
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(600,179
|
)
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
669,107
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2017
|
|
|
769,107
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
During the year ended December
31, 2016, a related party exercised 600,179 warrants for cash proceeds of $210,000.
During the year ended December
31, 2016, as discussed in Note 6 above, the Company issued 30,000 warrants with an exercise price of $1.50 per share that expire
January 29, 2021. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions: dividend
yield of 0%, annual volatility of 314%, risk free interest rate of 1.33%, and expected life of 5 years with a fair value of $10,500.
During the year ended December
31, 2016, the Company issued 25,000 warrants to a consultant with an exercise price of $1.00 per share that expire May 26, 2018.
The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, annual
volatility of 347%, risk free interest rate of 1.33%, and expected life of 2 years with a fair value of $24,653.
Under the SPA of August
23, 2017, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of
$0.35 per share. These warrants can be exercised at any time on or prior to August 23, 2022. In the event that there is no effective
registration statement covering the warrant shares after one year, this warrant may be exercised by means of a “cashless
exercise”, as defined in the agreement.
NOTE 10 – RELATED PARTIES
On October 1, 2015, the
Company entered into a property lease agreement with a Director of the Company and father of the President. The term of the lease
is for one year with an annual rent of $30,000 per year. The Company at its option had the right to extend for 9 additional years.
On July 1, 2016, the lease was cancelled and the Company entered into a new lease agreement (see below). As of December 31, 2017
and 2016, the Company accrued rent of $22,500 and $22,500, respectively under the lease agreement and is included in due to related
party at December 31, 2017 and 2016. Rent expense under the lease for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $0 and $15,000,
respectively.
On July 1, 2016, the Company
entered into a property lease agreement with a Director of the Company and father of the President. The term of the lease is for
one year with an annual rent of $30,000 per year. The Company at it option has the right to extend for 10 additional years. As
of December 31, 2017 and 2016 the Company accrued rent of $45,000 and $15,000, respectively, under the lease agreement and is included
in due to related party at December 31, 2017 and 2016. Rent expense under the lease for year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was
$30,000 and $15,000, respectively.
Prior to July 1, 2016,
the Company leased office space on a month to month basis from the Company president. The monthly rental payment was $2,000 per
month. No formal lease existed under the agreement. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded rent expense
of $0 and $12,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company accrued rent of $10,000 and $28,000, respectively
due to the Company’s president and is included in due to related party at December 31, 2017 and 2016.
As of December 31, 2017
and 2016, the Company owed its President accrued salary of $344,000 and $188,000, respectively.
On December 6, 2016, the Company made a pre-payment of $10,000 to a non-profit church (the “Church”),
for usage of the Church’s facilities on April 20, 2017. The Company’s CEO and director Steve Berke, CFO and director
Adam Mutchler, Chief Marketing Officer Lee Molloy along with William Berke, director and Alam Berke, the parents of Steve Berke,
are members of the board of directors of the Church. In addition, the Church’s facilities are housed in a property owned
by a Company controlled by Steve Berke and William and Alam Berke.
On
March 20, 2017, the Company entered into an agreement with the Church to provide social media services. The agreement is for
two years, starting April 1, 2017, and the Company will be compensated $10,000 monthly along with compensation based on
online views and impressions (the “performance based compensation”) calculated at a cost per thousand
(“CPM”) of $10, to be calculated and paid by the Church on a monthly basis. The CPM rate can be modified by the
Company, at its sole discretion, every ninety days to reflect prevailing market rates. During the year ended December 31,
2017, the Company recorded revenue of $118,281 related to the agreement which included performance based compensation of
$28,281. These sales are included in advertising sales – related party in the consolidated statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company is reflecting an accounts receivable balance due from the Church of $88,281 and is
shown separately on the consolidated balance sheets.
On August 23, 2017, the Company sold, under a Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”), 150,000 shares
of common stock, and a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $0.35 per
share for a purchase price of $150,000 to a company controlled by our CEO’s mother, Alam Berke.