UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
8-K
CURRENT
REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date
of Report (Date of earliest event reported): May 18, 2015
RISE
RESOURCES INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
Nevada |
|
000-53848 |
|
30-0692325 |
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation) |
|
(Commission
File
Number) |
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.) |
700
– 510 West Hastings Street
Vancouver, British Columbia
Canada
(Address of principal executive offices)
V6B
1L8
(Zip Code)
Registrants
telephone number, including area code: (604) 687-7130
Check
the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant
under any of the following provisions:
| o | Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
| o | Soliciting
material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a -12) |
| o | Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d -2(b)) |
| o | Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e -4) |
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This
current report on Form 8-K (this Report) contains forward-looking statements relating to Rise Resources
Inc. (we, our, us) which represent our current expectations or beliefs, including statements
concerning our operations, performance, financial condition and growth. For this purpose, any statements contained in this Report
that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, words
such as may, anticipate, intend, could, estimate, or continue
or the negative or other comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements by their
nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties, such as credit losses, dependence on management and key personnel, our ability
to continue our growth strategy and competition, certain of which are beyond our control. Should one or more of these risks or
uncertainties materialize or should the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual outcomes and results could differ materially
from those indicated in the forward-looking statements.
INTRODUCTION
On
May 18, 2015, we entered into an option agreement (the Option Agreement) with Eastfield Resources Ltd., a British
Columbia company with its common shares listed for trading on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol ETF (Eastfield),
pursuant to which Eastfield granted us the exclusive and irrevocable option to acquire up to a 75% undivided interest in and to
certain mineral claims known as the Indata property located in the Omineca Mining Division in British Columbia, Canada (the Property).
In order to earn the initial 60% interest, we are required to pay Eastfield an aggregate of $350,000 in cash and incur a minimum
of $2,000,000 in aggregate exploration expenditures on the Property by April 3, 2019. In
order to earn the additional 15% interest, we are required to pay Eastfield $100,000 within 90 days of earning the 60% interest
and incur a further $500,000 in aggregate annual exploration expenditures on the Property until such time as we are able to complete
a feasibility study on the Property. Upon the completion of a feasibility study, the additional 15% interest will be deemed to
have been earned.
Prior
to the entry into the Option Agreement, we were a shell company
(as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act))
since we were not generating revenues, did not own an operating business,
had only nominal assets other than cash and cash equivalents, and had no specific plan other than to explore
and evaluate potential strategic transactions in multiple industries, including but not limited to mineral properties and technology.
Since we were a shell company, and in accordance with the
requirements of Item 2.01(f) of Form 8-K, this Report sets forth information that would be required if we were required to file
a general form for registration of securities on Form 10 under the Exchange Act with respect to our common stock (which is the
only class of our securities subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act).
| Item
1.01 | Entry
into a Material Definitive Agreement |
On
May 18, 2015, we entered into the Option Agreement with Eastfield, and on May 25, 2015, we paid Eastfield $20,000 in cash and
provided Eastfield with a copy of a completed technical report on the Property in compliance with National Instrument 43-101 of
the Canadian Securities Administrators (the Technical Report), thereby completing the first milestone required to
earn an undivided 60% interest in and to the Property.
At
this time, the Property is owned 91.1% by Eastfield and 8.9% by Imperial Metals Corporation, a British Columbia company with its
common shares listed for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol III (Imperial).
Option
Agreement
The
Option Agreement sets out our obligations in respect of the Property as well as the terms and conditions governing our relationship
with Eastfield. In order to earn the initial 60% interest in the Property,
we are required to pay Eastfield an aggregate of $350,000 in cash and incur a minimum of $2,000,000 in aggregate exploration
expenditures on the Property by April 3, 2019, as follows:
Completion Date | |
Cash Payment ($) | | |
Exploration Expenditure ($) | | |
% Interest Earned | |
October 3, 2015 | |
20,000 plus completion of NI 43-101 technical report on the Property | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
April 3, 2016 | |
| 30,000 | | |
| 50,000 | | |
| - | |
April 3, 2017 | |
| 100,000 | | |
| 200,000 | | |
| - | |
April 3, 2018 | |
| 100,000 | | |
| 250,000 | | |
| - | |
April 3, 2019 | |
| 100,000 | | |
| 1,500,000 | | |
| 60 | |
Total | |
| 350,000 | | |
| 2,000,000 | | |
| 60 | |
In
order to earn the additional 15% interest in the Property, we are required to pay Eastfield $100,000
within 90 days of earning the 60% interest and incur a further $500,000 in aggregate annual exploration expenditures on the Property
until such time as we are able to complete a feasibility study on the Property.
During
the term of the Option Agreement, Eastfield is not required to fund any exploration expenditures on the Property.
In
addition, the Option Agreement provides that we will act as the operator on the Property and that until we earn
a 75% interest in the Property a management committee consisting of one representative from our company and one from Eastfield
will be responsible for approving work programs and budgets for all exploration work to be conducted on the Property. Such decisions
will be made by a majority vote, with our company having the deciding vote.
As
the operator on the Property, we are also obliged to perform a number
of functions, including the following:
| ● | comply
with the Mines Act (British Columbia), the Mineral Tenure Act (British Columbia), and any other laws dealing with miners and the
exploration for and mining of minerals; |
| ● | keep
the Property in good standing; |
| ● | use
all reasonable endeavours to have our exploration operations recorded for assessment credit against the Property to the fullest
possible extent; |
| ● | provide
Eastfield with a report summarizing the results of our exploration work on the Property, on at least an annual basis. |
| Item
2.01 | Completion
of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets |
The
disclosure in Item 1.01 regarding the Option Agreement is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
FORM
10 DISCLOSURE
As
disclosed elsewhere in this Rreport, on May 18, 2015 we entered into the Option Agreement and on May 25, 2015 we paid Eastfield
the sum of $20,000 and provided Eastfield with a copy of the Technical Report, thereby completing the first milestone required
to earn a 60% interest in and to the Property. Item 2.01(f) of Form 8-K provides that if we were a shell company, other than a
business combination related shell company (as those terms are defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act) immediately before
the entry into the Option Agreement, then we must disclose the information that would be required if we were filing a general
form for registration of securities on Form 10 under the Exchange Act reflecting all classes of our securities subject to the
reporting requirements of Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act upon the entry into the Option Agreement.
Since
we were a shell company immediately before the entry into the Option Agreement, we are providing the information that we would
be required to disclose on Form 10 under the Exchange Act if we were to file such a form.
BUSINESS
Our
History
Prior
to entering into the Option Agreement, we were a development stage company engaged in exploring and evaluating potential strategic
transactions in multiple industries, including but not limited to mineral properties and technology.
We
were incorporated in the State of Nevada on February 9, 2007 under the name Atlantic Resources, Inc.
On
April 11, 2012, we completed a merger with our wholly-owned subsidiary, Patriot Minefinders Inc., and
formally assumed the subsidiarys name by filing Articles of Merger with the Nevada Secretary of State. The subsidiary was
incorporated entirely for the purpose of effecting the name change and the merger did not affect our Articles of Incorporation
or corporate structure in any other way.
Effective
April 19, 2012, in accordance with approval from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), we changed
our name from Atlantic Resources Inc. to Patriot Minefinders Inc. In addition, we effected a forward split of our common stock
on a 24 new for 1 old basis such that our authorized capital increased from 70,000,000 to 1,680,000,000 shares of common stock
and correspondingly, our issued and outstanding common stock increased from 4,700,000 to 112,800,000 shares, all with a par value
of $0.001. The name change and forward split became effective in the market at the open of business on April 19, 2012, and effective
June 1, 2012, our stock symbol changed from AARI to PROF to better reflect our new name.
On
June 19, 2012 our board of directors approved the cancellation and sale of a portion of 72,000,000 post-split shares of common
stock held by our former director, officer and majority shareholder. Effective that day, the shareholder cancelled and returned
to treasury 52,000,000 shares of our common stock and sold an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of our common stock to certain of
our current and former directors at a price of $0.0014 per share. The shareholder currently holds the balance of 17,000,000
shares
of our common stock (212,500 shares following the completion of the 1 for 80 reverse split described below). Following the cancellation,
there were 61,800,000 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding.
On
January 14, 2015, we completed a merger with our wholly owned subsidiary, Rise Resources Inc., and formally assumed the subsidiarys
name by filing Articles of Merger with the Nevada Secretary of State (the Name Change). The subsidiary was incorporated
entirely for the purpose of effecting the Name Change and the merger did not affect our Articles of Incorporation or corporate
structure in any other way.
On
January 22, 2015, we completed a 1 for 80 reverse split of our common stock and effected a corresponding
decrease in our authorized capital by filing a Certificate of Change with the Nevada Secretary of State (the Reverse Split).
As a result of the Reverse Split, our authorized capital decreased from 1,680,000,000 shares to 21,000,000, and our issued and
outstanding common stock decreased from 63,400,000 shares to 792,500, with each fractional share being rounded up to the nearest
whole share.
Both
the Name Change and Reverse Split became effective in the market at the open of business on February 9, 2015.
On
February 11, 2015, we entered into debt conversion agreements with five non-U.S. investors pursuant to which such investors agreed
to convert an aggregate of Cnd$400,000 in debt into 20,000,000 shares of our common stock at a price of Cnd$0.02 per share.
On
February 16, 2015, the holders of a majority of our issued and outstanding common stock approved an increase in our authorized
capital from 21,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001, to 400,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 (the
Authorized Capital Increase). The purpose of the Authorized Capital Increase was to reorganize our capital structure
in connection with the Reverse Split, which management believed would better position us to attract financing. On April 9, 2015,
we formally effected the Authorized Capital Increase by filing a Certificate of Amendment with the Nevada Secretary of State.
On
March 31, 2015, we entered into debt conversion agreements with 12 non-U.S. investors and one U.S. investor pursuant to which
such investors agreed to convert an aggregate of Cnd$206,675.42 in debt into 10,333,771 shares of our common stock at a price
of Cnd$0.02 per share. On April 9, 2015, following the completion of the Authorized Capital
Increase, we formally issued these shares.
On
April 3, 2015, we entered into a letter of intent with Eastfield that was subsequently replaced by the Option Agreement.
Our
common stock is currently eligible for quotation on the OTC markets under the name Rise Resources Inc. and the trading
symbol RYES. As of the date of this Report, we have
38,297,179 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
Previous
Business
On
April 18, 2007, we entered into a mineral property staking and purchase agreement with 1698727 Ontario Inc., a private Ontario
corporation, whereby we purchased a 100% interest in the Vic Vein mining claim, located approximately 250 kilometers west of Williams
Lake, British Columbia, Canada, for $7,500. We no longer own any rights to the claim as it lapsed on October 6, 2010 and we no
longer own any rights in relation to the property.
On
February 28, 2012, we identified an opportunity with respect to the option to acquire a 50% interest in the La Buena Project from
San Marco Resources Inc. (San Marco). On May 17, 2012, we entered into an assignment agreement with Skanderbeg Partners
Inc. (Skanderbeg) to acquire an option to purchase the La Buena Project. We were unable to meet the terms of the
option agreement and it was terminated during the year ended July 31, 2013.
We
subsequently identified an opportunity with respect to the option to acquire a 75% interest in the KM 66 property from Bearing
Resources Ltd. We were unable to meet the terms of the option agreement and it was terminated during the year ended July 31, 2014.
On
November 12, 2013, we entered in to a binding letter of intent with Wundr Software Inc. (Wundr), pursuant to which
we expected to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding common shares of Wundr. Due to unforeseen circumstances we decided not
to proceed with the transaction, and we announced that the letter of intent had expired on January 10, 2014.
On
May 23, 2014, we entered into a share exchange agreement (the Share Exchange Agreement) with Juliet Press Inc.,
a private British Columbia, Canada corporation (Juliet), and all the shareholders of Juliet (the Juliet Shareholders),
to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding common shares of Juliet (the Juliet Shares) from the Juliet Shareholders.
Pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement, we expected to issue 14,000,000 shares of our common stock to the Juliet Shareholders
in consideration for the acquisition of the Juliet Shares, with the result that Juliet would become our wholly owned subsidiary
upon the closing of the transaction. On September 25, 2014 and pursuant to section 13.4(d) of the Share Exchange Agreement, we
mutually agreed in writing with Juliet and the Juliet Shareholders to terminate the Share Exchange Agreement. As a result of such
termination, the Share Exchange Agreement is of no further force and effect except for certain non-disclosure and confidentiality
obligations of the parties.
Glossary
Ag
– silver
Allochthonous
– referring to a large block of rock which has been moved from its original site
of formation
Anomaly
– any departure from the norm which may indicate the presence of mineralization in the underlying bedrock
Assay
– a chemical test performed on a sample of ores or minerals to determine the amount of valuable metals contained therein
Au
– gold
Base
metal – any non-precious metal (e.g., copper, lead, zinc, nickel, etc.)
Breccia
– a rock composed of broken fragments of minerals that can either be similar to or different from the composition of
the fragments
Chalcopyrite
– a copper iron sulfide mineral
Cu
– copper
Dacite
– an igneous, volcanic rock
Diorite
– a grey to dark-grey intermediate intrusive igneous rock
Epithermal
– deposited from warn waters at shallow depth under conditions in the lower ranges of temperature and pressure
G/T
– grams per tonne
Granodiorite
– a medium- to coarse-grained intermediate to acid igneous rock
Greenschist
– metamorphic rocks that
formed under the lowest temperatures and pressures usually produced by regional
metamorphism
Igneous
rocks – rocks formed by the solidification of molten material from far below the earths surface
Intrusive
– a body of igneous rock formed by the consolidation of magma intruded into other rocks, in contrast to lavas, which
are extruded upon the surface
Karst
topography – a landscape formed from the dissolution of soluble rocks
Mafic
– an adjective describing a silicate mineral or rock that is rich in magnesium
and iron
Magma
– the molten material deep in the Earth from which rocks are formed
Metamorphic
rocks – rocks which have undergone a change in texture or composition as the result of heat and/or pressure
Mineral
– a naturally occurring homogeneous substance having definite physical properties and chemical composition and, if formed
under favorable conditions, a definite crystal form
Mineralization
– a natural aggregation of one or more minerals, which has not been delineated to the extent that sufficient average
grade or dimensions can be reasonably estimated or called a deposit or ore. Further exploration or
development expenditures may or may not be warranted by such an occurrence depending on the circumstances.
Ore
– a mixture of ore minerals and gangue from which at least one of the metals can be extracted at a profit.
PPB
– parts per billion
PPM
– parts per million
Pluton
– a body of intrusive igneous rock that is crystallized from magma slowly cooling
below the surface of the Earth
Porphyry
– a variety of igneous rock consisting of large-grained crystals dispersed in
a fine-grained matrix or groundmass
Silica
– silicon dioxide, of which quartz is a common example
Silicification
– the process in which organic matter becomes saturated with silica
Terrane
– a fragment of material formed on, or broken off from, one tectonic plate and accreted or sutured to crust lying on
another tectonic plate
Tuff
– a type of rock consisting of consolidated volcanic ash ejected from vents during
a volcanic eruption
Ultramafic
– igneous and meta-igneous rocks with very low silica content
Vein
– A fissure, fault or crack in a rock filled by minerals that have travelled upwards from some deep source
Volcanic
rocks – Igneous rocks formed from magma that has flowed out or has been violently ejected from a volcano
Zone
– an area of distinct mineralization
The
Property
Location
and Means of Access
The
Property is situated in north-central British Columbia on the east side of Albert Lake, two kilometres west of the north end of
Indata Lake. It is approximately 130 kilometres northwest of the community of Fort St James and 230 kilometres northwest of the
city of Prince George. The Property is located in the Omineca Mining Division of British Columbia.
The
Property is roughly centered on UTM coordinates 351900E / 6141200N (datum NAD 83 Zone 10) and 55 23N / 125 19, West latitude
/ longitude on NTS sheets 093N034 and 035. The Property location is shown in Figure 1 below.
Figure
1: General Location Map
![(MAP)](rr001_v1.jpg)
Access
to the Property is from Fort St. James via the Leo Creek Forestry Road to near Tchentlo Lake and then on a road built by Eastfield
to the northern part of the Property. This road was built to British
Columbia
Ministry of Forests logging road standards and provides good access for trucks and heavy machinery such as drill rigs and
bulldozers. Driving time from Fort St. James to the Property is approximately two hours. Smaller haul and tote roads have been
constructed from the main road to other areas of the Property. Away from the roads, access is on foot only except for a few areas
where helicopter landing sites have been prepared.
All
of the land within the Property is held by the Crown, and there are no permanent structures in the area.
Description
of the Property
The
Property consists of 18 mineral claims totaling 3,170.03 hectares and is situated in a complex geological setting adjacent to
the Pinchi Fault, a major structure separating the Cache Creek and Quesnel Terranes. All of the claims that comprise the Property
are in good standing according to Mineral Titles Online (British Columbias internet-based
electronic mineral titles administration system). Importantly, a holder of mineral claims in British Columbia is not entitled
to surface rights.
The
characteristics of the 18 claims are as follows:
Claim Name | |
Record No. | |
Area (Hectares) | |
Expiry Date |
Indata 2 | |
239379 | |
375 | |
18-Oct-19 |
Indata 3 | |
240192 | |
500 | |
18-Oct-19 |
Schnapps 1 | |
238722 | |
500 | |
18-Oct-19 |
Schnapps 2 | |
238723 | |
500 | |
14-Nov-19 |
Schnapps 3 | |
238859 | |
200 | |
20-Oct-19 |
Schnapps 4 | |
238860 | |
250 | |
18-Oct-19 |
Schnapps 5 | |
238893 | |
100 | |
18-Oct-19 |
Schnapps 6 | |
362575 | |
25 | |
31-Dec-18 |
IN-6 | |
362576 | |
25 | |
31-Dec-18 |
IN-7 | |
362577 | |
25 | |
31-Dec-18 |
IN-8 | |
362578 | |
25 | |
31-Dec-18 |
IN-9 | |
362579 | |
25 | |
31-Dec-18 |
IN-10 | |
362582 | |
25 | |
31-Dec-18 |
IN-11 | |
362583 | |
25 | |
20-Dec-18 |
Limestone | |
753222 | |
441.33 | |
20-Apr-18 |
Triangle A | |
941109 | |
55.15 | |
16-Jan-18 |
Triangle B | |
941110 | |
55.17 | |
16-Jan-18 |
Triangle C | |
941111 | |
18.38 | |
16-Jan-18 |
Total | |
| |
3,170.03 | |
|
The
Nation Lakes Provincial Park abuts the Property on its north and east sides and partially overlaps the claims. However, the claims
were staked prior to the creation of the park and the entirety of the claims area remains valid. On June 29, 2000, the Order in
Council of the Government of British Columbia creating the Nation Lakes Park (published on April 9, 2003) specifically excluded
the Schnapps #1 (238722), Schnapps #2 (238723), Schnapps #4 (238860), Indata #2 (239379) and Indata #3 (240192) mineral claims
from the park, as is currently stipulated in the Protected Areas of British Columbia Act, Schedule D. The park boundaries are
included in Figure 2.
Figure
2: Map of Indata Claims
![(MAP)](rr002_v1.jpg)
In
British Columbia, a Notice of Work filed with the Department of Energy and Mines is generally required in order
for exploration work to be carried out, though exceptions can be made for small programs with limited surface disturbance. There
is a current Notice of Work (#100038) filed on the Property which allows for the installation of Grids, Camps and Helicopter
Pads, Access Construction,
Modification
or Reclamation, and seven holes of Surface Drilling. As a condition of granting this Notice of Work, an Archeological
Review was requested and conducted. This Notice of Work is valid until December 15, 2015.
History
The
initial claims on the Property were staked by Imperial in 1983, and in 1984, Imperial began to explore the Property. Following
initial soil sampling and the staking of additional claims, a four-hole diamond drilling program was completed to explore copper
mineralization observed in outcrop near the northeast side of Albert Lake (the Lake Zone). This program resulted in the discovery
of low grade chalcopyrite mineralization including 9.3 metres of 0.20% Cu in one drill hole. Hole depths were relatively shallow;
to a maximum of 76.8 metres.
On
March 3, 1986, Imperial sold the claims to Eastfield pursuant to a sale agreement that also covered the sale of other of Imperial
properties, for a total sum of $1, subject to a number of terms that included the right of Imperial to acquire up to a 30% interest
in the Property at a later date.
In
1986, Eastfield undertook a program of grid establishment, soil sampling, hand trenching and geophysical surveying. This was followed
by diamond drilling in 1987, 1988 and 1989 and trenching with a bulldozer-mounted backhoe in 1989. The drilling programs resulted
in the discovery of polymetallic quartz and quartz-carbonate veins some 500 metres east of the copper mineralization. These veins
contained elevated precious metal values (commonly in the range of several hundred ppb gold to 6 g/t with the most significant
intercept being 47 g/t gold over 4 metres). The veins generally strike north and dip to the east, and are commonly enveloped by
a zone of silicification in volcanic rocks and a thickening-downwards zone of talc-magnesite alteration in ultramafic rocks.
On
February 25, 1988, Imperial acquired a 30% interest in the Property from Eastfield and the two parties entered into a joint venture.
Imperial has not participated in exploration funding in recent years and its interest in the joint venture has therefore been
diluted. As of the date of this Report, it stands at 8.9%, while Eastfield retains the remaining 91.1%.
In
1988 a heavy mineral sampling program was conducted on streams on the claims. Most results were unimpressive, even those that
drained the area of the precious metal bearing polymetallic vein mineralization, except for an east draining creek which returned
a value of 3360 ppb Au in the southeast corner of the Property.
In
1995, after construction of an access road through the southern part of the Property, built to standards for log haulage, a trenching
program was completed near the northeast corner of Albert Lake, over the copper zone previously defined by soil sampling and the
1985 drilling. One of these trenches returned analyses which averaged 0.36% copper over a length of 75 metres.
In
1996, Clear Creek Resources Limited (Clear Creek) carried out a small diamond drilling program in the copper zone
northeast of Albert Lake. Results confirmed the existence of copper mineralization identified in the 1985 drilling and encountered
mineralization over significantly larger intervals: up to 97.5 metres of 0.12% Cu in one drill hole, and 21.0 metres of 0.23%
Cu in another drill hole. This program tested only a very small part of the area covered by anomalous soil copper geochemistry.
Clear
Creek returned with another drill program in the copper zone area in 1998 which confirmed and exceeded the 1996 drilling results
and also identified an altered granodiorite stock with copper mineralization adjacent to the eastern edge of Albert Lake. A new
zone of copper mineralization was also discovered in a fan of three holes: 98-I-4, 5 and 9, located 350 metres southeast of the
previous drill
intercepts,
halfway to the zone of polymetallic veins. Road construction exposed silicified volcanic rocks in a road cut in the southern part
of the existing grid where grab samples showed the presence of copper sulfides along with enriched gold values, demonstrating
for the first time an association of copper and gold on the Property.
In
2000, a helicopter borne very low frequency (VLF) and magnetic survey was flown across the Property. A total of 595 east-west
line kilometres were flown by Aerodat Ltd. The data was later reprocessed by Furgo Airborne Surveys Corp. No new exploration targets
were derived from this work.
A
program of linecutting, soil sampling and induced polarization surveying was completed in 2003, funded by Castillian Resources
Corp., with 11.2 line kilometres of induced polarization survey completed and 16 line kilometers of soil grid expansions established,
and 304 soil samples collected. The bulk of this work was completed in the northwestern side of the currently explored area. New
anomalies consisting of anomalous arsenic and/or antimony soil values associated with a moderate induced polarization chargeability
response were defined.
In
2005, two diamond drill holes were completed with a total meterage of 262 metres in a program funded by Aberdeen International
Inc. The first hole of the 2005 program, hole 2005-I-1, was designed to test below hole 98-I-4 which returned 145.4 metres grading
0.20% copper including 24.1 metres grading 0.37%. Unfortunately, significant drilling difficulties were encountered and this hole
was abandoned at a depth of 99.1 metres, approximately 50 metres short of the top of the target. The rest of the 2005 drilling
was located approximately 1400 metres to the south where hole 2005-I-03 encountered narrow intervals of anomalous copper mineralization
in a dioritic intrusive. Another hole designated 2005-I-02, located adjacent to 2005-I-03, was abandoned without successfully
setting casing.
Soil
sampling was conducted in 2007 to extend the grids to the west and north in the area north of the Lake Zone. A zone of anomalous
gold, arsenic, antimony and bismuth in soils was located in the northwest corner of the new sampling in an area underlain by recrystallized
limestone which is in fault contact with volcanic rocks to the south (the Northwest Soil Anomaly). A short excavator
trenching program targeting 2003 induced polarization (IP) and soil anomalies discovered a new polymetallic quartz
vein well to the west of those previously known. The 10 centimetre vein returned assay values of 17.16 and 7.84 g/t Au. This work
was funded by Redzone Resources Ltd.
Max
Resource Corp. optioned the property in 2008 and funded a five hole 1056.2 metre diamond drill program, focusing mostly on the
polymetallic vein zone. Highlights included hole 08-I-2, which returned 8.20g/t Au over 0.3 metres and 08-I-3 which returned 209g/t
Ag over 0.5 metres.
In
2010, the Property was optioned to Oceanside Capital Corporation (Oceanside). During that year a program of ground
geophysics and soil sampling was conducted. Four north-south lines totaling 5.4 kilometres were emplaced and an IP and magnetic
survey was run along these. One of the lines ran along the east side of the north end of Albert Lake across the area of the previously
known copper in soil anomaly and where previous porphyry copper mineralization encountered in the 2005 drilling (the Lake Zone).
The other three lines tested the area of the strong gold, arsenic, antimony and bismuth in soil anomaly discovered in 2007 in
the northwest part of the property (the Northwest Soil Anomaly).
A
strong chargeability high was returned from the Lake Zone area, coincidental with the copper in soil anomaly. Chargeability highs
were also discovered in the northwest and southeast areas of the other three lines in the Northwest Soil Anomaly, roughly flanking
a prominent ridge of recrystallized limestone.
Also
in 2010, a total of 471 soil samples were collected. The four IP lines were sampled and three other widely spaced reconnaissance
type east-west lines were emplaced and sampled in the southern part of the
Property
to the south of the existing grids. The multi-element epithermal-type soil anomaly in the northwest part of the
Property was confirmed and spotty gold and copper anomalies were discovered on the southern lines.
The
2011 program was made up of an IP/magnetics survey along the three southern 2010 soil lines, which totaled 8.1 line kilometres.
Two north-south trending chargeability highs were encountered near the eastern end of the two northern lines (L100N and L300S).
A strong copper in soil anomaly coincides with the western chargeability high on L100N. The southernmost line (L1850S) is 1550
metres south of the other two lines and has three prominent chargeability highs.
In
2012, Oceanside and Eastfield constructed 3.2 kilometers of drill road access along with the construction of six drill sites.
Eighteen rock samples were collected during this work, one of which returned an analysis of 0.78% copper in dacitic volcanic float
from a new road in the southern part of the Property, in the area of the 2010-2011 soil sampling and geophysical work.
The
2013 program was focused on the southern part of the property in the area where the copper bearing float was discovered in 2012.
Minor prospecting and rock sampling was conducted and additional mineralized float and rubble was found in the area. Three 1000
metre east-west soil lines were emplaced in the same area with samples collected at 50 metre intervals, to a total of 62 samples.
A number of localized copper anomalies were discovered. As well, 17 silt samples were taken from a number of areas of the Property.
A single high gold value was returned from a sample in the southeast corner of the Property. Subsequent to this work, Oceanside
terminated its option on the Property in October 2013.
Geologic
Setting
Regional
Geology
The
Property lies west of and along splay faults related to the contact of two major terranes of the Canadian Cordillera: the Quesnel
and Cache Creek Terranes. The contact between these terranes is marked by the Pinchi Fault Zone, a high angle reverse fault of
regional extent, and associated splay faults where Cache Creek strata to the west have been thrust over Takla strata to the east.
The fault zone is up to 10 kilometres in width. The regional geology of the Property area is shown in Figure 3.
Figure
3: Indata Regional Geology
![(MAP)](rr003_v1.jpg)
The
Quesnel Terrane consists of mafic to intermediate volcanic rocks of the Upper Triassic – Lower Jurassic Takla Group intruded
by the Hogem Batholith, which is composed of intrusive phases which
range
in composition from granite to monzonite to quartz syenite, which range in age from Lower Jurassic to Cretaceous.
The
Cache Creek Terrane in the region comprises mainly argillaceous metasedimentary rocks intruded by diorite to granodiorite plutons
(which may be pre-Triassic or Lower Cretaceous in age) and by small ultramafic stocks. Some of these latter intrusions may be
of ophiolitic origin.
A
northwest-striking fault bounded block situated between the two terranes (within the Pinchi Fault Zone) underlies the Property.
This block is underlain largely by limestone within which a sliver of mafic and intermediate volcanic rocks is preserved. Both
the limestone and volcanic rocks are considered here to be part of the Cache Creek Group but the evidence for this is equivocal
as similar strata occur within the Takla Group elsewhere in the region. As well, the volcanic rocks in this block have been subjected
to greenschist facies metamorphism, similar to what is normally found in Cache Creek rocks, whereas generally the metamorphic
grade of the Takla Group volcanic rocks is rarely higher than zeolite facies. But the areas proximity to such a major fault
may locally have raised the metamorphic grade as has been demonstrated further to south along the Pinchi fault at Pinchi Lake
where metamorphic grade increases to blueschist grade at the fault. It is also possible that the major fault movements along the
Pinchi Lake Fault have juxtaposed Cache Creek limestone against Takla volcanic rocks within this fault block.
The
dominant structural style of the Takla Group is that of extensional faulting, mainly to the northwest. In general Takla Group
rocks are tilted but not folded. In contrast, strata of the Cache Creek Group have been folded and metamorphosed to lower to middle
greenschist facies and a penetrative deformational fabric has been preserved in argillaceous rocks. Extensional faults are also
common within the Cache Creek Group and probably represent the effects of post-collision uplift.
Property
Geology
There
are no comprehensive geological maps of the Property. A generalized map showing outcrop locations of the various lithologies is
shown in Figure 4.
Figure
4: Property Geology
![(MAP)](rr004_v1.jpg)
Lithologies
The
Property is underlain by two main supracrustal assemblages: limestone with minor intercalated shale; and andesitic volcanic rocks
that were deposited under marine conditions. As discussed above, it is uncertain whether these rocks belong to the Cache Creek
or Quesnel Terranes.
Limestone
crops out as prominent hills and bluffs in the northern, western and southern parts of the area. Although generally massive, in
places bedding is defined by thin shaley partings and by intraformational limestone conglomerate. Breccias formed by carbonate
dissolution are displayed within karst topography in the southwestern part of the Property at the southern end of Albert Lake.
Volcanic
rocks underlying the Property are of andesitic composition and can be subdivided into two broad units. In the western part of
the Property, volcanic rocks consist of pillow lava, pillow breccia, coarse tuff breccia and fine-grained crystal lithic tuff.
The dominant mafic mineral in these rocks is amphibole, now represented by tremolite/actinolite but was probably hornblende prior
to alteration. The second volcanic unit consists of massive to poorly bedded volcanic tuff with variable amounts of amphibole
phenocrysts. Although commonly poorly bedded, bedding planes and fining upwards sequences can be recognized in places.
Intrusive
rocks recognized on the Property range in composition from ultramafic to granite and underlie the central part of the Property
area. Hornblende diorite occurs as a pluton which extends along part of the eastern side of the central part of the property and
as dykes. The bulk of this pluton has a fine to medium-grained hypidiomorphic granular texture although both marginal phases of
the pluton and the dykes are porphyritic. A small part of the pluton is of quartz diorite composition although primary quartz
is generally absent. While diorite dykes are common within the volcanic rocks of the property, no diorite intrusions have been
observed within the limestone unit, suggesting that the diorite and volcanic rocks are of similar age and are either older than
the massive limestone or that the limestone is allochthonous with respect to the volcanics and was emplaced adjacent to the volcanic
strata after volcanism and plutonism had ceased.
Intruding
both volcanic rocks and diorite are ultramafic bodies, serpentinite to varying degrees but which preserve textures suggesting
that the original rocks were peridotite and pyroxenite. Cross fibre chrysotile veins and veinlets occur throughout these bodies.
To the south of Radio Lake (see Figure 4) a differentiated and zoned ultramafic-mafic intrusion occurs, consisting of a coarse-grained
clinopyroxenite core, surrounded by peridotite and, in turn, enclosed by medium to coarse-grained hornblende-clinopyroxene gabbro.
The
youngest intrusive rocks of the Property consist of medium to coarse-grained grey and reddish grey biotite quartz monzonite and
granite. Whereas all other intrusive rocks in the area have been emplaced only into volcanic strata, this unit also intrudes limestone
of the Cache Creek Group.
A
large part of the Property is covered by glacial and fluvioglacial deposits. Extensive areas of glacial derived clay in low-lying
areas complicate geochemical soil results.
Structure
and Metamorphism
The
area covered by the Property can be divided into two structural domains: (i) the area underlain by carbonate rocks which is characterized
by concentric folds and the development of a penetrative fabric in finer grained clastic interbeds; and (ii) that area underlain
by volcanic strata which has undergone brittle deformation only. Contacts between carbonate and volcanic strata are obscured by
young cover but are inferred to be northwesterly-striking faults. Drilling and geological mapping in the central part of the Property
has indicated the presence of a number of westerly-striking faults which show normal displacements of up to a few tens of metres.
Carbonate
rocks have generally been recrystallized with the common development of sparry calcite while fine grained clastic interbeds display
a greenschist facies mineral assemblage. The assemblage actinolite/tremolite-chlorite-epidote within the matrix of volcanic rocks
also suggests the attainment of greenschist grade of regional metamorphism in these strata.
Mineralization
Exploration
on the Property has resulted in the discovery of a number of metallic mineral occurrences which can be divided into two main types:
porphyry copper mineralization and quartz-carbonate polymetallic vein mineralization. The location of these zones of mineralization
is shown in Figure 5.
Figure
5: Exploration Summary Map
![(MAP)](rr005_v1.jpg)
The
currently known area of porphyry copper mineralization occurs on the east side of the north end of Albert Lake (Lake Zone). Here
a strong and consistent >250 ppm Cu in soil anomaly often coincides
with
chargeability anomalies from the induced polarization surveys. This soil anomaly is approximately 2,000 metres north to south
and averages 400 to 600 metres east to west and sometimes attains soil copper values in excess of 7,000 ppm. Porphyry copper type
mineralization is known at the north end of this feature in outcrops, trenches and drill core occurring as disseminated and fracture
controlled pyrite-chalcopyrite-pyrrhotite in volcanic and granodiorite rock units. The best drill results from this area have
been 145.4 metres averaging 0.20% copper, including 24.1 metres of 0.37% Cu in drillhole 98-I-4. Minor work has been conducted
in the southern part of the soil anomaly/chargeability high where exploration work in 2012 and 2013 has discovered similar mineralized
rubble 3,800 metres to the south indicating that the area of porphyry copper mineralization may extend across a considerable area.
Polymetallic
veins have been recognized in the central part of the Property to the east of the porphyry copper mineralization (see Figures
5 and 6) within andesitic volcanic rocks and serpentinized ultramafics. The veins generally occupy a northerly-striking fault
zone dipping shallowly to the east. Within ultramafic rocks, the veins are accompanied by zones of intense carbonate and talc
alteration zones which range in width from a few metres to over 50 metres in deeper and more easterly parts of the fault. Proximal
to the veins in volcanic rocks, especially adjacent to ultramafic contacts, alteration is dominated by silicification and the
formation of quartz-carbonate veinlets but silicification is not common within ultramafic rocks.
To
date, five separate mineralized polymetallic veins have been located on the Property. Four of these are in the central part of
the Property on top of the ridge between Indata and Albert Lakes, and all have general north-south orientations. The longest of
these has been traced in drilling for over 450 metres. The fifth vein occurs to the northwest, halfway towards the Lake Zone porphyry
copper mineralization, where a 10 centimetre vein was discovered in 2007. This vein has an east-west orientation.
Polymetallic
veins often exhibit a subtle banded appearance with bands of quartz dominant material interrupted with sulphide rich sections
where the sulphide content can exceed 50%. Sulphides are dominantly pyrrhotite, arsenopyrite and stibnite with lesser pyrite and
minor chalcopyrite. Veins average approximately 1.5 metres in width but vary between 0.5 and 5.6 metres. Trace amounts of gersdorffite
(a nickel arsenide), bismuthinite (a bismuth telluride), pentlandite (a nickel sulphide) and free gold have been documented in
petrographic samples taken from high-grade intercepts. A review of 24 diamond drill intercepts grading at least 1.0 g/t gold
indicates that the average vein intercept is 1.54 metres wide with an average grade of 8.41 g/t gold and 52.43 g/t silver.
It must, however, be pointed out that one very high grade intercept in hole 88-11 biases this number such that if it is removed
from the calculation then the remaining 23 drill intercepts have an average thickness of 1.43 metres with an average grade of
3.06 g/t gold and 59.40 g/t silver. These drill intercepts are generally close to true thicknesses (g/t have been converted from
ppb).
Antimony,
arsenic and gold are the best soil geochemical pathfinders for the polymetallic veins. The high sulfide content of the veins also
makes them a good target for closely spaced induced polarization surveys.
The
relationship between the porphyry copper mineralization and the polymetallic veins has yet to be established although it is possible
that the polymetallic vein mineralization represents an outer zone to a central, copper-dominated part of the same hydrothermal
system. The host volcanic rocks of the porphyry copper mineralization exhibit a mineral assemblage consistent with both propylitic
hydrothermal alteration and greenschist faces regional metamorphism and could be a result of either one of, or both processes.
Because of poor outcrop and the paucity of drilling within the copper zone and in areas away from the polymetallic veins, a regional
hydrothermal zonation has not been adequately interpreted within the Property. Alternatively the veins and porphyry copper style
mineralization may be
unrelated
and are present together as coincidence, centered on the strong structural provenance of the Pinchi Fault Zone.
Deposit
Type
The
Property is host to mineralization of two deposit types: polymetallic precious metal veins and porphyry copper. Porphyry copper
mineralization is known on the Property from the Lake Zone on the east side of Albert Lake, some 500 metres west of the area of
the polymetallic veins. Drill results here include 145.4 metres averaging 0.20% Cu, which includes a higher grade interval of
24.1 metres of 0.37% Cu. There are a number of other porphyry copper occurrences in the area. The Central Zone of Serengeti Resources
Kwanika Project, located 14 kilometres north of the Property, contains an indicated resource of 244 million tonnes averaging 0.23%
Cu, 0.21 g/t Au and 0.69 g/t Ag. (Roscoe Postle and Associates NI 43-101 Technical Report for Kwanika Property Preliminary
Economic Assessment, 2013, Report filed on SEDAR March 4, 2013).
Homestake
style gold mineralization, similar to the Property vein occurrences, occurs at the Snowbird deposit located near Fort St. James
to the south of the Indata region, and at Mt. Sir Sidney Williams to the north of the Property. Arsenopyrite-stibnite-chalcopyrite-pyrite
veins with enriched precious metals occur at these occurrences at or near the contact of mafic and ultramafic rocks. Drill results
from polymetallic veins on the Property have reached as high as 4.0 metres of 46.20g/t Au and 2.0g/t Ag in hole 88-I-11, and 3.2
metres of 0.01 g/t Au and 354.1 g/t Ag in hole 89-I-6.
Other
mineralization styles are known from elsewhere in the region. Epithermal mercury mineralization in carbonate rocks occurs at the
former producing Bralorne-Takla Mercury Mine, located 26 kilometres north of the Property, and Pinchi Mine, located 100 kilometres
to the southeast. The Lustdust skarn deposit is located 1.5 kilometres west of the Bralorne-Takla Mine, and has returned drill
results including 0.80% copper and 0.67g/t gold over 59 metres and 2.19% copper and 24.04 g/t gold over 15 metres.
Plan
of Operations
We
plan to explore the under-explored southern part of the Property (Area B of Figure 6), where recent exploration has discovered
indications of porphyry mineralization. These indicators include coincidental copper in soil-chargeability anomalies, float rock
samples with up to 0.78% Cu, and the existence of intrusive rocks in outcrop.
A
two-phase program is proposed: an initial phase of surface work to cover the area with soil sampling and an IP-magnetics survey,
along with prospecting, mapping and rock sampling. This phase is budgeted at Cnd$270,000. The surface program should be followed
up by diamond drilling of the best targets. A 2,000 metre program, costing Cnd$270,000 is proposed for this, bringing the total
budget to Cnd$540,000.
Figure
6: Exploration Target Map
![(MAP)](rr006_v1.jpg)
Intellectual
Property
We
claim common law trademark rights in our corporate name. We do not hold any registered copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual
property right.
Employees
We
do not currently have any full-time or part-time employees. Our officers and directors provide services to us on an as-needed
basis, as we plan to rely on their efforts, as well as those of a number of independent consultants, to manage our operations
for the foreseeable future.
Government
Regulations
We
plan to engage in mineral exploration and development activities and will accordingly be exposed to environmental risks associated
with mineral exploration activity. Pursuant to the Option Agreement, we are now the operator of the Property.
Our
exploration and development activities will be subject to extensive federal, provincial and local laws, regulations and permits
governing protection of the environment. Among other things, our operations must comply with authorizations issued under the Mines
Act (British Columbia) and the Environmental Management Act (British Columbia).
Our
plan is to conduct our operations in a way that safeguards public health and the environment. We believe that our operations comply
with applicable environmental laws and regulations in all material respects. As of the date of this Report, the only environmental
permit or authorization we require to conduct our proposed work program is the Notice
of Work filed with the British Columbia Department of Energy and Mines; however, we expect that regular
monitoring and compliance with periodic reporting requirements will be integral components of any such permits or authorizations
that we apply for or receive in the future.
The
costs associated with implementing and complying with environmental requirements can be substantial and possible future legislation
and regulations could cause us to incur additional operating expenses, capital expenditures, restrictions and delays in developing
or conducting operations on the Property, the extent of which cannot be predicted with any certainty.
To
the best of our knowledge, there are no existing environmental liabilities on the Property.
RISK
FACTORS
An
investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Investors should carefully consider the risks described below,
together with all of the other information included in this Report, before making an investment decision. If any of the following
risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could suffer and they may lose all or part of
their investment. See Forward Looking Statements above for a discussion of forward-looking statements and the significance
of such statements in the context of this Report.
Risks
Related to Our Business
We
have a history of operating losses and there can be no assurance that we can achieve or maintain profitability.
We
have a history of operating losses and may not achieve or sustain profitability. We cannot guarantee that we will become profitable.
Even if we achieve profitability, given the competitive and evolving
nature
of the industry in which we operate, we may be unable to sustain or increase profitability and our failure to do so could adversely
affect our business, including our ability to raise additional funds.
Because
our auditors have issued a going concern opinion, there is substantial uncertainty that we will be able to continue our operations.
Our
auditors have issued a going concern opinion. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue to operate over
the next 12 months. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be
necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern. As such, if we are unable to obtain sufficient financing to
execute our business plan we may be required to cease our operations.
The
Property may not contain mineral reserves that are economically recoverable and we cannot accurately predict the effect of certain
factors affecting such a determination.
We
have not determined if the Property contains mineral reserves that are economically recoverable. Exploration for mineral reserves
involves a high degree of risk, which even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge, may not eliminate. Few
properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing properties. Regardless, we plans to complete the first and
second phases of our exploration program, which, pursuant to the Option Agreement, we are required to do in order to earn an initial
60% interest in the Property.
Estimates
of mineral reserves and any potential determination as to whether a mineral deposit will be commercially viable can be affected
by such factors as deposit size; grade; unusual or unexpected geological formations and metallurgy; proximity to infrastructure;
metal prices which are highly cyclical; environmental factors; unforeseen technical difficulties; work interruptions; and government
regulations, including regulations relating to permitting, prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting
of minerals and environmental protection. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted.
The
long term profitability of our operations will be in part directly related to the cost and success of our exploration and development
program. Substantial expenditures are required to establish reserves through drilling, to develop processes to extract the ore
and, in the case of new properties, to develop the extraction and processing facilities and infrastructure at any site chosen
for extraction. Although substantial benefits may be derived from the discovery of a major deposit, we cannot provide any assurance
that any such deposit will be commercially viable or that we will be able to obtain the funds required for development on a timely
basis.
If
the Property is ultimately placed into production, we will encounter hazards and risks that could result in significant legal
liability.
In
the event that we are ultimately able to commence commercial production on the Property, our operations will be subject to all
of the hazards and risks normally encountered in the exploration, development and production of mineral deposits, including unusual
and unexpected geologic formations, seismic activity, rock bursts, cave-ins, flooding and other conditions involved in the drilling
and removal of material, any of which could result in damage to, or destruction of, the mine and other producing facilities, damage
to life or property, environmental damage and possible legal liability. Although we plan to take appropriate precautions to mitigate
these hazards and risks by, among other things, obtaining liability insurance in an amount considered to be adequate by management,
their nature is such that the liabilities might exceed policy limits, they might not be insurable, or we may not elect to insure
against them due to high premium costs or other reasons, which could have a material adverse effect upon our financial condition
and results of operations.
We
face significant competition in the mineral resource industry that presents an ongoing threat to the success of our business.
The
mining industry is intensely competitive in all of its phases, and we will be forced to compete with many companies that possess
greater financial resources and technical facilities than we do. Significant competition exists for the limited number of mineral
acquisition opportunities available in our sphere of operations. As a result of this competition, our ability to acquire additional
attractive mining properties on terms we consider acceptable may be adversely affected.
Fluctuating
mineral prices may negatively affect our ability to secure financing or our results of operations.
Our
future revenues, if any, will likely be derived from the extraction and sale of base and precious metals. The price of those commodities
has fluctuated widely, particularly in recent years, and is affected by numerous factors beyond our control including economic
and political trends, expectations of inflation, currency exchange fluctuations, interest rates, global and regional consumptive
patterns, speculative activities and increased production due to new extraction developments and improved extraction and production
methods. The effect of these factors on the price of base and precious metals, and therefore the economic viability of our business,
could negatively affect our ability to secure financing or our results of operations.
We
are subject to government laws and regulations particular to our operations with which we may be unable to comply.
We
may not be able to comply with all current and future government environmental laws and regulations that apply to our business.
Our operations are subject to all government regulations normally incident to conducting business: occupational safety and health
acts, workmens compensation statutes, unemployment insurance legislation, income tax and social security laws and regulations,
and most importantly, environmental laws and regulations. In addition, we are subject to laws and regulations regarding the development
of mineral properties in the Province of British Columbia. We are also subject to governmental laws and regulations applicable
to small public companies and their capital formation efforts.
We
are engaged in mineral exploration and development and are accordingly exposed to environmental risks associated with such activities.
We are currently in the exploration stage and have not determined whether significant site reclamation costs will be required
on the Property in the future, which we will likely be responsible for as well. Although we will make every effort to comply with
all applicable laws and regulations, we cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to deal with evolving environmental
attitudes and regulations, nor can we predict the effect of any future changes to environmental regulations on our proposed business
activities. We only plan to record liabilities for site reclamation when reasonably determinable and when such costs can be reliably
quantified. Other costs of compliance with environmental regulations may also be burdensome.
Our
failure to comply with material regulatory requirements could have an adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business. The
expenditure of substantial sums on environmental matters would have a materially negative effect on our ability to implement our
business plan and could require us to cease operations.
Our
business depends substantially on the continuing efforts of our two officers, and our business may be severely disrupted if we
lose their services.
Our
future success heavily depends on the continued service of our two officers. Although we plan to increase the size of our Board
of Directors, appoint additional officers and engage various consultants as our business grows, if they are unable or unwilling
to continue to work for us in their present capacities, we may have to spend a considerable amount of time and resources searching,
recruiting and integrating one or more replacements into our operations, which would severely disrupt our business. This may also
adversely affect our ability to execute our business strategy.
Our
new officers limited experience managing a publicly traded company in the United States may divert his attention from operations
and harm our business.
Cale
Thomas, our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and director, has no experience managing a publicly traded company in the United
States and complying with federal securities laws, including compliance with recently adopted disclosure requirements on a timely
basis. He, together with Fred Tejada, our President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and director, will be required to design
and implement appropriate programs and policies in responding to increased legal, regulatory compliance and reporting requirements,
and any failure to do so could lead to the imposition of fines and penalties and harm our business.
We
may be unable to attract and retain qualified, experienced, highly skilled personnel, which could adversely affect the implementation
of our business plan.
Our
success depends to a significant degree upon our ability to attract, retain and motivate skilled and qualified personnel. As we
become a more mature company in the future, we may find recruiting and retention efforts more challenging. If we do not succeed
in attracting, hiring and integrating such personnel, or retaining and motivating existing personnel, we may be unable to grow
effectively. The loss of any key employee, including members of our management team, and our inability to attract highly skilled
personnel with sufficient experience in our industry could harm our business.
Since
our officers and directors are located in Canada, investors may be limited in their ability to enforce U.S. civil actions against
them for damages to the value of our common stock.
Our
officers and directors are residents of Canada. Consequently, U.S. investors may experience difficulty affecting service of process
on our officers and directors within the United States or enforcing a civil judgment of a U.S. court in Canada if a Canadian court
determines that the U.S. court in which the judgment was obtained did not have jurisdiction in the matter. There is also substantial
doubt whether an original action predicated solely upon civil liability may successfully be brought in Canada against our officers
and directors. As a result, investors may not be able to recover damages as compensation for a decline in the value of their investment.
We
may indemnify our officers and directors against liability to us and our security holders, and such indemnification could increase
our operating costs.
Our
Bylaws allow us to indemnify our officers and directors against claims associated with carrying out the duties of their offices.
Our Bylaws also allow us to reimburse them for the costs of certain legal defenses. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities
arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our officers, directors or control persons, we have been advised by the SEC
that such indemnification is against public policy and is therefore unenforceable.
Since
our officers and directors are aware that they may be indemnified for carrying out the duties of their offices, they may be less
motivated to meet the standards required by law to properly carry out such
duties,
which could increase our operating costs. Further, if any of our officers and directors files a claim against us for indemnification,
the associated expenses could also increase our operating costs.
Failure
to comply with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act could subject us to penalties and other adverse consequences.
As
a Nevada corporation, we are subject to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which generally prohibits United States companies
from engaging in bribery or other prohibited payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business.
Some foreign companies, including some that may compete with us, may not be subject to these prohibitions. Corruption, extortion,
bribery, pay-offs, theft and other fraudulent practices may occur from time-to-time in the countries in which we conduct our business.
However, our employees or other agents may engage in conduct for which we might be held responsible. If our employees or other
agents are found to have engaged in such practices, we could suffer severe penalties and other consequences that may have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current
global financial and economic conditions could adversely impact our operations and financial condition.
Current
global financial and economic conditions, while improving, remain volatile. Many industries, including the mineral resource industry,
are impacted by these market conditions. Some of the key impacts of the current financial market turmoil include contraction in
credit markets resulting in a widening of credit risk; devaluations and high volatility in global equity, commodity, foreign exchange
and precious metal markets; and a lack of market liquidity. Such factors may impact our ability to obtain financing on favourable
terms or at all. Additionally, global economic conditions may cause a long term decrease in asset values. If such global volatility
and market turmoil continue, our operations and financial condition could be adversely impacted.
Risks
Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
Because
there is a limited public trading market for our common stock, investors may not be able to resell their shares.
There
is currently a limited public trading market for our common stock. Therefore, there is no central place, such as stock exchange
or electronic trading system, to resell any shares of our common stock. If investors wish to resell their shares, they will have
to locate a buyer and negotiate their own sale. As a result, they may be unable to sell their shares or may be forced to sell
them at a loss.
We
cannot assure investors that there will be a market in the future for our common stock. The trading of securities on in the over-the-counter
markets is often sporadic and investors may have difficulty buying and selling our shares or obtaining market quotations for them,
which may have a negative effect on the market price of our common stock. Investors may not be able to sell shares at their purchase
price or at any price at all.
A
company controlled by one of our directors has voting control over a substantial portion of our common stock, and he may take
actions that conflict with the interests of our other stockholders.
Scharfe
Holdings Inc., a company over which Bradley Scharfe, our director, has sole
voting and investment power, controls approximately 35.4% of the votes eligible to be cast by our stockholders in the election
of directors and generally. As a result, Mr. Scharfe may have the ability to control certain
matters
requiring the approval of our stockholders, including the election of directors and the approval of mergers and other significant
corporate transactions.
The
sale of securities by us in any equity or debt financing could result in dilution to our existing stockholders and have a material
adverse effect on our earnings.
Any
sale of common stock by us in a future private placement offering could result in dilution to the existing stockholders as a direct
result of our issuance of additional shares of our capital stock. In addition, our business strategy may include expansion through
the acquisition of additional property interests or through business combinations with entities operating in our industry. In
order to do so, or to finance the cost of our operations, we may issue additional equity securities that could dilute our stockholders
stock ownership. We may also pursue debt financing, if and when available, and this could negatively impact our earnings and results
of operations.
We
are subject to penny stock regulations and restrictions and investors may have difficulty selling shares of our common stock.
Our
common stock is subject to the provisions of Section 15(g) and Rule 15g-9 of the Exchange Act, commonly referred to as the penny
stock rules. Section 15(g) sets forth certain requirements for transactions in penny stock, and Rule 15g-9(d) incorporates
the definition of penny stock that is found in Rule 3a51-1 of the Exchange Act. The SEC generally defines a penny
stock to be any equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. We are subject
to the SECs penny stock rules.
Since
our common stock is deemed to be penny stock, trading in the shares of our common stock is subject to additional sales practice
requirements on broker-dealers who sell penny stock to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. Accredited
investors are generally persons with assets in excess of $1,000,000 (excluding the value of such persons primary
residence) or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 together with their spouse. For transactions covered by these rules,
broker-dealers must make a special suitability determination for the purchase of such security and must have the purchasers
written consent to the transaction prior to the purchase. Additionally, for any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt,
the rules require the delivery, prior to the first transaction, of a risk disclosure document relating to the penny stock market.
A broker-dealer also must disclose the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current
quotations for the securities. Finally, monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stocks
held in an account and information to the limited market in penny stocks. Consequently, these rules may restrict the ability of
broker-dealer to trade and/or maintain a market in our common stock and may affect the ability of our stockholders to sell their
shares of common stock.
There
can be no assurance that our common stock will qualify for exemption from the penny stock rules. In any event, even if our common
stock was exempt from the penny stock rules, we would remain subject to Section 15(b)(6) of the Exchange Act, which gives the
SEC the authority to restrict any person from participating in a distribution of penny stock if the SEC finds that such a restriction
would be in the public interest.
We
do not expect to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.
We
do not intend to declare dividends for the foreseeable future, as we anticipate that we will reinvest any future earnings in the
development and growth of our business. Therefore, our stockholders will not receive any funds unless they sell their common stock,
and stockholders may be unable to sell their shares on favorable terms or at all.
Investors
may face significant restrictions on the resale of their shares due to state blue sky laws.
Each
state has its own securities laws, commonly known as blue sky laws, which (1) limit sales of securities to a states
residents unless the securities are registered in that state or qualify for an exemption from registration, and (2) govern the
reporting requirements for broker-dealers doing business directly or indirectly in the state. Before a security is sold in a state,
there must be a registration in place to cover the transaction, or it must be exempt from registration. The applicable broker-dealer
must also be registered in that state.
We
do not know whether our securities will be registered or exempt from registration under the laws of any state. A determination
regarding registration will be made by those broker-dealers, if any, who agree to serve as market makers for our common stock.
There may be significant state blue sky law restrictions on the ability of investors to sell, and on purchasers to buy, our securities.
Investors should therefore consider the resale market for our common stock to be limited, as they may be unable to resell their
shares without the significant expense of state registration or qualification.
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Selected
Financial Data
Not
required.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The
following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the information set forth in our audited financial statements
for the period ended July 31, 2014 and our interim unaudited financial statements for the six months ended January 31, 2015.
Plan
of Operations
As
at January 31, 2014, we had a cash balance of $1,833, compared to a cash balance of $72 as of July 31, 2014. Our plan of operations
for the next 12 months is to carry out a two-phase exploration program on the Property at a total cost of approximately Cnd$540,000,
as follows:
Phase
One: Surface Exploration
Description | |
Amount (Cnd$) | |
Field supervision / mapping / sampling | |
| 40,800 | |
Line cutting (including personnel costs, room & board and vehicle expenses) | |
| 86,400 | |
Soil sampling (including personnel costs, room & board and vehicle expenses) | |
| 9,180 | |
Sample analysis | |
| 20,000 | |
IP-magnetics survey | |
| 68,000 | |
Geophysical contractor costs (including room & board and vehicle expenses) | |
| 24,800 | |
Reporting and drafting | |
| 10,000 | |
Contingency | |
| 10,820 | |
Total | |
| 270,000 | |
Phase
Two: Drilling
Description | |
Amount (Cnd$) | |
Drilling costs | |
| 160,000 | |
Site preparation | |
| 10,000 | |
Sample analysis | |
| 10,000 | |
Geologist / supervisor expenses | |
| 30,000 | |
Field crew expenses (including room & board, vehicle expenses and equipment expenses) | |
| 50,000 | |
Data compilation / report preparation | |
| 10,000 | |
Total | |
| 270,000 | |
In
addition, we anticipate spending approximately $210,000 on general operating expenses, including fees payable in connection with
our filing obligations as a reporting issuer, as follows:
Description | |
Amount (Cnd$) | |
Consulting fees | |
| 120,000 | |
Professional fees | |
| 42,000 | |
Filing and regulatory expenses | |
| 5,500 | |
Rent | |
| 12,000 | |
Marketing and website development expenses | |
| 9,000 | |
General and administrative expenses | |
| 21,500 | |
Total | |
| 210,000 | |
We
do not currently have sufficient funds to carry out the two-phase exploration program or cover our anticipated general operating
expenses for the year, so we will require additional funding. We anticipate that additional funding will be in the form of equity
financing from the sale of our common stock or from director loans. We do not have any arrangements in place for any future equity
financing or loans, and if we are not successful in raising additional financing, we anticipate that we will not be able to proceed
with our business plan.
We
anticipate incurring operating losses for the foreseeable future. We base this expectation, in part, on the fact that very few
mineral claims in the exploration stage ultimately develop into producing, profitable mines. Our future financial results are
also uncertain due to a number of factors, some of which are outside our control. These factors include the following:
| ● | our
ability to raise additional funding; |
| ● | the
market price for any minerals that may be discovered on the Property; |
| ● | the
results of our proposed exploration program on the Property. |
We
have not attained profitable operations and are dependent upon obtaining financing to pursue our proposed exploration activities.
For these reasons our auditors believe that there is substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern.
Results
of Operations
We
have not generated any revenue since inception and are dependent upon obtaining financing to pursue our business activities. Our
activities have been financed from the proceeds of share subscriptions and loans from related parties. For these reasons, our
auditors believe that there is substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern.
For
the Three Months Ended January 31, 2015 and 2014
Our
operating expenses for the three month periods ended January 31, 2015 and 2014 and the changes between those periods for the respective
items are summarized as follows:
| |
For the three months ended January 31, 2015 ($) | | |
For the three months ended January 31, 2014 ($) | |
Consulting fees | |
| 12,813 | | |
| 13,866 | |
Filing and regulatory fees | |
| 7,252 | | |
| 2,979 | |
Foreign exchange | |
| (72,871 | ) | |
| (42,223 | ) |
Gain on settlement of payables | |
| (1,998 | ) | |
| Nil | |
General and administrative expenses | |
| 4,734 | | |
| 7,983 | |
Professional fees | |
| 7,340 | | |
| 26,813 | |
Promotion and shareholder communication expenses | |
| - | | |
| 133 | |
Net income (loss) | |
| 42,730 | | |
| (8,551 | ) |
In
general, our expenses between the two periods were relatively consistent except for our professional fees, which decreased during
the three months ended January 31, 2015 from the same period in the prior year largely because our level of activity in searching
for a potential strategic transaction also decreased.
For
the Six Months Ended January 31, 2015 and 2014
Our
operating expenses for the six month periods ended January 31, 2015 and 2014 and the changes between those periods for the respective
items are summarized as follows:
| |
For the six months ended January 31, 2015 ($) | | |
For the six months ended January 31, 2014 ($) | |
Consulting fees | |
| 47,917 | | |
| 41,264 | |
Filing and regulatory fees | |
| 11,398 | | |
| 4,010 | |
Foreign exchange | |
| (95,097 | ) | |
| (42,462 | ) |
Gain on settlement of payables | |
| (1,998 | ) | |
| Nil | |
General and administrative expenses | |
| 15,816 | | |
| 16,669 | |
Professional fees | |
| 9,015 | | |
| 35,390 | |
Promotion and shareholder communication expenses | |
| Nil | | |
| 606 | |
Net income (loss) | |
| 6,843 | | |
| (55,477 | ) |
Our
expenses decreased during the six month period ended January 31, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014 primarily as a result
of becoming less active while we searched for projects in the current period.
For
the Years Ended July 31, 2014 and 2013
Our
operating expenses for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2014 and 2013 and the changes between those years for the respective items
are summarized as follows:
| |
Year ended July 31, 2014 ($) | | |
Year ended July 31, 2013 ($) | |
Bad debt expense | |
| 50,038 | | |
| - | |
Consulting fees | |
| 51,284 | | |
| 116,273 | |
Filing and regulatory fees | |
| 9,557 | | |
| 23,374 | |
Foreign exchange | |
| (28,780 | ) | |
| (10,682 | ) |
Gain on extinguishment of debt | |
| (7,771 | ) | |
| - | |
General and administrative expenses | |
| 28,113 | | |
| 65,114 | |
Geological, mineral and prospect costs written off | |
| - | | |
| 364,000 | |
Professional fees | |
| 54,650 | | |
| 45,509 | |
Promotion and shareholder communication expenses | |
| 639 | | |
| 76,201 | |
Net loss | |
| 157,730 | | |
| 679,789 | |
Our
expenses decreased substantially during the year ended July 31, 2014 compared to the prior year largely because we wrote off an
aggregate of $364,000 in geological, mineral and prospect costs during the year ended July 31, 2013 and our other fees and expenses
decreased as a result. However, our professional fees during the two years remained relatively consistent.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Six
Months Ended January 31, 2015 and 2014
As
of January 31, 2015, we had $1,833 in cash, $7,581 in current and total assets, $717,193 in current and total liabilities, a working
capital deficit of $709,612 and an accumulated deficit of $1,042,812.
During
the six months ended January 31, 2015, we used $10,783 in net cash on operating activities, whereas we used $10,075 in net cash
on operating activities during the same period in the prior year.
Investing
activities provided $12,544 in net cash during the six months ended January 31, 2015, whereas we did not use any net cash on investing
activities during the six months ended January 31, 2014
Years
Ended July 31, 2014 and 2013
As
of July 31, 2014, we had $72 in cash, $9,152 in current and total assets, $725,607 in current and total liabilities, a working
capital deficit of $716,455 and an accumulated deficit of $1,049,655.
During
the year ended July 31, 2014, we used $10,074 in net cash on operating activities, whereas our operating activities provided $68,216
in net cash during the prior year. We did not use any net cash on investing activities during the year ended July 31, 2014, whereas
we used $60,000 during the prior year, all of which was in the form of mineral exploration.
From
our inception to July 31, 2014, we raised $29,200 through private placements of our common stock.
We
expect to incur at a loss for at least the next 12 months. We have no agreements for additional financing and cannot provide any
assurance that additional funding will be available to finance our operations on acceptable terms in order to enable us to carry
out our business plan. There are no assurances that we will be able to complete further sales of our common stock or any other
form of additional financing. If we are unable to achieve the financing necessary to continue our plan of operations, then we
will not be able to carry out any exploration work on the Property and our business may fail.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We
have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial
condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital
resources that are material to investors.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Not
required.
PROPERTIES
On
May 25, 2015, we paid Eastfield $20,000 in cash and provided Eastfield with a copy of the Technical Report, thereby completing
the first milestone under the Option Agreement required to earn an undivided 60% interest in and to the Property. See
the disclosure under Item 2.01 – Description of Business, which is incorporated herein by reference.
In
addition, we currently use the office space of one of our directors totaling approximately 3,000 square feet in area for which
we pay approximately 7.5% of the total monthly costs. This space is located at 700 – 510 West Hastings Street, Vancouver,
British Columbia, Canada V6B 1L8, and we believe that it is generally suitable to meet our needs for the foreseeable future; however,
we will continue to seek additional space as required to satisfy our growth.
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The
following table sets forth certain information regarding our common stock beneficially owned as of May 25, 2015 for (i) each stockholder
known to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of our outstanding shares of common stock, (ii) each of our officers and directors
and (iii) our officers and directors as a
group.
A person is considered to beneficially own any shares over which such person, directly or indirectly, exercises sole or shared
voting or investment power, or over which such person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership at any time within 60 days
through an exercise of stock options or warrants or otherwise. Unless otherwise indicated, voting and investment power relating
to the shares shown in the table for our officers and directors is exercised solely by the beneficial owner thereof.
For
the purposes of this table, a person or group of persons is deemed to have beneficial ownership of any shares of
our common stock that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days. For the purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding
shares of our common stock held by each person or group of persons named above, any shares that such person or persons has the
right to acquire within 60 days of May 25, 2015 is deemed to be outstanding, but is not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose
of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. The inclusion herein of any shares listed as beneficially owned does
not constitute an admission of beneficial ownership.
Title of Class | |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | |
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | | |
Percent of Class (1) | |
Common Stock | |
Fred Tejada (2) | |
| 709,259 | | |
| 1.9 | |
Common Stock | |
Cale Thomas (3) | |
| 2,000,000 | | |
| 5.2 | |
Common Stock | |
Bradley Scharfe (4) | |
| 13,548,241 | (5) | |
| 35.4 | |
All Officers and Directors as a Group | | | 16,257,500 | | |
| 42.5 | |
Common Stock | |
Perparim Alikaj (6) 700 – 510 West Hastings Street Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V6B 1L8 | |
| 6,250 | | |
| (7 | ) |
Common Stock | |
Greg Johnston (8) 700 – 510 West Hastings Street Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V6B 1L8 | |
| 1,522,500 | (9) | |
| 4.0 | |
Common Stock | |
Jason Scharfe 700 – 510 West Hastings Street Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V6B 1L8 | |
| 3,000,000 | | |
| 7.8 | |
Common Stock | |
Anthony Oram 4168 Susan Court Burlington, Ontario Canada L7M 4E9 | |
| 2,857,143 | | |
| 7.5 | |
| (1) | Based
on 38,297,179 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of the date of this Report. |
| (2) | Fred
Tejada was appointed as our President and Secretary on November 22, 2013, our Chief Executive Officer on April 2, 2015, and our
director on June 8, 2012. He also acted as our Chief Executive Officer from November 19, 2013 until
April 23, 2014, our Chief Financial Officer from March 4, 2014 until April 2, 2015, and our Treasurer from November 19, 2013 until
April 2, 2015. |
| (3) | Cale
Thomas was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and director on April 2, 2015 |
| (4) | Bradley
Scharfe was appointed as our director on April 2, 2015. |
| (5) | These
shares are held by Scharfe Holdings Inc., a corporation over which Mr. Scharfe has sole voting and investment power. |
| (6) | Perparim
Alikaj acted as our director from June 8, 2012 until the April 2, 2015. |
| (8) | Greg
Johnston acted as our Chief Executive Officer and director from April 23, 2014 to April 2, 2015. |
| (9) | These
shares are held by BDirect Online Communications Inc., a corporation over which Mr. Johnston has sole voting and investment power. |
Changes
in Control
We
are not aware of any arrangements, including any pledge by any person of our securities, the operation of which may at a subsequent
date result in a change in our control.
DIRECTORS
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Directors
and Executive Officers
The
names, ages and positions of executive officers and directors are as follows:
Name | |
Age | |
Position |
Fred Tejada | |
56 | |
President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Director |
Cale Thomas | |
45 | |
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Director |
Bradley Scharfe | |
50 | |
Director |
Fred
Tejada
Fred
Tejada was appointed as our President and Secretary on November
22, 2013, our Chief Executive Officer on April 2, 2015, and our director on June 8, 2012. He also acted
as our Chief Executive Officer from November 19, 2013 until April 23, 2014, our Chief Financial Officer from March 4, 2014 until
April 2, 2015, and our Treasurer from November 19, 2013 until April 2, 2015.
Mr.
Tejada has 30 years of international mineral industry experience and has a proven record working with both major mining companies
and exploration-focused organizations. He is currently the President of Tirex Resources Ltd., a Vancouver-based public company
with near term production projects in Albania. Prior to this, Mr. Tejada was the Vice-President for Exploration of Panoro Minerals
Ltd., where he directed resource definition drilling of the companys two major copper deposits in Peru. For seven years,
Mr. Tejada was the Country Manager and President of the Philippine subsidiary companies for Phelps Dodge Exploration Corp. with
responsibility for corporate matters and exploration activities from project generation, property acquisitions and permitting.
Cale
Thomas
Cale
Thomas was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and director on April 2, 2015. Mr. Thomas is a Vancouver businessman
and financial consultant who helps companies both public and private to develop their operations and provides access to private
capital and public markets where appropriate.
Mr.
Thomas is currently the Chief Financial Officer and a director of Carl Capital Corp. (CSE: CRL) and has held positions with several
other Canadian reporting issuers in the past. He was the Chief Financial Officer of Eagle Hill Exploration Corporation from May
2008 to August 2013 and a director of the same company from September 2008 to September 2013; the Chief Financial Officer of Yankee
Hat Minerals Ltd. from July 2007 to October 2012; the Chief Financial Officer of Worldwide Promotional Management Inc. from April
2008 to January 2009; and the Chief Financial Officer of Supreme Resources Inc. from April 2006 to December 2006.
Mr.
Thomas holds a Master of Business Administration degree from the DeGroote School of Business at McMaster University in Hamilton,
Ontario and a Bachelor of Arts degree with a major in Economics from the University of Western Ontario in London, Ontario. He
has also completed the Canadian Securities Course.
Bradley
Scharfe
Bradley
Scharfe was appointed as our director on April 2, 2015. Mr. Scharfe is a Vancouver businessman who has focused on venture capital
situations throughout his career and has worked with multiple companies in the areas of capital requirements, public market concerns
and personnel. Mr. Scharfe was previously a venture capital stock broker with Canaccord Capital Corporation for 12 years. He is
currently the Chairman and a director of Carl Capital Corp. (CSE: CRL), and a director of Corazon Gold Corp. (TSXV: CGW), both
of which are venture-stage Canadian public companies.
Mr.
Scharfe holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Toronto, with a major in Commerce and Economics.
None
of our directors has been a director of any company with a class of securities registered pursuant to section 12 of the Exchange
Act or subject to the requirements of section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, or
any
company registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, during the past five years.
Significant
Employees
Other
than our executive officers, we do not expect any other individuals to make a significant contribution to our business.
Family
Relationships
There
are no family relationships among our directors, executive officers or persons nominated or chosen by us to become directors or
executive officers.
Legal
Proceedings
None
of our directors, executive officers, promoters or control persons has been involved in any of the following events during the
past 10 years:
| ● | any
bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at
the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; |
| ● | any
conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other
minor offenses); |
| ● | being
subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction,
permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities
or banking activities; |
| ● | being
found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated
any federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated; |
| ● | being
the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree or finding, not subsequently
reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud
in connection with any business activity; |
| ● | being
the subject of, or a party to, any judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended
or vacated relating to an alleged violation of any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation or any law or
regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies; or |
| ● | being
the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any stock, commodities
or derivatives exchange or other self-regulatory organization. |
Except
as set forth in our discussion below in Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, none of our directors or
executive officers has been involved in any transactions with us or any of our directors, executive officers, affiliates or associates
which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.
Management
Agreements
We
do not yet have formal management or consulting agreements in place with any of our executive officers. Regardless, we expect
that they will allocate approximately 40% of their working time to our business.
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Compliance
Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act requires a companys directors and officers, and persons who own more than 10% of any class of
a companys equity securities which are registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, to file with the SEC initial statements
of beneficial ownership, reports of changes in ownership and annual reports concerning their ownership
of our common shares and other equity securities, on Forms 3, 4 and 5, respectively. Such officers, directors and 10% stockholders
are also required to furnish the company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely on our review of the
copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from the reporting persons as of the date of this Report, we believe
that all Section 16(a) reports applicable to our directors, officers and 10% stockholders with respect to our fiscal year ended
July 31, 2014 have been filed.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Summary
Compensation Table
The
following sets forth information with respect to the compensation awarded or paid to our current and former executive officers
for all services rendered in all capacities to us during our fiscal years ended July 31, 2014 and 2013. No other individual received
total compensation from us in excess of $100,000 during those years. Pursuant to Item 402(a)(5) of Regulation S-K we have omitted
certain columns from the table since there was no compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to these individuals required to
be reported in such columns in either year.
Name and Principal Position | |
Year Ended July 31, | |
All Other Compensation ($) | | |
Total ($) | |
Fred Tejada, President (1) | |
2014 | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
2013 | |
| 7,800 | (2) | |
| 7,800 | |
Greg Johnston, former Chief Executive Officer (3) | |
2014 | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
2013 | |
| N/A | | |
| N/A | |
John LaGourgue, former Chief Executive Officer (4) | |
2014 | |
| 8,629 | (5) | |
| 8,629 | |
| |
2013 | |
| 20,000 | (5) | |
| 20,000 | |
| (1) | Fred
Tejada was appointed as our President and Secretary on November 22, 2013, our Chief Executive Officer on April 2, 2015, and our
director on June 8, 2012. He also acted as our Chief Executive Officer from November 19, 2013 until
April 23, 2014, our Chief Financial Officer |
| | from
March 4, 2014 until April 2, 2015, and our Treasurer from November 19, 2013 until April 2, 2015. |
| (2) | Represents
consulting fees paid to Mr. Tejada. |
| (3) | Greg
Johnston acted as our Chief Executive Officer and director from April 23, 2014 to April 2, 2015. |
| (4) | John
LaGourgue acted as our President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer from February 1, 2013 until November 19, 2013,
and our director from January 25, 2013 until November 19, 2013. |
| (5) | Represents
consulting fees paid to a corporation over which Mr. LaGourgue has sole voting
and investment power. |
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
We
do not have any outstanding equity awards.
Benefit
Plans
We
do not have any pensions plan, profit sharing plan or similar plan for the benefit of our officers, directors or employees. However,
we may establish such plans in the future.
Director
Compensation
We
do not compensate any of our directors for serving on the board of directors. Management directors are not compensated for their
service as directors; however they may receive compensation for their services as our employees or consultants.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Transactions
with Related Persons
The
following includes a summary of transactions since August 1, 2012, or any currently proposed transaction, in which we were or
are to be a participant and the amount involved exceeded or exceeds $120,000 and in which any related person had or will have
a direct or indirect material interest (other than compensation described in Item 2.01 – Executive Compensation). We believe
the terms obtained or consideration that we paid or received, as applicable, in connection with the transactions described below
were comparable to terms available or the amounts that would be paid or received, as applicable, in arms-length transactions.
| ● | During
the year ended July 31, 2014, we paid consulting fees of $33,636 (2013 - $60,000) to a company with a common former director,
$Nil (2013 - $700) to our former Chief Executive Officer, $8,629 (2013 - $20,000) to a company controlled by the former Chief
Executive Officer, and $Nil (2013 - $7,800) to our Chief Financial Officer. |
| ● | As
at July 31, 2014, we had recorded loans from related parties of $67,100 (2013 - $67,100) representing advances made by a two former
directors and officers. The advances are due on demand without interest. |
| ● | As
at July 31, 2014, including in due to related parties was $545,494 (2013 - $398,323) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
to our current and former officers and companies controlled by our directors and officers. Of this amount, $325,643 (2013 - $287,431)
represents advances made by Skanderbeg Capital Partners Inc., a company that advises our management and does promotional work
for us (Skanderbeg). Skanderbeg has made payments on our behalf until such time as we are able to complete a financing. |
| ● | Included
in general and administration expenses for the year ended July 31, 2014 is rent of $1,725 (2013 - $11,476) and consulting fees
of $966 (2013 - $26,391) paid to Skanderbeg. |
Other
than as described above, we have not entered into any transactions with our executive officers, directors, persons nominated for
these positions, beneficial owners of 5% or more of our common stock, or family members of those persons wherein the amount involved
in the transaction or a series of similar transactions exceeded the lesser of $120,000 or 1% of the average of our total assets
for the last two fiscal years.
Director
Independence
Because
our common stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange, we currently use the definition in NASDAQ Listing
Rule 5605(a)(2) for determining director independence, which provides that an independent director is a person other
than an executive officer or employee of the company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the
companys board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities
of a director. The NASDAQ listing rules provide that a director cannot be considered independent if:
| ● | the
director is, or at any time during the past three years was, an employee of the company; |
| ● | the
director or a family member of the director accepted any compensation from the company in excess of $120,000 during any period
of 12 consecutive months within the three years preceding the independence determination (subject to certain exclusions, including,
among other things, compensation for board or board committee service); |
| ● | a
family member of the director is, or at any time during the past three years was, an executive officer of the company; |
| ● | the
director or a family member of the director is a partner in, controlling stockholder of, or an executive officer of an entity
to which the company made, or from which the company received, payments in the current or any of the past three fiscal years that
exceed 5% of the recipients consolidated gross revenue for that year or $200,000, whichever is greater (subject to certain
exclusions); |
| ● | the
director or a family member of the director is employed as an executive officer of an entity where, at any time during the past
three years, any of the executive officers of the company served on the compensation committee of such other entity; or |
| ● | the
director or a family member of the director is a current partner of the companys outside auditor, or at any time during
the past three years was a partner or employee of the companys outside auditor, and who worked on the companys audit. |
We
have determined that neither Fred Tejada nor Cale Thomas meet this definition of independence due to the fact that they are also
our executive officers.
We
currently have a separately designated audit committee but do not have a separately designated nominating or compensation committee.
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
On
September 17, 2014, we learned that we were the subject, along with a number of additional defendants, of a notice of civil claim
(the Claim) filed in the Supreme Court of British Columbia by Wundr Software Inc. (Wundr), an eBook
software developer. We were formerly a party to a binding letter of intent with Wundr that was announced on November 12, 2013
(the LOI), pursuant to which we proposed to acquire 100% of the outstanding shares of Wundr. On January 10, 2014,
we reported that the LOI had expired.
Among
other things, the Claim alleges that we committed the tort of intentional interference with economic or contractual relations
by virtue of our role in an alleged scheme to establish a competing business to Wundr, and that we, through our agents, breached
the terms of the LOI by appropriating certain confidential information and intellectual property of Wundr for the purpose of establishing
a competing business. The Claim also alleges that we are vicariously liable for the actions of our agents.
Wundr
is seeking general damages from us as well as damages for conspiracy to cause economic harm. None of the allegations contained
in the Claim have been proven in court.
Other
than as described above, we are not aware of any material pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or of which our property
is the subject. We also know of no proceedings to which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial
holders of more than 5% of any class of our securities, or any associate of any such director, officer, affiliate or security
holder are an adverse party or have a material interest adverse to us.
MARKET
PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON OUR COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
General
As
of the date of this Report we have 38,297,179 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. As of the date of this Report, the
exemption from registration provided by Rule 144 under the Securities Act was not available for any restricted shares of our common
stock pursuant to Rule 144(i).
Market
Information
Our
stock is quoted under the symbol RYES on the OTC Pink Current Information tier of the over-the-counter market operated
by OTC Markets Inc. Our common stock is not traded on any exchange
and we cannot assure you that there will be a market in the future for our common stock.
OTC
Pink securities are not listed and traded on the floor of an organized national or regional stock exchange. Instead, OTC Pink
securities transactions are conducted through a telephone and computer network connecting dealers. OTC Pink issuers are traditionally
smaller companies that do not meet the financial and other listing requirements of a national or regional stock exchange
The
following table reflects the high and low bid information for our common stock based on inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up,
mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions. It also reflects the 1 for 80 reverse split of our common
stock that we completed on January 22, 2015.
OTCQB / OTC Pink |
Quarter Ended | |
High ($) | |
Low ($) |
July 31, 2014 | |
15.76 | |
6.56 |
April 30, 2014 | |
12.00 | |
4.00 |
January 31, 2014 | |
15.60 | |
4.00 |
October 31, 2013 | |
19.20 | |
5.20 |
July 31, 2013 | |
20.40 | |
4.40 |
April 30, 2013 | |
16.80 | |
5.60 |
January 31, 2013 | |
22.40 | |
11.20 |
October 31, 2012 | |
26.00 | |
13.60 |
The
market for our common stock has been sporadic and there have been long periods during which there were few, if any, trades. Accordingly,
reliance should not be placed on the quotations listed above, as the trades and depth of the market may be limited, and therefore,
such quotes may not be a true indication of the current market value of our common stock.
Holders
As
of the date of this Report, there are approximately 50 holders of record of our common stock.
Dividends
To
date, we have not paid dividends on shares of our common stock and we do not expect to declare or pay dividends on shares of our
common stock for the foreseeable future. The payment of any dividends will depend upon our future earnings, if any, our financial
condition, and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.
Penny
Stock
Our
common stock is subject to the provisions of Section 15(g) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15g-9 thereunder, commonly referred to
as the penny stock rule. Section 15(g) sets forth certain requirements for transactions in penny stock, and Rule
15g-9(d) incorporates the definition of penny stock that is found in Rule 3a51-1 of the Exchange Act. The SEC generally
defines a penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions.
We are subject to the SECs penny stock rules.
Since
our common stock is deemed to be penny stock, trading in the shares of our common stock is subject to additional sales practice
requirements on broker-dealers who sell penny stock to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. Accredited
investors are generally persons with
assets
in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 together with their spouse. For transactions covered by
these rules, broker-dealers must make a special suitability determination for the purchase of securities and must have the purchasers
written consent to the transaction prior to the purchase. Additionally, for any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt,
the rules require the delivery, prior to the first transaction, of a risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC relating to
the penny stock market. A broker-dealer also must disclose the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered
representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally, monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information
for penny stocks held in an account and information to the limited market in penny stocks. Consequently, these rules may restrict
the ability of broker-dealer to trade and/or maintain a market in our common stock and may affect the ability of our stockholders
to sell their shares.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
We
do not have any compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance. We intend to adopt an equity
compensation plan in which our directors, officers, employees and consultants will be eligible to participate. However, no formal
steps have been taken as of the date of this Report to adopt such a plan.
RECENT
SALE OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
See
the disclosure set forth under Item 3.02 which is incorporated herein by reference. Other than that
or as disclosed in in previous quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or current reports on Form 8-K, we have not issued any equity
securities that were not registered under the Securities Act within the past three years.
DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES
Our
authorized capital consists of 400,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value.
Common
Stock
As
of the date of this Report we have 38,297,179 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
Holders
of our common stock have no preemptive rights to purchase additional shares of common stock or other subscription rights. Our
common stock carries no conversion rights and is not subject to redemption or to any sinking fund provisions. All shares of our
common stock are entitled to share equally in dividends from sources legally available, when, as and if declared by our board
of directors, and upon our liquidation or dissolution, whether voluntary or involuntary, to share equally in our assets available
for distribution to our security holders.
Our
board of directors is authorized to issue additional shares of our common stock not to exceed the amount authorized by our Articles
of Incorporation, on such terms and conditions and for such consideration as our board may deem appropriate without further security
holder action.
Voting
Rights
Each
holder of our common stock is entitled to one vote per share on all matters on which such stockholders are entitled to vote. Since
the shares of our common stock do not have cumulative voting rights, the holders of more than 50% of the shares voting for the
election of directors can elect all the directors if they choose to do so and, in such event, the holders of the remaining shares
will not be able to elect any person to our board of directors.
Dividend
Policy
Holders
of our common stock are entitled to dividends if declared by our board of directors out of funds legally available for the payment
of dividends. Since our inception on February 9, 2007 we have not declared any dividends.
We
do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends in the future. We intend to retain earnings, if any, to finance the development
and expansion of our business. However, it is possible that our management may decide to declare a stock dividend in the future.
Our future dividend policy will be subject to the discretion of our board of directors and will be contingent upon our future
earnings, if any, our financial condition, and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.
INDEMNIFICATION
OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
The
only statutes, charter provisions, bylaws, contracts or other arrangements under which any of our directors, officers or controlling
persons are insured or indemnified in any manner against any liability which he may incur in his capacity as such, are as follows:
| ● | Article
XIII of our bylaws; and |
Bylaws
Article
XIII of our bylaws provides that we will indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent not prohibited by Nevada law;
provided, however, that we may modify the extent of such indemnification by individual contracts with our directors and officers;
and, provided, further, that we shall not be required to indemnify any director or officer in connection with any proceeding (or
part thereof) initiated by such person unless:
| (1) | such
indemnification is expressly required to be made by law; |
| (2) | the
proceeding was authorized by our board of directors; |
| (3) | such
indemnification is provided by us, in our sole discretion, pursuant to the powers vested us under Nevada law; or |
| (4) | such
indemnification is required to be made pursuant to the bylaws. |
Our
bylaws provide that we will advance all expenses incurred to any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party
to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative,
by reason of the fact that he is or was our director or officer, or is or was serving at our request as a director or executive
officer of another company, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, prior to the final disposition of the proceeding,
promptly following request. This advanced of expenses is to be made upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of such person
to repay said amounts should it be ultimately determined that the person was not entitled to be indemnified under our bylaws or
otherwise.
Our
bylaws also provide that no advance shall be made by us to any officer in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative, if a determination is reasonably and
promptly
made: (a) by the board of directors by a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the proceeding;
or (b) if such quorum is not obtainable, or, even if obtainable, a quorum of disinterested directors so directs, by independent
legal counsel in a written opinion, that the facts known to the decision- making party at the time such determination is made
demonstrate clearly and convincingly that such person acted in bad faith or in a manner that such person did not believe to be
in or not opposed to our best interests.
The
general effect of the foregoing is that we may indemnify a director, officer or controlling person from liability, thereby making
us responsible for any expenses or damages incurred by such director, officer or controlling person in any action brought against
them based on their conduct in such capacity, provided they did not engage in fraud or criminal activity.
Insofar
as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling
persons pursuant to the NRS or our bylaws, or otherwise, in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy
as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
In
the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities, other than the payment by us of expenses incurred or paid
by one of our directors, officers or controlling persons in the successful defence of any action, suit or proceeding, is asserted
by one of our directors, officers or controlling persons, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel the matter has been settled
by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and we will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
Nevada
Revised Statutes
Section
78.138 of the NRS provides for immunity of directors from monetary liability, except in certain enumerated circumstances, as follows:
Except
as otherwise provided in NRS 35.230, 90.660, 91.250, 452.200, 452.270, 668.045 and 694A.030, or unless the articles of incorporation
or an amendment thereto, in each case filed on or after October 1, 2003, provide for greater individual liability, a director
or officer is not individually liable to the corporation or its stockholders or creditors for any damages as a result of any act
or failure to act in his or her capacity as a director or officer unless it is proven that:
| (a) | The
directors or officers act or failure to act constituted a breach of his or her fiduciary duties as a director or
officer; and |
| (b) | The
breach of those duties involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law. |
Section
78.7502 of the NRS provides as follows:
| 1. | A
corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed
action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, except an action by or in the right of the
corporation, by reason of the fact that the person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is
or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership,
joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses, including attorneys fees, judgments, fines and |
amounts
paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with the action, suit or proceeding if he:
| (a) | Is
not liable pursuant to NRS 78.138; or |
| (b) | Acted
in good faith and in a manner which he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation,
and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. |
| 2. | A
corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed
action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that the person
is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as
a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against expenses,
including amounts paid in settlement and attorneys fees actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with
the defense or settlement of the action or suit if the person: |
| (a) | Is
not liable pursuant to NRS 78.138; or |
| (b) | Acted
in good faith and in a manner which he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporationl. |
| 3. | To
the extent that a director, officer, employee or agent of a corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense
of any action, suit or proceeding referred to in subsections 1 and 2, or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, the
corporation shall indemnify him or her against expenses, including attorneys fees, actually and reasonably incurred by
him or her in connection with the defense. |
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
| Item
3.02 | Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities |
On
April 23, 2015, we entered into debt conversion agreements with two non-U.S. investors pursuant to which such investors agreed
to convert an aggregate of Cnd$40,981.69 in debt into 1,170,906 shares of our common stock at a price of Cnd$0.035 per share.
On the same day, we also issued an aggregate of 6,000,002 shares of our common stock to six non-U.S. investors at a price of Cnd$0.035
per share in exchange for gross proceeds of $210,000. We issued the foregoing shares in reliance upon
the exemption from registration provided by Rule 903 of Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities
Act).
Our
reliance on Rule 903 of Regulation S under the Securities Act (Regulation S) was based on the fact that the shares
were sold in offshore transactions, as defined in Rule 902(h) of Regulation S. We did not engage in any directed
selling efforts in the United States in connection with the sale of the shares, and the investors were not U.S. persons and did
not acquire the shares for the account or benefit of any U.S. person.
As
of the date of this Report, we have 38,297,179 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
| Item
5.02 | Departure
of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors, Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain
Officers |
On
May 19, 2015, we appointed Michael Evans as our director. Mr. Evans, age 55, is the Managing Partner of Evans & Evans, Inc.,
a boutique investment banking firm with offices and affiliates in Canada, the United States and Asia, that he founded in 1989.
The firm offers a range of independent and advocate services to clients including capital formation assistance, M&A advice,
valuation and fairness opinions, business due diligence, business planning and research, and market and competitive research.
Mr.
Evans received his Chartered Financial Analyst designation in 1991, his Chartered Business Valuator designation in 1995 and his
Accredited Senior Appraiser designation in 2008. He is a member of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Business Valuators, the
American Society of Appraisers (Western Canada Chapter) and the Association of Investment Management and Research. Mr. Evans holds
a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from Simor Fraser University and a Masters of Business Administration degree from
the University of Portland.
| Item
5.06 | Change
in Shell Company Status |
Since
we were a shell company prior to the execution of the Option Agreement, see the disclosure set forth under Item 2.01 which is
incorporated herein by reference.
| Item
9.01 | Financial
Statements and Exhibits |
Number | |
Exhibit Description |
| |
|
3.1 | |
Articles of Incorporation (1) |
| |
|
3.2 | |
Bylaws (1) |
| |
|
3.3 | |
Articles of Merger filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on January 14, 2015 (2) |
| |
|
3.4 | |
Certificate of Amendment filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on April 9, 2015 (3) |
| |
|
10.1 | |
Option Agreement with Eastfield Resources Inc. dated May 18, 2015 |
| |
|
14.1 | |
Code of Ethics (4) |
| (1) | Included
as an exhibit to our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on February 19, 2008. |
| (2) | Included
as an exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K filed on January 15, 2015. |
| (3) | Included
as an exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K filed on April 9, 2015. |
| (4) | Included
as an exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to our annual report on Form 10-K filed on October 30, 2008. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
Date:
May 26, 2015
RISE
RESOURCES INC.
/s/
Fred Tejada
Fred Tejada
President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Director
Exhibit 10.1
OPTION
AGREEMENT
This
option agreement (this Agreement) is entered into this 18th day of May, 2015 by and between:
EASTFIELD
RESOURCES LTD., a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of British Columbia with office address at Suite
110 – 325 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6C 1Z7, Canada
(EASTFIELD);
and
RISE
RESOURCES INC., a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Nevada, USA, with office address
at Suite 700 – 510 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, V6B 1L8, Canada
(RISE);
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS,
EASTFIELD owns a 91.1% interest in the Indata property located in the Omineca Mining Division, British Columbia,
consisting of 18 claims, and which is more specifically
described in Appendix A (the Property); and
WHEREAS,
EASTFIELD has an existing agreement with IMPERIAL METALS INC. (IMPERIAL) where by virtue of such agreement
IMPERIAL owns the remaining 8.9% interest in the Property; and
WHEREAS,
RISE desires to earn up to a 75% interest in the Property from EASTFIELD;
NOW,
THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth,
EASTFIELD and RISE (individually, a Party or collectively, the Parties) hereby agree
as follows:
| 1. | Grant
of 60% Option. EASTFIELD hereby grants to RISE the exclusive and irrevocable option to earn a 60% undivided interest in the
Property (the 60% Option) by: |
| a. | making
the cash payments to EASTFIELD as set out in Table 1 below on or before the relevant completion date; and |
| b. | subject
to clause 3, satisfying the exploration expenditure (the Expenditure) set out in Table 1 below on or before
the relevant completion date. The sum of the foregoing cash payments and Expenditure comprise the 60% Option Price. |
Table
1
Completion Date | |
Cash Payment ($) | | |
Exploration Expenditure ($) | | |
% Interest Earned | |
October 3, 2015 | |
20,000 plus completion of NI 43-101 technical report on the Property | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
April 3, 2016 | |
| 30,000 | | |
| 50,000 | | |
| - | |
April 3, 2017 | |
| 100,000 | | |
| 200,000 | | |
| - | |
April 3, 2018 | |
| 100,000 | | |
| 250,000 | | |
| - | |
April 3, 2019 | |
| 100,000 | | |
| 1,500,000 | | |
| 60 | |
Total | |
| 350,000 | | |
| 2,000,000 | | |
| 60 | |
| 2. | Grant
of Additional 15% Option. Upon RISE exercising the 60% Option, RISE shall have the exclusive and irrevocable option to earn
an additional 15% undivided interest in the Property (the 15% Option) by: |
| a. | making
the cash payments to EASTFIELD as set out in Table 2 below on or before the relevant completion date; and |
| b. | subject
to clause 3, satisfying the Expenditure set out in the Table 2 below and completing a feasibility study in accordance with industry
standards. The sum of the foregoing cash payments, Expenditure and completion of a feasibility study comprise the 15%
Option Price. |
Table
2
Completion Date | |
Cash Payment ($) | | |
Exploration Expenditure ($) | |
Additional % Interest Earned |
Within 90 days of exercising the 60% Option | |
| 100,000 | | |
- | |
- |
Completion of feasibility study | |
| - | | |
$500,000 per year until completion | |
15 |
Total | |
| 100,000 | | |
| |
15 |
| 3. | Expenditure
Commitments and Shortfall Payments. Each Expenditure for both the 60% Option and the 15% Option calls for RISE to contribute,
at a minimum, the amount indicated in Table 1 and Table 2 in respect of the Property on or before the relevant completion date.
If RISE fails to satisfy an Expenditure on or before such date, RISE may, in its sole discretion, pay to EASTFIELD the corresponding
shortfall amount (being the difference between the relevant Expenditure and the Qualifying Expenses at that time) within 20 business
days of the relevant completion date. Any Qualifying Expenses incurred in excess of Expenditure in both the 60% Option and the
15% Option will be |
| | rolled
over and applied towards satisfying the next or succeeding Expenditure requirements. |
| 4. | Option
Period, Withdrawal and Termination. The Option Period shall commence on April 28, 2015 and end on the
earlier of the date RISE exercises the 15% Option or the date this Agreement is terminated. This Agreement may be terminated as
follows: |
| a. | by
EASTFIELD sending a notice to RISE if RISE fails to make a cash payment or satisfy an Expenditure on the relevant completion date,
and such cash payment or Expenditure remains outstanding for a period of 10 calendar days; |
| b. | by
RISE sending a notice to EASTFIELD that it has elected to terminate this Agreement upon 10 business days notice. |
| 5. | Exercise
of Option. Within 10 business days of exercising the 60% Option or 15% Option, as applicable, EASTFIELD shall deliver to RISE
all registerable instruments of transfer executed by EASTFIELD as transferor of the corresponding percentage interest in the Property
in favour of RISE as transferee, together with anything reasonably required by RISE to give full effect to the transfer of the
interest. |
| 6. | Exploration
Report. On at least an annual basis, RISE will provide to EASTFIELD a report summarising the results of its Exploration on
the Property and access to all new information regarding the Property developed or obtained by RISE during the period covered
by such report. |
| 7. | Access
Rights. During the Option Period, RISE and its Personnel shall have the exclusive licence to enter the Property and conduct
operations thereon and RISE may exercise any and all of EASTFIELDs rights as the legal and beneficial owner of the Property.
RISE has complete discretion as to the nature, timing, method and conduct of all operations. RISE may access all business and
confidential information in EASTFIELDs possession, custody and control, which relate to the Property. RISE may, at its
cost, sample any of EASTFIELDs existing core samples and corresponding pulp samples for assay purposes. |
| 8. | Marketing
Rights. Subject to this clause 8, during the Option Period EASTFIELD and any person interested in acquiring all or a portion
of EASTFIELDs remaining interest in the Property (an Interested Party) may enter the Property and
access all of EASTFIELDs existing data on the Property and any new information which RISE has provided to EASTFIELD regarding
the Property. Prior to receiving any information and entering the Property, any Interested Party shall execute a confidentiality
agreement with EASTFIELD in form and substance acceptable to RISE, acting reasonably. Among other things, this agreement
will require the Interested Party to: |
| a. | keep
confidential all information disclosed to it by EASTFIELD and which it developed in connection with evaluating EASTFIELDs
interest in the Property; |
| b. | only
use such information for the limited purpose of evaluating the desirability of acquiring EASTFIELDs interest in the Property; |
| c. | not
acquire any interest in any exploration or mining property or claim within two (2) kilometres of the Property for a period of
24 months; and |
| d. | provide
RISE a copy of any report or reports generated from the Interested Partys review of the Property or any data or information
obtained from EASTFIELD. |
For
greater clarity, EASTFIELDs interest in the Property for the purposes of this clause 8 does not include that percentage
of the Property subject to a valid Option in favour of RISE.
| 9. | Exploration
Rights. During the Option Period, RISE will, in exercising its rights to the extent that they relate to its operations on
the Property: |
| a. | comply
with the Mines Act (British Columbia), the Mineral Tenure Act (British Columbia), and any other laws dealing with
miners and the Exploration for and mining of minerals; |
| b. | keep
the Property in good standing; and |
| c. | use
all reasonable endeavours to have its Exploration operations recorded for assessment credit against the Property to the fullest
possible extent. |
| 10. | Joint
Venture Agreement. Upon the exercise the 60% Option, the Parties and IMPERIAL shall execute a joint venture agreement (JVA)
on industry acceptable terms including, but not limited to, the following, and use the services of a recognized arbitrator of
the Province of British Columbia in connection therewith if necessary. At this point in time, RISE will own a 60% interest in
the Property while EASTFIELD and IMPERIAL combined will own the remaining 40% interest. Following the execution of the JVA and
provided that RISE has yet to exercise the 15% Option, the interest of each party will be adjusted from time to time by the contribution
of a party divided by the total contributions of all parties with the initial contribution of RISE being deemed to be $2,000,000
and that of EASTFIELD and IMPERIAL combined being deemed to be $1,333,333. The foregoing adjustment mechanism shall specifically
exclude any payment made by RISE to EASTFIELD in connection with the exercise of the 15% Option. The JVA shall be governed by
the laws of the Province of British Columbia. |
| 11. | Joint
Venture Company. Upon the exercise of the 15% Option, the Parties and IMPERIAL shall form a joint venture company (JVC)
that will own and operate the Property. Provided that the interest of the parties has not been adjusted in accordance with clause
10, the JVC will initially be 75% owned by RISE with EASTFIELD and IMPERIAL combined owning the remaining 25%. After the formation
of the JVC, each party will contribute to its share to fund operations on the Property commensurate to such partys interest
in the Property. If one party does not contribute its interest in the Property will be reduced pro-rata. |
| a. | For
the duration of the Option Period, the Parties will form a management |
| | committee
(the Management Committee) consisting of one representative from RISE, who shall act as Chairman, and one
representative from EASTFIELD. The Management Committee shall be responsible for making any and all exploration and development
decisions regarding the Property, including approving all work programs and budgets. During the Option Period, all decisions of
the Management Committee shall be determined by a simple majority vote (through a show of hands) and if there is an equality of
votes on a matter before the Management Committee, the Chairman shall have a further and deciding vote. Following the execution
of the JVA, the Management Committee will continue to exist with all decisions being determined by a simple majority vote but
with each representative having the number of votes commensurate with the interest of the relevant party in the Property at such
time. The Management Committee will cease to exist once the JVC is formed. |
| b. | If
at any time during the Option Period, RISE requires the assistance of third party contractors in conducting any Exploration, RISE
agrees to consider using persons associated with EASTFIELD for such work provided RISE is satisfied that: |
| i. | such
persons have demonstrable competence in the areas of work which RISE requires to be performed; and |
| ii. | the
terms on which the work will be provided (including the costs or rates proposed to be charged) by such persons (i) are no less
favourable than those which RISE could otherwise obtain from a similarly qualified and experienced contractor; and (ii) otherwise
reflect prevailing market terms and rates. |
| c. | RISE
may terminate its role as the operator on the Property upon providing EASTFIELD with 20 business days written notice. |
| d. | RISE
may not exceed any work program and budget approved by the Management Committee by more than 10% except with the Management Committees
prior approval or in a defensible emergency. |
| e. | During
the Option Period, each Party will indemnify and hold harmless the other Party and its Personnel from and against all Claims and
Liabilities incurred in connection with or in relation to its role as operator on the Property, save and except for those Claims
and Liabilities which arise as a result of the Gross Negligence or Wilful Misconduct of a Party or its Personnel. |
| 13. | Liability.
Each Party agrees that neither shall be, in any circumstances, liable to the other Party for any indirect or consequential
loss (including loss of profits, revenues, business opportunity and the like), howsoever arising; and releases the other from
all Claims for indirect or consequential loss arising under, or in respect of, this Agreement. |
| 14. | Representations,
Warranties and Covenants of the Parties. |
Each
Party hereby represents and warrants to the other Party that, as of the date of this Agreement:
| a. | it
is a body corporate duly incorporated and validly subsisting under the laws of its jurisdiction of incorporation; |
| b. | it
is not currently in default of any agreement or obligation material to it or to its operations; |
| c. | no
proceedings are pending and it is not aware of any basis for the institution of any proceedings leading to the dissolution or
winding-up of such Party or the placing of such Party into bankruptcy or subjecting such Party to any other laws governing insolvent
persons; |
| d. | it
has full power and authority to carry on its business and to execute this Agreement, and the person executing or accepting this
Agreement on its behalf is fully authorized to do so; |
| e. | neither
the execution, delivery or acceptance of this Agreement nor the consummation of the transactions hereby contemplated will conflict
with, result in the breach of or accelerate the performance required by any agreement to which it is a party or require any permit
or approval from any governmental authority or stock exchange, other than as contemplated herein; |
| f. | neither
the execution, delivery or acceptance of this Agreement violates or results in the breach of the laws of any jurisdiction applicable
or pertaining to a Party or of its organizational documents; |
| g. | all
corporate authorizations have been obtained for the execution or acceptance of this Agreement and for the performance of its obligations
hereunder; |
| h. | the
covenants contained in this Agreement by a Party constitute legal, valid and binding obligations of such Party, enforceable against
it in accordance with its terms, subject to the usual qualifications with respect to bankruptcy and the availability of equitable
remedies being within the discretion of a court; |
| 15. | Representations,
Warranties and Covenants of EASTFIELD. |
EASTFIELD
hereby represents and warrants to RISE that, as of the date of this Agreement and as of the date an Option is exercised, if applicable:
| a. | the
Property is free from any Encumbrances except as described herein; |
| b. | EASTFIELD
is the registered holder and beneficial owner of a 91.1% interest in the Property and has the ability to grant to the 60% Option
and 15% Option to RISE; |
| c. | the
Property is in good standing and not liable to forfeiture and EASTFIELD is not aware of any facts or circumstances which might
give rise to a breach this Agreement or render any of the claims comprising the Property liable to forfeiture; |
| d. | there
are no Claims by or before any Governmental Agency now pending or threatened against or affecting the Property which would affect
the validity of this Agreement or EASTFIELDs right to grant the Options; |
| e. | so
far as EASTFIELD is aware, there is no fact or matter which might prejudice the continuance or renewal, or result in the revocation
or variation in any material respect, of any Authorisation relating to the Property; |
| f. | no
event has, so far as EASTFIELD is aware, occurred and no fact or circumstance exists which with the giving of notice or lapse
of time, or both, would cause EASTFIELD to be in breach of any Authorisation or environmental law relating to the Property; |
| g. | all
Authorisations relating to the Property are in full force and effect in all material respects and have been complied with in all
material respects; |
| h. | there
are no outstanding Claims affecting the Property, nor have any Claims been threatened, nor is EASTFIELD aware of any facts or
circumstances which might give rise to any such Claims; |
| i. | there
are no current or potential environmental Liabilities of which EASTFIELD is aware which have not been disclosed to RISE; |
| j. | EASTFIELD
has disclosed to RISE all information known to EASTFIELD relating to the Property necessary for RISE to make an informed assessment
of the Property and which is material for disclosure to a prospective purchaser of an interest in the Property; and |
| k. | EASTFIELD
acknowledges that RISE is entering into this Agreement in reliance on these representations and warranties, and that each such
representation or warranty is separate and independent and not limited or restricted by any other representation, warranty or
provision of this Agreement. |
| 16. | Definitions.
In addition to the terms defined throughout this Agreement, in the this Agreement the following terms shall have the following
meanings: |
| a. | Authorisations
includes any authorisation, approval, agreement, indemnity, guarantee, consent, licence, permit, franchise, permission, filing,
registration, resolution, direction, declaration or exemption from any Governmental Agency or third party; and in relation to
anything which will be prohibited or restricted in whole or in part by law if a Governmental Agency intervenes or acts in a manner
within a specified period after notification to it, the expiry of that period without intervention or action by the relevant Governmental
Agency, which are necessary |
| | or
desirable for the conduct of the relevant activity, enterprise or undertaking; |
| b. | Claim
means any claim, notice, demand, action, proceeding, litigation, investigation or judgment whether based in contract, tort, and
statute or otherwise; |
| c. | Encumbrance
means any: (a) security interest; (b) right of first refusal or first offer, option, claim or contractual restriction; (c) any
Right to Use, royalty (other than royalties to any Governmental Agency), caveat or other encumbrance; and includes any agreement
to grant or create any of the foregoing or allow them to exist; |
| d. | Exploration
means all activities aimed at the discovery, location and delineation of minerals including assessments, data review and analysis,
sampling, aeromagnetic and geophysical surveys, assays, metallurgical work, carrying out pre-feasibility studies and feasibility
studies, drilling, maintenance and administration of the Property and field offices/sites; |
| e. | Governmental
Agency means any government or any governmental, semi-governmental, administrative, fiscal or judicial body, department,
commission, authority, tribunal, agency or entity in Canada (whether federal, provincial, or local); |
| f. | Gross
Negligence means such wanton and reckless conduct as constitutes an utter disregard for the harmful, foreseeable and
avoidable consequences which result from that conduct; |
| g. | Liabilities
mean all liabilities, losses, damages, outgoings, costs and expenses of whatever description; |
| h. | Option
Period has the meaning given to that term in clause 4; |
| i. | Option
means, as the case may be, either the 60% Option or the 15% Option; |
| j. | Personnel
means all directors, officers, employees, agents, contractors and sub-contractors of the relevant person; |
| k. | Qualifying
Expenses means the minimum expenses required to be incurred on the Property by the government of British Columbia to
maintain the Property in good standing and without penalty or the risk of being taken away or the rights cancelled; |
| l. | Wilful
Misconduct means an act or omission that is a reckless and intentional disregard of: (a) any provision of this Agreement;
(b) any adopted Program and Budget, except in the case of an emergency; or (c) any law required to be observed in connection with
operations on the Property; but does not include any error of judgement or mistake made by either Party or any of its Personnel
in the exercise, in good faith, of any function, authority or discretion conferred upon that Party. |
| m. | In
this Agreement, except where the context otherwise requires: |
| i. | the
singular includes the plural and vice versa, and a gender includes other genders; |
| ii. | another
grammatical form of a defined word or expression has a corresponding meaning; |
| iii. | a
reference to a clause, paragraph, schedule or annexure is to a clause or paragraph of, or schedule or annexure to, this Agreement,
and a reference to this Agreement includes any schedule or annexure; |
| iv. | a
reference to a document or instrument includes the document or instrument as novated, altered, supplemented or replaced from time
to time; |
| v. | a
reference to C$, $C, CAD, dollar or $ is to Canadian currency; |
| vi. | business
day means a day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, public holiday or bank holiday in Vancouver, British Columbia, business
hours means from 9.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m. on a business day and a reference to time is to Vancouver, British Columbian time; |
| vii. | a
reference to a Party is to a party to this Agreement, and a reference to a party to a document includes the partys executors,
administrators, successors and permitted assigns and substitutes; |
| viii. | a
reference to a person includes a natural person, partnership, body corporate, joint venture, association, governmental or local
authority or agency or other entity; |
| ix. | a
reference to a statute, ordinance, code or other law includes regulations and other instruments under it and consolidations, amendments,
re-enactments or replacements of any of them; |
| x. | the
meaning of general words is not limited by specific examples introduced by including, for example
or similar expressions; |
| xi. | a
rule of construction does not apply to the disadvantage of a Party because the Party was responsible for the preparation of this
agreement or any part of it; |
| xii. | if
a day on or by which an obligation must be performed or an event must occur is not a business day, the obligation must be performed
or the event must occur on or by the next business day; |
| xiii. | a
reference to a mineral property means the mineral property referred to and includes any other mineral property applied for, created
or granted by |
| | way
of conversion, reversion or substitution over a greater or lesser area from time to time or effecting any addition, amendment,
extension or variation to that mineral property; and |
| xiv. | headings
are for ease of reference only and do not affect interpretation. |
| 17. | Governing
Law. This Agreement will be interpreted and enforced in accordance with the laws of the Province of British Columbia and each
Party irrevocably and unconditionally submits to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of British Columbia. |
| 18. | News
Release. Unless otherwise required by law or the rules and regulations of any regulatory authority or stock exchange having
jurisdiction, the Parties will consult with each other prior to issuing any press release, or making or filing any other statement
(collectively, a Release) to a non-Party (including a Governmental Agency or exchange authority) regarding
this Agreement or activities thereon, and the disclosing Party shall advise the other Party of the text of the proposed Release.
The disclosing Party will provide the other Party with a reasonable opportunity (not less than two (2) Business Days) to comment
on the Release and will incorporate the other Partys reasonable changes to the Release before the Release is issued, made
or filed. Notwithstanding the foregoing, where a Party requests input or consent from the other Party as to any Release, and the
other Party has not responded to such request within two (2) Business Days, then the Party proposing the Release will be entitled
to proceed with its Release as if it had received input or consent from the other Party. |
| 19. | Notices.
Any notice, direction, objection, consent, request, approval, demand or other communication permitted or required to be given
hereunder, shall be in writing and, if courier service, shall be deemed to have been given and received on the day it is delivered
if delivered during normal business hours and, if sent by electronic transmission, shall be deemed to have been given and received
on the day it is so sent if sent during normal business hours or on the next following business day if delivered or sent outside
of normal business hours. Notices in each case shall be addressed as follows: |
110
– 325 Howe Street
Vancouver, BC V6C 1Z7
Email: jwmorton@eastfieldgroup.com
700
– 510 West Hastings Street
Vancouver, BC V6B 1L8
Email: fred@skanderbegcapital.com
Either
Party may give, at any time, notice in writing to the other Party of any change of address of the Party giving such notice and,
from and after the giving of such notice, the address or addresses therein specified shall be deemed to be the address of such
Party for
purposes of giving notice hereunder.
| 20. | Assignment.
This rights and obligations created by this Agreement are not assignable by either Party without the prior written consent
of the other Party, except that RISE may assign any such rights and obligations to an affiliate of RISE without obtaining prior
approval from EASTFIELD. |
| 21. | Amendment.
This Agreement may not be amended except by an instrument in writing signed by the Parties. |
| 22. | Entire
Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding, contract and agreement between the parties hereto with respect
to the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior oral or written understandings, agreements or contracts, formal
or informal, between the parties hereto or their representatives with respect thereto. |
| 23. | Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed and delivered in counterparts and by electronic transmission, each of which when so executed
shall be deemed to be an original and such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument. |
IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.
EASTFIELD
RESOURCES LTD. |
|
RISE
RESOURCES INC. |
|
|
|
Per: |
/s/
J.W. Morton |
|
Per: |
/s/
Fred Tejada |
|
|
|
J.
W. MORTON, |
|
FRED
TEJADA, |
Chief
Executive Officer |
|
Chief
Executive Officer |
APPENDIX
A
LIST
OF MINING CLAIMS
Claim Name | |
Record No. | |
Area (Hectares) | | |
Expiry Date |
Indata 2 | |
239379 | |
| 375 | | |
18-Oct-19 |
Indata 3 | |
240192 | |
| 500 | | |
18-Oct-19 |
Schnapps 1 | |
238722 | |
| 500 | | |
18-Oct-19 |
Schnapps 2 | |
238723 | |
| 500 | | |
14-Nov-19 |
Schnapps 3 | |
238859 | |
| 200 | | |
20-Oct-19 |
Schnapps 4 | |
238860 | |
| 250 | | |
18-Oct-19 |
Schnapps 5 | |
238893 | |
| 100 | | |
18-Oct-19 |
Schnapps 6 | |
362575 | |
| 25 | | |
31-Dec-18 |
IN-6 | |
362576 | |
| 25 | | |
31-Dec-18 |
IN-7 | |
362577 | |
| 25 | | |
31-Dec-18 |
IN-8 | |
362578 | |
| 25 | | |
31-Dec-18 |
IN-9 | |
362579 | |
| 25 | | |
31-Dec-18 |
IN-10 | |
362582 | |
| 25 | | |
31-Dec-18 |
IN-11 | |
362583 | |
| 25 | | |
20-Dec-18 |
Limestone | |
753222 | |
| 441.33 | | |
20-Apr-18 |
Triangle A | |
941109 | |
| 55.15 | | |
16-Jan-18 |
Triangle B | |
941110 | |
| 55.17 | | |
16-Jan-18 |
Triangle C | |
941111 | |
| 18.38 | | |
16-Jan-18 |
Total | |
| |
| 3,170.03 | | |
|
Rise Gold (QX) (USOTC:RYES)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2024 to Aug 2024
Rise Gold (QX) (USOTC:RYES)
Historical Stock Chart
From Aug 2023 to Aug 2024