UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number 001-16393
BMC Software, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
74-2126120
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
|
incorporation or organization)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2101 CityWest Boulevard
|
|
|
Houston, Texas
|
|
77042-2827
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number including area code:
(713) 918-8800
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company
o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes
o
No
þ
As
of July 21, 2008, there were outstanding 190,029,000 shares of Common Stock, par value
$.01, of the registrant.
BMC SOFTWARE, INC.
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2008
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements
BMC SOFTWARE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except par value data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
986.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,288.3
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62.2
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
162.6
|
|
|
|
208.0
|
|
Trade finance receivables, net
|
|
|
82.7
|
|
|
|
88.8
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
91.8
|
|
|
|
61.7
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
89.3
|
|
|
|
93.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,412.9
|
|
|
|
1,802.6
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
100.3
|
|
|
|
99.8
|
|
Software development costs, net
|
|
|
111.2
|
|
|
|
113.4
|
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
87.0
|
|
|
|
124.7
|
|
Long-term trade finance receivables, net
|
|
|
54.5
|
|
|
|
56.4
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
251.2
|
|
|
|
46.8
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,337.5
|
|
|
|
756.5
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
256.0
|
|
|
|
345.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,610.6
|
|
|
$
|
3,345.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
$
|
45.1
|
|
|
$
|
43.8
|
|
Finance payables
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
247.1
|
|
|
|
313.7
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
975.0
|
|
|
|
926.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,276.3
|
|
|
|
1,288.6
|
|
Long-term deferred revenue
|
|
|
846.5
|
|
|
|
852.6
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
306.4
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
204.9
|
|
|
|
200.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,634.1
|
|
|
|
2,351.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 1.0 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 600.0 shares authorized, 249.1 shares issued
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
815.8
|
|
|
|
786.7
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,754.3
|
|
|
|
1,753.1
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
22.9
|
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,595.5
|
|
|
|
2,562.0
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost (59.1 and 58.5 shares)
|
|
|
(1,619.0
|
)
|
|
|
(1,567.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
976.5
|
|
|
|
994.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,610.6
|
|
|
$
|
3,345.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
BMC SOFTWARE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In millions, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License
|
|
$
|
149.4
|
|
|
$
|
125.9
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
254.3
|
|
|
|
235.5
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
33.8
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
437.5
|
|
|
|
385.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of license revenue
|
|
|
27.6
|
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
Cost of maintenance revenue
|
|
|
40.5
|
|
|
|
41.9
|
|
Cost of professional services revenue
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses
|
|
|
140.4
|
|
|
|
127.9
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
61.8
|
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
53.5
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
50.3
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Severance, exit costs and related charges
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
424.2
|
|
|
|
323.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
61.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income, net
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Gain on sale of investments
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income, net
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
20.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
81.8
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing basic earnings per share
|
|
|
188.8
|
|
|
|
199.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
193.7
|
|
|
|
204.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
55.2
|
|
Net changes in accumulated comprehensive income
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
56.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
BMC SOFTWARE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
55.2
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
50.3
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
44.8
|
|
|
|
35.6
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade finance receivables
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
60.9
|
|
Finance payables
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
(35.8
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
Other operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(13.4
|
)
|
|
|
(18.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
151.3
|
|
|
|
165.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities / sales of investments
|
|
|
101.2
|
|
|
|
303.3
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
(105.5
|
)
|
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, and other investments
|
|
|
(784.1
|
)
|
|
|
(38.6
|
)
|
Capitalization of software development costs
|
|
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
(18.0
|
)
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)
|
Other investing activities
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(705.2
|
)
|
|
|
134.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock acquired
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)
|
|
|
(83.4
|
)
|
Repurchases of stock to satisfy employee tax withholding obligations
|
|
|
(15.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
295.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised and other
|
|
|
50.4
|
|
|
|
31.6
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
Payments on debt and capital leases
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
247.5
|
|
|
|
(46.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(301.8
|
)
|
|
|
258.1
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
1,288.3
|
|
|
|
883.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
986.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,141.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes, net of amounts refunded
|
|
$
|
29.0
|
|
|
$
|
6.4
|
|
Liabilities assumed in acquisitions
|
|
$
|
116.7
|
|
|
$
|
10.9
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
BMC SOFTWARE, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(1) Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
BMC Software, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, we, us, our or BMC). All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. These financial
statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are
necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented. These financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for
interim financial information and with the instructions
to
Form 10-Q
and Article 10 of Regulation
S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and
regulations. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods financial statements to
conform to the current periods presentation.
Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. Our results
generally tend to be stronger in the third and fourth quarters of our fiscal year, as compared to
the first and second quarters of the fiscal year. These financial statements should be read in
conjunction with our audited financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2008, as filed with
the SEC on Form 10-K.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS No. 159), which
permits entities to choose to measure various financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. If an entity chooses to measure various financial instruments and certain other items at
fair value, the standard requires that unrealized gains and losses be reported in earnings for
those items measured using the fair value option. SFAS No. 159 was effective for us beginning in
the first quarter of fiscal 2009. We have elected not to apply the fair value option to any of our
assets or liabilities. Therefore, the adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not impact our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157).
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements
that require or permit fair value measurements, with certain exceptions. In February 2008, the FASB
issued two FASB Staff Positions that remove leasing from the scope of SFAS No. 157, and delay the
effective date of SFAS No. 157 to April 1, 2009 for all non-financial assets and non-financial
liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (that is, at least annually). We have adopted the required
provisions of SFAS No. 157 beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The partial adoption of
SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or
cash flows. We have not determined whether the adoption of the deferred provisions of SFAS No. 157
will have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
Refer to Note 11 for information and related disclosures regarding our fair value
measurements.
6
(2) Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution
that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted
into common stock. For purposes of this calculation, outstanding stock options and unearned
nonvested stock are considered potential common shares using the treasury stock method. For the
quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, 7.1 million and 3.4 million weighted options, respectively,
have been excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS, as they were anti-dilutive. The following
table summarizes the basic and diluted EPS computations for the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
55.2
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
188.8
|
|
|
|
199.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
55.2
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
188.8
|
|
|
|
199.4
|
|
Incremental shares from assumed conversions of stock options and other
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
193.7
|
|
|
|
204.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) Business Combination
In April 2008, we completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding common shares of
BladeLogic, Inc. (BladeLogic), a leading provider of data center automation software, for $28 per
share. In addition, outstanding and unvested options to acquire the common stock of BladeLogic and
other share-based awards were converted pursuant to the terms of the transaction into options to
purchase our common stock and other share-based awards. BladeLogics operating results have been
included in our consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date as part of the
Enterprise Service Management segment. This acquisition expands our offerings for server
provisioning, application release management, automation and compliance.
The acquisition of BladeLogics outstanding common stock and other equity instruments resulted
in total purchase consideration of $854.0 million, including approximately $19.9 million of direct
acquisition costs. The following table summarizes the preliminary estimated fair values of the
acquired assets and assumed liabilities recorded as of the date of acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 18, 2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
73.3
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
Deferred tax
assets
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
214.8
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
50.3
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
569.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
964.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(17.3
|
)
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(86.5
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
(110.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
854.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
The allocation of the purchase price to specific acquired assets and assumed liabilities was
based, in part, upon appraisals of the fair value of certain assets and liabilities of BladeLogic.
This allocation is preliminary due to continuing analysis related to the determination of the fair
value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Any changes to the fair value of net assets
acquired, based on information as of the acquisition date, would result in a corresponding
adjustment to goodwill. Factors that contributed to a purchase price that resulted in goodwill
include, but are not limited to, the retention of research and development personnel with the
skills to develop future BladeLogic technology, support personnel to provide maintenance services
related to BladeLogic products and a trained sales force capable of selling current and future
BladeLogic products and the opportunity to cross-sell our products and BladeLogic products to
existing customers. We believe that this acquisition will help us remain competitive in the
Business Service
Management market and improve our Enterprise Service Management results of operations. The
goodwill resulting from the transaction was assigned to the Enterprise Service Management segment
and will not be deductible for tax purposes.
7
The acquired identifiable intangible assets included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
in Years
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Customer contracts and relationships
|
|
$
|
113.9
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Developed product technology
|
|
|
100.7
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Trademarks and tradenames
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identifiable intangible assets
|
|
$
|
214.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future
amortization expense related to the acquired identifiable intangible
assets is expected to be $40.4 million, $53.7 million,
$53.7 million, $53.6 million, and $2.5 million in the
remainder of 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 respectively.
Approximately $50.3 million of the purchase price was allocated to purchased in-process
research and development (IPR&D) and was written-off on the acquisition date. The amounts
allocated to IPR&D represent the estimated fair values, based on risk-adjusted cash flows and
historical costs expended, related to core research and development projects that were incomplete
and had neither reached technological feasibility nor been determined to have an alternative future
use pending achievement of technological feasibility as of the date of acquisition. The IPR&D
relates primarily to the development of a major new release to an existing core product, and to a
lesser degree the development of a new product, both of which we plan to continue developing and
expect to release in the second half of fiscal 2009.
The results of operations of BladeLogic are included in our consolidated statement of
operations prospectively from April 18, 2008. The unaudited pro forma combined historical results
of BMC and BladeLogic, giving effect to the acquisition assuming the transaction was consummated as
of the beginning of each period presented, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Pro Forma Combined:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
439.1
|
|
|
$
|
398.3
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
41.4
|
|
|
|
38.7
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
The pro forma combined historical results do not reflect any cost savings or other synergies
that might result from the transaction and they are provided for informational purposes only and
are not necessarily indicative of the combined results of operations for future periods or the
results that actually would have been realized had the acquisition occurred as of the beginning of
each specified period. Pro forma net earnings for the quarter ended
June 30, 2008 excludes the in-process research and
development charge of $50.3 million.
(4) Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Senior unsecured notes due 2018 (net of $1.8 million discount)
|
|
$
|
298.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Capital leases and other obligations
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
312.0
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less current maturities of capital leases and other
obligations (included in accrued liabilities)
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
306.4
|
|
|
$
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
In June 2008, we issued $300.0 million of senior unsecured notes due in 2018 (the Notes). Net
proceeds to us after issuance costs amounted to $295.6 million, which we intend to use for general
corporate purposes. The Notes were issued at an original issuance discount of $1.8 million to face
value. The Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.25% per annum payable semi-annually in June and
December of each year. The Notes are redeemable at our option at any time in whole or, from time to
time, in part at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) 100% of the principal amount of
the Notes to be redeemed, or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments
of principal and interest discounted at the applicable treasury rate plus 50 basis points, plus,
accrued and unpaid interest. The Notes are subject to the provisions of an indenture which includes
covenants limiting, among other things, the creation of liens securing indebtedness and
sale-leaseback transactions. As of June 30, 2008, we were in compliance with all such debt
covenants.
(5) Segment Reporting
We are organized into two business segments, Enterprise Service Management (ESM) and Mainframe
Service Management (MSM). The ESM segment derives its revenue from our service support, service
assurance and service automation solutions, along with professional service revenue derived from
consulting, implementation, integration and educational services related to our software products.
The MSM segment derives its revenue from products for mainframe database management, monitoring and
automation, enterprise scheduling and output management solutions. Beginning in the first quarter
of fiscal 2009, we revised our operating segment reporting as follows: i) our professional services
organization, which had previously been reported a separate operating segment, was combined with
our ESM segment, and ii) we revised and expanded our allocation of segment expenses to include
direct controllable and indirect allocated operating expenses in order to derive segment operating
income for each of our ESM and MSM segments. These revisions were made in order to reflect fiscal
2009 changes in how our President and Chief Executive Officer, who is our chief operating decision
maker, reviews the results of the Companys two business segments in order to assess corporate
performance and make resource allocations.
Segment performance is measured based on segment operating income, reflecting segment revenue
less direct and allocated indirect segment operating expenses. Direct segment operating expenses
primarily include cost of revenue, selling and marketing, research and development and general and
administrative expenses that can be specifically identified with a particular segment and are
directly controllable by segment management, while allocated indirect segment operating expenses
primarily include indirect costs within these operating expense categories that are not
specifically identified with or controllable by segment management. The indirect operating
expenses are allocated to the segments based on budgeted bookings,
revenue and other allocation
methods that management believes to be reasonable. Our measure of segment operating income does
not include the effect of share-based compensation expenses, amortization of acquired technology
and intangibles, the write-off of acquired in-process research and development or the costs
associated with severance and exit activities described in Note 7, which are collectively included
in unallocated operating expenses below. Assets and liabilities are reviewed by management at the
consolidated level only.
The table below summarizes segment performance for the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
The prior year information has been reclassified to conform to our revised segment reporting
methodology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise
|
|
|
Mainframe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
Management
|
|
|
Management
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License
|
|
$
|
89.6
|
|
|
$
|
59.8
|
|
|
$
|
149.4
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
136.7
|
|
|
|
117.6
|
|
|
|
254.3
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
33.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
260.1
|
|
|
|
177.4
|
|
|
|
437.5
|
|
Direct and allocated indirect segment operating expenses
|
|
|
242.3
|
|
|
|
84.3
|
|
|
|
326.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
93.1
|
|
|
|
110.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97.6
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise
|
|
|
Mainframe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
Management
|
|
|
Management
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License
|
|
$
|
66.6
|
|
|
$
|
59.3
|
|
|
$
|
125.9
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
125.4
|
|
|
|
110.1
|
|
|
|
235.5
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
215.6
|
|
|
|
169.4
|
|
|
|
385.0
|
|
Direct and allocated indirect segment operating expenses
|
|
|
215.7
|
|
|
|
80.2
|
|
|
|
295.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
89.2
|
|
|
|
89.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.9
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
81.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6) Share-Based Compensation
In June 2008, our Board of Directors and Compensation Committee approved annual share-based
award grants to our executive officers and non-executive employees. The types of awards issued were
generally consistent with the prior year and consisted of stock options related to 3.9 million
underlying shares, 0.8 million shares of time-based nonvested stock and 0.2 million shares of
performance-based nonvested stock. The vesting of the performance-based nonvested stock is
contingent upon meeting certain profitability targets in fiscal 2010 and 2011.
In April 2008, in connection with the acquisition of BladeLogic, outstanding options to
acquire the common stock of BladeLogic and other share-based awards were converted, pursuant to the
terms of the transaction, into 1.2 million options to purchase our common stock and $13.7 million
of other share-based awards.
The fair value of each option award granted is estimated as of the date of grant using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model. We used the following weighted-average assumptions for awards
during the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate %
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
of June 30, 2008, we had $174.9 million of total unrecognized share-based compensation
expense related to stock options and nonvested stock that is expected to be recognized as expense
over a weighted-average period of 3 years.
Share-based compensation expense as recorded in our condensed consolidated statements of
operations is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Cost of license revenue
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
Cost of maintenance revenue
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Cost of professional services revenue
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
22.4
|
|
|
$
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
(7) Severance, Exit Costs and Related Charges
We have undertaken various restructuring and process improvement initiatives in recent years
with the goal of reducing costs through the realignment of resources to focus on growth areas and
the simplification, standardization and automation of key business processes. These initiatives
include workforce reductions across all functions and geographies, and the affected employees were,
or will be, provided cash separation packages. Additionally, as part of these initiatives, we have
exited certain leases, reduced the square footage required to operate certain locations and
relocated some operations to lower cost facilities. During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we
have identified approximately 120 employees for termination under these process improvement
initiatives.
As of June 30, 2008, $16.7 million of severance and facilities costs related to actions
completed under these initiatives remain accrued as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Payments,
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Charged
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of Sublease
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
to Expense
|
|
|
to Estimates
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Accretion
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Severance and related costs
|
|
$
|
8.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.3
|
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
9.9
|
|
Facilities costs
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued
|
|
$
|
16.2
|
|
|
$
|
6.7
|
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
(6.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accruals for severance and related costs at June 30, 2008, represent the estimated amounts
to be paid to employees that have been terminated or identified for termination as a result of
these initiatives. These amounts are expected to be paid within twelve months from June 30, 2008.
We continue to review the impact of these actions and will determine if, based on future results of
operations, additional actions to reduce operating expenses are necessary. The amount of any
potential future charges for such actions will depend upon the nature, timing, and extent of those
actions.
The accruals for facilities costs at June 30, 2008, represent the remaining fair values of
lease obligations for exited locations as determined at the cease-use dates of those facilities,
net of estimated sublease income that could be reasonably obtained in the future, and will be paid
out over the remaining lease terms, the last of which ends in fiscal 2011. We may incur additional
facilities charges subsequent to June 30, 2008, as a result of our on-going initiatives. Accretion
(the increase in the present value of facilities accruals over time) is included in operating
expenses.
(8) Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $20.2 million and $26.6 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2008
and 2007, respectively, resulting in effective tax rates of 94.4% and 32.5%, respectively. The
effective tax rate is impacted primarily by the worldwide mix of estimated consolidated earnings
before taxes and our policy of indefinitely re-investing earnings from certain low tax
jurisdictions, changes in estimates related to our uncertain tax positions, changes in the
valuation allowance recorded against our deferred tax assets, benefits associated with income
attributable to both domestic production activities and the extraterritorial income exclusion and
the non-deductible write-off of IPR&D expense associated with certain acquisitions. The increase
in the effective tax rate for the current year quarter was attributable primarily to our write-off
of IPR&D expense in connection with BladeLogic acquisition, partially offset by a decrease
attributable to the extraterritorial income exclusion.
We file a federal income tax return in the United States as well as income tax returns in
various state, local and foreign jurisdictions. Our tax years are closed with the United States
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) through the tax year ended March 31, 2003. We are in settlement
discussions with the IRS for the tax years ending March 31, 2004 and 2005 and the IRS is currently
examining our tax returns for the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2007. In addition, certain tax
years related to state, local and foreign jurisdictions remain subject to examination.
(9) Guarantees and Contingencies
Guarantees
Under our standard software license agreements, we agree to indemnify, defend and hold
harmless our licensees from and against certain losses, damages and costs arising from claims
alleging the licensees use of our software infringes the intellectual property rights of a third
party. Also, under these standard license agreements, we represent and warrant to licensees that
our software products operate substantially in accordance with published specifications.
11
Other guarantees include promises to indemnify, defend and hold harmless each of our executive
officers, non-employee directors and certain key employees from and against losses, damages and
costs incurred by each such individual in administrative, legal or investigative proceedings
arising from alleged wrongdoing by the individual while acting in good faith within the scope of
his or her job duties on our behalf.
Historically, we have not incurred significant costs related to such indemnifications,
warranties and guarantees. As such, and based on other factors, no provision or accrual for these
items has been made.
Contingencies
We have received claims from a third party alleging that we infringe on one or more of the
third partys patents. We believe that we have meritorious defenses to the claims and intend to
vigorously contest them. Additionally, we have asserted counter-claims against the third party
alleging infringement on certain of our patents. No formal proceedings have been initiated by
either party and the ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be estimated at this time.
We are party to various labor claims brought by certain former international employees
alleging that amounts are due such employees for unpaid commissions and other compensation. The
claims are in various stages and are not expected to be resolved in the near future. We intend to
vigorously contest all of the claims. However, the ultimate outcome of all of the claims cannot be
estimated at this time.
In June 2006, in response to a filing by BMC seeking clarification as to whether a tax applies
to the remittance of software payments from its Brazilian operations, a lower level Brazilian court
denied our request for a preliminary injunction and published an unfavorable decision. We are in
the process of appealing this initial decision. In February 2007, a law was enacted that clarified
that this particular tax did not apply to the remittance of software payments, retroactive to
January 1, 2006. We continue to pursue a favorable resolution on this matter for years prior to
January 1, 2006, and believe we will ultimately prevail based on the merits of our position.
However, we cannot predict the timing and ultimate outcome of this matter.
We are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted,
which arise in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that the outcome of any of these
matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
(10) Treasury Stock
Our Board of Directors previously authorized a total of $3.0 billion to repurchase common
stock. During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we repurchased 2.6 million shares for $100.0 million
under this stock repurchase program. As of June 30, 2008, there was approximately $574.9 million
remaining in this stock repurchase program, which does not have an expiration date. In addition,
during the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we repurchased 0.4 million shares for $15.8 million to
satisfy employee tax withholding obligations upon the lapse of restrictions on nonvested stock
grants.
12
(11) Financial Instruments
We
measure certain financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis. These financial
instruments consist of money-market funds, which are included in cash equivalents, and investments in
auction rate securities and mutual funds and other securities that have readily determinable fair
values, all of which are classified as available-for-sale and included in short and long-term
investments in our consolidated balance sheets. In addition, we utilize certain derivative financial instruments to manage our foreign currency exchange
risk. The fair values associated with these derivative financial
instruments are included in other current assets and accounts payable
in our consolidated balance sheets. The fair values of these financial instruments
were
determined using the following inputs at June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for Identical
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
(1)
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
(2)
|
|
|
Inputs
(3)
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
704.4
|
|
|
$
|
704.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
|
67.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67.9
|
|
Mutual funds and other
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency exchange derivatives
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
792.4
|
|
|
$
|
723.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
67.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency exchange derivatives
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Level 1 classification is applied to any asset that has a readily available quoted
market price from an active market where there is significant transparency in the executed/quoted
price.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Level 2 classification is applied to assets that have evaluated prices where the data
inputs to these valuations are observable either directly or indirectly, but do not represent
quoted market prices from an active market.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Level 3 classification is applied to assets when prices are not derived from existing
market data.
|
As of June 30, 2008, we held auction rate securities with a par value of $72.2 million and an
estimated fair value of $67.9 million. Our auction rate securities consist entirely of bonds issued
by public agencies that are backed by student loans with at least a 97% guarantee by the federal
government under the United States Department of Educations Federal Family Education Loan Program.
These bonds are currently rated AAA by Moodys and Standard and Poors. We do not believe that any
of the underlying issuers of these auction rate securities are presently at risk or that the
underlying credit quality of the assets backing the auction rate security investments has been
impacted by the reduced liquidity of these investments. Due to the illiquidity in the auction rate
securities market caused by failed auctions, we estimated the fair value of these securities using
internally developed probability-weighted cash flow models based on assumptions regarding
probabilities of various scenarios including that of the securities being redeemed at par, market
recovery, illiquidity until maturity, a liquidity-driven forced sale and an outright default of the
securities. During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we recorded $1.0 million as an unrealized loss
that is included in other comprehensive income, as we believe the decline in fair value of the
auction rate securities is temporary. In making this determination, we primarily considered the
financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuers, the magnitude of the losses compared to
the investments cost, the length of time the investments have been in a an unrealized loss
position and our ability to hold the investments for a period of time sufficient to allow for any
anticipated recovery in market value. Because of the uncertainty related to the timing of liquidity
associated with these auction rate securities, we classified these securities as long-term
investments at June 30, 2008. The following table presents changes to our determination of the fair
value of the auction rate securities during the quarter ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction
|
|
|
|
Rate Securities
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Balance at
April 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
68.9
|
|
Unrealized loss included in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
67.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
(12) Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 161), which requires enhanced disclosures about an entitys
derivative and hedging activities. SFAS No. 161 is effective for us beginning in the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141(R)),
which changes the accounting for business combinations including: (i) the measurement of acquirer
shares issued in consideration for a business combination, (ii) the recognition of contingent
consideration, (iii) the accounting for preacquisition gain and loss contingencies, (iv) the
recognition of capitalized in-process research and development, (v) the accounting for
acquisition-related restructuring costs, (vi) the treatment of acquisition related transaction
costs, and (vii) the recognition of changes in the acquirers income tax valuation allowance. SFAS
No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after the beginning of fiscal 2010. The impact of adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) on our financial
position or results of operations is dependent upon the nature and terms of business combinations,
if any, that we may consummate in fiscal 2010 and thereafter.
Item 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 contains certain forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are identified by the use of the
words believe, expect, anticipate, estimate, will, contemplate, would and similar
expressions that contemplate future events. Numerous important factors, risks and uncertainties
affect our operating results, and could cause our actual results to differ materially from the
results implied by these or any other forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. There
can be no assurance that future results will meet expectations. It is important that the historical
discussion below be read together with the attached condensed consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto, with the discussion of such risks and uncertainties included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for fiscal 2008, with the audited financial statements and notes thereto, and with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Overview
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we continued to focus on our leadership in Business
Service Management (BSM) by responding to IT executive needs, improving IT service quality and
supporting business priorities. Our two segments, Enterprise Service Management (ESM) and
Mainframe Service Management (MSM), continue to provide the focus to align our resources and
product development efforts to meet the demands of the dynamic markets we serve.
In April 2008, we acquired BladeLogic, Inc. (BladeLogic), a leading provider of data center
automation software, for total purchase consideration of approximately $854.0 million. This
acquisition expands our service automation offerings for server provisioning, application release
management, and configuration automation and compliance.
In June 2008, we completed the issuance of $300.0 million in senior unsecured notes due 2018
(the Notes). Net proceeds from this offering amounted to $295.6 million, which we intend to use
for general corporate purposes.
It is important for our investors to understand that a significant portion of our operating
expenses are fixed in the short-term and that we plan a portion of our expense run-rate based on
our expectations of future revenue. In addition, a significant amount of our license transactions
are completed during the final weeks and days of each quarter and, therefore, we generally do not
know whether revenue has met our expectations until after the end of the quarter. If a shortfall in
revenue were to occur in any given quarter, there would be an immediate, and possibly significant,
impact to our overall earnings and, most likely, our stock price.
Because our software solutions are designed for and marketed to companies to manage their IT
infrastructure from a business perspective, demand for our products, and therefore our financial
results, are dependent upon corporations continuing to value such solutions and invest in such
technology. There are a number of trends that have historically influenced demand for systems
management software, including, among others, business demands placed on IT, computing capacity
within IT departments, complexity of IT systems, and IT operational costs. Our financial results
are also influenced by many economic and industry conditions, including, but not limited to,
general economic conditions in the United States and other local economies in which we market
products, corporate spending generally, IT budgets, the competitiveness of the systems management
software industry, the adoption rate for BSM and the stability of the
mainframe market. While neither current macro-economic conditions nor
the turmoil in the credit markets have materially impacted demand for
our products, we recognize that no enterprise software services
company is immune from economic cycles that impact its customers.
14
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenue and expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances; the results of which form
the basis for making judgments about amounts and timing of revenue and expenses, the carrying
values of assets and the recorded amounts of liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates and such estimates may change if the
underlying conditions or assumptions change. We have discussed the development and selection of the
critical accounting policies with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors, and the Audit
Committee has reviewed our related disclosures. The critical accounting policies related to the
estimates and judgments are discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2008 under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. There have
been no changes to our critical accounting policies during the quarter ended June 30, 2008.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS No. 159), which
permits entities to choose to measure various financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. If an entity chooses to measure various financial instruments and certain other items at
fair value, the standard requires that unrealized gains and losses be reported in earnings for
those items measured using the fair value option. SFAS No. 159 was effective for us beginning in
the first quarter of fiscal 2009. We have elected not to apply the fair value option to any of our
assets or liabilities. Therefore, the adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not impact our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157).
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements
that require or permit fair value measurements, with certain exceptions. In February 2008, the FASB
issued two FASB Staff Positions that remove leasing from the scope of SFAS No. 157 and delay the
effective date of SFAS No. 157 to April 1, 2009 for all non-financial assets and non-financial
liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (that is at least annually). We have adopted the required
provisions of SFAS No. 157 beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The partial adoption of
SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or
cash flows. We have not determined whether the adoption of the deferred provisions of SFAS No. 157
will have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentages that selected items
in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income bear to total
revenue. These financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Total Revenue
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License
|
|
|
34.1
|
%
|
|
|
32.7
|
%
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
58.1
|
%
|
|
|
61.2
|
%
|
Professional services
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of license revenue
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Cost of maintenance revenue
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
Cost of professional services revenue
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
Selling and marketing expenses
|
|
|
32.1
|
%
|
|
|
33.2
|
%
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Total Revenue
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Severance, exit costs and related charges
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
97.0
|
%
|
|
|
84.1
|
%
|
Operating income
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
21.2
|
%
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
Revenue
The following table provides information regarding license and maintenance revenue for the
quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
Software License Revenue
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Service Management
|
|
$
|
89.6
|
|
|
$
|
66.6
|
|
|
|
34.5
|
%
|
Mainframe Service Management
|
|
|
59.8
|
|
|
|
59.3
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total software license revenue
|
|
$
|
149.4
|
|
|
$
|
125.9
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
Software Maintenance Revenue
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Service Management
|
|
$
|
136.7
|
|
|
$
|
125.4
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
Mainframe Service Management
|
|
|
117.6
|
|
|
|
110.1
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total software maintenance revenue
|
|
$
|
254.3
|
|
|
$
|
235.5
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
Total Software Revenue
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Service Management
|
|
$
|
226.3
|
|
|
$
|
192.0
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
Mainframe Service Management
|
|
|
177.4
|
|
|
|
169.4
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total software revenue
|
|
$
|
403.7
|
|
|
$
|
361.4
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software License Revenue
Total software license revenue was $149.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, an
increase of 18.7%, or $23.5 million, over the prior year quarter. This increase was attributable to
license revenue increases in both the ESM and MSM segments, as further discussed below. Recognition
of license revenue that was deferred in prior periods increased $7.2 million for the quarter ended
June 30, 2008, as compared to the prior year quarter. Of the license transactions recorded, the
percentage of license revenue recognized upfront increased from 42% during the quarter ended June
30, 2007 to 51% during the quarter ended June 30, 2008. During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we
recorded 15 transactions with license values over $1 million, with a total license value of $50.8
million, compared with 17 transactions with license values over $1 million, with a total license
value of $75.6 million, in the prior year quarter.
ESM license revenue represented 60.0%, or $89.6 million, and 52.9%, or $66.6 million, of our
total license revenue for the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. ESM license
revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 increased 34.5%, or $23.0 million, over the prior year
quarter. This increase was attributable primarily to increased demand for our BSM solutions,
inclusive of incremental service automation revenues resulting from our acquisition of BladeLogic
in April 2008 and our fiscal 2008 acquisitions, as well as an increase in the recognition of
previously deferred license revenue quarter over quarter, partially offset by an increase in the
level of new license transactions with revenue being deferred into future periods.
MSM license revenue represented 40.0%, or $59.8 million, and 47.1%, or $59.3 million, of our
total license revenue for the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. MSM license
revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 increased 0.8%, or
$0.5 million, over the prior year quarter. This increase was attributable primarily to an
increase in the recognition of previously deferred license revenue quarter over quarter, primarily
offset by a decrease in the volume of license transactions recorded.
16
For the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, our recognized license revenue was impacted by
the changes in our deferred license revenue balance as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Deferrals of license revenue
|
|
$
|
(72.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(82.8
|
)
|
Recognition from deferred license revenue
|
|
|
74.2
|
|
|
|
67.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impact on recognized license revenue
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
(15.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred license revenue balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
554.0
|
|
|
$
|
520.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The primary reasons for license revenue deferrals include, but are not limited to, customer
transactions that include products for which the maintenance pricing is based on both discounted
and undiscounted license list prices, certain arrangements that include unlimited licensing rights,
time-based licenses that are recognized over the term of the arrangement, customer transactions
that include products with differing maintenance periods and other transactions for which we do
not have or are not able to determine vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair value of the
maintenance and/or professional services. The contract terms and conditions that result in deferral
of revenue recognition for a given transaction result from arms length negotiations between us and
our customers. We anticipate our transactions will continue to include such contract terms that
result in deferral of the related license revenue as we expand our offerings to meet customers
product, pricing and licensing needs.
Once it is determined that license revenue for a particular contract must be deferred, based
on the contractual terms and application of revenue recognition policies to those terms, we
recognize such license revenue either ratably over the term of the contract or when the revenue
recognition criteria are met. Because of this, we generally know the timing of the subsequent
recognition of license revenue at the time of deferral. Therefore, the amount of license revenue to
be recognized out of the deferred revenue balance in each future quarter is generally predictable,
and our total license revenue to be recognized each quarter becomes more predictable as a larger
percentage of that revenue comes from the deferred license revenue balance. As of June 30, 2008,
the deferred license revenue balance was $554.0 million. As additional license revenue is deferred
in future periods, the amounts to be recognized in future periods will increase. A summary of the
estimated deferred license revenue we expect to recognize in future periods as of June 30, 2008
follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder fiscal 2009
|
|
$
|
217.7
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
$
|
183.6
|
|
Fiscal 2011 and thereafter
|
|
$
|
152.7
|
|
Software Maintenance Revenue
Total software maintenance revenue was $254.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, an
increase of 8.0%, or $18.8 million, over the prior year quarter. This increase was attributable to
increases in both ESM and MSM maintenance revenue as discussed below.
ESM maintenance revenue represented 53.8%, or $136.7 million, and 53.2%, or $125.4 million, of
our total maintenance revenue for the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. ESM
maintenance revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 increased 9.0%, or $11.3 million, over the
prior year quarter. This increase was attributable primarily to the expansion of our installed ESM
customer license base, including incremental maintenance revenue resulting from of our acquisition
of BladeLogic in April 2008 and our fiscal 2008 acquisitions.
MSM maintenance revenue represented 46.2%, or $117.6 million, and 46.8%, or $110.1 million, of
our total maintenance revenue for the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. MSM
maintenance revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 increased 6.8%, or $7.5 million, over the
prior year quarter. This increase was attributable primarily to the expansion of our installed MSM
customer license base and increasing capacities of the current installed base.
17
As of June 30, 2008, the deferred maintenance revenue balance was $1,245.5 million. A summary
of the estimated deferred maintenance revenue we expect to recognize in future periods as of June
30, 2008 follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of fiscal 2009
|
|
$
|
567.0
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
$
|
390.9
|
|
Fiscal 2011 and thereafter
|
|
$
|
287.6
|
|
Domestic vs. International Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
License:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
72.5
|
|
|
$
|
66.1
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
76.9
|
|
|
|
59.8
|
|
|
|
28.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total license revenue
|
|
|
149.4
|
|
|
|
125.9
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
137.9
|
|
|
|
129.3
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
116.4
|
|
|
|
106.2
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total maintenance revenue
|
|
|
254.3
|
|
|
|
235.5
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
37.6
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
47.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total professional services revenue
|
|
|
33.8
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
|
43.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total domestic revenue
|
|
|
224.3
|
|
|
|
205.5
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
Total international revenue
|
|
|
213.2
|
|
|
|
179.5
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
437.5
|
|
|
$
|
385.0
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License Revenue
Our domestic license revenue represented 48.5%, or $72.5 million, and 52.5%, or $66.1 million,
of our total license revenue for the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our
domestic license revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 increased 9.7%, or $6.4 million, over
the prior year quarter. This increase was attributable primarily to an increase in ESM license
revenue, including incremental revenue resulting from our acquisition of BladeLogic in April 2008
and our fiscal 2008 acquisitions, partially offset by a decline in MSM license revenue.
Our international license revenue represented 51.5%, or $76.9 million, and 47.5%, or $59.8
million, of our total license revenue for the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Our international license revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 increased 28.6%, or $17.1
million, over the prior year quarter. This increase was attributable to ESM and MSM license revenue
increases in each of our core international regions. The ESM license revenue increase was
attributable primarily to increases in our European market, principally due to incremental revenue
resulting from our acquisition of BladeLogic in April 2008, and to a lesser degree increases in our
Asia Pacific and Latin American markets. The MSM license revenue increase was attributable
primarily to increases in our European, Asia Pacific and Latin American markets. These increases
were impacted favorably by changes in foreign exchange rates.
Maintenance Revenue
Our domestic maintenance revenue represented 54.2%, or $137.9 million, and 54.9%, or $129.3
million, of our total maintenance revenue for the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. For the quarter ended June 30, 2008, domestic maintenance revenue increased 6.7%, or
$8.6 million, over the prior year quarter. This increase was attributable to increases in both ESM
and
MSM maintenance revenue, including incremental ESM maintenance revenue resulting from our
acquisition of BladeLogic in April 2008 and our fiscal 2008 acquisitions.
18
Our international maintenance revenue represented 45.8%, or $116.4 million, and 45.1%, or
$106.2 million, of our total maintenance revenue for the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. For the quarter ended June 30, 2008, international maintenance revenue increased
9.6%, or $10.2 million, over the prior year quarter. This increase was attributable to ESM and MSM
maintenance revenue increases in each of our core international regions, resulting from the growth
in our installed customer base. This increase was impacted favorably by changes in foreign
exchange rates.
Professional Services Revenue
Professional services revenue increased 43.2%, or $10.2 million, in the quarter ended June 30,
2008 as compared to the prior year quarter. Domestic and international professional services
revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 increased 37.6%, or $3.8 million, and 47.4%, or $6.4
million, over the prior year quarters, respectively. These increases were attributable primarily
to increases in implementation and consulting services, principally related to growth in BSM
solution sales and inclusive of incremental revenue resulting from our acquisition of BladeLogic in
April 2008.
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of license revenue
|
|
$
|
27.6
|
|
|
$
|
23.2
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
%
|
Cost of maintenance revenue
|
|
|
40.5
|
|
|
|
41.9
|
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
Cost of professional services revenue
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
%
|
Selling and marketing expenses
|
|
|
140.4
|
|
|
|
127.9
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
61.8
|
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
|
|
35.5
|
%
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
53.5
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
50.3
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
183.3
|
%
|
Severance, exit costs and related charges
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
255.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$
|
424.2
|
|
|
$
|
323.8
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of License Revenue
Cost of license revenue consists primarily of (i) the amortization of capitalized software
costs for internally developed products, (ii) amortization of acquired technology for products
acquired through business combinations, (iii) license-based royalties to third parties and (iv)
production and distribution costs for initial product licenses. For the quarters ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, cost of license revenue represented 6.3%, or $27.6 million, and 6.0%, or $23.2
million, of total revenue, respectively, and 18.5% and 18.4% of license revenue, respectively. Cost
of license revenue increased 19.0%, or $4.4 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as
compared to the prior year quarter. This increase was attributable primarily to an increase in the
amortization of acquired technology related to fiscal 2008 and 2009 acquisitions, partially offset
by the conclusion of the amortization of certain acquired technology from earlier acquisitions.
Cost of Maintenance Revenue
Cost of maintenance revenue consists primarily of the costs associated with customer support
and research and development personnel that provide maintenance, enhancement and support services
to our customers. For the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, cost of maintenance revenue
represented 9.3%, or $40.5 million, and 10.9%, or $41.9 million, of total revenue, respectively,
and 15.9% and 17.8% of maintenance revenue, respectively. Cost of maintenance revenue remained
relatively flat, decreasing 3.3%, or $1.4 million, during the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as
compared to the prior year quarter.
19
Cost of Professional Services Revenue
Cost of professional services revenue consists primarily of salaries, related personnel costs
and third-party fees associated with implementation, integration and education services that we
provide to our customers, and the related infrastructure to support this activity. For the quarters
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, cost of professional services revenue represented 8.0%, or $35.2
million, and 7.1%, or $27.5 million, of total revenue, respectively, and 104.1% and 116.5% of
professional services revenue, respectively. Cost of professional services revenue increased 28.0%,
or $7.7 million, during the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as compared to the prior year quarter.
This increase was attributable primarily to an increase in professional service enablement
personnel and an increase in third party consulting fees associated with a larger volume of BSM
implementations, including incremental costs associated with our acquisition of BladeLogic in April
2008, as well as the impact from changes in foreign exchange rates associated with international
expenses.
Selling and Marketing Expenses
Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, related personnel costs, sales
commissions and costs associated with advertising, marketing, industry trade shows and sales
seminars. For the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, selling and marketing expenses represented
32.1%, or $140.4 million, and 33.2%, or $127.9 million, of total revenue, respectively. Selling and
marketing expenses increased 9.8%, or $12.5 million, during the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as
compared to the prior year quarter. This increase was attributable primarily to an increase in
sales personnel cost and related variable compensation, resulting principally from our acquisition
of BladeLogic in April 2008, and to a lesser degree an increase in share-based compensation and the
impact from changes in foreign exchange rates associated with international expenses.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and personnel costs related to
software developers and development support personnel, including software programmers, testing and
quality assurance personnel and writers of technical documentation, such as product manuals and
installation guides. These expenses also include computer hardware and software costs,
telecommunication costs and personnel costs associated with our development and production labs.
For the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, research and development expenses represented 14.1%,
or $61.8 million, and 11.8%, or $45.6 million, of total revenue, respectively. Research and
development expenses increased 35.5%, or $16.2 million, during the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as
compared to the prior year quarter. This increase was attributable primarily to an increase in
research and development personnel and related costs resulting principally from our acquisition of
BladeLogic in April 2008, a decrease in research and development personnel and related costs
allocated to software development projects that were capitalized and an increase in share-based
compensation expense.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related personnel costs
of executive management, finance and accounting, facilities management, legal and human resources.
Other costs included in general and administrative expenses are fees paid for outside legal and
accounting services, consulting projects and insurance. General and administrative expenses
represented 12.2%, or $53.5 million, and 13.2%, or $50.7 million, of total revenue during the
quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. General and administrative expenses increased
5.5%, or $2.8 million, during the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as compared to the prior year
quarter, primarily due to an increase in share-based compensation expense.
In-process Research and Development
During the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we expensed acquired in-process research and
development (IPR&D) totaling $50.3 million and $2.2 million in connection with our acquisitions of
BladeLogic and ProactiveNet, Inc., respectively. The amounts allocated to IPR&D represent the
estimated fair values, based on risk-adjusted cash flows and historical costs expended, related to
core research and development projects that were incomplete and had neither reached technological
feasibility nor been determined to have an alternative future use pending achievement of
technological feasibility as of the date of acquisition.
The BladeLogic IPR&D relates primarily to the development of a major new release to an
existing core product, and to a lesser degree the development of a new product, both of which we
plan to continue developing and expect to release in the second half of
fiscal 2009. The estimated cost of completing these projects was approximately $7.4 million
as of the acquisition date, which had not materially changed since the acquisition.
20
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Amortization of intangible assets consists primarily of the amortization of finite-lived
customer contracts and relationships, developed product technology and tradenames recorded in
connection with acquisitions. Amortization of intangible assets increased 183.3%, or $5.5 million,
during the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as compared to the prior year period. This increase was
attributable to additional amortization associated with intangibles acquired in connection with
fiscal 2008 and 2009 acquisitions, partially offset by the conclusion of the amortization of
certain intangibles from earlier acquisitions.
Severance, Exit Costs and Related Charges
We have undertaken various restructuring and process improvement initiatives in recent years to reduce
costs through the realignment of resources to focus on growth areas and the simplification, standardization
and automation of key business processes. We recorded $6.4 million and $1.8 million in expense related to
these actions during the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These expenses were
attributable primarily to identified workforce reductions and associated cash separation packages paid or
accrued by us. The separation charge for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 relates to the identification of
approximately 120 personnel for termination, consisting primarily of sales personnel in product areas that
were not achieving desired profitability as well as the elimination of certain non-quota bearing positions,
and to a lesser degree the reduction of certain research and development personnel. While we will reduce
future operating expenses as a result of these fiscal 2009 actions, we anticipate that these reductions will be
principally offset by incremental personnel-related expenses in other
areas, including that related to additional customer
facing personnel within our field sales organization. We will continue to evaluate additional actions that may be
necessary in the future to achieve our business goals.
Other Income, Net
Other income, net, consists primarily of interest earned, realized gains and losses on
investments and interest expense on our Notes and capital leases. For the quarters ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, other income, net, was $8.1 million and $20.6 million, respectively. Other income,
net, decreased 60.7%, or $12.5 million, during the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the
prior year quarter, primarily due to a decrease in interest income resulting from lower average
investment balances and lower average investment yields and an increase in interest expense related
to our Notes which were issued in June 2008.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $20.2 million and $26.6 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2008
and 2007, respectively, resulting in effective tax rates of 94.4% and 32.5%, respectively. The
effective tax rate is impacted primarily by the worldwide mix of estimated consolidated earnings
before taxes and our policy of indefinitely re-investing earnings from certain low tax
jurisdictions, changes in estimates related to our uncertain tax positions, changes in the
valuation allowance recorded against our deferred tax assets, benefits associated with income
attributable to both domestic production activities and the extraterritorial income exclusion and
the non-deductible write-off of IPR&D expense associated with certain acquisitions. The increase
in the effective tax rate for the current year quarter was attributable primarily to our write-off
of IPR&D expense in connection with the BladeLogic acquisition, partially offset by a decrease
attributable to the extraterritorial income exclusion.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 161), which requires enhanced disclosures about an entitys
derivative and hedging activities. SFAS No. 161 is effective for us beginning in the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141(R)),
which changes the accounting for business combinations including: (i) the measurement of acquirer
shares issued in consideration for a business combination, (ii) the recognition of contingent
consideration, (iii) the accounting for preacquisition gain and loss contingencies, (iv) the
recognition of capitalized in-process research and development, (v) the accounting for
acquisition-related restructuring costs, (vi) the treatment of acquisition related transaction
costs, and (vii) the recognition of changes in the acquirers income tax valuation allowance. SFAS
No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after the beginning
of fiscal 2010. The impact of adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) on our financial position or results
of operations is dependent upon the nature and terms of business combinations, if any, that we may
consummate in fiscal 2010 and thereafter.
21
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2008, we had $1.1 billion in cash, cash equivalents and investments, approximately
64% of which was held by our international subsidiaries and was largely generated from our
international operations. Our international operations have generated
$148.6 million of earnings
that we have determined will be invested indefinitely in our international operations. Were such
earnings to be repatriated, we would incur a United States Federal income tax liability that is not
currently accrued in our financial statements.
In June 2008, we issued $300.0 million of Notes. Net proceeds to us after discount and
issuance costs amounted to $295.6 million, which we intend to use for general corporate purposes.
The Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.25% per year payable semi-annually in June and December of
each year. The Notes are redeemable at our option at any time in whole or, from time to time, in
part at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) 100% of the principal amount of the Notes
to be redeemed or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of
principal and interest discounted at the applicable treasury rate plus 50 basis points, plus,
accrued and unpaid interest. The Notes are subject to the provisions of an indenture which includes
covenants limiting, among other things, the creation of liens securing indebtedness and
sale-leaseback transactions. As of June 30, 2008, we were in compliance with all such debt
covenants.
As of June 30, 2008, we held auction rate securities with a par value of $72.2 million and an
estimated fair value of $67.9 million. Our auction rate securities consist entirely of bonds issued
by public agencies that are backed by student loans with at least a 97% guarantee by the federal
government under the United States Department of Educations Federal Family Education Loan Program.
These bonds are currently rated AAA by Moodys and Standard and Poors. We do not have reason to
believe that any of the underlying issuers of our auction rate securities are presently at risk or
that the underlying credit quality of the assets backing our auction rate security investments has
been impacted by the reduced liquidity of these investments. Based on our current ability to
access cash and other short-term investments, our expected operating cash flows, and other sources
of cash that we expect to be available, we do not anticipate the current lack of liquidity of these
investments to have a material impact on our business strategy, financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
We believe that our existing cash and investment balances and funds generated from operating
and investing activities will be sufficient to meet our working and other capital requirements for
the foreseeable future. In the normal course of business, we evaluate the merits of acquiring
technology or businesses, or establishing strategic relationships with or investing in these
businesses. We may elect to use available cash and investments to fund such activities in the
future. In the event additional needs for cash arise, we might find it advantageous to utilize
third-party financing sources based on factors such as our then available cash and its source
(i.e., cash held in the United States versus international locations), the cost of financing and
our internal cost of capital.
Our cash flows were as follows during the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
151.3
|
|
|
$
|
165.0
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(705.2
|
)
|
|
|
134.7
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
247.5
|
|
|
|
(46.1
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(301.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
258.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Our primary method for funding operations and growth has been through cash flows generated
from operating activities. Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $13.7 million during
the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as compared to the prior year quarter. This decrease was
attributable primarily to higher cash receipts on financed receivables in the prior year quarter
and a reduction in cash payments on finance payables.
22
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $705.2 million during the quarter ended June 30,
2008, as compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $134.7 million in the prior year
quarter. This difference was attributable primarily to cash expended in the current quarter for
our acquisition of BladeLogic and a quarter over quarter decrease in proceeds from maturities and
sales of investments, partially offset by a quarter over quarter decrease in investment purchases
and capitalized software development costs.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $247.5 million for the quarter ended June 30,
2008 as compared to net cash used in financing activities of $46.1 million in the prior year
period. This difference was attributable primarily to net proceeds received in the current quarter
related to the issuance of our Notes and an increase in cash received from employee stock option
exercises and the excess tax benefit from share-based compensation, partially offset by a quarter
over quarter increase in treasury stock purchases.
Treasury Stock Purchases
Our Board of Directors have previously authorized a total of $3.0 billion to repurchase stock.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we repurchased 2.6 million shares for $100.0 million, under
this stock repurchase program. From the inception of the stock repurchase authorization through
June 30, 2008, we have purchased 106.6 million shares for $2.4 billion. In addition, during the
quarter ended June 30, 2008, we repurchased 0.4 million shares for $15.8 million to satisfy tax
withholding obligations upon the lapse of restrictions on nonvested stock grants. The repurchase of
stock is funded solely with cash generated from domestic operations and, therefore, affects our
overall domestic versus international liquidity balances. See
PART II. Item 2. Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
below for a monthly detail of treasury stock purchases for the quarter ending
June 30, 2008.
Repurchases of our common stock will occur over time through open market purchases, through
unsolicited or solicited privately negotiated transactions, or in such other manner as will comply
with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules and regulations
thereunder.
Available Information
Our internet website address is http://www.bmc.com. Our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or
furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available
through the investor relations page of our internet website free of charge as soon as reasonably
practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). Our internet website and the information contained therein or connected
thereto are not intended to be incorporated into this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to a variety of risks, including foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations
and changes in the market value of our investments in marketable securities. In the normal course
of business, we employ established policies and procedures to manage these risks including the use
of derivative instruments. There have been no material changes in our foreign exchange risk
management strategy or our portfolio management strategy subsequent to March 31, 2008, therefore
the risk profile of our market risk sensitive instruments remains substantially unchanged from the
description in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2008.
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
Material Weakness Previously Disclosed
As discussed in Item 9A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2008, as of March 31,
2008, we identified a material weakness in the design and operation of our internal controls over
the accounting for income taxes related to the reconciliation, analysis and review procedures
operating at that date. Although we have designed and implemented controls that we believe will
remediate the material weakness, we are unable to conclude the material weakness has been
remediated as of June 30, 2008 because an insufficient amount of time has passed for us to verify
the additional remediation measures are operating effectively. Management
will not be able to conclude that the material weakness has been eliminated until, at the
earliest, the completion of our second quarter of fiscal 2009.
23
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of June 30, 2008, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision of our principal
executive officer (CEO) and principal financial officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design
and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. In
light of the material weakness discussed above, which has not been fully remediated as of the end
of the period covered by this Quarterly Report, our CEO and CFO concluded, after the evaluation
described above, that our disclosure controls were not effective. As a result of this conclusion,
the financial statements for the period covered by this report were prepared with particular
attention to the material weakness previously disclosed. Accordingly, management believes that the
condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report fairly present, in
all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows as of and for
the periods presented.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, as part of our plan to address the aforementioned
material weakness, we implemented enhanced reconciliation, analysis and review procedures related
to our accounting for income taxes. These actions are reasonably likely to materially affect our
internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
There are no items that require disclosure under this Item.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
The following risk factor is added to our risk factors as included in our Annual Report of
Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008:
There are risks associated with our outstanding indebtedness.
In June 2008, we issued $300.0 million of senior unsecured notes due 2018 and we may incur
additional indebtedness in the future. Our ability to pay interest and repay the principal for our
indebtedness is dependent upon our ability to manage our business operations and the other factors
discussed in this section. There can be no assurance that we will be able to manage any of these
risks successfully. In addition, changes by any rating agency to our outlook or credit rating could
negatively affect the value and liquidity of both our debt and equity securities.
Item 2.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dollar Value
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares
|
|
|
of Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Value of Shares that
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Purchased as Part of a
|
|
|
as Part of a
|
|
|
may yet be
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Paid per
|
|
|
Publicly Announced
|
|
|
Publicly Announced
|
|
|
Purchased Under
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased(1)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Program(2)
|
|
|
Program(2)
|
|
|
the Program(1)
|
|
April 1-30, 2008
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
674,865,706
|
|
May 1-31, 2008
|
|
|
951,017
|
|
|
$
|
38.27
|
|
|
|
565,000
|
|
|
|
21,624,345
|
|
|
$
|
653,241,361
|
|
June 1-30, 2008
|
|
|
2,046,841
|
|
|
$
|
38.83
|
|
|
|
2,018,652
|
|
|
|
78,375,646
|
|
|
$
|
574,865,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,998,304
|
|
|
$
|
38.70
|
|
|
|
2,583,652
|
|
|
$
|
99,999,991
|
|
|
$
|
574,865,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes 414,652 shares of our common stock withheld by us to satisfy employee
withholding obligations.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Our Board of Directors have previously authorized a total of $3.0 billion to repurchase
stock. As of June 30, 2008, there was $574.9 million remaining in this stock repurchase
program and the program does not have an expiration date.
|
24
Item 6.
Exhibits
(a) Exhibits.
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of BMC Software, Inc.
pursuant to Section 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of BMC Software, Inc.
pursuant to Section 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of BMC Software, Inc.
pursuant to Section 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of BMC Software, Inc.
pursuant to Section 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
|
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BMC SOFTWARE, INC.
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Robert E. Beauchamp
|
|
July 25, 2008
|
|
Robert E. Beauchamp
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Stephen B. Solcher
|
|
July 25, 2008
|
|
Stephen B. Solcher
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
26
EXHIBIT INDEX
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of BMC Software, Inc.
pursuant to Section 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of BMC Software, Inc.
pursuant to Section 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of BMC Software, Inc.
pursuant to Section 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of BMC Software, Inc.
pursuant to Section 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
|
27
BMC (NYSE:BMC)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2024 to Jun 2024
BMC (NYSE:BMC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2023 to Jun 2024