Item 4.01 Changes in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant.

On April 4, 2019, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Truli Technologies, Inc. (“Truli” or the “Company”) received notice of resignation from RBSM LLP (“RBSM”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

The report of RBSM on Truli’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 did not contain any adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principle, except that the report contained a paragraph stating that there was substantial doubt about Truli’s ability to continue as a going concern. During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018 and through the subsequent interim period as of April 4, 2019, the effective date of RBSM’s resignation, there were (i) no disagreements (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) between Truli and RBSM on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of RBSM would have caused RBSM to make reference thereto in its reports on the consolidated financial statements of Truli for such years, and (ii) no “reportable events” (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

Truli provided RBSM with a copy of this Form 8-K and requested that RBSM furnish a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether or not RBSM agrees with the above disclosures. A copy of RBSM’s letter, dated April 10, 2019, is attached as Exhibit 16.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.

On April 4, 2019, the Board approved the appointment of Salberg & Company, P.A. (“Salberg”) as the new independent registered public accounting firm.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018 and through the subsequent interim period as of April 4, 2019, neither Truli, nor any party on behalf of Truli, consulted with Salberg with respect to either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of the audit opinion that might be rendered with respect to Truli’s consolidated financial statements, and no written report or oral advice was provided to the Truli by Salberg that was an important factor considered by Truli in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue, or (ii) any matter that was subject to any disagreement (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) or a reportable event (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).