UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the
Registrant
☑
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
☐
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
☐
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
|
|
☐
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
|
|
|
☑
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
|
|
☐
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials
|
|
|
☐
|
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to
§240.14a-12
|
Encana Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
☑
|
|
No fee required.
|
|
|
☐
|
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules
14a-6(i)(1)
and
0-11.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
0-11
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
|
☐
|
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
|
☐
|
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Filing Party:
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Date Filed:
|
March 23, 2017
Dear Fellow Shareholders,
On behalf of the Board and management of Encana Corporation, I would like to thank all of our shareholders for your continued support and
invite you to our annual meeting of shareholders to be held on Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. MT at BMO Centre, Palomino Room, 20 Roundup Way S.E., Calgary, Alberta. Live coverage of the meeting will be broadcast on our website at
www.encana.com
. An audio recording will also be available on our website for a period of time after the meeting.
As a
shareholder, you have the right to participate in and to vote your common shares on items of business at the meeting. This proxy statement describes the business to be conducted at the meeting and provides important information regarding our
nominated directors, corporate governance practices and approach to executive compensation. This information is intended to assist you in determining how to vote your common shares.
Your vote and participation at the meeting are important. We encourage you to review this proxy statement in advance of the meeting.
We look forward to seeing you at the annual meeting of shareholders on May 2, 2017.
Sincerely,
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Clayton H. Woitas
|
|
/s/ Douglas J. Suttles
|
|
|
Clayton H. Woitas
Chairman of the Board
|
|
Douglas J. Suttles
President & Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
Notice
of 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
|
|
|
|
When:
|
|
Where:
|
Tuesday, May 2, 2017,
|
|
BMO Centre, Palomino Room,
|
10:00 a.m. Mountain Time (MT)
|
|
20 Roundup Way S.E.,
|
|
|
Calgary, Alberta
|
The 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the Meeting) of Encana Corporation (Encana or the
Company) will be held on Tuesday, May 2, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. MT, at BMO Centre, Palomino Room, 20 Roundup Way S.E., Calgary, Alberta for the following purposes:
|
|
|
To receive the Consolidated Financial Statements together with the auditors report thereon for the year ended
December 31, 2016;
|
|
|
|
To elect the 10 director nominees identified in the accompanying proxy statement (Proxy Statement) to serve
as directors until the close of the next annual meeting of shareholders (Item 1);
|
|
|
|
To appoint independent auditors of the Company until the close of the next annual meeting of shareholders (Item 2);
|
|
|
|
To hold a
non-binding
advisory vote to approve compensation of Named Executive
Officers
(Say-on-Pay)
(Item 3);
|
|
|
|
To hold a
non-binding
advisory vote on the frequency of
Say-on-Pay
votes (Item 4); and
|
|
|
|
To consider such other business as may properly be brought before the Meeting or any adjournment or postponement
thereof.
|
Record Date
The Board of Directors set March 8, 2017 as the record date for the Meeting. This means that our shareholders as of the close of business on that
date are entitled to receive this notice of the Meeting (Notice of the Meeting), and to vote at the Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements of the Meeting. On the record date, there were 973,064,884 common shares of the
Company issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Meeting. Unless otherwise stated, information in the attached Proxy Statement is given as of March 1, 2017 and is being first mailed to shareholders on or about March 23, 2017.
Changes to Presentation
In previous years, the Company prepared its management proxy circular for its annual meetings of shareholders in compliance with Canadian disclosure
requirements, as permitted under the multijurisdictional disclosure system adopted by Canada and the United States. The Company is no longer a foreign private issuer pursuant to applicable U.S. securities laws. Accordingly, the attached Proxy
Statement has been prepared in compliance with disclosure requirements under the rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) applicable to a U.S. domestic issuer. As a result, the disclosure in this Proxy
Statement differs from the disclosure included in our management proxy circulars in prior years.
Webcast of the Meeting
If you are unable to attend the Meeting in person, you can listen to a live webcast of the Meeting by visiting the 2017 Annual Meeting
page on the Companys website, at
www.encana.com/investors/annual-meeting-of-shareholders.
On the website, you can also vote through the
Internet, access the proxy materials, submit questions in advance of the Meeting and learn more about the Company.
The Board of Directors has
approved the contents of the attached Proxy Statement and has authorized us to send it to you.
By order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ Joanne Alexander
Joanne Alexander
Executive Vice-President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary
Encana Corporation
Calgary, Alberta
March 23, 2017
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the
information that you should consider. You should read the entire Proxy Statement before voting. For more complete information regarding the Companys 2016 performance, please review the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2016, dated February 27, 2017 (the Annual Report). Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this Proxy Statement to Encana, the
Company, we, us and our means Encana Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries and partnerships and ELT, management, executive officers and
executives means members of the Companys executive leadership team.
You can vote your common shares of the Company (Common
Shares) by proxy or in person at the Meeting. For information regarding voting at the Meeting, see How do I vote if I am a REGISTERED Shareholder? or How do I vote if I am a NON-REGISTERED shareholder? beginning on page
62.
Shareholders are being asked to vote on the following matters at the Meeting:
|
|
|
|
|
Voting Matter
|
|
Board Vote
Recommendation
|
|
For more
information
see page
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Election of
Directors
The Board of Directors (the Board) and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believe that the 10
director nominees (Nominees) possess the necessary qualifications, attributes, skills and experience to provide quality advice and counsel to management and effectively oversee the business and the long-term interests of shareholders.
The 10 nominated directors receiving the highest number of FOR votes duly cast at the Meeting will be elected to the Board.
|
|
FOR
each Nominee
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
as Independent Auditors
The Audit Committee and the Board believe that the retention of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as the
independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017 is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, the Audit Committee and the Board propose that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP be reappointed as the auditors of
the Company until the close of the next annual meeting of shareholders. The appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Companys independent auditors requires an affirmative majority of the votes duly cast at the Meeting.
|
|
FOR
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Advisory Vote to Approve
Compensation of Named Executive Officers
The Company seeks a
non-binding
advisory vote to approve
the compensation of its Named Executive Officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section beginning on page 30 and the Compensation Tables section beginning on page 53. The Board values shareholders
perspectives, and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the advisory vote when considering future executive compensation decisions. In order to be approved, the advisory resolution on the compensation
of our Named Executive Officers requires an affirmative majority of the votes duly cast at the Meeting.
|
|
FOR
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
Item 4. Advisory Vote on Frequency of
Say-on-Pay
Votes
The Company seeks a
non-binding
advisory vote to determine whether the advisory shareholder vote on the compensation of its Named Executive Officers will occur every one, two or three years. After careful consideration of the various
perspectives supporting each frequency level, the Board has determined that an annual
Say-on-Pay
vote is appropriate for the Company and its shareholders at this time.
The Board values shareholders perspectives, and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the advisory vote when considering the frequency of future
Say-on-Pay
votes. In order to be approved, the advisory resolution providing for an annual frequency of
Say-on-Pay
votes
requires a plurality of the votes duly cast at the Meeting with respect to such frequency.
|
|
FOR ONE (1)
YEAR
|
|
29
|
1
|
Corporate Governance Highlights
|
We are committed to high standards of corporate governance which promotes the long-term interests of shareholders,
strengthens Board and management accountability, and helps build public trust in the Company. Several of our key governance strengths and actions are noted in the table below:
1
|
|
|
Size of Board
|
|
10
|
Number of Independent Directors
|
|
Nine
|
Average Age of Directors
|
|
63
|
Percentage of Female Directors
|
|
20 percent
|
Annual Election of Directors
|
|
Yes
|
Directors Elected Individually (rather than slate voting)
|
|
Yes
|
Majority Voting Guidelines for Directors
|
|
Yes
|
Separate Chair and CEO
|
|
Yes
|
Share Ownership Guidelines for Directors and Officers
|
|
Yes
|
Number of Board Meetings held in 2016
|
|
Seven
|
Board Orientation/Education Program
|
|
Yes
|
Business Code of Conduct and Ethics Program
|
|
Yes
|
Annual Advisory Vote of Executive Compensation
|
|
Yes
|
Formal Board Evaluation Process
|
|
Yes
|
Dual-Class Shares
|
|
No
|
Average Director Tenure
|
|
Five years
|
The following table provides summary information about each Nominee. Each director is elected annually and must meet our
majority voting guidelines. Detailed information about each Nominees background, qualification experience and areas of expertise can be found in the section entitled Nominees for Election to the Board Director Nominee
Profiles.
Pursuant to a Board resolution, the Board has fixed the number of directors to be elected at the Meeting at 10 directors
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Director
Since
|
|
Position Held
for
the Past Five Years
|
|
Independent
|
|
Committee
Memberships
|
|
Board and
Committee
Attendance in
2016
|
|
Other Public
Company
Boards
|
Peter A. Dea
|
|
63
|
|
2010
|
|
Executive Chairman,
Confluence Resources LP
|
|
YES
|
|
CREHS*/NCG/RESERVES
|
|
100%
|
|
0
|
Fred J. Fowler
|
|
70
|
|
2010
|
|
Corporate Director
|
|
YES
|
|
CREHS/HRC
|
|
100%
|
|
2
|
Howard J. Mayson
|
|
64
|
|
2014
|
|
Corporate Director
|
|
YES
|
|
CREHS/NCG/RESERVES*
|
|
100%
|
|
0
|
Lee A. McIntire
|
|
68
|
|
2014
|
|
Chief Executive Officer,
TerraPower, LLC
|
|
YES
|
|
CREHS/HRC
|
|
100%
|
|
0
|
Margaret A. McKenzie
|
|
55
|
|
2015
|
|
Corporate Director
|
|
YES
|
|
AUDIT/HRC
|
|
95%
|
|
3
|
Suzanne P. Nimocks
|
|
58
|
|
2010
|
|
Corporate Director
|
|
YES
|
|
AUDIT/HRC*/NCG
|
|
100%
|
|
3
|
Brian G. Shaw
|
|
63
|
|
2013
|
|
Corporate Director
|
|
YES
|
|
AUDIT/RESERVES
|
|
100%
|
|
1
|
Douglas J. Suttles
|
|
56
|
|
2013
|
|
President & Chief Executive Officer
|
|
NO
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
0
|
Bruce G. Waterman
2
|
|
66
|
|
2010
|
|
Corporate Director
|
|
YES
|
|
AUDIT*/HRC/NCG
|
|
100%
|
|
1
|
Clayton H. Woitas
3
|
|
68
|
|
2008
|
|
Corporate Director
|
|
YES
|
|
NCG*
|
|
100%
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Chair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUDIT
|
|
Audit Committee
|
|
CREHS
|
|
Corporate Responsibility, Environment, Health and Safety Committee
|
NCG
|
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
|
|
HRC
|
|
Human Resources and Compensation Committee
|
RESERVES
|
|
Reserves Committee
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
Information regarding the Size of Board, Number of Independent Directors, Average Age of Directors, Percentage of
Female Directors and Average Director Tenure assumes that the Nominees are elected to the Board at the Meeting.
|
2
|
Effective April 1, 2017, Mr. Waterman will become Chairman of the Audit Committee and a member of the NCG Committee.
|
3
|
In addition to being a member of the NCG Committee, Mr. Woitas is an ex officio
non-voting
member of all other committees of the Board (the Committees). As an
ex officio
non-voting
member, Mr. Woitas attends as his schedule
permits and may vote when necessary to achieve a quorum.
|
2
The Board is providing to you this Proxy Statement to solicit proxies on its behalf to be voted at the Meeting. The
Meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. MT at BMO Centre, Palomino Room, 20 Roundup Way S.E., Calgary, Alberta. The proxies also may be voted at any adjournments or postponements of the Meeting.
The mailing address of our principal executive offices is Encana Corporation, 500 Centre Street S.E., P.O. Box 2850, Calgary, Alberta, T2P 2S5. We are
first furnishing the proxy materials to shareholders on March 23, 2017.
Unless otherwise stated, information in this Proxy Statement is given
as of March 1, 2017.
All properly executed written proxies and all properly completed proxies submitted by telephone or Internet that are
delivered pursuant to this solicitation will be voted at the Meeting in accordance with the directions given in the proxy, unless the proxy is revoked prior to completion of voting at the Meeting.
Only owners of record of Common Shares as of the close of business on March 8, 2017, the record date, are entitled to notice of, and to vote
at, the Meeting or at any adjournments or postponements of the Meeting. Each owner of record on the record date is entitled to one vote for each Common Share held. On March 8, 2017, there were 973,064,884 Common Shares issued and
outstanding.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on May 2, 2017.
The Notice of the Meeting, this Proxy Statement
and the Annual Report are available at
www.encana.com
,
www.sedar.com
and
www.sec.gov
|
Item 1. Election of Directors
|
Directors are elected annually by shareholders, each to hold office until the close of the next annual meeting of shareholders or until such
persons successor is elected or appointed. Between shareholder meetings, the Board may appoint additional directors.
The Companys
articles of incorporation provide that the Board shall consist of a minimum of eight and a maximum of 17 directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance (NCG) Committee, with the assistance of an external search consultant if
necessary, identifies and recommends to the Board proposed nominees for appointment or election consistent with criteria approved by the Board.
The
NCG Committee believes each of the Nominees is well qualified and has the necessary skills and experience required to serve as a Board member. Each Nominee is a current member of the Board and is independent, excluding Mr. Suttles, who is not
independent as he is the Companys President & Chief Executive Officer (CEO). At the 2016 annual meeting of shareholders, each of the Nominees received a greater than 98 percent FOR vote.
Pursuant to a Board resolution, the Board has fixed the number of directors to be elected at the Meeting
at 10 directors
. Each elected director will hold office until the close of the next annual meeting of shareholders or until such persons successor is elected or appointed.
The persons named in the section Nominees for Election to the Board will be presented for election at the Meeting. The Company has no reason
to believe that any of the Nominees will be unable to serve as a director; however, if a Nominee withdraws his or her name, or is otherwise unable to serve as a director, you or your proxyholder will have the right to use discretion in voting for
such other properly qualified nominees.
Vote Required for Approval
The 10 nominated directors receiving the highest number of
FOR
votes duly cast at the Meeting will be elected to the Board.
|
The Board
Recommends that you Vote for the Election of each of the Nominees.
|
3
Role of the Board
The Board is elected by the shareholders to oversee the Companys strategy, financial strength and overall long-term success. The Board serves as
the ultimate decision-making body of the Company, except for those matters reserved to or shared with the shareholders. The Board plays a critical role in the strategic planning process and regularly examines and discusses the Companys
strategy throughout the year. The Board selects and oversees the members of senior management, who are charged by the Board with conducting the business of the Company.
|
|
|
All of the members of the Board are independent, with the exception of the CEO.
|
|
|
|
The roles of Chairman of the Board and CEO are separate.
|
|
|
|
There are no interlocking directorships at other reporting issuers.
|
Position Descriptions
The Board has approved written position descriptions for the Chairman of the Board, Committee Chairs and the CEO. These position descriptions are
available on the Companys website at
www.encana.com
.
Board Assessment Process
The NCG Committee assesses the effectiveness of the Board, its Committees and individual directors on an annual basis.
The Chairman of the Board conducts annual interviews with individual directors and the results are discussed with the NCG Committee. In addition, the
Board undergoes a comprehensive review on a regular basis to determine whether it, its Committees and its individual directors are functioning effectively. The evaluation will be conducted by the Chairman of the Board through detailed effectiveness
questionnaires and individual director interviews. Results of the formal evaluation process and individual director interviews are combined by the Chairman of the Board and are reported to the Board and the NCG Committee.
Evaluation results are used to facilitate continuous improvement in Board and Committee performance and processes. Action items and key takeaways
identified through this process are reviewed by the NCG Committee to ensure appropriate
follow-up
and action. The NCG Committee also regularly reviews the Board and Committee mandates to address any identified
issues and recommend any changes to the Board for approval.
Director Skills and Experience
Directors must have an appropriate mix of skills, knowledge and business expertise, as well as history of achievement, to be considered for nomination to
the Board. Members of the Board must be highly skilled and experienced to provide strong and effective oversight and to steward the Companys future growth.
The NCG Committee is responsible for identifying prospective Board members and ensuring a robust Board renewal process. The NCG Committee is comprised
exclusively of independent directors. To guide the Board renewal process, the NCG Committee uses a skills matrix to evaluate the composition of the Board and identify required areas of expertise, including when recruiting new director candidates.
The NCG Committee also considers other factors, including diversity and geographic representation. The NCG Committee evaluates candidate recommendations from individual directors and professional search organizations, and maintains a list of
potential candidates possessing the desired skills, expertise and experience, in light of the size and composition of the Board.
4
The following table represents the breadth of experience and expertise represented by the Nominees. These
areas have been identified by the Board as being important to effective stewardship of the Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skills and Expertise
|
|
Dea
|
|
Fowler
|
|
Mayson
|
|
McIntire
|
|
McKenzie
|
|
Nimocks
|
|
Shaw
|
|
Suttles
|
|
Waterman
|
|
Woitas
|
Accounting,
Finance and/or Audit
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
|
Environment,
Health & Safety
(2)
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
●
|
Financial Expert
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
|
Governance
(4)
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Human
Resources/Compensation
(5)
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
|
Mergers/Acquisitions and Divestitures
(6)
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
Natural Gas, Oil
and Natural Gas Liquids Development/Operations
(7)
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
●
|
Public
Policy/Government Relations
(8)
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
Reserves
(9)
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
●
|
Risk Management
(10)
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
|
Notes:
(1)
|
Experience in the financial services area, or experience overseeing complex financial transactions or on an audit
committee.
|
(2)
|
Experience in the areas of environment, health and safety.
|
(3)
|
An audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC (please refer to the audit committee financial expert
definition under Audit Committee Independence and Financial Literacy on page 17).
|
(4)
|
Experience overseeing governance practices may have gained experience through work on a corporate governance
committee or through experience as a senior executive of a major public company.
|
(5)
|
Experience overseeing compensation design, which may have been gained through experience as a senior executive of a
major public company or through work on a human resources and compensation committee.
|
(6)
|
Experience with mergers, acquisitions and/or divestitures for a major public company.
|
(7)
|
Experience with various aspects of natural gas, oil and natural gas liquids development and operations, including
exploration, marketing and production.
|
(8)
|
Experience working with local, provincial, national or international governments or gained public relations or
government experience as a senior executive in a major public company.
|
(9)
|
Experience with reviewing externally disclosed natural gas and oil reserves and resources data and reports prepared by
independent qualified reserves evaluators or auditors.
|
(10)
|
Experience identifying principal corporate risks to ensure management implements the appropriate steps to manage and
mitigate risks as a senior executive in a major public company or gained experience as a member of a risk committee.
|
Continuing Education
Continuing education enables directors to enhance their understanding of the Companys
business and remain current regarding issues or governance matters which may impact the Company. Board materials are provided to directors in advance of regularly scheduled meetings and include
pre-reading
and
background analysis. The Board also receives regular updates on emerging regulatory and governance matters from management at Board and Committee meetings.
The Company also supports continuing director education through paid subscriptions for Board members to leading national director education associations
in the U.S. and Canada. Directors receive access to continuing education resources and attend conferences, seminars and webinars on board governance and related industry matters. Examples of such continuing education, including sessions attended by
members of the Board and those hosted by the Company in 2016, include:
|
|
|
Corporate membership and access to continuing director education resources through Institute of Corporate Directors
(Canada) and National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) (U.S.);
|
|
|
|
Board site visit to the Companys Permian operations located in South Texas to review the Companys
operations, Environment, Health & Safety (EH&S) initiatives and met with management, operations and field personnel;
|
|
|
|
Quarterly updates on the Companys operations, including supply chain management initiatives;
|
|
|
|
Quarterly overviews of risks, including formal enterprise risk management report;
|
|
|
|
Quarterly overviews of market fundamentals, including analyses of commodity prices and basis differential projections,
and their potential impacts;
|
|
|
|
Regular attendance at Audit Committee meetings by all directors for
in-depth
discussions on the Companys accounting and financial reporting processes, financial statements and system of internal controls regarding accounting and financial reporting and accounting compliance;
|
|
|
|
Review of management reports, including treasury, tax, risk management, litigation, contingencies and commitments;
|
5
|
|
|
Attendance at HRC Committee meetings by all directors to review certain executive compensation matters;
|
|
|
|
Attendance at Reserves Committee meetings by all directors interested in
in-depth
discussions on reserves; and
|
|
|
|
Regular attendance at director continuing education programs facilitated by NACD, Women Corporate Directors, Goldman
Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Vinson & Elkins, Harvard Law & Business Schools, Financial Executives International (FEI), FEI Canada and Chartered Professional Accountants of Alberta.
|
Board Tenure
The
Company does not have a mandatory retirement age nor does it have formal director term limits. Board renewal is managed through regular Board assessments and evaluations. The Companys efforts to maintain a fresh perspective on the Board is
reflected in its relatively short average director tenure of five years.
Policy on Majority Voting
If a director receives more withhold than for votes at the Meeting, he or she must immediately tender his or her resignation to
the Board even though the director may have been duly elected under applicable law. The NCG Committee will review the matter and make a recommendation to the Board whether to accept or reject the resignation, having regard to the best interests of
the Company and any other factors it considers relevant. The Board shall accept the resignation absent exceptional circumstances and the resignation will be effective when accepted by the Board. The director will not participate in Board or
Committee deliberations on the matter. It is anticipated the Board will make a decision within 90 days. If the Board accepts the resignation, it may appoint a new director to fill the vacancy in accordance with the Companys articles of
incorporation,
by-laws
and applicable law. The Company will issue a news release as necessary in accordance with applicable securities laws and stock exchange rules.
The Policy on Majority Voting only applies to uncontested elections where the number of nominated directors equals the number of directors to be elected
at the Meeting. In a contested election (where the number of nominated directors exceeds the number of directors to be elected), the directors with the most number of Common Shares voted in their favour will be elected to the available Board seats.
6
|
Nominees for Election to the Board
|
Director Nominee Profiles
The following tables provide information on the Nominees. This includes the Nominees place of residence, principal occupations and
public directorships in the past five years (current directorships are indicated by *), 2016 Committee membership on the Board and respective attendance record for 2016. Also shown are the Company securities held by each Nominee,
directly, indirectly, controlled or directed (Common Shares and Deferred Share Units (DSUs)) as at March 1, 2017 and March 1, 2016, and the minimum director share ownership requirements as at March 1, 2017.
|
Peter A. Dea
Age: 63 | Denver, Colorado, USA | Independent | Director since 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Dea has been the Executive Chairman of Confluence Resources LP since September 2016. He has served as the President & Chief Executive
Officer of Cirque Resources LP (a private oil and gas company) since May 2007. From November 2001 through August 2006, he was President & Chief Executive Officer and a director of Western Gas Resources, Inc. (a public natural gas
company which was sold in 2006 for approximately US$5.3 billion). He joined Barrett Resources Corporation (a public natural gas company which was sold in 2001 for approximately US$2.7 billion) in November 1993 and served as Chief Executive
Officer and director from November 1999 and as Chairman from February 2000 through August 2001. Prior to that he held several managerial and geologic positions with Exxon Company, U.S.A.
Skills and Qualifications
Mr. Dea brings over 30 years of oil and gas exploration and production experience and involvement in state and national energy policies to the
Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 Board/Committee Membership
|
|
2016 Meeting Attendance
|
|
Areas of Expertise
Energy, Oil and Natural Gas
Energy Policy
Higher Education
|
Board
Corporate Responsibility, Environment, Health and Safety Chairman
Nominating and Corporate Governance
Reserves
|
|
7 of 7
4 of 4
3 of 3
3 of 3
|
|
100%
100%
100%
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education
Bachelor of Arts in Geology (Western State Colorado
University)
Masters of Science in Geology (University of Montana)
Harvard Business School, Advanced Management Program
Certified Professional Geologist
Non-profit
Sector Affiliations
Trustee, Denver Museum of Nature and Science
Trustee, ACE Scholarships
|
|
Awards and
Accomplishments
Named Wildcatter of the Year for 2010 by the
Independent Petroleum Association of Mountain States
Rocky Mountain Oil &
Gas Hall of Fame inductee in 2009
Inducted to All American Wildcatters in 2014
Fellow National Member, The Explorers Club
American Association of Petroleum Geologists Heritage of the Petroleum
Geologist honoree, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Held
|
Year
|
|
Common Shares (#)
(1)
|
|
DSUs (#) and Market or
Payout Value
(2,3)
|
|
Total Market Value of
Common Shares/DSUs
(1,2,4)
|
|
Minimum Share Ownership Required
(Value Equivalent)
(5)
|
2017
|
|
135
|
|
99,910 ($1,537,615)
|
|
$1,539,693
|
|
29,400 ($452,466)
|
2016
|
|
135
|
|
83,172 ($478,239)
|
|
$479,015
|
|
|
7
|
Fred J. Fowler
Age: 70 | Houston, Texas,
USA | Independent | Director since 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Fowler is a Corporate Director. He has been a director of PG&E Corporation (a public natural gas and electric utility company) since March
2012 and DCP Midstream Partners, LP (a public master limited partnership engaged in natural gas and natural gas liquids transport, storage, production and sale) since March 2015. He was Chairman of Spectra Energy Partners, LP (a public natural gas
pipeline and storage entity) from October 2008 to November 2013 and was a director of that company until February 27, 2017. He was President & Chief Executive Officer of Spectra Energy Corp. (a natural gas gathering, processing and mainline
transportation company) from December 2006 to December 2008 and served as a director from December 2006 to May 2009. He was President & Chief Executive Officer of Duke Energy Gas Transmission, LLC (a subsidiary of Duke Energy Corporation)
from April 2006 through December 2006. From June 1997, he occupied various executive positions with Duke Energy Corporation (a public electric and gas company), including President and Chief Operating Officer from November 2002 to April 2006.
Skills and
Qualifications
Mr. Fowler brings extensive experience in the areas of oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas processing and
transportation to the Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 Board/Committee Membership
|
|
|
2016 Meeting Attendance
|
|
Areas of Expertise
Energy, Oil, Natural Gas and
Natural Gas Liquids
Natural Gas Processing and Transportation
Corporate Governance
|
Board
Corporate Responsibility, Environment, Health and Safety
Human Resources and Compensation
|
|
|
7 of 7
4 of 4
4 of 4
|
|
|
100%
100%
100%
|
|
Education
Bachelor of Finance (Oklahoma State University)
Past Five Years of Public Company
Directorships
Spectra Energy Partners, LP
DCP Midstream Partners, LP*
PG&E Corporation*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Held
|
Year
|
|
Common Shares (#)
(1)
|
|
DSUs (#) and Market or
Payout Value
(2,3)
|
|
Total Market Value of
Common Shares/DSUs
(1,2,4)
|
|
Minimum Share Ownership Required
(Value Equivalent)
(5)
|
2017
|
|
15,000
|
|
86,816 ($1,336,098)
|
|
$1,566,948
|
|
29,400 ($452,466)
|
2016
|
|
15,000
|
|
76,468 ($439,691)
|
|
$525,941
|
|
|
|
Howard J. Mayson
Age: 64 | Breckenridge,
Colorado, USA | Independent | Director since 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Mayson is an independent businessman and corporate director and has over 40 years of North American and international oil and gas industry
experience. He has been a non-executive director of several private U.K. and North American energy-related companies from 2010 to present, including Fairfield Energy Ltd. from July 2010 to June 2015. Since 2014, he has served on the Advisory Board
and is a part-time Operating Partner with Azimuth Capital Management LLC. Mr. Mayson spent most of his career with BP Exploration & Production, PLC where he held various senior roles across the company including Chief Executive Officer of BP
Russia, President of BP Angola, Director of BPs Exploration & Production Technology Group and he also headed up BPs Global Subsurface Function. Prior to joining BP, Mr. Mayson was an engineer with Schlumberger Limited from 1977-1981.
(7)
Skills and Qualifications
Mr. Mayson brings over 40 years of extensive experience in oil and gas exploration, development and production to the Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 Board/Committee Membership
|
|
2016 Meeting Attendance
|
|
Areas of Expertise
Exploration, Development and Production
Oil and Gas Reserves Management and Reporting
Exploration and Production Technology
|
Board
Corporate Responsibility, Environment, Health and Safety
Nominating and Corporate Governance
Reserves Chairman
|
|
7 of 7
4 of 4
3 of 3
3 of 3
|
|
100%
100%
100%
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education
Bachelor of Engineering (1st Class Honors), University of Sheffield
Master of Science (Mechanical Engineering), MIT
Advanced Management Program, Wharton Business School
Non-profit Sector
Affiliations
Chairman, Industry Advisory Board, Institute of Petroleum
Engineering, Edinburgh,
1997-2009
|
|
Awards and
Accomplishments
Honorary Doctor of Engineering (Heriot-Watt
University)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Held
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Common Shares (#)
(1)
|
|
DSUs (#) and Market or
Payout Value
(2,3)
|
|
Total Market Value of
Common Shares/DSUs
(1,2,4)
|
|
Minimum Share Ownership Required
(Value Equivalent)
(5)
|
2017
|
|
20,224
|
|
40,411 ($621,925)
|
|
$933,173
|
|
29,400 ($452,466)
|
2016
|
|
20,104
|
|
30,393 ($174,760)
|
|
$290,358
|
|
|
8
|
Lee A. McIntire
Age: 68 |
Denver, Colorado, USA | Independent | Director since 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. McIntire has been the
Chief Executive Officer of TerraPower, LLC (a private nuclear energy technology company) since August 2015. Prior to that he served as Chief Executive Officer and President of CH2M HILL (a private consulting company) from January 2009 to January
2014, Chairman from 2010 through 2014 and Executive Chairman of the Board from January 2014 to October 2014. Mr. McIntire previously served as CH2M HILLs Chief Operating Officer and President. During his tenure as CEO, CH2M HILL enjoyed
growth and stability, increasing to over 30,000 employees, expanding its international presence to over 100 countries, diversifying its service offerings, and doubling revenues to US$7.0 billion. Prior to joining CH2M HILL, Mr. McIntire
was a partner, Executive Vice-President, and served on the Board of Directors of the Bechtel Group of Companies from 1989 to 2004. Mr. McIntire served on the Chairmans Leadership Council, and was President of several of Bechtels
multibillion-dollar companies.
Skills and Qualifications
Mr. McIntire brings over 35 years of executive leadership and governance experience
to the Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 Board/Committee Membership
|
|
2016 Meeting Attendance
|
|
Areas of Expertise
Risk Management
Finance and Accounting
Corporate Governance
|
Board
Corporate Responsibility, Environment, Health and Safety
Human Resources and Compensation
|
|
7 of 7
4 of 4
4 of 4
|
|
100%
100%
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering (University of Nebraska College of Civil
Engineering)
Masters from the Thunderbird School of Global Management in
Arizona
Executive Management Program at Dartmouths Tuck School of
Business
Past Five Years of
Public Company Directorships
BAE Systems (British Aerospace)
PLC
|
|
Awards and
Accomplishments
Woodrow Wilson Award, 2011
Josef Korbel Award, 2012
Elected to Presidents Circle of National Academy of Science, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Held
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Common Shares (#)
(1)
|
|
DSUs (#) and Market or Payout Value
(2,3)
|
|
Total Market Value of
Common Shares/DSUs
(1,2,4)
|
|
Minimum Share Ownership Required (Value Equivalent)
(5)
|
2017
|
|
17,100
|
|
42,069 ($647,442)
|
|
$910,611
|
|
29,400 ($452,466)
|
2016
|
|
17,100
|
|
26,643 ($153,197)
|
|
$251,522
|
|
|
|
Margaret A. McKenzie
Age: 55 | Calgary,
Alberta, Canada | Independent | Director since 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. McKenzie is a Corporate
Director. She has been a director of Inter Pipeline Ltd. (a public petroleum pipeline company) since August 2015, Bonavista Energy Corporation (a public oil and gas company) since May 2006 and PrairieSky Royalty Ltd. (a public oil and gas company)
since December 2014. She is also a director of two private energy-related companies. Prior to that, Ms. McKenzie was Chief Financial Officer of Range Royalty Management Ltd. (a private oil and gas royalty company) from 2006 to December 2014 and
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Profico Energy Management Ltd. (a private oil and gas royalty company) from 2000 to 2006.
(7)
Skills and
Qualifications
Ms. McKenzie brings over 18 years of energy, oil and natural gas exploration experience to the Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 Board/Committee Membership
|
|
2016 Meeting Attendance
|
|
Areas of Expertise
Energy, Oil and Natural Gas
Business Strategy
Finance and Accounting
|
Board
Human Resources and Compensation
Audit
|
|
6 of 7
4 of 4
5 of 5
|
|
86%
100%
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education
Bachelor of Commerce (University of Saskatchewan)
Chartered Accountant
ICD.D (Institute of Corporate Directors)
Non-profit
Sector Affiliations
Community Member, Audit Committee, University of Calgary
|
|
Past Five Years of Public
Company Directorships
Bonavista Energy Corporation*
PrairieSky Royalty Ltd.*
Zargon Oil and Gas Ltd.
Inter Pipeline Ltd.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Held
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Common Shares (#)
(1)
|
|
DSUs (#) and Market or
Payout Value
(2,3)
|
|
Total Market Value of
Common Shares/DSUs
(1,2,4)
|
|
Minimum Share Ownership Required
(Value Equivalent)
(5)
|
2017
|
|
12,000
|
|
27,796 ($427,780)
|
|
$612,460
|
|
29,400 ($452,466)
|
2016
|
|
12,000
|
|
17,868 ($102,741)
|
|
$171,741
|
|
|
9
|
Suzanne P. Nimocks
Age: 58 | Houston,
Texas, USA | Independent | Director since 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. Nimocks is a Corporate Director. She has been a director of Rowan Companies plc (a public international contract drilling services company) since
December 2010, ArcelorMittal (worlds largest public steel company) since January 2011 and Owens Corning (a leading global producer of residential and commercial building materials) since September 2012. She was a director (senior partner) with
McKinsey & Company (a private global management consulting firm) from June 1999 to March 2010 and was with the firm in various other capacities since 1989, including as a leader in the firms Global Petroleum Practice, Electric
Power & Natural Gas Practice, Organization Practice and Risk Management Practice. She served as a member of the firms worldwide personnel committees for many years and as the Manager of the Houston office for eight years.
Skills and
Qualifications
Ms. Nimocks brings strategy and risk management expertise in the energy industry to the Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 Board/Committee Membership
|
|
2016 Meeting Attendance
|
|
Areas of Expertise
International Energy Business
Strategy
Risk Management
|
Board
Audit
Human Resources and Compensation Chairperson
Nominating and Corporate Governance
|
|
7 of 7
5 of 5
4 of 4
3 of 3
|
|
100%
100%
100%
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education
Bachelor of Arts in Economics (Cum Laude) (Tufts University)
Masters in Business Administration (Harvard Graduate School of Business)
Non-profit
Sector Affiliations
Director, Houston Zoo, Inc.
Trustee, Texas Childrens Hospital
|
|
Past Five Years of Public
Company Directorships
Rowan Companies plc*
ArcelorMittal*
Owens Corning*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Held
|
Year
|
|
Common Shares (#)
(1)
|
|
DSUs (#) and Market or
Payout Value
(2,3)
|
|
Total Market Value of
Common Shares/DSUs
(1,2,4)
|
|
Minimum Share Ownership Required
(Value Equivalent)
(5)
|
2017
|
|
5,600
|
|
90,344 ($1,390,394)
|
|
$1,476,578
|
|
29,400 ($452,466)
|
2016
|
|
5,600
|
|
78,285 ($450,139)
|
|
$482,339
|
|
|
|
Brian G. Shaw
Age: 63 | Toronto,
Ontario, Canada | Independent | Director since 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Shaw is a Corporate Director. He has been a director of NuVista Energy Ltd. (a public oil and gas company) since August 2014, Manulife Bank of
Canada (a private chartered bank) since February 2012, Manulife Trust Company (a private trust company) since February 2012, Ivey Canadian Exploration Ltd. (a private exploration company) since March 2010 and Lakeview Mortgage Funding Inc. (a
private structured credit company) since January 2016. Mr. Shaw was a director of Patheon Inc. (a pharmaceutical development and manufacturing company) from December 2009 until March 2014 and a director of PrairieSky Royalty Ltd. (a public oil and
gas company) from April 2014 until December 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Shaw was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CIBC World Markets Inc. from 2005 through 2008.
Skills and
Qualifications
Mr. Shaw brings extensive experience as a financial services executive to his role as a member of the
Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 Board/Committee Membership
|
|
2016 Meeting Attendance
|
|
Areas of Expertise
Capital Markets and Investing
Financial Services
Energy, Oil and Natural Gas
|
Board
Audit
Reserves
|
|
7 of 7
5 of 5
3 of 3
|
|
100%
100%
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education
Bachelor of Commerce (University of Alberta)
Master of Business Administration (University of Alberta)
Chartered Financial Analyst
Non-profit
Sector Affiliations
Member, CFA Society Toronto
Chairman, TMX IP Governance Committee
Director, Toronto Symphony Orchestra
|
|
Past Five Years of Public
Company Directorships
Patheon Inc.
NuVista Energy Ltd.*
PrairieSky Royalty Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Held
|
Year
|
|
Common Shares (#)
(1)
|
|
DSUs (#) and Market or
Payout Value
(2,3)
|
|
Total Market Value of
Common Shares/DSUs
(1,2,4)
|
|
Minimum Share Ownership Required
(Value Equivalent)
(5)
|
2017
|
|
10,000
|
|
58,654 ($902,685)
|
|
$1,056,585
|
|
29,400 ($452,466)
|
2016
|
|
10,000
|
|
45,809 ($263,402)
|
|
$320,902
|
|
|
10
|
Douglas J. Suttles
Age: 56 | Calgary,
Alberta, Canada | Not Independent | Director since 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Suttles was appointed the Companys President & Chief Executive Officer on June 10, 2013. From March 2011 until June 2013,
Mr. Suttles was an independent businessman, having over 30 years of experience in the oil and gas industry in various engineering and leadership roles. He has held a number of senior leadership posts at British Petroleum (BP),
including Chief Operating Officer of BP Exploration & Production from January 2009 until March 2011 and President of BP Alaska from December 2006 until December 2008. He was a member of the board of BP America, as well as the BP America
Operations Advisory Board. Previously, he served as President of BP Sakhalin Inc., where he was responsible for BPs activities in Sakhalin, Russia and held other senior leadership roles in BP, including Vice-President for North Sea operations
and President of BPs Trinidadian oil business. Prior to joining BP, Mr. Suttles was an engineer with Exxon from 1983 to 1988.
Skills and Qualifications
Mr. Suttles brings extensive North American and international energy development and production experience to the Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 Board/Committee Membership
|
|
2016 Meeting Attendance
|
|
Areas of Expertise
Energy, Oil and Natural Gas
Acquisitions
Oil and Natural Gas Exploration and Production
|
Board
|
|
7 of 7
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education
Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering (University of Texas, Austin)
Non-profit
Sector Affiliations
Spindletop Charities Advisory Board
University of Texas Engineering Advisory Board
|
|
Awards and
Accomplishments
Recipient of University of Texas at Austin Mechanical
Engineering Distinguished Alumni Award, 2008
Mr. Spindletop Award
Honoree by Spindletop Charities, Inc., 2013
Past Five Years of Public Company Directorships
Ceres, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Held
|
Year
|
|
Common Shares (#)
(1)
|
|
DSUs (#) and Market or
Payout Value
(2,3)
|
|
Total Market Value of
Common Shares/DSUs
(1,2,4)
|
|
Minimum Share Ownership Required
(Value Equivalent)
(5)
|
2017
|
|
85,350
|
|
0
|
|
$1,313,537
|
|
N/A
|
2016
|
|
51,212
|
|
0
|
|
$294,469
|
|
|
|
Bruce G. Waterman
Age: 66 | Calgary,
Alberta, Canada | Independent | Director since 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Waterman is a Corporate Director. He retired in January 2013 from Agrium Inc. (a public agricultural company) as Executive Vice-President, having
held senior roles as Chief Financial Officer, as well as in Business Development and Strategy, since April 2000. Mr. Waterman is a director of Enbridge Income Fund Holdings Inc., a Trustee of Enbridge Commercial Trust, a director of Irving
Oil Limited (a private oil and gas company) and a director of Prairie Storm Energy Corp. (a private oil and gas company) and was a director of PrairieSky Royalty Ltd. (a public oil and gas company) from April 2014 until December 2014. He was
Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of Talisman Energy Inc. (a public oil and gas company) from January 1996 to April 2000. Mr. Waterman also has extensive expertise in oil and gas exploration and production operations, having spent
15 years (1981 to 1996) at Amoco Corporation, including Dome Petroleum Limited, a predecessor company and as a result of serving as Talismans Chief Financial Officer for over four years (as noted above). At Amoco (a global chemical, oil
and gas company which merged with British Petroleum in 1998), his roles included various positions in finance, accounting and business development.
Skills and Qualifications
Mr. Waterman brings a wealth of energy industry, financial, business development and government relations knowledge to the Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 Board/Committee Membership
|
|
2016 Meeting Attendance
|
|
Areas of Expertise
Energy, Oil and Natural Gas
Finance and Accounting
Business Development
|
Board
Audit
Human Resources and
Compensation
|
|
7 of 7
5 of 5
4 of 4
|
|
100%
100%
100%
|
|
Education
Bachelor of Commerce (Honours) (Queens University)
Chartered Accountant
ICD.D (Institute of Corporate Directors)
Non-profit
Sector Affiliations
Selection Committee Chairman, Canadas CFO of the Year
TM
FEI Canada Advisory Board
|
|
Awards and
Accomplishments
Named Canadas CFO of the Year
TM
in 2008
Fellow of the Chartered
Accountants
Past Five Years of
Public Company Directorships
Enbridge Income Fund Holdings Inc.*
PrairieSky Royalty Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Held
|
Year
|
|
Common Shares (#)
(1)
|
|
DSUs (#) and Market or
Payout Value
(2,3)
|
|
Total Market Value of
Common Shares/DSUs
(1,2,4)
|
|
Minimum Share Ownership Required
(Value Equivalent)
(5)
|
2017
|
|
125,000
|
|
107,799 ($1,659,027)
|
|
$3,582,777
|
|
29,400 ($452,466)
|
2016
|
|
125,000
|
|
91,904 ($528,448)
|
|
$1,247,198
|
|
|
11
|
Clayton H. Woitas
Age: 68 | Calgary,
Alberta, Canada | Independent | Director since 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Woitas is a Corporate Director and has been Chairman of the Board since July 22, 2013. From January 11, 2013 to June 10, 2013
Mr. Woitas acted as Interim President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company. He was Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of Range Royalty Management Ltd. (a private oil and gas royalty company) from 2006 to December 2014. He
has been a director of Gibson Energy Inc. (a public oil and gas midstream company) since June 2010. He is also a director of several private energy-related companies and advisory boards. Mr. Woitas was founder, Chairman, and
President & Chief Executive Officer of Profico Energy Management Ltd. (a private company focused on natural gas exploration and production in Western Canada) from January 2000 to June 2006. Prior to April 2000, he was a director and
President & Chief Executive Officer of Renaissance Energy Ltd. (a public company focused on the Western Canadian energy sector).
Skills and Qualifications
Mr. Woitas brings extensive experience in the areas of acquisitions, exploration and production to the Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 Board/Committee Membership
|
|
2016 Meeting Attendance
(6)
|
|
Areas of Expertise
Energy, Oil and Natural Gas
Acquisitions
Natural Gas Exploration and Production
|
Board
Nominating and Corporate Governance Chairman
|
|
7 of 7
3 of 3
|
|
100%
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering (University of Alberta)
|
|
Past Five Years of Public
Company Directorships
NuVista Energy Ltd.
Enerplus Corporation
Gibson Energy Inc.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Held
|
Year
|
|
Common Shares (#)
(1)
|
|
DSUs (#) and Market or
Payout Value
(2,3)
|
|
Total Market Value of Common Shares/DSUs
(1,2,4)
|
|
Minimum Share Ownership Required
(Value Equivalent)
(5)
|
2017
|
|
262,690
|
|
159,728 ($2,458,214)
|
|
$6,501,013
|
|
54,000 ($831,060)
|
2016
|
|
262,690
|
|
129,477 ($744,493)
|
|
$2,254,960
|
|
|
Notes:
(1)
|
The information as to Common Shares held has been furnished by each of the Nominees as of March 1, 2017 and
March 1, 2016, respectively.
|
(2)
|
The information as to the DSUs held by directors is as of March 1, 2017 and March 1, 2016, respectively. For
more detailed information relating to DSUs held by the directors, see Director Compensation.
|
(3)
|
Market or Payout Value represents the market or payout value expressed in Canadian dollars of vested DSUs
not paid out or distributed and determined by multiplying the number of DSUs held by each Nominee as of March 1, 2017 in respect of 2017 and as of March 1, 2016 in respect of 2016 by the closing price of the Common Shares on the Toronto Stock
Exchange (TSX) on those same dates (C$15.39 and C$5.75, respectively).
|
(4)
|
Expressed in Canadian dollars and determined by multiplying the number of Common Shares and DSUs held by each Nominee
as of March 1, 2017 in respect of 2017 and as of March 1, 2016 in respect of 2016 by the closing price of the Common Shares on the TSX on those same dates (C$15.39 and C$5.75, respectively).
|
(5)
|
The Companys share ownership guidelines for directors require each director, other than the CEO, within three
years immediately following the individual becoming a director, to purchase Common Shares or hold DSUs totaling in number at least three times the annual grant of DSUs which the director receives in his or her capacity as a director pursuant to the
Companys Deferred Share Unit Plan for Directors (DDSU Plan). See Director Compensation. Dollar values indicate the value of the minimum number of Common Shares/DSUs in Canadian dollars as at March 1, 2017.
Mr. Suttles is subject to executive share ownership guidelines and has achieved his required share ownership level. Please see page 52 with respect to Mr. Suttles executive share ownership requirements.
|
(6)
|
In addition to being a member of the NCG Committee, Mr. Woitas is an
ex
officio
non-voting
member of all other Committees. As an
ex
officio
non-voting
member, Mr. Woitas attends as his schedule permits and may vote when
necessary to achieve a quorum.
|
(7)
|
Mr. Mayson was a director of Endurance Energy Ltd. (Endurance) from March 2012 until his resignation
in December 2015 and Ms. McKenzie was a director of Endurance from November 2008 until her resignation in March 2016. On May 30, 2016, Endurance obtained an Initial Order under the Companies Creditors Arrangement Act
(CCAA) seeking a stay of proceedings and other relief provided under the CCAA.
|
Other than as disclosed herein, none
of the Nominees is, or has been in the last 10 years: (a) a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of any company that: (i) was subject to a cease trade order or similar order or an order that denied the issuer access
to any exemptions under securities legislation, for a period of more than 30 consecutive days, that was issued while the proposed director was acting in that capacity; or (ii) was subject to a cease trade or similar order or an order that
denied the issuer access to any exemption under securities legislation, for a period of more than 30 consecutive days, that was issued after the proposed director ceased to be a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer and which
resulted from an event that occurred while that person was acting in the capacity as director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer; or (b) a director or executive officer of any company that, while that proposed director was
acting in that capacity, or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or
compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets.
12
Board and Committee Governance
Board Structure
Encanas governance framework provides the Board with flexibility to select the appropriate leadership structure for the Company. In making
leadership structure determinations, the Board considers many factors, including the specific needs of the business and what is in the best interests of the Companys shareholders. The current Board leadership structure is comprised of a
Chairman of the Board, an independent Chair of each of the Committees and active engagement by all directors. The Board believes this structure provides an effective balance between strong Company leadership and appropriate safeguards and oversight
by independent directors.
Independent Chairman of the Board
As specified in the Companys Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board has determined that the Company is best served by separating the positions
of Chairman of the Board and the CEO. The Chairman of the Board must be an independent member of the Board and be appointed by the other members of the Board. The Chairman of the Board is responsible for ensuring the effective functioning of the
Board, providing leadership and serving as the primary liaison between the Board and management.
The Chairman of the Board, Clayton H. Woitas, is a
non-executive,
independent director. Mr. Woitas has served as Chairman of the Board since July 2013.
Duties and Responsibilities of the Chairman of the Board
The Chairman of the Board:
|
|
|
attends all Committee meetings (as his or her schedule permits);
|
|
|
|
encourages and facilitates active participation of all directors;
|
|
|
|
serves as a liaison between the independent directors and management;
|
|
|
|
has the authority to call meetings of the independent directors;
|
|
|
|
leads the Boards annual evaluation process;
|
|
|
|
monitors and coordinates with management on corporate governance issues and developments;
|
|
|
|
is available to advise the Committee chairs in fulfilling their designated roles and responsibilities to the Board;
|
|
|
|
is available for consultation and communication with shareholders where appropriate, upon reasonable request; and
|
|
|
|
performs such other functions as the Board or other directors may request.
|
Other Board Memberships and Interlocks
Several of the Nominees are also directors of other reporting issuers. The Board does not expressly limit the number of other public company boards upon
which the Companys directors may serve. The time commitment and expectations of the Board members are, however, carefully discussed with each candidate by the NCG Committee prior to such individual agreeing to be nominated as a director and on
an ongoing basis thereafter, where required. Board memberships of each Nominee are provided under Nominees for Election to the Board.
The Board does not have a formal policy on interlocking directorships. The NCG Committee, however, considers it to be good governance to avoid
interlocking relationships, if possible. No Nominee sits on the same board of directors of any outside reporting issuer.
Executive Sessions
The independent directors regularly meet without management present at Board and Committee meetings. Each Committee Chair presides over their respective
Committee executive sessions and the Chairman of the Board presides over any Board executive sessions. In 2016, there were seven Board meetings and 17 Committee meetings that held executive sessions.
13
Director Attendance
Each director is expected to attend each meeting of the Board and of the Committees of which he or she is a member.
The Company held five regularly scheduled Board meetings, two additional special meetings and 19 Committee meetings in 2016. The overall combined
director attendance at both Board and Committee meetings in 2016 was 99 percent. All board members, except Suzanne Nimocks, attended the Companys 2016 annual meeting of shareholders. Details regarding the attendance record of each
director are provided in Nominees for Election to the Board.
Director Orientation
The NCG Committee is responsible for the orientation of new directors and continued education of the Companys existing Board members. The
Companys director orientation program provides new directors with detailed background information on the Company, the role and expectations of the Board and its Committees, the Companys strategy, operations and assets, as well as annual
and quarterly financial information. Directors receive access to Board orientation resource material via an online Board portal, including a director information handbook and information regarding the organization and its policies, guidelines
and governance practices.
Directors, including new Board members, are provided with regular opportunities to interact with management to discuss key
operational, financial and industry matters regarding the Companys business. New directors are encouraged to meet independently with the Chairman of the Board, other directors or the CEO to discuss matters regarding the Company or its
business. Board and Committee meetings are held in the Companys offices in both Canada and the United States. Directors also participate in field tours of the operations of the Companys core assets.
Access to Independent Advisors
The Board and its Committees have authority to retain independent financial, legal, compensation and other advisors as it considers appropriate to assist
in the discharge of its duties.
Board Mandate
The Board has a written mandate (the Board Mandate), attached to this Proxy Statement as Schedule B. Under the Board Mandate, the
fundamental responsibilities of the Board are to appoint a competent executive team to oversee the management of the business, to maximize shareholder value and to ensure ethical corporate conduct through appropriate corporate governance and
internal controls. Specific responsibilities of the Board as contained in the Board Mandate are:
|
|
|
senior management responsibility;
|
|
|
|
operational effectiveness and financial reporting;
|
|
|
|
ethics, integrity and corporate responsibility; and
|
|
|
|
Board process/effectiveness.
|
Expectations of Directors
Directors are expected to understand the nature and operations of the Companys business and the external factors which may impact the Company.
Directors are also expected to review operating and financial performance results relative to the Companys approved strategy, budget and business objectives. Directors are expected to attend all meetings, review materials in advance of each
meeting and engage in regular evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board, its Committees and individual directors.
Supervision of Management
The Board appoints the CEO and establishes his or her annual performance objectives for the year. Each year, annual compensation for the CEO is
recommended by the Human Resources and Compensation (HRC) Committee and approved by the independent directors.
The Board has established
clear limits of authority for the CEO. These are primarily limitations related to his financial authority, approval of significant or material transactions, and departures from the strategic plan. The CEO is accountable to the Board, and the Board
conducts a formal review of his or her performance each year.
Strategic Planning
The Board is responsible for approving the Companys strategic plan and evaluating performance against the plan. Evaluation and discussion regarding
the Companys strategy is formally conducted by the Board, and with management, at various meetings throughout the year. The Board also holds an annual strategic planning session, during which it evaluates
14
the Companys progress relative to the plan, as well as the significant opportunities, challenges and potential risks facing the Companys business. Major operational and financial
objectives, and potential significant capital allocations, are also discussed. Following its review, the strategic plan is approved by the Board. Any transaction that would have a significant impact on the plan must be approved by the Board.
Strategic issues, including progress relative to key objectives of the plan, are continuously assessed by the Board throughout the year.
Corporate Governance
The Board and its NCG Committee are responsible for overseeing the Companys approach to corporate governance. This includes developing appropriate
practices to ensure the Board functions independently of management and that applicable legal, regulatory and other compliance matters are effectively addressed. The Board has implemented a comprehensive Business Code of Conduct (the
Code) as well as other corporate governance policies applicable to directors, employees, officers and contractors and is responsible for monitoring compliance with the Code. Any waivers of the Code in respect of any officer and director
can only be approved by the Board.
The Board and its Committees continually evaluate and enhance the Companys corporate governance
practices by monitoring Canadian and U.S. regulatory developments affecting corporate governance, accountability and transparency of public company disclosure.
The Code is available at
www.encana.com/pdf/about/board-governance/policies/business-conduct.pdf
. The Companys Corporate Governance
Guidelines are available at
http://www.encana.com/about/board-governance/documents-filings.html
.
For more information, see Policies and Standards Business Code of Conduct at page 19.
Internal Controls
The Board is responsible for overseeing the integrity of the Companys internal controls and management information systems. Responsibility for
oversight of controls over accounting and financial reporting systems is delegated by the Board to the Audit Committee.
Management is responsible
for establishing and maintaining an appropriate system of internal controls over financial reporting and provides quarterly updates to the Audit Committee. Financial results and forecasts are presented to the Audit Committee by our Executive
Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer each quarter.
Quarterly reporting to the Board and Audit Committee provides reasonable assurance
that public reporting of the Companys financial information is reliable and accurate, its transactions are appropriately accounted for, and its assets are appropriately safeguarded. Each quarter, the Company also follows an organization-wide
certification process to reinforce accountability for key internal controls at all levels. Management reviews these results and reports them quarterly to the Board.
Succession Planning
The Board, the HRC Committee and the NCG Committee are actively involved in succession planning processes. The HRC Committee annually reviews
organizational leadership and the Companys talent development strategies. Succession planning for the CEO is addressed by the HRC Committee and presented annually to the Board (succession planning for members of the ELT is addressed by the HRC
Committee). Succession planning involves a robust process which examines the competencies, experience, individual leadership qualities and development opportunities of each succession candidate. All independent Board members attend the succession
planning sessions for both the CEO and for the other members of the ELT.
Management focuses succession planning and talent management efforts on all
levels throughout the organization. These efforts are intended to retain and develop the skilled, high performance talent pool the Company requires to execute on its business and strategic objectives over the long term.
Risk Oversight
The Board has oversight responsibility for material risks associated with the Companys business. This includes taking reasonable steps to ensure
management has an effective risk management system in place to identify, understand and appropriately mitigate risks associated with the Companys business.
The Committees also play a key role in risk oversight. Each Committee has responsibility for reviewing the policies and procedures respecting the
Committees respective areas of allocated risk, as well as working with management to identify,
15
monitor and manage those risks. Each Committee regularly reports its progress to the Board, which coordinates and supervises the Companys overall risk management approach. The Boards
role in risk oversight has had no significant effect on the Boards leadership structure. In addition, we believe that the current leadership structure of the Board supports effective oversight of the Companys risk management
processes by providing independent leadership at the Committee level, with ultimate oversight by the full Board. The role of each Committee in addressing risk is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Board Committee
|
|
Risk Responsibilities
|
|
|
Audit Committee
|
|
Identification of principal financial
risks and ensuring the implementation of appropriate risk management policies, processes and internal controls; monitor material financial disclosure; and work directly with the Companys internal and external auditors on financial risk
matters.
|
|
|
Corporate Responsibility, Environment,
Health and Safety (CREHS) Committee
|
|
Oversight on policies and systems
related to EH&S issues; monitor EH&S performance, management systems and audit protocols; and oversight of ethics and compliance-related risk.
|
|
|
Human Resources and Compensation
Committee
|
|
Oversight of compensation risk,
including ensuring the Companys compensation program and practices do not encourage unnecessary or undue risk taking that could have a material adverse impact on the Company, as well as oversight of the ELT succession planning
process.
|
|
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee
|
|
Oversight of overall governance
framework; succession planning for the CEO; and oversight of director appointment, education and evaluation processes.
|
|
|
Reserves Committee
|
|
Oversight of preparation and disclosure
of the Companys oil and gas reserves and resources data and engagement of independent qualified reserves evaluators or auditors.
|
Compensation Risk
The Board, assisted by the HRC Committee, observes a formal decision-making process and program safeguards and conducts regular risk assessments to
identify and manage potential compensation-related risk. Compensation matters impacting the Companys executive officers, including the CEO, are reviewed by the HRC Committee and are approved by the independent members of the Board.
The HRC Committee conducts regular compensation risk assessments to ensure the Company does not directly or indirectly encourage its executive officers
to take unnecessary risks that could have a material adverse impact on the Company. This risk assessment is undertaken by the HRC Committees independent compensation consultant.
The most recent assessment of the Companys compensation program and practices was conducted by the HRC Committees independent consultant in
2014. Following its assessment, the consultant concluded that it was not reasonably likely that the Companys executive pay programs will have a material adverse impact on the Company, its business or its value. This review also
recognized the Companys strong compensation governance practices. For more information on how the HRC Committee and the Board manage compensation-related risk, see Compensation Risk Management at page 52.
Committees of the Board
All Committees are comprised solely of independent directors, and chaired by an independent director. The Board has established five standing committees
to assist in carrying out its responsibilities:
|
|
|
Corporate Responsibility, Environment, Health and Safety Committee
|
|
|
|
Human Resources and Compensation Committee
|
|
|
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
|
The Board may also create special
ad hoc
committees from time to time to deal with important matters. The following summarizes each
committees mandate and responsibilities. All of the Committee mandates, including the Audit Committee Mandate, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee Mandate and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Mandate, are available
on the Companys website at
www.encana.com/about/board-governance/mandates-guidelines.html
.
16
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee provides recommendations to the Board on the adequacy of the Companys internal control system and ensures that management, the
Companys external auditors and the Companys internal auditors annually report to the Audit Committee regarding financial reporting process and controls. Under its mandate, the Audit Committee meets regularly
in-camera
with the external auditors without management present.
Independence and
Financial Literacy
Each Audit Committee member must be independent and financially literate in accordance with applicable securities laws
and stock exchange rules. All current members of the Audit Committee are independent and financially literate.
The SEC also requires that the Board
annually determine if there is at least one audit committee financial expert on the Audit Committee, and if so, to name such individual(s). For this purpose, an audit committee financial expert must have the following
attributes:
|
|
|
an understanding of financial statements and generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
|
|
the ability to assess the general application of such principles in connection with the accounting for estimates,
accruals and reserves;
|
|
|
|
experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of
complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the Companys financial statements, or experience actively supervising one or more persons
engaged in such activities;
|
|
|
|
an understanding of internal controls and procedures for financial reporting; and
|
|
|
|
an understanding of audit committee functions.
|
In 2016, Ms. McKenzie, Ms. Peverett and Mr. Waterman were determined by the Board to be audit committee financial experts as
defined by the SEC.
In 2016, the Audit Committee held five meetings and was comprised of Jane L. Peverett, Chairperson, Margaret A. McKenzie,
Suzanne P. Nimocks, Brian G. Shaw and Bruce G. Waterman. Effective April 1, 2017, Bruce G. Waterman will become Chairman of the Audit Committee.
For further information about the Audit Committee, please see the Annual Report.
Human Resources and Compensation Committee
The HRC Committee is responsible for reviewing compensation and human resources issues in support of the achievement of the Companys business
strategy and making recommendations to the Board as appropriate. The HRC Committee is also responsible for reviewing and recommending to the Board, for approval, compensation for the Companys executive officers, including the CEO. Under its
mandate, the responsibilities of the HRC Committee include the following:
|
|
|
reviewing and recommending to the Board, for approval, annual goals and objectives relevant to compensation for the CEO
and other members of the ELT;
|
|
|
|
evaluating and recommending to the Board, for approval, annual compensation for the CEO and other members of the ELT;
|
|
|
|
assessing and recommending to the Board, for approval, operational, financial and other results under the Companys
performance-based short and long-term incentive plans;
|
|
|
|
overseeing the succession planning process for ELT members;
|
|
|
|
evaluating and approving the peer group used to assess the Companys executive compensation program;
|
|
|
|
monitoring the status of executive equity ownership under the Companys share ownership guidelines; and
|
|
|
|
reviewing and approving pension matters and recommend to the Board, for approval, any funding or material amendments
impacting the Companys pension plans.
|
17
By approval of a majority of its members, the HRC Committee may delegate certain of its duties and
responsibilities to a subcommittee of the HRC Committee.
The HRC Committee considers input from the CEO in making determinations regarding the
compensation program and the individual compensation of each ELT member, other than the CEO. At the beginning of the year, the CEO meets with each ELT member to discuss individual performance goals related to the executives expected
contribution to the Companys performance goals for the upcoming year. The CEO provides performance feedback throughout the year, and conducts a formal performance review with each executive officer at the end of the year. Management also
provides information each year to the HRC Committee (and to the Board) regarding the Companys performance relative to objectives previously approved by the Board for the purposes of assisting the Board in determining annual bonus eligibility
(Bonus awards). In respect of executive compensation, the Board receives recommendations from the HRC Committee; however, the HRC Committee is solely responsible for making the final determination regarding executive compensation. The
CEO makes no recommendations regarding, and does not participate in discussions about, his own compensation.
The HRC Committee retains an
independent compensation advisor to provide independent advice and perspective on executive compensation matters. The advisor reports directly to the HRC Committee Chairperson, and performs no services to management. For more information on the
independent compensation advisor, please see Independent Compensation Advisor in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section.
All
of the members of the HRC Committee qualify as
Non-Employee
Directors under Rule
16b-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act) and qualify as outside directors as defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
In 2016, the HRC Committee held four meetings and was comprised of Suzanne P. Nimocks, Chairperson, Fred J. Fowler, Lee A. McIntire, Margaret A.
McKenzie and Bruce G. Waterman.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No member of the HRC Committee is a current or was a former officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries during 2016. During 2016, no
member of the HRC Committee had a relationship that must be described under the SEC rules relating to disclosure of related person transactions. In 2016, none of the Companys executive officers served on the board of directors or compensation
committee of any entity that had one or more of its executive officers serving on the Board or the HRC Committee of the Company.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The NCG Committee is responsible for reviewing and providing
recommendations to the Board regarding corporate governance matters, monitoring regulatory developments and overseeing the director recruitment process, as well as Board, Committee and director assessment. The NCG Committee also reviews director
compensation and remuneration for the Chairman of the Board and recommends same to the Board for approval. Each Committee reviews its mandate on an annual basis and changes are recommended to the NCG Committee for review and recommendation to the
Board.
The NCG Committee is responsible for identifying prospective qualified candidates to fill vacancies on the Board, recommending directors
(including chairpersons) for each Committee, developing and recommending appropriate corporate governance practices and overseeing the self-evaluation of the Board. In considering individual director nominees and Committee appointments, the NCG
Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience and capability on the Board and Committees and to identify individuals who can effectively assist the Company in achieving its short-term and long-term goals, protect shareholders
interests and create and enhance value for shareholders. In so doing, the NCG Committee considers a persons diversity attributes (e.g., professional experiences, skills, background, race and gender) as a whole and does not necessarily
attribute greater weight to any one attribute. Moreover, diversity in professional experience, skills and background, and diversity in race and gender, are just a few of the attributes that the NCG Committee takes into account.
While there are no specific minimum requirements that the NCG Committee believes must be met by a prospective director nominee in evaluating prospective
candidates, the NCG Committee also considers whether the individual has personal and professional integrity, good business judgment and relevant experience and skills, including the skills listed in the director skills matrix on page 5, as well
as other credentials and qualifications, including, but not limited to, those set forth in the Companys Corporate Governance Guidelines. In addition, the NCG Committee will consider whether such prospective director nominee is willing and able
to commit the time necessary for Board and Committee service.
Furthermore, the NCG Committee evaluates each individual in the context of the Board
as a whole, with the objective of recommending individuals who can best perpetuate the success of the Companys business and represent shareholder
18
interests through the exercise of sound business judgment using their diversity of experience in various areas. The Company believes its current directors possess diverse professional
experiences, skills and backgrounds, in addition to (among other characteristics) high standards of personal and professional ethics, proven records of success in their respective fields and valuable knowledge of the Companys business and of
the oil and gas industry.
The Board is in compliance with the Companys articles of incorporation and Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the
Board has no current plans to increase its size. However, if in the future, the Board determines that it is appropriate to add a directorship, the NCG Committee will, pursuant to the Board Mandate, take into account diversity in professional
experience, skills and background, diversity in race and gender and the other attributes and factors described above, in evaluating candidates for such directorship.
The NCG Committee uses a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating director nominees. As an alternative to term limits for directors, the NCG
Committee annually reviews each directors continuation on the Board. The NCG Committee also regularly assesses the appropriate size of the Board. In addition, the NCG Committee considers, from time to time, various potential candidates for
directorships. Candidates may come to the attention of the NCG Committee through current Board members, professional search firms, shareholders or other persons. These candidates may be evaluated at regular or special meetings of the NCG Committee
and may be considered at any point during the year.
In addition, the NCG Committee will consider nominees recommended by shareholders in accordance
with the procedures outlined under Shareholder Proposals and Director Nominations. The NCG Committee will evaluate such nominees according to the same criteria, and in the same manner, as any other director nominee.
In 2016, the NCG Committee held three meetings and was comprised of Clayton H. Woitas, Chairman, Peter A. Dea, Howard J. Mayson, Suzanne P. Nimocks and
Jane L. Peverett. Effective April 1, 2017, Bruce G. Waterman will become a member of the NCG Committee.
Reserves
Committee
The Reserves Committee reviews the qualified reserves evaluators or auditors to be engaged to evaluate or audit, as
appropriate, the Companys oil and gas reserves and resources data, the procedures for providing information to the qualified reserves evaluators or auditors, as appropriate, and the annual reserves and resources estimates prior to public
disclosure.
In 2016, the Reserves Committee held three meetings and was comprised of Howard J. Mayson, Chairman, Peter A. Dea, Jane L. Peverett and
Brian G. Shaw.
Corporate Responsibility, Environment, Health and Safety Committee
The CREHS Committees primary function is to assist the Board in fulfilling its role in oversight and governance by reviewing, reporting and making
recommendations to the Board on the Companys policies, standards and practices with respect to corporate responsibility, including the environment, occupational health, safety, security, and overall business conduct and ethics.
In 2016, the CREHS Committee held four meetings and was comprised of Peter A. Dea, Chairman, Fred J. Fowler, Howard J. Mayson and Lee A. McIntire.
Policies and Standards
Business Code of Conduct
The Code is the
foundation of the Companys commitment to ethical conduct and integrity in all that it does. Grounded in the Companys foundational values of safety, trust, respect and integrity, the Code articulates the obligations and behavioural
expectations of the Companys directors, employees and contract personnel. The Code is available at
www.encana.com/about/board-governance/policies
. The Code is supported by a number of the Company policies, and covers among other
things, the following areas:
|
|
|
financial reporting and accountability
maintaining confidentiality
avoiding conflicts of interest
protection and appropriate use of assets
avoiding and reporting fraudulent behaviour
protecting corporate opportunities
|
|
complying with laws
fair dealing
compliance with competition and antitrust laws
reporting violations of the Code or applicable law
anti-retaliation
|
19
Each year, all directors and employees are required to reaffirm their commitment to the Code and its
related policies. In 2016, all directors and employees affirmed their commitment to the Code as part of the Companys annual recommitment process. Contractors are also required, as a condition of their engagement, to comply with the principles
and standards in the Code. The Company also conducts regular internal training on the Code and ethics and compliance issues.
Ethical business
conduct and reporting of concerns is strongly encouraged throughout the organization, including through the Companys Integrity Hotline (the Hotline). The Hotline, available online or by telephone, enables any individual (whether at
the Company or otherwise) to report, confidentially and anonymously, any suspected illegal, unethical or improper conduct. The Hotline is operated by a third party which provides reports to the Companys internal Ethics & Compliance
Team for review and, where required, investigation. Regular reporting
regarding the Hotline and investigation activities is provided to the CREHS Committee. Reports involving any accounting, internal accounting control, auditing or other
financial irregularity are provided to the Audit Committee. Any material matters or investigations are reported directly to the Board.
Any
waivers of the Code in respect of any officer or director can only be approved by the Board and must be promptly disclosed as required by law. The Board has not waived any aspect of the Code to date, and we have never been required to make
filings in accordance with securities laws regarding a departure from the Code.
Disclosure Policy
The Board has approved a Disclosure Policy, which reflects our commitment to timely, balanced and accurate public disclosure regarding the Companys
affairs and activities. Among the matters addressed in the policy include disclosure of material information, use of authorized and designated corporate spokespersons, as well as guidelines regarding interactions with analysts, investors and the
media to avoid selective disclosure. The policy also sets out the role and responsibilities of the Companys internal Disclosure Committee in the oversight and monitoring of disclosure matters. The Disclosure Policy applies to all directors,
employees and contract personnel, and is available at
www.encana.com/about/board-governance/policies
.
Securities Trading and Insider Reporting Policy
Directors, employees and contractors are subject to a Securities Trading and Insider Reporting Policy. The policy prohibits insider trading, establishes
a regular blackout period schedule, outlines the trading restrictions and reporting obligations of the Company insiders, and sets out the Companys obligations to stock exchanges and regulators.
The policy also expressly prohibits directors and employees from engaging in any form of equity monetization transactions (including the purchase of
financial instruments to hedge or offset a decrease in value), as well as the following activities, involving the Company securities:
|
|
|
selling securities they do not own, have not fully paid for or have no right to own (engaging in
a short sale);
|
|
|
|
selling a call option or buying a put option;
|
|
|
|
entering into equity monetization transactions involving any securities subject to the Companys share ownership
guidelines or that is the equivalent of short selling; and
|
|
|
|
entering into brokerage arrangements that might result in a sale at a time when he or she is not permitted
to trade.
|
The Securities Trading and Insider Reporting Policy applies to all directors, employees and contract personnel, and
is available at
www.encana.com/about/board-governance/policies
.
Diversity
The Board actively monitors governance developments in Canada and the U.S. regarding board diversity. While the Company does not adhere to quotas or
specific targets in determining Board membership, the Company does support the objectives of increasing diversity and actively considers diversity considerations when identifying qualified director candidates. The Company believes that a diversity
of perspectives enhances Board effectiveness, assists it to identify risks and allows it to recognize and more creatively address issues which may impact the business.
The Company is committed to advancing the professional development of women and individuals of various backgrounds. While the Company does not have a
formal gender diversity policy, the Company has historically maintained high levels of female representation on the Board and at the executive level. In 2016, 30 percent of the Companys independent directors were women. At this Meeting,
two of the Nominees are women.
20
At the executive level, three members (or 43 percent) of the ELT are women, each of whom has been
widely recognized for their accomplishments and contributions to the oil and gas industry. Below the executive level, the Company strongly supports professional development for its female employees through talent management and succession planning
processes, Encanas Womens Network, and formal and informal mentoring programs. Through a commitment to developing the Companys workforce and creating opportunities for professional growth and advancement, the Company continues to
actively pursue the objectives of diversity. Further, in respect of the Companys significant subsidiaries (as disclosed in the Annual Report), as at December 31, 2016, approximately 49 percent of board positions and 31 percent
of officer positions are held by women.
Philosophy and Objectives
The Companys compensation program is designed to attract and retain skilled director talent and create alignment with shareholder interests. To
achieve these objectives, compensation for directors consists of an annual retainer, director DSUs granted under the DDSU Plan and share ownership requirements. Each of these compensation elements is described below.
Independent directors do not receive performance-based compensation, benefits or other perquisites from the Company. Mr. Suttles does not receive
any compensation from the Company in his capacity as a director.
Director Compensation Structure
Effective January 1, 2015, the Board adopted a new director compensation structure. The compensation structure consists of an
all-inclusive
Board retainer (as opposed to an individual meeting and travel-based fee structure) and, for the Chairman of the Board, increased proportion of equity-based compensation (in the form of DSUs under the
DDSU Plan), and corresponding decrease in annual cash compensation. This compensation structure consists of the following key elements:
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Retainer
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
$94,375
|
|
Board Member
|
|
|
$45,300
|
|
Audit Committee Chair
|
|
|
$15,100
|
|
Human Resources and Compensation Committee Chair
|
|
|
$11,325
|
|
Other Committee Chairs
(1)
|
|
|
$7,550
|
|
Annual DSU Grant (units)
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
Board Member
|
|
|
9,800
|
|
Note:
(1)
|
As Chairman of the Board, Mr. Woitas does not receive a Committee Chair retainer for serving as Chair of the NCG
Committee.
|
Annual retainers are paid in quarterly installments. Annual retainers and any initial DSU grants are
pro-rated
for periods of partial service.
Directors Deferred Share Unit Plan
Directors receive an initial grant of DSUs upon joining the Board and also receive an annual grant of DSUs. Directors may choose to
receive a portion or all of their annual retainer either in cash or as DSUs. Separate DSU accounts are retained for each director. DSUs are credited with dividend equivalent DSUs whenever a dividend is paid on Common Shares.
DSUs vest immediately but cannot be redeemed until a director ceases to be a member of the Board. Directors must redeem their DSUs prior to
December 15 of the year following retirement from the Board. The value of redeemed DSUs is paid to the director in cash (on an
after-tax
basis) based on multiplying the number of DSUs redeemed by the then
market value of a Common Share. Market value for this purpose is defined as the closing price of the Common Shares on the date immediately prior to the redemption date. Redemption may be in respect of all DSUs or may occur in stages, provided it is
prior to the redemption deadline.
For information regarding the total number and market value of DSUs and the total market value of Common Shares
and DSUs held by the directors, see Nominees for Election to the Board.
21
Share Ownership Guidelines
Independent directors are required to maintain an ownership stake in the Company to align their interests with those of shareholders. Each director is
expected to own at least three times the value of his or her annual grant of DSUs within three years of joining the Board. Common Shares held directly or beneficially through a nominee, and DSUs, count towards meeting the guidelines. Each of
the Companys directors is currently in compliance with the guidelines.
Director Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the annual compensation of directors for the year ended December 31, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Fees Earned
(1)(4)
($)
|
|
Share Based
Awards
(2)
($)
|
|
All Other
Compensation
(3)(4)
($)
|
|
Total
(4)
($)
|
|
Peter A. Dea
(5)
|
|
52,850
|
|
51,312
|
|
379
|
|
|
104,541
|
|
Fred J.
Fowler
|
|
45,300
|
|
51,312
|
|
379
|
|
|
96,991
|
|
Howard J.
Mayson
|
|
52,850
|
|
51,312
|
|
379
|
|
|
104,541
|
|
Lee A. McIntire
(5)
|
|
45,300
|
|
51,312
|
|
379
|
|
|
96,991
|
|
Margaret A.
McKenzie
|
|
45,300
|
|
51,312
|
|
379
|
|
|
96,991
|
|
Suzanne P.
Nimocks
(5)
|
|
56,625
|
|
51,312
|
|
379
|
|
|
108,316
|
|
Jane L.
Peverett
|
|
60,400
|
|
51,312
|
|
379
|
|
|
112,091
|
|
Brian G. Shaw
(5)
|
|
45,300
|
|
51,312
|
|
379
|
|
|
96,991
|
|
Douglas J.
Suttles
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce G. Waterman
(5)
|
|
45,300
|
|
51,312
|
|
379
|
|
|
96,991
|
|
Clayton H. Woitas
(5)
|
|
94,375
|
|
94,247
|
|
379
|
|
|
189,001
|
|
Notes:
(1)
|
Fees earned include annual Board and Committee retainers.
|
(2)
|
The value of the annual DSU grants to the Chairman of the Board in 2016 was C$126,540 and to our other independent
directors was C$68,894 (18,000 DSUs to the Chairman of the Board and 9,800 DSUs for independent directors). The amounts have been calculated based on the closing price of Common Shares on the TSX on December 31, 2015 of C$7.03, representing the
annual grant date of DSUs, and converted to U.S. dollars using a December 30, 2016 exchange rate of C$1.00 = US$0.7448.
|
(3)
|
Represents the cost of the Company-provided life insurance coverage.
|
(4)
|
Amounts originally paid in Canadian dollars have been converted to U.S. dollars using an exchange rate of C$1.00 =
US$0.755, the average exchange rate for 2016, based on the daily noon buying rate published by the Bank of Canada.
|
(5)
|
Elected to receive all or a portion of fees in the form of DSUs in lieu of cash.
|
(6)
|
Mr. Suttles receives no compensation in his capacity as a director. See Incentive Plan Awards Grants
of Plan-Based Awards for 2016 on page 54 for Mr. Suttles grants of long-term incentive (LTI) awards as CEO.
|
Trading and Hedging Restrictions
Directors are subject to many of the Companys policies and practices, including a Securities Trading and Insider Reporting Policy, which prohibit
directors from directly or indirectly engaging in certain transactions in respect of the Company securities, including DSUs granted under the DDSU Plan. See Board and Committee Governance Securities Trading and Insider Reporting
Policy.
Director Independence and Related Person Transactions
Under applicable securities laws, stock exchange rules and the Companys Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board must consist of a majority of
independent directors. In making such determinations, the Board observes the criteria specified by applicable securities laws and stock exchange rules and considers all relevant facts and circumstances. To be considered independent:
|
|
|
the director must not have a disqualifying relationship as specified by applicable securities laws and stock exchange
rules; and
|
|
|
|
the Board must affirmatively determine that the director otherwise has no material relationship with the Company
directly, or as an officer, shareholder or partner of an organization that has a relationship with the Company.
|
In addition, when
determining director independence, the Board does not consider transactions:
|
|
|
with entities for which a director or an immediate family member served only as a director or trustee;
|
|
|
|
of less than $120,000; and
|
|
|
|
with entities in which the directors or an immediate family members only interest is less than
10 percent ownership interest.
|
22
The Companys definition of director independence is available at
http://www.encana.com/about/board-governance/documents-filings.html
.
The Board, through the NCG Committee, annually reviews all
relevant business relationships that any director nominee and any person who served as a director during 2016 may have with the Company. As a result of its annual review, the Board has determined that none of the Nominees has a material relationship
with the Company and, as a result, all Nominees except the CEO are independent.
All of the directors who serve as members of the Audit Committee,
HRC Committee and NCG Committee are independent in accordance with applicable securities laws and stock exchange rules. SEC regulations and NYSE rules for listed companies require that the Audit Committee, HRC Committee and NCG Committee meet
additional independence criteria, all of which were satisfied during the 2016 fiscal year.
Related Person Transaction
Policy and Process
A Related Person Transaction is a transaction, arrangement or relationship (or any series of similar
transactions, arrangements or relationships) in which the Company (including any of its subsidiaries) was, is or will be a participant and, as it relates to directors or shareholders who have an ownership interest in the Company of more than five
percent, the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which any Related Person (as defined below) had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
A Related Person means (i) a director, nominee director or executive officer of the Company, (ii) an immediate family member of a
director, nominee director or executive officer or (iii) a beneficial holder of greater than five percent of the Common Shares or an immediate family member of such holder.
In general, the Company will enter into or ratify Related Person Transactions only when the Board, acting through the NCG Committee, determines that the
Related Person Transaction is reasonable and fair to the Company. When considering whether a Related Person Transaction is reasonable and fair to the Company, among other things, the NCG Committee considers the evaluation of the transaction by
employees directly involved and the recommendation of the Chief Financial Officer. In addition, any Related Person Transaction involving an executive officer must be
pre-approved
by the CEO and any Related
Person Transaction involving the CEO or a beneficial owner of more than five percent of the outstanding Common Shares must be submitted to the Audit Committee for approval. If a Related Person Transaction is ongoing, any amendments or changes are
reviewed and the transaction is reviewed annually for reasonableness and fairness to the Company.
Identifying possible Related Person Transactions
involves completion of annual questionnaires by directors and executive officers. Further, directors and nominees for directors are required to annually verify and update information about (i) where the director is an employee, director or
executive officer, (ii) each entity where an immediate family member of a director is an executive officer, (iii) each firm, corporation or other entity in which the director or an immediate family member is a partner or principal or in a
similar position or in which such person has a five percent or greater beneficial ownership interest and (iv) each charitable or nonprofit organization where the director or an immediate family member is an employee, executive officer, director
or trustee.
The Audit Committee would review any Related Person Transaction on an ongoing basis to prevent conflicts of interest.
23
|
Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management
|
Ownership of Equity Securities of the Company
The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of Common Shares by each director, each individual named in the Summary
Compensation Table on page 53, and the directors and executive officers as a group, all as of March 1, 2017. Unless otherwise noted, voting power and investment power in Common Shares are exercisable solely by the named person and no
Common Shares were pledged as security by such person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Aggregate Number of Common
Shares Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Percentage of Outstanding
Common Shares
4
|
Peter A.
Dea
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
*
|
Fred J.
Fowler
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
*
|
Howard J.
Mayson
|
|
|
20,224
|
|
|
*
|
Lee A.
McIntire
|
|
|
17,100
|
|
|
*
|
Margaret A.
McKenzie
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
*
|
Suzanne P.
Nimocks
|
|
|
5,600
|
|
|
*
|
Jane L.
Peverett
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
Brian G.
Shaw
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
*
|
Bruce G.
Waterman
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
*
|
Clayton H.
Woitas
|
|
|
262,690
|
|
|
*
|
Douglas J.
Suttles
|
|
|
85,350
|
|
|
*
|
Sherri
Brillon
|
|
|
108,476
|
|
|
*
|
Mike
McAllister
|
|
|
20,882
|
|
|
*
|
David
Hill
|
|
|
31,173
|
|
|
*
|
Renee
Zemljak
|
|
|
20,471
|
|
|
*
|
All Directors and
executive officers as a group
5
|
|
|
774,680
|
|
|
*
|
*
|
Less than 1 percent of issued and outstanding Common Shares.
|
Principal Shareholders
Set forth in the table below is information about the number of Common Shares held by persons known by the Company to be the beneficial owners of more
than five percent of issued and outstanding Common Shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Address
|
|
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
|
|
|
Percentage of Outstanding
Common Shares
|
|
1
|
|
Viking Global Investors LP
55 Railroad Avenue, Greenwich, CT 06830
|
|
|
88,788,457
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
2
|
|
BlackRock Inc.
55 East
52nd St., New York, NY 10055
|
|
|
76,721,109
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
3
|
|
Davis Selected Advisers, L.P.
2949 East Elvira Road, Suite 101, Tucson, AZ 85756
|
|
|
71,084,413
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
4
|
|
Morgan Stanley
1585
Broadway, New York, NY 10036
|
|
|
61,867,095
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
(1)
|
This information is based upon a Schedule 13G/A filing on February 14, 2017, which can be retrieved at
www.sec.gov
.
|
(2)
|
This information is based upon a Schedule 13G/A filing on January 24, 2017, which can be retrieved at
www.sec.gov
.
|
(3)
|
This information is based upon a Schedule 13G/A filing on February 13, 2017, which can be retrieved at
www.sec.gov
.
|
(4)
|
This information is based upon a Schedule 13G/A filing on February 13, 2017, which can be retrieved at
www.sec.gov
.
|
4
|
Share units credited under the DDSU Plan are not included as outstanding shares in calculating these percentages.
Unvested performance share units and restricted share units that may be settled in shares upon vesting at the Companys option, also are not included.
|
5
|
Included are Common Shares beneficially owned by executive officers Joanne Alexander (26,976) and Mike Williams
(13,603).
|
24
|
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
|
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Companys executive officers, directors and persons who own more than
10 percent of a registered class of the Companys equity securities to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of the Common Shares with the SEC. SEC regulations require executive officers, directors and
greater than 10 percent shareholders to furnish the Company with copies of all forms they file pursuant to Section 16(a). As a matter of practice, the Companys administrative staff assists the Companys executive officers and
directors in preparing initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership and filing such reports with the SEC. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, the Company relied on the foreign private issuer exemption from the
requirements of Section 16(a) and therefore no forms concerning 2016 beneficial ownership were required to be filed by any person subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
|
Indebtedness of Directors and Executive Officers
|
As at the date of this Proxy Statement, there is no indebtedness outstanding by, or any guarantees, support agreements,
letters of credit or other similar arrangements or understandings provided by the Company or its subsidiaries to any of the Companys directors or executive officers or any of their associates.
|
Report of the Audit Committee
|
The Audit Committee operates under an Audit Committee Mandate adopted by the Board that outlines its responsibilities and
the practices it follows, which can be viewed at
www.encana.com/pdf/about/board-governance/mandate-audit.pdf
. The Audit Committee reviews and assesses the adequacy of its mandate on an annual basis and, when appropriate, recommends
changes for approval to the Board that reflect the evolving role of the Audit Committee. In 2016, the Audit Committee was composed of five directors, each of whom is independent as defined by applicable securities laws and stock exchange rules and
that at least one member is an audit committee financial expert.
Responsibilities
Management is responsible for preparing the Companys consolidated financial statements, managing the accounting and financial reporting processes,
devising and maintaining the systems of internal controls over financial reporting, and assessing the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting. The independent auditor is responsible for performing an independent audit of the
Companys consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit Committees primary responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes and procedures on behalf of the Board.
Oversight of Independent Auditors
The Audit Committee monitors the qualifications, performance and independence of the Companys independent auditors and recommends to the Board on
an annual basis whether to propose the reappointment of the Companys current independent auditors at the next annual meeting of shareholders or propose the appointment of another auditor. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP were the Companys
independent auditors for the year ended December 31, 2016 and, subject to an affirmative majority of the votes duly cast at the Meeting, will be reappointed in such capacity at the Meeting until the close of the next annual meeting of
shareholders.
The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors those matters required to be discussed by the auditors with the Audit
Committee under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the PCAOB). The Audit Committee has also received written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required by the PCAOB regulating the
independent auditors communication with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent auditors their independence from the Companys management and the Company as well as whether the provision of
non-audit
services by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is compatible with maintaining auditor independence.
2016 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed together with
management and the independent auditors the audited consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, the results of managements
assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal controls over financial reporting, and the independent auditors audit of the Companys internal controls over financial reporting.
25
In reliance on these reviews and discussions, and the reports of the independent auditors, the Audit
Committee has recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016, for filing with the SEC.
|
|
|
|
|
The Audit Committee
|
|
|
Jane L. Peverett, Chairperson
|
|
|
Margaret A. McKenzie
|
|
|
Suzanne P. Nimocks
|
|
|
Brian G. Shaw
|
|
|
Bruce G. Waterman
|
|
Item 2. Appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Independent Auditors
|
The Audit Committee has the authority and responsibility to review and evaluate the Companys independent auditors
and make a recommendation to the Board regarding the reappointment of such auditors at the annual meeting of the Companys shareholders, or regarding the discharge of such auditors, if necessary, to recommend to the Board alternate independent
auditors. In its capacity as a committee of the Board, the Audit Committee is responsible, subject to the applicable law and the rights of the Companys shareholders, for the appointment, compensation, retention and general oversight of the
work of the independent auditors.
Shareholders are being asked to appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC), a registered public
accounting firm, to serve as the Companys independent auditors until the close of the next annual meeting of shareholders. PwC (including its predecessors) has served as the Companys independent auditors for over ten years.
Annual Evaluation and Selection of Independent Auditors
The Audit Committee annually evaluates the performance of the Companys independent auditors, including the senior audit engagement team, and
recommends to the Board whether to propose the reappointment of the current independent auditors at the Companys annual meeting of shareholders or to consider other audit firms. Factors considered by the Audit Committee in deciding whether to
recommend to the Board retaining PwC include:
|
|
|
PwCs global capabilities;
|
|
|
|
PwCs technical expertise and knowledge of the Companys global operations and industry;
|
|
|
|
The quality and candour of PwCs communications with the Audit Committee and management;
|
|
|
|
The quality and efficiency of the services provided by PwC, including input from management on PwCs performance
and how effectively PwC demonstrated its independent judgment, objectivity and professional skepticism;
|
|
|
|
External data on audit quality and performance, including recent PCAOB reports on PwC and its peer firms; and
|
|
|
|
The appropriateness of PwCs fees, PwCs tenure as our independent auditor, including the benefits of a longer
tenure, and the controls and processes in place that help ensure PwCs continued independence.
|
Audit
Fees and All Other Fees
The Audit Committee is responsible for approving the audit and permissible
non-audit
services provided by the independent auditors and the associated fees. The following table provides information about the fees for audit and other services rendered by PwC during fiscal years 2016
and 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(C$ thousands)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Audit Fees
(1)
|
|
|
2,820
|
|
|
|
3,408
|
|
|
|
|
Audit-Related Fees
(2)
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Fees
(3)
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Fees
(4)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,447
|
|
|
|
4,309
|
|
(1)
|
Audit fees consist of fees for the audit of the Companys annual financial statements (including required quarterly
reviews), subsidiary audits, or services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
|
(2)
|
Audit-related fees consist of fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of
the audit or review of the Companys financial statements and are not reported as Audit Fees. During fiscal 2016 and 2015, the services provided in this category included reviews in connection with acquisitions and divestitures, research of
accounting and audit-related issues and the review of reserves disclosures.
|
26
(3)
|
Tax fees consist of fees for tax compliance services, tax advice and tax planning. During fiscal 2016 and 2015, the
services provided in this category included assistance and advice in relation to the preparation of corporate income tax returns.
|
(4)
|
During fiscal 2016 and 2015, the services provided in this category included the payment of maintenance fees associated
with a research tool that grants access to a comprehensive library of financial reporting and assurance literature.
|
All audit,
audit-related, tax and other services were
pre-approved
by the Audit Committee, which concluded that the provision of such services by PwC was compatible with that firms independence in the conduct of
its auditing functions. The Audit Committee has taken into consideration whether the provision of
non-audit
services by PwC is compatible with maintaining auditor independence.
The Company did not rely on the
de minimis
exemption provided by Section (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule
2-01
of SEC
Regulation
S-X
in 2016 or 2015.
Audit Committee
Pre-Approval
Policies and Procedures
The Audit Committee approves all audit and
non-audit
services to be provided by our independent auditors prior to the receipt of such services. The Company has adopted policies and procedures with respect to the
pre-approval
of audit and permitted
non-audit
services to be provided by PwC. The Audit Committee has established a budget for the provision of a specified list of audit
and permitted
non-audit
services that the Audit Committee believes to be typical, recurring or otherwise likely to be provided by PwC. The budget generally covers the period between the adoption of the budget
and the next meeting of the Audit Committee, but at the option of the Audit Committee it may cover a longer or shorter period. The list of services is sufficiently detailed as to the particular services to be provided to ensure that: (i) the
Audit Committee knows what services it is being asked to
pre-approve;
and (ii) it is not necessary for any member of management to make a judgment as to whether a proposed service fits within the
pre-approved
services.
Subject to the next paragraph, the Audit Committee has delegated authority to the Chair of
the Audit Committee (or if the Chair is unavailable, any other member of the Committee) to
pre-approve
the provision of permitted services by PwC which have not otherwise been
pre-approved
by the Audit Committee, including the fees and terms of the proposed services (Delegated Authority). All
pre-approvals
granted pursuant to
Delegated Authority must be presented by the member(s) who granted the
pre-approvals
to the full Audit Committee at its next meeting. The fees payable in connection with any particular service to be provided
by PwC that has been
pre-approved
pursuant to Delegated Authority: (i) may not exceed C$200,000, in the case of
pre-approvals
granted by the Chair of the Audit
Committee; and (ii) may not exceed C$50,000, in the case of
pre-approvals
granted by any other member of the Audit Committee.
All proposed services, or the fees payable in connection with such services, that have not already been
pre-approved
must be
pre-approved
by either the Audit Committee or pursuant to Delegated Authority. Prohibited services may not be
pre-approved
by the Audit Committee or pursuant to Delegated Authority.
Other
Information
The Company has been advised by PwC that neither the firm, nor any covered person of the firm, has any financial interest,
direct or indirect, in any capacity in the Company or its subsidiaries.
One or more representatives of PwC will be present at the Meeting. The
representatives will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Vote Required for Approval
The appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Companys independent auditors requires an affirmative majority of the votes duly cast at the Meeting.
The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote for the Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Independent Auditors of
the Company until the Close of the Next Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
27
Dear Fellow Shareholders:
We are pleased to provide the following detail concerning the Companys executive compensation programs. 2016 was a year of tremendous
accomplishment in which we saw extraordinary results related to the execution of our strategic transformation. We are pleased with the performance of every one of our employees in bringing about these results. We are also excited about the strength
of leadership demonstrated by our management team, led by our CEO, Doug Suttles. In just the third year of our five-year strategic plan, the Company has achieved most of its major milestones, resulting in sector leading performance for shareholders.
2016 Compensation Decisions
Consistent with the Companys pay for performance philosophy, its strong 2016 performance is reflected in annual Bonus awards for Mr. Suttles
and all of our bonus-eligible employees. At the outset, the goals set for this team were considered rigorous and challenging, reflecting the Board-approved operating plan for the year. These operational and financial objectives, as well as the
Companys strategic goals (or Major Milestones) were met or exceeded in 2016. The Company also proudly delivered industry-leading EH&S performance.
During 2016, the Committee approved a change to Mr. Suttles compensation arrangements so it is now delivered in U.S. dollar currency. This
change was made after several years of declining value of the Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar, and shows up in the compensation tables as a meaningful increase in 2016 compensation. However, the move was intended to keep Mr. Suttles, a U.S.
citizen, whole relative to our original agreement when he was recruited.
Compensation Governance
The Companys compensation program is characterized by Board oversight, strong governance practices and a focus on shareholder alignment.
Compensation risk is carefully considered by the HRC Committee, which conducts regular comprehensive risk assessments to ensure the program does not directly or indirectly incent the Companys executives to take risks that exceed its risk
tolerance, or could materially adversely affect the Company.
Shareholder Feedback & Engagement
The Company seeks to provide clear and meaningful disclosure about its program and remains open to feedback regarding the Companys approach.
Feedback from our shareholders, proxy advisors and governance bodies is carefully considered by the HRC Committee and the Board throughout the year and when making decisions regarding the Companys program.
2016
Say-On-Pay
Vote
At the Companys 2016 annual meeting of shareholders, shareholders provided feedback through the Companys
Say-on-Pay
vote which, at 87 percent, the Company views as indicative of broad shareholder support of its
pay-for-performance
approach and its compensation philosophy. This year, for the seventh consecutive year, the Company is again offering you the opportunity to
participate in its
non-binding
Say-on-Pay
vote. The Company encourages and welcomes your feedback. Should you have any comments
or questions regarding the Companys program, please contact us directly at
executive.compensation@encana.com
.
|
|
|
On behalf of the Board of Directors:
|
|
On behalf of the Human Resources and
Compensation
Committee:
|
|
|
/s/ Clayton H. Woitas
|
|
/s/ Suzanne P. Nimocks
|
|
|
Clayton H. Woitas
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
Suzanne P. Nimocks
Chairperson, Human Resources and Compensation
Committee
|
28
|
Item 3. Advisory Vote to
Approve Compensation of Named Executive Officers
|
The Company is committed to providing shareholders with clear, comprehensive and transparent disclosure on executive
compensation. For information on the Companys executive compensation, refer to Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act and related SEC rules, the Company is providing shareholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a
non-binding
advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers (NEOs) as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, commonly known as
Say-on-Pay.
The date of the next
Say-on-Pay
vote will be determined by the Board, in consultation with the HRC Committee, taking under advisement the results of Item 4 (Advisory Vote on Frequency of
Say-on-Pay
Votes).
The HRC Committee has spent considerable time and
effort recruiting
top-level
talent and developing the Companys executive compensation program to fit extraordinary circumstances. The Board believes that the executive compensation program that has been
implemented achieves the goal of maximizing long-term shareholder value while attracting, motivating and retaining world-class talent. The Company recognizes that the proper structure of executive compensation is critical to both managing risk and
appropriately incentivizing the Companys NEOs. The Company has been successful in recruiting individuals with unique and demonstrated abilities to improve performance, and shareholders have enjoyed extraordinary results. The Company believes
that its approach to executive compensation is fair and balanced, and creates incentives for NEOs that are well-aligned with shareholders interests over the long term.
As this is an advisory vote, the results will not be binding upon the Board. However, when considering the Companys approach to compensation for
the NEOs, the Board will take into account the results of this vote, together with other shareholder feedback and best practices in compensation and governance.
The Board recommends that shareholders vote FOR the resolution set out below and, unless otherwise instructed, the persons designated in the form of
proxy or the voting instruction form intend to vote FOR the following resolution:
RESOLVED
, that the
Companys shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers of the Company as disclosed in the Companys Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the compensation
disclosure rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure.
Vote Required for Approval
In order to be
approved, the advisory resolution on the compensation of the NEOs requires an affirmative majority of the votes duly cast at the Meeting.
|
The Board Recommends that Shareholders Vote for the Approval
of the Compensation of the Companys Named Executive Officers as Disclosed in the Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 4. Advisory Vote on
Frequency of
Say-on-Pay
Votes
|
Section 14A of the Exchange Act requires that shareholders be provided with the opportunity to vote on a
non-binding
advisory basis to determine whether the advisory shareholder vote on the compensation of the NEOs will occur every one, two or three years.
The proxy card provides shareholders with four choices (ONE (1) YEAR, TWO (2) YEARS, THREE (3) YEARS, or ABSTAIN). After careful
consideration of the various arguments supporting each frequency level, the Board has determined that an annual
Say-on-Pay
vote is appropriate for the Company and its
shareholders at this time.
As this is an advisory vote, the results will not be binding upon the Board. The outcome of this vote will not require
the Board or the HRC Committee to take any action regarding the frequency of future
Say-on-Pay
votes. However, the Board and the HRC Committee value the perspectives of
shareholders and will take into consideration the outcome of the vote when considering the frequency of future
Say-on-Pay
votes.
Vote Required for Approval
In order to be
approved, the advisory resolution providing for an annual frequency of
Say-on-Pay
votes requires a plurality of the votes duly cast at the Meeting with respect to such
frequency.
|
The Board Recommends that Shareholders Vote to Hold an
Advisory Vote Every One (1) Year.
|
29
|
Compensation Committee Report
|
The HRC Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of
Regulation
S-K
with management. Based on such review and discussions, the HRC Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and
incorporated by reference into the Annual Report as specified therein.
|
|
|
|
|
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee
Suzanne P. Nimocks, Chairperson
Fred J.
Fowler
Lee A. McIntire
Margaret A.
McKenzie
Bruce G. Waterman
|
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
Introduction
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) describes our executive compensation program, decisions reached by the HRC Committee and
the Board under our program in 2016, and the factors considered in making those decisions. In particular, this CD&A focuses on our NEOs for 2016, who were:
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
Doug Suttles
|
|
President & Chief Executive Officer
|
Sherri Brillon
|
|
Executive Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer
|
Mike McAllister
|
|
Executive Vice-President & Chief Operating Officer
|
David Hill
|
|
Executive Vice-President, Exploration & Business Development
|
Renee Zemljak
|
|
Executive Vice-President, Midstream, Marketing & Fundamentals
|
Biographical
information for each of our NEOs, including our CEO, Mr. Doug Suttles, and highlights of their 2016 performance is found starting at page 46. There were no terminations at the NEO level during 2016, and the NEOs listed above were the highest
paid individuals for the entirety of the 2016 fiscal year.
Key Takeaways
30
Key Performance Highlights
In 2016, under the leadership of Mr. Suttles, the Company delivered industry-leading shareholder value through one of the most challenging years
ever faced by the oil and gas industry. The strategic advancements overseen by Mr. Suttles and his ELT have the Company positioned to deliver one of the best value creation plans in the industry. Key highlights from 2016 include:
31
In addition, the Company achieved the following in 2016:
|
|
|
delivered significant total shareholder return, doubling our share price over the year, placing Encana in the top
10 percent of our PSU Performance Peer Group (as defined on page 44);
|
|
|
|
delivered operational excellence, innovation and efficiency across the business:
|
|
✓
|
|
achieved basin-leading well performance and drilling and completion costs in each of the core assets;
|
|
✓
|
|
more than halved initially expected production decline from the core assets to less than five percent from the fourth
quarter in 2015 to the fourth quarter in 2016;
|
|
✓
|
|
reached projected 2017 operational activity and rig count levels in December 2016;
|
|
✓
|
|
continued to focus the portfolio with the divestitures of Gordondale and DJ Basin assets; and
|
|
✓
|
|
another record-setting year for safety performance; and
|
|
|
|
delivered impressive financial results, the successful completion of a $1.15 billion public share offering and
further strengthened the balance sheet in a low price environment.
|
Encanas significant competitive advantages, including its
multi-basin portfolio, 100 percent short-cycle capital program and robust hedging strategy, combined with its disciplined capital allocation and relentless focus on costs and efficiency, enable the Company to mitigate risk while generating
sector-leading growth and returns.
32
Despite some of the toughest market conditions ever faced by our industry, Encana delivered on its 2016
operational and financial objectives to emerge strong and positioned for growth. Our focus on profitable growth is reflected in key decisions made in the execution of our strategy through 2016, as illustrated in the following graphic:
33
Our 2016 Share Price Performance
Disciplined execution of our operational and financial objectives resulted in a significant share price increase of 131% in 2016 (NYSE), placing Encana
in the top 10 percent of our PSU Performance Peer Group in 2016. The graphic below illustrates our 2016 share price performance versus our PSU Performance Peer Group.
Note:
(1)
|
Graph does not reflect share price variation between quarters.
|
34
Strategic Alignment and CEO Pay
Mr. Suttles realizable pay is strongly correlated with Total Shareholder Return (TSR). In 2016, our strong execution resulted in
leading share price performance and leading TSR, which corresponded to an increase in Mr. Suttles realizable pay. The increase in Mr. Suttles overall compensation in 2016 also reflects the decision by the Board to align his pay
to U.S. currency. This decision was made to address the significant unintended negative pay impact of foreign exchange since his appointment as CEO in 2013, when Canadian and U.S. currencies were close to par. Reflecting the strong alignment with
shareholder interests, Mr. Suttles realizable pay from 2013 to 2015 was considerably lower than his reported pay,
in-line
with lower TSR performance over the same period. The alignment between CEO
compensation and shareholder interests is illustrated in the following graphics:
Shareholder performance aligned with CEO Total Realizable Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Reported Total
Compensation
($000s)
(1)
|
|
Realizable Total
Compensation
($000s)
(1),(3
)
|
|
Doug Suttles
(4)
|
|
Shareholder
(5)
|
2013
|
|
$13,763
|
|
$6,075
|
|
-56%
|
|
-9%
|
2014
|
|
$8,941
|
|
$7,087
|
|
-21%
|
|
-23%
|
2015
|
|
$8,782
|
|
$3,506
|
|
-60%
|
|
-63%
|
2016
|
|
$13,272
|
|
$37,695
|
|
184%
|
|
131%
|
Notes:
(1)
|
Amounts in Canadian dollars have been converted to U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate for each year, based on
the daily noon buying rate published by the Bank of Canada (2013: C$1.00 = US$0.971, 2014: C$1.00 = US$0.905, 2015: C$1.00 = US$0.782, 2016: C$1.00 = US$0.755).
|
(2)
|
RSUs and Options are calculated based on December 31 TSX share price for the three year averaging period indicated.
PSUs are calculated based on the average closing price over the last 20 trading days of December for the three year averaging period indicated.
|
(3)
|
RSUs and Options are calculated based on December 31 TSX share price for each year indicated. PSUs are calculated
based on the average closing price over the last 20 trading days of December for each year indicated.
|
(4)
|
Represents a percentage of Reported Total Compensation reflected in Mr. Suttles Realizable Total Compensation as
of December 31 of each year.
|
(5)
|
Represents NYSE share price performance from start of year indicated to December 31 of each year.
|
Key Compensation Decisions in 2016
Consistent with our pay for performance philosophy, our strong 2016 performance is reflected in 2016 annual Bonus awards for Mr. Suttles and other
members of the ELT, as well as the current realizable value of their LTI awards. Our annual Bonus awards reflect strong achievement relative to the stretch performance objectives approved by the Board in our 2016 Company Scorecard. These operational
and financial objectives, as well as our Major Milestones were met or exceeded in 2016. We also proudly delivered industry-leading EH&S performance.
Compensation decisions reached by the Board reflect Encanas disciplined execution in 2016, despite a continued low commodity price environment, and
continued focus on long-term shareholder value creation. Examples of some key compensation actions by the Board in 2016 include:
|
|
|
Annual Base Salaries
for Mr. Suttles and our remaining NEOs were maintained at existing (2015) levels;
however, the Board approved adjusting Mr. Suttles 2016 compensation to be paid in U.S. (from Canadian) currency.
|
35
|
|
|
2016 Company Scorecard
results calculated at 159, with upward discretion applied to increase the score to
175 based on outstanding safety results.
|
|
|
|
Annual LTI Grants
for Mr. Suttles and our remaining NEOs consisted of 75 percent performance-based
vehicles, reflecting a mix of Performance Share Units (PSUs) (50%), Stock Options/Stock Appreciation Rights (25%) and Restricted Share Units (RSUs) (25%). For 2016,
at-risk,
performance-based LTI awards represented 79 percent of Mr. Suttles target annual compensation, and 66 percent for our remaining NEOs, an increase of 3 percent from the prior year.
|
|
|
|
PSU Grant Design
for our 2016 PSU grants added Strategic Milestones (as defined under 2016
Company Scorecard Results Performance Share Units 2016 PSU Performance Measures) as a new performance measure (50 percent of grants) to encourage managements execution of key objectives aligned with our strategic goals;
Relative TSR was retained as the other performance measure for such grants (50 percent of grants).
|
Compensation Philosophy
Compensation decisions by the Board are grounded in our compensation philosophy, as outlined by the following principles:
|
|
|
|
|
Principle
|
|
Practical Application
|
|
|
Pay
for Performance
|
|
✓
Annual Bonus awards determined by execution of key operational, financial and strategic measures approved by the Board, contained in our
annual Company Scorecard.
|
|
✓
Focus on LTI compensation aligns executive pay opportunity with the performance of our share price on an absolute and relative
basis.
|
|
✓
Realized pay designed to drive strong shareholder value creation.
|
|
|
Create Shareholder Alignment
|
|
✓
Annual pay largely consists of
at-risk,
performance-based LTI awards, aligned to the absolute and
relative performance of our share price.
|
|
✓
Realized pay
in-line
with value realized by shareholders over the same period.
|
|
|
Target
Market Median of Defined
Competitive Market
|
|
✓
Compensation design built around median compensation for target performance.
|
|
✓
Executive pay aligned to relevant executive role and competitive geographic market (Canada and U.S.).
|
|
|
Sound
Risk-Management
|
|
✓
Program design and strong governance practices reflect best practices and strong risk- management practices.
|
|
✓
Risk management aligned with Encanas strategic plan, encourages and rewards long-term shareholder value creation and mitigates risk.
|
Our program consists of predominantly performance-based pay, the realizable value of which is based on our execution of key operational, financial and
strategic measures approved by the Board and the absolute and relative performance of our share price. We believe that directly linking executive pay to clear performance goals drives the execution of our strategy and delivers long-term, sustainable
value to our shareholders.
Consistent with this objective, approximately 91
percent of Mr. Suttles 2016 target pay and
approximately 80
percent of the 2016 target pay for our remaining NEOs, was performance-based, consisting largely of share-based LTI award opportunity.
Total Direct Compensation (or TDC) consists of annual base salary, target annual Bonus awards and grant-date value of an individuals
annual LTI grant. The mix of 2016 target TDC for our CEO and remaining NEOs is illustrated in the following graphs.
36
2. Create Shareholder Alignment
We seek to align pay with shareholder interests by encouraging and rewarding performance that positions Encana to create sustainable long-term
shareholder value. We achieve this through a focus on incentive-based pay, which is intended to drive the execution of strategic performance objectives, and enhance the performance of our share price over periods from three to seven years. We also
pursue shareholder-alignment through careful consideration of feedback received from shareholders during the year, as well as the use of strong compensation governance practices.
We strive for alignment with the interests of our shareholders. Feedback received from our shareholders directly, as well as the perspectives of proxy
advisor firms and relevant governance bodies, is also carefully considered by the Board when making decisions regarding our program during the year.
3. Target Market Median of Defined Competitive Market
To remain competitive, we generally target annual TDC for our executives at the median (or 50
th
percentile) of comparable roles within our compensation peer group. Target compensation may be set above or below the median based on various factors, including time in role, sustained performance over time, readiness for promotion, skill set and
experience relative to external market counterparts. Actual compensation varies above or below the target based on company and individual performance, and absolute and relative changes in our share price over time.
As a North American energy producer, we compete for executive talent in both Canada and in the United States, and our compensation must be competitive in
order to attract and retain the executive talent we need to achieve our business objectives. For this reason, we define our competitive market as companies of similar size, industry focus, and geography as Encana, and assess our compensation against
a group of North American industry peers selected by the HRC Committee (our Compensation Peer Group). The HRC Committee carefully selects
E&P-focused
companies, since their performance is
similarly linked to changes in commodity prices during similar measurement periods.
The following outlines the criteria considered by the HRC
Committee in selecting our Compensation Peer Group:
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Peer Group: Evaluation Criteria
|
Financial & Operational Comparability
|
|
Total Assets
Production
Product Mix
|
|
Enterprise Value
Market Capitalization
Revenues
|
Nature & Scope of Operations
|
|
Primarily North American operations
Operate in similar North American plays
|
|
Upstream exploration and production
Development of unconventional resources
|
Identified
as Competitive Peer
|
|
Competitor for executive talent
Competitor for investment capital
|
|
Identified internally or externally as a peer to Encana
|
The HRC Committee closely examined our Compensation Peer Group in 2016 in light of the above criteria. Based on its
review, it removed one company from the existing peer group. Following this change, the HRC Committee approved the following Compensation Peer Group, consisting of the following 12 U.S.-based and 10 Canadian-based companies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Peers
|
|
U.S. Peers
|
|
|
|
|
ARC Resources Ltd.
|
|
Husky Energy Inc.
|
|
Apache Corporation
|
|
Hess Corporation
|
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
|
|
Imperial Oil Limited
|
|
Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation
|
|
Marathon Oil Corporation
|
Cenovus Energy Inc.
|
|
Suncor Energy Inc.
|
|
Chesapeake Energy Corporation
|
|
Murphy Oil Corporation
|
Crescent Point Energy Corp.
|
|
Penn West Petroleum Ltd.
|
|
Continental Resources, Inc.
|
|
Noble Energy, Inc.
|
Enbridge Inc.
|
|
TransCanada Corporation
|
|
Devon Energy Corporation
|
|
Pioneer Natural Resources Company
|
|
|
|
|
EOG Resources, Inc.
|
|
Southwestern Energy Company
|
The market competitiveness of the compensation of Mr. Suttles and other members of the ELT is assessed each year by
the HRC Committee using market data from the above Compensation Peer Group. For our CEO, Mr. Suttles, this assessment is conducted relative to a North American benchmark, meaning
CEO-specific
data from
the entire Compensation Peer Group is used. For other members of the ELT, country-specific data from the Compensation Peer Group is used, based on the particular role and country (U.S. or Canada) in which the executive is principally based.
The Board uses a different peer group to assess our relative TSR performance under our PSU Plan. The PSU Performance Peer Group includes companies with
whom we compete for investment capital (as opposed to executive talent). For information regarding our PSU Performance Peer Group, see page 44.
37
Our program incorporates sound compensation risk-management principles. Executive compensation decisions are recommended
by the HRC Committee and approved by the independent members of the Board. Comprehensive risk assessments are regularly conducted by the HRC Committee to ensure that our program does not directly or inadvertently encourage imprudent risk-taking.
Regulatory developments and compensation best practices are also regularly examined by the HRC Committee to ensure that our program remains both current and aligned with the interests of our shareholders.
The Board is responsible for ensuring that our executive compensation program aligns with Encanas strategic plan, encourages and rewards long-term
shareholder value-creation and mitigates risk. The following describes some of our executive compensation practices, both what we do and what we do not do, to highlight certain of the compensation best practices reflected in our program:
What We Do:
☑
|
|
Maintain an independent HRC Committee with the necessary skills, knowledge and experience and formalized decision-making
process;
|
|
☑
|
|
HRC Committee retains an independent compensation advisor that provides no services on behalf of management;
|
|
☑
|
|
Independent Board members annually assess Company performance relative to
pre-approved
key operational, financial and strategic performance objectives for purposes of determining annual Bonus awards;
|
|
☑
|
|
Design our annual executive LTI award grants to consist of 75 percent performance-based vehicles, for which
realizable value is determined by the relative and absolute performance of our share price, including relative to the TSR performance of a select group of industry peers;
|
|
☑
|
|
Subject annual executive Bonus awards and PSU grant payouts to maximum payouts (or caps);
|
|
☑
|
|
Maintain double trigger vesting provisions for cash severance payable to our CEO and other executives upon a
change-in-control
(CIC), requiring both a CIC and termination of employment in order for payout to occur. In addition, the CEO LTI award
sign-on
grant is also subject to double trigger vesting provisions;
|
|
☑
|
|
Subject incentive-based executive compensation to our compensation governance policies, including our Incentive
Compensation Clawback Policy, share ownership guidelines, and prohibitions regarding hedging and short sales of Encana equity;
|
|
☑
|
|
Provide executives the opportunity to convert a portion of annual Bonus awards to DSUs, which do not vest or pay out
until employment with Encana ceases, and the value of which is based on our share price performance; and
|
|
☑
|
|
Ensure that our program encourages the right behaviours, and discourages imprudent risks that could have a material
adverse impact on Encana, including through the use of sound compensation governance and risk-management practices.
|
|
What We Dont Do:
☒
|
|
No executive employment contracts with multi-year guaranteed pay increases, Bonus awards or LTI grants;
|
|
☒
|
|
No CIC or termination payments in excess of
two-times
cash pay multiple for our
executives, including our CEO;
|
|
☒
|
|
No
re-pricing,
option exchanges, or cancellations of LTI award grants;
|
|
☒
|
|
No
gross-up
of executive compensation, including perquisites or incentive awards,
to account for taxes; and
|
|
☒
|
|
No excessive contracts, severance packages or guaranteed compensation for our executives, including our CEO.
|
|
38
Compensation Elements
Annual TDC for our executives consists of base salary, target Bonus award opportunity, and LTI award grant date value. Executives generally participate
in the same pension and benefit plans as our other employees, but receive limited additional perquisites which are comparable with those provided by our Compensation Peer Group. The elements of annual TDC for our executives are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element
|
|
Form of Award
|
|
Performance Period
|
|
Payout (Fixed or
At-Risk)
|
Base Salary
|
|
Cash
|
|
One year
|
|
Fixed
|
Annual Bonus
|
|
Cash, election to defer 25 percent or
50 percent into DSUs
|
|
One year
|
|
At risk and variable. Award value based on
Company Scorecard results, which measures performance relative to Board-approved, key operational, financial and strategic metrics. Award based 75 percent on Company Scorecard results and 25 percent on individual performance results (CEO
and other ELT members).
|
LTIs
|
|
PSUs
|
|
Three years (cliff vested)
|
|
At risk and variable. Realized value determined by our TSR performance
relative to PSU Performance Peer Group, as well as achievement of Strategic Milestones (beginning in 2016). Settled in cash.
|
|
Stock Options/Stock
Appreciation Rights
(SARs)
|
|
Seven-year term (vests 30/30/40 percent over three years) (Grants prior to 2015 have a five-year term)
|
|
At risk and variable. Realized value based on appreciation in share price
relative to original grant price. May be settled as shares (Options only) or cash (Options or SARs).
|
|
RSUs
|
|
Three years (cliff vested)
|
|
Partially at risk. Realized value based
on our share price performance. Settled in cash.
|
Base Salary
Base salary is fixed pay that reflects an individuals scope of responsibilities, experience, performance and internal equity considerations. It is
also informed by competitive data from our Compensation Peer Group. Annual base salary recommendations are developed by the HRC Committee and approved by the Board each February.
For 2016, base salaries for our NEOs were approved by the Board at its February 2016 meeting. At that meeting, the Board determined to maintain NEO base
salaries at their existing (2015) levels. For Mr. Suttles, the Board approved a change to the currency of his annual compensation, including base salary, from Canadian to U.S. dollars. This change was approved to remove the ongoing
currency fluctuations that have impacted Mr. Suttles compensation since his appointment as CEO in 2013 and is intended to keep Mr. Suttles, a U.S. citizen, whole relative to the original agreement at the time of hire. Details
regarding the 2016 base salaries of our NEOs are provided in the 2016 Compensation Decisions section on page 46.
Annual Bonus
Plan
All employees, including our executives, are eligible to participate in our annual Bonus plan. The plan provides each employee with an
opportunity to earn a cash award based on the achievement of: (i) annual operational, financial and strategic performance measures, as contained in our Company Scorecard; and (ii) individual role-specific performance objectives for
the year.
All employees set individual performance objectives with their leader at the beginning of each year. Individual performance relative to
these objectives is subsequently assessed through
mid-year
and
year-end
reviews. For Mr. Suttles and other members of the ELT, individual performance is assessed by
the Board at its February meeting immediately following the performance year. At this meeting, Encanas prior-year performance relative to Company Scorecard metrics is also assessed by the Board.
39
Annual Bonus award opportunity is expressed as a range of minimum, target and maximum eligibility,
expressed as a percentage of base salary. Bonus award opportunity is capped at a maximum of two times (or 200 percent) Bonus award target. For our NEOs, the range of potential Bonus award opportunities in 2016 is illustrated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Base Salary (%)
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
Doug Suttles
President & Chief Executive Officer
|
|
0
|
|
125
|
|
250
|
Sherri Brillon
Executive Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer
|
|
0
|
|
75
|
|
150
|
Mike McAllister
Executive Vice-President & Chief Operating Officer
|
|
0
|
|
90
|
|
180
|
David Hill
Executive Vice-President, Exploration & Business Development
|
|
0
|
|
60
|
|
120
|
Renee Zemljak
Executive Vice-President, Midstream, Marketing & Fundamentals
|
|
0
|
|
60
|
|
120
|
The respective weighting of Company Scorecard results and individual performance varies based on an employees role
and level of responsibility. As our executives have greater ability to influence overall corporate results, their Bonus award opportunity is more heavily weighted to Company Scorecard results. For 2016, Bonus award opportunity for Mr. Suttles
and other members of the ELT was weighted: (i) 75 percent to approved Company Scorecard results (the Company Score); and (ii) 25 percent to individual performance results (Individual Score). This framework
is illustrated below:
2016 Company Scorecard
Shortly after the announcement of our new corporate strategy in late 2013, the Board approved a new Company Scorecard. This Company Scorecard was
designed to align the annual Bonus award opportunity with key performance measures integral to the execution of our strategy. Annual Bonus award opportunity for all employees, including our ELT members, is determined based on these same performance
measures.
The Board carefully examines the Company Scorecard framework each year relative to our current business objectives and progress in the
execution of our strategy. Given the significant progress achieved by Encana in transforming its portfolio since 2014, the Board approved an updated Company Scorecard for 2016, including two adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Performance
|
|
Increased Total Capital from 10% to 15%, resulting in a 55% combined weighting.
|
|
|
Major
Milestones
|
|
Replaced Portfolio Transition with Major
Milestones, comprised of four key metrics integrally aligned with the execution of key elements of our strategy for 2016.
|
40
For 2016, the Company Scorecard consists of three performance categories and nine corresponding metrics
aligned with our strategy, as follows:
An integral component of our performance is Safety. Our Company Scorecard therefore incorporates a Safety
Modifier, consisting of a fixed discretionary range of
-20 percent
to +10 percent of approved Company Scorecard results, to recognize our environmental, health and safety performance during the year.
The Safety Modifier is determined at the February Board meeting, to recognize significant achievements or misses. The Company Scorecard also incorporates a Board Discretion Modifier, representing a fixed discretionary range of
-25%
to +25%, to enable unforeseen or unusual circumstances that may arise during the year to be addressed, as necessary, by the Board. Most recently, the Board applied negative discretion to our 2015 performance
year, as recommended by Management, reducing the Company Scorecard from the calculated 131 score to 120, in recognition of challenging industry conditions.
41
|
2016 Company Scorecard Results
|
Results of our 2016 Company Scorecard were reviewed by the Board at its February 2017 meeting. At that meeting, the Board
carefully examined results in each Company Scorecard category. All performance Company Scorecard metrics were achieved or exceeded, resulting in a calculated 2016 Company Score of 159, as illustrated in the table below.
Specific operating performance and balance sheet strength highlights are outlined under Compensation Discussion
& Analysis Key Performance Highlights and are discussed further in the Annual Report. Highlights for Major Milestones include:
|
|
|
Exceeded target for capital productivity
. Total calendar year production efficiency is 14 percent lower than
target;
|
|
|
|
Exceeded target for cost transformation
. Direct operational expense was reduced by more than 26 percent in 2016,
a full year ahead of target;
|
|
|
|
Achieved culture, people and leadership milestones
. Succession planning was completed for all levels of
management as well as all key technical positions; and
|
|
|
|
Achieved process safety milestones
.
Process safety practices were integrated and communicated across the
Company and process safety system targets were set.
|
The Board
considered the above calculated scorecard results and carefully examined Encanas strong 2016 safety performance. In light of Encanas safety performance results, which yielded the safest year in the Companys history, the Board
applied a Safety Modifier, exercising upward discretion of 10 percent to approve a final Company Score of 175.
2016 NEO Bonus Awards
The approved 2016 Company Score is applied to determine 75 percent of the 2016 Bonus awards for Mr. Suttles and other members of the ELT. The
remaining 25 percent is based on approved Individual Score results. Such results were recommended by the HRC Committee and approved by the Board at the February 2017 meeting.
Consistent with the 2016 Company Score, the Board carefully reviewed calculated Individual Score results of each executive.
In determining Mr. Suttles 2016 Bonus award, the Board applied the final Company Score of 175 and, in recognition of his strong leadership and
individual performance achievements in 2016, applied an Individual Score of 200, representing a final 2016 Bonus award of $2,495,945
,
representing a total combined Bonus of 181 percent of his Bonus target. Details regarding the 2016
performance of Mr. Suttles and each remaining NEO are provided starting at page 46.
6
|
Total Costs is defined as transportation and processing expense, operating expense, excluding long-term incentive costs,
administrative expense, excluding restructuring and long-term incentive costs, and capitalized indirect costs, excluding long-term incentive costs.
|
42
Long-Term Incentive Awards
Consistent with our
pay-for-performance
approach, LTI award grants
represent the largest proportion of target executive pay. Such grants are designed to encourage shareholder alignment by rewarding our executives based on long-term increases to our share price.
For 2016, annual executive LTI award grants consisted of a mix of PSUs, Options/SARs and RSUs. Value realized by our executives from these LTI award
grants is tied directly to our share price performance on both an absolute and relative basis.
Annual executive LTI award grants are reviewed by the
HRC Committee and approved by the Board at its February meeting. In determining the value of such grants, the HRC Committee reviews individual performance, retention risk, internal equity and overall market competitiveness. The target and actual
realizable value of previously awarded LTI award grants are generally not considered when determining new annual grants.
For 2016, annual LTI award
grants to Mr. Suttles and other members of the ELT consisted of: (i) 50 percent PSUs; (ii) 25 percent Options/SARs; and (iii) 25 percent RSUs. All PSU and RSU grants, or 75 percent of annual executive LTI award
grants, are cliff vested, meaning that all vesting or payout, as applicable, is fully deferred for three years from the grant date. Details regarding LTI awards made to our NEOs in 2016 are found in the 2016 Compensation
Decisions section starting on page 46.
Performance Share Units
2016 PSU Performance Measures
PSUs represented
50 percent of the value of annual LTI award grants to our executives in 2016. We have used relative TSR as the performance measure for these grants since 2013. In 2016, introduction of a new performance measure was approved by the Board to
balance the use of an external, relative metric (relative TSR) with an internal, absolute metric directly linked to the current stage of the execution of our strategy. This new performance measure category, which represents 50 percent of our
2016 PSU grant, consists of the following three metrics: Margin Growth (20%), Balance Sheet Strength (20%) and Portfolio (10%) (the Strategic Milestones). We believe that Strategic Milestones reflect the evolution of the execution of our
strategy, as we move our focus from the transformation of our portfolio to delivering efficient and profitable growth from our business and our assets. Relative TSR continues to represent 50 percent of our 2016 PSU grants.
Vesting eligibility of PSU grants is based on Encanas performance (from both a relative TSR and Strategic Milestones perspective) and is measured
over a three-year period relative to Encanas performance peers (relative TSR) and internal execution against Strategic Milestones.
PSU Grants (2014-2016):
Relative TSR
PSU grants to our NEOs in 2014 and 2015 used relative TSR as the sole performance metric. As noted above, relative TSR made up
50 percent of the performance measures of PSU grants made in 2016.
For purposes of determining vesting eligibility of PSU grants, we measure
our TSR performance relative to our PSU Performance Peer Group which represents those companies in our industry against which we benchmark our performance relative to our financial and business objectives and opportunities.
For all PSU grants, vesting eligibility is assessed by the Board based on Encanas TSR performance relative to the PSU Performance Peer Group over
the preceding three-year performance period. Vesting eligibility is determined based on Encanas ranking relative to the group, based on the following scale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-Year TSR
Ranking*
|
|
Below P25
|
|
P25
|
|
P50
|
|
P75
|
|
P90/Above
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payout Multiplier
(% Original PSU Grant)
|
|
0
|
|
0.5 times
|
|
1 times
|
|
1.5 times
|
|
2 times
|
*
|
Encanas approved TSR performance relative to PSU Performance Peer Group. Results between performance thresholds
are interpolated.
|
43
Our PSU Performance Peer Group
Selection criteria is carefully tailored to meet Encanas unique business operations and cross-border North American nature. The PSU Performance
Peer Group was
re-examined
by the HRC Committee in late 2015 and the PSU Performance Peer Group purposefully selected and approved based on the following criteria:
|
|
|
|
|
|
PSU Performance Peer Group: Selection
Criteria
|
|
|
|
Similar market capitalization
(between 0.5x and 2.0x Encana)
|
|
North American headquartered
|
|
Material natural gas interests
|
|
|
|
Upstream exploration and production
|
|
Operating in similar plays in North America
|
|
Development of unconventional resources
|
The HRC Committee approved the following PSU Performance Peer Group to apply to PSU grants made commencing in 2016.
Assessment of the PSUs granted in 2016 will be made at the Boards February 2019 meeting, based on performance for the calendar years 2016 to 2018, inclusive.
|
|
|
|
PSU Performance Peer Group (2016 Grants)
|
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
Antero Resources Corporation
Apache Corporation
Baytex Energy Corporation
Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Concho Resources Inc.
Continental Resources, Inc.
Crescent Point Energy Corporation
Enerplus Corporation
Devon Energy Corporation
EOG Resources, Inc.
|
|
EP Energy Corporation
Hess Corporation
Murphy Oil Corporation
Newfield Exploration Company
Noble Energy, Inc.
Marathon Oil Corporation
Penn West Petroleum Limited
Pengrowth Energy Corporation
Pioneer Natural Resources Company
Southwestern Energy Company
Range Resources Corporation
Vermilion Energy Inc.
Whiting Petroleum Corporation
|
For PSU grants made to our NEOs in 2014 and 2015, the PSU Performance Peer Group is as follows:
|
|
|
|
PSU Performance Peer Group (2014-2015 Grants)
|
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
|
|
Devon Energy Corporation
|
Apache Corporation
|
|
Marathon Oil Corporation
|
Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation
|
|
Noble Energy, Inc.
|
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
|
|
Pioneer Natural Resources Company
|
Chesapeake Energy Corporation
|
|
Range Resources Corporation
|
Concho Resources Inc.
|
|
Southwestern Energy Company
|
EOG Resources, Inc.
|
|
|
Vesting and payout of 2014 PSU grants were assessed by the Board at its February 2017 meeting. At that meeting, the HRC
Committee reviewed Encanas TSR performance from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2016, relative to the applicable PSU Performance Peer Group. In particular, the HRC Committee noted Encanas performance resulted in a three-year
Relative TSR ranking of the 46
th
percentile for the performance period. In light of this result, the HRC Committee recommended, and the Board approved, a PSU Payout Multiplier of 92.9 percent
resulting in a payout of 73 percent of the original expected value for eligible participants, including eligible executives, in respect of such grant.
For more information on our PSU Plan, see Equity Compensation Plan Information in Schedule A.
44
Stock Options and SARs
Options represented 25 percent of the target value of annual LTI award grants to our executives in 2016. Option grants are made under our Employee
Stock Option Plan (ESOP). In lieu of Options, our U.S. based employees, including Mr. Hill and Ms. Zemljak, receive SARs under our Employee Stock Appreciation Rights Plan (ESAR Plan). As the potential to realize any
value requires an increase in our share price relative to the grant price, we believe that these grants represent performance-based, or
at-risk
compensation, and align our executives
interests with those of our shareholders by rewarding increases in long-term shareholder value. We also grant Options/SARs to remain market-competitive and to encourage retention.
Options/SARs granted in 2015 and 2016 have a seven-year term and vest over three years based on a schedule of 30/30/40 percent. Options/SARs granted
prior to 2015 have a five-year term and have the same vesting schedule. The grant (or strike) price is based on volume-weighted average price (VWAP) of our Common Shares on the TSX (for Canadian grantees) or NYSE (for U.S. grantees) on
the five trading days immediately prior to the grant date (the Grant Price). In the event of a trading blackout, the Grant Price is based on the VWAP of a Common Share on the five trading days immediately following the end of the
blackout. Encana does not re-price, and has not
re-priced,
any Options/SARs.
More information regarding our
ESOP and ESAR Plans is provided in the Equity Compensation Plan Information in Schedule A.
Restricted Share Units
RSUs represented 25 percent of the value of annual LTI award grants to our executives in 2016. Such grants are designed to encourage
increases in our share price, assist with retention and remain competitive within our Compensation Peer Group. RSUs are granted to employees in Canada and the U.S. under our RSU Plan.
RSUs have a notional value equivalent to the value of a Common Share. Similar to PSUs, RSU grants are cliff vested such that any vesting or
payout, as applicable, is deferred for three years from the grant date. RSUs are settled in cash, based on the closing price of our Common Shares on the TSX or NYSE, as applicable, on the trading day immediately prior to the vesting date. For grants
commencing in 2016, the settlement value will be calculated based on the VWAP of our Common Shares on the TSX or NYSE (as applicable) on the five trading days immediately prior to the vesting date. More information on our RSU Plan is provided in the
Equity Compensation Plan Information in Schedule A.
45
|
2016 Compensation Decisions
|
The following describes the key accomplishments and corresponding compensation decisions reached by the Board in respect
of each of our NEOs in 2016. All amounts are presented in U.S. dollars. Amounts paid or awarded in Canadian dollars have been converted to U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate for 2016 of C$1.00 = US$0.755, based on the daily noon buying
rate published by the Bank of Canada.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DOUG SUTTLES, President & Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Suttles is responsible for the overall success of Encana and for creating, planning, implementing and integrating our strategic vision. This
includes overall responsibility for operating and growing Encanas business while managing risk to achieve our goal of growing shareholder value through our strategy of disciplined focus on profitable growth.
|
|
|
2016 Performance
|
|
In 2016, Mr. Suttles led
the achievement of Encanas overall performance as described in the 2016 Company Scorecard Results section starting at page 42. Mr. Suttles also achieved the following individual performance goals:
Led the Company in doubling its share price
Adjusted capital programs, made significant cost reductions and improved capital efficiency while
preserving strategy
Drove company strategy and returned the Company to growth
Actively engaged with shareholders and the market, communicating Encana performance and
strategy
Continued to drive cultural change throughout the organization consistent with Encana
strategy
Enhanced the Companys leadership development process and advanced key succession
plans
|
2016 Compensation
|
|
Annual
base salary $1,100,000, effective April 1, 2016
Annual Bonus award opportunity based
75 percent on 2016 Company Score and 25 percent on Individual Score
Bonus Target
125 percent base salary, opportunity to receive up to maximum two times Bonus Target (or 250 percent base salary) for outstanding performance
2016 Bonus award of $2,495,945, representing 181 percent of Bonus Target
2016 LTI award grant date fair value $9,507,835, comprised of 43 percent PSUs, 36 percent
Options and 21 percent RSUs
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
Bonus Award
|
|
LTI Award
|
|
Total
|
|
Performance-
Based
|
|
$1,100,000
|
|
$2,495,945
|
|
$9,507,835
|
|
$13,103,780
|
|
92%
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHERRI BRILLON, Executive Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer
Ms. Brillon is responsible for the overall direction and stewardship of Encanas financial operations and ensuring Encana has the financial
resources in place to execute on our strategy. Sherris expertise on investment opportunities and resource allocation has been pivotal in the transition of Encanas portfolio to increase margin on its assets through focused capital
allocation and multiple divestitures and acquisitions.
|
2016 Performance
|
|
In 2016, Ms. Brillon
contributed to the achievement of Encanas overall performance as described in the 2016 Company Scorecard Results section starting at page 42. In addition, she achieved the following individual performance goals:
Led development of the five-year growth plan announced in October 2016
Instrumental in reducing debt over 20 percent including the repurchase of debt and the issuance of
equity
Advanced leadership development across the Finance team
Provided leadership to Investor Relations including the successful Montney and five-year growth
plan investor events
|
2016 Compensation
|
|
Annual base salary $441,675
Annual Bonus award opportunity based 75 percent on 2016 Company Score and 25 percent on
Individual Score
Bonus Target 75 percent base salary, with opportunity to receive to
maximum of two times Bonus Target (or 150 percent base salary) for outstanding performance
2016 Bonus award $579,698
2016 LTI award grant date fair value $1,907,721, comprised of 46 percent PSUs, 23 percent
Options and 32 percent RSUs
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
Bonus Award
|
|
LTI Award
|
|
Total
|
|
Performance-
Based
|
|
$441,675
|
|
$579,698
|
|
$1,907,721
|
|
$2,929,094
|
|
85%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MIKE MCALLISTER, Executive Vice-President & Chief Operating Officer
Mr. McAllister is responsible for Encanas upstream and production activities across our North American assets. He is responsible for leveraging
our
top-tier
plays, relentlessly pursuing greater efficiency and operational excellence, and optimizing base production to reduce costs, increase netbacks and enhance our profitability. Mr. McAllister is
also responsible for our EH&S performance.
|
|
|
2016 Performance
|
|
In 2016, Mr. McAllister contributed to the achievement of Encanas
overall performance as described in the 2016 Company Scorecard Results section starting at page 42. In addition, he achieved the following individual performance goals:
Delivered the best safety performance in company history
Reduced per barrels of oil (BOE) operating costs by greater than 20 percent
Mitigated core asset decline to less than five percent
Played a key leadership role in advancing diversity as executive sponsor for the Encana
Womens Network
|
|
|
2016 Compensation
|
|
Annual base salary
$524,725
Annual Bonus award opportunity based 75 percent on 2016 Company Score and
25 percent on Individual Score
Bonus Target 90 percent base salary, with opportunity
to receive up to a maximum of two times Bonus Target (or 180 percent base salary) for outstanding performance
2016 Bonus award $844,151
2016 LTI award grant date fair value $2,503,037, comprised of 45 percent PSUs, 32 percent
Options and 23 percent RSUs
|
|
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
Bonus Award
|
|
LTI Award
|
|
Total
|
|
Performance-
Based
|
|
|
|
$524,725
|
|
$844,151
|
|
$2,503,037
|
|
$3,871,913
|
|
86%
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DAVID HILL, Executive Vice-President, Exploration & Business Development
Mr. Hill is responsible for our Exploration and Business Development portfolios, including the exploration of new and emerging plays to ensure Encana
remains a leader in identifying and securing a
top-tier
resource portfolio.
|
|
|
2016 Performance
|
|
In 2016, Mr. Hill contributed to the achievement of Encanas overall
performance as described in the 2016 Company Scorecard Results section starting at page 42. In addition, he achieved the following individual performance goals:
Successfully executed key divestments including the DJ Basin and Gordondale
assets
Led the development and implementation of the Depletion Planning Process and
internalization of the reserves evaluation process
Supported new play development
including advancing the Austin Chalk and Montney liquids potential
Enhanced core asset
acreage through an effective acreage swap and
bolt-on
program
Played an integral role in piloting advancements to the Companys leadership development
process
|
|
|
2016 Compensation
|
|
Annual base salary
$450,000
Annual Bonus award opportunity based 75 percent on 2016 Company Score and
25 percent on Individual Score
Bonus Target 60 percent base salary, with
opportunity to receive up to maximum two times Bonus Target (or 120 percent base salary) for outstanding performance
2016 Bonus award $465,750
2016 LTI award grant date fair value $1,515,129, comprised of 50 percent PSUs,
25 percent SARs and 25 percent RSUs
|
|
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
Bonus Award
|
|
LTI Award
|
|
Total
|
|
Performance-
Based
|
|
|
|
$450,000
|
|
$465,750
|
|
$1,515,129
|
|
$2,430,879
|
|
81%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RENEE ZEMLJAK, Executive Vice-President, Midstream, Marketing & Fundamentals
Ms. Zemljak is responsible for marketing Encanas natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids, as well as execution of all commercial
midstream negotiations. She is also responsible for leading an energy fundamentals team focused on the assessment of global energy, markets and trends, executing a comprehensive commodity price risk management program and contributing to the overall
strategic direction of Encana. Her leadership has been instrumental in the development and execution of Encanas strategic plan as it relates to capital allocation, portfolio management and revenue maximization.
|
2016 Performance
|
|
In 2016, Ms. Zemljak
contributed to the achievement of Encanas overall performance as described in the 2016 Company Scorecard Results section starting at page 42. In addition, she achieved the following individual performance goals:
Delivered significant cost reductions in transportation and processing costs
including successfully renegotiating the Rockies Express pipeline transportation contract
Enhanced realized commodity prices through a very effective marketing program
Successfully developed and executed the commodity hedge program to reduce balance sheet risk
and support the capital program
Created midstream options to enhance value and reduce
risks with future developments
Provided leadership to commercial skill development in our
leadership development program
|
2016 Compensation
|
|
Annual base salary $490,000
Annual Bonus award opportunity based 75 percent on 2016 Company Score and
25 percent on Individual Score
Bonus Target 60 percent base salary, with
opportunity to receive up to maximum two times Bonus Target (or 120 percent base salary) for outstanding performance
2016 Bonus award $507,150
2016 LTI award grant date fair value $1,605,585, comprised of 47 percent PSUs,
30 percent SARs and 23 percent RSUs
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
Bonus Award
|
|
LTI Award
|
|
Total
|
|
Performance-
Based
|
|
$490,000
|
|
$507,150
|
|
$1,605,585
|
|
$2,602,735
|
|
81%
|
48
|
Other Compensation Elements
|
Pension and Retirement Benefits
Our NEOs participate in the same pension and retirement plans as other U.S. and Canadian employees. Mr. Suttles, Ms. Brillon and
Mr. McAllister participate in our Canadian retirement program, which consists of:
|
|
|
defined contribution (DC) registered and supplemental pension (Mr. Suttles and Ms. Brillon);
|
|
|
|
legacy defined benefit (DB) registered and supplemental pension (closed to new members since 2003)
(Mr. McAllister); and
|
|
|
|
investment plan (consisting of registered and
non-registered
investment options)
(Mr. Suttles, Ms. Brillon and Mr. McAllister).
|
Mr. Hill and Ms. Zemljak participate in our U.S. retirement program,
which consists of:
|
|
|
a combined 401(k) plan and DC pension plan; and
|
|
|
|
non-qualified
deferred compensation plan.
|
Detailed information regarding pension and retirement arrangements for our NEOs is found in the Retirement Benefits section starting on
page 56.
Executive Benefits
Executives participate in the same Company-sponsored benefit programs as our other employees, based on the country in which they reside. Additional
benefits were provided to Mr. Suttles as part of his compensation arrangements upon his appointment as CEO in 2013. These benefits were intended to encourage Mr. Suttles timely relocation to Calgary, Alberta and to facilitate the
efficient management of his personal commitments as a U.S. citizen. These benefits include: (i) a prescribed-value annual travel bank for personal travel on Company aircraft; and (ii) two round-trip business class flights per year. These
benefits are treated as employment income and are fully taxable. Mr. Suttles receives no tax
gross-ups
or loans in respect of the travel bank, and any unused balance at year end is forfeited and
cancelled. Further details of these benefits are included under the All Other Compensation column for Mr. Suttles in the Summary Compensation Table on page 53.
Executive Perquisites
Our executives receive
limited executive perquisites that are consistent with those provided within our Compensation Peer Group. These perquisites consist of an annual prescribed allowance to be used for: (i) personal benefits; (ii) financial counseling and tax
services; (iii) club membership fees; or (iv) annual executive medical examination to encourage good health. Further details of these perquisites are included in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation
Table on page 53.
Employee Deferred Share Unit Plan
Under the Employee Deferred Share Unit Plan (Employee DSU Plan), executives can elect to convert either 25 percent or 50 percent of
their annual Bonus award into DSUs. DSU holdings are intended to encourage shareholder alignment and assist executives to achieve required equity ownership levels.
To defer a portion of their annual Bonus award into DSUs, an executive must elect prior to December 31 of the preceding calendar year. Such
elections, once made, are irrevocable. Once an election is made, the number of DSUs credited to an executive is calculated as follows:
DSUs are payable only following an executives cessation of employment. DSUs are settled in cash and attract
additional DSUs equivalent to dividends payable on our Common Shares. Ms. Brillon elected to convert a portion of her 2016 Bonus award into DSUs.
Termination and
Change-in-Control
Arrangements
Encana currently does not have employment contracts with our NEOs that outline payment of severance or certain benefits for any termination other than
CIC. As a result, provisions applicable to terminations provisions outside of a CIC are
49
determined at the time of termination based on the specific situation. Each NEO, including Mr. Suttles, has a written
Change-in-Control
Agreement (CIC Agreement) that provides for payment of severance and certain benefits in the event of both: (i) a CIC of Encana; and
(ii) subsequent termination of the NEOs employment by the Company (other than for Cause) or the executive for Good Reason within a
24-month
period. In this context,
Good Reason means a material alteration in the executives role or duties, required relocation or a reduction in compensation or benefits from those received prior to the CIC. Such arrangements are commonly referred to as
double trigger, as both a CIC and a subsequent termination of employment are required in order to trigger the cash severance and related benefit obligations under the CIC Agreements.
Our LTI plans, which apply to all eligible employees, including our NEOs, also have CIC provisions. Other than the CEOs LTI award
sign-on
grant, which is double trigger, these provisions provide that upon a CIC, vesting of previously unvested LTIs accelerates and they become exercisable or vested, as applicable. Such provisions are
commonly referred to as single trigger provisions.
Under our executive CIC Agreements, the treatment of unvested LTI awards defaults to
the CIC provisions of our LTI plans, which are single trigger.
CIC Agreement Terms
The relevant terms of our executive CIC Agreements (and, as applicable, LTI plans, excepted as noted herein) are summarized in the table below.
|
|
|
NEO CIC Agreement Terms
|
APPLIES TO
|
|
CEO and all other
ELT members
|
TRIGGER
|
|
CIC and subsequent
termination of executives employment either (within 24 months thereafter) by Company (other than for Cause) or by executive for Good Reason
|
SEVERANCE
|
|
Lump sum cash
payment equal to two times the sum of the NEOs base salary, annual allowance and annual Bonus award (based on average Bonus award paid over the preceding three years)
|
BENEFITS
|
|
Continuation (or
lump sum payment in lieu) of medical, dental and insurance benefits and other perquisites such as value of matching contributions to the respective investment plan for
24-month
period
|
PENSION
|
|
Continued accrual
or payment of contributions (for DC pension plan participants) or, for Mr. McAllister, continued accrual of DB pension benefits for
24-month
period
|
OPTIONS/SARs
|
|
Under the ESOP and
ESAR Plan, upon a CIC only, all unvested Options/SARs vest immediately and remain exercisable until the earlier of (i) 24 months and (ii) the expiry date
|
PSUs
|
|
Under the PSU Plan,
upon a CIC only, all outstanding PSUs immediately vest and become payable. Any outstanding PSUs that have not yet satisfied their performance criteria would be valued based on target (or 100 percent) relative TSR and would be payable based on the
price at which Common Shares are valued for purposes of the CIC transaction(s) or, if no such CIC transaction(s), based on average closing price of Common Shares during the 30 days prior to CIC
|
RSUs
|
|
Under the RSU
Plan, upon a CIC only, any unvested RSUs immediately vest and are payable based on the price at which Common Shares are valued for purposes of the CIC transactions(s) or, if no such CIC transaction(s), the average market value of such Common Shares
during the 30 days prior to the CIC
|
|
Changes to Our Program for 2017
|
The Board regularly evaluates our program to ensure that it remains aligned with our strategic objectives, feedback
received from our shareholders and compensation best practices. Consistent with these efforts, the Board approved the following change to our program, applicable to compensation in 2017:
|
|
|
2017 Company Scorecard:
updated to reflect our 2017 strategic priorities. Specifically, this involves increased
emphasis on net debt, total costs and operating margin, replacing the Major Milestones category from the 2016 Company Scorecard.
|
Human Resources and Compensation Committee
The HRC Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in its oversight of our executive compensation program and practices. In 2016, our HRC Committee
members were Suzanne P. Nimocks (Chairperson), Fred J. Fowler, Margaret A. McKenzie, Lee A. McIntire and Bruce G. Waterman. Mr. Clayton H. Woitas, the Chairman of our Board, serves as an
ex
officio
HRC Committee
member. The HRC Committee is composed entirely of independent directors and operates independently from management.
50
With extensive expertise in the areas of compensation, corporate governance, finance, human resources,
leadership, and risk-management, our HRC Committee members have the necessary education, experience and skills required to discharge their responsibilities regarding executive compensation matters. For more information regarding the expertise and
the professional experience of our HRC Committee members, please refer to the Director Skills and Experience matrix at page 5.
Specific
responsibilities of the HRC Committee are outlined in its Mandate, available at
www.encana.com
. To assist the discharge of its Mandate, the HRC Committee follows an annual work plan of business items to address at each meeting. Among
the primary responsibilities of the HRC Committee is the development of annual compensation recommendations for our ELT members. Once developed, the HRC Committee provides these recommendations to the Board for review and, as appropriate, approval.
Specific responsibilities of the HRC Committee include the following:
|
|
|
reviewing and recommending to the Board, for
approval, annual corporate and individual performance objectives relevant to compensation for the CEO
|
|
evaluation and approval of peer groups used to
assess the competitiveness of our compensation program
reviewing and recommending to the Board, for
approval, succession plans for our ELT members
monitoring executive equity ownership under our share
ownership guidelines
reviewing and recommending to the Board, for
approval,
Encanas annual compensation disclosure
reviewing and recommending to the Board, for
approval, annual pension funding matters
|
reviewing and recommending to the Board, for approval, CEO
performance relative to previously approved corporate and individual performance objectives for purposes of determining annual CEO compensation
|
|
reviewing the recommendations of the CEO regarding prior-year
performance and current year annual compensation for remaining ELT members, and recommending to the Board, for approval
|
|
assessing and recommending to the Board, for approval, prior-year
Company performance results for purposes of determining annual Bonus award eligibility and LTI award vesting eligibility under performance-based LTI plans
|
|
The HRC Committee held four regularly scheduled meetings in 2016. At the end of each scheduled meeting, the HRC Committee
holds an in-camera session, without management present. These in-camera sessions are attended by the HRC Committees independent compensation advisor.
Independent Compensation Advisor
The HRC
Committee retains F.W. Cook as its independent compensation advisor to provide objective, specialized expertise on executive compensation matters. F.W. Cook reports directly to the HRC Committee Chairperson, Ms. Nimocks, and performs all
services under the direction of the HRC Committee. Where the advisor is requested to provide services in consultation with management, such services are
pre-approved
by and performed under the direction of
Ms. Nimocks. F.W. Cook provides no other services to Encana or its management. F.W. Cook provides independent analysis and perspective to the HRC Committee in respect of the following:
|
|
|
review and discussion of materials prepared by management with the
HRC Committee Chairperson and HRC Committee prior to each meeting
independent analysis of annual total direct compensation recommendations for individual
ELT members, including relative to competitive market data
|
|
independent analysis of the competitiveness of our program relative
to our Compensation Peer Group
regular evaluation and identification of areas of potential compensation-related risk
in our program
emerging regulatory and compensation best practices
|
In 2016 and 2015, the HRC Committees independent compensation advisor received the following fees for executive
compensation-related and other services provided to management:
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Compensation Advisor
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Executive Compensation-Related Fees
|
|
$164,982
|
|
$105,217
|
|
|
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
|
|
Management Consultants
Management engages Willis Towers Watson (Towers) to provide pension-related services, including as actuary to our Canadian pension plans.
Management also retains Towers from time to time to provide competitive market data regarding
51
our program and employee benefit programs. In 2016 and 2015, Towers received the following fees for executive compensation-related and other services provided to management:
|
|
|
|
|
Willis Towers Watson
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Executive Compensation-Related Fees
|
|
$30,108
|
|
$58,061
|
|
|
|
All Other Fees
|
|
$971,055
|
|
$1,241,932
|
Compensation Risk Management
The Board is committed to the identification and mitigation of compensation-related risk. The HRC Committee has adopted a structured approach to
compensation risk, designed to discourage inadvertent undue risk taking by: (i) incorporating risk management principles directly into our program design; (ii) active consideration of risk as a key element of compensation decision-making;
and (iii) concluding regular comprehensive compensation program risk assessments of our program. Specific examples of how our program incorporates compensation risk management include:
|
✓
|
|
use of balanced, operational and financial performance metrics in our Board-approved Company Scorecard;
|
|
✓
|
|
use of balanced mix of vehicles in our annual LTI award grants;
|
|
✓
|
|
deferral of all vesting and payout of 85 percent of annual executive LTI award grants for a three-year period; and
|
|
✓
|
|
vesting and payout maximums (or caps) in our PSU grants.
|
We believe these features reduce risk by diversifying rewards, scenarios and eliminating reliance on any single or limited number of performance measures
to determine executive incentive compensation. Risk is also managed through the consistent application of our program, which applies to all employees, including our executives.
Compensation-related risk is also mitigated through our corporate governance practices, which include share ownership guidelines, an Incentive
Compensation Clawback Policy and prohibitions regarding hedging of equity awards, all of which apply to incentive-based compensation granted to our executives.
Executive Share Ownership Guidelines
Encana
has had share ownership guidelines since 2002. The share ownership guidelines require our executives and designated Vice-Presidents to achieve minimum share ownership levels within a five-year period of appointment to their position. If a
participant is promoted, resulting in an increased target, the participant is given an additional
two-year
period to meet the new target.
Targets are calculated as a multiple of base salary, with share ownership calculated based on the aggregate value of: (i) owned Common Shares
(including beneficial ownership); (ii) unvested RSUs; and (iii) DSU holdings. The HRC Committee reviews the status of executive equity ownership under the share ownership guidelines on an annual basis.
The status of our NEOs share ownership as at December 31, 2016 is provided below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership Requirement
(Multiple of Base Salary)
|
|
|
Current Ownership
(Multiple of Base Salary)
|
|
|
|
|
Doug
Suttles,
President & Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
5 times
|
|
|
|
5.83 times
|
|
Sherri Brillon,
Executive Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
3 times
|
|
|
|
5.24 times
|
|
Mike
McAllister,
Executive Vice-President & Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
3 times
|
|
|
|
4.14 times
|
|
David
Hill,
Executive Vice-President, Exploration & Business Development
|
|
|
3 times
|
|
|
|
3.68 times
|
|
Renee Zemljak,
Executive Vice-President, Midstream, Marketing & Fundamentals
|
|
|
3 times
|
|
|
|
3.29 times
|
|
Incentive Compensation Clawback Policy
The Board adopted an Incentive Compensation Clawback Policy in 2012. Under the policy, the Board is authorized to require immediate reimbursement of all
or any portion of annual Bonus award or LTI compensation received by or payable to an executive in the event of any of the following circumstances:
|
|
|
Encana is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to material
non-compliance
with any financial reporting requirement under applicable securities laws (a Restatement);
|
|
|
|
incentive compensation received by a current or former executive in respect of years to which the Restatement pertains
exceeds the amount that would have been received by the executive under the Restatement (the Incentive Compensation); and
|
|
|
|
an executive engaged in gross negligence, intentional misconduct or fraud which either caused or significantly
contributed to the material
non-compliance
resulting in the Restatement.
|
52
Where such circumstances exist, the Board is authorized to: (i) require immediate reimbursement by the
executive to Encana for all or any Incentive Compensation previously paid; (ii) immediately terminate and forfeit any right of the executive to any Incentive Compensation (in the event not previously paid); (iii) immediately withhold or
cancel the value of any Incentive Compensation from any outstanding amounts owing to the executive (including any unvested or unexercised LTI awards) to compensate for (or
off-set)
the value against any
unrecovered Incentive Compensation amount; and/or (iv) initiate such other action against the executive as the Board may deem necessary.
No
Hedging Policy
Our Securities Trading and Insider Reporting Policy expressly prohibits directors and all employees, including executives, from
engaging in any form of equity monetization transactions (including the purchase of financial instruments to hedge or offset a decrease in value) involving the Encana securities that represent part of their LTI awards or, in respect of our
executives, Encana securities held under our share ownership guidelines.
The policy also prohibits directors and employees from engaging in the
following activities involving Encana securities:
|
|
|
selling securities they do not own, have not fully paid for or have no right to own (engaging in
a
short
sale
);
|
|
|
|
selling a call option or buying a put option;
|
|
|
|
entering into equity monetization transactions involving any securities subject to our share ownership guidelines or
that is the equivalent of short selling; and
|
|
|
|
entering into brokerage arrangements that might result in a sale at a time when he or she is not permitted
to trade.
|
2016 Compensation Details
Summary Compensation Table
The table below shows the compensation paid or awarded to each of our NEOs in each of the last three
years.
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
and Principal
Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary ($)
(2)
|
|
Stock
Awards ($)
(3)
|
|
Option
Awards ($)
(4)
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation ($)
(5)
|
|
Change in Pension value
and nonqualified deferred
compensation earnings ($)
(6)
|
|
All Other
Compensation ($)
(7)
|
|
Total
Compensation ($)
|
Doug Suttles
President & Chief Executive Officer
|
|
2016
2015
2014
|
|
1,033,973
822,384
787,276
|
|
6,117,315
4,530,021
3,397,527
|
|
3,390,520
1,510,001
1,132,501
|
|
2,495,945
1,323,609
1,778,122
|
|
|
|
234,499
292,446
329,147
|
|
13,272,252
8,478,461
7,424,573
|
Sherri Brillon
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
|
|
2016
2015
2014
|
|
441,675
441,675
439,788
|
|
1,302,380
1,302,387
1,132,529
|
|
605,341
434,126
377,502
|
|
579,698
397,508
597,918
|
|
|
|
97,160
126,798
121,999
|
|
3,026,254
2,702,494
2,669,736
|
Michael McAllister
Executive Vice-President & Chief Operating Officer
|
|
2016
2015
2014
|
|
524,725
524,725
520,950
|
|
1,698,757
1,698,764
1,698,779
|
|
804,280
566,252
566,252
|
|
844,151
566,703
876,029
|
|
1,247,813
1,414,311
|
|
66,809
68,180
77,794
|
|
5,186,535
3,424,624
5,154,115
|
David Hill
Executive Vice-President, Exploration & Business Development
|
|
2016
2015
2014
|
|
450,000
437,500
400,000
|
|
1,125,006
1,125,012
1,125,019
|
|
390,123
375,003
375,000
|
|
465,750
344,250
445,200
|
|
|
|
113,597
110,372
530,947
|
|
2,544,476
2,392,137
2,876,166
|
Renee Zemljak
Executive Vice-President, Midstream, Marketing & Fundamentals
|
|
2016
2015
2014
|
|
490,000
483,750
461,250
|
|
1,125,006
1,125,012
1,125,019
|
|
480,579
375,003
375,000
|
|
507,150
374,850
468,720
|
|
|
|
116,974
115,717
114,579
|
|
2,719,709
2,474,332
2,544,568
|
Notes:
(1)
|
All amounts are presented in U.S. dollars. Amounts paid or awarded in Canadian dollars have been converted to U.S.
dollars using an exchange rate (for each year above) of C$1.00 = US$0.755 for year-over-year comparability.
|
(2)
|
Effective April 1, 2016, the Board approved a change to the currency of Mr. Suttles annual compensation,
including base salary, from Canadian to U.S. dollars. Refer to Base Salary on page 39 for additional details.
|
(3)
|
For 2015 and 2016 RSU and PSU awards, grant date fair value is calculated by multiplying number of granted units by the
VWAP of the Common Shares on the TSX or NYSE, as applicable, on the five trading days immediately prior to the March 13, 2015 grant date (C$14.34 or US$11.35) and the March 3, 2016 grant date (C$5.56 or US$4.06), respectively. For 2014 RSU and
PSU awards, grant date fair value is calculated by multiplying number of granted units by the closing price of Common Shares on the TSX or NYSE, as applicable, on the trading day immediately prior to the February 18, 2014 grant date (C$20.35 or
US$18.51). PSU and RSU compensation expenses are accounted for on a fair value basis, as required by U.S. GAAP.
|
53
(4)
|
For 2016 Option and SAR grants, grant date fair value is determined by using a Black-Scholes-Merton Model based on
39.2 percent for Option grants and 41.5 percent for SAR grants, applied using the following assumptions: Expected Term = 7 years; Volatility = 45.31 percent (Option grants), 48.16 percent (SAR grants); Dividend Yield =
1.44 percent; Risk Free Rate = 0.51 percent. For 2015, this rate was 22.5 percent for Option grants and 23.8 percent for SAR grants, applied using the following assumptions: Expected Term = 7 years; Volatility =
29.11 percent (Option grants), 30.66 percent (SAR grants); Dividend Yield = 2.11 percent; Risk Free Rate = 0.47 percent. For 2014, this rate was 21.1 percent for Option grants and 23.0 percent for SAR grants, applied
using the following assumptions: Expected Term = 3.64 years; Volatility = 30.42 percent (Option grants), 33.20 percent (SAR grants); Dividend Yield = 1.50 percent; Risk Free Rate = 1.09 percent.
|
(5)
|
In 2015, Ms. Brillon elected to convert 25 percent of her 2016 Bonus award into DSUs. In 2014,
Mr. McAllister, Mr. Hill and Ms. Brillon elected to convert 25 percent of their 2015 Bonus award into DSUs. In 2013, Ms. Brillon and Mr. Hill elected to convert 25 percent and Ms. Zemljak elected to convert
50 percent of their respective 2014 Bonus award into DSUs. DSUs are reported in the Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Table for 2016 on page 57.
|
(6)
|
Pension Value represents the year-over-year compensatory change. Details are found in the Defined Benefit Pension
Table on page 57.
|
(7)
|
See the All Other Compensation Table below for additional information.
|
All Other Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Year
|
|
Company
Contributions to
Retirement
Plans
($)
(1)
|
|
Annual
Allowance
($)
|
|
Company
Aircraft
($)
|
|
Relocation
($)
|
|
Retention
Benefits
($)
|
|
Other
Perquisites and
Benefits
($)
(2)
|
|
Total
($)
|
Doug Suttles
|
|
2016
2015
2014
|
|
84,459
151,341
83,217
|
|
33,778
27,180
27,180
|
|
46,469
54,725
8,067
|
|
141,496
|
|
|
|
69,794
59,201
69,187
|
|
234,499
292,446
329,147
|
Sherri Brillon
|
|
2016
2015
2014
|
|
35,334
63,601
49,075
|
|
29,898
29,898
29,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,928
33,299
43,026
|
|
97,160
126,798
121,999
|
Michael McAllister
|
|
2016
2015
2014
|
|
|
|
29,898
29,898
29,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,911
38,282
47,896
|
|
66,809
68,180
77,794
|
David Hill
|
|
2016
2015
2014
|
|
72,900
69,675
51,592
|
|
38,000
38,000
38,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
2,697
2,697
41,355
|
|
113,597
110,372
530,947
|
Renee Zemljak
|
|
2016
2015
2014
|
|
76,022
74,765
73,751
|
|
38,000
38,000
38,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,952
2,952
2,828
|
|
116,974
115,717
114,579
|
Notes:
(1)
|
This column represents the matching contributions made by the Company for the benefit of the NEOs under the DC pension
plan or non-qualified deferred compensation plan. These plans are discussed in more detail in the Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Table for 2016 on page 57.
|
(2)
|
Amounts in this column include company match of respective investment plan contributions, limited personal club
memberships and taxable benefit of company parking.
|
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Type of
award
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Approval
Date
|
|
|
Estimated
future
payouts under non-equity incentive
plan awards
(1)
|
|
|
Estimated
future
payouts under equity incentive
plan awards
(2)
|
|
|
All other stock
awards: number
of shares of
stock or
units
(3)
(#)
|
|
|
All other option
awards: number
of securities
underlying
options
(4)
(#)
|
|
|
Exercise or
base price of
option
awards
(5)
($/sh)
|
|
|
Grant date fair
value of stock
and option
awards
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threshold
($)
|
|
|
Target
($)
|
|
|
Maximum
($)
|
|
|
Threshold
(#)
|
|
|
Target
(#)
|
|
|
Maximum
(#)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doug Suttles
|
|
|
RSU
PSU
Option
|
|
|
|
03/03/2016
03/03/2016
03/03/2016
|
|
|
|
02/23/2016
02/23/2016
02/23/2016
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1,292,466
|
|
|
$
|
2,584,931
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
971,511
|
|
|
|
1,943,022
|
|
|
|
485,756
|
|
|
|
2,060,433
|
|
|
$
|
5.56
|
|
|
$
$
$
|
2,039,107
4,078,209
3,390,520
|
|
Sherri Brillon
|
|
|
RSU
PSU
Option
|
|
|
|
03/03/2016
03/03/2016
03/03/2016
|
|
|
|
02/23/2016
02/23/2016
02/23/2016
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
331,256
|
|
|
$
|
662,513
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
206,835
|
|
|
|
413,670
|
|
|
|
103,418
|
|
|
|
367,868
|
|
|
$
|
5.56
|
|
|
$
$
$
|
434,128
868,252
605,341
|
|
Michael McAllister
|
|
|
RSU
PSU
Option
|
|
|
|
03/03/2016
03/03/2016
03/03/2016
|
|
|
|
02/23/2016
02/23/2016
02/23/2016
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
472,253
|
|
|
$
|
944,505
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
269,785
|
|
|
|
539,570
|
|
|
|
134,893
|
|
|
|
488,764
|
|
|
$
|
5.56
|
|
|
$
$
$
|
566,254
1,132,503
804,280
|
|
David Hill
|
|
|
RSU
PSU
Option
|
|
|
|
03/03/2016
03/03/2016
03/03/2016
|
|
|
|
02/23/2016
02/23/2016
02/23/2016
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
270,000
|
|
|
$
|
540,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
184,730
|
|
|
|
369,460
|
|
|
|
92,365
|
|
|
|
231,541
|
|
|
$
|
4.06
|
|
|
$
$
$
|
375,002
750,004
390,123
|
|
Renee Zemljak
|
|
|
RSU
PSU
Option
|
|
|
|
03/03/2016
03/03/2016
03/03/2016
|
|
|
|
02/23/2016
02/23/2016
02/23/2016
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
294,000
|
|
|
$
|
588,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
184,730
|
|
|
|
369,460
|
|
|
|
92,365
|
|
|
|
285,227
|
|
|
$
|
4.06
|
|
|
$
$
$
|
375,002
750,004
480,579
|
|
Notes:
(1)
|
The amounts shown represent the threshold, target and maximum payouts for the components of the 2016 annual Bonus
award. There are no thresholds within the design of our annual Bonus plan. Maximum represents a payout at 200% of target. The actual amounts paid for 2016 are shown in the Summary Compensation Table.
|
54
(2)
|
These columns reflect the potential payout range, in units, of PSUs granted in 2016. PSU awards cliff vest at three
years from the grant date. Actual payouts will range from 0 to 200% of the units granted plus reinvested dividends based on relative TSR (50%) and Strategic Milestones (50%) over the three-year performance period ending December 31, 2018.
|
(3)
|
RSU awards plus reinvested dividends cliff vest at three years from the grant date.
|
(4)
|
Option awards vest over three years from the grant date (30% the first two years and 40% the third year) and expire
seven years from grant date.
|
(5)
|
Option exercise prices reflect the
five-day
VWAP of the Common Shares on the
TSX or NYSE, as applicable, prior to grant date. Option-based awards to Canadian-based NEOs were granted based on option exercise prices in Canadian dollars (C$5.56), and SAR awards to U.S.-based NEOs granted based on exercise prices in U.S. dollars
(US$4.06).
|
(6)
|
Canadian dollar awards have been converted to U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate for 2016 of C$1.00 =
US$0.755, based on the daily noon buying rate published by the Bank of Canada. The grant date fair value of Options granted is determined by multiplying the number of Options granted by the Black-Scholes value.
|
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
The following table shows outstanding equity awards held by the NEOs at the end of the last fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Option Awards
(1)
|
|
RSUs
|
|
PSUs
|
Name
|
|
Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options (#)
exercisable
|
|
Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options (#)
unexercisable
|
|
Equity incentive
plan
awards:
number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
unearned
options
(#)
|
|
|
Option
exercise
price
($)
|
|
Option
expiration
date
|
|
Number of shares
or units of stock
that
have not
vested
(#)
|
|
Market value of
shares or units of
stock that have
not
vested
(3)
($)
|
|
Equity incentive
plan awards:
number
of
unearned
shares, units or
other rights
that have not
vested
(#)
|
|
Equity incentive
plan awards:
market or
payout value of
unearned shares
units
or other rights
that have
not
vested
(4)
($)
|
Doug
Suttles
|
|
185,960
209,602
534,189
|
|
2,060,433
433,907
139,735
934,830
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$5.56
$14.34
$20.35
$18.00
$18.00
|
|
03/03/2023
03/13/2022
02/18/2019
06/13/2018
06/13/2018
|
|
489,259
145,895
78,235
|
|
$5,821,607
$1,735,975
$930,915
|
|
978,518
291,789
156,470
|
|
$11,643,190
$3,471,939
$1,861,805
|
Sherri
Brillon
|
|
53,463
69,866
160,023
124,953
|
|
367,868
124,749
46,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
$5.56
$14.34
$20.35
$18.06
$21.10
|
|
03/03/2023
03/13/2022
02/18/2019
02/19/2018
02/22/2017
|
|
104,164
41,945
26,079
|
|
$1,239,427
$499,095
$310,321
|
|
208,327
83,890
52,157
|
|
$2,478,841
$998,190
$620,618
|
Michael
McAllister
|
|
69,735
104,800
155,731
32,381
|
|
488,764
162,716
69,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
$5.56
$14.34
$20.35
$18.06
$21.10
|
|
03/03/2023
03/13/2022
02/18/2019
02/19/2018
02/22/2017
|
|
135,866
54,711
39,118
|
|
$1,616,642
$650,995
$465,469
|
|
271,731
109,421
78,235
|
|
$3,233,273
$1,301,979
$930,915
|
David
Hill
|
|
41,646
52,850
25,929
|
|
231,541
97,177
35,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
$4.06
$11.35
$18.51
$17.95
|
|
03/03/2023
03/13/2022
02/18/2019
02/19/2018
|
|
93,026
34,570
21,508
|
|
$1,092,137
$405,864
$252,504
|
|
186,053
69,140
43,015
|
|
$2,184,262
$811,715
$504,996
|
Renee
Zemljak
|
|
41,646
52,850
90,520
62,056
|
|
285,227
97,177
35,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
$4.06
$11.35
$18.51
$17.95
$20.91
|
|
03/03/2023
03/13/2022
02/18/2019
02/19/2018
02/22/2017
|
|
93,026
34,570
21,508
|
|
$1,092,137
$405,864
$252,504
|
|
186,053
69,140
43,015
|
|
$2,184,262
$811,715
$504,996
|
Notes:
(1)
|
Option awards vest over three years (30% the first two years and 40% the third year) and expire seven years from grant
date for awards granted in 2015 and 2016 and expire five years from grant date for awards granted prior to 2015.
|
(2)
|
One-time
Performance Option grant which vests after four years if performance
measures are met.
|
(3)
|
The values shown in this column are based on the TSX or NYSE closing price of Common Shares on December 31, 2016.
Awards for Canadian-based NEOs were valued based on the TSX (C$15.76), and those for U.S.-based NEOs were valued based on the NYSE (US$11.74). Canadian dollar awards have been converted to U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate for 2016 of
C$1.00 = US$0.755, based on the daily noon buying rate published by the Bank of Canada.
|
(4)
|
The values shown in this column are based on the TSX or NYSE closing price of Common Shares on December 31, 2016.
Awards for Canadian-based NEOs were valued based on the TSX (C$15.76), and those for U.S.-based NEOs were valued based on the NYSE (US$11.74). The performance metric applied is based on a payout of 100 percent of the respective target. Canadian
dollar awards have been converted to U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate for 2016 of C$1.00 = US$0.755, based on the daily noon buying rate published by the Bank of Canada.
|
55
Option Exercises and Stock Vested for 2016
The following table provides information relating to the value realized upon the exercise of Options and the vesting of RSUs and PSUs under the incentive
plan during the last fiscal year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
RSUs
|
|
PSUs
|
Name
|
|
Number of shares
acquired
on
exercise
(#)
|
|
|
Value realized on
exercise
($)
|
|
|
Number of shares
acquired on vesting
(#)
|
|
Value realized on
vesting
(1)
($)
|
|
Number of shares
acquired on vesting
(#)
|
|
Value realized
on
vesting
(3)
($)
|
Doug Suttles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,432
|
|
$701,196
(2)
|
|
338,234
|
|
|
Sherri Brillon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,525
|
|
$104,451
|
|
57,050
|
|
|
Michael McAllister
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,656
|
|
$145,214
|
|
79,313
|
|
|
David Hill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,668
|
|
$37,551
|
|
5,334
|
|
|
Renee
Zemljak
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,620
|
|
$65,546
|
|
37,241
|
|
|
Notes:
(1)
|
The values realized upon vesting for RSUs are based on the TSX or NYSE closing price of Common Shares on
February 18, 2016, or C$4.85 and US$3.52 respectively. Canadian dollar awards have been converted to U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate for 2016 of C$1.00 = US$0.755, based on the daily noon buying rate published by the Bank of
Canada.
|
(2)
|
The values realized upon vesting for RSUs are based on the TSX closing price of Common Shares on June 10, 2016 or
C$10.27.
|
(3)
|
The values realized upon vesting for PSUs are based on the
20-trading
days
prior to and including the last trading day of the performance period (December 31, 2016). The
20-day
average closing price of Common Shares on the TSX and NYSE are C$16.57 and US$12.40, respectively. The
performance metric for the 2013 grant was determined to be 0%.
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan Information
|
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
Our ESOP is our only compensation plan under which equity securities of Encana have been authorized for issuance. The table below provides details
regarding Options outstanding under the ESOP as of December 31, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
Number of securities
to be issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants
and rights
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
|
|
Number of securities remaining
available for future
issuance
under equity compensation plans
(excluding securities reflected in
column (a))
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
Equity compensation plans approved by
security holders ESOP
|
|
16,417,144
|
|
$15.10
|
|
32,198,620
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by
security holders
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
16,417,144
|
|
$15.10
|
|
32,198,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian NEOs: Registered and Supplemental Pension Plans
Our Canadian-based NEOs, including Mr. Suttles, participate in our registered pension plan and supplemental pension plan (collectively, the
Canadian Plan). Pension contributions to the registered plan are payable up to the level permitted by the
Income Tax Act
; contributions beyond this level are made to the supplemental plan. The Canadian Plan has an active DC
component. It also has a legacy DB component which has been closed to new members since 2003. Pensionable earnings, for purposes of the Canadian Plan, include an NEOs base salary and annual Bonus award (capped to a maximum of base salary of
67 percent for the CEO and 40 percent for other NEOs).
Canadian DC Plan
Mr. Suttles and Ms. Brillon participate in the DC component of the Canadian Plan. Encana contributes eight percent of pensionable earnings
to an individuals DC account. Participants select from a variety of investment options and manage their own accounts.
Canadian DB Plan
Mr. McAllister is the only executive who participates in the DB component of the Canadian Plan. His participation commenced with a predecessor
company to Encana, and his DB benefits have fully vested.
56
Upon retirement, DB benefits are based on two percent of the individuals highest five
consecutive years of pensionable earnings in the preceding 10 years, multiplied by years of pensionable participation in the Canadian Plan. Participants contribute four percent of pensionable earnings to a defined annual maximum. Normal
retirement is age 65, but participants can retire at age 55 or after with a reduced pension. Pension is paid on an unreduced basis from age 60 (or after age 55 with 30 years of service).
Canadian Investment Plan
Our Canadian-based NEOs are also eligible to participate in our Canadian Investment Plan. Participants contribute up to a maximum of 25 percent of
base salary to self-selected investment options. Encana matches these contributions to a maximum of five percent of base salary in Common Shares purchased on the open market.
U.S. DC Plan
Our
U.S.-based NEOs participate in the Encana (USA) Retirement Plan. Encana contributes eight percent of base salary to a participants DC account. Similar to the Canadian Investment Plan, participant contributions are matched by Encana up to
five percent of base salary. Participants select among various investment options and manage their own accounts.
Similar to the supplemental
component of the Canadian Plan, Encana also contributes eight percent of the U.S.based NEOs annual Bonus award (to a maximum of 40 percent of base salary) to a U.S.
non-qualified
Deferred
Compensation Plan (NQDC Plan). The NQDC Plan provides
non-qualified
benefits in excess of those permitted (under the Encana (USA) Retirement Plan) by the Internal Revenue Code.
Defined Benefit Pension Table
The table below shows Mr. McAllisters estimated annual DB benefits, accrued DB pension obligations and compensatory and
non-compensatory
changes as at December 31, 2016.
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Plan Name
|
|
Number of years of
credited service (#)
|
|
Present Value of
accumulated
benefit
(2)
($)
|
|
Payments
during last
fiscal year($)
|
Michael McAllister
(3)
|
|
Registered Plan
|
|
16.500
|
|
640,637
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Plan
|
|
28.500
|
|
5,849,693
|
|
|
Notes:
(1)
|
Amounts are estimates only based on assumptions (referred to in Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the
Annual Report or other footnotes below) and therefore may not materialize.
|
(2)
|
Amounts converted from Canadian dollars to U.S. dollars using December 31, 2016 exchange rate of C$1.00 =
US$0.745. Calculations include no preretirement decrements. All accrued pensions are assumed payable at age 60, which is the earliest unreduced retirement age.
|
(3)
|
Was granted 12 additional years of service granted under an individual agreement in 2000. The additional Supplemental
Plan pension in respect of the 12 years of additional service is reduced by an annual pension offset of US$16,369 (converted from Canadian dollars to U.S. dollars using the December 31, 2016 exchange rate of C$1.00 = US$0.745) payable at age 60
from Mr. McAllisters previous employer. The additional pension, reflecting the offset, is US$2,533,486 of the present value listed above.
|
Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Table for 2016
The table below provides information relating to the compensation deferred during fiscal 2016 under the terms of the
non-qualified
plan by the NEOs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Executive
contributions in
last fiscal
year
(1)
($)
|
|
Registrant
contributions in
last fiscal
year
(2)
($)
|
|
Aggregate
earning
in
last fiscal
year
(3)
($)
|
|
Aggregate
withdrawals/
distributions
($)
|
|
Aggregate
balance at last
fiscal year
ended
(4)
($)
|
Doug
Suttles
|
|
|
|
64,821
|
|
11,393
|
|
|
|
302,765
|
Sherri
Brillon
|
|
75,030
|
|
15,697
|
|
79,917
|
|
|
|
556,698
|
Michael
McAllister
|
|
106,965
|
|
|
|
37,282
|
|
|
|
207,048
|
David Hill
|
|
177,566
|
|
38,450
|
|
217,378
|
|
39,596
|
|
967,865
|
Renee
Zemljak
|
|
|
|
43,388
|
|
289,229
|
|
87,271
|
|
1,455,072
|
Notes:
(1)
|
These include contributions made through election in the NQDC Plan and deferrals elected by NEOs through the Employee
DSU Plan. These amounts are reported in the
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation column (for 2015 annual Bonus award paid in 2016) of the Summary Compensation Table above.
|
(2)
|
These include contributions made by Encana to the NEO through the NQDC Plan and Supplemental DC Plan. These amounts are
reported in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table above.
|
57
(3)
|
Earnings not included in the Change in Pension value and non-qualified deferred compensation earnings
column of the Summary Compensation Table as they are not above-market or preferential earnings.
|
(4)
|
The aggregate balances shown include the following amount that was reported in previous years as compensation:
Mr. Suttles $196,581; Ms. Brillon $74,700; Mr. Hill $40,088; and Ms. Zemljak $62,048.
|
Potential Payments upon Termination or
Change-in-Control
The following outlines the treatment of
payments to each NEO in the various termination situations outlined below.
Voluntary or involuntary termination outside a CIC.
We do not have
employment agreements with any of the NEOs and therefore specific payments would be determined at the time of the termination. Our LTI plans outline vesting provisions for LTI awards in relation to termination outside a CIC. Upon termination under
age 55, all RSUs, PSUs and unvested Options or SARs are forfeited and cancelled with any vested Options or SARs having 60 business days from termination to be exercised. For early retirement between ages 55 to 60, RSUs and PSUs are
pro-rated
based on months from grant date to date of retirement and paid at the vesting date, and any vested Options or SARs have six months to be exercised from termination with unvested Options or SARs being
cancelled. For retirement above age 60, all outstanding RSUs and PSUs will continue to vest according to the vesting schedule, with any unvested Options or SARs vesting over time and exercisable up to the expiry date.
Termination following a CIC.
As described in the sections Other Compensation Elements Termination and Change-in-Control
Agreements and CIC Agreement Terms beginning on page 49, on a CIC, all LTI awards will become vested or exercisable, as applicable, except for a
one-time
grant of incentive equity to Doug
Suttles in 2013, which is subject to subject to double trigger vesting provisions. In addition, on a CIC and subsequent termination of employment, the NEO will receive payments as detailed in the below table.
Termination Due to Death.
Treatment is similar to a voluntary or involuntary termination
outside a CIC, with the exception that those under age 55 are treated in the same manner as an early retirement between ages 55 to 60. There is also an extra death benefit which values Options or SARs that would have vested within 12 months from
date of death.
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
Termination
($)
|
|
Involuntary
Termination outside
a Change-in-Control
($)
|
|
Involuntary
Termination within
a
Change-in-Control
($)
|
|
Termination Due to
Death
($)
|
Doug Suttles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,132,339
(2)
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,682,356
(3)
|
|
|
Value of Unvested LTIs
|
|
11,683,096
|
|
11,683,096
|
|
41,535,550
(4,5)
|
|
16,576,992
|
Incremental Value (Pension Benefits)
|
|
|
|
|
|
284,881
(6)
|
|
|
Other Compensation and Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
204,399
(9)
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
11,683,096
|
|
11,683,096
|
|
47,839,525
|
|
16,576,992
|
Sherri Brillon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
871,650
(2)
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,036,174
(3)
|
|
|
Value of Unvested LTIs
|
|
3,079,342
|
|
3,079,342
|
|
9,080,515
(4,5)
|
|
3,974,531
|
Incremental Value (Pension Benefits)
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,625
(6)
|
|
|
Other Compensation and Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,015
(9)
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
3,079,342
|
|
3,079,342
|
|
11,207,979
|
|
3,974,531
|
Michael McAllister
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,035,550
(2)
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,504,396
(3)
|
|
|
Value of Unvested LTIs
|
|
4,194,570
|
|
4,194,570
|
|
12,097,901
(4,5)
|
|
5,382,578
|
Incremental Value (Pension Benefits)
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,174,432
(7)
|
|
|
Other Compensation and Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,849
(9)
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
4,194,570
|
|
4,194,570
|
|
22,944,128
|
|
5,382,578
|
David Hill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
900,000
(2)
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
836,800
(3)
|
|
|
Value of Unvested LTIs
|
|
2,587,372
|
|
2,587,372
|
|
7,112,244
(4,5)
|
|
3,137,085
|
Incremental Value (Pension Benefits)
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,800
(8)
|
|
|
Other Compensation and Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,394
(9)
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
2,587,372
|
|
2,587,372
|
|
9,076,238
|
|
3,137,085
|
Renee Zemljak
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
980,000
(2)
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
900,480
(3)
|
|
|
Value of Unvested LTIs
|
|
16,242
|
|
16,242
|
|
7,524,552
(4,5)
|
|
3,260,778
|
Incremental Value (Pension Benefits)
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,760
(8)
|
|
|
Other Compensation and Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,904
(9)
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
16,242
|
|
16,242
|
|
9,645,696
|
|
3,260,778
|
Notes:
(1)
|
Calculated as at December 31, 2016 and converted from Canadian dollars to U.S. dollars using December 31, 2016
exchange rate of C$1.00 = US$0.745.
|
(2)
|
Calculated using two times NEOs base salary in effect at December 31, 2016.
|
(3)
|
Calculated based on two times average of Bonus award paid in immediately preceding three years (from 2013 to 2015,
inclusive).
|
(4)
|
Reflects estimated value from accelerated vesting of Options unvested as at December 31, 2016.
|
(5)
|
Vested PSUs granted in 2014 are valued, for illustration purposes, based on a payout of 100 percent of target, using
average closing price of Common Shares over the last 20 trading days of the applicable year, on TSX and NYSE, respectively, of C$16.57 and US$12.40. The unassessed PSU amounts (the 2015 and 2016 PSU grants) have been valued, for illustration
purposes, based on a payout of 100 percent of the respective target amount using the TSX or NYSE closing price of Common Shares on December 31, 2016, or C$15.76 and US$11.74 respectively. Value of 2016, 2015 and 2014 RSU grants reflects
all RSUs outstanding as at December 31, 2016 valued, for illustration purposes, based on the TSX or NYSE closing price of Common Shares on December 31, 2016, or C$15.76 and US$11.74 respectively.
|
(6)
|
Based on 24 months additional service under the DC component of the Canadian Plan, equal to eight percent of
two-times
base salary plus annual Bonus award (capped at 67 percent of base salary for Mr. Suttles and 40 percent of base salary for Ms. Brillon).
|
(7)
|
Based on additional DB pensionable service of 24 months, five-year final average pensionable earnings would be calculated
based on 2016 base salary plus annual Bonus award (capped at 40 percent of base salary) for
24-month
period. Incremental lump sum DB pension value equal to difference between actuarial present values of
accrued DB pension, as modified above, less accrued DB pension, unmodified, using commuted value basis for the DB Plan as of December 31, 2016. The discount rates used are 2.20 percent for 10 years and 3.50 percent thereafter.
|
(8)
|
Based on 24 months additional service in U.S. DC Plan. Incremental lump sum pension value equal to 13 percent
of
two-times
base salary plus eight percent of two times their annual Bonus award (capped at 40 percent of base salary).
|
(9)
|
Includes other compensation, including perquisites, annual allowances and five percent matching of participant
contributions.
|
59
|
Proxy
Materials and Voting Information
|
Please carefully read this section, as it contains important information regarding how to vote your Common Shares. The
Company is sending meeting materials in connection with the Meeting directly to Registered Shareholders and indirectly to all
Non-Registered
Shareholders through their intermediaries. The Company will pay for
an intermediary to deliver the meeting materials to objecting beneficial owners. The Company is not sending the meeting materials directly to
non-objecting
beneficial owners.
What is the purpose of the Meeting?
At the
Meeting, you will be asked to vote on the following matters:
|
|
|
Item 1
|
|
To elect the 10 Nominees identified in this Proxy Statement to serve as directors until the close of the next annual meeting of shareholders;
|
|
|
Item 2
|
|
To appoint PwC as independent auditors of the Company until the close of the next annual meeting of shareholders;
|
|
|
Item 3
|
|
To hold a
non-binding
advisory vote to approve compensation of Named Executive Officers; and
|
|
|
Item 4
|
|
To hold a
non-binding
advisory vote on the frequency of
Say-on-Pay
votes.
|
Our shareholders do not have dissenters rights or similar rights of appraisal with respect to the proposals
described herein and do not have cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of directors.
How does the Board recommend that I vote?
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal
|
|
|
|
Board Recommendation
|
1.
|
|
Election of Directors
|
|
FOR
each Nominee
|
2.
|
|
Appoint PwC as Independent Auditors
|
|
FOR
|
3.
|
|
Advisory Vote to Approve Compensation of Named Executive Officers
|
|
FOR
|
4.
|
|
Advisory Vote on Frequency of
Say-on-Pay
|
|
FOR ONE
(1) YEAR
|
For more information on the Nominees, refer to Nominees for Election to the Board.
Where and when is the Meeting?
The Meeting
will be held at BMO Centre, Palomino Room, 20 Roundup Way S.E., Calgary, Alberta, at 10:00 am MT on Tuesday, May 2, 2017. For information regarding voting at the Meeting, see How do I vote if I am a REGISTERED shareholder? or
How do I vote if I am a
NON-REGISTERED
shareholder?.
How many Common Shares are outstanding
and who are the Companys Principal Shareholders?
As of March 8, 2017, there were 973,064,884 issued and outstanding Common
Shares. Each Common Share carries one vote on each matter voted upon at the Meeting. Only holders of Common Shares of record at 5:00 p.m. on March 8, 2017 (the Record Date) will be entitled to receive the Notice of the Meeting and
to exercise the voting rights attached to the Common Shares in respect of which they are so registered at the Meeting, or any adjournment thereof, if present or represented by proxy. For information regarding the ownership of certain individuals,
including directors and officers of the Company, see Ownership of Equity Securities of the Company at page 24.
What vote is
required to elect directors?
At the Meeting, 10 directors will be elected. The 10 nominated directors receiving the highest number of FOR votes
duly cast at the Meeting will be elected to the Board.
60
Who is entitled to vote at the Meeting?
The Board has fixed March 8, 2017 as the Record Date for the purpose of determining shareholders entitled to receive the Notice of the Meeting and
to vote at the Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to vote at the Meeting. Each shareholder is entitled to one vote for each Common Share held.
Who is soliciting my proxy and how do I appoint a proxyholder?
Management of the Company is soliciting your proxies in connection with this Proxy Statement and the Meeting. The cost of this solicitation will be borne
by the Company. Proxies will be solicited by mail, in person, by telephone or by electronic communications. The Company has retained Kingsdale Advisors (Kingsdale), located at the Exchange Tower, 130 King Street West, Suite 2950,
Toronto, Ontario, M5X 1E2 as our strategic shareholder advisor, to assist with our communications with shareholders and solicitation of proxies. In connection with these services, Kingsdale will receive from the Company an initial fee of $45,000. In
addition, Kingsdale will be reimbursed by the Company for disbursements and
out-of-pocket
expenses. The Company may also reimburse brokers and other persons holding
Common Shares in their name or in the name of nominees for their costs incurred in sending proxy materials to their principals in order to obtain their proxies.
Encana may also use Broadridge Financial Solution Inc.s (Broadridge) QuickVote service to assist
non-registered
shareholders with voting their Common Shares.
Non-registered
shareholders may be contacted by Kingsdale to conveniently obtain a vote directly over the
telephone. Broadridge will then tabulate the results of all the voting instructions received and provide the appropriate instructions respecting the Common Shares to be represented at the Meeting.
Shareholders wishing to be represented by proxy at the Meeting must deposit a properly executed proxy with the Company or its agent, CST Trust Company
(CST), or Kingsdale, by 10:00 a.m. MT on April 28, 2017 or, in the case of any adjournment or postponement of the Meeting, not less than 48 hours (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) before the time of the adjourned
or postponed Meeting. The time limit for the deposit of proxies may be waived or extended by the Chair of the Meeting at his or her discretion without notice. All Common Shares represented by a properly executed proxy will be voted or withheld from
voting in accordance with the instructions of the shareholder on any ballot that may be called for and if the shareholder specifies a choice with respect to any matter to be acted upon, the Common Shares will be voted accordingly.
If I do not provide management with instructions in my proxy, how will my Common Shares be voted?
Shareholders who have appointed a named appointee of management to act and vote on their behalf, as provided in the enclosed form of proxy or voting
instruction form, and who do not provide instructions concerning any matter identified in the Notice of the Meeting, will have the Common Shares represented by such form of proxy or voting instruction form voted FOR each Nominee, FOR the appointment
of PwC as the Companys independent auditor, FOR the resolution to approve compensation of NEOs
(Say-on-Pay)
and FOR ONE (1) YEAR on the frequency of
Say-on-Pay
votes.
The enclosed form of proxy or voting instruction form to
be used in connection with the Meeting also confers discretionary authority on the person or persons named to vote on any amendment or variation to the matters identified in the Notice of the Meeting and on any other matter properly coming before
the Meeting. As of March 1, 2017, management is not aware of any such amendment, variation or other matter. If, however, any such amendment, variation or other matter properly comes before the Meeting, proxies will be voted at the discretion of
the person or persons named on the enclosed form of proxy or voting instruction form.
Abstentions are not considered votes cast on any proposal.
Broker
non-votes
are not considered votes cast on Item 1, Item 3 or Item 4, and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. Brokers will have discretionary voting power regarding Item 2 in the
event that beneficial owners, who own their Common Shares in street name, do not provide voting instructions regarding Item 2.
61
How do I vote if I am a REGISTERED shareholder?
You are a registered shareholder if your name appears on your Common Share certificate. If this is the case, this Proxy Statement will be accompanied by
a form of proxy. If you are a registered shareholder, there are two ways, listed below, that you can vote your Common Shares:
There are a number of ways you can vote your Common Shares by proxy:
|
|
|
Internet
|
|
Visit
www.cstvotemyproxy.com
and follow
the instructions. You will need your
13-digit
control number found on the back of the proxy form.
|
Phone
|
|
Call
1-888-489-5760
from a touch-tone phone and follow the voice instructions. You will need your
13-digit
control number found on the back of the proxy form. Please
note you cannot appoint a proxyholder via the telephone voting system.
|
Mail
|
|
Complete, sign and date your proxy form and return it in the business-reply envelope
included in your package.
|
Fax
|
|
Complete, sign and date your proxy form, faxing both sides of the proxy form to
1-866-781-3111
(toll free in North America) or
1-416-368-2502
(outside of North America).
|
You may also appoint the management appointee or someone else that
need not be a shareholder to vote for you as your proxyholder by using the enclosed form of proxy
. A shareholder has the right to appoint a person or company other than the named appointee of management
to represent such shareholder at the Meeting. To appoint a person or company other than the named appointee, write the name of the person or company you would like to appoint in the space provided.
As a registered shareholder, you may exercise your right to vote by attending and voting your Common Shares in person at the Meeting. Upon arriving at
the Meeting, report to the desk of our registrar and transfer agent, CST, to sign in and revoke any proxy previously given. You do not need to complete or return your form of proxy if you intend to vote at the Meeting.
To be valid, a proxy must be signed by the shareholder or his or her attorney authorized in writing. There are several ways to submit your form of proxy
which are indicated on the form of proxy. Carefully review your form of proxy for these instructions.
How do I vote if I am a
NON-REGISTERED
shareholder?
If your Common Shares are not registered in your name and are held in the name of
a nominee such as a trustee, financial institution or securities broker, you are a
non-registered
shareholder. If your Common Shares are listed in an account statement provided to you by your broker, those
Common Shares will, in all likelihood, not be registered in your name.
Such Common Shares will more likely be registered under the name of your
broker or an agent of that broker. Without specific instructions, Canadian brokers and their agents or nominees are prohibited from voting Common Shares for the brokers client. Without specific instructions, U.S. brokers and their agents or
nominees are prohibited from voting Common Shares for the brokers client with respect to
non-routine
matters, including the
non-binding
advisory vote
to approve compensation of NEOs, the non-binding advisory vote on frequency of Say-on-Pay votes and on the election of directors, but may vote such Common Shares with respect to routine matters, including the appointment of PwC. When a
broker is unable to vote on a proposal because it is
non-routine
and the owner of the Common Shares does not provide voting instructions, a broker
non-vote
occurs. Broker
non-votes
have no effect on the vote on such a proposal because they are not considered present and entitled to vote.
If you are a
non-registered
shareholder, there are two ways, listed below, that you can vote your Common Shares:
1.
|
Giving Your Voting Instructions
|
Your nominee is required to seek voting instructions from you in advance of the Meeting. Accordingly, you will receive, or have already received, from
your nominee either (i) a voting instruction form for completion and execution by you, or (ii) a form of proxy for completion by you, executed by the nominee and restricted to the number of Common Shares owned by you. These procedures are
to permit
non-registered
shareholders to direct the voting of the Common Shares that they beneficially own.
62
Each nominee has its own procedures which should be carefully followed by
non-registered
shareholders to ensure that their Common Shares are voted at the Meeting. Please contact your nominee for instructions in this regard. You may vote using any of the methods outlined on the
voting instruction form or form of proxy.
If you wish to vote in person at the Meeting, insert your own name in the space provided on the voting instruction form or form of proxy to appoint
yourself as proxyholder and follow the instructions of your nominee.
Non-registered
shareholders who
instruct their nominee to appoint themselves as proxyholders should, at the Meeting, present themselves to a representative of CST. Do not otherwise complete the voting instruction form or form of proxy sent to you as your vote will be taken and
counted at the Meeting.
If I change my mind, can I revoke or change my proxy once I have given it?
Yes. A shareholder may revoke a proxy by depositing an instrument in writing executed by such shareholder or by such shareholders attorney
authorized in writing (or, in the case of a corporation, by a duly authorized officer or attorney), either at the Office of the Corporate Secretary, Encana Corporation, 500 Centre Street S.E., Calgary, Alberta, T2P 2S5, or with the Chairman of
the Meeting on the day of the Meeting, or by an adjournment or postponement of the Meeting, or in any other manner permitted by law.
In addition to
any other manner permitted by law, a shareholder may change a previously submitted proxy or voting instruction form by submitting a new proxy or conveying new voting instructions by any of the means described under
How do I vote if I am a
REGISTERED shareholder?
or
How do I vote if I am a
NON-REGISTERED
shareholder?
, as applicable.
Non-registered
shareholders must ensure that
any change in voting instructions is communicated to the applicable nominee sufficiently in advance of the time of voting at the Meeting.
Non-registered
shareholders who have voted and who wish to change their
voting instructions should contact their nominee promptly if assistance is required.
What is the latest time that I can submit my form of proxy
or voting instruction form?
To be effective, your proxy must be received by 10:00 a.m. MT on April 28, 2017 or, in the case of any
adjournment or postponement of the Meeting, not less than 48 hours (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) before the time of the adjournment or postponed Meeting. The time limit for the deposit of proxies may be waived or extended by the
Chair of the Meeting at his or her discretion without notice.
The Company reminds shareholders that only the most recently dated voting instructions
will be counted and any prior dated instructions will be disregarded.
How will votes be tabulated?
Proxies will be counted and tabulated by the Companys registrar and transfer agent, CST. CST maintains the confidentiality of individual
shareholder votes. However, proxies will be submitted to management where they contain comments clearly intended for management or to meet legal requirements.
Whom should I contact if I have questions?
If
you have any questions about the information contained in this Proxy Statement or require assistance in completing your form of proxy or voting instruction form, please contact Kingsdale at:
|
|
|
Telephone:
|
|
1-866-229-8166
(toll
free in North America)
|
|
|
1-416-867-2272
(Outside North America, Banks and Brokers call collect)
|
Email:
|
|
contactus@kingsdaleadvisors.com
|
Mail:
|
|
The Exchange Tower, 130 King Street West, Suite 2950, P.O. Box 361, Toronto, Ontario, M5X 1E2.
|
How may I contact the registrar and transfer agent?
You may contact CST, the Companys registrar and transfer agent, by telephone, Internet or mail, as follows:
|
|
|
Telephone:
|
|
1-866-580-7145
(toll
free in North America)
|
|
|
1-416-682-3863
(outside of North America)
|
Internet:
|
|
www.canstockta.com
|
Mail:
|
|
CST Trust Company, 600 Dome Tower, 333 7 Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 2Z1.
|
63
|
Communications and Shareholder Engagement
|
The Board welcomes engagement with its shareholders and encourages them to share their perspective. Shareholders and
other interested parties can communicate directly with any director, including our Chairman of the Board, Mr. Clayton H. Woitas, at the following address:
c/o Office of the Corporate Secretary
Encana Corporation
500 Centre Street S.E.
P.O. Box 2850
Calgary AB T2P 2S5
Questions may
also be directed to our investor relations personnel at
investor.relations@encana.com
.
For detailed information on our business,
operating and financial results, refer to our website at
www.encana.com
. Our news releases and other prescribed documents are filed on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR) located at
www.sedar.com
and on the Electronic Data Gathering Analysis and Retrieval System (EDGAR) located at
www.sec.gov
.
|
Shareholder Proposals and Director Nominations
|
Shareholders may propose matters to be presented at our shareholder meetings and may also nominate persons to be
directors of the Company. Formal procedures have been established for those proposals and nominations.
Proposals for 2018
Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2018 Proxy Materials
The Company is subject to both the rules of the SEC under the Exchange Act and
the provisions of the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA) with respect to shareholder proposals. As clearly indicated under the CBCA and in the rules of the SEC under the Exchange Act, simply submitting a shareholder proposal does
not guarantee its inclusion in the proxy materials.
Shareholder proposals submitted pursuant to the rules of the SEC under the Exchange Act for
inclusion in the Companys proxy materials for 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be received by us, addressed to our Corporate Secretary, at our principal executive offices located at 500 Centre Street S.E., P.O. Box 2850, Calgary,
Alberta, Canada T2P 2S5, no later than November 23, 2017. Such proposals must also comply with all applicable provisions of Exchange Act Rule
14a-8.
Proposals submitted pursuant to the applicable provisions of the CBCA that a shareholder intends to present at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and wishes to be considered for inclusion in the Companys proxy statement and form of proxy relating to the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be received no later than December 23, 2017. Such proposals must also comply with all
applicable provisions of the CBCA and the regulations thereunder.
Nominations for 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Only persons who are nominated in accordance with the following procedures shall be eligible for election as directors. Pursuant to our
by-laws,
nominations of persons for election to our Board may be made at a meeting of our shareholders:
|
|
|
pursuant to our notice of the meeting;
|
|
|
|
by or at the direction of the Board;
|
|
|
|
by or at the direction or request of one or more shareholders pursuant to a proposal made in accordance with the
provisions of the CBCA, or a requisition of the shareholders made in accordance with the provisions of the CBCA; or
|
|
(i)
|
who, at the close of business on the date of the giving of the notice provided in Section 5.10 of our
by-laws
and on the record date for notice of such meeting, is entered in the securities register of the Company as a holder of one or more shares carrying the right to vote at such meeting or who beneficially owns
shares that are entitled to be voted at such meeting; and
|
|
(ii)
|
who complies with the notice procedures set forth in Section 5.10 of our
by-laws.
|
64
Nominations by any of our shareholders shall be made pursuant to timely notice, in writing, to the
Corporate Secretary of the Company. To be timely (in accordance with Section 5.10 of our
by-laws),
a shareholders notice with respect to our 2017 annual meeting of shareholders, shall be delivered
to the Corporate Secretary of the Company at our principal executive offices located at 500 Centre Street S.E., P.O. Box 2850, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 2S5, as follows:
|
(a)
|
in the case of an annual meeting of shareholders, not less than 30 days (being no earlier than the close of business on
April 2, 2017) and not more than 65 days (being no later than the close of business on February 26, 2017), before the date of the annual meeting of shareholders; provided; however, that in the event that the annual meeting of shareholders
is to be held on a date that is less than 50 days after the date (the Notice Date) on which the first public announcement of the date of the annual meeting was made, notice by the nominating shareholder may be given not later than the
close of business on the tenth day following the Notice Date; and
|
|
(b)
|
in the case of a special meeting (which is not also an annual meeting) of shareholders called for the purpose of
electing directors (whether or not called for other purposes), not later than the close of business on the 15
th
day following the day on which the first public announcement of the date of the
special meeting of shareholders was made.
|
In no event shall any adjournment or postponement of a meeting of shareholders, or the
announcement thereof, commence a new time period for the giving of a shareholders notice as described above.
The Companys management is not aware of any business to be presented for action by the shareholders at the Meeting
other than that mentioned herein or in the Notice of Meeting.
Additional Information
For those shareholders who cannot attend the Meeting in person, a live broadcast of the Meeting will be available. Details on how shareholders may access
the proceedings on the broadcast will be found on our website
www.encana.com
and will also be provided in a news release prior to the Meeting.
Additional information concerning the Company, including the Annual Report (which includes our financial statements and managements discussion and
analysis for the year ended December 31, 2016) is available on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com
and EDGAR at
www.sec.gov
.
We will provide, without charge to a shareholder, a copy of the Annual Report and this Proxy Statement, upon request to Investor Relations, Encana
Corporation, Suite 4400, 500 Centre Street S.E., P.O. Box 2850, Calgary, Alberta, T2P 2S5, telephone:
1-403-645-2000
or
investor.relations@encana.com
. This information may also be accessed on our website
www.encana.com
.
References to information contained on the Companys website at
www.encana.com
are not incorporated
by reference into, and does not constitute a part of, this Proxy Statement.
65
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Encana has adopted the following equity compensation plans:
|
|
|
Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP) (for Canadian-based employees);
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Appreciation Rights Plan (ESAR Plan) (for U.S.-based employees);
|
|
|
|
Performance Share Unit Plan (PSU Plan); and
|
|
|
|
Restricted Share Unit Plan (RSU Plan)
|
(collectively, the Plans).
Employee Stock Option Plan
The ESOP is designed to encourage a proprietary interest in Encana and align the interests
of eligible employees, including our executives, with those of our shareholders. Under the ESOP, Options are granted to eligible Canadian-based employees, including executives. The ESOP has been approved by our shareholders.
As at March 1, 2017, there were 16,747,133 Options outstanding under the ESOP and 32,716,037 Options available for grant, representing 1.7 percent
and 3.4 percent, respectively, of the total number of outstanding Common Shares at such date.
The ESOP is administered by the HRC Committee and the
Board which have full authority to interpret the ESOP and any Option granted thereunder. The HRC Committee also has discretion to attach tandem stock appreciation rights (TSARs) to Options granted under the ESOP.
The ESOP includes provisions that generally mirror the insider restrictions set out in the TSX Company Manual, that provide the aggregate of Common
Shares issued to Encana insiders, within any
one-year
period, or issuable to insiders of Encana, at any time, under the ESOP and any other security-based compensation arrangement of Encana cannot exceed
10 percent of the total issued and outstanding Common Shares (calculated on a
non-diluted
basis).
Options may be granted from time to time to eligible employees. Subject to regulatory requirements, the HRC Committee and the Board determine the terms
and conditions of Options granted, which are set out in the ESOP and corresponding Option Grant Agreement with the recipient.
Options granted
commencing in February 2015 are exercisable for a period of seven years from the grant date. Options granted prior to such date are exercisable for five years from the grant date. Options vest 30 percent on the first anniversary of grant, an
additional 30 percent on the second anniversary, and an additional 40 percent on the third anniversary of the grant.
Upon termination
of employment (other than by death or retirement), the Option holder has until the earlier of 60 trading days or the Option expiry date to exercise any vested unexercised Options. In the event of death or retirement before age 60, the
Option holder has until the earlier of six months from such date or the Option expiry date to exercise any vested unexercised Options. In any of these events, any Options that are unvested as of the date of termination of employment, death or
retirement do not vest and are cancelled. In the event of death or retirement after age 60, the Option holder may exercise vested Options, and any unvested Options continue to vest until the Option expiry date.
Options granted and outstanding under the ESOP have associated TSARs that entitle the Option holder to surrender the right to exercise his or her Option
to purchase Common Shares and to instead receive cash. Such amount is valued based on the difference between the strike price and for TSARs granted after February 2015, the VWAP of Common Shares on the TSX on the five trading days prior to vesting,
and for TSARs granted prior to such date, the closing price of Common Shares on the TSX on the immediately preceding trading day is used. In each case such share price is multiplied by the number of optioned Common Shares surrendered. Where a TSAR
is exercised, the right to the underlying Common Share is forfeited and such number of Common Shares are returned to the Common Shares reserved for issuance under the ESOP.
An Option can only be exercised by the Option holder and is not assignable, except on death by the Option holders estate. An Option holder only has
rights as a shareholder of Encana with respect to Common Shares he or she has acquired through exercise of an Option.
Adjustments may be made to the
exercise price of an Option, the number of Common Shares delivered to an Option holder upon exercise of an Option and the maximum number of Common Shares that may be reserved for issuance under the ESOP, in certain circumstances, such as a stock
dividend, split, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, combination or exchange of Common Shares or other similar corporate change.
A-1
Where an Option expires during or within 10 business days after a blackout period, the exercise period
is extended 10 business days from the last day of the blackout period (Blackout Extension Period).
The Board may amend, suspend or
terminate the ESOP in whole or in part; provided, however, no such amendment may, without the consent of Option holders, adversely affect the rights under any Option previously granted to the Option holder under the ESOP.
Shareholder approval is required in respect of any amendment of the ESOP that relates to:
|
|
|
any increase in the number of Common Shares reserved for issuance under the ESOP;
|
|
|
|
any reduction in the exercise price or cancellation and reissue of Options;
|
|
|
|
any extension of the term of an Option beyond the original expiry date, except as permitted under the Blackout Extension
Period;
|
|
|
|
any extension to the length of the Blackout Extension Period;
|
|
|
|
the inclusion of
non-executive
directors as eligible participants under
the ESOP;
|
|
|
|
any allowance for the transferability of Options (other than upon death of an Option holder); or
|
|
|
|
amendments which require shareholder approval under applicable law.
|
Employee Stock Appreciation Rights Plan
The ESAR Plan applies to our U.S.-based employees, including our U.S.-based executives. The purpose and provisions of the ESAR Plan mirror those of the
ESOP, described above.
Performance Share Unit Plan
The PSU Plan applies to eligible employees, including executives, in Canada and the U.S. The PSU Plan is designed to encourage alignment of interests
between employees and shareholders, encourage key performance measures approved by the Board and enhance shareholder value over the longer term.
The
PSU Plan is administered by the HRC Committee and the Board, which have full authority to interpret the PSU Plan and grants thereunder. The Board may amend or terminate the PSU Plan at any time in whole or in part. The HRC Committee has discretion
under the PSU Plan to settle vested PSUs in cash or Common Shares acquired on the open market. Vested PSUs are currently settled in cash.
In
2016, the Board approved the addition of an additional Strategic Milestones metric. Introduction of this new metric was approved by the Board to balance the use of an external, relative metric (relative TSR) with an internal, absolute metric
directly linked to the current stage of the execution of our strategy. The Strategic Milestones category, which represents 50 percent of our 2016 PSU grant, consists of the following three metrics: Margin Growth (20%), Balance Sheet Strength (20%)
and Portfolio (10%). Relative TSR represents the other 50 percent of our 2016 PSU grants. Vesting eligibility of PSU grants is based on Encanas performance (from both a relative TSR and Strategic Milestones perspective) and is measured over a
three-year period relative to Encanas performance peers (relative TSR) and internal execution against Strategic Milestones. Payout eligibility ranges from zero to a maximum of 200 percent of the initial PSU grant. Payout eligibility
(and any payout) is deferred for a period of three years from the grant date. PSUs attract dividend equivalent PSUs.
Vesting eligibility ceases upon
termination of employment other than by death or retirement. In the event of death or retirement after age 55 (but before age 60), the participant (or the estate) receives a
pro-rata
payment representing the
value of PSUs which vest (based on performance) calculated based on the period between the grant date and death or retirement (as applicable). PSUs that fail to vest, based on performance, are forfeited and cancelled.
In the event of death or retirement after age 60, the participant (or the estate) will receive a payment representing the value of PSUs which vest
(based on performance) following the three-year performance period. PSUs that fail to vest are forfeited and cancelled. Participants must be actively employed on vesting date to receive any payout in respect of vested PSUs (excluding death,
retirement or a Change-in-Control).
Restricted Share Unit Plan
The RSU Plan applies to eligible employees, including our executives, in Canada and the U.S. RSUs have been granted to eligible employees, including
executives, since 2012. The RSU Plan is designed to encourage a proprietary interest among employees, align the interests of employees with those of our shareholders and assist with retention.
The RSU Plan is administered by the HRC Committee and the Board, who have full authority to interpret the RSU Plan and any RSU granted thereunder. The
Board may amend or terminate the RSU Plan at any time in whole or in part. The
A-2
HRC Committee and the Board have discretion under the RSU Plan to settle vested RSUs in either cash or Common Shares acquired on the open market. RSUs are currently settled in cash.
An RSU is a conditional grant to receive a Common Share (or cash equivalent) upon vesting. One RSU is therefore notionally equivalent to one Common
Share. RSUs vest three years from the grant date, provided the participant remains employed with Encana on such date. RSUs that fail to vest are forfeited and cancelled. RSUs attract dividend equivalent RSUs where cash dividends are paid on Common
Shares.
RSU vesting ceases on termination of employment (other than by death or retirement). In the event of death or retirement after age 55 (but
before age 60), the participant (or the estate) receives a payment representing the
pro-rata
value of any vested RSUs, calculated based on the period between the grant date and death or retirement
(as applicable). In the event of death or retirement after age 60, the employee (or the estate) receives a payment representing the value of any vested RSUs, payable following the three year vesting period.
To receive any payout or distribution for vested RSUs, participants must be actively employed with Encana on the vesting date (with the exception of
death, retirement or a Change-in-Control).
A-3
BOARD OF
DIRECTORS MANDATE
GENERAL
The
fundamental responsibility of the Board of Directors is to appoint a competent senior management team and to oversee the management of the business, with a view to maximizing shareholder value and ensuring corporate conduct in an ethical and legal
manner via an appropriate system of corporate governance and internal controls.
SPECIFIC
Senior Management Responsibility
|
|
Appoint the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and senior officers, approve their compensation, and monitor the
CEOs performance against a set of mutually agreed corporate objectives directed at maximizing shareholder value.
|
|
|
In conjunction with the CEO, develop a clear mandate for the CEO, which includes a delineation of senior
managements responsibilities.
|
|
|
Ensure that a process is established that adequately provides for succession planning, including the appointing, training
and monitoring of senior management.
|
|
|
Establish limits of authority delegated to senior management.
|
Operational Effectiveness and Financial Reporting
|
|
Annual review and adoption of a strategic planning process and approval of the corporate strategic plan, which takes into
account, among other things, the opportunities and risks of the business.
|
|
|
Ensure that a system is in place to identify the principal risks to the Corporation and that the best practical
procedures are in place to monitor and mitigate the risks.
|
|
|
Ensure that processes are in place to address applicable regulatory, corporate, securities and other compliance matters.
|
|
|
Ensure that an adequate system of internal control exists.
|
|
|
Ensure that due diligence processes and appropriate controls are in place with respect to applicable certification
requirements regarding the Corporations financial and other disclosure.
|
|
|
Review and approve the Corporations financial statements and oversee the Corporations compliance with
applicable audit, accounting and reporting requirements.
|
|
|
Approve annual operating and capital budgets.
|
|
|
Review and consider for approval all amendments or departures proposed by senior management from established strategy,
capital and operating budgets or matters of policy which diverge from the ordinary course of business.
|
|
|
Review operating and financial performance results relative to established strategy, budgets and objectives.
|
Ethics, Integrity and Corporate Responsibility
|
|
Approve a communications policy or policies to ensure that a system for corporate communications to all stakeholders
exists, including processes for consistent, transparent, regular and timely public disclosure, and to facilitate feedback from stakeholders.
|
|
|
Approve a Business Code of Conduct for directors, officers, employees, contractors and consultants and monitor compliance
with the Business Code of Conduct and approve any waivers of the Business Code of Conduct for officers and directors.
|
|
|
Approve a Corporate Responsibility Policy which outlines Encanas commitment to conducting business ethically,
legally and in a manner that is fiscally, environmentally and socially responsible.
|
Board Process/Effectiveness
|
|
Ensure that Board materials are distributed to directors in advance of regularly scheduled meetings to allow for
sufficient review of the materials prior to the meeting. Directors are expected to attend all meetings.
|
|
|
Engage in the process of determining Board member qualifications with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
including ensuring that a majority of directors qualify as independent directors pursuant to National Instrument
58-101
Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices
(as implemented by the Canadian
Securities Administrators and as amended from time to time) and Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
|
|
|
Approve the nomination of directors.
|
|
|
Provide a comprehensive orientation to each new director.
|
|
|
Establish an appropriate system of corporate governance including practices to ensure the Board functions independently
of management.
|
|
|
Establish appropriate practices for the regular evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board, its committees and its
members.
|
|
|
Establish committees and approve their respective mandates and the limits of authority delegated to each committee.
|
|
|
Review and
re-assess
the adequacy of the Audit Committee Mandate on a regular
basis, but not less frequently than on an annual basis.
|
|
|
Review the adequacy and form of the directors compensation to ensure it realistically reflects the responsibilities
and risks involved in being a director.
|
|
|
Each member of the Board is expected to understand the nature and operations of the Corporations business, and have
an awareness of the political, economic and social trends prevailing in all countries or regions in which the Corporation invests, or is contemplating potential investment.
|
|
|
Independent directors shall meet regularly, and in no case less frequently than quarterly, without
non-independent
directors and senior management participation.
|
|
|
In addition to the above, adherence to all other Board responsibilities as set forth in the Corporations
By-Laws,
Corporate Constitution, applicable policies and practices and other statutory and regulatory obligations, such as approval of dividends, issuance of securities, etc., is expected.
|
B-1
ADVISORY REGARDING NON-GAAP MEASURES
Encanas financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(U.S. GAAP). This Proxy Statement contains references that do not have any standardized meaning as prescribed by U.S. GAAP and, therefore, are considered non-GAAP measures. These measures may not be comparable to similar measures
presented by other issuers. Non-GAAP measures include the following:
Non-GAAP Cash Flow (or Cash Flow) are non-GAAP measures defined as cash from
operating activities excluding net change in other assets and liabilities, net change in non-cash working capital and current tax on sale of assets. Cash Flow per share is Non-GAAP Cash Flow (or Cash Flow) divided by the weighted average number of
Common Shares outstanding. Management believes these measures are useful to the Company and its investors as a measure of operating and financial performance across periods and against other companies in the industry, and are an indication of the
Companys ability to generate cash to finance capital programs, to service debt and to meet other financial obligations. These measures are used, along with other measures, in the calculation of certain performance targets for the
Companys management and employees.
Net Debt is defined as long-term debt, including the current portion, less cash and cash equivalents.
Management uses this measure as a substitute for total long-term debt in certain internal debt metrics as a measure of the Companys ability to service debt obligations and as an indicator of the Companys overall financial strength.
Total Costs is defined as transportation and processing expense, operating expense, excluding long-term incentive costs, administrative expense,
excluding restructuring and long-term incentive costs, and capitalized indirect costs, excluding long-term incentive costs. Management uses this measure, along with other measures, in the calculation of certain performance targets for the
Companys management and employees.
Operating Margin is defined as revenues less production, mineral and other taxes, transportation and
processing and operating expenses. When presented on a per BOE basis, Operating Margin is defined as indicated divided by average barrels of oil equivalent production volumes. Margin Growth refers to growth of Operating Margin. Management
uses these measures as an internal measure of the profitability of a play.
Please refer to our Non-GAAP Definitions and Reconciliations available on
our website at
www.encana.com
for further reference regarding these measures.
C-1
Any questions and requests for assistance may be directed to the
Strategic Shareholder Services Advisor and Proxy Solicitation Agent:
The Exchange Tower
130 King Street West, Suite 2950, P.O. Box 361
Toronto,
Ontario M5X 1E2
www.kingsdaleadvisors.com
North American Toll Free Phone:
1-866-229-8166
Email:
contactus@kingsdaleadvisors.com
Facsimile:
416-867-2271
Toll Free Facsimile:
1-866-545-5580
Outside North America, Banks and Brokers Call
Collect:
416-867-2272
Appointment of Proxyholder
I/We, being holder(s) of Common Shares of Encana Corporation (the Corporation), hereby appoint: Clayton H. Woitas, Chairman of the Board, or,
failing him, Douglas J. Suttles, President & Chief Executive Officer OR
|
|
|
|
|
|
Print the name of the person you are appointing if this person is someone other than the individuals listed above
|
as proxy for the undersigned, to attend, act and vote on behalf of the undersigned in accordance with the below
directions (or if no directions have been given, as the proxyholder sees fit) on all the following matters and any other matter that may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Corporation to be held at 10:00 a.m. (Mountain
Time) on Tuesday, May 2, 2017, at BMO Centre, Palomino Room, 20 Roundup Way SE, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (the Meeting), and at any and all adjournments or postponements thereof in the same manner, to the same extent and with the
same powers as if the undersigned were personally present, with full power of substitution.
Management recommends voting FOR each of items 1-3 and ONE
(1) YEAR for item 4. Please use a dark black pencil or pen.
1.
|
ELECTION OF
DIRECTORS
:
☐
VOTE FOR all nominees
(or designate your vote for individual nominees below)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR
|
|
WITHHOLD
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR
|
|
WITHHOLD
|
|
|
01
|
|
Peter A. Dea
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
06
|
|
Suzanne P. Nimocks
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
02
|
|
Fred J. Fowler
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
07
|
|
Brian G. Shaw
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
03
|
|
Howard J. Mayson
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
08
|
|
Douglas J. Suttles
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
04
|
|
Lee A. McIntire
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
09
|
|
Bruce G. Waterman
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
05
|
|
Margaret A. McKenzie
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
10
|
|
Clayton H. Woitas
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
.
|
|
APPOINT
|
|
☐
FOR
|
|
☐
WITHHOLD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
as
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Auditors at a remuneration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to be fixed by the Board of Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE COMPENSATION
|
|
☐
FOR
|
|
☐
AGAINST
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF SAY-ON-PAY
|
|
☐
ONE (1) YEAR
|
|
☐
TWO (2) YEARS
|
|
|
|
|
VOTES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
☐
THREE (3) YEARS
|
|
☐
ABSTAIN
|
|
|
Under Canadian Securities Law, you are entitled to receive certain investor documents. If you wish to receive such
material, please tick the applicable boxes below. You may also go to our website
www.canstock.com/financialstatements
and input code 5811b.
|
|
|
I would like to receive quarterly financial statements
|
|
☐
|
I/We authorize you to act in accordance with my/our instructions set out above. I/We hereby revoke any proxy previously
given with respect to the Meeting.
If no voting instructions are indicated above, this proxy will be voted FOR items 1 3 and ONE (1) YEAR for item 4 by Managements appointees or, if you appoint another proxyholder, as that other
proxyholder sees fit. On any amendments or variations proposed or any new business properly submitted before the Meeting, I/We authorize you to vote as you see fit.
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear on this proxy. Please see reverse for instructions.
All proxies must be received by cut-off date, 10:00 a.m. (Mountain Time) on April 28, 2017.
Proxy Form Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Encana Corporation to be held on May 2, 2017
Notes to Proxy
|
1. This proxy must be signed by a holder or his or her attorney duly authorized in writing. If you are an individual, please sign
exactly as your name appears on this proxy. If the holder is a corporation, a duly authorized officer or attorney of the corporation must sign this proxy, and if the corporation has a corporate seal, its corporate seal should be affixed.
2. If the securities are registered in the name of an executor,
administrator or trustee, please sign exactly as your name appears on this proxy. If the securities are registered in the name of a deceased or other holder, the proxy must be signed by the legal representative with his or her name printed below his
or her signature, and evidence of authority to sign on behalf of the deceased or other holder must be attached to this proxy.
3. Some holders may own securities as both a registered and a beneficial holder; in which case you may receive more than one Proxy Statement and will need
to vote separately as a registered and beneficial holder. Beneficial holders may be forwarded either a form of proxy already signed by the intermediary or a voting instruction form to allow them to direct the voting of securities they beneficially
own. Beneficial holders should follow instructions for voting conveyed to them by their intermediaries.
4. If a security is held by two or more individuals, any one of them present or represented by proxy at the Meeting may, in the absence of the other or
others, vote at the Meeting. However, if one or more of them are present or represented by proxy, they must vote together the number of securities indicated on the proxy.
5. To be treated as valid, this form of proxy must be completed and
received by CST Trust Company (CST) no later than 10:00 a.m. (Mountain Time) on April 28, 2017 via the pre-paid business reply envelope provided, or otherwise delivered to CST Trust Company, P.O. Box 721, Agincourt, Ontario M1S 0A1,
Attention: Proxy Department, or, if the Meeting is adjourned, not less than 48 hours (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) before the time of the reconvened meeting.
All holders should refer to the Proxy Statement for further information
regarding completion and use of this proxy and other information pertaining to the Meeting.
|
This proxy is solicited by and on behalf of Management of the Corporation.
How to Vote
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTERNET
|
|
TELEPHONE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Go to
www.cstvotemyproxy.com
Cast your vote
online
View Meeting documents
|
|
Use any touch-tone phone, call toll free in Canada and United States
1-888-489-5760
and follow the voice instructions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To vote using your smartphone,
please scan this QR Code
®
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To vote by telephone or Internet you will need your control number. If you vote by Internet or telephone, do not return this proxy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MAIL, FAX or EMAIL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Complete and return your signed proxy in the envelope provided or send to:
CST Trust Company
P.O. Box 721
Agincourt, ON M1S 0A1
You may alternatively fax your proxy to 416-368-2502 or toll free in Canada and United States to
1-866-781-3111 or scan and email to
proxy@canstockta.com
.
An undated proxy is deemed to be dated on the day it was received by CST.
|
All proxies must be received by cut-off date,
10:00 a.m. (Mountain Time) on April 28, 2017.
|
|
If you wish to receive investor documents
electronically in future, please visit
www.canstockta.com/electronicdelivery
to enrol.
|
Encana (NYSE:ECA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Encana (NYSE:ECA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024