Fannie Mae (QB) (FNMAJ) Quote

It was just a notice of request of transcript.

Let's hope it's not out. If it's out and all we got from it was a daily total volume of 1.2m shares traded and down 2 cents that's awful bad.

Jury verdict opinion is out? see below post...

can anyone confirm Judge L finally doin his job or not?

TIA

"nagoya1
Re: RickNagra post# 46341
Friday, September 20, 2024 8:20:05 PM
Post# of 46349 Go
PACER account holder needed. Judge Lame's opinion is on PACER....
FNMA"

FNMA - You know it, I know it, the Whole World knows it:
FNMA will g o up and up, no matter if we're released or not,
FNMA is a good stock to buy and hold
Strong Buy - Strong Hold

I think in the beginning the instigators didn't realize they could steal and not be accountable so easily. Once they did, Katie bar the door!

"just when you think somebody knows sumthin, nutin honey, including and especially KTCarneyCanival Crowd who taints everything so u can only see that perspective in the fog, all BS facts out of context that dont mean a damn thing. (they are getting smaller and smaller as they dumped preferreds) so goes the GES extended saga."

As the old saying goes "don't nobody know squat!" And with nobody knowing squat, no squat is going to happen. We remain in limbo for the foreseeable future. Fannie, Freddie and the Invisible Man have much in common.

Oh wow. Sherwin Williams strikes again end of day one second before the close.

Any different from @FHFA seizing @FannieMae & @FreddieMac 16 years ago on the pretext of "temporary" conservatorship and sending $301 billion of their equity to @USTreasury for pet projects not funded through Congress?

If USA isn't a 🍌REPUBLIC...

FREE FANNIE!
FREE FREDDIE!— Guido da Costa Pereira (@GuidoPerei) September 23, 2024

And I wish that was because Freddie jumped up but the reality is that Fannie dropped more.

just when you think somebody knows sumthin, nutin honey, including and especially KTCarneyCanival Crowd who taints everything so u can only see that perspective in the fog, all BS facts out of context that dont mean a damn thing. (they are getting smaller and smaller as they dumped preferreds) so goes the GES extended saga.

Delta is now 2 cents. That’s just my 2 cents worth.

Thanks DaJester for combating the commie propaganda that (in this bastion of democracy) individuals aren't entitled to their property rights.

Did you miss the part about "Deem seniors paid?" You aren't going to school him on the illegality as evidenced by a book quote?

Or it's "reasonable numbers" when he projects it, but not when others think the seniors will be deemed paid? Hypocrite.

KThomp mentioned AIG again. Everyone drink!

"Reasonable shareholder expectations for any implied covenant claim over an action after the NWS has to take into account that the NWS itself was in place."

This would ONLY be true if a reasonable shareholder should expect that the NWS:
1.) Is not a breach of the shareholder agreement
2.) Exists in perpetuity, implying a permanent conservatorship

Since neither of those are reasonable nor true, your implication that the shareholders should have zero expectation to share in future financial profits is an incorrect conclusion.

"As to why the commitment fee wasn't charged between the start of conservatorship and the NWS, I don't know."

This is the first time I recall you claiming you don't know something. But I think this is a disingenuous claim. I believe you do know that the commitment fee would be illegal per the Charter Act.

I keep saying I'm not going to repeat myself, but since you keep repeating yourself, I suppose I have no choice.

"The only evidence we have is that Treasury thinks it is illegal. Why would you expect Treasury to do something they think is illegal?"

TREASURY does not "think" anything - FFS. There are over 100K employees there. You can keep talking about "they" as if it's a single person. Unless you know about secret surgeries Mnuchin may have had, you are falsely attributing a stance to the entire US Treasury.

1.) Non-sequitur: an inference or a conclusion that does not follow from the premises. Your premise is that since Calabria quoted a conversation with Mnuchin, therefore the writedown is illegal. You can try to reframe it now, but in the past you have said if "Treasury thinks it's illegal" that is evidence that it is, and DOJ would be giving guidance to Treasury, therefore the position is more valid than my position, which is that it is NOT illegal. Go ahead and try to deny it or change your stance.

2.) False-attribution: Appealing to an irrelevant, unqualified, fabricated or unidentified source in support of an argument, or when a quote is attributed to the wrong person or group. You consistently attribute the quote as if it applies to "Treasury" when Treasury has said no such thing. If you are going to use the quote, be specific with who said it. Do not imply an official department stance nor infer the opinion of 100K employees. Go ahead and refute this: Treasury has NEVER said the SPS writedown is illegal.

3.) Argument from Authority: The argument is based on the idea that if an authority figure in a field makes a statement about that field, it's probably true. However, this can be a logical fallacy and lead to unreliable conclusions if the authority figure is not qualified or the claim is made in a way that's misleading. First, Calabria is not an authority on the legality of the SPS write-down, he is simply recalling a conversation. Second, whomever he spoke with at Treasury may or may not be an authority on the legality of the SPS write-down. Calabria being the former director of the FHFA does not provide any relevant authority for your argument. Go ahead and refute this: The quote in Calabria's book did not come with any legal references that would support the illegality claim.

"Three strikes and you're out. Clearly giving you the list of logical fallacies wasn't enough because you don't seem to understand what any of them actually mean."

Ummm. You may want to read this post again, slowly. Maybe you need to use a lifeline - poll the audience, and see if they are following your understanding of the fallacies or mine.

Welcome back. Glad you are still kickin'... Even if you can't understand my points.

Robert from yahoo, are you still with us buddy?

Good Morning Warriors! It’s been awhile! Let’s get a WARRIOR headcount.
Give a thumbs up! Hang in there! The BOAT is just getting warmed up!

Just because it’s taking time doesn’t mean it’s not happening.

At this point all we have is algorithms.

In 5 minutes, ….stay tuned…fart, plop plop. Flush.
Fnma
Sound familiar tight coil and cat

Aaaaaaa, it was 2:00 pm Pacific when he posted it. 7:00 pacific is 5 hours. Anyway, nothing was announced so who cares.

No, No, Don't Say That:
Someone tampered with The Algorithm
It wasn't my fault, it was The Algorithm

Sometimes Time Stands Still in TheTwilightZone

It’s past that time- what news didn’t show up…your bird got the bird. Lol
Fnma

Ohh no

What would happen to my shares??

What is the land speed velocity of a sparrow???

If I’m taking a six hour flight from East to west then what time will it happen???

Oh wow. Thirty five minutes to go. I can hardly wait.

Yes, that would be 10;:15pm
East Coast Time

Oh wow. I was planning to get me some shut eye early tonight but now I will have to stay up for this big news event.

FNMA/FMCC
CountDown for Huge Breaking News Story for Sheerholders
Coming at 7:15 pm CA Time - Exactly 5 hours from NOW

Yes, Just imagine a Bird of Paradise landing in your yard, and they're carryiing a basket covered with a golden doily. You're reach to open it and inside is Wealth the likes of which are only in Dreams

This is 5 month old news. Here's other news - https://www.reuters.com/article/business/-government-takes-over-fannie-mae-freddie-mac-idUSN07578818/

Are you going to give us something to think about before the time....(I won't tell anyone, promise. wink wink)

FNMA

Yes, that would be 10;:15pm
East Coast Time

Funny how you of all people, the many times with your incorrect info, would mention that….huh
Fnma

If Nothing, May Lighting Strike You Twice And Vaporize You To Ashes

How is that 5 hours…east coast/west coast 3 hours…
Fnma

FNMA/FMCC
CountDown for Huge Breaking News Story for Sheerholders
Coming at 7:15 pm CA Time - Exactly 5 hours from NOW

And we were told by Bush that it was definitely temporary

Temporary Indefinite!

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/blackstone-ceo-schwarzman-back-trump-axios-reports-2024-05-24/

it is much higher but as you know it effectively negative in value and the political clutches are so tight that they can crumble with nothing left.

Great video. A must watch.

@SenAlexPadilla & @JudiciaryDems haven't once objected to @FHFA 's $301 billion swindle of @FannieMae & @FreddieMac equity while it keeps them in a fraudulent "temporary" conservatorship for over 16 years.

If USA isn't a🍌REPUBLIC...

END THE SWINDLE!
FREE FANNIE!
FREE FREDDIE!— Guido da Costa Pereira (@GuidoPerei) September 22, 2024

As of the latest information available, BlackRock holds a substantial number of shares in both $FNMA Fannie Mae and FMCC , although exact figures fluctuate based on portfolio adjustments. In earlier filings, BlackRock reported millions of common shares in both entities— Grail (@SmartMoney777) September 22, 2024

How Fannie Mae Could Multiply by 50x? -- $FNMA https://t.co/98aTLwqOgB via @YouTube— Cmdr Ron Luhmann (@usnavycmdr) September 22, 2024

Proof for the latter?

I

Kamala Harris is owned by BlackRock

BlackRock recently bought 21 million shares Fannie / Freddie common

End of message

8% max only if the JPS didn't exist. But they do.....so more likely 0.8% than 8%.