UPDATE: Any AXA Deal May Need Foreign Investment OK - Australia Min
November 20 2009 - 4:38AM
Dow Jones News
Australian wealth manager AMP Ltd. (AMP.AU) and French insurer
AXA SA's (AXA) A$12 billion takeover proposal for AXA Asia Pacific
Holdings Ltd. (AXA.AU) faces another potential hurdle even if the
pair can win over AXA Asia Pacific's board.
The deal may also need to satisfy Australia's Foreign Investment
Review Board along with its competition regulator, Financial
Services and Corporate Law Minister Chris Bowen said Friday.
"It would have to go before a range of government regulatory
bodies, potentially the Foreign Investment Review Board and the
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission," Bowen told Dow
Jones Newswires in an interview, adding that he "couldn't preempt
any government views" on the takeover proposal.
"We need to wait and see if there's a deal first and then
there's a process to go through."
Australia's Foreign Investment Review Board, a unit of the
Treasury that assesses foreign investment proposals, approves the
majority of foreign investment proposals, acting on behalf of
Australia's Treasurer Wayne Swan, although Swan has the final say
on any sensitive proposals.
Paris-based AXA SA, which has a 54% stake in the target, and AMP
said on Nov. 9 they were joining forces for an offer that valued
AXA Asia Pacific at A$5.34 a share, based on the previous trading
day's closing share price. AXA Asia Pacific's board of directors
rejected the bid almost immediately, saying it was too low.
As part of the proposal, AMP would buy AXA Asia Pacific and sell
the Asian operations of the target to AXA SA, which would
relinquish its interest in Australia. Most market participants had
expected that because AXA Asia Pacific would be bought by AMP, an
Australian entity, the proposal wouldn't need to be approved by
FIRB.
A spokeswoman for AMP said the company is aware the proposal
will require foreign investment approval.
As part of the original foreign investment approval when AXA SA
took a majority stake in what was then National Mutual in 1995, the
French insurer agreed with regulators to use the Australian arm for
its expansion into Asia.
AXA Asia Pacific is the only Australian financial services firm
with the majority of its business in Asia and has exposure to eight
regional markets, which account for two-thirds of its earnings.
Bowen said the move by AXA SA to exit its Australian holding
isn't a sign that foreign names are in any way deterred by the
prospect of future regulation of the Australian wealth management
sector.
Rather, it is part of a global trend by financial firms to
"focus more on their home markets" in the wake of the global
financial crisis.
"I don't think there's any particular adverse trend, or anything
to be concerned about at this stage," he said.
The comments come as Bowen embarks on a week-long tour to the
world's financial capitals, New York and London, touting Australia
to investors as a relative financial haven compared with
still-distressed markets elsewhere.
Australia has four of the world's nine AA-rated banks --
National Australia Bank Ltd., Australia and New Zealand Banking
Group Ltd., Commonwealth Bank of Australia and Westpac Banking
Corp.
The country's banking system sidestepped the worst of the global
financial crisis as the banks largely avoided structured
investments that crippled global peers and authorities injected
massive fiscal and monetary policy stimulus. Strong prudential and
market regulation also helped.
Bowen Friday endorsed the role the Big Four banks play in
underscoring the strength of the sector, despite concerns of
declining competition.
"I think as the market returns to normal you'll find more
competitive pressure in the banking industry, but that won't take
away from the fundamental strength of our Big Four," he said.
Asked if there is any risk regulation can become overzealous,
Bowen said there's always a "balance to be struck" and the
government is flexible in its approach.
Turning to the decision by Standard & Poor's and Moody's
Investors Service not to apply for licenses to rate retail
investments in Australia--a new requirement confirmed by the
government last week--Bowen said he wouldn't "preempt" any decision
by the securities regulator.
"We'll wait and see what the regulators come up with," he
said.
A spokesman for Bowen said later that the minister was referring
to the government not intervening in decisions made by regulators
generally, not the Australian Securities and Investments
Commission's specific decision to impose licensing conditions in
relation to credit ratings on retail products.
That regulation stands.
The ratings agencies' decision not to seek the license could
have implications across the debt spectrum by limiting the
attraction of hybrid bank bonds, an instrument that is especially
attractive to non-institutional buyers.
-By Rachel Pannett, Dow Jones Newswires; 61-2-6208-0901;
rachel.pannett@dowjones.com
Axa (NYSE:AXA)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2024 to Jun 2024
Axa (NYSE:AXA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2023 to Jun 2024