UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the
Registrant
x
Filed by a
Party other than the Registrant
¨
Check the
appropriate box:
|
|
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
|
|
x
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12
|
|
FOREST LABORATORIES, INC.
|
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
(Name of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the registrant)
|
|
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
x
|
|
No fee required.
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify
the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Filing Party:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Date Filed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Forest Laboratories Letterhead]
July 9, 2012
Dear Fellow Shareholders,
Forest Laboratories, Inc.s Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held on August 15, 2012. This meeting comes at an important point for the
future strategic direction of the Company, and our shareholders will face a key decision. Once again, Carl Icahn has nominated four individuals to the Forest Board nominees we believe would not serve the interests of all shareholders. We
strongly believe that Forests director nominees have the right experience, expertise, and insight to drive sustainable growth at Forest in 2012 and beyond.
Now is a very exciting time for Forest as we undergo a significant transition in our therapeutic portfolio, and we take pride in the progress we have made since our last Annual Meeting. Last year, we made
a commitment to advance our late-stage pipeline, grow and diversify our product portfolio, and further enhance our corporate governance practices. We have done all of those things, and we continue to work to realize the full potential of our
launched products, grow our company, and build value for our shareholders.
FOREST HAS CONTINUED TO ADVANCE ITS STRONG
PRODUCT
PORTFOLIO OVER THE PAST YEAR
Forests Board and leadership team are focused on building sustainable value for shareholders through the advancement of our product pipeline. As we promised you, Forest has made considerable
progress toward the introduction of new products since our 2011 Annual Meeting last August. Reflecting the hard work begun years ago to identify, develop and bring to market new products, we launched Bystolic in 2008 and Savella in 2009. Building on
this momentum, in 2011, we launched Teflaro, Daliresp and Viibryd. This past year, we also:
|
|
|
Filed a New Drug Application (NDA) with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for
aclidinium
, for the treatment of chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease;
|
|
|
|
Filed an NDA for
linaclotide
, a novel therapy for the treatment of constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome and chronic
constipation;
|
|
|
|
Announced positive results from the completed Phase III clinical program for
levomilnacipran
, an investigational agent for the treatment
of adults with major depressive disorder, and announced that a 2012 NDA filing is being prepared;
|
|
|
|
Announced positive results from the completed Phase III program for
cariprazine
, an investigational antipsychotic agent for the treatment
of adult patients with schizophrenia or acute mania associated with bipolar I disorder, and announced that a 2012 NDA filing is being prepared;
|
1
|
|
|
Enhanced the value of our product franchise by making significant progress on lifecycle programs, including beginning Phase III studies for
aclidinium-formoterol
(September 2011),
ceftazidime-avibactam
(December 2011)
Bystolic-valsartan
(January 2012), and preparing to launch
Namenda XR
(2013);
|
|
|
|
Received marketing approval from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for
Colobreathe
dry powder inhaler for the treatment of cystic
fibrosis and chronic lung infections; and
|
|
|
|
Secured the right to acquire
BC-3781
, a novel antibacterial agent, from Nabriva Therapeutics.
|
Over the last five years, Forest has received six product approvals in nine different indications. We expect the number of approvals to grow to eight
with the aclidinium approval expected in July 2012 and the linaclotide approval expected in the third quarter of calendar 2012. We also expect to file NDAs for levomilnacipran and cariprazine later this calendar year.
Forests track record of new product development compares favorably to its specialty-pharma peers, as well as many of the industrys largest
companies. For example, Forest has had more new molecular entity approvals and new drug application (NDA)/BLA filings over the last three years than similarly-sized companies such as Shire or Warner Chilcott, and has had the same number or more than
much larger companies like GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Merck and Eli Lilly. Forest now boasts one of the strongest and most diverse product portfolios and pipelines in the industry, in large part due to our strong core competency in our key
therapeutic focus areas and our status as a partner of choice, as evidenced by our numerous repeat collaborations.
We have a long track
record of successful product selection, product development and sales and marketing execution and the investments we are making to support our products are both prudent and necessary to help them reach their full potential. There are of
course substantial upfront expenses associated with successfully developing and launching new products. However, we have managed our expenses carefully and have kept our costs at appropriate levels when taking into account the many new products we
have in development and in the early-stage launch phase. This gives us great optimism about our future prospects, and we believe we will once again deliver substantial progress in the coming year.
OUR PRODUCT PORTFOLIO AND PIPELINE ARE A STRONG FOUNDATION FOR FUTURE
GROWTH AND VALUE CREATION FOR SHAREHOLDERS
We have deliberately and strategically diversified our product portfolio so that we should not be dependent on any single product or therapeutic area
. Today, Forest has one of the strongest, most
diverse pipelines in pharma, with multiple branded products in six large therapeutic areas: cardiovascular, CNS, pain, gastrointestinal, respiratory and anti-infectives.
2
These areas are six of the eight most common disease states that primary care physicians (PCPs) treat. Having a broad
portfolio of products to promote to PCPs will drive meaningful commercial synergies as Forest generates significant operating leverage from cross-selling multiple products to PCPs. For example, Forest already calls on approximately 80% of the
physicians to which it expects to promote linaclotide when approved. Through its broad access to and understanding of these physicians, Forest can create higher product sales and more profitable products.
Forests PCP-centric business model and unique promotion capabilities are currently driving the strong product growth of our newest launches. Within
the last year, Bystolic, Savella, Teflaro, Dalisresp and Viibryd have generated significant revenues driven by rapidly increasing market adoption rates and continued physician satisfaction. The strong prescription growth rates of Bystolic (20% vs.
CQ1 2011), Viibryd (42% increase YTD), and Daliresp (42% increase YTD) offer further evidence that our pipeline plan is on course. Furthermore, given the respective market sizes and varied therapeutic area focus of each drug, we believe we have
built a well-diversified product portfolio that has several potential candidates to reach blockbuster status.
For example, Bystolic, which
was launched in a highly genericized market in 2008, is growing strongly, and in combination with valsartan, it could achieve blockbuster status. We also expect strong long-term growth trajectories for Viibryd, Daliresp, and Teflaro. We will employ
the same prudent investment strategy to drive aclidinium and linaclotide upon product approvals this year, and we expect the combined sales of our portfolio of products to drive significant top-line growth and profitability in the years to come. But
dont take our word for it; see what pharmaceutical research analysts have to say:
|
PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY ANALYSTS AGREE
FOREST IS WELL POSITIONED FOR THE
FUTURE
1
Simple analysis supports significant pipeline value: A key element
of our Buy thesis has been our view that the evolution of FRXs pipeline has not been fully appreciated, and that this could change as investors revisit FRX in the wake of the Lexapro patent cliff and as numerous pipeline catalysts hit in
2012.
Gregg Gilbert, Gregory Fraser and Suman Kulkarni,
Bank of America Merrill Lynch, 6/8/12
|
1
|
Permission to use quotations neither sought nor obtained.
|
3
|
[W]e cant ignore FRX has been crushing it on the development side, and is flush with product launches to drive growth, cash to reload,
and durable IP. We dont see launches like the old days but linaclotide is as exciting an oppy as Spec Pharma gets.
Corey Davis, Jefferies, 4/18/2012
We rate FRX Outperform for several reasons including: (1) the underappreciated blockbuster potential of FRXs aclidinium and
aclidinium/formoterol franchise based on increasingly positive feedback from MEDACorp clinical and regulatory KOLs; (2) potential for sustained double-digit average sales growth through fiscal 2020 driven by seven new U.S. product launches; (3)
considerable financial flexibility to execute accretive M&A transactions; and (4) FRXs overall scarcity value following an unprecedented Phase III hit rate which should allow for up to seven out of seven new product approvals/launches
in just 3-4 years
Seamus Fernandez, Leerink Swann,
5/31/2012
Management is transitioning Forest to an even more
powerful commercial entity with deep therapeutic verticals, selling synergies, and a bright growth outlook beginning next year.
Irina Rivkind, Cantor Fitzgerald, 6/21/12
Forest has had strong development and regulatory performance over the past several years, leaving the company with a robust portfolio of new product
opportunities that should ultimately translate to a significant recovery in topline and EPS performance.
Chris Schott, JP Morgan, 6/20/12
We estimate that by F2019, FRXs new product launches and late stage pipeline have the potential to generate sales of $4B+ which could more than offset Lexapro and Namenda sales lost to generic
competition. The bottom line is that FRX has many potential shots on goal to increase its earnings potential with a full pipeline, large cash balance and no debt.
Louise Chen, Auriga, 4/26/12
Forests strong balance sheet, robust cash flow and leverageable commercial platform should provide the company with the ability to grow
revenues at an attractive rate after the loss of Lexapro and Namenda.
William Tanner, Colleen Mackay and Meredith Cheng, Lazard, 6/11/12
Forest has had an amazing success rate with respect to moving its pipeline
forward. And it should be commended for this (above normal) success rate.
Marc Goodman, Ami Fadia and Derek Yuan, UBS, 6/21/2012
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IS A CONTINUING PRIORITY OF YOUR
STRONG AND INDEPENDENT BOARD
Forests Board represents a balance of continuing leadership and new perspectives, including five new independent directors, half of the existing Board, in the last six years. In 2011, our
shareholders elected three new highly qualified and experienced independent directors to our Board, adding to the Boards financial acumen, operational skills, investor perspective and corporate governance leadership.
4
In keeping with our commitment to shareholders, the three new independent directors elected in 2011 have
been extremely active, have taken leadership roles on key committees, and each currently serves on two Board committees.
|
|
|
Christopher J. Coughlin
, Lead Director of Dun & Bradstreet, former Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Tyco
International, and former Chief Financial Officer of Pharmacia Corporation, serves as
Chairman of the Audit Committee
and is a member of the Compensation Committee;
|
|
|
|
Gerald M. Lieberman
, former President and Chief Operating Officer of AllianceBernstein, serves as
Chairman of the Nominating and Governance
Committee
and is a member of the Compensation Committee; and
|
|
|
|
Brenton L. Saunders
, Chief Executive Officer of Bausch + Lomb, serves on our Board Compliance Committee and Compensation Committee.
|
In addition,
Dr. Nesli J. Basgoz
, the Associate Chief for Clinical Affairs, Division of Infectious
Diseases at Massachusetts General Hospital, was elected to our Board in 2006, and
Dr. Peter J. Zimetbaum
, Director of Clinical Cardiology at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Associate Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical
School, joined in 2009. Dr. Basgoz and Dr. Zimetbaum each serve on both the Board Compliance Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee. As set forth above, these Board members include a current CEO, former CFO and former COO of
major corporations and top medical professionals from two of the countrys leading medical institutions.
These individuals join our
other board members with diverse and complementary backgrounds spanning a wide range of disciplines, such as medicine, law, business, accounting and finance. The board members include a former Chairman of the American Bar Associations
Committee on Law and Accounting and former Dean of the Faculty of the Mt. Sinai Medical School in New York. Mr. Icahns claim that any of our directors could be dominated by management or anyone else is completely baseless and defies
common sense.
YOUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR OUR FULL SLATE OF 10 HIGHLY QUALIFIED
DIRECTORS AT THE ANNUAL MEETING
Our Board is both determined and well equipped to ensure that Forest continues to
advance its robust, late-stage pipeline and execute its commercialization strategy.
Over the past year, we have taken additional steps to enhance our corporate governance and compensation policies in response to shareholder feedback, to
incorporate best practices, and to address the evolving needs of Forests business. For example, this year the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors which includes all three of our new directors added in 2011 retained
an independent compensation consultant to review senior executive compensation at Forest. Subsequent to that review, the Committee implemented new stock ownership guidelines for directors and senior executives and made changes to Forests
compensation program to continue our policy of aligning director and executive pay with shareholder interests.
5
In addition, as we previously disclosed, the Board is engaged in ongoing succession planning. In November
2010, we announced a series of senior executive promotions, which were implemented to ensure a successful CEO transition at the appropriate time by moving a number of our most talented employees into roles of increasing responsibility. Elaine
Hochberg was promoted to Executive Vice President (EVP) and Chief Commercial Officer; Frank Perier Jr. was promoted to EVP Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer; David Solomon was promoted to Senior Vice President (SVP) Corporate
Development and Strategic Planning; and Dr. Marco Taglietti was promoted to SVP Research and Development and President, Forest Research Institute.
The independent directors have a deep bench of management talent from which to evaluate potential CEO successors. The process is being led by our independent directors, who have directly retained Spencer
Stuart, a leading executive search and recruitment firm, to assist with the succession process, including the consideration of internal and external candidates.
Our Board recognizes that a commitment to good governance must be a continuing priority for any company. To ensure our policies remain aligned with our business needs and the most current best practices
and to fulfill the commitment we made to shareholders last year we are consulting with Robert C. Clark, a Harvard University Distinguished Service Professor and former Dean of Harvard Law School. A leading authority in corporate law
and corporate governance, Dean Clark advised us on our corporate governance policies, including the succession process. Our full Board intends to further this commitment by continuing to consult with experts on an annual basis. Additional steps the
Company has taken to enhance its corporate governance are detailed in a publicly available corporate governance white paper, found in the Corporate Governance section of Forests website.
WE STRONGLY URGE YOU TO REJECT ICAHNS NOMINEES
You will recall that Carl Icahn, the well-known corporate raider now trying to reinvent himself as a corporate governance guru, waged and lost a proxy contest against Forest in 2011. Despite
our clear progress and promising future, Mr. Icahn is again seeking to replace four members of Forests Board and recycling many of the same baseless arguments that were rejected last year by an overwhelming majority of Forest
shareholders.
We believe Mr. Icahns 2012 slate is even weaker than last years. It is led by Eric Ende, who was nominated by
Mr. Icahn last year and received the fewest number of votes of any of the fourteen director nominees in 2011. Eric Ende also has a highly unusual compensation arrangement with Mr. Icahn that a corporate governance expert has already drawn
into question because it gives him incentives to favor Icahns profits over the interests of the rest of our shareholders. Another of Mr. Icahns nominees, Daniel Ninivaggi, is a salaried employee of Icahn Enterprises with no pharma
experience. In addition, Mr. Icahn has nominated Andrew Fromkin and Pierre Legault, both of whom have limited relevant experience; even more troubling, we believe Mr. Fromkin is conflicted as a result of his prior association with Clinical
Data, a company we acquired in 2011. Forests Board has carefully reviewed and considered Mr. Icahns nominees and has determined that his candidates are far less qualified than our slate of experienced directors.
6
Mr. Icahn has had an open invitation to discuss his ideas or provide feedback since his defeat at last
years Annual Meeting. Rather than engaging in a constructive dialogue over the past year, Mr. Icahn did not contact the Company until he threatened another proxy contest in late May, and has since resorted to his standard playbook of wild
allegations, rants and litigation tactics. This type of mud-slinging is pointless, tiresome and counterproductive for shareholders.
OUR PROMISE TO SHAREHOLDERS
Over the past year, we have worked hard to fulfill our
commitments to you and we will continue to do so. As we move forward, we will remain keenly focused on serving your interests, working constructively with our active, strong and independent Board, and continuing to develop our pipeline and product
portfolio which is the key to building shareholder value.
Your Vote is Important Please Submit the WHITE
Proxy Card Today
Forests upcoming Annual Meeting is an important event in shaping our future. Forests Board unanimously
recommends that you vote for all of our highly qualified director nominees on the WHITE proxy card. You may vote by telephone, Internet, or by signing, dating and returning the enclosed WHITE proxy card in the postage-paid envelope. We also urge you
to discard any GOLD proxy card sent to you by Mr. Icahn or his affiliates.
On behalf of the Board of Directors, we thank you for your
continued support of our Company.
Sincerely,
/s/ Howard Solomon
Howard Solomon
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Kenneth E. Goodman
Kenneth E. Goodman
Presiding Independent
Director
Forward-Looking Information
Except for the historical information contained herein, this document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements
involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including the difficulty of predicting FDA approvals, the acceptance and demand for new pharmaceutical products, the impact of competitive products and pricing, the timely development and launch of new
products, and the risk factors listed from time to time in Forest Laboratories Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and any subsequent SEC filings.
7
Important Additional Information
Forest Laboratories, its directors, director nominees and certain of its executive officers may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies from Forest shareholders in connection with the
matters to be considered at Forest Laboratories 2012 Annual Meeting. Forest Laboratories has filed its definitive proxy statement (as it may be amended, the Proxy Statement) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) in connection with such solicitation of proxies from Forest shareholders. FOREST SHAREHOLDERS ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO READ THE PROXY STATEMENT AND ACCOMPANYING PROXY CARD AS THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION. Information
regarding the ownership of Forests directors and executive officers in Forest stock, restricted stock and options is included in their SEC filings on Forms 3, 4 and 5, which can be found at the Companys website (www.frx.com) in the
section Investors. More detailed information regarding the identity of potential participants, and their direct or indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, is set forth in the Proxy Statement and other materials to be filed
with the SEC in connection with Forest Laboratories 2012 Annual Meeting. Information can also be found in Forests Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012, filed with the SEC on May 25, 2012. Shareholders
can obtain the Proxy Statement, any amendments or supplements to the Proxy Statement and other documents filed by Forest Laboratories with the SEC for no charge at the SECs website at www.sec.gov. Copies are also available at no charge at
Forest Laboratories website at www.frx.com or by writing to Forest Laboratories at 909 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10022.
This
document contains quotes and excerpts from certain previously published material. Unless otherwise indicated, consent of the author and publication has not been obtained to use the material as proxy soliciting material.
If you have any questions, require assistance with voting your WHITE proxy card,
or need additional copies of the proxy materials, please contact:
105 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10016
frxproxy@mackenziepartners.com
(212) 929-5500 (Call Collect)
Or
TOLL-FREE (800) 322-2885
8
Forest Road Acquisition (NYSE:FRX)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2024 to Aug 2024
Forest Road Acquisition (NYSE:FRX)
Historical Stock Chart
From Aug 2023 to Aug 2024