REGULATORY OVERVIEW
The development of innovative new drugs is a time-consuming,
expensive, and risky process. Despite these challenges, the
pharmaceutical industry has been remarkably successful in
developing a broad range of important new medicines. It is also a
heavily regulated industry. Drugs are evaluated for safety,
efficacy, and manufacturing quality as a condition of market
access, and promotional messages must adhere to approved product
characteristics. Drug prices also are regulated in most countries
with national health insurance systems. Regulation of market access
and promotion derives from uncertainty about drug safety and
efficacy. These product characteristics can only be determined from
accumulated experience over large numbers of patients in carefully
designed trials or observational studies. The 1962 Amendments to
the United States Food and Drug Agency Act extended the powers of
the FDA to review safety, efficacy, manufacturing quality and
promotion. Subsequent studies concluded that the safety and
efficacy requirements added to the intrinsically high cost of
research and development, led to launch delay of new drugs and
favored large over small firms.
However, more recently the biotechnology revolution has transformed
the nature of drug discovery and the structure of the industry.
Increasingly, new drugs originate in small firms, which often
out-license their products
to more experienced firms for later-stage drug development,
regulatory review, and commercialization. In any given year, the
biotechnology industry may comprise a couple of thousand firms, but
the identities of these firms change as new start-ups are formed and established
firms grow, merge, or are acquired by other established
companies.
Government Regulation and Product Approval
As a preclinical to early clinical stage pharmaceutical company
that intends to test, register and commercialize products in the
United States and other jurisdictions, we are subject to extensive
regulation by various regulatory authorities. The primary
regulatory agency in the US is the FDA, in Canada it is HC, and in
Europe it is the EMA. Along with these three, there are other
federal, state, and local regulatory agencies. In the United
States, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or the “FDCA”,
and its implementing regulations set forth, among other things,
requirements for the research, testing, development, manufacture,
quality control, safety, effectiveness, approval, labeling,
storage, record keeping, reporting, distribution, import, export,
advertising and promotion of our products. Although the discussion
below focuses on regulation in the United States, we anticipate
seeking approval for, and marketing of, our products in other
countries.
Generally, our activities outside the United States will be subject
to regulation that is similar in nature and scope as that imposed
in the United States, although there can be important differences.
Approval in the United States Canada, or Europe does not assure
approval by other regulatory agencies, although often test results
from one country may be used in applications for regulatory
approval in another country. Additionally, some significant aspects
of regulation in Europe are addressed in a centralized way through
the EMA but country specific regulation remains essential in many
respects. A major difference in Europe, when compared to Canada and
the United States, is with the approval process. In Europe, there
are different procedures that can be used to gain marketing
authorization in the European Union. The first procedure is
referred to as the centralized procedure and requires that a single
application be submitted to the EMA and, if approved, allows
marketing in all countries of the European Union. The centralized
procedure is mandatory for certain types of medicines and optional
for others. The second procedure is referred to as national
authorization and has two options; the first is referred to as the
mutual recognition procedure and requires that approval is gained
from one member state, after which a request is made to the other
member states to mutually recognize the approval, whilst the second
is referred to as the decentralized procedure which requires a
member state to act as the reference member state through a
simultaneous application made to other member states.
The process of obtaining regulatory marketing approvals and the
subsequent compliance with appropriate federal, state, local and
foreign statutes and regulations require the expenditure of
substantial time and financial resources and may not be successful.
See “Risk Factors”.
114