Can Trump Change -- Or Kill -- Nafta on His Own? It's Complicated
April 23 2018 - 2:32PM
Dow Jones News
By William Mauldin
As U.S. trade representative Robert Lighthizer rushes to amend
the North American Free Trade Agreement as soon as the end of next
week, key questions have emerged: Could President Donald Trump
enact changes to Nafta without Congress? Would he try to do so?
The answers are complex. Under the U.S. Constitution, the
president has the right to negotiate treaties. But Congress sets
tariffs, and Congress often agrees to outsource much of those
powers to the executive branch, particularly to the Office of the
U.S. Trade Representative. Those powers are typically granted on
condition the administration consults with and seeks the consent of
Congress, and adheres to procedural rules.
President Donald Trump hasn't hidden his impatience with the
rules. "We have these provisions where you have to wait long
periods of time, you have to notify Congress, and after you notify
Congress, you have to get certified," Mr. Trump said in a speech a
year ago. "The whole thing is ridiculous."
Mr. Trump has also claimed the legal authority to pull out of
Nafta, a threat he has made repeatedly as part of his negotiating
tactics. Many members of Congress say the president doesn't have
such authority.
The president's team has followed procedural rules while
negotiating, according to congressional staffers. While the
president can make minor changes to the treaty on his own
authority, any change that affects U.S. law would require the
approval of Congress. It is unclear whether the current update of
Nafta, under negotiation with Canadian and Mexican officials behind
closed doors, will result in a deal that would require a change in
federal law, say people following the talks.
The biggest priority for the Trump administration -- tightening
Nafta's rules for auto trade in ways it hopes will boost American
employment in the industry -- doesn't require changes to U.S. law
and could be enacted without Congress, experts say. The
administration's proposal to scale back or eliminate investor-state
dispute settlement, an arbitration system popular with
international businesses, also wouldn't need congressional
approval. But its push to end another dispute-settlement system, in
Nafta's Chapter 19, would change U.S. law, according to a business
group following the talks.
While the Trump administration hasn't spelled out its exact plan
for implementing changes it is seeking to Nafta, the comments so
far suggest that as a procedural matter, a deal could soon go to
Congress under a 2015 law known as fast track, or trade promotion
authority, which allows the president to receive an up-or-down vote
on his trade plans. Congress gave the president that right in 2015.
It expires in July 2021 if Congress doesn't block an automatic
renewal by this July.
Some congressional and business advisers say they're analyzing
the possibility that Messrs. Trump and Lighthizer could scale back
the ambition of the negotiations to achieve a quick agreement -- a
deal that might not need congressional approval -- before Mexico's
presidential election and the U.S. midterm elections.
The U.S. law that implemented Nafta more than two decades ago
gives a president room to unilaterally proclaim changes to tariffs
and other Nafta rules under certain circumstances. But Mr. Trump
would have to consult with key congressional committees on these
changes, according to the congressional Research Service.
Changing Nafta without congressional cooperation poses risks for
the administration. Republican committee leaders have rejected some
of Mr. Trump's trade priorities. And it could alienate Democratic
lawmakers who are currently supportive of Mr. Trump's approach to
trade, potentially generating opposition to the president's party
during the 2018 midterm elections.
Write to William Mauldin at william.mauldin@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
April 23, 2018 14:17 ET (18:17 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2018 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.