UNITED STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed
by the Registrant þ
Filed
by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check
the appropriate box:
☐ |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐ |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only
(as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
þ |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
☐ |
Definitive Additional Materials |
☐ |
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
ZAGG
INC
(Name
of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name
of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment
of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☐ |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
(1). |
Title
of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
(2). |
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction
applies: |
|
|
(3). |
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction
computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 |
|
|
(set forth
the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
(4). |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
☐ |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
☐ |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing
by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
| (1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
|
| (2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
ZAGG Corporate Objectives & Values
The
corporate objectives and values of ZAGG (or the “Company”) were established to act as a foundation for the Company
to drive enterprise value. The four corporate objectives and seven core values guide the Company by aligning the functional teams’
goals and execution. Each core value supports the Company’s corporate objectives. Every employee is trained to understand
his or her role and the impact his or her work has on achieving the Company’s objectives.
Corporate Objectives |
|
|
|
|
|
The
Preferred Brand |
|
Creative
Product Solutions |
|
Targeted
Global Distribution |
|
Operational
Excellence |
|
|
|
Core Values |
|
|
|
Integrity |
|
Ownership |
|
Care for People |
|
Passion |
|
Continuous Improvement |
|
Performance |
|
Sense of Urgency |
|
ZAGG
INC | 910 WEST LEGACY CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 500 | MIDVALE,
UTAH 84047
Notice
of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
NOTICE
IS HEREBY GIVEN that the annual meeting of stockholders (the “Meeting”) of ZAGG Inc (“ZAGG” or the “Company”)
will be held virtually as follows:
Date:
June 22, 2017 Time:
9:00 a.m., Mountain Daylight Time (MDT)
Place:
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ZAGG2017
|
Purposes:
(1) |
|
(2) |
|
(3) |
|
(4) |
|
(5) |
To
elect five directors of the Company to serve until the next annual meeting of the stockholders and until a successor has been
elected and qualified; |
|
To
ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP, as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2017; |
|
To
provide an advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers; |
|
To
approve the Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan; and |
|
To
transact any other business that may properly come before the Meeting and any additional adjournments. |
Who
Can Vote: Stockholders
of record at the close of business on April 24, 2017.
How
You Can Vote: Stockholders
of record may vote electronically over the Internet, or by phone, or may request a complete
set of traditional proxy materials and vote their proxy by mail. Stockholders of record
may also vote at the Meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BY
INTERNET
www.proxyvote.com
|
|
BY
PHONE
1-800-690-6903
|
|
BY
MAIL
Fill
out your proxy card and submit by mail
|
|
BY
VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com
/ZAGG2017
|
|
By
Authorization of the Board of Directors, |
|
|
|
/s/
Bradley J. Holiday |
|
Bradley
J. Holiday
Chief
Financial Officer |
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 1 |
ZAGG
INC | 910 WEST LEGACY CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 500 | MIDVALE,
UTAH 84047
Important
Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on June 22, 2017.
The
Proxy Statement and the 2016 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at www.proxyvote.com.
YOUR
VOTE IS IMPORTANT
WHETHER
OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO VOTE AND SUBMIT YOUR PROXY BY INTERNET, TELEPHONE OR BY MAIL. FOR ADDITIONAL
INSTRUCTIONS ON VOTING BY TELEPHONE OR THE INTERNET, PLEASE REFER TO YOUR PROXY CARD. TO VOTE AND SUBMIT YOUR PROXY BY MAIL, PLEASE
COMPLETE, SIGN AND DATE THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND RETURN IT IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING, YOU MAY REVOKE
YOUR PROXY AND VOTE VIA THE MEETING WEBSITE. IF YOU HOLD YOUR SHARES THROUGH AN ACCOUNT WITH A BROKERAGE FIRM, BANK OR OTHER NOMINEE,
PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS YOU RECEIVE FROM YOUR ACCOUNT MANAGER TO VOTE YOUR SHARES.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 2 |
Proxy
Summary
Solicitation
This
Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors (the “Board”)
of ZAGG Inc, a Delaware corporation (“we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” or “ZAGG”),
for use in connection with the Annual Meeting of the Company’s Stockholders to be held on June 22, 2017 (the “Meeting”).
This Proxy Statement, the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting, proxy card and the Company’s 2016 Annual Report on Form
10-K, or alternatively a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Internet Notice”), will be mailed
to stockholders on or about May 5, 2017. The Board is soliciting your proxy in an effort to give all stockholders of record the
opportunity to vote on matters that will be presented at the Meeting. This Proxy Statement provides you with information on these
matters to assist you in voting your shares.
MATTERS
TO BE VOTED ON |
ITEM FOR BUSINESS |
|
BOARD
RECOMMENDATION |
|
FURTHER
DETAILS
(PAGE#) |
1. |
Election
of Five Directors |
|
FOR |
|
Page
7 |
2. |
Ratification
of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
FOR |
|
Page
16 |
3. |
Advisory
vote on executive compensation |
|
FOR |
|
Page
18 |
4. |
Approval
of Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan |
|
FOR |
|
Page
42 |
DIRECTOR
NOMINEES |
NAME | |
OCCUPATION | |
| AGE | |
| |
DIRECTOR
SINCE | |
|
| INDEPENDENT | |
| |
OTHER CURRENT
DIRECTORSHIPS |
|
| |
ZAGG
COMMITTEES (1) |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| A | | |
| C | | |
| NG | |
Cheryl A. Larabee
|
|
Lecturer,
College of Business & Economics,
Boise State University |
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
√
|
|
|
|
√
|
|
|
|
√
|
|
Randall
L. Hales | |
President
& CEO, ZAGG Inc | |
| 50 | | |
| 2010 | | |
| No | | |
| 2 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
E.
Todd Heiner | |
CEO,
Express Location LLC | |
| 55 | | |
| 2012 | | |
| Yes | | |
| 0 | | |
| √ | | |
| √ | | |
| √ | |
P.
Scott Stubbs | |
CFO,
Extra Space Storage | |
| 49 | | |
| 2015 | | |
| Yes | | |
| 0 | | |
| √ | | |
| √ | | |
| √ | |
Daniel
R. Maurer | |
Board
Member | |
| 60 | | |
| 2012 | | |
| Yes | | |
| 1 | | |
| √ | | |
| √ | | |
| √ | |
(1) |
“A”
refers to the Audit Committee of the Board (the “Audit Committee”), “C” refers to the Compensation
Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”), and “NG” refers to the Nominating and Governance
Committee of the Board (the “Nominating and Governance Committee”). |
2016
Business Highlights
ZAGG
is a global leader in accessories and technologies that empower mobile lifestyles. Its award-winning product portfolio includes
screen protection, mobile keyboards, power management solutions, social tech, and personal audio sold under the ZAGG®,
mophie®, InvisibleShield®, and IFROGZ® brands. ZAGG has operations in the United
States, Ireland, The Netherlands, and China. Our products are available worldwide, and can be found at leading retailers and online.
ZAGG’s consolidated results are comprised of the ZAGG business unit and the mophie business unit.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 3 |
Proxy
Summary
Consolidated
net sales increased 49% to a record of $401.9 million, primarily due to the mophie acquisition and a 7% increase in ZAGG business
unit sales to a record $288.1 million. The ZAGG business unit had record sales of the InvisibleShield® screen protection,
which grew market share to an all-time high of 51% in 2016, with improved operational performance generating a 220 basis point
improvement in the unit’s gross margin, as well as a 29% increase in Adjusted EBITDA1. Consolidated Adjusted
EBITDA was $37.2 million, reflecting ZAGG business unit Adjusted EBITDA of $53.1 million, and $(15.9) million for the mophie business
unit.
(1)
|
Adjusted
EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. Please refer to Annex A for additional information and a reconciliation to the most
directly comparable GAAP financial measure. |
Compensation
Objectives, Principles and Practices
Our
executive compensation program is closely aligned with our business strategy and intended to attract, retain, and motivate talented
executives, while compensating them for the achievement of measurable corporate performance goals. To reinforce the alignment
of executive incentive compensation with the interests of our stockholders, the Compensation Committee has adopted the following
practices. (Please see page 26 for a further details.)
Topic |
Practice |
Offer
Both Equity and Cash Incentives |
● |
Offering
both equity and cash incentives allows us to pay quarterly cash bonuses tied to monthly team goals, and annual equity bonuses
tied to overall Company performance metrics. |
Emphasize
Pay-for-Performance |
●
● |
Performance-based
cash incentive bonus, which compensates executives for the achievement of operational,
strategic, and functional team goals.
Performance-based
equity incentive bonus plan, which compensates executives for the Company’s achievement of financial metrics. |
Annual
Say-on-Pay Vote |
● |
We
annually ask stockholders to provide an advisory vote on our pay practices, which the Compensation Committee considers when
setting pay for the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). |
Equity
Ownership Guidelines |
● |
CEO
and named executive officers are required to own shares of the Company’s common stock (“Common Stock”) equivalent
to three times their base salaries. |
Double-Trigger
Change-of-Control |
● |
We
have double-trigger change-in-control provisions that require the actual or constructive termination of employment and the
consummation of a change-of-control transaction. |
Clawback
Policy |
● |
Our
policy allows recovery of incentive cash or equity compensation that is based on financial statements that were subsequently
restated due to the individual’s fraudulent or grossly negligent act or omission. |
Dividend
Equivalents |
● |
We
do not provide dividend equivalents on unvested equity awards. |
Engage
an Independent Compensation Consultant |
● |
The
Compensation Committee has retained a nationally recognized compensation consulting firm to serve as its independent compensation
consultant. |
Re-pricing
Stock Options |
● |
We
do not re-price our stock options and would not do so without stockholder approval. |
Excise
Tax Gross-Ups |
● |
We
do not provide our executive officers with excise tax gross-ups. |
Resetting
of Performance Targets |
● |
We
did not reset or amend any of the performance goals or targets used to set executive compensation programs in a fiscal year. |
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 4 |
Proxy
Summary
Governance
Highlights
Our
Board prides itself on its commitment to high ethical standards and sound governance practices. For more details, please see page
10 or visit the Company’s website to view our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Topic |
Practice |
Independence |
●
● |
4
out of 5 nominees are independent.
Board
committees are composed exclusively of independent directors. |
Independent
Chairperson |
● |
Board
has appointed an independent chairperson who is not an employee of the Company. |
Executive
Sessions |
● |
Independent
directors meet regularly without management. |
Annual
Election |
● |
All
directors are elected annually to one-year terms. |
Plurality
Plus Voting |
● |
In
uncontested elections, directors receiving less than 50% of the votes cast must tender their resignation for consideration
of the Board. |
Director
Evaluations |
● |
The
Board and each committee conduct annual self-evaluations. |
Stock
Ownership |
● |
Each
director is expected to hold shares of Common Stock equal to three times his or her annual cash retainer. |
Stockholder
Engagement |
● |
The
Board has adopted a protocol to allow stockholders with long-term significant holdings of our stock to communicate with Board
members on appropriate topics. |
Poison
Pill |
● |
The
Company does not have a stockholder rights plan. |
Right
to Call Special Meeting |
● |
Stockholders
holding 10 percent or more of the outstanding Common Stock have the right to call a special meeting. |
Confidential
Voting |
● |
Records
that identify the vote of a particular stockholder are kept confidential from the Company except in a proxy contest or as
required by law. |
Single
Voting Class |
● |
Common
stock is the only class of voting shares outstanding. |
2016
Stockholder Engagement
Our
Board and management value the opinions and feedback of our stockholders, and we are committed to ongoing engagement with, and
listening to, our stockholders. To date, our stockholder engagement team has consisted of our Director of Investor Relations and
the Chairperson of our Compensation Committee. This year, we reached out to our largest investors, representing approximately
50% of our outstanding Common Stock, to discuss executive compensation and corporate governance matters. A summary of the feedback
we received was provided to the Board for review and consideration.
In
response to discussions with stockholders, the Compensation Committee has made a number of enhancements to our executive compensation
program since 2014 as detailed on page 26 in “Recent Compensation Actions Taken”.
The
Compensation Committee will continue to closely monitor the executive compensation program in an effort to align the interests
of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders and to address material concerns raised by stockholders.
Stockholders
and other interested parties who wish to communicate with the Board on these or other matters may contact our Director of Investor
Relations electronically at IR@ZAGG.com or by mail at ZAGG Inc, 910 West Legacy Center Drive, Suite 500, Midvale, Utah
84047.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 5 |
Table
of Contents
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 6 |
PROPOSAL
NO. 1:
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our
Board of Directors
The
Board currently consists of five directors. All directors serve a one-year term and are subject to re-election each year. The
Board has nominated five individuals for election at the Meeting. All individuals up for election currently serve as directors
and each has consented to being named as a nominee for election as a director and has agreed to serve if elected.
Nominations
and Qualifications
Biographical
information for each of the nominees follows:
|
Cheryl A. Larabee
Age: 62
Director Since:
2011; appointed as Chairperson of the Board in August 2012
Committees: Chair
of Nominating and Governance Committee; Member of Audit Committee; Member of Compensation Committee
Principal
Occupation: Lecturer, College of Business & Economics, Boise State University |
|
|
Recommendation:
The Board has determined that Ms. Larabee’s background in corporate banking, financial strategies, and her senior executive
leadership experience qualify her to continue to serve as a director of the Company.
Experience: Ms.
Larabee had a 24-year corporate banking career focused on financial problem-solving with clients ranging from start-ups to
the Fortune 500. Prior to her current position at Boise State, she served as the Associate Vice President for University
Advancement at the College of Business and Economics. She is the former Senior Vice President and Western U.S. Regional
Manager of the Corporate Banking Division at KeyBank. Previously she managed middle market teams at U.S. Bank in Portland,
Oregon, and served a national client base at Crocker Bank in San Francisco, California.
Ms. Larabee holds a B.A. in
Psychology from Moorhead State University and an M.B.A. from Golden Gate University. She also completed the Stanford
University Graduate School of Business Executive Program. Ms. Larabee is a member of the National Association of Corporate
Directors and was named a NACD Board Leadership Fellow in December 2012.
Other Directorships:
Ms. Larabee serves as a director for Norco, Inc.
Family Relationships:
None
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 7 |
|
Randall L. Hales
Age: 50
Director Since: 2010
Committees: None
Occupation:
President and CEO, ZAGG Inc |
Recommendation:
The Board has determined that Mr. Hales’ prior experience as the CEO and a director of consumer products companies,
his extensive consumer products development and marketing experience, and strong background in corporate expansion strategy qualify
Mr. Hales to continue to serve as a director of the Company.
Experience:
Mr. Hales brings extensive business experience in operational development, product management, retail marketing, and management
to our Board. Mr. Hales began serving as a director in October 2010. From December 2011 to August 2012, Mr. Hales served as President,
Chief Operating Officer, and director of ZAGG. Beginning in August 2012, Mr. Hales served as the Company’s interim CEO as
the Board conducted its search for a permanent CEO. In December 2012, Mr. Hales was appointed as CEO of the Company.
From June 2007
to December 2011, he served as CEO and a director of Mity Enterprises (Orem, Utah), a multi-million dollar manufacturer of light-weight
multipurpose furniture. While at Mity Enterprises, Mr. Hales established strategic objectives to drive revenue and EBITDA growth,
established product management and a disciplined approach to new product introductions, and initiated aggressive operational improvement
plans.
From March 2002
to May 2007, he served as CEO and a director of Back to Basics (Bluffdale, Utah), a consumer products company. From April 2003
to June 2007, Mr. Hales served as a Board Advisor to WiLife, a consumer electronics firm, where he helped manage WiLife through
a rapid growth phase. WiLife was later sold to Logitech. Mr. Hales holds a B.S. in Engineering from Brigham Young University.
Other Directorships:
Mr. Hales serves as a director for Norco, Inc. and Development Capital.
Family Relationships:
None
|
E. Todd Heiner
Age: 55
Director Since: 2012
Committees: Member of Audit Committee; Member
of Nominating and Governance Committee; Member of Compensation Committee
Principal
Occupation: CEO, Express Locations LLC |
Recommendation:
The Board has concluded that Mr. Heiner’s more than 30 years of executive leadership, extensive background running divisions
of premier national telecommunications and wireless companies, and experience as an entrepreneur qualify him to continue to serve
as a director of the Company.
Experience:
Mr. Heiner has over 30 years of strategic and operational management experience in the telecommunications and wireless industries,
particularly in building national wireless retail markets. Mr. Heiner founded Express Locations LLC in 2006, which is the second
largest T-Mobile Premier Retail partner in the United States with more than 140 locations. Prior to founding Express Locations
LLC, Mr. Heiner was Vice President of Sales for Western Wireless where his efforts to revitalize the organization resulted in
record setting customer growth. Western Wireless was sold to Alltel Wireless for $6.6 billion in September 2005. At VoiceStream
Wireless, he led the sales and distribution teams of over 3,500 employees and 700 company-owned retail stores covering an area
of over 200 million people in the United States. VoiceStream Wireless was sold to Deutsche Telekom in June 2001 for $30.0 billion
and was rebranded T-Mobile USA. Mr. Heiner holds a B.A. in Communications from Utah State University.
Other Directorships:
None
Family Relationships:
None
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 8 |
|
P.
Scott Stubbs
Age:
49
Director
Since: 2015
Committees:
Member of Nominating and Governance Committee; Chair of Audit Committee; Member of Compensation Committee
Principal
Occupation: Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), Extra Space Storage, Inc. |
Recommendation:
Our Board has determined that Mr. Stubbs’ experience as the CFO of a public company and a licensed CPA, along with his
specific expertise in the areas of accounting and auditing, treasury, investor relations, and financial reporting qualify him
to continue to serve as a director of the Company.
Experience:
Mr. Stubbs has served as CFO of Extra Space Storage Inc. (“ESS”) since December 2011. He served as the Senior
Vice President Finance and Accounting of ESS since its inception, and as the Corporate Controller of its predecessor beginning
in December 2000. Prior to joining of ESS’s predecessor, Mr. Stubbs served as CFO of the Lyon Company from June 2000 through
December 2000. From 1995 through 2000, he served as the U.S. Controller of Critchley Inc. and from November 1992 through June
1995, he worked at Neilson, Elggren, Durkin & Co. as a consultant. Mr. Stubbs is a licensed CPA and holds a B.S. and a Masters
in Accountancy from Brigham Young University.
Other Directorships:
None
Family Relationships:
None
|
Daniel R. Maurer
Age: 60
Director Since: 2012
Committees: Chair of Compensation Committee; Member
of Audit Committee; Member of Nominating and Governance Committee
Principal
Occupation: Board Member |
Recommendation:
Our Board has determined that Mr. Maurer’s strong background in marketing and building brands for global consumer retail
and technology products as well as his expertise and understanding regarding the international consumer marketplace qualify him
to continue to serve as a director of the Company.
Experience:
Mr. Maurer has extensive global consumer retail sales and marketing experience with over 20 years in executive management
at Procter & Gamble (“P&G”), including 15 years internationally. As General Manager of Global Customer Development
at P&G’s headquarters, he was tasked with building an effective marketing strategy to achieve a competitive advantage
with P&G’s largest global customers including Wal-Mart, Costco, Ahold, Tessco, and Carrefour, who collectively represented
over $360.0 billion in annual sales. Subsequent to his tenure at P&G, Mr. Maurer was Vice President of Strategy for Global
Sales and US Business at Campbell’s Soup. From 2006 until his retirement in August 2014, he was a member of the senior management
team at Intuit, Inc. At Intuit, he oversaw the Small Business Solutions Group (including QuickBooks payroll, DemandForce, and
QuickBase), and previously led the TurboTax®, Mint, and Quicken brands. He has previous experience serving on the
board of Iomega Corporation which was acquired by EMC Corporation in 2008. Mr. Maurer holds a B.S. in Marketing and Finance from
the University of Wisconsin.
Other Directorships:
Mr. Maurer serves as a director of CNO Financial Group, Inc.
Family Relationships:
None.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 9 |
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE
ELECTION OF THE FIVE NOMINEES TO SERVE AS DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY.
Plurality
Plus Voting Policy
In
2016, the Board adopted an amendment to the Company’s bylaws which provides that if the number of shares “withheld”
for any director nominee exceeds the number of shares voted “for” the director nominee, then, notwithstanding that
such director was duly elected as a matter of corporate law, he or she must tender his or her written resignation to the Board,
and the Board must decide, through a process managed by the Nominating and Governance Committee and excluding the nominee in question,
whether to accept the resignation at the Board’s next regularly scheduled meeting.
Corporate
Governance
Corporate
Governance Guidelines and Code of Ethics
The
Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines which can be accessed at the Company’s corporate website at
http://investors.zagg.com/. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are intended to supplement the Company’s bylaws
and Board committee charters. The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines
at least annually, and then, as it deems appropriate, recommends amendments to the Board.
The
Board has also adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”) that is applicable to our directors,
officers (including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer or controller),
and employees. The Code of Ethics contains general guidelines for conducting our business consistent with the highest standards
of business ethics, and is intended to qualify as a “code of ethics” under applicable securities rules.
Leadership
Structure
Our
Board of Directors is currently comprised of five members. According to our bylaws, the Board of Directors shall not consist of
less than three nor more than thirteen members. The positions of Chairman of the Board and CEO are held by separate persons.
Mr.
Hales, the CEO, serves on the Board. His main focus, however, is to provide leadership to the Company in accomplishing the directives
established by the Board. In that role, he is responsible for the general administration, oversight, care and management of the
business of the Company and its subsidiaries, as well as full authority over all officers, managers and employees.
Ms.
Larabee, the Chairperson of the Board, is considered the lead independent director, and her role, along with the Board, is to
provide independent oversight of the CEO, to direct the business and affairs of the Company for the benefit of its stockholders,
and to balance the interests of the Company’s diverse constituencies including stockholders, customers, and employees.
Meetings
of the Board are chaired by Ms. Larabee, as the Chairperson. Ms. Larabee also sets the agenda for such meetings. The independent
directors may also meet from time to time without the presence of Mr. Hales as they determine appropriate.
Terms
of Office
Our
directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual meeting of our stockholders, and until their
successors are elected and qualified, or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws.
Director
Independence
The
Board reviews the independence of our directors on the basis of standards adopted by the NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”).
As a part of this review, the Board considers transactions and relationships between the Company, on the one hand, and each director,
members of the director’s immediate family, and other entities with which the director is affiliated, on the other hand.
The purpose of such a review is to determine which, if any, of such transactions or relationships were inconsistent with a determination
that the director is independent under NASDAQ rules. As a result of this review, the Board has determined that each of our directors
other than Mr. Hales (our President and CEO) is an “independent director” within the meaning of applicable NASDAQ
listing standards.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 10 |
Risk
Oversight
Our
Board has overall responsibility for the oversight of risk management at our Company. Day-to-day risk management is the responsibility
of management, which has implemented processes to identify, assess, manage and monitor risks that face our Company. Our Board,
either as a whole or through its committees, regularly discusses with management our major risk exposures, their potential impact
on our Company, and the steps we take to monitor and control such exposures.
In
conjunction with our Board’s general oversight responsibility for risk at our Company, the Board delegates certain risk
oversight duties to Board committees.
Risk
Oversight Duty | |
Board
Committee | |
Responsibility |
Monitoring
of credit, liquidity, regulatory, operational, and enterprise risks. | |
Audit Committee
& Board of Directors | |
Regular reviews
with management, internal and external auditors, and other advisors. |
Review
of accounting and financial controls, and assessment of business risks. | |
Audit Committee | |
Periodic meetings
with independent registered public accounting firms. |
Monitoring
of the Company’s governance and succession risk. | |
Nominating and
Governance Committee & Board of Directors | |
Regular review
with management and outside advisors. |
Monitoring
CEO succession and the Company’s compensation policies and related risks. | |
Compensation
Committee
& Board of Directors | |
Regular reviews
with management and outside advisors. |
Short-Term
or Speculative Transactions Policy
The
Board has a policy (the “Policy”) relating to short-term or speculative transactions in the Company’s securities
by directors, officers, and other employees which prohibits such individuals from engaging in short-term or speculative transactions
involving the Company’s securities, such as publicly traded options, short sales, puts and calls, hedging transactions and
holding the Company’s securities in a margin account.
The
Board believes that it is inappropriate for directors, officers or other employees of the Company or its subsidiaries to hedge
or monetize transactions to lock in the value of holdings in the securities of the Company. Such transactions, while allowing
the holder to own the Company’s securities without the full risks and rewards of ownership, potentially separate the holder’s
interests from those of the Company’s stockholders. The objective of this policy is to prohibit direct or indirect engagement
in hedging against future declines in the market value of any securities of the Company through the purchase of financial instruments
designed to offset such risk.
No
director, officer or other employee of the Company or its subsidiaries may, at any time, directly or indirectly, engage in any
kind of hedging transaction that could reduce or limit such person’s holdings, ownership or interest in or to any Common
Stock or other securities of the Company, including without limitation outstanding stock options, deferred stock, restricted stock
units, or other compensation awards, the value of which are derived from, referenced to or based on the value or market price
of securities of the Company. Prohibited transactions include the purchase by a director, officer or other employee of financial
instruments, including, without limitation, prepaid variable forward contracts, instruments for short sale or purchase or sale
of call or put options, equity swaps, collars, or units of exchangeable funds, that are designed to or that may reasonably be
expected to have the effect of hedging or offsetting a decrease in the market value of any securities of the Company.
Any
person who violates this policy will be subject to disciplinary action which may include, but is not limited to, termination of
employment or restrictions on future participation in the Company’s equity incentive plans.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 11 |
Additionally,
any executive officer or director must seek approval of the Board prior to any pledge of the Company’s securities, such
approval to be included in the minutes of the meetings or consent resolution of the Board; provided, that only a pledge or loan
of the Company’s securities that does not involve a prepaid variable forward or similar transaction will be considered.
As
of the date of this Proxy Statement, all of members of the Board and the Company’s officers were in compliance with the
Policy.
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
None
of our directors or executive officers, nor any proposed nominee for election as a director, nor any person who beneficially owns,
directly or indirectly, more than 5% of any class of our voting securities, nor any members of the immediate family (including
spouse, parents, children, siblings, and in-laws) of any of the foregoing persons has any material interest, direct or indirect,
in any transaction during 2016 or in any presently proposed transaction which, in either case, has or will materially affect us.
The
Company makes a concerted effort to review potential transactions with our executive officers and directors from the standpoint
of whether any related party transaction issues would be involved, and reviews any such issues, including the approval, ratification,
and disclosures relating to such transactions, on a case-by-case basis.
Meetings
and Committees of the Board
Each
director is expected to devote sufficient time, energy and attention to ensure diligent performance of his or her duties and to
attend all Board, committee and stockholders’ meetings. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, there were seven meetings
of the Board. Each of the directors attended, in person or by telephone, more than 75% of the meetings of the Board and the committees
on which he or she served (in each case during the period in which he or she served).
Directors
are encouraged to attend in person each Annual Meeting of Stockholders. One of our directors attended the 2016 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders.
Committees
of the Board
The
Board has three standing committees to facilitate and assist the Board in the execution of its responsibilities: (1) Audit Committee,
(2) Compensation Committee, and (3) Nominating and Governance Committee. Each committee acts pursuant to a written charter adopted
by the Board. Each committee’s charter is available on our corporate website at http://investors.zagg.com/. All of
the committees are comprised solely of non-employee, independent directors as defined by NASDAQ market listing standards.
The
table below shows membership for each of the standing Board committees as of December 31, 2016.
Audit | |
Compensation | |
Nominating
and Governance |
P. Scott Stubbs
(Chair) | |
Daniel R. Maurer
(Chair) | |
Cheryl A. Larabee
(Chair) |
E. Todd Heiner | |
Cheryl A. Larabee | |
E. Todd Heiner |
Daniel R. Maurer | |
E. Todd Heiner | |
P. Scott Stubbs |
Cheryl A. Larabee | |
P. Scott Stubbs | |
Daniel R. Maurer |
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 12 |
Audit
Committee
The
Board has determined that P. Scott Stubbs and Cheryl A. Larabee are “audit committee financial experts” within the
meaning established by the SEC. The primary responsibility of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight
responsibility by reviewing and appraising:
| ● | the
integrity of the Company’s financial statements; the accounting, auditing and financial
reporting processes of the Company; |
| ● | the
management of business and financial risk and the internal controls environment; |
| ● | the
Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and ethics programs
as established by management and the Board, which shall be in conjunction with any recommendations
by the Nominating and Governance Committee with respect to the corporate governance standards; |
| ● | the
reports resulting from the performance of audits by the independent auditor and the internal
audit team; |
| ● | the
qualifications, independence and performance of the Company’s independent auditors;
and |
| ● | the
performance of the Company’s internal audit team. |
The
Audit Committee also has responsibility for reviewing and making recommendations to the Company’s independent directors
regarding transactions between the Company and any related person and any other potential conflicts of interest of Board members
and the Company’s executive officers.
Additional
information regarding the Audit Committee’s processes and procedures is provided below under the heading “Audit Committee
Disclosure.” The Report of the Audit Committee is set forth later in this Proxy Statement on page 16.
Compensation
Committee (Including interlocks and Insider Participation)
The
primary responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are to:
| ● | approve
an overall compensation philosophy for the Company’s named executive officers (“NEOs”)
considering the Company’s goals and objectives; |
| ● | select
performance metrics aligned with the Company’s business strategy; |
| ● | review
and approve the Company’s executive cash and equity-based compensation plans; |
| ● | review
and approve any benefit plans, retirement and deferred compensation or other perquisites
offered to the NEOs and other eligible employees; |
| ● | review
the Company’s compensation practices so that they do not encourage imprudent risk
taking; |
| ● | review
and make recommendations to the Board regarding compensation for service on the Board
and Board committees; and |
| ● | develop
and recommend to the Board for approval an executive officer succession plan. |
Dan
Maurer, Cheryl Larabee, Todd Heiner and Scott Stubbs served on the Compensation Committee in 2016. None of the directors who served
on the Compensation Committee in 2016 has ever served as one of the Company’s officers or employees or is or was a participant
in fiscal 2016 in a related person transaction with the Company. None of our NEOs serves as a member of the compensation committee
or board of directors of any entity that has an executive officer serving on our Compensation Committee or as a member of our
Board.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 13 |
Nominating
and Governance Committee (Including Nomination Process)
The
primary responsibilities of the Nominating and Governance Committee are to:
| ● | review
and recommend individuals to the Board for nomination as members of the Board and its
committees; |
| ● | develop
and review the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines; |
| ● | monitor
compliance with the Code of Ethics; |
| ● | review
and recommend approval of corporate governance policies and practices; |
| ● | review
the Committee’s new director orientation program and continuing director education
programs; and |
| ● | oversee
the process developed by the Board for an annual performance evaluation of the Board
and its committees and the conduct of such evaluation. |
The
policy of the Nominating and Governance Committee is to consider stockholder recommendations for candidates to serve as directors
of the Company properly submitted in accordance with our bylaws. In evaluating those recommendations, the Nominating and Governance
Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience, and capability on the Board and to address the membership criteria
described below. Any stockholder wishing to recommend a candidate for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee
should submit a recommendation in writing indicating the candidate’s qualifications and other relevant biographical information
(including without limitation, name, age, business and residence address, principal occupation, class and number of shares of
the Company held by the candidate) and provide confirmation of the candidate’s consent to serve as a director. This information
should be addressed to the Nominating and Governance Committee c/o Secretary at the following address:
ZAGG
Inc
910
W. Legacy Center Drive, Suite 500
Midvale,
Utah 84047
As
contemplated by the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Nominating and Governance Committee reviews the appropriate
skills and characteristics required of directors in the context of the current composition of the Board, at least annually.
The
criteria considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee in evaluating director nominees include, without limitation, the
following:
| ● | a
candidate must demonstrate integrity, accountability, informed judgment, financial literacy,
creativity, and vision; |
| ● | a
candidate must be prepared to represent the best interests of all the Company’s
stockholders, not just those of a particular constituency; |
| ● | a
candidate must have a record of professional accomplishment in his or her chosen field;
and |
| ● | a
candidate must be prepared and able to participate fully in Board activities, including
membership on Board committees. |
The
criteria are not exhaustive and the Nominating and Governance Committee may consider other qualifications and attributes that
it believes are appropriate in evaluating the ability of an individual to serve as a director. Additionally, different factors
may assume greater or lesser significance at particular times and the needs of the Board may vary in light of its composition
and the Nominating and Governance Committee’s perceptions about future issues and needs.
The
Nominating and Governance Committee does not have a formal policy regarding diversity, but as described above considers a broad
range of attributes and characteristics in identifying and evaluating nominees for election to the Board. The Nominating and Governance
Committee assesses the appropriate size of the Board, and whether any vacancies on the Board are expected due to retirement or
otherwise. In the event that vacancies are anticipated, or otherwise arise, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers
various potential candidates for director. Candidates may come to the attention of the Nominating and Governance Committee through
various means, including current directors, stockholder recommendations or other referrals. Candidates are evaluated at meetings
of the Nominating and Governance Committee, and may be considered at any point during the year.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 14 |
There
have been no material changes to the procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to the Board since the Company last
provided this disclosure.
Director
Compensation
The
Company uses cash compensation and stock-based incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve as directors. In
setting director compensation, the Company considers the significant amount of time that directors expend in fulfilling their
duties to the Company, as well as the skill level required by the Company of its directors.
The
Company has granted restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to its non-employee directors concurrent with their appointment
to the Board. These RSU awards typically vest at the end of each fiscal year.
Director
Summary Compensation Table for 2016
The
table below summarizes the compensation paid (fees) or granted (stock-based compensation) by the Company to its non-employee directors
for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Name | |
Fees
Earned ($) | | |
RSUs
($)(1) | | |
Total
($) | |
Cheryl
A. Larabee | |
$ | 110,056 | (2) | |
$ | 104,722 | | |
$ | 214,778 | |
E. Todd Heiner | |
$ | 51,528 | | |
$ | 52,361 | | |
$ | 103,889 | |
Daniel R. Maurer | |
$ | 58,528 | (3) | |
$ | 52,361 | | |
$ | 110,889 | |
P. Scott Stubbs | |
$ | 51,528 | | |
$ | 52,361 | | |
$ | 103,889 | |
(1) |
This
column shows the full grant date fair market value of the RSUs granted as computed under ASC Topic 718 and the expense attributable
to these awards that will be recorded over the vesting period (excluding estimates for forfeitures in case of awards with
service-based vesting). Assumptions and methodologies used in the calculation of these amounts are included in footnotes to
the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, which are included in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. |
|
|
(2) |
Ms.
Larabee receives twice the annual base fees and RSU awards due to her role as Chairperson of the Board. |
|
|
(3) |
Mr.
Maurer received $7,000 in additional fees as he was the chair of the Compensation Committee for all of 2016. |
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 15 |
PROPOSAL 2:
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The
Audit Committee has appointed KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm
(independent auditors) to audit the consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting of the Company
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. The Company is seeking stockholder ratification of such action. Stockholder ratification
of the appointment of KPMG is not required by our bylaws or otherwise. However, we are submitting the appointment of KPMG to the
stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit
Committee will consider whether or not to retain KPMG. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion
may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines
that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.
The
Board UNANIMOUSLY RecommendS that Stockholders Vote “FOR” the
Ratification of Appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm.
KPMG,
independent registered public accounting firm, was engaged as our independent registered public accounting firm for the years
ended 2011 to 2016.
Audit
Committee Report
The
responsibilities of the Audit Committee include providing oversight to the financial reporting process of the Company through
periodic meetings with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and management to review accounting,
auditing, internal controls, and financial reporting matters. Management is responsible for the Company’s internal controls
and the financial reporting process. The independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG, is responsible for performing an
independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting in accordance
with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and for issuing reports thereon. The Audit Committee’s
responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.
In
this context, the Audit Committee has met and held discussions with management and KPMG. Management represented to the Audit Committee
that the Company’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (“US GAAP”), and the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with
management and KPMG. The Audit Committee discussed with KPMG matters required to be discussed by AS 1301, “Communication
with Audit Committee,” as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.
KPMG
also provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board regarding KPMG’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee
discussed with KPMG that firm’s independence. The Audit Committee also considered all non-audit services provided by KPMG
and verified that each was compatible with their independence.
Based
upon the Audit Committee’s discussion with management and KPMG, and the Audit Committee’s review of the representation
of management and the report of KPMG to the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee recommended that the Board include the audited
financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the SEC.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 16 |
The
Audit Committee
P.
Scott Stubbs, Chair
E.
Todd Heiner
Daniel
R. Maurer
Cheryl
A. Larabee
It
is expected that representatives of KPMG will attend the Meeting and be available to make a statement or respond to appropriate
questions.
Audit
Fees
For
the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we incurred fees to KPMG. Audit fees include the annual audit, the audit of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, quarterly reviews, and accounting consultations. The increase in audit fees from
2015 to 2016 is primarily related to incremental audit work required due to the acquisition of mophie during 2016. Audit-related
fees include a royalty contract audit and a subscription fee for an online accounting research tool. Tax fees include U.S., foreign
and state income tax preparation and tax consultation. Other fees include due diligence fees paid in connection with the mophie
acquisition during the first quarter of 2016. The Audit Committee believes KPMG’s independence has not been impaired by
their non-audit services.
A
summary of fees incurred to KPMG in 2016 and 2015 appears below:
Fee
Category | |
2016 | | |
2015 | |
Audit | |
$ | 1,700,740 | | |
$ | 927,096 | |
Audit-related | |
| 1,549 | | |
| 19,143 | |
Tax | |
| 406,329 | | |
| 186,840 | |
Other | |
| 436,749 | (1) | |
| -- | |
Total | |
$ | 2,545,367 | | |
$ | 1,133,079 | |
(1) |
Represent
due diligence fees paid in connection with the acquisition of mophie in March 2016. |
It
is the policy of the Audit Committee to pre-approve audit, audit-related, tax and non-audit services to be performed by the independent
registered public accounting firm and the related fees. The Audit Committee is authorized to delegate, within specified limits,
the pre-approval of such services and fees to an individual member of the Audit Committee, provided that such individual shall
report any decisions to pre-approve such services and fees to the full Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.
During 2016, no fees were approved by the Audit Committee after services were performed pursuant to the de minimis exception established
by the SEC.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 17 |
PROPOSAL 3:
ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Consistent
with the vote of our stockholders, our Board has determined to submit the approval of our executive compensation annually to our
stockholders on a non-binding basis. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives stockholders
the opportunity to express their views on the compensation of our NEOs. The vote is not intended to address any specific item
of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our NEOs.
Our
executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate and retain a talented team of executives. We seek to accomplish
this goal in a way that rewards performance that is aligned with our stockholders’ long-term interests. We believe that
our executive compensation program satisfies this goal and is strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders.
As
depicted below, the Company’s executive compensation program received significant support from stockholders in 2015 and
2016.
In
accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are including in this Proxy Statement a separate resolution,
subject to a non-binding stockholder vote, to approve the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. Accordingly,
the following resolution is submitted for stockholder vote at the Meeting:
RESOLVED,
that the stockholders of ZAGG Inc approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of its Named Executive Officers as disclosed
in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held June 22, 2017, pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including
the narrative discussion of executive compensation, the accompanying tabular disclosure regarding compensation of the Named Executive
Officers and the corresponding narrative disclosure and footnotes.
As
an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding on the Board. However, the Compensation Committee, which is responsible for designing
and administering the Company’s executive compensation program, values the opinions expressed by stockholders in their vote
on this proposal and considers the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for the Company’s NEOs.
THE
BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION
OF THE NAMED EXECUTIVES, AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 18 |
2016
Business Highlights
Consolidated net sales increased 49% to a record of
$401.9 million, primarily due to the mophie acquisition and a 7% increase in ZAGG business unit sales to a record $288.1 million.
The ZAGG business unit had record sales of the InvisibleShield® screen protection, which grew market share to an all-time
high of 51% in 2016, with improved operational performance generating a 220 basis point improvement in the unit’s gross
margin, as well as a 29% increase in Adjusted EBITDA2. Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA was $37.2 million, reflecting ZAGG
business unit Adjusted EBITDA of $53.1 million, and $(15.9) million for the mophie business unit.
(2) |
Adjusted
EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. Please refer to Annex A for additional information and a reconciliation to the most
directly comparable GAAP financial measure. |
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
The
compensation discussion and analysis describes the material components of the 2016 executive program, including the compensation
objectives, principles, practices, and decisions as they relate to our NEOs, and outlines the 2016 compensation paid to NEOs during
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.
ZAGG
2016 NEOs
Name |
|
Fiscal
Year 2016 Title |
Randall
L. Hales |
|
President
& Chief Executive Officer |
Bradley
J. Holiday |
|
Chief
Financial Officer |
Brian
Stech |
|
President,
ZAGG business unit |
Chris
Paterson |
|
VP
of Product Development – Asia |
Steve
Tarr |
|
Former
Chief Operating Officer – ZAGG China (1) |
(1) |
Mr. Tarr left the Company to pursue other interests in
February 2017. |
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 19 |
Executive
Compensation Philosophy
ZAGG’s
compensation philosophy mirrors our overall business strategy. We are keenly focused on creating a competitive, efficient and
sustainable business that provides real and on-going value to stockholders. These same principles govern our compensation philosophy.
ZAGG’s executive compensation program is centered on a pay-for-performance philosophy, which aligns executive compensation
with stockholder value and ultimately impacts our compensation program design.
Executive
Compensation Procedures
How
Executive Compensation is Determined
Role
of the Compensation Committee
The
Compensation Committee has responsibility for establishing and monitoring the Company’s executive compensation programs
and for making decisions regarding the compensation of the NEOs. In fulfillment of such responsibility, the Compensation Committee
performs the following tasks:
|
● |
Studies executive
compensation market data and trends; |
|
● |
Seeks advice
from compensation consultants regarding best practices; |
|
● |
Monitors
policies published by certain proxy advisory firms, including Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”) and Glass
Lewis; |
|
● |
Evaluates
the economic, strategic and organizational challenges facing our Company; |
|
● |
Establishes
base salaries, and determines short-term and long-term pay-for-performance compensation for the NEOs; |
|
● |
Presents
CEO’s overall compensation package to the entire Board of Directors for ratification; |
|
● |
Administers
the Company’s incentive compensation and equity-based plans; and |
|
● |
Makes regular
reports to the Board, including an annual report, with the approval or disapproval of management’s recommendations for
material changes in NEOs’ existing retirement and benefit plans. |
The
Compensation Committee finalizes the executive compensation decisions after reviewing the performance of the Company and evaluating
the NEOs’ performance against established goals, leadership ability, Company responsibilities, and current compensation
arrangements. To assist in this process, they review a compensation analysis for each NEO to understand how each element of compensation
relates to other elements and to the compensation package as a whole. The compensation analysis summarizes the total compensation
opportunity, including fixed and variable compensation, perquisites and potential payments upon termination or change of control.
In addition, the compensation analysis includes a summary of historical compensation.
The
Compensation Committee also monitors, administers and approves awards under the Company’s various pay-for-performance compensation
plans for all levels within the Company, including awards under the Company’s 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan.
Role
of Our Chief Executive Officer and Other Senior Executive Officers
Our
President and CEO, Mr. Randall L. Hales, also serves on our Board. By serving multiple roles, Mr. Hales is uniquely positioned
to serve as a resource to the Board and the Compensation Committee in many of its compensation decisions, and in their evaluation
of the issues, opportunities, and challenges facing the Company and industry. This support may help inform the identification
of key performance metrics and indicators that may be used in setting performance-based compensation. In his role as our CEO,
Mr. Hales is also close to the Company’s day-to-day operations to be able to identify key contributors and top performers
within the Company, to ensure that their compensation accurately reflects their responsibilities, performance, future expectations,
and experience levels. While Mr. Hales recuses himself from any Board discussions that involve his own compensation, his recommendations
and feedback, along with the feedback and recommendations of our other senior executive officers, are often taken into consideration
by the Board and the Compensation Committee when setting compensation levels.
Role
of Consultants
From
time to time, the Compensation Committee may engage consultants to perform compensation studies related to current executive and
Board compensation, including a review of cash and stock-based compensation to executives and the Board. The Compensation Committee
has sole authority over consultants, who work exclusively for the Board, and do not provide additional services to management
or the executive team. The Compensation Committee has sole authority to hire and fire any such consultants.
In
fiscal 2016 the Company retained Aon Hewitt, a nationally recognized executive compensation and corporate governance consulting
firm, to provide input and guidance on our compensation peer group, with the goal of broadening the group to reflect the acquisition
of mophie. Aon Hewitt also aided the Compensation Committee in evaluating alternative performance metrics and establishing multi-year
performance goals.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 20 |
Employment
and Severance Agreements
Messrs.
Hales, Holiday, Stech and Paterson have employment agreements with the Company, which are discussed below. Mr. Tarr also had an
employment agreement with the Company which terminated upon his departure from the Company in February 2017. Each of the employment
agreements includes an employee severance component, though none of the severance agreements provides for separation benefits
that exceed the employee’s annual compensation. Mr. Hales and Mr. Holiday also have a severance agreement related specifically
to a change of control of the Company, which is also discussed below. Executive employment agreements include a compensation addendum
with parameters established each fiscal year by the Compensation Committee.
Our
Compensation Principles
Principles
Guiding ZAGG’s Executive Compensation |
|
|
Link
a significant portion of compensation to Company and individual performance.
|
|
|
Talent
acquisition and retention. |
|
|
|
|
|
We
believe that compensation levels should reflect performance – both corporate and individual. This is
accomplished by:
|
|
|
We
strive to offer compensation that is competitive with that offered by comparable companies
regionally and globally to attract, retain and reward our NEOs.
|
● |
Motivating,
recognizing and rewarding individual excellence
|
|
|
Align
management’s interests with those of stockholders. |
● |
Paying
short-term cash bonuses based upon measurable corporate financial and individual performance
goals.
|
|
|
We seek to
implement programs that will encourage NEOs to remain with us and to increase long-term stockholder value by providing competitive
compensation and granting long-term equity-based awards with a minimum 3-year vesting period. |
● |
Linking long-term
compensation to our Company’s performance based on Net Sales and Adjusted EBITDA. |
|
|
|
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 21 |
Peer
Group and Benchmarking
The
Compensation Committee reviews peer groups used for compensation benchmarking periodically or upon a significant change in business
conditions for the Company or its peers. The Compensation Committee worked with Aon Hewitt to help identify comparable companies
to benchmark executive and outside director compensation for 2016. The acquisition of mophie in 2016 increased consolidated ZAGG
net sales and the overall size and complexity of the Company. It was determined that the peer group needed to be updated to reflect
these changes. We believe the new peer group more accurately represents organizations that
generally are impacted by the same economic factors affecting the Company.
Below
is a description of the methodology we used to select companies for our revised peer group:
| ● | reported
$250 million to $1,000 million in annual revenue in 2015 (0.5x—2.0x ZAGG’s
2016 estimated revenue of $500 million); |
| ● | are
publicly-traded on a major exchange and headquartered in the United States; and |
| ● | fall
into the following GICS industries which share similar profiles to ZAGG’s products. |
| ● | Apparel
and Accessories (excludes companies with a large retail presence) |
| ● | Consumer
Electronics (ZAGG’s GICS) |
| ● | Footwear
(excludes companies with a large retail presence) |
| ● | Housewares
and Specialties |
| ● | Leisure
Products (excludes firearm or vehicle manufacturers) |
| ● | Personal
products (excludes nutritional supplement manufacturers) |
| ● | We
excluded companies with atypical compensation practices such as no annual incentives
and/or no annual equity awards. |
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 22 |
Benchmarking
On
an annual basis, the Compensation Committee reviews and considers a number of factors in establishing or recommending a target
total compensation opportunity for each individual including, but not limited to, market data, tenure in position, experience,
sustained performance, and internal pay equity. Although the Compensation Committee strives to be at the median, it does not target
a specific market position.
2016
Stockholder Engagement
Our
Board and management value the opinions and feedback of our stockholders, and we are committed to ongoing engagement with, and
listening to, our stockholders. To date, our stockholder engagement team has consisted of our Director of Investor Relations and
the Chairperson of our Compensation Committee. This year, we reached out to our largest investors, representing approximately
50% of our outstanding Common Stock, to discuss executive compensation and corporate governance matters. A summary of the feedback
we received was provided to the Board for review and consideration.
The
Compensation Committee will continue to monitor the executive compensation program in an effort to align the interests of our
executive officers with the interests of our stockholders and to address material concerns raised by stockholders.
Stockholders
and other interested parties who wish to communicate with the Board on these or other matters may contact our Director of Investor
Relations electronically at IR@ZAGG.com or by mail at ZAGG Inc, 910 West Legacy Center Drive, Suite 500, Midvale, Utah
84047.
Recent
Compensation Actions Taken
The
Compensation Committee conducts an ongoing review and evaluation of our executive compensation and benefits programs in relation
to our compensation philosophy and objectives, and the interests of our stockholders. In response to stockholders’ input,
and as part of our continued effort to align our pay practices with stockholder interests, the Compensation Committee has pursued
the following enhancements to our executive compensation program since 2014:
Topic |
|
Action
Taken |
Peer Group |
|
Reassessment
and refinement of our peer group with the assistance of Aon Hewitt to reflect the mophie acquisition. |
RSU vesting |
|
Introduction
of a three-year vesting period for long-term incentive RSUs for 2016 grants. |
Short-term
Performance Metrics |
|
Review of
short-term performance metrics to align the NEOs’ compensation with key short-term Company processes and goals. |
Long-term
Performance Metrics |
|
Refinement
of the selection of long-term performance metrics to better link executive compensation to long-term performance. |
CD&A
Format |
|
Reformat
of the CD&A to increase the overall transparency of our compensation policies and ensure better communication with our
stockholders. |
|
|
|
Amendments
to 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan
(Subject to approval of stockholders
at the Meeting - See Proposal 4)
|
Prohibit
SARs/options buy-outs |
|
Prohibit
cash buyouts and share recycling associated with SARS and options. |
Increase
equity cap to align with peers |
|
Raise annual
participant equity grant cap from 300,000 shares to 600,000, which is below the mean and median for our peer group. |
Minimum
12-month vesting |
|
Require all
awards to include a minimum 12-month vesting period (subject to limited exceptions). |
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 23 |
Compensation
Risk Assessment
Management
has made an assessment of the Company’s compensation policies and practices with respect to all employees to determine whether
risks arising from those policies and practices are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. In doing
so, management considered various features and elements of the compensation policies and practices that discourage excessive or
unnecessary risk taking. As a result of the assessment, the Company has determined that its compensation policies and practices
do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Report
of the Compensation Committee
The
Compensation Committee has reviewed the foregoing compensation discussion and analysis and discussed with the Company’s
management the information set forth herein. Based on such review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee
recommended to the Board that the foregoing compensation discussion and analysis be included in the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders.
The
Compensation Committee
Daniel
R. Maurer, Chair
Cheryl
A. Larabee
E.
Todd Heiner
P.
Scott Stubbs
2016
Executive Compensation Overview
Executive
Officer Biographies
In
addition to Randall L. Hales, President, CEO and Director, whose biographical information is set forth above, the following individuals
currently serve as executive officers of the Company.
Bradley
J. Holiday, 63, is the CFO of the Company with responsibility for the common support areas of finance, accounting, treasury,
investor relations, and information technology. Mr. Holiday became our CFO in June 2015, at which time he resigned as a director
of the Company, a position he occupied since 2012. Prior to becoming CFO of the Company, Mr. Holiday served as Executive Vice
President and CFO of Callaway Golf, Inc. (“Callaway”) from September 2003 through June 2015 and as Vice President
and CFO of Callaway beginning in August 2000. Before joining Callaway, Mr. Holiday served as Vice President-Finance for Gateway,
Inc. Prior to joining Gateway, Inc., Mr. Holiday was employed with Nike, Inc. in various capacities beginning in April 1993, including
CFO-Golf Company, where he directed all global initiatives and strategic planning for Nike, Inc.’s golf business. Prior
to joining Nike, Inc., Mr. Holiday served in various financial positions with Pizza Hut, Inc. and General Mills, Inc. Mr. Holiday
holds an M.B.A. in Finance from the University of St. Thomas and a B.S. in Accounting from Iowa State University.
Brian
Stech, 41, is the President of the ZAGG business unit, with responsibility for leading the strategy and execution of the Company’s
product, brand and distribution initiatives. Mr. Stech became our Vice President of Sales in 2014, and was promoted to Executive
Vice President of Sales and Marketing in 2015. After the acquisition of mophie in 2016, Mr. Stech became President of the ZAGG
business unit. Prior to joining ZAGG in 2014, Mr. Stech served as president of SteelSeries, an award-winning gaming accessories
company that was recognized by Entrepreneur Magazine as one of the “Top 100 Brilliant Companies to Watch” in 2009.
Mr. Stech grew revenue twentyfold from 2008 to 2013 while guiding the company to a leading market share position in North America.
Prior to his tenure at SteelSeries, Mr. Stech led global marketing and channel development for Motorola’s smartphone business
unit. Mr. Stech has also served in leadership roles at Mobility Electronics (iGo, Inc.) and Ralston Purina Company. Mr. Stech
holds a B.S. in Business from Indiana University.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 24 |
Chris
Paterson, 49, is the Vice President of Product Development – Asia, with the responsibility as the on-site manager in
the ZAGG China office and for managing factories in Asia, particularly as it relates to new product introductions. During 2016,
he directed the development process of ZAGG’s award-winning products and overseeing the teams’ execution on Company
objectives and initiatives. Prior to joining ZAGG in 2014, Mr. Paterson served as the general manager of design and product marketing
at Griffin Technology, where he led the design, product management, and consumer and market research teams. Preceding his time
at Griffin, Mr. Paterson served as the global director of product innovation and design for the Oreck Corporation. As a design
professional, Mr. Paterson has over 75 patents and design awards, including Red Dot, Good Design, International Housewares Association
Best of Class, and IDEA. Mr. Paterson holds a B.S. in Industrial Design, Product Development from The Ohio State University and
an M.B.A. from Lipscomb University.
Steve
Tarr, 60, served as Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) of the Company until June, 2016 when he accepted the assignment
of COO of ZAGG China with responsibility for factory and quality management in China. Mr. Tarr left the Company in February, 2017.
Prior to joining ZAGG in 2014, Mr. Tarr served from 2012 to 2014 as Infrastructure Solutions Director for Europe and North America
at Stanley Black & Decker where his responsibilities included operations, engineering, sales, marketing, distribution and
supply chain. From 2006 to 2012, Mr. Tarr served as division president and on the board of directors of Prestolite Electric, where
he oversaw sales, manufacturing, purchasing, distribution, new product development, product and process quality, customer service
and strategic market development in Europe, Asia, and Africa from the Company’s London office. Mr. Tarr holds a B.A. in
Industrial Engineering from the University of Northern Iowa.
Chris
Ahern, 41, is the President of the mophie business unit and ZAGG International. Mr. Ahern was appointed President of ZAGG
International in June 2014 and was appointed President of mophie in January 2017. Prior to joining ZAGG in 2014, Mr. Ahern served
as Sales Operations Director for Dell Products in Europe, Middle East and Africa supporting a $4.0 billion indirect business.
Under Mr. Ahern’s leadership, his teams effectively grew revenue in various international markets, enhanced internal reporting
and inventory management systems, and developed operational processes to align regional distribution, effectively growing revenue
and improving operational efficiencies. Mr. Ahern holds a B.S. in Business Administration from Dublin City University.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 25 |
Compensation
Objectives and Practices
The
objective of the Company’s executive compensation programs is to align the actions of our executives with the Company’s
performance. Below is a summary of the executive compensation practices implemented to drive executive performance, as well as
practices not implemented, as they do not support our stockholders’ long-term interests:
Practices
Implemented |
|
Emphasize
Pay-for-Performance – All of our NEOs participate in a performance-based equity incentive bonus plan, which compensates
executives for the Company’s achievement of financial metrics. The NEOs also participate in a performance-based cash
incentive bonus, which compensates executives for the achievement of operational, strategic, and functional team goals. This
practice aligns our executive incentives with the financial performance of our Company and the creation of stockholder value.
|
|
|
Offer
Both Equity and Cash Incentives – The pay-for-performance compensation packages offered to our executives consist
of a combination of base salary, performance-based cash incentives, and performance-based equity awards, designed to incentivize
our executive officers to achieve performance results that deliver both short-term and long-term stockholder value. |
|
|
|
|
Utilize
Double-Trigger Change-of-Control Provisions – The equity awards granted to our CEO and CFO that provide for accelerated
vesting in the event of a change-of-control have a “double-trigger,” instead of a “single trigger.” |
|
|
Clawback
Policy – The Company employs an Incentive Clawback Policy under which the Compensation Committee has the right,
subject to applicable state and federal law, to require any executive to repay performance-based compensation paid if there
is a material financial restatement of results for any prior fiscal year, which results in overpayment of performance-based
incentives for the applicable fiscal year. |
|
|
|
|
Equity
Ownership Guidelines – All of our NEOs are required to, by the later of November 14, 2018 (five years from the guidelines’
implementation date) or within five (5) years from the date of the executive’s hire or promotion, own shares of Common
Stock having an aggregate value at least equal to: (i) three times the base salary for our CEO and (ii) three times the base
salary for all other executive officers. In addition, in the same timeframe, members of the Board are required to own shares
of Common Stock having an aggregate value at least equal three times the cash portion of their annual Board compensation. |
|
|
Engage
an Independent Compensation Consultant – The Compensation Committee has retained a nationally recognized compensation
consulting firm to serve as its independent compensation consultant. The compensation consultant reports directly to the Compensation
Committee and provides the Committee with useful competitive market data, information and guidance needed to make educated
compensation decisions. |
|
|
|
|
Annual
“Say-on-Pay” Vote – We conduct our “say-on-pay” vote on an annual basis to allow our stockholders
to provide us with their direct input on our compensation philosophies, policies and practices. |
|
|
|
Practices
Not Implemented |
No Re-pricing Stock Options – We do not re-price
our stock options and would not do so without stockholder approval.
No
Excise Tax Gross-Ups – We do not provide our executive officers with excise tax gross-ups.
No
Resetting of Performance Targets – We did not reset or amend any of the performance goals or targets used to set executive
compensation programs in a fiscal year.
No
Dividend Equivalents – We do not provide dividend equivalents on unvested equity awards.
|
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 26 |
Changes
to 2016 Compensation Plan
Our
NEOs are primarily responsible for the overall execution of the Company’s strategy. As a result, a high percentage of their
total direct compensation is variable and tied to Company performance, thereby providing incentives to achieve goals that help
create value for stockholders.
In
response to stockholder feedback, and to align with the pay-for-performance practices of our peer group, the Compensation Committee
made the following revisions in the 2016 compensation plan:
| ● | Revised
the 2016 long-term pay-for-performance program to introduce a three-year vesting period
for long-term incentive RSUs. |
| ● | Removed
earnings per share from the performance metrics for 2016 long-term incentive due to the
difficulty of predicting the impact of the mophie acquisition on our net income and earnings
per share. |
| ● | Evaluated
and revised the peer group. |
| ● | Improved
disclosure regarding short term incentive cash bonuses tied to the successful achievement
of the functional team goals designed to drive financial and operational performance,
including an additional table in the short-term incentive cash bonus section to illustrate
targets achieved and the target bonuses versus actual bonuses paid. |
Additional
Compensation-Related Actions Taken
The
Company noted that RSUs granted to Mr. Hales in 2016 exceeded the 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan limit of 300,000 shares granted
to an individual in a consecutive calendar year.
| ● | On
June 27, 2016 the Company rescinded 68,046 RSUs granted on January 8, 2016, as this grant
caused total RSUs granted to exceed the limit on maximum grants in a 12-month period.
This was reported on a Form 4 filed on June 29, 2016. |
| ● | In
response to this, the Company has redefined the process for overseeing the annual grant
approval amounts to provide clearer lines of accountability. |
To
drive the successful and timely integration of the mophie acquisition, the Compensation Committee designed a 2016 performance
RSU award for Mr. Hales, tied to achievement of the following during 2016, but subject to his continued employment with the Company
through January 8, 2018:
| ● | successful
integration of back office functions and teams (50% weighting), |
| ● | attaining
$8.5 million in cost savings in 2016 (25% weighted), and |
| ● | successful
implementation of a Human Resource Information System (“HRIS”) platform for
entire organization (25% weighting). |
Elements
of Executive Compensation
The
Company’s executive compensation is comprised of the three elements described below:
| |
Element | |
Form | |
Purpose | |
How
it Links to Performance |
Fixed | |
Base
Salary | |
Cash | |
To provide a stable, market
comparable,
reliable source of income. | |
●
|
Reviewed annually; adjustments
made based on individual and
Company performance |
At-Risk | |
Short-Term Performance
Based | |
Cash | |
To reward the achievement of
annual
financial and other
performance related goals. | |
●
●
|
Functional team goals and targets Maximum and minimum thresholds
based on achievement of
goals and targets |
| |
Long-Term Performance
Based | |
RSU’s | |
To reward the achievement
of
long-term Company performance
and strategic goals. | |
● ●
●
● |
Performance- and time-based Three-year vesting
EBITDA and Net Sales targets Maximum
and minimum thresholds
based on achievement of goals and targets |
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 27 |
Executive
Pay Mix
The Compensation Committee believes that emphasis on
variable, performance based compensation at the senior executive levels of the Company is a key element in achieving a pay-for
performance culture and in aligning management’s interests with those of the Company’s stockholders. When determining
target executive pay, the Committee attempts to ensure that compensation is closely aligned with the overall strategy of the Company
and that it motivates executives to achieve superior performance and stockholder returns. The relative mix of 2016 target compensation
for NEOs is presented in the chart below:
The
charts below illustrate the 2016 compensation plan’s total direct compensation and pay for performance alignment for our
CEO and our NEOs versus our peer group.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 28 |
2016
Executive Compensation
Base
Salary
The
NEOs’ salaries are set at levels that are competitive based on a review of salary levels within our industry and of our
compensation peer group. None of our NEOs are currently party to an employment agreement that provides for automatic or scheduled
increases in their base salary.
Name | |
Base
Salary ($) | | |
Percentage
Increase Over 2015 Base
Salary (%) | |
Randall
L. Hales | |
$ | 696,400 | | |
| -- | |
Bradley
J. Holiday | |
$ | 300,000 | | |
| -- | |
Brian
Stech | |
$ | 371,875 | | |
| 24 | %(1) |
Steve
Tarr | |
$ | 250,000 | | |
| (17) | %(2) |
Chris
Paterson | |
$ | 250,000 | | |
| -- | |
(1) |
Mr.
Stech’s base salary increased during 2016 after being promoted to president of the ZAGG business unit. |
|
|
(2) |
Mr.
Tarr’s compensation decreased during 2016 after accepting the position of chief operating officer of ZAGG China. |
Short-term
Incentive - Cash Bonus
The
Company ties NEO bonuses to specific ZAGG business unit functional team goals which are measured monthly and paid in quarterly
cash bonuses. The Company has seen improved operating efficiency, competitiveness, and profitably since the implementation of
monthly team goals.
The
ZAGG business unit has 26 teams, each responsible for three to five performance goals, resulting in 102 goals tracked and reported
monthly. The specific goals for the NEOs were established at the beginning of the fiscal year by each respective functional team
and approved by the CEO, Compensation Committee and Board. The CEO’s cash incentive bonus was tied to the achievement of
the NEOs’ goals, all of which are designed to improve operational processes to reduce costs, increase productivity, enhance
competitive positioning, and improve financial results.
Name | |
Goal | |
Total
Target
Achieved (%)(1) | | |
Target
Bonus ($) | | |
Actual Bonus
Earned ($) | |
Randall
L. Hales | |
100% Company-wide Team Goals
Achieved | |
| 97 | % | |
$ | 358,920 | | |
$ | 349,939 | |
Bradley
J. Holiday | |
100% of Reporting Functional Teams
Goals
Achieved (6 teams/23 goals) | |
| 98 | % | |
$ | 140,000 | | |
$ | 137,517 | |
Brain
Stech | |
100% of Reporting Functional Teams
Goals
Achieved (5 teams/20 goals) | |
| 96 | % | |
$ | 111,563 | | |
$ | 106,734 | |
Chris
Paterson | |
100% of Reporting Functional Teams
Goals
Achieved (3 teams/17 goals) | |
| 96 | % | |
$ | 75,000 | | |
$ | 71,874 | |
Steve
Tarr | |
100% of Reporting Functional Teams
Goals
Achieved (8 teams/28 goals) | |
| 99 | % | |
$ | 75,000 | | |
$ | 74,911 | |
| (1) | The
goals for the individual functional teams are weighted at the beginning of the year based
on the relative importance to the organization. Thus, the ultimate cash bonus to each
NEO is based on (1) the achievement of the individual goals and (2) the weight of each
goal. If a goal is not achieved in a given period, the cash pay-out associated with that
particular goal is $0. |
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 29 |
Long-term
Incentive - RSUs
The
goals of the long-term incentive program are to:
| ● | ensure
NEOs’ financial interests are aligned with our stockholders’ interests, |
| ● | motivate
decision making that improves financial performance over the long-term, |
| ● | recognize
and reward superior financial performance of the Company, |
| ● | provide
a retention element to our compensation program, and |
| ● | promote
compliance with the stock ownership guidelines for executives. |
Upon
review of yearly outreach to stockholders and best practices as defined by the leading proxy solicitation firms, the Compensation
Committee annually evaluates adjustments to further tie compensation to the Company’s performance.
In
anticipation of the closing of the mophie acquisition, the Compensation Committee revised performance metrics for 2016 grants
compared to 2015, removing the earnings per share component given the uncertainty of how purchase accounting would impact net
income and earnings per share. A summary of the 2016 performance metrics tied solely to the ZAGG business unit are as follows.
2016
Summary
| |
| | |
Actual | | |
Minimum | | |
| | |
Maximum | |
Metric | |
Weighting | | |
2016
(1) | | |
Threshold | | |
Target | | |
Threshold | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Net Sales | |
| 50% | | |
$ | 288,107,672 | | |
$ | 290,000,000 | | |
$ | 300,000,000 | | |
$ | 345,000,000 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Adjusted EBITDA | |
| 50% | | |
$ | 53,112,892 | | |
$ | 44,000,000 | | |
$ | 47,000,000 | | |
$ | 54,050,000 | |
(1) |
From
2015 to 2016, the ZAGG business unit sales increased from $269.3 million to $288.1 million, or 7%. Over the same period, the
ZAGG business unit Adjusted EBITDA increased from $42.2 million to $53.1 million, or 26%. |
For
every 1.0% increase or decrease relative to the target, the shares actually earned under each NEO’s RSU grant is increased
or decreased by 1.5%. No RSUs vest if the minimum threshold for each metric is not met. Maximum grants are capped based on the
maximum threshold, even if the maximum threshold is exceeded.
Based
on the ZAGG business unit’s 2016 operating results, the NEOs earned performance-based RSUs as detailed below. For 2016,
the Company continued to use a one-year performance period for performance-based awards that vest over a three-year period. Common
Stock was delivered during the first quarter of 2017 related to the one-third of these awards that vested.
Name | |
Target RSUs
(#) | | |
Impact
of Net Sales Target Achieved on Target RSUs (#) | | |
Impact
of Adjusted
EBITDA Target Achieved
on Target RSUs
(#) | | |
Net
RSUs Earned (#) | | |
Percent
of Target RSUs Earned (%) | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Randall
L. Hales | |
| 68,046 | | |
| (34,023 | ) | |
| 4,425 | | |
| 38,448 | | |
| 57 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Bradley J. Holiday | |
| 23,268 | | |
| (11,634 | ) | |
| 1,513 | | |
| 13,147 | | |
| 57 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Brian Stech | |
| 31,024 | | |
| (15,512 | ) | |
| 2,018 | | |
| 17,530 | | |
| 57 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Chris Paterson | |
| 25,853 | | |
| (12,927 | ) | |
| 1,681 | | |
| 14,608 | | |
| 57 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Steve Tarr | |
| 11,634 | | |
| (1 | ) | |
| (1 | ) | |
| (1 | ) | |
| (1 | ) |
| (1) | As
a result of Mr. Tarr’s departure in February 2017, these RSUs were forfeited prior
to vesting. |
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 30 |
In
granting performance-based RSUs to the NEOs, the Compensation Committee considers the impact of the grant on the Company’s
financial performance, as determined in accordance with the requirements of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards
Codification Topic 718, Stock Compensation (“ASC Topic 718”). For long-term awards, the Company records expense in
accordance with ASC Topic 718.
2016
CEO RSU Award Intended to Drive the Successful Integration of the mophie Acquisition
In
June 2016 the Compensation Committee approved a performance RSU award of 163,908 RSUs for Mr. Hales with the intent to achieve
the successful and timely integration of the mophie acquisition, while also reducing costs of the consolidated business.
The
award is tied to the achievement of the following:
| ● | the
back office integration of the ZAGG and mophie business units (50% of award), |
| ● | successful
cost savings from synergies of $8.5 million in 2016 (25% of award), |
| ● | complete
implementation of a HRIS platform (15% of award), and |
| ● | presentation
of the final mophie integration plan to the Board (10% of award). |
Based
on the achievement of the metrics set forth below, the award will vest on January 8, 2018, provided Mr. Hales continues to be
employed with the Company on that date.
Performance
Metric | |
Required
Threshold | |
Threshold
Achieved |
Back office integration | |
Completion of integration | |
√ |
2016 cost savings | |
$8.5 million | |
√ |
HRIS system implementation | |
Completion of implementation | |
√ |
Final mophie integration
plan | |
Completion of plan | |
√ |
2016
ZAGG President RSU Award Intended to Drive Growth at the ZAGG Business Unit
In
January 2016 the Compensation Committee approved a performance RSU award of 51,706 RSUs for Mr. Stech with the intent to drive
growth in 2016 at the ZAGG business unit.
The
award is tiered based on the achievement of 2016 net sales at the ZAGG business as follows:
Net
Sales Threshold | |
%
of RSU Potential | | |
RSU
Potential | |
Less
than $303,000,000 (Minimum) | |
| 0% | | |
| -- | |
$303,000,000 to 304,499,999 | |
| 33% | | |
| 17,270 | |
$304,500,000 to 305,999,999 | |
| 67% | | |
| 34,471 | |
Greater than $306,000,000
(Maximum) | |
| 100% | | |
| 51,706 | |
During
2016, the ZAGG business unit achieved net sales of $288.1 million and thus 0% of the award was achieved.
Performance
Metric | |
Net
Sales Achieved | | |
%
of Award Earned | | |
Actual
RSUs Earned | |
Net
Sales | |
| $ 288,107,672 | | |
| 0% | | |
| -- | |
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 31 |
NEO
Contracts and Change-in-Control Policies
Below
is a table of NEOs with clauses in their employment contracts and which clauses are applicable to each executive.
Named
Executive Officers | |
Termination
for Cause | |
Change
of Control |
Randall L. Hales | |
√ | |
√ |
Bradley J. Holiday | |
√ | |
√ |
Brian Stech | |
√ | |
|
Chris Paterson | |
√ | |
|
Steve Tarr | |
√ | |
|
Change
of Control “Double Trigger” Policy
Each
of Messrs. Hales and Holiday have entered into a change of control addendum to his employment agreement (the “Change of
Control Addendum”). Pursuant to the Change of Control Addendum, if the individual is subject to a termination without cause
or terminates his employment for good reason (each as defined in the Change of Control Addendum) at any time within 24 months
after a change of control in the Company, then he will be entitled to receive severance payments equal to the sum of his base
salary plus the current annual targeted bonus, less applicable withholding, for 24 months after the date of separation. Such severance
payments will be paid bi-monthly in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices and will commence within 30 days
from separation. In addition, the vesting and exercisability of outstanding incentive awards held by the executive (or of any
property received in exchange for such awards in a change of control) will automatically accelerate. During the severance period
of 24 months, the Company will also pay the premiums to continue the executive’s group health insurance coverage under COBRA
if he is eligible for COBRA and has elected continuation coverage under applicable rules. However, the Company’s COBRA obligations
shall immediately cease to the extent the executive becomes eligible for substantially equivalent health insurance coverage from
a subsequent employer.
Termination
for Cause Policy
If
a NEO’s employment is terminated by the Company for cause, the NEO is entitled to no compensation or benefits from the Company
other than those earned through the date of termination. A termination “for cause” occurs if the NEO is terminated
for any of the following reasons: (i) theft, dishonesty or falsification of any employment or Company records; (ii) improper disclosure
of the Company’s confidential or proprietary information resulting in damage to the Company; (iii) any action by the executive
which has a material detrimental effect on the Company’s reputation or business; (iv) the executive’s failure or inability
to perform any assigned duties after written notice from the Company to them of, and a reasonable opportunity to cure, such failure
or inability; (v) the executive’s conviction (including any plea of guilty or no contest) of a felony, or of any other criminal
act if that act impairs their ability to perform the duties under the employment agreement or (vi) the executive’s failure
to cooperate in good faith with a governmental or internal investigation of the Company or its directors, officers or employees,
if the Company has requested their cooperation.
Employment
Agreement: Randall L. Hales, President & CEO
Mr.
Hales is employed as the Company’s President and CEO pursuant to an employment agreement (the “Hales Agreement”)
with the Company dated December 15, 2014, as amended. Mr. Hales’ employment with the Company is “at will,” and
either the Company or Mr. Hales may terminate his employment at any time with or without cause.
Pursuant
to the Hales Agreement and the 2017 Compensation Addendum, Mr. Hales carries out all customary and usual duties of the CEO of
a consumer products company of similar size and operations. His annual base salary for 2017 is $675,000. The Compensation Committee
reviews Mr. Hales’ base salary and other compensation annually, and revises such amounts at its discretion. Additionally,
he may receive an annual cash incentive bonus in 2017 targeted at $675,000 or such greater amount as the Compensation Committee
may determine, subject to the achievement by the Company of various goals (see above Short-term Incentive - Cash Bonus section
for further details surrounding the achievement of the cash bonus). Mr. Hales also may receive annual equity compensation equal
to the share equivalent of $675,000 or an alternate amount as determined by the Compensation Committee, which is issued and vests
pursuant to the terms of the Company’s grants discussed in detail above under Long-term Incentive - RSUs.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 32 |
If
Mr. Hales’ at-will employment is terminated by the Company without cause, and if he signs a general release of known and
unknown claims in form satisfactory to the Company, he will receive severance payments equal to his current compensation, less
applicable withholding, for 12 months after the termination. For purposes of calculating such severance, his current compensation
means the sum of his then-current base salary plus his then-current annual targeted bonus amount.
Additionally,
Mr. Hales and the Company entered into an Indemnity Agreement (the “Indemnity Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company
agreed to provide indemnification to Mr. Hales in connection with certain claims and actions brought by third parties and in derivative
actions. The Company also agreed to the extent that the Board determines it to be economically reasonable, maintain a policy of
directors’ and officers’ liability insurance for Mr. Hales, on such terms and conditions as may be approved by the
Board, and to advance certain expenses incurred in connection with certain claims, as defined in the Indemnity Agreement.
Employment
Agreement: Bradley J. Holiday, CFO
Mr.
Holiday is employed as the Company’s CFO pursuant to an employment agreement (the “Holiday Agreement”) with
the Company dated June 11, 2015. Mr. Holiday’s employment with the Company is “at will,” and either the Company
or Mr. Holiday may terminate his employment at any time with or without cause.
Pursuant
to the Holiday Agreement and the 2017 Compensation Addendum, Mr. Holiday carries out all customary and usual duties of the CFO
of a consumer products company of similar size and operations. His annual base salary for 2017 is $340,000. The Compensation Committee
reviews Mr. Holiday’s base salary and other compensation annually, and revises such amounts at its discretion. Additionally,
he may receive an annual cash incentive bonus of $102,000 or such greater amount as the Compensation Committee may determine,
subject to the achievement by the Company of various goals (see above Short-term Incentive - Cash Bonus section for further details
surrounding the achievement of Mr. Holiday’s cash bonus). Mr. Holiday also may receive annual equity compensation equal
to the share equivalent of $225,000 or an alternate amount as determined by the Compensation Committee, which is issued and vests
pursuant to the terms of the Company’s grants discussed in detail above under Long-term Incentive - RSUs.
If
Mr. Holiday’s at-will employment is terminated by the Company without cause, and if he signs a general release of known
and unknown claims in form satisfactory to the Company, he will receive severance payments equal to his current compensation,
less applicable withholding, for 12 months after the date of termination. For purposes of calculating such severance, his current
compensation means the sum of his then-current base salary plus his then-current annual targeted bonus amount.
Employment
Agreement: Brian Stech, President of ZAGG Business Unit
Mr.
Stech is employed as the President of the ZAGG business unit pursuant to an employment agreement (the “Stech Agreement”)
with the Company dated December 15, 2014, as amended. Mr. Stech’ employment with the Company is “at will,” and
either the Company or Mr. Stech may terminate his employment at any time with or without cause.
Pursuant
to the Stech Agreement and the 2017 Compensation Addendum, Mr. Stech’s annual base salary for 2017 is $400,000. The Compensation
Committee reviews Mr. Stech’s base salary and other compensation annually, and revises such amounts at its discretion. Additionally,
he may receive an annual cash incentive bonus in 2017 targeted at $120,000 or such greater amount as the Compensation Committee
may determine, subject to the achievement by the Company of various goals (see above Short-term Incentive - Cash Bonus section
for further details surrounding the achievement of the cash bonus). Mr. Stech may receive annual equity compensation equal to
the share equivalent of $280,000 or an alternate amount as determined by the Compensation Committee. In addition, Mr. Stech may
receive the share equivalent of $500,000 for a 2017 performance RSU award. All RSU awards are issued and vest pursuant to the
terms of the Company’s grants discussed in detail above under Long-term Incentive - RSUs.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 33 |
If
Mr. Stech’s at-will employment is terminated by the Company without cause, and if he signs a general release of known and
unknown claims in form satisfactory to the Company, he will receive severance payments equal to his current compensation, less
applicable withholding, for 12 months after the date of the termination. For purposes of calculating such severance, his current
compensation means the sum of his then-current base salary plus his then-current annual targeted bonus amount.
Employment
Agreement: Chris Paterson, VP of Product Development – Asia
Mr.
Paterson is employed as the Company’s VP of Product Development – Asia pursuant to an employment agreement (the “Paterson
Agreement”) with the Company dated July 3, 2015. Mr. Paterson’s employment with the Company is “at will,”
and either the Company or Mr. Paterson may terminate his employment at any time with or without cause.
Pursuant
to the Paterson Agreement and the 2017 Compensation Addendum, Mr. Paterson’s annual base salary for 2017 is $250,000. The
Compensation Committee reviews Mr. Paterson’s base salary and other compensation annually, and revises such amounts at its
discretion. Additionally, he may receive an annual cash incentive bonus of $75,000 or such greater amount as the Compensation
Committee may determine, subject to the achievement by the Company of various goals (see above Short-term Incentive - Cash
Bonus section for further details surrounding the achievement of Mr. Paterson’s cash bonus). Mr. Paterson also may receive
annual equity compensation equal to the share equivalent of $250,000 or an alternate amount as determined by the Compensation
Committee, which is issued and vests pursuant to the terms of the Company’s grants discussed in detail above under Long-term
Incentive - RSUs.
If
Mr. Paterson’s at-will employment is terminated by the Company without cause, and if he signs a general release of known
and unknown claims in form satisfactory to the Company, he will receive severance payments equal to his current compensation,
less applicable withholding, for 12 months after the date of the termination. For purposes of calculating such severance, his
current compensation means the sum of his then-current base salary plus his then-current annual targeted bonus amount.
Section 162(m)
Treatment Regarding Pay-for-Performance Equity-based Awards
Under
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Code”), a public company is generally denied
deductions for compensation paid to certain of its NEOs to the extent the compensation for any such individual exceeds $1,000,000
for the taxable year. Certain performance-based compensation, based on performance criteria, approved by the Company’s stockholders
is not subject to this deduction limit. Generally, in structuring compensation for the Company’s NEOs, the Company considers
whether a form of compensation will be deductible; however, other factors as discussed above may be of greater importance than
preserving deductibility for a particular form of compensation.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 34 |
Executive
Compensation Tables
Summary
Compensation Table
The
following table summarizes information for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, concerning the compensation
paid (salary and bonus) or granted (stock-based compensation) to our NEOs who served as executive officers during
2016.
Name
and Principal Position | |
Year | |
Salary ($) | | |
Non-Equity
Inventive Cash Award
($) | | |
RSUs ($)(1) | | |
All
Other Compensation
($) | | |
Total
($) | |
Randall L. Hales | |
2016 | |
$ | 696,400 | | |
$ | 349,939 | | |
$ | 2,327,020 | | |
$ | 24,145 | (2) | |
$ | 3,397,504 | |
President, CEO & Director | |
2015 | |
$ | 696,400 | | |
$ | 353,570 | | |
$ | 1,932,402 | | |
$ | 21,907 | (3) | |
$ | 3,004,279 | |
| |
2014 | |
$ | 696,400 | | |
$ | -- | | |
$ | 677,026 | | |
$ | 20,704 | (4) | |
$ | 1,394,130 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Bradley J. Holiday (6) | |
2016 | |
$ | 300,000 | | |
$ | 137,517 | | |
$ | 530,604 | | |
$ | 10,000 | (5) | |
$ | 978,121 | |
CFO | |
2015 | |
$ | 128,461 | | |
$ | 21,964 | | |
$ | 104,003 | | |
$ | -- | | |
$ | 254,428 | |
| |
2014 | |
$ | -- | | |
$ | -- | | |
$ | -- | | |
$ | -- | | |
$ | -- | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Brian Stech | |
2016 | |
$ | 371,875 | | |
$ | 106,734 | | |
$ | 600,004 | | |
$ | 24,156 | (7) | |
$ | 1,102,769 | |
President of ZAGG business unit | |
2015 | |
$ | 300,000 | | |
$ | 133,313 | | |
$ | 300,000 | | |
$ | 21,907 | (8) | |
$ | 755,220 | |
| |
2014 | |
$ | 225,000 | | |
$ | -- | | |
$ | 486,398 | | |
$ | 8,028 | (9) | |
$ | 719,426 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Chris Paterson | |
2016 | |
$ | 250,000 | | |
$ | 71,874 | | |
$ | 500,000 | | |
$ | 26,454 | (10) | |
$ | 848,328 | |
Vice President of Product Development –
Asia (16) | |
2015 | |
$ | 103,365 | | |
$ | 21,964 | | |
$ | 104,003 | | |
$ | 11,907 | (11) | |
$ | 241,239 | |
| |
2014 | |
$ | -- | | |
$ | -- | | |
$ | -- | | |
$ | -- | | |
$ | -- | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Steve Tarr (12) | |
2016 | |
$ | 250,000 | | |
$ | 74,912 | | |
$ | -- | | |
$ | 20,893 | (13) | |
$ | 345,805 | |
COO – ZAGG China | |
2015 | |
$ | 300,000 | | |
$ | 133,313 | | |
$ | 224,999 | | |
$ | 22,836 | (14) | |
$ | 681,148 | |
| |
2014 | |
$ | 62,500 | | |
$ | -- | | |
$ | 37,501 | | |
$ | 3,284 | (15) | |
$ | 103,285 | |
(1) | Represents
the full grant date fair market value of the restricted stock awards as computed under
ASC Topic 718 and the expense attributable to restricted stock unit awards granted to
be recorded over the vesting period (excluding estimates for forfeitures in case of awards
with service-based vesting). Assumptions and methodologies used in the calculation of
these amounts are included in footnotes to the Company’s audited financial statements
for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, which are included in the
Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. |
(2) | All
other compensation for Mr. Hales for 2016 consisted of: $14,145 in employer-paid health
insurance premiums and $10,000 in matching 401(k) contributions. |
(3) | All
other compensation for Mr. Hales for 2015 consisted of: $11,907 in employer-paid health
insurance premiums and $10,000 in matching 401(k) contributions. |
(4) | All
other compensation for Mr. Hales for 2014 consisted of: $10,704 in employer-paid health
insurance premiums and $10,000 in matching 401(k) contributions. |
(5) | All
other compensation for Mr. Holiday for 2016 consisted of $10,000 in matching 401(k) contributions. |
(6) | Mr.
Holiday was hired on June 11, 2015. |
(7) | All
other compensation for Mr. Stech for 2016 consisted of: $14,156 in employer-paid health
insurance premiums and $10,000 in matching 401(k) contributions. |
(8) | All
other compensation for Mr. Stech for 2015 consisted of: $11,907 in employer-paid health
insurance premiums and $10,000 in matching 401(k) contributions. |
(9) | All
other compensation for Mr. Stech for 2014 consisted of $8,028 in employer-paid health
insurance premiums. |
(10) | All
other compensation for Mr. Paterson for 2016 consisted of: $13,243 in employer-paid health
insurance premiums, $4,948 in matching 401(k) contributions, and $8,263 in moving expenses. |
(11) | All
other compensation for Mr. Paterson for 2015 consisted of: $11,907 in employer-paid health
insurance premiums. |
(12) | Mr.
Tarr left the Company in February 2017 to pursue other interests and forfeited all 2016
RSU awards. |
(13) | All
other compensation for Mr. Tarr for 2016 consisted of: $10,893 in employer-paid health
insurance premiums and $10,000 in matching 401(k) contributions. |
(14) | All
other compensation for Mr. Tarr for 2015 consisted of: $12,836 in employer-paid health
insurance premiums and $10,000 in matching 401(k) contributions. |
(15) | All
other compensation for Mr. Tarr for 2014 consisted of: $1,784 in employer-paid health
insurance premiums and $1,500 in matching 401(k) contributions. |
(16) | Mr.
Paterson was hired on July 20, 2015. |
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 35 |
Grants
of Plan-based Awards
Performance-based
Awards
The
following table summarizes performance-based compensation granted to the NEOs during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2016 under the Company’s 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan
Estimated
Possible Payout Under Non-Equity Short-term
Incentive Cash Awards (1) | | |
Estimated
Possible Payouts Under Long-term
Incentive Plan Awards | |
Name | |
Grant Date | |
Minimum
Threshold ($) | | |
Target/
Maximum Threshold ($) | | |
Actual
Cash Incentive Earned ($) | | |
Minimum
Threshold RSUs (#) | | |
Target
RSUs (#) | | |
Maximum
Threshold RSUs (#) | | |
Actual
RSUs Earned (#) | | |
Grant
Date Fair Value of RSUs
($) (5) | |
Randall L. Hales | |
January 8, 2016 | |
| -- | | |
$ | 358,920 | | |
$ | 349,939 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
June 27, 2016 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| -- | | |
| 163,908 | | |
| 163,908 | | |
| 163,908 | | |
$ | 1,675,140 | |
| |
June 27, 2016 (2) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| -- | | |
| 68,046 | | |
| 83,356 | | |
| 38,448 | | |
$ | 325,940 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Bradley J. Holiday | |
January 8, 2016 (2) | |
| -- | | |
$ | 140,000 | | |
$ | 137,517 | | |
| -- | | |
| 23,268 | | |
| 28,503 | | |
| 13,157 | | |
$ | 225,000 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Brian Stech | |
January 8, 2016 (3) | |
| -- | | |
$ | 111,563 | | |
$ | 106,734 | | |
| -- | | |
| 51,706 | | |
| 51,706 | | |
| -- | | |
$ | 500,000 | |
| |
January 8, 2016 (2) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| -- | | |
| 31,024 | | |
| 38,004 | | |
| 17,530 | | |
$ | 300,000 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Chris Paterson | |
January 8, 2016 (2) | |
| -- | | |
$ | 75,000 | | |
$ | 71,874 | | |
| -- | | |
| 25,853 | | |
| 31,670 | | |
| 14,608 | | |
$ | 250,000 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Steve Tarr | |
January 8, 2016 (2) | |
| -- | | |
$ | 75,000 | | |
$ | 74,911 | | |
| -- | | |
| 23,268 | | |
| 28,503 | | |
| -- | (4) | |
$ | 225,000 | |
(1) |
Represents
minimum threshold and target/maximum threshold performance-based short-term incentive cash award to the NEOs (see prior discussion). |
|
|
(2) |
Represents
minimum threshold, target, and maximum threshold performance-based RSUs, vesting of which was based on the achievement of
specified metrics determined and agreed to on the grant date. These awards were granted on January 8, 2016 (June 27 in the
case of Mr. Hales) and vested on March 17, 2017 based on the achievement of the specific metrics (see prior discussion). Due
to the Company’s performance, relative to the predetermined performance metrics, these individuals earned 57% of these
awards. |
|
|
(3) |
Reflects
a performance-based award to Mr. Stech, the vesting of which was based on the achievement of specified metrics agreed to on
the grant date (see prior discussion). The award was granted on January 8, 2016, but as the specific metrics were not met,
the award did not vest. |
|
|
(4) |
As
a result of Mr. Tarr’s departure in February 2017, these RSUs were forfeited prior to vesting. |
|
|
(5) |
Reflects
the full grant date fair market value of the restricted stock unit awards granted as computed under ASC Topic 718 and the
expense attributable to these awards that will be recorded over the vesting period (excluding estimates for forfeitures in
case of awards with service-based vesting). Assumptions and methodologies used in the calculation of these amounts are included
in footnotes to the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, which are included
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. |
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 36 |
Time-based
Awards
The
following table summarizes time-based compensation granted to the NEOs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 under
the Company’s 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan
Name | |
Grant
Date | |
RSUs:
Granted Time-based Vesting (#) | |
Grant
Date Fair Value of RSUs (3) |
Randall L. Hales | |
June 27, 2016 | |
| 68,046 | (1) | |
$ | 325,940 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Bradley J. Holiday | |
January 8, 2016 | |
| 23,268 | (1) | |
$ | 225,000 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Brian Stech | |
January 8, 2016 | |
| 31,024 | (1) | |
$ | 300,000 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Chris Paterson | |
January 8, 2016 | |
| 25,853 | (1) | |
$ | 250,000 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Steve Tarr | |
January 8, 2016 | |
| 23,268 | (2) | |
$ | 225,000 | |
(1) |
Reflects
the number of RSU awards, vesting of which was based on continued employment through the vest date. 2/3 of the award vested
on January 8, 2017 and 1/3 of the award vests on January 8, 2018; provided the grantee continues to be employed with the Company
on that date. |
|
|
(2) |
As
a result of Mr. Tarr’s departure in February 2017, these RSUs were forfeited prior to vesting. |
|
|
(3) |
Reflects
the full grant date fair market value of the restricted stock awards granted as computed under ASC Topic 718 and the expense
attributable to these awards that will be recorded over the vesting period (excluding estimates for forfeitures in case of
awards with service-based vesting). Assumptions and methodologies used in the calculation of these amounts are included in
footnotes to the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, which are included
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. |
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 37 |
Outstanding
NEO Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-end December 31, 2016
Restricted Stock Units | |
| |
Name
| |
Number of RSUs That
Have Not Vested (#) | |
Market Value of RSUs
That Have Not Vested ($) | |
Randall L. Hales | |
| 38,448 | (1) | |
$ | 272,981 | |
| |
| 68,046 | (2) | |
$ | 483,127 | |
| |
| 163,908 | (3) | |
$ | 1,163,747 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Bradley J. Holiday | |
| 13,147 | (4) | |
$ | 93,344 | |
| |
| 23,268 | (2) | |
$ | 165,204 | |
| |
| 6,667 | (5) | |
$ | 47,336 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Brian Stech | |
| 17,530 | (4) | |
$ | 124,463 | |
| |
| 31,024 | (2) | |
$ | 220,270 | |
| |
| 27,640 | (6) | |
$ | 196,244 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Chris Paterson | |
| 14,608 | (4) | |
$ | 103,717 | |
| |
| 25,853 | (2) | |
$ | 184,556 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Steve Tarr | |
| 6,574 | (4) | |
$ | 46,675 | |
(1) |
This
award was granted to Mr. Hales on June 27, 2016 and vested on March 17, 2017. These RSUs represent the portion of a performance-based
granted that were ultimately earned. |
|
|
(2) |
This
award was granted on January 8, 2016; vesting of which is based on continued employment through the vest date. 2/3 of the
award vested on January 8, 2017 and 1/3 of the award vests on January 8, 2018; provided the grantee continues to be employed
with the Company on that date. |
|
|
(3) |
The
award was granted on June 27, 2016 subject to certain performance criteria. 100% was earned on March 25, 2017 upon
achievement of the performance criteria, subject to final vesting on January 8, 2018; provided Mr. Hales continues to be employed
with the Company on that date. |
|
|
(4) |
This
award was granted on January 8, 2016 and vested on March 17, 2017. These RSUs represent the portion of a performance-based
grant that were ultimately earned. |
|
|
(5) |
This
award was granted on April 28, 2016 subject to certain performance criteria. 1/3 vested May 19, 2016 upon the completion of
the specified criteria. The second 1/3 will vest on May 19, 2017 and the third 1/3 will vest on May 19, 2018; provided Mr.
Holiday continues to be employed with the Company on that date. |
|
|
(6) |
This
award was granted on April 1, 2014 and vested 1/3 on January 1, 2015; 1/3 on January 1, 2016; and 1/3 on January 1, 2017.
|
NEO
Option Exercises and Restricted Stock Vested Table for the year ended December 31, 2016
Restricted Stock | |
| |
Name
| |
Number
of Shares
Acquired on Vesting (#)(1) | | |
Value
Realized
Upon Vesting ($)(2) | |
Randall L. Hales | |
| 363,742 | (3) | |
$ | 3,291,542 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Bradley J. Holiday | |
| 15,583 | | |
$ | 136,501 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Brian Stech | |
| 73,722 | (4) | |
$ | 699,336 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Chris Paterson | |
| 13,992 | | |
$ | 125,228 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Steve Tarr | |
| 34,562 | | |
$ | 309,330 | |
(1) |
Represents
the number of share-based awards vested. |
(2) |
Computed
as the fair market value of the RSUs upon vesting. |
(3) |
Includes
22,782 shares which Mr. Hales elected to have the Company retain as part of a net share settlement to satisfy the applicable
tax withholding liability related to the vesting of such shares. |
(4) |
Includes
21,784 shares which Mr. Stech elected to have the Company retain as part of a net share settlement to satisfy the applicable
tax withholding liability related to the vesting of such shares. |
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 38 |
Potential
Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
The
information below describes and quantifies certain payments or benefits that would be payable under the existing plans and programs
of the Company if a NEO’s employment were terminated or the Company undergoes a change of control. These benefits are in
addition to benefits generally available to all salaried employees of the Company in connection with a termination of employment,
such as disability and life insurance benefits and the value of employee-paid group health plan continuation coverage under the
Consolidated Omnibus Reconciliation Act, or “COBRA.” As noted above, Randall Hales, Bradley Holiday, Brian Stech,
and Chris Paterson have separate employment agreements with the Company that include severance and/or change-of-control provisions.
Accelerated
Vesting of Equity Awards upon Change in Control
Under
both the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan, the Compensation Committee, which administers such
plans, at its sole and absolute discretion, has the ability to accelerate the vesting of awards granted under such plans, though
such acceleration of vesting is not mandated.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The
following table sets forth certain information as of December 31, 2016, concerning securities authorized for issuance under all
of the Company’s existing equity compensation plans:
Plan Category | |
Number
of securities to be issued upon
vesting of
restricted stock
units | | |
Weighted-average
exercise
price of outstanding
options (1) | | |
Number
of securities
remaining available for
future issuances under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities reflected
in first column) (2) | |
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders | |
| 765,726 | | |
| — | | |
| 2,999,066 | |
Equity compensation plans not approved
by security holders | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | |
Total | |
| 765,726 | | |
| — | | |
| 2,999,066 | |
(1) | Excludes
RSUs because they have no exercise price. |
| |
(2) | Represents
shares available for issuance under our 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan as the Company
has resolved to no longer issue awards under the ZAGG Incorporated 2007 Stock Incentive
Plan. |
In
2007, the Board adopted and in 2008, the Company’s stockholders approved, the ZAGG Incorporated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan
(the “2007 Plan”). Upon adoption of the 2013 Plan in January 2013, the Company ceased to grant awards pursuant to
the 2007 Plan. All subsequent awards were and all future awards will be granted under the 2013 Plan. All awards under the 2007
Plan have vested, been exercised, or expired according to their respective terms.
In
January 2013, the Board adopted and in June 2013, the Company’s stockholders approved, the ZAGG Inc 2013 Equity Incentive
Award Plan (the “2013 Plan”), an equity incentive plan intended to replace the 2007 Plan. The 2013 Plan is an “omnibus
plan” under which stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance share awards, restricted stock, and restricted stock
units can be awarded. The 2013 Plan’s initial share reservation is 5,000,000 shares. The term of the plan is for 10 years
from the date of its adoption. As of December 31, 2016, there were approximately 2,999,066 shares available for grant under the
2013 Plan.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 39 |
STOCK
OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
Security
Ownership of Directors and NEOs
The
following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of the Common Stock as of April 24, 2017, for each director and nominee for
director, each NEO, and by all directors (including nominees) and executive officers of the Company as a group.
Beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect
to securities. Shares of Common Stock granted as RSUs (excluding RSUs granted subject to performance conditions that have not
yet been realized) and stock subject to options, warrants or convertible securities exercisable or convertible within 60 days
of April 24, 2017, were deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person or entity holding such options, warrants
or convertible securities but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person, and was based upon
the number of shares of the Common Stock issued and outstanding, as of April 24, 2017, which was 27,961,276 shares.
Name
| |
Common Stock | | |
Unvested
Restricted Stock Units | | |
Total | | |
Beneficial
Ownership | |
Randall L. Hales | |
| 576,791 | | |
| 22,682 | | |
| 599,473 | | |
| 2.1 | % |
Bradley J. Holiday | |
| 85,164 | | |
| 14,423 | | |
| 99,587 | | |
| (1 | )% |
Brian Stech | |
| 117,791 | | |
| 10,341 | | |
| 128,132 | | |
| (1 | )% |
Chris Paterson | |
| 26,399 | | |
| 8,618 | | |
| 34,957 | | |
| (1 | )% |
Cheryl A. Larabee | |
| 94,595 | | |
| 18,594 | | |
| 113,189 | | |
| (1 | )% |
E. Todd Heiner | |
| 92,308 | | |
| 9,297 | | |
| 101,605 | | |
| (1 | )% |
Daniel R. Maurer | |
| 49,558 | | |
| 9,297 | | |
| 58,855 | | |
| (1 | )% |
P. Scott Stubbs | |
| 8,656 | | |
| 9,297 | | |
| 17,853 | | |
| (1 | )% |
All officers and
directors as a group (9 persons(2)) | |
| 1,051,262 | | |
| 102,549 | | |
| 1,153,651 | | |
| 4.2 | % |
(1) | Less
than one percent. |
(2) | Includes
Chris Ahern who became an executive officer during the first quarter of 2017, but is
not separately included in the table above. Steve Tarr is excluded as he left the Company
in February 2017. |
5%
or More Beneficial Owners
The
following table sets forth, as of April 24, 2017, certain information regarding each entity who is known to be the beneficial
owner of more than 5% of any class of our voting stock. Unless otherwise indicated below, to our knowledge, all persons listed
below had sole voting and investing power with respect to their shares of capital stock, except to the extent authority was shared
by spouses under applicable community property laws.
Beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect
to securities. Shares of Common Stock subject to options, warrants or convertible securities exercisable or convertible within
60 days of April 24, 2017, were deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person or entity holding such options,
warrants or convertible securities but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person, and was based
upon the number of shares of the Common Stock issued and outstanding, as of April 24, 2017, which was 27,961,276 shares.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 40 |
Title of Class | |
Name and Address
of
Beneficial Owners | |
Amount
and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | | |
Percent
of Class | |
Common Stock | |
RBC Global Asset Management (U.S.) Inc. 100 South Fifth Street, Suite 2300 Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55402 | |
| 3,683,307 | (1) | |
| 13.2 | % |
Common Stock | |
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP Building One 6300 Bee Cave Road Austin, Texas 78746 | |
| 2,381,400 | (2) | |
| 8.5 | % |
Common Stock | |
Blackrock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street New York, New York 10055 | |
| 2,221,399 | (3) | |
| 7.9 | % |
(1) |
The
information reported is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2017 by RBC Global Asset Management (U.S.)
Inc., an investment advisor. Pursuant to the Schedule 13G/A, RBC Global Asset Management (U.S.) Inc. reports shared voting
power with respect to 3,203,040 shares of Common Stock and shares dispositive power with respect to 3,683,307 shares of Common
Stock. |
|
|
(2) |
The
information reported is based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 9, 2017 by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. Pursuant
to the Schedule 13G, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP reports sole voting power with respect to 2,285,636 shares of Common Stock
and sole dispositive power with respect to 2,381,400 shares of Common Stock. |
|
|
(3) |
The
information reported is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 26, 2017 by BlackRock, Inc. Pursuant to the
Schedule 13G/A, BlackRock, Inc. reports sole voting power with respect to 2,136,334 shares of Common Stock and sole dispositive
power with respect to 2,221,399 shares of Common Stock. |
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
The
Company’s executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders are required under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Copies
of these reports must also be furnished to the Company.
To
the best of our knowledge based solely on a review of Forms 3, 4, and 5 (and any amendments thereof) received by us during or
with respect to the year ended December 31, 2016, all of the persons subject to the reporting requirements pursuant to Section
16(a) filed the required reports on a timely basis with the SEC.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 41 |
PROPOSAL 4 – APPROVAL
OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
2013 EQUITY INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN
Stockholders
are requested to consider and approve a proposal to amend and restate the 2013 Plan. The Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive
Award Plan (the “Amended Plan”) amends the 2013 Plan to:
| ● | Prohibit
shares of Common Stock subject to expired, terminated or lapsed options or stock appreciation
rights from returning to the pool of shares available for grant of an award under the
plan; |
| ● | Increase
the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be granted to any one participant
during a one-year period to 600,000; |
| ● | Expressly
provide for “net exercise” as an acceptable form of payment of the exercise
price of a stock option under the plan; |
| ● | Provide
that no award may vest or become exercisable (as applicable) until at least 12 months
after the grant date, subject to an exception for up to 5% of the shares of Common Stock
authorized for issuance under the plan which may be subject to awards that do not meet
such vesting or exercisability (as applicable) requirements; |
| ● | Prohibit
the Company from buying back outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights; |
| ● | Clarify
the rights of participants with respect to shares of Common Stock subject to awards granted
under the plan prior to vesting of the award and/or issuance of such shares; and |
| ● | Make
other technical or otherwise non-material revisions thereto. |
Purpose
The
purpose of the Amended Plan is to provide flexibility to the Company in its ability to attract, motivate and retain the services
of directors, employees and consultants upon whose judgment, interest and special effort the successful conduct of the Company’s
operation is largely dependent, by:
| ● | Aligning
the interests of management, employees and consultants of the Company with the stockholders
of the Company by reinforcing the relationship between participants’ rewards and
stockholder gains; |
| ● | Providing
management and employees with an equity ownership in the Company commensurate with Company
performance, as reflected in increased stockholder value; |
| ● | Maintaining
competitive compensation levels; and |
| ● | Providing
an incentive to management and employees to remain in continuing employment with the
Company and to put forth maximum efforts for the success of its business. |
The
Compensation Committee believes that participation in the Amended Plan by the employees, non-employee directors and consultants
of the Company and its subsidiaries promotes the success of the Company’s business through equity ownership. The Compensation
Committee further believes that the Amended Plan is an integral component of its benefits program intended to provide its employees
(including executive officers whose compensation may have implications under Section 162(m) (“Section 162(m)”) of
the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”)), consultants, and non-employee directors with an incentive to exert maximum
effort for the success of the Company and to participate in that success through acquisition of the Company’s Common Stock.
Consistent with such belief, the Compensation Committee regularly reviews its compensation programs to ensure that they are competitive
with the compensation practices of the Company’s peer group, responsive to stockholder interests and in line with current
industry trends and practices. In light of the foregoing objectives, the Compensation Committee has reviewed equity incentives
available to executives of its peer group, including the maximum value of annual awards available to individual participants.
The Committee found that as of March 31, 2017, the approximate maximum value of annual awards available to individual participants
at its peer group ranged from $2.3 million to more than $18.2 million and that the mean maximum award was $7.1 million and the
median maximum was $6.4 million. The maximum award value under the 2013 Plan (based on a cap of 300,000 shares of Common Stock
that may be granted to any one Company participant during a one-year period) was $2.2 million at March 31, 2017.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 42 |
Based
on its recent review of peer group compensation practices, the Compensation Committee has determined it necessary and appropriate
to increase the individual participant limit on annual awards from 300,000 shares to 600,000 shares in order that the Company’s
grant practices are more competitive with its peer group. The Compensation Committee also recognizes the importance of balancing
the need for attractive and competitive compensation programs with the interest of the Company’s stockholders in preserving
the value of their equity investments by aligning both the short and long-term interests of employees, non-employee directors
and consultants of the Company with the interests of the Company’s stockholders and by protecting against premature and/or
unnecessary dilution. The balance of the non-technical amendments included in the Amended Plan are intended to address such interests.
Overall, the Compensation Committee believes that the Amended Plan strikes an appropriate balance among all of these interests.
The
Compensation Committee adopted, subject to stockholder approval, the Amended Plan, effective April 20, 2017. If the Amended Plan
is not approved by stockholders, then the 2013 Plan will remain in place as in effect prior to the amendment that is the subject
of this proposal, and awards may continue to be granted pursuant to the terms of the 2013 Plan.
Key
Terms of the Amended Plan
The
following is a summary of the key provisions of the Amended Plan. This summary is not intended to be a complete summary of the
Amended Plan and is qualified by reference to the full text of the Amended Plan, which is incorporated by reference to Annex B
of this Proxy Statement.
Plan
Term: |
The
Amended Plan will expire on January 15, 2023, the tenth anniversary of the effective date of the 2013 Plan (unless earlier
terminated by the Compensation Committee). |
|
|
Eligible
Participants: |
Employees,
non-employee directors and consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries. Incentive stock options may be granted
only to employees of the Company or its subsidiaries. |
|
|
Shares
Authorized: |
5,000,000
shares of the Company’s Common Stock, subject to adjustment to reflect stock splits and similar events. As
of April 24, 2017, 2,731,359 shares remained available for grant under the Amended Plan. |
|
|
Award
Types: |
● Incentive
and nonqualified stock options;
● Stock
appreciation rights;
● Performance
share awards;
● Stock
awards, including restricted stock awards, stock payments, and deferred stock awards;
● Restricted
stock units;
● Other
stock-based awards; and
● Performance-based
awards. |
|
|
Award
Terms: |
Stock
options expire ten (10) years (or five (5) years in the case of incentive stock options granted to employees that are also
beneficial owners of more than 10% of the Company’s outstanding voting securities (“10% Owners”)) from the
date of grant. No award may vest or be exercisable (as applicable) until at least twelve (12) months from the date
of grant; provided that up to five percent (5%) of the shares authorized for issuance under the Amended Plan may be subject
to awards that do not meet the foregoing vesting or exercise requirements. |
|
|
Exercise
Price: |
The
exercise price of stock options or stock appreciation rights may not be less than 100% (or 110% in the case of incentive stock
options granted to 10% Owners) of the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant. |
Summary
of the Amended Plan
The
Amended Plan permits the Compensation Committee to grant various types of equity awards, including incentive stock options, nonqualified
stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance share awards, restricted stock, and restricted stock units to eligible individuals.
A summary of the principal provisions of the Amended Plan is set forth below. This summary is not intended to be a complete summary
of the Amended Plan and is qualified by reference to the full text of the Amended Plan, which is incorporated by reference to
Annex B of this Proxy Statement.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 43 |
Administration
The
Compensation Committee has the authority to administer the Amended Plan, including the power to determine eligibility, the types
and sizes of awards, the price and timing of awards and the acceleration or waiver of any vesting restriction, provided that the
Compensation Committee will not have the authority to accelerate vesting or waive the forfeiture of any performance-based awards.
The Compensation Committee may delegate to a committee of one or more members of the Board the authority to grant or amend awards
to participants other than senior executives of the Company who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, or employees who
are “covered employees” within the meaning of Section 162(m). The Compensation Committee includes at least two directors,
each of whom qualifies as a non-employee director pursuant to Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, and an “outside director”
pursuant to Section 162(m).
Eligibility
Persons
eligible to participate in the Amended Plan include non-employee directors, consultants to the Company, and all of the employees
of the Company and its subsidiaries, as determined by the Compensation Committee.
Limitation
on Awards and Shares Available
The
maximum number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Amended Plan is 5,000,000. To the extent that an award
(other than an option or stock appreciation rights) terminates, expires or lapses for any reason, any shares subject to the award
may be used again for new grants under the Amended Plan. In addition, shares tendered or withheld to satisfy the grant or exercise
price or any tax withholding obligation may be used for grants under the Amended Plan. Shares issued in assumption of, or in substitution
for, any outstanding awards of any entity acquired in any form of combination by the Company or any of its subsidiaries will not
be counted against the shares available for issuance under the Amended Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no shares will become
available upon the cancellation of existing awards or any similar transactions following the tenth anniversary of the effective
date of the Amended Plan. The maximum number of shares with respect to one or more awards granted to any one participant in the
Amended Plan during a one-year period (measured from the date of any grant) is 600,000.
Awards
The
Amended Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance
share awards, restricted stock, stock payments, deferred stock awards, restricted stock units, other stock-based awards and performance-based
awards. All awards must be evidenced by written award agreements setting forth the terms, conditions, limitations and award type
of each award.
Stock
Options
A
stock option, including an incentive stock option (as defined in Section 422 of the Code), and a nonqualified stock option, is
a right to purchase a specified number of shares of Common Stock as a specified price during specified time periods. The option
exercise price of all stock options granted pursuant to the Amended Plan will be at least 100% (or 110% in the case of incentive
stock options granted to 10% Owners) of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant. Stock options may be exercised
as determined by the Compensation Committee, but in no event after the tenth anniversary (or fifth anniversary in the case of
incentive stock options granted to 10% Owners) of the date of grant. The aggregate fair market value of the shares with respect
to which options intended to be incentive stock options are exercisable for the first time by an employee in any calendar year
may not exceed $100,000, or such other amount as the Code provides.
Upon
the exercise of a stock option, the purchase price must be paid in full in either cash or its equivalent, by tendering previously
acquired shares of Common Stock with a fair market value at the time of exercise equal to the exercise price, by “net exercise”
of the option, or in other property acceptable to the Compensation Committee (including through the delivery of a notice that
the participant has placed a market sell order with a broker with respect to shares then issuable upon exercise of the option,
and that the broker has been directed to pay a sufficient portion of the net proceeds of the sale to the Company in satisfaction
of the option exercise price, provided that payment of such proceeds is then made to the Company upon settlement of such sale).
However, no participant who is a member of the Board or an executive officer of the Company will be permitted to pay the exercise
price of an option in any method in violation of Section 13(k) of the Exchange Act. The Company is not permitted to buy back any
outstanding stock option.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 44 |
Restricted
Stock
A
restricted stock award is the grant of shares of Common Stock that is nontransferable and may be subject to substantial risk of
forfeiture until specific conditions are met. Conditions may be based on continuing employment or achieving performance goals.
During the period of restriction, participants holding shares of restricted stock may receive credit for dividends paid on such
shares during such restriction period, but otherwise shall have no voting or dividend rights with respect to such shares. The
restrictions will lapse in accordance with a schedule or other conditions determined by the Compensation Committee.
Stock
Appreciation Rights
A
stock appreciation right (a “SAR”) is the right to receive payment of an amount equal to the excess of the fair market
value of a share of Common Stock on the date of exercise of the SAR over the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the
date of grant of the SAR. Payments will be made by the Company in cash or Common Stock. The Company is not permitted to buy back
any outstanding SAR.
Performance
Share Awards
A
performance share award is the right to receive shares of Common Stock, the payment of which is contingent upon achieving certain
performance goals or other performance-based targets established by the Compensation Committee, in each case on a specified date
or dates or over any period or periods determined by the Compensation Committee.
Stock
Payment
A
stock payment is a payment in form of shares of Common Stock or an option or other right to purchase shares of Common Stock, as
part of any bonus, deferred compensation or other arrangement, made in lieu of all or any portion of such compensation.
Deferred
Stock
An
award of deferred stock is a right to receive a specified number of shares of Common Stock during time periods specified by the
Compensation Committee. The number of shares of deferred stock are determined by the Compensation Committee and may be linked
to any performance criteria determined appropriate by the Committee. Shares of Common Stock underlying a deferred stock award
are not issued until the deferred stock award has vested, pursuant to a vesting schedule or performance criteria set by the Compensation
Committee.
Restricted
Stock Units
A
restricted stock unit represents the right to receive one (1) share of Common Stock for each restricted stock unit granted. The
Compensation Committee is authorized to make awards of restricted stock units in such amounts and subject to such vesting and
forfeiture requirements, transfer restrictions, and purchase price requirements as are determined appropriate by the Compensation
Committee.
The
Compensation Committee is also authorized to grant other equity-based awards on such terms and conditions and based on such factors
as the Compensation Committee determines appropriate.
Performance-Based
Awards
The
Amended Plan also provides the Compensation Committee with the ability to qualify awards, including awards of restricted stock,
performance shares, deferred stock, stock payments, restricted stock units and other equity-based awards as “qualified performance-based
compensation” as described in Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code. Performance-based awards will be determined based on the
attainment of written performance goals approved by the Compensation Committee for a performance period established by the Compensation
Committee in its sole discretion while the outcome for that performance period is substantially uncertain and no more than ninety
(90) days after the commencement of the performance period to which the performance goal relates.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 45 |
The
performance goals will be based on one or more of the following criteria: net earnings (either before or after interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization or non-operating charges), other non-operating charges, economic value-added, sales or revenue,
net income (either before or after taxes), operating earnings, cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow and
free cash flow), cash flow return on capital, return on net assets, return on stockholders’ equity, return on assets, return
on capital, stockholder returns, return on sales, gross or net profit margin, productivity, expense, margins, operating efficiency,
customer satisfaction, working capital, earnings per share, price per share of the Company’s Common Stock, and market share,
any of which may be measured either in absolute terms or as compared to any incremental increase or as compared to results of
a peer group. The performance criteria may include a threshold level of performance below which no payment shall be made, levels
of performance at which specified payments shall be made and a maximum level of performance above which no additional payment
shall be made.
The
Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may adjust or modify the calculation of performance goals for a particular performance
period in order to prevent the dilution or enlargement of the rights of participants in the event of, or in anticipation of, any
unusual or extraordinary corporate item, transaction, event, or development, or in recognition of, or in anticipation of, any
other unusual or nonrecurring events affecting the Company, or the financial statements of the Company, or in response to, or
in anticipation of, changes in applicable laws, regulations, accounting principles, or business conditions. The Compensation Committee
must determine whether, with respect to the performance period, the applicable performance goals have been met with respect to
a given participant and if so met, shall so certify and ascertain the amount of the applicable performance-based award.
Vesting
and Privileges of Stock Ownership
No
award may be granted under the Amended Plan that vests or is exercisable (as applicable) until at least twelve (12) months following
the date of grant of the award; provided, that up to five percent (5%) of the shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under
the Amended Plan may be subject to awards that do not meet the foregoing vesting and/or exercise requirements.
Except
to the extent that the Compensation Committee grants an award that entitles the participant to credit for dividends paid on shares
of Common Stock subject to such award prior to the vesting of such award and issuance of the subject shares to the participant,
the award participant will not have any of the rights of a stockholder with respect to any such shares until such award vests
(or applicable restrictions or forfeiture conditions lapse) and the subject shares are issued to the participant.
Changes
in Capital Structure
In
the event of a stock dividend, stock split, combination or exchange of shares, merger, consolidation, spin-off, recapitalization,
distribution of assets or any other corporate event affecting the Common Stock or the share price of the Common Stock in a manner
that causes dilution or enlargement of benefits or potential benefits under the Amended Plan, then the Compensation Committee
will make proportionate adjustments to: (i) the aggregate number of, and types of, shares of stock subject to the Amended Plan,
(ii) the terms and conditions of any outstanding awards (including any applicable performance targets) and (iii) the grant or
exercise price for any outstanding awards. In addition, in such a case or in the event of any unusual or nonrecurring transactions
or events affecting the Company or of changes in applicable laws, the Compensation Committee, may, subject to the terms of the
Amended Plan, take any of the following actions if it determines that such action is appropriate in order to prevent the dilution
or enlargement of benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Amended Plan or with respect to any award:
(i) provide for either the termination, purchase or replacement of the awards, (ii) provide that the awards shall be assumed by
the successor or survivor corporation, or a parent or subsidiary thereof, or shall be substituted for by similar awards covering
the stock of the successor or survivor corporation, or a parent or subsidiary thereof, with appropriate adjustments as to the
number and kind of shares and prices, (iii) make adjustments in the number and type of shares of stock (or other securities or
property) subject to outstanding awards and/or in the terms and conditions of (including the exercise price), and the criteria
included in, outstanding awards which may be granted in the future, (iv) provide for the acceleration of vesting or exercisability
of the awards and (v) provide that the awards cannot vest or be exercised after the event that triggers the action.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 46 |
Amendment
and Termination
The
Compensation Committee may terminate, amend, or modify the Amended Plan at any time, except that (a) to the extent necessary and
desirable to comply with any applicable law, regulation, or stock exchange rule, the Company shall obtain stockholder approval
of any amendment or any modification of any options that would be deemed a re-pricing under applicable rules, in such a manner
and to such a degree as required, and (b) without stockholder approval the Committee may not (i) increase the maximum number of
shares of Common Stock which may be issued under the Amended Plan, (ii) extend the period during which any award may be granted
or exercised, (iii) amend the Amended Plan to permit the Committee to grant options with an exercise price that is below fair
market value on the date of grant, or (iv) extend the term of the Amended Plan.
In
no event may an award be granted pursuant to the Amended Plan on or after the tenth anniversary of the effective date of the 2013
Plan (June 12, 2023).
Securities
Law
The
Amended Plan is intended to conform to the extent necessary with all provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
“Securities Act”) and the Exchange Act, and any and all regulations and rules promulgated by the SEC thereunder, including
without limitation Rule 16b-3. The Amended Plan will be administered, and awards will be granted, vest and may be exercised, as
applicable, only in such a manner as to conform to such laws, rules and regulations. To the extent permitted by applicable law,
the Amended Plan and awards granted thereunder shall be deemed amended to the extent necessary to conform to such laws, rules
and regulations.
Withholding
Taxes
Prior
to delivering any shares or cash pursuant to any award, the Company or any subsidiary will have the authority to deduct, or require
a participant to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy federal, state, local, foreign or other taxes or payments
required to be withheld with respect to such award. The Compensation Committee may permit a participant to satisfy such tax withholding
obligation through various methods, including (without limitation) (a) paying cash, (b) electing to have the Company withhold
otherwise deliverable cash or shares having a fair market value equal to the minimum statutory amount required to be withheld
(the “net exercise” method), or (c) delivering to the Company already-owned shares having a fair market value equal
to the minimum statutory amount required to be withheld.
Federal
Income Tax Consequences
The
income tax consequences of the Amended Plan under current federal law are summarized in the following discussion which deals with
the general income tax principles applicable to the Amended Plan, and is intended for general information only. This summary does
not address alternative minimum tax, federal, state, or local income or other tax consequences. Tax laws are complex and subject
to change and may vary depending on individual circumstances and from locality to locality. The following summary is for informational
purposes only and is not a substitute for careful tax planning and advice based upon an individual’s particular circumstance.
Nonqualified
Stock Options
For
federal income tax purposes, an optionee generally will not recognize taxable income on the grant of a nonqualified stock option
(an “NQSO”) under the Amended Plan, but upon the exercise of an NQSO, an optionee will recognize ordinary income,
and the Company generally will be entitled to a compensation deduction. The amount of income recognized (and the amount generally
deductible by the Company) generally will be equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares at the time of
exercise over the aggregate exercise price paid for the shares, regardless of whether the exercise price is paid in cash or in
shares or other property. An optionee’s basis for the stock for purposes of determining his or her gain or loss upon a subsequent
disposition of the shares generally will be the fair market value of the stock on the date of exercise of the NQSO, and any such
gain or loss will generally be taxable as capital gains or losses.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 47 |
Incentive
Stock Options
An
optionee generally will not recognize taxable income upon either the grant or exercise of an Incentive Stock Option (an “ISO”);
however, the amount by which the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise exceeds the exercise price will be treated
as an “item of tax preference” for the optionee for purposes of the alternative minimum tax. Generally, upon the sale
or other taxable disposition of the shares of the Common Stock acquired upon exercise of an ISO, the optionee will recognize income
taxable as capital gains in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the amount realized in such disposition over the exercise
price paid by the optionee to acquire such shares, provided that no disposition of the shares has taken place within either (a)
two years from the date of grant of the ISO or (b) one year from the date of exercise. If the shares of Common Stock are sold
or otherwise disposed of before the end of the one-year and two-year periods specified above, the optionee will recognize compensation
income in the year of disposition equal to the lesser of (i) the difference between the exercise price paid by the optionee to
acquire such shares and the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise, or (ii) the difference between the amount
realized in such disposition and the exercise price paid by the optionee to acquire the shares. The Company (or other employer
corporation) generally will be entitled to a tax deduction equal to the amount of the compensation income recognized by the optionee
with respect to an ISO only to the extent the optionee recognizes ordinary income upon the sale or other disposition of the shares
of Common Stock acquired by the optionee pursuant to an ISO.
Stock
Appreciation Rights
No
taxable income is generally recognized upon the grant of a SAR, but upon exercise of a SAR the fair market value of the shares
(or cash in lieu of shares) received generally will be taxable as ordinary income to the participant in the year of such exercise.
The Company generally will be entitled to a compensation deduction for the amount the participant recognizes as ordinary income.
Restricted
Stock
A
participant to whom restricted stock is issued generally will not recognize taxable compensation income upon such issuance and
the Company generally will not then be entitled to a compensation deduction, unless such participant makes an election under Section
83(b) of the Code to treat such restricted stock as being substantially vested. However, when restrictions on shares of restricted
stock lapse, such that the shares are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the participant generally will recognize
ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the date such restrictions lapse over
the purchase price paid by such participant (if any). The Company generally will be entitled to a compensation deduction equal
to the amount of compensation income recognized by the participant. If a participant makes an election under Section 83(b) of
the Code with respect to restricted stock, the participant generally will recognize compensation income at the date of issuance
in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares at the date of issuance over the purchase price
paid by such participant and the Company will be entitled to a compensation deduction equal to the amount of compensation income
recognized by the participant.
Restricted
Stock Units, Performance Share Awards, and Other Stock-Based Awards
The
grant of a restricted stock unit, performance share award, or other stock-based awards (subject to vesting conditions) generally
should not result in taxable compensation income to the participant or a compensation deduction to the Company. However, the participant
will recognize taxable compensation income upon the settlement of such award in an amount equal to any cash that is received and
the fair market value of any Common Stock that is received in settlement of such award. The Company is entitled to a compensation
deduction upon the settlement of such an award equal to the compensation income recognized by the participant.
Stock
Payments
A
participant who receives a stock payment in lieu of a cash payment that would otherwise have been made will generally recognize
taxable compensation income and be taxed as if the cash payment had been received, and the Company generally will be entitled
to a compensation deduction for the same amount.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 48 |
Section
162(m) Limitation
In
general, under Section 162(m), income tax deductions of publicly held corporations may be limited to the extent the total compensation
(including base salary, annual bonus, stock option exercises, transfers of property and benefits paid under nonqualified retirement
plans) for certain executive officers exceeds $1 million (less the amount of any “excess parachute payments” as defined
in Section 280G of the Code) in any one year. However, under Section 162(m), the limit on the income tax deduction does not apply
to certain “performance-based compensation.” Under Section 162(m), stock options and SARs will satisfy the “performance-based
compensation” exception if the awards of stock options or SARs are made by a committee of the Board consisting solely of
two or more “outside directors,” the plan sets the maximum number of shares that can be granted to any person within
a specified period, and the compensation is based solely on an increase in the stock price after the grant date (i.e., the exercise
price of the stock option or SAR is equal to or greater than the fair market value of the stock subject to such award on the grant
date). Other types of awards may only qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) if such awards
are granted or payable to the participants based only upon the attainment of objectively determinable and pre-established performance
targets established by a qualifying committee of the Board and if the material terms of the performance-based compensation are
disclosed to and approved by the Company’s stockholders.
The
Amended Plan has been designed in order to permit the Compensation Committee to grant stock options and SARs that will qualify
as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m). In addition, in order to permit Awards other than stock
options and SARs to qualify as “performance-based compensation,” the Amended Plan allows the Compensation Committee
to designate as “Section 162(m) Participants” employees whose compensation for a given fiscal year may be subject
to the limit on deductible compensation imposed by Section 162(m). The Compensation Committee may grant awards to Section 162(m)
Participants that vest or become exercisable upon the attainment of specific performance targets that are related to one or more
of the performance goals set by the Compensation Committee as provided in the Amended Plan. Upon approval by the Company’s
stockholders, the Amended Plan, will permit the Company to grant awards intended to qualify as performance-based compensation
under Section 162(m).
New
Plan Benefits
The
Compensation Committee granted to Randall L. Hales performance-based RSUs under the Amended Plan, subject to obtaining stockholder
approval of the Amended Plan. The actual performance-based RSUs actually earned will not be determined until the end of the one-year
performance period ending December 31, 2017, and then will vest over a three year period. Up to 122.5% of the target number of
performance-based RSUs granted to Mr. Hales, will be earned if, and to the extent that, the Company’s revenue (50%) and
Adjusted EBITDA (50%) during such period achieves or exceeds the threshold performance levels established by the Compensation
Committee. The performance-based RSUs granted are eligible to vest for an aggregate of 132,300 shares of the Company’s common
stock if performance at the maximum performance levels established by the Compensation Committee is achieved for both corporate
objectives.
The
following table sets forth information pertaining to awards which have been granted to our NEOs, our executive officers as a group,
our non-employee directors as a group, and our employees (excluding executive officers) as a group as of April 24, 2017 under
the Amended Plan, subject to stockholder approval. In the event stockholder approval of the Amended Plan is not obtained, Mr.
Hales’ award will be automatically forfeited.
Name | |
Minimum
Performance RSUs
(#) | | |
Target
Performance RSUs (#) | | |
Maximum
Performance RSUs
(#) | | |
Aggregate
U.S. Dollar
Value of Maximum
Performance
RSUs ($)(1) | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Randall
L. Hales | |
| 83,700 | | |
| 108,000 | | |
| 132,300 | | |
$ | 826,875 | |
Bradley J. Holiday | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Brian Stech | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Chris Paterson | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Steve Tarr | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
All executive
officers | |
| 83,700 | | |
| 108,000 | | |
| 132,300 | | |
$ | 826,875 | |
All non-employee
directors | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
All employees
(excluding executive officers) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
(1) | Calculated
based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on March 2, 2017, the
date of grant, of $6.25, multiplied by the aggregate number of shares underlying the
performance-based RSUs granted. |
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 49 |
Awards
are subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee and, except as described above, no determinations have been made by
the Compensation Committee as to any awards that may be granted pursuant to the Amended Plan. Therefore, it is not possible to
determine the additional benefits that will be received in the future by participants in the Amended Plan.
Existing
Plan Benefits
As
of April 24, 2017, under the 2013 Plan there were 860,463 shares of Common Stock subject to outstanding unvested restricted stock
units (assuming outstanding unearned performance-based restricted stock units are earned at target). As of the record date, there
were approximately 400 employees and directors who were eligible to participate in the 2013 Plan.
The
following table sets forth, as to our NEOs, our executive officers as a group, our non-employee directors as a group, and our
employees (excluding executive officers) as a group, the number of shares underlying awards that have been granted through April
24, 2017 under the 2013 Plan, on a net basis.
Name | |
Number of Securities Underlying Awards | |
| |
| |
Randall
L. Hales | |
| 694,042 | |
Bradley J. Holiday | |
| 116,115 | |
Brian Stech | |
| 261,813 | |
Chris Paterson | |
| 81,844 | |
Steve Tarr | |
| - | |
All executive
officers | |
| 1,257,134 | |
All non-employee
directors | |
| 185,007 | |
All employees
(excluding executive officers) | |
| 826,500 | |
THE
BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE ZAGG INC AMENDED AND RESTATED 2013 EQUITY
INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 50 |
Other
Information
Stockholder
Proposal for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
If
any stockholder intends to present a proposal to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy material in connection
with the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the proposal must be in proper form (per SEC Regulation 14A, Rule
14a-8-Stockholder Proposals) and received by the Secretary of the Company on or before December 25, 2017. Stockholder proposals
to be presented at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders which are not to be included in the Company’s proxy materials
must be received by the Company no earlier than the close of business on March 24, 2018, nor later than the close of business
on April 23, 2018.
Delivery
of Documents to Stockholders Sharing an Address
In
instances in which multiple holders of the Common Stock share a common address and are the beneficial owners, but not the record
holders, of those shares of Common Stock, the holders’ banks, brokers or other nominees may only deliver one copy of this
Proxy Statement and the Company’s 2016 Annual Report to Stockholders, unless the applicable bank, broker or nominee has
received contrary instructions from one or more of the stockholders. The Company will deliver promptly, upon written request,
a separate copy of this Proxy Statement and the Company’s 2016 Annual Report to Stockholders to any stockholder at a shared
address to which a single copy of the documents was delivered. A stockholder who wishes to receive a separate copy of this
Proxy Statement and the Company’s 2016 Annual Report to Stockholders should submit a request by writing to Abby Barraclough,
Corporate Secretary, ZAGG Inc, 910 W. Legacy Center Drive, Suite 500, Midvale, Utah 84047. Beneficial owners sharing an address
who are receiving multiple copies of proxy materials and annual reports and who wish to receive a single copy of such materials
in the future will need to contact their broker, bank or other nominee to request that only a single copy of each document be
mailed to all stockholders at the shared address in the future.
Frequently
Asked Questions
What
is a proxy?
A
proxy is your legal designation of another person to vote on your behalf. You are giving the individuals appointed by the Board
as proxies (Randall L. Hales and Bradley J. Holiday) the authority to vote your shares in the manner you indicate.
Why
did I receive more than one notice?
You
may receive multiple notices if you hold your shares in different ways (e.g., joint tenancy, trusts, and custodial accounts) or
in multiple accounts. If your shares are held by a broker (i.e., in “street name”), you will receive your notice or
other voting information from your broker. In any case, you should vote for each notice you receive.
Who
is qualified to vote?
You
are qualified to receive notice of and to vote at the Meeting if you owned shares of Common Stock at the close of business on
April 24, 2017 (the “Record Date”).
How
many shares of Common Stock may vote at the Meeting?
As
of the Record Date, there were 27,961,276 shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share of Common Stock
is entitled to one vote on each matter presented at the Meeting.
What
is the difference between a “stockholder of record” and a “street name” holder?
If
your shares are registered directly in your name with Empire Stock Transfer, the Company’s transfer agent, you are a “stockholder
of record.” If your shares are held in the name of a brokerage, bank, trust or other nominee as a custodian, you are a “street
name” holder.
How
can I vote on the proposals to be considered at the Meeting?
If
you are a stockholder of record, you may vote electronically over the Internet, or by phone, or you may request a complete set
of traditional proxy materials and vote your proxy by mail. To vote your proxy using the Internet, see the instructions on the
proxy form and the Internet Notice and have the proxy form available when you access the Internet website. To vote your proxy
by mail, mark your vote on the enclosed proxy card, then follow the instructions on the card.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 51 |
Other
Information
If
you hold your shares in street name, which means your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or nominee, you will receive
a notice from your broker, bank or other nominee that includes instructions on how to vote your shares. Your broker, bank or nominee
will allow you to deliver your voting instructions over the Internet and may also permit you to vote by telephone. In addition,
you may request paper copies of the proxy statement and proxy card from your broker by following the instructions on the notice
provided by your broker. If you hold shares in
street name, you must obtain a legal proxy from the stockholder of record to vote in person at the Meeting.
What
are the Board’s recommendations on how I should vote my shares?
The
Board recommends that you vote your shares as follows:
Proposal
1 FOR the election of all five nominees for director with terms expiring at the next
annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders.
Proposal
2 FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent
registered public accounting firm (independent auditors) for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.
Proposal
3 FOR approval on an advisory basis of the compensation of the NEOs identified in the
Summary Compensation Table below, as disclosed herein.
Proposal
4 FOR approval of the Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan.
What
are my choices when voting?
Proposal
1 You may cast your vote in favor of up to five individual directors. You may vote for
fewer than five directors if you choose. You may also abstain from voting for any or all of the nominees for director.
Proposal
2 You may cast your vote in favor of or against the proposal, or you may abstain from
voting.
Proposal
3 You may cast your vote in favor of or against the proposal, or you may abstain from
voting.
Proposal
4 You may cast your vote in favor of or against the proposal, or you may abstain from
voting.
How
will my shares be voted if I do not specify how they should be voted?
If
you sign and return your proxy without indicating how you want your shares to be voted, the proxies appointed by the Board will
vote your shares as follows:
Proposal
1 FOR the election of all five nominees for director with terms expiring at the next
annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders.
Proposal
2 FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent
registered public accounting firm (independent auditors) for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.
Proposal
3 FOR approval on an advisory basis of the compensation of the NEOs.
Proposal
4 FOR approval of the Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan.
Can
I change or revoke my vote?
You
may change or revoke your proxy before the time of voting at the Meeting in any of the following ways:
● by
mailing a revised proxy to the Secretary of the Company;
● by
changing your vote on the Internet website; or
● by
voting in person at the Meeting.
If
you hold your shares in street name, you may
change or revoke the voting instructions you provide to your broker, bank or nominee by
following the specific directions provided to you by your broker, bank or nominee,
or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from your broker, bank or nominee, by attending
the Meeting and voting in person.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 52 |
Other
Information
What
vote will be required to approve each proposal?
If
a quorum is present at the Meeting, the votes required for the proposals to be considered at the Meeting and the treatment of
abstentions and broker non-votes in respect of such proposals are as follows:
Proposal
1 – Election of Directors. The five nominees with the most votes will be elected as directors of the Company, subject
to the Company’s plurality plus policy described below. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, are not counted for purposes
of electing directors and will have no effect on the results of this vote.
Proposal
2 – Ratification of KPMG LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The affirmative vote of a majority
of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Meeting is required to ratify KPMG LLP as
our independent registered public accounting firm. Abstentions will count as present and be entitled to vote for purposes of this
proposal. Broker non-votes are not considered entitled to vote on this proposal and, as a result, broker non-votes will have no
effect on this proposal.
Proposal
3 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented
by proxy and entitled to vote at the Meeting is required to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our NEOs. The advisory
vote on executive compensation is a non-binding advisory vote; however, the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors intend
to consider the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions. Abstentions will count as present
and entitled to vote for purposes of this proposal and will have the effect of votes against this proposal. Broker non-votes are
not considered entitled to vote on this proposal and as a result, broker non-votes will have no effect on this proposal.
Proposal
4 – Approval of Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Plan. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present
in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Meeting is required to approve the Amended and Restated 2013 Equity
Incentive Plan. Abstentions will count as present and entitled to vote for purposes of this proposal and will have the effect
of votes against this proposal. Broker non-votes are not considered entitled to vote on this proposal and, as a result, broker
non-votes will have no effect on this proposal.
Who
will count the votes?
Representatives
from Empire Stock Transfer, the Company’s transfer agent, or other individuals designated by the Board, will count the votes
and serve as inspectors of election. Management anticipates that the inspectors of election will be present at the Meeting.
Who
will pay the cost of this proxy solicitation?
The
Company will pay the costs of soliciting proxies. Upon request, the Company will reimburse brokers, dealers, banks and trustees,
or their nominees, for reasonable expenses incurred by them in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners of shares of the
Common Stock.
Is
this Proxy Statement the only way proxies are being solicited for use at the Meeting?
Yes.
The Company does not intend to employ any other methods of solicitation.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 53 |
Other
Information
How
are proxy materials being delivered?
The
Company is pleased to take advantage of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) rules that allow companies
to furnish their proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, the Company is mailing to most of its stockholders the Internet
Notice instead of a paper copy of the Proxy Statement and the Company’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Internet Notice
contains instructions on how to access those documents over the Internet. The Internet Notice also contains instructions on how
to request a paper copy of the Company’s proxy materials, including the Proxy Statement, 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K
and a form of proxy card or voting instruction card. All stockholders who do not receive an Internet Notice will receive a paper
copy of the proxy materials by mail. The Company believes this process will allow it to provide its stockholders with the information
they need in a more efficient manner, while reducing the environmental impact and lowering the costs of printing and distributing
these proxy materials.
NO
PERSONS HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT
IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOLICITATION OF PROXIES MADE HEREBY, AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATIONS MUST NOT
BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED BY ZAGG INC OR ANY OTHER PERSON.
Other
Business
The
Company’s management does not know of any other matter to be presented for action at the Meeting. However, if any other
matters should be properly presented at the Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote
said proxy in accordance with their best judgment.
/s/
Bradley J. Holiday
Bradley
J. Holiday
Chief
Financial Officer
Midvale,
Utah
April
25, 2017
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | 54 |
Other
Information
ZAGG Inc
Annual Meeting
of Stockholders
PROXY
This
Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors for use at the Annual Meeting on June 22, 2017
The
undersigned appoints Randall L. Hales or Bradley J. Holiday of ZAGG Inc with full power of substitution, the attorney and proxy
of the undersigned, to attend the annual meeting of stockholders of ZAGG Inc, to be held June 22, 2017, beginning at 9:00
am, MDT, and can be accessed by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ZAGG2017,
and at any adjournment thereof, and to vote the stock the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present, on all
matters set forth in the proxy statement sent to stockholders, a copy of which has been received by the undersigned, as follows:
Please mark your votes as
indicated ☒ |
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares Held:
_____________________ |
|
Certificate
Number(s) _____________________
This
proxy when properly signed will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned stockholder.
IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE,
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE NOMINEES LISTED BELOW, AND FOR PROPOSALS 2, 3 AND 4.
Nominees
– |
Randall L. Hales |
Cheryl
A. Larabee
E.
Todd Heiner
Daniel
R. Maurer
P.
Scott Stubbs
FOR
Election of ALL Nominees |
AGAINST
Election of ALL Nominees |
ABSTAIN
|
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
Except
vote withheld from the following nominee listed above. (INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for a nominee, strike
a line through the nominee’s name in the list below.)
Randall
L. Hales
Cheryl
A. Larabee
E.
Todd Heiner
Daniel
R. Maurer
P.
Scott Stubbs
2. |
Ratification
of the Appointment of KPMG LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for the Company |
FOR
Ratification |
AGAINST
Appointment |
ABSTAIN
|
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
|
|
|
3. |
To
provide an advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers |
FOR |
AGAINST |
ABSTAIN |
|
|
|
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
4. |
Approval
of Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan |
FOR |
AGAINST |
ABSTAIN |
|
|
|
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
In
their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting.
IMPORTANT
- PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN PROMPTLY. When joint tenants hold shares, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator,
trustee, or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by President or other
authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by an authorized person. Please sign exactly as your name
appears on your stock certificate(s).
|
|
|
|
|
Print Name |
|
Signature |
|
Date |
Please
provide updated address information as necessary: ___________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________.
Annex A
ZAGG INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Reconciliation
of Non-GAAP Financial Information to GAAP
Unaudited Supplemental
Data
The following information is not a financial measure under
generally accepted accounting principals (GAAP). In addition, it should not be construed as an alternative to any other measures
of performance determined in accordance with GAAP, or as an indicator of our operating performance, liquidity or cash flows generated
by operating, investing and financing activities as there may be significant factors or trends that it fails to address. We present
this financial information because we believe that it is helpful to some investors as a measure of our operations. We caution
investors that non-GAAP financial information, by its nature, departs from traditional accounting conventions; accordingly, its
use can make it difficult to compare our results with our results from other reporting periods and with the results of other companies.
Consolidated Adjusted
EBITDA Reconciliation | |
| |
| |
Twelve
Months Ended | |
| |
December 31,
2016 | | |
December 31,
2015 | | |
December 31,
2014 | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| |
Net income (loss) in accordance with GAAP | |
$ | (15,587 | ) | |
$ | 15,587 | | |
$ | 10,461 | |
Adjustments: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
a. Stock based compensation expense | |
| 3,830 | | |
| 3,893 | | |
| 2,249 | |
b. Depreciation and amortization | |
| 22,270 | | |
| 12,923 | | |
| 12,879 | |
c. Recovery of reserves on note receivable | |
| - | | |
| (639 | ) | |
| - | |
d. Other (income) expense | |
| 2,199 | | |
| 166 | | |
| 49 | |
e. mophie transaction expenses | |
| 2,591 | | |
| 179 | | |
| - | |
f. mophie fair value inventory write-up related to acquisition | |
| 2,586 | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
g. mophie restructuring charges | |
| 2,160 | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
h. mophie employee retention bonus | |
| 841 | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
i. Loss on disputed mophie purchase price | |
| 24,317 | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
j. Provision for income taxes | |
| (7,972 | ) | |
| 10,111 | | |
| 6,473 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Adjusted EBITDA | |
$ | 37,235 | | |
$ | 42,220 | | |
$ | 32,111 | |
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | A-1 |
Annex
B
ZAGG
INC
AMENDED
AND RESTATED
2013
EQUITY INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN
table
of contents
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-1 |
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-2 |
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-3 |
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-4 |
ZAGG
INC
AMENDED
AND RESTATED
2013
EQUITY INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN
ARTICLE
1
PURPOSE
The
purposes of the ZAGG Inc Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan (the “Plan”) are to:
(1) Closely
associate the interests of management, employees, directors and consultants of ZAGG Inc, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
with the shareholders of the Company by reinforcing the relationship between participants’ rewards and shareholder gains;
(2) Provide
management and employees with an equity ownership in the Company commensurate with Company performance, as reflected in increased
shareholder value;
(3) Maintain
competitive compensation levels; and
(4) Provide
an incentive to management and employees to remain in continuing employment with the Company and to put forth maximum efforts
for the success of its business.
The
Plan is further intended to provide flexibility to the Company in its ability to attract, motivate and retain the services of
members of the Board, Employees and Consultants upon whose judgment, interest, and special effort the successful conduct of the
Company’s operation is largely dependent.
ARTICLE
2
DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION
Wherever
the following terms are used in the Plan they shall have the meanings specified below, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
The singular pronoun shall include the plural where the context so indicates.
2.1. “Award”
means an Option, a Restricted Stock award, a Stock Appreciation Right award, a Performance Share award, a Stock Payment award,
a Deferred Stock award, a Restricted Stock Unit award, an Other Stock-Based Award, or a Performance-Based Award granted to a Participant
pursuant to the Plan.
2.2. “Award
Agreement” means any written agreement, contract, or other instrument or document evidencing an Award.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-5 |
2.3. “Board”
means the Board of Directors of the Company.
2.4. “Change
in Control” means the occurrence of any of the following in one or a series of related transactions: (i) an acquisition
after the date hereof by an individual or legal entity or “group” (as described in Rule 13d-5(b)(1) under the
Exchange Act) of more than thirty percent (30%) of the voting rights or equity interests in the Company; (ii) a replacement, during
a 24-month period, of more than one-half (1/2) of the members of the Board that is not approved by those individuals who are members
of the Board on the date hereof (or other directors previously approved by such individuals); (iii) consummation of a merger or
consolidation of the Company or any Subsidiary or a sale of more than one-half (1/2) of the assets of the Company in one or a
series of related transactions, unless following such transaction or series of transactions, the holders of the Company’s
securities prior to the first such transaction continue to hold at least one-half (1/2) of the voting rights and equity interests
of the surviving entity or acquirer of such assets; (iv) a recapitalization, reorganization or other transaction involving the
Company or any Subsidiary that constitutes or results in a transfer of more than one-half (1/2) of the voting rights or equity
interests in the Company; or (v) consummation of a “Rule 13e-3 transaction” as defined in Rule 13e-3 under the Exchange
Act with respect to the Company.
2.5. “Code”
means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
2.6. “Committee”
means the committee of the Board described in Article 12.
2.7. “Consultant”
means any consultant or adviser if:
(a) The
consultant or adviser renders bona fide services to the Company;
(b) The
services rendered by the consultant or adviser are not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a capital-raising
transaction and do not directly or indirectly promote or maintain a market for the Company’s securities; and
(c) The
consultant or adviser is a natural person who has contracted directly with the Company to render such services.
2.8. “Covered
Employee” means an Employee who is, or may be, as determined by the Committee, a “covered employee” within
the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code.
2.9.
“Deferred Stock” means a right to receive a specified number of shares of Stock during specified time periods
pursuant to Article 8.
2.10. “Disability”
means that the Participant qualifies to receive long-term disability payments under the Company’s long-term disability
insurance program, as it may be amended from time to time.
2.11. “Effective
Date” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 13.1.
2.12. “Eligible
Individual” means any person who is an Employee, a Consultant or a member of the Board, as determined by the
Committee.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-6 |
2.13. “Employee”
means any officer or other employee (as defined in accordance with Section 3401(c) of the Code) of the Company or any Subsidiary.
2.14. “Exchange
Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
2.15. “Fair
Market Value” means, as of any given date, the fair market value of a share of Stock on the date determined by such
methods or procedures as may be established from time to time by the Committee. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee,
the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock as of any date shall be (i) the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the principal
exchange on which shares of Common Stock are then trading, if any, on such date, or if shares were not traded on such date, then
on the closest preceding date on which a trade occurred; or (ii) if Common Stock is not traded on an exchange, the mean between
the closing representative bid and asked prices for the Common Stock on such date as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board or the
OTC Markets Group, Inc, or if not then in existence, by their successor quotation system; or (iii) if Common Stock is not publicly
traded, the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock as established by the Committee acting in good faith.
2.16. “Incentive
Stock Option” means an Option that is intended to meet the requirements of Section 422 of the Code or any successor
provision thereto.
2.17. “Independent
Director” means a member of the Board who is not an Employee of the Company.
2.18. “ISAR”
shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.3(a).
2.19. “Non-Employee
Director” means a member of the Board who qualifies as a “Non-Employee Director” as defined in Rule 16b-3(b)(3)
of the Exchange Act, or any successor definition adopted by the Board.
2.20. “Non-Qualified
Stock Option” means an Option that is not intended to be an Incentive Stock Option.
2.21. “Option”
means a right granted to a Participant pursuant to Article 5 of the Plan to purchase a specified number of shares of Stock
at a specified price during specified time periods. An Option may be either an Incentive Stock Option or a Non-Qualified Stock
Option.
2.22. “Other
Stock-Based Award” means an Award granted or denominated in Stock or units of Stock pursuant to Section 8.5 of the Plan.
2.23. “Option
Term” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.1(b).
2.24. “Original
2013 Plan” means the ZAGG Inc 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan originally adopted by the Board on January 15, 2013 and
approved by the stockholders of the Company on June 13, 2013.
2.25. “Original
2013 Plan Effective Date” means January 15, 2013.
2.26. “Participant”
means any Eligible Individual who, as a member of the Board or Employee or Consultant, has been granted an Award pursuant
to the Plan.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-7 |
2.27. “Performance-Based
Award” means an Award granted to selected Covered Employees pursuant to Articles 6 and 8, but which is subject to the
terms and conditions set forth in Article 9. All Performance-Based Awards are intended to qualify as Qualified Performance-Based
Compensation.
2.28. “Performance
Criteria” means the criteria that the Committee selects for purposes of establishing the Performance Goal or Performance
Goals for a Participant for a Performance Period. The Performance Criteria that will be used to establish Performance Goals are
limited to the following: net earnings (either before or after interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization or non-operating
charges as determined by the Committee), other non-operating charges (as determined by the Committee), economic value-added (as
determined by the Committee), sales or revenue, net income (either before or after taxes), operating earnings, cash flow (including,
but not limited to, operating cash flow and free cash flow), cash flow return on capital, return on net assets, return on stockholders’
equity, return on assets, return on capital, stockholder returns, return on sales, gross or net profit margin, productivity, expense,
margins, operating efficiency, customer satisfaction, working capital, earnings per share, price per share of Stock, and market
share, any of which may be measured either in absolute terms or as compared to any incremental increase or as compared to results
of a peer group. The Committee shall, within the time prescribed by Section 162(m) of the Code, define in an objective fashion
the manner of calculating the Performance Criteria it selects to use for such Performance Period for such Participant.
2.29. “Performance
Goals” means, for a Performance Period, the goals established in writing by the Committee for the Performance Period
based upon the Performance Criteria. Depending on the Performance Criteria used to establish such Performance Goals, the Performance
Goals may be expressed in terms of overall Company performance or the performance of a division, business unit, or an individual.
The Committee, in its discretion, may adjust or modify the calculation of Performance Goals for such Performance Period in order
to prevent the dilution or enlargement of the rights of Participants (a) in the event of, or in anticipation of, any unusual or
extraordinary corporate item, transaction, event, or development, or (b) in recognition of, or in anticipation of, any other unusual
or nonrecurring events affecting the Company, or the financial statements of the Company, or in response to, or in anticipation
of, changes in applicable laws, regulations, accounting principles, or business conditions.
2.30. “Performance
Period” means the one or more periods of time, which may be of varying and overlapping durations, as the Committee may
select, over which the attainment of one or more Performance Goals will be measured for the purpose of determining a Participant’s
right to, and the payment of, a Performance-Based Award.
2.31. “Performance
Share” means a right granted to a Participant pursuant to Article 8, to receive Stock, the payment of which is contingent
upon achieving certain Performance Goals or other performance-based targets established by the Committee.
2.32.
“Plan” means this ZAGG Inc Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan, as it may be amended from
time to time.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-8 |
2.33. “Qualified
Performance-Based Compensation” means any compensation that is intended to qualify as “qualified performance-based
compensation” as described in Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code.
2.34. “Restricted
Stock” means Stock awarded to a Participant pursuant to Article 6 that is subject to certain restrictions and may be
subject to risk of forfeiture.
2.35. “Restricted
Stock Unit” means an Award granted pursuant to Section 8.4.
2.36. “Section
409A Award” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 15.1.
2.37. “Securities
Act” shall mean the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
2.38. “Stock”
means the common stock of the Company, par value $0.001 per share, and such other securities of the Company that may be substituted
for Stock pursuant to Article 11.
2.39. “Stock
Appreciation Right” or “SAR” means a right granted pursuant to Article 7 to receive a payment equal
to the excess of the Fair Market Value of a specified number of shares of Stock on the date the SAR is exercised over the Fair
Market Value on the date the SAR was granted as set forth in the applicable Award Agreement.
2.40. “Stock
Payment” means (a) a payment in the form of shares of Stock, or (b) an option or other right to purchase shares of Stock,
as part of any bonus, deferred compensation or other arrangement, made in lieu of all or any portion of the compensation, granted
pursuant to Article 8.
2.41. “Subsidiary”
means any “subsidiary corporation” as defined in Section 424(f) of the Code and any applicable regulations promulgated
thereunder or any other entity of which a majority of the outstanding voting stock or voting power is beneficially owned directly
or indirectly by the Company.
ARTICLE
3
SHARES SUBJECT TO THE PLAN
3.1. Number
of Shares.
(a) Subject
to Article 11 and Section 3.1(b), the aggregate number of shares of Stock which may be issued, transferred or reserved for issuance
pursuant to Awards under the Plan shall be five million (5,000,000) shares. In order that the applicable regulations under the
Code relating to Incentive Stock Options be satisfied, the maximum number of shares of Stock that may be delivered upon exercise
of Incentive Stock Options shall be the number specified in this Section 3.1(a). Shares of stock that may be issued upon exercise
of Options under the Plan shall be authorized and unissued shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company
(“Common Stock”). In the absence of an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 (the
“Act”), all Options granted and shares of Common Stock subject to their exercise will be restricted as to subsequent
resale or transfer, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 144 promulgated under the Act.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-9 |
(b) To
the extent that an Award (other than an Option or an SAR) terminates, expires, or lapses for any reason, any shares of Stock subject
to the Award shall again be available for the grant of an Award pursuant to the Plan. Additionally, any shares of Stock tendered
or withheld to satisfy the grant or exercise price or tax withholding obligation pursuant to any Award shall again be available
for the grant of an Award pursuant to the Plan. To the extent permitted by applicable law or any exchange rule, shares of Stock
issued in assumption of, or in substitution for, any outstanding awards of any entity acquired in any form of combination by the
Company or any Subsidiary shall not be counted against shares of Stock available for grant pursuant to this Plan.
3.2.
Stock Distributed. Any Stock distributed
pursuant to an Award may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued Stock, treasury Stock or Stock purchased on
the open market.
3.3.
Limitation on Number of Shares Subject to Awards. Notwithstanding any provision in
the Plan to the contrary, and subject to Article 11, the maximum number of shares of Stock with respect to one or more Awards
that may be granted to any one Participant during a one-year period (measured from the date of any grant) shall be 600,000.
ARTICLE
4
ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION
4.1.
Eligibility. Each Eligible Individual shall be eligible to be granted one or
more Awards pursuant to the Plan.
4.2.
Participation. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee may, from
time to time, select from among all Eligible Individuals, those to whom Awards shall be granted and shall determine the nature
and amount of each Award. No Eligible Individual shall have any right to be granted an Award pursuant to this Plan.
4.3.
Foreign Participants. In order to assure the viability of Awards granted to Participants
employed in foreign countries, the Committee may provide for such special terms as it may consider necessary or appropriate to
accommodate differences in local law, tax policy, or custom. Moreover, the Committee may approve such supplements to, or amendments,
restatements, or alternative versions of, the Plan as it may consider necessary or appropriate for such purposes without thereby
affecting the terms of the Plan as in effect for any other purpose; provided, however, that no such supplements, amendments, restatements,
or alternative versions shall increase the share limitations contained in Sections 3.1 and 3.3 of the Plan.
ARTICLE
5
STOCK OPTIONS
5.1.
General. The Committee is authorized to grant Options to Participants on the
following terms and conditions:
(a) Exercise
Price. The exercise price per share of Stock subject to an Option shall be not less than 100% of the Fair
Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of the grant.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-10 |
(b) Time
and Conditions of Exercise. Each Option shall be fully exercisable at any time within the period beginning not
earlier than twelve (12) months after the date of the option grant and ending not later than ten (10) years after the date of
such grant (the “Option Term”), unless the Committee specifies otherwise. In no event, however, shall the Option
Term extend beyond ten (10) years after the date of the grant. No Option shall be exercisable after the expiration of the Option
Term. The Committee shall also determine the performance or other conditions, if any, that must be satisfied before all or part
of an Option may be exercised.
(c) Payment
The Committee shall determine the methods by which the exercise price of an Option may be paid, the form of payment, including,
without limitation: (i) cash, (ii) shares of Stock having a Fair Market Value on the date of delivery equal to the aggregate
exercise price of the Option or exercised portion thereof, or (iii) other property acceptable to the Committee (including
through the delivery of a notice that the Participant has placed a market sell order with a broker with respect to shares of Stock
then issuable upon exercise of the Option, and that the broker has been directed to pay a sufficient portion of the net proceeds
of the sale to the Company in satisfaction of the Option exercise price; provided that payment of such proceeds is then
made to the Company upon settlement of such sale), and the methods by which shares of Stock shall be delivered or deemed to be
delivered to Participants. The Committee may also in its discretion permit a Participant to pay the exercise price by the “net
exercise” of such Option. In such case, the Company will not require a cash payment of the exercise price, but will reduce
the number of shares of Common Stock issued upon the exercise of such Option by the largest number of whole shares of Common Stock
that have a Fair Market Value which does not exceed the aggregate exercise price, including tax withholding, with respect to the
portion of such Option that is being exercised. With respect to any remaining balance of the aggregate Option price, the Company
shall accept a cash payment. Upon the “net exercise” of an Option (i) shares used to pay the Option price, (ii) shares
actually delivered to the Option holder as a result of such exercise, and (iii) shares withheld for purposes of minimum statutory
tax withholding, will no longer be outstanding under such Option (and will therefore no longer be exercisable by the holder).
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, no Participant who is a member of the Board or an “executive
officer” of the Company within the meaning of Section 13(k) of the Exchange Act shall be permitted to pay the
exercise price of an Option by means of a personal loan or other credit extended by the Company or in any other method which would
violate Section 13(k) of the Exchange Act.
(d) Evidence
of Grant. All Options shall be evidenced by a written Award Agreement between the Company and the Participant.
The Award Agreement shall include the number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Option, the exercise date, the Option Term,
and such additional provisions as may be specified by the Committee.
5.2.
Incentive Stock Options. The terms of any Incentive Stock Options granted
pursuant to the Plan must comply with the conditions and limitations contained in Section 13.2 and this Section 5.2.
(a) Eligibility.
The Committee may grant one or more Incentive Stock Options to employees of the Company or any “subsidiary corporation”
thereof (within the meaning of Section 424(f) of the Code and the applicable regulations promulgated thereunder). The
date an Incentive Stock Option is granted shall mean the date selected by the Committee as of which the Committee shall allot
a specific number of shares to a participant pursuant to the Plan.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-11 |
(b) Individual
Dollar Limitation. The aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the time the Option is granted) of all shares
of Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are first exercisable by a Participant in any calendar year may not exceed
$100,000 or such other limitation as imposed by Section 422(d) of the Code, or any successor provision. Multiple Incentive
Stock Options may be granted to an Optionee in any calendar year.
(c) Ten
Percent Owners. The Committee may determine to grant an Incentive Stock Option to an employee who is also an individual
who owns, at the date of grant, directly or indirectly according to the stock ownership attribution rules of Section 424(d) of
the Code, stock possessing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of Stock of the Company.
However, the exercise price of such Option granted shall not be less than one hundred ten percent (110%) of Fair Market Value
on the date of grant. Furthermore, the Option may be exercisable for no more than five (5) years from the date of grant.
(d) Notice
of Disposition. The Participant shall give the Company prompt notice of any disposition of shares of Stock acquired
by exercise of an Incentive Stock Option within (i) two (2) years from the date of grant of such Incentive Stock Option or
(ii) one (1) year after the transfer of such shares of Stock to the Participant. In order to obtain the favorable tax treatment
available for Incentive Stock Options under Section 422 of the Code, the Optionee is prohibited from the sale, exchange,
transfer, pledge, hypothecation, gift or other disposition of the shares of Common Stock underlying the Incentive Stock Options
until the later of either two (2) years after the date of grant of the Incentive Stock Option, or one (1) year after
the transfer to the Optionee of such underlying Common Stock after the Optionee’s exercise of such Incentive Stock Option.
Should Optionee choose to make a premature disposition of such underlying Common Stock contrary to such restrictions, the Options
related to such Common Stock shall be treated as Non-qualified Stock Options pursuant to the terms of the Plan.
(e) Right
to Exercise. During a Participant’s lifetime, an Incentive Stock Option may be exercised only by the Participant.
5.3.
Substitution of Stock Appreciation Rights.
The Committee may provide in the Award Agreement evidencing the grant of an Option that the Committee, in its sole discretion,
shall have the right to substitute a Stock Appreciation Right for such Option at any time prior to or upon exercise of such Option,
subject to the provisions of Section 7.2 hereof; provided that such Stock Appreciation Right shall be exercisable with respect
to the same number of shares of Stock for which such substituted Option would have been exercisable.
5.4.
Paperless Exercise. In the event that
the Company establishes, for itself or using the services of a third party, an automated system for the exercise of Options, such
as a system using an internet website or interactive voice response, then the paperless exercise of Options by a Participant may
be permitted through the use of such an automated system.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-12 |
5.5.
Granting of Options to Independent Directors.
The Board may from time to time, in its sole discretion, and subject to the limitations of the Plan:
(a) Select
from among the Independent Directors (including Independent Directors who have previously been granted Options under the Plan)
such of them as in its opinion should be granted Options;
(b) Subject
to Section 3.3, determine the number of shares of Stock that may be purchased upon exercise of the Options granted to such
selected Independent Directors; and
(c) Subject
to the provisions of this Article 5, determine the terms and conditions of such Options, consistent with the Plan.
Options
granted to Independent Directors shall be Non-Qualified Stock Options.
ARTICLE
6
RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS
6.1.
Grant of Restricted Stock. The Committee
is authorized to make Awards of Restricted Stock to any Participant selected by the Committee in such amounts and subject to such
terms and conditions as determined by the Committee. All Awards of Restricted Stock shall be evidenced by a written Award Agreement.
6.2.
Issuance and Restrictions. Restricted
Stock shall be subject to such restrictions on transferability and other restrictions as the Committee may impose. These restrictions
may lapse separately or in combination at such times, pursuant to such circumstances, in such installments, or otherwise, as the
Committee determines at the time of the grant of the Award or thereafter. Any restrictions will be designated in the form of Award
Agreement between the Company and the Participant.
6.3.
Forfeiture. Except as otherwise determined by the Committee at the time of the
grant of the Award or thereafter, upon termination of employment or service during the applicable restriction period, Restricted
Stock that is at that time subject to restrictions shall be forfeited; provided, however, that the Committee may (a) provide
in any Award Agreement that restrictions or forfeiture conditions relating to Restricted Stock will be waived in whole or in part
in the event of terminations resulting from specified causes, and (b) in other cases waive in whole or in part restrictions
or forfeiture conditions relating to Restricted Stock.
6.4.
Certificates for Restricted Stock. Restricted Stock granted pursuant to the Plan
may be evidenced in such manner as the Committee shall determine. If certificates representing shares of Restricted Stock are
registered in the name of the Participant, certificates must bear an appropriate legend referring to the terms, conditions, and
restrictions applicable to such Restricted Stock, and the Company may, at its discretion, retain physical possession of the certificate
until such time as all applicable restrictions lapse.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-13 |
ARTICLE
7
STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS
7.1.
Grant of Stock Appreciation Rights. A
Stock Appreciation Right may be granted to any Participant selected by the Committee. A Stock Appreciation Right may be granted
(a) in connection and simultaneously with the grant of an Option, (b) with respect to a previously granted Option, or
(c) independent of an Option. A Stock Appreciation Right shall be subject to such terms and conditions not inconsistent with
the Plan as the Committee shall impose and shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement.
7.2.
No Coupled Stock Appreciation Rights. No Coupled
Stock Appreciation Rights shall be granted pursuant to this Plan.
7.3. Independent
Stock Appreciation Rights.
(a) An
Independent Stock Appreciation Right (“ISAR”) shall be unrelated to any Option and shall have a term set by
the Committee. An ISAR shall be exercisable in such installments as the Committee may determine. An ISAR shall cover such number
of shares of Stock as the Committee may determine. The exercise price per share of Stock subject to each ISAR shall be set by
the Committee; provided, however, that the exercise price for any ISAR shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value
on the date of grant; and provided, further, that, the Committee in its sole and absolute discretion may provide that the
ISAR may be exercised subsequent to a termination of employment or service, as applicable, or following a Change in Control of
the Company, or because of the Participant’s retirement, death or disability, or otherwise.
(b) An
ISAR shall entitle the Participant (or other person entitled to exercise the ISAR pursuant to the Plan) to exercise all or a specified
portion of the ISAR (to the extent then exercisable pursuant to its terms) and to receive from the Company an amount determined
by multiplying the difference obtained by subtracting the exercise price per share of the ISAR from the Fair Market Value of a
share of Stock on the date of exercise of the ISAR by the number of shares of Stock with respect to which the ISAR shall have
been exercised, subject to any limitations the Committee may impose.
7.4.
Payment and Limitations on Exercise.
(a) Subject
to Section 7.4(b) and (c), payment of the amounts determined under Section 7.3(b) above shall be in cash, in Stock
(based on its Fair Market Value as of the date the Stock Appreciation Right is exercised) or a combination of both, as determined
by the Committee.
(b) To
the extent payment for a Stock Appreciation Right is to be made in cash, the Award Agreement shall, to the extent necessary to
comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, specify the date of payment, which may be different than the date
of exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right. If the date of payment for a Stock Appreciation Right is later than the date of exercise,
the Award Agreement may specify that the Participant be entitled to earnings on such amount until paid.
(c) To
the extent any payment under Section 7.3(b) is effected in Stock it shall be made subject to satisfaction of any applicable
provisions of Article 5 above pertaining to Options.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-14 |
ARTICLE
8
OTHER TYPES OF AWARDS
8.1.
Performance Share Awards. Any Participant
selected by the Committee may be granted one or more Performance Share awards which shall be denominated in a number of shares
of Stock and which may be linked to any one or more of the Performance Criteria or other specific performance criteria determined
appropriate by the Committee, in each case on a specified date or dates or over any period or periods determined by the Committee.
In making such determinations, the Committee shall consider (among such other factors as it deems relevant in light of the specific
type of award) the contributions, responsibilities and other compensation of the particular Participant.
8.2.
Stock Payments. Any Participant selected
by the Committee may receive Stock Payments in the manner determined from time to time by the Committee. The number of shares
shall be determined by the Committee and may be based upon the Performance Criteria or other specific performance criteria determined
appropriate by the Committee, determined on the date such Stock Payment is made or on any date thereafter.
8.3.
Deferred Stock . Any Participant selected
by the Committee may be granted an award of Deferred Stock in the manner determined from time to time by the Committee. The number
of shares of Deferred Stock shall be determined by the Committee and may be linked to the Performance Criteria or other specific
performance criteria determined to be appropriate by the Committee, in each case on a specified date or dates or over any period
or periods determined by the Committee. Stock underlying a Deferred Stock award will not be issued until the Deferred Stock award
has vested, pursuant to a vesting schedule or performance criteria set by the Committee.
8.4.
Restricted Stock Units. The Committee
is authorized to make Awards of Restricted Stock Units to any Participant selected by the Committee in such amounts and subject
to such terms and conditions as determined by the Committee. At the time of grant, the Committee shall specify the date or dates
on which the Restricted Stock Units shall become fully vested and nonforfeitable, and may specify such conditions to vesting as
it deems appropriate. At the time of grant, the Committee shall specify the maturity date applicable to each grant of Restricted
Stock Units which shall be no earlier than the vesting date or dates of the Award and may be determined at the election of the
grantee. On the maturity date, the Company shall, subject to Section 10.9, transfer to the Participant one (1) share of Stock,
subject to any applicable transfer restrictions, for each Restricted Stock Unit scheduled to be paid out on such date and not
previously forfeited. The Committee shall specify the purchase price, if any, to be paid by the grantee to the Company for such
shares of Stock.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-15 |
8.5.
Other Stock-Based Awards. Any Participant
selected by the Committee may be granted one or more Awards that provide Participants with shares of Stock or the right to purchase
shares of Stock or that have a value derived from the value of, or an exercise or conversion privilege at a price related to,
or that are otherwise payable in shares of Stock and which may be linked to any one or more of the Performance Criteria or other
specific performance criteria determined appropriate by the Committee, in each case on a specified date or dates or over any period
or periods determined by the Committee. In making such determinations, the Committee shall consider (among such other factors
as it deems relevant in light of the specific type of Award) the contributions, responsibilities and other compensation of the
particular Participant.
8.6.
Term. Except as otherwise provided
herein, the term of any Award of Performance Shares, Stock Payments, Deferred Stock, Restricted Stock Units or Other Stock-Based
Award shall be set by the Committee in its discretion and designated in the form of Award Agreement between the Company and the
Participant.
8.7.
Exercise or Purchase Price. The Committee
may establish the exercise or purchase price, if any, of any Award of Performance Shares, Deferred Stock, Stock Payments, Restricted
Stock Units or Other Stock-Based Award; provided, however, that such price shall not be less than the par value of a share of
Stock on the date of grant, unless otherwise permitted by applicable state law. The exercise or purchase price, if any, will be
designated in the form of Award Agreement between the Company and the Participant.
8.8.
Exercise Upon Termination of Employment or Service.
An Award of Performance Shares, Deferred Stock, Stock Payments, Restricted Stock Units and Other Stock-Based Award shall only
be exercisable or payable while the Participant is an Employee, a Consultant, or a member of the Board, as applicable; provided,
however, that the Committee in its sole and absolute discretion may provide that an Award of Performance Shares, Stock Payments,
Deferred Stock, Restricted Stock Units or Other Stock-Based Award may be exercised or paid subsequent to a termination of employment
or service, as applicable, or following a Change in Control of the Company, or because of the Participant’s retirement,
death or disability, or otherwise; provided, however, that any such provision with respect to Performance Shares shall be subject
to the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code that apply to Qualified Performance-Based Compensation.
8.9.
Form of Payment. Payments with
respect to any Awards granted under this Article 8 shall be made in cash, in Stock or a combination of both, as determined
by the Committee, and as specifically designated in the form of Award Agreement between the Company and the Participant.
8.10. Award
Agreement. All Awards under this Article 8 shall be subject to such additional terms and conditions as determined
by the Committee and shall be evidenced by a written Award Agreement.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-16 |
ARTICLE
9
PERFORMANCE-BASED AWARDS
9.1.
Purpose. The purpose of this Article 9 is to provide the Committee the ability to qualify Awards other
than Options and SARs and that are granted pursuant to Articles 6 and 8 as Qualified Performance-Based Compensation. If the Committee,
in its discretion, decides to grant a Performance-Based Award to a Covered Employee, the provisions of this Article 9 shall
control over any contrary provision contained in Articles 6 or 8; provided, however, that the Committee may in its discretion
grant Awards to Covered Employees that are based on Performance Criteria or Performance Goals but that do not satisfy the requirements
of this Article 9.
9.2.
Applicability. This Article 9 shall apply only to those Covered Employees selected by the Committee to
receive Performance-Based Awards. The designation of a Covered Employee as a Participant for a Performance Period shall not in
any manner entitle the Participant to receive an Award for the period. Moreover, designation of a Covered Employee as a Participant
for a particular Performance Period shall not require designation of such Covered Employee as a Participant in any subsequent
Performance Period and designation of one (1) Covered Employee as a Participant shall not require designation of any other Covered
Employees as a Participant in such period or in any other period.
9.3.
Procedures with Respect to Performance-Based Awards. To the extent necessary to comply with the Qualified Performance-Based
Compensation requirements of Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code, with respect to any Award granted under Articles 6 and
8 which may be granted to one or more Covered Employees, no later than ninety (90) days following the commencement of any fiscal
year in question or any other designated fiscal period or period of service (or such other time as may be required or permitted
by Section 162(m) of the Code), the Committee shall, in writing, (a) designate one or more Covered Employees, (b) select
the Performance Criteria applicable to the Performance Period, (c) establish the Performance Goals, and amounts of such Awards,
as applicable, which may be earned for such Performance Period, and (d) specify the relationship between Performance Criteria
and the Performance Goals and the amounts of such Awards, as applicable, to be earned by each Covered Employee for such Performance
Period. Following the completion of each Performance Period, the Committee shall certify in writing whether the applicable Performance
Goals have been achieved for such Performance Period. In determining the amount earned by a Covered Employee, the Committee shall
have the right to reduce or eliminate (but not to increase) the amount payable at a given level of performance to take into account
additional factors that the Committee may deem relevant to the assessment of individual or corporate performance for the Performance
Period.
9.4.
Payment of Performance-Based Awards. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, a Participant
must be employed by the Company or a Subsidiary on the day a Performance-Based Award for such Performance Period is paid to the
Participant. Furthermore, a Participant shall be eligible to receive payment pursuant to a Performance-Based Award for a Performance
Period only if the Performance Goals for such period are achieved.
9.5.
Additional Limitations. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, any Award which is granted to a Covered
Employee and is intended to constitute Qualified Performance-Based Compensation shall be subject to any additional limitations
set forth in Section 162(m) of the Code (including any amendment to Section 162(m) of the Code) or any regulations
or rulings issued thereunder that are requirements for qualification as qualified performance-based compensation as described
in Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code, and the Plan shall be deemed amended to the extent necessary to conform to such
requirements.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-17 |
ARTICLE
10
PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO AWARDS
10.1.
Stand-Alone and Tandem Awards. Awards granted pursuant to the Plan may, in the discretion of the Committee,
be granted either alone, in addition to, or in tandem with, any other Award granted pursuant to the Plan. Awards granted in addition
to or in tandem with other Awards may be granted either at the same time as or at a different time from the grant of such other
Awards.
10.2.
Award Agreement. Awards under the Plan shall be evidenced by written Award Agreements that shall set forth
the terms, conditions, limitations and award type for each Award which may include the term of an Award, the provisions applicable
in the event the Participant’s employment or service terminates, and the Company’s authority to unilaterally or bilaterally
amend, modify, suspend, cancel or rescind an Award. Each Award Agreement shall specify whether payments with respect to such Award
may be made in cash, solely in Stock, or a combination of both, as determined by the Committee, and such statement of means of
payment shall govern any question relating to whether such payments may be made in cash or Stock.
10.3.
Limits on Transfer. Except as otherwise provided by the Committee, no right or interest of a Participant in
any Award may be pledged, encumbered, or hypothecated to or in favor of any party other than the Company or a Subsidiary, or shall
be subject to any lien, obligation, or liability of such Participant to any other party other than the Company or a Subsidiary.
Except as otherwise provided by the Committee, during the life of the recipient, such award shall be exercisable only by such
person or by such person’s guardian or legal representative.
10.4.
Death of Optionee.
(a)
Options. Notwithstanding Section 10.3, upon the death of the Optionee while either in the Company’s
employ or within six (6) months after termination of Optionee’s employment, any rights to the extent exercisable on the
date of death may be exercised by the Optionee’s estate, or by a person who acquires the right to exercise such Option by
bequest or inheritance or by reason of the death of the Optionee, provided that such exercise occurs within both the remaining
effective term of the Option and one (1) year after the Optionee’s death. A beneficiary, legal guardian, legal representative,
or other person claiming any rights pursuant to the Plan is subject to all terms and conditions of the Plan and any Award Agreement
applicable to the Participant, except to the extent the Plan and Award Agreement otherwise provide, and to any additional restrictions
deemed necessary or appropriate by the Committee. If no beneficiary has been designated or survives the Participant, payment shall
be made to the person entitled thereto pursuant to the Participant’s will or the laws of descent and distribution. Subject
to the foregoing, a beneficiary designation may be changed or revoked by a Participant at any time provided the change or revocation
is filed with the Committee.
(b)
Incentive Stock Options. Upon the death of the Optionee while in the Company’s employ or within not more
than ninety (90) days after termination of Optionee’s employment, any Incentive Stock Option exercisable on the date of
death may be exercised by the Optionee’s estate or by a person who acquires the right to exercise such Incentive Stock Option
by bequest or inheritance or by reason of the death of the Optionee, provided that such exercise occurs within both the
remaining Option Term of the Incentive Stock Option and one (1) year after the Optionee’s death.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-18 |
10.5.
Retirement or Disability.
(a)
Options. Upon termination of the Optionee’s employment by reason of retirement or permanent disability,
the Optionee may, within thirty-six (36) months from the date of termination, exercise any Options to the extent such Options
are exercisable during such 36-month period.
(b)
Incentive Stock Options. Upon termination of the Optionee’s employment by reason of retirement or permanent
disability, the Optionee may, within thirty-six (36) months from the date of termination, exercise any Incentive Stock Options
to the extent such Incentive Stock Options are exercisable during such 36-month period. However, the tax treatment available pursuant
to Section 422 of the Code will not be available to an Optionee who exercises any Incentive Stock Option more than (i) twelve
(12) months after the date of termination of employment due to permanent disability, or (ii) three (3) months after the date
of termination of employment due to retirement.
10.6.
Forfeiture for Other Reasons. Except as provided herein or except as otherwise determined by the Committee,
all Options shall forfeit ninety (90) days after the termination of the Optionee’s employment with the Company.
10.7.
Leaves of Absence and Performance Targets. The Committee shall be entitled to make such rules, regulations
and determinations as it deems appropriate under the Plan in respect of any leave of absence taken by the recipient of any award.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee shall be entitled to determine (i) whether or not any such
leave of absence shall constitute a termination of employment within the meaning of the Plan and (ii) the impact, if any,
of such leave of absence on awards under the Plan theretofore made to any recipient who takes such leave of absence. The Committee
shall also be entitled to make such determination of performance targets, if any, as it deems appropriate.
10.8.
Newly Eligible Employees. The Committee shall be entitled to make such rules, regulations, determinations and
awards as it deems appropriate in respect of any employee who becomes eligible to participate in the Plan or any portion thereof,
after the commencement of an award or incentive period.
10.9.
Stock Certificates; Book Entry Procedures. As soon as practicable after receipt of payment, the Company shall
deliver to the Optionee a certificate(s) for such shares of Stock. Upon receipt of such certificate(s), the Optionee shall
become a shareholder of the Company with respect to Stock represented by share certificates so issued and as such shall be fully
entitled to receive dividends, to vote and to exercise all other rights of a shareholder. All Stock certificates delivered pursuant
to the Plan are subject to any stop-transfer orders and other restrictions as the Committee deems necessary or advisable to comply
with federal, state, or foreign jurisdiction, securities or other laws, rules and regulations and the rules of any national
securities exchange or automated quotation system on which the Stock is listed, quoted, or traded. The Committee may place legends
on any Stock certificate to reference restrictions applicable to the Stock. In addition to the terms and conditions provided herein,
the Board may require that a Participant make such reasonable covenants, agreements, and representations as the Board, in its
discretion, deems advisable in order to comply with any such laws, regulations, or requirements. The Committee shall have the
right to require any Participant to comply with any timing or other restrictions with respect to the settlement or exercise of
any Award, including a window-period limitation, as may be imposed in the discretion of the Committee. Notwithstanding any other
provision of the Plan, unless otherwise determined by the Committee or required by any applicable law, rule or regulation, the
Company shall not deliver to any Participant certificates evidencing shares of Stock issued in connection with any Award and instead
such shares of Stock shall be recorded in the books of the Company (or, as applicable, its transfer agent or stock plan administrator).
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-19 |
10.10.
Minimum Vesting. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, at the time of grant, no Award will be granted
that vests (or, if applicable, is exercisable) until at least twelve (12) months following the date of grant of the Award; provided,
however, that up to five percent (5%) of the shares of Stock authorized for issuance under this Plan may be subject to Awards
that do not meet the foregoing vesting (and, if applicable, exercisability) requirements.
10.11.
Prohibition on Buyout of Options and SARs. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, the Company
shall not be permitted at any time to buy from a Participant an Option or SAR previously granted with payment in cash, shares
of Stock or other consideration.
ARTICLE
11
CHANGES
IN CAPITAL STRUCTURE
11.1.
Adjustments.
(a)
In the event of any stock dividend, stock split, combination or exchange of shares, merger, consolidation, spin-off, recapitalization,
distribution of Company assets to stockholders (other than normal cash dividends), or any other corporate event affecting the
Stock or the share price of the Stock, the Committee may make such proportionate adjustments, if any, as the Committee in its
discretion may deem appropriate to reflect such changes with respect to (i) the aggregate number and type of shares that
may be issued under the Plan (including, but not limited to, adjustments of the limitations in Sections 3.1 and 3.3); (ii) the
terms and conditions of any outstanding Awards (including, without limitation, any applicable performance targets or criteria
with respect thereto); and (iii) the grant or exercise price per share for any outstanding Awards under the Plan. Any adjustment
affecting an Award intended as Qualified Performance-Based Compensation shall be made consistent with the requirements of Section 162(m) of
the Code.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-20 |
(b)
In the event of any transaction or event described in Section 11.1(a) or any unusual or nonrecurring transactions or
events affecting the Company, any affiliate of the Company, or the financial statements of the Company or any affiliate (including
without limitation any Change in Control), or of changes in applicable laws, regulations or accounting principles, and whenever
the Committee determines that action is appropriate in order to prevent the dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential
benefits intended to be made available under the Plan or with respect to any Award under the Plan, to facilitate such transactions
or events or to give effect to such changes in laws, regulations or principles, the Committee, in its sole discretion and on such
terms and conditions as it deems appropriate, either by amendment of the terms of any outstanding Awards or by action taken prior
to the occurrence of such transaction or event and either automatically or upon the Participant’s request, is hereby authorized
to take any one or more of the following actions:
(i)
To provide for either (A) termination of any such Award in exchange for an amount of cash and/or other property, if any,
equal to the amount that would have been attained upon the exercise of such Award or realization of the Participant’s rights
(and, for the avoidance of doubt, if as of the date of the occurrence of the transaction or event described in this Section 11.1(b) the
Committee determines in good faith that no amount would have been attained upon the exercise of such Award or realization of the
Participant’s rights, then such Award may be terminated by the Company without payment) or (B) the replacement of such
Award with other rights or property selected by the Committee in its sole discretion;
(ii) To provide that such Award be assumed by the successor or survivor corporation, or a parent or subsidiary thereof, or shall be
substituted for by similar options, rights or awards covering the stock of the successor or survivor corporation, or a parent
or subsidiary thereof, with appropriate adjustments as to the number and kind of shares and prices; and
(iii) To make adjustments in the number and type of shares of Stock (or other securities or property) subject to outstanding Awards,
and in the number and kind of outstanding Restricted Stock or Deferred Stock and/or in the terms and conditions of (including
the grant or exercise price), and the criteria included in, outstanding options, rights and awards and options, rights and awards
which may be granted in the future;
(iv) To provide that such Award shall be exercisable or payable or fully vested with respect to all shares covered thereby, notwithstanding
anything to the contrary in the Plan or the applicable Award Agreement; and
(v) To provide that the Award cannot vest, be exercised or become payable after such event.
11.2.
Outstanding Awards—Other Changes. In the event of any other change in the capitalization of the Company
or corporate change other than those specifically referred to in this Article 11, the Committee may, in its absolute discretion,
make such adjustments in the number and kind of shares or other securities subject to Awards outstanding on the date on which
such change occurs and in the per share grant or exercise price of each Award as the Committee may consider appropriate to prevent
dilution or enlargement of rights.
11.3.
No Other Rights. Except as expressly provided in the Plan, no Participant shall have any rights by reason of
any subdivision or consolidation of shares of stock of any class, the payment of any dividend, any increase or decrease in the
number of shares of stock of any class or any dissolution, liquidation, merger, or consolidation of the Company or any other corporation.
Except as expressly provided in the Plan or pursuant to action of the Committee under the Plan, no issuance by the Company of
shares of stock of any class, or securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, shall affect, and no adjustment by
reason thereof shall be made with respect to, the number of shares of Stock subject to an Award or the grant or exercise price
of any Award.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-21 |
ARTICLE
12
ADMINISTRATION
12.1.
Committee. The Board of Directors may delegate the administration of the Plan to a Compensation Committee (the
“Committee”) in the event that such a committee is established by the Board of Directors and is comprised of
persons appointed by the Board of Directors of the Company in accordance with the provisions of Section 12.2; provided , however,
that the Board shall delegate administration of the Plan to a Committee as necessary to comply with the requirements of Section 162(m) of
the Code, Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act or to the extent required by any other applicable rule or regulation.
The Board shall exercise full power and authority regarding the administration of the Plan until such administration is delegated
to the Committee. Unless the context otherwise requires, references herein to the Committee shall be deemed to refer to the Board
of Directors until the administration of the Plan has been delegated to the Committee.
12.2.
Committee Membership. The Committee shall be composed of one or more members of the Board. The Board shall have the power
to determine the number of members which the Committee shall have and to change the number of membership positions on the Committee
from time to time. The Board shall appoint all members of the Committee. The Board may from time to time appoint members to the
Committee in substitution for, or in addition to, members previously appointed and may fill vacancies, however caused, on the
Committee. Any member of the Committee may be removed from the Committee by the Board at any time with or without cause.
12.3.
Certain Actions. Notwithstanding the foregoing: (a) the full Board, acting by a majority of its members
in office, shall conduct the general administration of the Plan with respect to all Awards granted to Independent Directors and,
for purposes of such Awards, the term Committee as used in this Plan shall be deemed to refer to the Board and (b) the Committee
may delegate its authority hereunder to the extent permitted by Section 12.8.
12.4.
Action by the Committee. A majority of the Committee shall constitute a quorum. The acts of a majority of the
members present at any meeting at which a quorum is present, and acts approved in writing by a majority of the Committee in lieu
of a meeting, shall be deemed the acts of the Committee. Each member of the Committee is entitled to, in good faith, rely or act
upon any report or other information furnished to that member by any officer or other employee of the Company or any Subsidiary,
the Company’s independent certified public accountants, or any executive compensation consultant or other professional retained
by the Company to assist in the administration of the Plan.
12.5.
Authority of Committee. Subject to any specific designation in the Plan, the Committee has the exclusive power,
authority and discretion to:
(a)
Designate Participants to receive Awards;
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-22 |
(b) Determine the type or types of Awards to be granted to each Participant;
(c)
Determine the number of Awards to be granted and the number of shares of Stock to which an Award will relate;
(d) Determine the terms and conditions of any Award granted pursuant to the Plan, including, but not limited to, the exercise price,
grant price, or purchase price, any restrictions or limitations on the Award, any schedule for lapse of forfeiture restrictions
or restrictions on the exercisability of an Award, and accelerations or waivers thereof, any provisions related to non-competition
and recapture of gain on an Award, based in each case on such considerations as the Committee in its sole discretion determines;
(e) Determine whether, to what extent, and pursuant to what circumstances an Award may be settled in, or the exercise price of an
Award may be paid in, cash, Stock, other Awards, or other property, or an Award may be canceled, forfeited, or surrendered;
(f)
Prescribe the form of each Award Agreement, which need not be identical for each Participant;
(g) Decide all other matters that must be determined in connection with an Award;
(h)
Establish, adopt, or revise any rules and regulations as it may deem necessary or advisable to administer the Plan;
(i)
Interpret the terms of, and any matter arising pursuant to, the Plan or any Award Agreement; and
(j)
Make all other decisions and determinations that may be required pursuant to the Plan or as the Committee deems necessary or advisable
to administer the Plan.
The Committee
may delegate to one or more of its members or to one or more agents such administrative duties as it may deem advisable.
12.6.
Decisions Binding. The Committee’s interpretation of the Plan, any Awards granted pursuant to the Plan,
any Award Agreement and all decisions and determinations by the Committee with respect to the Plan are final, binding, and conclusive
on all parties.
12.7.
Delegation of Authority. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Committee may from time to time delegate
to a committee of one or more members of the Committee or the Board or one or more officers of the Company the authority to grant
or amend Awards to Participants other than (a) senior executives of the Company who are subject to Section 16 of the
Exchange Act, (b) Covered Employees, or (c) officers of the Company (or members of the Board) to whom authority to grant
or amend Awards has been delegated hereunder. Any delegation hereunder shall be subject to the restrictions and limits that the
Committee specifies at the time of such delegation, and the Committee may at any time rescind the authority so delegated or appoint
a new delegatee. At all times, the delegatee appointed under this Section 112.5 shall serve in such capacity at the pleasure
of the Committee.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-23 |
12.8.
Committee Administration. One (1) member of the Committee shall be elected by the Board as chairman. The Committee
shall hold its meetings at such times and places as it shall deem advisable. The Committee may appoint a secretary and make such
rules and regulations for the conduct of its business as it shall deem advisable, and shall keep minutes of its meetings.
12.9.
Liability. No member of the Board or Committee shall be liable for any action taken or decision or determination
made in good faith with respect to any Option, the Plan, or any award thereunder.
ARTICLE
13
EFFECTIVE AND EXPIRATION DATE
13.1.
Effective Date. The Plan is effective as of the date the Plan is approved by the Committee (the “Effective
Date”). The Plan, however, shall be subject to approval by the stockholders. The Plan will be deemed to be approved
by the stockholders if it receives the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of stock of the Company present
or represented and entitled to vote at a meeting duly held in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Company’s
Bylaws, but, in any event, held no later than twelve (12) months after adoption on the Effective Date.
13.2.
Expiration Date. The Plan will expire on, and no Incentive Stock Option or other Award may be granted pursuant
to the Plan after, the tenth (10th) anniversary of the of the Original 2013 Plan Effective Date. Any Awards that are
outstanding on the tenth (10th) anniversary of the Original 2013 Plan Effective Date shall remain in force according
to the terms of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement.
ARTICLE
14
AMENDMENT, MODIFICATION, AND TERMINATION
14.1.
Amendment, Modification, and Termination. The Committee may at any time and from time to time terminate or
modify or amend the Plan in any respect, except that (a) to the extent necessary and desirable to comply with any applicable
law, regulation, or stock exchange rule, the Company shall obtain shareholder approval of any Plan amendment or any modification
of any Options that would be deemed a re-pricing under applicable rules, in such a manner and to such a degree as required, and
(b) without shareholder approval the Committee may not (i) increase the maximum number of shares of Stock which may
be issued under the Plan, (ii) extend the period during which any Award may be granted or exercised, (iii) amend to
the Plan to permit the Committee to grant Options with an exercise price that is below Fair Market Value on the date of grant,
or (iv) extend the term of the Plan. The termination or any modification or amendment of the Plan, except as provided in
subsection (a), shall not without the consent of a Participant, affect his or her other rights under an Award previously granted
to him or her.
14.2.
Awards Previously Granted. No termination, amendment, or modification of the Plan shall adversely affect in
any material way any Award previously granted pursuant to the Plan without the prior written consent of the Participant.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-24 |
ARTICLE
15
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 409A OF THE CODE
15.1.
Awards subject to Code Section 409A. Any Award that constitutes, or provides for, a deferral of compensation
subject to Section 409A of the Code (a “Section 409A Award”) shall satisfy the requirements of Section 409A
of the Code and this Article 15, to the extent applicable. The Award Agreement with respect to a Section 409A Award
shall incorporate the terms and conditions required by Section 409A of the Code and this Article 15.
15.2.
Distributions under a Section 409A Award.
(a)
Subject to subsection (b), any shares of Stock or other property or amounts to be paid or distributed upon the grant, issuance,
vesting, exercise or payment of a Section 409A Award shall be distributed in accordance with the requirements of Section 409A(a)(2) of
the Code, and shall not be distributed earlier than:
(i)
the Participant’s separation from service, as determined by the Secretary of the Treasury;
(ii) the date the Participant becomes disabled;
(iii) the Participant’s death;
(iv) a specified time (or pursuant to a fixed schedule) specified under the Award Agreement at the date of the deferral compensation;
(v) to the extent provided by the Secretary of the Treasury, a change in the ownership or effective control of the Company or a Parent
or Subsidiary, or in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of the Company or a Parent or Subsidiary; or
(vi) the occurrence of an unforeseeable emergency with respect to the Participant.
(b)
In the case of a Participant who is a “specified employee,” the requirement of paragraph (a)(i) shall be met
only if the distributions with respect to the Section 409A Award may not be made before the date which is six months after
the Participant’s separation from service (or, if earlier, the date of the Participant’s death). For purposes of this
subsection (b), a Participant shall be a “specified employee” if such Participant is a key employee (as defined in
Section 416(i) of the Code without regard to paragraph (5) thereof) of a corporation any stock of which is publicly
traded on an established securities market or otherwise, as determined under Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code and
the Treasury Regulations thereunder.
(c)
The requirement of paragraph (a)(vi) shall be met only if, as determined under Treasury Regulations under Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(ii) of
the Code, the amounts distributed with respect to the unforeseeable emergency do not exceed the amounts necessary to satisfy such
unforeseeable emergency plus amounts necessary to pay taxes reasonably anticipated as a result of the distribution, after taking
into account the extent to which such unforeseeable emergency is or may be relieved through reimbursement or compensation by insurance
or otherwise or by liquidation of the Participant’s assets (to the extent the liquidation of such assets would not itself
cause severe financial hardship).
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-25 |
(d)
For purposes of this Section, the terms specified therein shall have the respective meanings ascribed thereto under Section 409A
of the Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder.
15.3.
Prohibition on Acceleration of Benefits. The time or schedule of any distribution or payment of any shares
of Stock or other property or amounts under a Section 409A Award shall not be accelerated, except as otherwise permitted
under Section 409A(a)(3) of the Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder.
15.4.
Elections under Section 409A Awards.
(a)
Any deferral election provided under or with respect to an Award to any Eligible Individual, or to the Participant holding a Section 409A
Award, shall satisfy the requirements of Section 409A(a)(4)(B) of the Code, to the extent applicable, and, except as
otherwise permitted under paragraph (i) or (ii) below, any such deferral election with respect to compensation for services
performed during a taxable year shall be made not later than the close of the preceding taxable year, or at such other time as
provided in Treasury Regulations.
(i)
In the case of the first year in which an Eligible Individual or a Participant holding a Section 409A Award, becomes eligible
to participate in the Plan, any such deferral election may be made with respect to services to be performed subsequent to the
election with thirty days after the date the Eligible Individual, or the Participant holding a Section 409A Award, becomes
eligible to participate in the Plan, as provided under Section 409A(a)(4)(B)(ii) of the Code.
(ii) In the case of any performance-based compensation based on services performed by an Eligible Individual, or the Participant holding
a Section 409A Award, over a period of at least twelve months, any such deferral election may be made no later than six months
before the end of the period, as provided under Section 409A(a)(4)(B)(iii) of the Code.
(b)
In the event that a Section 409A Award permits, under a subsequent election by the Participant holding such Section 409A
Award, a delay in a distribution or payment of any shares of Stock or other property or amounts under such Section 409A Award,
or a change in the form of distribution or payment, such subsequent election shall satisfy the requirements of Section 409A(a)(4)(C) of
the Code, and:
(i)
such subsequent election may not take effect until at least twelve months after the date on which the election is made,
(ii)
in the case such subsequent election relates to a distribution or payment not described in Section 10.2(a)(ii), (iii) or
(vi), the first payment with respect to such election may be deferred for a period of not less than five years from the date such
distribution or payment otherwise would have been made, and
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-26 |
(iii)
in the case such subsequent election relates to a distribution or payment described in Section 10.2(a)(iv), such election
may not be made less than twelve months prior to the date of the first scheduled distribution or payment under Section 10.2(a)(iv).
15.5.
Compliance in Form and Operation A Section 409A Award, and any election under or with respect to
such Section 409A Award, shall comply in form and operation with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and the
Treasury Regulations thereunder.
ARTICLE
16
GENERAL
PROVISIONS
16.1.
No Rights to Awards. No Eligible Individual or other person shall have any claim to be granted any Award pursuant
to the Plan, and neither the Company nor the Committee is obligated to treat Eligible Individuals, Participants or any other persons
uniformly.
16.2.
Privileges of Stock Ownership; Voting and Dividends. Except to the extent that the Committee grants an Award
that entitles the Participant to credit for dividends paid on shares of Stock subject to such Award prior to the vesting of such
Award and issuance of the subject shares to the Participant (as reflected in the Award Agreement), no Participant will have any
of the rights of a stockholder with respect to any such shares until such Award vests (or applicable restrictions or forfeiture
conditions lapse) and the subject shares are issued to the Participant. For the avoidance of doubt, in the event the Committee
grants an Award that entitles a Participant to credit for dividends on shares of Stock subject to such Award prior to the date
such Award vests (or applicable restrictions or forfeiture conditions lapse) and the subject shares are issued, dividends shall
not be paid to a Participant until such Award vests (or applicable restrictions or forfeiture conditions lapse) and the subject
shares are issued with respect to such Award. Upon satisfaction of the foregoing conditions, the Participant will be a stockholder
and have all the rights of a stockholder with respect to such shares, including the right to vote and receive all dividends or
other distributions made or paid with respect to such shares; provided, that if such shares are restricted stock, then any new,
additional or different securities the Participant may become entitled to receive with respect to such shares by virtue of a stock
dividend, stock split or any other change in the corporate or capital structure of the Company will be subject to the same restrictions
as the restricted stock; provided, further, that the Participant will have no right to retain such stock dividends or stock distributions
with respect to shares of Stock that are repurchased at the Participant’s original purchase price or otherwise forfeited
to the Company.
16.3.
Withholding. The Company or any Subsidiary shall have the authority and the right to deduct or withhold, or
require a Participant to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy minimum federal, state, local and foreign taxes
(including the Participant’s FICA obligation) required by law to be withheld with respect to any taxable event concerning
a Participant arising as a result of this Plan. The Committee may in its discretion and in satisfaction of the foregoing requirement
allow a Participant to elect to have the Company withhold shares of Stock otherwise issuable under an Award (or allow the return
of shares of Stock) having a Fair Market Value equal to the sums required to be withheld. Notwithstanding any other provision
of the Plan, the number of shares of Stock which may be withheld with respect to the issuance, vesting, exercise or payment of
any Award (or which may be repurchased from the Participant of such Award within six (6) months (or such other period as may be
determined by the Committee) after such shares of Stock were acquired by the Participant from the Company) in order to satisfy
the Participant’s minimum federal, state, local and foreign income and payroll tax liabilities with respect to the issuance,
vesting, exercise or payment of the Award shall be limited to the number of shares which have a Fair Market Value on the date
of withholding or repurchase equal to the aggregate amount of such minimum liabilities based on the statutory withholding rates
for federal, state, local and foreign income tax and payroll tax purposes that are applicable to such supplemental taxable income.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-27 |
16.4.
No Right to Employment or Services. Nothing in the Plan or any Award Agreement shall interfere with or limit
in any way the right of the Company or any Subsidiary to terminate any Participant’s employment or services at any time,
nor confer upon any Participant any right to continue in the employ or service of the Company or any Subsidiary.
16.5.
Unfunded Status of Awards. The Plan is intended to be an “unfunded” plan for incentive compensation.
With respect to any payments not yet made to a Participant pursuant to an Award, nothing contained in the Plan or any Award Agreement
shall give the Participant any rights that are greater than those of a general creditor of the Company or any Subsidiary.
16.6.
Indemnification. To the extent allowable pursuant to applicable law, each member of the Committee or of the
Board shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company from any loss, cost, liability, or expense that may be imposed upon
or reasonably incurred by such member in connection with or resulting from any claim, action, suit, or proceeding to which he
or she may be a party or in which he or she may be involved by reason of any action or failure to act pursuant to the Plan and
against and from any and all amounts paid by him or her in satisfaction of judgment in such action, suit, or proceeding against
him or her; provided he or she gives the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before
he or she undertakes to handle and defend it on his or her own behalf. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive
of any other rights of indemnification to which such persons may be entitled pursuant to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation
or Bylaws, as a matter of law, or otherwise, or any power that the Company may have to indemnify them or hold them harmless.
16.7.
Relationship to other Benefits. No payment pursuant to the Plan shall be taken into account in determining
any benefits pursuant to any pension, retirement, savings, profit sharing, group insurance, welfare or other benefit plan of the
Company or any Subsidiary except to the extent otherwise expressly provided in writing in such other plan or an agreement thereunder.
16.8.
Expenses. The expenses of administering the Plan shall be borne by the Company and its Subsidiaries.
16.9.
Titles and Headings. The titles and headings of the Sections in the Plan are for convenience of reference only
and, in the event of any conflict, the text of the Plan, rather than such titles or headings, shall control.
16.10
Fractional Shares. No fractional shares of Stock shall be issued and the Committee shall determine, in its
discretion, whether cash shall be given in lieu of fractional shares or whether such fractional shares shall be eliminated by
rounding up or down as appropriate.
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-28 |
16.11.
Limitations Applicable to Section 16 Persons. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the Plan
and any Award granted or awarded to any Participant who is then subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act shall be subject
to any additional limitations set forth in any applicable exemptive rule under Section 16 of the Exchange Act (including
any amendment to Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act) that are requirements for the application of such exemptive rule. To the
extent permitted by applicable law, the Plan and Awards granted or awarded hereunder shall be deemed amended to the extent necessary
to conform to such applicable exemptive rule.
16.12.
Government and Other Regulations. The obligation of the Company to make payment of awards in Stock or otherwise
shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such approvals by government agencies as may be required.
The Company shall be under no obligation to register pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, any of the shares of
Stock paid pursuant to the Plan. If the shares paid pursuant to the Plan may in certain circumstances be exempt from registration
pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Company may restrict the transfer of such shares in such manner as it
deems advisable to ensure the availability of any such exemption.
16.13.
Governing Law. The Plan and all Award Agreements shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the
laws of the State of Delaware.
* * * * *
I
hereby certify that the foregoing Plan was duly adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of ZAGG Inc on
April 20, 2017.
|
/s/
Daniel Maurer |
|
Daniel
Maurer, Chair |
|
Compensation
Committee |
* * * * *
I
hereby certify that the foregoing Plan was approved by the stockholders of ZAGG Inc on __________, 2017.
|
|
|
Cheryl
A. Larabee, Chair |
|
ZAGG
Inc Board of Directors |
| | 2017 Proxy Statement | B-29 |
This regulatory filing also includes additional resources:
zaggincproxy.pdf
ZAGG (NASDAQ:ZAGG)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
ZAGG (NASDAQ:ZAGG)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024