Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in millions, except per share data)
Note
1
-
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) and disclosures considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. For further information, refer to TimkenSteel’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2015
.
TimkenSteel (the “Company”) manufactures alloy steel, as well as carbon and micro-alloy steel, with an annual melt capacity of approximately
two million
tons. TimkenSteel’s portfolio includes special bar quality steel (SBQ), seamless mechanical tubes (tubes) and value-add solutions, such as precision steel components. In addition, TimkenSteel supplies machining and thermal treatment services, as well as manages raw material recycling programs, which are used as a feeder system for the Company’s melt operations. The Company’s products and services are used in a diverse range of demanding applications in the following market sectors: oil & gas; automotive; industrial equipment; mining; construction; rail; aerospace and defense; heavy truck; agriculture; and power generation.
The SBQ bars and tubes production processes occur out of the Company’s Canton, Ohio manufacturing location. This location accounts for all of the SBQ bars and seamless mechanical tubes the Company produces and includes
three
manufacturing facilities: the Faircrest, Harrison, and Gambrinus facilities. TimkenSteel’s value-add solutions production processes occur out of
three
downstream manufacturing facilities: the TimkenSteel Material Services, Tryon Peak, and St. Clair facilities. Many of the production processes are integrated, and the manufacturing facilities produce products that are sold in all of the Company’s market sectors. As a result, investments in the Company’s facilities and resource allocation decisions affecting the Company’s operations are designed to benefit the overall business of the Company, not any specific aspect of the business.
Effective January 1, 2016, TimkenSteel eliminated its segment reporting as a result of organizational changes made in the second half of 2015, in addition to the integrated nature of the Company’s business as described above. These organizational changes were made to better align resources to support the business strategy of operating in a leaner, more efficient environment. Specifically, the Company has centralized its customer-facing activities under
one
leadership role and eliminated the former
two
segment operating structure. The Company is now organized in a centralized manner based on functionality. As a result, TimkenSteel is conducting its business activities and reporting financial results as
one
business segment.
The presentation of financial results as
one
reportable segment is consistent with the way the Company operates its business under the realigned organization and is consistent with the manner in which the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) evaluates performance and makes resource and operating decisions for the business as described above. Furthermore, the Company notes that monitoring financial results as
one
reportable segment will help the CODM manage costs on a consolidated basis, consistent with the integrated nature of the operations.
Note
2
-
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-05, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement.” This ASU clarifies the circumstances under which a cloud computing customer would account for the arrangement as a license of internal-use software. It is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2015
, with early adoption permitted. TimkenSteel adopted ASU 2015-05 effective January 1, 2016 on a prospective basis. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” This ASU requires the presentation of debt issuance costs as a deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability instead of a deferred charge. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2015
, with early adoption permitted. TimkenSteel adopted ASU 2015-03 as of March 31, 2016. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a Consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force)”. The guidance is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain items are classified in the cash flow statement. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted, provided that all the issues addressed in the standard are adopted in the same period. Retrospective transition is required. TimkenSteel plans to adopt ASU 2016-15 effective January 1, 2017, and the adoption is not expected to have a material effect on its Statements of Cash Flows.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”. This ASU changes how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets, including trade and other receivables. This guidance will replace today’s incurred loss approach with an expected loss model. It is effective for annual periods beginning after December 31, 2019, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods therein. TimkenSteel is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its results of operations and financial condition.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” which provides guidance for revenue recognition and will supersede Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition,” and most industry-specific guidance. The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Additional disclosures will be required about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenues and cash flows from contracts with customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date" which defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted but not before the original effective date of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The FASB issued additional amendments to ASU 2014-09. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” which clarifies the principal versus agent evaluation and how to apply the control principle to certain arrangements. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients”. This ASU amends the guidance on transition, collectibility, noncash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes. The effective date and transition requirements for ASU 2016-08 and ASU 2016-12 are the same as those for ASU 2014-09. TimkenSteel is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 and the additional amendments on its results of operations and financial condition.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”. This ASU will affect several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification on the statement of cash flows and accounting for forfeitures. It is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods, with early adoption permitted. TimkenSteel will adopt ASU 2016-09 effective January 1, 2017, and the adoption is not expected to have a material effect on its results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” which requires lessees to recognize lease liabilities and right-of-use assets on the balance sheet for operating leases, and requires additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company regularly enters into operating leases. TimkenSteel is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its results of operations and financial condition.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, “Inventory: Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (Topic 330),” which requires that certain inventory be measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The guidance applies only to inventories for which cost is determined by methods other than last-in, first-out (LIFO). It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company values certain portions of its inventory using the FIFO, average cost, or specific identification methods. TimkenSteel is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its results of operations and financial condition.
Note
3
-
Inventories
The components of inventories, net as of
September 30, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
Inventories, net:
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing supplies
|
|
$38.5
|
|
|
|
$43.3
|
|
Raw materials
|
13.5
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
Work in process
|
60.5
|
|
|
59.5
|
|
Finished products
|
51.7
|
|
|
64.9
|
|
Subtotal
|
164.2
|
|
|
182.3
|
|
Allowance for surplus and obsolete inventory
|
(8.8
|
)
|
|
(8.4
|
)
|
Total Inventories, net
|
|
$155.4
|
|
|
|
$173.9
|
|
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, with approximately
63%
valued by the LIFO method, and the remaining inventories, including manufacturing supplies inventory as well as international (outside the United States) inventories, valued by FIFO, average cost or specific identification methods.
An actual valuation of the inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations must be based on management’s estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs. Because these calculations are subject to many factors beyond management’s control, annual results may differ from interim results as they are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation.
The LIFO reserve as of
September 30, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
was
$43.1 million
and
$51.4 million
, respectively. TimkenSteel projects that its LIFO reserve will decrease for the year ending
December 31, 2016
due primarily to lower anticipated manufacturing costs and inventory quantities.
Note
4
-
Property, Plant and Equipment
The components of property, plant and equipment, net as of
September 30, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, net:
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$13.4
|
|
|
|
$13.4
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
418.2
|
|
|
418.2
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
1,332.3
|
|
|
1,298.2
|
|
Construction in progress
|
63.0
|
|
|
74.9
|
|
Subtotal
|
1,826.9
|
|
|
1,804.7
|
|
Less allowances for depreciation
|
(1,083.4
|
)
|
|
(1,035.4
|
)
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, net
|
|
$743.5
|
|
|
|
$769.3
|
|
Total depreciation expense was
$51.0 million
and
$49.7 million
for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
, respectively. TimkenSteel recorded capitalized interest related to construction projects of
$0.5 million
and
$1.2 million
for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
, respectively. TimkenSteel recorded impairment charges of
$0.9 million
related to the discontinued use of certain assets during the
nine months ended
September 30, 2015
.
On February 26, 2016, TimkenSteel entered into an agreement for the sale and leaseback of the Company’s Canton, Ohio office facilities for a purchase price of
$20 million
. During the second quarter, the Company terminated the agreement and no further obligations exist between the parties.
Note
5
-
Intangible Assets
The components of intangible assets, net as of
September 30, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
Gross Carrying Amount
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
Net Carrying Amount
|
|
Gross Carrying Amount
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
Net Carrying Amount
|
Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
$6.8
|
|
|
$4.0
|
|
|
|
$2.8
|
|
|
|
$6.8
|
|
|
|
$3.7
|
|
|
|
$3.1
|
|
Technology use
|
9.0
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Capitalized software
|
58.2
|
|
|
39.1
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
57.9
|
|
|
34.7
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
Total Intangible Assets
|
|
$74.0
|
|
|
|
$48.3
|
|
|
|
$25.7
|
|
|
|
$73.7
|
|
|
|
$43.1
|
|
|
|
$30.6
|
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization are amortized on a straight-line method over their legal or estimated useful lives. Amortization expense for intangible assets for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
was
$5.2 million
and
$4.9 million
, respectively.
Note
6
-
Financing Arrangements
Convertible Notes
In
May 2016
, the Company issued
$75.0 million
aggregate principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes, and an additional
$11.3 million
principal amount to cover over-allotments (the “Convertible Notes”).
The Indenture for the Convertible Notes dated May 31, 2016, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to a Form 8-K filed on May 31, 2016, contains a complete description of the terms of the Convertible Notes. The key terms are as follows:
Maturity Date:
June 1, 2021
unless repurchased or converted earlier
Interest Rate:
6.0%
cash interest per year
Interest Payments Dates:
June 1
and
December 1
of each year, beginning on
December 1, 2016
Initial Conversion Price: Approximately
$12.58
per common share of the Company
Initial Conversion Rate:
79.5165
common shares per
$1,000
principal amount of Notes
The net proceeds to the Company from the offering were
$83.7 million
, after deducting the initial underwriters’ discount and fees and the offering expenses payable by the Company. The Company used the net proceeds to repay a portion of the amounts outstanding under the Amended Credit Agreement.
The components of the Convertible Notes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
Principal
|
|
$86.3
|
|
|
|
$—
|
|
Less: Debt issuance costs, net of amortization
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Less: Debt discount, net of amortization
|
(18.5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Convertible notes, net
|
|
$65.6
|
|
|
|
$—
|
|
The initial value of the principal amount recorded as a liability at the date of issuance was
$66.9 million
, using an effective interest rate of
12.0%
. The remaining
$19.4 million
of principal amount was allocated to the conversion feature and recorded as a component of shareholders’ equity at the date of issuance. This amount represents a discount to the debt to be amortized through interest expense using the effective interest method through the maturity of the Convertible Notes.
Transaction costs were allocated to the liability and equity components based on their relative values. Transaction costs attributable to the liability component of
$2.4 million
are amortized to interest expense over the term of the Convertible Notes, and transaction costs attributable to the equity component of
$0.7 million
are included in shareholders’ equity.
The following table sets forth total interest expense recognized related to the Convertible Notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Contractual interest expense
|
|
$1.3
|
|
|
|
$—
|
|
|
$1.7
|
|
|
|
$—
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
0.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization of debt discount
|
0.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$2.1
|
|
|
|
$—
|
|
|
$2.8
|
|
|
|
$—
|
|
The fair value of the Convertible Notes was approximately
$80.9 million
as of
September 30, 2016
. The fair value of the Convertible Notes, which falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, is determined based on similar debt instruments that do not contain a conversion feature.
Holders may convert all or any portion of their Convertible Notes, in multiples of
$1,000
principal amount, at their option at any time prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding
March 1, 2021
only under certain circumstances described in the Convertible Notes Indenture, based on the reported sale price of the Company’s common shares for specified trading days as a percentage of the conversion price of the Convertible Notes, and upon the occurrence of specified corporate events. On or after
March 1, 2021
until the business day preceding the maturity date, holders may convert all or any portion of their Convertible Notes, in multiples of
$1,000
principal amount, at their option.
Upon conversion, the Company will pay cash or deliver common shares, or a combination thereof, at its election. The amount of cash and number of common shares due upon conversion will be based on a daily conversion value calculated on a proportionate basis for each trading day in a
40
-trading day period.
If the Company undergoes a fundamental change, subject to certain conditions, holders may require the Company to repurchase for cash all or part of their Convertible Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Convertible Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the repurchase date.
Upon certain events of default occurring and continuing (including failure to pay principal or interest on the Convertible Notes when due and payable), the Trustee or the holders of at least
25%
in principal amount may declare
100%
of the principal and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on all the Convertible Notes to be due and payable. In case of certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization, involving the Company or a significant subsidiary,
100%
of the principal and accrued and unpaid interest on the Convertible Notes will become due and payable immediately.
Other Long-Term Debt
The components of other long-term debt as of
September 30, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
Variable-rate State of Ohio Water Development Revenue Refunding Bonds, maturing on November 1, 2025 (0.84% as of September 30, 2016)
|
|
$12.2
|
|
|
|
$12.2
|
|
Variable-rate State of Ohio Air Quality Development Revenue Refunding Bonds, maturing on November 1, 2025 (0.83% as of September 30, 2016)
|
9.5
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
Variable-rate State of Ohio Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, maturing on June 1, 2033 (0.84% as of September 30, 2016)
|
8.5
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
Amended Credit Agreement, due 2019 (LIBOR plus applicable spread)
|
40.0
|
|
|
170.0
|
|
Total Other Long-Term Debt
|
|
$70.2
|
|
|
|
$200.2
|
|
Amended Credit Agreement
On February 26, 2016, the Company, as borrower, and certain domestic subsidiaries, as subsidiary guarantors, entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (as amended by the Amendment, the “Amended Credit Agreement”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the other lenders party thereto.
The Amended Credit Agreement provides for a
$265.0 million
asset-based revolving credit facility, including a
$13.3 million
sublimit for the issuance of commercial and standby letters of credit, and a
$26.5 million
sublimit for swingline loans. The availability of borrowings is subject to a borrowing base calculation based upon a valuation of the eligible accounts receivable, inventory and machinery and equipment of TimkenSteel and the subsidiary guarantors, each multiplied by an applicable advance rate. The Amended Credit Agreement includes a block on availability equal to the greater of
$28.9 million
or
12.5%
of the aggregate commitments (except that in the event of a mandatory reduction in the commitments, the block on availability will be equal to the greater of
$20.0 million
or
12.5%
of the aggregate commitments), effectively reducing the Company’s borrowing base by the availability block.
The Amended Credit Agreement contains certain customary covenants, including covenants that limit TimkenSteel’s and its subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things, (i) incur or suffer to exist certain liens, (ii) make investments, (iii) incur or guaranty additional indebtedness (iv) enter into consolidations, mergers, acquisitions and sales of assets, (v) make distributions and other restricted payments, (vi) change the nature of its business, (vii) engage in transactions with affiliates and (viii) enter into restrictive agreements, including agreements that restrict the ability to incur liens or make distributions. Further, the Amended Credit Agreement contains financial covenants that (i) limit the amount of capital expenditures TimkenSteel may make to
$45 million
in fiscal year 2016 and
$50 million
in fiscal years thereafter and (ii) require the Company to maintain a minimum specified fixed charge coverage ratio for the year-to-date periods beginning January 1, 2017 and ending June 30, 2017, July 31, 2017 and August 31, 2017.
Borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement bear interest based on the daily balance outstanding at LIBOR (with no rate floor), plus an applicable margin (varying from
3.00%
to
3.50%
) and an additional
0.75%
on the machinery and equipment component or, in certain cases, an alternate base rate (based on certain lending institutions’ Prime Rate or as otherwise specified in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, with no rate floor), plus an applicable margin (varying from
2.00%
to
2.50%
). The Amended Credit Agreement also carries a commitment fee equal to the unused borrowings multiplied by an applicable margin of
0.50%
. The applicable margins are calculated quarterly and vary based on TimkenSteel’s average quarterly availability as set forth in the Amended Credit Agreement. The interest rate under the Amended Credit Agreement was
4.6%
as of
September 30, 2016
. The amount available under the Amended Credit Agreement as of
September 30, 2016
was
$129.4 million
net, after reducing for the block on availability of
$33.1 million
.
Revenue Refunding Bonds
On June 1, 2014, The Timken Company (“Timken”) purchased, in lieu of redemption, the State of Ohio Water Development Revenue Refunding Bonds (Water Bonds), State of Ohio Air Quality Development Revenue Refunding Bonds (Air Quality Bonds) and State of Ohio Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds (Pollution Control Bonds) (collectively, Bonds). Pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated June 24, 2014 between Timken and TimkenSteel, Timken assigned all of its right, title and interest in and to the loan agreements and the notes associated with the Bonds to, and these obligations were assumed by, TimkenSteel. Additionally, replacement letters of credit were issued for the Water Bonds and the Pollution Control Bonds. The Bonds were remarketed on June 24, 2014 (Remarketing Date) in connection with the conversion of the interest rate mode for the Bonds to the weekly rate and the delivery of the replacement letters of credit, as applicable. TimkenSteel is responsible for payment of the interest and principal associated with the Bonds subsequent to the Remarketing Date.
On September 1, 2016, the Water Bonds were remarketed in connection with the delivery of a replacement letter of credit issued by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. The key terms of the Water Bonds did not change as a result of the remarketing.
All of TimkenSteel’s other long-term debt is variable-rate debt. As such, the carrying value of this debt is a reasonable estimate of fair value as interest rates on these borrowings approximate current market rates, which is considered a Level 2 fair value input as defined by Accounting Standard Codification (ASC) 820, “Fair Value Measurements.” The valuation of Level 2 is based on quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly.
Advanced Quench-and-Temper Facility
In the second quarter of 2015, TimkenSteel entered into a capital lease arrangement with the Stark County Port Authority in connection with the construction of a new advanced quench-and-temper facility in Perry Township, Ohio and the issuance of an Industrial Revenue Bond. The bond is held
100%
by TimkenSteel Material Services, LLC (a wholly-owned subsidiary of TimkenSteel) and, accordingly, the obligation under the lease agreement and investment in the Industrial Revenue Bond, as well as the related interest income and expense, are eliminated in the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. As of
September 30, 2016
,
$36.4 million
has been spent on the new advanced quench-and-temper facility and is reported in property, plant and equipment, net in the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets. Of this amount,
$10.8 million
has been financed through the capital lease arrangement described above.
Note
7
-
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
by component are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
|
|
Pension and Postretirement Liability Adjustments
|
|
Total
|
Balance at December 31, 2015
|
|
($6.3
|
)
|
|
|
($257.5
|
)
|
|
|
($263.8
|
)
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications, before income tax
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
(19.5
|
)
|
|
(22.3
|
)
|
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss, before income tax
|
—
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
—
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income, net of income taxes
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
Balance at September 30, 2016
|
|
($9.1
|
)
|
|
|
($256.7
|
)
|
|
|
($265.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
|
|
Pension and Postretirement Liability Adjustments
|
|
Total
|
Balance at December 31, 2014
|
|
($4.8
|
)
|
|
|
($292.5
|
)
|
|
|
($297.3
|
)
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications, before income tax
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss, before income tax
|
—
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
Income tax expense
|
—
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income, net of income tax
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2015
|
|
($5.9
|
)
|
|
|
($275.3
|
)
|
|
|
($281.2
|
)
|
The amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss for the pension and postretirement liability adjustment was included in cost of products sold and selling, general and administrative expenses in the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. These components are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost.
In the third quarter of 2016, the Company remeasured its pension obligations and plan assets associated with the TimkenSteel Corporation Retirement Plan. See Note 9 for additional information.
Note
8
-
Changes in Shareholders' Equity
Changes in the components of shareholders’ equity for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital
|
|
Retained Deficit
|
|
Treasury Shares
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
|
Balance at December 31, 2015
|
|
$686.4
|
|
|
|
$1,058.2
|
|
|
|
($61.7
|
)
|
|
|
($46.3
|
)
|
|
|
($263.8
|
)
|
Net loss
|
(40.7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(40.7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Pension and postretirement adjustment, net of tax
|
0.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
4.6
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Issuance of treasury shares
|
—
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
Equity component of convertible notes, net
|
18.7
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Deferred tax liability on convertible notes
|
(7.2
|
)
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2016
|
|
$659.8
|
|
|
|
$1,073.1
|
|
|
|
($102.4
|
)
|
|
|
($45.1
|
)
|
|
|
($265.8
|
)
|
Note
9
-
Retirement and Postretirement Plans
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the
three and nine months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
Pension
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
Pension
|
|
Postretirement
|
Service cost
|
|
$3.9
|
|
|
|
$0.4
|
|
|
|
$4.3
|
|
|
|
$0.4
|
|
Interest cost
|
13.2
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
(18.1
|
)
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
(19.4
|
)
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
0.1
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
6.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
Settlement loss
|
5.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
|
|
$10.8
|
|
|
|
$1.5
|
|
|
|
$6.5
|
|
|
|
$1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
Pension
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
Postretirement
|
Service cost
|
11.7
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
$12.6
|
|
|
|
$1.3
|
|
Interest cost
|
39.8
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
38.5
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
(54.3
|
)
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
|
(58.1
|
)
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
0.4
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
19.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
25.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
Settlement loss
|
5.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
|
|
$22.0
|
|
|
|
$4.6
|
|
|
|
$18.9
|
|
|
|
$4.0
|
|
Net periodic benefit costs are included in the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations as a component of cost of products sold and selling, general and administrative expenses.
In the third quarter of 2016, the Company amended its postretirement benefit plans relating to its non-bargaining retirees, effective January 1, 2017, to provide for the transition of certain Medicare-eligible retirees and their eligible dependents from company-sponsored group retiree medical coverage to individual health insurance purchased through an insurance company private exchange. The change was deemed to be insignificant and therefore, interim remeasurement was not necessary.
The TimkenSteel Corporation Retirement Plan (Salaried Plan) has a provision that permits employees to elect to receive their pension benefits in a lump sum. In the third quarter of 2016, the cumulative cost of all settlements exceeded the sum of the service cost and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost for the Salaried Plan. The Company completed a full remeasurement of its pension obligations and plan assets associated with the Salaried Plan as of September 30, 2016, which resulted in a non-cash pre-tax loss from the settlement of $
5.4 million
. The Company anticipates additional settlement losses will be recorded in the fourth quarter.
Note
10
-
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of common share equivalents calculated using the treasury stock or if-converted method. For the convertible notes, the Company utilizes the if-converted method to calculate diluted earnings (loss) per share. Under the if-converted method, the Company adjusts net earnings to add back interest expense (including amortization of debt discount) recognized on the convertible notes and includes the number of shares potentially issuable related to the convertible notes in the weighted average shares outstanding. Treasury stock is excluded from the denominator in calculating both basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share.
Common share equivalents, which include shares issuable for equity-based awards and upon the conversion of outstanding convertible notes, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because the effect of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the numerator and the denominator of basic and diluted loss per share for the
three and nine months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for basic and diluted earnings per share
|
|
($16.6
|
)
|
|
|
($30.8
|
)
|
|
|
($40.7
|
)
|
|
|
($48.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic
|
44,221,310
|
|
|
44,431,092
|
|
|
44,215,373
|
|
|
44,636,149
|
|
Dilutive effect of stock-based awards
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted
|
44,221,310
|
|
|
44,431,092
|
|
|
44,215,373
|
|
|
44,636,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share
|
|
($0.38
|
)
|
|
|
($0.69
|
)
|
|
|
($0.92
|
)
|
|
|
($1.08
|
)
|
Diluted loss per share
|
|
($0.38
|
)
|
|
|
($0.69
|
)
|
|
|
($0.92
|
)
|
|
|
($1.08
|
)
|
Note
11
-
Income Tax Benefit
TimkenSteel’s benefit for income taxes in interim periods is computed by applying the appropriate estimated annual effective tax rates to income or loss before income taxes for the period. In addition, non-recurring or discrete items, including interest on prior-year tax liabilities, are recorded during the periods in which they occur.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
($10.0
|
)
|
|
|
($19.0
|
)
|
|
|
($24.8
|
)
|
|
|
($29.4
|
)
|
Effective tax rate
|
37.6
|
%
|
|
38.2
|
%
|
|
37.9
|
%
|
|
37.9
|
%
|
The effective tax rate for the three months ended
September 30, 2016
was higher than the U.S. federal statutory rate of
35%
primarily due to U.S. state and local tax differences and foreign and domestic mix of pretax book income.
The effective tax rate for the three months ended
September 30, 2015
was higher than the U.S. federal statutory rate of
35%
primarily due to U.S. state and local taxes, and certain discrete tax items.
The effective tax rate for the nine months ended
September 30, 2016
was higher than the U.S. federal statutory rate of
35%
primarily due to U.S. state and local tax differences, certain discrete tax items, foreign and domestic mix of pretax book income, and other permanent differences.
The effective tax rate for the nine months ended
September 30, 2015
was higher than the U.S. federal statutory rate of
35%
primarily due to U.S. state and local taxes, certain discrete tax items and the tax benefit associated with non-U.S. earnings taxed at a rate less than the U.S. statutory rate. These were partially offset by the effect of other permanent differences.
Note
12
-
Contingencies
TimkenSteel has a number of loss exposures that are incurred in the ordinary course of business, such as environmental claims, product warranty claims, and litigation. Establishing loss reserves for these matters requires management’s estimate and judgment regarding risk exposure and ultimate liability or realization. These loss reserves are reviewed periodically and adjustments are made to reflect the most recent facts and circumstances.
Environmental Matters
From time to time, TimkenSteel may be a party to lawsuits, claims or other proceedings related to environmental matters and/or may receive notices of potential violations of environmental laws and regulations from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and similar state or local authorities. TimkenSteel recorded reserves for such environmental matters as other current and non-current liabilities on the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets. Accruals related to such environmental matters represent management’s best estimate of the fees and costs associated with these matters. Although it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of such matters, management believes that their ultimate dispositions should not have a material adverse effect on TimkenSteel’s financial position, cash flows, or results of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
2015
|
Beginning Balance, January 1
|
|
$1.3
|
|
|
$1.3
|
|
Expenses, net
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Payments
|
(0.4
|
)
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Ending Balance, September 30
|
|
$0.9
|
|
|
$1.0
|
|
Note
13
-
Restructuring Charges
During the second quarter of 2015, TimkenSteel approved and began implementing a cost reduction plan that resulted in the reduction of TimkenSteel’s salaried and hourly headcount. As of
September 30, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
, TimkenSteel had a
$0.2 million
and
$2.3 million
reserve for such restructuring charges, respectively, classified as other current liabilities on the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following is a rollforward of the consolidated restructuring accrual for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2015
|
|
$2.3
|
|
Expenses
|
0.3
|
|
Payments
|
(2.4
|
)
|
Balance at September 30, 2016
|
|
$0.2
|
|
Note
14
-
Segment Information
TimkenSteel manufactures alloy steel, as well as carbon and micro-alloy steel, with an annual melt capacity of approximately
two million
tons. TimkenSteel’s portfolio includes special bar quality steel (SBQ), seamless mechanical tubes (tubes) and value-add solutions, such as precision steel components. In addition, TimkenSteel supplies machining and thermal treatment services, as well as manages raw material recycling programs, which are used as a feeder system for the Company’s melt operations. The Company’s products and services are used in a diverse range of demanding applications in the following market sectors: oil & gas; automotive; industrial equipment; mining; construction; rail; aerospace and defense; heavy truck; agriculture; and power generation.
The SBQ bars and tubes production processes occur out of the Company’s Canton, Ohio manufacturing location. This location accounts for all of the SBQ bars and seamless mechanical tubes the Company produces and includes
three
manufacturing facilities: the Faircrest, Harrison, and Gambrinus facilities. TimkenSteel’s value-add solutions production processes occur out of
three
downstream manufacturing facilities: the TimkenSteel Material Services, Tryon Peak, and St. Clair facilities. Many of the production processes are integrated, and the manufacturing facilities produce products that are sold in all of the Company’s market sectors. As a result, investments in the Company’s facilities and resource allocation decisions affecting the Company’s operations are designed to benefit the overall business of the Company, not any specific aspect of the business.
Effective January 1, 2016, TimkenSteel eliminated its segment reporting as a result of organizational changes made in the second half of 2015, in addition to the integrated nature of the Company’s business as described above. These organizational changes were made to better align resources to support the business strategy of operating in a leaner, more efficient environment. Specifically, the Company has centralized its customer-facing activities under
one
leadership role and eliminated the former
two
segment operating structure. The Company is now organized in a centralized manner based on functionality. As a result, TimkenSteel is conducting its business activities and reporting financial results as
one
business segment.
The presentation of financial results as
one
reportable segment is consistent with the way the Company operates its business under the realigned organization and is consistent with the manner in which the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) evaluates performance and makes resource and operating decisions for the business as described above. Furthermore the Company notes that monitoring financial results as
one
reportable segment will help the CODM manage costs on a consolidated basis, consistent with the integrated nature of the operations. The Company’s Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements reflect the realignment of the reportable segments for periods beginning after January 1, 2016 and for all comparable periods presented.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(dollars in millions, except per share data)
Business Overview
TimkenSteel Corporation (we, us, our, the Company or TimkenSteel) was incorporated in Ohio on October 24, 2013, and became an independent, publicly traded company as the result of a spinoff from The Timken Company (Timken) on
June 30, 2014
.
We manufacture alloy steel, as well as carbon and micro-alloy steel, with an annual melt capacity of approximately two million tons. Our portfolio includes special bar quality steel (SBQ), seamless mechanical tubes (tubes) and value-add solutions, such as precision steel components. In addition, we supply machining and thermal treatment services, as well as manage raw material recycling programs, which are used as a feeder system for our melt operations. Our products and services are used in a diverse range of demanding applications in the following market sectors: oil & gas; automotive; industrial equipment; mining; construction; rail; aerospace and defense; heavy truck; agriculture; and power generation.
Based on our knowledge of the steel industry, we believe we are the only focused SBQ steel producer in North America and have the largest SBQ steel large bar (6-inch diameter and greater) production capacity among the North American steel producers. In addition, we are the only steel manufacturer with capabilities of developing SBQ steel large bars up to 16-inches in diameter. SBQ steel is made to restrictive chemical compositions and high internal purity levels and is used in critical mechanical applications. We make these products from nearly 100% recycled steel, using our expertise in raw materials to create custom steel products with a competitive cost structure similar to that of a high-volume producer. We focus on creating tailored products and services for our customers’ most demanding applications. Our engineers are experts in both materials and applications, so we can work closely with each customer to deliver flexible solutions related to our products as well as to their applications and supply chains. We believe our unique operating model and production assets give us a competitive advantage in our industry.
The SBQ bars and tubes production processes occur out of our Canton, Ohio manufacturing location. This location accounts for all of the SBQ bars and seamless mechanical tubes we produce and includes three manufacturing facilities: the Faircrest, Harrison, and Gambrinus facilities. Our value-add solutions production processes occur out of three downstream manufacturing facilities: the TimkenSteel Material Services, Tryon Peak, and St. Clair facilities. Many of the production processes are integrated, and the manufacturing facilities produce products that are sold in all of our market sectors. As a result, investments in our facilities and resource allocation decisions affecting our operations are designed to benefit the overall business, not any specific aspect of the business.
Effective January 1, 2016, we eliminated our segment reporting as a result of organizational changes made in the second half of 2015, in addition to the integrated nature of our business. These organizational changes were made to better align resources to support the business strategy of operating in a leaner, more efficient environment. Specifically, we have centralized our customer-facing activities under one leadership role and eliminated the former two segment operating structure. We are now organized in a centralized manner based on functionality. As a result, we are conducting our business activities and reporting financial results as one business segment.
The presentation of financial results as one reportable segment is consistent with the way the Company operates its business under the realigned organization and is consistent with the manner in which the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) evaluates performance and makes resource and operating decisions for the business as described above. Furthermore we note that monitoring financial results as one reportable segment will help the CODM manage costs on a consolidated basis, consistent with the integrated nature of the operations. We have conformed Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations to reflect this change in reportable segments.
Capital Investments
We invest in capital projects to strengthen our position of offering what we believe to be the broadest range of SBQ bars and seamless mechanical tubing steel capabilities, enhance our position as a leader in large bar capabilities in North America, provide differentiated solutions for the energy, industrial and automotive market sectors, and improve our operational performance and customer service capabilities.
On July 17, 2014, we announced plans to invest in additional advanced quench-and-temper heat-treat capacity. The approximately $
40 million
facility will perform quench-and-temper heat-treat operations and, we believe, will have capacity for up to 50,000 process-tons annually of 4-inch to 13-inch bars and tubes. This facility will be located in Perry Township, Ohio on the site of our Gambrinus Steel Plant near three existing thermal treatment facilities. This facility will be larger than each of our three existing thermal treatment facilities in Canton, Ohio. In response to the continued weakness in energy and some industrial
end markets, we have decided to defer the final installation until market conditions provide us the opportunity to achieve the best return on this investment.
Impact of Raw Material Prices and LIFO
In the ordinary course of business, we are exposed to the volatility of the costs of our raw materials. Whenever possible, we manage our exposure to commodity risks primarily through the use of supplier pricing agreements that enable us to establish the purchase prices for certain inputs that are used in our manufacturing process. We utilize a raw material surcharge mechanism that is designed to mitigate the impact of increases or decreases in raw material costs, although generally with a lag effect. This timing effect can result in raw material spread whereby costs can be over- or under-recovered in certain periods. While the surcharge generally protects gross profit, under certain circumstances it may have the effect of diluting gross margin as a percentage of sales.
We value certain of our inventory utilizing the LIFO inventory valuation method. Changes in the cost of raw materials and production activities are recognized in cost of products sold in the current period even though these materials and other costs may have been incurred in different periods at significantly different values due to the length of time of our production cycle. In a period of rising raw material prices, cost of products sold recognized under LIFO is generally higher than the cash costs incurred to acquire the inventory sold. Conversely, in a period of declining raw material prices, cost of products sold recognized under LIFO is generally lower than cash costs incurred to acquire the inventory sold. In periods of rising inventories and deflating raw material prices, the likely result will be a positive impact to net income. Conversely, in periods of rising inventories and increasing raw materials prices, the likely result will be a negative impact to net income.
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
% Change
|
Net sales
|
|
$213.8
|
|
|
|
$232.7
|
|
|
|
($18.9
|
)
|
|
(8.1)%
|
|
Net sales, excluding surcharges
|
184.9
|
|
|
201.7
|
|
|
(16.8
|
)
|
|
(8.3)%
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
2.5
|
|
|
(20.5
|
)
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
112.2%
|
|
Gross margin
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
(8.8
|
)%
|
|
NM
|
|
|
1,000 bps
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
25.0
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
(6.0)%
|
|
Net loss
|
(16.6
|
)
|
|
(30.8
|
)
|
|
(14.2
|
)
|
|
(46.1)%
|
|
Average scrap index per ton (30 day lag)
|
272
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
2.6%
|
|
Average selling price per ton, including surcharges
|
|
$1,202
|
|
|
|
$1,302
|
|
|
|
($100
|
)
|
|
(7.7)%
|
|
Shipments (in tons)
|
177,823
|
|
|
178,747
|
|
|
(924
|
)
|
|
(0.5)%
|
|
Melt utilization
|
44
|
%
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
NM
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
% Change
|
Net sales
|
|
$654.8
|
|
|
|
$899.6
|
|
|
|
($244.8
|
)
|
|
(27.2)%
|
|
Net sales, excluding surcharges
|
587.2
|
|
|
755.1
|
|
|
(167.9
|
)
|
|
(22.2)%
|
|
Gross profit
|
16.1
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
7.3%
|
|
Gross margin
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
NM
|
|
|
80 bps
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
71.6
|
|
|
85.4
|
|
|
(13.8
|
)
|
|
(16.2)%
|
|
Net loss
|
(40.7
|
)
|
|
(48.2
|
)
|
|
(7.5
|
)
|
|
(15.6)%
|
|
Average scrap index per ton (30 day lag)
|
229
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
(54.0
|
)
|
|
(19.1)%
|
|
Average selling price per ton, including surcharges
|
|
$1,183
|
|
|
|
$1,359
|
|
|
|
($176
|
)
|
|
(13.0)%
|
|
Shipments (in tons)
|
553,646
|
|
|
661,785
|
|
|
(108,139
|
)
|
|
(16.3)%
|
|
Melt utilization
|
45
|
%
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
NM
|
|
|
NM
|
|
The table above presents net sales, adjusted to exclude raw material surcharges, which represents a financial measure that has not been determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We believe presenting net sales adjusted to exclude raw material surcharges provides additional insight into key drivers of net sales such as base price and product mix.
Net Sales
Net sales for the
third
quarter of
2016
were
$213.8 million
, a decrease of
$18.9 million
compared to the
third
quarter of
2015
. Excluding surcharges, net sales decreased
$16.8 million
, or
8.3%
. The decrease was driven primarily by a
37.7%
decrease in ship tons in the energy end market and a 2.0% decrease from normal seasonality in automotive end markets. Lower shipments for the third quarter of 2016 in the energy end market were driven primarily by a decrease in the U.S. rig count of about 40% compared to the third quarter of 2015.
Net sales for the first nine months of
2016
were
$654.8 million
, a decrease of
$244.8 million
compared to the first nine months of
2015
. Excluding surcharges, net sales decreased
$167.9 million
, or
22.2%
. The decrease was driven primarily by lower ship tons of approximately
76.0%
in the energy end market and
19.9%
in the industrial end market. Lower shipments for the first nine months of 2016 in the energy end market were driven primarily by a decrease in the U.S. rig count compared to the first nine months of 2015. Lower shipments for the first nine months of 2016 in the industrial end market as compared to the first nine months of 2015 were due primarily to the ancillary impact of the decline in oil and gas markets.
Gross Profit (Loss)
Gross profit for the
third
quarter of
2016
was
$2.5 million
, an increase of $
23.0 million
, or
112.2%
, compared to gross loss of
$20.5 million
for the
third
quarter of
2015
. The increase was driven primarily by lower manufacturing costs of approximately $32 million and favorable raw material spread of approximately $9 million, partially offset by price/mix of approximately 9 million, lower LIFO income of approximately $7 million, and settlement expenses of $3 million.
Gross profit for the first nine months of
2016
was
$16.1 million
, an increase of $
1.1 million
, or
7.3%
, compared to gross profit of
$15.0 million
for the first nine months of
2015
. The increase was driven primarily by favorable raw material spread of approximately $40 million and lower manufacturing costs of approximately $36 million, partially offset by lower volume of approximately $31 million, price/mix of approximately $26 million, lower LIFO income of approximately $15 million, and settlement expenses of $3 million.
We have approximately 2 million tons of annual melt capacity. The amount of actual melt produced as a percentage of the capacity defines our melt utilization. Melt utilization is a key performance indicator for our business and is influenced by customer demand and inventory levels. We believe that production levels of approximately 50% melt utilization will generate breakeven Earnings Before Interest Taxes Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) results in normalized scrap markets. Many factors can influence the level at which melt utilization will generate breakeven results. The primary factors are product volume and mix, product price and cost structure.
Melt utilization for the
third
quarter of 2016 was
44%
compared to melt utilization of
40%
for the
third
quarter of 2015. Weakness in commodity markets, declining rig counts and high inventory levels in the distribution supply chain, resulted in lower customer demand and therefore lower production volumes. In order to align our cost structure with market demand and continue to manage our breakeven levels to offset potential headwinds from product mix and price, in the second half of 2015 we implemented a $75 million cost reduction initiative. These actions, which included reducing headcount, lowering operating costs and minimizing capital expenditures, have exceeded the initial $75 million target. Additionally, stabilizing scrap markets have provided positive timing impacts from raw material spread and enabled the Company to generate EBITDA at below 50% melt utilization. We continue to believe that our breakeven rate of 50% is more representative in typical market environments.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses decreased $1.6 million, or
6.0%
, for the
third
quarter of 2016 compared to the
third
quarter of 2015, and decreased
$13.8 million
, or
16.2%
, for the first nine months of 2016 compared to the first nine months of 2015, due primarily to realized benefits of cost reduction actions, partially offset by $2.4 million of settlement expenses.
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
$ Change
|
Cash interest paid
|
|
$1.1
|
|
|
|
$0.9
|
|
|
|
$0.2
|
|
Accrued interest on convertible notes
|
1.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Amortization of convertible notes discount and deferred financing
|
1.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Total Interest Expense
|
|
$3.9
|
|
|
|
$0.9
|
|
|
|
$3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
$ Change
|
Cash interest paid
|
|
$4.9
|
|
|
|
$2.0
|
|
|
|
$2.9
|
|
Accrued interest on convertible notes
|
1.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
Amortization of convertible notes discount and deferred financing
|
1.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Total Interest Expense
|
|
$8.0
|
|
|
|
$2.0
|
|
|
|
$6.0
|
|
Interest expense for the third quarter of 2016 was $3.9 million, an increase of $3.0 million, compared to $0.9 million for the third quarter of 2015. The increase was primarily due to the Convertible Senior Notes (Convertible Notes) issued in May, 2016.
Interest expense for the first nine months of 2016 was $8.0 million, an increase of $6.0 million, compared to $2.0 million for the first nine months of 2015. The increase was primarily due to the Convertible Notes.
Benefit for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
($10.0
|
)
|
|
|
($19.0
|
)
|
|
|
($9.0
|
)
|
|
(47.4)%
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
37.6
|
%
|
|
38.2
|
%
|
|
NM
|
|
|
(60) bps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
($24.8
|
)
|
|
|
($29.4
|
)
|
|
|
($4.6
|
)
|
|
(15.6)%
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
37.9
|
%
|
|
37.9
|
%
|
|
NM
|
|
|
0 bps
|
|
The decrease in the effective tax rate for the
third
quarter of
2016
compared to the
third
quarter of
2015
was primarily due to certain discrete tax items.
Net Sales, Excluding Surcharges
The table below presents net sales by end market sector, adjusted to exclude raw material surcharges, which represents a financial measure that has not been determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We believe presenting net sales by end market sector adjusted to exclude raw material surcharges provides additional insight into key drivers of net sales such as base price and product mix.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales adjusted to exclude surcharges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Tons in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Mobile
|
Industrial
|
Energy
|
Other
|
|
Total
|
|
Mobile
|
Industrial
|
Energy
|
Other
|
|
Total
|
Tons
|
100.5
|
|
70.2
|
|
7.1
|
|
—
|
|
|
177.8
|
|
|
102.4
|
|
64.9
|
|
11.4
|
|
—
|
|
|
178.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$120.4
|
|
|
$79.7
|
|
|
$8.7
|
|
|
$5.0
|
|
|
|
$213.8
|
|
|
|
$124.7
|
|
|
$85.0
|
|
|
$17.7
|
|
|
$5.3
|
|
|
|
$232.7
|
|
Less: Surcharges
|
16.3
|
|
11.3
|
|
1.3
|
|
—
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
12.7
|
|
2.6
|
|
—
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
Base Sales
|
|
$104.1
|
|
|
$68.4
|
|
|
$7.4
|
|
|
$5.0
|
|
|
|
$184.9
|
|
|
|
$109.0
|
|
|
$72.3
|
|
|
$15.1
|
|
|
$5.3
|
|
|
|
$201.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales / Ton
|
|
$1,198
|
|
|
$1,135
|
|
|
$1,225
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$1,202
|
|
|
|
$1,218
|
|
|
$1,310
|
|
|
$1,553
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$1,302
|
|
Base Sales / Ton
|
|
$1,036
|
|
|
$974
|
|
|
$1,042
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$1,040
|
|
|
|
$1,064
|
|
|
$1,114
|
|
|
$1,325
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$1,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Mobile
|
Industrial
|
Energy
|
Other
|
|
Total
|
|
Mobile
|
Industrial
|
Energy
|
Other
|
|
Total
|
Tons
|
317.4
|
|
216.8
|
|
19.4
|
|
—
|
|
|
553.6
|
|
|
310.4
|
|
270.5
|
|
80.9
|
|
—
|
|
|
661.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$365.8
|
|
|
$246.2
|
|
|
$27.7
|
|
|
$15.1
|
|
|
|
$654.8
|
|
|
|
$383.3
|
|
|
$368.3
|
|
|
$132.3
|
|
|
$15.7
|
|
|
|
$899.6
|
|
Less: Surcharges
|
38.0
|
|
26.9
|
|
2.7
|
|
—
|
|
|
67.6
|
|
|
56.3
|
|
65.2
|
|
23.0
|
|
—
|
|
|
144.5
|
|
Base Sales
|
|
$327.8
|
|
|
$219.3
|
|
|
$25.0
|
|
|
$15.1
|
|
|
|
$587.2
|
|
|
|
$327.0
|
|
|
$303.1
|
|
|
$109.3
|
|
|
$15.7
|
|
|
|
$755.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales / Ton
|
|
$1,152
|
|
|
$1,136
|
|
|
$1,428
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$1,183
|
|
|
|
$1,235
|
|
|
$1,362
|
|
|
$1,635
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$1,359
|
|
Base Sales / Ton
|
|
$1,033
|
|
|
$1,012
|
|
|
$1,289
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$1,061
|
|
|
|
$1,053
|
|
|
$1,121
|
|
|
$1,351
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
$1,141
|
|
Balance Sheet
The following discussion is a comparison of the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
September 30, 2016
(Unaudited) and
December 31, 2015
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
September 30,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$23.3
|
|
|
|
$42.4
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
103.8
|
|
|
80.9
|
|
Inventories, net
|
155.4
|
|
|
173.9
|
|
Deferred charges and prepaid expenses
|
3.8
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
Other current assets
|
6.7
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
$293.0
|
|
|
|
$317.8
|
|
Refer to the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a discussion of the change in cash and cash equivalents. Accounts receivable, net
increased
$22.9 million
or 28% due to a 20% increase in September shipments over December and 17% increase in net sales per ton, primarily from increase in surcharge revenue from higher No. 1 Busheling index. Inventories, net
decreased
$18.5 million
due to 20% higher shipments in September than December. Inventories also decreased primarily due to continued efforts to reduce inventory to align with anticipated sales volumes. Deferred charges and prepaid expenses
decreased
$7.6 million
due primarily to the receipt of tax refunds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
|
September 30,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$743.5
|
|
|
|
$769.3
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
decreased
$25.8 million
. The decrease was primarily due to depreciation expense of approximately
$51.0 million
, partially offset by capital expenditures of $26.1 million, during the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets
|
September 30,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
Pension assets
|
|
$11.0
|
|
|
|
$20.0
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
25.7
|
|
|
30.6
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
4.9
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Total Other Assets
|
|
$41.6
|
|
|
|
$54.7
|
|
Pension assets
decreased
$
9.0 million
. This decrease was primarily driven by the remeasurement of pension obligations and plan assets for the TimkenSteel Corporation Retirement Plan (see Note 9), partially offset by the expected return on plan assets exceeding service and interest costs as well as contributions to a foreign pension plan. Intangible assets, net
decreased
$4.9 million
primarily due to amortization in the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
|
September 30,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$115.9
|
|
|
|
$104.2
|
|
Convertible notes, net
|
65.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other long-term debt
|
70.2
|
|
|
200.2
|
|
Accrued pension and postretirement costs - long-term
|
143.8
|
|
|
114.1
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
10.1
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
12.7
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
659.8
|
|
|
686.4
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
|
|
$1,078.1
|
|
|
|
$1,141.8
|
|
Current liabilities
increased
$11.7 million. This increase was primarily due to an increase in accounts payable of approximately
$24 million
from extended payment terms, offset by lower capital spending, lower benefit accruals, and lower restructuring accruals.
See Note 6, “Financing Arrangements,” in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the change in the Convertible Notes.
Other long-term debt
decreased
due to repayments of $130.0 million on the Amended Credit Agreement primarily from net operating cash flows and proceeds from the issuance of Convertible Notes.
Accrued pension and postretirement costs - long-term
increased
as a result of the remeasurement of pension obligations and plan assets for the TimkenSteel Corporation Retirement Plan, VEBA reimbursement of certain retiree expenses incurred by the Company, and recognition of year-to-date pension and post retirement expense, partially offset by postretirement and pension payments. See Note 9, “Retirement and Postretirement Plans” in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
The decrease in non-current deferred income taxes related primarily to the non-current deferred tax assets generated by net operating losses, partially offset by the recognition of the non-current deferred tax liability for pension and postretirement expense.
Refer to Note
8
“
Changes in Shareholders' Equity
,” in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for details of the
decrease
in Shareholders’ Equity.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Convertible Notes
In May 2016, we issued $75 million aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes, plus an additional $11.3 million principal amount to cover over-allotments. The Convertible Notes bear cash interest at a rate of 6.0% per year, payable semiannually on June 1 and December 1, beginning on December 1, 2016. The Convertible Notes will mature on June 1, 2021, unless earlier repurchased or converted. The net proceeds received from the offering were $83.7 million, after deducting the initial underwriters’ discount and fees and the offering expenses payable. We used the net proceeds to repay a portion of the amounts outstanding under our Amended Credit Agreement.
Credit Agreement
During the third quarter of 2015, we projected that at December 31, 2015, we would not be in compliance with the interest coverage ratio covenant contained in our then-existing revolving credit facility, due to a steeper-than-expected drop in industrial demand driven by depressed commodity prices. Accordingly, on December 21, 2015, we amended and restated our existing revolving credit facility, effectively converting it from a cash flow-based facility to an asset-based facility in order to eliminate various financial covenants that are customary in cash flow-based facilities, including the interest coverage ratio covenant. As amended in December 2015, the revolving credit facility required us to maintain (i) certain minimum availability under the revolving credit facility, including a requirement to have availability of not less than $100 million for at least one day prior to July 1, 2016, and (ii) a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of no less than 1.0 to 1.0 for the twelve-month periods ending July 31, 2017, August 31, 2017 and September 30, 2017, and thereafter on a springing basis if minimum availability requirements were not maintained.
On February 26, 2016, we entered into Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 21, 2015 (as amended by the Amendment, the “Amended Credit Agreement) in order to provide more flexibility with respect to the amount and form of financing we could obtain to enhance our liquidity. The Amendment made several changes to the then-current revolving credit facility including, among other things: eliminating the one-time $100 million liquidity requirement; revising the timing of the applicability of, and eliminating the springing component related to, the fixed charge coverage ratio; permitting certain sale and leaseback transactions; and expanding the types of additional indebtedness that we are permitted to incur.
Pursuant to the Amendment, we also reduced the size of the revolving credit facility from $300 million to $265 million given that, in the near-term, it was unlikely that we would have a borrowing base sufficient to support such availability. The Amended Credit Agreement also includes a block on availability equal to the greater of $28.9 million or 12.5% of the aggregate commitments (except that in the event of a mandatory reduction in the commitments, the block on availability will be equal to the greater of $20.0 million or 12.5% of the aggregate commitments), effectively reducing our borrowing base by the availability block. Refer to Note 6, “Financing Arrangements,” in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and the Covenant Compliance section within Management’s Discussion and Analysis for details on the Amended Credit Agreement covenants.
The Amended Credit Agreement has a term of five years through June 30, 2019. The following represents a summary of key liquidity measures as of September 30, 2016, June 30, 2016, and March 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2016
|
June 30, 2016
|
March 31, 2016
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$23.3
|
|
|
$37.2
|
|
|
$37.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amended Credit Agreement:
|
|
|
|
Maximum availability
|
|
$204.1
|
|
|
$203.7
|
|
|
$205.9
|
|
Amount borrowed
|
40.0
|
|
50.0
|
|
155.0
|
|
Letter of credit obligations
|
1.6
|
|
1.6
|
|
0.7
|
|
Availability not borrowed
|
162.5
|
|
152.1
|
|
50.2
|
|
Availability block
|
33.1
|
|
33.1
|
|
33.1
|
|
Net availability
|
|
$129.4
|
|
|
$119.0
|
|
|
$17.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liquidity
|
|
$152.7
|
|
|
$156.2
|
|
|
$54.6
|
|
Our principal sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operations and available borrowing capacity under our Amended Credit Agreement. We currently expect that our cash and cash equivalents on hand and expected cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet liquidity needs; however, these plans rely on certain underlying assumptions and estimates that may differ from actual results. Such assumptions include improvements in operating results and cash flows driven by the restructuring and cost reduction activities taken during 2015 that streamlined our organizational structure, lowered operating costs and increased liquidity. As we continue through these challenging market conditions, prudent capital allocation tactics have also been deployed. In the fourth quarter of 2015, the Board of Directors suspended the Company’s cash dividend. Additionally, we have reduced the cash being spent on capital expenditures by 40% over 2015 levels to $45 million, in accordance
with the restrictions in our Amended Credit Agreement, including the deferral of certain elements of the previously announced advanced quench-and-temper facility.
As of
September 30, 2016
, taking into account the foregoing, as well as our view of industrial, energy, and automotive market demands for our products, our 2016 operating plan and our long-range plan, we believe that our cash balance as of
September 30, 2016
of
$23.3 million
, projected cash generated from operations, and borrowings available under the Amended Credit Agreement will be sufficient to satisfy our working capital needs, capital expenditures and other liquidity requirements associated with our operations, including servicing our debt obligations, for at least the next twelve months and through June 30, 2019, the maturity date of our Amended Credit Agreement.
To the extent our liquidity needs prove to be greater than expected or cash generated from operations are less than anticipated, and cash on hand or credit availability is insufficient, we would seek additional financing to provide additional liquidity. We regularly evaluate our potential access to the equity and debt capital markets as sources of liquidity and we believe that additional financing would likely be available if necessary, although we can make no assurance as to the form or terms of any such financing. We would also consider additional cost reductions and further reductions of capital expenditures. Regardless, we will continue to evaluate additional financing or may seek to refinance outstanding borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement to provide us with additional flexibility and liquidity. Any additional financing beyond that incurred to refinance existing debt would increase our overall debt and could increase interest expense. For additional discussion regarding risk factors related to our business and our debt, see “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
For more details on the Amended Credit Agreement and the Convertible Notes, please refer to Note 6 - “Financing Arrangements” in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
Cash Flows
The following table reflects the major categories of cash flows for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
. For additional details, please see the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows contained elsewhere in this quarterly report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$55.5
|
|
|
|
$63.8
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
(26.1
|
)
|
|
(52.5
|
)
|
Net cash used by financing activities
|
(48.5
|
)
|
|
(15.0
|
)
|
Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
($19.1
|
)
|
|
|
($3.7
|
)
|
Operating activities
Net cash provided by operating activities for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
was
$55.5 million
and
$63.8 million
, respectively. The
$8.3 million
decrease
was primarily due to the effect of managing working capital to current volume levels of $48.1 million, primarily offset by lower pension and postretirement of $22.4 million, $7.5 million decrease in net loss, and $5.4 million of non-cash pension settlement expense. Refer to the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for additional information.
Investing activities
Net cash used by investing activities for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
was
$26.1 million
and
$52.5 million
, respectively. Cash used for investing activities primarily relates to capital investments in our production processes. Capital spending decreased $
26.8 million
due to lower spending compared to the
nine months ended
September 30, 2015
.
Our business sometimes requires capital investments to maintain our plants and equipment to remain competitive and ensure we can implement strategic initiatives. Our
$63 million
construction in progress balance as of
September 30, 2016
includes: (a) $45 million relating to growth initiatives (i.e., new product offerings, additional capacity and new capabilities) and continuous improvement projects; and (b) $18 million relating primarily to routine capital costs to maintain the reliability, integrity and safety of our manufacturing equipment and facilities. We expect to incur approximately $34 million of additional costs including approximately $13 million relating to additional growth initiatives and continuous improvement and approximately $21 million
of additional costs to complete other remaining projects. These additional costs are expected to be incurred during the next one to three years.
Financing activities
Net cash used by financing activities for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
was
$48.5 million
compared to
$15.0 million
for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2015
. The change was mainly due to a $
130 million
repayment on the Amended Credit Agreement, partially offset by the proceeds of
$86.3 million
from the issuance of the Convertible Notes.
Covenant Compliance
Under the Amended Credit Agreement, we are required to comply with certain customary covenants, including covenants that limit our ability to, among other things, (i) incur or suffer to exist certain liens, (ii) make investments, (iii) incur or guaranty additional indebtedness (iv) enter into consolidations, mergers, acquisitions and sales of assets, (v) make distributions and other restricted payments, (vi) change the nature of our business, (vii) engage in transactions with affiliates and (viii) enter into restrictive agreements, including agreements that restrict the ability to incur liens or make distributions. Further, the Amended Credit Agreement contains financial covenants that (i) limit the amount of capital expenditures we may make to $45 million in fiscal year 2016 and $50 million in fiscal years thereafter and (ii) require the Company to maintain a minimum specified fixed charge coverage ratio for the year-to-date periods beginning January 1, 2017 and ending June 30, 2017, July 31, 2017 and August 31, 2017. The fixed charge coverage ratio is the ratio of EBITDA to fixed charges. Fixed charges include, among other things, cash interest, scheduled principal payments, cash taxes, dividends, capital expenditures, and capital lease obligation payments. As of
September 30, 2016
, we anticipate that EBITDA will need to be approximately $10 million in the first half of 2017, without considering capital expenditures, in order to comply with the fixed charge coverage ratio covenant as of June 30, 2017, and we believe that our earnings will be sufficient to meet this covenant throughout the term of the Amended Credit Agreement.
We expect to remain in compliance with our debt covenants for at least the next twelve months. If at any time we expect that we will be unable to meet the covenants under the Amended Credit Agreement, we would seek to further amend the Amended Credit Agreement to be in compliance and avoid a default or pursue other alternatives, such as additional financing. If, contrary to our expectations, we were unable to amend the terms of our Amended Credit Agreement to remain in compliance or refinance the debt under the Amended Credit Agreement, we would experience an event of default and all outstanding debt under the revolving credit facility would be subject to acceleration and may become immediately due and payable.
For additional discussion regarding risk factors related to our business and our debt, see “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Dividends and Share Repurchases
On November 13, 2015, our Board of Directors decided to suspend the cash dividend as we continue to manage through a challenging market environment. Our Board of Directors will review the dividend as business conditions improve.
On August 6, 2014, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase plan pursuant to which we may repurchase up to three million of our outstanding common shares in the aggregate. This share repurchase plan expires on December 31, 2016. We may repurchase such shares from time to time in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions. We are not obligated to acquire any particular number of common shares and may commence, suspend or discontinue purchases at any time or from time to time without prior notice. We may make all or part of these purchases pursuant to accelerated share repurchases or Rule 10b5-1 plans.
From inception of this program through
September 30, 2016
, $45.1 million was used to repurchase 1,540,093 shares under the share repurchase plan. No shares were repurchased during the first nine months of 2016 as our Amended Credit Agreement places certain limitations on our ability to repurchase our outstanding common shares.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
Total
|
|
Less than
1 Year
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
More than
5 Years
|
Convertible notes and other long-term debt
|
|
$156.5
|
|
|
|
$—
|
|
|
|
$—
|
|
|
|
$126.3
|
|
|
|
$30.2
|
|
Interest payments
|
33.8
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Operating leases
|
9.7
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
Purchase commitments
|
48.1
|
|
|
39.4
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Retirement benefits
|
19.8
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
Total
|
|
$267.9
|
|
|
|
$56.8
|
|
|
|
$37.1
|
|
|
|
$138.5
|
|
|
|
$35.5
|
|
Other long-term debt includes the amended credit facility and certain revenue refunding bonds. Interest payments in the table above represents fixed interest payments on the convertible notes and estimated interest payments on variable rate debt computed using the assumption that the interest rate at September 30, 2016 was in effect for the remaining term of the variable rate debt. Actual interest could vary. See Item 3. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” for further discussion.
Purchase commitments are defined as agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding on us. Included in purchase commitments above are certain obligations related to capital commitments, service agreements and energy consumed in our production process. These purchase commitments do not represent our entire anticipated purchases in the future, but represent only those items for which we are presently contractually obligated. The majority of our products and services are purchased as needed, with no commitment. We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities or other persons.
Retirement benefits are paid from plan assets and our operating cash flow. The table above depicts the expected pension and postretirement benefit payments to be paid by us in 2016 and our expected benefit payments over the next years related to our non-qualified pension plan.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. We review our critical accounting policies throughout the year.
There have been no material changes to these policies during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
. For a summary of the critical accounting policies and estimates that we used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2015
.
New Accounting Guidance
See Note
2
to our Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements entitled “
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
” for a discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements.