Washington, D.C. 20549
EDAP TMS S.A. Files on
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file
annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F .........X........ Form 40-F.................
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted
by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): .......
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted
by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): .......
THIS REPORT ON FORM 6-K SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN THE REGISTRATION
STATEMENTS ON FORM F-3 (NOS. 333-195435 and 333-136811) OF EDAP TMS S.A. AND TO BE PART THEREOF FROM THE DATE ON WHICH THIS REPORT
IS FURNISHED, TO THE EXTENT NOT SUPERSEDED BY DOCUMENTS OR REPORTS SUBSEQUENTLY FILED OR FURNISHED.
The following discussion of our results of operations and liquidity
and capital resources for the six months ended June 30, 2016 is based on, and should be read in conjunction with, the unaudited
consolidated interim financial statements and the notes thereto included in this report on Form 6-K. The unaudited consolidated
interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and refer to the new topic-based FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (“ASC”).
The financial data included in this report has been prepared by,
and is the responsibility of, EDAP TMS’s management. PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit has not audited, reviewed, compiled or
performed any procedures with respect to the accompanying financial data. Accordingly, PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit does not express
an opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto.
The unaudited consolidated interim financial statements filed in
this report on Form 6-K supplements the unaudited financial information furnished on Form 6-K on August 25, 2016.
Our total revenues increased 20.4% from €14.1
million in the first half of 2015 to €16.9 million in the first half of 2016.
The UDS division’s net sales of medical
devices decreased 0.8% from €5.6 million in the first half of 2015 to €5.5 million in the first half of 2016 with 16
lithotripsy devices sold in the first half of 2016 compared to 18 lithotripsy devices sold in the first half of 2015.
Net sales of UDS-related consumables, spare
parts, supplies, leasing and services increased 4.0% from €4.5 million in the first half of 2015 to €4.7 million in the
first half of 2016.
The HIFU division’s net sales of medical
devices increased 114.8% to €3.7 million in the first half of 2016, as compared to €1.7 million in the first half of
2015. We sold six Ablatherm units and two Focal One units in the first half of 2016, as compared with three Focal One units in
the first half of 2015.
Net sales of HIFU-related consumables, spare
parts, supplies, leasing and services increased 33.2% % to €2.9 million in the first half of 2016 as compared to €2.2
million in the first half of 2015.
Cost of sales increased 12.6% from €8.1
million in the first half of 2015 to €9.2 million in the first half of 2016, and represented 54.2% of net sales in the first
half of 2016, down from 57.9% of net sales in the first half of 2015.
Operating expenses increased 9.1%, or €615
thousand, from €6.8 million in the first half of 2015 to €7.4 million in the first half of 2016, reflecting the sales
and marketing efforts on expanding our HIFU business in the U.S.
Research and Development expenses, excluding
expenses related to the FDA PMA trials, increased €501 thousand, or 41.8% and expenses related to the FDA PMA trials decreased
€312 thousand, or 100.0% following the FDA clearance for Ablatherm end of 2015.
As a result of the factors discussed above,
we recorded a consolidated operating income of €0.4 million in the first half of 2016 as compared to a consolidated operating
loss of €0.8 million in the first half of 2015.
We realized an operating profit in the UDS division
of €0.02 million in the first half of 2016, as compared to an operating profit of €0.3 million in the first half of 2015,
and an operating profit in the HIFU division of €1.1 million in the first half of 2016, as compared to an operating loss of
€0.1 million in the first half of 2015.
Financial (expense) income net was an income
of €2.9 million in the first half of 2016, which was mostly comprised of a €2.9 million expense generated by the fair
value adjustments of the outstanding warrants, compared with an expense of €1.3 million in the first half of 2015, reflecting
the €1.3 million expense due to the adjustment of the warrants to fair value.
In the first half of 2016, we recorded a net
foreign currency exchange gain of €0.7 million, compared to a gain of €0.3 million in the first half of 2015.
Income tax was an expense of €91 thousand
in the first half of 2016, compared to an expense of €69 thousand in the first half of 2015.
As a result of the above, we realized a consolidated
net income of €3.9 million in the first half of 2016 compared with a consolidated net loss of €2.0 million in the first
half of 2015.
Our cash position as of June 30, 2016 was €21.9
million (including €1.0 million of short-term treasury investments), compared to €11.9 million (including €1.0 million
of short-term treasury investments), as of June 30, 2015. We experienced positive cash flows of €7.4 million in the first
half of 2016 and negative cash flows of €0.3 million in the first half of 2015.
In 2016, net cash generated by operating activities
was €1.5 million compared with net cash used in operating activities of €0.8 million in the first half of 2015.
In the first half of 2016, net cash used in
operating activities reflected principally:
In the first half of 2015, net cash used in
operating activities reflected principally:
In the first half of 2016, net cash used in
investing activities was €0.9 million compared with net cash used of €0.3 million in investing activities in the first
half of 2015.
Net cash used in investing activities of €0.9
million in the first half of 2016 reflected mainly acquisitions of equipment of €0.2 million and investments of €0.7
million in capitalized assets produced by the Company, mostly for commercial demonstrations, training and RPP activity.
Net cash used in investing activities of €0.3
million in the first half of 2015 reflected mainly acquisitions of equipment of €0.2 million and investments of €0.1
million in capitalized assets produced by the Company.
In the first half of 2016, net cash provided
in financing activities was €7.4 million compared with net cash used by financing activities of €0.9 million in the first
half of 2015.
In the first half of 2016, net cash generated
in financing activities reflected principally the €9.2 million net proceeds from the April 2016 Placement and the €0.1
million net proceeds from exercise of warrants, repayment of capital lease obligations totaling €0.1 million and of long term
borrowings totaling €0.1 million, the reimbursement of €1.0 million of short term borrowing and the decrease of €0.7
million in bank overdrafts.
In the first half of 2015, these activities
reflected principally the €0.2 million net proceeds from the exercise of warrants, repayment of capital lease obligations
totaling €0.1 million and of long term borrowings totaling €0.1 million, and an increase of €0.9 million in bank
overdrafts.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED INTERIM UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(in thousands of euros unless otherwise noted, except per share
data)
1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
1-1 Nature of operations
EDAP TMS S.A. and its subsidiaries (‘‘the
Company’’) are engaged in the development, production, marketing, distribution and maintenance of a portfolio of minimally-invasive
medical devices for the treatment of urological diseases. Moreover, the Company develops a novel HIFU treatment for liver cancer
in cooperation with its long-term academic partner INSERM and leading cancer centers (the “HECAM” project). The Company
currently produces devices for treating stones of the urinary tract and localized prostate cancer. Net sales consist primarily
of direct sales to hospitals and clinics in France and Europe, export sales to third-party distributors and agents, and export
sales through subsidiaries based in Germany, Italy, the United States and Asia.
The Company purchases the majority of the components
used in its products from a number of suppliers but for some components, relies on a single source. Delay would be caused if the
supply of these components or other components was interrupted and these delays could be extended in certain situations where a
component substitution may require regulatory approval. Failure to obtain adequate supplies of these components in a timely manner
could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position and results of operation.
1-2 Management estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (‘‘U.S. GAAP’’) requires management to make estimates
and assumptions, such as business plans, stock price volatility, duration of standard warranty per market and cost of maintenance
contract used to determine the amount of revenue to differ. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
1-3 Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of EDAP TMS S.A. and all its domestic and foreign owned subsidiaries, which include EDAP TMS France SAS, EDAP
Technomed Inc. (USA), Edap Technomed Sdn Bhd (Malaysia), Edap Technomed Italia S.R.L, EDAP Technomed Co. Ltd. (Japan) and EDAP
TMS Gmbh (Germany). Edap Technomed Sdn Bhd was incorporated in early 1997. Edap Technomed Co. Ltd. was created in late 1996. EDAP
TMS Gmbh was created in July 2006. EDAP SA, a subsidiary incorporating HIFU activities merged all of its activity into EDAP TMS
France SAS in 2008. All intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.
1-4 Revenue recognition
Sales of goods:
For medical device sales with no significant
remaining vendor obligation, payments contingent upon customer financing, acceptance criteria that can be subjectively interpreted
by the customer, or tied to the use of the device, revenue is recognized when evidence of an arrangement exists, title to the device
passes (depending on terms, either upon shipment or delivery), and the customer has the intent and ability to pay in accordance
with contract payment terms that are fixed or determinable. For sales in which payment is contingent upon customer financing, acceptance
criteria can be subjectively interpreted by the customer, or payment depends on use of the device, revenue is recognized when the
contingency is resolved. The Company provides training and provides a minimum of one-year warranty upon installation. The Company
accrues for the estimated training and warranty costs at the time of sale. Revenues related to disposables are recognized when
goods are delivered.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED INTERIM UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(in thousands of euros unless otherwise noted, except per share
data)
Sales of RPPs and leases:
Revenues related to the sale of HIFU treatments
invoiced on a ‘‘Revenue-Per-Procedure’’ (‘‘RPP’’) basis are recognized when the
treatment procedure has been completed. Revenues from devices leased to customers under operating leases are recognized on a straight-line
basis.
Sales of spare parts and services:
Revenues related to spare parts are recognized
when goods are delivered. Maintenance contracts rarely exceed one year and are recognized on a straight line basis. Billings or
cash receipts in advance of services due under maintenance contracts are recorded as deferred revenue.
1-5 Shipping and handling costs
The Company recognizes revenue from the shipping
and handling of its products as a component of revenue. Shipping and handling costs are recorded as a component of cost of sales.
1-6 Cash equivalents and short term investments
Cash equivalents are cash investments which
are highly liquid and have initial maturities of 90 days or less.
Cash investments with a maturity higher than
90 days are considered as short-term investments.
1-7 Accounts Receivables
Accounts receivables are stated at cost net
of allowances for doubtful accounts. The Company makes judgments as to its ability to collect outstanding receivables and provides
allowances for the portion of receivables when collection becomes doubtful. Provision is made based upon a specific review of all
significant outstanding invoices. These estimates are based on our bad debt write-off experience, analysis of credit information,
specific identification of probable bad debt based on our collection efforts, aging of accounts receivables and other known factors.
Accounts receivables also include receivables factored for which the Company is supporting the collection risk.
1-8 Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of manufacturing
cost, which is principally comprised of components and labor costs, or market (net realizable value). Cost is determined on a first-in,
first-out basis for components and spare parts and by specific identification for finished goods (medical devices). The Company
establishes reserves for inventory estimated to be obsolete, unmarketable or slow moving, first based on a detailed comparison
between quantity in inventory and historical consumption and then based on case-by-case analysis of the difference between the
cost of inventory and the related estimated market value.
1-9 Property and equipment
Property and equipment is stated at historical
cost. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment are calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful life of the related assets, as follows:
|
Leasehold improvements
|
10 years or
lease term if shorter
|
|
Equipment
|
3-10
years
|
|
Furniture, fixtures, fittings and other
|
2-10 years
|
Equipment includes industrial equipment and research equipment that
has alternative future uses. Equipment also includes devices that are manufactured by the Company and leased to customers through
operating leases related to Revenue-Per-Procedure transactions and devices subject to sale and leaseback transactions. This equipment
is depreciated over a period of seven years.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED INTERIM UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(in thousands of euros unless otherwise noted, except per share
data)
1-10 Long-lived assets
The Company reviews the carrying value of its
long-lived assets, including fixed assets and intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of such assets may not be fully recoverable. Recoverability of long-lived assets is assessed by a comparison
of the carrying amount of the assets (or the Group of assets, including the asset in question, that represents the lowest level
of separately-identifiable cash flows) to the total estimated undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset or
group of assets. If the future net undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset or group of assets, the
asset or group of assets is considered impaired and an expense is recognized equal to the amount required to reduce the carrying
amount of the asset or group of assets to its then fair value. Fair value is determined by discounting the cash flows expected
to be generated by the assets, when the quoted market prices are not available for the long-lived assets. Estimated future cash
flows are based on assumptions and are subject to risk and uncertainty.
1-11 Goodwill and intangible assets
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price
over the fair value of identifiable net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is not amortized but instead tested annually for
impairment or more frequently when events or change in circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired by comparing the
carrying value to the fair value of the reporting units to which it is assigned. Under ASC 350, “Goodwill and other intangible
assets”, the impairment test is performed in two steps. The first step compares the fair value of the reporting unit with
its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, a second step
is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss. The second step allocates the fair value of the reporting unit to the Company’s
tangible and intangible assets and liabilities. This derives an implied fair value for the reporting unit’s goodwill. If
the carrying amount of the reporting units goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized
equal to that excess. For the purpose of any impairment test, the Company relies upon projections of future undiscounted cash flows
and takes into account assumptions regarding the evolution of the market and its ability to successfully develop and commercialize
its products.
Changes in market conditions could have a major
impact on the valuation of these assets and could result in additional impairment losses.
Intangible assets consist primarily of purchased
patents relating to lithotripters, purchased licenses, a purchased trade name and a purchased trademark. The basis for valuation
of these assets is their historical acquisition cost. Amortization of intangible assets is calculated by the straight-line method
over the shorter of the contractual or estimated useful life of the assets, as follows:
Patents
|
5 years
|
Licenses
|
5 years
|
Trade name and trademark
|
7 years
|
1-12
Treasury Stocks
Treasury stock purchases are accounted for at
cost. The sale of treasury stocks is accounted for using the first in first out method. Gains on the sale or retirement of treasury
stocks are accounted for as additional paid-in capital whereas losses on the sale or retirement of treasury stock are recorded
as additional paid-in capital to the extent that previous net gains from sale or retirement of treasury stocks are included therein;
otherwise the losses shall be recorded to accumulated benefit (deficit) account. Gains or losses from the sale or retirement of
treasury stock do not affect reported results of operations.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED INTERIM UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(in thousands of euros unless otherwise noted, except per share
data)
1-13 Warranty expenses
The Company provides customers with a warranty
for each product sold and accrues warranty expense at time of sale based upon historical claims experience. Standard warranty period
may vary from 1 year to 2 years depending on the market. Actual warranty costs incurred are charged against the accrual when paid
and are classified in cost of sales in the statement of income.
1-14 Income taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance
with ASC 740, ‘‘Accounting for Income Taxes’’ Under ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined
based on differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured by applying enacted
tax rates and laws to taxable years in which such differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is established if,
based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of the deferred tax assets, will
not be realized. In accordance with ASC740, no provision has been made for income or withholding taxes on undistributed earnings
of foreign subsidiaries, such undistributed earnings being permanently reinvested.
As of January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FIN48
(now ASC 740) "Accounting for uncertainty in income tax". Under ASC740, the measurement of a tax position that meets
the more-likely-that-not recognition threshold must take into consideration the amounts and probabilities of the outcomes that
could be realized upon ultimate settlement using the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date.
1-15 Research and development costs
Research and development costs are recorded
as an expense in the period in which they are incurred. The French government provides tax credits to companies for innovative
research and development. This tax credit is calculated based on a percentage of eligible research and development costs and it
can be refundable in cash and is not contingent on future taxable income. As such, the Company considers the research tax credits
as a grant, offsetting operating expenses.
1-16 Advertising costs
Advertising costs are recorded as an expense
in the period in which they are incurred.
1-17 Foreign currency translation and
transactions
Translation of the financial statements of
consolidated companies
The reporting currency of EDAP TMS S.A. for
all years presented is the euro (€). The functional currency of each subsidiary is its local currency. In accordance with
ASC 830, all accounts in the financial statements are translated into euro from the functional currency at exchange rate as follows:
|
•
|
assets and liabilities are translated at year-end exchange rates;
|
|
•
|
shareholders’ equity is translated at historical exchange rates (as of the date
of contribution);
|
|
•
|
statement of income items are translated at average exchange rates for the year; and
|
|
•
|
translation gains and losses are recorded in a separate component of shareholders’
equity.
|
Foreign currencies transactions
Transactions involving foreign currencies are
translated into the functional currency using the exchange rate prevailing at the time of the transactions. Receivables and payables
denominated in foreign currencies are translated at year-end exchange rates. The resulting unrealized exchange gains and losses
are carried to the statement of income.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED INTERIM UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(in thousands of euros unless otherwise noted, except per share
data)
1-18 Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing
income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted
earnings per share reflects potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised
or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company. The
dilutive effects of the Company’s common stock options and warrants is determined using the treasury stock method to measure
the number of shares that are assumed to have been repurchased using the average market price during the period, which is converted
from U.S. dollars at the average exchange rate for the period.
1-19 Derivative instruments
ASC 815 requires the Company to recognize all
of its derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position at fair value. The accounting
for changes in the fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and
qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and further, on the type of hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments
that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, the Company must classify the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure
being hedged, as fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation.
Gains and losses from derivative instruments
are recorded in the income statement.
1-
20 Employee
stock option plans
At June 30, 2016, the Company had four stock-based
employee compensation plans. The Company adopted ASC 718, “Share-Based Payment”, effective January 1, 2006. ASC 718
requires the recognition of fair value of stock compensation as an expense in the calculation of net income (loss).
The Company did not make any stock option grant
during the year ended December 31, 2015 but did grant 575,000 stock options to subscribe to new shares to certain employees of
the Company in April 2016.
The fair value of each stock option granted
during the year is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
|
06-30-2016
|
|
12-31-2015
(1)
|
Weighted-average expected life (years)
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Expected volatility rates
|
|
|
60.6
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
Weighted-average exercise price (€)
|
|
|
3.22
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year (€)
|
|
|
1.67
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
(1) The Company did not make any grants during the
years ended December 31, 2015.
1-21 Warrants
On March 28, 2012, pursuant to a securities
purchase agreement dated March 22, 2012, as amended, the Company issued new ordinary shares in the form of ADSs to selected institutional
investors in a registered direct placement (the “March 2012 Placement”) with warrants attached (the “March 2012
Investor Warrants”). The Company also issued warrants to the placement agent, Rodman & Renshaw LLC (the “March
2012 Placement Agent Warrants” and together with the March 2012 Investor Warrants, the “March 2012 Warrants”).
The Company has accounted for the March 2012 Warrants as a liability and reflected this analysis in the Company’s financial
statements filed for the year 2012.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED INTERIM UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(in thousands of euros unless otherwise noted,
except per share data
The Company used the Black-Scholes pricing
model to value the March 2012 Warrants at inception, with changes in fair value recorded as a financial expense or income.
On May 28, 2013, pursuant to a securities purchase
agreement dated May 20, 2013, as amended, the Company issued new ordinary shares in the form of ADSs to selected institutional
investors in a registered direct placement (the “May 2013 Placement”) with warrants attached (the “May 2013 Investor
Warrants”). The Company also issued warrants to the placement agent, H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC (the “May 2013
Placement Agent Warrants” and together with the May 2013 Investor Warrants, the “May 2013 Warrants”). As the
May 2013 Warrants comprised the same structure and provisions than the March 2012 Warrants, including an exercise price determined
in U.S. dollars while the functional currency of the Company is the Euro, the Company determined that the May 2013 Warrants should
be accounted for as a liability.
The Company used the Black-Scholes pricing
model to value the May 2013 Warrants at inception, with changes in fair value recorded as a financial expense or income.
On April 14, 2016, pursuant to a securities
purchase agreement dated April 7, 2016, as amended, the Company issued new ordinary shares in the form of ADSs to selected institutional
investors in a registered direct placement (the “April 2016 Placement”) with warrants attached (the “April 2016
Investor Warrants”). As the April 2016 Warrants comprised the same structure and provisions than the March 2012 and May 2013
Warrants, including an exercise price determined in U.S. dollars while the functional currency of the Company is the Euro, the
Company determined that the April 2016 Warrants should be accounted for as a liability.
The Company used the Black-Scholes pricing
model to value the April 2016 Warrants at inception, with changes in fair value recorded as a financial expense or income.
1-22 Leases and Sales and leaseback transactions
In accordance with ASC 840, Accounting for Leases,
the Company classifies all leases at the inception date as either a capital lease or an operating lease. A lease is a capital lease
if it meets any one of the following criteria; otherwise, it is an operating lease:
|
-
|
Ownership is transferred to the lessee by the end of the lease term;
|
|
-
|
The lease contains a bargain purchase option;
|
|
-
|
The lease term is at least 75% of the property's estimated remaining economic life;
|
|
-
|
The present value of the minimum lease payments at the beginning of the lease term is 90% or more of the fair value of the
leased property to the lessor at the inception date.
|
For sales type leases, the following two additional criteria are applied:
|
-
|
Collectability of the minimum lease payment is reasonably predictable;
|
|
-
|
No important uncertainties surround the amount of un-reimbursable costs yet to be incurred by the lessor under the lease.
|
The Company enters into sale and leaseback transactions
from time to time. In accordance with ASC 840, any profit or loss on the sale is deferred and amortized prospectively over the
term of the lease, in proportion to the leased asset if a capital lease, or in proportion to the related gross rental charged to
expense over the lease term, if an operating lease.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED INTERIM UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(in thousands of euros unless otherwise noted,
except per share data
2—CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS
Cash and cash equivalents and short terms investments are comprised
of the following:
|
|
06-30-2016
|
|
12-31-2015
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
20,940
|
|
|
|
13,578
|
|
Short term investments
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalent and short term investments
|
|
|
21,940
|
|
|
|
14,578
|
|
Short term investments are comprised of money
market funds. The aggregate fair value of the short term investments is consistent with their book value.
3—INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
06-30-2016
|
|
12-31-2015
|
Components, spare parts
|
|
|
4,345
|
|
|
|
4,085
|
|
Work-in-progress
|
|
|
1,706
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
2,653
|
|
|
|
2,118
|
|
Total gross inventories
|
|
|
8,704
|
|
|
|
6,879
|
|
Less: provision for slow-moving inventory
|
|
|
(773
|
)
|
|
|
(728
|
)
|
Total
|
|
|
7,932
|
|
|
|
6,151
|
|
4—SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
As of June 30, 2016, short-term borrowings consist
mainly of €1,096 thousand of account receivables factored and for which the Company is supporting the risk of non-collection.
As of June 30, 2015, short-term borrowings consist
mainly of €1,980 thousand of account receivables factored and for which the Company is supporting the risk of non-collection
and loans in euros amounting to €1,000 thousand with the following conditions:
‘000 Euros
|
|
Amount
|
|
Maturation
|
|
Interest rate
|
EDAP-TMS France SAS
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
November 19, 2015
|
|
|
Euribor + 0,7%
|
5—CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS
The Company leases certain of its equipment
under capital leases. At June 30, 2016, this equipment consists mainly of medical devices for an amount of €193 thousand and
vehicles for an amount of €244 thousand.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED INTERIM UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(in thousands of euros unless otherwise noted, except per share
data)
6— LONG TERM DEBT, AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS CARRIED AT FAIR VALUE
6-1 Long-term debt:
|
|
06-30-2016
|
|
12-31-2015
|
Japanese yen term loan
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
Germany term loan
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
Italy term loan
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
Malaysia term loan
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Total long term debt
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
Total long-term portion
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
As of June 30, 2016, long-term debt in Japan
consists of 2 loans in Yen with the following conditions:
|
|
Initial Amount
|
|
Maturation
|
|
Interest rate
|
EDAP Technomed Co. Ltd
|
|
|
55,000,000
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
%
|
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
%
|
As of December 31, 2015, long-term debt in Japan
consists of 2 loans in Yen with the following conditions:
|
|
Amount
|
|
Maturation
|
|
Interest rate
|
EDAP Technomed Co. Ltd
|
|
|
55,000,000
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
%
|
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
As of June 30, 2016, long-term debt in Germany
consists of a loan in euro of an initial amount of €450 thousand with an interest rate at 2.49% due to mature on November
30, 2020. This loan is pledged by an HIFU equipment with a purchase value of €450 thousand and receivables amounting €391
thousand.
As of December 31, 2015, long-term debt in Germany
consists of a loan in euro of an initial amount of €450 thousand with an interest rate at 2.49% due to mature on November
30, 2020. This loan is pledged by an HIFU equipment with a purchase value of €450 thousand and receivables amounting €391
thousand.
As of June 30, 2016, long-term debt in Italy
consists of a loan in euro of an initial amount of €242 thousand with an interest rate at Euribor 1 month + 4.5% due to mature
on June 6, 2019.
As of December 31, 2015, long-term debt in Italy
consists of a loan in euro of an initial amount of €242 thousand with an interest rate at Euribor 1 month + 4.5% due to mature
on June 6, 2019.
6-2 Financial instruments carried at fair
value:
|
|
06-30-2016
|
|
12-31-2015
|
Investor Warrants
|
|
|
4,608
|
|
|
|
4,205
|
|
Placement Agent Warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,608
|
|
|
|
4,377
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(835
|
)
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
Total long-term portion
|
|
|
3,774
|
|
|
|
4,205
|
|
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED INTERIM UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(in thousands of euros unless otherwise noted, except per share
data)
On March 28, 2012, pursuant to a securities
purchase agreement dated March 22, 2012, as amended, the Company issued 2,812,500 ordinary shares in the form of ADSs to selected
institutional investors in a registered direct placement (the “March 2012 Placement”), at a price of $2.00 per share,
with warrants attached (the “March 2012 Investor Warrants”). The March 2012 Investor Warrants allow investors to purchase
up to 1,406,250 shares in the form of ADSs at an exercise price of $2.75. The March 2012 Investor Warrants are exercisable immediately
and expire on March 28, 2017. The Company also issued warrants to purchase up to 168,750 shares in the form of ADSs to the placement
agent, Rodman & Renshaw LLC, with an exercise price of $2.50 (the “March 2012 Placement Agent Warrants” and together
with the Investor Warrants, the “March 2012 Warrants”). The March 2012 Placement Agent Warrants are exercisable from
September 24, 2012 and expire on October 21, 2016. Total gross proceeds for the placement amounted to $5.625 million (€ 4.214
million) out of which $2.429 million (€1.821 million) allocated to the Investor and Placement Agent Warrants based on their
fair value and accounted for as liability, and the remaining $3.196 million (€2.393 million) allocated to the share capital
increase.
The form of the securities purchase agreement
and the form of Investor Warrant were furnished to the SEC on our report on Form 6-K dated March 28, 2012.
The Company determined that the March 2012
Warrants to purchase up to 1,575,000 new ordinary shares of the Company (1,406,250 shares underlying the March 2012 Investor Warrants
and 168,750 shares underlying the March 2012 Placement Agent Warrants) should be accounted for as a liability.
On May 28, 2013, pursuant to a securities purchase
agreement dated May 20, 2013, as amended, the Company issued 3,000,000 ordinary shares in the form of ADSs to selected institutional
investors in a registered direct placement (the “May 2013 Placement”), at a price of $4.00 per share, with warrants
attached (the “May 2013 Investor Warrants”). The May 2013 Investor Warrants allow investors to purchase up to 1,500,000
shares in the form of ADSs at an exercise price of $4.25. The May 2013 Investor Warrants are exercisable from November 29, 2013
and expire on November 29, 2018. The Company also issued warrants to purchase up to 180,000 shares in the form of ADSs to the placement
agent, H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC, with an exercise price of $5.00 per share (the “May 2013 Placement Agent Warrants”
and together with the Investor Warrants, the “May 2013 Warrants”). The May 2013 Placement Agent Warrants are exercisable
from November 29, 2013 and expire on May 28, 2016. As the May 2013 Warrants comprised the same structure and provisions than the
March 2012 Warrants, including an exercise price determined in U.S. dollars while the functional currency of the Company is the
Euro, the Company determined that the May 2013 Warrants should be accounted for as a liability. Total gross proceeds for the placement
amounted to $12.0 million (€ 9.270 million), out of which $3.817 million (€2.950 million) allocated to the Investor and
Placement Agent Warrants based on their fair value and accounted for as liability, and the remaining $8.183 million (€6.320
million) allocated to the share capital increase. The form of the securities purchase agreement and the form of Investor Warrant
were furnished to the SEC on our report on Form 6-K dated May 28, 2013.
The Company used the Black-Scholes pricing
model to value the May 2013 Warrants at inception, with changes in fair value recorded as a financial expense or income.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED INTERIM UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(in thousands of euros unless otherwise noted, except per share
data)
On April 14, 2016, pursuant to a securities
purchase agreement dated April 7, 2016, the Company issued 3,283,284 ordinary shares in the form of ADSs to selected institutional
investors in a registered direct placement (the “April 2016 Placement”), at a price of $3.50 per share, with warrants
attached (the “April 2016 Investor Warrants”). The April 2016 Investor Warrants allow investors to purchase up to 3,283,284
shares in the form of ADSs at an exercise price of $4.50. The April 2016 Investor Warrants are exercisable from October 14, 2016
and expire on October 14, 2018. As the April 2016 Warrants comprised the same structure and provisions than the March 2012 and
May 2013 Warrants, including an exercise price determined in U.S. dollars while the functional currency of the Company is the Euro,
the Company determined that the April 2016 Warrants should be accounted for as a liability. Total gross proceeds for the placement
amounted to $11.5 million (€ 10.2 million), out of which $3.578 million (€3.168 million) allocated to the Investor Warrants
based on their fair value and accounted for as liability, and the remaining $7.913 million (€7.006 million) allocated to the
share capital increase. The form of the securities purchase agreement and the form of Investor Warrant were furnished to the SEC
on our report on Form 6-K dated April 14, 2016.
The Company used the Black-Scholes pricing
model to value the April 2016 Warrants at inception, with changes in fair value recorded as a financial expense or income.
Fair Value of the March 2012 Investor Warrants:
The valuation model of the Investor Warrants
uses a Black-Scholes model.
At inception date, the Black-Scholes valuation
model used the following main assumptions and parameters:
|
-
|
Share price at closing date: $1.95
|
|
-
|
Strike price of warrants: $2.75
|
|
-
|
Risk free interest rate at 5 years: 1.05%
|
|
-
|
Share price volatility: 120%
|
As of December 31, 2015, the Black-Scholes valuation model used the following main assumptions
and parameters:
|
-
|
Warrants’ maturity is assumed to be their legal duration as per Warrant contract
|
|
-
|
Share price at closing date: $4.13
|
|
-
|
Strike price of warrants: $2.75
|
|
-
|
Risk free interest rate at 5 years: 0%
|
|
-
|
Share price volatility: 70%
|
As of June 30, 2016, the Black-Scholes valuation model used the following
main assumptions and parameters:
|
-
|
Share price at closing date: $3.31
|
|
-
|
Strike price of warrants: $2.75
|
|
-
|
Risk free interest rate at 5 years: 0.00%
|
|
-
|
Share price volatility: 60%
|
On that basis, the unit fair value of the Investor
Warrants was $1.55 per warrant at inception date, $1.86 per warrant as of December 31, 2015, and $0.94 per warrant as of June 30,
2016. The total fair value for the issued Investor warrants was $2.173 million at inception date, $1.840 million as of December
31, 2015 and $0.927 million as of June 30, 2016.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED INTERIM UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(in thousands of euros unless otherwise noted, except per share
data)
Fair Value of the March 2012 Placement Agent Warrants:
The valuation model of the Placement Agent
Warrants uses a Black-Scholes model.
At inception date, the Black-Scholes valuation
model used the following main assumptions and parameters:
|
-
|
Share price at closing date: $1.95
|
|
-
|
Strike price of warrants: $2.5
|
|
-
|
Risk free interest rate at 4.5 years: 0.92%
|
|
-
|
Share price volatility: 120%
|
As of December 31, 2015, the Black-Scholes valuation model used the following main assumptions
and parameters:
|
-
|
Warrants’ maturity is assumed to be their legal duration as per Warrant contract
|
|
-
|
Share price at closing date: $4.13
|
|
-
|
Strike price of warrants: $2.5
|
|
-
|
Risk free interest rate at 4.5 years: 0%
|
|
-
|
Share price volatility: 70%
|
As of June 30, 2016, all the March 2012 Placement Agent Warrants
were exercised.
On that basis, the unit fair value of the Placement
Agent Warrants was $1.52 per warrant at inception date, and $1.87 per warrant as of December 31, 2015. The total fair value for
the issued Placement Agent warrants was $0.256 million at inception date, $0.107 million as of December 31, 2015, and $0.000 million
as of June 30, 2016.
Fair Value of the May 2013 Investor Warrants:
The valuation model of the Investor Warrants
uses a Black-Scholes model.
At inception date, the Black-Scholes valuation model used the following
main assumptions and parameters:
|
-
|
Share price at closing date: $3.96
|
|
-
|
Strike price of warrants: $4.25
|
|
-
|
Risk free interest rate at 5.5 years: 1.07%
|
|
-
|
Share price volatility: 71%
|
As of December 31, 2015, the Black-Scholes valuation model used the following main assumptions
and parameters:
|
-
|
Warrants’ maturity is assumed to be their legal duration as per Warrant contract
|
|
-
|
Share price at closing date: $4.13
|
|
-
|
Strike price of warrants: $4.25
|
|
-
|
Risk free interest rate at 5.5 years: 0%
|
|
-
|
Share price volatility: 70%
|
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED INTERIM UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(in thousands of euros unless otherwise noted, except per share
data)
As of June 30, 2016, the Black-Scholes valuation
model used the following main assumptions and parameters:
|
-
|
Warrants’ maturity is assumed to be their legal duration as per Warrant contract
|
|
-
|
Share price at closing date: $3.31
|
|
-
|
Strike price of warrants: $4.25
|
|
-
|
Risk free interest rate at 5.5 years: 0.00%
|
|
-
|
Share price volatility: 60.2%
|
On that basis, the unit fair value of the Investor
Warrants was $2.35 per warrant at inception date, $1.82 per warrant as of December 31, 2015 and $0.94 per warrant as of June 30,
2016. The total fair value for the issued Investor warrants was $3.525 million at inception date, $2.737 million as of December
31, 2015 and $1.404 million as of June 30, 2016.
Fair Value of the May 2013 Placement Agent Warrants:
The valuation model of the Placement Agent
Warrants uses a Black-Scholes model.
At inception date, the Black-Scholes valuation
model used the following main assumptions and parameters:
|
-
|
Share price at closing date: $3.96
|
|
-
|
Strike price of warrants: $5.00
|
|
-
|
Risk free interest rate at 3 years: 0.36%
|
|
-
|
Share price volatility: 72%
|
As of December 31, 2015, the Black-Scholes valuation model used the following main assumptions
and parameters:
|
-
|
Warrants’ maturity is assumed to be their legal duration as per Warrant contract
|
|
-
|
Share price at closing date: $4.13
|
|
-
|
Strike price of warrants: $5.00
|
|
-
|
Risk free interest rate at 3 years: 0%
|
|
-
|
Share price volatility: 70%
|
As of June 30, 2016, all the March 2013 Placement Agent Warrants
were exercised or forfeited.
On that basis, the unit fair value of the Placement
Agent Warrants was $1.62 per warrant at inception date and $0.44 per warrant as of December 31, 2015. The total fair value for
the issued Placement Agent warrants was $0.292 million at inception date, $0.080 million as of December 31, 2015 and $0.000 million
as of June 30, 2016.
Fair Value of the April 2016 Investor Warrants:
The valuation model of the Investor Warrants
uses a Black-Scholes model.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED INTERIM UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(in thousands of euros unless otherwise noted, except per share
data)
At inception date, the Black-Scholes valuation model used the following
main assumptions and parameters:
|
-
|
Share price at closing date: $3.64
|
|
-
|
Strike price of warrants: $4.50
|
|
-
|
Risk free interest rate at 2.5 years: 0.00%
|
|
-
|
Share price volatility: 60.20%
|
As of June 30, 2016, the Black-Scholes valuation
model used the following main assumptions and parameters:
|
-
|
Warrants’ maturity is assumed to be their legal duration as per Warrant contract
|
|
-
|
Share price at closing date: $3.31
|
|
-
|
Strike price of warrants: $4.50
|
|
-
|
Risk free interest rate at 2.5 years: 0.00%
|
|
-
|
Share price volatility: 60.20%
|
On that basis, the unit fair value of the Investor
Warrants was $1.09 per warrant at inception date and $0.85 per warrant as of June 30, 2016. The total fair value for the issued
Investor warrants was $3.579 million at inception date, $2.785 million as of June 30, 2016.
Long-term debt and financial instruments carried
at fair value at June 30, 2016 mature as follows:
2016
|
|
|
103
|
|
2017
|
|
|
1,056
|
|
2018
|
|
|
3,963
|
|
2019
|
|
|
117
|
|
2020
|
|
|
83
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,320
|
|
7—SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
7-1 Common stock
As of June 30, 2016, EDAP TMS S.A.’s common
stock consisted of 29,098,144 issued shares, fully paid, and with a par value of €0.13 each. 28,727,616 of the shares were
outstanding.
7-2 Pre-emptive subscription rights
Shareholders have preemptive rights to subscribe
on a
pro rata
basis for additional shares issued by the Company for cash. Shareholders may waive such preemptive subscription
rights at an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders under certain circumstances. Preemptive subscription rights, if not
previously waived, are transferable during the subscription period relating to a particular offer of shares.
7-3 Dividend rights
Dividends may be distributed from the statutory
retained earnings, subject to the requirements of French law and the Company’s by-laws. The Company has not distributed any
dividends since its inception.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED INTERIM UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(in thousands of euros unless otherwise noted, except per share
data)
7-4 Treasury stock
As of June 30, 2016, the 370,528 shares of treasury
stock consisted of (i) 190,238 shares acquired between August and December 1998 for €649 thousand, and (ii) 180,290 shares
acquired in June and July 2001 for €493 thousand. All 370,528 shares of treasury stock have been acquired to cover outstanding
stock options (see Note 7-5).
7-5 Stock-option plans
As of June 30, 2016, the 370,528 ordinary shares
held as treasury stock were dedicated to serve stock purchase option plans as follows: 127,100 shares which may be purchased at
a price of €2.38 per share pursuant to the exercise of options that were granted on June 25, 2010.
As of June 30 2016, the Company sponsored four
stock purchase and subscription option plans:
On May 22, 2007, the shareholders of the Company
authorized the Board of Directors to grant up to 600,000 options to subscribe to 600,000 new Shares. Conforming to this stock option
plan, the Board of Directors granted 504,088 options to subscribe to new Shares to certain employees of EDAP TMS on October 29,
2007, and 95,912 options to subscribe to new Shares to certain employees of EDAP TMS on June 25, 2010. Under this plan, a total
of 440,500 options to subscribe to new shares were still in force on June 30, 2015.
On June 24, 2010, the shareholders of the Company
authorized the Board of Directors to grant up to 229,100 options to purchase up to 229,100 Shares. Conforming to this stock option
plan, the Board of Directors granted 229,100 options to purchase Shares to certain employees of EDAP TMS on June 25, 2010. Under
this plan, 149,100 options were still in force on June 30, 2015.
On December 19, 2012, the shareholders authorized
the Board of Directors to grant up to 500,000 options to subscribe to 500,000 new shares at a fixed price to be set by the Board
of Directors. Conforming to this stock option plan, the Board of Directors granted 500,000 options to subscribe Shares to certain
employees of EDAP TMS on January 18, 2013. Under this plan, 400,000 options were still in force on June 30, 2015.
On February 18, 2016, the shareholders authorized
the Board of Directors to grant up to 1,000,000 options to subscribe to 1,000,000 new shares at a fixed price to be set by the
Board of Directors. Conforming to this stock option plan, the Board of Directors granted 575,000 options to subscribe Shares to
certain employees of EDAP TMS on April 26, 2016. Under this plan, 562,000 options were still in force on June 30, 2016.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED INTERIM UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(in thousands of euros unless otherwise noted, except per share
data)
As of June 30, 2016, a summary of stock option
activity to purchase or to subscribe to Shares under these plans is as follows:
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted average exercise price
(€)
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted average exercise price
(€)
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted average exercise price
(€)
|
Outstanding on January 1,
|
|
|
917,188
|
|
|
|
2.79
|
|
|
|
1,095,850
|
|
|
|
2.76
|
|
|
|
1,310,850
|
|
|
|
2.70
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
575,000
|
|
|
|
3.22
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,412
|
)
|
|
|
2.13
|
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
3.99
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(42,750
|
)
|
|
|
2.98
|
|
|
|
(106,250
|
)
|
|
|
2.88
|
|
|
|
(90,250
|
)
|
|
|
2.07
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(124,000
|
)
|
|
|
2.60
|
|
Outstanding at the end of the period
|
|
|
1,449,438
|
|
|
|
2.96
|
|
|
|
917,188
|
|
|
|
2.79
|
|
|
|
1,095,850
|
|
|
|
2.76
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the period
|
|
|
702,438
|
|
|
|
3.02
|
|
|
|
724,688
|
|
|
|
3.03
|
|
|
|
784,600
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
Shares purchase options available for grant
on at end of period
|
|
|
243,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about
options to purchase Shares already held by the Company as treasury Shares, or to subscribe to new Shares, at June 30, 2016:
|
|
Outstanding options
|
|
Fully vested options
(1)
|
Exercise price (€)
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted average remaining contractual life
|
|
Weighted average exercise price
(€)
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(2)
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted average exercise price
(€)
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(2)
|
3.99
|
|
|
347,838
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
3.99
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
347,838
|
|
|
|
3.99
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
2.38
|
|
|
127,100
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
|
|
|
76,427
|
|
|
|
127,100
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
|
|
|
76,427
|
|
3.22
|
|
|
562,000
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
3.22
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3.22
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
362,500
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
388,352
|
|
|
|
270,000
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
289,260
|
|
1.88
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
1.88
|
|
|
|
55,066
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
1.88
|
|
|
|
55,066
|
|
1.88 to 3.99
|
|
|
1,449,438
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
2.96
|
|
|
|
519,846
|
|
|
|
794,938
|
|
|
|
2.89
|
|
|
|
420,753
|
|
(1)
|
|
Fully vested options are all exercisable options
|
(2)
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based
on the Company’s closing stock price of $3.31 at June 30, 2016, which would have been received by the option holders had
all in-the-money option holders exercised their options as of that date.
|
The Company applies FAS 123R on Share Based
Payments and its related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED INTERIM UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(in thousands of euros unless otherwise noted, except per share
data)
8—FINANCIAL INCOME, NET
Interest (expense) income, net consists of the
following:
|
|
6 months
2016
|
|
6 months
2015
|
Interest income
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
Warrants exercised or forfeited
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Changes in fair value of the warrants
|
|
|
2,734
|
|
|
|
(1,385
|
)
|
Total
|
|
|
2,891
|
|
|
|
(1,344
|
)
|
9—SEGMENT INFORMATION
In July of fiscal year 2002, the Company announced
an organizational realignment that created two operating divisions within the Company. For reporting purposes, this organizational
realignment created three reporting segments: the holding company, EDAP TMS S.A. (‘EDAP TMS Corporate’), the High Intensity
Focused Ultrasound (‘HIFU’) Division and the Urological Devices and Services (‘UDS’) Division.Then, in
2007, the Company created a new reporting segment dedicated to the FDA approval for Ablatherm-HIFU activity. Segment operating
profit or loss are determined in accordance with the same policies as those described in the summary of significant accounting
policies except that interest income and expense, current and deferred income taxes, are not allocated to individual segments.
A reconciliation of segment operating profit or loss to consolidated net loss is as follows:
|
|
6 months
2016
|
|
6 months
2015
|
Segment operating loss
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
(839
|
)
|
Interest income, net
|
|
|
2,891
|
|
|
|
(1,344
|
)
|
Foreign Currency exchange (losses) gains, net
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Income tax (expense) credit net
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
Consolidated net loss net
|
|
|
3,859
|
|
|
|
(1,953
|
)
|
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED INTERIM UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(in thousands of euros unless otherwise noted, except per share
data)
A summary of the Company’s operations
by business unit is presented below for periods ending June 30, 2016 and 2015:
|
|
HIFU
Division
|
|
UDS
Division
|
|
EDAP
TMS
Corporate
|
|
FDA
|
|
Total
consolidated
|
6 months 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of Goods
(incl. consumables)
|
|
|
4,536
|
|
|
|
6,725
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,261
|
|
Sales of RPPs & Leases,
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,578
|
|
Sales of Spare Parts & Services
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,078
|
|
Total Net Sales
|
|
|
6,676
|
|
|
|
10,241
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16,917
|
|
Other Revenues
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
|
6,682
|
|
|
|
10,243
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16,925
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
4,081
|
|
|
|
3,672
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,753
|
|
Research & Development
|
|
|
(1,048
|
)
|
|
|
(653
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,701
|
)
|
SG&A + Depreciation
|
|
|
(1,979
|
)
|
|
|
(2,996
|
)
|
|
|
(689
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5,664
|
)
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(689
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
HIFU
Division
|
|
UDS
Division
|
|
EDAP
TMS
Corporate
|
|
FDA
|
|
Total
consolidated
|
6 months 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of Goods
(incl. consumables)
|
|
|
2,318
|
|
|
|
6,785
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,103
|
|
Sales of RPPs & Leases,
|
|
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,119
|
|
Sales of Spare Parts & Services
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,830
|
|
Total Net Sales
|
|
|
3,948
|
|
|
|
10,104
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
14,052
|
|
Other Revenues
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
|
3,950
|
|
|
|
10,104
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
14,054
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
2,158
|
|
|
|
3,753
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,911
|
|
Research & Development
|
|
|
(745
|
)
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(312
|
)
|
|
|
(1,512
|
)
|
SG&A + Depreciation
|
|
|
(1,504
|
)
|
|
|
(3,014
|
)
|
|
|
(721
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5,238
|
)
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
(721
|
)
|
|
|
(312
|
)
|
|
|
(839
|
)
|
10—SUBSEQUENT SIGNIFICANT EVENTS
N/A