Item 10.
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors of the Company
|
|
|
|
|
WILLIAM A. COLEY
Age: 72
Director Since: March 2004
|
|
Board Committees:
Compensation
Health, Safety, Security and
Environmental
|
|
Other Public Directorships:
None
Former Public Directorships:
British Energy Group plc
CT
Communications, Inc.
SouthTrust Bank
|
From March 2005 to July 2009, Mr. Coley served as Chief Executive Officer and Director of British
Energy Group plc, the United Kingdoms largest electricity producer. He was previously a non-executive director of British Energy. Mr. Coley served as President of Duke Power, the U.S.-based global energy company, from 1997 until his
retirement in February 2003. During his 37-year career at Duke Power, Mr. Coley held various officer-level positions in the engineering, operations and senior management areas, including Vice President, Operations (1984-1986), Vice President,
Central Division (1986-1988), Senior Vice President, Power Delivery (1988-1990), Senior Vice President, Customer Operations (1990-1991), Executive Vice President, Customer Group (1991-1994) and President, Associated Enterprises Group (1994-1997).
Mr. Coley was elected to the board of Duke Power in 1990 and was named President following Duke Powers acquisition of PanEnergy in 1997. Mr. Coley earned his B.S. in electrical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and
is a registered professional engineer. He is also a director of two private companies, E. R. Jahna Enterprises and Ontario Power Generation.
Mr. Coleys executive management and energy industry experience, together with his past service on other public company boards
of directors, make him a valued advisor and highly qualified to serve as a member of the Board and its Health, Safety, Security and Environmental and Compensation Committees.
|
|
|
|
|
WILLIAM E. JAMES
Age: 70
Director Since: July 2001
|
|
Board Committees:
Compensation
Nominating and
Corporate Governance
|
|
Other Public Directorships:
None
Former Public Directorships:
Ener1, Inc.
|
In July 2000, Mr. James co-founded RockPort Capital Partners LLC, a venture capital fund
specializing in energy and power, advanced materials, process and prevention technologies, transportation and green building technologies. From July 2000 to December 2013, he was Managing General Partner of the fund. In January 2014, he became a
General Partner of the fund. Prior to joining RockPort, Mr. James co-founded and served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens Power LLC, the nations first and a leading power marketer. He also co-founded the nonprofit
Citizens Energy Corporation and served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens Corporation, its for-profit holding company, from 1987 to 1996. Mr. James is also a director of a private company, MicroSeismic, Inc.
Mr. James executive management and energy industry experience, together with his past service on another public company board
of directors, make him a valued advisor and highly qualified to serve as a member of the Board and its Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees.
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROBERT B. KARN, III
Age: 74
Director Since: January 2003
|
|
Board Committees:
Audit
Nominating and Corporate
Governance
|
|
Other Public Directorships:
Natural Resource
Partners L.P.
Numerous NYSE-listed closed-end, open-end mutual and exchange-traded funds under the Guggenheim Financial
Family of Funds
(about 100 funds)
Investment Company Directorships: Kennedy Capital Management
Former Investment Company Directorships:
Fiduciary/Claymore
Dynamic Equity Fund
|
Mr. Karn is a financial consultant and former managing partner in financial and economic consulting
with Arthur Andersen LLP in St. Louis. Before retiring from Arthur Andersen in 1998, Mr. Karn served in a variety of accounting, audit and financial roles over a 33-year career, including Managing Partner in charge of Arthur
Andersens global coal mining practice from 1981 through 1998. He is a Certified Public Accountant and has served as a Panel Arbitrator with the American Arbitration Association.
Mr. Karns extensive experience in accounting, auditing and financial matters, together with his service on other boards of
directors, make him a valued advisor and highly qualified to serve as a member of the Board and its Audit and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees.
|
|
|
|
|
GLENN L. KELLOW
Age: 48
Director Since: January 2015
|
|
Board Committees:
Executive
|
|
Other Public Directorships:
None
|
Mr. Kellow was named our President and Chief Operating Officer in August 2013, our President, Chief
Executive Officer-elect and a director in January 2015 and our President and Chief Executive Officer in May 2015. Mr. Kellow has extensive experience in the global resource industry, where he has served in multiple executive, operational and
financial roles in coal and other commodities in the United States, Australia and South America. From 1985 to 2013, Mr. Kellow served in a number of roles with BHP Billiton, the worlds largest mining company, including senior appointments as
President, Aluminum and Nickel (2012-2013), President, Stainless Steel Materials (2010-2012), President and Chief Operating Officer, New Mexico Coal (2007-2010), and Chief Financial Officer, Base Metals (2003-2007). He is a director and executive
committee member of the World Coal Association and the U.S. National Mining Association, and the International Energy Agency Coal Industry Advisory Board. He is the former Chairman of Worsley Alumina in Australia, Chairman of Mozal in Mozambique,
and Chairman of the global Nickel Institute. In addition, he is a past member of the executive committee of the Western Australian Chamber of Minerals and Energy and the advisory board of the Energy and Mining Institute of the University of Western
Australia. Mr. Kellow is a graduate of the advanced management program at the University of Pennsylvanias Wharton School of Business and holds a masters degree in business administration and a bachelors degree in commerce from the
University of Newcastle. He holds an honorary Doctor of Science degree from the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology.
Mr. Kellows extensive experience in the global resource industry makes him highly qualified to serve as a member of our
Board, its Executive Committee, and our President and Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
HENRY E. LENTZ
Age: 71
Director Since: February 1998
|
|
Board Committees:
Executive
Health, Safety, Security and
Environmental
Nominating and Corporate
Governance (Chair)
|
|
Other Public Directorships:
CARBO Ceramics, Inc.
Macquarie Infrastructure Company
WPX Energy, Inc.
Former Public Directorships:
Rowan Companies, Inc.
|
Mr. Lentz served as a Managing Director of Lazard Frères & Co. LLC, an investment
banking firm, from June 2009 to May 2011. He was a Managing Director of Barclays Capital, an investment banking firm and successor to Lehman Brothers Inc., an investment banking firm, from September 2008 to June 2009. From January 2004 to September
2008 he was employed as an Advisory Director by Lehman Brothers. He joined Lehman Brothers in 1971 and became a Managing Director in 1976. He left the firm in 1988 to become Vice Chairman of Wasserstein Perella Group, Inc., an investment banking
firm. In 1993, he returned to Lehman Brothers as a Managing Director and served as head of the firms worldwide energy practice. In 1996, he joined Lehman Brothers Merchant Banking Group as a Principal and in January 2003 became a
consultant to the Merchant Banking Group.
Mr. Lentzs experience in investment banking and financial matters, together
with his experience in serving on other public company boards of directors, make him a valued advisor and highly qualified to serve as a member of the Board and its Executive and Health, Safety, Security and Environmental Committees and as Chair of
its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
|
|
|
|
|
ROBERT A. MALONE
Age: 64
Director Since: July 2009
|
|
Board Committees:
Executive (Chair)
Nominating and Corporate
Governance
Non-Executive Chairman
|
|
Other Public Directorships:
Halliburton Company
Teledyne Corporation
|
Mr. Malone was elected Executive Chairman, President and CEO of First Sonora Bancshares, Inc., a
financial services holding company, in October 2014. He was previously President and Chief Executive Officer of the First National Bank of Sonora, Texas, a position he held from October 2009 to October 2014. He is a retired Executive Vice
President of BP plc and the retired Chairman of the Board and President of BP America Inc., at the time the largest producer of oil and natural gas and the second largest gasoline retailer in the U.S. He served in that position from 2006 to 2009.
Mr. Malone previously served as Chief Executive Officer of BP Shipping Limited from 2002 to 2006, as Regional President Western United States, BP America Inc. from 2000 to 2002 and as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating
Officer, Alyeska Pipeline Service Company from 1996 to 2000. Mr. Malone previously served in senior positions with Kennecott Copper Corporation. He is also a director of four private companies, First Sonora Bancshares, Inc., the First National Bank
of Sonora, Texas, INTERA Incorporated and International City Mortgage, Inc.
Mr. Malones global executive operating
experience, including crisis management and safety performance, and mining, engineering and energy industry experience, together with his service on another public company board of directors, make him a valued advisor and highly qualified to serve
as the non-executive Chairman of the Board and on the Boards Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees and as Chair of its Executive Committee.
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
WILLIAM C. RUSNACK
Age: 71
Director Since: January 2002
|
|
Board Committees:
Audit
Compensation (Chair)
Executive
|
|
Other Public Directorships:
Sempra Energy Company
Flowserve Corporation
Former Public Directorships:
Solutia Inc.
|
Mr. Rusnack served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Premcor Inc., one of the largest
independent oil refiners in the U.S. prior to its acquisition by Valero Energy Corporation in 2005. He served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Premcor from 1998 to February 2002. Prior to joining Premcor, Mr. Rusnack was
President of ARCO Products Company, the refining and marketing division of Atlantic Richfield Company. During a 31-year career at ARCO, he was also President of ARCO Transportation Company and Vice President of Corporate Planning.
Mr. Rusnacks executive management and energy industry experience, together with his service on other public company boards of
directors, make him a valued advisor and highly qualified to serve as a member of the Board and its Executive and Audit Committees and as Chair of its Compensation Committee.
|
|
|
|
|
MICHAEL W. SUTHERLIN
Age: 69
Director Since: January 2014
|
|
Board Committees:
Compensation
Health, Safety, Security and
Environmental
|
|
Other Public Directorships:
Tesco Corporation
Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc.
Former Public Directorships:
Joy Global Inc.
|
Mr. Sutherlin served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Joy Global Inc., a mining
equipment and services provider from 2006 to 2013. From 2003 to 2006, he served as Executive Vice President of Joy Global Inc. and as President and Chief Operating Officer of its subsidiary, Joy Mining Machinery. Prior to joining Joy Global Inc.,
Mr. Sutherlin served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Varco International, Inc.
Mr. Sutherlins executive
operating experience and industry experience, together with his experience in serving on other public company boards of directors, make him a valued advisor and highly qualified to serve as a member of the Board and its Compensation and Health,
Safety, Security and Environmental Committees.
|
|
|
|
|
JOHN F. TURNER
Age: 74
Director Since: July 2005
|
|
Board Committees:
Executive
Health, Safety, Security and
Environmental (Chair)
Nominating and Corporate
Governance
|
|
Other Public Directorships:
None
Former Public Directorships:
American Electric Power
Company, Inc.
Ashland, Inc.
International Paper
Company
|
Mr. Turner served as Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of Oceans and International
Environmental and Scientific Affairs from November 2001 to July 2005. Mr. Turner was previously President and Chief Executive Officer of The Conservation Fund, a national nonprofit organization dedicated to public-private partnerships to
protect land and water resources. He was director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service from 1989 to 1993. Mr. Turner also served in the Wyoming state legislature for 19 years and is a past president of the Wyoming State Senate. He
serves on the National Council of The Conservation Fund. Mr. Turner also serves as Chairman of the Board of Advisors to the Haub School of Environment and Natural Resources, the University of Wyoming.
Mr. Turners extensive experience in international, environmental, regulatory and governmental affairs and public policy,
together with his past service on other public company boards of directors, make him a valued advisor and highly qualified to serve as a member of the Board and its Executive and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees and as Chair of its
Health, Safety, Security and Environmental Committee.
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
SANDRA A. VAN TREASE
Age: 55
Director Since: January 2003
|
|
Board Committees:
Audit (Chair)
Executive
Health, Safety, Security
and
Environmental
|
|
Other Public Directorships:
Enterprise Financial Services
Corporation
|
Ms. Van Trease is Group President, BJC HealthCare, a position she has held since September 2004. BJC
HealthCare is one of the nations largest nonprofit healthcare organizations, delivering services to residents in the greater St. Louis, southern Illinois and mid-Missouri regions. Prior to joining BJC HealthCare, Ms. Van Trease
served as President and Chief Executive Officer of UNICARE, an operating affiliate of WellPoint Health Networks Inc., from 2002 to September 2004. Ms. Van Trease also served as President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of
RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc. from 2000 to 2002 and as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer from 1997 to 2000. Prior to joining RightCHOICE in 1994, she was a Senior Audit Manager with Price Waterhouse LLP.
She is a Certified Public Accountant and Certified Management Accountant.
Ms. Van Treases executive management,
healthcare and accounting experience, together with her experience in serving on another public company board of directors, make her a valued advisor and highly qualified to serve as a member of the Board and its Executive and Health, Safety,
Security and Environmental Committees and as Chair of its Audit Committee.
|
|
|
|
|
HEATHER A. WILSON
Age: 55
Director Since: August 2013
|
|
Board Committees:
Audit
Nominating and Corporate
Governance
|
|
Other Public Directorships:
Raven Industries,
Inc.
|
Dr. Wilson has served as President of the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology since June
2013. During 2011 and 2012, Dr. Wilson was a candidate for election to the U.S. Senate. From 2009 to 2011, she served as President of the consulting firm of Heather Wilson & Company. From 1998 to 2009, Dr. Wilson served as a
member of the U.S. House of Representatives, where she served as a senior member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee and Chair of the House Intelligence Subcommittee on Technical and Tactical Intelligence. Prior to that time,
Dr. Wilson served as Cabinet Secretary for the State of New Mexico Children, Youth and Families Department, as founder and President of Keystone International, Inc., a company dedicated to international business development, and as Staff
Director of Defense Policy and Arms Control for the National Security Council. She is a former U.S. Air Force officer.
Dr. Wilsons experience in government, strategy and global affairs and intelligence make her a valued advisor and highly
qualified to serve as a member of the Board and its Audit and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees.
Executive Officers of the Company
Information concerning the executive officers of the Company is set forth in Part I, Item 1. Business under the caption
Executive Officers of the Company of the Original Form 10-K.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Our officers and directors and persons beneficially holding more than 10% of our Common Stock are required under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of our Common Stock with the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). We file these reports of ownership and changes in ownership on behalf of our officers
and directors.
To the best of our knowledge, based solely on our review of the copies of such reports furnished to us during the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, filings with the SEC and written representations from certain reporting persons that no additional reports were required, all required reports were timely filed for such fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
6
|
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics can be found on our website (
www.peabodyenergy.com
) by clicking on Investors
and then Corporate Governance. Information on our website is not considered part of the Original Form 10-K or this Amendment. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to all of our directors, officers and salaried employees.
Director Nomination Process and Proxy Access
As of the date of this Amendment, there have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees
to our Board as described in the Companys Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on March 24, 2015 (the 2015 Proxy Statement).
Effective December 10, 2015, the Company modified its Amended and Restated Bylaws to implement proxy access, a means for
shareholders to include shareholder-nominated director candidates in the Companys proxy materials for annual meetings of shareholders. The proxy access process will first be available to shareholders in connection with the Companys 2017
annual meeting of shareholders.
The Audit Committee
The Company has a standing Audit Committee consisting of Ms. Van Trease, Mr. Karn, Mr. Rusnack and Dr. Wilson. The Board of
Directors has affirmatively determined that, in its judgment, all members of the Audit Committee are independent under NYSE and SEC rules. The Board also has determined that each of Messrs. Rusnack and Karn and Ms. Van Trease is an
audit committee financial expert under SEC rules.
Item 11.
|
Executive Compensation.
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
On April 13, 2016, the Company and a majority of the Companys wholly owned domestic subsidiaries, as well as one international
subsidiary in Gibraltar, filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. Section 503(c) of the Bankruptcy Code places limitations
on payments made to insiders of a company for retention payments, severance payments or other payments outside of the ordinary course of business. In addition, payment of prepetition deferred compensation arrangements are limited by the
Bankruptcy Code. Accordingly, certain aspects of our NEOs compensation noted herein will likely be subject to limitations.
Modifications to Our Named
Executive Officer Compensation Program in 2015
For the year ended December 31, 2015, our named executive officers
(NEOs or Named Executive Officers) include the following individuals:
|
|
|
Current Officers
|
|
Title as of December 31, 2015
|
Glenn L. Kellow
(1)
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Amy B. Schwetz
(2)
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Charles F. Meintjes
|
|
President Australia
|
Andrew P. Slentz
(3)
|
|
Executive Vice President Human Resources and Administration
|
Kemal Williamson
|
|
President Americas
|
Former Officers
|
|
Former Title
|
Gregory H. Boyce
(1)
|
|
Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
Michael C. Crews
(2)
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
(1)
|
On January 22, 2015, Mr. Kellow was appointed President and CEO-elect, and he became CEO effective May 4, 2015. At that time, Mr. Boyce became Executive
Chairman. Mr. Boyce separated from the Company on December 31, 2015.
|
|
(2)
|
On July 1, 2015, Ms. Schwetz was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in conjunction with Mr. Crews voluntary resignation on the same
date. Mr. Crews remained with the Company until July 31, 2015.
|
|
(3)
|
Mr. Slentz voluntarily resigned from the Company on March 31, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
7
|
The Compensation Committee, together with the independent members of the Board with respect
to the compensation of our President and CEO (the independent directors of the Board comprising the Special Committee), have responsibility for oversight of our executive compensation framework and, working with external advisors and
senior management, aligning pay with performance and creating incentives that reward operational excellence, safety and financial prudence and ultimately are designed to create shareholder value. The following is a summary of the key NEO program
decisions and actions for 2015:
|
¡
|
|
Both Mr. Kellow and Mr. Boyce requested a voluntary 10% reduction in their annual base salaries in response to market
conditions and to align with our other cash conservation initiatives;
|
|
¡
|
|
Target compensation for Mr. Kellow was established at the 25
th
percentile of the market, as further described below;
|
|
¡
|
|
Using negative discretion, award payouts under the 2015 annual cash incentive plan were reduced to 50% of amounts earned
based on actual performance;
|
|
¡
|
|
For our 2015 long-term equity incentive program, we changed the mix of awards to 25% stock options, 25% time-based
restricted stock and 50% performance units to better align with competitive market practices, optimize share usage and balance the equity vehicles;
|
|
¡
|
|
We updated the industrial-based compensation comparator group (Compensation Peer Group) to reflect changes
in our company size and market capitalization; and
|
|
¡
|
|
For our 2015 annual cash incentive plan, we updated our safety metric to equally weigh a Global Safety Incidence Rate
metric (inclusive of contractors), and the implementation of our safety management system to continue integration with injury prevention.
|
2015 Named Executive Officer Compensation Program
For 2015, the principal components of NEO compensation were:
|
¡
|
|
Long-term incentives; and
|
|
¡
|
|
Retirement and other benefits provided on the same basis as those provided to other employees.
|
As determined by the Compensation Committee and the Special Committee (together, the Committees), the graph on the following
page illustrates the mix of target direct compensation for our NEOs at the time their 2015 long-term incentive awards were granted in January 2015. Further, our CEO Pay Mix and Other NEO Pay Mix reflect the average target direct compensation mix for
positions that were held by more than one individual during 2015 (as described in more detail in the footnotes to the graph). We believe presenting our compensation information in this manner provides an accurate representation of the Companys
2015 compensation practices. For purposes of the graph, target direct compensation includes base salary, annual cash incentive at target, and long-term incentive awards at target.
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
8
|
|
(1)
|
Peabodys CEO Pay Mix is based on the average of Messrs. Kellow and Boyces base salaries, annual cash
incentives at target and long-term incentives at target because both individuals held the position of CEO in 2015.
|
|
(2)
|
Peabodys Other NEO Pay Mix includes the average of Ms. Schwetz and Mr. Crews base salaries, annual cash
incentives at target and long-term incentives at target since both individuals held the position of CFO in 2015.
|
Our target total direct compensation program is relatively consistent with that of our Compensation Peer Group, as shown in the graph
above. In the graph, restricted stock is depicted as being time-based. However, we believe the value of our restricted stock awards at current prices are at risk and therefore aligned with shareholder interests, as the potential earned value
increases or decreases with stock price fluctuations. The Committees believe this overall mix of total direct compensation:
|
¡
|
|
Encourages alignment of NEO compensation with shareholders interests; and
|
|
¡
|
|
Guides NEO decision-making to deliver long-term value for the benefit of the enterprise.
|
2015 Annual Cash Incentive Awards
In 2015,
our NEOs earned annual cash incentive awards ranging from 100% to 111% of target, based on our performance against the Price-collar Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Total Costs, Sales Volumes, and Safety (each as defined on page 14) targets discussed on
page 14, as well as their performance against individual goals as discussed on page 15. By controlling the controllable, we believe our NEOs demonstrated the appropriate focus on, and performance with respect to, those metrics that most
significantly impact our annual results.
The aggregate performance against business metrics was approximately 100% of target.
However, management requested, and the Board approved, decreasing annual cash incentive payouts by 50% to reflect current market conditions. This reduction in the annual cash incentive resulted in cash payouts ranging from 50% to 62% of target,
further aligning our NEOs with shareholders. Ms. Schwetzs annual cash incentive payout was reduced to 62% which approximates 50% of her target cash payout calculated using her annual incentive target and her base salary as of the end of the
fiscal year.
2015 Long-Term Incentive Awards
With respect to our 2013 performance unit program results, our NEOs earned 27% of target units, consistent with our three-year total
shareholder return (TSR) versus the coal comparator peer group (Performance Unit Peer Group) and the S&P 500 Index, excluding financial services companies (the S&P 500 Index Group), during the 2013-2015
performance period, as described on pages 32-33.
However, due to the decline in our share price during the performance period, the
value of the shares awarded in payment of the earned units was less than 1% of the original grant date value, resulting in a 99% decline in long-term incentive compensation value for the NEOs.
As of December 31, 2015, all stock options and stock appreciation rights (SARs) held by our NEOs were
out-of-the-money
and therefore had no realizable value. On an aggregate basis, as of December 31, 2015, all
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
9
|
unvested restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance units held by our NEOs are worth approximately 4% of their grant date fair value. The following chart reflects the fair value of
our outstanding long-term incentive awards as of December 31, 2015 compared to their grant date fair values:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value a t December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officer
|
|
Outstanding
Options
(Exercisable
and
Unexercisable)
($)
|
|
|
Unvested
Restricted
Stock ($)
|
|
|
Unvested
Restricted
Stock Units
($)
|
|
|
Outstanding
Performance
Units ($)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
Options
(Exercisable
and
Unexercisable)
($)
|
|
|
Unvested
Restricted
Stock ($)
|
|
|
Unvested
Restricted
Stock Units
($)
|
|
|
Outstanding
Performance
Units ($)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
% Fair
Value
Decline
Since
Grant
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glenn L. Kellow
|
|
|
2,749,665
|
|
|
|
749,890
|
|
|
|
1,616,062
|
|
|
|
4,219,477
|
|
|
|
9,335,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
49,605
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,213
|
|
|
|
66,818
|
|
|
-99%
|
Amy B. Schwetz
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
554,546
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
554,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20,130
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20,130
|
|
|
-96%
|
Charles F. Meintjes
|
|
|
372,406
|
|
|
|
1,949,947
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,673,054
|
|
|
|
4,995,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
68,491
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,085
|
|
|
|
77,576
|
|
|
-98%
|
Kemal Williamson
|
|
|
4,880,714
|
|
|
|
249,963
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,430,043
|
|
|
|
7,560,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16,535
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,258
|
|
|
|
24,793
|
|
|
-100%
|
Andrew P. Slentz
(1)
|
|
|
330,650
|
|
|
|
1,197,127
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
552,194
|
|
|
|
2,079,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
37,271
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,928
|
|
|
|
40,199
|
|
|
-98%
|
Gregory H. Boyce
|
|
|
23,937,050
|
|
|
|
1,103,531
|
|
|
|
2,999,624
|
|
|
|
10,098,527
|
|
|
|
38,138,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
72,998
|
|
|
|
117,865
|
|
|
|
33,265
|
|
|
|
224,128
|
|
|
-99%
|
Michael C. Crews
|
|
|
4,199,293
|
|
|
|
337,503
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,728,508
|
|
|
|
7,265,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
22,326
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,725
|
|
|
|
32,051
|
|
|
-100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
36,469,778
|
|
|
|
6,142,507
|
|
|
|
4,615,686
|
|
|
|
22,701,803
|
|
|
|
69,929,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
287,356
|
|
|
|
117,865
|
|
|
|
80,474
|
|
|
|
485,695
|
|
|
-99%
|
(1) Mr. Slentz voluntarily resigned from the Company effective March 31, 2016.
Taken as a whole, these results demonstrate that our NEOs are receiving approximately one-third of targeted total direct compensation,
defined on page 12, a direct alignment of executive pay with shareholder returns.
Named Executive Officer Compensation Program Changes for 2016
On April 13, 2016, the Company and a majority of the Companys wholly owned domestic subsidiaries, as well as one international
subsidiary in Gibraltar (the subsidiaries together with the Company, the Debtors), filed voluntary petitions for reorganization (collectively, the Bankruptcy Petitions) under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United
States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (the Court), for which joint administration has been approved under Case No. 16-42529. Each Debtor will continue to operate its business as a debtor in possession
under the jurisdiction of the Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and the orders of the Court. The Bankruptcy Code places restrictions on certain compensation paid to the Companys employees, including
NEOs. As a result, our 2016 NEO compensation program may be impacted by the Bankruptcy Petitions. Any description in this Amendment of our 2016 NEO compensation program may be subject to modification as a result of our Bankruptcy Petitions.
|
¡
|
|
For 2016, we continued to revise our NEO compensation program to reflect the ongoing market decline in the global coal
sector, provide focus on key line-of-sight metrics critical to the business and preserve shares in a depressed environment. These
changes are currently intended to be a short-term solution due to the distressed nature of the industry and coal
stocks.
|
|
¡
|
|
To limit share utilization and reduce the burn rate for the Peabody Energy Corporation 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan, we
made the following modifications:
|
|
¡
|
|
Rebalanced our award vehicles
by eliminating stock options and relative TSR performance units;
|
|
¡
|
|
Focused on share conservation
by awarding 50% of long-term incentive awards in the form of performance-based
restricted stock units (PRSUs) and 50% in the form of service-based cash awards (the Cash Awards):
|
|
¡
|
|
The maximum payout for the PRSUs is capped at 100% versus a 200% historic maximum;
|
|
¡
|
|
The performance metric for the PRSUs relates to compliance with the Companys secured credit agreement, which, as
disclosed in the Original Form 10-K we did not achieve;
|
|
¡
|
|
The PRSUs vest one-third per year and shares are delivered in settlement of earned awards after the end of the
three-year performance period, subject to achievement of the performance metric in each year; and
|
|
¡
|
|
The Cash Awards are intended to add a retentive element. Cash Awards vest in three substantially equal annual tranches
over three years and are paid annually after each of the three anniversaries of the grant date;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
10
|
|
¡
|
|
Modified the 2016 approach for granting PRSUs,
resulting in further share conservation and lower awards to NEOs:
|
|
¡
|
|
PRSUs awarded and the NEOs grant date fair value was reduced by approximately 50% as a result of the
difference between $7.75 per share, the closing stock price per share of Peabody common stock on January 4, 2016, and $15 per share, the assumed share price used to calculate the number of units awarded; and
|
|
¡
|
|
Added restrictive covenants and notice period requirements to award agreements
:
|
|
¡
|
|
Non-compete and non-solicitation provisions were added to all long-term incentive award agreements; and
|
|
¡
|
|
Notice period requirements were added to the award agreements and state that certain individuals provide at least ninety
days advance notice of voluntary termination.
|
|
¡
|
|
In line with our overall goal of focusing on line-of-sight metrics, the
2016 short-term cash incentive award
is
tied to measureable financial and safety goals over which the NEO has direct control:
|
|
¡
|
|
Metrics were simplified to include Price-collar Adjusted EBITDA weighted at 50%, Safety weighted at 25% and Individual
Objectives weighted at 25%;
|
|
¡
|
|
In order to motivate our employees in a distressed environment and promote their retention, our annual cash incentive
award will be paid in two installments, with the first installment based on mid-year results and paid after the first six months of the year and the second installment based on full-year results and paid after the end of the year;
|
|
¡
|
|
Given the coal pricing environment, we retained a coal pricing collar, but with a maximum range at plus or minus $100
million, which limits the upside and downside related to significant price changes; and
|
|
¡
|
|
We did not make any increases to target annual cash incentive award levels unless they were in connection with a
promotion.
|
|
¡
|
|
2016 Base Salary Adjustments
For 2016, Peabody provided a 1% increase to the salaries of all salaried
employees (including the NEOs salaries). In addition, in early March, the Committees approved a 5% increase in salary for Mr. Kellow and a 7% increase in salary for Ms. Schwetz to bring their base salaries closer to market median within
our Compensation Peer Group (as defined below) and in recognition of their individual performance.
|
|
¡
|
|
Employment Agreements
- All NEOs have transitioned out of employment agreements and are participants in the 2015
Amended and Restated Executive Severance Plan, with the exception of Mr. Kellow, who is expected to similarly transition in September 2016 when his current employment agreement expires. The terms of the 2015 Amended and Restated Executive
Severance Plan and Mr. Kellows employment agreement are summarized on pages 2324.
|
2015 Say-on-Pay Results
At the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, 58.9% of the votes cast on our advisory resolution to approve NEO compensation (Item
3) were in favor of our NEOs compensation. This vote is commonly known as Say-on-Pay. The Compensation Committee considered the result of this 2015 Say-on-Pay vote at its meetings following the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
and while it reflects majority support for our NEO compensation program, this result is less than desired. We performed the following actions to obtain shareholder feedback on our compensation practices:
|
¡
|
|
Contacted our 50 largest institutional shareholders as of April 2015. Ten shareholders (owning approximately 23% of
our outstanding stock measured as of April 2015) agreed to have at least one telephonic meeting with us. The valuable feedback indicated that:
|
|
¡
|
|
Shareholders wanted greater transparency around program structure and the linkage between pay and performance;
|
|
¡
|
|
Shareholders requested more information about the drivers behind compensation decisions, and requested expanded
explanation on selected incentive metrics;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
11
|
|
¡
|
|
Shareholders provided feedback regarding our CEO succession process and other aspects of our corporate governance,
specifically the separation of the Chairman and CEO roles; and
|
|
¡
|
|
Shareholders suggested that we review our Compensation Peer Group.
|
|
¡
|
|
As a result of these discussions, we have attempted, where possible, to address shareholder comments for each topic in
our compensation program design and throughout this Compensation Discussion and Analysis (or CD&A).
|
|
¡
|
|
We reviewed our Compensation Peer Group, and made changes as described below on page 21.
|
Performance Basis for Our 2015 Named Executive Officer Compensation Program
Decisions regarding executive compensation made by the Compensation Committee and the Special Committee during 2015 reflect our industry
context, operating environment and results. Our compensation philosophy and programs are based on the following core principles: competitive compensation opportunities and shareholder alignment through stock ownership and pay for performance.
In 2015, the Compensation Committee, in conjunction with our independent advisors, reviewed our executive compensation program to
determine whether it appropriately aligns pay and performance and links officer activities and performance with shareholder interests. The analysis indicated that our 2015 executive compensation program did align with our compensation philosophy and
performance and the program appropriately links pay and performance.
For 2015, the performance-based portion of NEO compensation
consisted of an annual cash incentive opportunity, performance units, stock options and restricted stock awarded under our 2011 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan. Annual cash incentive plan payouts were contingent on meeting certain goals for
Price-collar Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Total Costs, Sales Volume (tons), Safety (each as defined on page 14) and individual achievement. For 2015, our NEOs earned annual cash incentive payouts ranging from 100% to 111% of target; however, upon
managements request and Board approval, award payouts were reduced by 50% and resulted in cash payouts ranging from 50% to 62% of target, further aligning our NEOs compensation results with shareholders investment results. Ms.
Schwetzs annual cash incentive payout was reduced to 62% which approximates 50% of her target cash payout calculated using her annual incentive target and her base salary as of the end of the fiscal year.
With respect to our performance unit program, our NEOs earned 27% of target units, consistent with our three-year TSR relative to the
Performance Unit Peer Group and the S&P 500 Index Group during the 2013-2015 performance period.
However, due to the decline in
our share price during the performance period, the value of the earned units was less than 1% of the original grant date value, resulting in a 99% decline in long-term incentive compensation value for the NEOs. As of December 31, 2015, the
performance metrics underlying the performance units granted in 2014 were not on course to be achieved and the performance metrics underlying the performance units granted in 2015 were on course to be achieved at only 25% of target. On their grant
dates, the 2014 and 2015 performance units held by our NEOs had an aggregate fair value of approximately $15 million.
As of
December 31, 2015, all stock options and SARs held by our NEOs were out-of-the-money and therefore had no realizable value. On an aggregate basis, as of December 31, 2015, all unvested restricted stock, restricted stock units and
performance units held by our NEOs are worth approximately 4% of their grant date fair value. The chart on page 10 reflects the fair value of our outstanding long-term incentive awards as of December 31, 2015 compared to their grant date fair
values.
The following discussion provides detail regarding our executive compensation program and 2015 compensation arrangements
for each of our NEOs.
What We Pay and Why: Elements of Compensation
We have three elements of total direct compensation (TDC): base salary, annual cash incentive and long-term incentives. As
illustrated in the chart on page 9, in 2015, 68% of reported TDC for our President and CEO and former Chairman and CEO combined, and 55% of reported TDC for our other NEOs was performance-based and not guaranteed. In the chart, restricted stock
is depicted as being time-based; however, we believe the value of our restricted stock awards are at risk as the potential earned value increases or decreases with stock price fluctuations. This places the vast majority of the NEO total direct
compensation at-risk and in direct alignment with shareholders interests.
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
12
|
Base Salary
We pay base salaries to attract and retain talented executives and to provide a fixed base of cash compensation. The base salaries of our
President and CEO, and our former Executive Chairman, were recommended by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Special Committee after review of peer information conducted by the Compensation Committees independent compensation
consultant, F.W. Cook & Co., Inc. (F.W. Cook). 2015 base salaries for the other NEOs were individually recommended by our former Chairman and CEO, and were approved by the Compensation Committee. In each case, base salaries were set
after consideration of:
|
¡
|
|
Breadth, scope and complexity of the NEOs role;
|
|
¡
|
|
Comparability with the external and internal marketplace (roles of similar responsibilities, experience and
organizational impact);
|
|
¡
|
|
Current compensation levels; and
|
|
¡
|
|
Individual performance.
|
On January 22, 2015, the Board elected Mr. Kellow to the position of President and CEOelect, with an effective transition to CEO on
May 4, 2015. In connection with Mr. Kellows promotion to President and CEOelect, the Committees increased Mr. Kellows base salary from $800,000 to $950,000, effective February 1, 2015. In light of business conditions and to align
himself on a personal level with the Companys ongoing cost reduction strategies, Mr. Kellow requested a 10% base salary reduction ($950,000 to $855,000) for the period from May 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015. Mr. Boyce, our former
Chairman and CEO, also requested a 10% base salary reduction at that time ($1,062,830 to $956,547). Effective July 15, 2015, Ms. Schwetz base salary increased from $257,500 to $440,000 as a result of her promotion to Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer. Effective August 1, 2015, Mr. Slentz base salary increased from $410,000 to $450,000 in recognition of his increased scope of responsibilities as further discussed on page 15. No other changes were made to
2015 base salaries for our NEOs.
Annual Cash Incentive
Our annual cash incentive plan provides opportunities for our NEOs, to earn annual cash incentive payments tied to the successful
achievement of safety, operating and financial objectives that support our business strategy.
Under the annual cash incentive plan,
the NEOs are assigned threshold, target and maximum incentive opportunities. The target incentive opportunity is established through an analysis of compensation for comparable positions in companies of similar size and complexity and is intended to
provide a competitive level of compensation when performance objectives are achieved. Maximum incentive payments may be awarded when target performance objectives are significantly exceeded.
At threshold performance, the incentive that can be earned generally equals 50% of the target incentive and, at maximum performance, the
incentive that can be earned is up to 200% of the target incentive. No incentive is earned if actual performance does not meet the threshold level.
Each year, the Committees review and approve the goals and payouts for the NEOs.
2015 Annual Cash Incentive Performance Measures
Based on input from management and information and advice from F.W. Cook, the Committees established performance metrics and weightings
for determining the NEOs 2015 annual cash incentive payouts, with a focus on controlling the controllable given the price volatility inherent in our business. Consistent with that approach, in 2015 we utilized the same metrics as
in 2014 (Adjusted Total Costs and Total Sales Volumes), and implemented another equally-weighted safety metric, Safety, A Way of Life (SAWOL). Together with our Global Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR) metric (inclusive of
contractors), SAWOL is our management system to continue integration with CORESafety® and injury prevention. Definitions of our 2015 performance measures are summarized on the following page.
Given the price volatility endemic to the coal sector and the cyclical nature of the global coal markets, the annual cash incentive plan
has a price collar feature to eliminate potential windfalls and penalties arising from uncontrollable factors that can significantly impact Adjusted EBITDA. We believe this allows our NEOs to focus on operational performance and take the
necessary actions to benefit us and our shareholders on an annual basis and in the longer term. In years when coal prices decline significantly, the price collar has the effect of increasing
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
13
|
Adjusted EBITDA as used for the annual cash incentive compensation plan. Conversely, in years when coal prices rise significantly, the price collar has the effect of decreasing Adjusted EBITDA as
used for the annual cash incentive compensation plan. In 2015, Adjusted EBITDA performance was $435 million, while our Price-collar Adjusted EBITDA (as defined below) was $694 million, reflecting an adjustment of $259 million for price volatility,
including an aggregation of negative pricing impact in Australia and positive pricing within the Americas platform as compared to target. Adjusted EBITDA is a financial measure that is not recognized in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP). A definition of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to its most comparable measure under U.S. GAAP is included in Item 6 of the Original Form 10-K.
In the past, we have not included injuries and hours associated with contractors in calculating our global TRIFR. However, in
keeping with leading industry practices, we began doing so in 2015. As a result of a work-related fatality at one of our U.S. operations in 2015, there was no incentive payout associated with our global TRIFR metric even though this metric
indicated award achievement on a quantitative basis. We believe this impact to our 2015 annual cash incentive awards is appropriate and consistent with our core organizational values. The following table shows the performance metrics and our actual
results for 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metric
|
|
% of Total
Award
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Actual
Results
|
|
|
Achievement
|
Price-collar Adjusted EBITDA ($ millions)
|
|
|
30.0%
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
Below target
|
Adjusted Total Costs ($ millions)
|
|
|
15.0%
|
|
|
|
4,432
|
|
|
|
4,029
|
|
|
|
3,626
|
|
|
|
3,529
|
|
|
Above target
|
Total Sales Volumes (Tons)
|
|
|
15.0%
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
Below target
|
TRIFR
|
|
|
7.5%
|
|
|
|
1.43
|
|
|
|
1.22
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
None
|
SAWOL MS
|
|
|
7.5%
|
|
|
|
90%
|
|
|
|
95%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
97%
|
|
|
Above target
|
Individual Goals
|
|
|
25.0%
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
Ranged
from 100%
to 142%
|
|
|
Various
|
The following table provides a definition for each of the performance measures used in 2015 and
describes how we use these measures in managing the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
Price-collar Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
This metric is based on
Adjusted EBITDA (as defined below), after excluding 50% of the impact of realized pricing versus budget. This adjustment was $259 million in 2015.
Adjusted EBITDA is equal to income or loss from continuing operations before deducting net interest expense; income taxes; asset retirement obligation expenses;
depreciation, depletion and amortization; asset impairment and mine closure costs; charges for the settlement of claims and litigation related to previously divested operations and changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowance and amortization
of basis difference related to equity affiliates.
|
|
Management uses this metric
to measure our performance, the impact of cost savings programs and operational earnings across the global platform. The price collar addresses the impact of extraordinary price volatility, both positive and negative.
|
Adjusted Total Costs
|
|
This metric is based on aggregate total production costs for our
Americas and Australia mining operations and asset retirement expense, but excluding depreciation, depletion and amortization, expenses associated with currency, fuel and explosives hedging, sales-related costs and exploration expenses.
|
|
Reflects the efficiency and effectiveness of the operational
platform and is a benchmark metric to competitors and historical trends.
|
Total Sales Volumes
|
|
This metric is calculated using total sales volumes for our
Americas and Australia mining operations in short tons, excluding purchased coal and sales from the Middlemount Mine, in which we own a 50% equity interest.
|
|
The key metric related to revenue generation, market share and customer engagement
|
Global Total Recordable Injury Frequency
Rate (TRIFR)
|
|
Global TRIFR is the number of injuries that result in medical
treatment, restricted work or lost time, divided by the number of hours worked (includes employees, contractors and visitors), multiplied by 200,000 hours. The rate includes the injuries and hours associated with office workers, as well as
travel-related injuries when employees are travelling for work purposes.
|
|
Safety is a value that is integrated into our business. For
2015, our quantitative safety target was set at a 15% improvement over 2014s actual results
|
Safety, A Way of Life (SAWOL) Management System (MS) Conformance
|
|
SAWOL sets the
expectations relating to safety and health for the organization. SAWOL aligns with CORESafety
TM
(a National Mining Association framework) and is centered on three key areas of leadership and
organization, risk management and assurance. Embedded in this framework is a requirement to audit conformance.
|
|
Safety is a value that
is integrated into our business. For 2015, our qualitative safety target was set as no major non-conformances at year-end
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
14
|
Individual Performance
In determining the amount of each NEOs actual annual cash incentive award within the range determined by the payout formula, the
Committees considered quantitative and qualitative factors relating to the following individual accomplishments:
Mr.
Kellow:
Mr. Kellows strategic vision and leadership in the areas of portfolio optimization,
operational excellence, organizational efficiency, fiscal focus and health and safety were critical to the enterprise achievements in 2015. In his role as President and Chief Operating Officer, the CORESafety
TM
systems were implemented and yielded the lowest global safety incident rate in Peabodys 133-year history; he drove initiatives to strip out $620 million in costs across the platform, including
reducing selling, general, and administrative expenses (SG&A) to its lowest level in nearly a decade, with gross margins averaging 26% across four of the five business segments. In May 2015, Mr. Kellow assumed the President and CEO
role and re-organized the Executive Leadership Team to reduce its size, expand roles and responsibilities and drive further organizational efficiencies; he responded to market conditions with capital reductions, financial initiatives designed to
preserve liquidity; and, working with the Board and the EVP and CFO, he initiated discussions with debt holders on debt reduction strategies.
Ms. Schwetz:
Ms. Schwetz was promoted to the role of EVP and CFO in July 2015 from her role as Senior Vice President, Finance and
Administration, Australia. Ms. Schwetz has quickly and seamlessly transitioned into the role at a time of increasing market volatility, assuming control of the finance and accounting arenas, re-organizing her teams for maximum effectiveness and
immediately engaging with shareholders, banking institutions and debt holders. During 2015, Ms. Schwetz led efforts to manage numerous cash flow, balance sheet and deleveraging initiatives.
Mr. Meintjes:
In 2015, Mr. Meintjes led our Australian platform to its lowest safety incident rate in its operational history,
reduced costs by 24% to $51.07 per ton and improved Adjusted EBITDA to $175.4 million, all against the backdrop of $420 million in negative pricing impact. Additionally, Mr. Meintjes was successful in assigning excess port capacity to reduce
infrastructure costs by $60 million through 2020. Finally, Mr. Meintjes is the Peabody representative in the interdisciplinary forums in the Australian mining community as well as key customer engagements in the Asia marketing region.
Mr. Williamson:
As President of the Americas Business Unit, Mr. Williamson led the achievement of $937.2 million in Adjusted
EBITDA and a 5% operational cost improvements despite a 13.5 million ton volume reduction. Mr. Williamson and his teams were instrumental in the portfolio restructuring efforts, realizing cash proceeds of $70 million related to surplus land and
coal reserves sales.
Mr. Slentz:
In 2015, Mr. Slentz assumed additional responsibility for Information Technology; as a
result, Mr. Slentz had responsibility for Human Resources, Information Technology, Global Security, Aviation and Facilities Management. Mr. Slentz led the creation of Peabody Business Services to consolidate global administrative activity into one
organizational unit to achieve greater operational efficiencies and lower costs. Additionally, Mr. Slentz co-led the repositioning project to address SG&A costs, layers and spans of control resulting in the lowest SG&A levels in nearly a
decade.
Mr.
Boyce:
Mr. Boyce transitioned to Executive Chairman of the Board in May 2015 with the
appointment of Mr. Kellow as President and Chief Executive Officer. Under Mr. Boyces leadership of the Board, initiatives were pursued to retain and enhance the standing of Peabody in those markets and exchanges in which we operate,
notably the reverse stock split initiated in September 2015 to retain our listing on the NYSE and his continued advocacy efforts demonstrated through his representation of Peabody on the Coal Industry Advisory Board.
Mr. Crews:
Mr. Crews did not receive a 2015 cash incentive award as a result of his July 31, 2015 voluntary resignation from
the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
15
|
2015 Annual Cash Incentive Awards
For 2015, our NEOs earned annual cash incentive payouts ranging from 100% to 111% of target; however, upon managements request and
Board approval, award payouts were reduced by 50% resulting in cash payouts ranging from 50% to 62% of target, further aligning our NEOs compensation interests with shareholders investment interests. Ms. Schwetzs annual cash
incentive payout was reduced to 62% which approximates 50% of her target cash payout calculated using her annual incentive target and her base salary as of the end of the fiscal year.
The following table shows the 2015 annual cash incentive awards earned by each NEO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Target
Opportunity as a
% of Base Salary
|
|
2015 Cash Incentive Award
Opportunity Range as a % of
Base Salary
|
|
2015 Cash
Incentive
Award
Achieved ($)
|
|
|
2015 Cash
Incentive
Award Paid ($)
|
|
|
2015 Cash
Incentive
Award Earned
as a % of
Target
|
Glenn L. Kellow
(1)
|
|
100% / 110%
|
|
0 - 200% / 0 - 220%
|
|
|
1,039,460
|
|
|
|
519,730
|
|
|
50%
|
Amy B. Schwetz
(1)
|
|
50% / 80%
|
|
0 - 75% / 0 - 160%
|
|
|
298,216
|
|
|
|
174,108
|
|
|
62%
|
Charles F. Meintjes
|
|
80%
|
|
0 - 160%
|
|
|
487,276
|
|
|
|
243,638
|
|
|
55%
|
Kemal Williamson
|
|
80%
|
|
0 - 160%
|
|
|
410,978
|
|
|
|
205,489
|
|
|
51%
|
Andrew P. Slentz
|
|
80%
|
|
0 - 150%
|
|
|
380,500
|
|
|
|
190,250
|
|
|
53%
|
Gregory H. Boyce
(1)
|
|
120% / 100%
|
|
0 - 240% / 0 - 200%
|
|
|
1,200,804
|
|
|
|
600,402
|
|
|
51%
|
Michael C. Crews
(2)
|
|
80%
|
|
0 - 200%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The NEOs Target Opportunity as a percentage of Base Salary
and 2015 Cash Incentive Award Opportunity Range as a percentage of Base Salary reflects the percentages for each position held within 2015, as the 2015 Cash Incentive Award Achieved was based on both sets of metrics
|
|
(2)
|
Mr. Crews did not receive a 2015 cash incentive report as a result
of his July 31, 2015 voluntary resignation from the Company
|
Long-Term Equity Incentives
Our NEOs generally receive long-term equity incentive compensation through awards of stock options, time-vested restricted stock, and
performance units. In approving long-term equity incentive awards, the Committees consider the advice of F.W. Cook, as well as available benchmarking data. These awards are structured to provide competitive long-term equity incentive opportunities
where earned values are based on performance and aligned with shareholder value.
The Compensation Committee guidelines for
delivering long-term equity compensation for NEOs in 2015 were consistent with the prior year. The long-term incentive opportunities are based on ranges of potential value from zero to 1.75 times a NEOs target opportunity. In any given year,
the NEOs opportunity can be increased or decreased within the range. This provides more flexibility to align long-term compensation opportunities with changes in roles and assignments, to recognize extraordinary performance efforts or
shortfalls and to respond to competitive market conditions.
For 2015, the targeted value of these awards, shown in the table below
as a percentage of each NEOs base salary, is based on a mix of stock options, restricted stock and performance unit awards.
2015 Long-Term Equity Incentive Award Targets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Award Range as a % of Base Salary
|
|
|
2015
|
Name
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Actual
|
Glenn L. Kellow
(1)
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
375%
|
|
|
|
656%
|
|
|
375%
|
Amy B. Schwetz
(2)
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
75%
|
|
|
70%
|
Charles F. Meintjes
(3)
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
200%
|
|
|
|
350%
|
|
|
200%
|
Kemal Williamson
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
200%
|
|
|
|
350%
|
|
|
200%
|
Andrew P. Slentz
(4)
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
150%
|
|
|
|
263%
|
|
|
150%
|
Gregory H. Boyce
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
415%
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
415%
|
Michael C. Crews
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
225%
|
|
|
|
394%
|
|
|
225%
|
|
(1)
|
Mr. Kellows 2016 target increased as a result of his
promotion to President and CEO on January 22, 2015
|
|
(2)
|
Ms. Schwetzs 2016 target increased as a result of her
promotion to Executive Vice President and CFO on July 1, 2015
|
|
(3)
|
Mr. Meintjes received restricted stock awards in lieu of
stock options of commensurate value and comparable vesting terms, as this approach is more tax-efficient under current Australian tax laws.
|
|
(4)
|
Mr. Slentzs 2016 target increased as a result of additional
responsibilities assumed in 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
16
|
Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs)
Our stock options and SARs are designed to create a direct link between executive compensation and increased shareholder value, provide
an opportunity for increased equity ownership by the NEOs and maintain competitive levels of total compensation opportunity.
The
Committees meet in December of each year to evaluate, review and approve the annual award design and level of awards for the NEOs. The Committees approve awards prospectively. Annual awards are generally approved in early December for grants on the
first trading day in January at our closing market price per share on the grant date. The Committees may occasionally approve awards that are granted other than on the first trading day of the year, to recognize promotions or new hires. In these
cases, the award is approved in advance of the grant date, and the grant is awarded on the determined date with an exercise price equal to our closing market price per share on the grant date. We use a Black-Scholes valuation model to establish the
grant date fair value of all grants of stock options and SARs.
Stock options and SARs have intrinsic value only if the market price
of our common stock increases after the grant date. Stock options generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period. If a NEO, other than Mr. Boyce, terminates employment without Good Reason, as defined in the 2015 Amended and
Restated Executive Severance Plan, all unvested stock options and SARs are forfeited. Mr. Boyces vesting provisions are described in his transition agreement which is summarized on page 25. Stock options expire ten years from the grant date.
In 2015, 25% of NEOs long-term incentive award was in stock options, with the exception of Messrs. Boyce and Meintjes. Mr.
Boyce was awarded 21% of his long-term incentive target in stock options. In lieu of the full 25% award mix, Mr. Boyce received 4% of his long-term incentive award in the form of SARs. The SARs have similar terms and conditions and vesting
provisions as stock options, and, if exercised, are payable in cash due to limitations on the number of awards that could be issued under the plan to an individual in any calendar year. In lieu of stock options, Mr. Meintjes, was awarded 50% of
his long-term incentive award in restricted stock. This approach is more tax-efficient under Australian tax laws, and Mr. Meintjes has residency status in Australia.
At December 31, 2015, all outstanding stock options and SARs held by our NEOs were out of the money and therefore had
no realizable value. On their grant dates, the outstanding stock options and SARs held by our NEOs, granted over multiple years, had an aggregate fair value of approximately $37 million.
Performance Units
Similar to the stock options and SARs program, our performance units are designed to create a direct link between executive compensation
and increased shareholder value by rewarding NEOs for performance over a three-year performance period.
In 2015, 50% of our
NEOs long-term incentive target was awarded in performance units. Performance units granted to the NEOs are payable, if earned, in shares of our common stock, except for the awards made to Messrs. Kellow and Boyce. A portion of the
performance units granted to Mr. Kellow, and all performance units granted to Mr. Boyce will be payable, if earned, in cash due to limitations on the number of awards that could be issued under the plan to an individual in any calendar year.
The percentage of the performance units earned is based on (1) our TSR over a period beginning January 2, 2015 and ending December 31, 2017 (the Performance Period) relative to the Performance Unit Peer Group and the S&P
400 Midcap Index, excluding financial services companies (the S&P 400 Midcap Index Group), and (2) our Return on Mining Assets (ROMA) over the Performance Period. TSR relative to the Performance Unit Peer Group and
the S&P 400 Midcap Index Group are each weighted at 25% of the total award, and ROMA is weighted at the remaining 50% of the total award.
The
target number of performance units granted is determined using the average closing market price per share of our common stock during the four weeks of trading immediately following the grant date.
Units vest ratably each month and are payable in our common stock (or cash for Messrs. Kellow and Boyce) at the end of the Performance
Period, subject to the achievement of (1) performance goals and (2) proration or acceleration if a NEO terminates employment prior to the end of the Performance Period in instances of death, disability, retirement or in connection with a change in
control (each as defined in the relevant award agreement). If a NEO, other than Mr. Boyce, terminates employment without good reason, all performance units are forfeited. Mr. Boyces vesting provisions are described in his transition agreement
which is summarized on page 25.
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
17
|
TSR Component
Total Shareholder Return measures cumulative stock price appreciation plus dividends. TSR is utilized because the Committees
have determined that the metric further aligns executive interests with those of our shareholders. We measure TSR relative to the Performance Unit Peer Group because that group is subject to similar market conditions and investor reactions. For
purposes of the 2015 performance unit award, the Performance Unit Peer Group consisted of the following four companies and one exchange-traded fund (ETF):
|
|
|
Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.
|
|
Walter Energy, Inc.
|
Arch Coal, Inc.
|
|
Market Vectors Coal Index ETF
(1)
|
Cloud Peak Energy, Inc.
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Excludes Peabody and other companies in the Performance Unit Peer
Group.
|
The performance unit payout formula for the 2015 award (assuming a positive TSR for Peabody at the end of
the Performance Period) is as follows:
Three-Year Cumulative TSR (Positive Return) Performance Unit Peer Group & S&P 400
Midcap Index Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSR Percentile Ranking
|
|
|
< 35th
|
|
|
|
35th
|
|
|
|
42.5th
|
|
|
|
50th
|
|
|
|
62.5th
|
|
|
³
75th
|
Payout Percentage
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
40%
|
|
|
|
70%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
150%
|
|
|
200%
|
The performance unit payout formula for the 2015 award (assuming a negative TSR for Peabody at the end of
the Performance Period) is as follows:
Three-Year Cumulative TSR (Negative Return) Performance Unit Peer Group & S&P 400
Midcap Index Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSR Percentile Ranking
|
|
|
< 50th
|
|
|
³
50th
|
Payout Percentage
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
100%
|
The maximum payout under the TSR component of the performance unit awards cannot exceed 100% if
Peabodys TSR performance is at or above the 50
th
percentile, but is negative.
Payouts are ratably adjusted for performance between payout levels using straight-line interpolation.
Our TSR over the three-year Performance Period is based on the average closing market price per share of our common stock during the
first four weeks of trading in the Performance Period compared to the average closing market price per share of our common stock during the last four weeks of trading in the Performance Period.
Return on Mining Assets (ROMA) Component
ROMA is calculated as the average annual operating profit on our assets related to our worldwide mining operations, expressed as a
percentage of such assets employed (calculated as the average of the assets employed at the beginning and end of each year). In the calculation of ROMA, annual operating profit is defined as operating profit before deducting (1) selling and
administrative expenses; (2) operating losses (or profits) associated with the results from our 50% equity interest in the Middlemount Mine; and (3) asset impairment and mine closure costs.
The Compensation Committee, in consultation with F.W. Cook, selected ROMA over other performance measures as it believes this is the
best reflection of the return capabilities of active assets in the portfolio. As such, ROMA measures the efficiency of employed capital in our operational structures and guides management as to which assets are best deployed in different
pricing environments. The Compensation Committee believes that ROMA is one of the most appropriate metrics to use for a global mining coal company subject to significant price volatility. ROMA targets are set using the three-year forward budget
forecast and then establishing thresholds and maximums based on spreads at plus or minus 25%.
The performance unit payout formula
for the 2015 award with respect to the ROMA component is as follows:
Three-Year Cumulative ROMA (Positive Return)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROMA
|
|
|
< 4.7%
|
|
|
|
4.7%
|
|
|
|
6.2%
|
|
|
³
7.8%
|
Payout Percentage
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
200%
|
To the extent ROMA is between the listed percentages, the payout percentage is interpolated on a
straight-line basis. For example, if ROMA is 5.5%, the payout percentage would be 75%.
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
18
|
Restricted Stock
In 2015, 25% of the NEOs long-term incentive award was in time-based restricted stock. In lieu of stock option awards,
Mr. Meintjes, was awarded 50% of his long-term incentive target in restricted stock. This approach is more tax-efficient under Australian tax laws, and Mr. Meintjes has residency status in Australia. Generally, restricted stock vests at the end
of a three-year period. Mr. Boyces vesting provisions are described in his transition agreement which is summarized on page 25.
When appropriate, we may also grant time-based and/or performance-based restricted stock awards for various retention or special
recognition purposes. In addition, as noted above, based on tax requirements in the geographies in which we operate, we may grant restricted stock awards in lieu of stock option awards.
Restricted Stock Units
To date, we have granted restricted stock unit (RSU) awards to NEOs only in special situations, such as a new hire.
Restricted stock units may be performance-based or time-based, depending upon the circumstances.
Mr. Kellow received an award
of 7,386 performance-based RSUs (the Inducement Equity Award) when he joined us as President and Chief Operating Officer on September 16, 2013 (the Commencement Date). These RSUs will vest, if at all, on the fifth
anniversary of the Commencement Date as follows:
|
¡
|
|
50% of the RSUs will vest if our TSR equals or exceeds 20% for any 20 consecutive trading days between the Commencement
Date and September 16, 2017; and
|
|
¡
|
|
The remaining 50% of the RSUs will vest if our TSR equals or exceeds 40% for any 20 consecutive trading days between the
Commencement Date and September 16, 2018.
|
Vesting of these RSUs is also conditioned on Mr. Kellows
continued employment with us through September 16, 2018. If, however, his employment is terminated by us without cause or by him for good reason, or by reason of death or disability, the RSUs (or a prorated portion of the RSUs, if
Mr. Kellow resigns pursuant to a specified clause of the good reason definition in his employment agreement) will continue to vest in accordance with their terms, subject to his compliance with his restrictive covenant agreement, as though he
remained employed with us at that date.
Under his April 2013 Transition Agreement, Mr. Boyce received a grant of time-based
RSUs in January 2015. The RSUs were intended to facilitate an effective leadership succession, and are not part of our regular executive compensation program. The terms and conditions of Mr. Boyces RSUs are described on page 25.
Earned Performance Unit Awards for 2013 Grant
With respect to our performance unit programs recent results, our NEOs achieved performance of 27% of target units, consistent
with our three-year TSR performance relative to our Performance Unit Peer Group and the S&P 500 Index Group during the 2013-2015 Performance Period, all as described on pages 32-33. However, due to the decline in our share price during the
performance period, the value of the earned units was less than 1% of the original grant date value, resulting in a 99% decline in long-term incentive compensation value for the NEOs.
Additional Compensation Elements
Benefits
NEOs are eligible to participate in benefit plans generally available to the broader employee group.
Perquisites
We
provide perquisites that the Committees believe are necessary to enable the NEOs to perform their responsibilities safely and efficiently. We believe the benefit we receive from providing these perquisites significantly outweighs the cost of
providing them. The table on the next page summarizes and provides the business rationale for each of the perquisites provided to the NEOs.
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perquisite
|
|
Description and Business Rationale
|
|
|
Aircraft Usage
|
|
The Board does not require Mr. Kellow to travel
on our corporate aircraft for business or personal travel. Further, only business travel is allowed on our corporate aircraft. For certain travel destinations, the Board required Mr. Boyce, but not the other NEOs, to travel on our corporate or
chartered private aircraft for business and personal travel through his December 31, 2015 separation date. This was required for security purposes based on an analysis conducted by the Boards independent advisor on corporate security. However,
the Board did allow Mr. Boyce to travel on commercial aircraft for business and personal travel depending upon his travel destination. Per the terms of his Transition Agreement, Mr. Boyce was required to reimburse the Company to the extent the
incremental costs, as calculated in accordance with Item 402(c)(2)(ix) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, for his personal travel exceeded $60,000 for the period from July 1, 2015 to December 31,
2015.
We do not provide tax gross-ups for imputed income due to
personal aircraft use. Reimbursement is provided for taxes incurred only when a spouse travels for business purposes. Employees do not pay for business travel.
|
|
|
Security
|
|
We provide personal security to NEOs when
circumstances warrant. A car and driver are also provided only when necessary for security reasons.
|
|
|
Other
|
|
We may
provide tax equalization to NEOs on expatriate assignments to keep them tax neutral.
We also provide relocation, temporary housing and tax return
preparation costs as discussed in the All Other Compensation table.
|
|
|
How We Make Compensation Decisions
Risk Considerations
The Compensation
Committee periodically reviews our compensation programs for features that might encourage inappropriate risk-taking. The programs are designed with features that mitigate risk without diminishing the incentive nature of the compensation. We believe
our compensation programs encourage and reward prudent business judgment without encouraging undue risk.
In 2015, we conducted, and
the Compensation Committee reviewed, a comprehensive global risk assessment. The risk assessment included a global inventory of incentive plans and programs and considered factors such as the plan metrics, number of participants, maximum payments
and risk mitigation factors. Based on the review, we believe our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Responsibilities for Executive Compensation
Compensation decisions for the CEO role, which included in 2015 both Messrs. Kellow and Boyce, are determined by the Special Committee.
Compensation decisions for the other NEOs are determined by the Compensation Committee and the CEO. The role of the CEO is to review the performance of other NEOs and make recommendations on base salary, annual incentive and long-term incentives for
other NEOs. F.W. Cook, an independent consultant engaged by the Compensation Committee, and the compensation group in our Human Resources Department support the Committees efforts.
Compensation Peer Group
Talent for
senior-level management positions and key roles in the organization can be acquired across a broad spectrum of companies. As such, we rely on compensation data for a group of publicly-held companies of similar size and/or complexity as us based on
revenue, market capitalization and assets (the Compensation Peer Group):
|
¡
|
|
As an input in developing base salary ranges, annual incentive targets and long-term equity award ranges;
|
|
¡
|
|
To evaluate share utilization by reviewing overhang levels and annual run rate;
|
|
¡
|
|
To benchmark the form and mix of equity awarded to NEOs;
|
|
¡
|
|
To benchmark share ownership guidelines;
|
|
¡
|
|
To assess the competitiveness of total direct compensation awarded to NEOs;
|
|
¡
|
|
To validate whether our executive compensation program is aligned with our performance; and
|
|
¡
|
|
As an input in designing compensation plans, benefits and perquisite programs.
|
While the Compensation Committee examines executive compensation data for the Compensation Peer Group, compensation paid at those
companies is not the sole factor in their decision-making process.
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
20
|
Each year, the Compensation Committee also commissions a compensation analysis conducted by
its independent compensation consultant to determine whether our executive compensation program is appropriate compared to the Compensation Peer Group and revises it as circumstances warrant. As a result of our independent compensation
consultants review, the following changes were made to our Compensation Peer Group for 2015:
|
|
|
Deletions from the Compensation Peer Group in 2015
|
|
Additions to the Compensation Peer Group in 2015
|
EOG Resources, Inc.
|
|
AK Steel Corporation
|
Monsanto Company
|
|
Allegheny Technologies Inc.
|
National Oilwell Varco, Inc.
|
|
Domtar Corporation
|
Southern Copper Corporation
|
|
Joy Global Inc.
|
|
|
Kinross Gold Corporation
|
The Compensation Peer Group for 2015 consists of the 19 companies listed in the following chart, which
sets forth the relative size measures considered by the Compensation Committee:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
Revenue
(1)
|
|
|
Net Income
(1)(2)
|
|
|
Total Assets
(3)
|
|
|
Market Cap
(3)
|
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.
|
|
|
9,895
|
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
17,438
|
|
|
28,029
|
AK Steel Corporation
|
|
|
6,693
|
|
|
|
(509)
|
|
|
|
4,084
|
|
|
398
|
Allegheny Technologies Inc.
|
|
|
3,720
|
|
|
|
(378)
|
|
|
|
5,752
|
|
|
1,229
|
Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.
|
|
|
2,965
|
|
|
|
(1,473)
|
|
|
|
9,784
|
|
|
2
|
Arch Coal, Inc.
|
|
|
2,685
|
|
|
|
(2,521)
|
|
|
|
5,848
|
|
|
21
|
Barrick Gold Corporation
|
|
|
9,029
|
|
|
|
(2,838)
|
|
|
|
26,308
|
|
|
8,597
|
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
(749)
|
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
|
242
|
CONSOL Energy Inc.
|
|
|
2,503
|
|
|
|
(375)
|
|
|
|
10,930
|
|
|
1,810
|
Domtar Corporation
|
|
|
5,264
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
5,663
|
|
|
2,322
|
Eastman Chemical Company
|
|
|
9,648
|
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
15,611
|
|
|
10,032
|
Ecolab, Inc.
|
|
|
13,545
|
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
18,642
|
|
|
33,777
|
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc.
|
|
|
15,877
|
|
|
|
(12,236)
|
|
|
|
46,577
|
|
|
8,056
|
Joy Global Inc.
|
|
|
3,172
|
|
|
|
(1,178)
|
|
|
|
3,712
|
|
|
1,235
|
Kinross Gold Corporation
|
|
|
3,052
|
|
|
|
(985)
|
|
|
|
7,735
|
|
|
2,074
|
Newmont Mining Corporation
|
|
|
7,729
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
25,182
|
|
|
9,519
|
Praxair, Inc.
|
|
|
10,776
|
|
|
|
1,547
|
|
|
|
18,319
|
|
|
29,168
|
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
|
|
|
6,308
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
6,405
|
|
|
13,523
|
SPX Corporation
|
|
|
1,719
|
|
|
|
(83)
|
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
|
381
|
Teck Resources, Inc.
|
|
|
5,953
|
|
|
|
(1,783)
|
|
|
|
25,001
|
|
|
2,238
|
Median
|
|
|
5,953
|
|
|
|
(378)
|
|
|
|
9,784
|
|
|
2,238
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
|
5,609
|
|
|
|
(2,045)
|
|
|
|
10,973
|
|
|
142
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
Percentile Rank
|
|
|
47%
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
|
56%
|
|
|
9%
|
Data Source: Standard & Poors Research Insight
|
(1)
|
Most recently reported four quarters through December 31, 2015 (in
millions)
|
|
(2)
|
Net income is reflected before extraordinary items and
discontinued operations
|
|
(3)
|
As of December 31, 2015 (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
21
|
Share Ownership Requirements
We have share ownership requirements for our executives, including the NEOs, which are designed to align their long-term financial
interests with those of our shareholders.
The NEO share ownership requirements are as follows:
|
|
|
Role
|
|
Value of Common Stock
to be Owned
*
|
CEO
|
|
5 times base salary
|
Other NEOs
|
|
3 times base salary
|
If at any time an NEO does not meet his ownership requirement, he or she must retain (1) any of our
common stock owned by him or her (whether owned directly or indirectly) and (2) any net shares received as the result of the exercise, vesting or payment of any equity award until the ownership requirement is met, in each case unless otherwise
approved by the Compensation Committee. For this purpose, net shares means the shares of stock that remain after shares are sold or withheld to (1) pay the exercise price for a stock option award or (2) satisfy any tax obligations,
including withholding taxes, arising in connection with the exercise, vesting or payment of an equity award.
Compliance with these
requirements is evaluated as of December 31 of each year. The value of an individuals share ownership as of such date is determined by multiplying the number of shares of our stock or other eligible equity interests held by the individual
by the closing price of our stock as of the business day immediately preceding the date of determination.
For purposes of
determining executive stock ownership levels, only the following forms of our equity interests are included:
|
¡
|
|
Stock owned directly (including stock or stock units held in any defined contribution plan or employee stock purchase
plan;
|
|
¡
|
|
Stock held by immediate family members residing in the same household or through trusts for the benefit of the person or
his or her immediate family members residing in the same household; and
|
|
¡
|
|
Unvested restricted stock or RSUs (provided that vesting is based solely on the passage of time and/or continued service
with the Company).
|
Due to the continued decline in the market price per share of our stock, in addition to the
short tenure of some of our NEOs, ownership requirements were not met for any of our NEOs as of December 31, 2015; however, during 2015, all of our NEOs complied with the Companys requirements that apply until the required stock ownership
level is met. Further, our NEOs purchased shares of our stock through our employee stock purchase plan and our 401(k) plan to increase their share ownership and to express their confidence in our long-term value.
Prohibition on Hedging or Pledging of Company Stock
Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits our directors and all of our employees, including our officers, from entering into hedging
transactions involving our stock, and from holding our stock in a margin account as collateral for a margin loan or otherwise pledging our stock as collateral for a loan.
Clawback Provisions
If we
are required to prepare an accounting restatement due to fraudulent and/or intentional material misrepresentation, the Board may take action to recoup incentive awards and equity gains on awards granted to NEOs to the extent such awards exceeded the
payment that would have been made based on the restated financial results. This right to recoup expires unless such determination is made by the Board within three years following the payment of the award. When final regulations for clawbacks are
promulgated by the SEC and NYSE under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, we will modify our clawback policies and provisions accordingly to ensure compliance with such new regulations.
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
22
|
Employment Agreements and the 2015 Amended and Restated Executive Severance Plan
In 2015, all NEOs have transitioned from employment agreements and are participants in the 2015 Amended and Restated Executive Severance
Plan (the Severance Plan), with the exception of our President and CEO, who is expected to similarly transition in September 2016 when his current employment agreement expires. The Severance Plan is intended to provide transitional
assistance to certain senior executives whose employment is terminated for reasons other than cause, death or disability, or by the senior executive for good reason. The Severance Plan provides cash severance based upon a tiered severance multiple
of annual base salary and average annual cash incentive paid over the preceding three years ranging from a 1.5x multiple for certain executives to a 2x multiple for NEOs (or a 2.5x multiple for the CEO if termination occurs within two years
following a Change in Control), as well as continuing healthcare benefits. Terms used in the following table are defined in Mr. Kellows employment agreement and the Severance Plan, as applicable. On April 13, 2016, the Company and a
majority of the Companys wholly owned domestic subsidiaries, as well as one international subsidiary in Gibraltar, filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of Missouri. Section 503(c) of the Bankruptcy Code places limitations on payments made to insiders of a company for, among other things, severance payments. Accordingly, the severance payments described below will be
subject to such limitations.
The following table highlights employment agreement provisions for Mr. Kellow and Severance Plan
provisions for the other NEOs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement Provisions
|
|
Severance Plan Provisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position
|
|
¡
|
|
President and CEO through September 2016
|
|
¡
|
|
Other NEOs and President and CEO beginning in September 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most recent
employment
agreement commencement date
|
|
¡
|
|
September 16, 2013
|
|
¡
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of contract
|
|
¡
|
|
Three-year employment agreement
|
|
¡
|
|
Plan may be modified, amended or terminated at any time by the Board without notice to plan participants with certain exceptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¡
|
|
For a period of two years following a Change in Control, the Severance Plan may not be discontinued, terminated or amended in such a manner that decreases the Severance Payment payable to any
Participant or that makes any provision less favorable for any Participant without the consent of the Participant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¡
|
|
Plan may not be modified, amended or terminated in a manner adverse to Participants as of the date of the modification, amendment or termination without one years advance written notice of such
modification, amendment or termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¡
|
|
Either the Company or the executive may terminate employment at any time for any reason (other than for cause) by delivery of notice 90 days in advance of the termination
date
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance Benefits
|
|
¡
|
|
Upon termination other than for cause or upon resignation for good reason, severance is equal to a 2x multiple times (or in the event termination occurs within two years after a Change in Control, the
severance multiplier changes to 2.5x):
|
|
¡
|
|
Upon termination other than for cause or upon resignation for good reason, severance is equal to a 2x multiple times (or in the event termination occurs within two years after a Change in Control for
the CEO, the severance multiplier changes to 2.5x):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
°
|
|
Base salary
|
|
|
|
°
|
|
Base salary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
°
|
|
Average annual cash incentive award paid for the three years preceding the year of termination
|
|
|
|
°
|
|
Average annual cash incentive award paid for the three years preceding the year of termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
°
|
|
6% of base salary (to compensate for Company contributions he or she otherwise would have earned under our 401(k) plan)
|
|
|
|
°
|
|
6% of base salary (to compensate for Company contributions he or she otherwise would have earned under our 401(k) plan)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¡
|
|
Upon termination other than for cause or resignation for good reason, executive is also entitled to medical and other benefits for 18 months
|
|
|
|
°
|
|
Upon termination other than for cause or resignation for good reason, executive is also entitled to medical and other benefits for 18 months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¡
|
|
1/4 of severance benefit total paid in lump sum on the earlier of executives death or first day after six-month anniversary of termination (or, in the event termination occurs within two years
after a Change in Control, 1/5 of such severance benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¡
|
|
Remaining 3/4 of severance benefits paid in 18 equal monthly payments beginning on the first day of the month next following the initial lump sum payment (or, in the event termination occurs within two
years after a Change in Control, 4/5 of such severance benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¡
|
|
We are not obligated to provide any benefits under tax qualified plans that are not permitted by plan terms or applicable
laws
|
|
¡
|
|
We are not obligated to provide any benefits under tax qualified plans that are not permitted by plan terms or applicable laws
|
Restrictive Covenants
(post-termination)
|
|
¡
|
|
Confidentiality (perpetual)
|
|
¡
|
|
Confidentiality (perpetual)
|
|
¡
|
|
Non-compete (1 year)
|
|
¡
|
|
Non-compete (1 year)
|
|
¡
|
|
Non-solicitation (1 year)
|
|
¡
|
|
Non-solicitation (1 year)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¡
|
|
Breach will result in forfeiture of any unpaid amounts or benefits; executive will repay any portion of the severance
payment previously paid to him or her
|
|
¡
|
|
Breach will result in forfeiture of any unpaid amounts or benefits; executive will repay any portion of the severance payment previously paid to him or her
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make-Whole Payments
|
|
¡
|
|
None
|
|
¡
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Gross-Ups
|
|
¡
|
|
Mr. Kellow is not entitled to any tax gross-up payment if Excise Tax is
incurred.
|
|
¡
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
24
|
Mr. Crews was a participant in the Severance Plan at the time of his voluntary resignation
from the Company on July 31, 2015. Because his separation was voluntary, Mr. Crews was not eligible for any severance payment or benefits continuation provisions under the Severance Plan.
Information regarding Mr. Boyces 2013 Transition Agreement is summarized below.
2013 Transition Agreement with Mr. Boyce
In April 2013, as part of our succession plan for the CEO position, we entered into a Transition Agreement with Mr. Boyce that
amended his existing employment agreement with us. The Transition Agreement provided that Mr. Boyce would continue his term as Chairman and CEO through December 31, 2014, and as Executive Chairman through December 31, 2015, subject to
the terms of the Transition Agreement. On May 8, 2014, we entered into a Restated Transition Agreement with Mr. Boyce, which extended Mr. Boyces term as Chairman and CEO by six months.
Mr. Boyce continued as our Chairman and CEO through May 4, 2015, at which date Mr. Kellow assumed the role of CEO and Mr. Boyce
assumed the role of Executive Chairman of the Board. On December 31, 2015, Mr. Boyces employment with us ceased upon the appointment of his successor, Mr. Malone, as non-executive Chairman (the Separation Date).
The Restated Transition Agreement provides that termination of Mr. Boyces service as a result of the appointment of his
successor(s) as Chairman and CEO will be considered a termination of his employment without cause for purposes of his employment agreement.
Mr. Boyce received three grants of restricted stock units, each valued at $1,000,000 as of the close of business on the applicable
grant date, as follows: (i) the first grant was made on April 30, 2013 (the 2013 Transition Award); (ii) the second grant was made on January 2, 2014 (the 2014 Transition Award); and (iii) the third grant was
made on January 2, 2015 (the 2015 Transition Award and, together with the 2013 Transition Award and the 2014 Transition Award, the Special Transition Awards).
The 2013 Transition Award and 2014 Transition Award vested as to 50% of the RSUs included in each Special Transition Award on the
appointment of Mr. Kellow as CEO-elect, and the remaining 50% of the RSUs included in each Special Transition Award vested on the Separation Date. Mr. Boyces 2015 Transition Award vested at 100% of the RSUs included in such Special
Transition Award on the Separation Date. The 2013 and 2014 Transition Awards are settled in our common stock. The 2015 Transition Award was made outside our 2011 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan and will be settled in cash.
In accordance with the terms of his Restated Transition Agreement and employment agreement, Mr. Boyce is entitled to continued
vesting of previously granted but unvested stock option awards, SARs, restricted stock and performance units following his separation.
In accordance with the terms of his original employment agreement dated October 1, 2003 for the position of President Chief
Operating Officer, Mr. Boyce is entitled to payment of deferred compensation of $2,349,384 six months after his Separation Date, which consists of (1) $800,000 for amounts he forfeited upon leaving a former employer and (2) $1,549,384, which is
the greatest of:
|
o
|
$636,400 plus interest from October 1, 2003 through the date of separation;
|
|
o
|
an amount equal to the fair market value of 5,773 shares of common stock on the Separation Date; or
|
|
o
|
the greater of (a) $1.6 million, reduced by 0.333% for each month that the Separation Date occurred before he reached
age 62; or (b) on or after age 62, the greater of the amount referenced in (a) on the date of termination or $1.6 million.
|
As a
result of filing the Bankruptcy Petitions on April 13, 2016, the Company will likely not be able to make the payments related to Mr. Boyces original employment agreement as they constitute prepetition claims and interests.
Deductibility of Compensation Expenses
Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, some compensation paid to certain NEOs in excess of $1 million is not tax
deductible, except to the extent it constitutes performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m). The Committees generally consider the impact of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code when establishing incentive
compensation plans. As a result, a significant portion of our executive compensation may be designed so that it may be able to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) depending upon facts and circumstances. At
the same time, the Committees consider as their
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
25
|
primary goal the design of compensation strategies that further our best interests and the best interests of our shareholders. In certain cases, for example, the Committees may determine that the
amount of tax deductions lost is not significant when compared to the potential opportunity an executive compensation program provides for creating shareholder value. The Committees therefore retain the ability to evaluate our NEOs performance
and to pay appropriate compensation, even if some of it may be non-deductible. Moreover, even if the Committees intend to grant compensation that qualifies as performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m), the Committees
cannot guarantee that such compensation will so qualify or ultimately will be deductible.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
2015 Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the compensation of our Named Executive Officers for their performance during the years ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, as applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal
Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
|
Bonus
($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)
(1)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
($)
(1)
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
(2)
|
|
|
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
(3)
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
(4)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
Glenn L. Kellow
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
874,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,573,358
|
|
|
|
749,747
|
|
|
|
519,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,220
|
|
|
4,811,222
|
President and
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,771,919
|
|
|
|
1,499,933
|
|
|
|
955,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
552,299
|
|
|
5,579,516
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
233,333
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
2,240,153
|
|
|
|
499,985
|
|
|
|
246,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
259,236
|
|
|
3,978,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amy B. Schwetz
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
341,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,613
|
|
|
896,629
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles F. Meintjes
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,218,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,912
|
|
|
2,201,021
|
President - Australia
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,497,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
537,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
352,644
|
|
|
2,937,597
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,907,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386,338
|
|
|
3,286,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kemal Williamson
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
857,800
|
|
|
|
249,916
|
|
|
|
205,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,960
|
|
|
1,865,165
|
President - Americas
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
738,299
|
|
|
|
624,970
|
|
|
|
462,683
|
|
|
|
1,434
|
|
|
|
76,438
|
|
|
2,403,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew P. Slentz
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
426,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527,487
|
|
|
|
153,697
|
|
|
|
190,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,229
|
|
|
1,325,330
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Human Resources and Administration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory H. Boyce
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
997,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,786,661
|
|
|
|
1,103,140
|
|
|
|
600,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,726,802
|
|
|
10,214,407
|
Former Chairman
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
1,225,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,619,615
|
|
|
|
3,064,014
|
|
|
|
1,682,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401,905
|
|
|
10,994,083
|
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
1,225,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,795,733
|
|
|
|
3,064,914
|
|
|
|
1,325,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
377,978
|
|
|
10,789,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael C. Crews
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,158,083
|
|
|
|
337,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,893
|
|
|
1,867,352
|
Former Executive Vice
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
885,969
|
|
|
|
749,967
|
|
|
|
586,219
|
|
|
|
5,192
|
|
|
|
71,730
|
|
|
2,899,077
|
President and Chief
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
595,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,021,959
|
|
|
|
825,209
|
|
|
|
503,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,501
|
|
|
3,018,233
|
Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Reported salary amounts for Mr. Kellow and Ms. Schwetz represent a
blend of (1) amounts paid prior to their promotions to President and CEO and EVP and CFO, respectively, for the applicable time period, and (2) amounts paid following their promotions. Additionally, reported salary amounts for Mr. Slentz
represent a blend of (1) amounts paid prior to this salary increase related to his assumption of additional responsibilities and (2) amounts paid following the salary increase.
|
(2)
|
Amounts in the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns reported for
2015 represent the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation Stock Compensation (FASB ASC Topic 718). A discussion of
the relevant fair value assumptions is set forth in Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements included in the Original Form 10-K. For 2015 performance unit awards included in the Stock Awards column, the maximum potential payout is estimated
as follows: Mr. Kellow, $2,287,433; Mr. Meintjes, $1,337,241; Mr. Williamson, $1,215,674; Mr. Slentz, $747,541; Mr. Boyce, $5,366,323; and Mr. Crews $1,641,159. Ms. Schwetz was not eligible for the performance unit
award. The amounts actually realized from the stock and option awards will vary based on a number of factors, including our actual operating performance, stock price fluctuations and the timing of exercises (for options and SARs only) and stock
sales.
|
(3)
|
Amounts in this column reported for 2015 represent awards under
our annual cash incentive plan. The material terms of the 2015 awards are described under the heading Annual Cash Incentive above.
|
(4)
|
Amounts in this column reported for 2015 reflect only changes in
the actuarial present value of Messrs. Williamsons and Crews accumulated benefit under the Peabody Investments Corp. (PIC) Retirement Plan, which for 2015 were decreases in value of $188 and $1,231, respectively. See page 34 for
further discussion.
|
(5)
|
Amounts included in this column are described in the All Other
Compensation table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
26
|
All Other Compensation
The following table sets forth detailed information regarding the 2015 amounts reported in the All Other Compensation column of the 2015
Summary Compensation Table above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Group
Term Life
Insurance
($)
|
|
|
Registrant
Contributions
for Defined
Contribution
Plans
($)
|
|
|
Tax Gross-
Ups
($)
|
|
|
Perquisites
($)
(1)(2)
|
|
|
Contractual
Separation
Payments
($)
(7)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
Glenn L. Kellow
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
|
|
52,450
|
|
|
|
908
|
(3)
|
|
|
39,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,220
|
Amy B. Schwetz
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
20,510
|
|
|
|
53,377
|
(4)
|
|
|
126,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,613
|
Charles F. Meintjes
|
|
|
2,139
|
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
31,618
|
(5)
|
|
|
122,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,912
|
Kemal Williamson
|
|
|
3,612
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,960
|
Andrew P. Slentz
|
|
|
1,629
|
|
|
|
25,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,229
|
Gregory H. Boyce
|
|
|
7,524
|
|
|
|
59,844
|
|
|
|
10,176
|
(6)
|
|
|
299,874
|
|
|
|
2,349,384
|
|
|
2,726,802
|
Michael C. Crews
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,893
|
(1)
|
Amounts include the aggregate incremental cost to us of trips
where a spouse/guest accompanied the executive on our corporate aircraft for company business purposes, and for Mr. Boyce, the aggregate incremental cost of his personal use of corporate aircraft. Aggregate incremental cost to us for use of our
corporate aircraft was determined on a per flight basis and includes the following: cost of fuel; landing fees; in-flight meals; sales tax; crew expenses; the hourly cost of aircraft maintenance for the applicable number of flight hours; and other
variable costs specifically incurred. Aggregate incremental cost to us of a company-provided car and driver is determined as the sum of an allocable portion of vehicle operating expenses and an allocable portion of the drivers salary and
benefits.
|
(2)
|
For Mr. Kellow, includes $5,032 for relocation expenses,
$33,366 for tax return preparation costs, and $754 for corporate aircraft usage. For Ms. Schwetz, includes $110,695 for relocation expenses and $15,476 for tax return preparation costs. For Mr. Meintjes, includes relocation expenses of
$88,713 and tax return preparation costs of $33,442. For Mr. Williamson, includes tax return preparation costs of $18,348. For Mr. Boyce, includes $291,065 for corporate aircraft usage and $8,809 for use of a company-provided car and
driver.
|
(3)
|
Represents tax gross-ups relating to taxes due for use of our
corporate aircraft when his spouse accompanied him on business travel.
|
(4)
|
Represents tax gross-ups relating to taxes due for relocation
expenses.
|
(5)
|
Represents tax gross-ups relating to taxes due for relocation
expenses.
|
(6)
|
Represents tax gross-ups relating to taxes due for use of our
corporate aircraft when his spouse accompanied him on business travel ($1,729) and for use of a company-provided car and driver ($8,447).
|
(7)
|
In accordance with the terms of his original employment agreement
dated October 1, 2003 for the position of President Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Boyce is entitled to payment of deferred compensation of $2,349,384 six months after his Separation of $2,349,384, which consists of (1) $800,000 for amounts he
forfeited upon leaving a former employer and (2) $1,549,384, which is $1.6 million, reduced by 0.333% for each month that his separation date occurred before he reached age 62.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
27
|
2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth information concerning grants to the NEOs of plan-based awards during the year ended December 31,
2015. As discussed further in the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2015 Fiscal Year-End table below, shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance units, options and option exercise prices have been adjusted to reflect the 1-for-15
reverse stock split that was effective at the close of business on September 30, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-
Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
(1)
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
(2)
|
|
|
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
|
|
|
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
|
|
|
Exercise
or Base
Price of
|
|
|
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock
and
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
Approval
Date
|
|
Threshold
($)
|
|
|
Target
($)
|
|
|
Maximum
($)
|
|
|
Threshold
(#)
|
|
|
Target
(#)
|
|
|
Maximum
(#)
|
|
|
of Stock
or Units
(#)
(3)
|
|
|
Underlying
Options
(#)
(4)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
($)
(5)
|
|
Glenn L. Kellow
|
|
|
518,463
|
|
|
|
1,036,925
|
|
|
|
2,073,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,733
|
|
|
|
9,333
|
|
|
|
18,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,143,717
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,219
|
|
|
|
5,547
|
|
|
|
11,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
679,751
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
749,890
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,005
|
|
|
|
116.10
|
|
|
|
749,747
|
|
Amy B. Schwetz
|
|
|
140,743
|
|
|
|
281,486
|
|
|
|
504,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,071
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles F. Meintjes
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
440,000
|
|
|
|
880,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,182
|
|
|
|
5,456
|
|
|
|
10,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
668,621
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
549,850
|
|
Kemal Williamson
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
4,960
|
|
|
|
9,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
607,837
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,963
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,335
|
|
|
|
116.10
|
|
|
|
249,916
|
|
Andrew P. Slentz
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
675,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
|
|
3,050
|
|
|
|
6,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373,771
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,716
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,896
|
|
|
|
116.10
|
|
|
|
153,697
|
|
Gregory H. Boyce
|
|
|
592,698
|
|
|
|
1,185,396
|
|
|
|
2,370,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,758
|
|
|
|
21,895
|
|
|
|
43,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,683,161
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,103,531
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
999,969
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,963
|
|
|
|
116.10
|
|
|
|
1,103,140
|
|
Michael C. Crews
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
|
|
480,000
|
|
|
|
960,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,678
|
|
|
|
6,696
|
|
|
|
13,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
820,580
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337,503
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
12/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,552
|
|
|
|
116.10
|
|
|
|
337,376
|
|
(1)
|
Represents the estimated payouts under the annual cash incentive
plan. The target award represents 100% of the maximum award value payable upon the achievement of the performance measures (Price-collar Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Total Costs, Total Sales Volumes, Safety and Individual Goals) described above under
the heading 2015 Annual Cash Incentive Performance Measures at 100% of the specified performance measures. The maximum award represents 200% of the target award value and the threshold award represents 50% of the target award value. The
actual amounts earned by the NEOs for 2015 are set forth in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the 2015 Summary Compensation Table. Mr. Crews did not receive a cash incentive award as a result of his July 31, 2015
voluntary resignation from the Company.
|
(2)
|
Represents the number of shares of our common stock underlying
performance unit awards granted in 2015. The performance units vest over a three-year performance period ending on December 31, 2017. Payout is subject to the achievement of the following goals: (i) our three-year TSR performance relative to
the applicable peer group and the S&P 400 Midcap Index Group and (ii) a three-year return on mining asset target. The material terms of these awards, including payout formulas, are described under the heading Performance Units. Due
to limitations on the number of awards that could be issued under the plan to an individual in any calendar year, a portion of Mr. Kellows performance unit awards will be payable, if earned, in cash (9,333 target units), with the remainder to
be settled in shares of our common stock (5,547 target units). All of Mr. Boyces performance unit awards will be payable, if earned, in cash based on the plan limitation previously discussed. Mr. Crews forfeited his performance units as a
result of his July 31, 2015 voluntary resignation from the Company.
|
(3)
|
Represents the number of shares of restricted stock and/or restricted stock units that were granted in 2015. The
restricted shares granted to Messrs. Kellow, Williamson and Slentz and Ms. Schwetz vest on the third anniversary of the grant date. One-half of the number of restricted shares that were granted to Mr. Meintjes will vest in three equal annual
installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date; the remaining one-half will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date. Mr. Boyce was granted 9,505 shares of restricted stock and 8,613 shares of restricted stock units, which
vested as described under the heading Transition Agreement with Mr. Boyce. Mr. Boyces restricted stock units are payable in cash due to the plan limitation previously discussed in footnote 2. Mr. Crews forfeited his restricted
stock as a result of his July 31, 2015 voluntary resignation from the Company.
|
(4)
|
Represents the number of shares of our common stock underlying stock options and SARs granted in 2015. All stock
options and SARs vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. The material terms of these awards are described under the heading Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs).
Mr. Crews forfeited his stock options as a result of his July 31, 2015 voluntary resignation from the Company.
|
(5)
|
Represents the grant date fair value of awards determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. A discussion of the
relevant fair value assumptions is set forth in Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements included in the Original Form 10-K. The amount ultimately realized from the awards will vary based on a number of factors, including our actual
operating performance, stock price fluctuations and the timing of exercises (for options and SARs only) and stock sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
28
|
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2015 Fiscal Year-End
The table on the following page sets forth details about the outstanding equity awards for each of the NEOs as of December 31, 2015.
We note that the amount ultimately realized from the outstanding equity awards will vary based on a number of factors, including our actual operating performance, stock price fluctuations and the timing of exercises (for options and SARs only) and
stock sales. For certain equity incentive awards, the amount ultimately realized will also vary with our TSR relative to the Performance Unit Peer Group and the S&P 500 Index Group, for the 2014 grant and the S&P 400 Midcap Index Group, for
the 2015 grant.
All unexercisable options and SARs and unvested restricted stock, restricted stock units or performance units
reflected in the table held by a NEO are generally subject to forfeiture if he or she terminates employment without good reason (as defined in the Severance Plan). Stock options expire, at the latest, ten years from the grant date.
At a special shareholders meeting held on September 16, 2015, authorization to implement a 1-for-15 reverse stock split was approved by
our shareholders. The reverse stock split was effective at the close of business on September 30, 2015, which resulted in Peabodys common stock trading on a split-adjusted basis at market open on October 1, 2015. Upon completion of the reverse
stock split, every 15 shares of common stock owned by a shareholder were combined into one share of common stock, with a proportionate adjustment made to the per-share value of common stock. Therefore, all outstanding equity awards for the NEOs were
converted accordingly. For the NEOs holding restricted stock at the time of the conversion, our transfer agent aggregated and sold all fractional shares. Net proceeds were then remitted to the NEOs. For those NEOs holding stock options and SARs,
fractional shares were cancelled since those awards were out-of-the-money at the time of the conversion. For those NEOs holding RSUs, fractional shares will be paid in cash (without interest and subject to applicable withholding taxes)
at the time and to the extent the RSUs become vested and are settled. The value of the fractional shares will be based on the closing stock price at the time of settlement. For those NEOs holding performance units, fractional shares will be paid in
cash (without interest and subject to applicable withholding taxes) at the end of the applicable three-year performance period, to the extent the performance units vest. The amount paid for a performance unit fractional share will be based on the
payout percentage of achievement determined in accordance with the respective performance unit agreement, and will reflect the proportional value of the whole performance units that are being settled.
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
(1)
Exercisable
|
|
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
(1)
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
(1)
|
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|
|
Number of
Shares or
Units
of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
(1)
|
|
|
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units
of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)
(2)
|
|
|
Equity and
Cash-Settled
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested
(#)
(1)(3)
|
|
|
Equity and
Cash-Settled
Incentive Plan
Awards: Market
/
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested
($)
(4)
|
Glenn L. Kellow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,874
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,920
|
(6)
|
|
9,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,386
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,459
|
(10)
|
|
|
49,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,636
|
(19)
|
|
|
1,318
|
(19)
|
|
|
270.7500
|
|
|
|
9/16/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,486
|
(20)
|
|
|
8,972
|
(20)
|
|
|
293.1000
|
|
|
|
1/2/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,005
|
(22)
|
|
|
116.1000
|
|
|
|
1/2/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7,122
|
|
|
|
29,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,845
|
|
|
|
49,605
|
|
|
|
11,794
|
|
|
9,523
|
|
|
|
|
Amy B. Schwetz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644
|
(8)
|
|
|
4,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426
|
(9)
|
|
|
3,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,551
|
(10)
|
|
|
11,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,621
|
|
|
|
20,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles F. Meintjes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
859
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,637
|
(6)
|
|
3,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,318
|
(8)
|
|
|
10,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,181
|
(9)
|
|
|
16,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,736
|
(10)
|
|
|
36,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358
|
(16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
967.8000
|
|
|
|
1/3/2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
680
|
(17)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
544.0500
|
|
|
|
1/3/2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,235
|
|
|
|
63,245
|
|
|
|
4,496
|
|
|
3,492
|
|
|
|
|
Kemal Williamson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
780
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,307
|
(6)
|
|
3,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,153
|
(10)
|
|
|
16,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,638
|
(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
597.2145
|
|
|
|
1/3/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
524.3295
|
|
|
|
1/3/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,050
|
(13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
940.8000
|
|
|
|
1/2/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,436
|
(14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
402.6000
|
|
|
|
1/5/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,090
|
(15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
718.0500
|
|
|
|
1/4/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850
|
(16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
967.8000
|
|
|
|
1/3/2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
799
|
(17)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
544.0500
|
|
|
|
1/3/2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,095
|
(18)
|
|
|
1,548
|
(18)
|
|
|
387.6000
|
|
|
|
1/2/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,869
|
(20)
|
|
|
3,738
|
(20)
|
|
|
293.1000
|
|
|
|
1/2/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,335
|
(22)
|
|
|
116.1000
|
|
|
|
1/2/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
12,397
|
|
|
|
11,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,153
|
|
|
|
16,535
|
|
|
|
4,087
|
|
|
3,174
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew P. Slentz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,033
|
(6)
|
|
1,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
961
|
(8)
|
|
|
7,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,568
|
(9)
|
|
|
19,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,324
|
(10)
|
|
|
10,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
689
|
(21)
|
|
|
1,377
|
(21)
|
|
|
244.3500
|
|
|
|
4/1/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,896
|
(22)
|
|
|
116.1000
|
|
|
|
1/2/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
5,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,853
|
|
|
|
37,271
|
|
|
|
2,261
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory H.
Boyce
(23)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,827
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,597
|
(6)
|
|
14,013
|
|
|
|
6,115
|
(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
597.2145
|
|
|
|
1/3/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,020
|
(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
524.3295
|
|
|
|
1/3/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,184
|
(13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
940.8000
|
|
|
|
1/2/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,410
|
(14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
402.6000
|
|
|
|
1/5/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,627
|
(15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
718.0500
|
|
|
|
1/4/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,515
|
(16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
967.8000
|
|
|
|
1/3/2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,412
|
(17)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
544.0500
|
|
|
|
1/3/2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,843
|
(18)
|
|
|
5,421
|
(18)
|
|
|
387.6000
|
|
|
|
1/2/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,164
|
(20)
|
|
|
18,329
|
(20)
|
|
|
293.1000
|
|
|
|
1/2/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,963
|
(22)
|
|
|
116.1000
|
|
|
|
1/2/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
104,290
|
|
|
|
51,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,424
|
|
|
14,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
30
|
(1)
|
The number of stock options/SARs/shares/units and the exercise
prices of options have been adjusted, where applicable, to reflect: our 2-for-1 stock splits in March 2005 and February 2006; the spin-off of Patriot Coal Corporation on October 31, 2007; and the 1for-15 reverse stock split in September
2015.
|
(2)
|
The market value was calculated based on the closing market price
per share of our common stock on the last trading day of 2015 ($7.68 per share).
|
(3)
|
The number of performance units disclosed is based on the
assumption that target performance goals will be achieved.
|
(4)
|
The market value was calculated based on the percent of award
achievement as of December 31, 2015 and the closing market price per share of our common stock on the last trading day of 2015 ($7.68 per share). As of December 31, 2015, our 2014 and 2015 grants of performance units are reflecting 0% and 25%,
respectively, of award achievement.
|
(5)
|
The performance units were granted on January 2, 2014, and
vest over a three-year performance period (December 31, 2016). Payout in early 2017 is subject to the achievement of the following goals: (i) our three-year TSR performance relative to the applicable Performance Unit Peer Group and the S&P
500 Index Group and (ii) a three-year ROMA target. The performance units granted to Mr. Boyce will be payable, if earned, in cash due to limitations on the number of awards that could be issued under the plan to an individual in any calendar year.
Mr. Crews forfeited his performance units as a result of his July 31, 2015 voluntary resignation from the Company.
|
(6)
|
The performance units were granted on January 2, 2015, and
vest over a three-year performance period (December 31, 2017). Payout in early 2018 is subject to the achievement of the following goals: (i) our three-year TSR performance relative to the applicable Performance Unit Peer Group and the S&P
400 Midcap Index Group and (ii) a three-year ROMA target. A portion of the performance units granted to Mr. Kellow, and all performance units granted to Mr. Boyce will be payable, if earned, in cash based on the plan limitation previously discussed.
Mr. Crews forfeited his performance units as a result of his July 31, 2015 voluntary resignation from the Company.
|
(7)
|
The performance-based restricted stock units were granted on
September 16, 2013 under Mr. Kellows employment agreement. 50% of these units vest on September 16, 2018, contingent upon our TSR exceeding 20% for 20 consecutive trading days prior to September 16, 2017. The remaining 50%
vest on September 16, 2018, contingent upon our TSR exceeding 40% for 20 consecutive trading days prior to September 16, 2018. As of December 31, 2015, the performance-based restricted stock units do not reflect achievement of the relevant
performance target.
|
(8)
|
The restricted shares were granted on January 2, 2013 and
vested on the third anniversary of the grant date (January 2, 2016), although they were unvested as of December 31, 2015. Forty-three percent of the number of restricted shares that were granted to Mr. Meintjes vested in three equal annual
installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date; the remaining restricted shares vested on the third anniversary of the grant date.
|
(9)
|
The restricted shares were granted on January 2, 2014 and
will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date (January 2, 2017). Twenty percent of the number of restricted shares that were granted to Mr. Meintjes have vested or will vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first
anniversary of the grant date; the remaining restricted shares will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date.
|
(10)
|
The restricted shares were granted on January 2, 2015 and
will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date (January 2, 2018). One-half of the number of restricted shares that were granted to Mr. Meintjes have vested or will vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary
of the grant date; the remaining restricted shares will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date. Mr. Crews forfeited his restricted shares as a result of his July 31, 2015 voluntary resignation from the Company.
|
(11)
|
The options were granted on January 3, 2006 and vested in
three equal annual installments beginning January 3, 2007.
|
(12)
|
The options were granted on January 3, 2007 and vested in
three equal annual installments beginning January 3, 2008.
|
(13)
|
The options were granted on January 2, 2008 and vested in
three equal annual installments beginning January 2, 2009.
|
(14)
|
The options were granted on January 5, 2009 and vested in
three equal annual installments beginning January 5, 2010. Mr. Crews forfeited his stock options as a result of his July 31, 2015 voluntary resignation from the Company.
|
(15)
|
The options were granted on January 4, 2010 and vested in
three equal annual installments beginning January 4, 2011. Mr. Crews forfeited his stock options as a result of his July 31, 2015 voluntary resignation from the Company.
|
(16)
|
The options were granted on January 3, 2011 and vested in
three equal annual installments beginning January 3, 2012. Mr. Crews forfeited his stock options as a result of his July 31, 2015 voluntary resignation from the Company.
|
(17)
|
The options were granted on January 3, 2012 and vested in
three equal annual installments beginning January 3, 2013. Mr. Crews forfeited his stock options as a result of his July 31, 2015 voluntary resignation from the Company.
|
(18)
|
The options were granted on January 2, 2013 and have vested
or will vest in three equal annual installments beginning January 2, 2014. Mr. Crews forfeited his stock options as a result of his July 31, 2015 voluntary resignation from the Company.
|
(19)
|
The options were granted on September 16, 2013 and have
vested or will vest in three equal annual installments beginning September 16, 2014.
|
(20)
|
The options were granted on January 2, 2014 and have vested
or will vest in three equal annual installments beginning January 2, 2015. Mr. Crews forfeited his stock options as a result of his July 31, 2015 voluntary resignation from the Company.
|
(21)
|
The options were granted on April 1, 2014 and have vested or will
vest in three equal annual installments beginning April 10, 2015.
|
(22)
|
The options were granted on January 2, 2015 and have vested
or will vest in three equal annual installments beginning January 2, 2016. Mr. Crews forfeited his stock options as a result of his July 31, 2015 voluntary resignation from the Company.
|
(23)
|
In accordance with the terms of his transition agreement,
Mr. Boyce was provided continued vesting through the end of the vesting period set forth in his award agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
31
|
2015 Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table sets forth detail about stock awards that vested during 2015 for each of the NEOs. The stock awards included
performance units, restricted stock and restricted stock units. There were no stock option exercises in 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
(1)(2)
|
|
Name
|
|
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)
|
|
|
Value Realized
on Vesting
($)
(3)(4)
|
|
Glenn L. Kellow
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
|
4,324
|
|
Amy B. Schwetz
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
32,709
|
|
Charles F. Meintjes
|
|
|
7,989
|
|
|
|
274,293
|
|
Kemal Williamson
|
|
|
2,224
|
|
|
|
5,159
|
|
Andrew P. Slentz
|
|
|
1,219
|
|
|
|
141,603
|
|
Gregory H. Boyce
|
|
|
32,642
|
|
|
|
208,936
|
|
Michael C. Crews
|
|
|
2,757
|
|
|
|
320,095
|
|
(1)
|
Includes the
following number of shares of common stock delivered in February 2016 in connection with the payout of the performance unit awards that were granted in 2013 and that vested on December 31, 2015 for Mr. Kellow, 1,864; Mr. Meintjes, 2,447;
Mr. Williamson, 2,224; and Mr. Boyce, 7,790. Mr. Crews forfeited his performance units as a result of his July 31, 2015 voluntary resignation from the Company.
|
(2)
|
Includes the
following number of shares of common stock delivered in connection with lapse of restrictions on restricted stock that vested during 2015: Ms. Schwetz, 280; Mr. Meintjes, 2,313; Mr. Slentz, 1,219; and Mr. Crews, 2,757. In conjunction with
the terms of his transition agreement, restrictions lapsed on restricted stock (9,505) and restricted stock units (15,347) for Mr. Boyce. Provided that an irrevocable general release is executed by Mr. Boyce, 9,505 shares of common stock will be
delivered on the third anniversary of the grant date, January 2, 2018; 8,613 restricted stock units will be payable in cash on July 1, 2016; and 6,734 restricted stock units will be converted to shares of common stock and delivered on January 1,
2017. For purposes of this disclosure, Mr. Boyces value realized on the vesting of his restricted stock units is based on the closing market price per share of our common stock on the last trading day of 2015 ($7.68 per share). However, Mr.
Boyces actual value realized will be based on the closing market price per share of our common stock at the time of settlement.
|
(3)
|
Grant date
fair value of the 2013 performance unit awards for our NEOs was $7.7 million, of which $33,232 was realized upon vesting at 27.0% of target. If the 2013 performance unit awards had been paid out at target based on the closing market price per share
of our common stock on the last trading day of 2015 ($7.68 per share), $111,206 of realized value would have been distributed to the NEOs listed above that were eligible for participation in the performance unit program at the time of the grant.
|
(4)
|
A detailed explanation of the value realized due to the payout of
performance unit awards granted in 2013 is included in the
Peabody Relative Performance for Performance Period Ended December
31, 2015 and Resulting Performance Unit Award Payouts to NEOs
table below.
|
Performance Unit Program
In February
2016, the NEOs received payouts under the terms of performance unit awards granted in 2013 that vested on December 31, 2015. The value realized is shown in the Stock Awards column in the above table. These payouts were consistent
with our stated executive compensation philosophy to create a clear link to shareholder value and to base compensation, in part, on relative external performance. Specifically, the percentage of these performance units earned was based on (i) our
TSR over the three-year performance period beginning January 3, 2013 (September 16, 2013 for Mr. Kellows award) and ended December 31, 2015, relative to the TSR of the Performance Unit Peer Group was weighted at 25% and (ii) our TSR
relative to the S&P 500 Index Group was weighted at 75%.
Over the three-year performance period, our negative TSR of
97.7% (negative TSR of 96.7% for Mr. Kellows September 16, 2013 award) was at the 52
nd
percentile of the Performance Unit Peer Group and was below the 1
st
percentile of the S&P 500 Index Group.
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
32
|
Peabody Relative Performance for Performance Period Ended December 31, 2015 and
Resulting Performance Unit Award Payouts to NEOs
The following table compares our TSR for the three-year period ended December 31, 2015 to the performance of the Performance Unit
Peer Group and to the performance of the S&P 500 Index Group. Based on our relative performance, the NEOs earned the following performance units under the program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25% Weighting
|
|
75% Weighting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEO
|
|
Performance
Period
|
|
Percentile
Ranking
Among
Performance
Unit Peer
Group - TSR
|
|
Ranking
Among
Performance
Unit Peer
Group
|
|
Percentile
Ranking
Among
Index
Companies -
TSR
(1)
|
|
Ranking
Among Index
Companies
(1)
|
|
Percent of
Metric
Earned for
TSR
|
|
Total
Payout
as a %
of
Target
|
|
Target
Award
Units
(#)
|
|
|
Actual
Award
Shares
(#)
(2)
|
|
|
Actual
Award
Value
($)
(3)
|
Glenn L. Kellow
(4)
|
|
2013 - 2015
|
|
52.0%
|
|
3 of 5
|
|
0.0%
|
|
392 of 392
|
|
108.0%
|
|
27.0%
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
4,324
|
Amy B. Schwetz
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles F. Meintjes
(6)
|
|
2013 - 2015
|
|
52.0%
|
|
3 of 5
|
|
0.0%
|
|
388 of 388
|
|
108.0%
|
|
27.0%
|
|
|
2,473
|
|
|
|
5,676
|
|
|
5,676
|
Kemal Williamson
(7)
|
|
2013 - 2015
|
|
52.0%
|
|
3 of 5
|
|
0.0%
|
|
388 of 388
|
|
108.0%
|
|
27.0%
|
|
|
2,248
|
|
|
|
2,224
|
|
|
5,159
|
Andrew P. Slentz
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory H. Boyce
(8)
|
|
2013 - 2015
|
|
52.0%
|
|
3 of 5
|
|
0.0%
|
|
388 of 388
|
|
108.0%
|
|
27.0%
|
|
|
7,875
|
|
|
|
7,790
|
|
|
18,073
|
Michael C. Crews
(9)
|
|
2013 - 2015
|
|
52.0%
|
|
3 of 5
|
|
0.0%
|
|
388 of 388
|
|
108.0%
|
|
27.0%
|
|
|
2,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The index is designed to track the performance of companies
included in the S&P 500 Index Group.
|
(2)
|
The actual number of shares delivered in respect of earned
performance units was calculated by dividing the actual award value (see footnote 3) by the market closing price per share of our common stock on the settlement date, February 16, 2016 ($2.32).
|
(3)
|
The value of the awards was calculated based on the average
closing price per share of our common stock for the four-week period ended December 31, 2015 ($8.50), multiplied by the total payout as a percentage of target.
|
(4)
|
Grant date fair value was $624,090. As noted on page 32, Mr.
Kellows award was granted on September 16, 2013 while our other NEOs awards were granted January 3, 2013, due to this difference in grant date, the S&P 500 Index Group utilized for Mr. Kellow was slightly larger than the group utilized for
our other NEOs.
|
(5)
|
Ms. Schwetz and Mr. Slentz were not eligible to participate in the
performance unit program at the time of the grant.
|
(6)
|
Grant date fair value was $1,192,312.
|
(7)
|
Grant date fair value was $1,083,906.
|
(8)
|
Grant date fair value was $3,795,741.
|
(9)
|
Mr. Crews forfeited his performance units as a result of his July
31, 2015 voluntary resignation from the Company.
|
2001 Pension Benefits
Our Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees, or pension plan, is a qualified defined benefit pension plan. The pension plan
provides a monthly annuity to eligible salaried employees when they retire. An employee must have at least five years of service to be vested in his or her benefit under the pension plan. A full benefit is available to a retiree at age 62. A
retiree can begin receiving a benefit as early as age 55; however, a 4% reduction factor applies for each year a retiree receives a benefit prior to age 62.
The pension plan was phased out beginning January 1, 2001. Certain transition benefits were introduced based on the age and service
of affected employees at December 31, 2000. Each of the participants in the pension plan has had his or her pension benefits frozen. In all cases, final average earnings for retirement purposes are capped at December 31, 2000 levels.
A participants retirement benefit under the pension plan is equal to the sum of (1) 1.112% of the highest average monthly
earnings over 60 consecutive months up to the covered compensation limit multiplied by the employees years of service, not to exceed 35 years, and (2) 1.5% of the average monthly earnings over 60 consecutive months over
the covered compensation limit multiplied by the employees years of service, not to exceed 35 years. Under the pension plan, earnings include compensation earned as base salary and up to five annual incentive
awards.
Listed on the following page is the actuarial present value of the current accumulated pension benefit under the pension
plan as of December 31, 2015 for the NEOs. Due to the phase out of the pension plan in 2001, Messrs. Williamson and Crews are the only NEOs who are eligible to receive a benefit under the pension plan. The estimated present value was
determined assuming the NEO retires at age 62, the normal retirement age under the plan, using a discount rate of 4.55% and the RP 2014 Blue Collar Sex-Distinct Annuitant Mortality projected back to 2007 with MP 2014, and projected forward
using generational Scale BB-2D. Other material assumptions used in making the calculations are discussed in Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements included in the Original Form 10-K. The disclosed amounts are estimates only and do not
necessarily reflect the actual amounts that will be paid to an NEO. Such amounts will be known only at the time the NEO becomes eligible for payment.
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Plan Name
|
|
Number of
Years
Credited
Service
(#)
(1)
|
|
Present Value
of
Accumulated
Benefit
($)
|
|
Payments
During
Last
Fiscal
Year
|
Glenn L. Kellow
(2)
|
|
Peabody Investments Corp. Retirement Plan
|
|
|
|
Not a plan participant
|
|
|
Amy B. Schwetz
(2)
|
|
Peabody Investments Corp. Retirement Plan
|
|
|
|
Not a plan participant
|
|
|
Charles F. Meintjes
(2)
|
|
Peabody Investments Corp. Retirement Plan
|
|
|
|
Not a plan participant
|
|
|
Kemal Williamson
(3)
|
|
Peabody Investments Corp. Retirement Plan
|
|
0.3
|
|
8,671
|
|
|
Andrew P. Slentz
(2)
|
|
Peabody Investments Corp. Retirement Plan
|
|
|
|
Not a plan participant
|
|
|
Gregory H. Boyce
(2)
|
|
Peabody Investments Corp. Retirement Plan
|
|
|
|
Not a plan participant
|
|
|
Michael C. Crews
(3)
|
|
Peabody Investments Corp. Retirement Plan
|
|
2.3
|
|
23,512
|
|
|
(1)
|
Due to the phase-out of our pension plan as described above, years of credited service are less than years of actual
service. The actual years of service number for Messrs. Williamson and Crews are 15.3 and 16.8, respectively.
|
(2)
|
Messrs. Kellow, Meintjes, Slentz and Boyce and Ms. Schwetz are not eligible to receive benefits under our pension
plan because their employment with us began after the pension plan was phased out.
|
(3)
|
Under the terms of the phase-out, pension benefits for Messrs. Williamson and Crews were frozen as of December 31,
2000, and years of credited service, for the purpose of the pension plan, ceased to accrue.
|
2015 Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation
The following table sets forth detail about activity for the NEOs in our nonqualified excess defined contribution
retirement plan (Excess Retirement Plan).
All of the NEOs participate in the Excess Retirement Plan, which is designed
to allow highly compensated management employees to make contributions in excess of certain limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code that apply to our tax-qualified 401(k) plan. The Excess Retirement Plan is designed to restore the benefits,
including matching contributions, not permitted due to certain limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code on the 401(k) plan. Investment options under the Excess Retirement Plan are identical to those under the 401(k) plan, except that historically
the 401(k) plan also included the Peabody Energy Stock Fund as an investment option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Plan Name
|
|
Executive
Contributions in
Last Fiscal
Year ($)
|
|
|
Registrant
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year
($)
(1)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Earnings in Last
Fiscal Year ($)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Withdrawals /
Distributions
($)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Balance at
Last Fiscal
Year End ($)
(2)
|
|
Glenn L. Kellow
|
|
Excess Retirement Plan
|
|
|
36,550
|
|
|
|
36,550
|
|
|
|
(2,987)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,874
|
|
Amy B. Schwetz
|
|
Excess Retirement Plan
|
|
|
4,610
|
|
|
|
4,610
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,901
|
|
Charles F. Meintjes
|
|
Excess Retirement Plan
|
|
|
17,100
|
|
|
|
17,100
|
|
|
|
3,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
332,570
|
|
Kemal Williamson
|
|
Excess Retirement Plan
|
|
|
47,448
|
|
|
|
17,793
|
|
|
|
7,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
942,367
|
|
Andrew P. Slentz
|
|
Excess Retirement Plan
|
|
|
9,700
|
|
|
|
9,700
|
|
|
|
12,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,198
|
|
Gregory H. Boyce
|
|
Excess Retirement Plan
|
|
|
43,944
|
|
|
|
43,944
|
|
|
|
27,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,862,290
|
|
Michael C. Crews
|
|
Excess Retirement Plan
|
|
|
7,650
|
|
|
|
5,100
|
|
|
|
2,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540,554
|
|
(1)
|
The amounts reported in this column are also included in the 2015
Summary Compensation Table, in the All Other Compensation column for 2015 and in the Registrant Contribution for Defined Contribution Plans column of the All Other Compensation table.
|
(2)
|
Of the totals in this column, the following amounts represent
Registrant Contributions to the Excess Retirement Plan that are reported in the 2015 Summary Compensation Table for the years 2007-2014:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Excess Defined
Contribution
Retirement Plan
Registrant
Contributions
Included in the
2015
Summary
Compensation
Table
($)
|
|
|
Excess Defined
Contribution
Retirement Plan
Registrant
Contributions
Included in the
2007 -
2014
Summary
Compensation
Tables
($)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
Glenn L. Kellow
|
|
|
36,550
|
|
|
|
63,180
|
|
|
|
99,730
|
|
Amy B. Schwetz
|
|
|
4,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,610
|
|
Charles F. Meintjes
|
|
|
17,100
|
|
|
|
96,158
|
|
|
|
113,258
|
|
Kemal Williamson
|
|
|
17,793
|
|
|
|
46,603
|
|
|
|
64,396
|
|
Andrew P. Slentz
|
|
|
9,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,700
|
|
Gregory H. Boyce
|
|
|
43,944
|
|
|
|
800,479
|
|
|
|
844,423
|
|
Michael C. Crews
|
|
|
5,100
|
|
|
|
208,551
|
|
|
|
213,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
34
|
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
In 2015, all NEOs transitioned from employment agreements and are participants in the Severance Plan, with the exception of
our President and CEO, who is expected to similarly transition in September 2016 when his current employment agreement expires. The Severance Plan was adopted to provide transitional assistance to certain senior executives whose employment is
terminated by us (for reasons other than cause, death or disability) or by the senior executive for good reason. Mr. Kellows employment agreement and the Severance Plan provide cash severance based upon a 2x severance multiple of the sum of
annual base salary and average annual cash incentive paid over the preceding three years (or a 2.5x multiple for the CEO if termination occurs within two years following a Change in Control), as well as continuing healthcare benefits. The table set
forth on the next page reflects the amount of compensation that would have been payable to the NEOs in the event of termination of employment, including certain benefits upon an involuntary termination related to a change in control, under the terms
of the Severance Plan, or employment agreement for Mr. Kellow, and long-term incentive award agreements, as applicable. Terms used in the following chart are defined in the applicable employment agreement, Severance Plan or award agreement.
Information regarding Mr. Boyces December 31, 2015 separation from the Company is discussed under the heading 2013 Transition Agreement with Mr. Boyce on page 25. Mr. Crews was a participant in the Severance Plan at the time of his
voluntary resignation from the Company on July 31, 2015. Because his separation was voluntary, Mr. Crews was not eligible for any severance payment or benefits continuation provisions under the Severance Plan. The amounts shown assume a termination
effective as of December 31, 2015. The actual amounts that would be payable can be determined only at the time of the NEOs termination. The amount of compensation payable to each NEO upon retirement is not included in the table, as none
of the NEOs were eligible for retirement (age 60, with 10 years of service) as of December 31, 2015. As noted above, on April 13, 2016, the Company and a majority of the Companys wholly owned domestic subsidiaries, as well as
one international subsidiary in Gibraltar, filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. Section 503(c) of the Bankruptcy Code places
limitations on payments made to insiders of a company for, among other things, severance payments. Accordingly, the severance payments described herein will be subject to such limitations. In addition, the Company will likely not be able to
make the payments described above to Mr. Boyce as they constitute prepetition claims and interests.
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Severance
($)
|
|
|
Continued
Benefits
and
Perquisites
($)
|
|
|
Other Cash
Payment
($)
|
|
|
Accelerated
and/or
Continued
Vesting /
Earnout of
Unvested
Equity
Compensation
($)
(1)
|
|
|
Exercise
Tax Gross-
up or Cut-
back($)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
Glenn L. Kellow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Cause Termination or Voluntary Termination
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death or Disability
(3)
|
|
|
519,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726,158
|
Involuntary Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason
(4)
|
|
|
4,336,711
|
|
|
|
60,078
|
|
|
|
141,578
|
|
|
|
9,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,547,890
|
Involuntary Termination Related to a Change in Control
(5)
|
|
|
5,290,956
|
|
|
|
60,078
|
|
|
|
141,578
|
|
|
|
206,428
|
|
|
|
953,390
|
|
|
4,745,650
|
Amy B. Schwetz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Cause Termination or Voluntary Termination
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death or Disability
(3)
|
|
|
174,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194,238
|
Involuntary Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason
(4)
|
|
|
1,403,363
|
|
|
|
70,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,473,969
|
Involuntary Termination Related to a Change in Control
(5)
|
|
|
1,403,363
|
|
|
|
70,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,130
|
|
|
|
37,171
|
|
|
1,456,928
|
Charles F. Meintjes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Cause Termination or Voluntary Termination
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death or Disability
(3)
|
|
|
243,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,150
|
Involuntary Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason
(4)
|
|
|
2,470,845
|
|
|
|
74,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,553,699
|
Involuntary Termination Related to a Change in Control
(5)
|
|
|
2,470,845
|
|
|
|
74,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,651,473
|
Kemal Williamson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Cause Termination or Voluntary Termination
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death or Disability
(3)
|
|
|
205,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,587
|
Involuntary Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason
(4)
|
|
|
2,171,448
|
|
|
|
56,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,231,192
|
Involuntary Termination Related to a Change in Control
(5)
|
|
|
2,171,448
|
|
|
|
56,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,279,116
|
Andrew P. Slentz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Cause Termination or Voluntary Termination
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death or Disability
(3)
|
|
|
190,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,278
|
Involuntary Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason
(4)
|
|
|
1,681,104
|
|
|
|
56,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,739,626
|
Involuntary Termination Related to a Change in
Control
(5)
|
|
|
1,681,104
|
|
|
|
56,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,794,702
|
(1)
|
Reflects the value the NEO could realize as a result of the
accelerated and/or continued vesting of any unvested performance units, restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock option awards. Performance units reflect earned amounts for the 2015 and 2014 awards based on actual performance as of
December 31, 2015. Value attributed to restricted stock and restricted stock units is based on the December 31, 2015 closing stock price of $7.68. There is no value assigned to outstanding stock options, as all outstanding stock options have
exercise prices that are greater than the December 31, 2015 closing stock price of $7.68.
|
(2)
|
For Cause, as defined for all NEOs includes: (1) any
material and uncorrected breach by the NEO of the terms of his employment agreement, including but not limited to, engaging in disclosure of secret or confidential information; (2) any willful fraud or dishonesty of the NEO involving our property or
business; (3) a deliberate or willful refusal or failure to comply with any major corporate policies which are communicated in writing; or (4) the NEOs conviction of, or plea of no contest to any felony if such conviction shall result in
imprisonment or if such conviction has a material detrimental effect on our reputation or business.
|
(3)
|
For all NEOs, compensation payable upon death or disability would
include (1) accrued but unused vacation; (2) earned but unpaid annual incentive for the year of termination; (3) 100% payout of outstanding performance units based on actual performance to the date of termination; and (4) the value the NEO could
realize as a result of the accelerated and/or continued vesting of any unvested restricted stock, restricted stock units, and stock option awards, as applicable. For 2015, the earned but unpaid annual incentive was equal to 100% of the sum of the
non-equity incentive plan compensation, as shown in the Summary Compensation Table. Amounts do not include life insurance payments in the case of death.
|
(4)
|
For all NEOs, compensation payable would include: (1) severance
payments of two times base salary; (2) a payment equal to two times the average of the actual annual incentives paid in the three prior years; (3) a payment equal to two times 6% of base salary to compensate the NEO for Company contributions the NEO
otherwise might have received under our 401(k) plan; (4) any earned but unpaid annual incentive for the year of termination; (5) continuation of benefits for 18 months; (6) the value that could be realized based on a portion of the continued vesting
of outstanding stock option awards; and (7) a prorated payout of outstanding performance units based on performance through the end of the performance period. In addition, the amounts reflect the value that could be realized based on a portion of
the continued vesting of outstanding restricted stock awards, and for Mr. Kellow, the amounts reflect the value he could realize based on the accelerated and/or continued vesting of outstanding and unvested restricted stock unit awards held by
him;
provided
, that if his employment had terminated on December 31, 2015 by virtue of clause (vi) of his Good Reason definition set forth in his employment agreement, the amount reflects the value he could realize based on the accelerated
and/or continued vesting of a pro-rated portion of his outstanding and unvested restricted stock unit awards (determined based on his period of service through the termination date).
|
(5)
|
The amounts the NEOs would receive in the event of an involuntary
termination in connection with a Change in Control, as defined in the applicable employment agreement, Severance Plan, or award agreement, are similar to those described in footnote 4, except that Mr. Kellows severance multiple increases from
2x to 2.5x if termination occurs within two years following a Change in Control.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
36
|
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Compensation of non-employee directors for 2015 consisted of cash compensation, specifically annual board and committee retainers, and
equity compensation. Each of these components is described below in more detail. Any director who is also our employee receives no additional compensation for serving as a director.
Annual Board and Committee Retainers
In 2015, each non-employee director was eligible to receive an annual cash retainer of $110,000. In view of the financial challenges
facing the Company, the Board temporarily reduced the annual cash retainer by $20,000 for 2015, resulting in an annual cash retainer of $90,000 for 2015.
The Chairs of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee each received an additional annual $15,000 cash retainer, and the Chairs of
the Health, Safety, Security and Environmental Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee each received an additional annual $10,000 cash retainer. The Lead Independent Director received an additional annual $25,000 cash
retainer.
Non-employee directors may elect to receive their total annual cash retainer in the form of additional deferred stock
units (based on the fair market value of our Common Stock on the grant date). The additional grant of deferred stock units is subject to the same grant timing, vesting and distribution date elections as the annual equity compensation grant described
below.
We pay travel and accommodation expenses of our non-employee directors to attend meetings and other corporate functions.
Non-employee directors do not receive meeting attendance fees. Non-employee directors may be accompanied by a spouse/partner when traveling on Company business on our aircraft or charter aircraft. Non-employee directors also have the opportunity to
participate in our charitable contribution matching gifts program at the same level and based on the same guidelines applicable to our full-time employees.
Annual Equity Compensation
In 2015, non-employee directors received equity compensation valued at $130,000, awarded in deferred stock units (based on the fair
market value of our Common Stock on the grant date). The deferred stock units generally vest ratably over 12 months (such that they fully vest on the first anniversary of the grant date) and are converted into shares of our Common Stock on the
specified distribution date elected by each non-employee director. In the event of a change in control (as defined in our 2011 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan), any unvested deferred stock units will vest on an accelerated basis. The deferred stock
units also provide for accelerated vesting in the event of the non-employee directors death or disability or separation from service due to the non-employee director reaching the end of his or her elected term and either (1) being
ineligible to run for an additional term on the Board as a result of reaching age 75 or (2) having completed three years of service as a non-employee director and the current Board term for which he or she was elected.
As of December 31, 2015, all stock options held by our directors were out-of-the-money and therefore had no realizable
value. On an aggregate basis, as of December 31, 2015, all undistributed deferred stock units held by our directors are worth approximately 4% of their grant date fair value. The following chart reflects the fair value of the outstanding equity
awards held by directors compared to their grant date fair values:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
Options
(Exercisable
and
Unexercisable)
($)
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed
Deferred
Stock Units
($)
|
|
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
Options
(Exercisable
and
Unexercisable)
($)
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed
Deferred
Stock Units
($)
|
|
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
|
|
% Fair
Value
Decline
Since
Grant
Date
|
William Coley
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
465,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,569
|
|
|
|
|
-97%
|
William James
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
465,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,569
|
|
|
|
|
-97%
|
Robert Karn III
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
480,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
555,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,739
|
|
|
|
|
-98%
|
H.E. Lentz
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
465,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,569
|
|
|
|
|
-97%
|
Robert Malone
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,996
|
|
|
|
|
-95%
|
William Rusnack
|
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
427,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,569
|
|
|
|
|
-97%
|
Michael Sutherlin
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,373
|
|
|
|
|
-95%
|
John Turner
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
335,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,996
|
|
|
|
|
-96%
|
Sandra Van Trease
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
425,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,709
|
|
|
|
|
-97%
|
Heather Wilson
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,878
|
|
|
|
|
-96%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
487,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,495,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,982,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,967
|
|
|
|
|
-97%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
37
|
The total 2015 compensation of our non-employee directors is shown in the table on the
following page.
2015 Director Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
(1)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)
(1)(2)
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
(3)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
|
Undistributed
Deferred
Stock Units
(#)
|
|
|
Outstanding
Stock
Options
(#)
(4)
|
|
William A. Coley *
|
|
|
97,500
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
230,500
|
|
|
|
5,895
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
William E. James
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
222,500
|
|
|
|
5,895
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Robert B. Karn III
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
6,122
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Henry E. Lentz *
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,000
|
|
|
|
5,895
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Robert A. Malone ^
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,000
|
|
|
|
5,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
William C. Rusnack *
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
237,500
|
|
|
|
5,895
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Michael W. Sutherlin
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
5,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
John F. Turner
|
|
|
96,667
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,667
|
|
|
|
5,895
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Sandra Van Trease *
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235,000
|
|
|
|
5,895
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Heather A. Wilson
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
222,500
|
|
|
|
6,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan H. Washkowitz
(5)
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
154,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
*
|
Committee Chair during 2015
|
^
|
Lead Independent Director in 2015
|
(1)
|
Annual fees may be taken in the form of deferred stock units. No
director elected to do so in 2015.
|
(2)
|
Represents the grant date fair value of awards granted in 2015 as
computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. A discussion of the relevant fair value assumptions is set forth in Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements included in the Original Form 10-K. The amount actually realized from the deferred
stock units will vary based on a number of factors, including our actual operating performance, stock price fluctuations and the timing of sales.
|
(3)
|
Amounts include (1) charitable contributions in our matching
gifts program and (2) the aggregate incremental cost to us of use of our corporate aircraft where a spouse accompanied the non-employee director on our corporate aircraft for company business purposes. The aggregate incremental cost to us of
use of our corporate aircraft was determined on a per flight basis, including the cost of fuel, landing fees, in-flight meals, sales tax, crew expenses, the hourly cost of aircraft maintenance for the applicable number of flight hours, and other
variable costs specifically incurred.
|
(4)
|
There were no stock options granted in 2015.
|
(5)
|
Mr. Washkowitz retired from the Board effective January 22, 2015.
|
Share Ownership Requirements
Under our share ownership requirements for directors, each non-employee director is required to acquire and retain Common Stock having a
value equal to at least five times his or her annual cash retainer.
If at any time a non-employee director does not meet his or her
ownership requirement, the director must retain (1) any Common Stock owned by the director (whether owned directly or indirectly) and (2) any net shares received as the result of the exercise, vesting or payment of any Company equity award until the
ownership requirement is met, in each case unless otherwise approved in writing by the Compensation Committee. For this purpose, net shares means the shares of Common Stock that remain after shares are sold or withheld, as the case
may be, to (1) pay the exercise price for a stock option award or (2) satisfy any tax obligations, including withholding taxes, arising in connection with the exercise, vesting or payment of an equity award.
Compliance with these requirements is evaluated as of December 31 of each year. The value of an individuals share ownership
as of such date is determined by multiplying the number of shares of our Common Stock or other eligible equity interests held by the individual by the closing price of our stock as of the business day immediately preceding the date of determination.
For purposes of determining stock ownership levels, only the following forms of equity interests in the Company are included:
|
¡
|
|
Stock owned directly (including stock or stock units held in any defined contribution plan or employee stock purchase
plan and shares of restricted stock);
|
|
¡
|
|
Stock held by immediate family members residing in the same household or through trusts for the benefit of the person or
his or her immediate family members residing in the same household;
|
|
¡
|
|
Unvested restricted stock or RSUs (provided that vesting is based solely on the passage of time and/or continued service
with the Company); and
|
|
¡
|
|
Vested and undistributed deferred stock units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
38
|
Due to the continued decline in the market price per share of our stock, ownership
requirements were not met for any of our directors as of December 31, 2015; however, during 2015, all of our directors complied with the Companys requirements that apply until the required stock ownership level is met.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Messrs. Coley, James, Malone, Rusnack, and Sutherlin served on the Companys Compensation Committee during 2015. None of these
committee members is a current or former Peabody officer or employee. In addition, none of our executive officers served during 2015 as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity which has one or more executive
officers serving as a member of our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Companys disclosure under Compensation Discussion
and Analysis section of this Amendment.
Based on such review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the
Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Companys Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
MEMBERS OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE:
|
|
WILLIAM C. RUSNACK, CHAIR
|
WILLIAM A. COLEY
|
WILLIAM E. JAMES
|
MICHAEL W. SUTHERLIN
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peabody Energy Corporation
|
|
2015 Form 10-K/A
|
|
39
|