ADVFN Logo
Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customized watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, OTC Markets Small-Cap, LSE and more.
Voip Pal Com Inc (QB)

Voip Pal Com Inc (QB) (VPLM)

0.00685
-0.00015
( -2.14% )
Updated: 13:00:36

Professional-Grade Tools, for Individual Investors.

Key stats and details

Current Price
0.00685
Bid
0.0063
Ask
0.007
Volume
413,711
0.00665 Day's Range 0.00695
0.0063 52 Week Range 0.029
Market Cap
Previous Close
0.007
Open
0.00665
Last Trade Time
12:59:27
Financial Volume
$ 2,864
VWAP
0.006922
Average Volume (3m)
2,474,462
Shares Outstanding
3,553,945,275
Dividend Yield
-
PE Ratio
-1.54
Earnings Per Share (EPS)
-0.01
Revenue
-
Net Profit
-23.11M

About Voip Pal Com Inc (QB)

Voip-Pal.com Inc. ('Voip-Pal') is a publicly traded corporation (OTCQB: VPLM) incorporated in December of 1997 in the state of Nevada and headquartered in Waco, Texas. Voip-Pal is a technical leader in the broadband Voice-over-Internet Protocol ('VoIP') market with the ownership and continuing devel... Voip-Pal.com Inc. ('Voip-Pal') is a publicly traded corporation (OTCQB: VPLM) incorporated in December of 1997 in the state of Nevada and headquartered in Waco, Texas. Voip-Pal is a technical leader in the broadband Voice-over-Internet Protocol ('VoIP') market with the ownership and continuing development of a portfolio of leading-edge VoIP patents. Show more

Sector
Tele & Telegraph Apparatus
Industry
Tele & Telegraph Apparatus
Headquarters
Reno, Nevada, USA
Founded
-
Voip Pal Com Inc (QB) is listed in the Tele & Telegraph Apparatus sector of the OTCMarkets with ticker VPLM. The last closing price for Voip Pal Com (QB) was $0.01. Over the last year, Voip Pal Com (QB) shares have traded in a share price range of $ 0.0063 to $ 0.029.

Voip Pal Com (QB) currently has 3,553,945,275 shares outstanding. The market capitalization of Voip Pal Com (QB) is $24.88 million. Voip Pal Com (QB) has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -1.54.

VPLM Latest News

PeriodChangeChange %OpenHighLowAvg. Daily VolVWAP
1-0.00075-9.868421052630.00760.00770.006612714740.00698817CS
4-0.00065-8.666666666670.00750.00880.006320383210.00722248CS
12-0.00485-41.4529914530.01170.01290.006324744620.00882943CS
26-0.00849-55.34550195570.015340.0290.006336866330.01336513CS
52-0.01815-72.60.0250.0290.006330826530.01464232CS
156-0.00755-52.43055555560.01440.11440.006324931560.02970571CS
260-0.01965-74.15094339620.02650.11440.00621732420.02627243CS

Movers

View all
  • Most Active
  • % Gainers
  • % Losers
SymbolPriceVol.
EVOLSymbolic Logic Inc (CE)
$ 0.99
(98,999,900.00%)
600
CRMBQCrumbs Bake Shop Inc (CE)
$ 0.012
(1,199,900.00%)
15.64k
GPDBGreen PolkaDot Box Incorporated (CE)
$ 0.0002
(19,900.00%)
21.54k
FCGDFirst Colombia Gold Corporation (PK)
$ 0.0001
(9,900.00%)
600k
BIIOBionovate Technologies Corporation (CE)
$ 0.0001
(9,900.00%)
1.21k
TIHETaihe Group Inc (CE)
$ 0.000001
(-100.00%)
1
SBBGSeibels Bruce Group Inc (CE)
$ 0.000001
(-100.00%)
4
MXLGFMX Gold Corporation (CE)
$ 0.000001
(-100.00%)
1.1k
VIVEViveve Medical Inc (CE)
$ 0.000001
(-99.75%)
652
SMGISMG Industries Inc (CE)
$ 0.000001
(-99.50%)
10k
AITXArtificial Intelligence Technology Solutions Inc (PK)
$ 0.00275
(0.00%)
51.06M
GTEHGenTech Holdings Inc (CE)
$ 0.000001
(0.00%)
48.25M
HMBLHUMBL Inc (PK)
$ 0.0002
(-33.33%)
42.65M
CBGLCannabis Global Inc (PK)
$ 0.00015
(50.00%)
41.81M
GTVHGolden Triangle Ventures Inc (PK)
$ 0.0008
(33.33%)
41.61M

VPLM Discussion

View Posts
sunspotter sunspotter 2 hours ago
This is dedicated to those previously prolific and vociferous posters who were never off this MB before the disastrous tactical mistake of the anti-trust lawsuits:

👍 1
ORCA ORCA 2 hours ago
BROKE LOL.BTW VPLM IS MY B$TCH.I WILL MAKE A TON OF MONEY HERE AGAIN.I AM ACCUMULATING WEEKLY.
THE TIME WILL COME WHEN I SAY BOOOMMMMMMMM THAT DAY THE LEVEL II WILL GOT BANANAS
I AM WAITING FOR THE RIGHT TIME.TO HIT WITH NO REMORSE AND GET EVEN.VPLM TIME WILL COME
KEEP WATCHING.
BTW MAKE THAT $58,589.66 FOR NOVEMBER.WITH THE TODAYS NET PROFIT PROBABLY $60,000.00 FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER.BROKE ORCA.LOL.WHEN IT COMES TO TRADING ORCA HAS YET TO POST FAKE TRADES
STRAIGHT FROM THE SCHWAB.GUESS WHAT???I BEAT THESE PROS WITH ONE ACCOUNT IMAGINE THAT HUH?
BEATING THEM ON PENNY STOCKS WITH ALMOST NO VOLUMES.LOL.THE GREATEST OF ALL TIMES.
BTW. NO ONE HAS 95% SUCCESS RATE,IF I GO TO TRADE ON BIG BOARDS,THEY ARE ABSOLUTELY TOAST.,I WILL TAKE EVERY FREAKEN CENT OUT OF THEIR WALLETS.I WENT ON BIG BOARDS IN FEBRUARY 2021 FOR COUPLE MONTHS.GUESS WHAT??I WAS MAKING MONEY SOOOOO EASY IT WAS CRAZY.I HAD ABOUT 50 FLIPS IN ONE DAY.
THAT WAS MY BEST MONTH EVER.I MADE $185,000.00 JUST FOR FEBRUARY.IF I STAYED ON BIG BOARDS.THESE GUYS WOULD HAVE LOST THEIR SHIRTS.I FELT SORRY FOR THEM.AND I LEFT THE BIG BOARDS.THERE WAS ZERO CHALLENGE FOR ME THERE.ABSOLUTE ZERO.IF THESE DIRT BAGS CAN NOT BEAT ME ON STOCKS WITH NO VOLUMES.HOW CAN THEY BEAT ME ON STOCKS WITH ENORMOUS VOLUMES??THEY ARE TOAST.ALL THAT WITH ONE ACCOUNT.LOL
I AM FURIOUS BEYOND BELIEF WITH THEIR STUPID ALGO SYSTEM THAT I AM GOING TO BIG BOARDS IN 2025.
THEY ARE GOING TO BE SOOOOOOOOOOO FD.THE REASON I WILL CREATE SHORT COVERS.,AND DESTROY THAT ENTIRE GROUP OF SHORT SELLERS.ONCE AND FOR ALL.I CAN NOT WAIT.
👍️0
Dontnosheet Dontnosheet 3 hours ago
Sure dude.. that’s why you talk about sodas. You broke as a joke son.
👍️0
ORCA ORCA 3 days ago
THE SS HAS BEEN UPDATED.WHILE THE O/S IS THE SAME.THE UNRESTRICTED SHARES ARE UP TO 2,108 BILLION
FROM 2,105 BILLION.SO THE INSIDERS SOLD 3 MILLION SHARES.ADDED TO THE FLOAT.SELLING AT .007 IS VERY SCARRY.FOR THE STOCK.WE WILL STAY DOWN HERE,AND SHAKE THEM OUT AT DIRT LOWS.F THEM.
I OWN 9 MILLION NOW.AVERAGE ON THE 6 MILLION IS AT .0072.ON THE STUPID FIDELITY ACCOUNT ON 3 MILLION AVERAGE IS .011.I HAVE NOT LOGGED IN TO POS FIDELITY EVER SINCE THEY PULLED THEIR GARBAGE ON PENNY STOCKS.SCAMBAGS.ANYWAYS.VPLM IS NOT GOING ANYWHERE UNLESS WE SHAKE OUT THE INSIDERS AT THE LOWEST PRICES POSSIBLE.WHEN I DETECT THEM SELLING,I WILL SELL TOO.IF THEY UNDER CUT ME I WILL TOO.TO DEATH.F YOU ALGO SYSTEM.F YOU.
Outstanding Shares
3,624,945,275
11/19/2024
Restricted
1,516,728,610
11/19/2024
Unrestricted
2,108,216,665
11/19/2024
👍️0
ORCA ORCA 3 days ago
YEA BRO I AM BROKE.I ONLY MADE 56K $ FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER SO FAR.NOT MUCH BUT ITS AS MUCH AS A MIDDLE CLASS WORKER MAKES PER YEAR.
👍️0
Dontnosheet Dontnosheet 3 days ago
Wow, you must be broke to eat and drink chicken and soda, LMAO!!! Maybe if you invested smarter you would be eating steak and seafood like me, LMFAO!!!🤡
👍 1
ORCA ORCA 4 days ago
VPLM IN ITS WORSE SHAPE EVER PRICE PER SHARE WISE..0066 UNREAL.NOT TO MENTION IS BEEN UNDER .01 FOR HOW LONG NOW???WOW.GOOD THING FOR ME I FLIP IT TO MAKE CHICKEN TRIOS AND A CAN OF SODA.
OR I WOULD HAVE LOST MY SHIRT.KEEP SELLING LIONS.
👍️0
ORCA ORCA 4 days ago
LOW TODAY .0066.WOW.LET;S HOPE IT GOES TO TRIPLE ZERO FOR A COUPLE DAYS.
👍️0
DesktopDR DesktopDR 4 days ago
Just sitting on our hands waiting on the reconsideration. The Judge didn't say no right away which leads me to believe he is looking over it carefully or at the very least there is a chance. Anyone that is invested is hoping this is true! I also hope that the trashers will sell their shares so they have a writer off and can be rid of this chat. This will drive the price down so us positive thinkers can buy more.
👍 9
sunspotter sunspotter 4 days ago
"A week later, or so, I think it was sun (I forget) was good enough to post the exhibit A rebuttal from Verizon."

It was me. It's here, and not only is it a comprehensive trashing of the anti-trust lawsuits (and the lawyers behind it) it also exposed some of VPLM's sneaky and indeed illegal social media tactics:

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175410858
👍️0
nyt nyt 5 days ago
Here's how it's done, truthfully, logically and factually...

Around a couple weeks ago, someone posted what I think was called exhibit A of the anti-trust or monopoly suit. I think it was 1 page and it was the 1st and only document I've read where the lawyers explained how the big dogs were acting as a monopoly. I read it and concluded it to be a ridiculous non sequitor complaint that was based on such nonsense, it was hard to believe it was serious.

So I immediately posted exactly what I perceived to be wrong with it, with detail. No one commented on it even tho it poked a huge hole in the bs suit.

A week later, or so, I think it was sun (I forget) was good enough to post the exhibit A rebuttal from Verizon. Sorry if I'm not properly naming the documents, I'm not good with that.....but what the defendant lawyers had to say against the complaint was nice and crystal clear to me and agreed, to the letter, with what I had earlier posted as my take on the suit.

I guess my simply coming on now and claiming this is not enough, so I'll take the time and try to find both posts for display here to backup my contention. That'll give yall time to call bs and hopefully I can find the posts. I had it NAILED!
👍️0
nyt nyt 5 days ago
Thanks for posting that opinion. You've been dead wrong so far on all your others so you've made it easy to know the outcome will be the opposite of your call. Another pro vplm contrivance. Mark it.
👍️ 1
chazzy1 chazzy1 5 days ago
There has been expressed some question as to whether or not a judge in the Western District of Texas is required to respond to a motion for reconsideration, if that judge does not intend to reverse his final ruling. I believe that the judge must respond, and for the following reason.
There is a specific time limit in which to appeal a decision from a district court. However, the clock does not start on that until after the district court judge makes a ruling on the motion for reconsideration. Actually, this makes sense because, otherwise, a district court judge could conceivably run out the clock, leaving the agrieved party no time to execute an appeal.
Thus, my opinion is that Judge Albright must respond to VoIP-Pal's motion for reconsideration, regardless of which way he may decide. As to a specific time limit imposed on a judge for responding to a motion for reconsideration, I think that it would be the same as it is for all motions, as defined in the judge's standing orders.
👍️ 4
nyt nyt 7 days ago
They already fell short on the 30 days stipulation and are well into not making the 180 day, 10 days in a row requirement. Of course, this is Vplm, so as always, it's a good thing. Now Lord Emu of eGipped won't have to bother with all those pesky nuisance filings.....oh wait....he hasn't been worried about them while QB anyway.

BEST P.O.S. EVER!
👍️0
nyt nyt 1 week ago
All OTCQB companies must meet the minimum bid price of $.01 per share at the close of business of at least one of the previous 30 consecutive calendar days; in the event that the price falls below $.01, the company will begin a grace period of 180 calendar days to maintain a closing bid price of $.01 for ten consecutive trading days.

Of course it won't matter worth a damn what level or color they reside in. They're a worthless fiat share printing/selling scheme regardless the color of your shades..


Vplm is headed back into the womb. Tsk, tsk
👍️0
nyt nyt 1 week ago
Vplm.....soon to be "back in the pink!"
for patent cancer awareness...
👍️0
ORCA ORCA 1 week ago
CDEL COME ON DOWN DIRT BAG.I WANT MY CHICKEN TRIOS.SELL DAMMIT SELL.
👍️0
straightword straightword 1 week ago
He isn't worth defending because NOTHING he has said has ever come true. Where's that .85 price per share he was just talking about a month or so ago?
👍️0
shajandr shajandr 1 week ago
This is EXACTLY right. 10/10 for a complete, correct response.

VPLM is nuffin butt an OBVIOUS scam from a career scammer (Emo).
👍️0
ORCA ORCA 1 week ago
ORCA YOU SAID IT BRO.AND THEY DELIVERED.LOL.YOU CAN NOT FIX STUPID.KEEP THEM COMING LIONS.
11/20/2024 Buy
Trade Details
VPLM
VOIP-PAL COM INC
994,922
$0.0071 $3.00 -$7,066.9
👍️0
ORCA ORCA 1 week ago
LIKE A SONG.ORCA SAID:::::COME ON DOWN MMs ORCA NEEDS TO MAKE CHICKEN TRIOS:::::
THEY SURE DID.LMAO.UNREAL.TO PREDICT WHAT THEY WILL DO IS WHAT MASTERY OF DAY TRADING IS ALL ABOUT.
I KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THEY WILL DO.AT ANY MOMENT.EVERYTHING FALLING ON MY LAP:)))
ON VDRM EVERYTHING WAS FALLING ON MY LAP BY THE MILLIONS AND VICIOUSLY.I WAS LMAO EACH TIME
SELLING ME .004 .005 AND .006.LOL.AND I WAS TELLING THEM.WE WILL SEE WHAT PRICES YOU WILL PAY TO BUY THEM BACK FROM ME.LOL.KEEP THEM COMING.THEY SURE DID:)))VPLM IS MY CHICKEN TRIO REWARDER.WHILE VDRM BUYS ME CARS:))LOL.BOTH RUN BY THE SAME PROMOTORAS.THIS IS WHY I MENTION THEM BOTH.THE V STOCKS.LOL
ADDED CLOSE TO 1 MILLION TODAY HERE.WE WILL SEE WHAT PRICES THEY WILL PAY TO BUY IT BACK FROM ME:))))THE KING FLIPPER.BUY LOW.SELL HIGH.THERE IS NO OTHER WAY FOR ORCA.REMEMBER ONE THING,.:::::THE LOWER YOU BRING HER THE BETTER FOR ME.I LOVE THAT.THIS IS WHAT VDRM WAS DOING.LOWER AND LOWER AND LOWER.AT ONE TIME THEY TOOK HER DOWN TO .0027.LMAO.THEN OUT OF NO WHERE ROCKS TO .0145S.
NO ONE TRADES LIKE ME.WHAT I MEAN BY THAT??NO MATTER HOW MANY SHARES I OWN IN A STOCK.I WANT IT TO GO LOWER AND LOWER AND LOWER,WHILE ME ADDING MILLIONS.THE STOCK WILL REACH AN AREA THAT MANY TRADERS WILL SAY::::MAN THIS THING IS WAY OVERSOLD.THEY WILL JUMP IN AND BOOM SHE WILL GO.
I HAVE STOCKS THAT I WAIT 20 YEARS IN ORDER TO MAKE A PROFIT.IT IS VERY HARD TO SHAKE ORCA OUT AT A LOSS.IF I LOSE EVERYONE LOSES.THERE IS NO OTHER WAY.THUS KEEP MAKING ME MONEY:)))I NAMED MYSELF
ORCA BECAUSE OF HOW SMART ORCAS ARE.THEY HAVE A PLAN.AND THEY EXECUTE THEIR PLAN.VICIOUSLY.
THE ONLY TREMENDOUS DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THIS ORCA=ME, IS I ACT ALONE.ALWAYS.ONE MAN SHOW.ONE ORCA SHOW.WHILE THE CHICKENS=ORCAS OF THE SEA.IN ORDER TO MAKE A BIG KILL THEY ARE LIKE A DOZEN OF THEM TOGETHER.BS WIN.IS LIKE A UFC CHAMP FIGHTS ONE ON ONE.OR A UFC CHAMP FIGHTS 5 GUYS.THEY WILL MURDER HIM IN THE CAGE.LOL.BUT THIS ORCA=ME CAN TAKE 20 OR 30 PRO TRADERS AND MAKE SUSHI OUT OF ALL OF THEM.THEY TRY ALL KINDS OF BS. TO MAKE ME LOSE.SHAKE ME OUT ETC.THAT STUPID ALGO SYSTEM DOES NOT WORK AGAINST ORCA.I WILL DISABLE THIS POS SYSTEM OF ALGO.IT TRIES TO UNDER CUT ME ALL THE TIME.HUGE MISTAKE.UNTIL THE SHARES FALL ON MY LAP STUPID B$TCH.A STUPID SYSTEM WILL TRY TO TAKE THE MONEY FROM A TRADER.LOL.THEY ARE LOSING THEIR A$$ES WITH THE ALGO SYSTEM.AND IN MANY PENNY STOCK THEY ARE NOT EVEN USE IT MUCH.LOL.IMAGINE THAT???A STUPID MACHINE IS TRYING TO TAKE OUR MONEY.LOL.REALLY????KEEP THE BS GOING ALGO.AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS.

11/20/2024 Buy
Trade Details
VPLM
VOIP-PAL COM INC
994,922
$0.0071 $3.00 -$7,066.9
👍️0
ORCA ORCA 1 week ago
F.FIDELITY.THEY WILL PAY FOR WHAT THEY DID THE MFs.I DO NOT EVEN USE THAT ACCOUNT ANYMORE.I ONLY USE SCHWAB FOR TRADING.I WANT FIDELITY TO GO BANKO.TO LOSE EVERYTHING.THE SCAMBAGS.FOR THE SCAM THEY PULLED ON INVESTOR TRADERS.THEY ARE FD.THEY ARE LOSING ACCOUNTS LIKE CRAZY.MANY TRADERS MOVING AWAY FROM THEM.
👍️0
9Coastal 9Coastal 1 week ago
To Orca: On Fidelity I can currently buy any penny stock in multiples of 40k/shares with individual trade submissions.
👍️0
nyt nyt 1 week ago
Agreed. I noticed those same 2 facts but the foot in mouth disease is like stage 4 and that and all the rest of the contradicting, conflicting and ignorant statements have quickly become fully expected M.O.

When a person is shown the facts contradict his fiction, and instead of acknowledging, correcting and apologizing, they push it even farther into lala land, there's a mental issue of some sort imho. This has now occurred too many times to count. Amusement is giving way to concern for well being.
👍️ 1
ORCA ORCA 1 week ago
THE VOLUMES ARE GONE.WOW.I WILL NOT BE ABLE TO MAKE CHICKEN TRIOS.F.COME ON DOWN MMs ORCA NEEDS TO MAKE CHICKEN TRIOS.
👍️0
Dontnosheet Dontnosheet 1 week ago
Nah, what's really funny is this statement by you: What is sunspotter's connection to Verizon that he would be privy to this kind of sensitive material Also, not knowing that if the judge rules against the reconsideration, that he doesn't have to say anything about his ruling, BUT, BUT then to say that the judge basically owes an explanation. PUMPER ALERT!!!!! PUMPER ALERT!!!!
👍️ 1
straightword straightword 1 week ago
History show us that nothing will come of this. Get back to me when they get financial judgements that are in-line with the "billions and billions of ongoing" infringements that the CEO has spoken about. If not then it's a complete failure and confirmation that the patents aren't worth near as claimed.
🈺 1 👍️ 1
sunspotter sunspotter 1 week ago
Not as hilarious as you opining on the merits of a case you haven’t even read.

Especially as the thing you found so amusing was actually a made up distortion of a factual comment I once made.
👍️0
chazzy1 chazzy1 1 week ago
LOL! Bulldawg99, that was hilarious.
👍️ 2
sunspotter sunspotter 1 week ago
“ I have not read it (and probably won't).”

While you may find that ignorance is bliss, reality dictates otherwise.
👍️0
nyt nyt 1 week ago
"and I won't"

How many times can one underwater dweller put their foot in their mouth re: one worthless rogue stock? Apparengly, no end to it. Worth the price of admission...
👍️ 1
bulldawg99 bulldawg99 1 week ago
He got it from the Feds. You know, the ones that he has been working with for 12 years to “take this down”
👍️ 4
chazzy1 chazzy1 1 week ago
Thanks for posting, and no, I have not read it (and probably won't).
👍️ 2
nyt nyt 1 week ago
I can't believe there's STILL dummkopfs out there that STILL think the 36 positive IPRs prove anything and/or are somehow legally valuable to vplm. The only value they have is to stock dummies who buy more shares based on that. You know who I'm talkin to, Mr PROCESS CHEESEHEAD... 1st you must learn to process info and your thoughts.

Remember... I issued at least 2, no 3, challenges for anyone to show a single case where a judge has used positive IPR outcomes, as a basis, on any level, for a trial decision.

I CAN'T HEARRRR YOUUU!!!
👍️0
fung_derf fung_derf 1 week ago
BWAHAHAHA!!
So, it's ok that you regularly post your WAG's as to what's going on, even though there is a zero percent chance you're correct, but now you're accusing a poster on here of inside info because he posted public info?....
Even funnier is that you NEVER challenged DB for posting his daily inside info (he claimed) garbage.

If you aren't being paid from the company, you should be. You've taken over exactly where DB left off. Be very careful.....the lawyers are following this board.
Ironic that you came back as DB left
👍️ 1
sunspotter sunspotter 1 week ago
" VPLM put something out using a penny stock board, you would laugh them up and down...."

You do know who MoFo are, and what their reputation is, right?

I'm sure I don't know what you mean about putting something out using a penny stock board- until very recently VPLM were doing exactly that on a daily basis. Maybe you should read the exhibits and this very message board again..................................
👍️0
lbird33 lbird33 1 week ago
Hobby, LOL!!!!!

If roles were reversed and VPLM put something out using a penny stock board, you would laugh them up and down....

Dumbest thing I've ever read. Can't even believe their lawyers are that dumb.

but, but, but Judge, did you see what that Deerballs said on Ihub? Judge: What's Ihub? It's a penny stock board that 5 people read.
👍️ 6 👏 1
nyt nyt 1 week ago
THAT...is SOOOO funny!! 😅😆😂

A connection.....YA THINK??
👍️0
sunspotter sunspotter 1 week ago
Given that we have established that even VPLM boosters who claim to understand the antitrust case haven't even read it (that's you, @chazzy1) I thought it might be helpful to post the entire MoFo letter here (I obviously obtained this via devious Verizon contacts - or maybe it was Pacer):


👍️0
Dontnosheet Dontnosheet 1 week ago
Did you really just this, LMAO!! Only Sun and everyone else on the planet, DUH!!!
👍️ 1
sunspotter sunspotter 1 week ago
“how did sunspotter obtain a written copy?”

It’s included in VPLM’s own filing which you have already declared all-conquering and a masterpiece of legal argumentation, so you must have read it yourself already, mustn’t you?

I’m amazed that someone as knowledgeable and indeed opinionated as you on matters of law hasn’t heard of Pacer.

Duh.
👍️0
chazzy1 chazzy1 1 week ago
What piques my curiosity is that if this so-called "MoFo letter" is authentic, and was actually addressed to VPLM's lawyers from Verizon's lawyers, how did sunspotter obtain a written copy? Wouldn't this be considered confidential and priveleged, even sensitive (and potentially insider) information? Shouldn't lawyer to lawyer communications be kept confidential? What is sunspotter's connection to Verizon that he would be privy to this kind of sensitive material, or has this letter been published elsewhere. Just curious.
👍️ 6 😯 1
ORCA ORCA 1 week ago
YOU GUYS KEEP THE NOISE GOING,WHILE I AM MAKING MY CHICKEN TRIOS:))I LOVE IT THAT WE STAYED DOWN AT THESE LEVELS TO KEEP MAKING MY CHICKEN TRIOS:))HOPING WE TRADE DOWN AT THESE LEVELS FOR THE NEXT 10 YEARS SO I CAN KEEP FLIPPING IT AND MAKE CHICKEN TRIOS:))
👍️0
sunspotter sunspotter 1 week ago
We haven't heard a peep out of numerous previously extremely prolific and regular posting aliases since MoFo sent their letter to VPLM's lawyers identifying DeerBalls as one of their targets in Discovery.

The shock must have been too much for them. Before then they were hardly off the board in their fervid defense of VPLM and DB.
👍️0
VVVVVV VVVVVV 1 week ago
So what you’re saying, the antitrust lawsuits were just fabricated just to pump up a penny stock? Do I understand you correctly?

Anyone with common sense knows no one would put themselves it that position.

No, actually I have better words than laughable if you want to know the truth.

You can think all you want, it’s not going to change anything. It’s wasted energy.

IMHO
👍️ 2 👏 1
sunspotter sunspotter 1 week ago
“ It’s a ridiculous “assumption” they’re derived just to pump up a penny stock. I mean, how weak is that. Laughable!!!!”

Have you read this MB?

Anyone who has ( including you) knows that far from being laughable, it’s the stone cold truth.
👍️0
VVVVVV VVVVVV 1 week ago
You’re the one that’s not keeping up. Or shall I say, comprehending and processing it. Your cut and paste means nothing. Doesn’t hold water!

Bringing more eye balls with these lawsuits, is an opinion and certainly doesn’t make them meritless. It’s a ridiculous assumption they’re derived just to pump up a penny stock. I mean, how weak is that. Laughable!!!!

Still not too sure what’s wrong with being encouraged with the value of VPLM’s patents and recent success, aka successful 36 IPR’s, successful Alice with the Mobile Gateway, and favorable reconsideration with the ‘606 patent with the active case with Amazon.

Any knowledge of this, is public information and should be very encouraging and exciting to all shareholders. IMHO

Yeah, yeah, I know, the Mobil Gateway has been dismissed until further review. But, this patent has nothing to do with the antitrust lawsuits. Which is clearly stated, if you have been keeping up.

IMHO
👍️ 4 👏 1 🗑️ 1 🚮 1 🤢 1 ☠️ 1
chazzy1 chazzy1 1 week ago
I agree, DesktopDR. Once these errors of law have been cited by Mr. Hudnell, it would seem that this judge would be compelled to explain his rational behind his rather odd conclusion; a conclusion which cites the wrong precedent (an error of law) and a conclusion which seems to contradict the very claim term definitions which had already been allowed during claim construction (namely, that a single message may be broken up into multiple transmissions). A failure to reconsider this flawed opinion would result in a manifest injustice to the plaintiff. Although motions for reconsideration are generally frowned upon by the court, there are three situations where they are justified. Two of those justifying situations are cited in Mr. Hudnell's motion (a third justification would have been to introduce new evidence which was not available at the time of the hearing). The US Court of Appeals is poised to address these errors, should this judge neglect to correct them himself. IMHO.
👍️ 4 👏 1 🗑️ 1 🚮 1 🤢 1
sunspotter sunspotter 1 week ago
You should try and keep up. It’s your money after all (or is it?) - you don’t want a repeat of HDVY, where the insiders took away millions and the retail shareholders nothing, surely?

I was merely wondering what the link was between the recent disappearance of previously prolific pro-VPLM posters and the legal documents shown here:

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175407494
👍️0
ORCA ORCA 1 week ago
IMO AND I AM 99% SURE THE JUDGE RULED AGAINST VPLM,BECAUSE HE GOT AN EAR FULL FROM THE DEFENCE LAWYERS THAT THE INSIDERS WERE SELLING AND MAKING KILLING.ALL ALONG.HE GOT PISSED OFF AND DID WHAT HE DID.AS I SAID I AM 99% SURE ABOUT IT.IMO.
👍️0

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock