Voip Pal Com Inc (QB) (VPLM) Quote

How much did the shareholders receive from this settlement?

Drhome, the case against Huawei was not cancelled. It was dismissed with prejudice, which is often the case when the litigants settle out of court. Yes, that case was subsequently settled, which is why it was dismissed with prejudice.

Drhome, it was not cancelled. It was dismissed with prejudice, which is often the case when the litigants settle out of court. Yes, that case was settled, which is why it was dismissed with prejudice.

An obnoxious and persistent ad was blocking full access to the edit page of my last post until my time expired, causing that post to look like gibberish, so I will restate it here in its entirety for the most clarity:

I beg to differ, straightword. What information the company is allowed to put out publicly is a matter that is best determined by the legal team representing VP. It would be irresponsible and reckless for the IR department to divulge details that are being negotiated in private, merely to placate some nervous investor. That kind of manipulation would be more in line with what scam companies do. Therefore, I fail to see how this is somehow a red flag, but a scam? No way. Investing involves risk, and not everyone has the stomach for it. If the reasons that you invested in VP still exist, then ignore all of the noise and remain focused.

Why expect otherwise from a scam?
Almost down to subpenny now. Looks like an ever increasing number of shareholders finally see the truth and are exiting. Most won't admit it, it they see and I see the dive. It's a shame but most wouldn't listen to reason when all the lies and inconsistancies were presented. Then there's the rude crude nasties. They deserve...

This PR from VPLM was in May against Huawei https://finance.yahoo.com/news/voip-pal-receives-favorable-ruling-120000149.html , Have you seen it was cancelled since?

Only Voip-pal! How can a company have a day like Friday with false news and the two trials we were expecting canceled and then have no PR from the company Monday morning? Shareholders continue to get no respect from management. the prophet

I beg to differ, straightword. What information the company is allowed to put out publicly is a matter that is best determined by the legal team representing VP. It would be irresponsible and reckless for the IR department to divulge details that are being negotiated in private, merely to placate some nervous investor. That kind of mamipulation would be more in line with what scam companies do. Therefore, I fail to see how this is somehow a red flag, but a scam? No. Investing involves risk, and not everyone has the stomach for it. If the reasons you invested in VP still exist, t704 292 9736hen ignore all of the noise and remain focused.

Like I said before, the website is still "Voip-Pal.com". "Voip-palusa.com" also works and they both go to same site but have different names.

HUGE red flag that the company doesn't give updates to investors and that the CEO refuses to do calls so that investors can ask any questions. Just more confirmation of what a scam this all is.

Thanks, rapz. I always enjoy reading your astute and enlightened posts. I agree with you that one reason for this unexpected delay in proceedings revolves around a dispute over the damages being claimed by VP. VP is assessing damages in the $ billions, which came out in the pretrial motions hearings on July 9th. The defendants are also contesting VP's request to substitute a new damage assessment expert. My sentiment has not changed. They are hagling over the amount, not over the fact that they owe VP. This is the important takeaway.

from what ive seen his name has been removed from the website ...correct me if wrong i havent seen it since the new voip-palusa, has been established.no love lost with him

I hope Rich Inza isn't being paid. If he is, he should be fired. We need updates. We own part of the company!!!

God bless, best wishes for your surgery!..I work in cat scan/x-ray..without medical .imaging where would we be ?

as I stated cases weren't dismissed !! just cancelled to a further a date with new suits coming forward..I'm waiting it out...the bozo identified as ""nuuuts"" over at stock twits,started a frenzy for no rhyme or reason...and where is he now??? hmmm

Betcha it isn’t.

Today will tell us which one of us is right, agreed?

find a new hobby..its bouncing back :)

Given that the insiders’ warrants are mostly priced at 0.0025, that will form the floor for most of today’s trading.

Friday’s volume of 25 million will be dwarfed by the insiders dumping their millions of free shares as soon as they can, given that it can’t be long before even the most misled VPLM long realises the jig is up.

When is DB Back?

Apparently denial is not a river in Egypt, but a way of life for VPLM longs, and those insiders posting on this board pretending to be longs.

Here’s the truth about the Huewai case:

“The last defendant to exit from the campaign was Huawei, the most recent suit against which was dismissed with prejudice on May 13, 2024. That dismissal was with prejudice from the Northern District of Texas, shortly after District Judge Brantley Starr—on April 30, 2024—denied a motion to dismiss a complaint asserting two mobile gateway patents (8,630,234; 10,880,721) because the asserted claims are not drawn to eligible subject matter. The court refused to treat claim 1 of the '234 patent as representative of the remaining asserted claims (claims 10-11, 19-22, 24-25, 28, 30-33, 35, 37-40, 43, 45-48, 51, 53-54, 61-62, 64-65, 70, 72, and 75 of the '234 patent and claims 1, 6, 15-16, 20, 25, 34, 38, 39, 43, 45-46, 49-51, 63, 67, 77, 103-104, 109-110, 124, 130, 135-136, and 138-140 of the '721 patent), some of which contain means-plus-function elements.“


https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/patent/1495130/voippalcom-sues-tmobile-and-verizon-over-previously-unasserted-claims-from-previously-asserted-patents

Vplm. Mom said growing old wasn’t for pcats 😊

Most of my shares are long now-so I can afford to follow thru on a tag team of waiting for VPLM too finish their journey and another operation in October..Not looking forward to another aneurism operation. But these shares of Vplm are for my kids and their kids. After all you can’t take it with you. These silly penny plays are my 10 percent of account plays. And 8000 plus hours of flying helicopters in the wild tells me to screw the aneurism and just go for it. GLTA

RBR 606 patent cases against VZ and TMUS were filed quite a while ago.
U.S. District Judge David Counts
200 East Wall, Midland, TX 79701
Totally three RBR cases are pending: AMZN, VZ, TMUS.

TWO MG cases are in progress. Trial dates were canceled, not dismissed as many have already guessed.
Conflicts with damages, expert testimonies, the use of specific infringement models should have been sorted out during or before the pre-trial. A big reason a defendant would back out of a jury trial is the risk of triple damages; or they might have other reasons.

All good news, hopefully it won't take a year to schedule and a settlement would be great!

That is music to my ears, Butters. To recap, the trial dates have been cancelled but the cases have NOT been dismissed. A huge distinction! New trial dates can always be assigned. On top of that, two brand new complaints have just been filed against T-Mobile by Hudnell Law Group P.C, and a judge has not yet been assigned for those. Because of some rule changes, there is no guarantee that these new cases will be assigned to Judge Albright. In these new claims, only the '606 patent is asserted. Through the IPR re-examination process, VP's patents have been strengthened, and are considered to be "Alice proof", plus new patent claims have been added to VP's suite of enforceable patents.
So folks, this ain't over yet, by a long shot. Stay tuned, the pps may fluctuate as investors figure this out, but I see the stock rebounding over time. JMHO.

Regarding Huwuai, VP won the Alice 101 ruling against MG and then immediately settled. that case is closed.

The cases that are open, are the RBR against Amazon, which mysteriously hasn't budged in almost 8 months, V and Tmob, which were recently filed. Remember the RBR patent has won an exparte re-examination from the PTAB (IMO, is basically and should be the same as an Alice 101 win) and is now stronger with 8 additional claims.

Regarding the MG V and Tmob cases, to my knowledge at this point, all that has happened is that the TRIAL DATES have been cancelled, but the cases are still active. The cases have NOT been dismissed and are NOT terminated. Hoping for more clarifying information to come out soon on why the cancellation is needed, but IMO VP needs to continue that effort and in an escalated manner.

“ I saw in May Huwuai had asked for Summary Judgment, and the Judge denied the motion. Nothing further since that PR so I'm assuming that case is proceeding.”

Your assumption is incorrect:

The last defendant to exit from the campaign was Huawei, the most recent suit against which was dismissed with prejudice on May 13, 2024. That dismissal was with prejudice from the Northern District of Texas, shortly after District Judge Brantley Starr—on April 30, 2024—denied a motion to dismiss a complaint asserting two mobile gateway patents (8,630,234; 10,880,721) because the asserted claims are not drawn to eligible subject matter. The court refused to treat claim 1 of the '234 patent as representative of the remaining asserted claims (claims 10-11, 19-22, 24-25, 28, 30-33, 35, 37-40, 43, 45-48, 51, 53-54, 61-62, 64-65, 70, 72, and 75 of the '234 patent and claims 1, 6, 15-16, 20, 25, 34, 38, 39, 43, 45-46, 49-51, 63, 67, 77, 103-104, 109-110, 124, 130, 135-136, and 138-140 of the '721 patent), some of which contain means-plus-function elements.“

https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/patent/1495130/voippalcom-sues-tmobile-and-verizon-over-previously-unasserted-claims-from-previously-asserted-patents

I saw in May Huwuai had asked for Summary Judgment, and the Judge denied the motion. Nothing further since that PR so I'm assuming that case is proceeding. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/voip-pal-receives-favorable-ruling-120000149.html

Please rephrase the question. You lost me.

Have you read it in illegal document or just some fool that’s out there spreading stuff. just answer that question for me.

I didn’t say it was true.

That poster was referencing a so called decision that was to have happened on July 9th. I wouldn’t imagine there would be more filings, since then, if that were true.

If you can find he’s email, the best bet would be to contact that law clerk that was named in that post. Good luck finding it.

IMHO

If it comes from Vplm, it automatically is fake news, as that is their MO and their ultimate legacy. If it comes from the avg self styled, self proclaimed "true long", it's fake news and/or ignorance. Most of the anti Vplm speak the truth or give somewhat supported opinion. There are a couple, well known, some stupidly revered, who, if their lips are moving or they can still fog a mirror, they are not only lying but get compensated for doing so. Disgusting Bastard(s).

Myself.....anti Vplm, long for close to 15 yrs, always tell the truth, have done much DD, have opinions and theories that I've supported and backed up with logic, critical thinking and by connective dotology. Most if not all of my calls and predictions and explanations have been proven true again and again over time, except for the ones you might see from time to time, not from me, but from a small number who fabricate and tell out and out lies, who gaslight, and who attribute things to me that were never said or twist what was said to their own decrepid agenda and therefore are never backed up with proof and that is how pure scoundrels and rats operate.

Almost everything Vplm has put out in the past is a downright lie or distortion of the truth and has been designed to support what vplm truly is.....which is a fiat share printing, share selling, self enrichment scheme with an insider ATM to boot. They even were found guilty of "unjust self enrichment" AND "breach of Fiduciary duty" BY A JURY OF THEIR PEERS and with lord emu of eGipped at the top of the list.

so what nuuut on stock twits posted is true? yes or no

Because July 18th comes after the so called emailed referencing a decision on July 9th . IMHO

How can we be certain that this is fake news? So much conflicting information. Is VPLM still going strong???

“ contact vplm ir and let them know aboyut this chump”

As you know and indeed most everybody else knows, the crook who passes for VPLM’s IR “professional” is a constant presence on this message board.

His silence - and his fellow insiders’ constant dumping of their free shares - tells anyone with a modicum of common sense all they need to know.

public record!! this statement by this bozo cant be found anywhere!! look for it while you feed your pet squirrel..

i call it cruel and psychotic..it cant be found anywhere..this is a fabrication, to buy cheap shares..he was successful in that way.. i expect a rebound monday..fo;lks were buying on friday thru out the dips. contact vplm ir and let them know aboyut this chump....while your at it let lthem know we need a press report....their inbox must be jammed by now...have a good sunday!

Fake news that’s why, and most people fell for it.

this wasnt nmade public.. it was an email to a person named nuuut on stock twits...it should of been posted immediately if that was the case ...how come no one else has seen this??

Here’s the truth:

“ Oral summary judgments in the U.S. are generally not confidential. These judgments are part of the public record, meaning they are accessible to the public unless a specific court order seals them. This transparency is a fundamental aspect of the judicial system, ensuring accountability and public trust”

Which makes sense, if you think about it.

For lord emu gave his only begotten patents so that he (and she) might live lavishly, according to the story, he him, her so did...And it was so. And it was good........for them.

Maybe I'm reading it all wrong, but somehow I'm getting the feeling that I'm not gonna see my 50 cents... Was that really too much to ask for a 15 yr wait?
Bummer

“ i read on stock twits a post from an illinois attorney..by his wording , i dont doubt he isnt one..he stated that this clerk can be in serious trouble for doing this”

That’s not what he said at all.

Nice try, though.

hi vvvvvv..i read on stock twits a post from an illinois attorney..by his wording , i dont doubt he isnt one..he stated that this clerk can be in serious trouble for doing this , if its true...he can be fired and fined...he believes this person would be dumb as rocks to do so...he also believes this notion: that this person named nuuut on that board more than likely fabricated this and drove the price down to get cheaper shares...now on that note id like to add he also posted that charles schwab was down and he couldnt purchase shares...the nerve and stupidity on his part!!..this fella nuuut is a new poster over there...could this be sabotage?? smells like s...t to me.....on that note ...please go look at the recent posts over there...this lawyer fells handle began with the letter "K""

Agreed….if in fact this clerk’s email is public, they need to be contacted and questioned whether this dismissal for non infringement is true.

If it’s not true, VPLM without a doubt NEEDS TO ISSUE A PR AND ADDRESS THIS ASAP. I believe a few years ago, another penny stock had done the same thing. This needs to be done to stabilize the PPS.

If it’s not true, this needs to be looked into with serious consequences.

Please read my previous post on the responsibilities of a judge’s clerk, regarding non public disclosure.

IMHO

cant hurt to flood IR mailbox with your thoughts , opinions, and sec rules..for a publicly traded company...this may force the hand for them to do damge control ..jmo...(some may have already done this??)..glta

the cases against vz and tmus have not been dismissed .. jury trials have been canceled and a summary judgement for both parties are on the table..which from what ive read , is unusual at best, rarely seen....appeals maybe on the table...a p.r. is needed to clarify....thats whats needed...as far williams and others within the company selling on insider information prior to any statement, is a big problem..thers records of the sells,with the dates . they are gone to have serious problems down the road.....lets see if monday or tues some kind of statement shows up..

Sunspotter you may be correct, however, I don't believe that Emil and the law firm representing VP would go to the expense, time and trouble to pursue infringement litigation in a court of law, while knowing that their case was bogus, merely to fleece shareholders out of pennies while leaving dollars on the table. According to your hypothesis, VP'S lawfirm was either duped (which would mean that they are naiive) or that they were participants in this alleged "scheme" (which would mean that they knowingly broke the law), neither theory of which I find credible. The shareholders need a statement from the company to confirm or dispel the many rumors being floated by folks with, frankly, no equity positions in the stock.

When penny stock CEO self-enrichment schemes like VPLM fall below 2 cents and begin their inevitable (although often punctuated by brief spikes) decline to the trips, it becomes clearer who among their followers are sheep who, in this case, have been woefully misled and misdirected by the said CEO and his crooked IR guy, and who are the wolves in sheep's clothing who have actively connived with the CEO Malak and his felonious partner/in-crime Inza to transfer his marks' money to their own pockets while pretending to be among those very marks.

While I already have a pretty good idea who falls into each camp, it will be fascinating to get a more forensic feel for this over the coming months.