hedge_fun
11 hours ago
You say I am out of the loop……..BUTT
you claimed they were no longer working Melbourne.
BUTT, that wasn’t true, was it?
You only said that because Peter and Max were claiming it only takes a weekend, which was bullshit. Critics were asking, if it only takes
a weekend what about Melbourne. You responded in an attempt to carry their water.
You were trying to suggest they had moved on. Kyle even said the tech showed no treasure at Melbourne. Some of us critics had said that for years. I saw the data and read the reports. I didn’t need Timmy’s Toy to tell me what I already knew.
Regardless, SFRX got the permit renewals on sites that the state says their target vessel would be off limits without prior approval from Spain. The state admits they don’t even own those wrecks.
Why the …. would SFRX even request a permit from someone that didn’t even own the target vessel?
It’s a rhetorical question. You lack the ability to comprehend the question.
It makes you a really good fit with SFRX.
hedge_fun
13 hours ago
If they were “fully focused” the site…..
would have been scanned while they waited on the permit, though it should have been scanned BEFORE applying for a permit.
In fact, an affiliate even said the tech must have already located treasure which is why they were waiting on the permit.
SFRX proves with their actions (and words) just how inefficient and incompetent they are. There was no treasure on or near the ballast pile, yet they spent two years waiting on a permit, while also claiming a scan only takes a weekend. Add to it the fact they have lost million$ the past two years.
The JBAS should have been scanned at least a year and a half ago. Several other sites should be scanned as well….if the tech works. What the hell have they been doing besides making exaggerated claims and YouTube videos pretending to be experts?
My guess is the next update will say something like, we have completed the scan of the JBAS, and several promising targets have been located. We will inspect those targets after we grid the entire site, which is what proper archaeology requires, and we have the highest standards, blah, blah, blah.
Hope it works out for you but these guys are a joke.
If I am wrong, that’s okay. We’ll both make bank.
GL
hedge_fun
24 hours ago
This month marks the 5th anniversary of the.......
claim the tech works, but I'm sure that's not relevant.
....but I never tire of hearing SFRX stories from 5 or 10 years ago because they are so relevant.
Is that why they have them on their website,,,,ie Melbourne, the next big thing?
Juno, I mean the JBAS is a dud. Prove me wrong and I'll make bank.
I'd be okay with that.
GL
hedge_fun
2 days ago
Was Dr.(?) deBry one of the other archeologists…
mentioned in this article?
And who did the X-ray?
Archaeologists (plural) with Seafarer Exploration Corporation have unearthed an ancient death mask, dating back possibly thousands of years BC. The artifact, which is as thin as a piece of paper, was found on Melbourne Beach, Florida.
And that’s not all. The mask contains a precious metal, as an X-ray has revealed the presence of iridium, possibly from a meteorite. The theory is, the item was taken by Spanish tomb-raiders, and the piece of metal was part of a funeral headpiece from a pre-Incan civilization in Peru.
https://www.wogx.com/news/part-of-ancient-death-mask-containing-space-metal-discovered-in-florida
Talk about setting the standard.
EmpressWanderer93
2 days ago
We’re thrilled to share a significant update in this June edition of our newsletter—Seafarer Exploration has launched a new website! This is more than just a redesign; it's a strategic enhancement to how we communicate our cutting-edge technology and the unprecedented standards we are setting in underwater rescue archaeology.
What’s New?
Advanced Technology: Get insights into the tools and techniques that make our underwater expeditions revolutionary.
Pioneering Archaeology: Learn about the stringent standards and processes that underscore our commitment to preserving maritime heritage.
Innovative Design: Experience our fresh look, which reflects our leadership in the industry and dedication to innovation.
Visit https://seafarerexplorationcorp.com to see how we're transforming the way the world interacts with underwater history.
Thank you for your continued support and enthusiasm. Your engagement fuels our efforts to push the boundaries of what's possible in underwater exploration.
Seafarer's CEO on Overcoming Deep-Sea Challenges and Tech Innovations
Our CEO shares an exciting update on overcoming unique challenges at our key site. Discover how our team has optimized our tech to reveal hidden artifacts beneath the ocean floor. Tune in to learn how innovation is reshaping underwater archaeology and get a glimpse into our progress!
Explore More: Dive into our video series for exclusive updates and innovations!
Facebook icon
Instagram icon
Twitter icon
YouTube icon
LinkedIn icon
Threads icon
Website icon
Discover Seafarer's Culture: Pioneers in Underwater Rescue Archaeology
At Seafarer Exploration, our culture is driven by a passion for discovery and a commitment to preserving maritime heritage. We're more than just a team; we're a community of explorers, scientists, and historians dedicated to responsibly exploring and conserving underwater sites. Our collaborative environment fosters innovation, respects the ocean's mysteries, and ensures every artifact we uncover is treated with the utmost care and respect. If you haven't already, follow us on your favorite platform to join our mission to explore the past and protect it for future generations. Dive deep into our culture, engage with our past posts, and stay tuned for what's coming next as we make waves in the field of underwater archaeology.
Follow us on social media for all updates.
Facebook icon
Instagram icon
Twitter icon
YouTube icon
LinkedIn icon
Threads icon
Website icon
Seafarer's Archaeological Integrity: Beyond Section 106 | SeaVac3000 in Action!
Discover our commitment to the highest archaeological standards in our latest video! Watch as Andrew explains how Seafarer goes beyond Section 106 of the NHPA, demonstrating the integrity that drives our operations. See the SeaVac3000 in action, gently uncovering ocean secrets.
Discover our commitment in this YouTube short!
Porman
2 days ago
Raaa raa ree, kick em in the knee, raa raa rass, kick em in the a???. Lets see what the scans show, and start digging, $SFRX$. Singing Burl Ives "Silver and Gold" As long as this is moving forward? Let's see of this new technology works as advertised. Take what ya can, Give nothing back, Yarr. ( much better, Getting there)
hedge_fun
7 days ago
I suppose SG could make up chit.....
about others like some do, in a pathetic attempt to deflect from the company's continued failure.
You recently suggested I mocked Reynolds previous work yet provided no proof. How shocking.
You have been one of Reynold's biggest pom pom shakers. Why would a brilliant scientist like Reynolds be involved with SFRX given their track record?
If he so brilliant, why isn't he with a company or agency that's actually changing the world? He may have had some success in his previous life, but past performance isn't a guarantee of future results, is it?
He's obviously CLUELESS when it comes to salvage law, even when explained to him by the state on multiple occasions, and the word is the currents were giving his Toy fits, hence the tether removal.
Do you think Timmy is clueless when it comes to salvage law, or is he pretending to be?
As far as his Toy, why is it proving to be inferior to the numerous products on the market? Instead of using a proven system, they're sending a diver down to hold the Toy's hand. Successful salvors would have purchased a ROV/AUV and integrated their sensors and software onto the platform.
Don't get me wrong, it's a cute little toy, but a GPS buoy?
You might want to share these links with SFRX's CTO. It appears he could use some help.
https://www.ixblue.com/north-america/knowledge/what-is-a-usbl-system/
https://www.unmannedsystemstechnology.com/expo/positioning-navigation-guidance-tracking-systems/
P.S. Didn't SFRX claim they were making more of the first version?
And didn't they also say they made a second-generation model?
Which is it?
The reason I ask is that they haven't submitted a specimen in the new trademark application. Maybe it's to confuse the Chinese.
Thx and GL